Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

OK, you are right, it did wake me up at night. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Chemical Engineer > wrote: > > No, I am not making it up and it was not a dream > > Physics is ultimately a work of the imagination. Over ti

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

Mark, Yes I would like to post it on arxiv, I need a sponsor in the physics area. Do you know of any? I am cleaning up the document some and want to make sure i get all of the references, etc. I do not fault Abd. He has years of frustration built up

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

hysics. Now, he is a wikipedia editor for Cold Fusion. So, > this is the background of our Wiki "expert". You know what my mother always > says; " Shallow waters run noisy." LOL ... > > > > > > > > Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus > > Abd ul-

Re: [Vo]:LENR and Fermi Acceleration

I also am not sure why a "hot" neutron might not be created as opposed to a "Cold Neutron" from this. If there were some type of collapsed matter triggering the event I can understand loss of momentum to all radiation escaping due to the extra quantum gravitational pull to be overcome. On Wed, A

Re: [Vo]:LENR and Fermi Acceleration

I agree that you do have "particles" constrained thermodynamically and spatially within the void(s) & cracks of the lattice. Why a proton causes the lattice energy to be "uncertain" escapes me but might be true. I can understand how some collapsed matter would keep things "uncertain" since it is

Re: [Vo]:Celani device update

works for me On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Andre Blum wrote: > It would explain why at NI-week he saw more output than at ICCF: 5000 > people make more vibrations than 300. > > > On 08/15/2012 01:33 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > > Jed, > > What if you make s

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

The mass sets the radius On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > No, I am not making it up: > > A *charged black hole* is a black > hole<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole> that > possesses electric charge <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elect

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

gt; as a solution for a point mass without electric charge and angular momentum. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Chemical Engineer > wrote: > > > > > Conductivity inversion effects in a metal wire/lattice. It is well

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

iki/Schwarzschild_metric> as a solution for a point mass without electric charge and angular momentum. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Chemical Engineer > wrote: > > > > > Conductivity inversion effects in a metal wir

Re: [Vo]:Celani device update

Jed, What if you make some loud noise around it or shake it?(he probably does not want you to shake it) Does the energy output increase?...I am serious. The singularities he created in those voids should be sensitive to any type of external EMR or stimulation On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM, A

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

would like to leave them a planet that was better then the way we got. So far I would say NOT Clean Nuclear fission and fusion don't appear to exist anytime soon. Solar, wind and bio suck as a source of energy and is an economic step backwards On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, Chemical Eng

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

ould give them a fit and trigger the gremlin. On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > I can't tell when CE is serious anymore. > > T > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > > Ah, no … you better recheck > > > > > > &g

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

Ok i stand corrected On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, Jones Beene wrote: > Ah, no … you better recheck > > ** ** > > *From:* Chemical Engineer > > ** ** > > Atomic hydrogen carries an ionization charge last time I checked > > > > > ** ** >

Re: [Vo]:New comment paper re Defkalion

g 15, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Chemical Engineer > > > wrote: > >> 150! >> >> Off set by the youth-inducing effects of Russian Vodka? (Just kidding) >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck >> >> > wrote: >> >>>

[Vo]:Ultra Low Momentum Neutrons

And here is what my theory says about "Ultra low momentum neutrons" : If you had just barely escaped the clutches of a micro(quantum) singularity(black hole) wouldn't you be tired too? This phenomena supports the redshifting of all radiation coming from near the singularity Stewart

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

Atomic hydrogen carries an ionization charge last time I checked On Wednesday, August 15, 2012, P.J van Noorden wrote: > Hello, > > From Randell Mills I understood that only H can be a catalyst because the > atom has to be neutral. He+ is not neutral, so it is difficult / impossible > to collaps.

Re: [Vo]:New comment paper re Defkalion

150! Off set by the youth-inducing effects of Russian Vodka? (Just kidding) On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: > Formally I am almost 75, however the years lived in Communism count > double; everybody having had this experience will agree. > Peter > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

02 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > I was hoping they would embrace my theory and observations but I guess it > is a little too early for that. If everyone could get on the same page > this fledgling industry can generate some serious revenue and transform the > World! > > My theory

Re: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus

I was hoping they would embrace my theory and observations but I guess it is a little too early for that. If everyone could get on the same page this fledgling industry can generate some serious revenue and transform the World! My theory explains the following observations: Ed Storms, well respe

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

agreed, my theory can collapse any matter albeit some requiring more energy than others On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:57 PM, wrote: > In reply to Chemical Engineer's message of Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:48:29 > -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >Correct, I can only go on what I am told. > > Note that any such H m

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

Correct, I can only go on what I am told. On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:47 PM, wrote: > In reply to Chemical Engineer's message of Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:41:17 > -0400: > Hi, > >If the Papp engine really works, it shows us that collapsed Helium ions > >work just as well as Collapsed Hydrogen ions...

[Vo]:Grand Unification Theory of Cold Fusion

I know you guys are sick of hearing about it, but here is a link to revision 4 of my theory, with a list of recent observations and how this theory explains them. http://wp.me/p26aeb-4 Basically the Ghostbusters had it right, if you cross the streams and generate enough charge you may vaporize gr

Re: [Vo]:Brillouin ICCF17 Presentation

I think that is their wet boiler? On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Whoa. 130 bar & light water electrolysis instead of gas phase! > > > -Original Message- > From: Terry Blanton > > Jed just informed me that it's okay to open this one: > > > https://docs.google.com/p

Re: [Vo]:The faint young Sun paradox

Just a bunch of collapsed microsingularities emitting hawking radiation around the sun collapsed due to the intense gravity and flux. The smaller they are the hotter they get. The smallest might get up to... 5.6×1032 K vs a monster black hole in the emptiest part of space which is somewhat cooler

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Celani ICCF17 Presentation

I wonder if they got the Rohner brothers to recharge it?:) On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > OK, thanks > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > >> Chemical Engineer wrote: >> >> >>> I am surprised pressu

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Celani ICCF17 Presentation

OK, thanks On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Chemical Engineer wrote: > > >> I am surprised pressure changes on the airplane did not flush a few out. >> > > It was recharged with fresh gas at a KAIST laboratory before being brought > to the

Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

LHC, any problem > with the gremlin theory is they do not exist? > > > Cheers:Axil > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> Axil, >> >> I believe you are correct. My understanding is that there are two coils >> in each c

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Celani ICCF17 Presentation

Jed, Based upon Celani's paper at the following step: "After adding a H2/Ar mixture (75/25 ratio) at 7 bar of total pressure, and using as monitor parameter the resistance of both the active and inert wires, it was given power (48W) to the inert wire. It was found that when the temperature inside

Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

ll stay in the cylinder for an >> appreciable length of time. >> Helium is notoriously fugitive and will escape from virtuall any >> container not made of solid glass >> or metal. O-rings just aren't going to work in their engine unless the >> noble gas mixture

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

I think in the Papp you are trading Helium ions for energy at the rate of e=mc2. Not a bad trade, i just hope the cost of balloons does not go up. On Tuesday, August 14, 2012, wrote: > In reply to David Roberson's message of Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:50:22 -0400 > (EDT): > Hi, > [snip] > >There is a

Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK

at 2:50 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > singularity is frightening > peter > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... >> >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Vo]:Recombination

Axil, DGT has claimed no less than 10-11 elements created that would typically be created from fission or fusion. My theory is that the collapsed matter(gremlin) is indiscriminate, it can rip protons and/or electrons from nearby atoms due to the immense local quantum gravity and evaporate them ba

Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK

I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor... On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor" > would work better. > > T > >

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

If the Papp engine really works, it shows us that collapsed Helium ions work just as well as Collapsed Hydrogen ions... On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > At 01:56 PM 8/13/2012, Bastiaan Bergman wrote: > >> http://physics.aps.org/**articles/v5/90

Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

take charged particles away. Unfortunately, he may also be getting bombarded with quarks, gluons and other quantum goo that he is not even aware of... On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF7HVi5OVIc > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2

Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

Dave > -Original Message- > From: Chemical Engineer > To: vortex-l > Sent: Tue, Aug 14, 2012 6:25 am > Subject: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi > > At 2:30 of this video they mention aligning the holes shown machined on > the outside of each cylinder to the top f

Re: [Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

r they run this in a closed > loop, generating the power for the spark and such, and produce a > significant amount of work out over a significant amount of time they have > nothing. Don't buy a thing until you have proof that it works. > > - Original Message - > *Fr

[Vo]:Introducing Gremlin's Non-Identical Twin Brother - Chameleon

In my last post I explained why the radiation from "Anomolous Heat" is very weak. For those of you who missed it, it is because in order for radiation to first escape the quantum gravity of the gremlin's (collapsed matter) surface horizon, most of the radiation's energy is used up in escaping the

[Vo]:Re: ProdEngAssemble.avi

At 2:30 of this video they mention aligning the holes shown machined on the outside of each cylinder to the top for access to the coils for wiring, etc. I believe they mount a circuit board for each cylinder atop/near each hole to access the coils to supply control power. They do not show the c

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Another secret sauce.

interpretation of Casimir effect where the semantics of > temperature and spatial displacement [expansion] take on a different > meaning based on an environment that rapidly varies equivalent inertial > frames [fractured isotropy] .**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Chemical Engineer [m

Re: [Vo]:Inspiration

In my Grand Unification Theory of Cold Fusion (Gremlins - collapsed singularities): A gremlin that has devoured/collapsed Hydrogen ions is nicknamed a "Hydrino" A gremlin that has devoured Helium ions is nicknamed a... Helino? A Helino might belch Hydrinos? or at least something similar. On Mon

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Another secret sauce.

ler if quantum gravity is stronger than we think On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > If it is not fission or fusion then it is Gremlins(collapsed matter) > belching hawking radiation. They are going to be very hard to witness > since when you focus photons/light on t

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Another secret sauce.

If it is not fission or fusion then it is Gremlins(collapsed matter) belching hawking radiation. They are going to be very hard to witness since when you focus photons/light on them they devour it... Expansion should trigger cooling Evaporation should trigger heat, electrical charge/conductivity(

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

The 3rd Sterling video from the tesla tech discussed 2 coils in each cyclinder, one for compression & one for containment. Rossi had two sets of wires leading into his tubular heater... If you do not use the coils for containment and compression of ions, you will require much higher voltage for i

Re: [Vo]:1200 degrees E-cat operating at 1 bar?

I think the air is both the cooling fluid and source of fuel. On Monday, August 13, 2012, David Roberson wrote: > I think that the hole in the center of the device is open to allow cooling > fluid to flow through. This appears to be the hottest region of Rossi's > reactor. Notice the bright col

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

Also, as the gremlin expands he cools his surroundings. Just be careful when he exhales and belches copious amounts of quantum energy and goo on you. On Monday, August 13, 2012, Chemical Engineer wrote: > I just call it the way I see it. > > On Monday, August 13, 2012, Andre B

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

I just call it the way I see it. On Monday, August 13, 2012, Andre Blum wrote: > Now you hush! Underwriters Laboratories may be reading this. > > Andre > > > > On 08/13/2012 07:54 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > > Mark, > > A singularity(collapsed matter), what

Re: [Vo]:1200 degrees E-cat operating at 1 bar?

Air IS the "fuel" or source of matter to feed the gremlins On Monday, August 13, 2012, Andre Blum wrote: > As far as I understand, but I could be wrong, the hot cat reactor is not > open at all. > > These are two concentric tubes with their ends somehow closed with some > kind of appropriate 'pu

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

to the conductive copper wire. The electrostatic charge of > theRydberg matter induces a electric charge in the copper wire which in > turn producing heat. > > > > > > QED: Axil > > > > ** ** > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM,

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device. ALL by same Nuclear process ??

Jed, If the Papp engine and latest Rossi device shown do indeed work, it causes me to believe that the metal takes part in the reaction only when it comes into contact with the "gremlin" or "lightning ball" dancincing in the voids & cracks. The metal is useful only if you want to create some tran

Re: [Vo]:1200 degrees E-cat operating at 1 bar?

Yes, i believe it is operating at atmospheric pressure like the Papp engine. The molecules in the air are being ionized, confined, ignited and are reacting, imparting heat to the inside walls of the tube. On Monday, August 13, 2012, Teslaalset wrote: > Group, > Recent posted foto that seems to

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

I'm just sayin... http://phys.org/news/2011-05-mini-black-holes-atoms-earth.html I saw ball lightning once in Maine while hunting as a kid. I was out in a field with a powerline going through it. I first heard a loud humming noise and could feel the vibration in the air. I looked up and saw a l

[Vo]:the Coil

I agree that the effect is the same as ball lightning. I think dgt and rossi are all creating this ball upon ignition On Sunday, August 12, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > I have the answer to why the gas leaves the cylinder and it is not > teleportation. > > Ball lightning is Rydberg matter, and ball

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

Was that the popper? On Sunday, August 12, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > In a video of the Papp engine that was fitted with a transparent cylinder > sleeve, no coil was used so that the reaction could be seen. The piston > sometimes moved but not with any force. > > > Cheers:Axil > > On Sun, Aug 1

Re: [Vo]:the Coil

Correct, no reaction therefore nothing to expand the gas and drive the piston On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > does that mean the piston does not move? > Harry > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > Removing the coil disables the Papp reaction. > > > > >

Re: [Vo]:What is with Papp?

Kelly, I believe the process is the same in ALL of these systems that work. Gas Ionization/Excitement, Confinement, Sparking/Arcing, Reaction. The reaction gives off additional ions to sustain the reaction without further outside energy from sparking and arcing if you control it well. I think t

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device.

No, I was going to put one of those things on the back of my waverunner... On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Chemical Engineer > wrote: > > OK, I will embrace the uncertainty principle. I can see one of those > 1500 >

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device.

OK, I will embrace the uncertainty principle. I can see one of those 1500 hp engines in my boat... On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > At 09:29 AM 8/11/2012, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> I now firmly believe Papp/Rohner, Rossi device, DGT, Brillouin, C

Re: [Vo]:Hydrogen in Papp

short on money as I am. I can't > afford even a hundred dollar loss. > > - Original Message - > *From:* Chemical Engineer > > I'm buying the kit! > >

Re: [Vo]:NIWeek2012 user contributed video - Big Physics panel discussion on LENR

I am working on my Powerpoint, complete with Gremlins On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Ruby wrote: > On 8/11/12 11:20 AM, Terry Blanton wrote: > > Also interesting is the author of the video, John Abrahamsen, a jazz musician: > bluesmovers.com > > I wonder how he became a fan of LENR? > > > I a

Re: [Vo]:Thoughts about PAPP Process

David, I agree, the He ions end up at the intersecting point of the 160 kV plugs firing (4x40kV per plug) due to the coil. After that POOF (and what ever that implies) On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 2:15 PM, David Roberson wrote: > I was thinking about the PAPP engine and had a couple of interesting

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device. ALL by same Nuclear process ??

, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM, David L Babcock wrote: > On 8/11/2012 10:41 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > > Let me add to that last statement, "Generating Energy & Matter" > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> I now firmly

Re: [Vo]:Blather in the mass media makes scientists think we are crazy -I will not..

JoJo, I think you add something to this forum for your technical ability. I have no comment on the rest. On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, David L Babcock wrote: > Thank you, thank you, thank you. > > Ol' Bab > > > On 8/11/2012 2:11 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote: > > > But I am tired of this. You may h

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device.

No, better wording would be "The transformation of matter to energy and vice versa" Basic laws of the universe still apply On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > Let me add to that last statement, "Generating Energy & Matter" > > &

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device.

Let me add to that last statement, "Generating Energy & Matter" On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > I now firmly believe Papp/Rohner, Rossi device, DGT, Brillouin, Celini and > others are all generating energy by the exact same Nuclear process and my

Re: [Vo]:The Next Commercial Device.

I now firmly believe Papp/Rohner, Rossi device, DGT, Brillouin, Celini and others are all generating energy by the exact same Nuclear process and my prediction of what will come next when the world realizes what this is is that ALL HEAVEN AND HELL WILL BREAK LOOSE. The Papp/Rohner device has the p

Re: [Vo]:Hydrogen in Papp

I have used http://www.airproducts.com/products/Gases.aspx Based on what i read they will have a freon-type cannister you will pickup at the local automotive store and just screw onto the engine to recharge. On Friday, August 10, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Axi

[Vo]:Hydrogen in Papp

I'm buying the kit! I guess that thing has an alternator keeping the battery charged and firing the starter coil so in effect it is self-sustaining until the gas leaks by seals, etc. 300 hp = 224 kW self sustaining and that is the 2 cylinder unit! HOLY S#%€ is that thing real? If they are going

Re: [Vo]:Hydrogen in Papp

I'm buying the kit! I guess that thing has an alternator keeping the battery charged and firing the starter coil so in effect it is self-sustaining until the gas leaks by seals, etc. 300 hp = 224 kW self sustaining and that is the 2 cylinder unit! HOLY S#%€ is that thing real? If they are going

Re: [Vo]:Gas driven E-cat

ent! The FART triggered ECAT! I > bet that after this announcement the BEAN's stock market, aside the nickel > one, is going to get a big boost on the near future. Let's see what's > goin'on in Wall Street next Monday opening! > Just matter of solve the smell issue b

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012

Think of a big lightning ball floating inside that reactor creating ionizing radiation and lots of heat. I would think you would want to keep it away from the walls of your reactor and maybe spark plug/instruments else you will cook them. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:16 PM, David Roberson wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012

I do not see any mention of radiation/ionization products like gammas, x-ray, etc. They do mention UV laser bombardment. Trying to make sure my theory still holds... DGT still made out that they did not understand the complexities of their Rx > > I perused it, but I'm not sure how Defkalion inc

Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012

I would imagine that anything coming close to those high temperature (thousands of degrees) singularities evaporating would take alot of wear and tear from both the heat and particles actually getting sucked into the singularity. The constant, Hawking radiation spectrum of emissions should over ti

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine: inside piccy

Well, Now that I have thought about it some more, if you look out into space and see millions of galaxies rotating around singularities, within that singularity is probably the last civilization in that part of the universe that had a Quantum Singularity device operated by Rossi... I hope that I

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine: inside piccy

quantum singularity engine at some point and stepped on the throttle too hard... On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson < svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Chemical Engineer > > > This is not chemistry. It is high energy particle & quantum ph

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine: inside piccy

This is not chemistry. It is high energy particle & quantum physics. I believe you can collide just about any gas particles and end up with a collapsed singularity if you add enough energy at point and time of collision. To minimize energy required, use a smaller vessel/voids(down to quantum siz

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine: inside piccy

The device is a high energy gas particle collider creating quantum singularities (perceived as ball lightning) at the point of the high energy collisions. Since Hawking radiation emits the full spectrum of visible light, that is what they are seeing. On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:33 AM, OrionWorks - S

Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

elieve we better be careful what we are playing with else we might become one of those black holes we see up in the sky... On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > Guys, > > I did it again, I have a couple revisions of this, in one instance it > should say 1-8

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

Guys, The energy from this device would come from the atomic gas ion collisions in the approx 1 TeV to 8 TeV range and should produce singularities (ion collapse) which quickly evaporate releasing nuclear energy. Just enough and it will purr like a Schrodinger kitten. Too many singularities or o

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

Guys, The energy from this device would come from the atomic gas ion collisions in the approx 1 TeV to 8 TeV range and should produce singularities (ion collapse) which quickly evaporate releasing nuclear energy. Just enough and it will purr like a Schrodinger kitten. Too many singularities or o

Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

gt; > > Jojo > > > > - Original Message ----- > *From:* Chemical Engineer > *To:* c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM > *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag > > Just a couple of quick corrections to my

[Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

ry for the confusion. On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote: > All, > > > I understand that National Instruments is now calling this a quantum > reactor. I have attached a draft of what I believe, without a doubt is the > primary Nuclear process formerly k

Re: [Vo]:Curiosity

Since the saucer drops like a rock unlike in the movies where the saucers use quantum singularity drives, the aliens will assume we are stupid and harmless with no way to get back home... On Tuesday, August 7, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, David Roberson > > > wr

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

That too! On Tuesday, August 7, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Chemical Engineer > > > wrote: > > It's not fusion, you are witnessing a quantum black hole singularity > > evaporating and emitting low energy photoms, quarks, etc. St

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

It's not fusion, you are witnessing a quantum black hole singularity evaporating and emitting low energy photoms, quarks, etc. Stimulated by electric arcs, lightning, emf, etc. Quantum gravity holds this together while it evaporates. On Tuesday, August 7, 2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote: > Eric,

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

This also happens in the Rossi reactor to thermalize gamma radiation. > Test your theory by explaining this anomaly. By the way, you can see this > anomaly first hand and experiment with it by buying the $350 kit. > > That is a small price to pay for a Nobel prize. > > Cheers: Axil

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

tml > > Also, the August edition of Scientific American re-examines this: > > "Thunderclouds Make Gamma Rays—and Shoot Out Antimatter, Too" > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=thunderclouds-make-gamma-rays-shout-out-matter > > -- Lou Pagnucco > >

Re: [Vo]:The literature is confusing. That's why I recommend . . .

Jed, Thanks, I have read Ed's guide and found it very easy to understand and very informative. He mentions there is only one pathway (other than fission) to release that level of energy - Fusion, while I believe there is another which better explains the phenomenon seen across the board - the eva

Re: [Vo]:Noble Gas Plasma Engine

Axil, I believe that light is from a quantum singularity evaporating while feeding off your rydberg matter. A perfect e=mc2 engine. See my grand unification theory of cold fusion just posted. On Monday, August 6, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > The Rossi reactor is already obsolete. > > > Joseph Pap

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

ine involved. I was hoping you could answer all of these questions by morning?... Godspeed On Monday, August 6, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > > At 10:17 AM 8/6/2012, Chemical Engineer wrote: > >> I have been following for a year and half but it is still very confusing >&g

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

Abd, Great informative post with ego left out unlike others. On Monday, August 6, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: > At 09:31 PM 8/5/2012, Mark Gibbs wrote: > >> Jed and Craig, >> >> It's interesting that you both want the mainstream media to pay attention >> to cold fusion yet you complain when

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

Jed, I happen to be at the Kitty Hawk, NC beach today so i am channeling your thoughts. The only planes flying overhead today are pulling banners selling Geico insurance. You are obviously one of the better resources for all scientific documents and history associated with anomalous heat. I sug

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

That was my point, thanks for confirming On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Chemical Engineer 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > He did not use the word "exothermic" you made that up to support your >> point. > > > I was r

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

He did not use the word "exothermic" you made that up to support your point. I am going to tune out now and get an update on one of your robots landing on Mars in T-3:45. Let's all pray for that dude coming in hot at 13,000 mph On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

Jed, You were nit picking Mark, we all new what he meant. I will await the next edition of your book, "Anomalous Heat and the Future" On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Chemical Engineer 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> wrote > >> >> On

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

Jed, On one hand you want to be technical and on the other hand you do not. Which is It? Actually I think you call it cold fusion to promote your book else you will need to change the name... On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Chemical Engineer 'cheme...@gmail.com&#x

Re: [Vo]:Gibbs article is annoying

Jed, He did say " ...there are various reactions that output more energy than is put in..." which is good enough for me. What i think is more curious is that everyone, including you want to call it "cold fusion". Even Martin F. regretted calling it that according to what i read. On Sunday, Aug

Re: [Vo]:Obituary: Fleischmann, 85

I agree with Mark on this one and credit him with a more balanced summary of the state of things this go around On Sunday, August 5, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: > > http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2012/08/04/the-state-of-the-cold-fusion-market/ > > "Many have argued that the discrediting of

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter to ICCF-17

Frank, That was 600 C and 1000 C and not F... On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, wrote: > You are not kidding, it will soon be a year since Rossi's big test. I > worked for and was at meetings with a big utility. Independent tests mean > a lot. The lack of such is a disappointment. > > Increasing

Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides

ns end up making > the overall situation worse since we do not know the consequences > associated with them. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: Chemical Engineer > To: vortex-l > Sent: Mon, Jul 30, 2012 5:19 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate

  1   2   3   >