Re: Inventory move ticket system for tracking progress of manufactured parts

choose to stock the resultant product in a different facility than the one from which the BOMs were used? On 01/31/2014 01:49 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: I think production runs are sufficient for managing all of the information currently handled by the companies custom-built ticket system. The

Re: Inventory move ticket system for tracking progress of manufactured parts

/2014 02:32 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: The inventory transferring difficulties mentioned in my last post seem invalid. When a production run is started the BOMs are deducted when the first task is completed (by default). Therefore the inventory would not exist to be transferred to the inspection

Re: Inventory move ticket system for tracking progress of manufactured parts

nufacturing process. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Christian Carlow < christian.car...@gmail.com> wro

Re: Inventory move ticket system for tracking progress of manufactured parts

But, if your business process(es) regarding the quality inspection of the products have the requirement that forms need to be filled out that are specific to that process and need to be done by other persons than those in the manufacturing process then you will need something else than just the

Why production run tasks cannot be changed after confirmation? How to model rework on parts?

The Tasks tab of production runs that appears before the production run is confirmed allows tasks to be added, edited, or removed. Why is this functionality lost once confirmed? I'm trying to correctly model "rework" on parts that do not pass inspection and require being the preceding manufac

Re: Why production run tasks cannot be changed after confirmation? How to model rework on parts?

Thanks Pierre, Are the only tasks that should be related to production runs those that represent work performed by the same facility as the production run? The cleaning/inspection tasks is actually performed by a dept/facility external to the one that performed manufacturing. But when the c

Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type? Currently, "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the three values available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks. The purpose type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of the use of the fie

Re: Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?

rre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Ta

More questions pertaining to correct data modeling of inspection-only manufacturing tasks

After pieces are received into inventory they go to an inspection dept that determines the number of good and bad pieces. Since this inspection dept does not do any actual manufacturing to the part I assumed the work should be defined as the first step of the first manufacturing process that i

Re: More questions pertaining to correct data modeling of inspection-only manufacturing tasks

stage as a route that produces the inspected version of the product received which is the product on the customer order. On 02/03/2014 11:07 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: After pieces are received into inventory they go to an inspection dept that determines the number of good and bad pieces.

Difficulties modeling materials that may be ordered at various dimensions

I'm having difficulty determining how materials that may be ordered at various dimensions should be modeled. For example, two orders can be placed to the same supplier for the same part but at different diameter lengths and thicknesses/depths. I assume that each of the dimension variations sh

Re: Difficulties modeling materials that may be ordered at various dimensions

I've determined that providing dimensions as selectable features is appropriate because a dimension feature type already exists as demo data. I created "diameter length' and "thickness" features with "dimension" are their parent. On 02/03/2014 03:09 PM,

Minilang entity-condition delegator-name not working

When I use entity-condition "Error running the simple-method: In find entity by condition could not find definition for entity with name [test].null": delegator-name="legacydb"> However when I use find-by-and it works fine: delegator-name="legacydb

Why can't production run tasks be started while the previous is incomplete?

Is there a reason why a production run task cannot be started while the previous is incomplete? The "Quick Run All Tasks" and "Quick Start All Tasks" buttons have the ability to start all tasks. Shouldn't the ability to manually start only the next task also exist?

Should a single production run task allow for tracking multiple declarations? How to determine number of rejected pieces by employee?

Sometimes a work center will receive 16 pieces but split work resulting in one employee finishing 12 pieces earlier than the remaining 4 finished later by another employee. For these cases, shouldn't production run tasks support multiple declarations? How would one track which employee is at f

Re: Should a single production run task allow for tracking multiple declarations? How to determine number of rejected pieces by employee?

e has always existed. There are also FIXME comments to add quantityProduced, quantityRejected, and setupTime fields to the timesheet entity. On 02/06/2014 01:27 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Sometimes a work center will receive 16 pieces but split work resulting in one employee finishing 12 p

Re: Should a single production run task allow for tracking multiple declarations? How to determine number of rejected pieces by employee?

Sorry, There are also FIXME comments to add quantityProduced, quantityRejected, and setupTime fields to the timesheet entity. *time_entry entity (not timesheet)

Should Production run task quantity produced be based on sum of quantity produced of it's declarations?

Currently if the sum of a production run task declarations is is not used to determine the quantity produced of the task when completed. Instead the task quantity produced is updated to the quantity to produced minus the declared rejected quantities. So rejected quantity be declared in order f

Canceled project tasks remain in task list with status complete

Canceling a project task does not remove it from the project's task list. The status also gets changed to complete. Is this a bug? Is there any way to remove a task from a project task list?

Re: Canceled project tasks remain in task list with status complete

After further testing, I've determined the status actually only gets changed to complete for milestones when canceled, not tasks. Canceled tasks status is correctly changed to canceled. On 02/15/2014 02:00 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Canceling a project task does not remove it fro

How to add fax numbers to party contact information?

Is there a way to specify a fax number as contact information for a party? There is a phone number option but nothing to distinguish between normal and fax numbers. Would adding another CONTACT_MECH_TYPE like TELECOM_FAX_NUMBER be correct?

Re: How to add fax numbers to party contact information?

I figured it out. After a number is initially added, the contactPurpose can be selected from the list which includes main and secondary fax options. On 02/17/2014 08:09 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Is there a way to specify a fax number as contact information for a party? There is a phone

How to view/edit order item comments?

Comments can be added to order items when added to a shopping cart but cannot be edited afterwards. At least on the shopping cart page the comments will appear as text just as the selected features do. However, once the order is created, the comments no longer appear. Is the comments field int

Print Order functionality supported OOTB?

Does anyone know if there is a way to print an order OOTB? This functionality is important for sending purchase order forms to suppliers. I'm hoping there is a template that already exists.

How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

Is there a way to modify the received and rejected quantities associated with shipment receipts? The company may receive pieces from the supplier on one day but determine that some should be rejected on a later date. The company tracks supplier delivery dates so the shipment receipt cannot be

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

available on the form to be set manually to reflect the actual date received. I'm not sure if it would be worth adding another field to track the actual rejection date. On 02/20/2014 10:45 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Is there a way to modify the received and rejected quantities associated

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

Thanks Pierre, Do you know the purpose of the rejected quantity field in the receiving form since RMA is the correct way of returning items? On 02/21/2014 05:04 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Christian, Normally, when goods are received and subsequently rejected by the QA/QI department an RGA/RMA n

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

Sorry Pierre, Its the shipment receiving form: Facility -> Receive Inventory or: https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/facility/control/ReceiveInventory It includes a quantityAccepted and quantityRejected field. On 02/21/2014 06:39 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Referring screens/forms fields as they a

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

d field is hidden in the form and the value set to blank. Shouldn't this field be available as a drop down field referencing the ReturnItemType entity? On 02/21/2014 07:16 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Sorry Pierre, Its the shipment receiving form: Facility -> Receive Inventor

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

Nevermind, It seems the returnItemTypeId is supposed to be hidden and set according to the values listed in the ReturnItemTypeMap entity. I haven't yet determined why the value of the field is being set to blank yet. On 02/21/2014 07:37 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Hey Pierre, I

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

I've determined the why the returnItemTypeId is blank in the return/RMA form. There exist no record for the RAW_MATERIAL order item type in the ReturnItemTypeMap entity. On 02/21/2014 07:57 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Nevermind, It seems the returnItemTypeId is supposed to be hidden an

Re: How to modify received and rejected quantities of shipment receipts?

I'll create a JIRA issue to add RAW_MATERIAL return functionality OOTB. On 02/21/2014 08:04 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: I've determined the why the returnItemTypeId is blank in the return/RMA form. There exist no record for the RAW_MATERIAL order item type in the ReturnItemType

createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment service error: In field [description] less-than (<) and greater-than (>) symbols are not allowed

This error occurred when trying to import legacy data into OFBiz by calling service createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment: "In field [description] less-than (<) and greater-than (>) symbols are not allowed" Is there an easy way to resolve this error? The same descriptions were imported fine when th

Re: createReturnAndItemOrAdjustment service error: In field [description] less-than (<) and greater-than (>) symbols are not allowed

I expected adding the allow-html="any" would resolve the problem but it didn't: optional="true" allow-html="any"/> On 02/21/2014 02:18 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: This error occurred when trying to import legacy data into OFBiz by calling service crea

How to track manufacturing rejects by employee?

Does anyone know how to track manufacturing rejects by employee? I created a production run containing a first task that represents manufacturing work and a second that represents the inspection work. I need to be able to determine how many bad pieces were caused by the employee associated wi

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

he an extension would be necessary for relating time entries. Something such as TimeEntryAssoc could be created to relate the inspection task time entry to the manufacturing task time entry so that the actual workers and associated quantities could be determined. On 02/24/2014 11:03 AM, Christ

InventoryItem partyId not set when created from production run declaration

Shouldn't the partyId of an InventoryItem record created from a production run declaration be set to the declaring worker? InventoryItem.partyId gets set to the SupplierPartyId when receiving purchase order shipments so it seems to make sense that workers should be the partyId of declaration-cr

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

provide a way of relating time entries created by production run task declarations. Is anyone against adding timeEntryId to InventoryItemDetail? On 02/24/2014 12:14 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: I changed the title to be more clear. The company ticket system has inspection functionality that

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

ng to be done using the second form? On 02/24/2014 12:36 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Another related issue is how to determine the particular rejection reasons. Inspectors may declare rejected pieces as by-products during production run inspection steps that may be capable of rework.

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

from time entries can be determined. On 02/24/2014 01:05 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Is there a reason the two Production Run Declaration (manufacturing/control/ProductionRunDeclaration) forms cannot be combined into a single form? If the first form is used to declare rejections, why can't t

Add "Mis-Produced" option to Physical Inventory Variances ReasonId dropdown to handle corrections to production run task quantity produced declarations?

Should another options such as "Mis-Produced" (VAR_MISPRODUCED) be added to the physical inventory variance reasonId dropdown? Inventory Items can created by production run declarations but there doesn't seem to be an adequate reason to describe corrections to the quantity produced when declare

Re: Add "Mis-Produced" option to Physical Inventory Variances ReasonId dropdown to handle corrections to production run task quantity produced declarations?

On 02/24/2014 02:56 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Should another options such as "Mis-Produced" (VAR_MISPRODUCED) be added to the physical inventory variance reasonId dropdown? Inventory Items can created by production run declarations but there doesn't seem to be an adequate re

element supported in form widget element?

Does the form widget element support the ? I thought it was at least supported for but can't seem to get it working either.

Shouldn't the maximum declaration amount of the task responsible for issuing components be limited to the amount issued?

Arbitrary quantityProduced values may be specified for production run declarations. In a previous post, it was agreed that the quantityProduced should be limited to the quantityProduced of the previous task. Shouldn't this logic apply to the task that is responsible for stocking out materials

Re: Shouldn't the maximum declaration amount of the task responsible for issuing components be limited to the amount issued?

k-out task if one isn't chosen. I can't think of a reason why material stock out would occur after prior tasks and if those prior tasks would need to declare quantityProduced. Anyone have suggestions? On 02/25/2014 10:21 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Arbitrary quantityProduced values m

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

ot always happen. Therefore it seems creating a dedicated entity like TimeEntryRejectParty is the better method. Anyone have any thoughts on this issue? On 02/24/2014 01:37 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: My last post can be disregarded, splitting the production run declaration into two diffe

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

I suppose the TimeEntryAssoc entity could be extended to include quantityRejected and responsiblePartyId fields to eliminate the need for a separate TimeEntryRejectParty entity. On 02/27/2014 08:53 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: After making some progress on this issue by adding the timesheet

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

ciate the inspection task to the prior manufacturing task and something like TIME_ENTRY_REJECT (with parent TIME_ENTRY_DEPENDENCY) could be used to indicate the faulty manufacturing task. This would possibly entail a new TimeEntryAssocType entity. On 02/27/2014 09:06 AM, Christian Carlow wro

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

ably have to be created similar to WorkEffortInventoryProduced. On 02/27/2014 10:39 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: I'm now aware of more complexity. The inspector supervisor explained that partial inspections sometimes occur for which parts are moved from a manufacturing dept to an inspectio

Re: How to track manufacturing rejects by employee based on inspection production run task rejections? Add TimeEntryAssoc entity?

23:32, Christian Carlow a écrit : I've made more progress on this issue but it seems another entity might be needed to support the intended functionality. In a previous post I suggested adding the timeEntryId field to the InventoryItemDetail entity to track by-products created by production run

Re: InventoryItem partyId not set when created from production run declaration

left-side declaration form but it was never implemented. All of this functionality should be handled by OFBIZ-5548 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5548>. On 03/04/2014 04:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: This would be optional, right? Jacques Le 24/02/2014 19:21, Christian Car

Re: The future of OFBiz

I've only been with the project for about a year, but agree activity seems to have be faded recently. There are a lot of unresolved JIRA issues reported by me that I haven't had time to reevaluate. Based on a previous posts by contributors such as Adrian Crum about lack of potential innovation

Re: The future of OFBiz

Looking forward to all inspiring comments (in other words, please no rants) Jacques Le 05/03/2014 18:00, Christian Carlow a écrit : I've only been with the project for about a year, but agree activity seems to have be faded recently. There are a lot of unresolved JIRA issues reported by me tha

Why must production run task components be issued in descending order when associated with other tasks beside the first

Can someone explain why the "Issue Components" button appears for production tasks in descending order? To reproduce: 1. Create a production run for PIZZA 2. Assign PEPPERS-G to the first task and PEPPERS-H to the second using the "Materials" tab 3. Return to "Edit Production Run" tab and c

Re: Why must production run task components be issued in descending order when associated with other tasks beside the first

tasks requiring components, not just the last task requiring issuances for which the button appears. On 03/05/2014 02:24 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Can someone explain why the "Issue Components" button appears for production tasks in descending order? To reproduce: 1. Create a prod

createAcctgTransForWorkEffortInventoryProduced does not store inventoryItemId in AcctgTransEntry entity

Shouldn't the inventoryItemId be stored in the acctgTransEntry entity when created from production run task declarations or am I misunderstanding something? Also, shouldn't the original quantity that was credited be tracked also? There is no orig_quantity field in AcctgTransEntry as there is

Re: createAcctgTransForWorkEffortInventoryProduced does not store inventoryItemId in AcctgTransEntry entity

Perhaps adding a quantity field to WorkEffortInventoryProduced would be a better solution than adding fields to AcctgTransEntry? On 03/06/2014 12:28 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Shouldn't the inventoryItemId be stored in the acctgTransEntry entity when created from production run

Re: createAcctgTransForWorkEffortInventoryProduced does not store inventoryItemId in AcctgTransEntry entity

described. If someone thinks its worth creating a JIRA issue to resolve it then it will be done. Otherwise I'm not sure how to proceed at the moment and will abandon it for now. On 03/06/2014 12:56 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Perhaps adding a quantity field to WorkEffortInventoryProduce

Re: Why must production run task components be issued in descending order when associated with other tasks beside the first

ed for the next last task requiring materials. Perhaps I did something different the first time around. I'll have to do more testing to be sure. Is there a reason the "Issue Components" button doesn't appear for all tasks requiring materials? On 03/05/2014 02:36 PM, Chris

Re: Why must production run task components be issued in descending order when associated with other tasks beside the first

ww.orrtiz.com On 03/06/2014 09:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Damn, I should have read your last msg before answering to the earlier. I must say I'm not much versed in Manufacturing component. My answer was what I understood reading the excellent Sharan's book. I might have overlooked som

Production Run "Fail If Items Are Not Available" in "Materials Required By Running Task" section not working

When the "Fail If Items Are Not Available" options are set to "No" and the "Materials Required By The Running Task" form is submitted, the same thing that happens when the value is set to "Yes" occurs. Is the "No" option supposed to allow issuances to occur even if the materials do not exist an

Re: Production Run "Fail If Items Are Not Available" in "Materials Required By Running Task" section not working

Sorry, I should have been more clear. The same error indicating that there is insufficient material inventory that occurs for the "Yes options also occurs for the "No" option. On 03/07/2014 09:44 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: When the "Fail If Items Are Not Available" op

Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

Shouldn't the "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" form limit the amount of materials that can be returned based on the amount that has been produced by the first production run task? In other words, for a production run to produce 10 pizzas requiring 10 PEPPERS-G as materials for example, i

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

3/07/2014 11:23 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Shouldn't the "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" form limit the amount of materials that can be returned based on the amount that has been produced by the first production run task?

Re: Production Run "Fail If Items Are Not Available" in "Materials Required By Running Task" section not working

hope it helps, Jacopo On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Sorry, I should have been more clear. The same error indicating that there is insufficient material inventory that occurs for the "Yes options also occurs for the "No" option. On 03/07/2014 09:44

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

rds, WorkEffortInventoryAssign and WorkEffortInventoryProduced would be used instead of the WorkEffort entity to determine how much can be returned. Granted the quantity field is added to the WorkEffortInventoryProduced table as suggested in an earlier post. On 03/07/2014 12:17 PM, Christian Car

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

Sorry again (please bare with me its been a long day), The scenario described in the first post was correct. I was getting confused in my last post which can be disregarded. On 03/07/2014 01:24 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Sorry, the bottom scenarios should be described like this instead

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

uced.add(quantityRejected))) > 0) { So that the ManufacturingProductionRunTaskCannotReturnMoreItems error is thrown when trying to return materials that have been allocated as the task quantity produced and rejected? On 03/07/2014 02:16 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Sorry again (please bare with me

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

Thanks Pierre, My issue is that the material return form allows quantity to be returned that has been declared/rejected a task. Meaning the task did something to it that constitutes a WIP rather than the original material that was issued. I think the quantityProduced and quantityRejected sho

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

Thanks for the clarification Pierre, I agree that the inventory declaration form logic should prevent materials from being created as "by-product" inventory items. The question is how to properly define "by-product". In Jacopo's pizza scenario, the tortilla technically represents a finished

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

tion form? On 03/08/2014 12:22 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Mar 8, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: In Jacopo's pizza scenario, the tortilla technically represents a finished good (though different than the PRun good). But I think you are saying that the form should only be

Re: Production Run "Return Unused Materials To Warehouse" allows all materials to be returned even if quantity produced has been declared

:29 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Thanks Jacopo, Since we've established the inventory declaration form should only be used for stocking in defective products, is there a way to prevent non-defective products from being declared with the form? Is there an easy way to determine if a pr

What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

Can someone explain the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products? Are deliverable products supposed to be documents or actual products? I added a deliverable product record for the first task of a route but I do not notice any different in data after running and completing the production

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

Thanks Pierre, I just discovered that Routing Task Deliverable Products controls the productId field of the production run inventory declaration form. Whenever a deliverable product is specified then the declaration form productId field changes to a drop down with only those deliverable prod

Re: Possible Issue - appendOrderItem Service

This reminded me of my almost forgotten OFBIZ-5423 I created because the same form does not allow variant selections when virtual products are added which is required when adding items to the shopping cart before the order exists. Therefore th

Help clarifying proper use of production run quantity produced and rejected.

Production run declarations allow produced and rejected quantities to be declared but because of the various by-product scenarios that may exist, ambiguity is preventing me from determining how to properly use the fields. For example, for Pierre's yeast-residue brewery example, the product is

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

cking rules when by-products are declared. On 03/10/2014 09:43 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Thanks Pierre, I just discovered that Routing Task Deliverable Products controls the productId field of the production run inventory declaration form. Whenever a deliverable product is specified then

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

limitations or problems with such a suggestion? On 03/10/2014 11:44 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: Can anyone think of reasons against changing the Routing Task Deliverable Products to reference ProductAssoc instead of Product? If "BYPRODUCT" and "PRODUCT_REJECT" were added as P

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

create new variant by-product records and related them in the ProductAssoc similar to the virtual variant auto-create methods. On 03/10/2014 11:56 AM, Christian Carlow wrote: If the reason field of ProductAssoc were changed to reference the VarianceReason entity instead of being an open entry

Re: Help clarifying proper use of production run quantity produced and rejected.

Thanks Pierre, You are correct, I'm the only one carrying the burden. So what you are saying is for a production run to create 10 of some amount of brews, the yeast would not constitute quantity produced specified in the left hand form? So there is yeast-residue left over after each of the 1

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

0/2014 12:10 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: To provide the varianceReason drop down suggested in the previous post, and entity such as ProductAssocVarianceReason could be created for relating varianceReasons to the productId of ProductAssoc. Once the drop down is provided it, the ProductAssocVarian

Re: What is the purpose of Routing Task Deliverable Products?

ities. I might include this in the manufacturing patches to come if no one is against it and it isn't too inconvenient. On 03/10/2014 12:34 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Since by-product reason variance products wont exist ahead of time, they can't be related in the WorkEffortGoodStand

Form widget can have OR contraint applied?

I'm creating a form widget with a and need the to be contrained with an OR condition. This doesn't seem to be supported. Can someone confirm and should a JIRA issue be created?

Re: Form widget can have OR contraint applied?

Disregard. IN operator handles it. On 03/11/2014 02:30 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: I'm creating a form widget with a and need the to be contrained with an OR condition. This doesn't seem to be supported. Can someone confirm and should a JIRA issue be created?

Do form widgets support "screenlet-title-bar" buttons used throughout those implemented in FTL?

Many FTL forms use tags within the "screenlet-title-bar" tags to provide buttons in the title bar and are aligned to the right. Can this also be done for form widgets? I grepped for "screenlet-title-bar" and "Forms.xml" but got no results.

Demo site running slowly

Just letting whomever it concerns know the demo site is running slowly. I waited up to 5 minutes for the page to load but got nothing.

Re: Demo site running slowly

Actually it times out. On 03/11/2014 05:05 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: Just letting whomever it concerns know the demo site is running slowly. I waited up to 5 minutes for the page to load but got nothing.

Form Widget not checking title checkbox

Hey community, When using form widget element the checkbox included in the title that controls checking and unchecking all checkboxes does not get checked. Am I missing something or is this a bug worthy of a JIRA issue?

Value of QuantityBreak and QuantityBreakType entities?

Can someone explain the value of the QuantityBreak and QuantityBreakType entities? Is the QuantityBreakType entity necessary? Why wouldn't the same quantity range be used regardless of the break types? Also, I noticed that the "Shipping Estimates" tab on the Catalog->Store app doesn't even r

France geo questions

When choosing France as the country for creating contact info for a party, the state/province field is not populated. One reason for this is that the FRA record in the CountryAddressFormat entity does not have the geoAssocTypeId set. However, even when the geoAssocTypeId is set to REGIONS, th

Re: France geo questions

s to the other geo JIRA issues I created, which I assume is the case for Israel being so small, then they may potentially need to be reverted. The service doesn't require the state/province field so leaving the list empty doesn't cause any problems. On 04/01/2014 10:30 AM, Chr

Re: France geo questions

ame rule applies to the other geo JIRA issues I created, which I assume is the case for Israel being so small, then they may potentially need to be reverted. The service doesn't require the state/province field so leaving the list empty doesn't cause any problems. On 04/01/2014 10

Re: France geo questions

geoIds againts ISO codes, but I guess if anybody complains then it must be OK (at least for now) Jacques Le 01/04/2014 18:53, Christian Carlow a écrit : Also, with regards to my question about the France geoIds not matching those of ISO codes, the same incompatibility exists for USA state geo

Shipping Accounts supported

Does OFBiz support shipping accounts for situations when the company ships the good but uses the customer shipping account for the shipping costs?

Error when trying to change invoice status to ready

This error occurs when trying to change an invoice status to ready: Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: Service invocation error (No transaction manager or invalid status) The setInvoiceStatus eca rule at applications/accounting/servicedef/secas_olap.xml seems to

Re: Error when trying to change invoice status to ready

/2014 03:01 PM, Christian Carlow wrote: This error occurs when trying to change an invoice status to ready: Error calling event: org.ofbiz.webapp.event.EventHandlerException: Service invocation error (No transaction manager or invalid status) The setInvoiceStatus eca rule at applications

Re: FOP reports cann't refresh in the browser!

He is talking about parameters for reports generated by FOP being lost after a browser refresh. This issue still exists in the trunk. Specify a date range for any one of the reports on the OrderPurchaseReportOptions page and notice the date range parameters along with any others are lost once

Re: FOP reports cann't refresh in the browser!

Issue: OFBIZ-5700 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5700> On 08/05/2014 01:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: If there is not already a Jira issue, please someone create it, thanks Jacques Le 05/08/2014 18:07, Christian Carlow a écrit : He is talking about parameters for r

ShipmentReceipt potential bugs and potential enhancements proposal

When a ShipmentReceipt is created, an AcctgTrans is also created with the shipmentId field set but not the receiptId. Should the AcctgTrans.receiptId also be set since it exists? Also, when a ShipmentReceipt is cancelled, no AcctgTrans and corresponding debit/credit AcctgTransEntry records ar

Having condition for fields using functions supported?

Is there anyway to implement a having condition for a field using a function? Such as below using SUM function?: SELECT te.time_entry_id, te.quantity_produced, sum(te2.quantity_produced) FROM time_entry te left outer join time_entry_assoc tea on te.time_entry_id = tea.time_entry_id_

<    1   2   3   >