atom-syntax  

Messages by Date

• 2006/05/18 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call David Powell
• 2006/05/18 RE: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/18 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track for Atom Threading Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/17 Re: Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track for Atom Threading Extensions Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/05/17 RE: Feed Thread in Last Call Byrne Reese
• 2006/05/17 RE: Feed Thread in Last Call Byrne Reese
• 2006/05/17 Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) Nicolas Krebs
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Antone Roundy
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call John Panzer
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James Holderness
• 2006/05/17 RE: Feed Thread in Last Call Byrne Reese
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) John Panzer
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Paul Hoffman
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Paul Hoffman
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Julian Reschke
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed update mechanism Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/17 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Bill de hÓra
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Martin Duerst
• 2006/05/16 Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed update mechanism M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/16 Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread)) Paul Hoffman
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Lisa Dusseault
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/16 Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) James M Snell
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/16 Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) Bill de hÓra
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Paul Hoffman
• 2006/05/16 Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-snell-atompub-feed-thread) The IESG
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed update mechanism Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/16 Feed update mechanism Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/16 Re: Feed update mechanism David Powell
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/15 Re: Feed Thread in Last Call Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/15 Feed Thread in Last Call James M Snell
• 2006/05/10 Re: Content and Summary Test James Holderness
• 2006/05/10 Re: Content and Summary Test James M Snell
• 2006/05/10 Re: Content and Summary Test James Holderness
• 2006/05/10 Weekly Posting Summary Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/10 Content and Summary Test James M Snell
• 2006/05/09 RE: What Atom software are you working on? Granqvist, Hans
• 2006/05/08 Re: What Atom software are you working on? M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/08 Atom Rank Extension Design Issues (was: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted) Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/08 RE: What Atom software are you working on? Sean Lyndersay
• 2006/05/08 Re: Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/07 Re: What Atom software are you working on? M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/06 Re: What Atom software are you working on? James Tauber
• 2006/05/05 Re: What Atom software are you working on? M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/05 Re: Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) James M Snell
• 2006/05/05 Re: What Atom software are you working on? Nick Gerakines
• 2006/05/05 Re: Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) James M Snell
• 2006/05/05 Re: Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) Thomas Broyer
• 2006/05/05 Atom Rank Extensions: Feedback on r:value and r:range elements wanted (long) Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/05 Re: What Atom software are you working on? M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/05 Re: Feed thread -09 M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/05 Re: Feed thread -09 M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/05 Re: Feed thread -09 David Powell
• 2006/05/05 What Atom software are you working on? Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/05 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/05 Re: Feed thread update David Powell
• 2006/05/05 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Tim Bray
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update James M Snell
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Tim Bray
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Tim Bray
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Kyle Marvin
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Tim Bray
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread -09 A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread update Thomas Broyer
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread -09 M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread -09 A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread -09 James M Snell
• 2006/05/04 Re: Feed thread -09 (was: Re: Atom Rank Extensions) A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/03 RE: Atom Rank Extensions Sean Lyndersay
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Peter Robinson
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Peter Robinson
• 2006/05/03 Re: Atom Rank Extensions David Powell
• 2006/05/03 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/05/03 Re: addition to next rev of FH?[was Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links?] Mark Nottingham
• 2006/05/03 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/03 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Paul Hoffman
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/05/03 Re: NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community Mihai Sucan
• 2006/05/03 addition to next rev of FH?[was Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links?] Bill de hÓra
• 2006/05/03 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/03 Re: NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/03 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? David Powell
• 2006/05/03 Re: NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community Mihai Sucan
• 2006/05/02 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/05/02 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Weekly Posting Summary Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/05/02 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/05/02 Feed thread -09 (was: Re: Atom Rank Extensions) James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions David Powell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions James Holderness
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/02 Re: NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community Mihai Sucan
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 NOTE TO OPERA STAFF : Problem with misrepresentation of Atom version number in Widget community M. David Peterson
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/02 Re: Feed thread update A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Andreas Sewe
• 2006/05/02 Re: Entry types James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Feed thread update James M Snell
• 2006/05/02 Re: Feed thread update A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/02 Re: Entry types Sylvain Hellegouarch
• 2006/05/02 Re: Entry types David Powell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Atom Rank Extensions John Panzer
• 2006/05/01 Feed thread update James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/01 Re: Atom Rank Extensions A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/05/01 Re: Atom Rank Extensions Robert Sayre
• 2006/05/01 Atom Rank Extensions James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James Holderness
• 2006/05/01 Entry types James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Peter Robinson
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Peter Robinson
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Eric Scheid
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/05/01 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Eric Scheid
• 2006/04/30 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/04/30 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James Holderness
• 2006/04/30 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/04/30 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? Mark Nottingham
• 2006/04/28 Re: Datatype for IRIs in RELAX NG Henri Sivonen
• 2006/04/27 Re: Is there a way to specify that a feed requires a login? John Panzer
• 2006/04/27 Re: Feed Thread Draft Updated A. Pagaltzis
• 2006/04/27 Re: Feed Thread Draft Updated David Powell
• 2006/04/26 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James Holderness
• 2006/04/26 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/04/26 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? John Panzer
• 2006/04/26 Re: Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? James M Snell
• 2006/04/26 Tools that make use of previous/next/first/last links? John Panzer
• 2006/04/25 Re: Atom ConformanceTests results and feedback James Holderness
• 2006/04/25 Re: Link rel test cases James M Snell
• 2006/04/25 Re: Link rel test cases James Holderness

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]