Peter Stein wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Pratik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On 03/25/2002 06:17 PM, Peter Stein wrote:
>>
>>>Has anyone taken a look? Does anyone care?
>>
>>I just did. And I can't reproduce it. Try deleting your XUL.mfasl file.
>>try it with XUL disabled/enable
Garth Wallace wrote:
> Glenn Miller wrote:
>
>> On 22 Mar 2002, Jay Garcia was seen to have posted this wee note into
>> netscape.public.mozilla.general, to which I have responded as follows:
>>
>>
>>> The build date is 03-14-2002 but that doesn't mean that it's using the
>>> 0.9.9 Gecko engine.
Netscape Basher wrote:
> ftp://sunsite.ualberta.ca/pub/Mirror/mozilla/mozilla/nightly/latest-0.9.9/
>
> I suggest the mozilla-win32-installer-sea.exe download because if you
> download mozilla-win32-installer.exe, it will attempt to download the
> rest from ftp.mozilla.org which current is bein
michael lefevre wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Davey wrote:
>
>>Alex Farran wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
>>>time I go to a site with adverts on it
Alex Farran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The place where I work has blocked access to doubleclick. Now every
> time I go to a site with adverts on it I get a pop-up error telling me
> that Mozilla can't find doubleclick. I preferred the adverts!
Find your hosts file, under Windows NT its under:
c:\winn
Chris wrote:
>
> I was hoping somebody can help me solve this problem I've been having
> with Netscape and Mozilla.
> My setup:
> Windows 2000
> root partition (c: drive) about 200 megs free of a 2 gig partition
> File server, z: drive about 40 gigs free
>
> I went to download Oracle 9i (abo
JTK wrote:
>>Wordstar used to fly on old hardware too. Win 3.11 ran very well in a
>>486 environment with 4megs yet Win 95 replaced it despite the fact it
>>required a Pentium class CPU and at least 16 megs of RAM.
>>
>
>Win95 was a hell of a lot better than Win3.11. Mozilla is a hell of a
>lot
dman84 wrote:
> Tom Hatta wrote:
>
>> I am having another problem. My menu, location bar, links bar, and
>> status bar disappears, leaving only the tabs, and navigation buttons.
>> Pressing Control-N to produce a new window doesn't help (same
>> situation with the new window). My other user pr
John wrote:
> Under windows the recommendation is to uninstall mozilla before
> installing a new version (e.g. 0.9.6 to 0.9.7). Under Linux using RPMs
> what is the procedure? Do you rpm -e current_mozilla first and then
> rpm -ivh new_mozilla or is it ok to simply upgrade using rpm -U?
>
rpm
Myself wrote:
>> If you're really interested you can do a search on google groups,
>> this argument has been beaten to death many times. It basically comes
>> down to that fact that plain text is far more accessible to a large
>> variety of email and usenet clients. You can't even ensure a web
Myself wrote:
>> And besides, more often than not, html mail contains ugly
>> fonts/colors and is spam.
>
>
> Oh well then it must be true. What a terrific argument.
>
> Is there anyone that can state the case?
>
If you're really interested you can do a search on google groups, this
argument ha
Damien Covey wrote:
> Blake Ross wrote:
>
>> This is a petition to fire David Hyatt for his crimes against the
>> World Wide Web, namely his implementation of automatic favicon
>> retrieval. Sign your name here and I will pass this on to Steve Case.
>>
> Is this some joke that normal guys just
Gil wrote:
>[Tacitus@localhost mozilla]$ gzip -dc
>mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-0.9.7-installer.tar.gz | tar -xvf
>tar: option requires an argument -- f
>
Use a simpler method:
tar zxvf mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-0.9.7-installer.tar.gz
ian.
JTK wrote:
>Jonathan Wilson wrote:
>
>>>download manager still needs to land.
>>>
>>Download manager?
>>
>
>Read: Ad pump.
>
You're think SmartDownload. Have you read the spec for Download Manager?
ian.
JTK wrote:
> Well, until you try to run/unizp whatever you downloaded and
> Windows/Winzip tells you it's short. Here's an interim patch until
> future civilizations rediscover the magic of ZMODEM and are able to
> resume failed file transfers. You're more than welcome:
>
> if(DownloadFailed
John Fabiani wrote:
>I only have a two button mouse. I gather there a way to use the keyboard
>for the middle button?
>
Press both mouse buttons at the same time,
ian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it seems that Mozilla doesn't display images with a width of zero
> but a height greater than zero in tables. Is this conform to the
> standard? I think it should "display" an invisible line cosuming
> vertical space.
It sounds like its doing what it should. You can't
David REY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some of my customers (using Netscape) have a pop up windows when they
> start Netscape.
>
> The window say this :
>
> "Time bomb version
> This version has expired. You must download a newer version at
> http://www.mozilla.org";
>
> What should I do ? I really do
Greg Miller wrote:
>
> That's not a terrible increase in bandwidth (the exact figures would
> depend on protocol overhead and such), but web hosts have a nasty habit
> of charging for disk space, which often includes the space for those log
> files that shoot up by over 20% if everyone adopts
Greg Miller wrote:
>>> Last I heard, the industry averages were supposed to be something
>>> like 3:1 pageviews-to-users ratio and 50% repeat visitors. So the
>>> number of favicon 404s would be approximately 1/6 of the total number
>>> of pageviews.
>>
>> That would only be true if every site
Ian Davey wrote:
>
> 1/(6*10*10)
>
> So that accounts to 1/6000 resource requests. If you can come up with
> some numbers to fill in the above guesses then you'd get closer to the
> actual figure.
That should be 1/600 - it's too early in the morning :-)
ian.
Greg Miller wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> It would be really interesting to get some hard numbers on this. Just
>> looking at the current logs will not really say anything since very few
>> people browse with a mozilla with this pref turned on. So we need to
>> come up
>> with some way to
David Hyatt wrote:
> Make sure you ban Konqueror too. :)
And don't forget IE...!
ian.
Christopher Jahn wrote:
> And it came to pass that Gregory Spath wrote:
>
>
>>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Jahn
>>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>>And it came to pass that Schelstraete Bart wrote:
>>>
>>>
--090503040007000902030100
Jay Garcia wrote:
>Jo
Emlyn wrote:
>>What "data security issues" are there in NS6.1 that are
>>not there in NS4.08-4.82(<- HUH???)???
>>
>>So this time it's not a "standards compliance" issue...
>>
>>
>
> If you point Mozilla to a .xul file (intentionally or not) then
> someone else gains some measure of control over
Pratik wrote:
>> (2) The confusing close box on the far right has been eliminated.
>> Looking for ideas for a better solution (perhaps an X on the tab only
>> when it is the active tab).
>
>
>
> I like the MultiZilla way of middle clicking on the tab to close it.
That'd be no good on Linux
Thomas Gilfether and Jonathan Carver wrote:
> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
>
>
>>Anyone have any info as to when the next milestone is going to be released?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Gordon
>>
>
> download the nightly build to get 0.9.4
The nightly builds show progress towards 0.9.4 (which is very cl
Ian Winter wrote:
> Thank you for input. I followqed rge directions on that site, but i am still
> having problems. When I click on a url in an e-mail messege MS explower
> launches instead of Netscape ^. Is there some other problem?
If setting it under View --> Advanced --> System doesn't work
Marcel Dorenbos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a few days ago I have installed Netscape 6.1. Now I can only run this
> application being root on Linux. As a normal user I see the following
> error message:
>
> /usr/local/netscape/netscape
> /usr/local/netscape/run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/netscape/mozilla-bin
JTK wrote:
> Garth Wallace wrote:
>
>>"JTK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>>>What I find rather odd is that while many here cry
>>>"Mozilla isn't for users!", Netscape 6.x, which is no more than Mozilla
>>>with an AOL sticker on it, is sup
Jerry Watson wrote:
> Does anyone know if Netscape ever plans to add a "forms AutoFill" feature
> for easily completing forms on web pages. If this feature was in the
> Netscape application I would walk away from other browsers in a second.
>
It may have been disabled in 6.0 but it's a featur
rob wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is my understanding that XHTML transitional documents are rendered in
> standards mode. (please correct me if i'm wrong)
>
> We've been experimenting here with XHTML transitional code and we're
> continually finding extra space around elements, particularly images
rob wrote:
>
> Hmmm ... just have a question about how the bookmarks are supposed to be
> working these days.
>
> I test mozilla / NS builds at home and at work, and I've got some
> different behavior happening depending on where i use it and what build
> i'm using so i'm sorta wondering
Crash Course wrote:
> I installed the newest version of mozilla an our or so ago.
> Everything seemed to run fine until I tried to run it as myself instead
> of as root (I installed it as root of course though).
>
> Here is the dump I get when trying to run (by typing
> "/usr/local/mozil
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lamb liu) wrote:
>I use netscape6.01A on Solaris8 (UltraStation10, UltraSparcII 260M ,
>Memory 128M), It is very slow though more stable than Netscape 4.7
>(which is an ugly stupid software)
>who knows how to speed up it?
Try Mozilla 0.9 instead.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Its not a matter of being lazy. It takes no more or less time to bottom
>or top post.
>
>All you have to do is choose to set for one or the other. Top posting
>is just more logical. The thread flows better.
Then why is bottom posting the
In article , "Moose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Netscape 6. Does cellpadding work or not??
Yes.
ian.
\ /
(@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
| |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This worked however on some sites there are bakgrounds that will stay their
>> original color, most of the time making reading the white fonts unreadable.
>
>I'm not sure if UserContent.css applies to documents where th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Betz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a problem with a form on my site, it's a textarea when you hit
>submit it sends the content to my email adress. No problem with Netscape
>old and IE, a warning msg appears that this msg will be sent via email
>and it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ian Davey wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >Well I'd hope so, given how much memory it hogs. Again, over 22MB *T
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AhmetAA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Some of my humble thoughts,
>General theme is much better than before.
>1- The contrast is too much, the colors are too bright.it dazzles my
>eyes
I'd did prefer the slightly darker blue in the preview image.
>2- The toolbar he
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Well I'd hope so, given how much memory it hogs. Again, over 22MB *TO
>DISPLAY A BLANK PAGE*.
On what platform, on start up it's 14MB to display a blank page here (on
WinNT at work). Not sure of the numbers at home on Linux. This
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mozilla is way too much of a pig for your machine. I have a
>PIII/933/256MB here, and it's not really usable.
That's strange, I'm using it on a PII/233/64MB machine and it is perfectly
usable, in fact it's pretty nippy when it's up
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Scott Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I regularly use the nightly builds of mozilla and update every week or
>so. I've tried to install 2 builds out of the last weeks and both of
>those crashed on startup with the following error:
>
>/home/scott/mozilla/run-mo
In article <3adc44e5$0$18689$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, I did. I also installed it as root, but that should not cause it to
>fail to run, should it? Interestingly enough, I looked in the
>"/usr/local/mozilla/run-mozilla.sh" file that is mentions and at the
In article <3adc40d1$0$18686$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After downloading and installing the binaries for Mozilla on my Linux
>Mandrake 7.2 box, I tried running the program in a shell only to get after
>the registering of plugins the following line;
Did you ru
In article <9bh2fb$8t1uf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well I have tried some SVG samples in my Netscape 4.7 and it works!
>I don't know really how, but it works, I don't even need new 6 version.
You're probably using the Abobe plugin...
ian.
\ /
(@_@) http://www.ecli
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1. Why does Mozilla not need such control over the open/save dialog?
>Why is this not skinnable like literally everything else is? Doesn't
>that violate the whole design concept of "skinnability"?
On Linux it is skinnable ;-)
ian
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Courtney Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Just installed [successfully as far as I can tell] Mozilla from the
>FreeBSD port and get core dumped no matter how I try to start it.
I think it still needs to write to the install directory the first time it
runs, so y
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andre G- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If any issues, please mention them.
>I have already noted than the ~/.netscape seems to be a problem.
>What are the require so libaries?
I've got no problems, Mozilla uses ~/.mozilla and it doesn't interfere at all.
On my machi
In article <0104051046170G.00233@Insanity>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I tried to install the shockwave flash plugin with mozilla ( Linux
> Version),
>butit does not seem to recongnize that it is there when I enter any of the
>shockwave enabled pages...I followed the instructions for a Ne
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "r.e." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>i have downloaded the last version o mozilla for linux, but how can i do
>for view the shackwave animation? i have downloaded the flash player for
>linux but it's for netscape...
% tar zxvf shockwave_flash.tar.gz
% cd shock
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Neville Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Installed mozilla 0.8.1 using mozilla-installer and experienced the
>following error, but mozilla operates.
>
>Error [-621] An installation module (.xpi) failed to install.
>
>Curious as to what this may be or mean in respec
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> too
>much of a privacy invasion. I went as far as to filter all requests for
>alexa.com web sites from my local DNS server, but now I get pestered by mozilla
>(two or three timer *per* web page) saying that it can't find alexa.com. Is
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Shepps) wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Orrin Edenfield) wrote
>>Have you tried deleting the file mozreg.dat, which is probably somewhere
>>in your C:\Windows (maybe C:\Windows\System) folder? Search for it with
>>Find All Files, and see what y
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Scott G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thanks. I'll d/l it and try it on my home machine. What's this about
>'nightlies' I see here? Are there new builds released every day? If so, why
>aren't they called 'dailies'?
A very good question, I think it's traditional,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Scott G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Interesting. I was not aware that Mozilla/NS6 were complete rewrites.
>Beginning with which version?
The rewrite started about two years ago, when the idea of trying to build on
the NS4 codebase was dumped. Every version of
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I have a website where I want to allows visitors to download .jar files from
>my site. With IE, I just create an anchor tag that points to the resource
>and when the user clicks it, the file downloads.
>
>With Mozilla, when a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carcarlo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Many people asked for it in the last months but we never receive a
>satisfactory reply.
It already is available without Java, that is just an optional component. I've
never run Mozilla with the Java plugin (I did try it out in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Hoopman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The default is baseline and would explain the extra pixels you are seeing.
>I thought this would not be an issue seeing that the td height attributes
> exactly match the height of the images for that row.
It's an issue bec
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Hoopman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've been looking at this, glancing at it from the corners of my eyes,
>put it away for a few days, printed it an put it under my pillow at
>night, chanting black/white and other magic at it, stared at it some
>more and fin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, AhmetAA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>N6.5 is quite pesimistic.. 6.1 or 6.2 could be ok.. But 6.01 is yes, unusable.
>From what I've heard it sounds like 6.5 will be the next release. If it does
turn out to be 6.1, then I'd recommend that one (or whatever version o
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Zsolt Koppany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>a couple of weeks ago I tried netscape-6.0 under Linux. The software was
>simple unusable. Should I try 6.01? I can hardly imagine that a lot of
>bugs were fixed in a couple of weeks. Right now I use 4.76 and it is
>stable.
In article <968vht$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jeffrey Yasskin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>By the way, this shouldn't be this difficult. There should be an
>easy-to-find setting in preferences so that people other than Mozilla
>developers can make their own stylesheet.
I'm sure there will be, there ju
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warren Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can Mozilla have a user assignable stylesheet like IE and Opera?
>Somthing where you can have your own rules to apply to every page you
>visit. If not, do they plan on having somthing like this? Don't tell
>me IE has this fe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Veditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>mozver.dat and mozregistry.dat don't need to be deleted. This is a myth
>promulgated by the same folks who thump the side of their TV to fix the
>reception. Mozilla will work just fine even if these files happen to be
>co
In article <959pii$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alex Eagar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>List,
>
>I sent the following email to the appropriate person, but I have gotten
>no reply. Do any of you happen to have the answer to my question, or know
>where I should look for an answer to it? It applies to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Diego Pietralunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>I've just installed Mozilla 0.7 (Win2000) either with the .exe installer
>and with the .zip file.
>When Mozilla starts, I CANNOT find the address bar!!
>Where do I put the URL about where I want to go?
Look at
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I downloaded Netscape 6 (dumb of me). Among other things, it converted
>every image file in my computer over to a Netscape file. And to open an
>image, each time a new Netscape window opens, with an error message. I
>tried to de-in
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karsten Wutzke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Huh? Not in my Messenger...! Can you tell me the EXACT button name or similar,
> please? Which version of
>Communicator do you have?
These are the Mozilla newsgroups (Mozilla/Netscape 6), so I was talking about
those rat
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karsten Wutzke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is annoying me!!! I takes longer, and it is only AMERICAN news. I
>want to get rid of it. Is there a way?
Edit --> Preferences --> Mail
There's a preference there to choose the mail "start page".
ian.
\ /
(@_@)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Veditz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Wrong files, under the WINNT folder you'll file "Profiles", and under that
>you NT user profile directory, and under that "Application Data". Inside
>that last one you'll find a Mozilla folder that needs to be nuked.
I m
In article <94684v$is5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jean-Denis Richard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can you post a URL? I've only ever come across this on page with a
>> genuine infinite loop (a redirect to itself)?
>
>I can't post any URL since it happens nearly all the time. For example,
>I've just u
In article <944e40$bv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jean-Denis Richard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Mozilla 0.7 still comes with the "Infinite loop detected" bug,
>apparently for people having a proxy/firewall (ie people at
>work).
Can you post a URL? I've only ever come across this on page with a g
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Well, like I said - it just started bringing up Java by itself whenever
>I start the browser. Although I don't typically visit Java sites, I
>don't want to turn off Java completely via the Preferences - in case I
>just happe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>The Mozilla nightlies are getting more resource hungry rather than
>less, it seems :-( After yesterday's download, I discovered with some
>dismay that it's already using 29Megs - without me having visited ANY
>pages (orthe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The Mozilla nightlies are getting more resource hungry rather than
>less, it seems :-( After yesterday's download, I discovered with some
>dismay that it's already using 29Megs - without me having visited ANY
Just to clarif
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>By the way, keeping performance reasonable and memory usage low doesn't
>only help people on low-end machines. It also helps those of us (MANY of
>us, I'm sure, in this developer-oriented group) who multitask heavily
>and
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On my 64meg RAM, 400MHz Laptop, Mozilla is not usable, much patience
>is needed when working with it, especially if other applics are open.
I'm quite suprised at this, as I'm using it right now on a 233MHz 64MB desktop
machine and
In article <90l0ua$s0o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Hesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is is possible to view vbscript with netscape 6???
No. It's possible someone may attempt a project to implement it in the future,
but I'd imagine it's quite tightly tied to IE's object model.
ian.
\ /
(@_@) ht
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gervase Markham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> layer support as it existed in version 4.7 and maybe even drop the BLINK
>> tag wich is far more useless in my opinion. The BLINK tag is not even part
>> of any standard so its a bit of a contradiction to say that you
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Henning Schnoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>in today's and yesterday's build, Scrollbars don't appear (using
>Windows). The problem occurs both in Navigator and in MailNews (didn't
>check anything else).
>
>You probably know about that, but I didn't see it mentione
In article <3a27c8d5.93537650@news-server>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Netscape 6 does not support Internet standards in my opinion. If you
>print a web page with an applet on it, the applet will not print.
That has nothing to do with internet standards. This group is also about
Mozilla (which i
83 matches
Mail list logo