In a message dated 10/24/07 2:55:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well, I don't know nuttin' 'bout nuttin', but it looks like
uchs's own website lists the house as being on the national
register for historic places, june 22, 1979
Ray, my mistake, I've been assuming that the property on the
In a message dated 10/23/07 6:04:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did they happen to say exactly *how* the community would benefit?
On Oct 23, 2007, at 05:41 PM, KAREN ALLEN wrote:
The two members who voted in favor of the project stated that the proposed
hotel would be a great benefit
In a message dated 10/19/07 12:55:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sprung out, walked to the gate, opened it, and then did the mugging under
the bright
streetlamp on a busy street?
VERRRY effective. ;)
Sprung OVER the fence? Don't know, just wondering, just offering ideas.
The
Cappy, Lew's suggestion of a deranged weeder is fascinating.
But, Lew, does the guy actually take away the debris?
The thing that came to my mind is that perhaps a neighbor thought that the
ivy was a safety issue? I haven't been to the corner and looked, but could
someone have possibly
Here's some good news.
- Melani Lamond
Street's corridor money draws a Council crowd
By Marcia Gelbart
Inquirer Staff Writer
It's tough to recall the last time so many City Council members showed up at
one of Mayor Street's news conferences.
But show up they did yesterday - eight of the 17
Here's an interesting article (from yesterday's Inquirer) on a BID in an area
with some similarities to (university involvement), and a lot of differences
from (crosses city boundaries, has gigantic commercial spaces), UC.
- Melani Lamond
Celebrating City Avenue
A sign to be lighted tonight
In a message dated 10/11/07 10:28:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, Melani. I missed that article. Do you know how much of the money is
coming to our area, and for which corridors in particular? Also, do you know
which community-development groups and other nonprofits in West
In a message dated 10/11/07 3:11:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 10/11/2007 10:24:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an interesting article (from yesterday's Inquirer) on a BID in an
area with some similarities to (university involvement),
In a message dated 10/10/07 1:09:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the problem is that some people are posting private emails
to the list. this is wrong, especially when it's done
without the author's permission, and it's another example
(along with ad hominem) of people's difficulty grasping
Wilma, your response surprises me. I thought you were a feminist! I
thought you were someone who cared about people being personally attacked for
their
beliefs! And I thought you wanted to know why participants dropped off this
list! Are you saying that you think it's appropriate for a
Where's the link to this publication and article, Al? With a link, we can
be sure this isn't a spoof, like your doctored article about Prince Charles
coming to Clark Park
Thanks
Melani Lamond
Melani Lamond, Associate Broker
Urban Bye, Realtor
3529 Lancaster Ave.
Philadelphia, PA
In a message dated 10/9/07 11:28:59 AM, Krfapt writes:
In a message dated 10/9/2007 11:17:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, I don't remember this at all. I do remember ranting landlords
screaming against the BID at a BID meeting at that location with
In a message dated 10/9/07 11:57:22 AM, Krfapt writes:
In a message dated 10/9/2007 11:46:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Al, my question was, what was the date of the anti-HD meeting you just
described on the listserv?
Are you stamping your adorable
Thanks for the confirmation, Brian.
Melani Lamond
Melani Lamond, Associate Broker
Urban Bye, Realtor
3529 Lancaster Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19104
cell phone 215-356-7266
office phone 215-222-4800, ext. 113
office fax 215-222-1101
**
See what's new
at
In a message dated 10/9/07 1:20:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those messages were private -- offlist -- notes to Melani. She chose and
chooses to make them public, for reasons known only to her (trying to punish
me?)
Whether one replies to another's list comments off- or on- list, it
Wilma, I didn't mistakenly receive your post - you sent it to me! The
only way I could receive it was by you sending it.
This is a push. Please do post publicly what [I] ever did to you. A
public posting of the facts (which, I feel, are rather scant) would be much
more fair to the
In a message dated 10/6/07 11:25:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The crux of the problem I have with many organizations is that they have
an
effect disproportionate to their actual numbers in the community they
purport
to serve. When their involvement goes
In a message dated 10/6/07 12:56:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
btw, I think it's intriguing that you (and others) deliver
the sermons you do. in one ear we're told how this is such a
wonderful neighborhood (so capable and functional that we're
able to unanimously install dock street at the
Forwarded for Tony:
**
See what's new at
http://www.aol.com
---BeginMessage---
/Melani,
Can you please post this for me as I am having technical difficulties?
List owner Jeff hasn't answered my message yet and the problem persists.
-- Tony
/This
In a message dated 10/5/07 5:38:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...the other day al posted something about individual
responsibilities vs group participation. the idea that one
need not join a group in order to be considered an equal
urban dweller.
yes, I think this is where people get
In a message dated 9/30/07 10:31:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for refocusing the discussion on the real issue, Karen.
Kimm
If the real issue is Who do sworn officers of the Philadelphia Police report
to?, then Lt. McCurdy answered that question before this ever came up on
the
In a message dated 10/1/07 12:15:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
isn't it time for ucd to just bow out? we'll take it from here.
In theory, everything you write sounds reasonable, excellent.
But we've been there, done that, with voluntary community organizations
(which some on this list
In a message dated 9/30/07 1:04:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, UCD doesn'tt own the buildings at 3940-42 Chestnut Street. The
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania own them. Penn provides space at
3940 to UCD for office (and bagel distribution) use, and at 3942 Chestnut to
**
See what's new at http://www.aol.com
---BeginMessage---
In a message dated 9/30/07 4:08:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 9/30/2007 3:47:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you saying that Penn doesn't
In a message dated 9/30/07 4:55:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I meant what I said... It's not complicated. I provided the people on the
useful list with the information that Penn owns the property and provides
space to UCD and the Police Dept. No more, no less.
So it appears that you
In a message dated 9/30/07 5:46:05 PM, Krfapt writes:
In a message dated 9/30/2007 5:43:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A careful reader,
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
In a message dated 9/28/07 4:31:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is deceitful of UCD and demeaning to the Lieutenant to make it appear
that the Lieutenant is subordinate to UCD administration, rather than being
the Commander of a Philadelphia Police Substation that happens to be supplied
http://ucreview.com/
Lois and George had an enormous impact on our community. I feel so lucky to
have known them and worked with them.
- Melani
Lois Bye Funderburg 9/17/26 – 8/15/07
More than sixty years ago, an idealistic group of people formed the
Friendship Co-Operative, an intentionally
In a message dated 7/30/07 11:45:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Kyle didn't start the UCNeighbor list because he was being
childish or selfish and walking away with his bat and ball. He started it
because
the communication on this listserv is becoming petty, myopic and
In a message dated 7/30/2007 11:46:36 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My question is this: What is meant by cilvilized an uncivilized? Is
this REALLY a concern about the tone, or is there also a concern about the
ideas expressed?Would I be banned for posting
In a message dated 7/28/07 11:01:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hear, hear!
If the name of this new forum is as Al Krigman wrote, that says it all.
In a message dated 7/28/07 10:00:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still here. Haven't joined the list at [EMAIL
Uh, Al, I'm not sure your offlist threats to sue folks with whom you didn't
agree on list, could be called deliberation to help participants recognize
the moral merit in their opponents' claims.
I won't miss that.
- Melani Lamond
In a message dated 7/28/07 11:38:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 7/28/07 2:00:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The population of University City has never been nearly as high as it is
now, said Melani Lamond, an associate broker...
Anybody who's ever spoken with a reporter knows that all too often, the
resulting quote is incorrect,
In a message dated 7/27/07 11:50:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it just me or does anyone else think bringing children to the opening of
a business whose main purpose is brewing and selling beer is inappropriate
in the first place?
Also, does every business that asks for community
In a message dated 7/27/07 10:28:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that I've had an opportunity to look at the picture I remember what
that event was. I'm still frosted that after asking for community support to
get
them in the building, the welcome party was tailored only to people who
I have a family coming from Ireland to rent my carriage house for a two-month
stay in September and October (maybe arriving a little earlier, like the last
week in August). They have a child who was two in April. His mom will be
a visiting law professor at Temple, and she had expected to
Sharrieff, UCD is a very small company; you know that! I believe they
subcontract with another firm to provide their cleaning and security staff, so
they
don't have many direct employees. If they had an employee just to handle HR
for a few employees, Al would be screaming bloody murder
In a message dated 7/16/2007 11:13:04 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Glenn,
Just read your post. No, I don't remember her name or exactly when she met
with CPN.
Karen, I don't remember this particular visit to CPN, though I was on the
board then, but I do
In a message dated 7/15/07 9:56:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
McCain accepts blame for missteps
By Associated Press
Saturday, July 14, 2007
CONCORD, N.H. - Republican John McCain said yesterday he was to blame for
the weakened state of his presidential campaign that has undergone two
In a message dated 7/15/07 10:40:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorta wondering why no one is complaining or cheering about
parking permits being required for parts of 46th street. We got a
notice through the door yesterday and it appears so did everyone else
between Kingsessing and
In a message dated 7/15/07 12:45:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 7/15/2007 12:41:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, MLamond
writes:
So, Al, are you saying that the Philadelphia candidate, Tom Knox, should
have taken the blame for having John Fenton help out with his
In a message dated 7/14/07 10:18:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the breadtruck analogy above is misapplied. for example, in
the malcolm x park incident, fenton did not act alone, and
the event took place over 2 days.
In a message dated 7/14/07 11:05:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What on
In a message dated 7/13/07 1:54:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am hoping that the appreciation of the house value
since we bought it will offset this and we won't have to pay PMI, but I'm
not sure if that counts or if you have to have actual cash equity in the
house.
Yes, the
Perhaps one of our list attorneys knows the answer. Here's a summary:
Seller of a property has a service contract and oil purchase contract with a
local oil company. Service contract runs from April 1, 2006 to March 31,
2007.
Seller sells the property in the fall of 2006 and tells the
In a message dated 7/11/07 12:03:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melani Lamond wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HAHA thanks melani! now we see what our neighborhood's
proposed bid looks like, compared to mt. airy's bid. you
couldn't have made my point any more nicely!
And your
In a message dated 7/10/07 12:03:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
speaking of apples and oranges, did the article say anything
about how the mt. airy bid was the brainchild of a large
nearby university? or about how the mt. airy bid boundaries
included a large nearby university which wouldn't
In a message dated 7/10/07 5:07:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HAHA thanks melani! now we see what our neighborhood's
proposed bid looks like, compared to mt. airy's bid. you
couldn't have made my point any more nicely!
And your point was? When caught providing false information,
In a message dated 6/28/07 1:19:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this week's uc review interviews lewis wendell in an attempt
to 'reach out to readers' with 'candor' and 'a forthright
manner'. unfortunately, it backfires.
Sharreiff Ali wrote:
*Lewis Wendell tries to bury John on the
In a message dated 6/28/07 2:21:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
melani, when wendell was interviewed by uc review, maybe he
could have mentioned, for the readers' benefit, that fenton
works with blackwell now. [wendell must have known that, no?
and if he didn't, that's pretty worrisome, no?]
In a message dated 6/26/07 11:34:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as always, we need to be careful in public discourse to
avoid resorting to ad hominem. the issue here is not about
personalities or personal likes/dislikes but about public
organizations and the public roles involved, about the
In a message dated 6/26/07 12:07:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But here we are. We must take the UCD for what is is. We may never
truly come together under a generalissimo UCD director, but that's hardly a
problem. If UCD stayed as it is now getting funded by local businesses and
In a message dated 6/26/07 1:51:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what can we (we being people opposed to the cranks and greedy
landlords and other anti-BID forces) do?
- Mike V.
I don't know, Mike, but I'd certainly be interested in suggestions.
Melani
Melani Lamond, Associate
In a message dated 6/26/07 1:55:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simplicity is most notable by its absence.
Liz, when are your posts ever simple? I think the notable thing here is
that, as often as you and I disagree, neither of us feels that calling for
Lewis
Wendell's resignation is
In a message dated 6/26/07 2:07:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melani,
Why does the UCD, its staff and steering committee, want to have two
separate legal entities? What would the scope of control be in such a
scenario?
I'm assuming both non-profit orgs would each have their own
In a message dated 6/26/07 2:26:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simply... do not confuse my support of Lewis with support for a NID.
No, I will not make that mistake; I agree that they are not at all the same.
What worries me is that folks call for Lewis' and the current UCD's
In a message dated 6/25/07 3:26:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.I called for change within the mission, board, and directorship of
UCD...
Mission, Board and Director, will need to change in order
for the UCD to be effective in a way which will benefit the broader
In a message dated 6/23/07 11:55:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[gracefully, tactfully, announcing his new career plans at
dock street's grand opening later this summer, turning the
whole thing into a celebratory and face-saving leave-taking
which gives the long-silent daily news, dp,
In a message dated 6/23/07 8:36:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Melani...I would respond but I really don't believe you are as clueless
as you pretend to be.
The real interested parties can ask their own questions in due time.
S
Yes, I am clueless...but even if I weren't, you must
In a message dated 6/19/07 1:03:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The three anarchists apprehended yesterday in connection with the murder at
49th and locust have been released after questioning.
KYW reports that police are looking for two upper middle class educated
young-adults The
Wait a minute, Ray, I asked you what you would have done - not what you think
UCD did wrong. So, in the situation where a valuable employee is accused in
the newspaper of having done something improper, for starters, you'd put
press releases on your organization's web site?
Not sure how
Sharrieff, your long reply from last night (copied below) seems to say it
wasn't new information, I'm just guessing. Is that what it says? Have you
made your allegations against Lewis Wendell and asked him to resign on the
basis of just guessing?
If not, from what sources did you obtain
In a message dated 6/15/07 8:26:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generally the question is : “Why is Lewis Wendell
more responsible?
Well..the answer is if it was a Board decision to
suspend John then I guess we would have all known
about it from the meeting held by our community
In a message dated 6/16/07 11:17:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think what sharreiff was getting at, above, is that there
are ways for an organization to behave responsibly,
publicly, as an organization, and when it doesn't, the
person in charge is most responsible, ultimately
In a message dated 6/16/07 2:20:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lewis acted without Board consent and made a catastrophic decision to
suspend John Fenton without any real evidence, just based on an allegation.
After John spoke with Lewis about what happened, Lewis made a unilateral
In a message dated 6/15/2007 3:44:01 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that what's important is that more information has been
released in an effort to clarify the situation. Unfortunately that
information seems to be getting lost in the continued
Hi, Sharrieff, I have a couple of thoughts or questions about the points
raised earlier by Doc Baldy, to which you responded below:
In a message dated 6/14/07 7:45:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Racial Discrimination has been alleged because of
the disproportionate amount of whites in
The UCD released a second press release on Friday. It seems not to have
been picked up by the media. I became aware of it through another listserv
member, and I've received an OK to put it on the list:
June 8, 2007
University City District has made numerous documented attempts to contact
In a message dated 6/14/07 2:03:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where did you get this press release from on Friday? Seems like Tony
picked it up from Mr Wendell at the Thursday meeting according to his...
Why did a press release go to a listserv member rather than to the
press? Who
In a message dated 6/14/07 1:32:56 PM, Krfapt writes:
In a message dated 6/14/2007 1:18:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See your emails of 5/23, 8:09 AM; 5/24, 3:46 PM, 4:37 PM, 4:48 PM; 6/1,
1:38 PM; 6/2, 7:48 PM 7:50 AM; 6/7, 2:19 PM, and 6/10, 7:46 PM.
I was going to make the same suggestion. Liz is giving you great
information here. Check out this house! Also, Russell Roofing has a large
ad in this
week's UC Review with a picture of Ed in front of his house. Neat idea for
an ad!
Melani Lamond
In a message dated 6/14/07 3:16:22
In a message dated 6/14/07 3:54:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stop mincincing around. You can either show it or you're making it up. And
making something up is what's called lying and makes the person who does it a
liar.
Show it and I'll certainly post a humble apology saying that
Uh, Wilma, I'm not sure you meant to send this email to me, but you did.
Just in case you've never met Al, I do want to mention that he's not in the
us group you mention. Also, I feel no jealousy toward him. And - what
behavior of mine were you trying to monitor? Sounds ominous. I
In a message dated 6/11/07 12:03:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ucd also:
markets us,
brands us,
kicks businesses out and installs others,
programs our entertainments,
occupies our public
In a message dated 6/11/07 10:29:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To be fair, I suppose one must admit that Penn and Judy made a difference
in the hood, but to give her all the credit seems a little unrealistic and
mythic, to say the least.
Yes, there is a history in UC of groups /
In a message dated 6/11/07 2:19:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This post may be your most twisted perspective on reality, yet.
Not sure where we disagree here, Liz. I agreed with Ross that people (in
this case, Penn) claiming credit for things they hadn't done has always been a
problem
In a message dated 6/9/07 1:44:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ucd also:
markets us,
brands us,
kicks businesses out and installs others,
programs our entertainments,
occupies our public spaces,
populates our public buildings,
puts their agendas into our neighborhood
Lomb21 is the landlord Guy Laren. His is not a bad idea, but you've
certainly pointed out the impractical parts of it, Tony.
We already tried this in 1987-88: it was called the University City Special
Services District, or the UCSSD. You'll still see some of the green and
purple UCSSD
In a message dated 6/8/07 12:36:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody notice the mention of Glenn Moyers account of the meeting. There's
a mention of a Glenn Bryan. Could this be Committeeman7? Under
Glennsdesktop? He certainly could have insider information, right?
Dan Myers
In a message dated 6/8/07 12:14:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I personally believe that what the institutions and the corporate landlords
are really after is the power to control the direction of the neighborhood,
and would indeed balk if a substitute that they did not control came into
In a message dated 6/8/07 3:28:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You have to fund it somehow, and if one of the goals is to cut the big
doners out (and thereby their influence), you need to make up for some
of that lost revenue. And we already heard that going door to door with
hat in hand
Tony, thank you for this thorough and important update. A question remains
about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
My guess, now, is that our anonymous poster, Committeeman7, is either
affiliated with the Councilwoman's office or has inside information from the
Councilwoman's
In a message dated 6/7/07 10:59:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 6/7/2007 10:36:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A question remains about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
A desperate attempt at diverting attention from the real
In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:05:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who Committeeman7 is, has not [been clarified].
In a message dated 6/7/07 12:06:01 PM, Krfapt writes:
What's the relevance? The posting on our little list had nothing to do
with what happened at
In a message dated 6/7/2007 5:46:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My questions include:
How do we thank John Fenton?
Can his job and reputation be saved?
Should we
save his job?
lose UCD?
settle for what
In a message dated 6/7/07 8:23:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'm trying to understand about the investigation is, to be blunt,
what's taking so long?
Matthew, we know UCD has had time to ASK all the parties, but we don't know
what, if any, answers were received. Or if the answers
In a message dated 6/6/07 11:54:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I apologize, Glenn. I did misunderstand the meaning of that header, and I
agree that I was wrong. Frankly, the writing style of committeeman7 reminds
me of a different contributor to this list, so I was surprised at what I
In a message dated 6/5/07 12:18:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray, each community association has a representative on the board of the
UCD.
There is one for Spruce Hill and one for Walnut Hill, both covering
areas
near your apartment. If you don't like
In a message dated 6/5/07 6:00:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Glenn--'fess up!
(hint--search headers below on glenn
This header is from the First Thursday post, the following one is from
Glenn's post immediately preceding that one, just chosen at random.
For those who didn't
In a message dated 6/4/07 11:42:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's my take on complaining quickly to IRS about an UCD impropriety at
the Malcolm X Park event is that such a complaint will plausibly result in
pushing UCD to fire John Fenton in an effort to limit damage. Since both
In a message dated 6/4/07 12:52:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what I don't understand in all this is the expectation that
we can have it both ways. we're supposed to accept how
'involved' ucd is in our public lives, but at the same time
we're not supposed to look too closely, to ask too
In a message dated 6/1/2007 9:28:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:In a message dated 6/1/2007 9:11:41 AM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of us don’t believe an open-ended internal investigation which UCD
claims, is actually occurring
In a message dated 6/1/07 1:38:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it's true that the alleged violations of federal law have to to with
UCD and not the NID...
On this point I agree with you, Al. And I agree that I am a member of the
NID Steering Committee.
The Steering Committee is
On 5/29/07, Kyle Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my favorite of Glenn's questions:
Windhole Lewis, yo dude, I don't know nothin', I don't see nothing,
and I don't give a damn 'cause I'm the UCD man.
Sadly, I think that Glenn has already abandoned his pledges to reform the
In a message dated 5/29/07 8:28:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't be concerned with the fee simple stuff - it's just your basic
deed. Look for what property the city already owns in the area described and
note
the ordinance calls for a subsequent sale at market value to a third
In a message dated 5/26/07 8:24:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following, from today's Inquirer, is about the Center City District
(CCD). It is another example of the potential for abuse by organizations such
as
UCD.This article shows abuse in the form of putting a bunch of
In a message dated 5/26/07 1:55:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have posted a clarification on the relationship between these two sites
here:
http://malcolmxpark.org/?p=92
I am still finding my feet as a blogger, so any confusion is owing entirely
to
my own inept administration.
In a message dated 5/26/07 3:13:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I do think is strange is that Greg Smith, who I've never noticed
on the listserv before, pointed out the Friends blog mere hours after
it was registered as a domain.
Frank
Greg Smith has written on the list before.
In a message dated 5/24/07 11:07:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what would Laserbeam PR do if you'd been hired by UCD to deal with this?
You know, I asked this question a couple of days ago, and Krigman Al
suggested that we withhold our judgment.
Since then, everybody's been rushing
I'm surprised to hear rather fervent support for John Fenton from today's
listserv writers. When I was appreciating him for so quickly solving the
problem with the missing sewer covers on a Saturday afternoon a couple of weeks
ago,
nobody jumped in to add their personal thanks to him. Ray
In a message dated 5/22/07 10:03:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shouldn't we withhold judgement until the facts are in? Not only those from
UCD's internal investigation -- which would be somewhat suspect because
there's always the possibility of a cover-up with John as the scapegoat --
101 - 200 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
