Not sure if this is the cause but check if your AE descriptor has this
multipleDeploymentAllowedtrue/multipleDeploymentAllowed
Jerry
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Eddie Epstein eaepst...@gmail.com wrote:
The CPE runs pipeline threads in parallel, not necessarily CAS processors.
In a CPE
: Controller: ducc.jd.queue.13202 Output Channel Shutdown Completed
Thanks Reshu.
On 02/20/2015 12:40 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
One possible explanation for destroy() not getting called is that a
process
(JP) may be still working on a CAS when Ducc deallocates the process. Ducc
first
1.What are Heartbeat Packets?
Ducc Agent publishes node metrics at regular intervals. The information
included is node identification, OS info, memory, etc. This is consumed by
the RM and WS. If the RM stops seeing publication from a node within a
configurable window, it will mark the node as
This error comes from UIMA-AS client not the pipeline code. From what I can
see
the UIMA-AS received getMeta reply from the service (your pipeline). This
means
that it connected to the service and it received a reply.
The only thing that comes to my mind is to check the Map that you pass in
to
Hi, the UIMA-AS 2.6.0 release is being voted right now. If no issues are
found it should release soon.
The UIMA-DUCC uses UIMA-AS. It just extends it with extra capabilities. You
can learn more
about it here: https://uima.apache.org/doc-uimaducc-whatitam.html
Jerry
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:54
and all the best
Frank
Am 12.06.2014 16:09, schrieb Jaroslaw Cwiklik:
All you need is a reference to a thread that called sendAndReceive().
Once
you have it, just call myThread.interrupt().
I would still like to know more about the timer not working. Is there
anything in the log
Jaroslaw Cwiklik:
The 2.4.2 AS code also supports interrupts on a thread stuck in
sendAndReceive(). You can implement your own
timer if you like, and if it pops just interrupt the thread and try
calling
sendAndReceive() again. The subsequent call
should block until a new connection
recover after the broker gets restarted
nor time out when UimaAsynchronousEngine.Timeout is reached.
Is this the expected behaviour when a broker is getting terminated
unexpectedly?
Thanks and all the best
Frank
Am 22.04.2014 15:22, schrieb Jaroslaw Cwiklik:
Hi, do you see any evidence
You can use UIMA-AS client API. All you need to know is the endpoint and
the broker url to communicate.
Jerry C
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, reshu.agarwal reshu.agar...@orkash.comwrote:
Hi,
I am just curious about DUCC Service uses. Can we call Ducc Service using
UIMA AS client API.
Hi, do you see any evidence in the service log of any problems? The client
side will block in sendAndReceive() until a reply comes back from the
service.
You can attach jconsole to the service to see if it is hung somewhere.
Please check UIMA-AS README for instructions how to configure service to
Each UIMA-AS service should produce uima.log. Is there another exception
preceding
org.apache.uima.aae.error.AsynchAEException: javax.jms.JMSException: JMS
Send Failed. Check UIMA Log For Details.
Looks like the service was unable to deliver an ACK message to the client.
This ACK
message is a
://stackoverflow.com/questions/12938083/what-where-is-net-sf-josql
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, thanks for spotting references to 5.4.1. I will create JIRA and fix
these. The fixes will be in the next release.
I will take a look at SLF4J
on there.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen baishen.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
any problems with using 5.7 instead of 5.6.
The problem with the test cases is from removing the SLF4J dependencies
from the UIMA pom.
Just wanted to clarify that they are two separate issues.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just checked
, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Got it. Thanks for clarifying this.
Jerry Cwiklik
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Bai Shen baishen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't need a newer version of AMQ. I was attempting to fix the SLF4J
issue and had to change AMQ to 5.7 just to get
It seems like the ActimeMQ documentation (
http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html)
is wrong with respect to the default maxFrameSize being MAX_LONG. I checked
ActiveMQ source code and the default is 100 MB:
public final class OpenWireFormat implements WireFormat {public
Not knowing your particular CPE deployment details here is one way to
programmatically configure the CR:
CollectionProcessingEngine cpe =
UIMAFramework.produceCollectionProcessingEngine(cpeDescriptor, params);
Is your application calling UIMA-AS client collectionProcessComplete()
method?
-
void collectionProcessingComplete(): Sends a Collection Processing
Complete request to the UIMA-AS Analysis Service. This call is cascaded
down to all delegates; however, if a particular delegate is
at a time.
JC
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote:
On 8/7/2013 2:07 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
When you launch your service, do you see a Warning similar to this:
*** WARN: line-number: 30 Top Lovel Async Primitive specifies a scaleout
Instead of speculating, I decided to setup a test with similar
configuration ( casPool=6) and am noticing similar
problem. It appears that the input queue is drained one CAS at a time as if
there was only one thread processing
an input queue.
Investigating...
JC
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:14 PM,
.
The problem is with the implementation.
I will be working on solving this shortly. Should be fixed in the upcoming
2.4.2 uima-as release.For now I created JIRA for this problem
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3160
JC
JC
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote
, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
Do you want to share your code across nodes? If so, use Network File
System
(NFS)
JC
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:02 AM, reshu.agarwal reshu.agar...@orkash.com
**wrote:
Yes JC, you are rightly understand my scenario and I also want to put my
code on only one
UIMA-AS and Camel integration is described in Chapter 6 Uima Async Scaleut
document:
http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-as-2.4.0/uima_async_scaleout.html#ugr.async.camel.driver
Its essentially a thin camel wrapper around UIMA-AS client. Its quite dated
and may not
work with newer versions of Camel.
that?
--
Reshu Agarwal
On 07/25/2013 08:02 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
If I understand your scenario, you only need one broker.Services can be
deployed an different machines and point to the same
queue (endpoint) and broker (brokerURL) defined in the deployment
descriptor.
JC
On Thu
If I understand your scenario, you only need one broker.Services can be
deployed an different machines and point to the same
queue (endpoint) and broker (brokerURL) defined in the deployment
descriptor.
JC
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, reshu.agarwal reshu.agar...@orkash.comwrote:
Hi,
I
AM, reshu.agarwal reshu.agar...@orkash.comwrote:
On 07/24/2013 06:13 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
The ...Cannot publish to a deleted Destination.. is caused by a broker
not being able to deliver a message to a
given queue. It looks like the client has terminated and the broker
deleted
its
The ...Cannot publish to a deleted Destination.. is caused by a broker
not being able to deliver a message to a
given queue. It looks like the client has terminated and the broker deleted
its temp reply queue while the service
was processing a CAS.
JC
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:11 AM,
Hi, is this problem reproducable? This error happens when the uima-as is
unable to deliver a reply to the client. Typically, this means that the
uima-as client
has gone away or there is a problem with the network. Are you running your
client and service and the same machine?
Not sure what else
I frequently run UIMA-AS with scaled up AEs in the same jvm with no
problems. The UIMA-AS calls defineCasPool() once
when all AEs are instantiated.
The uima-core code that throws the exception is in
CasManager_impl.defineCasPool()
private synchronized void defineCasPool(UimaContext
As a followup, can you describe your uima-as deployment? Is it async
aggregate or primitive? If aggregate, what are the delegates and how each
is scaled?
Jerry C
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
I frequently run UIMA-AS with scaled up AEs in the same
Florin, try the latest uima-as (2.4.0) and let me know if you can replicate
the problem.
There are many bug fixes in the latest code.
-jc
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Spico Florin spicoflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I'm using UIMA AS 2.3.1. My pipeline has this structure:
1. An
Hi, do you have a deeply nested CMs in your pipeline? Is the top level
UIMA-AS service (the one the client is sending CASes to) a CM?
What you can do to debug this is to use jConsole attached to the UIMA-AS
process once you observe a hang. Click on Threads tab
and check each thread to determine
Spico, both of these:
stopProducingCases()
stopProducingCases(String casReferenceId);
were meant to stop remote UIMA-AS CM from producing child CASes.
So the first question is, is your remote service (UIMA-AS pipeline) a CM?
If it is, what is the behavior that you are seeing? A hang?
If the
Elmar, this seems to be a bug. Just to clarify, are you deploying the
aggregate in the same jvm as the
RunRemoteAsyncAE? The client's stop() method is not waiting for the AE
threads to finish. Its doing an immediate
stop. The 2.4.0 version of UIMA-AS does support Queisce mode where the
service
Hi, JMS connection in UIMA-AS is created once, cached and reused.
- Jerry C
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Spico Florin spicoflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I would like to know what kind of JMS connection is used by UIMA AS:
pooled connection or each time a message is sent to a new
Florin, the newly released UIMA-AS 2.4.0 provides performance breakdown you
are looking for.
There is a new API on UIMA-AS client that facilitates this:
public String sendAndReceiveCAS(CAS aCAS,
ListAnalysisEnginePerformanceMetrics componentMetricsList) throws
ResourceProcessException;
For
The Apache UIMA team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.0 of
the Apache UIMA AS, which includes
asynchronous scaleout capabilities for the UIMA annotators.
The UIMA AS 2.4.0 binaries and source are available for download from:
http://uima.apache.org/downloads.cgi
UIMA AS includes
Not sure I fully understand your problem. In the CPE, the CR runs in its
own thread supplying CASes to processing pipelines.
Cas Consumer(s) run in a dedicated thread(s) as well.
The processingUnitThreadCount property determines scaleout for your AEs
if you set it to say 3, you get 3 processing
Florin, check the README that ships with the release. It says:
...set the ACTIVEMQ_HOME environment variable to the location of
ActiveMQ you intend to use...
Jerry
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Spico Florin spicoflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I have installed UIMA 2.3.1 AS that comes
Christine, I took another look at this and tested the code. You are right,
the listener's batchProcessComplete() is not called no matter what the
batchSize is set to.
I think the real intent for the Checkpoint... element within
CpeConfig... is to define a checkpoint file and frequency of
to do special processing.
It seems to me that the StatusCallbackListener.batchProcessComplete()
should be deprecated since it is never called.
Jerry C
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Christine, I took another look at this and tested the code. You
It seems like a CPM hung of some sort while running a jUnit tests. Does
this happen every time you do mvn install?
I just fetched 2.3.1 source and built fine on Win XP with java 1.5 and
maven 3.0.2. I built multiple times each time with success. Not denying
there is a problem, just saying cant
If I recall, you need to modify checkpoint element and set batch
attribute to enable this
function. I think, by default this method is not called since batch=0
(default).
JC
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Christine Engelmann
chr.engelm...@gmx.netwrote:
Hi,
I seem to have some issues with
Peter, I don't recall a specific reason why Exceptions caught in
ArtifactProducts.run()
method are only logged at Level.FINER. This seems wrong to me. I remember
putting
conditionals around all logging though. Perhaps this was a cut and paste
mistake. I'll
add JIRA to fix this.
If you want to
I've checked the code and indeed this is a bug in uima-as client when
running with a CR. As soon as the CR
returns false from hasNext() the uima-as client process() method calls
collectionProcessComplete().
The fix for this is to wait until all outstanding CASes are processed
before calling
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote:
I've checked the code and indeed this is a bug in uima-as client when
running with a CR. As soon as the CR
returns false from hasNext() the uima-as client process() method calls
collectionProcessComplete().
The fix for this is to wait
Jorn, this problem has been fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2414
Jerry
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running the 2.3.1 release version on my cluster.
Jörn
On 06/13/2012 01:02 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
The error was linked
Not sure if this the best way, but consider using different
Logger.properties (default one is in UIMA_HOME/as_config) for each
service. Change
java.util.logging.FileHandler.pattern = uima.log
to whatever you want and set
UIMA_JVM_OPTS=-Djava.util.logging.config.file=myfile
before you launch
From UIMA AS documentation:
The continueOnRetryFailure attribute, if set to 'true' causes the
framework to ask the aggregate's flow controller if the processing for the
CAS can continue. If this attribute is 'false' or if the flow controller
indicates it cannot continue, further processing on the
After you restart the broker, do you send another CAS to the remote and
does it fail for the same reason?
JC
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Spico Florin spicoflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I have a pipeline that is using the AdvancedFixedFlowController.xml.
After shooting down the
Seems like a bug, as a workaround can you try the following:
mCPE = UIMAFramework.produceCollectionProcessingEngine(path to cpe
descriptor);
ConfigurationParameterSettings settings =
mCPE.getCollectionReader().getProcessingResourceMetaData().getConfigurationParameterSettings();
You
I am not certain, but perhaps you are running into a similar bug reported
and fixed recently under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2354
Maybe the UIMA AS primitive service suffers from a similar problem than the
UIMA AS aggregate as described in the JIRA. I will verify this soon.
. None was logged.
In your test case, do you send just one CAS after bouncing the broker or
does your client send multiple CASes and each fails the same way
(InvalidDestination) in the service?
Jerry C
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Frank, I will try
Florin, your problem is that you are using one CAS instance with asynch
sendCAS(). Your main() is calling sendCAS(CAS) where the CAS is being
serialized. Serialization is an expensive operation and on a slow machine
may exceed your 100ms sleep. While the CAS is being serialized you calling
reset()
Frank, I will try to recreate the problem. Yesterday, I tried the scenario
with async sendCAS() and saw no problems after bouncing a broker. Will test
the scenario with sendAndReceive().
Jerry C
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Frank Enders end...@averbis.de wrote:
Jerry, thanks for your reply
Florin from you description I cant figure out the cause of the slowness
that you see. Are you saying that your application thread is stuck in
sendCAS() method as if it was waiting for a reply? This is certainly not
intent behind this API. It is an asynchronous call and should not wait for
a reply
UIMA AS aggregate client waits for all replies to come back from Parallel
step before allowing a CAS to move on to the next step in the flow. From
the UIMA AS service point of view, services are independent and consume
messages(CASes) as soon there is capacity to do so. Faster service will
consume
Dave, the UIMA AS client is designed to auto recover from broker failures.
Currently there is no override for this. The client will have to change to
support application directive to report an error on JMS problems. The
application could add a new parameter to the Application Context Map (
Jorn, this is an interesting bug. Current UIMA AS service code serializes
the Exception object and the client side deserializes it. The activemq
client fails in the way you describe if a class in the serialized object is
not available.
Seems like UIMA AS bug to me. UIMA AS service side should
Florin, there is more than one way to get a CAS. Here a two methods you can
try:
1) Check UIMA Tutorial and User Guides.pdf
http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.3.1/tutorials_and_users_guides.pdf
page 71 shows an example how to get a CAS from a CasPool that the
application
manages (not UIMA AS
; the AS remains
unresponsive. However, if i also restart the AS, then things flow as
normal.
Could this be because i'm using a 2.4.0 snapshot build instead of a
stable release?
Thanks,
..meghana
On 30 November 2011 20:08, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Meghana
Meghana, what is your broker's -Xmx setting? On linux,
grep ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin/activemq for ACTIVEMQ_OPTS_MEMORY. If you are
running with a default setting (256M) perhaps you need to increase the
memory.
Jerry
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Meghana meghana.mara...@germinait.comwrote:
Hi,
I
Sorry, this is working as designed. If I remember, it was an attempt to
reduce number of connections. I'll look into this next week. Perhaps I can
relax this and parametrize its use. For now I will create JIRA to document
this.
Jerry C
2011/10/7 Dietmar Gräbner d.graeb...@gmail.com
Hi,
I
Meghana, UIMA AS aggregate cant recover a CAS that is stuck in a collocated
AE. You may not be observing this problem in the UIMA aggregate due to a
fact that UIMA aggregate is single threaded. Timeouts are only supported for
remotes. Try to run synchronous (UIMA) aggregate deployed in a primitive
Are you doing any real analysis in your AEs? If the analysis is fast,
replicating AEs makes no sense. You can see that by observing queue depths
in jConsole. Attach it to a broker and check the queue size while you are
processing. You may need to enable broker JMX support in activemq.xml first:
, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Meghana, in addition to
-Duima.jmx.monitor.interval=1000
-Duima.jmx.monitor.formatter=
org.apache.uima.aae.jmx.monitor.BasicUimaJmxMonitorListener
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
Meghana, in addition to
-Duima.jmx.monitor.interval=1000
-Duima.jmx.monitor.formatter=
org.apache.uima.aae.jmx.monitor.BasicUimaJmxMonitorListener
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false
add -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=xxx, where
Is your UIMA_HOME set correctly? Do you have spring jars in a classpath that
are newer from those in the uima-as distribution?
JC
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Meghana meghana.mara...@germinait.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to deploy my aggregate AE as an AS.
When I call
Meghana, check your classpath. Seems like you are running with old uima
jars. When UIMA AS service starts it dumps the entire classpath. I checked
uima-as source and method calls shown in a stack trace you've provided dont
line up with the 2.3.1 source.
JC
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:09 AM,
On 2 August 2011 18:51, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Meghana, check your classpath. Seems like you are running with old uima
jars. When UIMA AS service starts it dumps the entire classpath. I
checked
uima-as source and method calls shown in a stack trace you've provided
You may need to set a different JMX port for each service via -D setting if
you run on the same machine. I agree with Eddie. logging should work as
Eddie describes. If it doesnt, perhaps your logger.properties has been
modified. Just a guess.
JC
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Eddie Epstein
Your best bet is to interrogate the Broker via JMX. Uima AS does not
currently provide auto discovery mechanism beyond what AMQ broker has to
offer. Looking at the brokers stats you *can* determine if a particular
queue has consumers attached to it or not.
Jerry C
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:16
continues without errors.
JC
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Pierre, thanks I will try to replicate the scenario to see what is
preventing CASes from timing out in the application client.
JC
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Pierre Pujalon ppuja
)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Thanks
Pierre
Le 31/03/2011 15:43, Jaroslaw Cwiklik a écrit :
Pierre, since the aggregate
exception for the first CAS.
This only occurs when I have a delegated annotator.
When I configure my application with aggregates without any delegate
annotator, the callback receives timeout from all CASes.
Pierre
Le 31/03/2011 16:40, Jaroslaw Cwiklik a écrit :
Pierre, to set a timeout
client always recover clean with this scenario.
Anyway Thanks
Pierre
Le 28/03/2011 18:07, Jaroslaw Cwiklik a écrit :
Pierre, in my last posting I meant maxRetries=1, not retryCount=1.
JC
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklikuim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pierre, I've
This should force creation of a new listener on the delegate reply queue.
The listener recovery should be done with no retry being set and I will make
necessary changes in the code to support that use case.
Thanks for finding the bug!
JC
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim
Pierre, in my last posting I meant maxRetries=1, not retryCount=1.
JC
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote:
Pierre, I've identified the bug in UIMA AS code that causes the problem
described. As a workaround, set the retryCount=1 in the error handling
The Apache UIMA team is pleased to announce the release of version 2.3.1 of
the Apache UIMA AS, which includes
asynchronous scaleout capabilities together with the base Apache UIMA SDK.
The UIMA AS 2.3.1 binaries and source are available for download from:
http://uima.apache.org/downloads.cgi
, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dietmar, the UIMA AS client should throw an exception in the case you
described. I am looking into why it does not.
Jerry C
2011/2/21 Dietmar Gräbner d.graeb...@gmail.com
Hi,
for some reason sendAndReceiveCas
Kameron, while the CPE is processing it aggregates statistics. When the
processing is completed, the CPE GUI
fetches the stats using CollectionProcessingEngine
API: getPerformanceReport()
To see how this report is generated look at the source in:
uimaj-tools project. Source File:
First, thank you for identifying the problem. The interim fix is to add
name element in the AE descriptor and specify a value. I was able to
verify that if the name element is missing OR it has no value, the Spring
Container throws the exception. I will create a JIRA to detect
missing/undefined
Looking at the CPM code, I see that the process times are aggregated on a
per component basis. If you have say 10 threads, meaning you scale out a
particular component, process times for all of them are aggregated (added
together). So it seems that what you are seeing is working as designed. You
Hi, can you provide a full trace from a thread that is stuck on
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.
Which version of ActiveMQ are you using? If 4.1.1, perhaps you can try a
newer version like 5.3.2. Once you download new AMQ, just set ACTIVEMQ_HOME
to point to the AMQ install dir.
The fact that there are
I've created a multi-threaded application that uses a
BaseUIMAAsynchronousEngine_impl instance per thread. Scaled this up to 100
threads (100 clients). Ran this many times with a single instance of
RoomNumber Annotator service (from uima as examples). No hangs. Can you try
to run your
Are there any exceptions in the uima log?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Neha Yadav neha.ya...@orkash.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to deploy AS service with version Uima-as 2.3. I had earlier
done it with 2.2. Previously I did not find any problem while deploying but
with the new
101 - 186 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
