On 21.01.21 11:10, Steve Charmer wrote:
on this documentation page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UpgradingVersion
"If you install using a Linux package installer:
Debian unstable: apt-get install spamassassin
"
what is the meaning of "unstable" ?
it's a debian quest
Bill Cole wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Only if you have upgraded to an Ubuntu nightly or installing a
> > backport would you get 3.4.5.
>
> Also required: a time machine.
>
> 3.4.5 is not yet released. There have been substantial fixes made to the 3.4
> branch since the last pre-release snapsho
On 21 Jan 2021, at 17:05, Bob Proulx wrote:
Only if you have upgraded to an Ubuntu nightly or installing a
backport would you get 3.4.5.
Also required: a time machine.
3.4.5 is not yet released. There have been substantial fixes made to the
3.4 branch since the last pre-release snapshot that
Steve Charmer wrote:
> SA was originally installed using apt-get (Ubuntu-16)
I recommend upgrading from Ubuntu 16 to 18.04 and letting it upgrade
spamassassin as part of that upgrade. Then upgrade from 18.04 to
20.04 and again let it upgrade spamassassin along with everything
else. That's the be
Steve Charmer wrote:
> on this documentation page:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UpgradingVersion
>
> "If you install using a Linux package installer:
> Debian unstable: apt-get install spamassassin
> "
> what is the meaning of "unstable" ?
> it sounds scary, like the
On 1/21/2021 11:25 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
On 21 Jan 2021, at 11:08, Steve Charmer wrote:
I would "like" to backup everything, for safety, that is why I included a
list of the directories (fodlers) which I thought had Spamassassin content,
to get feedback from other users if they are the correct
On 21 Jan 2021, at 11:08, Steve Charmer wrote:
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your message.
I thought an upgrade fixes bugs. Maybe you are thinking about an
update,
which seems like it would updates rules in *.samples?
From the man page for 'apt-get':
update
Used to re-synchronize t
on this documentation page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UpgradingVersion
"If you install using a Linux package installer:
Debian unstable: apt-get install spamassassin
"
what is the meaning of "unstable" ?
it sounds scary, like the package should not be run in live ma
I'm sorry, but I do not understand your message.
I thought an upgrade fixes bugs. Maybe you are thinking about an update,
which seems like it would updates rules in *.samples?
I would "like" to backup everything, for safety, that is why I included a
list of the directories (fodlers) which I thoug
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:31:33 -0500
Steve Charmer wrote:
> SA was originally installed using apt-get (Ubuntu-16)
> BACKUP
> I would feel safer if I had a backup of the current spamassassin
> system. is there a recommended method to backup all files to a tar?
>
> I think I have identified these f
are these the important folders which need to be backed up?
PREFIX=/usr,
DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin,
LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/spamassassin,
LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib/spamassassin
and...
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004002
does that match to SA version 3.4.2 ?
I see 3.00... and think, NO that i
Had a similar question on another list (MailWatch for MailScanner). I received
the following reply:
"Centos 5.x and 6.x
Source installs the binary in /usr/local/bin/ so you might need a symlink for
/usr/bin/spamassassin if you are using Mailwatch or you might need to edit your
Mai
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:42 PM
To: Kaleb Hosie
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now.
> I ran into a bit of an issue with the N
lti
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at -e line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at -e line 1.
Am I doing something wrong?
-Original Message-
From: R P Herrold [mailto:herr...@owlriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:42 PM
To: Kaleb Hosie
Cc: users@sp
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for now. I
ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've installed it but
when I try to install the built RPM file it gives me this error:
error: Failed dependencies:
leb Hosie [mailto:kho...@spectraaluminum.com]
Sent: 17 March 2010 16:26
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3
I do have a test VM so I thought I would go ahead and try out 3.3.0 for
now. I ran into a bit of an issue with the NetAddr::IP module. I've
installed it
f you run into this problem?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:46 AM
To: Kaleb Hosie; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.3
3.3.0 works fine on CentOS 5.4, but 3.3.1 is due out
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 11:35 -0400, Kaleb Hosie wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm running SA 3.2.5 on CentOS 5.4 and I've noticed that a newer major
> release has been released. The server is currently in production so I'm a bit
> leery to upgrade.
>
> Do you feel that it is worth the upgrade to 3.3? Is the
3.3.0 works fine on CentOS 5.4, but 3.3.1 is due out imminently (in the
next week or two), so I'd hold back for that.
Read the release notes carefully and ensure that 3.3.x's prerequisites
are installed.
If you have a test VM you can install on, use it. I tested on a CentOS
5.4 VM on my home PC
Hi,
>> check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
>> (/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
> How's this a SA question?
Yes, my apologies. I don't know enough about amavis yet, and thought
it may be related to all the modules I upgraded, and not amavis
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:36 -0400, Alex wrote:
> I recently upgraded perl from 5.6.0 to perl-5.10.0, along with all the
> modules necessary for sa-3.2.5 and amavisd-new (an old version still).
> I'm now having a problem that I really don't understand:
>
> Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (017
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, MySQL Student wrote:
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) TROUBLE in
check_mail: decoding2-get-file-types FAILED: 'file' utility
(/usr/bin/file) failed, status=1 (256 ) at /usr/sbin/amavisd line
4019.
Jul 30 14:24:30 bigship amavis[1757]: (01757-175) PRESERVING
> Hi all,
>
> What would the reccomended procedure be for upgrading SA from 3.001008 to
> 3.002003 and then staying up to date.
>
> This would be on FreeBSD 6.n, with the original SA installed from ports.
>
> TIA,
>
> -Grant
>
Sorry, just saw this.
Should be easy, a portupgrade -R p5-Mail-Sp
Jack Raats пишет:
Hi Grant,
First update the ports (see the handbook how (cvsup-without-gui and
portupgrade))
After this you'll run portupgrade -a
It seems to me that using `portupgrade -a` is not very good.
You should consult /usr/ports/UPDATING and look if there are special
instructions f
Hi Grant,
First update the ports (see the handbook how (cvsup-without-gui and
portupgrade))
After this you'll run portupgrade -a
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Grant Peel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:58 PM
Subject: Upgrading
Hi all,
What would
Hi Jarif,
No, the spam assasin is called by procmail. It seems that it was a problem
with a new whitelist entry not configured well. I rolled back the changes
now but still receive a couple of bounced emails from the half an hour I
changed the configuration.
Thanks for the advice.
Best regards,
live server(s).
>>
>> Doing something on a live server that you haven't done
>> before at all, will get you labelled as a loose cannon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
t; Doing something on a live server that you haven't done before at all,
> will get you labelled as a loose cannon.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 14 April 2008 9:04 p.m.
>> To: us
annon.
Cheers,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 April 2008 9:04 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Upgrading
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> That sounds on the limit to scarry.
> I will rethink it before upgrad
Hi Mike,
That sounds on the limit to scarry.
I will rethink it before upgrading then.
Thanks for the advice and the information!
Best regards,
/Hiram
Michael Hutchinson-3 wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>
> Sir,
>
> You or someone else, has managed to break apt-get's info about S.A
> -Original Message-
> From: hiram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 April 2008 4:32 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading
>
>
> Hi again!
>
> Sorry, that's what my wife means when she says: "you hear but you
don&
Hi again!
Sorry, that's what my wife means when she says: "you hear but you don't
listen" :-((. Thanks for the answers.
Still, I cannot manage to upgrade spam assassin. Does anyone have any idea
what the problem could be?
in debian-sarge:
apt-get install spamassassin
/Hiram
--
View this messa
At 13:59 12-04-2008, Grant Peel wrote:
so up to this point, I have been cpoying the contents of
"/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org" to "
/usr/local/share/spamassassin"
Based on what you guys are telling me, I bet there is some
configuration knob somewhere (to forgo the co
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "hiram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Upgrading
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hiram wrote:
/Hiram,
If you are going to administer a Unix system you n
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, hiram wrote:
/Hiram,
If you are going to administer a Unix system you need to know the basics
of paths and shells. If you look -CLOSELY- at what Jim wrote you will
see that it is not the same as what you did.
You did:
spamassassin restart
Jim said:
./spamassassin restar
> Hi Jim!
>
> Yep, that's exactly what I meant, I change to directory
> "/etc/init.d/" and from the root shell prompt "#" I write:
> spamassassin restart
> But it seems that it wants to process the file "restart",
> instead of understanding the option restart.
>
> Thanks for your answer,
>
> /Hi
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 09:49, hiram wrote:
> Hi Jim!
>
> Yep, that's exactly what I meant, I change to directory "/etc/init.d/" and
> from the root shell prompt "#" I write:
> spamassassin restart
> But it seems that it wants to process the file "restart", instead of
> understanding the option res
Hi Jim!
Yep, that's exactly what I meant, I change to directory "/etc/init.d/" and
from the root shell prompt "#" I write:
spamassassin restart
But it seems that it wants to process the file "restart", instead of
understanding the option restart.
Thanks for your answer,
/Hiram
Jim Knuth wrote
Am 12.04.2008 0:41 Uhr, schrieb hiram:
> Hi!
>
> It's Hiram again. I've updated the "local.cf" file and I'm trying to restart
> spam assassin.
> I write:
> /etc/init.d/# spamassassin restart
> But I get:
> Unable to open restart: No such file or directory
>
> What can I do to restart it? I'm runn
Hi!
It's Hiram again. I've updated the "local.cf" file and I'm trying to restart
spam assassin.
I write:
/etc/init.d/# spamassassin restart
But I get:
Unable to open restart: No such file or directory
What can I do to restart it? I'm running it in debian-sarge.
I'm kind of very new to spam assa
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 04:25 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing*
> KB> special about SA version numbers.
> Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file [...]
Then stick to the user_prefs file.
You do realize there is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 3:26 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: upgrading is just like installing
KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is
*nothing*
KB> special
KB> User? SA is for administrators, not for users. Also, there is *nothing*
KB> special about SA version numbers.
Is too or else there wouldn't be a user_prefs file or instructions for
installing non-root. And SA version numbers & aliases often need explaining,
just like Debian package version numb
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 05:12 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> KB> No, you are not. Please note that these are version numbers, not floats.
> KB> With respect to minor versions, 24 is massively larger than 2...
>
> It's all a usability (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/) problem. You
> might say SpamA
KB> No, you are not. Please note that these are version numbers, not floats.
KB> With respect to minor versions, 24 is massively larger than 2...
It's all a usability (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/) problem. You
might say SpamAssassin is usability exempt, as it is only for computer
pros. But I'm
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 12:32 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let's record my 3.23 to 3.24 upgrade attempt.
>
> I untar Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and of course read the file entitled
> UPGRADE.
>
> In it I find "Note for Users Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.2.0".
> But I am upgrading to 3.24.
No, you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now after reading the whole INSTALL file, I come to the conclusion
that to upgrade, one just acts like one never installed SpamAssassin
in the first place, and apparently the new SpamAssassin will just
install on top of the old one (with cruft surely accumulating in t
I imagine this depends a little on your distro. Some more details would be
helpful.
> From: Netdynamix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have SA 3.1.4 running on my server successfully. I want to
> upgrade to
> 3.2.3 for safety sake.
>
> I have NEVER upgraded SA before and am a little scared t
S Johnson wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:16:30 -0500:
> Im currently running SA 3.0.4 on Fedora Core 4. Is anyone aware of any
> issues
upgrading SA to the current version from where I am or is it a pretty seemless
upgrade?
I don't remember as this is quite an "old" version ;-) You should defi
Dominic Caputo wrote:
>
> I have been running spamassassin for the past few months on my mail
> server. I am in the process of upgrading my version to the latest
> release and was wondering if someone can verify my procedure is
> correct as I have not done this before.
>
> Is there a way to backup
Hi,
2007/7/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
We are trying to upgrade from 3.1.0 on SLES9 using spamd. I have viewed
the install notes and downloaded the zip. Extracted and CD'd to that new
SA dir. Followed these install instructions:
[unzip/untar the archive]
cd Mail-SpamAssassi
Henry Kwan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am running 3.18 on a vanilla CentOS 4 box and tried to upgrade to 3.20. The
> make/make test/make install cycle went fine but I noticed that the scoring is
> slightly different between the two version. I sent myself an email and here's
> how they scored:
>
> 3.18:
>
>
AbbaComm.Net abbacomm.net> writes:
> I noticed a large difference in scoring "behavior" between the versions
> 3.1.8 and 3.2.0 myself.
>
> Yet, after training bayes and then after a few more days of bayes auto
> learn, things seem to have "mostly" cleared up.
Ok, I'll check again after a few da
> Did the Bayes scoring change that much between 3.18 and 3.20?
> Also, it
> looks like 3.20 SPF checking is broken. How can I debug where it broke?
Henry
I noticed a large difference in scoring "behavior" between the versions
3.1.8 and 3.2.0 myself.
Yet, after training bayes and then after a
Matt Kettler wrote:
Yes, it's covered in the UPGRADE file
[..]
sa-learn --sync
Thanks Mark,
Meanwhile, I discovered that a few messages were still delivered
and filtered by SA 2.6 on another mail delivery server and I think
that's what was causing trouble. I made sure mail was coming throug
Jean-Michel Barbet wrote:
>
>
>=> Any experiences of a migration of the bayes DB files when
> upgrading from 2.6x to 3.1.x ?
Yes, it's covered in the UPGRADE file
>
>=> What is the best way to deal with this ?
sa-learn --sync
>
> Thank you all.
>
> Jean-Michel BARBET.
>
Matthias Haegele wrote:
Rod schrieb:
Hello,
I'm currently using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 and would like to upgrade to
version 3.1.7. I would like to backup the currently installed version
but I don't know where all of the files are stored. I would
appreciate any input as to what files/directorie
Rod schrieb:
Hello,
I'm currently using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 and would like to upgrade to
version 3.1.7. I would like to backup the currently installed version
but I don't know where all of the files are stored. I would appreciate
any input as to what files/directories to backup as well as any
Rod schrieb:
Hello,
I'm currently using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 and would like to upgrade to
version 3.1.7. I would like to backup the currently installed version
but I don't know where all of the files are stored. I would appreciate
any input as to what files/directories to backup as well as any
Matt Kettler writes:
> Mark wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm finally upgrading from SpamAssassin 2.55 (tweaked myself, over time)
> > to 3.1.6. I have a few questions regarding this upgrade.
> >
> > In the "old" SA, I had a file called ConfSourceSQL.pm, which did the
> > per-user stuff for MySQL. I c
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vrijdag 6 oktober 2006 4:33
> To: Mark
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgrading from SpamAssassin 2.55
Wow; that was a very comprehensive and useful answer. :) Part of th
Mark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm finally upgrading from SpamAssassin 2.55 (tweaked myself, over time)
> to 3.1.6. I have a few questions regarding this upgrade.
>
> In the "old" SA, I had a file called ConfSourceSQL.pm, which did the
> per-user stuff for MySQL. I cannot seem to find a similar file in
>
Dan O'Brien wrote:
Now that I'm trying to update my production server from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3
(since Friday eve), every CPAN mirror I try results in the following
messages
Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/modules/02packages.details.txt.gz
Database was generated on Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:41:38 GMT
CPA
On Sunday 01 May 2005 06:57 am, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> Warning: This index file is 42 days old.
> Please check the host you chose as your CPAN mirror for staleness.
> I'll continue but problems seem likely to happen.
You just want to tell cpan to use a different source as its
primary.
You can d
I'm still not sure exactly what was happening, but I was able to get it
working after I deleted the ~/.cpan directory. Previously, I was just
deleting ~/.cpan/Metadata.
Dan O'Brien
__
Axon Solutions, Inc. Telephone: 703-845-8400
P
Thanks for the feedback loren. We do use a *lot* of
custom rules, so I'll make it a more long term target I
think.
Richard
From: Loren Wilton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2005
11:10To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re:
Upgrading to 3.0
Certainly better
Certainly better spam catching if you aren't using addon
rules.
Probably better spam catching if you are.
Gives you a chance to tell your boss you need to upgrade all
the email servers to 3GHz/4GB, and thus you need a pay raise!
Version is supported.
Basically, 2.64 is now old and dead, and
On Thursday 13 January 2005 07:19 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Phil Barnett wrote:
> I'm feeling puckish today so I'll say it.
>
> Or even symlink /usr/sbin to /usr/bin (shock, horror) :-)
Gasp, You've gone too far, now... ;-)
--
Top ten reasons to procrastinate.
1.
Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2005 03:44 pm, Thomas Arend wrote:
>
>> Because SuSE stores spamd in /usr/sbin/spamd and the tarball stores
>> it in /usr/bin/spamd the SA does not run.
>
> You could have put a symlink in /usr/bin
>
> ln -s /usr/sbin/spamd /usr/bin/spamd
I'm feeling
On Thursday 13 January 2005 03:44 pm, Thomas Arend wrote:
> Because SuSE stores spamd in /usr/sbin/spamd and the tarball stores it
> in /usr/bin/spamd the SA does not run.
You could have put a symlink in /usr/bin
ln -s /usr/sbin/spamd /usr/bin/spamd
--
Top ten reasons to procrastinate.
1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 21:42 schrieb Hans du Plooy:
> I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading
> spamassassin on the more mainstream rpm based distros (MDK/Fedora/rh/SUSE).
>
> I have a SUSE 9.1 server, running spamassassi
I like to use RPMs from YUM or APT repositories where ever I can on RPM
based distrabutions. But I think for spamassassin, you are better off
going with CPAN to keep it up to date.
Martin
Hans du Plooy wrote:
I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading spamassassin
on the m
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 14:54 -0600, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:42:42PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading
> > spamassassin
> > on the more mainstream rpm based distros (MDK/Fedora/rh/SUSE).
> >
> > I have a SUSE
Hans du Plooy wrote:
> I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading
> spamassassin on the more mainstream rpm based distros
> (MDK/Fedora/rh/SUSE).
I'm not running RedHat on my own systems any more, but I still have one
legacy RH7.3 system at work. All of my own new installs h
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:42:42PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> I was wondering what method you guys & gals prefer for upgrading spamassassin
> on the more mainstream rpm based distros (MDK/Fedora/rh/SUSE).
>
> I have a SUSE 9.1 server, running spamassassin through amavisd-new. Works
> like a
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 09:21, Anton Krall wrote:
> Whats he rules-de-jour homepage?
>
http://www.exit0.us
--
Whats he rules-de-jour homepage?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Viernes, 05 de Noviembre de 2004 05:31 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 3.0
Anton Krall wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:59:49 -0600:
> How can I upd
Anton Krall wrote on Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:59:49 -0600:
> How can I update
> my rules with version 3.0?I use to use rules-du-jour but haven't used it in
> a long time... Any leads or ideas?
>
It's *exactly* as with 2.6x.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet S
Matt Kettler scribbled on Wednesday, September 29, 2004 7:31 PM:
> At 07:37 PM 9/29/2004 -0500, SAtalk Mail User wrote:
>> I have a, possibly, easy question. I have SpamAssassin 2.64 with a
>> ton of the rules that you have at rules emporium, and man they work
>> great, but I am wanting to upgrad
At 07:37 PM 9/29/2004 -0500, SAtalk Mail User wrote:
I have a, possibly, easy question. I have SpamAssassin 2.64 with a ton
of the rules that you have at rules emporium, and man they work great, but
I am wanting to upgrade my Spamassassin from 2.64 to 3.0.0, the latest via
CPAN.
1) delete antidrug
At 08:01 PM 9/20/2004 -0500, Andy Norris wrote:
Sorry if this is old news, but we just got on a new dedicated server, and
it's stuck at v2.55. Our old server had 2.64, and some of our settings
didn't make it over in the move.
Please point me in the right direction for upgrading to 2.64. We're
r
81 matches
Mail list logo
