Re: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024]
Geeze!! Why not? I guess they already had this on mind when deciding to cut their own 15900 Lambda router. Now it makes more sense. Kent Circusnuts wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Geeze !!! Why !!! Phil - Original Message - From: Natasha To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:52 PM Subject: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024] London, June 3 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc. may make a 12 billion pound ($17 billion) bid for the U.K.'s Marconi Plc to increase sales in Europe, Sunday Business reported, citing unidentified industry sources. http://www.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?T=marketsquote99_news.hts=AOxpdARUzQ2lzY 28g Does anybody know anything about this? Thanks -- Natasha Flazynski CCNA, MCSE http://www.ciscobot.com My Cisco information site. http://www.botbuilders.com Artificial Intelligence and Linux development Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7034t=7024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a helper to answer four questions [7:6974]
Actually, deleted aren't reported down by signalling, if you mean that the FR switch sends LMI info about them. Deleted means that they aren't being reported by LMI at all, but the router knows about them. If the PVC is down but the FR switch knows about it, it will be reported as inactive. It can be configured on the router and still be inactive, if the circuit's broken (e.g. a problem at the other end of the PVC). If you do a 'debug frame lmi', every minute the status of each PVC is reported by the switch. There will be a message for each active and inactive PVC (with status 0x2 and 0x0 respectively), but no message for deleted PVCs, because the switch doesn't know about them. Caveat - info above regarding switch messages applies to LMI type ANSI. I don't know if it applies to all LMI types. Also, partial mesh doesn't necessarily mean hub and spoke, although it's a common configuration. It just means full mesh with some of the links removed, which may turn it into hub and spoke or may just turn it into a collection of random links (hopefully bearing some resemblance to optimum traffic patterns :-) JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 04/06/2001 02:36 pm --- Doug Lockwood @groupstudy.com on 04/06/2001 06:26:20 am Please respond to Doug Lockwood Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: Need a helper to answer four questions [7:6974] 1. What is the two status on PVC mode ? In SVC, which have three status (call setup , transfer and call terminate). I have seen 3 on both ATM and Frame Relay: Active, inactive and deleted. Active were circuits that are up Inactive were VC's that were not configured on that router that are discovered by signaling Deleted are VC's that are reported down by signaling. 4. What is benefit of partial mesh compare with fully mesh? It will use less routers or use less virtual circuits ? A partial mesh costs less, compared to a full mesh. It will use the same number of routers, but less PVC's. Each pvc costs money and adds complexity. However, if most of the traffic is not destined for the hub, the hub and spoke adds latency and uses bandwidth on both links. Both designs are appropriate, depending on the nature of the traffic. Hope this helps. Doug Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7035t=6974 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7: [7:7036]
Hi.. What I need is whatever service that I connected to 50.100.167.102 it will connect me to 192.168.3.31 If this cannot be done, can you show me one service by one service. -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7: 7033] which services are you looking to redirect, any or just 1?? Brian - Original Message - From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 11:05 PM Subject: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7:7032] Hi..dear all, We have a requirment to NAT a destination virtual IP to a different IP behind the Firewall. I have set up a cisco 2500 packet filter with 2 interfaces ethernet0, 50.100.167.101 and ethernet1 192.168.3.2 and they are in two different networks. There is a SUN host 192.168.3.31 (A) in 192.168.3.X network, We want to contact A in network 192.168.3.X from B (50.100.167.199) in network 50.100.167.x via a virtual IP 50.100.167.102 in eth0. What I mean when I connect to 50.100.167.102, I actually connect to 192.168.3.31, but people won't know the real IP of that. Can Cisco IOS router do this? The information I get can only translate the source IP address. How about destination address? If yes, can you show me how is the command look like? CT == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7036t=7036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7:7037]
Hi, I guess you can config a static nat mapping and reverse the inside and outside interface. that is , ip nat inside source static 192.168.3.31 50.100.167.102 interface e0 ip nat outside interface e1 ip nat inside -Michael Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote in message ... Hi..dear all, We have a requirment to NAT a destination virtual IP to a different IP behind the Firewall. I have set up a cisco 2500 packet filter with 2 interfaces ethernet0, 50.100.167.101 and ethernet1 192.168.3.2 and they are in two different networks. There is a SUN host 192.168.3.31 (A) in 192.168.3.X network, We want to contact A in network 192.168.3.X from B (50.100.167.199) in network 50.100.167.x via a virtual IP 50.100.167.102 in eth0. What I mean when I connect to 50.100.167.102, I actually connect to 192.168.3.31, but people won't know the real IP of that. Can Cisco IOS router do this? The information I get can only translate the source IP address. How about destination address? If yes, can you show me how is the command look like? CT == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7037t=7037 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883]
Yes,my English is very poor, And my mean is how to get the bible or dumps of Exam 640-504 Can you tell me? Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McCallum, Robert) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless my English has totally left me I reckon you might need to elaborate slightly as I do not have a clue what you are on about! -Original Message- From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 June 2001 16:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] anybody know it ,please tell me Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7038t=6883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hardware compatibility [7:7039]
hi all, Does anyone know where on the Cisco site the hardware compatibility matrix is, what I want to be able to do is put in my router/switch model to try and find all the different modules available aswell as being able to see (for example what modules are compatible with 2600 and 3600 router). any help greatly appreciated. D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7039t=7039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Encryption+Compression [7:7012]
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Lists Wizard wrote: Hello, Is it good to both compress and encrypt data going out of an interface? Thanks Law Yes, in theory. Compression, if performed *before* encrypting, removes redundancy, thus making cryptanalysis much harder. It used to be, though, that cisco routers, when asked to do both, would insist on encrypting first, thus essentially turning compression into a time-consuming no-op. I haven't looked whether that was still the case. Hmm... *browse* *browse* *ping* *traceroute* Sorry, can't get to CCO. -- Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7040t=7012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BRI0 Backup Interface for Ethernet Primary Interface [7:7041]
My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 That's too skimpy for a reliable diagnostic. Can you post your whole configuration to the list? (Sanitize as necessary.) A few things you may want to try or check: - I don't think you need the backup statements in that case. What triggers dialing using the BRI isn't e1 going down, but traffic to 172.20.20.0/24 after EIGRP removes the route to that through e1. - Is 10.10.9.5 reachable with e1 down? Does pinging it bring up bri0? - When you say bri0 doesn't come up, do you mean when e1 goes down, when the EIGRP route goes away, or when there's traffic for 172.20.20.0/24 and the route's down? On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, KM Reynolds wrote: Hi Everyone, I need to configure a ISDN link as backup for the primary interface. The primary interface is Ethernet1. I researched a numbers of books and they all are talk about serial or frame relay interface as the primary. I was able to search the archives and I found the identical problem that I am encountering. The post stated that yes the BRI0 interface can work as a backup for an ethernet interface. The following is a paste of the post(by Howard Berkowitz): Yes. The key to the solution is to use a low-overhead routing protocol such as OSPF or EIGRP as a layer 3 keepalive mechanism. Set up OSPF or EIGRP to define a path to the destination using the Ethernet. Set up a static route with administrative distance greater than that of the routing protocol (at least 200 is a good idea), with this static route going to the next hop address of the remote ISDN interface. If OSPF or EIGRP stop seeing hellos across the Ethernet, they will drop the route. The static route will now float up into the routing table, and you will get dial-on-demand routing across the ISDN. When OSPF sees its route again, after the Ethernet is back up, the Ethernet route will replace the ISDN in the active routing table, and the inactivity timer on the ISDN will disconnect it. I have followed the instructions, but no luck. When I shutdown the ethernet interface the BRI0 backup interface will not come up. The question I have are: 1. If I administratively shutdown the ethernet interface is that the same as if I disconnected the cable so that the e1 interface will not see a keepalive. 2. I did not see any other treads as to if solution worked. Has anyone run into this situation and has an answer or suggest anything. My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 Lastly, one of the books (Internetworking Troubleshooting by C. Long) stated something about layer 2 and the no keepalive option. It didn't go further on this issue and don't know if I understood it. If someone can explain, it would be much appreciated. Sorry for the long post. TIA -- Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7041t=7041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIPv1: why /32 route is distributed [7:7010]
Doug Lockwood wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Just a thought. Are you really running rip V1 or are you running Rip V2 in compatibly mode. The first config would look like: Router Rip Net 172.10.0.0 The second would look like: Router rip version 1 net 172.10.0.0 Doug I think you are right but dont forget that RIP ver 1 doesnt support Variable Subnetting as oppossed to RIP ver 2 that does. Jerry's subnets are : 172.10.12.0/25 172.10.11.0/28 and RIP v1 distributes 172.10.0.1/32 only. HTH George Yiannibas MCSE CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7043t=7010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCRAN exam [7:6988]
I remember I took the foudation exam where they regroup the BCMSN , BSCN and the BCRAN exams and I remember questions on cisco 700 in the bcran section. take some tets from examcarm.com before it is helpfull and free , be carefull they ask questions on commands of cisco 700 , I temmeber specially on profiles , call back and on the router futures and models , good luck anthony moore a icrit : I am taking the BCRAN in a couple of days. Does anyone have any advice? Thanks [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of hedhili.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7044t=6988 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hardware compatibility [7:7039]
the Cisco commercial configurator is very helpfull , and updated on the cisco web try ordering information and assistance and tan configuration tool . another section on the cisco web is the modularity cafe . Hope this help Dwayne Saunders a icrit : hi all, Does anyone know where on the Cisco site the hardware compatibility matrix is, what I want to be able to do is put in my router/switch model to try and find all the different modules available aswell as being able to see (for example what modules are compatible with 2600 and 3600 router). any help greatly appreciated. D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of hedhili.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7045t=7039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Cisco Secure [7:7047]
Dear friends, We have Pix520 firewall and cisco secure2.5 on Windows NT 4.0 and using windows NT users database, the problem when cisco secure authenticate user who are using internet browsing it prompts user ID and Password several times and then says page can not be displayed once you refresh the page it goes for browsing without getting authenticated, sometimes it authenticates properly, I wonder if someone knows this unsuitable behavior. Regards Munzir Khan System Engineer MCSE+I CCNA, NP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7047t=7047 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS exhcnage Security over PIX [7:7046]
Dear fellows, How we could secure MS exchange over PIX firewall, we do not want any unknown user to access Exchange Server5.5 for relaying, is there any way that we can protect that thru PIX firewall or thru the external Router??? Immidiate respond will appericiated. Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7046t=7046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dos Attack [7:7049]
Hi, If there is a machine within my network generating high load of traffic, how can I detect the machine asap? I have cisco 7507 routers and catalyst 5509 switches. Which command should I use to check? On the catalyst switch which command can I use to find out port the machine is plugged to? Thanks Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7049t=7049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: can we NAT the destination IP using IOS's NAT nature? [7:7050]
If yes, can you show me how is the command look like? Hi, I guess you can config a static nat mapping and reverse the inside and outside interface. Mike, Try this instead, ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.0.100 25 25 extendable This statement will allow mail to your rfc1918 addressed mail bridgehead server. With Cisco's implementation you can actually redirect ports to different output ports unlike most Linksys and Netgear cable/modem routers, have fun and secure your mail realy! The only difference from what you are asking is this is on a port by port basis, I am not familiar of a way to do full 1to1 NAT to virtual IP. Also I have not found any documentation supporting the ability to add Conduit(Pix, similar to ACL)statements or access-list's to these statics so use them at your own risk. HTH You can use a secondary address if you need Virtual addresses I beleive, I have tested with secondary's on the internal site but not the external. Ken Claussen MCSE CCNA CCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7050t=7050 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dos Attack [7:7049]
Hi Andy Try this command on catalyst 5509 show top It gives the top stations report. -Original Message- From: Andy Low [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, June 04, 2001 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dos Attack [7:7049] Hi, If there is a machine within my network generating high load of traffic, how can I detect the machine asap? I have cisco 7507 routers and catalyst 5509 switches. Which command should I use to check? On the catalyst switch which command can I use to find out port the machine is plugged to? Thanks Andy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7051t=7049 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup plan for a campus [7:7052]
hiya folks :) happy monday I'm thinking of backup solutions for a network I'm consulting for. This network consists of 7 Vlans of which 5 are used for production. The core switch is a Cat 6509 with gig uplinks to 9 closets with about 1500 nodes total. Incase the Cat catches on fire I would like to have a borg like spanning tree festival that will make the network at least usable till smartnet kicks in and replaces things. To each closet we have multiple fibers running that are unused that I can use. To the best of my little knowledge of design of networks. What Im thinking is a smaller cat3508 as a redundant link to the closets. Spanning tree will do it's job on the trunks. But this is just a bunch of 35xx switches and intervlan routing is not taken care of. Now, here I have a 2620 with a Fast Ethernet capable of ethernet trunks. if need be I can install another Fast Ethernet card in it. This would do the inter-vlan routing. questions: Is this a good idea? Any better ideas for it? Where the heck would I put the router to do the intervlan stuff and what would tell the switches to use it as such. Can I just plug it into a peripheral trunked 3524 and let er rip or does it have to be on the temp backbone switch? your design expertise would be GREATLY___ appreciated. This company is in the middle of layoffs like mad. Soon it will be back to paper like the '60s :| But anyways this is what keeps me paid. Links, replies, money, free cheeze, coupons appreciated! Thanks VERY VERY much in advance, David Cooper eosyn at linuxmafia dot org (no Im not a mafia person or '31337') Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7052t=7052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2900XL Switch [7:7053]
Can anyone please advise me of what is wrong with my Switch? It keeps rebooting and rebooting into this loop. Thanks in advance, the output from the 2900XL is below. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Switch uptime is 14 seconds cisco WS-C2924-XL (PowerPC403GA) processor (revision 0x11) with 8192K/1024K byte s of memory. C2900XL Boot Loader (C2900-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.1)XP, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOF TWARE Compiled Fri 10-Dec-99 11:06 by cchang starting... Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:02:16:65:20:40 Xmodem file system is available. Initializing Flash... flashfs[0]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. ...done Initializing Flash. Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3 Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4 Loading flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin... # File flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin uncompressed and installed, entry poi nt: 0x3000 executing... Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x00329E10 Initializing C2900XL flash... flashfs[1]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 7 seconds. flashfs[1]: Initialization complete. ...done Initializing C2900XL flash. C2900XL POST: System Board Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Daughter Card Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Buffer Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Notify RAM Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Interface Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Testing Switch Core: Passed Error with Switch Core BIST test Phase 0. Returns: Test Complete Low : 0x000FFF7F, Test Complete High : 0x000E Test Phase Low: 0x, Test Phase High : 0x0200 Test Phase Third : 0x, Test Complete Third : 0x C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Switch Core: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Buffer Table: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Data Buffer Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Configuring Switch Parameters: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Switch Core BIST failed. C2900XL POST FAILURE: Cannot test Modules due to failure of Switch Core POST Del Mar Failure (0th Del Mar): req system failed to init C2900XL POST FAILURE: C2900XL POST FAILURE: ATM: required system failed to init C2900XL POST: Ethernet Controller Test: Passed C2900XL POST FAILURE: MII Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Error waiting for Ethernet Controller and SW_PARAMS C2900XL POST FAILURE: Initialization/POST failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: AT: Failing because system POST failed Exception (8192)! Debug Exception (Could be NULL pointer dereference) CPU Register Context: Vector = 0x2000 PC = 0x000EECC8 MSR = 0x00029200 CR = 0x2200 LR = 0x000F1F1C CTR = 0x001D6BD8 XER = 0x60001000 R0 = 0x R1 = 0x0059E7E8 R2 = 0x R3 = 0x R4 = 0x0001 R5 = 0x R6 = 0x0059E980 R7 = 0x0059E980 R8 = 0x0059E980 R9 = 0x R10 = 0x R11 = 0x0044 R12 = 0x4200 R13 = 0xA0F40453 R14 = 0x R15 = 0x R16 = 0x R17 = 0x R18 = 0x R19 = 0x R20 = 0x R21 = 0x R22 = 0x R23 = 0x R24 = 0x R25 = 0x0020 R26 = 0x0059E980 R27 = 0x0059E980 R28 = 0x0020 R29 = 0x2513 R30 = 0x0001 R31 = 0x Stack trace: PC = 0x000EECC8, SP = 0x0059E7E8 Frame 00: SP = 0x0059E808PC = 0x Frame 01: SP = 0x0059E880PC = 0x000F1F1C Frame 02: SP = 0x0059E910PC = 0x000F2BEC Frame 03: SP = 0x0059E930PC = 0x000E372C Frame 04: SP = 0x0059E958PC = 0x001EC928 Frame 05: SP = 0x0059E978PC = 0x001ECA24 Frame 06: SP = 0x0059E9B0PC = 0x00232FF4 Frame 07: SP = 0x0059E9B8PC = 0x0023254C Frame 08: SP = 0x0059EA30PC =
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
with regards to the contents of the exam, I am reminded of the time I told my son that when I was his age I could name all the presidents of the IUnited States, to which he answered there were only 5 or six of them back then :- with regards to the value of the CCIE, whatever that may be, like it or not, there are tens of thousands of us wannabes in the queue. Assuming normal progress, that tells me that in 5 more years, there will be tens of thousands of CCIE's. Ain't nothing anyone can do about that. Louie, let me ask - if you were to walk into the lab tomorrow, do you think you could pass? if not, of what value is your CCIE? I have a sneaking suspoicion that most CCIE's, unless they passed the lab very recently, would not get through it again without some devoted study. kinda like passing the bar, or the CPA exam? Chuck tride hard to keep out of this one, but. Louie Belt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I agree there is no way to talk apples to apples - too many things have changed - but don't forget you no longer have to deal with LAT, X.25, CLNS, DEC, Banyan Vines, Appollo, Appletalk or ATM Lane. (Voice was already on the lab prior to these items being removed.) My concern is with the material that is not focused on teaching you networking (I have no problem with that), but on the material the simply teaches you how to pass the test (kind of like all of the Microsoft braindump material available - desinged only to help you pass the test). I see too much material as of late that is way too focused on passing the lab, not on learning networking. Louie -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:01 PM To: Louie Belt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Louie- I don't think we're talk'n Apple to Apples here... During the early CCIE exams, I was told candidates were able to use their own notes during the test (if Pamela Forsythe is out there, she could confirm this rumor) can you imagine how much easier the lab would have been with versions 9.0, 10.0 or even 11.0(22) IOS. I agree there's more information available, but after having sat through a 2 week CCIE lab prep class... I think the information just gets you in the ballpark. Things like bad time management poor interpretations, are big obstacles no book can fix. I believe the exam is as hard (if not harder) than it's ever been. Man- this cup of coffee I'm drink'n must not be decaff :o) Phil - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] When the CCIE cert first came about there were not 100+ books avilable to help you pass it. There were not a multitude of online labs, lab study guides, study groups, ... Since all of those items are now available, I feel the bar has been lowered. I'm for putting it back where it was. Additionally I'm studying for my second CCIE cert, I sincerely hope that it is much tougher than my first. I want to maintain the value of the cert. Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] I agree with you. It's awful easy for someone who's already gotten their CCIE (which when they passed the lab probably could be quoted as saying something like that was the most difficult thing I've ever seen) to now say Sure.. make it as difficult as possible I don't know many CCIEs personally. Only a couple, and both of them said that given the time constraints of the lab (2 days), it is extremely difficult. So I don't think jamming it into 1 day just because Cisco is too cheap to spring for more testing centers to keep up with demand is a resonable solution. Isn't this why Cisco is contemplating making it 1 day? Not to raise the bar of the level of the exam, but simply because they're testing centers can't handle the demand. Mashing into 1 day, IMHO, would be a very poor decision. Agreeing with Brad, do all of the CCIEs that are out there have a problem with leaving the bar where it was when you passed it? It only seems fair. Mike W. Bradley J. Wilson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I weren't up to the challenge, I wouldn't be on this newsgroup. Are you up to the challenge of leaving the bar at the same height that it was when *you* passed the test? I personally think the test is difficult enough as it is. Am I a wimp because of that? Do we need to dump some dirt on the top of Everest now that it's been conquered by someone else ahead of me? If Cisco wants to make the test tougher, they're well within their rights to do so.
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Hi, Great. Nowadays you have IPSec, MPLS, Voice, Optical and you still need CLNS/CLNP for IS-IS. You can also argue whether Appletalk or IPX should be removed or not. These are important protocols that should be placed in an add-on certification for Desktop or Client/server issues. Me thinks people are right claiming that in IOS 9.xx or 10.xx times the exam was easier. It's the sheer amount of topics and their synergies that are killing us now. I'd happily trade X.25 or DecNet versus MPLS or IPsec ;-). Just kidding, these topics are far too interesting. Besides, hopefully we all learned from the failure of the Design CCIE. It is not possible to measure one's ability in design and architecture objectively. Hence, me thinks the CCND is pointless and waste of time too. One can also argue whether a CCIE lab based on time-pressure and protocol memorization is the best way of measuring a candidate's ability in network engineering. My 0.02$, Gernot Louie Belt wrote: I agree there is no way to talk apples to apples - too many things have changed - but don't forget you no longer have to deal with LAT, X.25, CLNS, DEC, Banyan Vines, Appollo, Appletalk or ATM Lane. (Voice was already on the lab prior to these items being removed.) My concern is with the material that is not focused on teaching you networking (I have no problem with that), but on the material the simply teaches you how to pass the test (kind of like all of the Microsoft braindump material available - desinged only to help you pass the test). I see too much material as of late that is way too focused on passing the lab, not on learning networking. Louie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6970t=6735 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BRI0 Backup Interface for Ethernet Primary Int [7:7048]
Is your ISDN interface on the same network as 10.10.9.5? Maybe try ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 BRI0 200 instead. THis will force the BRI interface up if the route is used. Can you do an isdn call command to bring up the isdn manually? Try debug ppp auth and various debug isdn commands, you should be able to find out what is happening. Also, your eigrp network statement is a different network to your static route. Is the static route syntax correct? If I have something incorrect here, pls let me know, as I am trying to learn from your problem too! Symon --- My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 That's too skimpy for a reliable diagnostic. Can you post your whole configuration to the list? (Sanitize as necessary.) A few things you may want to try or check: - I don't think you need the backup statements in that case. What triggers dialing using the BRI isn't e1 going down, but traffic to 172.20.20.0/24 after EIGRP removes the route to that through e1. - Is 10.10.9.5 reachable with e1 down? Does pinging it bring up bri0? - When you say bri0 doesn't come up, do you mean when e1 goes down, when the EIGRP route goes away, or when there's traffic for 172.20.20.0/24 and the route's down? On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, KM Reynolds wrote: Hi Everyone, I need to configure a ISDN link as backup for the primary interface. The primary interface is Ethernet1. I researched a numbers of books and they all are talk about serial or frame relay interface as the primary. I was able to search the archives and I found the identical problem that I am encountering. The post stated that yes the BRI0 interface can work as a backup for an ethernet interface. The following is a paste of the post(by Howard Berkowitz): Yes. The key to the solution is to use a low-overhead routing protocol such as OSPF or EIGRP as a layer 3 keepalive mechanism. Set up OSPF or EIGRP to define a path to the destination using the Ethernet. Set up a static route with administrative distance greater than that of the routing protocol (at least 200 is a good idea), with this static route going to the next hop address of the remote ISDN interface. If OSPF or EIGRP stop seeing hellos across the Ethernet, they will drop the route. The static route will now float up into the routing table, and you will get dial-on-demand routing across the ISDN. When OSPF sees its route again, after the Ethernet is back up, the Ethernet route will replace the ISDN in the active routing table, and the inactivity timer on the ISDN will disconnect it. I have followed the instructions, but no luck. When I shutdown the ethernet interface the BRI0 backup interface will not come up. The question I have are: 1. If I administratively shutdown the ethernet interface is that the same as if I disconnected the cable so that the e1 interface will not see a keepalive. 2. I did not see any other treads as to if solution worked. Has anyone run into this situation and has an answer or suggest anything. My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 Lastly, one of the books (Internetworking Troubleshooting by C. Long) stated something about layer 2 and the no keepalive option. It didn't go further on this issue and don't know if I understood it. If someone can explain, it would be much appreciated. Sorry for the long post. TIA -- Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7048t=7048 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Book club [7:6811]
Agreed. avoid Library of Computer and Information Sciences.. they lost one of my orders. never billed me twice, but sent selections of the month that I clearly declined. I've e-mailed them asking how to end my membership (because their website says nothing about it that I can find), and I haven't heard back from them.. Mike W. Georgescu, Aurelian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Make sure you don't subscribe to Library of Computer Information Sciences (http://lcis.booksonline.com/cgi-bin/ndCGI.exe/Develop/pagHome?clubId=LCIpr omo=bhp-1-2) They are the worst! They lose your order, bill you twice and have no customer support!! -Original Message- From: William E. Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Book club [7:6811] yeah Carl, its www.booksonline.com/telecommunications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MIRSKY Carl Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] A while back there was information posed on a book club where you could get several CCIE books for like $10 and then only have to buy X books afterwards. Does anyone have the name or URL for this? Thanks Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^' ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP, CCDP, SCSA, MCSE Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. - (---( )--- _) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=6963t=6811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supervisor port 1/1 has been disabled. [7:7054]
Hi all, I have a big problem on Catalyst 5505. After I upgrade the Supervisor module form CatOS 4.2 to 5.5.7, the port 1/1 on the supervisor is disabled. I try to replace another Supervisor module and upgarde it's CatOS to 5.5.7 too. the problem occurs again. Does any cisco doc. mention this problem? Does anyone have experience on it? Please help me very very urgent. Thank you very much. Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7054t=7054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024]
Natasha, Marconi are making no comment citing that the top execs are in Atlanta at a trade show My own personal thought would be that the Marconi execs would have issued a statement if their was NO truth in the matter, since Marconi shares are up 6% today on this rumour. Q: What have Marconi got that Cisco want ? A: Strong European foothold. Regards, Phil. - Original Message - From: Natasha To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:52 AM Subject: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024] London, June 3 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc. may make a 12 billion pound ($17 billion) bid for the U.K.'s Marconi Plc to increase sales in Europe, Sunday Business reported, citing unidentified industry sources. http://www.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?T=marketsquote99_news.hts=AOxpdARUzQ2lzY 28g Does anybody know anything about this? Thanks -- Natasha Flazynski CCNA, MCSE http://www.ciscobot.com My Cisco information site. http://www.botbuilders.com Artificial Intelligence and Linux development Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7055t=7024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with home network [7:6922]
Ok, I changed the HUP with a 10/100 MB switch. That fixed the problem. Why? I have no idea. It is quite puzzling how a hub would affect the connection one hop away. I am wondering if it is a combination of the hub/ethernet card/ and software problem (as described in another response). This started when I upgraded the kernel to the latest version. Anyway changing the hub fixed the problem. I just bugs the heck out of me. Take care, Paul Borghese W. Alan Robertson wrote: Paul, If the ethernet driver was setting the card up for 100Mbps, and you were using a 10Mbps Hub, then you'd likely get no connectivity at all, rather than partial connectivity with a high percentage of packet loss. I'd be inclined to look into the duplex settings, as Daniel mentioned. A hub, even a so-called dual-speed hub, doesn't have the capability of providing for full duplex operation. When you cable the two machine together directly, they can communicate in full-duplex, which is most likely the reason the problem goes away when not using the hub. Manually configure both the Linux box, and the PC, for half-duplex operation, and your problem should go away. Alan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7056t=6922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with home network [7:6922]
I can recall the same sort of problems with Ericsson Congo Routers and anything they had to autonegotiate with.a software flash cured the problem. An inscrutable glitch. Karl - Original Message - From: Paul Borghese To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:17 PM Subject: Re: Problem with home network [7:6922] Ok, I changed the HUP with a 10/100 MB switch. That fixed the problem. Why? I have no idea. It is quite puzzling how a hub would affect the connection one hop away. I am wondering if it is a combination of the hub/ethernet card/ and software problem (as described in another response). This started when I upgraded the kernel to the latest version. Anyway changing the hub fixed the problem. I just bugs the heck out of me. Take care, Paul Borghese W. Alan Robertson wrote: Paul, If the ethernet driver was setting the card up for 100Mbps, and you were using a 10Mbps Hub, then you'd likely get no connectivity at all, rather than partial connectivity with a high percentage of packet loss. I'd be inclined to look into the duplex settings, as Daniel mentioned. A hub, even a so-called dual-speed hub, doesn't have the capability of providing for full duplex operation. When you cable the two machine together directly, they can communicate in full-duplex, which is most likely the reason the problem goes away when not using the hub. Manually configure both the Linux box, and the PC, for half-duplex operation, and your problem should go away. Alan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7057t=6922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024]
They have a pretty poor history as a defence contractor though. They managed to squander millions/billions on a British Version of AWACS which bellyflopped. We ended up buying American again. They could not get the Radar to work properly. Apparently had stationary brick walls moving at 100 m.p.h. etc etc I trust that if Cisco acquire then they get rid of that division to some one who wants it, Lockheed-Martin perhaps! Karl - Original Message - From: Philip Barker To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:04 PM Subject: Re: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024] Natasha, Marconi are making no comment citing that the top execs are in Atlanta at a trade show My own personal thought would be that the Marconi execs would have issued a statement if their was NO truth in the matter, since Marconi shares are up 6% today on this rumour. Q: What have Marconi got that Cisco want ? A: Strong European foothold. Regards, Phil. - Original Message - From: Natasha To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:52 AM Subject: Cisco May Bid for Marconi [7:7024] London, June 3 (Bloomberg) -- Cisco Systems Inc. may make a 12 billion pound ($17 billion) bid for the U.K.'s Marconi Plc to increase sales in Europe, Sunday Business reported, citing unidentified industry sources. http://www.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?T=marketsquote99_news.hts=AOxpdARUzQ2lzY 28g Does anybody know anything about this? Thanks -- Natasha Flazynski CCNA, MCSE http://www.ciscobot.com My Cisco information site. http://www.botbuilders.com Artificial Intelligence and Linux development Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7058t=7024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:7060]
that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7060t=7060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837]
what is the question - Original Message - From: Mike Peterson To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] Hi All, A while back I posted some questions but I haven't got any answers back from no one whomake me think that ether nobody have an answer or the oposite ...no one wants to share the knowledge between us.I would like to find out what do you guys think about this total silence.Thanks a lot for your thoughts. Mike Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7061t=6837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052]
At 09:33 AM 6/4/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: once apon a time there was a man who was given a spec to build a network with full redundency...the spec he put togother cost WAY to much and need severly cutting down...he told them not to do it but they ordered him to .so he did it the network fell over and the company sued for designing a crap network ...who got the blame..the man with his NAME on the design doc. have fun steve 1) I am confused. So, if the man who built the over priced network made a fully redundant network, and it still failed, did he not fail his job miserably? 2) Or did you mean, they cut his budget, and STILL told him to make the fully redundant network, despite his warnings? I am going to assume #2, since #1 does not make sense. -Carroll Kong Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7062t=7052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7063t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7064t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837]
Q. What is your favorite color? A. Blue... NO RED. AG! (Courtesy of Monty Python and the Holy Grail) -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] what is the question - Original Message - From: Mike Peterson To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] Hi All, A while back I posted some questions but I haven't got any answers back from no one whomake me think that ether nobody have an answer or the oposite ...no one wants to share the knowledge between us.I would like to find out what do you guys think about this total silence.Thanks a lot for your thoughts. Mike Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7065t=6837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
You want Fries with that? -Original Message- From: Me [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7066t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Book club [7:6811]
Yes, you can (IF you can find them!!) -Original Message- From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 1:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] Is this the same book club that sent me 3 books today? I don't even know how they got my name and address and without me even having the slightest idea as to why they sent me the books, A+, CCDA, Solaris Admin. Why in the world would I want these 3 books, A+ Did that 6 years back, Solaris Admin-What is it? And CCDA-No interest. If they had shipped me 3 CCIE books, I might have considered it-maybe. My question is has anyone is this group ever got such an offer without your knowledge and consent? And most important, what's the next step? Shall I bang their heads with a 2501? ;-) _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7067t=6811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
Reminds me of a gag suggestion from George Carlin: You drive to a Jack-In-the-Box drive-thru. You place your order, drive up to the window. The guy hands you your bag and says $2.52. You pay him, leave, and drive to the nearest Jack-In-The-Box. You drive up to the speaker, and give the *same order*. When you drive up to the window, you hand *him* the bag and say $2.52! - Original Message - From: Me To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:03 AM Subject: Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7068t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS exhcnage Security over PIX [7:7046]
There's a way to prevent relaying on Exchange 5.5 and it's posted on MS Technet. The link is http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/relay.asp and it has nothing to do with the Pix. If you're allowing traffic from the Internet to your Exchg server, then you should only permit access to the ports required for mail traffic. I think the fixup protocol smtp could help in preventing certain attacks by only allowing specific commands to be sent to your mail server but you still need to limit access to the server. Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MS exhcnage Security over PIX [7:7046] Dear fellows, How we could secure MS exchange over PIX firewall, we do not want any unknown user to access Exchange Server5.5 for relaying, is there any way that we can protect that thru PIX firewall or thru the external Router??? Immidiate respond will appericiated. Regards. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7070t=7046 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BRI0 Backup Interface for Ethernet Primary Interface [7:7069]
Thanks for the reply, You are correct on your first point. The post in the archive, by Howard, I realize it does NOT make mention of dial backup. I think this is my error, I need to delete the backup interface command. I think the dial backup is meant for a serial interface (frame relay, X-25,etc.), this is because layer 2 can be detected when it goes down. So I think in the case of ethernet, the alternate is a floating static route. I am not going to show the whole config, cause I think the backup command is the issue. However if you would like to anyway, let me know. I will give this a try tonight(if some maintenance downtime is available) and let you and everyone know how it works out. Thanks again. KM From: ElephantChild To: KM Reynolds CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BRI0 Backup Interface for Ethernet Primary Interface [7:7027] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:18:00 +0200 (CEST) My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 That's too skimpy for a reliable diagnostic. Can you post your whole configuration to the list? (Sanitize as necessary.) A few things you may want to try or check: - I don't think you need the backup statements in that case. What triggers dialing using the BRI isn't e1 going down, but traffic to 172.20.20.0/24 after EIGRP removes the route to that through e1. - Is 10.10.9.5 reachable with e1 down? Does pinging it bring up bri0? - When you say bri0 doesn't come up, do you mean when e1 goes down, when the EIGRP route goes away, or when there's traffic for 172.20.20.0/24 and the route's down? On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, KM Reynolds wrote: Hi Everyone, I need to configure a ISDN link as backup for the primary interface. The primary interface is Ethernet1. I researched a numbers of books and they all are talk about serial or frame relay interface as the primary. I was able to search the archives and I found the identical problem that I am encountering. The post stated that yes the BRI0 interface can work as a backup for an ethernet interface. The following is a paste of the post(by Howard Berkowitz): Yes. The key to the solution is to use a low-overhead routing protocol such as OSPF or EIGRP as a layer 3 keepalive mechanism. Set up OSPF or EIGRP to define a path to the destination using the Ethernet. Set up a static route with administrative distance greater than that of the routing protocol (at least 200 is a good idea), with this static route going to the next hop address of the remote ISDN interface. If OSPF or EIGRP stop seeing hellos across the Ethernet, they will drop the route. The static route will now float up into the routing table, and you will get dial-on-demand routing across the ISDN. When OSPF sees its route again, after the Ethernet is back up, the Ethernet route will replace the ISDN in the active routing table, and the inactivity timer on the ISDN will disconnect it. I have followed the instructions, but no luck. When I shutdown the ethernet interface the BRI0 backup interface will not come up. The question I have are: 1. If I administratively shutdown the ethernet interface is that the same as if I disconnected the cable so that the e1 interface will not see a keepalive. 2. I did not see any other treads as to if solution worked. Has anyone run into this situation and has an answer or suggest anything. My config: interface Ethernet1 backup delay 0 3 backup interface BRI0 router eigrp 10 network 172.26.0.0 ip route 172.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.9.5 200 Lastly, one of the books (Internetworking Troubleshooting by C. Long) stated something about layer 2 and the no keepalive option. It didn't go further on this issue and don't know if I understood it. If someone can explain, it would be much appreciated. Sorry for the long post. TIA -- Someone approached me and asked me to teach a javascript course. I was about to decline, saying that my complete ignorance of the subject made me unsuitable, then I thought again, that maybe it doesn't, as driving people away from it is a desirable outcome. --Me _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7069t=7069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hardware compatibility [7:7039]
Here is one place I would look for detailed info on the different mods. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/modulecafe/ The other on is the configuration tool. If you worked at a VAR you would use this ten times a day. http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/newConfig/config_root.pl Good Luck !! Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: Dwayne Saunders To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:59 AM Subject: hardware compatibility [7:7039] hi all, Does anyone know where on the Cisco site the hardware compatibility matrix is, what I want to be able to do is put in my router/switch model to try and find all the different modules available aswell as being able to see (for example what modules are compatible with 2600 and 3600 router). any help greatly appreciated. D'Wayne Saunders Network Admin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7071t=7039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Book club [7:6811]
In the UK if you are sent goods unsolicited then if the company does not pick em up when you tell em you get to keep em. Then you could sell em. Nothing like a profit. Karl - Original Message - From: Georgescu, Aurelian To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:17 PM Subject: RE: Book club [7:6811] Yes, you can (IF you can find them!!) -Original Message- From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 1:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] Is this the same book club that sent me 3 books today? I don't even know how they got my name and address and without me even having the slightest idea as to why they sent me the books, A+, CCDA, Solaris Admin. Why in the world would I want these 3 books, A+ Did that 6 years back, Solaris Admin-What is it? And CCDA-No interest. If they had shipped me 3 CCIE books, I might have considered it-maybe. My question is has anyone is this group ever got such an offer without your knowledge and consent? And most important, what's the next step? Shall I bang their heads with a 2501? ;-) _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7072t=6811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
large or extra large - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: RE: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] You want Fries with that? -Original Message- From: Me [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7073t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help With Multimode Fiber [7:7075]
Greetings All, Is there a beast out there that can take advantage of 2.7 Km multimode connection? We're currently using DEC bridges and getting 10/half connection. I need to replace the DEC bridges with something new but, I can't seem to put my hand on a device with this long haul connection capabilities. Any info would be great. Thanks, Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7075t=7075 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837]
Run Away...Run Away.. - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:04 PM Subject: RE: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] Q. What is your favorite color? A. Blue... NO RED. AG! (Courtesy of Monty Python and the Holy Grail) -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] what is the question - Original Message - From: Mike Peterson To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: It group study worth it or not!!!??? [7:6837] Hi All, A while back I posted some questions but I haven't got any answers back from no one whomake me think that ether nobody have an answer or the oposite ...no one wants to share the knowledge between us.I would like to find out what do you guys think about this total silence.Thanks a lot for your thoughts. Mike Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7074t=6837 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883]
I don't know that I would call it a bible, but try Caslow's Cisco Certification: Bridges, Routers and Swithes, or any of the Cisco Press books. Also belive it or not but CCO is a great resource as well, and get this, it's free! As far as a dump goes, this is a family oriented discussion list, let's try and keep it clean. tm Tim Medley - CCNA, CCDA Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld 704-943-3615 - Phone 704-943-3660 - Fax 877-6-iReady - Helpdesk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] Yes,my English is very poor, And my mean is how to get the bible or dumps of Exam 640-504 Can you tell me? Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McCallum, Robert) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless my English has totally left me I reckon you might need to elaborate slightly as I do not have a clue what you are on about! -Original Message- From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 June 2001 16:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] anybody know it ,please tell me Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7076t=6883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063]
Would you like to make that a large for only $0.25 extra? MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7078t=7063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079]
I have looked and searched and looked all over the software center and CCO for the place to download this damn thing!!! Can anyone send me a link of where the hell the download page is for this so I can try it out?? Thanks a ton!! Tony M. #6172 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7079t=7079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052]
yes they did cut my budget.yes i told them it was a bad idea and yes they made me do it . all it took was a UPS brownout to show them i was right.for my troubles .. i was blamed by the customer and shunned by my employer... all in all a good days work.. steve (once buggered twice shy) From: Carroll Kong Reply-To: Carroll Kong To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:56:28 -0400 At 09:33 AM 6/4/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: once apon a time there was a man who was given a spec to build a network with full redundency...the spec he put togother cost WAY to much and need severly cutting down...he told them not to do it but they ordered him to .so he did it the network fell over and the company sued for designing a crap network ...who got the blame..the man with his NAME on the design doc. have fun steve 1) I am confused. So, if the man who built the over priced network made a fully redundant network, and it still failed, did he not fail his job miserably? 2) Or did you mean, they cut his budget, and STILL told him to make the fully redundant network, despite his warnings? I am going to assume #2, since #1 does not make sense. -Carroll Kong _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7081t=7052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help With Multimode Fiber [7:7075]
Have you tried the companies that specialize in media conversion? Canary, www.canarycom.com, Transition, Lancast. -Original Message- From: Nabil Fares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help With Multimode Fiber [7:7075] Greetings All, Is there a beast out there that can take advantage of 2.7 Km multimode connection? We're currently using DEC bridges and getting 10/half connection. I need to replace the DEC bridges with something new but, I can't seem to put my hand on a device with this long haul connection capabilities. Any info would be great. Thanks, Nabil Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7082t=7075 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079]
YES! Thanks you !!! Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From: Vijay Ramcharan To: 'Tony Medeiros' ; Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: RE: QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079] Would this be what you're seeking? http://www-1.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/qdm Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079] I have looked and searched and looked all over the software center and CCO for the place to download this damn thing!!! Can anyone send me a link of where the hell the download page is for this so I can try it out?? Thanks a ton!! Tony M. #6172 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7084t=7079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079]
Would this be what you're seeking? http://www-1.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/qdm Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Medeiros Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: QDM 2.0 (QOS device manager enhancement for IOS) [7:7079] I have looked and searched and looked all over the software center and CCO for the place to download this damn thing!!! Can anyone send me a link of where the hell the download page is for this so I can try it out?? Thanks a ton!! Tony M. #6172 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7083t=7079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup plan for a campus [7:7052]
Ahh, don't we all get those wonderfully exorbitant design requirements with multiple tiers of redundancy and so very often a budget to barely implement the base network with no redundancy? Management always expect the network and design guys to come up with some hoodoo design for a kickass network that will never fail. I'm in a similar situation right now. I see all the fanciful notions of 5 nines reliability slowly getting thrown out one by one because of budget constraints. Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephen Skinner Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052] yes they did cut my budget.yes i told them it was a bad idea and yes they made me do it . all it took was a UPS brownout to show them i was right.for my troubles .. i was blamed by the customer and shunned by my employer... all in all a good days work.. steve (once buggered twice shy) From: Carroll Kong Reply-To: Carroll Kong To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:56:28 -0400 At 09:33 AM 6/4/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: once apon a time there was a man who was given a spec to build a network with full redundency...the spec he put togother cost WAY to much and need severly cutting down...he told them not to do it but they ordered him to .so he did it the network fell over and the company sued for designing a crap network ...who got the blame..the man with his NAME on the design doc. have fun steve 1) I am confused. So, if the man who built the over priced network made a fully redundant network, and it still failed, did he not fail his job miserably? 2) Or did you mean, they cut his budget, and STILL told him to make the fully redundant network, despite his warnings? I am going to assume #2, since #1 does not make sense. -Carroll Kong _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7086t=7052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
serial interfaces [7:7089]
Hi guys Can anyone tel me if the config for the DCE is clockrate or clock rate Thanks Tade Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7089t=7089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with home network [7:6922]
paul, you may just have been looking at a faulty hub.i`ve seen some strange things with hubs.like being able to ping your gateawy but not bieng able to ping yourself(not loopback).here`s a good test.plug the hub back in with everything live...5 `ll get ya 10 it works fine...(don`t switch anything off..just plug the hub into the mains and then move the network cables)i recon it will work fine there is really no technical (DONT SHOOT,list) answer for this..it`s not a bug in the hub/ethernet protocol or anything it just happens... Windows crahses.hubs don`t like changes (bieng switched on or off) steve From: Paul Borghese Reply-To: Paul Borghese To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problem with home network [7:6922] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:17:16 -0400 Ok, I changed the HUP with a 10/100 MB switch. That fixed the problem. Why? I have no idea. It is quite puzzling how a hub would affect the connection one hop away. I am wondering if it is a combination of the hub/ethernet card/ and software problem (as described in another response). This started when I upgraded the kernel to the latest version. Anyway changing the hub fixed the problem. I just bugs the heck out of me. Take care, Paul Borghese W. Alan Robertson wrote: Paul, If the ethernet driver was setting the card up for 100Mbps, and you were using a 10Mbps Hub, then you'd likely get no connectivity at all, rather than partial connectivity with a high percentage of packet loss. I'd be inclined to look into the duplex settings, as Daniel mentioned. A hub, even a so-called dual-speed hub, doesn't have the capability of providing for full duplex operation. When you cable the two machine together directly, they can communicate in full-duplex, which is most likely the reason the problem goes away when not using the hub. Manually configure both the Linux box, and the PC, for half-duplex operation, and your problem should go away. Alan _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7091t=6922 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial interfaces [7:7089]
It is clockrate. Thanks Mohammad khalid -Original Message- From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial interfaces [7:7089] Hi guys Can anyone tel me if the config for the DCE is clockrate or clock rate Thanks Tade Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7092t=7089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093]
Does anybody know what's the cheapest layer 3 Catalyst I can get. Port number doesn't matter. Thanks. Adam __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7093t=7093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup plan for a campus [7:7052]
Stephen, Your situation is very common. Especially with military contracts. The Colonel is never wrong, but YOU are, even if you were ordered to implement his solution. Average and mid-level personnel are usually not blamed by insecure/immature management because They were just doing their job and the implication is left unsaid that they were simply average employees - next time an expert will be required, and management begins immediately to hire an expert. No one gets hurt here. However, once the expert is brought in, and the same situation reoccurs, they have to howl point fingers. It's the exceptional and talented who receive a level of professional and personal abuse that doesn't belong in the work place, the military, or any where else. Somehow they see you as strong enough to take it, and assume that your expert opinion if heard would damage them severely. So they have to take you out first. Clients always seem to take advantage of companies who fail at client management/relationships. So leave these guys who wouldn't stand up for you when the situation required it. Remember they still look bad no matter how much is blamed on you. The client will go looking elsewhere, and may even refuse to pay. You should find another job. It's a big wide world out there. - Susan -Original Message- From: Stephen Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052] yes they did cut my budget.yes i told them it was a bad idea and yes they made me do it . all it took was a UPS brownout to show them i was right.for my troubles .. i was blamed by the customer and shunned by my employer... all in all a good days work.. steve (once buggered twice shy) From: Carroll Kong Reply-To: Carroll Kong To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backup plan for a campus [7:7052] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:56:28 -0400 At 09:33 AM 6/4/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: once apon a time there was a man who was given a spec to build a network with full redundency...the spec he put togother cost WAY to much and need severly cutting down...he told them not to do it but they ordered him to .so he did it the network fell over and the company sued for designing a crap network ...who got the blame..the man with his NAME on the design doc. have fun steve 1) I am confused. So, if the man who built the over priced network made a fully redundant network, and it still failed, did he not fail his job miserably? 2) Or did you mean, they cut his budget, and STILL told him to make the fully redundant network, despite his warnings? I am going to assume #2, since #1 does not make sense. -Carroll Kong _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7094t=7052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial interfaces [7:7089]
On 12.0 see the following. The configuration command is clock rate (speed) 2523(config-if)#clockrate ? % Unrecognized command 2523(config-if)#clock? clock 2523(config-if)#clock ? rate Configure serial interface clock speed 2523(config-if)#clock rate ? Speed (bits per second) 300 1200 2400 4800 9600 14400 19200 28800 32000 38400 56000 57600 64000 72000 115200 Choose clockrate from list above A show run command gives the following: interface Serial2 ip address 192.168.1.49 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 Note that clockrate is all one word here. -Original Message- From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial interfaces [7:7089] Hi guys Can anyone tel me if the config for the DCE is clockrate or clock rate Thanks Tade Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7095t=7089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial interfaces [7:7089]
It must depend on the interface or version of IOS because on my 3640 running 12.04 its clock rate. Cory -Original Message- From: IP Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: serial interfaces [7:7089] It is clockrate. Thanks Mohammad khalid -Original Message- From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial interfaces [7:7089] Hi guys Can anyone tel me if the config for the DCE is clockrate or clock rate Thanks Tade Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7096t=7089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883]
Do you want the New King James Version of the Bible? What? You are asking the wrong crowd for dumps. WARNING!!! YOU WILL GET FLAMED BY THESE PEOPLE IF YOU ASK FOR DUMPS! And some of them are not kind. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (samuel chaing) To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:50 AM Subject: RE: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] Yes,my English is very poor, And my mean is how to get the bible or dumps of Exam 640-504 Can you tell me? Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McCallum, Robert) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless my English has totally left me I reckon you might need to elaborate slightly as I do not have a clue what you are on about! -Original Message- From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 June 2001 16:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] anybody know it ,please tell me Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7097t=6883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no ip classless [7:7100]
In what situation would you use the command no ip classless? Cisco's site says ip classless --- This command allows the software to forward packets that are destined for unrecognized subnets of directly connected networks. The packets are forwarded to the best supernet route. no ip classless --- When this feature is disabled, the software discards the packets when a router receives packets for a subnet that numerically falls within its subnetwork addressing scheme, if there is no such subnet number in the routing table and there is no network default route. When would you use this in the real world? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7100t=7100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Subject: 2900XL Switch [7:7053]
A couple of thoughts on this matter. First, what changed? Is this a new switch, or is this a switch you have been using that all of a sudden woke up one day and started getting problems? Did somebody attempt to upgrade the operating system? Can you get into diagnostic mode? More input is needed. v/r, Paul Werner Can anyone please advise me of what is wrong with my Switch? It keeps rebooting and rebooting into this loop. Thanks in advance, the output from the 2900XL is below. **BIGE HUGE SHIP** Get your own 800 number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7101t=7053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102]
I have this set up below: My problem is that I can not ping E0 on R2501 from anywhere. I also cannot enter a static route to it. How would I get the 2501 to act as a gateway between the two networks? I've done some searches and looked over some books but I'm still not getting out through E0. This is just a simple home lab but it is begining to irk me, any help would be grealy appreciated. Internet/Cable modem | | | E0: 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 R2501 S0:172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 | | | | S0: 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0 R2521 S1: 172.16.40.1 255.255.255.0 | | | S0: 172.16.40.2 255.255.255.0 R2502 Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Router ! enable secret 5 $1$aifs$0SCPCn.iDMa/ISoNcv.gH. ! ip dhcp-server 10.1.1.1 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 172.16.40.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.2 ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password login line vty 5 197 password login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7102t=7102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883]
Not only is your english cute, but your internet searching skills leave alot to be desired. :) Try hotbot or something. - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: Re: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] Do you want the New King James Version of the Bible? What? You are asking the wrong crowd for dumps. WARNING!!! YOU WILL GET FLAMED BY THESE PEOPLE IF YOU ASK FOR DUMPS! And some of them are not kind. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (samuel chaing) To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:50 AM Subject: RE: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] Yes,my English is very poor, And my mean is how to get the bible or dumps of Exam 640-504 Can you tell me? Thanks! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McCallum, Robert) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unless my English has totally left me I reckon you might need to elaborate slightly as I do not have a clue what you are on about! -Original Message- From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 June 2001 16:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: where has the bible or dump for 504? [7:6883] anybody know it ,please tell me Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7103t=6883 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2900XL Switch [7:7053]
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Rodney Spears wrote: Can anyone please advise me of what is wrong with my Switch? It keeps rebooting and rebooting into this loop. Thanks in advance, the output from the 2900XL is below. Looks like a hardware problem to me. What does the TAC say? Or your favorite official support channel? Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Switch uptime is 14 seconds cisco WS-C2924-XL (PowerPC403GA) processor (revision 0x11) with 8192K/1024K byte s of memory. C2900XL Boot Loader (C2900-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.1)XP, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOF TWARE Compiled Fri 10-Dec-99 11:06 by cchang starting... Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:02:16:65:20:40 Xmodem file system is available. Initializing Flash... flashfs[0]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. ...done Initializing Flash. Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3 Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4 Loading flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin... # File flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin uncompressed and installed, entry poi nt: 0x3000 executing... Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x00329E10 Initializing C2900XL flash... flashfs[1]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 7 seconds. flashfs[1]: Initialization complete. ...done Initializing C2900XL flash. C2900XL POST: System Board Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Daughter Card Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Buffer Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Notify RAM Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Interface Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Testing Switch Core: Passed Error with Switch Core BIST test Phase 0. Returns: Test Complete Low : 0x000FFF7F, Test Complete High : 0x000E Test Phase Low: 0x, Test Phase High : 0x0200 Test Phase Third : 0x, Test Complete Third : 0x C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Switch Core: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Buffer Table: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Data Buffer Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Configuring Switch Parameters: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Switch Core BIST failed. C2900XL POST FAILURE: Cannot test Modules due to failure of Switch Core POST Del Mar Failure (0th Del Mar): req system failed to init C2900XL POST FAILURE: C2900XL POST FAILURE: ATM: required system failed to init C2900XL POST: Ethernet Controller Test: Passed C2900XL POST FAILURE: MII Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Error waiting for Ethernet Controller and SW_PARAMS C2900XL POST FAILURE: Initialization/POST failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: AT: Failing because system POST failed Exception (8192)! Debug Exception (Could be NULL pointer dereference) CPU Register Context: Vector = 0x2000 PC = 0x000EECC8 MSR = 0x00029200 CR = 0x2200 LR = 0x000F1F1C CTR = 0x001D6BD8 XER = 0x60001000 R0 = 0x R1 = 0x0059E7E8 R2 = 0x R3 = 0x R4 = 0x0001 R5 = 0x R6 = 0x0059E980 R7 = 0x0059E980 R8 = 0x0059E980 R9 = 0x R10 = 0x R11 = 0x0044 R12 = 0x4200 R13 = 0xA0F40453 R14 = 0x R15 = 0x R16 = 0x R17 = 0x R18 = 0x R19 = 0x R20 = 0x R21 = 0x R22 = 0x R23 = 0x R24 = 0x R25 = 0x0020 R26 = 0x0059E980 R27 = 0x0059E980 R28 = 0x0020 R29 = 0x2513 R30 = 0x0001 R31 = 0x Stack trace: PC = 0x000EECC8, SP = 0x0059E7E8 Frame 00: SP = 0x0059E808PC = 0x Frame 01: SP = 0x0059E880PC = 0x000F1F1C Frame 02: SP =
new virtual lab site [7:7105]
I just found this website and would like to share it with you all. www.rentarack.com Anwar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of hal9001 Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] large or extra large - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: RE: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] You want Fries with that? -Original Message- From: Me [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE:UNIX NT BEATING A DEAD OS [7:7063] Actually it's for here or to go, Sir ;-) MIRSKY Carl wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I wish I had thought of it... :-) Anyway, can we PLEASE end this now? We ALL have our own opinions, and as is was stated several times, there is no one OS that can do it all Just like anything else. I think what we should be more concerned with is how we can all unite and keep this exceptional industry going, so we can continue to earn a decent living and be able to afford to have groups like this (THANKS PAUL). Otherwise instead of asking UNIX or NT, we will be asking PAPER or PLASTIC ?!?!?! Carl. -Original Message- From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:37 AM To: MIRSKY Carl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] that was awesome Thank You, Don Johnson - Original Message - From: MIRSKY Carl To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:12 PM Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6820] Soapbox on: I think this says it all and that's all's I know. (Courtesy of your friends at Brainbuzz.com) http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/video/everyossucks/default.asp?OSsucks=Open Soapbox Off: Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^'\ ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP,CCDP,MCSE,SCSA, Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. -\ (---( )--- \_) ) / (_/ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7105t=7105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093]
in answer to your question ..there really isnt one... the 3100 does layer 2 and 3 switching but doesn`t have a REAL ios ...so no good... then you have a choice of 2948-LG3 3550-T12 4908-LG3 ALL of these are expensive ...i was quoted 6K(US) 4.5k (UK) for the 29.the rest i don`t want to hazard a guess anyone else??? steve From: Adam Wang Reply-To: Adam Wang To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:53:57 -0400 Does anybody know what's the cheapest layer 3 Catalyst I can get. Port number doesn't matter. Thanks. Adam __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7106t=7093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any know of how to get PPOE on WIN2K server working with [7:7107]
John, If I am not mistaking you are trying to setup PPPoE Client on win2k. If yes then you can download PPPoE client software from http://www.dslreports.com/pppoe. thanks, rahul. - Original Message - From: John Brandis To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 6:07 PM Subject: Any know of how to get PPOE on WIN2K server working with [7:7019] HI All, Quick ADSL question. Does any body have a hack or a suggestion of how to get PPOE working on a WIN2k server on TELSTRA ADSL ???/ How does this add to the cisco learning channel that is groupstudy.com , well it doesn't sorry but there has been so much crap lately I thought my quetsion would not hurt. Thanks all John Sydney, Australia Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7107t=7107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments on my Home Lab! [7:7108]
Hello, I just bought a home lab today. The equipment in my lab will be as follows. Does anyone have any input as to the quality of this lab setup? What would you expand on in the future. Has anyone taken the CCIE lab that can tell me what they think of this lab and possible scenarios I should run through with this lab. I will be receiving the items over the next few days. The lab is as follows: Cisco 2507 8/16 11.2 Cisco 2501 8/16 11.2 Cisco 4000 M+ 1 token ring,2 serial Cisco 2924XL-EL Cisco 5005 catalyst 1 12 port 100 BaseT,1 sup engine back to back Cables 3 Console kits Thank you, JC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7108t=7108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: serial interfaces [7:7089]
MUST BE clock rate you can find that in Sybex Todd book. Adekola, Dennis D wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7109t=7089 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Apologize for these two Questions [7:7111]
Comrades, Please do not fan the flame the flames of the religious O/S war... from this message. I passed my Switch test this Saturday... Walking away with a big smile; Thank you all for your help! Due to my current Intel contract situation, I will be have to put my CCNP drive and desire on hold for three month while I migrate my MCSE 3.51 certification to a MCSE 2K certification... BUT, I will return as I really enjoy Cisco and Networking more. Question 1: Is there is a MCSE study group such as this one in existence? Question 2: Has anyone found a set of books that is really good? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7111t=7111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2900XL Switch [7:7053]
Usually a failure on POST means the Switch is Bad. You can try Xmodeming a new IOS image to it, but I think this one is really broken. TAC 1-800-553-nets Ejay Hire -Original Message- From: Rodney Spears [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2900XL Switch [7:7053] Can anyone please advise me of what is wrong with my Switch? It keeps rebooting and rebooting into this loop. Thanks in advance, the output from the 2900XL is below. Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Switch uptime is 14 seconds cisco WS-C2924-XL (PowerPC403GA) processor (revision 0x11) with 8192K/1024K byte s of memory. C2900XL Boot Loader (C2900-HBOOT-M) Version 12.0(5.1)XP, MAINTENANCE INTERIM SOF TWARE Compiled Fri 10-Dec-99 11:06 by cchang starting... Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:02:16:65:20:40 Xmodem file system is available. Initializing Flash... flashfs[0]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[0]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[0]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[0]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[0]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[0]: flashfs fsck took 6 seconds. ...done Initializing Flash. Boot Sector Filesystem (bs:) installed, fsid: 3 Parameter Block Filesystem (pb:) installed, fsid: 4 Loading flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin... # File flash:c2900xl-c3h2s-mz-120.5-xu.bin uncompressed and installed, entry poi nt: 0x3000 executing... Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) of the Commercial Computer Software - Restricted Rights clause at FAR sec. 52.227-19 and subparagraph (c) (1) (ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS sec. 252.227-7013. cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, California 95134-1706 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C2900XL Software (C2900XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5.1)XW, MAINTENANCE IN TERIM SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 21-Dec-00 11:45 by devgoyal Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x00329E10 Initializing C2900XL flash... flashfs[1]: 111 files, 3 directories flashfs[1]: 0 orphaned files, 0 orphaned directories flashfs[1]: Total bytes: 3612672 flashfs[1]: Bytes used: 2861568 flashfs[1]: Bytes available: 751104 flashfs[1]: flashfs fsck took 7 seconds. flashfs[1]: Initialization complete. ...done Initializing C2900XL flash. C2900XL POST: System Board Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Daughter Card Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Buffer Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Notify RAM Test: Passed C2900XL POST: CPU Interface Test: Passed C2900XL POST: Testing Switch Core: Passed Error with Switch Core BIST test Phase 0. Returns: Test Complete Low : 0x000FFF7F, Test Complete High : 0x000E Test Phase Low: 0x, Test Phase High : 0x0200 Test Phase Third : 0x, Test Complete Third : 0x C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Switch Core: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Testing Buffer Table: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Data Buffer Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Configuring Switch Parameters: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Switch Core BIST failed. C2900XL POST FAILURE: Cannot test Modules due to failure of Switch Core POST Del Mar Failure (0th Del Mar): req system failed to init C2900XL POST FAILURE: C2900XL POST FAILURE: ATM: required system failed to init C2900XL POST: Ethernet Controller Test: Passed C2900XL POST FAILURE: MII Test: Failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: Error waiting for Ethernet Controller and SW_PARAMS C2900XL POST FAILURE: Initialization/POST failed C2900XL POST FAILURE: AT: Failing because system POST failed Exception (8192)! Debug Exception (Could be NULL pointer dereference) CPU Register Context: Vector = 0x2000 PC = 0x000EECC8 MSR = 0x00029200 CR = 0x2200 LR = 0x000F1F1C CTR = 0x001D6BD8 XER = 0x60001000 R0 = 0x R1 = 0x0059E7E8 R2 = 0x R3 = 0x R4 = 0x0001 R5 = 0x R6 = 0x0059E980 R7 = 0x0059E980 R8 = 0x0059E980 R9 = 0x R10 = 0x R11 = 0x0044 R12 = 0x4200 R13 = 0xA0F40453 R14 = 0x R15 = 0x R16 = 0x R17 = 0x R18 = 0x R19 = 0x R20 = 0x R21 = 0x R22 = 0x R23 = 0x R24 = 0x R25 = 0x0020 R26 = 0x0059E980 R27 = 0x0059E980 R28 = 0x0020 R29 = 0x2513 R30 = 0x0001 R31 = 0x Stack trace: PC = 0x000EECC8, SP = 0x0059E7E8 Frame 00: SP = 0x0059E808PC = 0x Frame 01: SP
RE: Comments on my Home Lab! [7:7108]
I presume that the 8/16 is flash and memory. If it is then I would say that you need a good few more routers. Although you do configure a token ring switch in the lab I have heard that it is a very minimal config on this. The other switch in use is the cat 5000, so there is no need to have any more switches but plenty need to have at least another 4 routers. My lab has 9 routers and on some of the Bootcamp labs that is just enough. For lab scenarios buy the bootcamp labs there is quite simply no better! -Original Message- From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 June 2001 18:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Comments on my Home Lab! [7:7108] Hello, I just bought a home lab today. The equipment in my lab will be as follows. Does anyone have any input as to the quality of this lab setup? What would you expand on in the future. Has anyone taken the CCIE lab that can tell me what they think of this lab and possible scenarios I should run through with this lab. I will be receiving the items over the next few days. The lab is as follows: Cisco 2507 8/16 11.2 Cisco 2501 8/16 11.2 Cisco 4000 M+ 1 token ring,2 serial Cisco 2924XL-EL Cisco 5005 catalyst 1 12 port 100 BaseT,1 sup engine back to back Cables 3 Console kits Thank you, JC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7112t=7108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP Multicast Configuration [7:7114]
Hi Friends I have 2 checkpoint Firewalls configured for high availability and load balancing mode. I need to configure the IP Multicast on both the Internal and external interfaces of both firewall. I have configured the common virtual IP on both the external and internal I/Fs. I am using 2900 XL series switch with 12.0(5)XU for connecting both the internal and external I/Fs of the firewall. I need to configure all these 4 interface for multicast grouping. So if there is traffic flow across the FW then the traffic should be forwarded to both the I/Fs. What I need to do to configure IP multicast on the Switch. I think CGMP is by default enabled. Please give me some guidance. regards imran _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7114t=7114 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Learning aids [7:6863]
Save your money on those high priced cds and buy a good book, some equipment and your off. - Original Message - From: Stephen Flint To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:40 AM Subject: Learning aids [7:6863] Hi, Would someone who is aware of self-study CDs please write and suggest the better ones available for CCNP. Thanks, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7115t=6863 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Technology Religion (was Re: last word: UNIX guys look down [7:7113]
your on a littlte rip-tear today, huh mike - Original Message - From: Michael L. Williams To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 8:58 PM Subject: Re: Technology Religion (was Re: last word: UNIX guys look down [7:6855] Isn't this group moderated? Can't the moderator kill out of control threads? Cthulu wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can we please kill this post?I frankly don't give two rat *sses whether UNIX is better than NT 'cause it has triple decker jet engines and a a self flushing toilet, or that NT can burp the alphabet while connected to a 2501 via token ring or that Cisco once gave Nortel a wedgie in grade school, or that you can save 5 cents with friends and family from MCI. I have said it before and I will say it again: all OSes and IOSes s*ck in their own special way. If they did not, none of us would have a job. Please, enjoy the unqiue s*ckiness of each component you deal with, and do not compare it to other components. Confiential to certain males on the list: please stop indulging in Inadequate P*nile Appendage Compenstation (IPAC) exercises by uttering statements such as I make X big bucks a year or I am boss and overlord of Y number of employees. I am sure that someone will love you for yourself someday, and not for your money, car, or power so you do not need to preen on the list! This is a list to learn about Cisco topics: how to use, configure, fix, troubleshoot, sell, etc. Cisco. In some cases, how to use Cisco with other company's products. Good luck, and if angered by my comments, direct them to my personal account at: [EMAIL PROTECTED], not the group. Love, Charles Greg Hoffman wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... STFW?! So much for helping out. From the things I have seen on here, I no longer want ANY part of this. Enjoy you bunch of snot nosed brats. -Original Message- From: Jim Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 6:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: last word: UNIX guys look down on we NT guys [7:6842] Come one man, this is not a sour grape, right? I'm not comparing which OS is good, which is bad. Every OS has pros and cons, what I'm saying is some guys' attitude. What's wrong with being a NT admin? What's wrong with a NT guy making $240K? I made $240K last year 'cause I had 10 people working for me and I'll make even more this year. Sorry, I'm not trying to show off here, I'm just trying to teach some smart UNIX guys a lesson: show some respect to others. By the way, I'm not that smart but I've got MS Computer Science degree and I speak 2 languages (English is my second language), so before you call me looser, tell me what you have. Jim -Original Message- From: Christopher Kolp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6353] Hey NT LOOSER, Go away. This a cisco mailing list. Why don't you go study for the MCSE or something... =] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6323] UNIX guys, I make $240K per year, how much you make? Why you guys look down on us??? I don't get it... Jim NT guy __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7113t=7113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pix and exchange server [7:7117]
Hello I need sample configuration for pix and exchange server ! jmpp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7117t=7117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comments on my Home Lab! [7:7108]
Think about another two serial interfaces on the 4000M. A router that can be used as a terminal server is good. 2509/2511 are most common. I don't see any ISDN BRI interfaces. You'll want some. 2503 Depending on budget you might want to stay with the 2500 series or spring for the newer 2600s. To do trunking on the Cat5K you'll need a router with a 100 Mbs port. 2620/2621 would do it. To run the newer Enterprise code on the 2500s you will need 16 Flash or use MZMaker. (Check archives for details.) -Original Message- From: JC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Comments on my Home Lab! [7:7108] Hello, I just bought a home lab today. The equipment in my lab will be as follows. Does anyone have any input as to the quality of this lab setup? What would you expand on in the future. Has anyone taken the CCIE lab that can tell me what they think of this lab and possible scenarios I should run through with this lab. I will be receiving the items over the next few days. The lab is as follows: Cisco 2507 8/16 11.2 Cisco 2501 8/16 11.2 Cisco 4000 M+ 1 token ring,2 serial Cisco 2924XL-EL Cisco 5005 catalyst 1 12 port 100 BaseT,1 sup engine back to back Cables 3 Console kits Thank you, JC Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7118t=7108 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pix and exchange server [7:7117]
It's on www.cisco.com. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/ Choose your version configuration guide Configuring for MS-Exchange Learn to use the search engine on cisco.com. It's very useful for finding info within minutes. Allen - Original Message - From: Jose Miguel Perez To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:35 PM Subject: pix and exchange server [7:7117] Hello I need sample configuration for pix and exchange server ! jmpp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7121t=7117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pix and exchange server [7:7117]
i need a sample config for a GSR, a 7513, a 7206 with 400 interfaces, a can of glue, a bottle of orange soda, and two and a half peanuts. go away, or be more precise. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Jose Miguel Perez To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: pix and exchange server [7:7117] Hello I need sample configuration for pix and exchange server ! jmpp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7122t=7117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093]
We. i have a True l;ayer 3 catalyst. its a cat 5 with sup III and nffc Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Stephen Skinner To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 1:29 PM Subject: Re: low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093] in answer to your question ..there really isnt one... the 3100 does layer 2 and 3 switching but doesn`t have a REAL ios ...so no good... then you have a choice of 2948-LG3 3550-T12 4908-LG3 ALL of these are expensive ...i was quoted 6K(US) 4.5k (UK) for the 29.the rest i don`t want to hazard a guess anyone else??? steve From: Adam Wang Reply-To: Adam Wang To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: low-end layer3 Catalyst [7:7093] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 11:53:57 -0400 Does anybody know what's the cheapest layer 3 Catalyst I can get. Port number doesn't matter. Thanks. Adam __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7124t=7093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transparent Bridging ? [7:7126]
Hi Group, I vill say ziss only vonce. Okay, its my second attempt at trying to work out how I can bridge IP across to 2500's. I have 2 2500's configured with no ip routing. 2 PC's are connected at either end, i.e one to bridge 1 and one to bridge 2. I have a sniffer on both PC's. I am attempting to ping from one PC to the other. IEEE spanning tree is applied on both bridges. The bridges are connected via a serial cable and the serial ports of the bridges as well as the Ethernet ports are in bridge group 1. I have verified spanning tree operation and one of the serial ports has been elected root port on bridge 1, the other bridge is the designated bridge. Ref : Radia Perlman, Interconnections p.83. So far so good. I have configured the PC's with a default gateway to the IP address of each of the bridges. When I attempt to ping from one PC to the other, I can see from my Sniffer trace that the PC ARP's for the MAC Address of the bridge, this ARP is successful and the PC then sends out an ICMP echo request. This echo request appears to be my problem since the destination MAC address of this packet contains the Ethernet Mac address of the local bridge and the local bridge consequently disregards the packet. Should the PC have an ARP entry installed for the destination IP address that I am pinging ? Has anyone achieved this scenario ? or am I way off mark with my thinking here. The reason I set this LAB up was because so many questions appear to be being asked at CCIE written level akin to this setup i.e can PC 1 ping PC 2 in similar arrangement using (RSRB/DLSW+/SRB etc) Any comments welcome. Regards, Phil. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7126t=7126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Tell us Louie what did you use. Don - Original Message - From: Bradley J. Wilson To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 7:13 PM Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Well, again, Sir Edmund, just because the newcomers can be better-informed before their attempts doesn't mean that the challenge needs to be altered or is less of a challenge for the individual. Again, I'm not against making certs tougher to achieve. But it sounds like there's a touch of bitterness that these study guides weren't around way back when...well, that's just the way life is. Making the CCIE tougher and still calling it the CCIE is like asking runners to run a 400m race, but then making them run 500m without telling them. ;-) Besides, the argument about the study materials is subjective. Was CCO around when you took the CCIE? Were other engineers around who were studying for it? Were used routers around for you to purchase, and perhaps set up for others to telnet into? I'm sure there were - if you (and/or others) didn't make use of them, then that's water under the source-route bridge. If you want someone to be angry at, be angry at the people who took the CCIE, passed or not, and then went out and wrote books on how to study for the CCIE. But I personally don't think these people are doing a disservice to the CCIE, nor are they devaluing it - and with a consistent 80% failure rate, they're certainly not making it less challenging. The study guides, etc. make it more of a group effort, and there's nothing wrong with that - not against the rules, not against the NDA, and our society wins because we're able to learn from (and teach to) one another, thereby filling the desperate need we have today for knowledgeable network engineers. Don't punish those of us who have not yet earned our CCIE status for using the resources which are available to us - or for having the foresight to create and share new resources. It really sounds like your argument is that it should be more of a dog-eat-dog world than a world where we're allowed to cooperate and share knowledge. Am I wrong? If so, why? - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: Bradley J. Wilson Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 8:56 PM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] I willing to have the tougher recerts and the tougher challenge with my 2nd CCIE cert. The bar has been lowered due to the deluge of study materials that are now present to assist you. I'm for putting the bar back to where it was taking into consideration the additional study aids available. Louie and also wrote... When the CCIE cert first came about there were not 100+ books avilable to help you pass it. There were not a multitude of online labs, lab study guides, study groups, ... Since all of those items are now available, I feel the bar has been lowered. I'm for putting it back where it was. Additionally I'm studying for my second CCIE cert, I sincerely hope that it is much tougher than my first. I want to maintain the value of the cert. Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bradley J. Wilson Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] If I weren't up to the challenge, I wouldn't be on this newsgroup. Are you up to the challenge of leaving the bar at the same height that it was when *you* passed the test? I personally think the test is difficult enough as it is. Am I a wimp because of that? Do we need to dump some dirt on the top of Everest now that it's been conquered by someone else ahead of me? If Cisco wants to make the test tougher, they're well within their rights to do so. I just hope they don't call it the CCIE - call it something different, and reset the numbers to zero (or 1025, whichever). - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:33 AM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Any CCIE or CCIE candidate worth his salt would want the lab to be tougher. A number of study aids are now available that were not in the past. This has somewhat lessened the difficulty of the process (as witnessed by the backlog of people taking the lab after breezing through the written). Making it tougher is just a method of counterbalancing all of the increased study aids and maintaining the value of the CCIE cert. If you truly want to obtain your CCIE then you should want it to be as difficult as possible, otherwise where is the value in the cert? If you are not up to the challenge, then don't make the attempt. As for who should evaluate the CCIE program - most (not all)employers couldn't begin to answer the questions about what is needed from a CCIE. The biggest employer of CCIE's is Cisco (by far) so they should already have an idea of what is needed. Cisco
Re: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102]
Uhh, NAT perhaps!? -humboldt Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Bob Edmonds To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102] I have this set up below: My problem is that I can not ping E0 on R2501 from anywhere. I also cannot enter a static route to it. How would I get the 2501 to act as a gateway between the two networks? I've done some searches and looked over some books but I'm still not getting out through E0. This is just a simple home lab but it is begining to irk me, any help would be grealy appreciated. Internet/Cable modem | | | E0: 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 R2501 S0:172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 | | | | S0: 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0 R2521 S1: 172.16.40.1 255.255.255.0 | | | S0: 172.16.40.2 255.255.255.0 R2502 Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Router ! enable secret 5 $1$aifs$0SCPCn.iDMa/ISoNcv.gH. ! ip dhcp-server 10.1.1.1 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 172.16.40.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.2 ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password login line vty 5 197 password login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7127t=7102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Louie if you walk into a totally dark room and fall into a three foot hole, how many feet have you fallen. If you walk into an amply lit room and fall into a three foot hole, how many feet have you fallen. The bar hasn't been lowered the situation just got brighter. You didn't obtain the needed skills by birth, you had to obtain them somewhere. Obviously they are easier to find now. I would venture to say that anything that is on the Lab exam is freely available on the CCO site.and was when you prepared for your exam, condensening that info and repackaging it just makes it easier to prepare. How many feet do you have to climb to get out of that hole lights on or off? 3 When I decided to obtain my CCIE in 98 there was probably only a hand full of books. I am glad I waited, got my DP/NP a deluxe lab and plenty of resources. Instead of trying it with a handful of Cisco press books and maybe Giles. I believe his was the first guide. please correct me if I am wrong. Don - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 6:16 PM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] When the CCIE cert first came about there were not 100+ books avilable to help you pass it. There were not a multitude of online labs, lab study guides, study groups, ... Since all of those items are now available, I feel the bar has been lowered. I'm for putting it back where it was. Additionally I'm studying for my second CCIE cert, I sincerely hope that it is much tougher than my first. I want to maintain the value of the cert. Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] I agree with you. It's awful easy for someone who's already gotten their CCIE (which when they passed the lab probably could be quoted as saying something like that was the most difficult thing I've ever seen) to now say Sure.. make it as difficult as possible I don't know many CCIEs personally. Only a couple, and both of them said that given the time constraints of the lab (2 days), it is extremely difficult. So I don't think jamming it into 1 day just because Cisco is too cheap to spring for more testing centers to keep up with demand is a resonable solution. Isn't this why Cisco is contemplating making it 1 day? Not to raise the bar of the level of the exam, but simply because they're testing centers can't handle the demand. Mashing into 1 day, IMHO, would be a very poor decision. Agreeing with Brad, do all of the CCIEs that are out there have a problem with leaving the bar where it was when you passed it? It only seems fair. Mike W. Bradley J. Wilson wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I weren't up to the challenge, I wouldn't be on this newsgroup. Are you up to the challenge of leaving the bar at the same height that it was when *you* passed the test? I personally think the test is difficult enough as it is. Am I a wimp because of that? Do we need to dump some dirt on the top of Everest now that it's been conquered by someone else ahead of me? If Cisco wants to make the test tougher, they're well within their rights to do so. I just hope they don't call it the CCIE - call it something different, and reset the numbers to zero (or 1025, whichever). - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:33 AM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Any CCIE or CCIE candidate worth his salt would want the lab to be tougher. A number of study aids are now available that were not in the past. This has somewhat lessened the difficulty of the process (as witnessed by the backlog of people taking the lab after breezing through the written). Making it tougher is just a method of counterbalancing all of the increased study aids and maintaining the value of the CCIE cert. If you truly want to obtain your CCIE then you should want it to be as difficult as possible, otherwise where is the value in the cert? If you are not up to the challenge, then don't make the attempt. As for who should evaluate the CCIE program - most (not all)employers couldn't begin to answer the questions about what is needed from a CCIE. The biggest employer of CCIE's is Cisco (by far) so they should already have an idea of what is needed. Cisco has been respectful enough of the CCIE population to also ask for their input and most have given it willingly. My main interested is in preserving the value of the CCIE cert. I am currently studying for my 2nd CCIE cert and still hope they make it tougher (before I complete it). I also hope they make the recertification tests tougher as well. I'm up to the challenge - are you? Louie
RE: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102]
You are missing a default route to the internet. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 206.107.237.x where x is the address of the cable modem. However if the 2521 can't see it, either somthing else is wrong. Are the interfaces Up,Up? A sh ip int bri should tell the tale on the 2501. HTH Doug Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7128t=7102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unknown Traffic [7:7129]
Hi, Hope somebody can enlighten me. I got this router 2 uplinks and 1 connected to my LAN. When I performed sh int on the respective interfaces, this was the result: Uplink 1: 5 minute input rate 501000 bits/sec, 373 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 1748000 bits/sec, 330 packets/sec Uplink 2: 5 minute input rate 749000 bits/sec, 735 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 23912000 bits/sec, 2762 packets/sec LAN interface: 5 minute input rate 3678 bits/sec, 4011 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 13476000 bits/sec, 2096 packets/sec Can someone explain to me why when 36M of traffic went into my LAN interface (input), only less than 26M were threw out to the Uplinks (output) Best Regards, Andy Low Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7129t=7129 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Transparent Bridging ? [7:7126]
The PC shouldn't ARP for a bridge. A bridge is transparent. It should ARP for the end station. Something is weird with addressing and submasks. Priscilla At 03:22 PM 6/4/01, Philip Barker wrote: Hi Group, I vill say ziss only vonce. Okay, its my second attempt at trying to work out how I can bridge IP across to 2500's. I have 2 2500's configured with no ip routing. 2 PC's are connected at either end, i.e one to bridge 1 and one to bridge 2. I have a sniffer on both PC's. I am attempting to ping from one PC to the other. IEEE spanning tree is applied on both bridges. The bridges are connected via a serial cable and the serial ports of the bridges as well as the Ethernet ports are in bridge group 1. I have verified spanning tree operation and one of the serial ports has been elected root port on bridge 1, the other bridge is the designated bridge. Ref : Radia Perlman, Interconnections p.83. So far so good. I have configured the PC's with a default gateway to the IP address of each of the bridges. When I attempt to ping from one PC to the other, I can see from my Sniffer trace that the PC ARP's for the MAC Address of the bridge, this ARP is successful and the PC then sends out an ICMP echo request. This echo request appears to be my problem since the destination MAC address of this packet contains the Ethernet Mac address of the local bridge and the local bridge consequently disregards the packet. Should the PC have an ARP entry installed for the destination IP address that I am pinging ? Has anyone achieved this scenario ? or am I way off mark with my thinking here. The reason I set this LAB up was because so many questions appear to be being asked at CCIE written level akin to this setup i.e can PC 1 ping PC 2 in similar arrangement using (RSRB/DLSW+/SRB etc) Any comments welcome. Regards, Phil. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7130t=7126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:7131]
I think he would tell you but he still lives at home and he doesn't want you to do donuts on his Mom's front lawn. - Original Message - From: Michael L. Williams To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 9:14 AM Subject: Re: another OT: why you UNIX guys look down on we NT guys? [7:6985] Yes, please.. let's end this I understand news servers, Sir. I've configured and installed many of them. They're not complex. I understand them enough to know that if you weren't scared to, you could take 10 seconds in your news reader to enter your REAL name and e-mail address. I also understand that you're not brave enough to because all you've given is nothing but fake names, e-mail addresses, and credentials the whole time. Please don't waste anymore bandwidth until you're ready to stop hiding behind a shield of anonymity. Me wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You must be a GREAT GURU who couldn't even even figure out how the groupstudy news server works and how you have been getting your mails.. ha ha ha Could someone tell this poor guy how the news server for groupstudy have been configured so that he can understand I think it's too complicated !!! In any case, don't bother emailing me because talking to you would be a absolute waste of time if you cannot understand a simple news-server, how can I even discuss anything technical with you ha ha ha. Let's end this... Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... You don't even deserve a rebuttal, [EMAIL PROTECTED]. You won't even say who you are.. 50,000 workstations my ass while you're making up fake credentials, why not just say it was 100,000 workstations or 1 million. Me wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Guess I have not read any CCNA books recently I won't even bother to flame you for the joke?? . When you find me a unix admin who can plan the deployment of 50,000 workstation and successfully roll it out, we can discuss again Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... In case you haven't noticed, most CCNA books point out the fact that the IOS uses a Unix-ish shell, with command line completion, etc. just like Unix. Some of the low end equipment, like the 700 series and the 1900s allow you to use a web interface, but virtually everything else is command line. Can you provide facts showing that the IOS *isn't* Unix-ish? Perhaps Cisco is working on a GUI, (don't flame me for this ... it's a joke), they're working on a GUI so all the NT admins can have a chance at becoming Cisco gurus =) Mike W. (former NT admin) Jason wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Oh, now the IOS is Unixish ?? Phew, so by that token, all Unix experts would be CCIE... so I guess the number would include all the so call Unix/Linux experts I don't remember mentioning that the ATM runs NT, most of them actually run OS2. The extra $$ you save from using open?? source OS would be waste on support In case you have not notice, Cisco is working on a GUI Kelly Hair wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Jason - By your logic, Windows NT 3.1 is all you need for your Enterprise to succeed. Good luck in that endevour! In response to your other point, yes, I would trust my ATM server to Linux. The blue screen is pretty but I would prefer to have money instead. Oh.. not to mention the extra money I would have from using a an open source OS rather than an M$ one... Perhaps Cisco should throw out the Unixish IOS and replace it with a GUI so everyone could write configs for routers. Sounds like a grand idea... Regards, Kelly What was your point ? That Multics sucks , and by the same token, therefore Unix sucks and NT/W2K rules !!! At least, NT/W2K was based on a working operating system. Anyone of you notice that Unix is all about ego ? If Unix is finished in 1 month, why are there still people working on it ? On the other hand, if Unix is perfect, why the hell are people working on it ? If Unix promotes innovation, why is nobody using it ? Would you trust you ATM machine to Linux ? Jim Dixon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE B ABSTRACT B is a computer language designed by D. M. Ritchie and K. L.
Cisco Certification Test Centers [7:7132]
Are there any Cisco certification test center for 640-503 BSCN cheaper (less than $100.00) than Sylvan Prometrics ? Thanks in advance. FREDL AZARES Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7132t=7132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pix and exchange server [7:7117]
Peter dont be rude.. i know that u have achieved a lot. There is a sample configuration involving PIX and Exchange server on cisco site. Ask ur good friend to search there. Thanks, Tobproud --- Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist wrote: i need a sample config for a GSR, a 7513, a 7206 with 400 interfaces, a can of glue, a bottle of orange soda, and two and a half peanuts. go away, or be more precise. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Jose Miguel Perez To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: pix and exchange server [7:7117] Hello I need sample configuration for pix and exchange server ! jmpp [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ http://messenger.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Messenger - Voice chat, mail alerts, stock quotes and favourite news and lots more! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7134t=7117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix and exchange server [7:7117]
Ok here it is: version 11.2 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname I need a ! enable secret booger ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ipx routing glue.soda.peanuts ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 235 front street ipx network 100 encapsulation plastic tube ipx network 101 encapsulation aluminum can ! interface Orange Soda Orange water mixem up ! interface Serial0.16 Glue White sticky stuff Smell Elmer dude ! ! ip http server ip classless ip route Glue 255.0.0.0 peanuts ip route Orange 255.0.0.0 other peanuts ! ! end -Original Message- From: Peter I. Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pix and exchange server [7:7117] i need a sample config for a GSR, a 7513, a 7206 with 400 interfaces, a can of glue, a bottle of orange soda, and two and a half peanuts. go away, or be more precise. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Jose Miguel Perez To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:35 PM Subject: pix and exchange server [7:7117] Hello I need sample configuration for pix and exchange server ! jmpp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7135t=7117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: no ip classless [7:7100]
If you were running RIP V1 on your network, correct design would dictate that all the local networks must appear in the routing table of your routers. If one of your users accesses a network not in the table, the router would send an icmp network unreachable with no IP classless and an icmp timeout error (after a long wait) with ip classless. This behavior prevents some routing loops, prevents traffic to nonexistant devices and is good design. Doug Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7136t=7100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame Relay Traffic Shaping [7:7137]
Got a question on traffic shaping. Have a couple high speed frame pipes going into data center/server farm locations. Speeds are 9.264MBPS at datacenter, 6.176MBPS going into primary server farm, and 4.632MBPS going into a less-used server location. Remote sites are running from 128K to 1.544Meg. I have been playing with traffic shaping a bit, and need to make 2 settings. One is for times with no congestion, the second entry is for times with congestion. All sites are running zeroK CIR (okay, not my call, but need to support it). I was thinking for the first stab at it, to make peak speed equal to the port speed of the remote location, and average speed equal to average prime shift utilization of the PVC group (look at all 1544 ports, average out utilization - then set average to this rate). * enable traffic shaping, use BECN (Carrier does not use ForeSight) int hssi8/0/0 frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn * * make the map classes *set PEAK at port speed of remote site *set AVERAGE at prime shift average utilization at remote site? map-class frame-relay 1544K_Port frame-relay traffic-rate average 1544000 * ^ * | *average out prime shift usage for 1.544 ports * map-class frame-relay 768K_Port frame-relay traffic-rate average 768000 * ^ * | *average out prime shift usage for 768KB ports * map-class frame-relay 512K_Port frame-relay traffic-rate average 512000 * ^ * | *average out prime shift usage for 512KB ports * map-class frame-relay 256K_Port frame-relay traffic-rate average 256000 * map-class frame-relay 128K_Port frame-relay traffic-rate average 128000 * * Apply Traffic-shaping map classes to subinterfaces int hssi8/0/0.101 class 1544K_Port * int hssi8/0/0.173 class 512K_Port * int hssi8/0/0.202 class 256K_Port * end Any thoughts (other than buy CIR) - maybe set average to a percentage of peak? I don't want to get into custom queue lists and priority queuing just yet. Would need to maybe break out a sniffer and get a look at traffic then work with customer on defining priorities. Bruce Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7137t=7137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102]
Where did you get the 206.107.237.0 address? - Original Message - From: Bob Edmonds To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:50 AM Subject: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102] I have this set up below: My problem is that I can not ping E0 on R2501 from anywhere. I also cannot enter a static route to it. How would I get the 2501 to act as a gateway between the two networks? I've done some searches and looked over some books but I'm still not getting out through E0. This is just a simple home lab but it is begining to irk me, any help would be grealy appreciated. Internet/Cable modem | | | E0: 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 R2501 S0:172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 | | | | S0: 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0 R2521 S1: 172.16.40.1 255.255.255.0 | | | S0: 172.16.40.2 255.255.255.0 R2502 Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Router ! enable secret 5 $1$aifs$0SCPCn.iDMa/ISoNcv.gH. ! ip dhcp-server 10.1.1.1 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 206.107.237.12 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip address 172.16.20.1 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 172.16.40.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.2 ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password login line vty 5 197 password login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7141t=7102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: no ip classless [7:7100]
Cisco routers by default are still classfull, even though the internet has long since gone classless. For a router to effective understand CIDR routes that don't fall on classfull boundrys it is necessary to turn off the default by executing the command ip classless If for some reason you live in a time warp, and your network is fully classfull, and you just got a used router from someone who was using it on a classless network, and you wanted to convert it back to being classfull you would execute the command no ip classless. Why Classless? Lets say you have a large network, and you happen to own a class A network. Lets say the 5.0.0.0 network. Lets say that one of the interfaces on your router connects to another router which connects to your larger network. Let say that on your end the interface address is 5.0.0.1 /30 and on the other end the address is 5.0.0.2 /30. Lets say you have a default route pointing out the serial interface that has the 5.0.0.1 interface. If you then tried to reach something else in the 5.0.0.0 network, say 5.1.2.3, the packet would go to your router. (remember our router is configured for classfull, the default). Then your router would say to itself hey I have an interface in the 5 network, that means that all of 5.0.0.0 /8 must be connected to me, but I don't see the specific network I'm trying to reach (5.1.2.3) sop I guess it doesn't exist so I'll throw the packet away That's what happens if your router is set to classful SO to recap Classfull cisco default BAD Classless need ip classless command GOOD hope this helps Tom At 12:31 PM 06/04/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In what situation would you use the command no ip classless? Cisco's site says ip classless --- This command allows the software to forward packets that are destined for unrecognized subnets of directly connected networks. The packets are forwarded to the best supernet route. no ip classless --- When this feature is disabled, the software discards the packets when a router receives packets for a subnet that numerically falls within its subnetwork addressing scheme, if there is no such subnet number in the routing table and there is no network default route. When would you use this in the real world? Tom Pruneau Trainer Network Operations GENUITY 3 Van de Graff Drive Burlington Ma. 01803 24 Hr. Network Operations Center 800-436-8489 If you need to get a hold of me my hours are 8AM-4PM ET Mon-Fri --- This email is composed of 82% post consumer recycled data bits --- Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7139t=7100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Book club [7:6811]
I had a little trouble with the tcbc part of booksonline, but I called (317) 541-8920 and they got everything strightened out to my satisfaction. --Original Message-- From: Michael L. Williams To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 4, 2001 1:00:30 PM GMT Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] Agreed. avoid Library of Computer and Information Sciences.. they lost one of my orders. never billed me twice, but sent selections of the month that I clearly declined. I've e-mailed them asking how to end my membership (because their website says nothing about it that I can find), and I haven't heard back from them.. Mike W. Georgescu, Aurelian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Make sure you don't subscribe to Library of Computer Information Sciences (http://lcis.booksonline.com/cgi-bin/ndCGI.exe/Develop/pagHome?clubId=LCIpr omo=bhp-1-2) They are the worst! They lose your order, bill you twice and have no customer support!! -Original Message- From: William E. Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Book club [7:6811] yeah Carl, its www.booksonline.com/telecommunications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MIRSKY Carl Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] A while back there was information posed on a book club where you could get several CCIE books for like $10 and then only have to buy X books afterwards. Does anyone have the name or URL for this? Thanks Put yer seat belt on, I wanna try somethin'. I saw it in a cartoon once and I'm pretty sure it'll work ! , /'^ ^' ((o)-(o)) --oOOO--(_)--OOOo- Carl Mirsky CCNP, CCDP, SCSA, MCSE Technical Solutions Architect Covansys ( www.covansys.com ) 1750 E. Golf Rd. #1100 Schaumburg, IL 60173 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 847-969-3054 .oooO ( ) Oooo. - (---( )--- _) ) / (_/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7120t=6811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102]
...he needs to do nat as well. he has an entire network, and only one IP address Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th Street New York, NY 10001 Cell:(516) 782.1535 Desk: (646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(646) 792.2396 - Original Message - From: Doug Lockwood To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:32 PM Subject: RE: Help with irksome situation = ( [7:7102] You are missing a default route to the internet. ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 206.107.237.x where x is the address of the cable modem. However if the 2521 can't see it, either somthing else is wrong. Are the interfaces Up,Up? A sh ip int bri should tell the tale on the 2501. HTH Doug Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7140t=7102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
.PICTURE THE SCENE... it`s 8.30am your palms are sweating so much you try and pull open the door of the cisco building your hands slips of the rail and you land smack on your rump.a man walks past trying not to laugh with the words Cisco Proctor emblazoned on a badge pinned to his jacket... BAD START you at last walk through the door and attempt to speak your name to the receptionist ...who replies.. i don`t have a cuuuccc laarieee on my listso you write it down ..she smiles back oh !chuck ... she says the smile becomes a frown ,becomes a look of horror as she see`s CCIE LAB ...written next to you name .and points you in the direction of the coffeethere you run into me..Barking at the moon shaped light ( WAY too much caffeine)..and cast your eyes on the other sleep deprived (half mad) students all talking in ios commands .. a man runs up to you and says THERE CAN`T BE ANY IPX ON THE LAB CAN THERE..CAN THERE and promptly passes out ,mumblings something about how stupid the tic is suddenly you cheer-up.heyif everyone else is this bad i should be fine..and proceed to guzzle 2 pints of Red-bull ...just then the proctor strolls out..(GIT ...you think he`s already passed the exam..) GENTLEMENjust a quick note ...the lab is now scheduled for one daythe plus side to this is that you`ll know by tonight if you have passed ...the bad news is that you now have 3 hours to build and configure the network...( impossible you think,and you would be right)...1 hour for lunch and 4 hours to fix what i did to your network ...as he turns he says... yesterday i ended a long-term relationship and i`m in a VERY bad mood.to which news i stop howling and start crying ...everyone else simply picks up there bags and says Rollocks! ...and leaves...what you do now is up to you But i hardly think that something as simple as a one day lab is worth worrying about ...Hey its only the rest of your life. howling mad steve From: Chuck Larrieu Reply-To: Chuck Larrieu To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:00:14 -0400 with regards to the contents of the exam, I am reminded of the time I told my son that when I was his age I could name all the presidents of the IUnited States, to which he answered there were only 5 or six of them back then :- with regards to the value of the CCIE, whatever that may be, like it or not, there are tens of thousands of us wannabes in the queue. Assuming normal progress, that tells me that in 5 more years, there will be tens of thousands of CCIE's. Ain't nothing anyone can do about that. Louie, let me ask - if you were to walk into the lab tomorrow, do you think you could pass? if not, of what value is your CCIE? I have a sneaking suspoicion that most CCIE's, unless they passed the lab very recently, would not get through it again without some devoted study. kinda like passing the bar, or the CPA exam? Chuck tride hard to keep out of this one, but. Louie Belt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I agree there is no way to talk apples to apples - too many things have changed - but don't forget you no longer have to deal with LAT, X.25, CLNS, DEC, Banyan Vines, Appollo, Appletalk or ATM Lane. (Voice was already on the lab prior to these items being removed.) My concern is with the material that is not focused on teaching you networking (I have no problem with that), but on the material the simply teaches you how to pass the test (kind of like all of the Microsoft braindump material available - desinged only to help you pass the test). I see too much material as of late that is way too focused on passing the lab, not on learning networking. Louie -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:01 PM To: Louie Belt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Louie- I don't think we're talk'n Apple to Apples here... During the early CCIE exams, I was told candidates were able to use their own notes during the test (if Pamela Forsythe is out there, she could confirm this rumor) can you imagine how much easier the lab would have been with versions 9.0, 10.0 or even 11.0(22) IOS. I agree there's more information available, but after having sat through a 2 week CCIE lab prep class... I think the information just gets you in the ballpark. Things like bad time management poor interpretations, are big obstacles no book can fix. I believe the exam is as hard (if not harder) than it's ever been. Man- this cup of coffee I'm drink'n must not be decaff :o) Phil - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Cisco moving
Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Rumour of new lab test centre in London. Anyone confirm or deny. Gaz Gernot W. Schmied wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, Great. Nowadays you have IPSec, MPLS, Voice, Optical and you still need CLNS/CLNP for IS-IS. You can also argue whether Appletalk or IPX should be removed or not. These are important protocols that should be placed in an add-on certification for Desktop or Client/server issues. Me thinks people are right claiming that in IOS 9.xx or 10.xx times the exam was easier. It's the sheer amount of topics and their synergies that are killing us now. I'd happily trade X.25 or DecNet versus MPLS or IPsec ;-). Just kidding, these topics are far too interesting. Besides, hopefully we all learned from the failure of the Design CCIE. It is not possible to measure one's ability in design and architecture objectively. Hence, me thinks the CCND is pointless and waste of time too. One can also argue whether a CCIE lab based on time-pressure and protocol memorization is the best way of measuring a candidate's ability in network engineering. My 0.02$, Gernot Louie Belt wrote: I agree there is no way to talk apples to apples - too many things have changed - but don't forget you no longer have to deal with LAT, X.25, CLNS, DEC, Banyan Vines, Appollo, Appletalk or ATM Lane. (Voice was already on the lab prior to these items being removed.) My concern is with the material that is not focused on teaching you networking (I have no problem with that), but on the material the simply teaches you how to pass the test (kind of like all of the Microsoft braindump material available - desinged only to help you pass the test). I see too much material as of late that is way too focused on passing the lab, not on learning networking. Louie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7098t=6735 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735]
Man Chuck, I didn't know you were that old? Chuck's response actually brought up something interesting. How many current CCIE's could just walk in and pass the lab again? I know several CCIE's that could walk in off the street and pass the CCIE lab without a problem, but I also know a couple of CCIE's that would take another 3 or 4 attempt and months of study to pass again. What if cisco upped the ante and made a mandatory recert every 3 years by re-taking the lab exam? That would keep the CCIE certification respectable wouldn't it? just my $0.02 tim Tim Medley Network Architect VoIP Group iReadyWorld -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 9:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] with regards to the contents of the exam, I am reminded of the time I told my son that when I was his age I could name all the presidents of the IUnited States, to which he answered there were only 5 or six of them back then :- with regards to the value of the CCIE, whatever that may be, like it or not, there are tens of thousands of us wannabes in the queue. Assuming normal progress, that tells me that in 5 more years, there will be tens of thousands of CCIE's. Ain't nothing anyone can do about that. Louie, let me ask - if you were to walk into the lab tomorrow, do you think you could pass? if not, of what value is your CCIE? I have a sneaking suspoicion that most CCIE's, unless they passed the lab very recently, would not get through it again without some devoted study. kinda like passing the bar, or the CPA exam? Chuck tride hard to keep out of this one, but. Louie Belt wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I agree there is no way to talk apples to apples - too many things have changed - but don't forget you no longer have to deal with LAT, X.25, CLNS, DEC, Banyan Vines, Appollo, Appletalk or ATM Lane. (Voice was already on the lab prior to these items being removed.) My concern is with the material that is not focused on teaching you networking (I have no problem with that), but on the material the simply teaches you how to pass the test (kind of like all of the Microsoft braindump material available - desinged only to help you pass the test). I see too much material as of late that is way too focused on passing the lab, not on learning networking. Louie -Original Message- From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:01 PM To: Louie Belt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] Louie- I don't think we're talk'n Apple to Apples here... During the early CCIE exams, I was told candidates were able to use their own notes during the test (if Pamela Forsythe is out there, she could confirm this rumor) can you imagine how much easier the lab would have been with versions 9.0, 10.0 or even 11.0(22) IOS. I agree there's more information available, but after having sat through a 2 week CCIE lab prep class... I think the information just gets you in the ballpark. Things like bad time management poor interpretations, are big obstacles no book can fix. I believe the exam is as hard (if not harder) than it's ever been. Man- this cup of coffee I'm drink'n must not be decaff :o) Phil - Original Message - From: Louie Belt To: Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] When the CCIE cert first came about there were not 100+ books avilable to help you pass it. There were not a multitude of online labs, lab study guides, study groups, ... Since all of those items are now available, I feel the bar has been lowered. I'm for putting it back where it was. Additionally I'm studying for my second CCIE cert, I sincerely hope that it is much tougher than my first. I want to maintain the value of the cert. Louie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael L. Williams Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco moving to a one day lab? [7:6735] I agree with you. It's awful easy for someone who's already gotten their CCIE (which when they passed the lab probably could be quoted as saying something like that was the most difficult thing I've ever seen) to now say Sure.. make it as difficult as possible I don't know many CCIEs personally. Only a couple, and both of them said that given the time constraints of the lab (2 days), it is extremely difficult. So I don't think jamming it into 1 day just because Cisco is too cheap to spring for more testing centers to keep up with demand is a resonable solution. Isn't this why Cisco is contemplating making it 1 day? Not to raise the bar of the level of the exam, but simply because they're
