Yes we have settled the question. Most PBX's will probably use analog E&M
if small, or Digital PRI/QSIG if larger.
You can run an IP phone off of a router with ITS or SRST, but I probably
shouldn't be telling you that without the caveat that you need a license for
either service.
When you combine the switches via gigastack, you are usually doing it
because you can't afford a chassis based switch in the closet (or don't need
one). If you do gigastack the switches, they are treated as separate hops
in spanning tree. I guess it's cheaper to run small gigast
You can use dialer-load threshold for incoming traffic as well.
""Christopher Dumais"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all,
> I have an ISDN line set up for vendor support. It is dedicated to one
> vendor. They are always the one to initiate the call, their
I'd just use MRTG, and cut and paste the files into a Power Point slide or
2. Plus some numbers with the pictures. That should suffice for both of
you.
""Moises Luy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sorry, I don't have
t;news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Chuck's Long Road wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm putting in some rack time to review certain QoS features.
> > > Configuration
> > > is not really a problem. MQC makes this really easy :->
> > >
> >
Is it me, or is no-sync the default in BGP in 12.2.11T?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53920&t=53920
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
The signalling protocol used to set-up/tear-down a converstation wouldn't
affect the quality of the voice. Maybe the equipment you used was superior,
or was on a low latency network.
""Gunjan Mathur"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree that SIP is the future, it just isn't there yet. There is some SIP
being built into Unity and CM, but until everything is SIP (as opposed to
MGCP/H.323 and Skinny), it just isn't useful yet.
I know that SIP is being deployed in SP networks, and I have implemented it
in a Telc
h.323 is more robust, but more complicated (both to develop for and learn).
SIP is new and easy, but useless right now. There's more security in h,323
right now.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Gunjan Mathur"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> Is Cisco 2600 se
I have to imagine a 1548 is quiet.
""Charlie Wehner"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm looking to buy a switch for my apartment. (Right now, the 2950T
24port
> 10/100/1000Base-T looks promising.)
>
> However,
you can do priority dlci's and you can apply class maps to map classes I
think.
""dayo olabisi"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi listers,
>
> I want to do some form of queueing on sub-interfaces
> on some of
I don't think much has changed from the "old days". I know there's a ton of
new h.323 features, but those aren't in CVOICE. And most aren't used in
simple networks. The VoFR stuff will probably go away.
SIP's the new thing, but not there yet
--
RFC 1149 Co
I believe that it's the same.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""JohnZ"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can I use access-list to produce the same effect as prefix-list ? Any
> thoughts on which is a better way to use in redistrib
I believe IGRP is still proprietary.
>From the IETF page:
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/igrp
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""hktco"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When I learned my CCNA and CCNP, I read that IGRP is Cisco
> proprietary. Recently I was told that
ced
> that the CVOICE book (edited by Steve McQuerry etal) discusses
> VoFR and VoATM (chapters 8 and 9):
>
>
> analog+---+ +---+ analog
> phone A1 | | ATM | | phone B1
>...
no, not that I have ever heard of.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""John Wright"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi guys,
>
> Just found this group and it looks like a great resource for Cisco
> certification misc. question
I'm in the process of connecting several 3548 switches ( located in IDFs )
via GBICs and need some long patch cables to do so. Does anyone know of a
good source for extended fiber patch cables?
Thanks in advance, Bob McIntire
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
I have lab vouchers for Fatkid. I tried one but did not find
them very helpful. Are there any lab experiments online
that would be good practice w/ three routers, and three
switches. -edgar
. . . there was given to me a thorn in the flesh,
the messager of Satan to buffet me
That line is the reason, but it got cut off. Resend the entire line.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""FAhmed"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all
> I ve got a problem
>
> The user is getting disconnect after 2-3 minut
tells isdn card at what point to bring up second channel.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""hagedorn"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hy can someone exlpain me for what the load-interval in isdn is.
>
> any comments are welcome.
>
> Regards Philipp
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
does not appear to be any jobs
anyway, so I'm in no great hurry.
Any suggestions where I might get any kind of
experience/practice?? I would work for free to get it.
-edgar
P.S. I can work for free because I am independently wealthy.
. . . there was given to me a thorn i
so far so good. I installed one for a client, and it worked awesome. I
even dropped it 10 feet, and it still worked!
""Brian Wilkins"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I was wondering if anyone else has been experiencing pro
dialer-load threshold 1either
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear ALL,
>
> how i can make ISDN BRI to connect at 128kbps instead of 64kbps as a
bundle
> channel of C
sh ip int
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""YASSER ALY"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All, Is there a way to verify that " no ip directed-broadcast " is
> enabled on an interface.I was trying to enable it on a route
No Speed 64 is the default. But I will try it. Are your sure this card
supports straight no PRI T1? I have heard conflicting reports.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52093&t=52090
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscrip
Is it possible to configure an interface to support a full non channellized
T1? If so how?
The T1 interface goes up up but after I config the serial interface goes UP
UP then after about 10 seconds the serial goes up down. The T1 never goes
down.
version 12.2
service timestamp
service
Larry hit it right on the head. WFQ is a poor choice for voice, and you'll
probably notice a huge difference when moving to LLQ.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have 6 sit
h.323 can do it with RAI, or you could use SA Agents. THose are your two
best options.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Jake"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is there a way to tell a router (3810) , which is running voip, to reroute
a
this is a nother link.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/474/pswdrec_2900xl.html
Regards,
Fathalla
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mamoon Dawood
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Erasing a password
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Erasing a password from a 3524 switch [7:51709]
Dear All,
How to erase Enable password from 3524 switch,
Regards,
Mamoon
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51714&t=51709
--
: RE: IP Multicast. [7:51648]
for a start you can get the book on IP multicast from
Cisco Press by Beau Williamson...It covers most of it
in detail...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jose
I did it before one year, It was 54 questions over the WEB (35$ for a trial)
with 80% passing score and unlimitted answering time. I have heard that now
the answer time is limited.
Regards,
Fathalla
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay
Speaking of stateful PIX's, if I make a change on 1 PIX, and it has failover
on, will it automatically make a change on the other PIX?
""Gaz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> says...
>
Is there an IDS signature that can help you recognize it on the PIX? That
maybe the easiest way to do it.
""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey all, maybe silly question, but how do I log who is port scanning me?
Iv
> got the logging on my PIX t
I never had a cisco engineer ask if we were silver or up. Just call your SE
and schedule some lab time, that's how it works in MA. The only requirement
is you have to have passed the CCIE written.
""cebuano"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
John,
I would first try looking at the logs on the PIX (look for denied traffic
from, or to devices in question), and also run debugs on both inside and
outside interfaces to see if the packets are making it to the PIX, and
source and destination ports and addresses.
Message Posted at:
http://w
All,
I am new to studygroup. I recently the CCIE written, and I am looking for
some suggestions as to what equipment would be optimal to set up a home lab
(keeping in mind a restricted budget).
Thanks to all,
RA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51302&
you can use "show process" to check the router CPU utilization.
For SNMP traffic timeout you need to have a snifer to monitor the source and
destination ports and check the network status and what is the problem.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai
Hi Mark,
If you don't mind can you please send me a copy of the same.
Regards,
Fathalla
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Turpin, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 9:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I'd appreciate if you can send me a copy of the same.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark W. Odette II
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LANE Information [7:50420]
I'd like
can you please paste a copy of your x25 debug?
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Pooja Thakur
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X.25 switching on CISCO; Please help [7:50521]
Hello,
I have a
Did you check her website?
Lots of information on troubleshooting there.
www.priscilla.com
>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 08/02/02 10:47am >>>
Speaking of Priscilla's books:
I've recently bought TDND as it was recommended as a great study guide for
the CCDP, CI
Dear All,
Thanks for some valueable suggestions. One more thingif one is willing
to be a great networker, young, energatic but unable to get hands on
experience then what are some guidelines for him/her..
Thanks,
AA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&a
Dear All,
Thanks for some valueable suggestions. One more thingif one is willing
to be a great networker, young, energatic but unable to get hands on
experience then what are some guidelines for him/her..
Thanks,
AA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&a
Dear All,
Thanks for some valueable suggestions. One more thingif one is willing
to be a great networker, young, energatic but unable to get hands on
experience then what are some guidelines for him/her..
Thanks,
AA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&a
apter that I left that
book.
You mentioned that "And to learn how protocols really work, the must have
book is by Oppenheimer and Bardwell. ;-)" but what is the name of the book?
Thanks a lot!
AA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&
then
gradually move towards advance networking stuff. My ultimate aim is to be a
Voice Engineer.
Thanks in advance!
AA
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=50317&t=50317
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription in
Sup 3 is IOS based, Sup 2 is CatOS based. Sup 3 is new, and may not have
all the features you desire right away.
I think Sup 1 is L2 only.
""Stuart Pittwood"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We're looking into replacing
s are not shared between clusters within
the
> } software, so a "Grand Dial Plan Scheme" should be developed before
starting
> } and implemented within each cluster.
>
> At this point, the astute will note that dial plans are simply
> another form of addressing. They wil
to pick the version up front. I have Compaq DL380s and DL360s,
> these are the fastest servers I have ever seen. Esp for the size, 1U,
> and its great that it comes with insight manager for free. I don't like
> IBM, I think there products are junk and they can never get a concept
>
I don't think so. I have never seen any of those requirements in the
blueprint or anywhere else.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if IPSec or CBAC or TCP intercept topics are REQUIRED for
> the
CBWFQ should work. You can guarantee a minimum that each class of traffic
will receive during times of congestion.
""DW"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone help,
>
> I am setting up a WAN link between two sites that
oc192.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Suppose you have a network with a mix of FE, GE, OC-3/12/48 POS
> links.
>
> With the standard OSPF link costing mechanism, all of these l
ers as well.
But I guess if they did ask about old qing methods, it would be someting
like this:
Use a qing method that gives priority to one q with no regard to protocol
starvation. Then you'd use PQ
Use a qing method with no PQ and has 5 classes for you to chose from. Then
you'd use
> internal use. I think that having a private corporate IM server for the
> corporate users to connect to would be a great way to increase
> productivity. However, on the same hand, I would fear the end-users
> being able to connect to AIM, ICQ, MSN, etc. That would open up way to
&
Does anyone know what type of traffic a typical Polycom Video Con. unit
creates? It it multicast? What ports does it use? Is it standard h.323?
I can sniff it, but if anyone has already done their homework on it, it will
save me some time.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Message Posted at:
http
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Be careful with this kind of thinking. More and more holes in IM are
> showing up everyday. If you let IRC on your network then you are asking
for
> trouble. As for streaming audio, have you looked at the % of bandwidth
they
> use? If
There are a lot of "Cisco Powered" networks doing QoS, but more for
multi-service type stuff for voice and video.
If you look on Cisco's web-site, there's a whole program your ISP can join
to become "Cisco-powered" in multiservice, although I don't know the ex
PDM. It's just too easy. Or use CiscoWorks VMS or CSPM to manage a bunch
of them.
I can't stand the cli and it's archaic language. I'd rather make sure my FW
is easy to configure so I don't miss anything. If something is too
complicated, you don't even know if
CBWFQ is easier to configure and the default q is a WFQ.
""Jay Greenberg"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone please explain the difference between CBWFQ and CQ? It seems
> to me that they both allow you to class traffic in a custom manner, so
&
I haven't been keeping up with NBAR, but they may have some pdm's to block
the streaming audio apps.
NBAR was built for stuff like that, but I don't feel there's a need to block
this type of stuff. Same with IM. Let the users have some use of their PC
and increase produ
if I'm wrong, but if you use ip default network, all
> other routes are being announced anyway?
>
> Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> >
> > on the interface to the rest of the routers, do a ip eigrp
> > summary address
> > 00.0.00 0.0.0.0
> >
> > or
> >
t; Steven, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you use ip default network, all
> other routes are being announced anyway?
>
> Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> >
> > on the interface to the rest of the routers, do a ip eigrp
> > summary address
> > 00.0.00 0.0.0.0
> &g
I'D recommend it.
""Doug Korell"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is anyone using Cisco Secure Access Control Server and if so, how do you
> like it? I am looking for something to work with PIX VPN, RSA SecurID key
> fobs, and possibly Cisco Aironet. My Cisco rep
L PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dennis Laganiere wrote:
>
> > "To prepare for this exam, candidates may wish to review the exam
> > blueprint and study suggestions."
> > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#5
> >
VoIP or Call Manager/IP Tel?
If I had to take a class, I guess it would be CVOICE, although I've never
taken it. I've read the book, and I'd recommend that.
I would also recommend a QoS class. That may be the most useful, and there
aren't a ton of good books to help unders
yes.
""Robert Cluett"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone clarify this for me?
>
> During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books
> states it is in this order:
>
> - Routing Table is Generated
> Down State
> Init State
> 2w
turn on dcef or cef.
""GEORGE"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet
> interface on a 7513
> service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF
It's just one stream (the other users). You don't talk, send out your
stream over the wan, have it come back to you.
""neil K."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Steve,
>
> It makes sense to consider two RTP fl
I'm not sure the context the document was written in, but it's only 24K
(give or take depending on the L2 encap) that you need to plan for.
Steve
""neil K."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Using the st
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Steven A. Ridder
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 4:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: callmanager intercluster setup [7:49191]
>
> IP telephony documentation on -line should hel
Sounds like it could be faulty or out of DSP's. Check the syslogg for
errors.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Kevin Love"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> We are connecting two QSIG voice switches through a compressed VoIP
&
IP telephony documentation on -line should help
There's also the official documents on-line as well
""supernet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Where can I find some information on how to set up callmanager
> instercluter?
>
> Thanks.
> Yoshi
Message Posted
What kind of traffic is going across? What type of link connects the router
to the AP (10 or 100 MB)?
""neil K."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> Please recommend a QoS technique for implementing on Cisco
shape.
""Alejandro Acosta Alamo"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> Today I'll be installing DC3 card on my router. I wanted to restrict the
> bandwidth only to 14 Mbps. How can I do that?, do I have to use
rate-limit?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alejandro Acosta
Comments inline:
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> >
> > I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain
> > multicast traffic
> > unless i
I just want to make sure I'm correct: A VLAN will contain multicast traffic
unless ip multicast routing is on the router (or other l3 device) right? So
a whole switch (or stack of switches) will not be flooded with one VLAN's
multicast traffic, right?
Also, why is "ip forward-
reboot it and still have control of the router, for rommon and such.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""supernet"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've got a US Robatics modem on 2621 Aux port. When I dialed up to the
> router, I go
That's a good justification.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If the Wan Guys were the only one who could access the NMS, then I would
> agree, but giving "others" acc
L PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Out of curiosity, what ones did you like?
>
> Dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Steven A. Ridder
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
answer. I didn't understand the two stage dialling
which
> I think I do now.
> The voip dial peer sends all digits whereas the pots dial peer strips the
> matched digits.
> The destination pattern for an operator (dial 0) on a remote site would be
> something like:
>
> dial-
You would be going against conventional wisdom, Cisco's Kool-ade and every
other help-desk manager. I think one platform SHOULD manage all the stuf.
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Guys,
>
> I
Yes, it's the same thing. Everything I learned was from Cisco press,
there's a couple of great books out there.
""blitzlight"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currenty preparing for CIPTSS cer
I got April 2002 in a recent router. You just have to open up a box at work
and get the latest.
""Mark Godfrey"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone help me find the latest and greatest version for the CCIE Lab
>
I think the RFC that say's keepalives must be at least 2 hours isn't very
security conscious. What I mean is if you take a syn attack, it sets up
connections and then never sends any data, holding the connection in a
half-open state. I know there's a finite number of connections
Here's a hidden command: csim start (number). If the call completes
correctly, it will tell you. And the other thing is to do some debugs as
someone already wrote.
""Pierre-Alex Guanel"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Tha
I'm not sure I understand the question. If the question is, if there's a
number 335, and I tell the router 355 is over on a different router, is that
a valid dial-peer (355). If that's the question, yes it is.
Did I understand the question correctly?
""Gaz&q
If you have CM, you can do it with CRM records.
If you have Cisco Works, there's a VoIP package for it. You can probably
get pretty graphs from that.
There's probably others, like HPOV, What's up Gold, PDM may have something
(that's free from Cisco) but reporting is probabl
I did a search under WinTar and here's what I found:
pad
pad
http://www.spiralcomm.com/
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I should have made it clear that I need to retain the directory
> structur
command,
in
> particular the "Output Queue" and "Available Bandwidth" line.
>
> Why on a 256Kb line does it show Available Bandwidth 192Kb?
>
> I look forward to your responses.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Jens
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
The proctors have been saying it in all the Networkers CCIE powersessions.
""Paul Jones"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Where did you hear that there were going to be two switches per rack? How
> do you know you won't have to do any CatIOS?? Please enlighten
Do you have a protocol sniffer? Even etherreal may help.
""Curious"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Open Question
> How do we detect the source of collision, i am experiencing alot of
> collision on my LAN, which
.0.255 172.25.0.0 0.0.255.255
> access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq 3389
> access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq www
> access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq 443
> access-list 100 permit tcp any 203.19.170.0 0.0.0.31 eq ftp-data
>
at 08:13:02AM +, Ross Wood wrote:
> At the moment I am doing a design project for my CCNA classes. But I am
> having some problems. I have chosen the 3550-48 & 3550-24 switches and was
> wondering what kind of router I should choose. Most of the routers only
have
> 10/100 Ethe
gt; ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0
> ip inspect firewall in
> bandwidth 192
> frame-relay de-group 1 17
> frame-relay interface-dlci 17
> frame-relay payload-compression packet-by-packet
>
>
> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]&q
I'd do some dubugs like "debug voice ccapi inout" to see what numbers are
being sent to the PBX and across the IP call leg (on both sides).
I'd also try to validate your dialing plan by doing a "show dialplan number
(DN you wish to test)" to see whci dial-peer
One of your routers should act as DTE end and the other should act as DCE
end. To accomplish this you need two cables and as an example you can use
one V35-MT (for DTE end) and one V35-FC (for DCE end).
___
Fathalla A. Fathalla
International Turnkey
You can use CDR and CMR records on the CM
Plus the phone gives you the CMR info if you're on a call and the i button
twice.
As for ensuring the quality is good, you need to do a good QoS design.
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Legatio and a SAN. I probably spelled it wrong, but that's the best
package.
""Firesox"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Folks, I searching for the best way to do the backup for servers.
Currently
> we have local backup ta
show me the configs
""Dennis Cooper"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi guys
>
> The scenario is two customer networks merging in the same building and we
> have a Cisco 3620 in between the two LAN networks. (E
101 - 200 of 1310 matches
Mail list logo
