Hi
Sounds useful! I wonder if we want to support injecting both or just
bundleContext, since it is pretty straightforward to get bundle from
bundleContext (or the other way around).
Lin
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking about adding support for in
Congrats Shawn!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Ivan wrote:
> I would like to welcome Shawn as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
> invitation to join the PMC. We look forward to working with him to maintain
> oversight of the Geronimo project.
>
> Welcome!
>
> --
> Ivan
>
Congrats!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo
> PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has
> demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
> We're very glad
Congrats!
Lin
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Please join us in congratulating Delos as a new member of the Geronimo
> PMC. In addition to all his work on GEP and Samples, Delos also has
> demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
> We're very g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12903529#action_12903529
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-5553:
---
Hi
After some initial investigate, it tu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4681.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I believe this work is done in current trunk/plugingroups/javaee6-web-jetty
Yes they are all in the current web profile assembly with no plan to
remove them.
Thanks,
Lin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> We need connector, TranQL and RAs for OpenJPA
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 8/20/10 2:29 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
>> Ok, regardi
010 4:36 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it. At
>> least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the
>> openejb-client.
>>
>> Also, I don't
It seems hard to remove javamail given openejb depends on it. At
least for the javamail schema for JNDI, which is used by the
openejb-client.
Also, I don't quite understand this comment in G roomt pom.xml -
org.apache.geronimo.javamail
ge
g else I missed on this topic?
>
> Thanks
>
> Lin
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the
about tranql could comment
on this?
Anything else I missed on this topic?
Thanks
Lin
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the
>>
Hi
I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the
requirements for Java EE 6 web profile and prune the unnecessary
artifacts. I've been mainly look at the tomcat7-javaee6-web and I
have some comments/questions:
felix core: i assume we'll always ship 2 osgi runtime?
connector
Hi
I tried to run the following:
jaxb-tck-runner, stax-tck-runner
it both has run.sh scripts and requires JAXB_HOME or STAX_HOME to be set.
Anyone knows where these variables should be set to? Thanks
Lin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone know t
Hi
Does anyone know the latest test status of these standalone TCKs?
I am building my G 3.0 server and intend to run these TCKs one by one,
except the at-inject-tck and the jcdi-tck. The at-inject tck doesn't
need a full G server and it all pass now. From what I heard, the
jcdi-tck isn't read
I agree too!
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> All,
> Our policy for granting access to the Geronimo TCK test harness is described
> here --
> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html#GeronimoProjectPolicies-AccesstoTCK
>
> The policy describes
t;>> biggest part of the effort would be mapping the openwebbeans profile
>>> from Tomcat over to using Geronimo
>>>
>>> Since the JBoss provided TCKs use ASL 2.0, take a look at their website,
>>> which usually describes in pretty good detail how to run t
the open web bean jar(s).
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi Donald
>
> Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point
> me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid
> archive to be deployed to a App server?
>
Hi Donald
Thanks for the reply. I am not familar with BVAL tck. Can you point
me the suiteXmlFiles? Also does the BVAL tck provides a valid
archive to be deployed to a App server?
Please see more comments in line.
Lin
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> It looks like th
Hi
I have been investigating how to run the JSR 330 tck (also called the
atinject tck), as this is a requirement for Java EE 6 compliance.
I am able to check out the open web bean project and run its atinject
tck from the open web bean project checkout dir, using the atinject
tck runner provided
+1 sounds reasonable
Lin
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Jarek Gawor brought to my attention that the web services support in 3.0 has
> not yet gotten any testing or attention. While it builds, it is in a state
> where it doesn't really work. Since the focus of the M1 re
Seems No. 3 is the right approach, given that there is no overhead on
the user side and it gives the ability to add the imports at the last
minute, before the PU is resolved.
No. 2 gives some extra work on the user side which can make the PU not portable.
Np. 4 has to be done when PU is installed
hu, May 6, 2010 at 15:24, Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I think no. 3 is cool. some other qualifiers that I can think of are
>>
>> 3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release
>>
>>
>> Lin
>>
>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor w
Hi
I think no. 3 is cool. some other qualifiers that I can think of are
3.0.0.m1, 3.0.0.m2, 3.0.0.release
Lin
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before the milestone release we might have to figure out what osgi
> version (if any) the Geronimo packages should be e
Congrats Donald!
Lin
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new member
> of the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition of his many
> contributions to Geronimo, OpenJPA, and Incubator projects.
>
> Co
That sounds a great idea to me!
Lin
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently
> in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder,
> could be quite useful to other projects, so it m
Great news. Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently integrated the JTA and JPA pieces from Aries in Geronimo
> and exposed connection factories in OSGi service registry. With these
> changes we now have all the main pieces in place to deploy un
I think there was a similar discussion on aries list last year, and we
decided to use the ones from osgi (which is more current and
official).
Lin
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I noticed some comments on a felix list that I think indicated they thought
> the core and comp
+1 able to start, stop the server, visited admin console and verified
a few link function okay.
Thanks for pulling together this release David. I visited the jira
list, it contains hundreds of items!
Lin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2
Hi, thanks for trying that. I guess the difference of your scenario
vs. what I've tried before is that your scenario imports the package
but also exports the package(like bundle 2)
Lin
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Lin Sun wrot
Interesting. I used other mandatory attribute without Require-Bundle
fine before. And "partial" here is just same as other mandatory
attribute, right?
Anyway this should be something quick to try to see if we could avoid
Require-Bundle
Lin
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Hi,
Do we have to use Require-Bundle here? I would think Import-Package
of packageX with the mandatory attribute should wire bundle 2 to
bundle 1.
Here's my understanding of your scenario:
Bundle1:
Export-Package:x;partial=true;mandatory:=partial
Bundle2:
Import-Package:x;partial=true
Export-P
Hi Jarek
Great progress! I have 2 minor comments, let me know if I misread it -
1. You may want to unget the ApplicationMetadata manager service
2. the deploymentException message looks weird - Unable to copy app
client module jar into configuration
Thanks
Lin
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:59 AM,
Hi,
I wonder if ear should continue working as what what they were working
before and would not be installed as bundles in OSGi framework. And
if users want to leverage OSGi functions in ear, they would have to
migrate their ear file to an Aries Application
(http://incubator.apache.org/aries/appl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785488#action_12785488
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4971:
---
FYI -
Ok, I was under the impression that you need to modify the bundle
before the bundle is started/starting, thus I was suggesting the url
handler to do so.
Lin
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I'm not trying to implement a new way for Geronimo to convert a WAB bundle
> into G
What I meant was that geronimo has full control of artifact deployment
when user is deploying through the geronimo supported deployment
mechanism. You are right that a bundle can use
BundleContext.install() to install any bundle at any time, but that
doesn't mean it will work or it is supported.
Hi, see comments below.
Lin
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The URL handler is a different stage of the processing. That gets involved
> at the installation time of the bundle, and
> causes a transform of a standard WAR into a WAB, which then gets processed
> by the exte
Hi, Please see comments below, Thanks
Lin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> For a WAB deployment, the extender become involved after the bundle has
> been installed and started. At this stage, there's no opportunity to modify
> the bundle contents.
You are right that the
+1
Lin
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The Aries podling has just been accepted (see
> http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place
> for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo.
> This vote is mainly for donating the co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4683.
-
> Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4683.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely c
+1
Lin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
> implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
> an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
> Spring-DM being the RI of this sp
Thanks. If there is no objection by end of Sunday, I'll start this
work earlier next week.
Lin
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
> Agreed, since it won't hurt.
>
> -Jack
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>&g
Hi,
Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G about the Transaction.commit
signature is missing the IllegalStateException. The reason why I
raised this JIRA is because in OSGi RFC 98 (Transaction in OSGi)
compliance test, we use Geronimo's JTA spec jar as the baseline.
During OSGi RFC 98 compliance t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun reopened GERONIMO-4683:
---
I just realized that the SecurityException is also unchecked exception. So we
are listing one but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4683.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Lin Sun
> Transaction.commit method signature isn't
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I would like to welcome Ivan as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
> invitation to join the PMC. We look forward to working with him to
> maintain oversight of the Geronimo project.
>
> Welcome!
> david jencks
>
>
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I would like to welcome Rex, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
> invitation to become a committer. We are still waiting for his account to
> be created, but hope to get that straightened out shortly and start seeing
> c
Congrats!
Lin
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I would like to welcome Shawn, as he recently accepted the Geronimo PMC
> invitation to become a committer. His account (genspring) has been created
> so we may be seeing some commits from him soon.
>
> Congratulations!
> davi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12724211#action_12724211
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4711:
---
Where is the component definition for
Also, would it be possible to get it working by specify a version range, like:
Import-Package:javax.transaction;version=”[1.1,1.2)”
Lin
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Interesting prob... I wonder if you add the split-package (see
> http://www.aqute.biz/Code/Bnd) wh
Interesting prob... I wonder if you add the split-package (see
http://www.aqute.biz/Code/Bnd) when you export the jta packages would
solve the prob for you. This is what I have been using but I only
tried Equinox so far.
Export-Package = \
javax.transaction;version=1.1;-split-package:=f
: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Lin Sun
I found out the Transaction.commit method signature isn't entirely correct.
Per JTA 1.1 for the Transaction interface:
commit
public void commit() throws Rollbac
I believe this is caused by the fact that config admin service is not
active yet when I attempted to start the bundleprint sample. After I
made sure config admin is active, this error doesn't appear.
Lin
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the
Hi,
I followed the instruction in the blueprint README and everything went
well till step 5a - start
-> start 9
Bundle start
[org.apache.geronimo.blueprint.container.BlueprintExtender] : Scanning
bundle blueprint-sample for blueprint application
[org.apache.geronimo.blueprint.container.Blueprint
One example that we did this is with the config-substitution property
file where we allow users to specify configuration and the server
reads the config-substitution property file during the startup of the
server. If we more or less freeze the configuration, wouldn't this
(reading data from serve
I am not a tomcat expert either... :-) I think we could also try the
following approach:
1. figure out how to read tomcat server.xml like you described.
Tomcat is using
2. at the G server startup, transform data in tomcat server.xml into G
config.xml, if there is change to server.xml since last ti
One quick way would be allow users to start a tomcat server from a
geronimo tomcat javaee5 assembly or little G tomcat assembly(say
geronimo.sh start tomcatOnly=true). It is possible to just launch
the tomcat server, and read the configuration files (conf/server.xml,
etc) and start a tomcat serv
Hi,
In case you don't know, the OSGi Alliance has chosen to use the
Geronimo txmanager to build the Reference Implementation of
Transaction in OSGi (RFC 98). If you are interested in RFC 98, there
is an early draft specification avail off the OSGi Alliance home page
(go to http://www.osgi.org/Ma
gt; work in getting geronimo to actually work has been focussed on solving (2).
>> If we ditch our working system for (2) we won't have a server.... perhaps
>> ever. In terms of assembling a server, without (2) the space of possible
>> bundles to resolve to is the entire mav
good discussion here:
http://thhal.blogspot.com/2008/02/dependencies-and-package-imports.html
- in particular in the first comment from Neil Bartlett and the
limitations of Require-Bundle documented in the OSGi v 4.1 core spec
(section 3.13.3).
Lin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Lin Sun wro
I think this is a valid concern. My understanding is that the OSGi
community is working hard on this as they are working on
specifications for a Web Container in OSGi with requirements like Java
EE compliant web container in OSGi. They are also working on
specifications for JNDI in OSGi, transac
See comments below.
Lin
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> The point I was trying to make is that with Geronimo the classloader
> hierarchy is pretty much created/setup at build time while in osgi if
> you are using Import-Package is at runtime. Here's an example. Say, we
> ha
Congrats Ivan!!!
Lin
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he recently accepted the Geronimo
> PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just created this
> morning (xuhaihong), so you should start seeing some commits from him
I think this is a fair requirement from.I also think the OSGi
community is aware of this requirement. For example, the web
container in OSGi spec that I am following, it requires the web
container in OSGi to support deployment of traditional war file as
well as the OSGi bundle war file.
Lin
Hi David, I think this is a good move and worthy investigation! I
have some comments below.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Geronimo has been around for a while and despite the many good features
> gbeans and the geronimo kernel are not catching on big time. I think we
> w
ssary if you had
> performed the step immediately prior to the copy (chmod -R g+w
> public_html/staging-site/[siteId]). Are you sure you didn't just skip that
> step by mistake?
>
> Regards,
> Joe
> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
> Lin Sun wrote:
>>
>> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4564.
-
> update to use transaction manager 2.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4564.
---
Resolution: Fixed
updated trunk and 2.1.4 server to use txmanager 2.1.2 (see subversion commit
issues)
Components: transaction manager
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.2
Reporter: Lin Sun
Assignee: Lin Sun
Fix For: 2.1.4, 2.2
Txmanager 2.1.2 is released. Let's update pom.xml to use it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
Yo
The vote passes with 7 +1 votes (all from PMC members) and no others.
I'll push the binaries and site out today.
Thanks!
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
>
> The following changes
Hi,
Many thanks to Joe and Donald for their votes! Anyone else wants to
vote but hasn't had the time to do so? Let me know... I can extend
the vote till end of Monday.
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager
Here is my +1 too
Lin
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
>
> The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
> GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on singl
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on single host -
default impl needs some 'random' entropy
GERONIMO-4438 - TransactionSynchronizationRegistry.ge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4519.
-
> When XAException.XA_RBROLLBACK arisen from XAResource.end, TM should not send
> rollback request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun closed GERONIMO-4506.
-
> switch to use txmanager 2.1.2-snapshot in geronimo server 2.1 bra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4519.
---
Resolution: Invalid
mark as invalid (see subversion commit tab)
> When XAException.XA_RBROLLB
Ok, I thought it would not be long before I can start a vote on this.
I'll revert this in case someone else wants to work on the txmanager
2.1.2 branch.
Lin
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:25 AM, lin...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: linsun
> Date:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4506.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
resolved - see subversion commit tab
> switch to
+1 Thanks for volunteering to be the release manager!
Lin
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it's time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release. We've had a lot of
> important fixes since 2.1.3 and we should get them out to our users.
> And if we agree, I would also like to v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666594#action_12666594
]
Lin Sun commented on GERONIMO-4519:
---
I have been reading the XA spec again on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4482:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
> a few improvements on XAExceptions during enlist resource, prep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4482.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits tab
> a few improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4478:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
> enhance exception handling during transaction rollb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4471:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
> improve heuristic exception handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4478.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits.
> enhance except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4471.
---
Resolution: Fixed
see subversion commits tab
> improve heuristic exception handling in rollb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4449:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4466.
---
Resolution: Fixed
see subversion commits tab
> Improve exception during transaction mana
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4466:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
> Improve exception during transact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun resolved GERONIMO-4461.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
see subversion commits tab
> Improve except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4461:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
> Improve exception during transaction manager one phase com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4438:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4448:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1.4
Fix Version/s: 2.1.4
> TransactionManager resume method sho
Good point - I agree the vote only passes if it doesn't cause any tck prob.
Lin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Would like to see a full run of the TCK to make sure there are no
> regressions before we release it
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Lin Su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lin Sun updated GERONIMO-4519:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.2
Fix Version/s: 2.2
> When XAException.XA_RBROLLBACK arisen f
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4519
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: transaction manager
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
Reporter: Lin Sun
Assignee: Lin Sun
Hi,
I 'd like to release txmanager 2.1.2 as I made some changes to it
recently. I am going to work on putting a vote out if there is no
objection by end of tomorrow.
If you are interested in the details of the changes, I think most of
them are recorded as JIRAs:
GERONIMO-4438
GERONIMO-4448
GERO
Kevan, Thanks for resolving this. I haven't thought of those
SNAPSHOTS were dated, as changes have been there for quite a few days.
Lin
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Lin Sun wrote:
>
>> Donald, I performed a compl
Donald, I performed a complete build (mvn clean install) last Friday
with this change. There were only a few web services test failure but
my test server appeared to hang. So I reran these failed web services
tests individually and they all passed.
Lin
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Donald Wo
1 - 100 of 1011 matches
Mail list logo
