Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS

[Amp]

Hey,
That command is assigning COS value 5 to Queue 1 Threshold 3.  
Depending on what DSCP value is mapped to COS 5 in the mld qos map  
cos-dscp mapping will determine what traffic is placed in that queue  
and threshold. I have seen COS 5 mapped to DSCP 40 by default using  
Auto QOS, which means that if we wanted EF or DSCP 46 mapped to COS  
value 5 we would need to change the cos-dscp mapping to match that. I  
hope I didn't confuse you even more. The QoS section of the 3750  
Configuration Guide is a great help.


Amp

Quoting CCIEing :


HI All,

I am really struggling with QOS

I can understand what this command means :

mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3  5

How to use it ???




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Exam Speed Strategy

[Amp]

Hey Dane,
In my humble opinion one of the things that can help with speed is practicing 
in notepad and not thinking about it. 

Amp

Sent from an awesome iPad!

On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Dane Warner  wrote:

> To All,
>  
> I took my second attempt on Monday, March 25 and did not pass.
> I was hoping for some insight on concrete suggestions to get faster.
> I didn’t get hung up on any one task, I seemed to keep moving forward and 
> tried to type as fast as I could, using CLI shortcuts, etc.
> I used the device-based methodology and I feel pretty confident of my 
> technical knowledge.
> Yet I didn’t even get to many tasks at all, I would have needed another 2-3 
> hours to complete all tasks.
> I hear of candidates completing all tasks in 6-7 hours, which means I would 
> need to become twice as fast as my last attempt.
> It almost sounds insurmountable. Do I need to take typing classes?
>  
> Any recommendations that don’t break the NDA would be greatly appreciated.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Dane Warner, CCVP
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Epoch Universal, Inc.
> (909)226-0755
> dwar...@epochuniversal.com 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor Labs .PCF File and OSX 10.8.2

[Amp]

Hey Bill,
Thanks a million sir. I would normally use Fusion and Windows but I  
have had my HD replaced (2) times this year from Fusion deciding to  
screw me over.



Thanks,
Amp

Quoting Bill Lake :


Hello Amp,

I got it working with the native client.

You have to setup a new native OS X Cisco IPSec VPN

Go to System Preferences, Network, click the + to create a new VPN, select
VPN, Cisco IPSec and name it

Now set the Server IP, this worked for me 74.126.20.247

add your user name and password

setup authentication using the information from the vpn file provided
by IPExpert
or contact IPExpert tech support for the group name and shared secret

Then hit OK and apply, then connect if you have active session.

You can also use VMware fusion to set up a windows based virtual machine
and use the cisco client if you prefer.

Bill

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Amp  wrote:


Hey Gang,
Question for you guys. It appears that the Cisco VPN Client is not
compatible with this version of OSX. Can anyone point me in the right
direction of some documentation that explains how to setup the Mac OSX
Native VPN Client for use with Proctor Labs?


Thanks a million,
Amp

__**_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor Labs .PCF File and OSX 10.8.2

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
Question for you guys. It appears that the Cisco VPN Client is not  
compatible with this version of OSX. Can anyone point me in the right  
direction of some documentation that explains how to setup the Mac OSX  
Native VPN Client for use with Proctor Labs?



Thanks a million,
Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE # 38487

[Amp]

Jason,
That is awesome news!!! Congratulations on getting it done

Amp

Quoting Jason Lee :


All,

I'm pleased to let everyone know that I got my numbers!  I am CCIE # 38487.

It's been a very long road.  For me, my pursuit of the CCIE lasted a little
over 2 years.  I used IPExpert as my end to end solution for the CCIE.  I
went through the initial Volume 1 and 2 study material and then attended
the 2 week bootcamp with Vik.  I can truly say that the bootcamp was the
piece of the puzzle that put everything together for me.  I highly
recommend it to everyone.

While I didn't pass in 3 attempts, which was my goal, I'm happy to have
finished.  My advice to everyone is to make sure you know ALL the
technology and can set it up efficiently and effectively.  Furthermore, I
think the key is perserverance.  Everything probably won't go according to
plan or your schedule.  Don't let that phase you and when you get close
book every 30 days until you clear it.

For me I eventually switched to a hybrid device based approach.  My
strategy was to apply a base configuration to all devices in order that was
repeatable based on what I was being asked.  Once complete I would then
start working through the lab in order, but at a much quicker pace as most
of my configuration was in place.

I want to thank everyone on this mailer for their continued support and
knowledge sharing.  I wish everyone luck!


Thanks,

Jason Lee





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 VG dial-peers

[Amp]

Hey,
I would hard code the preferences. Being that the default preference  
in canonical terms is 0, you could set the preference on the pub dial  
peer to preference 1, or you could set the sub dial-peer to preference  
1 and the pub to preference 2. Either way, I would hard code it.


Amp


Quoting CCIEing :


I am sorry the below dial-peers should be :
dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 3 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Pub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad


On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, CCIEing  wrote:


Hi All,

For site B let us say that the lab ask us to configure it as H323 gateway,
and the question mentioned that call have to go to SUB CUCM then to PUB,
in that case we have to create the 2 voip dial peers pointing to sub and
PUB as below :

My question here , in order to make sure the preference of the 1st dial
peer , do we have to hard coded the preference command in the dial-peers or
the tag index of the dial peer will grantee that the sup dial peer will
chosen 1st as it is tag is less than the pub dial-peer

Thanks

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad

dial-peer voice 2 voip
destination-pattern 12341$
session target ipv4:Sub_IP_Address
codec g711ulaw
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumaric h245-siganal cisco
no vad







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Questions regarding Unified CME as SRST

[Amp]

Hey Jason, 
After dueling with this lab a few times now, I am a fan of anything that saves 
time without causing problems or more work later. With that said, I do not see 
a problem with that strategy. 

Sent from the most awesome iPhone EVER!

On Feb 28, 2013, at 7:27 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:

> Quick update on my strategy...
> 
> I've usually shied away from pre-configuring SRST as it tends to register my 
> phones prior to them being ready to register to CUCM while I'm doing my base 
> lab setup.  Probably not a big deal, but it's just one of those things that 
> irks me.  To get around that I've started pre-configuring SRST again, but not 
> including the ip source command.  This allows me to get my entire config in 
> the router, but not initiate a failover until I'm ready.  When I get to the 
> HA portion of a lab, I then add the source command in.  
> 
> Does this seem like a good strategy? 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jason Lee  wrote:
>> Sounds good to me.  I'm probably in a little late in the game to change my 
>> strategy now, but if you can make it work for you it sounds like it could be 
>> very beneficial.
>> 
>> I can't say I've run into any issues with the preconfigured templates 
>> though.  What have you seen?
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Bill  wrote:
>>> Hi Bill 
>>> 
>>> Read the question carefully but if you can control the config it is better 
>>> than trusting something you don't trust
>>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> On Feb 21, 2013, at 12:29 AM, William Bell  wrote:
>>> 
 Leslie/Steve/Jason,
 
 What are your thoughts on pre-configuring ephone-dns when you are 
 permitted to use CME-SRST with autoprovision dn or all? Instead of dorking 
 around with templates (which I hear is flaky) I was thinking about 
 tweaking my approach to pre-configure ephone-dns when I build out SRST. I 
 have done some basic tests and read the docs. It is supported and appears 
 to work. 
 
 The benefits:
 
 I don't have to wait for phones to failover to finish SRST related 
 configs. I can configure BACD, call coverage for VM, mwi sip, name, 
 description, etc. 
 
 
 Thoughts?
 
 
 --
 William Bell
 blog: http://ucguerrilla.com
 twitter: @ucguerrilla
 
 
 
 On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:23 PM, Leslie Meade wrote:
 
> Hey Steve,
>  
> I just ran this via my lab and the light turns on..
> If I run debug ccsip messages I see the cue send a mwi notify to the 
> ephone and the light comes on
>  
>  
> R3(config)#
> *Feb 21 03:11:56.231: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 10: Name=SEP001BD4607B13 
> Load= SCCP41.8-4-1S Last=TCP-timeout
> *Feb 21 03:11:56.279: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER: ephone-2:SEP001BD4607B13 
> IP:10.69.66.20 Socket:1 DeviceType:Phone has registered.
> *Feb 21 03:11:58.615: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 10: Name=SEP0017E066C2E7 
> Load= SCCP41.8-4-1S Last=TCP-timeout
> *Feb 21 03:11:58.679: %IPPHONE-6-REGISTER: ephone-1:SEP0017E066C2E7 
> IP:10.69.66.21 Socket:2 DeviceType:Phone has registered.
> *Feb 21 03:12:15.235: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> NOTIFY sip:4002@10.69.66.254:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.66.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bKyHFdoT6xNYZ85fvOD9z4kQ~~1
> Max-Forwards: 70
> To: 
> From: ;tag=ds3be1f82d
> Call-ID: c234c79-1100@sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060
> CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
> Content-Length: 115
> Contact: 
> Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
> Event: message-summary
>  
> Messages-Waiting: yes
> Message-Account: sip:4002@10.69.66.253
> Voice-Message: 1/0 (0/0)
> Fax-Message: 0/0 (0/0)
>  
> *Feb 21 03:12:15.243: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Sent:
> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.69.66.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bKyHFdoT6xNYZ85fvOD9z4kQ~~1
> From: ;tag=ds3be1f82d
> To: ;tag=3BF3A8-1459
> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:12:15 GMt
> Call-ID: c234c79-1100@sip:4002@10.69.66.253:5060
> CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
> Content-Length: 0
>  
>  
>  
> sip-ua
>  mwi-server ipv4:10.69.66.253 expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
> unsolicited
> !
> !
> !
> gatekeeper
> shutdown
> !
> !
> telephony-service
> srst mode auto-provision all
> srst ephone template 1
> srst dn template 1
> srst dn line-mode octo
> max-ephones 30
> max-dn 30 no-reg both
> ip source-address 10.69.66.254 port 2000
> time-zone 42
> voicemail 4220
> mwi relay
> max-conferences 8 gain -6
> transfer-system full-consult
> transfer-pattern .T
> secondary-dialtone 9
> create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
>  
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hyphothetical Voice Infrastructure Issue Question

[Amp]

Hey Michael,
Have you checked to make sure that DHCP snooping is not turned on on  
the switch, as well as, check and make sure your operational vlan is  
being allowed on the trunk.



Thanks,
Amp

Quoting Michael Davis :


Scenario for campus intrasture problem:


Phones are not registering. Phones are obtaining a valid IP address  
and have been erased to ensure they are getting a fresh IP address.


Solutions investigated

Verified VLAN's are correct and active
Verified option 150 is correct in the DHCP options
Verified Helper IP address is on was  the voice vlan's when in  
different subnet

TFTP and DHCP on CM was restarted.
NTP was verified and CM DB replication is normal.

Idea that not checkd: WAN Qos may have been enabled thereby causing  
phone registration issues.


Am I on the right track?

Michael Davis




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Learn and Motivation Strategy for the second attempt

[Amp]

Ok seriously, my last post, I promise, maybe. I took the liberty of  
reaching out to a friend of mine at IPexpert to see if he can help  
you. Call IPexpert and ask for Phillip. Tell him that Deluxe sent you.  
Long story about the name so don't ask.



Amp out!
Quoting Steffen Bruening :


Hi all,

I was in Bruessels yesterday and I failed. I was suprised about my score
report and about the amount of section were lost points. I only know one
definitly mistake, about the other things I could only suppose.

It seems that I am just to stupid to read the questions. I was finished
with the configuration after 5 1/2 hours and I tested everything twice,
solved the issues I found, but unfortunately it was not enough.

I booked my second attempt for January, but to be honest I am really
frustated and I don't know how should keep my motivation and focus. Sure I
will make further remote labs to keep my speed, but what else could I do
till my second attempt?

So all second/more attempter what have you made during your till your next
lab seat? Did you changed or strategy/learning focus or anything else?

Regards

Steffen





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Learn and Motivation Strategy for the second attempt

[Amp]

Oh yeah I forgot to answer one of the questions. Yes I have changed my  
strategy since my previous (2) attempts.


Here is what I am practicing:
After infrastructure is configured and working, go ahead and get QoS  
out of the way. No need to have that ugly monster bite me in my ass  
later in the day. From there focus on knocking out as much as I can in  
my IOS devices, with the exception of a completed dial-plan. You've  
taken the lab twice now, I am sure there are some things that you know  
that you can expect. Configure some of those things in notepad before  
you ever touch a device or open the lab book. No need to waste time on  
those things, get over with quickly. Once I move to servers, I know  
the top-down, left to right approach is famous however I have been  
doing some things such as building place holders for things that I am  
not ready to configure yet, before doing the top-down, left to right  
thing. I know that my device pools will hold certain information so I  
build those placeholders first so that I won't have to go back and  
dilly-dally with that stuff.


One of the things that has been helping me is I am learning how to  
slow things down mentally. Deep breaths have been working wonders for  
me.

Quoting Steffen Bruening :


Hi all,

I was in Bruessels yesterday and I failed. I was suprised about my score
report and about the amount of section were lost points. I only know one
definitly mistake, about the other things I could only suppose.

It seems that I am just to stupid to read the questions. I was finished
with the configuration after 5 1/2 hours and I tested everything twice,
solved the issues I found, but unfortunately it was not enough.

I booked my second attempt for January, but to be honest I am really
frustated and I don't know how should keep my motivation and focus. Sure I
will make further remote labs to keep my speed, but what else could I do
till my second attempt?

So all second/more attempter what have you made during your till your next
lab seat? Did you changed or strategy/learning focus or anything else?

Regards

Steffen





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Learn and Motivation Strategy for the second attempt

[Amp]

Hey Steffen,
Sorry to hear about your unsuccessful attempt. First things first, you  
didn't fail bro, you just didn't pass this time and believe me  
exchanging the word unsuccessful for failed makes a huge difference in  
a persons psyche. Anyway, like you I have had (2) attempts that  
resulted in my not getting my number. One of the questions that you  
have to ask yourself and be very honest about is, was it due to lack  
of knowledge or other factors such as speed, or strategy. If it is  
because of lack of knowledge in a certain area, then I think you know  
exactly what you need to do between now and January, get rid of that  
lack of knowledge. Now with regard to the other (2) items I mentioned,  
that can be a little trickier. For starters, what were the strategies  
that you used for your previous (2) attempts? I can tell you not  
having a solid strategy KILLED my chances of passing my last attempt  
in August. I have a friend, shout out to Scott Dozier, who passed his  
voice lab yesterday in RTP and he swore by the device based approach.  
If you don't know what that approach is, Google it. But you have  
others, like Vik here at IPexpert, that tend to favor a hybrid-based  
approach. Both approaches have made people successful, so it comes  
down to what is most comfortable for you. I am a firm believer that if  
your method is not working and has not worked then you may want to  
explore another method. This exam is about what you know, but more  
importantly what you can configure, how it's being asked to do it. So  
for me I have to remove logic and years of design experience from the  
equation and revert back to my military days and just DO WHAT I AM  
TOLD. Nothing more, nothing less. Like you, I am heading into my 3rd  
attempt, mine is Feb. 27. I have wanted to throw in the towel and say  
F-U CISCO but knowing that almost daily someone is passing, is giving  
me hope and I hope that it gives you hope.


1. Forget the word failed. You are not a failure and you did not fail.  
You just didn't pass.
2. Remember why you are doing this in the first place. Keep your "Why"  
in the forefront of your mind.

3. Take the rest of the week off and relax.
4. Someone passes this exam every month, January will be your month.
5. Find a test taking, lab building strategy that is workable in 6  
hours and stick to it. Practice it every day that you practice, no  
matter how mundane it may seem.
6. Set a time goal with every section and practice until you meet  
and/or exceed those times. How long does it take you to get  
infrastructure configured correctly and working? Beat that time, or  
try to, every time you lab.
7. Let us see what you're doing. When you finish a lab, shoot the  
configs to the forum and let us see if we can find mistakes or  
weaknesses.
8. If you have not purchased them yet, purchase the 5-Lab Challenge  
from IPexpert. The training advisors will work out a deal with and for  
you. These are crucial.
9. Remember, who you are! You are Steffen Bruening. NO, I don't know  
you but YOU know YOU. Your family and friends know you and I am sure  
they know, as well as you know, that YOU CAN DO THIS.

10. Dust yourself off and get back to it!

Amp
Quoting Steffen Bruening :


Hi all,

I was in Bruessels yesterday and I failed. I was suprised about my score
report and about the amount of section were lost points. I only know one
definitly mistake, about the other things I could only suppose.

It seems that I am just to stupid to read the questions. I was finished
with the configuration after 5 1/2 hours and I tested everything twice,
solved the issues I found, but unfortunately it was not enough.

I booked my second attempt for January, but to be honest I am really
frustated and I don't know how should keep my motivation and focus. Sure I
will make further remote labs to keep my speed, but what else could I do
till my second attempt?

So all second/more attempter what have you made during your till your next
lab seat? Did you changed or strategy/learning focus or anything else?

Regards

Steffen





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config

[Amp]

Steffen,
You're correct there is no "spanning-tree portfast trunk" for the ESW  
but what you can do with regards to the ESW is enter the command "no  
spanning-tree vlan 301" or whatever your voice-vlan number is and  
still meet the requirement.


Amp
Quoting Cory Gray :


I have not seen bypass all of the spanning tree states in IPexpert's labs
and I cannot comment on what I have seen in the real lab.  If portfast is a
requirement I guess you have to do what you have to do but I will say this
again.. I believe I lost all points on my CUCME section because my phones
were down when my lab was graded.  Using switchport mode access and switch
access vlan X on the ESW has been known to randomly stop working.  Use those
commands at your own risk as I mistakenly did.



Cory



From: Steffen Bruening [mailto:stbruen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:16 AM
To: Cory Gray
Cc: vir...@rediffmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config



I still need the sw access mode, because there is no "spanning-tree portfast
trunk" command for the ESW and so I would lose the marks for the vlan
section because in most cases it is required to bypass all the spanning-tree
states or just that the phones should boot up as fast as possible.



Regards

Steffen

2012/11/1 Steffen Bruening 

Oh okay. I apologize for the confusion I made.



2012/11/1 Cory Gray 

IPexpert and myself have run into problems doing it the traditional way.
But for the authoritative source you should be looking at the LAN Switching
Guide for IOS 12.4T which confirms that recommendation.  The guide you point
to is for Metro 3750 switches.  The ISR routers in the lab run 12.4T.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/lanswitch/configuration/12-4t/ls
w-hwic-ethsw-ic.html#GUID-379450C0-5434-4AC3-9BED-396CB7D162C1





  _

Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:08:36 +
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config
From: stbruen...@gmail.com
To: corygray22...@hotmail.com
CC: vir...@rediffmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com



Recommed by whom? Ipexpert, I know, but the problem is that the
Proctors/Scripts which marks your lab are not from IPExpert they are from
Cisco. Therefore it should be better to follow the cisco guidelines:



"You should configure voice VLAN on switch access ports; voice VLAN is not
supported on trunk ports. You can only configure a voice VLAN on Layer 2
ports."



http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/catalyst3750m/software
/release/12.2_25_ey/configuration/guide/swvoip.html#wp1030825





2012/11/1 Cory Gray 

You should be fine without one just know that the recommended ESW config is

Switchport mode trunk

Switch trunk native vlan X (X equals data vlan)

Switch voice vlan Y (y equals voice vlan)



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of virajith
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:22 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW and switch config



hi Guys,

I am just wondering if one can practice the labs without a ESW module .

I have a setup in with I am using a switch (3750) for the vlan config.

Is an ESW module necessary for the lab practice?

How is the above config on 3750 different from using an ESW module?


-Vir


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?>


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?> Catch India as it happens with the Rediff News App.
To download it for FREE, click here


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?>


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?>


<http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/sign
atureline.htm%40Middle?>






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Problem with Proctor Labs Voice vRack Control Web UI

[Amp]

Hey Brandon,
The only time I have seen weird issues when using ProctorLabs vRacks  
is if I don't do a 'Revert Entire Pod' BEFORE loading the lab config  
that I want to work with.


Amp

Quoting Brandon :






I've completed a few labs and did a search on this topic but didn't  
find much.



I'm having a problem where my CUCM servers don't come up with config  
that should already be in-place at the start of a lab.  I choose the  
appropriate lab from the config load button.

 
Are students expected to build from a blank slate CUCM each time we  
progress through the series of labs?

 
I've tried loading both Lab 4A initial and Lab 4A final to  
troubleshoot, but the result is the same.  For example, the CUCM  
System > Region is missing the regions created in labs 1-3.

 
Also, the  Advertise G.722 Codec Enterprise Parameter is set to  
enabled which is set to disabled in lab 2A.

 

"You will not waste time on our racks... when you begin your  
session, YOU will be able to choose the lab scenario you are working  
on, and pre-load the configs for that lab scenario -  
THIS INCLUDES loading base configs for each of the servers!!"

 
When I read that it appears to me I shouldn't have to do anything to  
the server and should be able to start at the beginning of a new lab  
and have all of the cumulative changes from previous labs ready to go.

 
Any ideas?
 




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question

[Amp]

Hello Chrysostomos,
"Real World" questions have been known to be answered via this online  
community. The only thing that really gets frowned upon in this  
community is asking specifics regarding the actual lab (that would  
break NDA) or spamming the community; other than that you should be  
fine.


Thanks,
Amp


Quoting Chrysostomos Christofi :


Hi to all

First I would like to say many thanks to all of you for the great  
community that you have here
Since I am new with ccie voice lab preparation and now I joined your  
community  , I was wondering if it?s possible to send any questions  
that I have in the real world (job)  ..


Is it possible ?

Regards
Chrysostomos






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab Attempt....(and the winner is)... :-)

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
I sat my 2nd attempt at the voice lab yesterday here in RTP. It was a  
fair and fun test and according to the proctor one of the newer tests.  
I can solemnly affirm that the IPexpert BLS material does an awesome  
job of preparing you for what is to come; and with that said I am a  
perfect 0 and 2 against the lab. I didn't make it this time. Back to  
the drawing board.



Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Passed!

[Amp]

Jason,
Congrats; well done and well deserved!

Amp,

Quoting Jason Murray :

Hello everyone just wanted to send a note out that I have passed my  
CCIE last week #36408!! First and foremost I want to thank God for  
the ability to retain as much information as I had to take in.  
Definitely a lot of prayers were answered last week. Next I have to  
thank my family for sure for putting up with me for the last year  
(esp these last 4 months of not having my full attention almost  
daily). They have sacrificed with me. It will be nice not getting up  
pretty much every morning including Saturdays and turning on my home  
lab. Will enjoy some peace and quiet of not having the hum of  
servers and routers running in my office. I wanted to say thanks to  
Vik and the ipexpert crew. I used their BLS product for about a year  
now. I had my own equipment so it was easy for me to turn it on  
almost everyday and run through the walkthroughs and everything  
until I had it down. Then a month out I went to the One Week Lab  
Experience which I think put it all together and finalized my  
studies. I would like to have said I passed my first time, as I did  
come very close I didn't but the next 30 days I worked with Vik to  
help understand where I was needing improvements and the next time I  
went in I passed. Vik went above and beyond in helping me understand  
it. He truly loves what he does and enjoys helping people. If he  
didn't he would have put up with all my emails. I know he's  
especially glad I passed so he doesn't have to be bothered by me  
anymore lol :). Also I did use another product some (Cisco 360)  
which helped to see the grading process using their graded  
assessments. But as far as actual study material I used ipexpert  
exclusively.


 So to help those out on this same journey as I was I thought I  
would put my strategy out there so it may help someone else.


 My strategy was using the device based approach (search google and  
you will find a nice video on this) where I made a table and read  
through the entire guide and put each question under the device it  
corresponded to. Once that was complete I started with SiteC and did  
that router config along with CUE. Then moved to SB, complete, then  
check CUE and finish. Then to SA RTR finish that, check CUE if  
needed. Then finish the 3750 config. On the routers if I happened to  
be doing QOS or RSVP or something I would configure on the router I  
was on and then I would hop over to the router it was going to and  
finish that particular config on it. Then come back and finish up on  
the router I was on. Oh and the first time I hit the NTP config I  
would hop over to CUCM and configure it and then ssh into it and run  
a utils dbreplication repair all since NTP does have a tendency to  
mess up replication on CUCM. One thing on the routers as well is I  
skipped over SRST to hit that up later.


 Once all the routers and switch was complete I started with CUCM.  
Created RGs, CSSs, AAR (if needed), MRGLs then moved to the System  
menu and walked down that menu, Server IPs, Server group, Date/Time,  
Region, Location, DHCP, SRST, Enterprise Parameters, Service  
Parameters, then created the Device pools. Once that was complete I  
auto registered my phones. Then once they were configured I would  
start going through all the questions with CUCM and knock those out.  
In practice and the exam I skip over anything that has to with call  
routing and making calls till after lunch. Before then I would just  
keep continuing on and if I was done with CUCM and still hadn't  
taken lunch I would move on to CUC, then Presence, then CCX once I  
went to lunch I'd come back and finish up whatever I was doing and  
then hit call routing. Vik has an excellent strategy which I learned  
in the OWLE that I used in practice and on the lab. Once call  
routing was done I'd go back and hit whatever I didn't do. Once all  
the applications where complete then I went back and configured  
everything I needed on the routers that had SRST. Did my testing and  
everything there while in SRST once I came back out from SRST I  
never came back to it because it was already configured and tested.


 As you notice through that in the device base approach I did no  
testing until I got to SRST. So you need to be really good at your  
technologies and know what you are doing just not memorizing stuff.  
That's where the Vol1 and Vol2 practice came in from the BLS. I had  
this down and in the last three months before my exam I practiced  
this strategy with each of those labs as well as the labs from OWLE  
once I went there. Anyway once all the config was complete I then  
went back with the first question and completely tested everything  
(except srst since it was already tested) Fix what you need and move  
on. For me with this strategy I had like three hours to test so I  
went through the question with a f

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed

[Amp]

CONGRATS ON PASSING DAN!!! You have been a tremendous help to the  
forum and community.


Amp

Quoting "Dan Quinlan (daquinla)" :


All,

I passed my Voice exam on Monday.  Thanks to everyone on this list  
who assisted me in my studies.  I'm happy to continue to help others  
who are in the process.


Dan Quinlan, CCIE # 36129
d...@cisco.com









___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FINALLY CLEARED :) :)

[Amp]

Yes, Cisco employees get the lab paid for up to 3 attempts (that  
policy has not changed), and yes vipji...@cisco.com is a Cisco  
address; however there are clearly some people (cisco employees or  
not) that get to a point where this exam kicks their tail so much that  
looking at "actual exams" or any other lab dump is a viable option.  
Cisco's stance on the NDA is cut and dry. Cisco employees have been  
fired for proof of breaking the NDA so their stance is straight  
forward and cut and dry. As a study community I truly believe that it  
is up to us to help maintain the standard; when we see stuff that is  
questionable or potentially NDA breaking we should step in and say  
something; to the person and/or the OSL community at the very least.  
Anyway, Cisco employees (at the end of the day) are people too.


Amp


Quoting Ravindra Lakpriya :


Hmmm Ken now Cisco employees get it only for written exam.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Ken Wyan  wrote:


Hey All,

It's very very interesting that cisco employees are also talking about
Actual Exam Content publicly & openly.

Because following email is from vipji...@cisco.com  (a cisco's email
address). I guess cisco NDA is not applicable for cisco employees who get
free vouchers for the test.

I paid from my pocket for all 3 attempts to get my CCIE.

Any comments ???

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:48 AM, vipjinda  wrote:


Steven,

I got lab 7 too in my first attempt and really struggling getting the
answer for LAN qos question.

Any idea for answer will help me creating the solution.


--
Vipul Jindal







On 6/23/12 2:18 PM, "steven smith"  wrote:

 HI GUYS,

CLEARED i am so happy to announce i am CCIE V now its product to say 

Lab , -7 is really hard lab and people has to understand all proper
variations of MGCP + H323 , * calling for CUE/Meet me

I struggled for this lab took 1 month did this lab and got it :)

People can openly email me for any questions no problem will help

Thanks to everyone

--
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/>


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/>




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com





--
Ravindra Lakpriya





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco NDA Agreement

[Amp]

Hey Guys/Gals,
I know that we all are either preparing for our CCIE exam or have  
taken it and possibly passed. The purpose of the Online Study List  
Forum is NOT to discuss exam specifics and definitely not to share or  
ask for vendor materials (they have to make money so that we can have  
something to practice with) and absolutely not to share or ask for  
exams from companies that are known to have lab dumps. The Cisco NDA  
(NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT) is in place for a reason, let's do our part  
to respect that on these open forums. Do what you wanna do in private  
but in these open forums please stop it. For those of you that are  
unclear as to what is allowed/disallowed with regards to what you are  
able to discuss, you might want to familiarize yourself with the  
document in the link below.


http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/downloads/Cisco-Career-Certifications-and-Confidentiality-Agreement_v16.pdf

and

http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/ccie/exam/violation_rules.html


Amp










___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Blueprint update

[Amp]

Whew, that is great news, thanks Vik. I hope to be finished on August 27, 2012.

Sent from an awesome iPad!

On Jun 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:

> The message from CIsco Live is 
> 
> Dont expect an announcement any time soon re: the blueprint change for 
> CCIE-V. My interpretation is this means you have the rest of this year and 
> fairly deep into 2013 before a blueprint change.
> 
> Understandably not much information is being given but I will share my 
> thoughts on our blog next week.
> 
> If you are mid way through your studies then you have ample time- I would 
> encourage you to not get distracted and get it done on this version.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> 
> 
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, 
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE 
> (R&S, Voice, Wireless, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with 
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and 
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at 
> www.ipexpert.com/communities   and our 
> public website at www.ipexpert.com 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 5 new labs lab 1 - cue

[Amp]

Hmmm is class of restriction correct?

Sent from an awesome iPad!

On Jun 9, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Randall Crumm  wrote:

> Hi,
> I am starting up again.
> 
> I am trying to leave a message for branch 2 user.  Branch 2 has CUE.
> 
> I configured CTI PR, CTI ports,VM pilot,applied VM pilot to br2ph2 line. 
> configured transcoder on br2 gw, registered br2 transcoder to CUCM. applied 
> transcoder to a MRG
> 
> When I call from br1 I get a fast busy
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
>  
> Cheers,
> Randall
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCME integration with Cisco Unity Connection (SCCP)

[Amp]

Hey Ashwani,
Have you checked this out yet?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucme_sip/guide/cucintcucmesip.html

Amp
Quoting Ashwani :


Hello Experts,



Does anyone knows if SIP Phones MWI works when we have CUCME integration
with Unity Connection using SCCP?  I am able to get MWI work for CUCME-SCCP
phones but not for SIP Phones.  Any help will be appreciated.



Thanks,

Ashwani






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Labs

[Amp]

Hey Graham,
If you have time, repeat them all, if you don't have time to repeat  
them all I would suggest creating a few multi-protocol labs by taking  
sections from all of them to create a couple monster labs. Also, I've  
heard that the 5-Lab Challenge is pretty spot on and would be a great  
investment for you.


Hope that helps,
Amp


Quoting Graham Newberry :


Are there any suggestions for which labs to repeat in Volume 2?  I am going
to finish all 10 once, but will not have time to go through them all again.
 From other's experience, are there 2 or 3 that are better to focus on in
Vol 2?  Should I mix Vol 1 back in at all?

Thanks,
Graham





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Frame-Relay Problem

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
I have finally been able to assemble enough equipment (thank u Cisco) to build 
a rack that mimics Proctorlabs racks but I'm running into one hell of a problem 
with Frame-Relay. I notice that in the base configs for the PSTN/WAN router 
that OSPF is configured and FastEthernet0/0 is connected to "something"; what 
is that something? I rented some time this morning from Proctorlabs and tried 
to figure this out on my own but I have run into a big wall.

Amp

Sent from an awesome iPad!
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: How to prepare and pass the LAB?

[Amp]

CCIEV Wannabe,
I took my 1st lab attempt last week, I didn't fail the lab but did not  
pass either. Now with that being said, the lab is extremely passable  
but you MUST have a solid plan and strategy going into your attempt,  
but most of all you MUST follow your game-plan and strategy. So how do  
you develop a passing strategy? You MUST develop a solid study  
strategy. Because time is a factor in the lab, a lot of people will  
follow the device-based approach. Many rock-stars who have come from  
this very list, Matthew Berry, James Key, and Vik Malhi (just to name  
a few), have followed the device-based approach. It's a very good idea  
to KNOW the technologies inside out, but it is also valuable to know  
WHERE to find the information should you need it. The documentation is  
fairly simple to navigate and you are able to copy directly from it.  
Use that knowledge during your practice. During your studies you  
should have figured out how long it takes you to configure certain  
things such as MGCP, H323, IOS Xcoders and IOS conferencing, QoS, etc.  
Figure out your average time for configuring those technologies and  
don't waste time on those subjects. If you can do IOS xcoders/conf in  
2-3 minutes, don't spend 4-5 minutes on lab day doing it. Most of all,  
no one can give you the key ingredient or it factor that will help you  
pass, take the advice that you can work with, get rid of the advice  
that you can't, keep practicing, and NEVER EVER give up.


Amp

Quoting cciev wannabe :


Ok, while I am awaiting help from you, here is my own thoughts on LAB.
I will try no to violate NDA, I want to share some of my experiences.

1. device-by-device or question-by-question approach
It depends. For example, device approach is better if cue integrate with
cme.
but I think technology (question) approach is beeter if cue integrate with
cucm.

2. touch cue sooner than later
Vic Mahil already said repeatedly in his blog/lectures. cue took a lot of
times and may need a few reboots.
So, you can do something else while rebooting cue

3. don't wait to do uccx as last
you need a very good knowledge on scripting and rdp to uccx is very slow
it was so slow for all my attempts. I did politely told proctor but I was
told nicely that we all have the same setup/lab
well anyway what a very slow box indeed





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab strategy?

[Amp]

Voiper,
I would recommend that you follow the IPexpert Structured Learning  
Approach. Watch the VOD, Listen to the Audio on Demand, Work through  
the vol. 1 workbook, then move on the vol. 2 workbook. As far as the  
troubleshooting labs, in your members section on www.ipexpert.com you  
will have access to the configuration files. Copy the initial lab  
configs for whatever lab you are working on, and paste them into the  
respective devices.



Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice LAB - Material to study

[Amp]

Evandro,
Congrats on passing your written. To answer your question, yes without  
question IPexpert has the best voice material on the market. Contact  
Mike Down - md...@ipexpert.com or +1.810.326.1444, ext. 206. Tell him  
Amp sent ya!


Best wishes to you..
Quoting Evandro Nunes :


Hi,

I've just passed in CCIE written and now i'm starting study to LAB.

Is the ipexpert the best material to study for lab ?

  _

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de groganhockey
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 3 de dezembro de 2010 12:45
Para: Josh Kittle
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What do I 'really need' - home lab


Josh,

I was in the same boat when I began my studies. Ultimately, my lab existed
in about 3 phases:
Phase 1:
3x 1720s
1x 2600xm
1x 2600
1x 3640
1x 3500xl
4x 7940

This allowed me to do the basic UCM configuration, but DSP configuration was
based on the older config style, and CME/CUE support was limited to older
versions. I quickly found myself frustrated with the limitations,
particularly when trying to work through the IPExpert labs.

Phase 2:
I was able to borrow a couple of 2800s (one with CUE and switch HWIC), and
re-arrange the lab setup. This allowed me to replicate more of the lab
materials, although I still had to be cognizant of HW/SW limitations while
testing and troubleshooting. I used this setup for the majority of my
studies.
One of the main limitations of this setup was the flexibility in practicing
different lab scenarios. Any revision of the PSTN router configuration would
end up being a mini-lab by itself, which, while valuable, took away from
time dedicated to other topics.

Phase 3:
I went completely online with proctor labs. I went virtual for about the
last 2 weeks of my test prep. The biggest advantage for me was not wasting
time updating configurations and focusing on the tasks.



I think that it's most important to have similar hardware in this order:
PSTN
BR2
HQ
BR1


Having said that, my PSTN/WAN config was actually spread across 2x 1720s and
the 3640, however, so if you're willing to pick and choose the labs you work
on, you can drop the PSTN router to the tail end of that list.

Hope that helps!
mike


On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Josh Kittle 
wrote:


Ok guys so I'm pretty new to the CCIE Voice Lab Prep experience - starting
to build the home lab.  I've read tons of stuff along the line of  'you need
3x 2811's, etc" and I've come to the group to ask - what do i REALLY need.
Not so much cards, modules etc (although that feedback is much welcome and
appreciated) - but from a router perspective.  Does HQ, and the BR sites
each need to really be 2811's to run the scenarios?  Why not a 3725, etc? Is
it hardware module support (lack thereof) - if so, for which modules give
the grief as far as support goes? I know I can't skimp on everything - but
certainly there have to be some compromises that could be made.  If there
aren't - tell me why - that answer is just as valuable in the learning
process.

I'm just starting to browse the lab guides, so forgive me if this is covered
elsewhere (and if so, kindly reference the location).

Thanks guys!

Josh

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com









___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN phone

[Amp]

Hey Carm,
Did you try doing a factory reset on the phone and a revert all on the  
pod? Also, try a different phone and see if it still happens. Good  
luck...


Antonio

Quoting C-note :

No matter what I do my PSTN phone is coming up with numbers for OWLE  
 Lab 3.  Can

someone tell me the trick to make it come up with the lab that I loaded, OWLE
Lab 2?
 
Thanks in advance.







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Speed for taking the Lab

[Amp]

Hey Pithog,
You ask a tough question my friend. I think some of the things that  
you need to consider are how well do you know the core technologies  
and how fast can you correctly configure them? Based upon the forums  
and the practice labs there are going to be some things that you will  
need to know how to configure rather swiftly. Will you have CME with  
SCCP and SIP phones to configure on your lab? Who knows but it would  
be a good idea to know how to configure CME in a matter of minutes.  
Can you configure IOS media resources as fast as you can type your  
name? If not then ask yourself why not. Start configuring H323, MGCP,  
and Gatekeepers in notepad. If you can do it in notepad with little to  
no screw-ups then you can do it in the router lightning fast. Are you  
able to read the question and not over-complicate what's being asked?  
How fast can you configure COR? Furthermore what's your strategy? Do  
you plan on configuring once and copying, modifying, and pasting? What  
do you know really well and what do you need help in? Spend as much  
time trying to master the areas that you are weak in. Also remember,  
it is very possible that the IPX labs are more difficult than the  
actual lab so if you can't get through the IPX labs in less than 8  
hours, can you do the core of what's being asked in a timely manner?  
So in my opinion, configure as much as you can in notepad to ensure  
you know the configuration steps inside and out. During your steps  
write out the steps to configure what's being asked. Do this without  
looking it up and see where you are coming up short. I know I didn't  
directly answer your question but I hope that helps.


Amp

Quoting Pithog Oil :


Please i will like to know if my speed is okay and good enough for the exam, 
it takes me 8 hours at the moment to finish the ipexpert, Labs,   
suggestions are welcome on how i can shorthen the time to 4 hours, i  
 really hope its possible, please i need assistance on this.

Ultimately i want to know how to manage my time better.
Thanks






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Pass

[Amp]

Congrats Jeff. That is a huge accomplishment.

Amp
Quoting Jeff Cotter :

Finallytook more times than I care to admit!  A big thanks to   
IPexpert (especially Vic) and everybody who has been a part of this   
list.


Jeff Cotter
CCIE #27033








___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus

[Amp]

Hey Tyson,
Will that discount code be in effect before the boot camp starts next week?

Amp
Quoting Tyson Scott :


I recommend the Fairfield Inn and suites on worthington rd.  We are in
the process of negotiations with them.  Will have a discount code soon
with them.  You cannot walk across the overpass but extended stay does
offer shuttle service.

Regards,

Tyson Scott
CCIE # 13513 (R&S, Security, SP)
Managing Partner/Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc.
tsc...@ipexpert.com




- Reply message -
From: "Mike Thompson" 
Date: Sun, Sep 19, 2010 11:38 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus
To: "Amp" 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 


And be careful, due to the number of hotels I'm a small area, lots of
car break ins

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp  wrote:


Hey Gang,
Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in   
walking distance to the IPexpert training facility?


Thanks,

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
please visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in walking  
distance to the IPexpert training facility?


Thanks,

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Columbus OH BootCamp

[Amp]

Awesome. So the party will be in Marko's room, woo hoo!!!

Quoting Marko Milivojevic :


On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 15:54, Amp  wrote:

Hey Gang,
Anyone out here planning on attending the upcoming boot camp in Columbus


I'll be in the room next-door :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Columbus OH BootCamp

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
Anyone out here planning on attending the upcoming boot camp in  
Columbus with Amy?



Regards,
Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I've got a new favorite number!

[Amp]

Congrats Mike and thanks for your contributions here on the studylist...

Amp


Quoting groganhockey :


26966!

I'm not sure how often it'll come up in everyday life, but there it is.

I took the lab Monday in RTP and finally got my score report last night.

IPExpert/Vik/Amy: Thank you for the excellent study guides, walkthroughs,
audio and everything!

Mike
CCIE #26966 Voice





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

[Amp]

I think I'm going to go to the doctor and just yell, "Ouch!". Hahaha  
naa all joking aside, I know what you mean.


Quoting Sam Park :


This is like one of those instances when a person's mind is so fried that
only the basic primal pleas escape from a person's lips.  In this case,
through the keyboard and into an e-mail.

Sam Park

On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, rearviewmirror   
wrote:



"Help".. pretty much sums up my whole lab preparation.


On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Vik Malhi  wrote:


 Can you be a little bit more specific detailing the problem? Thanks:-)
--
Vik Malhi ? CCIE #13890
Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com
*Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat <*
http://www.ipexpert.com/chat*>

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
www.ipexpert.com/communities <*http://www.ipexpert.com/communities*>  and
our public website at www.ipexpert.com <*http://www.ipexpert.com/*>



--
*From: *Trevor Peddle 
*Date: *Wed, 1 Sep 2010 21:28:10 + (GMT)
*To: *OSL Group 
*Subject: *[OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

help


--
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com








___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Location of QoS SRND from DocCD Page

[Amp]

Ok Matthew,
You got me stumped on this one. I have been trying to find it. I have  
heard from a few sources that the QoS SRND will be on the desktop of  
the computer that you are on in the lab so trying to find it via the  
products page may not be necessary; however knowing exactly where to  
find it is a good thing "just in case".


Amp

Quoting Matthew Berry :

I know the QoS SRND is available through cisco.com/go/design, but I   
am trying to find it from the   
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html web page.


Does anyone know the location of the document when accessed from the  
 link above?


Thanks,
Matthew Berry
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
please visit www.ipexpert.com






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Amp]

No not based on lunch. With the longer lunch time I will be able to  
have some time to think about what I have completed, what I need to  
complete, and if I need to change anything that I have done.


Quoting ccie voice :


@Amp

So you choose a lab location based on lunch?

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Amp  wrote:


I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San Jose.
Here are my reasons:

1. Later Start Time
2. Longer Lunch
3. Better Weather
4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC

Amp


Quoting Jeff Garvas :

 I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east of that

location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late start.
RTP
supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.

2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 

  Hi,


I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's timezone! this
will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to exam
awake
enough!



Regards,

--
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up  now.<
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com








___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com







___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Better Voice Lab Locations

[Amp]

I live here in the RTP area but have decided to take the lab in San  
Jose. Here are my reasons:


1. Later Start Time
2. Longer Lunch
3. Better Weather
4. Just have a gut feeling about SJC

Amp

Quoting Jeff Garvas :


I heard that the West coast facility starts later, so someone east of that
location would gain the time zone benefits as well as the late start.   RTP
supposedly starts first thing in the morning bright and early.

2010/6/9 Mouhammad Nasser 


 Hi,

I think it is better to take one that is closest to one's timezone! this
will eliminate the factor of travel sickness, and one may go to exam awake
enough!



Regards,

--
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up   
now.<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com








___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VLAN interfaces down

[Amp]

Hey Bro,
I ran into an issue similar to that before but mine was because there  
was no phone connected to the port.


Antonio

Quoting Matthew Berry :


I see this issue from time to time.  The VLAN interfaces on my BR1-RTR
show a state of up, but line protocol is down.

I made sure that there are ports with the vlans configured.  I reload
the router.  I also made sure the vlans were in existence.

At this point, my BR1-RTR is useless until I get this working.  Any ideas?

interface Vlan130
 ip address 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan240
 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0

...

interface FastEthernet1/1
 switchport trunk native vlan 130
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 240



BR1-RTR#show vlan-switch br

VLAN Name StatusPorts
  -
---
...
130  DATA activeFa1/1, Fa1/15
240  PHONES   activeFa1/1, Fa1/2, Fa1/3, Fa1/4
Fa1/5, Fa1/6, Fa1/7, Fa1/8
Fa1/9, Fa1/10, Fa1/11, Fa1/12
Fa1/13, Fa1/14, Fa1/15



BR1-RTR#show ip int bri
Interface  IP-Address  OK? Method Status
Protocol
...
Vlan13010.10.101.1 YES manual up
down
Vlan24010.10.201.1 YES NVRAM  up
down

--

*Matthew Berry*

/A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/

*_Vitals:_*

*GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044

*Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com

*Skype*: ciscovoiceguru

*Twitter*: ciscovoiceguru

*_Cert Stats:_*

Cisco Cert Journey Began: Jan 1, 2009

1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16, 2010




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 50, Issue 80 - Strategy

[Amp]

Hey Kev,
Have you reviewed the strategy section on the VODs? Also, I thought  
this was a pretty good post from someone that recently passed the v3  
lab.

http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg14346.html

Amp

Quoting Kevin Hobson :

> Hi All,
>
> I'm really struggling to come up with a decent strategy which is something
> that let me down in my one attempt at version 2 just before it became
> version 3.
>
> So looking for some ideas on how best to approach this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Kev
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
> Sent: 14 April 2010 01:36
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 50, Issue 80
>
> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>   http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>   ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>   ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. 7975 Firmware file not loading (Ashar Siddiqui)
>2. Please Help: cannot select octo-line (Arnold Schwarzeneger)
>3. Re: Please Help: cannot select octo-line (bkvalent...@gmail.com)
>4. Re: Please Help: cannot select octo-line (Dew Swen)
>5. Re: 7975 Firmware file not loading (Amy Ryan)
>6. Cisco Phones - 7960/7961 (Matthew Berry)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:31:14 +0100
> From: Ashar Siddiqui 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7975 Firmware file not loading
> To: "CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"
>   
> Message-ID: <4bc4f0b2.4050...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi all,
>
> One of our customer had an issue with his 3x 7975 phones. The phones are
> showing an incorrect time (they are showing GMT) while all other phones
> in the same device pool are showing correct time BST (GMT+1). I looked
> at the display debugs of the phone and found that its looking for the
> firmware file SCCP-7975-sccp.8-3-4SR1. This file is at TFTP and the
> device pack is also cmterm-devicepack6.0.1.1102-1which is fine. The
> phone cannot get the firmware from TFTP. I even upgraded the firmware to
> cmterm-7975-sccp.8-5-2.cop.sgn but phone is still looking for the old
> file. The device default is reflecting the new file and I also mentioned
> the phone load at the device as well but phone is not searching for new
> firmware. Did factory reset etc but no joy. Anyone who coan throw some
> light on this please?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ashar Siddiqui
>
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100413/4ea27da
> 9/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:02:12 +0100
> From: Arnold Schwarzeneger 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Please Help: cannot select octo-line
> To: 
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have CME7.0(1) up and running. I wanted to start configuring an octo line,
> but all I see is the "dual-line" option:
>
> Router(config)#ephone-dn 1 ?
>   dual-line  dual-line DN (2 calls per line/button)
>   
>
> Router(config)#ephone-dn 10 ?
>   dual-line  dual-line DN (2 calls per line/button)
>   
>
>
> ephone-dn 1 and 10 re new and not configured before. Can please someone tell
> me why I don't have the Octo-line option?
>
> Thanks
>
> _
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/19780/direct/01/
> We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us
> now
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100414/eb56faf
> e/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:05:56 +
> From: bkvalent...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Please Help: cannot select octo-line
> To: "Arnold Schwarzeneger" ,
>   ccie_voic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] does CME support + sign?

[Amp]

Matthew,
You are correct, a voice translation rule appending the + sign will do it.

Amp
Quoting Matthew Berry :

> Wouldn't it depending on what protocol you were using on the CUCME
> side?  For example, H.323 does not support the + character.  Therefore,
> you'd need to setup a voice translation rule on the voice-port to
> append a + to all incoming calls.
>
> I'd prefer the voice translation rule on the voice-port rather than
> dial-peers.  That way, you handle the requirement for the entire system
> in one location.
>
>
> Matthew Berry
>
> /A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Written/
>
> *Gmail:* ciscovoiceguru
>
> *Skype:* ciscovoiceguru
>
> *Twitter:* ciscovoiceguru
>
> *1st Lab Attempt: *Aug 16, 2010
>
>
> On 4/13/2010 10:12 AM, Amp wrote:
>> Anupam,
>> I do not recall seeing that '+ Dialing' was supported in CME when I
>> read through the CME SRND.
>>
>> Amp
>>
>> Quoting anupam TYAGI:
>>
>>
>>> Does cme version 7.0 support + sign. i can see in the isdn debug that the
>>> calling number is coming with + , but on the missed or received call it is
>>> with out +..
>>>
>>> Is there any way to achieve it
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] does CME support + sign?

[Amp]

Anupam,
I do not recall seeing that '+ Dialing' was supported in CME when I  
read through the CME SRND.

Amp

Quoting anupam TYAGI :

> Does cme version 7.0 support + sign. i can see in the isdn debug that the
> calling number is coming with + , but on the missed or received call it is
> with out +..
>
> Is there any way to achieve it
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 10 Q4.6 - VoiceView and CUCM - Authentication Error

[Amp]

Thanks for that info Amy. I found a link that should be helpful.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_tech_note09186a008067cb94.shtml

Amp

Quoting Amy Ryan :

> Hello Sergio,
>
> Thank you for bringing to our attention that the solution was missing.  This
> has now been added and the update should be available for download shortly.
>
> In this instance, there should not be an issue with the license and IVR
> sessions are not required as part of the license.  It appears below that you
> have the correct license.  (CCM)
>
> Please ensure you have completed the following steps:
> In Cisco Unity Express
> 1. Enabled Voiceview
>
> In CUCM
> 1. Added Voiceview as a phone service  (Service url:
> http://10.10.202.2/voiceview/common/login.do)
> 2. Applied service to the appropriate phone and reset phone
> 3. Associated phone as a controlled device with the ³cue² Application User
> (just as you have for cti ports and cti route point)
>
> Once the above steps are completed, you should be able to press the Services
> button and see the menu option for Voiceview (or the name you gave the phone
> service).  Use the username and pin assigned to the voicemail box in Unity
> Express for Login (authentication).
>
> Once logged in:
> 1. Press 1 for Inbox
> 2. Highlight and Select desired message
> 3. Press Listen
>
> At that point the message should be played via the speakerphone.  Please let
> us know your results.
>
> HTH,
> Amy
>
>
> ---
> Amy Ryan ­ CCIE #24677 (Voice)
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities>  and our
> public website at www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sergio Polizer 
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:10:36 -0300
> To: , 
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 10 Q4.6 - VoiceView and CUCM -
> Authentication Error
>
> Hello Mirco,
>
> I added 4 IVR ports but same issue. Any other suggestions?
>
> Can It be an expected behavior?
>
> Thank you, Sergio.
> 
> cue# sh software licenses
> Installed license files:
>  - voicemail_lic.sig : 12 MAILBOX LICENSE
>  - ivr_lic.sig : 4 PORT IVR BASE LICENSE
>
> Core:
>  - Application mode: CCM
>  - Total usable system ports: 8
>
> Voicemail/Auto Attendant:
>  - Max system mailbox capacity time: 6000
>  - Default # of general delivery mailboxes: 5
>  - Default # of personal mailboxes: 12
>
>  - Max # of configurable mailboxes: 17
>
> Interactive Voice Response:
>  - Max # of IVR sessions: 4
>
> Languages:
>  - Max installed languages: 5
>  - Max enabled languages: 5
>
>
>
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:27:22 -0700
> From: moataz_m...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 10 Q4.6 - VoiceView and CUCM -
> Authentication Error
> To: spoli...@hotmail.com; mlin...@conet.de
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> I have the same issue
>
> --- On Mon, 4/12/10, Linden, Mirco  wrote:
>>
>> From: Linden, Mirco 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 10 Q4.6 - VoiceView and CUCM -
>> Authentication Error
>> To: "Sergio Polizer" 
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 12:48 PM
>>
>> Hi Sergio,
>>
>> If I¹m not completely wrong you need an IVR license on your CUE to get the
>> listen function running.  Brgds, Mirco
>>
>>
>> Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Im Auftrag von   
>> Sergio Polizer
>> Gesendet: Montag, 12. April 2010 14:25
>> An: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Lab 10 Q4.6 ­ VoiceView and CUCM -
>> Authentication Error
>>   Hi,  After integrated CUE w/ CUCM, Question 4.6 (Vol 2 LAB 10) asks us to
>> allow users to log into the voicemail system via the services   
>> button on their
>> phone. Users should have the ability to view, sort and manage their  
>>  voicemail
>> messages and manage their voicemail greetings.  The question does not say
>> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QSIG on the lab?

[Amp]

Matthew,
I am not an expert with QSIG but from what I do know I don't see it as  
being a probability that it will be on the lab although, it is a  
possibility. I checked the blueprint and didn't see it on there  
either. If there are or were some PBX's in the picture then I would  
guess that QSIG would be probable. Later dude...

Amp

Quoting "Berry, Matthew J." :

> I don't know much about QSIG, so pardon the simple minded question:   
> Could QSIG be on the lab and, if so, in what ways could we see it   
> manifest?
>
> Thanks!
> - Sent from my Blackberry
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] anyone issue scheduling proctorlabs.com

[Amp]

Akash,
I believe there is a boot camp going on this week; if that's the case  
then you may be running into a scheduling issue because of that.

Quoting akash patel :

> i am trying to schedule a proctorlab today till Friday, but all   
> session seemed to booked.  I never had session availability issue   
> even for single session till yesterday, and now suddenly 10 session   
> get filled out?
>
> please let me know as i try to schedule it from 2 different PC.
>
> thank you



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] which path? v2+v3 or just v3?

[Amp]

Hey Dew,
The current version of the lab is v3 so you should roll with that.

Quoting Dew Swen :

> Hi there,
>
> I will write my written test in a month. After that I will start to the
> workbooks.
>
> Which version do you offer me to begin? I have enough time (one year). First
> blueprint2 and then blueprint3 workbooks; or just blueprint3 workbooks?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards,
> -
> Dew Swen
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26

[Amp]

Hey Roger,
I am all signed up and ready to go, just need to make hotel  
arrangements. I was actually asking who will be attending the boot  
camp because I wanted to see if anyone wanted to share the hotel  
expense costs.

Amp
Quoting Roger Källberg :

> Hi Amp,
> I plan to go to the second week, 22-26 of March, of this boot camp   
> in San Jose and before that I will attend the first week in Columbus  
>  on the 8-12 of March. I haven't booked it yet, but according to  
> Mike  Down there are still available seats. Plan to make up my mind  
> within  the next couple of days and book it :-)
>
> Brgds,
> Roger Källberg
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amp [mailto:amccar...@cciequest.com]
> Sent: den 4 januari 2010 18:18
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26
>
> Hey gang,
> I was wondering has registered for or is planning to register for the
> boot camp in San Jose from March 15 - 26?
>
> Amp
>
>
>
>
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Printing Proctor Labs

[Amp]

Hey Randall,
I had the same problem that you have but I was able to resolve the  
issue by not only setting the duplex setting in Adobe Reader but in  
the settings of the printer as well. Hope that helps...

Amp

Quoting Randall Crumm :

> HI,
> Is it me or can you not print the Proctor Guides with a duplexer? I   
> configure it to use the duplexer and it is not working.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randall Crumm | Voice and Network Engineer
> Direct: (408) 490-6734 | Cell: (408) 507-2373
> www.harmonicinc.com
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CA8D5A.A432DBD0]
>
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26

[Amp]

Hey gang,
I was wondering has registered for or is planning to register for the  
boot camp in San Jose from March 15 - 26?

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] URL to GUI for CUPS (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Amp]

Hey Jeffery,
See if one of these links has what you're looking for.

http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence%2C_Release_7.x
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Unified_Presence,_Release_7.x_--_Configuration_and_Maintenance_of_Cisco_Unified_Presence

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 46, Issue 137

[Amp]

Wayne,
I personally don't have a problem with what you say or how you say it,  
like you I am a Marine at heart and have heard worse and have said  
worse about a whole lot of nothing. Sometimes things may sound harsh  
but at the end of the day I think we all can benefit from looking at  
everyone's point of view. I remember the awesome giveaway that you  
personally ran last year for Christmas so if anyone wonders about your  
commitment to helping people they need to go to December 2008 Blog and  
look at Santa's Christmas Giveaway. Well I'm off to read some SRND  
stuff before the lil ones come up with a different plan for me.

Quoting Wayne Lawson :

> Craig -
>
>   I respect your opinion - and yes, I can be "right to the point"
> - which some people may not appreciate the "blunt tone". However, with
> that being said - my intentions are good - and my overall objective is
> to make things better here. I typically skip the "candy coating" and
> just get the job done and the message out there. (I've learned over 10
> years that "candy coating" these types of messages doesn't get through
> to the ones I'm speaking directly to on this list - most of the time)
>
>   Also, kudos to you on your weekend cutover - however, I still
> don't agree that "everyone does it" - I could probably send you over
> 100 messages (from customers about competition) justifying what I'm
> saying - however, hopefully our competitors are learning and getting
> better - it will only improve the industry - as competition drives
> excellence! ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
> Founder & President - IPexpert
> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> ::Message sent from iPhone::
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
> Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
> throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
> out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
> public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>
> On Dec 27, 2009, at 7:56 AM, Craig Rees  wrote:
>
>> Again Wayne, it is the way you state things.  I did not complain
>> about customer service towards me from Ipexperts.  I have never
>> dealt with you personally.  All of the other individuals I have
>> worked with at Ipexerts have been great to work with.  It is your
>> tone in the email you sent that I stated was "horrible customer
>> service".   Please do not try and change the issue.  Let's end this
>> debate and move on to more important things.
>>
>> By the way no one cares that you are working late on a holiday
>> weekend.  I just finished doing a cut for a customer at 5:30am on a
>> holiday weekend.  We all do it:-)
>>
>>
>> Also I have tried a competitor and I do feel I get great customer
>> service from them as I also feel I have got great customer service
>> from IPexperts as well.  I was just referring to your tone in the
>> message you sent.  I can assure you other individuals at Ipexperts
>> have not responded to me in that manner.  You should scale it down a
>> bit.  If you cannot take the advice without getting offended I am
>> sorry.  I am just trying to offer some constructive criticism.  I
>> have seen and heard several complaints about Ipexperts on the forums
>> and I would think every little of bit advice could only help.
>>
>> Peace out!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-
>> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of   
>> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 12:30 AM
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 46, Issue 137
>>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 46, Issue 134

[Amp]

Hey Wayne,
When I had the issue that I had many moons ago I originally went to  
the PL forum but as you said, that forum is often overlooked and I  
didn't get any response there, that's when I came here to the OSL. I  
only brought up that particular incident to suggest that it's possible  
that the original poster may have been told the same thing, but in any  
case you are absolutely correct, by the time we reach CCIE studies we  
should be at a point of knowledge that exceeds the basic problems that  
keep popping up. I have been guilty of over-thinking what the problem  
IS or COULD be and hitting your support guys or even the OSL up only  
to have to admit that I was a complete idiot and the problem was  
between the chair and keyboard. I for one appreciate the quality of  
this list, which is why I prefer to not go anywhere near the other  
lists (just my opinion), so I agree with you not wanting the quality  
or integrity of this list to take a downward spiral. Anyway, whatever  
you are paying Drew and Ryan probably isn't enough for all the  
problems that these two have to sort through.
Quoting Wayne Lawson :

> Amp -
>
>  They were possibly referring to the "Proctor Labs Rack Forum" -
> which is often overlooked.  Keep in mind - I have no problem providing
> guidance to customers - but if and when they refuse to follow basic
> procedures and / or are too lazy to read basic instructions (or look
> for the answer within an FAQ area) - our time begins to get wasted -
> and other customers that have justified support issues then get
> neglected.  We make it pretty clear where to go to get answers to basic
> questions or issues - and in many cases (not all cases, but frequently)
> - my support teams spends countless hours providing guidace and
> answering questions that could have been answered if that particular
> customer took the initiative to follow basic procedures or read our
> instructions / directions. Let's face it - if someone can't follow
> basic procedures on how to merge files into a web account - or retrieve
> a password - their chance at passing the CCIE lab is pretty slim.  A
> true CCIE candidate should have a little more intelligence and drive
> than the average "end user".
>
>  Regardless of the issue you were referring to (Amp) - our support
> team deals with printing problems, access issues (to files) and
> hardware problems (Proctor Labs).  This list is for technical guidance
> and meant to be used to help teach our customers the protocols and
> technologies seen on the lab and discuss questions that arise as
> clients complete scenarios seen throughout our products. It's not meant
> to be a loud speaker for people who refuse to follow simple procedures
> - as many, many people have seen and read - these types of clients can
> bring down the quality of the list.  My job is to make sure this list
> is top notch and used correctly and that basic questions - or questions
> that should be directed elsewhere are funneled in the right direction.
>
>  Also - Craig - if you have a problem with how I run this company
> and how support is provided - I'd be happy to discuss this over the
> phone - I've already pulled your account up and have reviewed EVERY
> email and live chat transcript that has ever been sent and received
> from you (over the past year and a half) *yes, that's how I spend my
> holiday weekends - verifying and resolving customers complaints or
> issues*.  I feel we've handled your issues pretty damn well.  Your
> comment about our customer service being "horrible" is out of line and
> to be honest - doesn't sit well with me - it's actually quite absurd
> and unjustified.  If you think our support is "horrible" - I challenge
> you to spend a week dealing with the few competitors we have worldwide
> - I highly doubt you'll get a response during working hours - let alone
> on a holiday weekend at 11:30 PM.
>
> Regards,
>
> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
> Founder & President - IPexpert
> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> ::Message sent from iPhone::
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
> Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
> throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
> out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
> public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>
> On Dec 26, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Amp  wrote:
>
>> I remember when I first started using 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 46, Issue 134

[Amp]

I remember when I first started using PL sessions I had some problems  
and was asked by one of the support guys if I had tried to get any  
help on the forum first before contacting them.

Quoting "CCIETalk.com" :

> Well you have to see his point of view. He has been telling all of these
> people to contact support but they keep coming here for support issues. This
> list is NOT a support list for issues like that. IPX has a well defined
> process for SUPPORT ISSUES.
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Craig Rees  wrote:
>
>> Wow, in my company if I were to get annoyed by a customer and publicly
>> state it I would get fired and rightly so.
>>
>> Broken Record or not, horrible customer service!
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
>> ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 10:00 AM
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 46, Issue 134
>>
>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>   1. Re: Proctorlabs connection issue (Wayne Lawson)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:19:34 -0500
>> From: Wayne Lawson 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs connection issue
>> To: A A 
>> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
>>Ryan Barnum 
>> Message-ID: <475444f4-e1c7-436f-82f4-5d957a001...@ipexpert.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Guys - I feel like a broken record here...PLEASE, PLEASE try to get it
>> this time...
>>
>> If you are having technical difficulties - PLEASE CONTACT OUR SUPPORT
>> TEAM DIRECTLY. All issues have been resolved - and everything that is
>> being reported has ended up being an end user error.  Believe it or
>> not - many of our clients can't follow simple procedures - and
>> blasting this list (over and over and over and over) with the se
>> questions / topics is getting a bit annoying for me - and the other
>> list members.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
>> Founder & President - IPexpert
>> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> ::Message sent from iPhone::
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
>> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
>> Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
>> throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
>> out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
>> public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>>
>> On Dec 26, 2009, at 10:07 AM, A A  wrote:
>>
>> > I downloaded firfox and coulf telnet to routers. However , i still
>> > cannot connect to CUCM-PUB or any other servers.
>> >
>> > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:39:42 +0530
>> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs connection issue
>> > From: arunv...@gmail.com
>> > To: f...@hotmail.com
>> > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> >
>> > try re-connecting ? if still not work contact support.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 7:00 PM, A A  wrote:
>> > I can't seem to connect to anything. My session has already started
>> > and when I double click any router or server I get "The webpage
>> > cannot be displayed". The vpn clinet is conneted. Can anybody
>> > through some light on this issue where have I gone wrong?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Add other email accounts to Hotmail in 3 easy steps. Find out how.
>> >
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Have more than one Hotmail account? Link them together to easily
>> > access both.
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20091226/c49193fe/attachment.html
>>
>> --
>>
>> ___
>> CCIE_Voice mailing list
>> CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>
>>
>> End of 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 (CCIE Voice 3.0) Walk-Through Video Tutorials

[Amp]

Hey Vik,
Do you know what the cost is going to be, if any, to existing customers?

Quoting Vik Malhi :

> They have not started shipping yet but will do so very shortly.
>
> Vik Malhi - CCIE#13890
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>
> Join IPexpert's Free CCIE Peer Groups & Study Communities at
> www.IPexpert.com/communities
>
> On Dec 25, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Amp  wrote:
>
>> Hey Gang,
>> I was wondering has these started shipping yet and if so, how much for
>> current customers?
>>
>> Volume 1 (CCIE Voice 3.0) Walk-Through Video Tutorials
>> Shipping Status: This new product is not expected to ship until
>> December 20th, 2009.
>>
>> Amp
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 (CCIE Voice 3.0) Walk-Through Video Tutorials

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
I was wondering has these started shipping yet and if so, how much for  
current customers?

Volume 1 (CCIE Voice 3.0) Walk-Through Video Tutorials
Shipping Status: This new product is not expected to ship until  
December 20th, 2009.

Amp

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Finally My Time CCIE #25772

[Amp]

I have to say it again, congrats bro. I haven't met anyone as humble  
as you during this entire process and if anyone deserves the digits  
it's you!!!
Quoting James Key :

> Received the news yesterday that I passed my lab in San Jose!  CCIE   
> #25772.  This was my 4th attempt, 3 for V2 and first V3 attempt.  A   
> big thanks to all of you guys on this list (and those who have come   
> and gone with their numbers) and to IPexpert!
>
> I will try and put together my history preparing for this exam soon.
>
>
> James Key
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with   
> it are intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.   
> The message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or   
> privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure   
> or distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPexpert Web site - still issues?

[Amp]

CCIETALK,
Great points and I am sure that IPExpert appreciates your patience  
however what about the group of people that are unable to access their  
workbooks and have lab dates coming up soon and would really like to  
access their workbooks to continue with their prep? The original word  
from IPX was that things "should" be done by Saturday evening or  
Sunday now it's possibly today Tuesday. I understand your point,  
however try to understand those that are seriously impacted by this  
migration. Just my two pennies.
Quoting "CCIETalk.com" :

> Everyone needs to realize that this is not just a simple website upgrade.
> You have tons of backend features that are tied into this and it can be
> hectic for such a migration to go 100% smooth without issues. IPX has been
> VERY upfront about the issues and they even suggested that you guys
> open/download the workbooks you want access to before the cutover started.
>
> I have had ZERO impact during all this because I opened all the related
> workbooks (Voice) on my computer after I read the email/blog/twitter post. I
> think the authentication happens every so often so even after I closed my
> workbook, I was able to open it back up without any issues.
>
> And yes I am still not able to login to my IPX Members Area but who cares?
> Let them work this out without complicating things so we can all have a
> better experience :)
>
> Its amazing how many emails we have seen regarding "Site not working". I
> think we are all adults and should be able to glance our inbox before
> sending out another spam.
>
> Good luck Wayne and Co - Its hard to please folks these days :-D
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Wayne Lawson wrote:
>
>> Omotayo - (and others),
>>
>>  Due to the structure and what's happening on the backend - there was
>> no way to run 2 different systems concurrently. Everything will be available
>> and back to normal (actually better than normal) today. We will also be
>> adding additional labs / sections as almost every workbook is now completed
>> with the exception of our Vol 2 Voice WB. Also (Omotayo) - I apologize for
>> our support team not getting back to you. They have been very responsive -
>> I'm sure your email slipped through the cracks (which is still
>> unacceptable).
>>
>>  Gang - I apologize for the major inconvenience, but appreciate the
>> support and patience - we're really working on adding some great features
>> and I feel that it will be worth the few days of downtime once this is up
>> and functioning as designed.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
>> Founder & President - IPexpert
>> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: 
>> www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> ::Message sent from iPhone::
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S,
>> Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service
>> Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United
>> States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at
>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Omotayo  wrote:
>>
>> it didnt work
>>
>> I feel they should not have launched the Site until its fully functional
>>
>> i cant access my documents with userid and email id
>>
>> i have mailed the support but no one is responding
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Sarrick < 
>> ssarr...@drsllc.net> wrote:
>>
>>>  Here is the response I received and it worked fine for me
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> IPexpert is currently in the process of transferring all client product
>>> files/information over to our new website. We are working hard to ensure
>>> that this process goes as quickly and smoothly as possible. Unfortunately,
>>> for the time being, this means that some of our clients may not have access
>>> to the files in their account and have issues logging into the new site
>>> until all transfers have been completed. We sincerely apologize for the
>>> inconvenience this may have caused you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> However, there is a way to get access to the old IPexpert member?s site
>>> but you will have to jump through a couple of hoops.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> First you will need to disable on the browser you are using, the option to
>>> check server certificate revocation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In Internet Explorer go to Tools -> Internet Options -> Advanced (Tab) ->
>>> Under ?Settings? Scroll down to Security -> Uncheck ?Check for server
>>> certificate revocation*" Then navigate back to the following link   
>>> and bypass
>>> the security warning.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In Fire Fox go to Tools -> Options -> Advanced -> Encryption (Tab) ->
>>> Validation (Button) -> Uncheck ?Use the Online Certificate Status   
>>> Protocol??
>>> Then navigate back to the following link and add an exception for our
>>> w

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vrack pod 19 problems

[Amp]

I know this may seem like an idiotic question but I made the idiotic  
mistake last week so here goes, did you load the 'inital config'  
scripts from the vRack GUI?
Quoting "Sprengers, Harry" :

> Hello,
>
> when working on pod 19 voice vrack at protorlabs, I don't see any   
> layer 3 on my BR2 gateway.
> The frame-relay seems to be up, I can see HQ-RTR with cdp, but my   
> ppp packets don't come in.
> I have attached the configs and the debug ppp neg  from both sides.   
> I suspect the PSTN gateway, any suggestions?
>
>
>
>
> Harry Sprengers
> Engineer
>
> Getronics
> Van Deventerlaan 31-51k
> 3528 AG Utrecht
> The Netherlands
> M +31 (0)6 5123 1027
> T +31 (0)30 290 6941
> F +31 (0)30 290 6910
> harry.spreng...@getronics.com
> www.getronics.nl
> Getronics Nederland BV, Handelsregister 34.115.845 Amsterdam
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for use by the   
> addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.   
> Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or   
> the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by   
> persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is   
> prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender   
> and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. Thank you
>
>
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ephone registration problem

[Amp]

I ran into that problem when I was working on Lab1A in the vol. 1 WB  
and what I did was reset the phone from the CUCME router. Another  
thing you can do is shut down port Fa0/3/0, clear IP dhcp binding, and  
remove/re-add the config.

Quoting Gobind Singh Gill :

> Hi Guys!
>
> I have problem registering ephone to CUCME. Here's the configuration
> of the port :-
>
>  switchport trunk native vlan 200
>  switchport mode trunk
>  switchport voice vlan 400
>
> The phone has acquired IP address from DHCP and is in up and up state.
>
> BR2-RTR(config-if)#do sh ip int brie
> Interface  IP-Address  OK? Method Status
>  Protocol
> FastEthernet0/3/0  unassigned  YES unset  up  
> up
> Vlan20010.10.102.1 YES manual up
>  up
> Vlan40010.10.202.1 YES manual up
>  up
> SSLVPN-VIF0unassigned  NO  unset  up
>  up
> Loopback0  10.10.110.3 YES manual up  
> up
>
> BR2-RTR#sh cdp neighbors f0/3/0 det
> -
> Device ID: SEP001BD4C6CC00
> Entry address(es):
>   IP address: 10.10.202.50
> Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
> Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
>
> I have also followed the standard telephony setup. Any input will be  
>  helpful :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Gobind Singh Gill
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #25689

[Amp]

Congratulations Dan...

Quoting Daniel Rodriguez :

> Folks:
>
> Just wanted to thank a few people here for helping me with some of   
> my questions over the past few weeks... and a huge thanks to   
> IPExpert for the very helpful bootcamp and practice lab material.
>
> - Dan
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Say it isn't so!

[Amp]

My first impression is/was WOW..WHAT THE F*&^. However, knowing that  
Wayne is a former Marine like myself I have the utmost confidence that  
me, a voice candidate, will be alright with whatever direction  
IPexpert goes in. Some will like the move, some won't like the move,  
so what..let's keep the party going.

Just my opinion
Quoting Wayne Lawson :

> We're very unhappy with the quality of the VOD that Mark created. It
> will be redone by Vik in early 2010.
>
> Also, stay tuned for quite a few announcements. Everything happening
> fits perfectly into our corporate direction, business plan and
> strategy. Our clients will not suffer - and will be extremely pleased
> with what happens at IPexpert throughout the month of November.
> Things aren't always as they appear! ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
> Founder & President - IPexpert
> Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 701
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> ::Message sent from iPhone::
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
> Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
> throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
> out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
> public website at www.ipexpert.com.
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 1:42 PM, kamal yousaf   wrote:
>
>> I think Vik Malhi is a great great resource.His labs/even vlectures  
>>   are always orientated towards practical demonstration while most   
>>  others just use slides.I wish Vik had produced Voice VoD too.I  
>> have   great faith in him and Wayne,and i am positive , IPexpert  
>> will  keep  dominating voice track.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Thomas Koch   wrote:
>> I?m sure Wayne will find a suitable resource to replace Mark.
>>
>> No worries.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas J. Koch
>> Owner/Consultant
>>
>> CCNA, CCVP
>> Digitones, LLC
>> Cell: 630-808-4910
>> E-mail: digito...@comcast.net
>>
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-   
>> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Scott ODonnell
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:12 AM
>> To: Brian Valentine
>> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Say it isn't so!
>>
>>
>>
>> Wow.
>>
>>
>>
>> That is a shame for IPExpert and truly a huge loss.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark is really one of the best instructors I've ever had.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Brian Valentine   
>>  wrote:
>>
>> I got an email from ?the other guys? yesterday welcoming Mark  Snow  
>>  to their team.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://ieoc.com/forums/p/8799/57626.aspx#57626
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
>>  please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
>>  please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,   
>>  please visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Handling burnout

[Amp]

Nara,
I can understand completely the burnout issue. I have been studying  
(starting over and over and over again more times than I can count)  
since January and between work issues, family issues, personal issues,  
and sometimes spiritual issues burnout has been a constant in my  
situation. What I have done that has seemed to help me is, talk to  
someone who has gone through it (James Key) has been very instrumental  
in helping me, taking time away from it all when necessary, and most  
of all being a fighter. Believe, Rest, and Fight and just know that no  
matter what you are doing this for you and what's most important to or  
for you. Stay strong and if you wanna holla one on one email me.

Amp

Quoting Nara Shikamaru :

> I've been working through my studies for about a year now, my lab date is
> set for probably February, and I have to say that overall I'm enjoying the
> process of preparing (and learning).  There are a LOT of things on this exam
> that never come up in the course of everyday work as an enterprise engineer
> and I'm enjoying working through excersises on CUBE and gatekeepers.  I've
> definitely grown since I've started.
>
> My question has to do with burnout.  I find that even a reasonable schedule
> can be taxing sometimes and I wonder how others on the list handle it.  Some
> on this list have been working through passing the exam for a few years, do
> you have any advice?  Do you find that the burnout's a symptom of something
> to be aware of or is this normal for the aspiring learner and something that
> just needs to be worked through?
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] October Boot Camp

[Amp]

Hey gang,
I was wondering who, if anyone, is going to the boot camp in San Jose  
from October 19 - 30?


Amp

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey JB,
I am talking about the BR2 phone that is located at Proctor Labs and  
yes I am able to ping the 10.10.110.3 address, which is the BR2  
Loopback0 interface, from my home pc.


Quoting ccie voice :


Hi,
I have not read all posts, but if you are talking about the BR2 phone that's
your homephone, then do the following:

Just to let you know that since 1 or two weeks I have to add a static route
on the HQ router towards my HOME network and redistribute that network in
OSPF.

Try to ping to 10.10.110.3 from you HOME PC, does that work?

regards,

JB



2009/6/19 Cliff McGlamry 


Sounds like debugging TFTP events might be helpful here.



--
From: "Brian Valentine" 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:52 PM
To: "Amp" 
Cc: ; "Cliff McGlamry"
; ; "CCIE-Voice"
; 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Sorry.  I wasn't clear.  I'm not looking for "load 7960-7940
P00308000500.loads".  I'm looking for "load 7960-7940 P00308000500".  But
also a command that says: "tftp-server flash:P00308000500.loads".

Before you had under telephony-service:  "load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00". But
no global command "tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.loads"
See what I'm getting at?

Brian


- Original Message -
From: "Amp" 
To: 
Cc: ; "Cliff McGlamry"
; ; "CCIE-Voice"
; 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register


Hey Brian,
Tried that earlier, here's the output, I ended up with an error:

BR2-RTR(config-telephony)#load 7960-7940 P00308000500.loads
 LOAD COMMAND ERROR:cnf-file location system is not supported,Plese
use flash|slot0|tftpUpdating CNF files
CNF files update complete for phonetype(7940)
CNF files update complete for phonetype(7960)

BR2-RTR(config-telephony)#
Quoting bkvalent...@gmail.com:

> Amp,
>
> The load command under telephony-service needs to point at a file   that
> ends with the .loads extension that is being served via the   tftp-server
> command.
>
> Brian
>
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Amp 
>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:31:47
> To: Cliff McGlamry
> Cc: ;   CCIE-Voice;
> 
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register
>
>
> This is Branch2, it has the ESW and is not connected to the 3750. The
> 3750 is connected to HQ-RTR. The VLANS are correct, take a look at the
> Volume 1 - Lab Tables document.
>
>
> Quoting Cliff McGlamry :
>
>> DUDE
>>
>>
>> The VLAN numbers on your switch don't match what's on the router
It
>> will never come up that way!!!
>>
>>
>> --
>> From: "Amp" 
>> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:22 PM
>> To: "Cliff McGlamry" 
>> Cc: "Larry Hadrava" ; ;
>> "CCIE-Voice" ; 
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea Cliff.
>>
>> BR2-RTR:
>> ===
>> version 12.4
>> service timestamps debug datetime msec
>> service timestamps log datetime msec
>> no service password-encryption
>> !
>> hostname BR2-RTR
>> !
>> boot-start-marker
>> boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-22.T.bin
>> warm-reboot
>> boot-end-marker
>> !
>> logging message-counter syslog
>> logging buffered 4096
>> !
>> no aaa new-model
>> memory-size iomem 20
>> clock timezone CET 1
>> clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
>> network-clock-participate wic 0
>> no network-clock-participate wic 1
>> !
>> dot11 syslog
>> ip source-route
>> !
>> !
>> ip cef
>> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
>> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
>> !
>> ip dhcp pool CME
>> network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
>> option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
>> default-router 10.10.202.1
>> !
>> !
>> no ip domain lookup
>> no ipv6 cef
>> multilink bundle-name authenticated
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> voice-card 0
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> !
>> archive
>>   log config
>>hidekeys
>> !
>> !
>> controller E1 0/0/0
>> !
>> controller

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Brian,
Tried that earlier, here's the output, I ended up with an error:

BR2-RTR(config-telephony)#load 7960-7940 P00308000500.loads
 LOAD COMMAND ERROR:cnf-file location system is not supported,Plese  
use flash|slot0|tftpUpdating CNF files

CNF files update complete for phonetype(7940)
CNF files update complete for phonetype(7960)

BR2-RTR(config-telephony)#
Quoting bkvalent...@gmail.com:


Amp,

The load command under telephony-service needs to point at a file   
that ends with the .loads extension that is being served via the   
tftp-server command.


Brian

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Amp 

Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:31:47
To: Cliff McGlamry
Cc: ;   
CCIE-Voice; 

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register


This is Branch2, it has the ESW and is not connected to the 3750. The
3750 is connected to HQ-RTR. The VLANS are correct, take a look at the
Volume 1 - Lab Tables document.


Quoting Cliff McGlamry :


DUDE


The VLAN numbers on your switch don't match what's on the router   It
will never come up that way!!!


------
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:22 PM
To: "Cliff McGlamry" 
Cc: "Larry Hadrava" ; ;
"CCIE-Voice" ; 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Sounds like a good idea Cliff.

BR2-RTR:
===
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-22.T.bin
warm-reboot
boot-end-marker
!
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 4096
!
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 20
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
network-clock-participate wic 0
no network-clock-participate wic 1
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
default-router 10.10.202.1
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice-card 0
!
!
!
!
!
archive
  log config
   hidekeys
!
!
controller E1 0/0/0
!
controller E1 0/0/1
!
controller T1 0/1/0
  channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255
  ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface Service-Engine0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/0
  switchport trunk native vlan 200
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport voice vlan 400
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/1
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/2
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/3
  shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0
  no ip address
  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
  no fair-queue
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0.1 point-to-point
  ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0
  ip ospf mtu-ignore
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
interface Vlan1
  no ip address
!
interface Vlan200
  ip address 10.10.102.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
  router-id 10.10.202.1
  log-adjacency-changes
  network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
ip http server
ip http authentication local
no ip http secure-server
!
!
!
!
!
tftp-server flash:P00307010100.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.bin alias P00308000500.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.loads alias
P00308000500.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sb2 alias P00308000500.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sbn alias P00308000500.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.loads alias
P0S3-08-6-00.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.sb2 alias P0S3-08-6-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.bin alias P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.sbn alias P003-08-6-00.sbn
!
control-plane
!
!
!
ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
!
mgcp fax t38 ecm
!
!
!
!
!
telephony-service
  no auto-reg-ephone
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

This is Branch2, it has the ESW and is not connected to the 3750. The  
3750 is connected to HQ-RTR. The VLANS are correct, take a look at the  
Volume 1 - Lab Tables document.



Quoting Cliff McGlamry :


DUDE


The VLAN numbers on your switch don't match what's on the router   It
will never come up that way!!!


--
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:22 PM
To: "Cliff McGlamry" 
Cc: "Larry Hadrava" ; ;
"CCIE-Voice" ; 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Sounds like a good idea Cliff.

BR2-RTR:
===
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-22.T.bin
warm-reboot
boot-end-marker
!
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 4096
!
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 20
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
network-clock-participate wic 0
no network-clock-participate wic 1
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
default-router 10.10.202.1
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice-card 0
!
!
!
!
!
archive
  log config
   hidekeys
!
!
controller E1 0/0/0
!
controller E1 0/0/1
!
controller T1 0/1/0
  channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255
  ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface Service-Engine0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/0
  switchport trunk native vlan 200
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport voice vlan 400
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/1
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/2
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/3
  shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0
  no ip address
  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
  no fair-queue
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0.1 point-to-point
  ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0
  ip ospf mtu-ignore
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
interface Vlan1
  no ip address
!
interface Vlan200
  ip address 10.10.102.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
  router-id 10.10.202.1
  log-adjacency-changes
  network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
ip http server
ip http authentication local
no ip http secure-server
!
!
!
!
!
tftp-server flash:P00307010100.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.bin alias P00308000500.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.loads alias
P00308000500.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sb2 alias P00308000500.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sbn alias P00308000500.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.loads alias
P0S3-08-6-00.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.sb2 alias P0S3-08-6-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.bin alias P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.sbn alias P003-08-6-00.sbn
!
control-plane
!
!
!
ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
!
mgcp fax t38 ecm
!
!
!
!
!
telephony-service
  no auto-reg-ephone
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  time-format 24
  date-format dd-mm-yy
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 04:04:07
!
!
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
!
!
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  codec g729r8
  type 7960
  button  1:1
!
!
!
line con 0
  exec-timeout 0 0
  logging synchronous
line aux 0
line 194
  no activation-character
  no exec
  transport preferred none
  transport input all
  transport output all
line vty 0 4
  exec-timeout 0 0
  privilege level 15
  logging synchronous
  no login
  transport preferred none
  transport input t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Bill,
I have tried that as well with no joy.

Quoting Bill Talley :


I could be wrong, but assuming the files are in the Phone subdirectory in
flash, I think your load statement under telephony-service should say:

load 7960-7940 P00308000500

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:23 PM
To: Cliff McGlamry
Cc: ms...@ipexpert.com; CCIE-Voice; vma...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Sounds like a good idea Cliff.

BR2-RTR:
===
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-22.T.bin
warm-reboot
boot-end-marker
!
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 4096
!
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 20
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
network-clock-participate wic 0
no network-clock-participate wic 1
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
default-router 10.10.202.1
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice-card 0
!
!
!
!
!
archive
  log config
   hidekeys
!
!
controller E1 0/0/0
!
controller E1 0/0/1
!
controller T1 0/1/0
  channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255
  ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface Service-Engine0/0
  no ip address
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
  no ip address
  shutdown
  duplex auto
  speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/0
  switchport trunk native vlan 200
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport voice vlan 400
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/1
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/2
  shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/3
  shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0
  no ip address
  encapsulation frame-relay IETF
  no fair-queue
  frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0.1 point-to-point
  ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0
  ip ospf mtu-ignore
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
interface Vlan1
  no ip address
!
interface Vlan200
  ip address 10.10.102.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
  router-id 10.10.202.1
  log-adjacency-changes
  network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
ip http server
ip http authentication local
no ip http secure-server
!
!
!
!
!
tftp-server flash:P00307010100.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.bin alias P00308000500.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.loads alias P00308000500.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sb2 alias P00308000500.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sbn alias P00308000500.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.loads alias P0S3-08-6-00.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.sb2 alias P0S3-08-6-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.bin alias P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.sbn alias P003-08-6-00.sbn
!
control-plane
!
!
!
ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
!
mgcp fax t38 ecm
!
!
!
!
!
telephony-service
  no auto-reg-ephone
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  time-format 24
  date-format dd-mm-yy
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 04:04:07
!
!
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
!
!
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  codec g729r8
  type 7960
  button  1:1
!
!
!
line con 0
  exec-timeout 0 0
  logging synchronous
line aux 0
line 194
  no activation-character
  no exec
  transport preferred none
  transport input all
  transport output all
line vty 0 4
  exec-timeout 0 0
  privilege level 15
  logging synchronous
  no login
  transport preferred none
  transport input telnet
line vty 5 15
  exec-timeout 0 0

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Sounds like a good idea Cliff.

BR2-RTR:
===
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR2-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9-mz.124-22.T.bin
warm-reboot
boot-end-marker
!
logging message-counter syslog
logging buffered 4096
!
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 20
clock timezone CET 1
clock summer-time CET recurring 1 Sun Apr 1:00 last Sun Oct 1:00
network-clock-participate wic 0
no network-clock-participate wic 1
!
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
!
!
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
!
ip dhcp pool CME
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
   default-router 10.10.202.1
!
!
no ip domain lookup
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice-card 0
!
!
!
!
!
archive
 log config
  hidekeys
!
!
controller E1 0/0/0
!
controller E1 0/0/1
!
controller T1 0/1/0
 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24
!
!
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.10.110.3 255.255.255.255
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface Service-Engine0/0
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
 duplex auto
 speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/0
 switchport trunk native vlan 200
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport voice vlan 400
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/1
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/2
 shutdown
!
interface FastEthernet0/3/3
 shutdown
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 no fair-queue
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0/1/0:0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.10.112.2 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf mtu-ignore
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
interface Vlan1
 no ip address
!
interface Vlan200
 ip address 10.10.102.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan400
 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
 router-id 10.10.202.1
 log-adjacency-changes
 network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
ip http server
ip http authentication local
no ip http secure-server
!
!
!
!
!
tftp-server flash:P00307010100.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-8-12-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-07-5-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-10-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-6-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-7-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.bin
tftp-server flash:P003-08-9-00.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.bin alias P00308000500.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.loads alias P00308000500.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sb2 alias P00308000500.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P00308000500.sbn alias P00308000500.sbn
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.loads alias P0S3-08-6-00.loads
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P0S3-08-9-00.sb2 alias P0S3-08-6-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.bin alias P003-08-6-00.bin
tftp-server flash:PHONE/7940-7960/P003-08-9-00.sbn alias P003-08-6-00.sbn
!
control-plane
!
!
!
ccm-manager fax protocol cisco
!
mgcp fax t38 ecm
!
!
!
!
!
telephony-service
 no auto-reg-ephone
 em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
 max-ephones 1
 max-dn 1
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 auto assign 1 to 1
 network-locale ES
 network-locale 1 ES
 network-locale 2 ES
 network-locale 3 ES
 network-locale 4 ES
 load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
 time-format 24
 date-format dd-mm-yy
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 04:04:07
!
!
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
 number 3001
!
!
ephone  1
 no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
 no multicast-moh
 mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
 codec g729r8
 type 7960
 button  1:1
!
!
!
line con 0
 exec-timeout 0 0
 logging synchronous
line aux 0
line 194
 no activation-character
 no exec
 transport preferred none
 transport input all
 transport output all
line vty 0 4
 exec-timeout 0 0
 privilege level 15
 logging synchronous
 no login
 transport preferred none
 transport input telnet
line vty 5 15
 exec-timeout 0 0
 privilege level 15
 logging synchronous
 no login
 transport preferred none
 transport input telnet
!
scheduler allocate 2 1000
ntp server 10.10.100.2
end
==
HQ-3750

no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname HQ-3750
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
!
no aaa new-model
switch 1 provision ws-c3750-24p
system mtu routing 1500
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet1/0/1
 switchpor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Cliff,
1. I tried the suggestion you made here, still no change.
2. Yes 10.10.110.3 is the Loopback0 and yes it is up/up and the IP  
address is correct.

3. I am unable to access the phone via the web.
4. Yes, yes, and yes to those 3 questions.

This is really friggin weird. Thanks for your input, if you can think  
of anything else please let me know.


Quoting Cliff McGlamry :


Oh...

Regarding item #1,

I'd recommend you change the telephony service source address to the voice
vlan address, and change option 150 to match.  If you can get that to come
up, then you can try shifting it back.  Sometimes things just won't come up
on the loopback for some reason.

--
From: "Cliff McGlamry" 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:43 PM
To: "Amp" ; "Larry Hadrava" 
Cc: ; "CCIE-Voice" ;

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

I've seen this before.

Couple of suggestions:

1.  In your telephony service config, change the ip source address to the
voice vlan address on the router.  Right now, you have it pointed at
10.10.110.3   See if it will come up on the ethernet address on the phone
VLAN.

2.  I'm assuming that 10.10.110.3 is your loopback address on CME.  Did you
confirm that the loopback address is configured as that?  Does a show ip int
brief show the interface as up?

3. What happens if you web into the phone?  What does it show?  Is it trying
to connect to the 10.10.110.3, or is it on something else?  If the phone has
gone into a secure mode, a reset to factory defaults may be required on the
phone.

4.  Did you confirm that the voice vlan the phone is assigned to is
configured on the switch?  Does the VLAN match what's configured on the
router?  Are they both set to be encapsulated or native (doesn't matter
which as long as it's the same).

Every single one of the above issues has bitten me in the past.  See if
these don't get you going.

Cliff



--
From: "Amp" 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:45 PM
To: "Larry Hadrava" 
Cc: ; "CCIE-Voice" ;

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Larry,
No the mac address was assigned dynamically.


Quoting Larry Hadrava :


Did you assign the mac of the ephone statically? If so, try and delete it
and allow the phone to auto register. If you didn't enable auto
registration
under telephony setup, you would need to do so.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Amp  wrote:


Hey Mark or Vik,
Do either one of you have any advice or input that you can give me on
this?

Quoting Amp :

Hey Bill,

Nothing has the .50 address, I have tried to get the phone to drop the
.51 address to see if it would pick up the .50 but it is a stubborn lil
thing. There's only one leased address and that's the .51 that the
phone has.

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp pool

Pool CME :
 Utilization mark (high/low): 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)   : 0 / 0
 Total addresses: 254
 Leased addresses   : 1
 Pending event  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current indexIP address rangeLeased
addresses
 10.10.202.1  10.10.202.1  - 10.10.202.254 1
BR2-RTR#
Quoting Bill Talley :

What has the .50 ip address?


Sent from a mobile phone with very tiny touchscreen keys.  Please
excuse my typos.

-Original Message-
From: Amp 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani 
Cc: CCIE-Voice 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not
Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
  network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
  default-router 10.10.202.1
  option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expiration
Type
   Hardware address/
   User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM
  Automatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
 IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Larry,
No the mac address was assigned dynamically.


Quoting Larry Hadrava :


Did you assign the mac of the ephone statically? If so, try and delete it
and allow the phone to auto register. If you didn't enable auto registration
under telephony setup, you would need to do so.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Amp  wrote:


Hey Mark or Vik,
Do either one of you have any advice or input that you can give me on this?

Quoting Amp :

Hey Bill,

Nothing has the .50 address, I have tried to get the phone to drop the
.51 address to see if it would pick up the .50 but it is a stubborn lil
thing. There's only one leased address and that's the .51 that the
phone has.

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp pool

Pool CME :
 Utilization mark (high/low): 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)   : 0 / 0
 Total addresses: 254
 Leased addresses   : 1
 Pending event  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current indexIP address rangeLeased addresses
 10.10.202.1  10.10.202.1  - 10.10.202.254 1
BR2-RTR#
Quoting Bill Talley :

What has the .50 ip address?


Sent from a mobile phone with very tiny touchscreen keys.  Please
excuse my typos.

-Original Message-
From: Amp 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani 
Cc: CCIE-Voice 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
  network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
  default-router 10.10.202.1
  option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
   Hardware address/
   User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM
  Automatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
 IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :

Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and

max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
 em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
 max-ephones 1
 max-dn 1
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 auto assign 1 to 1
 network-locale ES
 network-locale 1 ES
 network-locale 2 ES
 network-locale 3 ES
 network-locale 4 ES
 load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
 max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
 number 3001
ephone  1
 no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
 no multicast-moh
 mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
 keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
 codec g729r8 pre-ietf
 type 7960
 button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Bill,
I believe it is, I have not been able to find any information to say  
otherwise.


Quoting Bill Talley :


Is 'load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00' valid for a sccp device?

-Original Message-----
From: Amp [mailto:amccar...@cciequest.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 7:04 PM
To: Bill Talley
Cc: Aamir Panjwani; CCIE-Voice
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Bill,
Nothing has the .50 address, I have tried to get the phone to drop the
.51 address to see if it would pick up the .50 but it is a stubborn
lil thing. There's only one leased address and that's the .51 that the
phone has.

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp pool

Pool CME :
  Utilization mark (high/low): 100 / 0
  Subnet size (first/next)   : 0 / 0
  Total addresses: 254
  Leased addresses   : 1
  Pending event  : none
  1 subnet is currently in the pool :
  Current indexIP address rangeLeased addresses
  10.10.202.1  10.10.202.1  - 10.10.202.254 1
BR2-RTR#
Quoting Bill Talley :


What has the .50 ip address?

Sent from a mobile phone with very tiny touchscreen keys.  Please
excuse my typos.

-Original Message-
From: Amp 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani 
Cc: CCIE-Voice 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.202.1
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
 Hardware address/
 User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM
Automatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
   IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
  max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
  codec g729r8 pre-ietf
  type 7960
  button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Mark or Vik,
Do either one of you have any advice or input that you can give me on this?

Quoting Amp :


Hey Bill,
Nothing has the .50 address, I have tried to get the phone to drop the
.51 address to see if it would pick up the .50 but it is a stubborn lil
thing. There's only one leased address and that's the .51 that the
phone has.

BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp pool

Pool CME :
 Utilization mark (high/low): 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)   : 0 / 0
 Total addresses: 254
 Leased addresses   : 1
 Pending event  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current indexIP address rangeLeased addresses
 10.10.202.1  10.10.202.1  - 10.10.202.254 1
BR2-RTR#
Quoting Bill Talley :


What has the .50 ip address?

Sent from a mobile phone with very tiny touchscreen keys.  Please
excuse my typos.


-Original Message-----
From: Amp 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani 
Cc: CCIE-Voice 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 10.10.202.1
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
Hardware address/
User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM 
 Automatic

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
  IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
 em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
 max-ephones 1
 max-dn 1
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 auto assign 1 to 1
 network-locale ES
 network-locale 1 ES
 network-locale 2 ES
 network-locale 3 ES
 network-locale 4 ES
 load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
 max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
 number 3001
ephone  1
 no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
 no multicast-moh
 mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
 keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
 codec g729r8 pre-ietf
 type 7960
 button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Bill,
Nothing has the .50 address, I have tried to get the phone to drop the  
.51 address to see if it would pick up the .50 but it is a stubborn  
lil thing. There's only one leased address and that's the .51 that the  
phone has.


BR2-RTR#sh ip dhcp pool

Pool CME :
 Utilization mark (high/low): 100 / 0
 Subnet size (first/next)   : 0 / 0
 Total addresses: 254
 Leased addresses   : 1
 Pending event  : none
 1 subnet is currently in the pool :
 Current indexIP address rangeLeased addresses
 10.10.202.1  10.10.202.1  - 10.10.202.254 1
BR2-RTR#
Quoting Bill Talley :


What has the .50 ip address?

Sent from a mobile phone with very tiny touchscreen keys.  Please   
excuse my typos.


-Original Message-----
From: Amp 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani 
Cc: CCIE-Voice 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.202.1
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
 Hardware address/
 User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AMAutomatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
   IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
  max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
  codec g729r8 pre-ietf
  type 7960
  button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Cristobal,
I sure do see the phone that I am trying to get to register and it is  
showing unregistered.


show ephone

ephone-1[0] Mac:001B.D4C6.C136 TCP socket:[1] activeLine:0 UNREGISTERED
mediaActive:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:1 paging 0 debug:1 caps:8
IP:10.10.202.51 51057 Telecaster 7960  keepalive 0 max_line 6
button 1: dn 1  number 3001 CH1   DOWN CH2   DOWN
Preferred Codec: g729

BR2-RTR#
Quoting Cristobal Priego :


I have faced something like that before
If you issue a show ephone
Do you see an entry of the phone that you are trying to get register there?

Cheers

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 18, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Amp  wrote:


Hey,
Aamir, yes I changed the max-ephones and max-dn to a higher value   
and reset the phone, no change when I did that.


Ccie1d0t, I recreated the cnf file and nope no change.

Aamir, I setup the time zone information and reset the phone again,  
 no change.


Thanks for you guys help thus far, if you can think of anything   
else please let me know. I am searching through my CME book now to   
see if there is something that I may have missed.


Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Have you also changed max-ephones and max-dn to higher value and reset
the phone?

And I think CME phones won't register without time zone setup.

Enter following under telephone service

time-zone 48
time-format 24
date-format dd-mm-yy




-Original Message-
From: Amp [mailto:amccar...@cciequest.com]
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 9:08 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: CCIE-Voice
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
  network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
  default-router 10.10.202.1
  option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
   Hardware address/
   User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM
Automatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
 IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
max-ephones 1
max-dn 1
ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
auto assign 1 to 1
network-locale ES
network-locale 1 ES
network-locale 2 ES
network-locale 3 ES
network-locale 4 ES
load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
number 3001
ephone  1
no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
no multicast-moh
mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
codec g729r8 pre-ietf
type 7960
button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__




This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__





__




This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__










__




This email has 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey,
Aamir, yes I changed the max-ephones and max-dn to a higher value and  
reset the phone, no change when I did that.


Ccie1d0t, I recreated the cnf file and nope no change.

Aamir, I setup the time zone information and reset the phone again, no change.

Thanks for you guys help thus far, if you can think of anything else  
please let me know. I am searching through my CME book now to see if  
there is something that I may have missed.


Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Have you also changed max-ephones and max-dn to higher value and reset
the phone?

And I think CME phones won't register without time zone setup.

Enter following under telephone service

time-zone 48
 time-format 24
 date-format dd-mm-yy




-Original Message-
From: Amp [mailto:amccar...@cciequest.com]
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 9:08 AM
To: Aamir Panjwani
Cc: CCIE-Voice
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.202.1
option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
 Hardware address/
 User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AM
Automatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
   IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
  max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
  codec g729r8 pre-ietf
  type 7960
  button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__






__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Aamir,
Yeah I debugged tftp events and I see that it looks for the files,  
finds them, and opens them, and as far as DHCP the phone gets an IP  
address in the range that is being allowed in the DHCP config.


BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh run | sec dhcp
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.1 10.10.202.49
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.202.70 10.10.202.254
ip dhcp pool CME
   network 10.10.202.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 10.10.202.1
   option 150 ip 10.10.110.3
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#do sh ip dhcp bind
Bindings from all pools not associated with VRF:
IP address  Client-ID/  Lease expirationType
Hardware address/
User name
10.10.202.510100.1bd4.c6c1.36   Jun 20 2009 01:06 AMAutomatic
BR2-RTR(config-ephone)#

BR2-RTR#sh cdp nei f0/3/0 det
-
Device ID: SEP001BD4C6C136
Entry address(es):
  IP address: 10.10.202.51
Platform: Cisco IP Phone 7960,  Capabilities: Host
Interface: FastEthernet0/3/0,  Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
Holdtime : 179 sec

Version :
P003-08-9-00

advertisement version: 2
Duplex: full
Power drawn: 6.300 Watts

BR2-RTR#




Quoting Aamir Panjwani :


Make sure phone can get to DHCP/TFTP. Also try changing max ephone and
max dn to higher value. Double check phone type and mac address is
correct :)


Debug tftp events
Debug ip dhcp server events





-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amp
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 8:49 AM
To: CCIE-Voice
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this
out?

Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
  max-ephones 1
  max-dn 1
  ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
  auto assign 1 to 1
  network-locale ES
  network-locale 1 ES
  network-locale 2 ES
  network-locale 3 ES
  network-locale 4 ES
  load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
  max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
  number 3001
ephone  1
  no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
  no multicast-moh
  mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
  keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
  codec g729r8 pre-ietf
  type 7960
  button  1:1
BR2-RTR#


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Help, SCCP Ephone Will Not Register

[Amp]

Hey Gang,
I am having some trouble with getting the Br2 SCCP phone to register  
after I go through the telephony-service setup and configure  
everything according to section 1.8 of Lab1A. A debug ephone register  
doesn't return anything. I have reset and restarted the phone to no  
success. Anyone have any ideas on what else I can check to figure this  
out?


Here's a copy of the telephony-service config:

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec tele
telephony-service
 em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
 max-ephones 1
 max-dn 1
 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000
 auto assign 1 to 1
 network-locale ES
 network-locale 1 ES
 network-locale 2 ES
 network-locale 3 ES
 network-locale 4 ES
 load 7960-7940 P003-08-9-00
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Jun 19 2009 00:12:38

BR2-RTR#sh run | sec ephone
 max-ephones 1
ephone-dn  1  dual-line
 number 3001
ephone  1
 no phone-ui speeddial-fastdial
 no multicast-moh
 mac-address 001B.D4C6.C136
 keepalive 30 auxiliary 0
 codec g729r8 pre-ietf
 type 7960
 button  1:1
BR2-RTR#

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 WB Lab1A & Proctor Labs assistance...

[Amp]

FYI, the problem is resolved. It was a DHCP pool conflict. I'm rocking  
and rolling now. Big thanks to James Key!!!


Amp
Quoting Vik Malhi :


Can you ping the pub from your computer? Try manually browsing to
http://10.10.210.10

--
Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com


Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand
and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE
Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage
Lab Certifications.








From: Amp 
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:49:14 -0400
To: OSL Group 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 WB Lab1A & Proctor Labs assistance...

Hey gang,
I am in the middle of a proctor labs session and have run into a bit
of a pickle and need some help. I am using EzVPN with a 2611XM and it
appears that everything is working just fine with that. My crypto
session is up-active, I am able to ping the Pub and Sub from my 2611
sourcing the Loopback address. I have verified and re-verified and
verified some more that my HQ-RTR and HQ-3750 switch are configured
correctly; from all of the routers in the Proctor Labs network I am
able to ping the Pub and Sub also. However, when I click on the CUCM
Pub to connect to server on the Proctor Labs -vRack Control page I am
unable to connect to the server. Any suggestions, pointers, life line,
or something that can help me save this session?

Thanks,
Amp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3 WB Lab1A & Proctor Labs assistance...

[Amp]

Hey gang,
I am in the middle of a proctor labs session and have run into a bit  
of a pickle and need some help. I am using EzVPN with a 2611XM and it  
appears that everything is working just fine with that. My crypto  
session is up-active, I am able to ping the Pub and Sub from my 2611  
sourcing the Loopback address. I have verified and re-verified and  
verified some more that my HQ-RTR and HQ-3750 switch are configured  
correctly; from all of the routers in the Proctor Labs network I am  
able to ping the Pub and Sub also. However, when I click on the CUCM  
Pub to connect to server on the Proctor Labs -vRack Control page I am  
unable to connect to the server. Any suggestions, pointers, life line,  
or something that can help me save this session?


Thanks,
Amp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 1st time using Proctor Labs and EasyVPN

[Amp]

Hey gang,
I am in need of a little help and I'm hoping that one of you  
ProctorLabs vRacks veterans can help me out. I am using a 2611XM and I  
believe I have it physically connected correct:
2611XM F0/0 ==> (via Crossover Cable) to port on my broadband router  
which is connected to my Cable Modem.


When looking at the configs to load on the 2611XM I didn't see one  
specific for it, so I clicked on the one for the 2811; I'm assuming  
that was the correct thing to do, and I loaded the config onto my  
2611XM and ran the two commands at the end of the config file.


Now my next question concerns using my hardware 7960 IP phones. Is  
this the correct physical layout:


3550 ==> to the F0/1 of the 2611XM (via straight-thru) and 7960 ==>  
3550 (via straight-thru).


Do I have this setup correctly?

Thanks,
Amp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Services

[Amp]

Hey gang,
I was watching the UCM Basics exercises video and became very  
interested in knowing is there anywhere that I can go that will  
describe what each service does or is for? I have checked the Cisco  
CallManager Fundamentals book and the 7.x SRND. I'm just wondering is  
there anywhere, other than pressing help on the Sub or Pub, that will  
explain each service?


Thanks,

Amp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 1760 Routers

[Amp]

Hey gang I was wondering, is it possible to use a 1760-v router as a  
gatekeeper? I have a 2611XM, a 3640, and two 1760-v routers and I am  
trying to figure out what limitations (if any) I'll have with these  
routers as I try to simulate the IPexpert lab topology. Thanks a  
million.


Amp

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Getting back on the horse.

[Amp]

Hey Larry,
Thanks for that input, it is a major help. I have a question for you,  
I remember reading somewhere on the IPexpert blog that the company was  
considering allowing folks to purchase rack time in smaller than 8  
hour increments, is that still in the works or was it just a rumor?


Amp
Quoting Larry Hadrava :


Amp:
Here is a post that I made on my blog about this very subject.
I had a long lapse since passing the R&S lab ( 2003 ) and late last year
starting to study for the Voice IE. I hope that the comments help.

I have now completed going through the BLS video presentations. So now what?
I have been giving a lot of thought on how to best approach the next steps.
I thought about how I *should have *approached the R&S track and am going to
put that thought process to work in passing the Voice lab by December of
2009.
So, what am I going to do? How am I going to proceed?
Here is the study plan that I am working on (of course I will probably tweak
this as I go along and will share the progress or lack of on the blog).
• Complete the BLS Video on Demand presentations
• Go through the technology focused labs – don’t just do the labs, but
explore other possibilities on the technology being focused on. *DO NOT
WORRY ABOUT TIME ON THIS – LEARN THE TECHNOLOGIES!!!*
• While doing the technology focused labs, download and *READ* the SRND for
that technology
• Go through the technology focused labs again, this time working on the
exact items being asked for in the scenario. *Work for 100% accuracy and
complete the lab within the suggested time limit*
• Move on to the full mock labs – go through each lab focusing on *
UNDERSTANDING* the tasks and learning how they are interrelating with the
full lab. *DO NOT WORRY ABOUT TIME *– Focus On Completing Every Step Of The
Lab
• After completing ALL of the full mock labs for understanding go through
ALL of them again. This time *WORK ON COMPLETING THE TASKS IN THE ALLOTED
TIMEFRAME AND 100% ACCURACY*.
• Once the mock labs have been completed 2 times, I should have a good idea
of my weak areas. Take time to focus on those areas. Read the SRND’s for
these areas. Review any technology focused labs for these areas. Go through
the mock labs and review these areas.
• During this learning approach, I know that I will be able to develop a
strategy for completing the labs in the time allotted.

Before I passed the R&S lab, I read several peoples strategies that they
employed. I TRIED to make their strategy FIT me. Once I developed MY OWN
strategy that WORKED for me, I passed the lab. Do not underestimate this in
your studies. When you take the time to work through the labs you will find
yourself developing a method to complete the labs. You are developing your
strategy!!! Be aware of this.

Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Amp  wrote:


Hey gang, I have a quick question for anyone out here who may have
experienced this on their CCIE journey. I just wanted to ask for some
advice. What is the best way to maximize the use of the BLS, as well as,
what's the best way
(in your opinion) to bounce back from an extended period of not
studying at all? I hope those questions makes sense.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] anyone who is close to GMT+5:30 ??

[Amp]

Joel,
Where exactly do you live and what times do you plan on studying?

Amp

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Getting back on the horse.

[Amp]

Hey gang, I have a quick question for anyone out here who may have  
experienced this on their CCIE journey. I just wanted to ask for some  
advice. What is the best way to maximize the use of the BLS, as well  
as, what's the best way

(in your opinion) to bounce back from an extended period of not
studying at all? I hope those questions makes sense.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

[Amp]

If you have a CCO account, you can go to Cisco Marketplace and order  
the NFR kit; I believe it is $275 USD.

Quoting "Padmanabhan, Padhu" :


How did you get nfr kit ? Through cisco am ?
--
Sent using BlackBerry


- Original Message -
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com   


To: Frank Costeira ; KatGuru 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ;  
 Michael Ciarfello 

Sent: Mon Jun 01 20:30:24 2009
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

I have Presence installed and Fully functioning In VMware a well, the
NFR (Demo) Pack comes with 2 User and 2 Node License.


Regards

Mohammed

Support +61 8 6380 1955 | supp...@netlinkgroup.com.au

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Costeira
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:03 AM
To: KatGuru
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; Michael Ciarfello
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

Hi,

  Does CUPS come with a demo licenses for vmware?

Thanks,

On May 23, 2009, at 2:01 PM, KatGuru wrote:



I haven't tried VM yet. Let me try and let you know guys.

Thanks for all your answers.

--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Michael Ciarfello  wrote:


From: Michael Ciarfello 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install
To: "ccieid1ot" 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 10:46 AM
Yep, that's one of the things about
the new Linux appliances..  The hardware support is
really strict.  Try an IBM or HP branded server
equalivent and you'll go crazy.  But it's a LOT better
than customers installing stuff on the windows boxes and
wondering why the server doesn't work anymore and you spend
all night fixing it (basically reinstalling.)

If for a lab, install VMWARE on it like stated below and
run multiple applications on it.  The 7845 would be a
pretty nice box for a VMWare machine.  We have two in
our demo racks with Raid5, more memory, etc.  Pretty
speedy.

If for production, must order another server.  No way
around it.  And you wouldn't want to go around it
anyways.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
On Behalf Of ccieid1ot [ccieid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 5:28 PM
To: KatGuru
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence Install

VMWARE

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:27 PM, KatGuru 
wrote:


I'm trying to install Presence for my lab. I've

MCS-7845-H3-IPC1 but its kicking me out with "HW is not
supported" error. Is there any work around to use the same
server to install the CUPS?


In HP 7845 Cisco recommended only the following.
MCS-7845-H2-IPC1
MCS-7845-H2-IPC2

Thanks in advance.














__
This email has been scanned and checked by Netlink Group's Managed Email
service
__

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] New LAB Scheduling

[Amp]

I am scheduled for November 13, 2009 here in RTP.

Quoting Kirchhof Björn :


Hi,

is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I've scheduled my first try for November.

Regards.
Bjoern

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3.0 Workbook

[Amp]

I was wondering if labs 4a and 4b were the latest labs released for  
the 3.0 track? Thanks.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] A few requests from a beginner...

[Amp]

Hey Shai,
You are absolutely correct, there are not a lot of books out here  
covering everything for the v3.0 lab, however ever topic on the  
blueprint is covered in one of the SRNDs, Configuration Guides, or  
Design Guides.
You can start with the 7.x SRND at  
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/uc7_0.html.  
The SRND for Unity Connection you can find here,  
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/design/guide/7xcucdg.html. Here is the Configuration and Maintenance Guide for Cisco Unified Presence, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cups/7_0/english/config_maintenance/administration/guide/cupconfig.html. All of the topics on the blueprint you will find some supporting documentation via either the SRNDs (www.cisco.com/go/srnd) or through what used to be the DocCD but now the Product Support page (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/index.html). I am just now starting out on this journey as well, so I by no means have all the answers, but these are the documents that I am either reading or have downloaded to  
read.


HTH,

Amp


Quoting Shai Loufton :


Hi again,

I have received a few emails answering my questions and I also asked
IPexpert sales department and there is no plan to issue any Written Exam
material for the voice CCIE (or any other track I think).



Vik Malhi and/or Mark Snow - any chance you could put your 2 cents here and
tell me exactly which books I should read?

 - if I go through the new blueprint it has a lot of new material and I am
having difficulty finding books that correlate to that knowledge expected of
me (https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-3569).



Again - thanks for everyone,



Shai L.



From: Shai Loufton [mailto:osl_vo...@shai-l.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 10:26 AM
To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: A few requests from a beginner...



Hello All,



I was wondering if anyone can assist me with a few issues I have -



I am about to start my voice studies in about a month time (or a bit more) -
but because I have no knowledge at all on this direction I am having trouble
starting (not sure from where to start).



I should specify here that I am almost CCIE SP - but never studied voice
related material before.



So - I think I should start with CCNA Voice , go through the CCVP
certification and then start reading books related to voice, and hence my
problem -



1.   Is there any organized study guide I can use to build my knowledge
from CCVP to CCIE - for the Voice Written Exam , and if not will IPexpert
consider creating such "Boot Camp" or "study guide" or anything else related
(especially with the new v3.0 announced and "IPexpert University" to begin
during 2009) ?

2.   Can anyone provide a detailed list of books required to be read for
both the CCIE Written and CCIE Lab exam - knowledge wise ?
- I already have the Voice BLS and it should be more than enough, especially
after they will update it, to do the Voice Lab, but not for someone who
needs to study for the Voice Written Exam.

3.   Another thing that came to mind - would anyone here recommend not
doing the CCNA Voice and the CCVP track, and start directly with CCIE level
Voice related books - because my ultimate goal is the CCIE Voice ?



Any thoughts or answers from anyone would be helpful.



Thanks everyone



Shai L.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feeling lost

[Amp]

That's strange, I am getting the same thing when I go to Proctor Labs Forum.


Quoting Cliff McGlamry :


Hmmm.

Can't find the setup for a hardware VPN to support physical phones   
on my end.  The IP Expert Tech FAQ's hint at it, but provide no   
guidance.  ProtorLabs forums are completely hosed up and unusable   
for some reason.  Just a bunch of server debug coming to the browser.


  - Original Message -
  From: rob
  To: Cliff McGlamry
  Cc: Vik Malhi ; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Feeling lost


  Hi Cliff,

  Finally there are some questions on here that I can answer! ;)

  1. IPBlue = http://www.ipblue.com/download.asp?product=vtgo

  2. IPExpert Tech FAQs =   
http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/2008/11/01/proctor-labs-voice-faq/


  & http://proctorlabs.com/forum/ for FAQ's on how to connect via   
EZVPN... Also, when you schedule an online lab and have the rack   
available there will be comprehensive instructions/config/VPN   
profile made available before you connect!


  Hope this helps!

  Rob