Re[2]: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

9/9/2013 8:29 AM Hi MAU, On 9/9/2013 MAU wrote: M> That is the problem. Blacklist may use whatever criteria they wish, the M> problem is that some sysadmins may decide to reject email based on what M> one or another blacklist "tell them". That is the problem with the M> server hosting tbudl.

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello MFPA, > Very good, on a pade visited by people whose email service has been > disrupted due to somebody else using an ill-conceived and > poorly-configured "anti-spam solution." That is the problem. Blacklist may use whatever criteria they wish, the problem is that some sysadmins may d

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello Thomas, > Hm. Which POP client would have downloaded your message before you > check your TBUDL account? None in my case. I'm just illustrating what "recent" stands for. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v5.4 My photos at: http://www.Rancho-K.com My p

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello MAU, On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 11:28:36 +0200 GMT (07-Sep-13, 16:28 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: >>> Now that I have this working, could someone now explain a little >>> theory behind the addition of "recent." >> >> Some non-English-speaking immigrant working at Gmail chose this word. >> It should have

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hi On Saturday 7 September 2013 at 10:28:36 AM, in , MAU wrote: > Hel > I wish there was an option for "own" or "self". > "Recent" stands for "recent", as you can see here: If I recall correctly, Gmail only exhibits this bug if your outgoing mail goes through their server. Sending through a

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello Thomas, >> Now that I have this working, could someone now explain a little >> theory behind the addition of "recent." > > Some non-English-speaking immigrant working at Gmail chose this word. > It should have been "own:" or "self:". I wish there was an option for "own" or "self". "Recent"

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

On Thursday, September 5, 2013, 11:41:26 AM, Thomas Fernandez (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > I hope to have shed some light. Yes, you and Jack both have. Thanks, Leonard -- Leonard S. Berkowitz Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello Leonard, On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 04:44:45 -0400 GMT (05-Sep-13, 15:44 +0700 GMT), Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: > On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 7:23:29 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) > wrote: >> Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: >> Instead of "usern...@gmail.com" u

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello Leonard, On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 05:03:29 -0400 GMT (05-Sep-13, 16:03 +0700 GMT), Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: >> Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: >> Instead of "usern...@gmail.com" use "recent:usern...@gmail.com" > Now that I have this working, could someone now explain

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

>Now that I have this working, could someone now explain a little theory behind >the addition of "recent." Why they use that word/ Who knows, but what it does is bring back your sent messages. Google doesn't default to this since you sent it, you probably don't want to see it again. (don't shoot

Re: Unacceptable wrapping result

On Thursday, September 5, 2013, 10:41:58, Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: > No, the only confirmation that I have that a posting of mine has > reached the list is when someone responds. That's a gmail feature - it hides your own messages from you. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybor

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 7:23:29 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: > Instead of "usern...@gmail.com" use "recent:usern...@gmail.com" Now that I have this working, could someone now explain a little theory behind the add

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 8:42:14 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > Just make sure you have gone out to the web and cleared what you > don't want as once you do that it ALL comes. That is from > experience. When I did that a long time ago i didn't check first :)) I three caution

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 7:23:29 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: > Instead of "usern...@gmail.com" use "recent:usern...@gmail.com" Thanks, Thomas. That worked. Someone, perhaps you, suggested something like this a whil

Re: Unacceptable wrapping result

On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 6:40:56 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > I may be missing something here (I usually am) but since you address your > posts > to this list (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) don't they appear in your inbox the > next > time you do a fetch? > Mine do and I loo

Re: How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

>Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: Instead of >"usern...@gmail.com" use "recent:usern...@gmail.com" Just make sure you have gone out to the web and cleared what you don't want as once you do that it ALL comes. That is from experience. When I did that a long time ago i did

How to see your own post (Gmail problem) (was: Unacceptable wrapping result)

Hello Leonard, On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:31:36 -0400 GMT (05-Sep-13, 00:31 +0700 GMT), Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: > (Could someone please remind me how I can see my own post?) Accouint / Properties / Transport / Receive Mail / User: Instead of "usern...@gmail.com" use "recent:usern...@gmail.com"

Re: Unacceptable wrapping result

Hello Leonard, On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 you wrote: LSB> (Could someone please remind me how I can see my own post?) I may be missing something here (I usually am) but since you address your posts to this list (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) don't they appear in your inbox the next time you do

Re: Unacceptable wrapping result

On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, 10:48:55 AM, Thomas Fernandez (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote: > You might want want to make a paragrah (two times "enter") between > the two list items. There already was a two-times enter space between the list items. I figured out a work-around: I took the "

Re: Unacceptable wrapping result

Hello Leonard, On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:17:00 -0400 GMT (02-Sep-13, 04:17 +0700 GMT), Leonard S. Berkowitz wrote: > I pasted a very long line into an e-mail message. The message starts > with "1." because it is part of a list. There is already a "2." in the > list. When I hit +l to wrap the item I

Unacceptable wrapping result

I pasted a very long line into an e-mail message. The message starts with "1." because it is part of a list. There is already a "2." in the list. When I hit +l to wrap the item I had pasted, it wrapped ok, but the second line was also preceded by "1." I should add that part of the text of the long

Text vs HTML word wrapping

Fellow Batties, I just noticed something which I don't quite understand. I received an HTML message which displays properly, in that the text does not go all the way to the end of the screen. However, if I click on REPLY, the resulting HTML reply screen has the text of the original message running

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

On Thursday, September 3, 2009, 5:18:11 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Long lines are wrapped to the width of that window and it is just > plain wrong that they were sent to me that way IMNSHO. even worse is when they don't even wrap, but there is good reason for lines to be shorter. They are

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Dear Mfpa, @3-Sep-2009, 18:21 MFPA [M] in mid:1192642679.20090903182...@my_localhost said to Marck: ... M> I had always thought it was hard wrapping but on checking again it M> appears to be just cosmetic when placed in Outbox. I shall format M> this as one long line to test/illust

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Hi On Thursday 3 September 2009 at 12:35:52 PM, in , Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Have you checked whether these are wrapped as a cosmetic exercise by > the viewer or hard wrapped with inserted CR/LF pairs? I would be > interested to know. I had always thought it was hard wrappi

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Dear Mfpa, @3-Sep-2009, 12:17 MFPA [M] in mid:1932345199.20090903121...@my_localhost said to Marck: ... M> ... or put it in the outbox the long lines get wrapped to 96 M> characters. ... Have you checked whether these are wrapped as a cosmetic exercise by the viewer or hard wrapped with inser

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Hi On Thursday 3 September 2009 at 11:18:11 AM, in , Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > This is not about TB or any other client. It is about > the email standard - RFC822, which says stuff about 70 > character line limits and how to delimit such things. I have noticed that if I edit a paragraph and

Re: How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Dear Ac, @02-Sep-2009, 21:57 -0700 (03-Sep 05:57 here) AC [A] in mid:oviu951avoq6jijh7b1qt2tca7rdo5b...@4ax.com said: ... A> When I write a paragraph, how does it get sent if I use plain A> text? Exactly as seen. TB has already used hard CR/LF pairs at the end of each visible line to signify en

How do different programs process lines/wrapping ?

Many of you will begin to think I'm obsessed with this issue, but I'm curious. How do email programs understand line wrapping, carriage returns, etc.? When I write a paragraph, how does it get sent if I use plain text? Do most programs split the paragraph into actual lines as soon as

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

On Saturday, August 22, 2009, 12:32:20 PM, Bill McQuillan wrote: > Now I have figured the reason is that RitLabs considers that the Windows > Editor is to be normally used with proportional fonts and that the number > of characters is not an appropriate measurement (although they seem to > handle

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

(75 chars). Unfortunately, when the message is transmitted, the BM> paragraphs are sent *without* wrapping. Thus my correspondents see lines BM> that either wrap at *their* window edges or extend off the window to the BM> right and must be scrolled to be seen depending on their particular e

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

e checkbox." When I am composing, the editor wraps lines in a paragraph at my specified margin (75 chars). Unfortunately, when the message is transmitted, the paragraphs are sent *without* wrapping. Thus my correspondents see lines that either wrap at *their* window edges or extend off the win

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

say it ends if that is sooner than I have chosen for default wrapping. On the odd occasion that I edit a paragraph, it is no bother to re-wrap it with ALT+L. -- Best regards, MFPA Don't be silly, it's all "make believe" anyway Using The Bat! v4.0.

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hello AC, On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:23:04 -0700 GMT (22/Aug/09, 14:23 PM +0700 GMT), AC wrote: A> When I asked for this as a support ticket, the answer I got was this: A> "Hello, A> I am sorry to say, but this is not a bug, it's a feature of MicroEd. A> Auto-Format works that way for years and we d

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hallo AC, On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:23:04 -0700GMT (22-8-2009, 9:23 +0200, where I live), you wrote: A> Thanks for the response (thanks to everyone else also). Now you've A> hit on the issue that I really want to resolve. Why can't the A> developers add an extra option (checkbox) so that you don't

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

n the same line. To really start a new line you've got to >start a new paragraph: hit enter twice so you've got an empty line in >between. >When you start typing in the middle of some text it keeps on wrapping >everything correctly instead of what you experience with quest

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hi On Friday 21 August 2009 at 7:13:56 PM, in , Peter Meyns wrote: > MicroEd leaves the decision to you if you want to wrap your edited > message or keep that extra-long line. I have wrapping set to 70 characters. I can keep the extra-long line in the editor window but when I put the m

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hi On Friday 21 August 2009 at 3:03:12 PM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: > I think the long/short lines appear when you use CR in > the middle of a line. Maybe the person is reading the message in an application that wraps at the window edge. If the line length in the message is a bit longer tha

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hi AC, on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:58:00 -0700GMT (21.08.2009, 08:58 +0200GMT here), you wrote: A> ... A> Question #5: A> Why do we have to use Alt-L to reformat the wrapping if you go back A> and edit? All other editors everywhere in the world do this A> automatically... This do

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hello Roelof, On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:46:58 +0200 GMT (21/Aug/09, 15:46 PM +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote: A>> Question #4: A>> Sometimes I write an email, it looks fine. But when the other person A>> recieves it, the wrapping is all crazy with alternating long/short A>>

Re: Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

Hallo AC, On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:58:00 -0700GMT (21-8-2009, 8:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: A> Question #1: A> What are the differences between MicroEd and Plain Windows? Mainly the wrapping and the free caret (in MicroEd you can place the cursor anywhere and start typing, wi

Please help me understand the Pros and Cons of MicroEd (many, many wrapping issues)

I cannot get my head around MicroEd. I want to like it, but I always have problems with wrapping issues. Please help me answer some questions: Question #1: What are the differences between MicroEd and Plain Windows? Question #2: What does Auto-Format do? Please be detailed, I don't g

Message Viewer: wrapping

'Ello TBUDL, Can I prevent the message Viewer from wrapping text at the viewer boundary? I seem to remember the solution used to be (lots of years back) that turning off auto-wrapping under the Editor preferences solved this, but now that doesn't work. Is there a setting I am mis

Re: automatic line wrapping issues

[Reply to: »Paul Berger« · 2009-03-31 · 07:32 h (CET)] Moin, Paul! >> The point is, the wrapping only works when you are typing the >> paragraph from scratch. When you go back to edit a paragraph, all >> the wrapping gets broken and messed up. Why can't it dynamically >

Re: automatic line wrapping issues

gt; also with the bat, I always have issues with word wrappiing. A> Specifically for the Bat, I notice A> problems when I type a paragraph, but then go back to edit A> something or delete something in the A> middle of the paragraph. What happens is that the line wrapping A>

automatic line wrapping issues

something in the middle of the paragraph. What happens is that the line wrapping gets all screwed up and if I add some words to the middle of the paragraph, that line I added on to will now stretch way beyond the regular wrapping edge. Similarly, if I delete words, the line will short

Re: Wrapping quotes

Hi On Thursday 18 September 2008 at 1:45:24 AM, in , I wrote: > Hi > It has long been a minor irritation that neither of the > following will wrap the quoted text in a reply:- > %WRAPPED='%Quotes'%- %WRAPPED(45,'%Quotes')%- > Is there a simple and reliable way to achieve this? I found it mys

Wrapping quotes

Hi It has long been a minor irritation that neither of the following will wrap the quoted text in a reply:- %WRAPPED='%Quotes')%- %WRAPPED(45,'%Quotes')%- Is there a simple and reliable way to achieve this? -- Best regards, MFPA Is it possible to be a closet claustro

Reply wrapping

I use Plain Text (windows) for Replies to email, as well as viewing text emails. When I reply using Plain Text (Windows) occasionally a line will not have the citation at the beginning. I assume it has to do with the sender's email but is there a way to highlight the text and reformat with cita

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Thomas Fernandez: > Luca wrote: > L> We're talking of a typing > L> syndrome. TB's MicroEd (any mode) requires a heavy modification of deeply > L> rooted and continuously practised typing habits. I could agree with you if > L> TB's way were common among all the other programs, or if I could use TB

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca, On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:40:28 +0100 GMT (26/12/2005, 17:40 +0700 GMT), Luca wrote: L> Obviously, it's not only a one-key difference. We're talking of a typing L> syndrome. TB's MicroEd (any mode) requires a heavy modification of deeply L> rooted and continuously practised typing habits

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca, please, go elsewhere and stop bothering me with your endless rants. You don't want to understand, do you? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) To witness suffering and do nothing is betrayal. -- Patrick Douglas _

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Alexander S. Kunz: > on 25-Dez-2005 at 18:33 you (Luca) wrote: > > > Since you insist > > No, I do not insist. I tried to help by providing a workaround for the > problem you have. If I say "I want to be able to hit return once" and you say "then hit it twice", that's not what I'd call "a worka

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca & everyone else, on 25-Dez-2005 at 18:33 you (Luca) wrote: > Since you insist No, I do not insist. I tried to help by providing a workaround for the problem you have. > So you want the Windows-like editor [...] I think we have a little bit of a misunderstanding here. I don't *want*

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

"flowed" format (aka the way the Windows |editor is working now), it should a) add the "flowed" headers to the |outgoing message and b) not cause the false impression of wrapping by |formatting the text while typing (but using the fill window width just as |well). So you want the W

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

t the window margin which >> isn't always useful. This is why most text editors/viewers will offer a >> line wrapping mode for viewing at a specific character limit. > Yes, the viewer should support wrapping at a user specified column of > course, not only at the window border

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

be nice. > I've yet to come across a supporting client, whose viewer works well with > it. Opera's M2 does support it quite well (IMHO). > there's no mechanism for the user to wrap except the window margin which > isn't always useful. This is why most text editors/

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

to wrap at their own length, but then, there's no mechanism for the user to wrap except the window margin which isn't always useful. This is why most text editors/viewers will offer a line wrapping mode for viewing at a specific character limit. -- -= Curtis =- The Bat!™ v3.64.01 Christ

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca & everyone else, on 25-Dez-2005 at 11:53 you (Luca) wrote: >>> No. I don't want format flowed. I want at least one typing mode capable >>> to automatically reformat paragraphs separated by *one* hit of my >>> return key when I'm editing the message, *and* I want to send my >>> messages

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Alexander S. Kunz: > on 25-Dez-2005 at 11:46 you (Luca) wrote: > > > No. I don't want format flowed. I want at least one typing mode capable to > > automatically reformat paragraphs separated by *one* hit of my return key > > when > > I'm editing the message, *and* I want to send my messages wit

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca & everyone else, on 25-Dez-2005 at 11:46 you (Luca) wrote: > No. I don't want format flowed. I want at least one typing mode capable to > automatically reformat paragraphs separated by *one* hit of my return key when > I'm editing the message, *and* I want to send my messages with hard

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

e chooses to use the "flowed" format (aka the way the Windows > editor is working now), it should a) add the "flowed" headers to the > outgoing message and b) not cause the false impression of wrapping by > formatting the text while typing (but using the fill window width ju

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

ka the way the Windows editor is working now), it should a) add the "flowed" headers to the outgoing message and b) not cause the false impression of wrapping by formatting the text while typing (but using the fill window width just as well). -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neuro

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Alexander S. Kunz: > on 23-Dez-2005 at 12:53 you (Luca) wrote: > > But if I write a message using the Windows-like editor, lines wrappings get > > lost as soon as I save the message. Then, recipients get a message with > > lines > > as long as the whole paragraph. > > I'm not sure but from my PO

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

send messages with correct line > wrapping, one can't use it, and I can't see any point in putting it > in. One can use it, and it's interesting (to me) to see how these sorts of "basic functionality" issues still bug people now, six years after I first started using TB!

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca & everyone else, on 23-Dez-2005 at 12:53 you (Luca) wrote: > But if I write a message using the Windows-like editor, lines wrappings get > lost as soon as I save the message. Then, recipients get a message with lines > as long as the whole paragraph. I'm not sure but from my POV it is

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

On 23/12/2005 at 12:36:18 PM [GMT -0500], Luca wrote: > That means that TB's Windows-like editor is useless, plain and simple. If > there is no way to send messages with correct line wrapping, one can't use it, > and I can't see any point in putting it in. Depends on per

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

#x27;t *really* wrapped. So, on > sending, the text is sent formatted as is, i.e., with no wrapping. That means that TB's Windows-like editor is useless, plain and simple. If there is no way to send messages with correct line wrapping, one can't use it, and I can't see any point in

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

On 23/12/2005 at 6:53:01 AM [GMT -0500], Luca wrote: > I can't understand how the Windows-like editor works, as far as line > wrapping is concerned. TB!'s original editor was microEd. It does no virtual wrapping of text. As MicroEd wraps text, it's hard wrapped. You'l

Re: Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

Hello Luca, Friday, December 23, 2005, 5:53:01 AM, you wrote: L> I can't understand how the Windows-like editor works, as far as line wrapping L> is concerned. L> In my viewer/editor|editor preferences dialog box, it says: L> General (common for all editors) L>

Line wrapping in plain text (Windows) editor

I can't understand how the Windows-like editor works, as far as line wrapping is concerned. In my viewer/editor|editor preferences dialog box, it says: General (common for all editors) Wrap text at 72 characters But if I write a message using the Windows-like editor, lines wrap

Re: Windows editor text wrapping not conserved after being Sent [was Re: how to stop TB! cutting word in half when at the end of the line?]

Hello Richard! On Tuesday, August 09, 2005, 3:50 PM, you wrote: MB>> So I wrote an issue report: MB>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5016 > And I've added a note to it too. The issue's status is now "Confirmed." Additionally, its status is now Related to some other Windows and HTML edito

Re: Windows editor text wrapping not conserved after being Sent [was Re: how to stop TB! cutting word in half when at the end of the line?]

Hello Richard! On Tuesday, August 09, 2005, 3:50 PM, you wrote: MB>> So I wrote an issue report: MB>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5016 > And I've added a note to it too. Thanks a million. I'm monitoring it, so I'll let you know any comments I get from the developers. -- Best regar

Re: Windows editor text wrapping not conserved after being Sent [was Re: how to stop TB! cutting word in half when at the end of the line?]

Hello Mary, On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 you wrote in MB> So I wrote an issue report: MB> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5016 And I've added a note to it too. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.51.10 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Kerio 4.20.B5 and

Windows editor text wrapping not conserved after being Sent [was Re: how to stop TB! cutting word in half when at the end of the line?]

Hello Richard! On Tuesday, August 09, 2005, 3:07 PM, you wrote: MB>> I'm a firmly committed user of MicroEd, > Me too, used it right from the word go. MB>> but if TB! is going to offer a Windows style editor, then it should MB>> be as functional as possible. > I'll go along with that. I await yo

Re: wrapping in quick templates

Hallo Scott, On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:03:51 -0800GMT (27-1-2005, 8:03 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SF> I have my editor set to wrap at 65 characters but one of my SF> quick templates creates messages with each paragraph one one big SF> line. You could try to use the %Wrapped macro in you

wrapping in quick templates

wrapping when it runs. What do I have to do to fix this? -- Best regards, Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A BayesIt! 0.5.5 pgp key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20

Re: Wrapping text when forwarding without quotes

brary (http://cgi.marck.free-online.co.uk/library.php) : -=-=-=-=-=-=-= All New Wrap for v2 -=-=-=-=-=-=- The multi-paragraph wrapping template is a general purpose template that can be used on it's own, or in conjunction with other templates. To wrap and insert text from the clipboard, simply copy

Wrapping text when forwarding without quotes

Hi, I've just been trying to work out how to forward an email, but at the same time, wrapping it without the quote (>) marks. I'd like something between %QUOTES & %TEXT. I've also tried %wrapped=#%TEXT#, but it doesn't wrap. Can someone please help? -- Regards, C

Re: wrapping badly

Hello rich, On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:29:09 -0400 GMT (11/06/2004, 01:29 +0700 GMT), rich gregory wrote: rg> I know now that TB! does not wrap links. Here is an excerpt from an rg> email I just got from eBay: rg> So the wrapping occurs where? At sender'

Re: Word wrapping

On Fri 11 June 2004, 19:47:48 +1000, Simon Elliott wrote: > The latter seems to be what I need. One minor irritation: Auto Format > doesn't seem to understand the "minus minus space" .sig separator, and > wraps the separator and following lines if you type on the blank line > above the .sig separat

Re: Word wrapping

Hi On Tuesday, June 8, 2004, 5:05:03 PM, Martin wrote: SE>> When I'm using the message editor, I find that I have to keep on SE>> doing Utilities->Format Block->Left (or Alt-L) to keep my paragraphs SE>> correctly wrapped and justified. Is there any mode where wor

Re: Word wrapping

phs SE> correctly wrapped and justified. Is there any mode where word SE> wrapping happens on an ongoing basis as happens in many word SE> processors and text editors? What's your 'Wrap text to' option set to? (Options | Preferences | Editor preferences)... and what editor do

Word wrapping

Hi When I'm using the message editor, I find that I have to keep on doing Utilities->Format Block->Left (or Alt-L) to keep my paragraphs correctly wrapped and justified. Is there any mode where word wrapping happens on an ongoing basis as happens in many word processors and t

Re: link wrapping

Jacopo Ognibene, [JO] wrote: JO> More than this, i've noticed that you can add many text after the URL JO> and TB doesn't wrap. See at the end of the line here: Yes. What you see in the editor before sending is what is sent, without any additional wrapping. Technically, this isn

Re: link wrapping

Allie, on Tue, 25 May 2004, at 21:40:28 [GMT -0500] (which was 4.40 here in Italy) you wrote to Rich Gregory: AM> I'll give you a long URL: AM> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1880418592/ref=pd_ts_coop/104-7943297-2153543?v=glance&s=books&n=549066 AM> I really don't expect TB! to w

Re: link wrapping

Hello John, On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:39:59 +0100 GMT (27/05/2004, 18:39 +0700 GMT), John Cunnane wrote: JC> If the original mail was sent in HTML format and you reply in a plain JC> text format such as MicroEd, then The Bat! seems to have a big problem JC> with certain characters in a URL, e.g. the

Re[2]: link wrapping

TF> No, TB doesn't do that. I know that other email clients break URLs TF> when displaying and cause problems, but not TB. That's one of the TF> beauties of TB. If the original mail was sent in HTML format and you reply in a plain text format such as MicroEd, then The Bat! seems to have a big prob

Re: link wrapping

Hello rich, On Tue, 25 May 2004 20:17:36 -0400 GMT (26/05/2004, 07:17 +0700 GMT), rich gregory wrote: rg> TB! will wrap long links and not "know" that it has truncated a URL. No, TB doesn't do that. I know that other email clients break URLs when displaying and cause problems, but not TB. That's

Re: link wrapping

if a long URL is one of the things it's wrapping. You receive the message with the URL already wrapped and TB! simply displays the wrapped URL, already broken. I'll give you a long URL: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1880418592/ref=pd_ts_coop/104-7943297-2153543?v=glance&a

%Text wrapping behaviour in forward and reply templates

TBUDL members I use the %Text macro in both a reply template and a forward template in one of my accounts. When I forward, the text from the original message is wrapped. When I reply it is not. I can even copy the contents of one template to the other (ie make the two templates identical) and the

Re: wrapping quotes stopped "working"

Check these: Options -> Preferences -> Editor pref -> Quote name limit andSmart wrapping quoted text The second needs to be checked and the first needs to be set to something sensible like seven. -- Groetjes, Roelof ___

wrapping quotes stopped "working"

Hello Batters! My bat has started screwing up quotes. Can someone tell me which configuration checkbox(es) must've "changed" after a recent registry problem forced a roll-back? What happens *now* is that ALT-L does not recognize where the start of line quote marks are and considers them just anot

Re: Wrapping reply quotes

Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote: >>>MK> This seems like JUST the kind of blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah, >>>and >>>MK> blah, blah, blah, blah. Blah, blah. The thing is, blah, blah, blah.. RG> NOW, is there any non-invasive way to fix this or is it an exercise RG> in wastefulness to spend the time bo

Wrapping reply quotes

Howdy, Folks A few weeks ago I promised that the next time I saw a certain behavior from TB! I would post the sample here. OK, FIRST OF ALL... I know it is not The Bat!'s fault. So the topic was wrapping reply quotes and it was suggested that scrolling down through an outgoing reply one

Re: Header Word Wrapping

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Marck, On Oct 19, 2003, 16:09 +0100 ( 11:09 AM here), Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote in : MDP> There is already a bug report on this in the BT. I must have missed the original messages. MDP> The presence of an email addres

Re: Header Word Wrapping

Hi Kevin, @19-Oct-2003, 09:27 -0400 (14:27 UK time) Kevin Coates said: > I've noticed that the header information when displayed with > Ctrl-Shift-K when using "Rich Text/HTML Viewer" mode seems to word > wrap the header information. ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED

Header Word Wrapping

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TBUDL! I've noticed that the header information when displayed with Ctrl-Shift-K when using "Rich Text/HTML Viewer" mode seems to word wrap the header information. The F9 viewer still looks okay. For example, this: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Messag

Re: Wrapping recieved mail correctly

David R. Austen, [DRA] wrote: DRA> I am now using Januk Aggarwal's excellent wrap templates DRA> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rewrap DRA> (%QINCLUDE="wq") DRA> for (replies and forwards) and also hope to accomplish wrapping on DRA> redire

Re: wrapping cookies problem

Hi Mark, you wrote: MA> Try with the quotes the other way round! MA> %WRAPPED="%COOKIE='t:\the bat\quotes.txt'" yes have ... Just found the problem ... the file-path had run on to 2 lines ... putting it back solved the problem. -- regards, David Boggon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 2.0

  1   2   3   4   5   >