Hi Ahmed,
The single most important piece of advice I can give you is to make a copy of
your ACS database, load it on a lab MySQL server, setup your current version of
ACS and then run the upgrade in your lab with the production database. That
will help avoid most issues.
Cheers
Alez
Alex.
Dear CloudStack Users/Team,
We are planning to update our CloudStack environment from version 4.17.x to
4.19.x. Additionally, we are using a Ceph storage cluster for our storage
solution. If anyone has faced challenges or has suggestions based on real
experiences, please share your insights.
> @Wei Zhou If the network into which the StorageVM runs IPv6 (as per your
> implementation of IPv6) it should automatically get an IPv6 IP, correct?
yes,it should get Ipv6 addr advertised by cloudstack VR. @Alexblue.com
we need to make sure IPv6 is enabled in the storagefs vm (Ipv6 is
disabled
@Wei Zhou If the network into which the StorageVM runs IPv6 (as per your
implementation of IPv6) it should automatically get an IPv6 IP, correct?
@Wido den Hollander @Wei ZhouHow much effort do you guys thing it would it take
to add support to VirtioFS? I'm not super aware of it, what would
Hi Wido,
The StorageVM will receive an IP from the Isolated network (or VPC tier) it
belongs to. If that network is setup for IPv6 (or dual-stack), then the
StorageVM will use IPv6.
Regarding file system pass through, that's definitely an possible enhancement
for a future version, we'd like
Hi Rich, Brian, Ryan, Pedro and I hope I am not missing someone :)
On behalf of the Apache CloudStack community, I would like to thank you for the
organisation and having our project at the Community Over Code EU.
It was great to meet the ASF community and interact with other projects. I hope
Hi all,
I am writing to share that we have agreed with the H10 Tribeca Hotel in Madrid
to be the official accommodation for all people, who would like to book a room
for the yearly CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2024.
https://www.h10hotels.com/en/madrid-hotels/h10-tribeca/booking
If you
Hi Jimmy and Marty
I am sorry about that, please let me know if you can access these links.
1. To Add IPs Tab
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Si7DD13FFDLhGOqQunUizp4dsUs9_2To/view?usp=drive_link
2. Setting reservation
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging
via rsyslog
@soreana should/can we mark this for 4.16?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677697
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user soreana added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via
rsyslog
@rhtyd good :+1:
Sorry for late, we got a lot of issues recently, I can't find a room to work on
this pr. Maybe next week 爛
GitHub link:
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Centralised
logging via rsyslog
Removing 4.16 milestone as PR has no milestone; let's move this back if the
milestone tagging changes.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677701
GitHub user soreana added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via
rsyslog
No, they are legitimate requirements :D
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677696
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user soreana added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via
rsyslog
@DaanHoogland Honestly, it took a lot of time to apply the changes you required
to merging this pr. I discussed it with my colleagues, and we concluded that it
isn't our priority now. We focused on other
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Centralised
logging via rsyslog
I think it's possible to do this as part of a custom systemvm.iso where you can
bake-in your deployment specific option. Any further update on this @soreana or
we can close the issue?
GitHub link:
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Centralised
logging via rsyslog
I think it may be possible via some log4j config?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677703
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user soreana added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via
rsyslog
@DaanHoogland When do you planned for 4.16 release?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677698
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging
via rsyslog
tnx for your efforts @soreana , i'm marking it as unplanned for now, feel free
to come back at any time of your convenience.
GitHub link:
GitHub user soreana added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging via
rsyslog
I asked our PO. We made a story to work on that. :)
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677700
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging
via rsyslog
@soreana are you still planning for this?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677692
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging
via rsyslog
this summer somewhere.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9179#discussioncomment-9677699
This is an automatically sent email for users@cloudstack.apache.org.
To
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Centralised logging
via rsyslog
> @DaanHoogland Honestly, it took a lot of time to apply the changes you
> required to merging this pr. I discussed it with my colleagues, and we
> concluded that it isn't our priority now. We focused
GitHub user soreana created a discussion: Centralised logging via rsyslog
# ISSUE TYPE
* Feature Idea
# COMPONENT NAME
~~~
Systemvm
~~~
# CLOUDSTACK VERSION
~~~
It can be merge to 4.14
~~~
# CONFIGURATION
# OS / ENVIRONMENT
Used Ubuntu 18:04 as a host for management
Hi Nischal,
You’re pictures are not working.
--
Jimmy
From: Nischal P
Date: Wednesday, 5 June 2024 at 06:30
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: System VM static IPs
Hi Marty
There is an option from the UI also that I just remembered, When you go to the
Zones > Physical Network >
Hi Marty
There is an option from the UI also that I just remembered, When you go to
the Zones > Physical Network > network Name > Traffic Types Then Add IP
Range for Public IPs
[image: image.png]
Please select Option of Set Reservation and SystemVMs which will enable
reserving IP for SSVM and
No worries, Wei. I do think it would be an excellent feature request, but it’s
not a “deal killer” or causing any harm; it’s just kind of annoying at times.
And creating a separate dedicated IP range, on the surface, would just be more
work than it is worth at this point.
From: Wei ZHOU
As Nischal said, currently ACS does not reserve IPs for system vms. The
workaround is, create or dedicate a public Ip range (with at least 2 IPs)
to system vms.
I think it is a valid feature request to reserve IPs (not ip range) for
system vms. But we also need to consider what if some users want
Marty,
are you talking about network rate limit? what is the value now (both
in the UI and in the DB)? I think the value for unlimited is 0, but
this is not relevant. You need to set it in the zone settings not in
the global settings. But I tried it and that does not give the output
I expect in
Hello Nischal,
That’s why I ask about reservations; it doesn’t. For example, I destroyed and
recreated a console proxy yesterday, and when it was recreated, it grabbed
another IP. I am 100% confident that the IP that it just had about 30 seconds
prior was not taken by a customer.
This is a
Hi Wei,
We won't be able to reserve for specific systems, but we do reserve 2 IPs
which would be used for SSVM and CPVM, the only thing we follow is that we
Destroy 1 systemVM at a time so that it would take the same IP each time.
Thanks & Regards
Nischal
On Tue, 4 Jun, 2024, 3:49 pm Wei ZHOU,
I would rather not modify the database for something like this. Although I
would like to see it, it’s not worth modifying the database directly.
Thank you for the responses, everyone.
From: Wei ZHOU
Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 6:19 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: System VM
That's a major technical debt that should have been addressed years ago. Am
glad to see it is being addressed now.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Abhisar Sinha
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 6:04 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a
This should works.
I am wondering if we can reserve specific IP for system vms, like ACS does
for virtual routers.
-Wei
On Tuesday, June 4, 2024, Nischal P wrote:
> HI Marty
>
> You could technically reserve the IPs for System VMs to grab the IPs using
> the DB, by updating the table
HI Marty
You could technically reserve the IPs for System VMs to grab the IPs using
the DB, by updating the table user_ip_address
update user_ip_address set forsystemvms=1 where
public_ip_address='172.16.16.171';
Please remember if you reserve more IPs for SystemVms they may pick up any
in
When the system vms boot they are given an IP like 22-76-87-56.domain.com. Is
this able to be changed.
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 1:29:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Marty Godsey
Subject: Re: System VM static IPs
WARNING: This email
When system vms are destroyed, ACS will recreate new system vms. Mostly new
vms will get the same IPs. However, if the IPs are allocated during the
period, new vms will get different IPs.
In this case, If users do not use wildcard DNS, they have to update the DNS
records.
-Wei
On Tuesday, June
Op 04/06/2024 om 06:29 schreef Marty Godsey:
Hello All,
I want the system VMs always to grab the same IP. Is this possible?
What is it that you want to achieve exactly? Why do you want/need this?
Wido
Hello All,
I want the system VMs always to grab the same IP. Is this possible?
Is there a way to remove the limit from a networking offering? I do not want it
limited at all. I tried putting in a -1 in the global settings and the
individual offering, which did not work.
It would be amazing to be able to hide disabled offerings (network, compute,
etc.).
Also, it would it be an easy method to just have it as permission. Something
like “Ability to see hidden offerings”?
I know you can get more complicated, but this could be a starting point.
From:
Hi all and good morning from lovely Bratislava!
This week our community is at Community Over Code in Bratislava and today we
are having a whole bunch of sessions in our dedicated track.
If you are here, please stop by and say hi. Ensure you visit the talks and the
poster session.
If someone
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@alexandremattioli can you comment
@kiranchavala I see some discrepancies in your description, though I think
there is some merit to this issue. Can you check and
GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option of
disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@kiranchavala and others If I'm understanding it right I guess we are mixing
listall functionality with displaynetwork functionality.
`displaynetwork` param
GitHub user alexandremattioli added a comment to the discussion: Provide the
option of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@kiranchavala I'm struggling to see the use case.
Is the idea to disable a network so no new VMs can use it?
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
> yes @weizhouapache ,
>
> to allow to undo the on-display flag, we must display it, so an exemption to
> the non-display directive must be defined to do that. A
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
@alexandremattioli @DaanHoogland @weizhouapache
>From the Ui point of view
As an admin user from the UI if I can disable "Display network" for a
particular
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
display or not-display, not enable/disable, right ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9162#discussioncomment-9643959
This is an
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Provide the option
of disabling/Enabling Shared/Isolated/L2 networks,
yes @weizhouapache ,
to allow to undo the on-display flag, we must display it, so an exemption to
the non-display directive must be defined to do that. A trivial
We save it in an gitlab project, every project has a terraform state option
Atte,
Ricardo Pertuz
On 31 May 2024 at 9:15 AM -0500, Francisco Arencibia Quesada
, wrote:
> Thank you all for your feedback. I'm using Terraform, and it works like a
> charm.
>
> I have another question: where are
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
@lohitslohit you're better off following this
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md
The upstream docs website is outdated and we need to improve it. Ubuntu 18.04
isn't support yet, it
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Bash script to
install CloudStack
Thanks for sharing! I'm trying to build this: https://c8k.in and I might steal
something from these scripts :)
GitHub link:
Hi Marty,
Currently it's not support on per-domain basis. It's either globally enabled or
not, however, you can add/authorise accounts against a SAML IDP in specific
domain(s). All users will see the single-sign on tab on the UI when logging in,
but only those who have SAML/SSO access will be
Thank you all for your feedback. I'm using Terraform, and it works like a
charm.
I have another question: where are you saving the tfstate file, and how are
you handling locking?
In AWS, I used to save it in a versioned S3 bucket and DynamoDB for locking.
Best Regards
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at
Hi all,
We are few months away from the CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2024, which
will happen in Madrid, Nov 20-22.
Currently, we are searching for companies, who would like to support the
CCC2024 as event sponsors. Supporting the project and the event specifically,
enable the whole
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache traffic mirroring is a great tool but it doesnt allow for taking
action against malicious traffic.
Would Option 1 be more straightforward to implement? And in this option, i
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
this seems like a discussion that ccan lead to several implementation
ideas/issues. I'm converting it to a discussion.
GitHub link:
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache , ive updated the diagram to reflect Option 1 better.
Is my understanding right?
![Screenshot 2024-05-31 at 11 57 21
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
> Hi @weizhouapache ,
>
> Allowing VNF to be the LB Provider would be great, but come to think of it, i
> think it will pose a challenge because Cloudstack will need to recognise the
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
Hi @weizhouapache ,
Allowing VNF to be the LB Provider would be great, but come to think of it, i
think it will pose a challenge because Cloudstack will need to recognise the
different
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
> @weizhouapache actually in my diagram above, im suggesting to not use VNF to
> provide Autoscaling Feature. Let the current logic work as is.
>
> The end result we are trying to
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Support for
Autoscale, using VNF in L2 Networks.
Currently the autoscale feature has dependency on loadbalancing service. For
now it only works with isolated networks or vpc with lb.
Do you want VNF to be working as the LB provider
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Support for Autoscale,
using VNF in L2 Networks.
@weizhouapache actually in my diagram above, im suggesting to not use VNF to
provide Autoscaling Feature. Let the current logic work as is.
The end result we are trying to achieve is to
Hi All,
Thanks so much for the insights, it’s really eye opening.
Im wondering, is vGPU for KVM possible? And does it only work with NVIDIA
cards? Or has anyone successfully integrated AMD MI300X before (using vGPU KVM)?
Regards,
Bryan
On 12 Mar 2024 at 3:54 AM +0800, Pierre-Luc Dion , wrote:
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
okay. But during the dev environment setup. I had executed the
`mvn -Pdeveloper,systemvm clean install`
Given in this docs
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.1/developersguide/developer_guide.html
But
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
okay @weizhouapache
How to check the JVM heap size?
I am using the ubuntu 18.04. Is it okay to use 18.04
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9157#discussioncomment-9615173
This
GitHub user sureshanaparti added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
Hi @lohitslohit Can you try with mbx-based env, details here:
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/2-dev.md#mbx-based-development
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> @weizhouapache Again I had tried to run the same cmd. but I got amother
> error.
>
> ```
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools .. SUCCESS [ 0.014
> s]
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack
GitHub user lohitslohit added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev Setup.
@weizhouapache Again I had tried to run the same cmd. but I got amother error.
```
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools .. SUCCESS [ 0.014 s]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack apidocs
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> okay. But during the dev environment setup. I had executed the
>
> `mvn -Pdeveloper,systemvm clean install`
>
> Given in this docs
>
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: CloudStack Dev
Setup.
> okay @weizhouapache
>
> How to check the JVM heap size? I am using the ubuntu 18.04. Is it okay to
> use 18.04
export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx4096m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=1024m"
then run the maven command
it may be
GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: KVM not listing
Unmanaged Instances
Please read the documentation. It lists's only stopped VMs and it requires
listen_tcp=1 in the libvirtd config
GitHub link:
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> > > which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> @0x I tried using Debian12 as a KVM host with CloudStack 4.19.0.1.
> `Addhost` failed initially, then I installed the `cpu-checker`. Then executed
> the `cloudstack-setup-agent` , and the host is visible in the
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > > > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual
> > > > machine, which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x Yes, it's because the current deb packages are only tested, used
and supported for Ubuntu that you're welcome to use to an out-of-box
installation experience, support for Debian is largely experimental
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x I tried using Debian12 as a KVM host with CloudStack 4.19.0.1.
`Addhost` failed initially, then I installed the `cpu-checker`. Then executed
the `cloudstack-setup-agent` , and the host is visible in the
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> When I failed to add storage, I clicked on return to fix and then clicked on
> next again. Add Host reported an error again, stating that it already exists.
> I think this is a logical bug in the web UI.
>
>
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
initialized state.
Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine, which belongs to nested
virtualization.
Cloudstack was executing LSCPU related
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> > initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> > which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was executing
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
After my continuous investigation. I found that the kvm ok program is missing
in the debian12 system. That's because cloudstack setup agent called kvm ok.
Just install: **sudo apt install cpu-checker** to
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> Cloudstack agent has been successfully added, but it is always in an
> initialized state. Because I am testing cloudstack in a virtual machine,
> which belongs to nested virtualization. Cloudstack was executing
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@0x
can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9155#discussioncomment-9614840
This is an automatically sent email for
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9155#discussioncomment-9614839
This is an automatically sent
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
When I failed to add storage, I clicked on return to fix and then clicked on
next again. Add Host reported an error again, stating that it already exists. I
think this is a logical bug in the web UI.
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
Hello, I have kept you waiting for a long time. I have added a brand new host
log, and besides that, I haven't done anything on the web UI.
**Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Hi All,
>
> We managed to resolve our issue.
>
> Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > > @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
> >
> >
> > Yes, it exists.
> >
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
Yes, it exists.
GitHub user zap51 added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Hi All,
>
> We managed to resolve our issue.
>
> Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was down,
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
> > @0x can you check if file `/dev/kvm` exists ?
>
> Yes, it exists.
>
>
GitHub user dineshjchoudhary added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
@weizhouapache We are using
Core Zone Type
GitHub user 0x added a comment to the discussion: add hosts fail
@weizhouapache
The libvirtd configuration file, which is automatically generated by
Cloudstack, has not been modified by me
[libvirtd.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/15196981/libvirtd.txt)
GitHub link:
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Hi All,
We managed to resolve our issue.
Upon further checking, we found out that the VXLAN in Host 6 was down, while
other
GitHub user btzq added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
Hi @dineshjchoudhary @akshaybachhav
Did you guys managed to resolve this? We have Compute 6 Nodes and our 6th Node
is having
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Have you disabled apparmour on them, what guide or steps of installation if
> any did you follow @akshaybachhav Make
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> * vm gets ip from dhcp
It looks we forgot to ask you
- what type of zone do you use ?
- do you use vlan ?
GitHub
GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
If you are testing communication between 2 VMs on the SAME network, but on
different KVM hosts, then you should
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> Have you disabled apparmour on them, what guide or steps of installation if
> any did you follow @akshaybachhav Make
GitHub user akshaybachhav added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> @akshaybachhav can you create a new vm on the host (where the VR is not
> running on), and check
>
> * if the new
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine on
different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
> @akshaybachhav can you check iptables/firewall rules in the VM? Can you ping
> the VR from the VMs? You can try
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Virtual machine
on different hosts but in same isolated network not able to communicate (can't
ping each other).
@akshaybachhav can you check iptables/firewall rules in the VM? Can you ping
the VR from the VMs?
You can try
301 - 400 of 37086 matches
Mail list logo
