Re: Riddle [7:41491]

2002-04-16 Thread Dimitris Vassilopoulos

I agree with you Chuck. It's very unsecure indeed...

However, consider it as one of the certifications' riddle...
Too theoretic, but must be solved... It has a solution, and it
is ROUTER oriented. No IDS or CSPM included...

In case you come up with something let me know...

Thanx

Dvass


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41564t=41491
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Signature for blocking telnet to SMTP server [7:41565]

2002-04-16 Thread Cisco Breaker

Hi,

Is it possible to block telnet to SMTP server from port 25 with IDS. I want
to create a custom signature for this but I don't know how this can be done.
If  I write a signature beginning with hello it will block all mail traffic
because all of them starts with hello as I know.  And are there any
resources that tells how to write a custom signature. We are using CSPM
2.3.3i.

Any help will be appreciated.

Best regards,

Cisco Breaker




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41565t=41565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41567]

2002-04-16 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh

Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing the
market.

Ismail Al-shelh


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41476]


April 10, 2002

Cisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy

We are continuing to receive questions concerning the consequences of Cisco
end users acquiring GBICs (Gigabit Interface Converter) modules from
non-Cisco sourced third parties or directly from GBIC suppliers for
deployment in Cisco routers and switches.

Apparently there is still some confusion on what Cisco's position and policy
is in respect of these third party GBIC's, which is why I would like to
summarize those for you and highlight the main points. I would also like to
take this opportunity to outline what Cisco would expect from you as a
Channel Partner when it comes to you supplying non-Cisco GBIC's together
with Cisco equipment to end users.

Cisco's policy:
Products from non-Cisco sources do not qualify for Cisco support and may not
be compatible with hardware, power, or software requirements. Cisco sourced
GBIC's can be easily identified by the Cisco logo and trademarks on the
label. If a GBIC does not have the Cisco label and trademarks on it, then it
has not been sourced from Cisco and is subject to the conditions outlined
below.

GBIC's acquired through non-Cisco sources will be subject to the following
conditions:

1) Cisco TAC is not under an obligation to support any non-Cisco GBIC
modules;

2) Cisco SMARTnet will not cover non-Cisco GBIC modules;

3) Cisco does not guarantee the performance or results you may obtain by
using a non-Cisco GBIC;

4) In the event that an end user experiences a support issue that Cisco
determines is caused by use of a third party GBIC, Cisco will not provide
warranty support or support under SMARTNet or another Cisco support program
for that issue. On the other hand, where a product fault or defect occurs in
the network and Cisco concludes that the fault or defect is not attributable
to the use of a GBIC installed by our customers or partners, Cisco will
continue to provide support for the affected product under warranty or a
Cisco support program. The nature of the defect or error is the key to
determining what Cisco's support obligations are.

Cisco sources GBIC's from third party suppliers, who agree to follow Cisco
quality standards.  Sometimes, Cisco disqualifies a supplier because of
quality issues with that supplier's product, or for other reasons (i.e. EMI
or power requirements). Disqualified suppliers may continue to sell their
GBIC's and please note that they or parties that have purchased from them
may claim that their GBIC's are Cisco approved. Such statements are at best
unreliable and our customers should understand that only by sourcing GBIC's
directly from Cisco or a Cisco Authorized Channel, can our customers be
confident they are getting Cisco approved modules that will qualify for
Cisco support (Cisco sourced GBICs can be identified by the Cisco logo and
trademarks on the label). We are taking appropriate legal action against
suppliers using such false and misleading statements.


What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above, this
may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to protect
Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:

Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco GBIC;
Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
Cisco support;
Inform the end user of the brand of the non-Cisco GBIC and how they can
obtain support on those products and what the warranty terms are.

Although this statement specifically covers GBIC's, the same issues arise
with other third party components e.g. memory or cables.  With regard to
those products the same principles as set out in this letter apply.

For any specific questions please contact your Cisco channel account
manager.

Yours Sincerely

Paris G Arey
VP EMEA Channels  Alliances
Cisco Systems Inc.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41567t=41567
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: CIT Exam [7:41437]

2002-04-16 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh

please do not depend on  cram sheets cause its gonna make you lost at the
end , believe me you will not gain the concept by doing that.

Ismail Al-shleh
-Original Message-
From: CODETEL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CIT Exam [7:41437]


Hello.. i'm going to take 640-506 exam next week and i would like to know
about some good exam cram...

someone could recommend good material for pass this exam?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41566t=41437
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CEF pitfalls [7:41568]

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Scott

I'm starting to understand CEF. I like what it does. But can
anyone refer me to a list of the pitfalls, or features, to
beware of? What are the problems with CEF and can I avoid
them with workarounds or careful planning and
configurations?

-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41568t=41568
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Scott

Ouellette, Tim wrote:

 I've never heard of anything like that.  YOu do have to be carefull with
 fiber though.  I've got 10baset cables that are less than a foot and
 100baset cables that are 10.  I think there is a restriction (51.2
bittimes)
 for fast ethernet on the long end but nothing stated as to how short it can
 be.

I use factory-terminated cable assemblies (jumpers) that are 1' (one foot)
in length.
They come in handy in certain situations where real estate is dear.

Fiber is tricky. Our installer had one heck of a time terminating a short
segment. Less
is not always more when you're dealing with fiber. It depends on the skill
of the
installer and the sensitivity of the installation equipment.

-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41569t=41448
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41570]

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Scott

Ismail Al-Shelh wrote:

 Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing
the
 market.

Business is business. Specifying their own product is standard practice for
any vendor.
The pragmatic advice is to use Cisco whenever possible (that's a judgment
call, the
final decision is left to the contractor). But be aware of the consequences,
which is
what the last few paragraphs of the announcement indicate:

--- begin quoted material ---
What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above, this
may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to protect
Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:

Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco GBIC;
Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
Cisco support;
Inform the end user of the brand of the non-Cisco GBIC and how they can
obtain support on those products and what the warranty terms are.

Although this statement specifically covers GBIC's, the same issues arise
with other third party components e.g. memory or cables.  With regard to
those products the same principles as set out in this letter apply.
--- end quoted material ---

You're free to specify non-cisco, but be sure to apprise your client / boss
of the
risks. Losing TAC support is no small matter.

-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41570t=41570
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]

2002-04-16 Thread Cisco Breaker

Hi All,

Our customer wants to buy cat 4006 with sup3. But they use Appletalk. As I
know the sup3 IOS doesnt support Appletalk routing yet, so I have to put a
router for that, am I right?

 And also is it possible to assign the server's port  into 2 vlans. If I can
put the server's port which is on the switch to 2 Vlans (multi Vlan) it will
be OK but is it possible?

Any help will be appreciated.

Best regards,

Cisco Breaker




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41571t=41571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Irwan Hadi

Dear All,

Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided that
the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course will
makes
the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP to
the one at 10.0.1.0/24.

My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?

Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41572t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE Security Written Exam [7:41573]

2002-04-16 Thread Michal Dubec

Hi all,
can you anybody advice me what is in the security exam?
Thank you for your answer.

Michal


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41573t=41573
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats the difference between Classful Classless??? [7:41574]

2002-04-16 Thread Jorge Rodriguez

Classfull routing protocol does not advertise and address mask with the 
advertise destination address, which means that it assumes a defaul mask 
for the three major address IP classes A,B,C. Classless on the other 
hand does advertise the mask, which means that it will advertise the 
mask along with the destination address, RIP version 2 is the case, 
great for subneting, VLSM.


Jorge



Matt Saunders wrote:

 Hi Group,
 
 Im really struggling to understand the requirement in using the ip
classless
 command when you are configuring a default route.
 
 I noticed that RIP 2 is a classless protocol  RIP ver 1 is a classfull.
 
 Can anyone help me understand what the difference is (in simple terms!!) as
 i want to move on with my studies though im sure this is something thats
 going to come up again
 
 Cheers
 
 Matt




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41574t=41574
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 April 2002 09:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]


Dear All,

Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided that
the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course will
makes
the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP to
the one at 10.0.1.0/24.

My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?

Thanks
DISCLAIMER
This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and
may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not read it and
must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person
other than TeleCity Limited or the addressees of its existence or contents.
If you have received this email and are not a named addressee, please delete
it and notify the TeleCity IT department on 0161 226 7643 or by email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41575t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41576]

2002-04-16 Thread Jason

What's wrong with the message below... sounds fair to me..


Ismail Al-Shelh  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing
the
 market.

 Ismail Al-shelh


 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41476]


 April 10, 2002

 Cisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy

 We are continuing to receive questions concerning the consequences of
Cisco
 end users acquiring GBICs (Gigabit Interface Converter) modules from
 non-Cisco sourced third parties or directly from GBIC suppliers for
 deployment in Cisco routers and switches.

 Apparently there is still some confusion on what Cisco's position and
policy
 is in respect of these third party GBIC's, which is why I would like to
 summarize those for you and highlight the main points. I would also like
to
 take this opportunity to outline what Cisco would expect from you as a
 Channel Partner when it comes to you supplying non-Cisco GBIC's together
 with Cisco equipment to end users.

 Cisco's policy:
 Products from non-Cisco sources do not qualify for Cisco support and may
not
 be compatible with hardware, power, or software requirements. Cisco
sourced
 GBIC's can be easily identified by the Cisco logo and trademarks on the
 label. If a GBIC does not have the Cisco label and trademarks on it, then
it
 has not been sourced from Cisco and is subject to the conditions outlined
 below.

 GBIC's acquired through non-Cisco sources will be subject to the following
 conditions:

 1) Cisco TAC is not under an obligation to support any non-Cisco GBIC
 modules;

 2) Cisco SMARTnet will not cover non-Cisco GBIC modules;

 3) Cisco does not guarantee the performance or results you may obtain by
 using a non-Cisco GBIC;

 4) In the event that an end user experiences a support issue that Cisco
 determines is caused by use of a third party GBIC, Cisco will not provide
 warranty support or support under SMARTNet or another Cisco support
program
 for that issue. On the other hand, where a product fault or defect occurs
in
 the network and Cisco concludes that the fault or defect is not
attributable
 to the use of a GBIC installed by our customers or partners, Cisco will
 continue to provide support for the affected product under warranty or a
 Cisco support program. The nature of the defect or error is the key to
 determining what Cisco's support obligations are.

 Cisco sources GBIC's from third party suppliers, who agree to follow Cisco
 quality standards.  Sometimes, Cisco disqualifies a supplier because of
 quality issues with that supplier's product, or for other reasons (i.e.
EMI
 or power requirements). Disqualified suppliers may continue to sell their
 GBIC's and please note that they or parties that have purchased from them
 may claim that their GBIC's are Cisco approved. Such statements are at
best
 unreliable and our customers should understand that only by sourcing
GBIC's
 directly from Cisco or a Cisco Authorized Channel, can our customers be
 confident they are getting Cisco approved modules that will qualify for
 Cisco support (Cisco sourced GBICs can be identified by the Cisco logo and
 trademarks on the label). We are taking appropriate legal action against
 suppliers using such false and misleading statements.


 What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
 Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
 quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
 certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above,
this
 may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
 confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to
protect
 Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
 following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
 already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:

 Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco GBIC;
 Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
 Cisco support;
 Inform the end user of the brand of the non-Cisco GBIC and how they
can
 obtain support on those products and what the warranty terms are.

 Although this statement specifically covers GBIC's, the same issues arise
 with other third party components e.g. memory or cables.  With regard to
 those products the same principles as set out in this letter apply.

 For any specific questions please contact your Cisco channel account
 manager.

 Yours Sincerely

 Paris G Arey
 VP EMEA Channels  Alliances
 Cisco Systems Inc.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41576t=41576
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Tim Champion

I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting
together this kind of document?
Many thanks in advance




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41577t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G

What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to be
no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out there.
Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel that
everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.

Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!

Shawn K.

 -Original Message-
 From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 Champ , cheers
 
 What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them
 all?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41578t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Riddle [7:41491]

2002-04-16 Thread Marc Thach Xuan Ky

The last time I looked, a Cisco router would send an ICMP
administratively unreachable message when an access list blocked a
packet.  What the source host does with that is not up to the router.
Marc

Dimitris Vassilopoulos wrote:
 
 Team,
 
 I was wondering
 Is it possible to make a router respond to an access-list blocking,
 using a custom-made user defined phrase?
 
 For example, if we deny telnet from a host we need to reply to
 him Access-list blocks incoming telnet...
 
 ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41579t=41491
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Last changes [7:41580]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello everybody,

  I have one question for you. We have several routers that shows
who and when made last changes in the configuration and who/when saved that
changes in NVRAM.

  For example:

Router#  show run

 ...
 ...

 Current configuration : 2352 bytes
 !
 ! Last configuration change at 11:45:15 UTC Tue
Apr 9 by XXX
 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:23:50 UTC Thu
Apr 4 2002 by XXX
 !

 ...
 ...

  How can I activate this messages in other routers?? We have other
routers with the same IOS, almost the same configuration and they don't
show these messages! I am very interested in this

  Thanks a lot!

  Mike.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41580t=41580
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Please confirm (conf#2f25cd26a34d4ca56db58b9a5770589f) [7:41581]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

16/04/2002 12:16
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Asunto:   Please confirm (conf#2f25cd26a34d4ca56db58b9a5770589f)


Hi,

You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).

PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN!  BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.


By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:

1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.

2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.

3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com

4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.

5. The message is NOT inflammatory.

6. The message is NOT a test message.

To confirm, simply reply to this message.  No editing is necessary.  Once
confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.


Welcome to GroupStudy.com!


--ORIGINAL MESSAGE-

From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Apr 16 07:16:40 2002
Received: from aurora.tsm.es ([194.224.100.20])
 by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA12871
 GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 07:16:36 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by aurora.tsm.es; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id NAA15043; Tue, 16 Apr
2002 13:20:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Subject: Last changes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:17:41 +0200
Message-ID: 
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on abantos/TSM(
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Versi=F3n__5=2E0=2E6a_|Febrero_8_=2C_2001=29_at_16=2F04=2F?
=
 =?us-ascii?Q?2002?= 01:17:43 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hello everybody,

  I have one question for you. We have several routers that shows
who and when made last changes in the configuration and who/when saved that
changes in NVRAM.

  For example:

Router#  show run

 ...
 ...

 Current configuration : 2352 bytes
 !
 ! Last configuration change at 11:45:15 UTC Tue
Apr 9 by XXX
 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:23:50 UTC Thu
Apr 4 2002 by XXX
 !

 ...
 ...

  How can I activate this messages in other routers?? We have other
routers with the same IOS, almost the same configuration and they don't
show these messages! I am very interested in this

  Thanks a lot!

  Mike.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41581t=41581
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Last changes [7:41582]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- Remitido por Miguel Angel Encinar
Blazquez/UN23812/OPERACION Y MANTENIMIENTO/TSM con fecha 02/02/2002 13:18
---

16/04/2002 12:17
Miguel Angel Encinar Blazquez
OPERACION Y MANTENIMIENTO

Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Asunto:   Last changes

Hello everybody,

  I have one question for you. We have several routers that shows
who and when made last changes in the configuration and who/when saved that
changes in NVRAM.

  For example:

Router#  show run

 ...
 ...

 Current configuration : 2352 bytes
 !
 ! Last configuration change at 11:45:15 UTC Tue
Apr 9 by XXX
 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:23:50 UTC Thu
Apr 4 2002 by XXX
 !

 ...
 ...

  How can I activate this messages in other routers?? We have other
routers with the same IOS, almost the same configuration and they don't
show these messages! I am very interested in this

  Thanks a lot!

  Mike.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41582t=41582
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



IPX EIGRP Metrics [7:41585]

2002-04-16 Thread Stephen Barlow

Is there any way to alter the metrics of IPX EIGRP other than changing the
bandwidth on an interface?  Specifically, I want to route IPX traffic over a
40Mbs link instead of a 100Mbs temporarily, and I don't want to alter the
bandwidth on the interface as it will affect the IP routing.
Thank you in advance.

Steve



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41585t=41585
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



silly encryption question [7:41583]

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Monte

I am studying for my MCNS test.  The Cisco Press book says that
Diffie-Hillman public key encryption is used to create a secure channel to
exchange DES private keys for data encryption.  If Diffie-Hillman is secure
enough to transfer the DES private keys, why not use it to transfer the
data?  This seems silly and needlessly complex.  Can someone explain this?


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete the message and all copies of it from
your system, destroy any hard copies of it and contact the sender
by return e-mail.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41583t=41583
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A little help in the right direction [7:41500]

2002-04-16 Thread Marc Thach Xuan Ky

Joel,
Start with a management summary which includes a statement that it will
save your business X thousand creds per year, recouping capital and
manpower implementation costs within Y months.  Then write a load of
blurb to prove it.  Job done.  Remember to think business, not
technical, and that at the moment, only you know why it should be done.
rgds
Marc

Joel Panetta wrote:
 
 Can anyone point me in the right direction to implement a pros and cons
 document for a back bone and infrastructure upgrade? we have a Catalyst
5000
 back bone I want to push to 6509 with redundancy but have to put it all on
 paper.
 
  Thanks
 
 Joel Panetta - CCNA, MCP
 Network Engineer - Anda, Inc
 954-217-4797
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41584t=41500
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael L. Williams

Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
(like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality (not
so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way better than
the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).

I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd really be
interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and make such
statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider much
better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you say.

Mike W.

Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to be
 no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
 Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
there.
 Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel that
 everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
 opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
 little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.

 Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
 underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!

 Shawn K.

  -Original Message-
  From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
  Champ , cheers
 
  What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them
  all?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41587t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]

2002-04-16 Thread Mark Rumfield

 I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's.
 When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows
 available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on the
 interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF.
 
 What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth
 determined? 
 
 
 
 Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up 
   Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
   Description: PTP to MB-West
   Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30
   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, 
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
   Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set
   Keepalive set (10 sec)
   Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never
   Last clearing of show interface counters 8w5d
   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
   Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) 
  Conversations  0/10/256 (active/max active/max total)
  Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
  Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles
  16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
  53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
  2 carrier transitions
  DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
 
 
 Thanks in advance!
 
 
 Mark Rumfield
 Network Engineer
 Enterprise Products
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41586t=41586
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael L. Williams

Personally, I've never come across a situation where MAC-based VLANs were
useful. Port-based membership is more practical/common.  You can always
enforce port-security based on MAC address, but still have the same problem
with regard to if someone changes their NIC, it'll require a call to you to
change things up to make them work.

Mike W.

Irwan Hadi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Dear All,

 Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
 All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
 10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided that
 the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

 Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course
will
 makes
 the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP to
 the one at 10.0.1.0/24.

 My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?

 Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41588t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]

2002-04-16 Thread Manuel Pajares

Cisco routers reserve 25% (this value can be changed, but is not 
recommended)for routing, layer 2, etc. traffic. You can use the rest (75%) 
when configuring QoS.


From: Mark Rumfield 
Reply-To: Mark Rumfield 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:16:35 -0400

  I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's.
  When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows
  available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on the
  interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF.
 
  What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth
  determined?
 
 
 
  Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
Description: PTP to MB-West
Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
   reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never
Last clearing of show interface counters 8w5d
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: weighted fair
Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
   Conversations  0/10/256 (active/max active/max total)
   Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
   Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer
   Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles
   16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
   53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns
   0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
   0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
   2 carrier transitions
   DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
 
 
  Thanks in advance!
 
 
  Mark Rumfield
  Network Engineer
  Enterprise Products
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41589t=41586
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41590]

2002-04-16 Thread Kelly Cobean

Wow, with this wonderfully informative and relavent post, I feel ready to
tackle the lab exam.  Thanks so much for your precious insight into the
world of capitalism and it's relavance to the topic of this list.
Next time, keep your insights to yourself.  Mr. Crane wasn't sharing this
with us so that you could bash on Cisco for trying to maintain excellence in
their product line by instituting a standard that they can control.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy
[7:41567]


Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing the
market.

Ismail Al-shelh


-Original Message-
From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41476]


April 10, 2002

Cisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy

We are continuing to receive questions concerning the consequences of Cisco
end users acquiring GBICs (Gigabit Interface Converter) modules from
non-Cisco sourced third parties or directly from GBIC suppliers for
deployment in Cisco routers and switches.

Apparently there is still some confusion on what Cisco's position and policy
is in respect of these third party GBIC's, which is why I would like to
summarize those for you and highlight the main points. I would also like to
take this opportunity to outline what Cisco would expect from you as a
Channel Partner when it comes to you supplying non-Cisco GBIC's together
with Cisco equipment to end users.

Cisco's policy:
Products from non-Cisco sources do not qualify for Cisco support and may not
be compatible with hardware, power, or software requirements. Cisco sourced
GBIC's can be easily identified by the Cisco logo and trademarks on the
label. If a GBIC does not have the Cisco label and trademarks on it, then it
has not been sourced from Cisco and is subject to the conditions outlined
below.

GBIC's acquired through non-Cisco sources will be subject to the following
conditions:

1) Cisco TAC is not under an obligation to support any non-Cisco GBIC
modules;

2) Cisco SMARTnet will not cover non-Cisco GBIC modules;

3) Cisco does not guarantee the performance or results you may obtain by
using a non-Cisco GBIC;

4) In the event that an end user experiences a support issue that Cisco
determines is caused by use of a third party GBIC, Cisco will not provide
warranty support or support under SMARTNet or another Cisco support program
for that issue. On the other hand, where a product fault or defect occurs in
the network and Cisco concludes that the fault or defect is not attributable
to the use of a GBIC installed by our customers or partners, Cisco will
continue to provide support for the affected product under warranty or a
Cisco support program. The nature of the defect or error is the key to
determining what Cisco's support obligations are.

Cisco sources GBIC's from third party suppliers, who agree to follow Cisco
quality standards.  Sometimes, Cisco disqualifies a supplier because of
quality issues with that supplier's product, or for other reasons (i.e. EMI
or power requirements). Disqualified suppliers may continue to sell their
GBIC's and please note that they or parties that have purchased from them
may claim that their GBIC's are Cisco approved. Such statements are at best
unreliable and our customers should understand that only by sourcing GBIC's
directly from Cisco or a Cisco Authorized Channel, can our customers be
confident they are getting Cisco approved modules that will qualify for
Cisco support (Cisco sourced GBICs can be identified by the Cisco logo and
trademarks on the label). We are taking appropriate legal action against
suppliers using such false and misleading statements.


What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above, this
may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to protect
Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:

Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco GBIC;
Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
Cisco support;
Inform the end user of the brand of the non-Cisco GBIC and how they can
obtain support on those products and what the warranty terms are.

Although this statement specifically covers GBIC's, the same issues arise
with other third party components e.g. memory or cables.  With regard to
those products the 

RE: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41591]

2002-04-16 Thread Ismail Al-Shelh

Me not.


-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41576]


What's wrong with the message below... sounds fair to me..


Ismail Al-Shelh  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing
the
 market.

 Ismail Al-shelh


 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41476]


 April 10, 2002

 Cisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy

 We are continuing to receive questions concerning the consequences of
Cisco
 end users acquiring GBICs (Gigabit Interface Converter) modules from
 non-Cisco sourced third parties or directly from GBIC suppliers for
 deployment in Cisco routers and switches.

 Apparently there is still some confusion on what Cisco's position and
policy
 is in respect of these third party GBIC's, which is why I would like to
 summarize those for you and highlight the main points. I would also like
to
 take this opportunity to outline what Cisco would expect from you as a
 Channel Partner when it comes to you supplying non-Cisco GBIC's together
 with Cisco equipment to end users.

 Cisco's policy:
 Products from non-Cisco sources do not qualify for Cisco support and may
not
 be compatible with hardware, power, or software requirements. Cisco
sourced
 GBIC's can be easily identified by the Cisco logo and trademarks on the
 label. If a GBIC does not have the Cisco label and trademarks on it, then
it
 has not been sourced from Cisco and is subject to the conditions outlined
 below.

 GBIC's acquired through non-Cisco sources will be subject to the following
 conditions:

 1) Cisco TAC is not under an obligation to support any non-Cisco GBIC
 modules;

 2) Cisco SMARTnet will not cover non-Cisco GBIC modules;

 3) Cisco does not guarantee the performance or results you may obtain by
 using a non-Cisco GBIC;

 4) In the event that an end user experiences a support issue that Cisco
 determines is caused by use of a third party GBIC, Cisco will not provide
 warranty support or support under SMARTNet or another Cisco support
program
 for that issue. On the other hand, where a product fault or defect occurs
in
 the network and Cisco concludes that the fault or defect is not
attributable
 to the use of a GBIC installed by our customers or partners, Cisco will
 continue to provide support for the affected product under warranty or a
 Cisco support program. The nature of the defect or error is the key to
 determining what Cisco's support obligations are.

 Cisco sources GBIC's from third party suppliers, who agree to follow Cisco
 quality standards.  Sometimes, Cisco disqualifies a supplier because of
 quality issues with that supplier's product, or for other reasons (i.e.
EMI
 or power requirements). Disqualified suppliers may continue to sell their
 GBIC's and please note that they or parties that have purchased from them
 may claim that their GBIC's are Cisco approved. Such statements are at
best
 unreliable and our customers should understand that only by sourcing
GBIC's
 directly from Cisco or a Cisco Authorized Channel, can our customers be
 confident they are getting Cisco approved modules that will qualify for
 Cisco support (Cisco sourced GBICs can be identified by the Cisco logo and
 trademarks on the label). We are taking appropriate legal action against
 suppliers using such false and misleading statements.


 What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
 Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
 quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
 certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above,
this
 may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
 confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to
protect
 Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
 following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
 already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:

 Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco GBIC;
 Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
 Cisco support;
 Inform the end user of the brand of the non-Cisco GBIC and how they
can
 obtain support on those products and what the warranty terms are.

 Although this statement specifically covers GBIC's, the same issues arise
 with other third party components e.g. memory or cables.  With regard to
 those products the same principles as set out in this letter apply.

 For any specific questions please contact your Cisco channel account
 manager.

 Yours Sincerely

 Paris G Arey
 VP EMEA Channels  Alliances
 Cisco Systems Inc.





Need info on setting up a CCIE practise Lab [7:41593]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I am interested in setting up a CCIE home LAB,Can anyone let me know how
much money I would have to invest in buying the sufficient equipments for
setting up the LAB.I am located in Reading,UK.Also I am interested in
knowing quipment list and  nearby places from where I can get the
equipments.

Kind Regards /Thangavel

186K
Reading,Brkshire
Direct No   -0118 9064259
Mobile No  -07796292416
Post code: RG16LH
www.186k.co.uk

--
The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling,
 but in rising every time we fall .
 -- Nelson Mandela





**
This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the 
addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential
or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the named 
addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The
contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies
taken.
186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England 
 Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street 
London SW1Y 4UR
**




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41593t=41593
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: Last changes [7:41580]

2002-04-16 Thread hktco

Newly bootup router does not provide the info.

But once you start to modify the config, it shows you the time and by who
the changes were made.
And once you save the changes to the NVRAM, it shows you when and who saved
the changes.

hktco
- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:18 PM
Subject: Last changes [7:41580]


Hello everybody,

  I have one question for you. We have several routers that shows
who and when made last changes in the configuration and who/when saved that
changes in NVRAM.

  For example:

Router#  show run

 ...
 ...

 Current configuration : 2352 bytes
 !
 ! Last configuration change at 11:45:15 UTC Tue
Apr 9 by XXX
 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:23:50 UTC Thu
Apr 4 2002 by XXX
 !

 ...
 ...

  How can I activate this messages in other routers?? We have other
routers with the same IOS, almost the same configuration and they don't
show these messages! I am very interested in this

  Thanks a lot!

  Mike.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41592t=41580
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



2520 DRAM [7:41594]

2002-04-16 Thread richard roe

Hello,

Need some information here, have seen a cisco 2520 with these, after a #sh
ver:
...
cisco 2520 (68030) processor (revision N) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory.
...
Could anyone let me know if it's 16MB of Dram being shared with packet
memory (2MB), or is 14mb of DRAM all that's available.
And can IOS 12.2 be loaded effectively on these specs?

many thanks.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41594t=41594
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing Support Policy [7:41595]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael J. Doherty

Looks like standard warranty wording to me.  The Telco equipment
manufacturers that I work with, in addition to the Cisco work that I do, say
pretty much the same thing will happen to warranties if you use
after-market, 3-party remanufactured devices.

- Original Message -
From: Ismail Al-Shelh 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 08:56
Subject: RE: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41591]


 Me not.


 -Original Message-
 From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:07 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41576]


 What's wrong with the message below... sounds fair to me..


 Ismail Al-Shelh  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Its so Obvious that Cisco is trying to be like Microsoft by monopolizing
 the
  market.
 
  Ismail Al-shelh
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Matthew Crane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:55 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Might be of InCisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy [7:41476]
 
 
  April 10, 2002
 
  Cisco GBIC Sourcing  Support Policy
 
  We are continuing to receive questions concerning the consequences of
 Cisco
  end users acquiring GBICs (Gigabit Interface Converter) modules from
  non-Cisco sourced third parties or directly from GBIC suppliers for
  deployment in Cisco routers and switches.
 
  Apparently there is still some confusion on what Cisco's position and
 policy
  is in respect of these third party GBIC's, which is why I would like to
  summarize those for you and highlight the main points. I would also like
 to
  take this opportunity to outline what Cisco would expect from you as a
  Channel Partner when it comes to you supplying non-Cisco GBIC's together
  with Cisco equipment to end users.
 
  Cisco's policy:
  Products from non-Cisco sources do not qualify for Cisco support and may
 not
  be compatible with hardware, power, or software requirements. Cisco
 sourced
  GBIC's can be easily identified by the Cisco logo and trademarks on the
  label. If a GBIC does not have the Cisco label and trademarks on it,
then
 it
  has not been sourced from Cisco and is subject to the conditions
outlined
  below.
 
  GBIC's acquired through non-Cisco sources will be subject to the
following
  conditions:
 
  1) Cisco TAC is not under an obligation to support any non-Cisco GBIC
  modules;
 
  2) Cisco SMARTnet will not cover non-Cisco GBIC modules;
 
  3) Cisco does not guarantee the performance or results you may obtain by
  using a non-Cisco GBIC;
 
  4) In the event that an end user experiences a support issue that Cisco
  determines is caused by use of a third party GBIC, Cisco will not
provide
  warranty support or support under SMARTNet or another Cisco support
 program
  for that issue. On the other hand, where a product fault or defect
occurs
 in
  the network and Cisco concludes that the fault or defect is not
 attributable
  to the use of a GBIC installed by our customers or partners, Cisco will
  continue to provide support for the affected product under warranty or a
  Cisco support program. The nature of the defect or error is the key to
  determining what Cisco's support obligations are.
 
  Cisco sources GBIC's from third party suppliers, who agree to follow
Cisco
  quality standards.  Sometimes, Cisco disqualifies a supplier because of
  quality issues with that supplier's product, or for other reasons (i.e.
 EMI
  or power requirements). Disqualified suppliers may continue to sell
their
  GBIC's and please note that they or parties that have purchased from
them
  may claim that their GBIC's are Cisco approved. Such statements are at
 best
  unreliable and our customers should understand that only by sourcing
 GBIC's
  directly from Cisco or a Cisco Authorized Channel, can our customers be
  confident they are getting Cisco approved modules that will qualify for
  Cisco support (Cisco sourced GBICs can be identified by the Cisco logo
and
  trademarks on the label). We are taking appropriate legal action against
  suppliers using such false and misleading statements.
 
 
  What does Cisco expect from its Authorized Channels?
  Obviously we believe strongly that our GBIC's are superior in terms of
  quality and performance to any non-Cisco GBIC. Nevertheless, you may in
  certain instances prefer to resell third party GBIC's. As stated above,
 this
  may occasionally give rise to support and warranty issues, and may cause
  confusion with the end users. In order to prevent such issues and to
 protect
  Cisco's brand and reputation we would like to ask you to observe the
  following guidelines when reselling non-Cisco GBIC's together with or
  already installed in any Cisco products you are reselling:
 
  Inform the end user of the fact that he is receiving a non-Cisco
GBIC;
  Inform the end user that such a non-Cisco GBIC will not qualify for
  Cisco support;
 

Re: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]

2002-04-16 Thread MADMAN

I just got a supIII installed in the lab a couple days ago and I don't
see any multi vlan options aside from a trunk:

C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport ?
  accessSet access mode characteristics of the interface
  host  Set port host
  mode  Set trunking mode of the interface
  nonegotiate   Device will not engage in negotiation protocol on this
interface
  private-vlan  Set the private VLAN host association or promiscuous
mapping
  trunk Set trunking characteristics of the interface
  

C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport acc
C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport access ?
  vlan  Set VLAN when interface is in access mode

  As far as appletalk is concerned yes you need a appletalke capable
router or bridge it.

  Dave

  As 

Cisco Breaker wrote:
 
 Hi All,
 
 Our customer wants to buy cat 4006 with sup3. But they use Appletalk. As I
 know the sup3 IOS doesnt support Appletalk routing yet, so I have to put a
 router for that, am I right?
 
  And also is it possible to assign the server's port  into 2 vlans. If I
can
 put the server's port which is on the switch to 2 Vlans (multi Vlan) it
will
 be OK but is it possible?
 
 Any help will be appreciated.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Cisco Breaker
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41596t=41571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Boson and BCRAN/BCMSN [7:41597]

2002-04-16 Thread NetEng

What Boson test is good for studying BCRAN? BCMSN? TIA.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41597t=41597
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Terminal server reverse telnet ? [7:41496]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael Williams

Google rocks!


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41598t=41496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fw: Last changes [7:41580]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank hktco, but what do you mean with newly bootup router?? Is this a
feature of the IOS?? We have routers with the same IOS and similar
configuration but some of them shows who made last changes and some of them
don't I think this is a very interesting feature because you can see
who made the last changes (very usefull when several users can modify
configurations)Is there anybody who have the same doubt

 Thanks for your help

-- Remitido por Miguel Angel Encinar
Blazquez/UN23812/OPERACION Y MANTENIMIENTO/TSM con fecha 16/04/2002 15:45
---

16/04/2002 13:58
hktco @groupstudy.com


Por favor, responda a hktco 

Enviado por:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Destinatarios: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Asunto:   Fw: Last changes [7:41580]


Newly bootup router does not provide the info.

But once you start to modify the config, it shows you the time and by who
the changes were made.
And once you save the changes to the NVRAM, it shows you when and who saved
the changes.

hktco
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:18 PM
Subject: Last changes [7:41580]


Hello everybody,

  I have one question for you. We have several routers that shows
who and when made last changes in the configuration and who/when saved that
changes in NVRAM.

  For example:

Router#  show run

 ...
 ...

 Current configuration : 2352 bytes
 !
 ! Last configuration change at 11:45:15 UTC Tue
Apr 9 by XXX
 ! NVRAM config last updated at 12:23:50 UTC Thu
Apr 4 2002 by XXX
 !

 ...
 ...

  How can I activate this messages in other routers?? We have other
routers with the same IOS, almost the same configuration and they don't
show these messages! I am very interested in this

  Thanks a lot!

  Mike.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41599t=41580
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]

2002-04-16 Thread Cisco Breaker

Can you configure Appletalk routing between VLAN's on cat4006sup3?

Best regards,


MADMAN  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I just got a supIII installed in the lab a couple days ago and I don't
 see any multi vlan options aside from a trunk:

 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport ?
   accessSet access mode characteristics of the interface
   host  Set port host
   mode  Set trunking mode of the interface
   nonegotiate   Device will not engage in negotiation protocol on this
 interface
   private-vlan  Set the private VLAN host association or promiscuous
 mapping
   trunk Set trunking characteristics of the interface


 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport acc
 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport access ?
   vlan  Set VLAN when interface is in access mode

   As far as appletalk is concerned yes you need a appletalke capable
 router or bridge it.

   Dave

   As

 Cisco Breaker wrote:
 
  Hi All,
 
  Our customer wants to buy cat 4006 with sup3. But they use Appletalk. As
I
  know the sup3 IOS doesnt support Appletalk routing yet, so I have to put
a
  router for that, am I right?
 
   And also is it possible to assign the server's port  into 2 vlans. If I
 can
  put the server's port which is on the switch to 2 Vlans (multi Vlan) it
 will
  be OK but is it possible?
 
  Any help will be appreciated.
 
  Best regards,
 
  Cisco Breaker
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41601t=41571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Bill Carter

I have done this.  In a large network CiscoWorks 2000 Resource Manager
Essentials is invaluable.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tim Champion
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 5:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IOS Documentation [7:41577]


I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting
together this kind of document?
Many thanks in advance




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41600t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



WIn 2K CA error with Cisco 2600 Routers, in VPN [7:41602]

2002-04-16 Thread NKP

Hi ,
  I am facing a particular error , in my two routers , which are configured
to enroll with the CA , which is the Win2K Advanced Server , setup with the
cepsetup .
 I have got the routers enrolled with the CA server and the administrator on
WIn2K server  has also issued the certificates as well .

  As I give the command of
crypto ca enroll xyz.com ,  it asks me for the password to create after
which it gives me an error message of :

R3(config)#
Signing Certificate Reqeust Fingerprint:
9FBA1550 C448F5B0 A1073F33 BF4D4C99
Encryption Certificate Request Fingerprint:
ADACBCA0 83E0352C B7106133 F03217ED

03:52:10: %CRYPTO-6-CERTREJECT: Certificate enrollment request was rejected
by C
ertificate Authority
03:52:11: %CRYPTO-6-CERTREJECT: Certificate enrollment request was rejected
by C
ertificate Authority



what could be cause of this error , both of my routers are configurd
properly , I am pasting there confis of the router below as well , do let me
know what I should do .
thanks,

--

Navin Parwal

Director
Technosys
tel: 91-141-372400
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

R3#sh run
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 7328 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 18:24:23 UTC Tue Apr 16 2002
! NVRAM config last updated at 18:17:07 UTC Tue Apr 16 2002
!
version 12.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname R3
!
!
memory-size iomem 10
ip subnet-zero
!
!
ip domain-name xyz.com
ip host server 192.168.255.2
!
ip audit notify log
ip audit po max-events 100
ip ssh time-out 120
ip ssh authentication-retries 3
!
crypto ca identity xyz.com
 enrollment mode ra
 enrollment url http://server:80/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll
 crl optional
crypto ca certificate chain xyz.com
 certificate ra-sign 6169436B0007
  308203CA 30820374 A0030201 02020A61 69436B00  07300D06 092A8648
  86F70D01 01050500 306A3115 30130609 2A864886 F70D0109 01160670 61727761
  6C310B30 09060355 04061302 494E3112 30100603 55040813 0972616A 61737468
 FDBC2CAF 1625A3E4 D24F3F57 3F2C2DBD 2C9C1A5A 1123EDA1 348FECDE 54E8947D
  16D77C4A FBAD
  quit
!
call rsvp-sync
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface Ethernet0/0
 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
 no keepalive
 half-duplex
!
interface Serial0/0
 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
 no fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/1
 no ip address
 shutdown
!
router rip
 network 172.16.0.0
 network 192.168.1.0
 network 192.168.2.0
 network 192.168.255.0
!
ip classless
ip http server
ip pim bidir-enable
!
!
dial-peer cor custom
!
!
!
!
!
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
!
no scheduler allocate
end

R3#
R3#conf term
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
R3(config)#crypto ca enroll xyz.com
% Start certificate enrollment ..
% Create a challenge password. You will need to verbally provide this
   password to the CA Administrator in order to revoke your certificate.
   For security reasons your password will not be saved in the
configuration.
   Please make a note of it.

Password:
Re-enter password:

% The subject name in the certificate will be: R3.xyz.com
% Include the router serial number in the subject name? [yes/no]: n
% Include an IP address in the subject name? [yes/no]: n
Request certificate from CA? [yes/no]: y
% Certificate request sent to Certificate Authority
% The certificate request fingerprint will be displayed.
% The 'show crypto ca certificate' command will also show the fingerprint.

R3(config)#
Signing Certificate Reqeust Fingerprint:
9FBA1550 C448F5B0 A1073F33 BF4D4C99
Encryption Certificate Request Fingerprint:
ADACBCA0 83E0352C B7106133 F03217ED

03:52:10: %CRYPTO-6-CERTREJECT: Certificate enrollment request was rejected
by C
ertificate Authority
03:52:11: %CRYPTO-6-CERTREJECT: Certificate enrollment request was rejected
by C
ertificate Authority
R3(config)#
R3(config)#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41602t=41602
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: silly encryption question [7:41583]

2002-04-16 Thread Kent Hundley

Tom,

It's all about performance.  Public key encryption/decryption such as DH is
about 100-1000 times slower than the same process using shared key
cryptography (it has to do with the type of algorithms required).  Given
this, the standard modus operandi is for two hosts to use public key
cryptography to setup the shared key and then use shared key algorithms such
as 3DES to achieve the best possible throughput for the least number of CPU
cycles on each host.

HTH,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tom Monte
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 5:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: silly encryption question [7:41583]


I am studying for my MCNS test.  The Cisco Press book says that
Diffie-Hillman public key encryption is used to create a secure channel to
exchange DES private keys for data encryption.  If Diffie-Hillman is secure
enough to transfer the DES private keys, why not use it to transfer the
data?  This seems silly and needlessly complex.  Can someone explain this?


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete the message and all copies of it from
your system, destroy any hard copies of it and contact the sender
by return e-mail.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41603t=41583
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Tom Scott

Tim Champion wrote:

 I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
 our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting
 together this kind of document?

Good question. I hope someone takes the time to answer. Documentation is one
of the
most important, and most neglected, aspects of the networking profession.
Establishing
a baseline is a good start. It includes not only traffic statistics but also
configurations, cabling, logical and physical topologies, and anything else
that might
make the job of maintaining and troubleshooting a network an enjoyable
challenge
instead of the headache it can be without documentation.

I have a potential customer who refuses to acknowledge the need for
documentation. He's
got an AVVID network that works just fine without having to hire a
consultant to draw
a bunch of diagrams as he puts it. The guy who installed it told him it was
zero
maintenance, and nothing I've said thus far can convince him otherwise. So
I'm
preparing a slideshow about network documentation and baselining. I'd
appreciate any
suggestions, horror stories, success stories, etc.

My philosophy is: Plan for failure. I don't mean that in a pessimistic way.
It's just
that, given enough time, all networks fail in one way or another. Some
events are
disasters, others only an inconvenience that can be worked around and coped
with by
non-technical users. But in the long run, something serious will happen,
It's our job
to be prepared for that and to reduce the negative impact as much as
possible.

How do we convince clients to invest in baselining, contingency plans and
the like?
Does anyone have a good book on this? other than the usual ones, like the
CIT cert exam
preps and Semester 8 from the CNAP curriculum? Is there any specific book or
chapter or
website that gives a template for baselining, network documentation,
contingency
planning?

-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41604t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Swicthing and sniffing [7:41501]

2002-04-16 Thread Mike Sweeney

Well.. on the big cats, 2900s and 1900s, you can set up a monitor port which
gets a mirror of data from a port you specify. Works pretty well. You can
sniff either port or specify a VLAN to be mirrored. I tend to use the hub as
a quicky tool when I'm at an office and out of ports.

On the cheapo switches like Linksys and Netgear, I dont know of any *mirror*
function so it's drop and insert the hub.

I'm sure other folks here have some tricks and tips.. 

MikeS


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41606t=41501
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Signature for blocking telnet to SMTP server [7:41565]

2002-04-16 Thread Kent Hundley

Short answer: It's probably going to be impossible to write a signature that
won't give you tons of false positives.  The problem is that there is
virutally no difference between someone manually typing mail commands via
telnet to port 25 and a standard SMTP program sending the same commands.

Long answer: There was an interesting thread on this topic recently on the
firewalls mailing lists.  Go to the archives here:
http://www.nextrieve.com/knowledge/  and search in the firewalls list for
'telnet to port 25' for the year 2002 and you'll find some interesting
tidbits related to trying to distinguish between a manual telnet to port 25
and a connection via an SMTP program.  Bottom line, see the short answer.
;-)

As far as writing custom sigs, see the Cisco docs, they show you how to do
this.

HTH,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cisco Breaker
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Signature for blocking telnet to SMTP server [7:41565]


Hi,

Is it possible to block telnet to SMTP server from port 25 with IDS. I want
to create a custom signature for this but I don't know how this can be done.
If  I write a signature beginning with hello it will block all mail traffic
because all of them starts with hello as I know.  And are there any
resources that tells how to write a custom signature. We are using CSPM
2.3.3i.

Any help will be appreciated.

Best regards,

Cisco Breaker




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41607t=41565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]

2002-04-16 Thread Steven A. Ridder

You can change it with max-reserved-bandwidth command.


Manuel Pajares  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Cisco routers reserve 25% (this value can be changed, but is not
 recommended)for routing, layer 2, etc. traffic. You can use the rest (75%)
 when configuring QoS.


 From: Mark Rumfield
 Reply-To: Mark Rumfield
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Available Bandwidth on 2610 [7:41586]
 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:16:35 -0400
 
   I have a 2610 with 3 serial interfaces. All 3 are point-to-point T1's.
   When you do a sho int, it shows bandwidth as 1544 Kbit, but it shows
   available bandwidth as 1158Kbit, no matter what the current load on
the
   interface is. Routing protocal is OSPF.
  
   What does this really mean? And/or how is this available bandwidth
   determined?
  
  
  
   Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up
 Hardware is DSCC4 with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
 Description: PTP to MB-West
 Internet address is 10.32.1.37/30
 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
 Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set
 Keepalive set (10 sec)
 Last input 00:00:02, output 00:00:02, output hang never
 Last clearing of show interface counters 8w5d
 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops:
0
 Queueing strategy: weighted fair
 Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
Conversations  0/10/256 (active/max active/max total)
Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
53324797 packets input, 1426721882 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 622749 broadcasts, 0 runts, 4 giants, 0 throttles
16 input errors, 1 CRC, 9 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
53203873 packets output, 3470780381 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
2 carrier transitions
DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up
  
  
   Thanks in advance!
  
  
   Mark Rumfield
   Network Engineer
   Enterprise Products
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
 MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
 http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41608t=41586
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

Personally, I've never come across a situation where MAC-based VLANs were
useful. Port-based membership is more practical/common.  You can always
enforce port-security based on MAC address, but still have the same problem
with regard to if someone changes their NIC, it'll require a call to you to
change things up to make them work.

Mike W.

I agree they aren't that useful, but they are in fairly common use 
with DSL and cable providers, who use the modem/router MAC address as 
a primitive form of security.  And yes, equipment changes do cause 
problems.


Irwan Hadi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Dear All,

  Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
  All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
  10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided that
  the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

  Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course
will
  makes
  the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP to
  the one at 10.0.1.0/24.

  My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?

   Thanks


-- 
What Problem are you trying to solve?
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not 
directly to me***

Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com
Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41610t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Signature for blocking telnet to SMTP server [7:41565]

2002-04-16 Thread Patrick Ramsey

well, if you are reffering to telnet just because somebody brings up a
telnet app to connect to a certain port, (in this case, 25) your signature
would not be based on the correct conversation between the telnet client and
smtp server...rather base it on incorrect/non standard/delayed conversations.

check out the rfc's  (watch wrap)

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclientquerytime=4Cgy2q=smtp+rfc 

and if you find that for some reason, yoru yahoo mail can't get through,
make changes accordingly...  Run tcpdump on a linux box simultaneously on
the same port you have your mail server on  and watch the conversation from
various mail exchanges.  there's only so many out there...regardless of
frontend, it's going to be postfix, sendmail, groupwise,lotus,M$,etc..

-Patrick

You may also want to try searching for signatures already built.


http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=smtp+ids+signature

 Cisco Breaker  04/16/02 02:51AM 
Hi,

Is it possible to block telnet to SMTP server from port 25 with IDS. I want
to create a custom signature for this but I don't know how this can be done.
If  I write a signature beginning with hello it will block all mail traffic
because all of them starts with hello as I know.  And are there any
resources that tells how to write a custom signature. We are using CSPM
2.3.3i.

Any help will be appreciated.

Best regards,

Cisco Breaker
  Confidentiality Disclaimer   
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed.  This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41609t=41565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IPX EIGRP Metrics [7:41585]

2002-04-16 Thread Kelly Cobean

You might consider using static routes since, as you say, it's only
temporary.  Is there such a thing as a floating static route for IPX?  Never
tried it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPX EIGRP Metrics [7:41585]


Is there any way to alter the metrics of IPX EIGRP other than changing the
bandwidth on an interface?  Specifically, I want to route IPX traffic over a
40Mbs link instead of a 100Mbs temporarily, and I don't want to alter the
bandwidth on the interface as it will affect the IP routing.
Thank you in advance.

Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41605t=41585
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Neil Moore

You can do a snmpwalk on the router to grab that info.
-Neil


On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Tom Scott wrote:

 Tim Champion wrote:

  I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
  our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in
putting
  together this kind of document?

 Good question. I hope someone takes the time to answer. Documentation is
one
 of the
 most important, and most neglected, aspects of the networking profession.
 Establishing
 a baseline is a good start. It includes not only traffic statistics but
also
 configurations, cabling, logical and physical topologies, and anything else
 that might
 make the job of maintaining and troubleshooting a network an enjoyable
 challenge
 instead of the headache it can be without documentation.

 I have a potential customer who refuses to acknowledge the need for
 documentation. He's
 got an AVVID network that works just fine without having to hire a
 consultant to draw
 a bunch of diagrams as he puts it. The guy who installed it told him it
was
 zero
 maintenance, and nothing I've said thus far can convince him otherwise. So
 I'm
 preparing a slideshow about network documentation and baselining. I'd
 appreciate any
 suggestions, horror stories, success stories, etc.

 My philosophy is: Plan for failure. I don't mean that in a pessimistic way.
 It's just
 that, given enough time, all networks fail in one way or another. Some
 events are
 disasters, others only an inconvenience that can be worked around and coped
 with by
 non-technical users. But in the long run, something serious will happen,
 It's our job
 to be prepared for that and to reduce the negative impact as much as
 possible.

 How do we convince clients to invest in baselining, contingency plans and
 the like?
 Does anyone have a good book on this? other than the usual ones, like the
 CIT cert exam
 preps and Semester 8 from the CNAP curriculum? Is there any specific book
or
 chapter or
 website that gives a template for baselining, network documentation,
 contingency
 planning?

 -- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41612t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OSPF vs EIGRP [7:41613]

2002-04-16 Thread Madory Douglas C 1Lt 603 ACS/LGC

What experiences have people had in setting up and maintaining OSPF vs EIGRP
on a large network? 

I'm aware of the proprietary implications of EIGRP and the basic differences
in design of the protocols - how they are _supposed_ to work, but, in
practice, would you say one is more stable / dependable / manageable than
the other?

Also, what about OSPF between Cisco and non-Cisco products? Do they always
work together like they're supposed to?

If you have some first-hand experience with this, I'd really like to hear
about it.

Thanks,
Doug.


 Douglas Madory,1st Lt  
 Flt CC, C4I Systems
 603 ACS / LGC  
 UVA '99 WAHOOWA!   





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41613t=41613
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]

2002-04-16 Thread Bill Carter

Sup3 is IP only right nowCome One Cisco at least get the IPX on there.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cisco Breaker
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]


Can you configure Appletalk routing between VLAN's on cat4006sup3?

Best regards,


MADMAN  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I just got a supIII installed in the lab a couple days ago and I don't
 see any multi vlan options aside from a trunk:

 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport ?
   accessSet access mode characteristics of the interface
   host  Set port host
   mode  Set trunking mode of the interface
   nonegotiate   Device will not engage in negotiation protocol on this
 interface
   private-vlan  Set the private VLAN host association or promiscuous
 mapping
   trunk Set trunking characteristics of the interface


 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport acc
 C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport access ?
   vlan  Set VLAN when interface is in access mode

   As far as appletalk is concerned yes you need a appletalke capable
 router or bridge it.

   Dave

   As

 Cisco Breaker wrote:
 
  Hi All,
 
  Our customer wants to buy cat 4006 with sup3. But they use Appletalk. As
I
  know the sup3 IOS doesnt support Appletalk routing yet, so I have to put
a
  router for that, am I right?
 
   And also is it possible to assign the server's port  into 2 vlans. If I
 can
  put the server's port which is on the switch to 2 Vlans (multi Vlan) it
 will
  be OK but is it possible?
 
  Any help will be appreciated.
 
  Best regards,
 
  Cisco Breaker
 --
 David Madland
 Sr. Network Engineer
 CCIE# 2016
 Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 612-664-3367

 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41614t=41571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IPX EIGRP Metrics [7:41585]

2002-04-16 Thread Logan, Harold

Steve,

What IP routing protcol are you using? If you're using an IP routing
protocol that only routes based on bandwidth (ie OSPF) you should be able to
influence the IPX EIGRP routing decisions by changing the delay on the
interface.

If you're using EIGRP as your IP routing protcol as well, that doesn't do
you much good. From there you have two possible solutions I can think of.
One would be to change the bandwidth or delay to get your IPX traffic to do
what you want, then use policy routing to force your IP traffic to do what
you want. That sounds like the simplest approach.

Your other option would be to tune the metrics under IP EIGRP so that they
don't take delay into account, then change the delay on the interface
however you see fit. I don't know if changing the metric weights in IP EIGRP
would affect IPX EIGRP, so I'd shy away from that if at all possible.

hth,
Hal

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Barlow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPX EIGRP Metrics [7:41585]


Is there any way to alter the metrics of IPX EIGRP other than changing the
bandwidth on an interface?  Specifically, I want to route IPX traffic over a
40Mbs link instead of a 100Mbs temporarily, and I don't want to alter the
bandwidth on the interface as it will affect the IP routing.
Thank you in advance.

Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41615t=41585
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Multi Vlan and cat4006 sup3 [7:41571]

2002-04-16 Thread MADMAN

No appletalk or IPX, ya life is getting better :)

  Dave

Cisco Breaker wrote:
 
 Can you configure Appletalk routing between VLAN's on cat4006sup3?
 
 Best regards,
 
 MADMAN  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  I just got a supIII installed in the lab a couple days ago and I don't
  see any multi vlan options aside from a trunk:
 
  C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport ?
accessSet access mode characteristics of the interface
host  Set port host
mode  Set trunking mode of the interface
nonegotiate   Device will not engage in negotiation protocol on this
  interface
private-vlan  Set the private VLAN host association or promiscuous
  mapping
trunk Set trunking characteristics of the interface
 
 
  C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport acc
  C4006SUPIII(config-if)#switchport access ?
vlan  Set VLAN when interface is in access mode
 
As far as appletalk is concerned yes you need a appletalke capable
  router or bridge it.
 
Dave
 
As
 
  Cisco Breaker wrote:
  
   Hi All,
  
   Our customer wants to buy cat 4006 with sup3. But they use Appletalk.
As
 I
   know the sup3 IOS doesnt support Appletalk routing yet, so I have to
put
 a
   router for that, am I right?
  
And also is it possible to assign the server's port  into 2 vlans. If
I
  can
   put the server's port which is on the switch to 2 Vlans (multi Vlan) it
  will
   be OK but is it possible?
  
   Any help will be appreciated.
  
   Best regards,
  
   Cisco Breaker
  --
  David Madland
  Sr. Network Engineer
  CCIE# 2016
  Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  612-664-3367
 
  Emotion should reflect reason not guide it
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

Emotion should reflect reason not guide it




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41616t=41571
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2520 DRAM [7:41594]

2002-04-16 Thread Georg Pauwen

Hi Richard,

your total DRAM is 14336+2048=16348K. The number before the slash (14336) is
the amount of DRAM allocated for local memory, and the number after the
slash (2048) is the amount of DRAM allocxated for I/O Memory.
Which IOS feature set are you trying to load ? 16MB should be enough for
most sets...

Regards,

Georg


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41617t=41594
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Logan, Harold

My selling point on documentation is that it's like carrying car insurance.
Most of the time you don't really need it, but when you do need it you spend
a lot less because you have it. Of course, the same people who don't want
their network documented probably wouldn't carry automotive insurance if it
weren't required by law, so you're back to square one.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IOS Documentation [7:41577]


Tim Champion wrote:

 I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used within
 our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in putting
 together this kind of document?

Good question. I hope someone takes the time to answer. Documentation is one
of the
most important, and most neglected, aspects of the networking profession.
Establishing
a baseline is a good start. It includes not only traffic statistics but also
configurations, cabling, logical and physical topologies, and anything else
that might
make the job of maintaining and troubleshooting a network an enjoyable
challenge
instead of the headache it can be without documentation.

I have a potential customer who refuses to acknowledge the need for
documentation. He's
got an AVVID network that works just fine without having to hire a
consultant to draw
a bunch of diagrams as he puts it. The guy who installed it told him it was
zero
maintenance, and nothing I've said thus far can convince him otherwise. So
I'm
preparing a slideshow about network documentation and baselining. I'd
appreciate any
suggestions, horror stories, success stories, etc.

My philosophy is: Plan for failure. I don't mean that in a pessimistic way.
It's just
that, given enough time, all networks fail in one way or another. Some
events are
disasters, others only an inconvenience that can be worked around and coped
with by
non-technical users. But in the long run, something serious will happen,
It's our job
to be prepared for that and to reduce the negative impact as much as
possible.

How do we convince clients to invest in baselining, contingency plans and
the like?
Does anyone have a good book on this? other than the usual ones, like the
CIT cert exam
preps and Semester 8 from the CNAP curriculum? Is there any specific book or
chapter or
website that gives a template for baselining, network documentation,
contingency
planning?

-- TT




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41618t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Kelly Cobean

I've never heard the term MAC-based VLAN before.  Is this a reference to
the use of VMPS?  We considered doing VMPS for MAC based VLAN assignments,
but ran into several issues, one of which was the fact that we have Cat3548
clusters that, while there are as many as 9 switches in the cluster, have
only one IP address for the stack.  The VMPS protocol specifies that when an
access switch sends a VMPS request to the VMPS server, it identifies itself
using it's own IP address and the port# that the device is trying to connect
to.  With a building of over 800 employees, managing this type of system
would be pretty intensive because you need the MAC address of EVERY PC in
the building that you desire to assign to a VLAN, typically with unkown's
going into the fallback VLAN.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]


Personally, I've never come across a situation where MAC-based VLANs were
useful. Port-based membership is more practical/common.  You can always
enforce port-security based on MAC address, but still have the same problem
with regard to if someone changes their NIC, it'll require a call to you to
change things up to make them work.

Mike W.

I agree they aren't that useful, but they are in fairly common use
with DSL and cable providers, who use the modem/router MAC address as
a primitive form of security.  And yes, equipment changes do cause
problems.


Irwan Hadi  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Dear All,

  Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
  All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
  10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided that
  the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.

  Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course
will
  makes
  the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP to
  the one at 10.0.1.0/24.

  My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?

   Thanks


--
What Problem are you trying to solve?
***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
directly to me***


Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
http://www.gettlabs.com
Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41619t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OSPF vs EIGRP [7:41613]

2002-04-16 Thread Bill Carter

I currently manage a Large network (300) routers running OSPF and IPX.  When
I first got here the network was Proteon routers.  The routers were severely
limited in memory.  Think 2500's with 8Mb RAM. We had a Cisco 5500 w/ RSM in
the core and started to replace the Proteons with Bay ASN.  So we had a
Proteon/Cisco/Bay OSPF network.  The only vendor compatibility problems were
Proteon vs. everything else.  The Bay's and Cisco's worked together fine.
The IPX network is very large.  900 routes and 3500 SAP's.  The Bay couldn't
handle it.  Honestly they were underspec'd (done before I got here).  So the
customer decided to replace the Bay with Cisco.  We now have 2 7206VXR's in
the core and 300+ 2600's in the remotes with about 20 3600's in regional
centers.  I like OSPF because or all the built in tweaks with different
areas etc.

I know of a much larger network here locally running BGP and EIGRP.  You can
do lot's with EIGRP in terms of different AS's and summarization.  They have
done some innovative things with the network and it works very well.  In
essence they have made an EIGRP network look and behave like an OSPF
network.

I would also look at IS-IS.  It is a clean, neat protocol.  I know many who
aren't in the SP area are scared of IS-IS but it is a great protocol.  Think
OSPF without the Area 0 concept.  You create different Areas of L1 routers
and tie them together with L1/L2 routers.

The primary problem in any large network is memory consumption on the
routers.  If all the routers must maintain full routing tables you can eat
up a lot of memory.  Whether you go OSPF, EIGRP, or IS-IS, you need to
segment the network into logical summarization boundaries.  I would draw out
your network from a layer-2 perspective, find the logical boundaries for
summarization, and then see what works for a routing protocol.  In a poorly
designed large network it doesn't matter if you are running OSPF, EIGRP, or
IS-IS.

Have I done a good job of not answering your question???  Email me if you
want to discuss this further.

Bill Carter
CCIE 5022


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Madory Douglas C 1Lt 603 ACS/LGC
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF vs EIGRP [7:41613]


What experiences have people had in setting up and maintaining OSPF vs EIGRP
on a large network?

I'm aware of the proprietary implications of EIGRP and the basic differences
in design of the protocols - how they are _supposed_ to work, but, in
practice, would you say one is more stable / dependable / manageable than
the other?

Also, what about OSPF between Cisco and non-Cisco products? Do they always
work together like they're supposed to?

If you have some first-hand experience with this, I'd really like to hear
about it.

Thanks,
Doug.


 Douglas Madory,1st Lt
 Flt CC, C4I Systems
 603 ACS / LGC
 UVA '99 WAHOOWA!





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41620t=41613
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Website File Management Software [7:41621]

2002-04-16 Thread John Neiberger

Wyyy  OT. sorry.  :-)

Right now we have a couple of web servers with identical content and
all file updates must be handled manually by myself or someone else in
my group because we're the only ones with access to the secure part of
our network.  Even with only two servers, it gets to be a pain to
manually copy files out to the web servers, especially since certain
files can change multiple times per day.

I'm thinking that companies that have a lot of servers, especially
'mirrored' servers, must have a better way of managing all of this and
perhaps automating a portion of it.  However, I don't even really know
where to start looking.

Do you know what products might be out there to handle this particular
issue?

Thanks,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41621t=41621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OSPF question [7:41611]

2002-04-16 Thread Kane, Christopher A.

Can you show us the rest of the config of R5-2602? Are you using any
filtering? (i.e. distribute-lists/route-maps). I've seen routes (LSAs) in
the OSPF database and not in the routing table due to filtering. What about
clearing the route table? 

Curious - Is this the entire routing table? Because you don't have any OSPF
routes in this table at all.

-chris

 Hi, Group,
 
 I am having trouble with this OSPF configuration.
 Router R5-2602 in Area 0 learned a route from Area 1 from 
 Router 6.6.6.6 ,
 as shown as Summary Net link.  Router 6.6.6.6 is the ABR.  
 But this route
 does not appear in routing table, only in OSPF database.  
 Anyone know why
 and how to fix it.
 
 Thanks
 
 Ruihai
 
 R5-2602#sh ip ospf da
 
OSPF Router with ID (5.5.5.5) (Process ID 10)
 
 
 Router Link States (Area 0)
 
 Link ID ADV Router  Age Seq#   
 Checksum Link count
 5.5.5.5 5.5.5.5 92  0x8002 0xB4D4   3
 6.6.6.6 6.6.6.6 92  0x8003 0xBEFB   1
 
 Net Link States (Area 0)
 
 Link ID ADV Router  Age Seq#   Checksum
 150.100.2.6 6.6.6.6 93  0x8001 0x1F2
 
 Summary Net Link States (Area 0)
 
 Link ID ADV Router  Age Seq#   Checksum
 150.100.50.40   6.6.6.6 213 0x8001 0xFAD1
 
 
 R5-2602#
 R5-2602#sh ip ospf ne
 
 Neighbor ID Pri   State   Dead Time   Address 
 Interface
 6.6.6.6   1   FULL/  -00:01:47150.100.2.6 
 Serial0/0
 
 
 R5-2602#sh ip route
  1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
 C   1.2.3.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
 S209.123.45.0/24 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
  65.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
 S   65.215.18.0 [1/0] via 192.168.1.1
  5.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
 C   5.5.5.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
  150.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
 C   150.100.2.0/23 is directly connected, Serial0/0
 C   150.100.10.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41622t=41611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Know of any good internetworking programs? [7:41468]

2002-04-16 Thread Daniel Cotts

There are several books in print that are classroom oriented in that they
explain the theory with the underlying math. Can others mention some?
See if you can contact Doug Comer at Purdue University. The following info
is several years old. Hope that it is still current. 
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/people/comer

He is the author/co-author of a series of books on TCP/IP. (among others) He
regularly teaches workshops at Networld+Interop. He was one of several
professors who attempted to create a part time high level networking academy
for those already in the workforce.

 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Reaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:20 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: OT: Know of any good internetworking programs? [7:41468]
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 I am currently a college student that will be receiving a diploma in
 Telecommunications Technology (http://www.telecomtech.org) 
 from Sheridan
 College (http://www.sheridanc.on.ca) in Dec 2002.  I have 
 decided that I
 wish to pursue a bachelors degree and possibly a masters thereafter,
 specifically an engineering degree.  After browsing local 
 university program
 calendars I find that most programs with any 
 telecommunications content are
 generally labeled, Electrical Engineering with a 'Specialization' in
 Telecommunications.  I spoke to my current professors, who 
 both have these
 degrees, and they say that the telecommunications content is 
 a joke for the
 application in todays market unless you are looking only to 
 deal with layer
 1 technologies.
 
 Though my current program has provided me with an exceptional base of
 conceptual and technical knowledge, I feel the need to go 
 deeper and truly
 understand the engineering detail of all this.  I want to 
 attend a program,
 International if I must, that was built from the ground up as an
 Internetwork Engineering program.  A program with content 
 focus above layer
 1.  I understand that all good engineering programs will 
 contain advanced
 math and that all telecommunications oriented programs will contain
 electronics and physical layer material, though I do not want this to
 dominate the curriculum.  I have found such programs as 
 Internet Engineering
 (http://www.uow.edu.au/discover/courses/yr2002/benginternet.html) and
 Telecommunications Engineering
 (http://www.uow.edu.au/discover/courses/yr2002/cour736.html) 
 in my brief and
 mostly futile searches, though only in 1 Australian 
 University, Wollongong
 University.
 
 I post this here because I know that there are many knowledgeable and
 industry-aware poeple here, some of whom have made quite a name for
 themselves in our field.  I figure that with the wealth of knowledge
 observing this forum there must be someone, that who 
 themselves or through
 their associations, know of 'the' program I am looking for.  
 I would greatly
 appreciate any leads or information anyone may be able to provide.
 
 Thanks for your time,
 
 Greg
 
 PS.  I think this industry is in serious need of some type of 
 educational
 search engine.  In the short time I've spent on educational 
 search pages
 I've found not one that specifically lists even a category acutely
 appropriate for the internetworking field.  I am quite 
 confident, being in a
 field related program and seeing the obvious void in this 
 area, that such a
 definative resource would be a hit among seasoned academics and
 post-secondary students alike, wishing to extend their 
 knowledge.  Just a
 thought for anyone up to the challenge.  :)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41623t=41468
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G

CCxx Productions and, soon, Network Learning.

Disclaimer: I have also written materials for CCxx Productions and am
working on some stuff for Network Learning

 -Original Message-
 From: Tom Monte [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:00 AM
 To:   'Kaminski, Shawn G'
 Subject:  RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 what are the other options that are as good as Boson and cheaper?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:06 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 
 What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to be
 no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
 Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
 there.
 Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel that
 everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
 opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
 little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
 
 Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
 underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
 
 Shawn K.
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
  
  Champ , cheers
  
  What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them
  all?
 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for
 the person(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not the intended
 recipient, please delete the message and all copies of it from
 your system, destroy any hard copies of it and contact the sender
 by return e-mail.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41624t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets????? [7:41448]

2002-04-16 Thread Ryan Lecomte

I found this info on the Krone web site, the page was titled Length
Matters 

Patch cords are an integral - and often overlooked - part of your
network's cabling. Transmission protocols on today's networks run at
specified frequencies. When those frequencies are interrupted or
compromised with patch cords of random or unspecified lengths, the
disturbance created causes signal loss and corrupted data flow. TrueNet
patch cords are designed and manufactured at specified lengths - 4, 7,
10, and 15 feet - to correspond to the critical wavelengths of
transmission frequencies. An average of all the key frequencies - 10,
100, Gigabit Ethernet, and ATM 155/622- was used to determine the
optimal lengths for data transmission.

Ryan



-Original Message-
From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 100Mbit cable can't shorter than 6 feets? [7:41448]

Hi.. everyone,

My friend told me that 100Mbit cable can't SHORTER than 6 feets.  Have
everyone heard that this theory ?  If yes, what is the reason or he is
bull
shitting.

Tong





==
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en 
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht 
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en 
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. 
==
The information contained in this message may be confidential 
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you 
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents 
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41625t=41448
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G

CCxx Productions, and soon, Network Learning.

Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working on
stuff for Network Learning

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
 (like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
 WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality
 (not
 so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way better than
 the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).
 
 I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd really be
 interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and make
 such
 statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider much
 better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you say.
 
 Mike W.
 
 Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to
 be
  no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
  Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
 there.
  Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel that
  everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
  opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
  little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
 
  Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
  underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
 
  Shawn K.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
  
   Champ , cheers
  
   What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get
 them
   all?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41626t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2520 DRAM [7:41594]

2002-04-16 Thread richard roe

Thanks Georg!
Much obliged for the information. If I'm not mistaken most all feature sets
for the 2520 can be run on 16MB/16MB dram/flash configuration?!



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41627t=41594
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Website File Management Software [7:41621]

2002-04-16 Thread Clayton Dukes

Use wget's mirror feature.


Clayton Dukes
Cisco Info Center SE
Micromuse, Inc.
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
(h) 904-292-1881
(c) 904-477-7825

- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: OT: Website File Management Software [7:41621]


 Wyyy  OT. sorry.  :-)

 Right now we have a couple of web servers with identical content and
 all file updates must be handled manually by myself or someone else in
 my group because we're the only ones with access to the secure part of
 our network.  Even with only two servers, it gets to be a pain to
 manually copy files out to the web servers, especially since certain
 files can change multiple times per day.

 I'm thinking that companies that have a lot of servers, especially
 'mirrored' servers, must have a better way of managing all of this and
 perhaps automating a portion of it.  However, I don't even really know
 where to start looking.

 Do you know what products might be out there to handle this particular
 issue?

 Thanks,
 John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41628t=41621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



WANTED!! MCS-7822/ COMPAQ DL320 [7:41630]

2002-04-16 Thread George Siaw

Guys,

I urgently need to buy a secondhand callmanager kit and just wondering
if any of you have one to sell or point me in the right direction.

Thanks -  George.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41630t=41630
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G

I didn't just pop into the group. I have been a member of this group for
quite a while. I don't post very often because I find it nearly impossible
to go over every message that comes into the group and try to offer a
solution because of my job (Network Engineer at EDS) and all my other
activities. I don't know how some of you guys and gals do it, but appreciate
all the time you put into this and the answers you provide. I have learned
more from this group than you can imagine.

I usually post answers to certification questions because I have written
many practice tests for CCxx Productions, did some work with Boson/Quizware,
and am currently working on stuff for Network Learning (NLI). I have done a
lot of research on this kind of stuff and you wouldn't believe the rip-offs
out there. I believe that Boson has good quality products, but I'm just
trying to let people know that there are other alternatives besides Boson,
Boson, Boson. It's like a cult with this group. Even though I have a
financial interest in most of these companies, I want to help people out by
letting them know that there are other quality options that can save people
a lot of money. I mean, would you rather spend $119.85 for all the Boson
CCIE Written materials or spend $29.95 with CCxx and get  it all in one
package?

Shawn K.

 -Original Message-
 From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
 (like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
 WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality
 (not
 so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way better than
 the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).
 
 I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd really be
 interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and make
 such
 statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider much
 better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you say.
 
 Mike W.
 
 Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to
 be
  no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
  Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
 there.
  Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel that
  everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
  opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
  little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
 
  Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
  underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
 
  Shawn K.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
  
   Champ , cheers
  
   What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get
 them
   all?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41631t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Signature for blocking telnet to SMTP server [7:41565]

2002-04-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

When people Telnet to SMTP server, what do they then do? Do they manually 
send the normal SMTP commands? Sorry, if that's a dumb question, but I'm 
just trying to figure out the situation.

If they are not Telnetting in order to send ordinary SMTP commands (HELO, 
RSET, RCPT, DATA, etc). then of course, you could recognize them because by 
what they aren't doing.

Let's say they are sending ordinary SMTP commands. Would it be possible 
then to recognize this by the timing? Even the fastest typist can't send 
those commands as fast as e-mail software can.

That's my $0.0010. Please do answer, though. I'm trying to learn more 
about this curious thing of Telnetting to ports other than 23.

Priscilla

At 02:51 AM 4/16/02, Cisco Breaker wrote:
Hi,

Is it possible to block telnet to SMTP server from port 25 with IDS. I want
to create a custom signature for this but I don't know how this can be done.
If  I write a signature beginning with hello it will block all mail traffic
because all of them starts with hello as I know.  And are there any
resources that tells how to write a custom signature. We are using CSPM
2.3.3i.

Any help will be appreciated.

Best regards,

Cisco Breaker


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41632t=41565
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IOS Documentation [7:41577]

2002-04-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 11:18 AM 4/16/02, Neil Moore wrote:
You can do a snmpwalk on the router to grab that info.
-Neil

That's a good idea.

Regarding baselining and network documentation, I cover it in Top-Down 
Network Design. It think it is of utmost importance. A lot of real 
engineers are sick of hearing about it though. They think they can gut out 
any network downtime with hard work and perseverance. ;-) It's a 
personality thing. Some people don't even balance their checkbooks. When 
talking to these real engineers, try to avoid all the buzz words they've 
heard before. Make sure not to sound like you're coming from the ivory 
tower or that you learned your style from Catbert. Keep the discussion 
focused on the practical consequences of not having documentation and 
baselines.

There is also a new book out from Cisco Press called Network Consultants 
Handbook. I haven't read it, but it looks good and seems to cover what you 
want. To quote Cisco Press, it is a complete resource for assessing, 
auditing, analyzing, and evaluating any network environment.

You can download templates for documentation that the author developed from 
Cisco Press's Web site.

Priscilla



On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Tom Scott wrote:

  Tim Champion wrote:
 
   I have recently been asked to document the various IOS images used
within
   our network to be used as a baseline. Has anyone had experience in
putting
   together this kind of document?
 
  Good question. I hope someone takes the time to answer. Documentation is
one
  of the
  most important, and most neglected, aspects of the networking profession.
  Establishing
  a baseline is a good start. It includes not only traffic statistics but
also
  configurations, cabling, logical and physical topologies, and anything
else
  that might
  make the job of maintaining and troubleshooting a network an enjoyable
  challenge
  instead of the headache it can be without documentation.
 
  I have a potential customer who refuses to acknowledge the need for
  documentation. He's
  got an AVVID network that works just fine without having to hire a
  consultant to draw
  a bunch of diagrams as he puts it. The guy who installed it told him it
was
  zero
  maintenance, and nothing I've said thus far can convince him otherwise.
So
  I'm
  preparing a slideshow about network documentation and baselining. I'd
  appreciate any
  suggestions, horror stories, success stories, etc.
 
  My philosophy is: Plan for failure. I don't mean that in a pessimistic
way.
  It's just
  that, given enough time, all networks fail in one way or another. Some
  events are
  disasters, others only an inconvenience that can be worked around and
coped
  with by
  non-technical users. But in the long run, something serious will happen,
  It's our job
  to be prepared for that and to reduce the negative impact as much as
  possible.
 
  How do we convince clients to invest in baselining, contingency plans and
  the like?
  Does anyone have a good book on this? other than the usual ones, like the
  CIT cert exam
  preps and Semester 8 from the CNAP curriculum? Is there any specific book
or
  chapter or
  website that gives a template for baselining, network documentation,
  contingency
  planning?
 
  -- TT


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41634t=41577
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Need blank plates for Catalyst 5505 [7:41635]

2002-04-16 Thread Thomas Crowe

Sorry for the off topic post, but does anyone have a power supply and 2 line
card blank cover plates for a catalyst 5505 at a reasonable price?  Thanks!

__

Thomas Crowe
Senior Systems Engineer / Senior Architect
EMC Proven Master Architect
CTS Professional Services - Atlanta
__

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Thomas Crowe.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41635t=41635
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OSPF vs EIGRP [7:41613]

2002-04-16 Thread Kane, Christopher A.

 Also, what about OSPF between Cisco and non-Cisco products? 
 Do they always
 work together like they're supposed to?
 

Doug,

I've worked with OSPF in a multi-vendor environment and had no problems. All
the required parameters in the Hello packets were met and neigh/adj's were
established with no configuration changes needed. You need Area ID, Stub
Flag, Auth and Hello/Dead Intervals to match. If you have problems getting
neighbors to form, look for mismatches in the Hello packets.

I can't answer your other questions from first hand experience. But I've
heard other people comment that EIGRP tends to let you be 'sloppier' in your
overall network design. OSPF works best when you can take advantage of
multiple areas, summarization and use of stub networks. OSPF seems to
require a little more thought and planning where as EIGRP seems to provide
flexibility in a network that may not have been designed/or grown in the
most optimal ways.

-chris




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41629t=41613
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Everybody else is bad except Network Learning, because you work for Network 
Learning and have written materials for CCXX productions?

This is what I call an unbiased, honest opinion!!

A Strobel



Quoting Kaminski, Shawn G :

 CCxx Productions, and soon, Network Learning.
 
 Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working on
 stuff for Network Learning
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
  
  Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
  (like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
  WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality
  (not
  so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way better
 than
  the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).
  
  I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd really be
  interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and make
  such
  statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider much
  better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you say.
  
  Mike W.
  
  Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems to
  be
   no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype over
   Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
  there.
   Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel
 that
   everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just my
   opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around a
   little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
  
   Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
   underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
  
   Shawn K.

-_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_-
This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41637t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers? [7:41638]

2002-04-16 Thread hall

Hi all,

I have a 3620 that has 4MB RAM/16MB Flash that serves as my VOIP router with
12.0(3) IOS.  I also have a few 2621's laying around doing nothing with 32MB
RAM/16MB Flash.

Can I take the RAM and Flash from the 2621 and put them in the 3620?

TIA,

Jeff Hall




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41638t=41638
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]

2002-04-16 Thread Edward Sohn

Has anyone ever seen an L1010, while booting up, always try to boot from
a flash card?  Specifically, slot0?  How does one set it so that the
image is always searched for in the internal SIMM instead of looking at
slot0 first?  If you've seen this before (on any item, for that matter),
please let me know what you did to re-point it to the internal
flash...

Just FYI, it does boot into the internal flash IOS, but it only does so
after searching slot0 first...

Thanks,

Eddie



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41639t=41639
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco IDS Event Viewer Error Message [7:41640]

2002-04-16 Thread CiscoEnthuastic

Hi all
After upgrading sensor signature version to 20 when i
choose view=sensor events=database i get
NrldNameManager::insertSig,ID already exists message
When i click ok it works without problem but what is that message?
Any info will be will be appreciated




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41640t=41640
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G

You didn't read my other posts carefully. I didn't say that evebody else is
bad. I'm just offering an optional solution to try to help people save money
on their study materials. It isn't any different than any one of you
offering a solution to a different problem on this message board. Also, I
don't work for Network Learning, I work for EDS.

Shawn K.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
 
 Everybody else is bad except Network Learning, because you work for
 Network 
 Learning and have written materials for CCXX productions?
 
 This is what I call an unbiased, honest opinion!!
 
 A Strobel
 
 
 
 Quoting Kaminski, Shawn G :
 
  CCxx Productions, and soon, Network Learning.
  
  Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working
 on
  stuff for Network Learning
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
   To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject:  Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
   
   Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility,
 options
   (like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're
 wrong
   WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality
   (not
   so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way better
  than
   the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).
   
   I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd really
 be
   interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and
 make
   such
   statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider
 much
   better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you
 say.
   
   Mike W.
   
   Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money seems
 to
   be
no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype
 over
Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives out
   there.
Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still feel
  that
everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just
 my
opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look around
 a
little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
   
Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized
 how
underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now,
 though!
   
Shawn K.
 
 -_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_-
 This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41642t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: WANTED!! MCS-7822/ COMPAQ DL320 [7:41630]

2002-04-16 Thread Magichut

Here you go, get it quick, and I get to borrow it next... :)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2016448146


George Siaw  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Guys,

 I urgently need to buy a secondhand callmanager kit and just wondering
 if any of you have one to sell or point me in the right direction.

 Thanks -  George.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41633t=41630
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers? [7:41643]

2002-04-16 Thread Daniel Cotts

Open up both boxes and compare the physical dimensions of the Flash and
DRAM. If memory serves, you can swap the flash but not the DRAM.

 -Original Message-
 From: hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:37 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers?
 [7:41638]
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 I have a 3620 that has 4MB RAM/16MB Flash that serves as my 
 VOIP router with
 12.0(3) IOS.  I also have a few 2621's laying around doing 
 nothing with 32MB
 RAM/16MB Flash.
 
 Can I take the RAM and Flash from the 2621 and put them in the 3620?
 
 TIA,
 
 Jeff Hall




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41643t=41643
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



What is the equivalent of a router's term leng 0 in a [7:41644]

2002-04-16 Thread Kevin Zhang

TIA




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41644t=41644
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]

2002-04-16 Thread Daniel Cotts

And a 'show boot' or a sh run gives you what? Any boot system ... type
command?

 -Original Message-
 From: Edward Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:40 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]
 
 
 Has anyone ever seen an L1010, while booting up, always try 
 to boot from
 a flash card?  Specifically, slot0?  How does one set it so that the
 image is always searched for in the internal SIMM instead of 
 looking at
 slot0 first?  If you've seen this before (on any item, for 
 that matter),
 please let me know what you did to re-point it to the internal
 flash...
 
 Just FYI, it does boot into the internal flash IOS, but it 
 only does so
 after searching slot0 first...
 
 Thanks,
 
 Eddie
 
 
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41645t=41639
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]

2002-04-16 Thread Edward Sohn

Sorry, I forgot to mention that the ASP does boot up from internal
flash, but it only does so AFTER looking at slot0 first, failing to find
a card, and then moves on to boot from internal flash.  what led me to
believe that there is a persistent pointer to the slot0 is because
after doing a sh flash i get an error message that reads along the
lines of no card found in slot0  

in answer to your question, show boot gives a similar response to sho
flash (if i remember correctly--i'm away from the unit right now).

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:17 PM
To: 'Edward Sohn'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]


And a 'show boot' or a sh run gives you what? Any boot system ... type
command?

 -Original Message-
 From: Edward Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:40 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Lightstream Boot Order [7:41639]
 
 
 Has anyone ever seen an L1010, while booting up, always try
 to boot from
 a flash card?  Specifically, slot0?  How does one set it so that the
 image is always searched for in the internal SIMM instead of 
 looking at
 slot0 first?  If you've seen this before (on any item, for 
 that matter),
 please let me know what you did to re-point it to the internal
 flash...
 
 Just FYI, it does boot into the internal flash IOS, but it
 only does so
 after searching slot0 first...
 
 Thanks,
 
 Eddie
 
 
 
 _
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41646t=41639
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael Williams

Comments inline

Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
 I didn't just pop into the group.

I must admit that my phrasing (pop into the group) probably sounded
negative, but I can assure you that I in no way meant it to be so.

 I'm just
 trying to let people know that there are other alternatives
 besides Boson,
 Boson, Boson. It's like a cult with this group. 

Yeah... it is like a cult with this group.  =)   But at least for me
personally, when I was doing CCNA, I got the Boson exams and I felt they
helped alot to let you know what the real exam was for...  And for every
CCNP exam I used them and felt it was worth the (then) $29 per exam.

 I mean, would you rather spend $119.85 for all
 the Boson
 CCIE Written materials or spend $29.95 with CCxx and get  it
 all in one
 package?

I will (definitely) check out the CCxx materials.  Again, all I was trying
to point out in my previous post was that it's strange for someone to
comment about cheaper and better materials and not leave a single web
link, URL, company name, etc.

Mike W.



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41648t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OSPF and required Hello parameters [7:41647]

2002-04-16 Thread Kane, Christopher A.

This question is more protocol related than perhaps Cisco (vendor) specific.

Someone posted a question to the group today pertaining to OSPF and EIGRP.
One of the poster's questions were about OSPF and multi-vendor
interoperability. I've worked with OSPF on different routers and have not
run into any problems. But it got me thinking more about the Hello protocol.

It's within the Hello protocol that there are certain criteria that must be
met. ACCORDING TO CISCO they are: Hello/Dead Interval, Area ID, Stub Flag
and Authentication [method and password]. So, I wanted to see what RFC 2328
had to say about it. I also checked John T. Moy's book, Anatomy of an
Internet Routing Protocol. In both of those sources I find that the
following must match: Network mask, HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval and
the E-bit of the Options Field. The exception being the Network mask
(depending on the Network Type in use).

RFC states:
HelloInterval
RouterDeadInterval
Network Mask
E-bit of Options Field (Area capable of processing AS-external-LSAs)

Cisco implementation:
Hello/Dead Interval
Area ID
Stub Flag
Authentication Method/password

I realize vendors have the choice of how closely they follow an RFC. I'm
just trying to make sure I understand the protocol for what it is and for
how Cisco deploys it. Can someone experienced with this protocol check my
understanding?

-chris




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41647t=41647
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

2002-04-16 Thread Brian Zeitz

I have an un-bias opinion. For some of us who have already done a few
exams, Boson is the only choice. Do you have test software for PIX, VPN,
CVOICE etc.? I don't really use boson, I use books. But for CSS1, I
might need to use them, just to get an idea if I have any weak spots.
There is no 1 source for any exam. I have heard the term, you get what
you pay for.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]

Everybody else is bad except Network Learning, because you work for
Network 
Learning and have written materials for CCXX productions?

This is what I call an unbiased, honest opinion!!

A Strobel



Quoting Kaminski, Shawn G :

 CCxx Productions, and soon, Network Learning.
 
 Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am
working on
 stuff for Network Learning
 
  -Original Message-
  From:   Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent:   Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
  
  Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility,
options
  (like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're
wrong
  WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and
quality
  (not
  so say I've never seen a wrong answer on a Boson exam, but way
better
 than
  the quality of a Brainbuzz cramsheet, etc).
  
  I don't mean my above comment in a smart ass way, because I'd
really be
  interested in an alternative, but to simply pop into the group and
make
  such
  statements without even a single URL or name of what you consider
much
  better and less expensive doesn't lend much credibility to what you
say.
  
  Mike W.
  
  Kaminski, Shawn G  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   What the hell, get them all. In fact, buy two sets since money
seems to
  be
   no object to any of you. :-) I still can't understand all the hype
over
   Boson when there are much better and less expensive alternatives
out
  there.
   Hell, I've even written materials for Boson/Quizware but still
feel
 that
   everyone could pass their exams using less expensive methods. Just
my
   opinion because this forum is for helping people out. So look
around a
   little before rushing out to buy the almighty overpriced Boson.
  
   Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized
how
   underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now,
though!
  
   Shawn K.

-_-_-_ Mail3000 gives you 30 Megs of Email space free -_-_-
This mail sent through http://mail3000.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41649t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Website File Management Software [7:41621]

2002-04-16 Thread sam sneed

We use rdist to push new content on to production boxes and to keep
consistency. Here is a link:

http://www.magnicomp.com/rdist/

John Neiberger  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Wyyy  OT. sorry.  :-)

 Right now we have a couple of web servers with identical content and
 all file updates must be handled manually by myself or someone else in
 my group because we're the only ones with access to the secure part of
 our network.  Even with only two servers, it gets to be a pain to
 manually copy files out to the web servers, especially since certain
 files can change multiple times per day.

 I'm thinking that companies that have a lot of servers, especially
 'mirrored' servers, must have a better way of managing all of this and
 perhaps automating a portion of it.  However, I don't even really know
 where to start looking.

 Do you know what products might be out there to handle this particular
 issue?

 Thanks,
 John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41650t=41621
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NLI CD-Rom [7:41651]

2002-04-16 Thread Robert Raver

Hey , 
My CD-Rom in the NLI's CCIE RS Written Exam book is missing.  Is there
anyone on the list could create an image and send it to me.  I still have my
own user and pass im just missing the cd.  If you could help me out then
messege me personally. 

-Thanks-
   -Robert-




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41651t=41651
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RJ45 rolled cables + Pentium 4 laptops with serial ports? [7:41652]

2002-04-16 Thread Aaron DuShey

Does anybody have a list or know all the uses for a RJ45 rolled cable? The 
only think I know is using it for a connection to a router via a serial 
port.

Also, does anyone out there know of a pentium 4 laptop that has a com/serial 
port built in? I know you can buy those USB/serial things but I haven't got 
good feedback on those.
thanks-


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41652t=41652
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: What is better? MLPP or load balancing with IO [7:41249]

2002-04-16 Thread J ACH

IOS load balancing can also be done, if one end is access router with static
routes on both sides of the link.
 The load balancing may not be 100% due to some of the issues like fast
switching,caching, etc. You may get balancing like 40-60.

If both routers are running IGP  protocols like OSPF, EIGRP then load
balancing can be done without additional resources.

 MLPP is resource intensive. But it will do 100% load balncing.


Hope this helps!!
Thanks
Jana.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41653t=41249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ccie 351-001 [7:41655]

2002-04-16 Thread khalid ameen

is there any news about the beta CCIE new exam 351-001
?
any news,


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41655t=41655
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RJ45 rolled cables + Pentium 4 laptops with serial ports? [7:41656]

2002-04-16 Thread Patrick Ramsey

go here...

pad pad

http://www.usbgear.com/usa/item_288.html 

This works under xp now too... my laptop has NO legacy ports on it...this
cable works fine! (great actually, since if I don't have it plugged in, it
doesn't use any resources!)

-Patrick

 Aaron DuShey  04/16/02 05:04PM 
Does anybody have a list or know all the uses for a RJ45 rolled cable? The 
only think I know is using it for a connection to a router via a serial 
port.

Also, does anyone out there know of a pentium 4 laptop that has a com/serial 
port built in? I know you can buy those USB/serial things but I haven't got 
good feedback on those.
thanks-


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com 
  Confidentiality Disclaimer   
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and
/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System,
Inc. (WellStar) and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom
addressed.  This email may contain information that is held to be
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or
copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may
subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this
email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this
email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you.






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41656t=41656
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OSPF and required Hello parameters [7:41647]

2002-04-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

With regards to the items below, I would say that Cisco follows the RFC, 
but just describes the issues a little differently. See comments below.

At 04:28 PM 4/16/02, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:

It's within the Hello protocol that there are certain criteria that must be
met. ACCORDING TO CISCO they are: Hello/Dead Interval, Area ID, Stub Flag
and Authentication [method and password]. So, I wanted to see what RFC 2328
had to say about it. I also checked John T. Moy's book, Anatomy of an
Internet Routing Protocol. In both of those sources I find that the
following must match: Network mask, HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval and
the E-bit of the Options Field. The exception being the Network mask
(depending on the Network Type in use).

RFC states:
HelloInterval

Cisco says this must agree also.

RouterDeadInterval

Cisco says this must agree also.

Network Mask

The RFC says to ignore this on point-to-point networks and on virtual 
links. Maybe Cisco just doesn't mention it because it's not a rule that 
always applies.

E-bit of Options Field (Area capable of processing AS-external-LSAs)

That's what Cisco calls the stub flag I bet.


Cisco implementation:
Hello/Dead Interval
Area ID

The RFC covers this too, but in the general discussion, not just in the 
discussion of Hellos. The Area ID in an OSPF packet must match the area of 
the receiving interface (except in the case of virtual links, in which case 
it must indicate the backbone).

Stub Flag
Authentication Method/password

The RFC says this must agree on every OSPF packet. It just doesn't 
specifically mention that it must agree on Hello packets.


I realize vendors have the choice of how closely they follow an RFC.

If the RFC says must then a vendor must do what it says. It's only when 
it says should or in grey areas where the authors didn't make something 
clear that you run into problems.

  I'm
just trying to make sure I understand the protocol for what it is and for
how Cisco deploys it. Can someone experienced with this protocol check my
understanding?

-chris


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41654t=41647
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael L. Williams

Howard C. Berkowitz  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I agree they aren't that useful, but they are in fairly common use
 with DSL and cable providers, who use the modem/router MAC address as
 a primitive form of security.  And yes, equipment changes do cause
 problems.

Very good point... shows my lack of exposure to those areas of
networking. (meaning the ISP/Provider side of things)

Mike W.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41657t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: What is better? MLPP or load balancing with IO [7:41249]

2002-04-16 Thread Chuck

an alternative is CEF/dCEF, which is now supported down to the 36xx level.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fswt
ch_c/swprt1/xcfcef.htm#1000904
watch the wrap

HTH

J ACH  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 IOS load balancing can also be done, if one end is access router with
static
 routes on both sides of the link.
  The load balancing may not be 100% due to some of the issues like fast
 switching,caching, etc. You may get balancing like 40-60.

 If both routers are running IGP  protocols like OSPF, EIGRP then load
 balancing can be done without additional resources.

  MLPP is resource intensive. But it will do 100% load balncing.


 Hope this helps!!
 Thanks
 Jana.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41658t=41249
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Command Line and Web Interface [7:41660]

2002-04-16 Thread group study

Hi,

Iam recently looking into the Command Line interface and web interface of a 
router.To my surprise, when a Web Interface is invoked, it send some bulk of 
traffic on the network and remains constant if we don't do anything at the 
front end whereas on the contrary,I can see when a Command Line interface is 
invoked,it repeatedly sends some traffic (Telnet) everytime on the network 
irrespective of you do anything at the front end.

So my question, which one is better?So far, I thought Command Line is better 
,But, now I feel Web Interface is much better in terms of traffic.

Has anybody noticed this.

Further help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Jay

_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41660t=41660
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Michael L. Williams

This is a perfect opportunity for me to learn something.  What
aspects/advantages of using MAC based VLAN assignments were causing you to
consider using it?  Considering in a large organization (5000+ IP devices...
and that's not large to some people =) using MAC based VLAN assignment
sounds like an administrative nightmare. Hell, port-based VLAN
assignment is a pain enough sometimes =)

Sometimes I just wanna thrown everything into ONE BIG BROADCAST DOMAIN and
be done with it  even setup all WAN routers to bridge instead of
route Mmm..

Mike W.

Kelly Cobean  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I've never heard the term MAC-based VLAN before.  Is this a reference to
 the use of VMPS?  We considered doing VMPS for MAC based VLAN assignments,
 but ran into several issues, one of which was the fact that we have
Cat3548
 clusters that, while there are as many as 9 switches in the cluster, have
 only one IP address for the stack.  The VMPS protocol specifies that when
an
 access switch sends a VMPS request to the VMPS server, it identifies
itself
 using it's own IP address and the port# that the device is trying to
connect
 to.  With a building of over 800 employees, managing this type of system
 would be pretty intensive because you need the MAC address of EVERY PC in
 the building that you desire to assign to a VLAN, typically with unkown's
 going into the fallback VLAN.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Howard C. Berkowitz
 Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:02 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]


 Personally, I've never come across a situation where MAC-based VLANs were
 useful. Port-based membership is more practical/common.  You can
always
 enforce port-security based on MAC address, but still have the same
problem
 with regard to if someone changes their NIC, it'll require a call to you
to
 change things up to make them work.
 
 Mike W.

 I agree they aren't that useful, but they are in fairly common use
 with DSL and cable providers, who use the modem/router MAC address as
 a primitive form of security.  And yes, equipment changes do cause
 problems.

 
 Irwan Hadi  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
   Dear All,
 
   Suppose that I create a MAC based VLAN with for example 100 computers.
   All of these computers either will get IP from the DHCP for the
   10.0.1.0/24 IP block, or they can hard wired their own IP provided
that
   the IP is their own, and it is in the 10.0.1.0/24 subnet.
 
   Now suppose one person changes his NIC at his computer. This of course
 will
   makes
   the switch won't recognize his new MAC address, and hard wired his IP
to
   the one at 10.0.1.0/24.
 
   My question is will his connection get bumped out from the network ?
 
Thanks


 --
 What Problem are you trying to solve?
 ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not
 directly to me***


 
 Howard C. Berkowitz  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications
 http://www.gettlabs.com
 Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com
 retired Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41659t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Command Line and Web Interface [7:41661]

2002-04-16 Thread group study

Hi,

Iam recently looking into the Command Line interface and web interface of a 
router.To my surprise, when a Web Interface is invoked, it send some bulk of 
traffic on the network and remains constant if we don't do anything at the 
front end whereas on the contrary,I can see when a Command Line interface is 
invoked,it repeatedly sends some traffic (Telnet) everytime on the network 
irrespective of you do anything at the front end.

So my question, which one is better?So far, I thought Command Line is better 
,But, now I feel Web Interface is much better in terms of traffic.

Has anybody noticed this.

Further help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Jay

_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41661t=41661
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



PAT, PIX 515 and VPN ..... [7:41662]

2002-04-16 Thread Paul

Cisco say that one gloabal IP address can be used for up to 64,000 local
addresses 

I want to use the same method for 100 - 130 predominantly web-browsing
end-users  through a PIX 515.

Has anyone had any experience of this .. and does anyone forsee any problems
!!! this is the first time I have done this and I don't want to make any
basic
mistakes   :)

Also  The PIX 515 can have a VAC installed to allow up to 2000
similtaneous VPN connections at any one time . but .. how many sessions
can the PIX 515 manage on its own, without a VAC ??

Any help or suggestions will be greatly received ...

Kind regards ..

Paul 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41662t=41662
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OSPF and required Hello parameters [7:41647]

2002-04-16 Thread Chuck

masks do not need to match on a virtual link for obvious reasons, those
being that one cannot be certain of the end points. I suppose that in
practical terms, one should always use /30's on serial links, and thus the
end point masks would always match, but who can ever tell? I suppose it is
possible that one end of a virtual link could be an ethernet or a token ring
interface, and the distant end a serial interface, and thus it would be
likely that masks do not match. ( and yes I know that in the case of Cisco,
anyway, that the RID is the end point, and RID's don't have masks anyway. )
BTW, a virtual link hello has the v-bit set - it is that which determines
that the packet is for purposes of a virtual link.

the point to point link masks not having to match is interesting. one of
these days I'll have to set something up in the lab, just to see. not
generally being one to deliberately setting things up incorrectly, I
sometimes miss out on these kinds of curiousities.

Chuck



Priscilla Oppenheimer  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 With regards to the items below, I would say that Cisco follows the RFC,
 but just describes the issues a little differently. See comments below.

 At 04:28 PM 4/16/02, Kane, Christopher A. wrote:

 It's within the Hello protocol that there are certain criteria that must
be
 met. ACCORDING TO CISCO they are: Hello/Dead Interval, Area ID, Stub Flag
 and Authentication [method and password]. So, I wanted to see what RFC
2328
 had to say about it. I also checked John T. Moy's book, Anatomy of an
 Internet Routing Protocol. In both of those sources I find that the
 following must match: Network mask, HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval
and
 the E-bit of the Options Field. The exception being the Network mask
 (depending on the Network Type in use).
 
 RFC states:
 HelloInterval

 Cisco says this must agree also.

 RouterDeadInterval

 Cisco says this must agree also.

 Network Mask

 The RFC says to ignore this on point-to-point networks and on virtual
 links. Maybe Cisco just doesn't mention it because it's not a rule that
 always applies.

 E-bit of Options Field (Area capable of processing AS-external-LSAs)

 That's what Cisco calls the stub flag I bet.


 Cisco implementation:
 Hello/Dead Interval
 Area ID

 The RFC covers this too, but in the general discussion, not just in the
 discussion of Hellos. The Area ID in an OSPF packet must match the area of
 the receiving interface (except in the case of virtual links, in which
case
 it must indicate the backbone).

 Stub Flag
 Authentication Method/password

 The RFC says this must agree on every OSPF packet. It just doesn't
 specifically mention that it must agree on Hello packets.


 I realize vendors have the choice of how closely they follow an RFC.

 If the RFC says must then a vendor must do what it says. It's only when
 it says should or in grey areas where the authors didn't make something
 clear that you run into problems.

   I'm
 just trying to make sure I understand the protocol for what it is and for
 how Cisco deploys it. Can someone experienced with this protocol check my
 understanding?
 
 -chris
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41663t=41647
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Whats going to happen ? [7:41572]

2002-04-16 Thread Irwan Hadi

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 07:03:57AM -0600, Michael L. Williams wrote:

 Personally, I've never come across a situation where MAC-based VLANs were
 useful. Port-based membership is more practical/common.  You can always
 enforce port-security based on MAC address, but still have the same problem
 with regard to if someone changes their NIC, it'll require a call to you to
 change things up to make them work.

The idea of doing MAC based VLAN is surely for security. I want that
computers that aren;t registered yet to have an IP in the 172.16.0.0
subnet, while computers which already registered will have a routable IP
address.
Right now unregistered computers can still use the routable IP address
by hard wired the IP address manually (not through DHCP), and this
creates a problem.

I'm also thinking to use a Foundry Netiron L3 switches to do this MAC
based vlan, so that if someone in the 172.16.0.0 address wants to send
data to other in the routable subnet, which is basically served by the
same switch, the data doesn;t need to be delivered to the uplink first.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41666t=41572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NLI CD-Rom [7:41651]

2002-04-16 Thread Chuck

Have you reported this to NLI directly? My experience has been that they are
very much service oriented and would make good if they failed you.

Chuck



Robert Raver  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hey ,
 My CD-Rom in the NLI's CCIE RS Written Exam book is missing.  Is there
 anyone on the list could create an image and send it to me.  I still have
my
 own user and pass im just missing the cd.  If you could help me out then
 messege me personally.

 -Thanks-
-Robert-




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41667t=41651
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Command Line and Web Interface [7:41660]

2002-04-16 Thread Chuck

sounds like normal behaviour to me. http passes no traffic other than what
is actually sent or received - no keepalives of any kind. telnet sessions
require keepalives to remain active.

Just my opinion, but I find the Cisco web interface practically useless for
anything that involves real work.

Chuck


group study  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 Iam recently looking into the Command Line interface and web interface of
a
 router.To my surprise, when a Web Interface is invoked, it send some bulk
of
 traffic on the network and remains constant if we don't do anything at the
 front end whereas on the contrary,I can see when a Command Line interface
is
 invoked,it repeatedly sends some traffic (Telnet) everytime on the network
 irrespective of you do anything at the front end.

 So my question, which one is better?So far, I thought Command Line is
better
 ,But, now I feel Web Interface is much better in terms of traffic.

 Has anybody noticed this.

 Further help is appreciated.

 Thanks,

 Jay

 _
 MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
 http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41665t=41660
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >