I had around 12 waverider lms8000 radios installed. They were a
nightmare. We had problems from day one and pulled all of them. Unless
they have made some changes I would stay away from them. Also the
dongle on the 8000's were a big problem.
Sent from my iPhone
- End of message -
Sen
I think ther are specific issues regarding ofdm and 900 MHz that
causes problems. We did everything possible to fix noise and radio
issues. We use all tiltek sector antennas with lmr cabling and cavity
filters at each radio. We were able to get sporadic speeds up to
8mbps. We did a radio fi
quite a bit of bandwidth. If you have more information, i would be
glad to give you some recommendations off list.
Jeremie Chism
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:15:11 -0500
From: "ad...@svic.net"
Subject: [WISPA] DVR camera system
To: wireless@wispa.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
IP cameras are fine. Many companies have gone to IP. If you are going
that route I would lean toward the H.264. Try to find one made in
Taiwan, South Korea or a country other than china. You will find that
the quality and software will be much better. Only problem with ip
cameras is if your
Does anybody know of a good tower climber willing to do some work in
northeast Louisiana. I have three new tower locations that I am ready
to deploy and no reliable tower climber. Any suggestions would be
appreciated.
Sent from my iPhone
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at adding more
capacity. At peak times I run at 65-70 percent of capacity. Just
looking for suggestions.
Sent from my iPhone
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
ht
at the time to upgrade might be better determined when
> average
> latency exceeds a specific threshold. And the feedback from
> subscribers may
> also be important.
>
> Also note, there are many different meaning to "average" and how it is
> calculated. There is a reaso
and technology of the
>>> backbone.
>>>
>>> Tom DeReggi
>>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Scott Reed"
>>> To:
Do you have a model that would go between my cisco router and cisco
switch?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 12:14 -0500, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>> Anyone can build this to your needs as well.
>
> Not true. Only someone with extensiv
Faxxbochs. It works
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Charles Wu wrote:
> Looking to solve a faxing issue (that's being caused by VoIP) -- so
> probably don't want a VoIP solution =)
>
> -Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless
my iPhone
On May 25, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Voipsupply.com sells them. Thanks for the screwy spelling correction.
>
> On 5/25/10, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Faxxbochs. It works
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On May 25, 2010, at 9:02 PM
until it comes back up.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> It doesn't work with IE or it only works with IE?
>
> On 5/26/10, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> The only time it doesn't work is if you don't dial the area code.
>>
I can tell you how it works. To make this answer short.the
faxxbochs functions like a receiving fax machine. When you send a fax
the faxxbochs generates a dial tone, the fax sends the fax to the the
faxxbochs. The faxxbochs converts it to a file and sends it to their
fax servers on the
t;
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> On 5/26/2010 9:21 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> I can tell you how it works. To make this answer short.the
>> faxxbochs functions like a receiving fax machine. When you send
I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, "Robert West" wrote:
> Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building. That
> would be
>
If you haven't been in this business you probably don't fully
understand the work involved so I agree that if your not making money
it won't last long. Especially those 7am calls because the Internet
isn't working (even though it may have nothing to do with your
service) and the customer wh
I knew when he asked me about load balancing routers something was up.
I won't fight you over him that's for sure. Haha.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Bret Clark
wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 01:23 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> and the customer who does perpet
Waverider has one but I have not personally used it. I have a couple
of their 5.8 units running for over 2 years. No problems.
900 didn't have enough bandwidthfor me.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 27, 2010, at 5:54 PM, "Pat O'Connor" wrote:
> I just want to see what everyone else is using and w
That reminds me of the wasp story someone told here.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> true debugging
>
> Greg
>
> On May 31, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Robert West wrote:
>
>> Had a storm last night, woke up, part of the network down. I
>> figure the
>> common conn
I was just remembering we had to sen him a check to work on finding us
capital. Nothing ever happened. Don't think we ever got out money back
either.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Be prepared to sign over your company to them if you use them for
> a
Does anyone have a script that would allow failover on a 750g. I hve a
customer that has dsl with pppoe for one connection and cable with
dhcp on the other and in the event one fails would change over to the
available connection.
Sent from my iPhone
Looke good to me too. But from their other machines I bet it rumba in
the 2k range. I'll stick to renting on the occasional use.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 10, 2010, at 9:37 AM, "Robert West" wrote:
> Man, I like that little dude! Don't want an engine but that thing
> looks
> sweet. I'd b
Axxcelera.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Mike Hammett
wrote:
> Other than Canopy, what systems also use GPS sync?
>
> --
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>
> ---
> ---
> ---
> ---
>
Axxcelera 3.65 can sync for aggressive frequency reuse.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:33 AM, "Gino Villarini"
wrote:
> Any Wimax based
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> 787.273.4143
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun
Pretty sure redline does also.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Jerry Richardson
wrote:
> Redline 3.65?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:20 AM
Antennasearch.com might help.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:31 PM, Jerry Richardson
wrote:
> Do an FCC search for towers between yourself and Tuscon and/or
> Willcox. you may be able to put together a path across existing
> towers.
>
> You may even find a tower that has bandwi
I have also seen improvements during periods of rain and fog. Not sure
why but it is noticable. Signal even seems to be stronger during rain.
I am in a very congested area and have 900 MHz delivering 1.5/1 to
police cars working in a place that has scada and other noise in a
very close proxi
All sectors. Omni in 900 is a nightmare. An omninin almost any band
is a nightmare.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:52 AM, KP Performance
wrote:
> Jeremie C.
>
> Are you running an omni or sectors at your towers sites?
>
>
> On 15-Jun-10, at 9:35 PM, Jeremie C
ectors and separate APs.
>
>
>
> On 16-Jun-10, at 9:27 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>
>> All sectors. Omni in 900 is a nightmare. An omninin almost any band
>> is a nightmare.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:52 AM, KP Performance
>
ot final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
> continue that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Jeremie Chism
> wrote:
>> I used an omni once. It took me about two months to pull it down.
>> Still have it as a matter
We had a discussion about this on the ubnt board. I have a pair of nanobridge M
units. No difference was shown with an increase or decrease in power. I did
notice at a certain point that after a day the units would completely stop
transmitting. A reboot would fix it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Ju
I am also trying to figure out a way to get there. Between the weather and
other variables it's hard to make an early commitment. If I can go it will be a
last minute decision. I think you might find out that other people may be in
the same predicament.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2010, at
gt;
> Hope to see you there!
> Rick
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
>> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:24 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Anyone else using vox experiencing an outage. I am unable to get anyone there
to figure out what is going on.
Sent from my iPhone
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
upport line out of band.
>
> Patrick Shoemaker
> Vector Data Systems LLC
> shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
> office: (301) 358-1690 x36
> http://www.vectordatasystems.com
>
>
> Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Anyone else using vox experiencing an outage. I am unable to get
ker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, IP connectivity to their SIP servers is gone so everything is down
>>>> hard. Sure would be nice if they ran their support line out of band.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick Shoemaker
>>>> Vector
;>> Yes, IP connectivity to their SIP servers is gone so everything is down
>>>> hard. Sure would be nice if they ran their support line out of band.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick Shoemaker
>>>> Vector
d yes, I see that we've got IP connectivity back to them. Devices
>> haven't started to reregister yet though.
>>
>> Patrick Shoemaker
>> Vector Data Systems LLC
>> shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
>> office: (301) 358-1690 x36
>> http://www.vector
I have 900 MHz 5.8 ghz and 3.65 wimax all deployed. I sell voice and data
packaged together to businesses only in a location with a lot of interference.
Wimax is by no means a fix to every situation, but my goal
Is to sell better service than AT&T and Comcast. No noise in 3.65 and the qos
option
Axxcelera.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 1, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
> Which 3.65 vendor are you using?
>
> On 06/30/2010 12:25 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> I have 900 MHz 5.8 ghz and 3.65 wimax all deployed. I sell voice and data
>> packaged together to
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscri
I had two cpe's get struck by lightening yesterday that took out the
cpe, the router behind it and the voip adapter behind that. Along with
a few Ethernet cards also. What are you using on the customers end to
try to stop this. The cpe is powered by poe.
Sent from my iPhone
-
Except for one bad one, the nanobridge works very well.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 28, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
distance?
On Jul 28, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Kosinet Wireless wrote:
Gentlemen,
I need opinions...
We have an opportunity to provide a short term / high speed link for an
I had one end go bad. Replaced it and no problems.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 28, 2010, at 6:46 PM, "KosiNet Wireless"
wrote:
And the bad thing would be.
-Gary-
- Original Message -
*From:* Jeremie Chism
*To:* WISPA General List
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 28, 20
mory serves me right.
>
> I know, not much help.
> marlon
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremie Chism"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 6:53 AM
> Subject: [WISPA] Lightening protection
>
>
>> I had two cpe&
We have a few 8meg customers and a couple radio stations that stream a total
of 5 radio stations. Not sure with what my customers are used to that I
could squeeze that many customers into 10 megs. But I guess it depends on
the situation. All of my customers are business so no netflix but there is
T
Also I guess when you are saying 100 subs is that mainly 100 residential
with one or two computers behind the cpe. One of my customers has 20
computers so I guess it all evens out.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2010, at 10:52 PM, Robert West
wrote:
My thinking has been 10 meg per 100 as a base
e same way it was Friday. My question is, is there a way to determine in
the future that this is happening. Is there something specific that would
lead me to the conclusion that in fact that is what is going on.
--
Jeremie Chism
Trit
222.222 or 8.8.8.8 it really stinks
> for folks... for sure.
>
> So you want to make sure you are blocking the right thing of course.
>
> Are you running anything like NTOP ? There are a few simple things to have
> in place to watch incoming traffic when needed vs hoping that it g
I see 15/month for static public all the time here. I guess it depends
on your market. But I also have comcast doing 50/5 here to.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2010, at 6:27 PM, John Thomas wrote:
> And if I were your client, and you told me $10 for an IP address, I would
> find a new ISP. Th
True. Sounds like a bandwidth hog to me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:46 PM, "Mike" wrote:
> Simple analysis might expose that customer to be one you'd rather let go.
> Or not.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>
the ISPs I have ever known of assign IP addresses
> either free or $5 per month.
>
> Jeremie Chism wrote:
>
>> True. Sounds like a bandwidth hog to me.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:46 PM, "Mike" wrote:
>>
&g
gt;
>> I wasn't aware so many WISPs charge for static and/or public IPs.
>>
>> We have a /19 and /21 IPv4 allocation, and a /32 v6 allocation. All
>> customers get dynamic, possibly changing, public IPs. We charge for a
>> consistent public IP.
>>
>> NAT ca
For the second week in a row lightning has got me. This time it was my
main tower taking out my core cisco router, switch, AP. My luck is
great. Maybe it's time to look at something besides cisco.
Sent from my iPhone
---
Good idea. I had Ethernet surge protectors but it must have jumped them.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 8/6/2010 04:38 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> For the second week in a row lightning has got me. This time it was my
>> main tower tak
my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Jeremie Chism
> Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 16:16:38
> To: WISPA General List
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Lightning AGAIN
>
> Good idea. I had
My laptop is doing the same thing. It was connected to the switch at
the tower that got the lightning. When I connect it to the new ap, I
can use it to configure it but when I connect it to the Internet
nothing. Strange.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2010, at 12:37 PM, "Marlon K. Schafer" wrote:
I was also seeing problems that stopped on Sunday but I replaced alot.
Thought I did something right and fixed it. Could have been that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:59 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" wrote:
> I have seen problems as well since last Friday but they have vanished since
> Sund
There was a discussion here not to long ago about interference with using two
radios in one rb. As I recall there is interference but someone had a solution.
I am sure someone will chime in or you could check the archive.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Paolo Di Francesco
wr
Good link. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Refurbups.com has them at 300 bucks, a 961x on ebay is 120.
>
>> On Aug 18, 2010 6:45 PM, "Mark Nash" wrote:
>>
>> I usually buy APC SmartUPS 1500KVA, used on ebay with SNMP card
>> AP9617...this card
What problems are they having. Is it voice quality, incoming voice, outgoing
voice, no dial tone.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Martha Huizenga wrote:
> hi all,
>
> We have a client that has Vonage and is having problems. When his office was
> somewhere else we gave him
hear me alright.
>>>
>>> I had trouble with understanding them.
>>>
>>> Update: they have two vonage boxes (two phone lines). Neither are off the
>>>
>>> main router. all the routers (three) are hard wired together.
>>>
>>>
ll kinds of things.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Usually if nat is the problem it causes one way audio not poor
> into two accounts.
>
> I haven't tried the port or protocol changes yet. Working on that next.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Martha Huizenga
> DC Access, LLC
> 202-546-5898
> Friendly, Local, Affordable, Internet!
> Connecting the Capitol Hill Community
I suggested that so if the local network was suggested.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:47 PM, "Leon D. Zetekoff"
wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 03:31 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Agreed. If the ata has a built in router I try to connect it in front of the
>>
Congested.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:47 PM, "Leon D. Zetekoff"
wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 03:31 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Agreed. If the ata has a built in router I try to connect it in front of the
>> customer router to take advantage of the built
I have a customer on my network with a netgear VPN router. For some reason now
the VPN drops about every hour. There is no problem with the Internet, just the
VPN. The customer is setup as a 1to1 nat. I am thinking it might be a nat issue
but looking for suggestions.
Sent from my iPhone
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:10 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] VPN
>
> I have a customer on my network with a netgear
;
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, Fl 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net
>
> On 8/24/2010 10:09 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> > I have a customer on my network with a netgear VP
ichardson
> Sent Mobile
>
> On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:11 AM, "Jeremie Chism" wrote:
>
> I thought the same thing, but it also drops while they are entering data,
> so there should be data moving over the connection.
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <
I will have to get the exact figure, but I think I remember looking at that
and it was a large number.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
> On 8/24/2010 10:09 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>
>> I have a customer on my network with a netgear VPN router. For some r
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
>
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> A
I also have a waverider ncl5800 we are pulling. One is new in the box and one
is comin off the tower.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I'm not ready to move them yet, but looking to move a Radwin (I
> believe WL-1000), 1.5x Motorola PtP 400 links (plus
Comcast has just rolled out their 50/10 and 100/20 service here. At 189.99 for
50/10 I was seriously considering ordering one as a backup connection if my
main connection failed. Talked to the sales manager and they had no problem
with it and would put it on the contract. Any suggestions or has
th" wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 16:55, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> Comcast has just rolled out their 50/10 and 100/20 service here. At 189.99
> for 50/10 I was seriously considering ordering one as a backup connection if
> my main connection failed. Talked to the sales m
I switch customers from them all the time because of quality issues. Just
thinking of a cheap emergency backup.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 26, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Bret Clark wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 05:59 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2
th" wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 16:55, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> Comcast has just rolled out their 50/10 and 100/20 service here. At 189.99
> for 50/10 I was seriously considering ordering one as a backup connection if
> my main connection failed. Talked to the sales m
BGP?" when you start
> talking anything more then your windows computer and modem. Oh, and a
> router, Don't you dare use a router with there service..
>
> Nick Olsen
> Network Operations
> (321) 205-1100 x106
>
> ---- Original Message
>> From
Under 3mb causes alot of complaints due to repeated buffeting.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
> Why not bandwidth shape them down to something reasonable? I find
> 1.1~1.2mbit for netflix and it looks fine. they will each 5mbit if you
> let it. This keep
gt; found.
>
> --- On Tue, 8/31/10, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>
> From: Jeremie Chism
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] netflix/hulu IP's
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010, 7:09 PM
>
> Under 3mb causes alot of complaints due to repeated buffeting.
>
If you bundle Internet with phone it's actually not that hard to get over
500/month. I have several over 800.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 1, 2010, at 6:34 PM, "Mike" wrote:
> I too would love to know that formula. I doubt if it would work in rural
> Tama County Iowa. Most businesses are agr
Docsis 3 is here. Fios is not. Even though I can't compete with 50meg and
100meg, I don't yet have to. Many of my customers state that the quality of my
Internet is so much better than Comcast. Obviously some people will go to them,
but when it goes down and they are told it will be three days o
Cogent has a colo facility in Jackson MS that is about 100 miles away from me
on I20. How do I locate these alternate transit providers.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 3, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> There are many ways to do this, which one is best, really depends on the
> 'Trust Le
from his small town to Atlanta/ Telx for a lot less than what
> it was costing him to get 100meg of Internet Transit from the same LEC !.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>
>
> On 9/3/2010 8:33 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Cogent has a colo facility i
like you could get twice the amount of bandwidth
> for the same spending ...
>
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>
> On 9/3/2010 9:00 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>> Pricing here is what I think is competitive. 100meg for 2800.00 but I am
>> loo
We have pulled some equipment from our towers. All equipment is in good
working order and less than 2 years old. If anyone is interested hit me
offlist.
7 chasis mount 900mhz alvarion units (the 3 Meg version)
2 Alvarion chasis
2 alvarion gps sync units
3 alvarion chasis mount ac power supp
-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
>> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:48 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: [WISPA] Pulled equipment
>>
>> We have pulled some equipment from o
Nothing against redline but I put a few ubnt links up against my better
judgement and have been very impressed. Their price point always scared me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Rogelio wrote:
> I've got a project where I need some affordable PtP links with as
> little late
I have a wireless sub that from everything I can tell has a very good link. The
signal is -62. Line of sight. No fade etc etc. There is only one problem. I am
seeing fec errors. I just checked and the installer put it to where there is a
power line about 25-30 feet straight out in front of the c
gt;> Might also just try turning the power down on the unit. Move it up, down or
>> sideways, sometimes by just a couple of feet.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> marlon
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jeremie Chism"
>> To: "WISP
I had some links like that when we used waverider but it was on sectors with
little interference. They will probably work if you have a low noise floor.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
> Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipme
Part of their mac polling will turn it off if their is not traffic for a while.
If I remember correctly their is a high priority setting that will keep it up.
I will check all that at the office Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:34 PM, "Kevin R. Battersby" wrote:
> On Septemb
Agreed. Here where I am at 3 Meg is the lower end. People are used to having
more and more bandwidth. Most of my customers are in the 6-8 Meg range with
some wanting 10-15. It doesn't matter that they really don't need more that
probably 4. That is what the customer wants so I guess that is what
I am unaware of the 99 limit. I actually have a set at 185 ft.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> 3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe -
> someone will correct me if I am wrong.
> If you are using airmax - 2.4 should help
>
What specific rules did you add for your voip.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:21 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
> We enabled it both in the CPE and AP. We also added queue rules in both the
> CPE and AP to ensure that VoIP traffic got priority not just at layer 2, but
> layer 3.
>
> On
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
--
Jeremie Chism
TritonDataLink
Will make time today.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2010, at 11:00 AM, "Rick Harnish" wrote:
> Update on TV Whitespaces Comments:
>
>
>
> There are currently 44 WISP comments publicized on the FCC Website supporting
> the WISPA proposal. Keep up the good work but we still need more!
>
It's a secret code that AT&T techs can use to grab free wifi.
Just kidding.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
> Most likely it is the last 4 numbers of the serial number
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I
I was wondering how mikrotik vpn's performed compared to other routers. I have
had nothing but problems out of some of the other cheaper routers. Anybody with
experience with this?
Sent from my iPhone4
WISPA Wants
That is the way my network is setup using a cisco router at the core. No
problems that I am aware of.
Sent from my iPhone4
On Sep 17, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 9/17/2010 08:52 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>> I would have to agree...you could switch to all UBNT, but whose to say th
101 - 200 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
