Hi Jerome,
You can do that with the Python QMF API. I extracted the below from another
script so it may need some adjustments but should get you there.
-Steve
import os
import sys
from qpid import *
import qpid.messaging
host="localhost"
port=5672
sock = util.connect(host, port)
qmf_con =
I agree, Robbie. Good idea.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
> On Apr 15, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to propose bumping Qpid JMS up to version 1.0.0+ for
> future releases, and simultaneous
+1 - thanks for engaging this, Robbie.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 11:10 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org; d...@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [NOTICE / DISCUSS] migrating Git repositories to gitbox.apache.org
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Per the below
Congratulations, and welcome, Roddie!
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:28 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Welcome Roddie Kieley as an Apache Qpid committer
>
> The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit rights to Roddie Kieley in
>
It is likely to be 5D002 but I have not specifically chased down the license
exception for it.
http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: DEMIAN, Beatrice (SOPRA STERIA GROUP SA)
>
> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 8:50 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
>
I recommend signing the message before handing it off for send. You will need
to decide on where to place the signature and if/where you will place the
certificate.
Steve Huston
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Yeats
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 12:33 PM
&g
Try:
qpidd --load-module /usr/local/lib/qpid/daemon/linearstore.so
> -Original Message-
> From: Aleksey Vorona [mailto:voron...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 6:06 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Struggling to undersand Qpid C++ message store
>
> Dear all,
>
> I
ent from the routing from broker to consumer. From
> outside of the router, there appears to be only one address, but in the
> router's forwarding table, there are multiple distinct addresses.
>
> Let me know if you have any other problems with this. It should work fine.
>
> -Ted
>
I am bootstrapping my dispatch router knowledge on a little project driven by
the need to feed messages through:
- AMQP 0-10 client sends messages to a broker that speaks both 0-10 and 1.0
- dispatch router takes messages out of that dual-protocol broker and routes
them to another broker that
Thanks for replying, Gordon - sorry for the confusing terms.
> On 22/08/17 21:22, Steve Huston wrote:
> > I'm using the C++ broker and I am setting up queue pull routes to
> > another broker. I want to be able to have my local broker set a
> > virtual IP address as the I
I'm using the C++ broker and I am setting up queue pull routes to another
broker. I want to be able to have my local broker set a virtual IP address as
the IP source address when connecting to the remote broker it will pull from.
Is this possible using current broker capabilities?
I tried to
Welcome, Adel!
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
> On Aug 9, 2017, at 6:49 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit rights to Adel Boutros in
> recognition of continued contributi
Hi Ben,
Thank you for introducing yourself and welcome to the Apache Qpid community!
Documentation pro?! Awesome! Can I get you a cup of coffee? ;-) make yourself
at home please.
-Steve
> On Jul 18, 2017, at 6:25 PM, Ben Hardesty wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm starting to
Everything is the same… except for the version of qpid ;-)
It may be that the Ubuntu version doesn’t support AMQP 1.0 and that’s what
ActiveMQ is asking for. Qpid is responding with 0-10.
-Steve
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, Matt Singman wrote:
>
> I have a QPID
Try increasing your reconnect_interval_min to 1.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Bee [mailto:nbe...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 2:42 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: qpid-0.20 Execution exception: resource-locked
>
> Hello, I'm quite new here. Hopefully, I can
ou for your reply.
> In fact at the end I must use qpid on windows, so maybe I should find a
> substitute for rgmanager.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Lei Dai
>
> From: Steve Huston
> Date: 2016-11-21 21:56
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Qpid C++ Broker][
I am not an expert in all cluster things, but the only way I have seen qpid C++
brokers in a cluster is using rgmanager. It takes care of managing the need to
move the cluster primary around. It also manages the virtual IP address
assigned to the broker cluster - you didn't mention a virtual IP
I believe you can gather all that info using QMF messages to the broker. You
can probably "translate" the qpid-stat, qpid-tool tools from python into the
equivalent C++.
> -Original Message-
> From: Flores, Paul A. [mailto:paul.a.flo...@saic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:22
you could look
into Kaazing's product
(https://kaazing.com/products/websocket-gateway/editions/)
-Steve Huston
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
No I don't think so.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 3:32 PM, loremIpsum1771 <celij...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure. I just tried deleting the cache from the CMake GUI and I then
> re-ran: cmake -G "Vis
Not Boost... the cmake cache in your qpid build stores that stuff. You can
either run the cmake gui and delete those variables, or delete the whole cache
file.
> -Original Message-
> From: loremIpsum1771 [mailto:celij...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 2:53 PM
> To:
The CMake find module for Boost is rather finicky. The BOOST_ROOT env variable
should be set to the 'root', which is the directory above the one where your
boost library binaries are. If that doesn't work, try setting BOOST_LIBRARYDIR
explicitly - that is more direct.
-Steve
> -Original
and following the announced procedure helps us
to do that.
Thank you,
Steve Huston, Chair
OASIS AMQP Bindings and Mappings TC
From: amqp-bindmap-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:amqp-bindmap-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Chet Ensign
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:27 PM
To: tc-annou
Subject: Re: Messages in qpid.management exchange
>
> Thank you Steve, do you know what are those exchanges for? when it say
> drop those messages are still in file system so will file system grows as
> those
> msg count grow?
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Steve Huston <shus...@riv
The message counts you see for qpid.management are "drops" - they were not
routed to a queue (no topic matches on any of its bindings). They are not held
in memory. Exchanges route messages, they do not queue them.
So there's no resource issue with those numbers.
-Steve Huston
>
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Ross [mailto:justin.r...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:40 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid C++ and Qpid Python to Git
>
> As proposed and discussed at the following links:
>
>
>
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:03 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] move the website bits to a Git repo
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Short version:
> As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the
It would be great if you can raise a JIRA and attach your patch against the
current trunk/head/master.
Thanks,
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Adel Boutros [mailto:adelbout...@live.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:01 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Incompatible
Offhand, there would be two reasons I can see...
1. The original poster didn't reply to the request to test the patch - Ken said
he couldn't test it
2. There was no JIRA entered for it with the patch included
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Adel Boutros
The test is failing because the test script looks through the log for errors
and flags the SSL error. It isn't perfect and should be worked on, but at this
point in time you can safely ignore that particular error.
-Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Adel Boutros
I haven't tried this, but the documentation suggests you can set it:
http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.32/messaging-api/cpp/api/classqpid_1_1messaging_1_1Connection.html#aed260d368e7a61444bd20536dd8ee0a8
I don't know which API you are using, but the above may help you.
> -Original
Offhand, your options at this point are:
- Fix the bug (most long-term benefit)
- Write an alternative SSL handling mechanism (more difficult)
- Split them and reassemble at the other end. I don't know anything about your
system so don't know how hard this would be. I've seen a system that does
That's the one... there is no workaround at this time, but Cliff's recent
analysis provides a way forward for someone to work on.
> -Original Message-
> From: rat...@web.de [mailto:rat...@web.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:35 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSL
And which OS is the C++ part on? There was discussion of a buffer overrun on
Windows w/ SSL a short while back.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 11:42 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSL maximum
The tests try to pick an unused port, so 52652 is reasonable.
> -Original Message-
> From: Flores, Paul A. [mailto:paul.a.flo...@saic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:27 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: QPID CPP 0.34: Interop Test Failure?
>
> Is the URL incorrect in
Congratulations, Ganeth! Welcome!
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 12:30 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Welcome Ganesh Murthy as an Apache Qpid committer
>
> The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit
Hi Paul,
I work with a set of customers that set this kind of thing up as a set of
meshed brokers with federation links that both load balances and acts as a
mechanism of high availability.
-Steve Huston
> -Original Message-
> From: Flores, Paul A. [mailto:paul.a.flo...@sa
)?
I'm using it in a project now for a customer... (Camel -> JMS -> C++ broker)
The examples hanging off http://qpid.apache.org/components/jms/amqp-0-x.html
should be a good start for you.
-Steve
>
> From: Steve Huston [shus...@riverace.com]
&g
_95
>
> QPID Messaging API: qpid-cpp-0.34
> C++ Broker
> ____
> From: Steve Huston [shus...@riverace.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:13 PM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: QPID C++ broker and Java - One broker to "r
As long as the front end, back end, and broker can speak the same AMQP version,
they should all play nice regardless of the programming language.
If you can be a little more specific about the client code versions, it's
highly likely that someone can help point you to at least one broker to do
Google for that error. The hoops PS makes you jump through to run scripts is
amazing.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Aug 5, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Suman.Patro-TRN suman.patro-...@lntebg.com
wrote:
OK Steve. Thanks for the correction. But I would
The broker doesn't need to be run as a Windows service (but that's a perfectly
good thing to do). The error below was likely because there is no \temp or
\temp\qpidd.data directories and your account didn't have rights to create it.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Suman.Patro-TRN
Hi Frase,
You’ve done a good job at guessing the limits - I’ll let Gordon educate us on
the rest.
The threading model, though - definitely not per connection. There’s a pool of
threads that can handle I/O - by default there are (number of cores) + 1, but
you can change it by command line
Hi Mansour,
I am a bit confused by the compatibily issues between different versions of
the AMPQ, and lost in the documentation.
Sorry about that - hopefully we can help get things straightened out.
First thing, as far as I know, AMQP is not JMS. There's a lot of examples QPid
about JMS,
Welcome Jakub!
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On May 22, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote:
The Qpid PMC has voted to grant commit rights and PMC membership to
Jakub Scholz in recognition of his contributions to the project
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kim van der Riet [mailto:kim.vdr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:52 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Ask infra to add git repo and JIRA for qpid-interop
Thank you to all those who responded to my e-mail about the qpid-interop
among my work and tell you how it went.
Best
Filipe Santos
-Original Message-
From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com]
Sent: terça-feira, 21 de Abril de 2015 20:22
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Qpid client in Mac OS X
Hi Filipe,
I'm not aware of anyone
Hi Filipe,
I'm not aware of anyone trying this since that time. However, I see conflicting
reports of __thread support being added and working on OS X g++/clang. Intel
C++ allegedly supports it in 15.0.
It's worth a try... If you give it a try, please let us know how it goes.
-Steve
I agree - it looks really good.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 9:27 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Website changes for the JMS client
On 03/19/2015 05:55 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ivanov [mailto:iv...@logit-ag.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:52 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Images transfer
Good evening,
Is it reasonable to use amqp messages (currently I am using proton together
with qpidd) for image
qpid-cpp is ok on AIX.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Ross [mailto:justin.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 9:22 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: 0.32 release update - RC is available
Hi, folks. The 0.32 release candidate is now available.
Release
The only one I'm strongly opposed to is #4.
I slightly prefer #3 of the remaining options. It gets the old content out of
the way without deleting it.
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 12:25 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:41 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: towards releasing the new AMQP 1.0 JMS client
On 18 February 2015 at 14:59, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On
There's a missing file that was (should have) been added with the patch. Will
check on it later.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
https://paste.apache.org/eGBG
Steve, this appears
Thanks Justin. I will check on this tonight
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Justin Ross justin.r...@gmail.com wrote:
https://paste.apache.org/eGBG
Steve, this appears to arise from the AIX change, 1657338.
I'm on F20
PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have a customer working on some development and trying the Proton
Java Messenger API. They're having some problems and sent along the
following questions. Could someone please help clarify these issues?
Thanks,
-Steve
Sorry to chime in late on this - I saw the discussions going by in December but
paid no attention as I was mostly not working then.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:49 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid C++
I don't think the boost warnings are pertinent in this case, and boost is tough
to get built with xlC, so for the time being, I'd let that dog lie.
It smells like a mismatch between std::vector arguments between xlC and what
the code expects. I'd chase that one down first. If I get done with
recommend biting the bullet and going with xlC++.
FWIW,
-Steve Huston
From: Chris Whelan [mailto:chris.whe...@systemsandsoftware.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:54 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Compiling qpid on aix 6.1 with gcc 4.8.2 (or gcc 4.8.3)
Hello,
We have been
)
Thanks for your quick reply Steve. We are proceeding with xlc as you
suggested. I have a feeling though it being aix and all, I will be posting
again
shortly...
Regards,
-Chris
On Dec 16, 2014, at 4:17 PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
wrote:
Hi Chris,
I don't have any
Congratulations and welcome, Dominic!
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:rob...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 6:04 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org; pro...@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Welcome Dominic Evans as a Qpid committer
The Apache Qpid PMC have voted to
(Adding users@ to get more input)
-Original Message-
From: srodof [mailto:sfodor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:16 AM
To: d...@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Qpid client disconnect notification
I have a qpid sender c++ and multiple qpid receivers in Java, using c++
. They
expect returns.
-Steve Huston
-Original Message-
From: tom peterson [mailto:2tompeter...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 1:24 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org; d...@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Does RH MRG End of Life have an Effect on QPID?
It seems RH is EOL'ing MRG
Hi Marcel,
No. The persistence functionality would be a part of the broker, though, not
the client side. Feel free to reply to explain more about what you are looking
for in terms of features.
-Steve
On Nov 26, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Marcel Ruff m...@marcelruff.info wrote:
Hi,
does the AMQP
Welcome Ernie!
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Nov 21, 2014, at 4:29 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
The Qpid PMC have voted to grant commit rights to Ernie Allen in
recognition of his contributions to the project.
Welcome Ernie, and thank
The requested URL /proton/development.html was not found on this server.
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:00 PM
To: pro...@qpid.apache.org; d...@qpid.apache.org; users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Proton release
at 4:01 PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com
wrote:
The requested URL /proton/development.html was not found on this
server.
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:00 PM
To: pro...@qpid.apache.org; d
message twice?
Yes:
http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.30/programming/book/acknowledgements.html
There is some duplicate checking and I would like to confirm it is necessary.
Yes, it is.
-Steve Huston
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
+1
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 12:35 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Migrate the repo for the new JMS client work to use Git
Hello all,
I mentioned this briefly in a previous thread,
Exactly - I agree with Andrew.
On 7/25/14, 10:46 AM, Andrew Stitcher astitc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 10:30 -0400, Alan Conway wrote:
...
So I vote for making the default build type Release. Someone who finds
performance sucks is more likely to leave without asking questions
On 7/25/14, 12:13 PM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 16:47 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
On 25/07/14 15:30, Alan Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 17:31 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
On 24/07/14 13:59, Alan Conway wrote:
Very important point I forgot to
-Original Message-
From: Fraser Adams [mailto:fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:22 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: REQEST FEEDBACK Re: How to test the performance quid c++
broker
On 25/07/14 17:27, Steve Huston wrote:
I believe
I haven’t seen this come around to the Qpid users list, so am forwarding it
directly.
-Steve
From: amqp-bind...@lists.oasis-open.org
[mailto:amqp-bind...@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Paul Knight
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 4:10 PM
To: tc-annou...@lists.oasis-open.org;
Great - thanks for the follow-up Wesley!
-Original Message-
From: Wesley Holevinski [mailto:wes...@adaptiveapps.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:04 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Ruby qpid client + SSL 'Unknown protocol'
All,
Found it! After thinking about it
It won't work.
-Steve
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:18 PM, smartdog jwjjj1...@gmail.com wrote:
We need post some messages to Azure Service Bus and figure it would be nice
(in case Azure service bus is down) to post messages to the local qpid
broker first and then let the broker propagate messages
Hi Jeremy,
I'm afraid we're going to need more info in order to help you.
What Qpid version, OS/compiler do you have, and what is the complete output
from cmake?
Thanks,
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: coolness_2...@yahoo.com [mailto:coolness_2...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday,
I _think_ Qpid is packaged by Red Hat for RHEL 6.3 - you may want to check RHN
or your distro before trying to build it yourself.
If you do need to build it, we need to see the configure output and the make
output (esp the section that fails).
-Steve
-Original Message-
From:
Great! Thanks!
-Steve
On Feb 7, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Steve Huston shus...@riverace.com wrote:
On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention
Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do
Cursory check on ipad looks good.
On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention
Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do static analysis.
-Steve
On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Justin Ross jr...@apache.org wrote:
Hi, everyone. I've got a pending website
I have some experience with supporting a customer with fairly demanding
messaging needs and they were using the active-active cluster mechanism.
They're very happy to be on active-passive now.
If you'd like to talk further about why you think active-active is a better
choice, I'd be happy to
Hi Xiong,
Thanks a lot Steve and Alan, appreciate your prompt helps.
You're welcome.
I guess I have not posted my ideas clearly. Let me describe it below for your
better information.
After going through the link provided by Alan, I realize that HA is only to
group two nodes into a
such API calls.
The API doesn't know about HA, by design.
Can you please help?
If this doesn't answer what you need, please ask again.
Thanks a lot in advance!
You're welcome.
-Steve Huston
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
Hi Ryan,
The users list is the best place for this type of question.
You actually may want to consider the AMQP Messenger API in the Proton kit -
that would get you AMQP 1.0 via a C API. Again, nobody has tried that on Win
Mobile that I know of, but it does run on Windows.
-Steve
PM, Steve Huston wrote:
No.
Unless you ask it to(!). There is an exclusive flag on queue to restrict other
usage where that is important. This is on by default for subscription queues
(i.e. the queue automatically created by the qpid messaging library when
receiving messages from
This is a bit of a SWAG but you may be seeing effects of Nagle's algorithm. I
believe the default for --tcp-nodelay changed to on sometime after your
version. You may want to try that on both the client and broker side.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: Toralf Lund
This is great, Fraser! You're certainly an enterprising fellow, eh? :-)
I chair the OASIS AMQP Bindings and Mappings Technical Committee and one of the
things that TC is doing is developing a spec for AMQP over Websockets. The
Websockets binding is getting near to a public review committee
.
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h
Hi guys,
-Original Message-
From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:21 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router component
On 10 October 2013 15:35, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/10/2013 04:38 AM,
c.
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 6:47 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: survey: c++ broker and queue depth statistics
The c++ broker reports a queue depth in terms of total bytes, as well as the
number of
with that fix.
However, the JIRA page has a link to the svn change for that issue - you could
check the changes and apply them locally if you're running 0.24. If you have an
earlier version, it may be a bit tougher, not sure.
-Steve
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support
Hi Chris,
No, there's no means to specify thread class/priority at this time.
-Steve
--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Total Lifecycle Support for Your Networked Applications
http://www.riverace.com
-Original Message-
From: cjl...@san.rr.com [mailto:cjl...@san.rr.com]
Sent
No.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:03 AM, Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com wrote:
Gordon was installing the qpid-cpp 0.24 sources [1], which failed due to
the LICENSE file for the Perl bindings not being present. After filling
Add the --port=n option to specify a new port.
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Khan [mailto:rajeshkhan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 4:37 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Possibility Running multiple instances of broker on the same
machine.
We are currently
If you want to work with AMQP 0-10, and not AMQP 1.0, you don't need to worry
about missing qpid-proton. Similarly, the missing python and perl libs keep you
from building those bindings. If you don't need to program qpid with
python/perl, you don't need to worry about those.
For ha, if you do
Python is used for some of the code generation involved in the build, so
it is required to build the C++ client API.
-Steve
On 8/1/13 7:24 AM, yonexw zw...@liquidcapital.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build qpid C++ client apid, when I configure it I found it
will use python. And I am sure
Those libraries are not linked to python.
Steve Huston
(sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos)
On Aug 1, 2013, at 7:49 AM, yonexw zw...@liquidcapital.com wrote:
Thanks guys for your quick answer.
I found libqpidclient.so libqpidmessaging.so will link to python. I will try
I'm certainly not sure about your case, but here are some points from our
knowledge:
Make sure that /proc/sys/fs/file-max (total number of files that can be opened
by all users) is large enough. To check, you can: cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
If you need to increase it, modify /etc/sysctl.conf and
You can sort of do #2 by auto-deleting the queue when the last consumer
disconnects. To avoid orphaning any messages, you can set up an alternate
exchange for the queue, so when the queue is deleted, any messages get rerouted
to the alternate exchange. You can use other queues/bindings to
not in the manual
you linked to below. Is Active-Active not available?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Huston [mailto:shus...@riverace.com]
I'm considering a Qpid.22 implementation under MS Windows for
message queueing. In the future we might go to a mixed
Can you please post here:
- what qpid version you are trying to build
- the configure or cmake output
Thanks,
-Steve Huston
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Wagner [mailto:coolness_2...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:02 PM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Unable
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo