[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999056#comment-12999056
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-2995:
---
This looks ok to me although I don't like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12996947#comment-12996947
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-2995:
---
Since it's been about 2 1/2 months before
that putting it in myfaces impl is not a good idea because
theoretically myfaces-api can be used with another jsf implementation.
thanks
david jencks
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
this suggestion?
Out of curiosity, how are myfaces releases scheduled? I didn't see any notice
or warning on the dev list that this vote was imminent.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.4 release of Apache
+ impl bundle), so I'd be interested to
know what problems Leonardo has run into.
And, sorry for sounding disgruntled I didn't realize 2.0.4 was a kind of
emergency bug fix release.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
If it is for OSGI only I think
Hi,
It's a month later, holidays are over, I'd like to ask again that this be
considered.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I don't think we can include it for 2.0.3 release. This change should be
discussed carefully, and that requires some time
carefully at
the ee spec and think that 1 classloader per ear is definitely allowed.
thanks
david jencks
So imo this sounds like a no-go
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 12/7/10, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Subject: Classloaders
for your response) .
2010/12/7 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I have not compared the myfaces classes with the openejb jaxb tree for
faces-config.xml, so I have no idea how plausible this idea might be. Would
it be possible to annotate the myfaces object tree representing
faces
the default implementation of the spi then there
is something wrong with the interface design. If the sorting is universal then
perhaps it should not be in a class implemented by a service provider?
thanks
david jencks
--
Ivan
: Improvement
Components: General
Affects Versions: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
As discussed on dev list geronimo would like to explicitly mark component
boundaries rather than relying on the TCCL changing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
this proposal out for consideration and review ASAP.
I've opened MYFACES-2995 and am attaching an initial patch for consideration.
thanks
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks updated MYFACES-2995:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Make method of determinine app context
, expertise, and a
few minutes could take a look and provide some advice I'd really appreciate it.
thanks
david jencks
())
assuming a non-null argument.
Whatever the cause of the null I'm seeing returned from getFacesConfig this
doesn't seem right.
thanks
david jencks
to be filing jiras for the other
issues tomorrow.
thanks!
david jencks
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
It could be good to do a release of myfaces core 2.0.3 next week, after
release myfaces-builder-plugin.
The last patch required to add support to myfaces with geronimo
: General
Affects Versions: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
Attachments: MYFACES-2991.patch
I ran into this with the tck in geronimo. The test appears to be trying to
render a button that is just created and not part of a view to test the EL bits
of encodeBegin
Thanks for taking care of MYFACES-2983. I've opened MYFACES-2990 and
MYFACES-2991 for the other two problems I know about. At this point these are
the only critical problems for geronimo that I know about although I may have
some further suggestions in a couple days.
many thanks!
david
org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator
...
(several more)
Anyone else seeing this? I think the relevant methods were removed from
FacesConfigurator in rev 1039554
thanks
david jencks
: Bug
Components: General
Affects Versions: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
There are a few instances where only the TCCL is considered for loading
resources that are actually in a myfaces jar. This won't work in an isolated
classes environment like OSGI. A simple
3 lite already. Or you might try packaging it in two
ways, one as a web profile app and one as a servlet app with all the extra
support included in the war.
david jencks
BTW, it's not a *real* real-world app (it's not running in production for a
client). I'm not allowed to do
and OpenJPA 2.0. I also
use Hibernate Validator.
If you want to line up with more apache projects you could look into apache
bval.
david jencks
I got a strange error with CODI, so I skipped it for now to stay up-to-speed,
but I guess we should get that one in.
My goal with this example app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12936113#action_12936113
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-2976:
---
I think the downloaded snapshot is working
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12935946#action_12935946
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-2976:
---
Jakob's revised patch seems to work fine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933662#action_12933662
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-2976:
---
I added the export
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Extension Feature
Affects Versions: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
The current osgi solution of using require-bundle between the api and impl jars
is generally thought of as osgi worst
.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 8, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
2010/11/5 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
I'm trying to understand why the require-bundle header is in the api bundle.
This is a pretty bizarre thing to do in what I've seen of osgi.
Could you be more
If you don't need a shaded source jar, have you guys experimented with the
bundle plugin for generating this jar?
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
No, I understand well, but maybe we are talking about many possible
enhancements at the same time
Reporter: David Jencks
myfaces will only run on tomcat in osgi due to a mistaken Import-Package entry
generated due to tomcat integration code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
doesn't work with snapshot versions.
many thanks!
david jencks
On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
I think we need to do the integration with geronimo first. The only thing
left is an interface for cache faces-config.xml information. I hope to do it
on the following days
, but maybe
not.
I saw some vague claims in the comments to MYFACES-2911 that the api classes
need to load impl classes, but no details. Could someone point me to the code
where this happens? There must be a better way to do this
thanks
david jencks
the plugin is
released. I'd include a comment on why its needed too.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 5, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
the ASF master-pom does contain a _regular_ snapshot repo (linked to
the (new) nexus repo), see:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/trunk
Many thanks for applying this!
If it doesn't go against any myfaces development policies, it would be
great if someone could deploy a snapshot built after this patch.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 24, 2009, at 5:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view
scenario that currently
works that this proposed change would affect, all it does is allow
myfaces to be used in more environments. If you think this change
will prevent a currently working scenario from working please explain
what it is and how.
thanks
david jencks
Scott
David Jencks
to MYFACES-2290 as https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12428613/allow-ee6-versioned-apis.diff
With this patch we can at least start a server that has loaded myfaces
2. Hopefully soon we'll be able to run the ee6 version of the tck.
many thanks
david jencks
On Nov 26, 2009, at 6:23 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540615
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-1761:
---
I'm not sure you have your environment configured correctly
Isn't this complete? We're happy in geronimo with how it's working.
thanks
david jencks
On Jul 17, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1559?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthias
improvement IMO.
many thanks,
david jencks
On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices
changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd
for faces 1.0 and 1.1.
Please take a look at the newly updated files
explain the differences.
thanks
david jencks
Cheers,
Bruno
On 21/05/07, Martin Haimberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
anyone running Tomahawk with MyFaces 12 and Tomcat 6 successfully?
I have created the intellij project with the -Djsf=12 parameter,
which
is working fine for the creation
it fundamentally works differently than 1.1
then 2.0 (or higher :-) would be more appropriate. I have pretty
limited exposure to myfaces but have the impression that 1.2 would be
more in line with the extent and nature of the changes.
thanks
david jencks
On May 18, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Grant Smith
. Having an automated build system is a lot more reliable to
catch problems than waiting for people to complain on the mailing
list or trying to remember to check out the changes into another copy
of the project and build it there.
thanks
david jencks
On 5/15/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL
What is in head that needs to be merged with the 1.2 branch? Why not
move head to 1.1.5_1 and move 1.2 to head?
I'm rather worried that the spec compliance will go down drastically
if there are extensive merges.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:35 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote
on the web without going
through even a clickthrough license can be maintained to be
confidential is a question I can only assume lawyers would love to
answer.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:23 AM, Lance Bader wrote:
I am disturbed by the web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd and web
david jencks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481195
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-1559:
---
Thanks for implementing this, I've hooked it up to geronimo
/
AnnotationProcessorFactory rather than having the factory examine its
environment for something that might work.
many thanks!
david jencks
On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Bernd Bohmann wrote:
Hello David,
we can move the AnnotationProcessor to the package
org.apache.myfaces or an other package and add
in less than a day and even less confidence
that it wouldn't be accidently subverted by a user app.
thanks
david jencks
Regards
Bernd
Mathias Brökelmann wrote:
IMO the simple interface which David suggest is quite sufficient to
solve the problem. I also think that discovery to look up
be called on all managed beans, based on the
spec language you quote
thanks
david jencks
Regards
Bernd
David Jencks wrote:
I actually think my MYFACES-1559-2.patch is a better solution than
the current code + my MYFACES-1559-3.patch. I don't think anyone
will be interested in implementing
On Mar 13, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Bernd Bohmann wrote:
Hello David,
comments inline
David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:38 PM, Bernd Bohmann wrote:
I read this to mean that the jsf implementation is prohibited from
calling posConstruct methdods after putting the bean in scope
the app starts and
injecting them into any object that could possibly want to use them
would avoid your performance concerns and clarify the structure of
the framework. You may have noticed my opinion of discovery on
another thread :-)
thanks
david jencks
Dennis Byrne
On 3/13/07, David
Feature
Components: General
Affects Versions: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
Fix For: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
I'm opening this jira as a convenient place to put code samples in support of
discussion on the dev list
Based on my experience implementing
the
LifecycleProviderToAnnotationProcessorAdapter.
The jira issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1559
Comments? Flames?
many thanks,
david jencks
Affects Versions: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
Fix For: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
If getCurrentInstance decides to create a new MyFacesConfig, it sets it before
filling in the values. This is obviously not thread safe.
With the current MyFaces implementations getting
: General
Affects Versions: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: David Jencks
FactoryFinder has insufficient synchronization to be thread safe, and has a
memory leak in _registeredFactoryNames.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479973
]
David Jencks commented on MYFACES-1558:
---
Thanks for looking into this. I have been working with what you
hoping that the current code base is actually located at https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk/
thanks
david jencks
55 matches
Mail list logo