sip-implementors
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Olle E. Johansson
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Roman Shpount
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] Some TLS questions
Alex Balashov
[Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Jonathan Lennox
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Jonathan Lennox
Re: [Sip-implementors] Way to Secure RTP as per RFC 4568
Aman
[Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Liviu Chircu
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] Reinvite/ACK race
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY method for CNAM querying
Alex Balashov
[Sip-implementors] Opensource voice engine to use in VoLTE client
DeejayD
[Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Gaurav Khare
Re: [Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Shadab Siddiqui
Re: [Sip-implementors] EVS Codec
Srinivas Ch
[Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Ivo Vastert
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Ivo Vastert
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec negotiation on SIP Referred-by
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
VARUN BHATIA
Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] B2BUA behavior in correlation of Pre-Conditions & Multiple Early Dialogs
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Abhishek Jain
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Abhishek Jain
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Network Initiated De-registration
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Andrew Pogrebennyk
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
M. Ranganathan
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] rules for From-tag generation in forking B2BUA
Andrew Pogrebennyk
[Sip-implementors] R-URI INVITE with not UA IP@
Ruben Barriga
[Sip-implementors] 183 session
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
Re: [Sip-implementors] 183 session
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SBC sending 403 Forbidden when UE includes Anonymous in From header's user part
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] Offerless Re-INVITE
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Offerless Re-INVITE
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
neil corcoran
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
AnUBhav SriVaSTavA
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Should CANCEL request include the Route set from a reliable 18X
neil corcoran
[Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Arun Tagare
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Ranganatha, Bharath (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
venkat ramana
Re: [Sip-implementors] Dividing the AS, RR and RS values from NW allocated DL_MBR
Ranganatha, Bharath (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
[Sip-implementors] SDP Payload Format
bidhu biswal
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP Payload Format
Asim Sulaiman
[Sip-implementors] In-Dialogue
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
Re: [Sip-implementors] In-Dialogue
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
NK
Re: [Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
Alex Balashov
Re: [Sip-implementors] No ACK for 200 OK
Puneet Kumar
[Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Asim Sulaiman
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Rohit
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Prakash K
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Robert Sparks
Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] How to insert the ephemeral port in Via header as source port
Rohit Jain
[Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Contact header URI comaprision
Rakesh
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Shanbhag, Somesh (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
[Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Is it possible to fork early media?
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
[Sip-implementors] SDP answer with c=0.0.0.0 and a=sendrecv behavior
Sourav Dhar Chaudhuri
[Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Parveen Aggarwal
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Parveen Aggarwal
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Sending deRegister request just after sending REGISTER request
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] indicating to send requests over TLS
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] SIP ALG detector
Matt Rea
[Sip-implementors] AYUSH - Ayurveda, Yoga, Homeopathy and More invite by Directorate Of AYUSH
Directorate Of AYUSH
[Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
NK
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Bye before 200 OK for Initial Invite
NK
[Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
sampat patnaik
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Jan Bollen
Re: [Sip-implementors] FAX T38 issue
Rakesh
[Sip-implementors] Message Body in SIP ACK is NOT SDP
amrita chaudhary
[Sip-implementors] answer RTP/AVPF to offer RTP/AVP
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] answer RTP/AVPF to offer RTP/AVP
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dinoop
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dinoop
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Handling of message cross over between 200OK(INVITE) and 200OK(PRACK)
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anjan Naik
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anand Konji
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Anjan Naik
Re: [Sip-implementors] Early Media and 200 OK with SDP
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Ramesh Kuppili
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Shanbhag, Somesh (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Ramesh Kuppili
Re: [Sip-implementors] Duplicate RTP streams with same source IP address and Port number
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Adam Frankel
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Adam Frankel
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Re: [Sip-implementors] What is being rejected here?
Aman
[Sip-implementors] race_condition
Verma, Salil (Nokia - IN/Noida)
Re: [Sip-implementors] race_condition
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] race_condition
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] Receiving 481 Call Leg Transaction does not exists for INVITE with Reliable Provisioning
Harshith Mulky
Re: [Sip-implementors] Receiving 481 Call Leg Transaction does not exists for INVITE with Reliable Provisioning
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Puneet Kumar
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on SIP REGISTER refresh dialog
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Rohit Jain
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Alok Tiwari
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] X-Forwarded-For for sip traffic
Maxim Sobolev
Re: [Sip-implementors] X-Forwarded-For for sip traffic
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] Re-INVITE without SDP - Held Both
Bharath Reddy Mallepalli
Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-INVITE without SDP - Held Both
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
dheeraj kumar
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
dheeraj kumar
Re: [Sip-implementors] Request for RFC section for UE behavior
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: Contact within PUBLISH
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 7463: PUBLISH with To tag question
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Mohit Soni
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Rakesh
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTRTION INFO
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Varadhan Work
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Mohit Soni
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Request URI Domain processing without Port
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] PRACK and Proxy Servers Compliant to RFC 2543
Vimal Tewari
Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK and Proxy Servers Compliant to RFC 2543
Brett Tate
[Sip-implementors] PRACK and RFC Compliant to RFC 2543
Vimal Tewari
Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK and RFC Compliant to RFC 2543
Paul Kyzivat
[Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Varadhan Work
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Brett Tate
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
kamini gangwani
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Dale R. Worley
Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Domain with single part
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] Routing logic at network when multiple clients co-exist on same device
Senthil.Pandian
Re: [Sip-implementors] Routing logic at network when multiple clients co-exist on same device
Senthil.Pandian
[Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
sairam pokkunuri
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
Tarun Gupta
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
sairam pokkunuri
Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding UAC behaviour for ACK with proxy-authentication
Tarun Gupta
[Sip-implementors] Question about RFC 3398- Ring back Tone and One Way Audio Issues.
Zuñiga , Guillermo
Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about RFC 3398- Ring back Tone and One Way Audio Issues.
ankur bansal
Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about RFC 3398- Ring back Tone and One Way Audio Issues.
Dale R. Worley
[Sip-implementors] m:inactive in SDP offer
Aman
Re: [Sip-implementors] m:inactive in SDP offer
Paul Kyzivat
Re: [Sip-implementors] m:inactive in SDP offer
Aman
Earlier messages
Later messages