[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it
apart fromthe process of evaluation and acceptance is simple not
possible. You can cast the project in whatever light you desire; YOU
play a role in what you believe the message says. I have said it
Terry I know you must have had scripture revealed to
you by the Holy Spirit; have you never had God's
Word quickened to you, like parts of it just 'coming
alive' to you and you have understanding that you didn't
have before? No one person other than Jesus has
"all truth" but He has sent the
The Holy Spirit has led me into much truth, not all truth. I still
have many questions for which I do not have answers. I have no doubt
that the day I die I will still have more questions than answers.
Terry
Judy Taylor wrote:
Terry I know you must have had scripture
revealed to
Probably all of us could make the same response Terry
because none of us is in possession of "all truth" at this point;
howeverthe Holy Spirit has been sent to lead us
there and this is His ministry. I for one, am more than willing to receive His
ministry. How about you? jt
On Sat, 11 Jun
Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:59:27 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it apart fromthe process of evaluation and acceptance is simple not possible. You
Judy Taylor wrote:
Probably all of us could make the same
response Terry because none of us is in possession of "all truth" at
this point; howeverthe Holy Spirit has
been sent to lead us there and this is His ministry. I for one, am more
than willing to receive His ministry. How
So was the codex called the "Bible."-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:48:12 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It does not play into anything; upon what grounds
less of the rhetoric.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:11:13 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Lances doctrine of the incarnation conflicts with the clear teaching of God's
utter of words.
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:44:04 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
There is most definitely something perverse about equating a curse word wit
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri,
10 Jun 2005 00:48:12 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It does not play into anything; upon what grounds would you make such a
statement? The dark ages
where ppl were illiterate and the rcc kept the scriptures chained to the
pulpit were much later. jt
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking also. Relationships do
not happen by osmosis, they require love, trust, most of all communication
andconsistency. How do you get anything other than a mere mutter of words
out of any of Garys posts? jt
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:16:52 -0400 [EMAIL
I give up.
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:40:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking also. Relationships do not happen by osmosis
jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:25:26 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
The codex were scriptures, and the Bible is scriptures. jt
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:49:33 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So was the codex called
Good for you JD - I gave up a long time ago :) jt
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:31:52 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I give up.
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking also. Relationships do
not happen by osmosis, they require love,
No JD; my belief is that there is no relationship with Christ apart from
acknowledgement of and obedience to
His Word. It makes no difference how it is received or whether or not one
is in possession of their own personal Bible. (In our generation we have no
excuse). The Synogogue came out
Where do you get this stuff?
LUKE 4 Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read.
He wants us to go back to those days and he can be the BISHOP of your soul.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not play into anything; upon what grounds would you make such a statement? The dark ages where ppl were illiterate and the rcc kept the scriptures chained to the pulpit were
Luke refers to
the'book' in ch4, but never said itwas read that day--the custom was
for someoneto read from it--apparentlyJC didn't do that; instead he
merely'opened the book' looking for something in particular; he 'found'
it,then gave a brief sermon about it:Isaiah's writing (which
Was it called the Revised Standard Version?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So was the codex called the "Bible."-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:48:12 -0400Subject: Re:
IN HIS MIND while we DO the best that we can. None on this forum has another approach regardless of the rhetoric.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:11:13 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
rd" to describe a relationship[ but relegating this relationship to a mere mutter of words.
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:44:04 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocry
What makes you think we haven't? Have you?
Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:17
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
Luke refers to
the'book' in ch4, but never said itwas
udy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:48:12 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It does not play into anything; upon what grounds would you make such a statement? The dark ages
where ppl were illiterate and th
Now maybe God can start working?Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good for you JD - I gave up a long time ago :) jt
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:31:52 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I give up.
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking also.
I give up.
PTL![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I give up.
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:40:53 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking
The correct Interpretation lies in KNOWING and BELIEVING the AUTHOR!
LU 24:45; 2PT 1:20; 1 JN 2:27Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No JD; my belief is that there is no relationship with Christ apart from acknowledgement of and obedience to
His Word. It makes no difference how it is received
How do you get anything other than a mere mutter of words out of any of Garys posts?
He has duel SECRET DECODER Rings!
This is NOT a MYTH!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only perversion but convoluted thinking also. Relationships do not happen by osmosis, they require love, trust, most
Luke refers to the'book' in ch4, but never said itwas read that daydelivered[handed]..the book of the prophet Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written
It was handed to him
He opened the BOOK
He found where it was written
Everything needs to be spelt out
the moderator
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
HEAR YE HEAR YE,
Bible Pervert speaks on perversion!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
ionship with Christ that is
something other than memorizing or studing the Bible?
JD
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:02
I think I am before you, but I am not sure on that one. -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:25:42 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
He makes us correct IN HIS MIND
When is He going to START on you
By reading with a view to understanding. -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
How do you get anything other than a mere mutter of words out of any of Garys
)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Was it called the Revised Standard Version?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So was the codex called the "Bible."-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:01:10 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it apart
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:22:28 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and
believe it apart fromthe process of evaluation and acceptance is
simple not possible.
jt:
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Was it called the Revised Standard Version?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So was the codex called the "Bible."-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo:
ndgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:01:10 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it apart fromthe process of evaluation and acceptance
it's v challenging!
such authorityisdifficult to come by--when did you become hostile to
our pursuit?
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everything needs to be spelt out for you BIBLE
"AUTHORITIES"
||
TED] wrote:
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:01:10 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it apa
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:22:28 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that we pick of the Bible, read it and believe it apart fromthe process of evaluation and acceptance is simple not possible.
jt: Why not? This is what was expected of Israel under the
, at the cross, it is an occurrence IN THE MIND OF GOD.
-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:01:57 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It (Hb 10) doesn't have to. Few singular texts, if any, are meant to explicate
:-)-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:10:17 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
it's v challenging! such authorityisdifficult to come by--when did you become hostile to our pursuit?
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:50:33 -0700
: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:39:17 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD wrote:
The Bible tells us that "faith is reckoned as righteousness."
That is true. Paul encourages us, however,to accept that, and move onto perfection (maturity):
Heb. 6:1-3
Therefore leaving the
Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD wrote:
We are righteous IN HIS MIND.
Whoa, so, God isdeceiving himself!
JD,how does thatinterpretation tie intoHeb. 10:14? "For by one offering he
relational in nature and substance, God's success in our lives will be demonstrated in spite of our sins or errant thinking. Correct?
Jd
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:13:31 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [
.comTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:13:31 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
You had implied in the past that you yours are the only ones
capable of inteligent discussion. Was that
the OLD JD?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are saying th
as it may be, to the exclusion of the larger picture (much larger) of who we are and what we are becoming is somewhat preposterous, to me.
Jd
-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:46:22 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
6:40
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
The "duh !!" response was the
only thing I could think of at the time. Judy had once again put me in the
category of teaching the doctrine of men, for some reason, while entering
into a discussion of what she
o wrong actions and a pagan
lifestyle.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:13:31 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
You had implied in the past that you yours are the only
2005 7:10
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
That is exactly what I mean by "the truth." We sinners have so
much going for us than creative ways of doing things wrong. AT THE
SAME TIME, we can be concerned with our physical health, with doing a
He died for a better raltionship with Him. -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:21:14 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
That's the crux of our theological divergence, JD. You believe that God's goal for His
That I can agree with.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 7:35
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
He died for a better raltionship with Him.
-Original Message-From
nal Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:25:45 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
You can't "express" the fruit of the Spirit unless you AREIN the Spirit. You can fake it for short periods of time, but the real you w
JD wrote:
God's success in
our lives will be demonstrated in spite of our sins
or errant thinking.
We are supposed to hate sin. We don't shrug at it.
And I wouldn't necessarily connect sin with errant
thinking. Even the Israelites made a distinction
between 'high-handed' sins and sins
Then the Old Man still ain't dead.
Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:07
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Apocrypha
Soo, if say95% of the time your actions manifest love , joy
hey christine,
someone else hasyour conscience problem too, eh? how'd she know this, by
analyzing her children?
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:55:37 -0500 "ShieldsFamily"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[JD:]Can one compare himself to certain
biblical standards and be deceived at the same
time?
myth [the
biblicalWord created and sustains the world--'the earth..and they that
dwell therein' belong to Him, as always, therefore,
(our)'relationship'(with him) isboth positive and negative,
e.g., as
when anon-Chrisitianmutters 'Jesus Christ' and as when someone who
loves him like JD
all part that is negative and expressive of the "old you -- ala Eph 4:20-24?
JD
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:58:09 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Then the Old Man still ain't dead. Iz
F
: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:02:20 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
How so JD? Since there is no relationship with the Truth outside of His Word?
The Truth Himself says: "If a man love me he will keep my words and my Father will love him and we will
come into him and make our abode with him&quo
Why not save some typing?
Just post a "1" for MYTH
post a "2" for Dualism
So in this case, you could havejust posted "12" MYTH DUALISM in one post.
The variety of it all!
myth [the biblicalWord created and sustains the world--'the earth..and they that dwell therein' belong to Him, as always,
Judy, do you accept that thousands of Christians of the first and second centuries never personally
read nor studied the Bible? How does that play into your point below.
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:02:20 -0400 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..there is no relationship with the Truth
There is most definitely something perverse about equating a curse word
with a relationship. jt
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:19:28 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth [the
biblicalWord created and sustains the world--'the earth..and they that
dwell therein' belong to Him, as always,
It does not play into anything; upon what grounds would you make such a
statement? The dark ages
where ppl were illiterate and the rcc kept the scriptures chained to the
pulpit were much later. jt
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:40:39 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, do you
5 17:02:20
-0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
How so JD? Since there is no relationship with the Truth
outside of His Word?
The Truth Himself says: "If a man love me he will keep my
words and my Father will love him and we will
come into him and make our abode with h
It has occurred to me that if we speak and write with the view in mind that we at the beginning of another day of learning, our hearts and minds will be more open to what God has instore. Perhaps our doctrinal statements should not be "as if written n stone.' But reflective of the growth that
We don't start all over again from the beginning JD; if we don't hold fast
to what we already know and
understand as truth then we are in danger of slipping ie: "Therefore we
ought to give the more earnest heed (attention) to the things which we have
heard, lest at any time we should let
You really don't even try to understand what I am saying.
Let's move on, shall we.
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:57 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
We don't
I understand what you are saying JD but youmix spiritual growth which
is in flux and has to do with
obedience in our daily lives withdoctrine - or what we believe.
They are related because "as a man
believes in his heart - so is he" but it is impossible for an internet list
to evaluate how
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It has occurred to me that if we speak and write with the
view in mind that we at the beginning of another day of learning, our
hearts and minds will be more open to what God has instore. Perhaps our doctrinal
Let me make sure I'm on the same page here.
JD is saying that our "doctrinal statement" which for me
is God's Word should not be as if written in stone.
You Izzy if I am understanding correctly are saying that WE
grow in Christ and are more perfected each new day.
Is this what you are
] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005
8:56 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Let me make sure I'm on the same page here.
JD is saying that our
doctrinal statement which for me is God's Word should
e-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:10:36 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I understand what you are saying JD but youmix spiritual growth which is in flux and has to do with
obedience in our dail
appears to me thatit is this very point that keeps so many of us apart.
JD-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:35:39 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Good thought, JD. It is the normal walk fo
Not exactly. I do notinclude our (read: my) doctrinal statements with the "Word of God." I do believe that when we think we know something, we do not yet know it as we ought. I also believe that God can and does work great good in His people in spite of the fact that might be thinking poorly on
The disciples were learning by doing with a limited understanding - Things
changed after Pentecost when they
received the Promise. Look at the difference in Peter - We begin
there so God's Word should no longer be a mystery to us whether we are walking
in every bit ofit or not. My point is
JD Paul is surely NOT against knowing but knowing that is final
So you say.
Then I can never really know if what you are saying even now is true.
Why are you always looking to talk people out of knowing the truth?
Do you want them to end up like you, questioning everything?
Or so you can then
@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:57 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
We don't start all over again from the beginning JD; if we don't hold fast to what we already know and
understand as truth then we are in danger of slipping ie: "Therefo
of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:45 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
It has occurred to me that if we speak
ferently.such is our "performance."
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:10:36 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I understand what you are saying JD but youmix spiritual g
Me too! It's either the Word of God orLance and his crowd who
believe that we can't know anything
because of the enlightenment...
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
We get the gist of it and we don't like it.
Your words are your private
.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:35:39 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Good thought, JD. It is the normal walk for a Believer that we are growing in Christ and His Word each new day?being more and more perfected. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [
But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The disciples were learning by doing with a limited understanding - Things changed after Pentecost when they
received the Promise. Look
, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
We get the gist of it and we don't like it.
Your words are your private doctrine.
I prefer the Word of God[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really don't even try to understand what I am saying.
Let's move on, shall we.
Jd
-- I do not know.
JD
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:33:21 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD Paul is surely NOT against knowing but knowing that is final
So you say.
Then I can never really know
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:55:51 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When we decide upon a "truth," finalize that in our mind and even
institutionalize the concept, we close the doorto further
examination.
jt: What do you mean "decide upon a truth" JD? Are you saying that
--Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD are you Growing or Vacillating?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one called you ignorant. BUT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DEBATE
has everything to do with the
"way we act." How could it be seen
differently.such is our "performance."
Jd-Original
Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 20
.
Jd
-Original Message-
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:10:36
-0400
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
I understand what you are saying JD but youmix spiritual growth which is in flux and
has
.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.com
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:49:49
-0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD are you
Growing or Vacillating?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No one called you
: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
When we decide upon a truth, finalize
that in our mind and even institutionalize the concept, we close the
doorto further examination. With that door closed, we
are shut off from amending our point of view.We stop growing and
declare to all who
Perhaps this is true in the high church as
well -- I do not know.
JD
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:33:21 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD Paul is surely NOT against knowing but knowing tha
resulting insult? What is intellectual fair game to you?
Jd-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:35:28 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
We get the gist of it and we don't like it.
Your words are your
e-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:49:49 -0700 (PDT)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
JD are you Growing or Vacillating?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one called you ignorant. BUT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DEBATE THIS TYPE OF COMME
PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
Not too bad of a question. Quite often growth may appear to bevacillation.If we define new birth as a putting on of Christ, emphasis ona relationship, then we might suppose that the resulting validation marking the difference
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:56 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
When we decide upon a "truth," finalize that in our mind and even institutionalize the concept,
that's cuz
yergoin' ta hell
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:58:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to jt:
You really don't even try to understand what I am saying.
||
yer goin'
ta hell
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:12:41 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to jt:
||
If you don't agree, so what?
HA HA good subject for jokin about.
Go stand by the gates of hell, and hear the damned entreat you to go to their father's house and bid their brothers and sisters and servants and masters not to come there[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's cuz yergoin' ta hell
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:58:48 -0400
Oh, I forgot.
JD-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:46:38 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apocrypha
that's cuz yergoin' ta hell
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:58:48 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to jt:
You really don't even try
HA HA
Just like a LOST man.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yer goin' ta hell
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:12:41 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes to jt:
||
If you don't agree, so what?
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
