Re: [UC] Clark Park announcements on this list

2011-06-29 Thread Glenn
FOCP Leader: These are community issues, so I think there's a good reason to do this. I can't imagine this become a bother or problem on the list, but if there's a huge objection, let me know. People of West Philly! Now that the park is completely controlled by the secret invitation only Clark

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2011-04-30 Thread Richard Conrad
Darco, Bill, and Tony, Brian answered me with absurdly sarcastic and abusive rhetoric so exaggerated as to be insipid and cruel. Are you going to ignore my several attempts to find some resolution, as if I deserved no comment? Do you all just need to cultivate only antagonistic rapport... or

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Glenn
Ric, I want to publicly thank you for confronting the use of a straw man. One of the reasons that this technique is so ubiquitous is to intimidate and silence everyone else. Tony knows that he will never silence or intimidate me. He is trying to send a message to the rest of the list and

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Richard Conrad
Dear Glenn, I appreciate your gratitude and quite concur with your astute identification of straw man bullying. I hope you are mistaken about Tony's message being all about power and still hope that he will come to his senses and apologize for his unfair behaviors in attacking you, and then

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Glenn
Rick, I tend to be optimistic. For over a decade, I worked with serious drug addicts and ex-prisoners. Only those of us with abundant optimism manage to do that work successfully-haha. Darco seems reasonable and I hope he considers our criticism constructively. I think it's out of

RE: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Lalevic, Darco
[mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] On Behalf Of Richard Conrad Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:43 AM To: Anthony West Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11 You are reading in. You don't play fair. You just can't admit it. Glenn does not say as Darco implied

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Brian Siano
Lemme see if I have this straight. Real-state investor uses a soapbox to yell about crazy, baseless conspiracy theories. Most of the evidence offered rests on assertions, suppositions, insinuations, and claims of fact that evaporate beyond the guy's say-so. There's also a comical insistence that

RE: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Lalevic, Darco
, that is the Philly way when it comes to politics. -Original Message- From: owner-univc...@list.purple.com [mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] On Behalf Of Brian Siano Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 1:16 PM Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11 Lemme see if I have

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Glenn
On 4/29/2011 12:30 PM, Lalevic, Darco wrote: I apologize for any misinterpretation on my part, however the general tone of most of Glenn's emails is that the public is excluded from use of the park, of which I have seen little evidence Darco, You just did it again. Maybe if you would work

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
On 4/29/11 12:30 PM, Lalevic, Darco wrote: University City’s gentrification (I don’t know what else to call it) over the last 15 years has had plenty of positive as well as negative effects. the main negative effect is that we now have a staunchly divided neighborhood. and it's a big

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Mike V.
In my years of experience on this listserv, I have found that the best way to read Glenn's posts involve substituting Penn or UCD or Clark Park Committee or whoever his bogeyman-du-jour is with the Martians, Sasquatch or, occasionally, the pixies that live in my teeth. Then I picture him

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Richard Conrad
Thank you Darco very much... I was really not expecting an apology (despite my quixotic claim to the contrary), and even a terse, partial, and perhaps conditional one felt rather warm and fuzzy to me... You reason well and speak honestly and sincerely about your concerns but then you slam

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Richard Conrad
One thing seems to ring true, very sad, but sometimes also true I should say... In the realm of political debate: One often only does one's best work when one's adversaries make it particularly difficult to do it! Now, enough! Let us start to get along DAMN IT! On Apr 29, 2011, at 5:47

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-29 Thread Richard Conrad
Darco and Tony, There is a way to be sure we are getting onto the same page... YOU HAVE SAID THAT NO ONE IS EXCLUDED FROM THE PARK. SO THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM WITH CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED RIGHTS (eg.): TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLY TO PETITION FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES, BEING EXERCISED

RE: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Lalevic, Darco
So, I'm curious. While I tended to disagree with some of the revitalization plan, do you have evidence of people being excluded from the park? And don't give me general intimidation that you have felt - I would like a concrete example of someone being excluded. And no, the fence being up while

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Glenn
Also, can you respond in a few short sentences? I just want to know of one example of someone being excluded from the park. No, I will not answer your silly question. There is overwhelming evidence that park stakeholders were barred from the planning committees over the past 10 years.

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Richard Conrad
Darco, I must agree with Glenn that you have most clearly misinterpreted what Glenn wrote and you should read it again more closely. Although, in fact I might point out, as control by private parties increases, particularly when park spaces are leased or sold to private parties, it can

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Anthony West
Richard, I would have to say Darco's reading is quite skilled. Glenn's overwhelming evidence is either imaginary, or self-fabricated. The 10-year-old article he is fond of citing offers one (1) piece of hard evidence that people were being excluded from Clark Park planning: an unsupported,

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread William H. Magill
On Apr 28, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Glenn wrote: Also, can you respond in a few short sentences? I just want to know of one example of someone being excluded from the park. No, I will not answer your silly question. There is overwhelming evidence that park stakeholders were barred from the

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Richard Conrad
O.K. let's get real! Darco represents Glenn as saying soething he did not. Darco asks: do you have evidence of people being excluded from the park? Glenn did not ever say in his communique that people were excluded from the park. Whether he said something else with which you disagree,

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Anthony West
Richard, I quote from Glenn's text, which Darco and I have read quite clearly: The master plan for 'revitalization' of Clark Park was always a master plan for secrecy, exclusion of the public, and Penn control! Glenn has, for years, been publishing on this list false allegations that

Re: [UC] Clark Park Secrecy, 01-11

2011-04-28 Thread Richard Conrad
You are reading in. You don't play fair. You just can't admit it. Glenn does not say as Darco implied that people were excluded from the park (and actually people have been - you and everyone else can probably realize that people are routinely told to leave the park, for sleeping overnight

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2011-03-14 Thread Glenn moyer
Tim, Closing the park for two seasons isan important and well studiedgentrificationstrategy for public spaces. This is a strategy designed to eliminateregular locals likethe drum circle, volleyball, capture the flag, chess, dark skinned people, etc. After two seasons, the

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2011-03-13 Thread Brian Siano
Latest new we have is early June. http://www.friendsofclarkpark.org On 3/13/11, tim dunn kafkaatka...@yahoo.com wrote: Spring is in the air, and me and some friends are wondering when Clark Park is scheduled to re-open. Does anyone know...? You are receiving this because you are

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-10-05 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
...@list.purple.com] On Behalf Of UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 10:07 AM To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR Lalevic, Darco wrote: I too am often offended by the bias and misinformation that is often propagated as marketing

RE: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-10-05 Thread Lalevic, Darco
- From: owner-univc...@list.purple.com [mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] On Behalf Of Anthony West Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 3:21 PM To: UnivCity listserv Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR A half-hour ago, on a cool, gray fall afternoon, I observed

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-10-03 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR Lalevic, Darco wrote: I too am often offended by the bias and misinformation that is often propagated as marketing for University City. can you cite examples of this? Sure, I disagree with UCD and FOCP on many issues

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-10-03 Thread Anthony West
A half-hour ago, on a cool, gray fall afternoon, I observed 15 inner-city kids playing on the new basketball court, 12 kids playing on the new older-kids playground, 6 kids playing on the new totlot -- all fruits of the Clark Park Revitalization Plan. Different people hold different

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-26 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Lalevic, Darco wrote: I too am often offended by the bias and misinformation that is often propagated as marketing for “University City”. can you cite examples of this? Sure, I disagree with UCD and FOCP on many issues, examples? The fact is, by not engaging the argument in

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR - and your rights are?

2010-09-25 Thread Glenn
Craig, You will get a good deal of pleasure from this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmByfTKKUV4NR=1feature=fvwp On 9/24/2010 5:34 PM, craigso...@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 9/24/2010 12:37:39 Eastern Daylight Time, glen...@earthlink.net writes: ... speak up against

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Kathleen Turner
Does comparison to the Holocaust invoke Godwin's Law, and if so, does that mean that Glenn is forever barred from writing further messages on this topic? Kathleen On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:47 PM, craigso...@aol.com wrote: “They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Cindy Miller
No, but according to Wikipedia, it means that Glenn has lost and the discussion is now over. -cm On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Kathleen Turner wrote: Does comparison to the Holocaust invoke Godwin's Law, and if so, does that mean that Glenn is forever barred from writing further

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
but then soon after glenn invoked chaucer, and Right so as bees out swarmen from an hyve, Out of the develes ers ther gonne dryve Twenty thousand freres on a route, And thurghout helle swarmed al aboute, And comen agayn as faste as they may gon, And in his ers they crepten everychon. He clapte

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Glenn
Darco, I would normally wish to ignore the ambiguous injury you suffered in your one line tweet. These tweets solely to intimidate speakers or chill speech of others should not ordinarily receive a serious response. But the code of silence which you invoke is so severely dangerous that I

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Glenn
Yes, you understand! On 9/24/2010 8:33 AM, Cindy Miller wrote: No, but according to Wikipedia, it means that Glenn has lost and the discussion is now over. -cm On Sep 24, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Kathleen Turner wrote: Does comparison to the Holocaust invoke Godwin's Law, and if so, does

RE: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Lalevic, Darco
rendered any assistance. The Wolf, having no cause of fear, at his leisure lacerated or destroyed the whole flock. - Aesop From: Glenn [mailto:glen...@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 12:36 PM To: Lalevic, Darco Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR - and your rights are?

2010-09-24 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 9/24/2010 12:37:39 Eastern Daylight Time, glen...@earthlink.net writes: ... speak up against ...the forces ... and strip them of their rights In the end you know what we do with guys like you, who know their rights, and refuse to accept they're wrongs?

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-24 Thread Wilma de Soto
, September 24, 2010 12:36 PM To: Lalevic, Darco Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR Darco, I would normally wish to ignore the ambiguous injury you suffered in your one line tweet. These tweets solely to intimidate speakers

RE: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-23 Thread Lalevic, Darco
Glenn, While I appreciate your futile intentions to wrest control of Clark Park from the UCD/Penn/FOCP/everyone-else conspiracy, I find it extremely offensive that you use a Holocaust reference for effect. Darco From: owner-univc...@list.purple.com [mailto:owner-univc...@list.purple.com] On

Re: [UC] Clark Park: Power and secrecy was the goal, UCR

2010-09-23 Thread craigsolve
“They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. And then we came for Glenn,

Re: [UC] Clark Park reconstruction: start date is week of Aug 9!

2010-07-29 Thread Anthony West
I feel a growing interest in what comes next. The 2001 Revitalization Master Plan for Clark Park spelled out millions of dollars in longterm improvements (a timeframe looking ahead to 2050), which should be addressed piecemeal, as funds become available. Several longstanding sore spots -- the

Re: [UC] Clark Park Weed killer question

2010-07-10 Thread Brian Siano
The landscapers don't use herbicides on Clark Park. They pull weeds by hand. On 7/9/10, Glenn moyer glen...@earthlink.net wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/08/weighing-safety-of-weed-k_n_639120.html Did anyone ever uncover the name of the particular safe herbicides dumped in Clark

Re: [UC] Clark Park Weed killer question

2010-07-10 Thread Glenn
Thanks Brian. How did they kill dandelions, clover, crab grass, and all the broad leaf grasses over the past years? Several years ago, Lew was told the stuff was safe enough to drink when he asked the guy spraying the stuff , but no one has ever named the mysterious liquid. I'd ask

Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale

2008-10-17 Thread Glenn moyer
Title: Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale West says "How could FoCP possibly "sell advertising rights in Clark Park"?" "Ok. So, just to be clear, FOCP is not selling advertising rights in Clark Park? I don’t have to worry about billboards for payday lenders in the Park?

Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale

2008-10-16 Thread Kimm Tynan
On 10/16/08 1:54 PM, Glenn moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was revealed last night that FOCP will start selling advertising rights in Clark Park. So far, a bench in the shape of one of the car share companies is planned. OK ­ someone ­ please say it ain¹t so? Kimm

Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale

2008-10-16 Thread Anthony West
It isn't so, Kimm. Glenn is talking about a street-art installation left over from a citywide project, which cut up a car into two pieces, that can be used as a bench. These were originally set up in Center City on-street parking spaces, to demonstrate the potential of car-free urban public

Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale

2008-10-16 Thread Kimm Tynan
Ok. So, just to be clear, FOCP is not selling advertising rights in Clark Park? I don¹t have to worry about billboards for payday lenders in the Park? Kimm On 10/16/08 11:00 PM, Anthony West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It isn't so, Kimm. Glenn is talking about a street-art installation left

Re: [UC] Clark Park is for sale

2008-10-16 Thread Anthony West
Kimm, How could FoCP possibly sell advertising rights in Clark Park? Clark Park is owned by the City of Philadelphia and administered by the Dept. of Recreation. FoCP is just the park support group. It's roughly akin to the Neighborhood Advisory Councils that connect Rec with the communities

Re: [UC] Clark Park to follow Dutch lead??

2008-03-10 Thread Anthony West
Those Dutch are so puritanical. What's so bad about off-leash dogs, anyway? -- Tony West Frank wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1982504/posts Frank You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see

Re: [UC] Clark Park Basketball Court is Open for Use

2008-02-15 Thread deeno7100
A little late on the reply?because?I do not check this list everyday but?this is wonderful news! A very?large part of me will miss the unlevel,?hazardous, slippery, rusty and dusty green monster that?me and my game?grew up on. However,?I am hopeful that the new court will be appreciated,

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-05 Thread Glenn
. This isn't going to help the many diverse calls for reform which I'm hearing, and will probably hurt them. Very sincerely, Glenn - Original Message - From: S. Sharrieff Ali To: 'Lewis Mellman' ; univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 8:28 AM Subject: RE: [UC] Clark

RE: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-05 Thread Kyle Cassidy
7/5/2007 9:46 AM To: S. Sharrieff Ali; 'Lewis Mellman'; univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park The committee process is to plan the public forums. And that..is it. Tony West will chair the next meeting. Sharrieff, I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw that you put Mr West

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-05 Thread Glenn
RE: [UC] Clark Park - Original Message - From: Kyle Cassidy To: Glenn ; S. Sharrieff Ali ; Lewis Mellman ; univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:14 AM Subject: RE: [UC] Clark Park Yeah Sharrieff, for crying out loud, your comittee can't represent

RE: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-02 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Lew..the meeting is 7/18/07 6PM. FYI I don't know if that helps. S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lewis Mellman Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; univcity@list.purple.com Subject: [UC] Clark Park S. Ali

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-02 Thread Glenn
Lew, I have raised the issue of UCD involvement with Clark Park since 2001. You saw UCD bar park user groups from the Clark Park Revitalization with complete impunity in its first initiative past 40th St. The steering committee had been handpicked and closed before the initiative was even

RE: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-02 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Lew and All: I previously posted the notes and planning process, based on some of the e-mails I have received, many never read them! :-) no harm...no problem... The committee process is to plan the public forums. And that..is it. Tony West will chair the next meeting. We are not

Re: [UC] Clark Park

2007-07-02 Thread Brian Siano
S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: Lew..the meeting is *7/18/07** *6PM. FYI I don't know if that helps. That is the same evening as the FoCP General Membership Meeting. S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lewis Mellman Sent:

Re: [UC] Clark park Farmer's Market makes the Inky

2007-05-20 Thread Ross Bender
On 5/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/19/2007 8:30:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One of the largest farmers markets in the city, Clark Park demonstrates a salutary aspect of the phenomenon - revival of the town-square tradition.

Re: [UC] Clark park Farmer's Market makes the Inky

2007-05-19 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 5/19/2007 8:30:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One of the largest farmers markets in the city, Clark Park demonstrates a salutary aspect of the phenomenon - revival of the town-square tradition. What? Wendell Lewis wasn't quoted as saying he

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-20 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 4/19/2007 10:59:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Based on the evidence of the other day, all you need to do is offer free Ben and Jerry's ice cream and the crowds will come rushing in. This is just what UCD has been doing in its ploy to usurp

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-20 Thread Ross Bender
Argue with YOU?? You want me to engage in rational discourse with a libertarian anarchist who's so far to the left of Ivan the Terrible that he don't know what hit him? Surely you jest. Has everybody gone loony? Am I the only sane one left? On 4/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-20 Thread Glenn
scum A very bad whore and gang member, Glenn the terrible - Original Message - From: Ross Bender To: Brian Siano Cc: Univcity Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:58 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th All good ideas, but a trifle complex

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Glenn
to a board member's resignation. Glenn Moyer - Original Message - From: Anthony West [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:52 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th I might add that the vice president and several

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Glenn
the rest of my misinformation. Banned from FOCP discussions since 2003. Glenn - Original Message - From: Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Cc: Jonathan Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Margie Politzer
] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th Glenn wrote: Folks, Don't forget the really big show tonight. Although the members have directed the FOCP to publicly announce their meetings in the University Review, the leaders

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Glenn
- From: Margie Politzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: University City listserv Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th I will step in here to say that FOCP has submitted announcements of all meetings to the University

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Margie Politzer
Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th I will step in here to say that FOCP has submitted announcements of all meetings to the University City Review for the Almanac section. However, the paper has not always

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Glenn
Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th Glenn, I know it to be true that FOCP submitted announcements to the UC Review for the Almanac section and they did not appear. That is why an ad was taken out, to ensure

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Brian Siano
Glenn wrote: Thanks Brian. I knew if I ever made even a small mistake the unbroken silence from your gang would end. I thought everyone is to accept your gangs usual silence towards my assertions or questions because I'm such a liar and crank? Please send any additional corrections of my

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Glenn
have UCD ticket the bastards! Your humble servant, thank you for pointing out my lies. Glenn the terrrible - Original Message - From: Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Brian Siano
Glenn wrote: Thank you Brian! Oh my god, thank you Focp! You have done all this just for me! Oh my god thank you, thank you so much! It was on the kiosk, the bastards! Damn the UC Review! Damn those bastards! How dare they think the Focp should be ignored as if they're a bunch of

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-19 Thread Ross Bender
All good ideas, but a trifle complex and extravagant. Based on the evidence of the other day, all you need to do is offer free Ben and Jerry's ice cream and the crowds will come rushing in. On 4/19/07, Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glenn wrote: Thank you Brian! Oh my god, thank you

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-18 Thread Glenn
Folks, Don't forget the really big show tonight. Although the members have directed the FOCP to publicly announce their meetings in the University Review, the leaders forgot to announce tonights community show in the community paper. I hope no one was shocked that FOCP leaders continue to

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-18 Thread Brian Siano
Glenn wrote: Folks, Don't forget the really big show tonight. Although the members have directed the FOCP to publicly announce their meetings in the University Review, the leaders forgot to announce tonights community show in the community paper. I hope no one was shocked that FOCP

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-04-18 Thread Anthony West
I might add that the vice president and several directors of FoCP are renters. Whores, gang members and other criminals are always welcome at meetings, especially if they pay like everybody else to support the park. If they're prepared to work, they'll be welcome on the Board as well. The

Re: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th

2007-03-20 Thread Glenn
- Original Message - From: Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Cc: Jonathan Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:47 PM Subject: [UC] Clark Park Quarterly Meeting, April 18th Posted on behalf of FoCP President Jonathan Snyder: Dear

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted

2007-03-05 Thread Margie Politzer
David, I live in Cedar Park, and certainly consider Clark Park to be an important part of the neighborhood. I don¹t see any reason why we have to think in terms of micro-communities (i.e. Cedar Park vs. Spruce Hill) when considering a mural that celebrates the neighborhood. Thanks, Margie P.

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 3/5/2007 12:00:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just yesterday, I was trying to explain to my son how racism is sustained by people who do not intend to be part of the problem. You could have used the debate over the application for a zoning

RE: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Kyle Cassidy
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:29 PM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities? In a message dated 3/5/2007 12:00:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to - diversity

2007-03-05 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 3/5/2007 12:48:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A catholic church next to an abortion clinic? That's diversity That is an interesting euphemism for The slaughtering of lambs at the foot of God. Even the Third World has evolved - from

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Mike
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:29:08 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In a message dated 3/5/2007 12:00:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just yesterday, I was trying to explain to my son how racism is sustained by people who do not intend to be part of the problem. You could

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:29 PM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities? In a message dated 3/5/2007 12:00:06 P.M

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Mike and List, Mike's first point assumes a perception that the mosque at 42nd and Walnut enjoys significant racial diversity. It is not a perception supported by the evidence of my eyes. Mike's second point is false because it is based upon a false premise of Owner privilege. The property in

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Mike, Philosophical training or not: It seems sloppy to me that some vocal proponents continue to ignore that the property has RESIDENTIAL ZONING and are pretend that a defending against a ZONING CHANGE is the same thing as imposing or acting to dictate their views upon the rest of the

Re: [UC] Clark Park our default setting when it comes to out door activities?

2007-03-05 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 3/5/2007 4:57:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems sloppy to me that some vocal proponents continue to ignore that the property has RESIDENTIAL ZONING and are pretend that a defending against a ZONING CHANGE is the same thing as imposing or

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted

2007-03-04 Thread MLamond
In a message dated 3/4/07 12:24:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A mural artist has been contracted to depict a scene of a Clark Park festival.  (Mural to go on the 4700 block of Baltimore.)  He approached me for pictures to look at for inspiration.  I pointed him to Sean Dorn, who's been

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted

2007-03-04 Thread Vincent/Roger
Harman - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted In a message dated 3/4/07 12:24:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A mural

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted

2007-03-04 Thread Jedidiah McKee
people have confused the two. Roger Harman - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 11:35 AM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted In a message dated 3/4/07 12:24:22 AM

Fwd: Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted

2007-03-04 Thread Jedidiah McKee
, all in digital form. Let me know. --Josh - Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2007 3:14:27 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival pics wanted Dear Jed

Re: [UC] Clark Park Jan 18 Meeting: Video Now Available

2007-01-21 Thread Brian Siano
Bill Sanderson wrote: Absolutely brilliant--Listening to it now. Would love to be able to see the slides--are they at the web site? They are now. Browse to http://www.clarkpark.info, and select the Park A page. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named

Re: [UC] Clark Park Jan 18 Meeting: Video Now Available

2007-01-19 Thread Ross Bender
Brilliant! I will probably never have the time or inclination to attend an FOCP meeting, but this was great! I felt like I was right there in the audience. Could have used a little more sex and violence, but otherwise, hey -- great entertainment! -- Ross Bender http://rossbender.org/doggies.html

RE: [UC] Clark Park Jan 18 Meeting: Video Now Available

2007-01-19 Thread Bill Sanderson
Absolutely brilliant--Listening to it now. Would love to be able to see the slides--are they at the web site? You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.

Re: [UC] Clark Park Jan 18 Meeting: Video Now Available

2007-01-19 Thread Brian Siano
Bill Sanderson wrote: Absolutely brilliant--Listening to it now. Would love to be able to see the slides--are they at the web site? They will be. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see

Re: [UC] Clark Park, Baltimore Ave, Stolen History, UCD, etc

2005-04-21 Thread Mosetter
Isn't this part of Jannie Blackwells area of responsibility ? You folks elected her! It's time for a change before she gives up the rest of the hood to Penn In a message dated 4/20/2005 8:14:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I must admit when I was at the park I too

Re: [UC] Clark Park, Baltimore Ave, Stolen History, UCD, etc

2005-04-21 Thread bgandersen
I voted for [EMAIL PROTECTED].-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: univcity@list.purple.comSent: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:19:29 EDTSubject: Re: [UC] Clark Park, Baltimore Ave, Stolen History, UCD, etc Isn't this part of Jannie Blackwells area

RE: [UC] Clark Park, Baltimore Ave, Stolen History, UCD, etc

2005-04-21 Thread Karen Heenan
I think the state of the neighborhood after this weekend - including Baltimore Avenue and the park - is one more thing we can blame on Penn - wasn't it Hay Day or whatever they call it? There was much festivity going on around Walnut Street, and I saw roaming bands of college kids in silly

Re: [UC] Clark Park, Baltimore Ave, Stolen History, UCD, etc

2005-04-21 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
John Ellingsworth wrote: Maybe it's just me, or maybe it's the weather, but something seems amiss on Baltimore Ave these days . . . anyone else notice any of this? daffodil, john? . laserbeam® [aka ray] You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named

Re: [UC] Clark Park festival in park A

2004-09-25 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 9/24/2004 7:11:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the relatively few people who are privileged to live by the park and enjoy its beauty every day should be willing to put up with a twice-yearly event which is enjoyed by many in the community.

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival

2004-07-04 Thread Brian Siano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order for you to understand my comments, you have to have read the entire dialogue. Since perhaps you didn't, what you read is out of context. Re context: You may not be aware of this, but when replying to a message, many newsreaders allow you to include the text to

Re: [UC] Clark Park Festival

2004-06-30 Thread Brian Siano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Polluted air, very hard on anyone with respiratory problems, such as asthma! Last I checked, this was _not_ the fault of a one-day music and arts festival. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive

  1   2   >