""LOON"" wrote in message
news:200211120210.CAA20443@;groupstudy.com...
> 1. Where should one start to prepare for the CCIE written exam, what kind
of
> approach?
as always, begin at the beginning
www.cisco.com/go/ccie
> 2. What are the benefits or privileges associated with the CCIE?
in toda
a couple of things - in line below
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:200211120028.AAA03239@;groupstudy.com...
> Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets
> suppose I have two routers (R1 and R2) which are advertising the same
> set of networks: N1, N2, ... Nk.
>
> OSPF is
not that I really know, but a couple of thoughts
increase the TCP window size, and enable the selective ack feature.
increasing window size allows for the transmission of more data whilst
waiting for acks.
the selective ack feature supposedly allows for selectively acknowledging
packets within
it can't hurt! ;->
just think in terms of what Cisco thinks is important to them. I believe
that Cisco has taken great steps to make the CCIE Lab more relevant than it
has been in several years. Cisco considers voice to be the driving
technology and engine of its growth over the next few years. w
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:200211060114.BAA21842@;groupstudy.com...
> Vicuna, Mark wrote:
> >
> > this is a good pdf to peruse over...
> >
> > http://www.usb.org/developers/data/devclass/usbcdc11.pdf
>
> Good stuff. It doesn't mention PPP or SLIP, which I wouldn't think that i
As of this morning, I have been able to verify the following resources for
Cisco 3550 study and practice. By Monday, not only will these switches be in
the CCIE Lab, but test takers will be responsible for all L2 and L3
functionality, including things like VLAN tunneling, BGP, and a wealth of
other
For those United States residents, Tuesday is election day. No politics
here. No flames here. You have a right and a privilege that is rare in
today's world. Please take the appropriate amount of time to get to your
polling place and exercise the right that many have fought and died for.
Your vote
""Stephane Litkowski"" wrote in message
news:200211021923.TAA29421@;groupstudy.com...
> As I said, on my 2500, there's no command "clns routing" in "show run"
> But after verification, clns routing is enabled (but command does not
> appear).
>
> 2514-MPLS#sh protocols
> Global values:
> Internet
""Catalin"" wrote in message
news:200211021650.QAA21112@;groupstudy.com...
> Here is my problem:
>
> 1) I have two subnets: 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 and 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0
> 2) 10.5.0.0 should not access any resource on 10.1.0.0
> 3) 10.5.0.0 should have internet access
> 4) the internet access rout
""Greg Macaulay"" wrote in message
news:200211012046.UAA07098@;groupstudy.com...
> Stop the presses --
>
> I solved the problem
>
> (1) I needed to have connectivity between the router and my LAN. So I
> connected the E0 interface to the Cable-Modem Router (10/100).
> (2) Then I configured th
""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message
news:200211010440.EAA07078@;groupstudy.com...
> I think the version of IOS in the LAB is 12.1(5T). Chuck could confirm
> this, as well as I believe it is on the CCO site.
CL: actually, I don't know, as I haven't been in the lab in a while ( but
will be soon
""Eric R"" wrote in message
news:200211010406.EAA30793@;groupstudy.com...
> for those of you planning to take the new test coming soon...
>
>
> Resolved IOS Caveats in Release 12.1(11)EA1a
> These IOS caveats were resolved in Release 12.1(11)EA1
what port is your hyperterminal set up to use? surely not your ethernet
port, since one uses hyperterminal for serial communications.
if you can ping from DOS to the router, then the ethernet segment is OK
but your hyperterminal provides you only with a session to the router or
switch.
Greg - d
found this while stumbling around:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/safev_wp.pdf
enjoy
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56618&t=56618
--
FAQ, list archives, and su
well, I was going to do a quick and dirty lab for you, but entering the
neighbor command has been wreaking havoc on one of my routers.
in general, what I seem to have proven is that even with the neighbor
statement configured under the RIP process, RIP announcements will not go
out an interface th
""Jennifer Mellone"" wrote in message
news:200210310718.HAA06644@;groupstudy.com...
> Cute!
>
> So I'm thinking that tomorrow (Halloween) I'll put on a subnet mask.
> It will be 255.255.0.0, and the two 0's will have little holes in the
middle
> for my eyes ;-)
too bad they no longer allow "whac
ran into another one today. customer specified APC ( angle polished
connector ) for his fiber links.
I did some searching on the net, and I believe I understand a bit of the
physics involved. 8 degree reflection of the lightwave. used in cable tv
deployments. ( I may be misunderstanding )
I asked
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:200210302236.WAA17724@;groupstudy.com...
> Jason Owens wrote:
> >
> > I have a LAN segment in which I wish to move the routing from a
> > 7206 to a new 6509. On the 7206, The interface I want to move
> > has the one main segment (172.16.x.y/24) and a
in any octet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
if the rightmost bit is 0 ( zero ) the number is even
if the rightmost bit is 1 ( one ) the number is odd
= even
0010 = even
0100 = even
etc
0001 = odd
= odd
etc
you should be able to figure out a one line access-list using this i
""DAve Diaz"" wrote in message
news:200210301521.PAA21871@;groupstudy.com...
> you get a regrade and the same detail, takes ages apparently, unless your
> really close you are giving cisco free money
>
CL: probably "takes forever" because the proctor would have to rebuild your
pod from the saved
saw this one come through today. Personally, I agree with the premise.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3953254;5700831;g?http://207.27.3.33/2/
watch the wrap
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56500&t=56500
--
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
news:200210291940.TAA15991@;groupstudy.com...
> Priscilla,
>
> This doesn't explain why it says at the beginning of the survey (not sure
if
> this is true for all exams), "Your answers to this survey will help in the
> grading of this exam" (not sure if these
o visits here regularly.)
>
> John
>
> >>> "The Long and Winding Road"
> 10/29/02 10:45:30 AM >>>
> Some folks believe that writing is a solitary profession. The writer
> sits in
> his/her little office, banging out the thoughts, coming up wit
Some folks believe that writing is a solitary profession. The writer sits in
his/her little office, banging out the thoughts, coming up with the
manuscript, and sending it off to the publisher, who does everything else,
including sending royalty checks in huge amounts.
I recently discovered that w
""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
news:200210290538.FAA14601@;groupstudy.com...
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > ""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
> > news:200210280429.EAA24675@;groupstudy.com...
> > > The Long and Winding
""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
news:200210280429.EAA24675@;groupstudy.com...
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> [snipped]
> > > area 0 range 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area not working on ABR
> > either
> > >
> >
> > CL: well, ar
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
news:200210252303.XAA06341@;groupstudy.com...
> >Tim Medley wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh did they mean to redesign the website? I thought some script
> >> kiddies defaced it and Cisco hadn't had time to fix it.
> >>
> >
> >Nope, marketing kiddies! ;-)
> >
> >Prisc
think "route-maps"
the access-list part should be easy to figure out.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
""J B"" wrote in message
news:200210251954.TAA07601@;groupstudy.com...
> Can some one help me with this one?
> or point me into the right direction!
>
>
> Rip routes:
>
> 100.0.0.0/24
> 100.1.0.
one more thing - I have proof positive that in line power "can" work just
fine over Cat 3
Chuck
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message news:200210251844.SAA20015@;groupstudy.com...
> Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.
Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan
and the server configuration. I was one of the warm bodies corralled to do
installation of the desk sets.
Some idle thoughts.
( Mr. RFC 1149 Compliant is free to laugh loudly at me and make denigrating
comments :-> )
1)
there. probably for all
those people out there who can't or won't do proper design
>
> Dave
>
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> > news:200210241322.NAA16403@;groupstudy.com...
> > > Sure y
""ccie ccielab"" wrote in message
news:200210231402.OAA29232@;groupstudy.com...
> I configure point-to-multipoint on serial int and the /32 mask show up
CL: yes - that's the way it is supposed to work. see rfc 2328 for details.
>
> R1
> int s0
> ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
> ip ospf net poi
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:200210241322.NAA16403@;groupstudy.com...
> Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
> VLANs in the same box.
CL: you can also bridge between unlike vlans and unlike subnets - don't
forget fallback bridging!
>
>
> Dave
>
> Jesse Loggin
""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message
news:200210210329.DAA32381@;groupstudy.com...
> Sorry for the misunderstanding, guys. I got to thinking more about this
and
> I guess I wasn't thinking of the MSFC, just the 6500 switch itself. I work
> with 6000's with MSFC's and it should have slapped me in
route. I can't
find anything off hand. It might require a more careful read than I have
time for right now.
>
> Although, at first look everything does seem to be very straight-forward,
> not until you get under the hood do you really see or observe the real
> issues involved. Thanks
OR - who / what is over rated?
I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. I sat down
with high hopes, after a frustrating afternoon at the rack. I was looking
for some enlightenment.
The first book I hit was one of the so called "CCIE Professional
Development" books. The chap
this is the second consecutive morning where I have seen the entire week of
November 11 with lots of empty Lab seats.
Plus a few on Nov 19th.
The next open dates after that are in May 2003
Interesting.
Get 'em while they're hot!
--
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.ph
On Behalf Of
> > Erick B.
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:53 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Native VLAN 1 [7:55743]
> >
> >
> > Comments inline...
> >
> > --- The Long and Winding Road
> > wrote:
> > > ""L
""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Pris,
>
> In our 6509's we used to make the native vlan and the data vlan
> the same and it was something other than 1...if a blade fails and
> we put in a new one , it defaults to vlan 1 for all ports. If the
> b
This one deserves a homily. I can sleep tonight after solving this one.
The age old question - how to get a /23 to propagate into classful /24
domain via redistribution.
I've been toying with this a while tonight.
The problem - an "in use" interface - token ring or ethernet - has a /23
assignme
""Shahid Muhammad Shafi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> the babies are in San jose as well ;-)
CL: did you hear sobbing and the sounds of heads banging against the
desktops while you were there? ;->
> Cisco Nuts wrote:Sorry Greg,
>
> On a sidenote, they ha
""John Brandis"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Got this problem. Have a site at the moment, site a running the 172.17.x.x
> networks. Management has just informed me that we have just acquired an
> empty building down the road, site b. The idea is tha
an addition to the mix
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa
versa
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa versa
a) getting smaller subnets to match a longer boundary
( subnets with longer prefixes )
b) dealing with larger subnets than
based on this and the off line moderators' thread, I have to ask, Howard -
who put the nickel in you? Cuz whoever it is, no more nickels for them. :->
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
the price for this list is reading Howard's jokes
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in messa
better off buying a cheap hub.
someone better versed in the electronics than I will explain this.
Essentially, the splitter does not provide the right circuitry back to the
switch.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""Sim, CT (Chee Tong)"" wrote in message
[EMAIL
no no no - read CCO and what it says.
during the period Sept 1 through Nov 4 the equipment will be swapped. It
won't happen in every rack in every location on the same day.
There are some places where the 3550 is already in place. RTP, for example,
so folks have said - here on this list and else
> > play with them as well, and I have seen a lot of innovative
> > devices, (right
> > now I get a T-Mobile Pocket PC Phone Edition as my cell phone)
> > and I love
> > them, but what I'm seeing is not the devleopment of bandwidth
> > over their
> > networks, but
0's of thousands
of lines per year to wireless, and most people just want to yak on the
phone, no matter where they are. Which is one more reason to telecommute.
> --
>
> RFC 1149 Compliant.
>
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message [EMAIL PR
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP
telephony/VoIP
> isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little
as
> 8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS scor
Passed the DQoS exam today.
60 questions, 60 minutes, can't review questions, for those of you who can't
live without this kind of information.
Let me say that after my recent hellish experience with the CIPT exam, I
found it a pleasure to take a test in which all of the questions were based
on
S bits marked,
I think I stated in a different post that all packets were apparently being
identified as IP packets with no ToS bit set.
> JMcL
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
> >
> >
> > As near
snipping a little for clarity and brevity. response below
--
""Jenny McLeod"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> snip
> >
> > > I am getting confused at this point, should it be possible to
> > have IP,
> > > IPX and QoS all at the same time?
> >
> >
> > CL: sure, th
: Sunday, October 13, 2002 6:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CCIE Lab - what's wrong with this picture? [7:55288]
>
>
> ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
> message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Fol
this looks like a job for NBAR, if not Surf Control
""Arnold, Jamie"" wrote in message
news:200210122343.XAA07638@;groupstudy.com...
> It will try one of the standard, higher ports that are listed, if it can't
> get through it begins to look elsewhere...like 80.
>
> MS made it smart..to som
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
news:200210122330.XAA04802@;groupstudy.com...
> In line (like a firewall)...
snip
>
> CL: Let he who has never brought a network down by accident ( or
> otherwise )
> cast the first stone. Did I ever tell you the one about the newly
> minted
> Novell admin who de
OS thing. I'm using
12.1.5T10, which "should" work. I'm following along in the DQoS class book.
>
> >>> "The Long and Winding Road"
> 10/12/02 01:42PM >>>
> the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
>
>
> As near as
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of testing
QoS configurations.
I have done any number of tests this morning. all of the following have been
applied inbound on an interface:
access-list 171 deny ip any any p
""Daniel Cevallos"" wrote in message
news:200210121728.RAA31195@;groupstudy.com...
> I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office
on
> October 15, 2002.
>
CL: I can hardly wait!
>
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
a couple of comments below. may get longish as I just put together a Q&D
lab, and the outputs may bog this down.
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:200210121501.PAA05804@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi JFD,
>
> Thanks for the response, but it doesn't answer the question. Is there
> something
> about
the 3550 documentation instructs you to use the "change vtp domain name"
technique, which works fine.
I haven't tried the other ways, because they are too radical.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
""Paul Ruiz"" wrote in message
news:200210120215.CAA31258@;groupst
here are a couple of internet sources I use:
time.nist.gov
ns.arc.nasa.gov
tick.usno.navy.mil
I haven't looked in a while, but these days you can probably do a google
search and get a zillion reliable time servers.
if your client requires the IP address, you can ping each of the names, and
get t
""neil K."" wrote in message
news:200210112334.XAA14349@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi Group,
>
> Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any
> help is highly appreciated.
whoa - deja vu, dude! just had a thread like this one yesterday. there
were some good explaina
I'm doing something very similar on a customer network recently installed.
Double NAT'ing works just fine provided you have the appropriate paths to
and from the other end.
In my case I have Clinic-Umbrella_Org_Router-PIX-internet
Clinics have a hodgepodge of addresses. I NAT from the
in case anyone is interested, my answer below
--
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a
> moment, until I remembered somethi
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Nathan Chessin wrote:
> >
> > 1) Since when is VoIP a "bandwidth-hungry app"
>
> Good point. VoIP isn't usually a bandwidth hog, although I guess it could
be
> with tons of users all using their phones at on
I downloaded the most recent B*S*N test engine and sample tests. I'm just
wondering
On my laptop, the software locks up every time. No keyboard or mouse
response. Will sit forever. I finally had to uninstall it for fear of losing
too many other important things.
On my desktop - it doesn't l
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Nathan Chessin wrote:
> >
> > 1) Since when is VoIP a "bandwidth-hungry app"
>
> Good point. VoIP isn't usually a bandwidth hog, although I guess it could
be
> with tons of users all using their phones at on
DQoS test on Monday. Let's see if I pass of rail!
some thoughts below
--
""Adam Broad"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I have a 1720 router connected to a 3640 router by leased line (256K
> link). I wish to route IP, IPX and have VoIP (QoS) from site to
""Nathan Chessin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 1) Since when is VoIP a "bandwidth-hungry app"
CL: it sure will be when teenage boys and teenage girls start using the
medium! :->
>
> Nate
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The number after network.node is the IPX socket number, not an SPX socket
snip for clarity
> Were those numbers you told us made up to hide the details for security
> reasons? Can you tell us the actual num
""Aziz Islam"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Group,
> Is there a way of finding out if a 8-port or 16-port Gigabit Ethernet
module
> on a Catalyst 6509 Switch has GBIC's installed by consoling into the box.
A
> quick answer can be to just look at the Catalyst
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I just realized that I kind of looked like a dork by responding like I
> did. I discovered that if you read this email on the web you can see
> the entire thing. In my mail box it was truncated dramatically.
CL:
""Clark, John"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What difference does it make when I say "default-metric 1 100 255 1
> 1550" instead of the above.
>
> answer: EIGRP uses a composite metric so you would be changing the
bandwidth
> (1) and MTU (1550) for route
Following my own advice, I regularly check CCO to see what's up with the
CCIE Lab.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45
Looks what's new!
-
Equipment List
2500 series routers
2600 series routers
3600 series routers
3900 series Token
""Black Jack"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> As long as we're dreaming...how about adding a big whiteboard with Caslow
or
> Pavlichenko stationed in front? :-)
CL: as long as we're headed towards left field, let's get that remote viewer
guy who's always on Art
""John Hutchison"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm curious. We offer DSL and CIR as far as I've ever dealt with it is the
> minimum throughput the telco will guarantee. Are they mistating? For
> example, our 768x128 dsl has a cir of 10k.
CL: you would think th
Ole, it's been a long time for me as well, but isn't that last set of
numbers - the four after the : ( colon ) the SPX socket number? That is the
thing that appears to be changing.
Not that I would know what the change signifies. what's running on that
workstation?
--
!
""Ole D Jensen"" wro
you're asking two different questions.
in answer to question number 2 -
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html
""Colin Weaver"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for opinions on what you would do (buy) if yo
Again, not claiming to know a lot of ATM, but certainly understanding telcos
who don't configure their part correctly..
does your carrier use ILMI at all? if so, you could set up ILMI and then do
a debug to see what the telco is sending you.
I'm trying to recall if there is a downside to doi
""Al Walter"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Do you think he could have meant the 111th CCIE?
CL: hhhmm... a thought.
CL: it wasn't too many years ago that a lot of CCIE's that I met weren't
really big on strutting their numbers. My former boss at Ma
the problem? [7:55218]
>
>
> Someone changed the MTU size and now Outlook won't work!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The Long and Winding Road
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a
moment, until I remembered something.
Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it
I remembered?
High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try their hands.
"During the maintenance
well, this has been discussed here many times but
the first CCIE was #1025 I don't recall the name now, but a month or so
back we got the name here on the list
the second CCIE was / is Terry Slattery, #1026
you can always check out the guy's bona fides on CCO -
http://tools.cisco.com/CCI
assuming you have the proper image on the 3550. this should give you the
idea
interface vlan 10
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface vlan 20
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
interface fa 0/10
switchport access vlan 10
interface fa 0/20
switchport access vlan 20
router eigrp 123
""Router Man"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've always known it to work the other way around. If you change the
hello
> interval - the dead interval will
> become 4 times the hello interval.
CL: this was one of the old standbt trick questions in various stud
in line ( like the skates )
""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Our parent "company" had the idea of letting a TelCo do the same for us.
> The TelCo was/is contracted to set up a "gateway" between the old
> network and the new network. Lucky for u
401 - 487 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
