Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
So your saying that you configured the serial interface with ip unnumbered, sourcing the ethernet interface of the repective routers. If you shut down the ethernet you can still access the remote router over the serial?? This is something new or have I been out of the unnumbered game too long!! Dave richard dumoulin wrote: > > Peter , > > The book says clearly that the interface is pingable. Even more, I have > tried it and it really works. I just took two routers connected by > back_to_back serial cables with IP unnumbered configured on both. When I > unplugg the Lan interface of one them, this router is still reachable by the > IP address. > > Regards. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49393&t=49347 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dialup configuration [7:49423]
Hi, I have configure AUX port for routing and need to configure asyn port s0/0. Need the configuration for both to work simultaneously. AUX port configuration is as. interface Async65 ip address 10.190.6.1 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp keepalive 30 async mode dedicated peer default ip address 10.190.6.2 no cdp enable ppp authentication pap line aux 0 no exec modem InOut modem autoconfigure discovery transport input all stopbits 1 flowcontrol hardware Regards Waqar Ahmed __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49423&t=49423 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Bandwidth Calculation you wil have to consider two [7:49406]
It's just one stream (the other users). You don't talk, send out your stream over the wan, have it come back to you. ""neil K."" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Steve, > > It makes sense to consider two RTP flows as a conversation consists of > full-duplex transmission. > both people speak at the same time in a normal conversation, so that is why. > please let me know if you have any thoughts on this > > neil > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I'm not sure the context the document was written in, but it's only 24K > > (give or take depending on the L2 encap) that you need to plan for. > > > > Steve > > > > > > ""neil K."" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Using the standard formulas, I see for a bandwidth required for a g.729 > > call > > > is 24kbps without RTP compression.I used to do the same when using other > > > codecs. > > > Recently I came across some VoIP documentation which said that you will > > have > > > to consider two RTP flows to simulate a call, and hence the requirement > > for > > > Bandwidth doubles.say g729 24 kbps becomes almost 48kbps if u consider > two > > > RTP flows. > > > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49406&t=49406 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
At 08:04 PM 7/21/2002 +, Chuck wrote: >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 5:25 PM + 7/21/02, richard dumoulin wrote: > > >Well, I interpret it that you can ping the serial, no ? > > > > > > > I would assume that. It makes no sense for an ISP to use unnumbered > > interfaces, because it easily can use /30 or /31 private addresses. > > It could use a small part of its registered address space, which > > would let someone traceroute to the gateway. > > >CL: I have a question about that. Recently I was doing some work for a >government entity, with multiple sites statewide. I was doing some >traceroutes to ascertain paths and potential security issues. this >organization had contracted with a third party of internet services, who >also was contractually responsible for firewalls and other security devices >and procedures. In any case, I saw two interesting phenomena while doing my >testing. One was the presence of private IP numbers in some of the paths. >The other was the lack of anything from particular hops along the path. EG >the infamous * * * response, although the trace would continue and conclude >to the destination I wanted to reach. as all my work commenced from my >office across the public internet to the destination, this led me to >conclude that the presence of 1918 addresses does not necessary disallow the >successful completion of traces. PV: 1918 certainly doesn't prevent the completion of traceroutes, but it does tend to break Path MTU Discovery which isn't ideal. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49389&t=49347 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Bandwidth Calculation you wil have to consider two [7:49388]
That 24Kbps would make sense as G.729 should compress the voice to 8Kbps for a unidirectional voice signal, so 16Kbps for bi-directional 24Kbps should be plenty for overhead and a bi-directional voice stream. However, if you want you could use G.729b (or G.729ab if you happen to be using medium complexity) to enable Voice Activation Detection (VAD) and that can reduce your overall bandwidth utilization by up to 40% by not sending data when a party is not talking (and throw on some comfort noise while using VAD). That kicks azz, as that would lower the bandwidth needed for a G.729b (or ab) call to roughly 14.4Kbps, so you could (in theory) jam up to four simultaneous (close-to-toll-quality) calls over a single 64Kbps line. NICE!! Mike W. "Steven A. Ridder" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I'm not sure the context the document was written in, but it's only 24K > (give or take depending on the L2 encap) that you need to plan for. > > Steve > > > ""neil K."" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi All, > > > > Using the standard formulas, I see for a bandwidth required for a g.729 > call > > is 24kbps without RTP compression.I used to do the same when using other > > codecs. > > Recently I came across some VoIP documentation which said that you will > have > > to consider two RTP flows to simulate a call, and hence the requirement > for > > Bandwidth doubles.say g729 24 kbps becomes almost 48kbps if u consider two > > RTP flows. > > > > Any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49388&t=49388 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228]
which is the software on the cisco that does4nt come up? CCna,CCNP CQS. Antero Vasconcelos COMPTA - Parceria e Tecnologia Engenharia de Redes e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. (+351) 222070940 Fax (+351) 222070935 www www.compta.pt -Original Message- From: Sujal G. Ajmera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: sexta-feira, 19 de Julho de 2002 12:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228] Hi, I have ppp as the encapsulation protocol at both ends but the line protocol doesn't come up. I interchanged the Motorola router at the other end with a Cisco router and line protocol came up. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Sujal [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49425&t=49228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wanted-CCIE Lessons Learned/Attitude/Plan [7:49167]
Tom, Thanks for the input about taking the lab. Where did you find 12.1 IOS Docs?. I looked at Cisco Press and other book stores on line, they only have 12.0. Is 12.1 being used in the lab?. Thanks Reza ""Thomas Larus"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > (I recently failed my first attempt, so weigh my advice accordingly.) > > > The short form is: > > 1)Read obsessively and quickly start doing simple labs > 2) Labs will raise questions, sending you back to the books and IOS docs > 3) Do complex lab scenarios created by other people until you are blue in > the face > > 4) Always strive to nail down things you are unsure of, and nail down every > setting that you are permitted to nail down in you configs (advice from > Caslow in NMC-1 class, which class is highly recommended and worth every > penny). An important motto of the quest for CCIE is "Nail everything down." > > As for time periods, that is impossible for me to set out. Everyone is > different. We all start at different places when we set out for the CCIE. > Some are top network engineers when they start and have less to learn than > someone like me. I have found that this takes much more time than I ever > planned for initially. > > You should read always and everywhere. IOS docs, TAC articles, Cisco Press > Books, McGraw Hill technical expert books, Caslow, Doyle, etc. You start > off by doing labs on individual technologies, such as those provided by > fatkid, ipexpert, and the like, or labbing up the scenarios in Doyle, etc. > When you do these labs, you will have questions, which you send you back to > the books with a keen interest. I think that reading in order to find an > answer or to learn about something that you are dying to learn about leads > to greater absorption than reading straight through a book with the goal of > reading so many pages a day. I know we need to do both kinds of reading, > but I am making the point that doing labs makes your absorption and > compehension of what you read so much deeper. > > You can try to do you own labs, but you may find that you move much faster > through teh material doing labs prepared by someone else. Plus, doing labs > written by others gets you practice interpreting instructions. > > You soon move on to complex lab scenarios. Do lots and lots of these. The > commercial labs will teach you a lot, and are worth spending money on, even > though they may not be perfect. These commercial labs will teach you that > many knowledgeable CCIEs make the same kinds of mistakes that you are scared > to death of making on the CCIE lab. It is frustrating, yet somehow > comforting, to find the glaring errors and omissions in expensive labs > written by CCIEs. The authors will tell you to configure something, and > then completely forget to configure it themselves. (and then continue to > forget to configure it through several revisions of their labs and lab > solutions) You learn from this that it is possible to pass the CCIE even > though you are prone to making almost unforgivably glaring errors when you > have years to do it right. I am a bit absent-minded myself, so that is > comforting. (I simply need an 8-hour "lucid interval" of perfect focus on > getting every detail right and avoiding landmines, while moving through the > tasks at high speed.) > > In short, use lab scenarios early on, and do reading and lab scenarios > concurrently, and read everything. I bought the 12.1 IOS Docs in printed > format, and have really enjoyed reading them. They are loaded with good > stuff. Do NOT buy the old books of IOS docs (I bought a bunch of these, > mainly as half-price closeouts), because out-of-date docs are almost worse > than no docs at all. This IOS has changed a lot from 11.2 or even 12.0 to > 12.1. > > > > ""Jennifer Mellone"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > LESSONS LEARNED, ATTITUDE, AND STRUCTURED STUDY PLAN > > > > I was wondering if anyone could elaborate on "lessons learned" when > studying > > for CCIE. What did you do right? What did you do wrong? If you had to do > it > > all over again, what would you change - especially if someone wants to > pass > > the first time? > > > > I think the attitude "do it right and try and pass the first time" could > be > > helpful (I know it doesn't always happen in reality). It seems more > positive > > than "I'll fail the first time so I know what to expect the second or > third > > or later time". > > > > My instinct tells me that determination and practicing on the routers > every > > night and on weekends for at least 6 months is key, and is easier said > than > > done. There are no short-cuts. This is fine; it's the price one must pay. > > But how does one do that in a methodical and structured manner such that > all > > the major stones are unturned? Of course, some stones will be unturned > > quicker than others due to experience, and others will be slower due to > lack > > of exper
RE: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228]
12.5 on a 3660 -Original Message- From: Antero Vasconcelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:42 PM To: Sujal G. Ajmera; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228] which is the software on the cisco that does4nt come up? CCna,CCNP CQS. Antero Vasconcelos COMPTA - Parceria e Tecnologia Engenharia de Redes e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. (+351) 222070940 Fax (+351) 222070935 www www.compta.pt -Original Message- From: Sujal G. Ajmera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: sexta-feira, 19 de Julho de 2002 12:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228] Hi, I have ppp as the encapsulation protocol at both ends but the line protocol doesn't come up. I interchanged the Motorola router at the other end with a Cisco router and line protocol came up. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Sujal [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49426&t=49228 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - IP protocol scans [7:49358]
Chuck wrote: > > never mind - I've done a bit of testing, and it appears that > the IP number > that is incrementing is a count of distinct events. I.e. if I > do a test > ping, let it sit a while, and do another test ping, I see the > number > increment. > > I gotta get out more. LOL, Chuck. Good to know anyway. > > > > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a piece of equipment connected to the public internet > for something > > I'm doing with a friend. It is protected by an access-list > restricting the > > source address and the particular application. > > > > However, in monitoring the device, I am seeing what appear to > be not only > > TCP port scans, but IP protocol scans. I.e. a series of > inquiries using > > different successive IP protocol numbers. > > > > 17:43:26: datagramsize=48, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=12.246.161.19, totl > > 17:43:26: datagramsize=48, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=12.246.161.19 (Fast > > 17:43:26: datagramsize=70, IP 87: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=12.246.161.19 (Fast > > 17:43:32: datagramsize=48, IP 88: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=12.246.161.19, > totlen > > 56, > > 17:56:30: datagramsize=48, IP 90: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=61.37.239.23, totle > > 17:56:36: datagramsize=48, IP 91: s=x.x.x.x (local), > d=61.37.239.23, totle > > ( this output is showing the reply my device is sending to > the IP's in > > question. ) > > > > at least, I am assuming that the IP XX = the IP protocol > number, as > reported > > by the debug. > > > > Just wondering if one of you security gurus might shed some > light here, > > seeing as how out of touch I seem to be. This one of the > standard hacking > > procedures? Been around a while? new because so many entities > are now > doing > > a lot more to crack down on TCP port scanning? > > > > I checked the various registries. The behavior is coming from > several > > places, some Thailand, some Korea, some from customers of > ATT.net > > > > Just looking to increase my awareness. > > > > thanks. > > > > Chuck > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49407&t=49358 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]
Edward, I had the same exact issue from the same exact book, I am working with a LS1010 ASP in a 5500 switch (pretty much the same as your setup). The previous post was correct in saying that you only have to enter the PVC on one of the interfaces, do a "show atm vc" (I think that's right) and you will see a list of all VPI/VCI pairs, the ports they are on and the VPI/VCI pair they connect to and the associated port. Even though you have only one PVC statement you will see that the ports are cross-connected properly (there will be two entires in the table). Also, when you look at the table it should show that the VC status is "UP", if not there is another issue going on. Hope this helps! Joe ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Heya, > > I'm kinda new at the ATM bit, and I'm having trouble configuring an > L1010... > > I'm simply trying to perform the configuration as documented in Lab18 in > the CCIE Practical Studies book. I have two active ATM interfaces, > 12/0/0 and 12/0/2. > > As I go to enter in the first PVC command on 12/0/0, "atm pvc 0 112 > interface ATM12/0/2 0 121", I don't seem to have any problems. It's on > the corresponding PVC command that I get an error. When I enter in the > "atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM 12/0/0 0 112" command on the 12/0/2 > interface, i get an error stating, "%connection creation fails: vpi/vci > has been used by other connections." > > I tried this many times, without luck. I was simply configuring the > interfaces with the exact same commands as the book says. I looked on > CCO, but couldn't find anything regarding this... > > Anyone run into this before? > > Thanks in advance, > > Eddie > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of > Notebook.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49400&t=49352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please confirm (conf#cdfecb5ec75237ba7cca6224113fe72d) [7:49401]
> >Hi, > >You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. >Because >the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be >required >to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a >spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending >Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). > >PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL >YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED. > > >By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: > >1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. > >2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. > >3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com > >4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. > >5. The message is NOT inflammatory. > >6. The message is NOT a test message. > >To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once >confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. > > >Welcome to GroupStudy.com! > > >--ORIGINAL MESSAGE- > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 8 20:44:00 2002 >Received: from hotmail.com (f133.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.23.133]) > by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00403 > GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:43:59 GMT >Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; >Mon, 8 Jul 2002 13:43:29 -0700 >Received: from 212.175.24.135 by lw15fd.law15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; > Mon, 08 Jul 2002 20:43:28 GMT >X-Originating-IP: [212.175.24.135] >From: "Fuat Akar" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:43:28 +0300 >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed >Message-ID: >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2002 20:43:29.0096 (UTC) >FILETIME=[1D8A1480:01C226C0] > >Hello Everybody, >I need your experiences and help; >I'm a network responsible for a large bussiness sized Service Provider and >at our POPs we would like to give a wireless Internet service to our >customers, but here I have got bandwidth limitation problem at wireless >applications. As you know Wireless Bridges have various connection speeds >from 1Mbps up to 10 Mbps but at that time I would like to give our customer >at speeds of 128k, 256k or 512kbps Internet bandwidth, what will be the >right solution for these type of applications which need a bandwidth >limitation? Maybe Inserting a Layer 3 Switch( or Layer4/7 switches) and >defining the bandwidth limitation in the switch. > >I'll be pleased to get your comments and suggestions. > >Thanks >Fuat AKAR > > > > >_ >MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: >http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49401&t=49401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]
A couple of suggestions: 1) Verify that your ATM interfaces are up and up which i assume you already did. 2) Since your LS1010 ATM interfaces are setup with UNI version 3.1, change your ATM uni version on your routers to be 3.1. (The default is 3.0). Please provide the IOS version you are running on the LS1010 and on the routers as well. Thanks. AR- On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Edward Sohn wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Andre... > > Hmmm...I was thinking the same way you did at first, but then the book's > configuration actually has both "atm pvc" commands in each interface. > Is that a typo, then? > > Even so, I cannot get connectivity between my routers. Here is my "sho > run" for the L1010 and 2 routers: > > L1010: > > Current configuration: > ! > version 11.2 > no service pad > no service password-encryption > no service udp-small-servers > no service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname L1010 > ! > ! > ip host-routing > no ip domain-lookup > ! > atm address 47.0091.8100..0050.a2c6.4001.0050.a2c6.4001.00 > atm router pnni > node 1 level 56 lowest > redistribute atm-static > ! > ! > interface ATM12/0/0 > no atm auto-configuration > atm uni version 3.1 > atm maxvp-number 8 > atm maxvc-number 8192 > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > atm maxvci-bits 10 > ! > interface ATM12/0/1 > ! > interface ATM12/0/2 > no atm auto-configuration > atm uni version 3.1 > atm maxvp-number 8 > atm maxvc-number 8192 > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > atm maxvci-bits 10 > atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM12/0/0 0 112 > ! > interface ATM12/0/3 > ! > interface ATM13/0/0 > ip address 175.128.100.5 255.255.255.0 > atm maxvp-number 0 > ! > interface Ethernet13/0/0 > no ip address > ! > no ip classless > ! > line con 0 > exec-timeout 0 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > ROUTER 1 > > Current configuration : 854 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname R3620-1 > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > fax interface-type fax-mail > mta receive maximum-recipients 0 > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 165.128.1.1 255.255.255.0 > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > clockrate 200 > ! > interface ATM1/0 > no ip address > no atm ilmi-keepalive > ! > interface ATM1/0.1 multipoint > ip address 165.128.100.1 255.255.255.0 > map-group ip-Pvc > atm pvc 112 0 112 aal5snap > ! > router eigrp 100 > network 165.128.0.0 > auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > ip classless > ip http server > ! > ! > ! > map-list ip-Pvc > ip 165.128.100.2 atm-vc 112 broadcast > ! > call rsvp-sync > ! > ! > mgcp profile default > ! > dial-peer cor custom > ! > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > ! > ! > end > > ROUTER 2: > > Current configuration : 835 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname r3620-2 > ! > ! > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > fax interface-type fax-mail > mta receive maximum-recipients 0 > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 165.128.2.2 255.255.255.0 > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface ATM1/0 > no ip address > no atm ilmi-keepalive > ! > interface ATM1/0.1 multipoint > ip address 165.128.100.2 255.255.255.0 > map-group ip-Pvc > atm pvc 121 0 121 aal5snap > ! > router eigrp 100 > network 165.128.0.0 > auto-summary > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > ! > ip classless > ip http server > ! > ! > map-list ip-Pvc > ip 165.128.100.1 atm-vc 121 broadcast > ! > call rsvp-sync > ! > ! > mgcp profile default > ! > dial-peer cor custom > ! > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > ! > ! > end > > THANKS! > > Eddie > > -Original Message- > From: Andre Riscalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 2:36 PM > To: Edward Sohn > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352] > > > > Edward, > > You are simply trying to define the same PVC mapping 2 times... > Basically you need to see the mapping of a PVC in the LS1010 similar as > a cross-connect - You only need to configure the cross-connect in ONE of > the physical interface. > > For example, let's say you want to configure a PVC from port 12/0/0 > (0/112) to port 12/0/2 (0/121) in your ATM switch. You would have 2 ways > of doing this: > > Either: > > interface ATM12/0/0 > no ip address > atm pvc 0 112 interface ATM12/0/2 0 121 > ! > interface ATM12/0/2 > no ip address > ! > Or: > > interface ATM12/0/0 > no ip address ! > interface ATM12/0/2 > no ip address > atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM12/0/0 0 112 > ! > > Hope this helps, > > AR- > > > On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Edward Sohn wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > I'm kinda new a
Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
hhm learn something new every day. thanks. that still gets back to how ip unnumbered "really" works, as opposed to how most of us "think" it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about using the RID as the interface address: "this memo has adopted an alternate scheme, which has been invented multiple times but which is probably originally attributable to Phil Karn. In this scheme, a router that has unnumbered point to point lines also has a special IP address, called a router-id in this memo. The router-id is one of the router's IP addresses (a router is required to have at least one IP address). This router-id is used as if it is the IP address of all unnumbered interfaces." whaddaya know - I did recall correctly :-> so it would appear that in the Cisco implementation, at least, for unnumbered interfaces, the reference interface ip also becomes the RID for purposes of unnumbered? So what does this discovery do to the proposition that one "should" use a loopback as the reference for unnumbered interfaces because loopbacks are "never down"??? interesting discussion. learned something new. Chuck ""richard dumoulin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > No prob, see below. > > > > RB#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration: > ! > version 11.2 > no service password-encryption > no service udp-small-servers > no service tcp-small-servers > ! > hostname RB > ! > enable password cisco > ! > no ip domain-lookup > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial2 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial3 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial4 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial5 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial6 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial7 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial8 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial9 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface BRI0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > no ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0 > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password cisco > login > ! > end > > RB#172.16.1.1 > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > User Access Verification > > Password: > RA>en > Password: > RA#sh run > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 801 bytes > ! > version 12.2 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname RA > ! > enable password cisco > ! > memory-size iomem 10 > ip subnet-zero > ! > ! > no ip domain-lookup > ! > ip ssh time-out 120 > ip ssh authentication-retries 3 > ! > call rsvp-sync > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > interface Ethernet0/0 > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0 > no keepalive > half-duplex > ! > interface Serial0/0 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial0/1 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > interface Serial0/2 > ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 > clockrate 200 > ! > interface Serial0/3 > no ip address > shutdown > ! > ip classless > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/2 > no ip http server > ! > ! > ! > dial-peer cor custom > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > password cisco > login > line vty 5 15 > login > ! > no scheduler allocate > end > > RA# > RB# > [Resuming connection 1 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > RA# > RA# > RB#172.16.1.1 > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > User Access Verification > > Password: > RA>en > Password: > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > ! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms > RA# > RB#term mon > % Console already monitors > RB# > %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to > down > [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > ! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > ! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/5/8 ms > RA# > RB#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > RB(config)#int e0 > RB(config-if)#shut > RB(config-if)# > %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively > down^Z > RB#d > %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleeb ip pa det > IP packet debugging is on (detailed) > RB# > [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > RA# > IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), len 40, sending > TCP src=11001, dst=23, seq=3044171494, ack=4024004928, win=4288 ACK > IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0),
RE: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]
Hey Andre, Thanks for your help thus far...Yes, all the interfaces say up/up. I have changed the router versions to 3.1 as you suggested. I still have no ip connectivity. Any other suggestions? The routers/l1010 both have very up-to-date software, as shown below from my "sho ver". Thanks, Eddie ROUTER 1: 3600 Software (C3620-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XT3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Compiled Wed 13-Mar-02 23:15 by shawnk Image text-base: 0x600089A8, data-base: 0x6153A000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) R3620-1 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 50 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c3620-is-mz.122-2.xt3.bin" cisco 3620 (R4700) processor (revision 0x81) with 58368K/7168K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 20530878 R4700 CPU at 80Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Serial network interface(s) 1 ATM network interface(s) DRAM configuration is 32 bits wide with parity disabled. 29K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) 8192K bytes of processor board PCMCIA Slot0 flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2182 ROUTER 2: 3600 Software (C3620-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XT3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac Compiled Wed 13-Mar-02 23:15 by shawnk Image text-base: 0x600089A8, data-base: 0x6153A000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) r3620-2 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 51 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "flash:c3620-is-mz.122-2.xt3.bin" cisco 3620 (R4700) processor (revision 0x81) with 58368K/7168K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 21963872 R4700 CPU at 80Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Serial network interface(s) 1 ATM network interface(s) DRAM configuration is 32 bits wide with parity disabled. 29K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 32768K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) Configuration register is 0x2182 --- L1010: Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) LS1010 WA3-4 Software (LS1010-WP-M), Version 11.2(10)WA3(4a), RELEASE SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1902 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 14-Mar-02 14:50 by integ Image text-base: 0x600108D0, data-base: 0x60436000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.2(1.4.WA3.0) [integ 1.4.WA3.0], RELEASE SOFTWARE L1010 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 24 minutes System restarted by reload System image file is "bootflash:ls1010-wp-mz.112-10.wa3.4a.bin", booted via bootflash cisco ASP (R4600) processor with 32768K bytes of memory. R4700 processor, Implementation 33, Revision 1.0 Last reset from power-on 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 4 ATM network interface(s) 123K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K). Configuration register is 0x2101 --- Andre Riscalla wrote: > > A couple of suggestions: > > 1) Verify that your ATM interfaces are up and up > which i assume you > already did. > > 2) Since your LS1010 ATM interfaces are setup with > UNI version 3.1, change > your ATM uni version on your routers to be 3.1. (The > default is 3.0). > > Please provide the IOS version you are running on > the LS1010 and on the > routers as well. > > Thanks. > > AR- > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Edward Sohn wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply, Andre... > > > > Hmmm...I was thinking the same way you did at > first, but then the book's > > configuration actually has both "atm pvc" commands > in each interface. > > Is that a typo, then? > > > > Even so, I cannot get connectivity between my > routers. Here is my "sho > > run" for the L1010 and 2 routers: > > > > L1010: > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 11.2 > > no service pad > > no service password-encryption > > no service udp-small-servers > > no service tcp-small-servers > > ! > > hostname L1010 > > ! > > ! > > ip host-routing > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > atm address > 47.0091.8100..0050.a2c6.4001.0050.a2c6.4001.00 > > atm router pnni > > node 1 level 56 lowest > > redistribute atm-static > > ! > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/0 > > no atm auto-configuration > > atm uni version 3.1 > > atm maxvp-number 8 > > atm maxvc-number 8192 > > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > > atm maxvci-bits 10 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/1 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/2 > > no atm auto-configuration > > atm uni version 3.1 > > atm maxvp-number 8 > > atm maxvc-number 8192 > > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > > atm maxvci-bits 10 > > atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM12/0/0 0 112 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/3 > > ! > > interface ATM13/0/0 > > ip addres
Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
Chuck wrote: > > hhm learn something new every day. thanks. > > that still gets back to how ip unnumbered "really" works, as > opposed to how > most of us "think" it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about > using the RID > as the interface address: > > "this memo has adopted an alternate scheme, which has been > invented > multiple times but which is probably originally attributable > to Phil Karn. > In this scheme, a router that has unnumbered point to point > lines also has > a special IP address, called a router-id in this memo. The > router-id is one > of the router's IP addresses (a router is required to have at > least one IP > address). This router-id is used as if it is the IP address of > all > unnumbered interfaces." > > whaddaya know - I did recall correctly :-> > > so it would appear that in the Cisco implementation, at least, > for > unnumbered interfaces, the reference interface ip also becomes > the RID for > purposes of unnumbered? > > So what does this discovery do to the proposition that one > "should" use a > loopback as the reference for unnumbered interfaces because > loopbacks are > "never down"??? Good point Chuck. Peter, I did not know the meaning of "quote", hehe. > > interesting discussion. learned something new. > > Chuck > > > > > ""richard dumoulin"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > No prob, see below. > > > > > > > > RB#sh run > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 11.2 > > no service password-encryption > > no service udp-small-servers > > no service tcp-small-servers > > ! > > hostname RB > > ! > > enable password cisco > > ! > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > interface Ethernet0 > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > interface Serial0 > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial2 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial3 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial4 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial5 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial6 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial7 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial8 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial9 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface BRI0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > no ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0 > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password cisco > > login > > ! > > end > > > > RB#172.16.1.1 > > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > > > > User Access Verification > > > > Password: > > RA>en > > Password: > > RA#sh run > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration : 801 bytes > > ! > > version 12.2 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname RA > > ! > > enable password cisco > > ! > > memory-size iomem 10 > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > ip ssh time-out 120 > > ip ssh authentication-retries 3 > > ! > > call rsvp-sync > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0 > > no keepalive > > half-duplex > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial0/1 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial0/2 > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 > > clockrate 200 > > ! > > interface Serial0/3 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/2 > > no ip http server > > ! > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer cor custom > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password cisco > > login > > line vty 5 15 > > login > > ! > > no scheduler allocate > > end > > > > RA# > > RB# > > [Resuming connection 1 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > > > RA# > > RA# > > RB#172.16.1.1 > > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > > > > User Access Verification > > > > Password: > > RA>en > > Password: > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = > 4/4/8 ms > > RA# > > RB#term mon > > % Console already monitors > > RB# > > %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, > changed state > to > > down > > [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = > 4/4/8 ms > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 > seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = >
RE: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49427]
The only problem I see with Access lists on the router is the ports having to be in the same VLAN. This will allow them to see each other without going through the router. If the ports do not need to see each other why the need to be in the same VLAN, you could try put the ports in separate VLANS 41-45 and then use ACL at L3. Michael -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 July 2002 08:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49424] you thought about access lists on your router that will be doing the routing ? Some one else may be able to offer a better solution than this, I hope so at least. I would also like to know if there is a better way. John -Original Message- From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49410] I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able to access port 6, on VLAN 60, but not each other. I did find something on CCO about Private VLANs, but I see that the 2924 is not on the list of hardware that supports PVLAN's. Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this segregation within the same VLAN, short of PVLAN's? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Don Claybrook ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49427&t=49427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CID 3.0 [7:49428]
Hi all, anyone knows what I must emphasize on for CID 3.0. Is SNA included ? AppleTalk ? any form of inputs will be greatly appreciated thanks suaveguru __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49428&t=49428 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49429]
Hi all, I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - router B Router A : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 redistribute bgp 1 subnets network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 5.0.0.0 network 6.0.0.0 network 7.0.0.0 network 8.0.0.0 network 9.0.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 ! ip classless ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 Router B : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and propagated to neighbor : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 592 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 592 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 4 0x8001 0x2A22 0 But after some seconds, the external LSA is aged out and so disappears (by what ) : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 593 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 593 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 36000x8002 0x301B 1 CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 597 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 596 0x8006 0x7C72 2 If I use another summary-address (like 4.0.0.0/6 or 8.0.0.0/5), it works fine (external LSAs are not aged out). Why this use doesn't work ? What happens ? Why the LSA is aged out ? The purpose of this test was to conditionnaly advertise default routes (if BGP routes disappears, default route disappears). NB : router A is 1750 router with IOS 12.1(14) Thanks for help, -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49429&t=49429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hardware Diagnostic - How to interpret [7:49431]
I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router. I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004 to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location, boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard ressources and system IO ( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/112/appB.html#4000 ) The result of the test seems to indicate that my DRAM (lower location) is OK but that the main board of the router is defective? Is my interpretation correct? >t m Memory/Bus diagnostic Starting Address [0x1000]? 0x0004 Ending Address [0x100]? 0x067F Hex argument for variable tests [0x]? Select Tests [all]? Number of passes to run [2]? Trigger word for hardare debugging [0]? Message Level (0=silence, 1=summary, 2=normal)[2]? Testing addresses between 0x4 and 0x67f Begin pass 0, test 0 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020002 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020002 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020004 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020004 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020006 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020006 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020008 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020008 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202000a in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202000a SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202000c in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202000c SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202000e in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202000e SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020010 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020010 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020012 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020012 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020014 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020014 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020016 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020016 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x2020018 in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x2020018 SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202001a in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202001a SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202001c in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress: 0x202001c SSW: 0x76d, B pipe: 0xb491, C pipe: 0x5491 Bus Error control register: 0x0fb0 non-local memory transaction timeout system overtemp local memory transaction timeout at address 0x202001e in test number 0 while attempting short read at add ress:
BSCI exam [7:49432]
Hi, Today I passed the BSCI exam towards my CCIP certifictaion.I scored 930 and the passing score was 700 and the number of questions are 57.The exam contains all the routing protocol (more stress on IS-IS). The pattern of the exam is different from other exams,The exam has some design questions that needs to be implemented through the router simulators,very much like the real router's hyperterminal (Cisco CIM) but the functionality of help and tab commands are disabled here.One needs to remember the complete configuration command. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49432&t=49432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3640 ATM Support (NM-4T1-IMA) [7:48858]
are u trying to run ima? if you have questions about the card, plug a loopback plug in and the port should go green. if u don't think the 3660 is recognizing the card, try reseating the card after rebooting the box. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49433&t=48858 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes. If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out your aggregation, you may want to use some lower end routers/switches, kind of like a distribution layer leading to the core devices in your POPs. HTH Kent ""bbfaye"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > we are handling a case of a MAN project now. > We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means we > have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access nodes(expensive...). > Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the > aggressive > nodes.I think it's not so good to do this,but not so sure about the > disadvantage. > Does anyone have experience or suggestion about using vlan and l2-mpls vpn in > the man? > thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49414&t=49346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that turn people on? Last I checked, IP did a pretty decent job of providing a robust means of interconnection between remote sites. To me, its LANE all over again, ie lets take a scalable, robust, intelligent technology and try and bridge with it. As far as building MANs with Spanning Tree as your control protocol, I might suggest that it will give you a real headache from a scaling and provisioning standpoint. You might want to find someone who worked at Yipes to give you some ideas. As far as building MPLS based bridging networks I would suggest that in many cases, the technology is pretty fresh at this point. The ppvpn group in the ietf and the vendor community (same thing?) are still considering a number of candidate solutions. However, at this point you should be able to find vendors capable of providing point to point topologies with various degrees of scaling properties. As well, I have heard that Riverstone may have a point to multipoint (ie capable of replicating one packet across a series of point to point LSP's) solution, but I have not researched it. In the future, a true VPLS solution should shake out that provides multi vendor compatible, 802.1d like bridging (ie mac learning with some type of listen/learn/forward STP like loop prevention). Again though, I tend to ask myself, is this really what we want to do with our nifty IP networks. I will say that I am fully behind replacing legacy frame/atm vpn networks with IP/MPLS networks in order to reduce the number of networks supported by a single provider. There are definite efficiencies to be gained here. Most access gear at this point supports some type of MPLS however. What type of gear are you using currently that makes it prohibitively expensive to upgrade at this point? At 08:12 PM 7/21/2002 +, bbfaye wrote: >we are handling a case of a MAN project now. >We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means we >have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access nodes(expensive...). >Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the >aggressive >nodes.I think it's not so good to do this,but not so sure about the >disadvantage. >Does anyone have experience or suggestion about using vlan and l2-mpls vpn in >the man? >thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49430&t=49346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSCI exam [7:49432]
Nothing like "real-world" scenarios on test that are nothing like the "real-world".. :) Tim CCIE 9015 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BSCI exam [7:49432] Hi, Today I passed the BSCI exam towards my CCIP certifictaion.I scored 930 and the passing score was 700 and the number of questions are 57.The exam contains all the routing protocol (more stress on IS-IS). The pattern of the exam is different from other exams,The exam has some design questions that needs to be implemented through the router simulators,very much like the real router's hyperterminal (Cisco CIM) but the functionality of help and tab commands are disabled here.One needs to remember the complete configuration command. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49436&t=49432 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]
Try using VPI 1 instead of 0. I know 0 is a valid option but I have seen it not work and we don't use it for other reasons that I don't know the history of. Also the framing and scrambling parameters are needed if I recall. Here is a config I know works cause I was using it in the lab: interface ATM0/0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache cef no atm ilmi-keepalive scrambling cell-payload framing cbitplcp ! interface ATM0/0/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast no ip route-cache cef no atm ilmi-keepalive atm pvc 1 32 interface ATM0/0/0 1 32 scrambling cell-payload framing cbitplcp Dave The Edward Groove wrote: > > Hey Andre, > > Thanks for your help thus far...Yes, all the > interfaces say up/up. I have changed the router > versions to 3.1 as you suggested. I still have no ip > connectivity. Any other suggestions? > > The routers/l1010 both have very up-to-date software, > as shown below from my "sho ver". > > Thanks, > > Eddie > > ROUTER 1: > > 3600 Software (C3620-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XT3, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac > Compiled Wed 13-Mar-02 23:15 by shawnk > Image text-base: 0x600089A8, data-base: 0x6153A000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > R3620-1 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 50 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c3620-is-mz.122-2.xt3.bin" > > cisco 3620 (R4700) processor (revision 0x81) with > 58368K/7168K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 20530878 > R4700 CPU at 80Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 1 Serial network interface(s) > 1 ATM network interface(s) > DRAM configuration is 32 bits wide with parity > disabled. > 29K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 16384K bytes of processor board System flash > (Read/Write) > 8192K bytes of processor board PCMCIA Slot0 flash > (Read/Write) > > Configuration register is 0x2182 > > > > ROUTER 2: > > 3600 Software (C3620-IS-M), Version 12.2(2)XT3, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac > Compiled Wed 13-Mar-02 23:15 by shawnk > Image text-base: 0x600089A8, data-base: 0x6153A000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.1(20)AA2, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > r3620-2 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 51 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is "flash:c3620-is-mz.122-2.xt3.bin" > > cisco 3620 (R4700) processor (revision 0x81) with > 58368K/7168K bytes of memory. > Processor board ID 21963872 > R4700 CPU at 80Mhz, Implementation 33, Rev 1.0 > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > 1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 1 Serial network interface(s) > 1 ATM network interface(s) > DRAM configuration is 32 bits wide with parity > disabled. > 29K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > 32768K bytes of processor board System flash > (Read/Write) > > Configuration register is 0x2182 > > --- > > L1010: > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) LS1010 WA3-4 Software (LS1010-WP-M), Version > 11.2(10)WA3(4a), RELEASE SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1902 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Thu 14-Mar-02 14:50 by integ > Image text-base: 0x600108D0, data-base: 0x60436000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.2(1.4.WA3.0) [integ > 1.4.WA3.0], RELEASE SOFTWARE > > L1010 uptime is 1 day, 13 hours, 24 minutes > System restarted by reload > System image file is > "bootflash:ls1010-wp-mz.112-10.wa3.4a.bin", booted via > bootflash > > cisco ASP (R4600) processor with 32768K bytes of > memory. > R4700 processor, Implementation 33, Revision 1.0 > Last reset from power-on > 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 4 ATM network interface(s) > 123K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > > 8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K). > Configuration register is 0x2101 > > --- Andre Riscalla > wrote: > > > > A couple of suggestions: > > > > 1) Verify that your ATM interfaces are up and up > > which i assume you > > already did. > > > > 2) Since your LS1010 ATM interfaces are setup with > > UNI version 3.1, change > > your ATM uni version on your routers to be 3.1. (The > > default is 3.0). > > > > Please provide the IOS version you are running on > > the LS1010 and on the > > routers as well. > > > > Thanks. > > > > AR- > > > > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Edward Sohn wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the reply, Andre... > > > > > > Hmmm...I was thinking the same way you did at > > first, but then the book's > > > configuration actually has both "atm pvc" commands > > in each interface. > > > Is that a typo, then? > > > > > > Even so, I cannot get connectivity between my > > routers. Here is my "sho > > > run" for the L1010 and 2 routers:
Everything working now? [7:49438]
GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize. We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. Any suggestions! Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49438&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2600 Series VPN with 3DES [7:49440]
I am configuring 2620 3DES feature set. On the other side of IPSec is Avaya VPNet. I am debugging this and seems as the transform set is configured right. VPNet is configured as follows: Encryption: 3DES Hash: SHA Diffie-H Group1 Anyone know what tranform set setting I should be using? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49440&t=49440 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delay on ISDN Backup with Dialer Profiles !?!? [7:49441]
Hi all, How can I configure a delay with dialer Profiles ?? Let's say I have a the following scenario with three routers (FR with OSPF). In case of the failure of the connection between router_3 and router_1 , either router_2 or router_3 can bring up an ISDN line. First it should come up the line between R1 and R3, but if after let's say 90sec the ISDN isn't up, router_2 should connect to router_3 via ISDN. So, how can I configure delay under "int DialerXX" ?? In every case router_3 should be the Called Router, and the others the calling routers ... router_2 * router_3 ** * * ** router_1 * on router_2 interface Dialer0 description ** ISDN Backup to router_3 ** ip address x.x.x.6 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name router_3 dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer string 123456 dialer-group 1 - on router_1 interface Dialer0 description ** ISDN Backup to router_3 ** ip address z.z.z.2 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name router_3 dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer string 123456 dialer-group 1 - on router_3 interface BRI0 description ** ISDN Backup to router_1/router_2 ** no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 dialer pool-member 2 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap interface Dialer0 description ** ISDN Backup to router_1 ** ip address z.z.z.3 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer pool 1 dialer map ip z.z.z.2 name router_1 broadcast dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap interface Dialer1 description ** ISDN Backup to router_2 ** ip address x.x.x.7 255.255.255.252 encapsulation ppp dialer idle-timeout 300 dialer pool 2 dialer map ip x.x.x.6 name router_2 broadcast dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap dialer list 1 . bla bla any ideas ?? cheers, monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49441&t=49441 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delay on ISDN Backup with Dialer Profiles !?!? [7:49441]
Sorry for the confusing "diagram" ;) router_1 connects to router_2 via FrameRelay router_1 connects to router_3 via FrameRelay All routers have ISDN connections need something like the backup delay xx yy command but for dialer interfaces ?!? cheers, monti Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49442&t=49441 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would like to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list. Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity 1 for all the IOS documenations. And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I couldn't find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the questions here have already been answered. Thanks everyone, -Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49444&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People of follow via the NewsFeed [7:49439]
If you follow this group via the Newsfeed (nntp://news.groupstudy.com) you may have missed a few messages from this morning. You can see what you missed by going to the website: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/list.php?f=7 Sorry for the inconvenience! Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49439&t=49439 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Everything working now? [7:49438]
Dude- Your Getting' a Dell! :-) Seriously, I think you could pick up a Dell Refurb 1U system with extended warranty at a steal... and they work great! 2U would be the way to go though, that way you can get RAID 5 Hot-Swap-ability, and have plenty of cooling space for the SCSI Drives. BTW- What server DOESN'T work with RedHat?? -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Everything working now? [7:49438] GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize. We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. Any suggestions! Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49446&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Kent Yu wrote: >I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the >aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes. >If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out >your aggregation, you may want to use some lower end routers/switches, kind >of like a distribution layer leading to the core devices in your POPs. > >HTH >Kent Agreed, if the access devices have only one or two uplinks and don't need the rerouting ability of IP. > > >""bbfaye"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> we are handling a case of a MAN project now. >> We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means >we >> have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access >nodes(expensive...). >> Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the >> aggressive >> nodes.I think it's not so good to do this,but not so sure about the >> disadvantage. >> Does anyone have experience or suggestion about using vlan and l2-mpls vpn >in >> the man? >> thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49445&t=49346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote: >Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this >direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that >turn people on? My impression is that it is an unholy alliance of traditional telcos and traditional vendors to traditional telcos, coupled with FUD/cluelessness with certain enterprises who think L2 is automatically configurable and infinitely scalable. I have seen estimates from telcos that without massive retraining, they think they can only support 10% L3, 90% L2 with their existing provisioning and support personnel. >Last I checked, IP did a pretty decent job of providing a >robust means of interconnection between remote sites. To me, its LANE all >over again, ie lets take a scalable, robust, intelligent technology and try >and bridge with it. As far as building MANs with Spanning Tree as your >control protocol, I might suggest that it will give you a real headache >from a scaling and provisioning standpoint. You might want to find someone >who worked at Yipes to give you some ideas. > >As far as building MPLS based bridging networks I would suggest that in >many cases, the technology is pretty fresh at this point. The ppvpn group >in the ietf and the vendor community (same thing?) are still considering a >number of candidate solutions. However, at this point you should be able >to find vendors capable of providing point to point topologies with various >degrees of scaling properties. As well, I have heard that Riverstone may >have a point to multipoint (ie capable of replicating one packet across a >series of point to point LSP's) solution, but I have not researched it. In >the future, a true VPLS solution should shake out that provides multi >vendor compatible, 802.1d like bridging (ie mac learning with some type of >listen/learn/forward STP like loop prevention). Again though, I tend to >ask myself, is this really what we want to do with our nifty IP networks. > >I will say that I am fully behind replacing legacy frame/atm vpn networks >with IP/MPLS networks in order to reduce the number of networks supported >by a single provider. There are definite efficiencies to be gained here. > >Most access gear at this point supports some type of MPLS however. What >type of gear are you using currently that makes it prohibitively expensive >to upgrade at this point? > > > > > >At 08:12 PM 7/21/2002 +, bbfaye wrote: >>we are handling a case of a MAN project now. >>We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means we >>have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access nodes(expensive...). >>Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the >>aggressive >>nodes.I think it's not so good to do this,but not so sure about the >>disadvantage. >>Does anyone have experience or suggestion about using vlan and l2-mpls vpn >in >>the man? >>thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49443&t=49346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
I'm curious what would happen if you took the "no keepalive" statement off of the ethernet interface you are using. By having this in place, you are effectively "spoofing" the up condition on the interface by telling it that "up" is ok, even if you aren't sending or receiving keepalives. I would imagine that if you took this off, then your test will fail. Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily relfect those of AT&T Government Solutions, Inc., it's management, or it's affiliates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of richard dumoulin Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347] No prob, see below. RB#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 11.2 no service password-encryption no service udp-small-servers no service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RB ! enable password cisco ! no ip domain-lookup ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface Serial0 ip unnumbered Ethernet0 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial2 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial3 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial4 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial5 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial6 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial7 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial8 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial9 no ip address shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address shutdown ! no ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0 ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login ! end RB#172.16.1.1 Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open User Access Verification Password: RA>en Password: RA#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 801 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RA ! enable password cisco ! memory-size iomem 10 ip subnet-zero ! ! no ip domain-lookup ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! call rsvp-sync ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0 no keepalive half-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0/1 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0/2 ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 clockrate 200 ! interface Serial0/3 no ip address shutdown ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/2 no ip http server ! ! ! dial-peer cor custom ! ! ! ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 password cisco login line vty 5 15 login ! no scheduler allocate end RA# RB# [Resuming connection 1 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] RA# RA# RB#172.16.1.1 Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open User Access Verification Password: RA>en Password: RA#ping 192.168.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms RA# RB#term mon % Console already monitors RB# %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state to down [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] RA#ping 192.168.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms RA#ping 192.168.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/5/8 ms RA# RB#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. RB(config)#int e0 RB(config-if)#shut RB(config-if)# %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Ethernet0, changed state to administratively down^Z RB#d %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleeb ip pa det IP packet debugging is on (detailed) RB# [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] RA# IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), len 40, sending TCP src=11001, dst=23, seq=3044171494, ack=4024004928, win=4288 ACK IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), len 42, sending TCP src=11001, dst=23, seq=3044171494, ack=4024004928, win=4288 ACK PSH IP: s=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), d=192.168.1.1 (Serial0), len 42, rcvd 3 TCP src=23, dst=11001, seq=4024004928, ack=3044171496, win=4058 ACK PSH IP: s=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), d=192.168.1.1 (Serial0), len 43, rcvd 3 TCP src=23, dst=11001, seq=4024004930, ack=3044171496, win=4058 ACK PSH IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), len 40, sending TCP src=11001, dst=23, seq=3044171496, ack=4024004933, win=4283 ACKping 192.168.1.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: !! IP: s=192.168.1.1 (local), d=172.16.1.1 (Serial0), len 41, sending TCP src=11001, dst=23, seq=3044171496, ack=4024004933, win=4283 ACK PSH IP: s=172
Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Jason, I am not sure but I think it depends on the type contract you have. I have the same issue. I know there are people on this list that have ordered 12.2 but when I look for it on the list I don't see it, I only see 12.1. Reza ""Barbee Jason"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select > documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would like > to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list. > Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity 1 > for all the IOS documenations. > And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco > Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. > Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? > > I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I couldn't > find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive > search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the > questions here have already been answered. > > Thanks everyone, > -Jason > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49448&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serial Number Retrieval Tool [7:49449]
Is there a tool out there for retrieval serial numbers from cisco switches? Anyone? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49449&t=49449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pix quick help [7:49450]
to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use and configure via the PDM, we give the command http server enable http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside what is the purpose for the command pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside do we need both the commands to allow the workstation be able to access PDM GUI ?? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49450&t=49450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vigilar spam? [7:49453]
Did anyone else get the vigilar.com spam? I am trying to determine if they are culling addresses from this list. If they are we will make it public they are spammers and arrange a boycott against their company. Please contact me direct and do not reply to the entire list. Thanks! Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49453&t=49453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Everything working now? [7:49438]
Paul, I'm sure that you'll get 1000 diffent suggestions on this, but my preference is Compaq. The DL380-G2 offers everything you'll need. You can get Dual processors, SCSI-RAID, etc, and they are fully Redhat compliant. We are using several of them with Redhat 7.2, and they are awesome. They are a little more expensive, but the support, service and quality you get from Compaq are unmatched in the Intel-based server industry in my opinion. Cost is probably around 4K/server once you outfit it with drives, etc. Check CDW.com for prices and configurations. HTH, Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily relfect those of AT&T Government Solutions, Inc., it's management, or it's affiliates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Everything working now? [7:49438] GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize. We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. Any suggestions! Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49454&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Product Number Product Description DOC-SRIOS12.2=Cisco IOS Release 12.2 Documentation Set -Eric - Original Message - From: "Reza" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:19 AM Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] > Jason, > I am not sure but I think it depends on the type contract you have. > I have the same issue. I know there are people on this list that have > ordered 12.2 but when I look for it on the list I don't see it, I only see > 12.1. > > Reza > > > > ""Barbee Jason"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select > > documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would > like > > to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list. > > Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity > 1 > > for all the IOS documenations. > > And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco > > Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. > > Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? > > > > I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I > couldn't > > find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive > > search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the > > questions here have already been answered. > > > > Thanks everyone, > > -Jason > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49455&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
I just went back onto CCO, and this is what I found. You just might have overlooked what you were looking for. The following is an excerpt from the order site: DOC-SRIOS11.3= Cisco IOS Release 11.3 Documentation Suite DOC-SRIOS12.0= Cisco IOS Release 12.0 Documentation Suite DOC-SRIOS12.1= Cisco IOS 12.1 Documentation Suite DOC-SRIOS12.2= Cisco IOS Release 12.2 Documentation Set So, it looks like, if you go looking for the above listed items, you should find what you're looking for. It was listed just after "Standard Router Documentation for IOS Release ..." Enjoy! Mark -Original Message- From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would like to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list. Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity 1 for all the IOS documenations. And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I couldn't find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the questions here have already been answered. Thanks everyone, -Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49456&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix quick help [7:49450]
I believe the answer is yes. The HTTP command specifies what node is allowed to hit the HTTP Server, while the PDM command defines the host allowed to log into the PDM App. I'm sure someone will rightly correct me if I'm wrong. :) -Mark -Original Message- From: John Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pix quick help [7:49450] to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use and configure via the PDM, we give the command http server enable http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside what is the purpose for the command pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside do we need both the commands to allow the workstation be able to access PDM GUI ?? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49457&t=49450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Everything working now? [7:49438]
I'd agree with the 2u and Dell recommendations. Much more flexible and better redundancy in the 2u systems. If the box will sit in a "populated" area be wary of the new Dell 2650, it's an extremely loud system. -Kevin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Mark W. Odette II > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Everything working now? [7:49438] > > > Dude- Your Getting' a Dell! :-) > > Seriously, I think you could pick up a Dell Refurb 1U system > with extended warranty at a steal... and they work great! > > 2U would be the way to go though, that way you can get RAID 5 > Hot-Swap-ability, and have plenty of cooling space for the > SCSI Drives. > > BTW- What server DOESN'T work with RedHat?? > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Everything working now? [7:49438] > > GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, > I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in > operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may > enable it later once things stabalize. > > We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money > to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth > from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we > have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need > suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The > more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The > new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. > > Any suggestions! > > Paul Borghese > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49460&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Jason, Funny you should mention it. I just received my order of documentation, which I placed over a month ago. One thing for sure, I got more documentation than I realized I ordered- and it was all free. I did not find an indication of charge for shipping or the docs themselves. Now I have enough documentation to fill 5 bookshelves! ... and yes, part of that documentation is the 12.2 docs-- config guide, debug docs, command guide, Voice-Video-Fax docs, and the list goes on. All of it is soft-cover though, so don't expect hard-cover. I received 1 very large box, a medium sized box, several small boxes and bubble envelopes... 11 pieces in all. Some of that was Voice docs though... ICS 7750, IP Phones, Call Manager, CiscoWorks for Voice, etc. I figured, if it was free, and I want to familiarize myself with that stuff for the future, why the heck not order it! I believe my Reseller Status is what allowed me to order it all for free though. Good Luck! Mark Odette II StellarConnection Services CCNP, MCSE, A+ Certified. -Original Message- From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would like to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list. Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity 1 for all the IOS documenations. And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I couldn't find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the questions here have already been answered. Thanks everyone, -Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49451&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial Number Retrieval Tool [7:49449]
I think Cricket will do this via rmon or SNMP? -Original Message- From: Kwame [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial Number Retrieval Tool [7:49449] Is there a tool out there for retrieval serial numbers from cisco switches? Anyone? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49458&t=49449 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vigilar spam? [7:49453]
I've received a couple emails from them. Same email sent to two of my addresses; only one is on this list I hate spam!! I hate spam!! I hate spam!! Cheers, mike j. ~~~ Michael Jablonski ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc. 161 North Clark St. 9th Flr Chicago, IL 60601-2468 PH: 312.884.2996 FAX: 312.278.5550 ~~~ -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vigilar spam? [7:49453] Did anyone else get the vigilar.com spam? I am trying to determine if they are culling addresses from this list. If they are we will make it public they are spammers and arrange a boycott against their company. Please contact me direct and do not reply to the entire list. Thanks! Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49462&t=49453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP Server on Multiple VLANs [7:49403]
did you try the " ip helper address" command on each of the vlans to point to a DHCP server? ""Don Pezet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey guys, > > I have a Cisco 3620 connected to a 2948G-L3 which > in turn provides layer three services to a cluster of > 3548XLs. I have 9 operating VLANs and have been trying > to work out a scenario for DHCP in my environment. > Right now, we assign static IPs in all 9 vlans because > we do not want to provide seperate DHCP servers for > each. If we could find a way to get one server to > provide DHCP to all the VLANs then we could implement > it. The trick is, each VLAN is a different subnet. > > I had heard that if you use the 3620 as a DHCP > server, create subinterfaces on a FE port using ISL and > assign IP addresses appropriately, and create multiple > DHCP pools, then the router would issues IPs from pools > that matched the interface it drew the request from. > However, when I try this it just issues IPs from the > first pool until it is full and then moves to the next. > > Is there a way to make sure the router assigns > correct IPs on the correct sub-interfaces? Is there a > 3rd party DHCP server that would do this better? > > Let me do a sample config to show what I tried. > Each network has a network printer at .200 (don't ask) > and a router sub-interface at .1 except the 10.10.10.0 > network which has reserved IPs through 100, but still a > router interface at .1 > > Here's the Cisco 3620 DHCP portion of the config: > ! > ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.100 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.200 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan1 > network 10.10.10.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 10.10.10.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan10 > network 192.168.1.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.1.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan20 > network 192.168.2.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.2.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan30 > network 192.168.3.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.3.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan40 > network 192.168.4.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.4.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan50 > network 192.168.5.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.5.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan60 > network 192.168.6.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.6.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan70 > network 192.168.7.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.7.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan80 > network 192.168.8.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.8.1 > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0 > description connected to Private Network > no ip address > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.1 > encapsulation isl 1 > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.10 > encapsulation isl 10 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.20 > encapsulation isl 20 > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.30 > encapsulation isl 30 > ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.40 > encapsulation isl 40 > ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.50 > encapsulation isl 50 > ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.60 > encapsulation isl 60 > ip address 192.168.6.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.70 > encapsulation isl 70 > ip address 192.168.7.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.80 > encapsulation isl 80 > ip address 192.168.8.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > > > Thanks, > > Don Pezet > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49463&t=49403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49461]
Hi all, I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - router B Router A : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 redistribute bgp 1 subnets network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 5.0.0.0 network 6.0.0.0 network 7.0.0.0 network 8.0.0.0 network 9.0.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 ! ip classless ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 Router B : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and propagated to neighbor : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 592 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 592 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 4 0x8001 0x2A22 0 But after some seconds, the external LSA is aged out and so disappears (by what ) : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 593 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 593 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 36000x8002 0x301B 1 CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 597 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 596 0x8006 0x7C72 2 If I use another summary-address (like 4.0.0.0/6 or 8.0.0.0/5), it works fine (external LSAs are not aged out). Why this use doesn't work ? What happens ? Why the LSA is aged out ? The purpose of this test was to conditionnaly advertise default routes (if BGP routes disappears, default route disappears). NB : router A is 1750 router with IOS 12.1(14) Thanks for help, -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49461&t=49461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nbar message [7:49466]
I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet interface on a 7513 service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF enabled Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49466&t=49466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nbar message [7:49466]
turn on dcef or cef. ""GEORGE"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet > interface on a 7513 > service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF > enabled Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49467&t=49466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Wow. Maybe my eyes were strained last night, but that option was not there. I logged in today and it was there. =DOC-SRIOS-12.2. Placed my order, and when I called Cisco Customer Support to verify they said the balance due is $0.00. Thanks for your help! -Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49468&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Everything working now? [7:49438]
Yea, but most co-location facilities charge on a per u basis. While we are currently being hosted for free at Swiftcomm, you never know when we will need to pay again. Therefore, I am trying to keep the footprint down to 1u. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Stone Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Everything working now? [7:49438] I'd agree with the 2u and Dell recommendations. Much more flexible and better redundancy in the 2u systems. If the box will sit in a "populated" area be wary of the new Dell 2650, it's an extremely loud system. -Kevin > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Mark W. Odette II > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:51 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Everything working now? [7:49438] > > > Dude- Your Getting' a Dell! :-) > > Seriously, I think you could pick up a Dell Refurb 1U system > with extended warranty at a steal... and they work great! > > 2U would be the way to go though, that way you can get RAID 5 > Hot-Swap-ability, and have plenty of cooling space for the > SCSI Drives. > > BTW- What server DOESN'T work with RedHat?? > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Everything working now? [7:49438] > > GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, > I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in > operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may > enable it later once things stabalize. > > We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money > to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth > from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we > have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need > suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The > more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The > new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. > > Any suggestions! > > Paul Borghese > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49470&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vigilar spam? [7:49453]
Then please report it to any and every spam list you can think of. Please the more of us that take action, the better. Here is some e-mails to help along the way. Their corporate network is being hosted by earthling (or at minimum their website). Try complaining to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Their domain name was reserved using these addresses: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The actual e-mail came from a service called silverpop.com. Please contact them at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Plus please complain to the silverpop hosting company, inflow: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please add to this list. Let's get these guys shutdown! They are culling e-mail addresses from virtually every Cisco discussion group on the net (as far as I can tell). Paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've received a couple emails from them. Same email sent to two of my > addresses; only one is on this list > > I hate spam!! > I hate spam!! > I hate spam!! > > Cheers, > mike j. > > > > > ~~~ > Michael Jablonski > ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc. > 161 North Clark St. > 9th Flr > Chicago, IL 60601-2468 > PH: 312.884.2996 > FAX: 312.278.5550 > ~~~ > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Vigilar spam? [7:49453] > > > Did anyone else get the vigilar.com spam? I am trying to determine if > they are culling addresses from this list. If they are we will make it > public they are spammers and arrange a boycott against their company. > > > > Please contact me direct and do not reply to the entire list. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49469&t=49453 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49471]
Some more informations : LSA for 0.0.0.0 (using summary-address) : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 5 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0x2A22 Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States Delete flag is set for this LSA LS age: MAXAGE(3600) Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8002 Checksum: 0x301B Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 16777215 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 1 LSA for 4.0.0.0 & 8.0.0.0 summary routes : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 11 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 4.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0xEC5E Length: 36 Network Mask: /6 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 LS age: 11 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 8.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8002 Checksum: 0xAA9F Length: 36 Network Mask: /5 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 LSA 0.0.0.0 using default-originate command -> works fine CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 13 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0x3C0F Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 1 So there's no difference, I just saw that using summary-address, the LSA 0.0.0.0 as an external route tag set to 0 and set to 1 when it is aged out. I done the same test using a cisco 2500 router with IOS 12.2, and it's the same, LSA is prematurely aged out when using summary-address command. Thanks for the help. Stephane ""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP > routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. > > (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - > router B > > > Router A : > -- > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > redistribute bgp 1 subnets > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > ! > router bgp 1 > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 5.0.0.0 > network 6.0.0.0 > network 7.0.0.0 > network 8.0.0.0 > network 9.0.0.0 > network 10.0.0.0 > ! > ip classless > ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 > > Router B : > -- > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and > propagated to neighbor : > > CustomerA#sh ip ospf database > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Router Link States (Area 0) > > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count > 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 592 0x8003 0x6121 2 > 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 592 0x8006 0x7C72 2 > > Type-5 AS External Link States > > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag > 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 4 0x8001 0x2A22 0 > > But after some seconds, the external LSA is aged out and so disappears (by > what ) : > > CustomerA#sh ip ospf database > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.2
switch simulator review? [7:49472]
Thinking of buying routersim.com's switch simulator to help me w/ BCMSN: http://www.routersim.com/product_switchsim.asp Does anybody have a review? Or recommend a similar product? Thanks everybody, -Sean. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49472&t=49472 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xyplex Maxserver 1600 as a router terminal server? [7:49474]
Anyone using a Maxserver series terminal server in their rack? I got a 24 port one for free and would love to use it in my lab. However, this thing has proven a major PITA to configure! If anyone out there has configured one of thse I would really appreciate some tips or examples. Thanks in advance, John Matney Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49474&t=49474 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49461]
Stephane, You're missing the "default-information originate" command. 0/0 can not be propagated into OSFP without it. Static, conditional, dynamic, redistributed, it doesn't matter. You need that statement to allow the 0/0 route into OSPF. (No doubt why it's showing up in the database but not in the route-tables - your logic is correct and the route is being summarized, but not allowed in) Read up on the default-information command; it's a neat one. You can do the conditional advertisement you're looking for with this command - and make it very specific using a route-map. Good Luck --Wes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49475&t=49461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49476]
Hello Mr. Litkowski, Based upon what is represented as your goal and diagram, I would suggest you use a "default-information originate route-map" statement under the ospf process on router A. The route map should clearly identify the bgp routes of interest. Winston V. Shaw CCIE(#7991) -Original Message- From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49471] Some more informations : LSA for 0.0.0.0 (using summary-address) : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 5 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0x2A22 Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States Delete flag is set for this LSA LS age: MAXAGE(3600) Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8002 Checksum: 0x301B Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 16777215 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 1 LSA for 4.0.0.0 & 8.0.0.0 summary routes : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 11 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 4.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0xEC5E Length: 36 Network Mask: /6 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 LS age: 11 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 8.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8002 Checksum: 0xAA9F Length: 36 Network Mask: /5 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 0 LSA 0.0.0.0 using default-originate command -> works fine CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Type-5 AS External Link States LS age: 13 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0x3C0F Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 1 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 1 So there's no difference, I just saw that using summary-address, the LSA 0.0.0.0 as an external route tag set to 0 and set to 1 when it is aged out. I done the same test using a cisco 2500 router with IOS 12.2, and it's the same, LSA is prematurely aged out when using summary-address command. Thanks for the help. Stephane ""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP > routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. > > (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - > router B > > > Router A : > -- > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > redistribute bgp 1 subnets > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > ! > router bgp 1 > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 5.0.0.0 > network 6.0.0.0 > network 7.0.0.0 > network 8.0.0.0 > network 9.0.0.0 > network 10.0.0.0 > ! > ip classless > ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 > > Router B : > -- > > router ospf 1 > log-adjacency-changes > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and > propagated to neighbor : > > CustomerA#sh ip ospf database > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Router Link States (Area 0) > > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link
Re: pix quick help [7:49450]
I was under the impression that the PDM command is just a pain in the arse cosmetic addition for use only within PDM. I'm fairly certain it's nothing to do with access to PDM itself. I'll try deleting them next time I get chance and see what effect it has on PDM, and if PDM automatically puts them back (in the same way that it automatically put them there in the first place) As always...let me know if I'm talking rubbish. Gaz ""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe the answer is yes. > > The HTTP command specifies what node is allowed to hit the HTTP Server, > while the PDM command defines the host allowed to log into the PDM App. > > I'm sure someone will rightly correct me if I'm wrong. :) > > -Mark > > -Original Message- > From: John Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: pix quick help [7:49450] > > to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use > and configure via the PDM, we give the command > http server enable > http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > what is the purpose for the command > pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > do we need both the commands to allow the workstation > be able to access PDM GUI ?? > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49478&t=49450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49477]
Is another router sending out the same summary? At 07:26 PM 7/23/2002 +, Stephane LITKOWSKI wrote: >Some more informations : > >LSA for 0.0.0.0 (using summary-address) : > >CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Type-5 AS External Link States > > LS age: 5 > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 > LS Seq Number: 8001 > Checksum: 0x2A22 > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 1 > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 0 > >CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Type-5 AS External Link States > > Delete flag is set for this LSA > LS age: MAXAGE(3600) > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 > LS Seq Number: 8002 > Checksum: 0x301B > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 16777215 > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 1 > > > >LSA for 4.0.0.0 & 8.0.0.0 summary routes : > > >CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Type-5 AS External Link States > > LS age: 11 > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 4.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 > LS Seq Number: 8001 > Checksum: 0xEC5E > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /6 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 1 > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 0 > > LS age: 11 > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 8.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 > LS Seq Number: 8002 > Checksum: 0xAA9F > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /5 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 1 > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 0 > > >LSA 0.0.0.0 using default-originate command -> works fine > >CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > Type-5 AS External Link States > > LS age: 13 > Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.254.254 > LS Seq Number: 8001 > Checksum: 0x3C0F > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 1 > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 1 > >So there's no difference, I just saw that using summary-address, the LSA >0.0.0.0 as an external route tag set to 0 and set to 1 when it is aged out. >I done the same test using a cisco 2500 router with IOS 12.2, and it's the >same, LSA is prematurely aged out when using summary-address command. > >Thanks for the help. > > >Stephane > > > >""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > > > I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP > > routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. > > > > (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - > > router B > > > > > > Router A : > > -- > > > > router ospf 1 > > log-adjacency-changes > > summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 > > redistribute bgp 1 subnets > > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > ! > > router bgp 1 > > bgp log-neighbor-changes > > network 5.0.0.0 > > network 6.0.0.0 > > network 7.0.0.0 > > network 8.0.0.0 > > network 9.0.0.0 > > network 10.0.0.0 > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > > ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > > ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > > ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > > ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 > > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 > > > > Router B : > > -- > > > > router ospf 1 > > log-adjacency-changes > > network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 > > > > > > On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and > > propagated to neighbor : > > > > CustomerA#sh ip ospf database > > > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) > > > > > > Router Link States (Area 0) > > > > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count > > 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 592 0x8003 0x6121 2 > > 192.1
RE: Need Cheap ATM Switch [7:48945]
I have an atm switch similar to the LS100 in almost every way except the color of the case. It was NEC before it became the LS100 and I will sell it to you for a very reasonable price. The swith does work and I have pictures of it side by side with the LS100 to show the simalarities. The best part of all is they both take the same CLI commands. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49479&t=48945 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49480]
Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy. Try setting port security commands or setting cam filter commands. If it takes these commands you are in business. Be careful of how you use them though. Using MAC addresses for security can cause problems like shutting ports down when the unwanted MAC tries to cross the port threshold. Winston V. Shaw CCIE(#7991) -Original Message- From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49410] I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able to access port 6, on VLAN 60, but not each other. I did find something on CCO about Private VLANs, but I see that the 2924 is not on the list of hardware that supports PVLAN's. Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this segregation within the same VLAN, short of PVLAN's? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Don Claybrook Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49480&t=49480 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Virtually any Cisco contract will entitle you to free documentation. If it shows up with an orderable quantity in the product upgrade tool, then you can get it for free. Thanks, Shawn "Mark W. Odette II" wrote: > > Jason, > > Funny you should mention it. > > I just received my order of documentation, which I placed over a month > ago. > > One thing for sure, I got more documentation than I realized I ordered- > and it was all free. I did not find an indication of charge for > shipping or the docs themselves. Now I have enough documentation to > fill 5 bookshelves! > > ... and yes, part of that documentation is the 12.2 docs-- config guide, > debug docs, command guide, Voice-Video-Fax docs, and the list goes on. > > All of it is soft-cover though, so don't expect hard-cover. > > I received 1 very large box, a medium sized box, several small boxes and > bubble envelopes... 11 pieces in all. > > Some of that was Voice docs though... ICS 7750, IP Phones, Call Manager, > CiscoWorks for Voice, etc. > > I figured, if it was free, and I want to familiarize myself with that > stuff for the future, why the heck not order it! > > I believe my Reseller Status is what allowed me to order it all for free > though. > > Good Luck! > > Mark Odette II > StellarConnection Services > CCNP, MCSE, A+ Certified. > > -Original Message- > From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] > > When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select > documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would > like > to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the > list. > Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter > quantity 1 > for all the IOS documenations. > And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco > Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. > Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? > > I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I > couldn't > find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive > search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the > questions here have already been answered. -- Shawn Heisey Cisco Systems USA Technical Lead for SLC-SECURITY team Direct: +1 801 736 3939 ext 55153 Toll Free: +1 800 553 2447 Shift: Mon-Fri 8:30a-5:00p Mountain Daylight Time Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49473&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix quick help [7:49450]
PDM location commands have no functionality. Think of them as PDM build a map of networks/hosts around it based on the static, nat, global and route statements you have configured on your PIX. You can remove those commands if you wish, but next time you'll use PDM, they'll be back in your config. Just pay no attention to them. Again, they have no functionality; they do not allow or disallow anything... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pix quick help [7:49450] I was under the impression that the PDM command is just a pain in the arse cosmetic addition for use only within PDM. I'm fairly certain it's nothing to do with access to PDM itself. I'll try deleting them next time I get chance and see what effect it has on PDM, and if PDM automatically puts them back (in the same way that it automatically put them there in the first place) As always...let me know if I'm talking rubbish. Gaz ""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe the answer is yes. > > The HTTP command specifies what node is allowed to hit the HTTP Server, > while the PDM command defines the host allowed to log into the PDM App. > > I'm sure someone will rightly correct me if I'm wrong. :) > > -Mark > > -Original Message- > From: John Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: pix quick help [7:49450] > > to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use > and configure via the PDM, we give the command > http server enable > http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > what is the purpose for the command > pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > do we need both the commands to allow the workstation > be able to access PDM GUI ?? > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49483&t=49450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: nbar message [7:49466]
Got it!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: nbar message [7:49466] turn on dcef or cef. ""GEORGE"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet > interface on a 7513 > service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF > enabled Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49485&t=49466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Cheers Guys... docs on da way!!! - Original Message - From: "Shawn Heisey" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:41 PM Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] > Virtually any Cisco contract will entitle you to free documentation. If > it shows up with an orderable quantity in the product upgrade tool, then > you can get it for free. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > "Mark W. Odette II" wrote: > > > > Jason, > > > > Funny you should mention it. > > > > I just received my order of documentation, which I placed over a month > > ago. > > > > One thing for sure, I got more documentation than I realized I ordered- > > and it was all free. I did not find an indication of charge for > > shipping or the docs themselves. Now I have enough documentation to > > fill 5 bookshelves! > > > > ... and yes, part of that documentation is the 12.2 docs-- config guide, > > debug docs, command guide, Voice-Video-Fax docs, and the list goes on. > > > > All of it is soft-cover though, so don't expect hard-cover. > > > > I received 1 very large box, a medium sized box, several small boxes and > > bubble envelopes... 11 pieces in all. > > > > Some of that was Voice docs though... ICS 7750, IP Phones, Call Manager, > > CiscoWorks for Voice, etc. > > > > I figured, if it was free, and I want to familiarize myself with that > > stuff for the future, why the heck not order it! > > > > I believe my Reseller Status is what allowed me to order it all for free > > though. > > > > Good Luck! > > > > Mark Odette II > > StellarConnection Services > > CCNP, MCSE, A+ Certified. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:37 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] > > > > When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select > > documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would > > like > > to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the > > list. > > Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter > > quantity 1 > > for all the IOS documenations. > > And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco > > Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. > > Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? > > > > I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I > > couldn't > > find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive > > search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the > > questions here have already been answered. > > -- > Shawn Heisey > Cisco Systems USA > Technical Lead for SLC-SECURITY team > Direct: +1 801 736 3939 ext 55153 > Toll Free: +1 800 553 2447 > Shift: Mon-Fri 8:30a-5:00p Mountain Daylight Time Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49486&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mop enable [7:49487]
This command I looked it up at Cisco web site and it says it's a maintenance operation protocol But what does it do exactly? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49487&t=49487 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49489]
I agree with the other post... if you don't want 1 and 5 to access each other, then what's the point of having them in the same VLAN? Mike W. "Winston Shaw" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy. > Try setting port security commands or setting cam filter commands. If it > takes these commands you are in business. Be careful of how you use them > though. Using MAC addresses for security can cause problems like shutting > ports down when the unwanted MAC tries to cross the port threshold. > > Winston V. Shaw > CCIE(#7991) > > > -Original Message- > From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from > [7:49410] > > > I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same > VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with > one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another > port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able to access > port 6, on VLAN 60, but not each other. > > > > I did find something on CCO about Private VLANs, but I see that the 2924 is > not on the list of hardware that supports PVLAN's. Does anyone know of a > way > to accomplish this segregation within the same VLAN, short of PVLAN's? Any > help is much appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Don Claybrook Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49489&t=49489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: L2/L3 traceroute [7:49260]
New version, v1.1.3, with numerous bug fixes :(, is posted on http://www.geocities.com/milicsasa/Tools/ Now with Windows2000 support ! Regards, Sasa, CCIE 8635 "Wright, Jeremy" wrote: > > does anyone know of a similar tool for windows. we dont have redhat on a > laptop which would be a huge troubleshooting asset. tia. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49490&t=49260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix quick help [7:49450]
Thanks for the clarification! I figured I'd learn the truth to what I thought when I read up on the PDM documentation, or the PIX doc for the CSS1. -Mark -Original Message- From: Lidiya White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: pix quick help [7:49450] PDM location commands have no functionality. Think of them as PDM build a map of networks/hosts around it based on the static, nat, global and route statements you have configured on your PIX. You can remove those commands if you wish, but next time you'll use PDM, they'll be back in your config. Just pay no attention to them. Again, they have no functionality; they do not allow or disallow anything... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pix quick help [7:49450] I was under the impression that the PDM command is just a pain in the arse cosmetic addition for use only within PDM. I'm fairly certain it's nothing to do with access to PDM itself. I'll try deleting them next time I get chance and see what effect it has on PDM, and if PDM automatically puts them back (in the same way that it automatically put them there in the first place) As always...let me know if I'm talking rubbish. Gaz ""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I believe the answer is yes. > > The HTTP command specifies what node is allowed to hit the HTTP Server, > while the PDM command defines the host allowed to log into the PDM App. > > I'm sure someone will rightly correct me if I'm wrong. :) > > -Mark > > -Original Message- > From: John Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: pix quick help [7:49450] > > to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use > and configure via the PDM, we give the command > http server enable > http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > what is the purpose for the command > pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside > > do we need both the commands to allow the workstation > be able to access PDM GUI ?? > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49491&t=49450 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Everything working now? [7:49438]
I'm just curious, whats the newsgroup running on now? ""Paul Borghese"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the > list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the > archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize. > > We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase > said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth from Swiftcomm and the > selling of banner advertisements, we have been able to create quite a trust > fund. So I need suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. > The more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The new server > needs to work under RedHat Linux. > > Any suggestions! > > Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49481&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254]
I have seen a similar error when we had 2 pcs on the same switch with the same mac address. (it was a strange driver issue that caused pc's with that driver to have the same, incorrect mac address) I don't understand teaming, I would guess teaming has to come up with a "shared" mac address to work. The switch may see that address moving back and forth between teamed ports?? Maybe someone else can clarify.. Ed --- Gary Crouch wrote: > When I team our Intel NICs one of the ports on our > cat 3500xl shows > addr_flapp about once every minuet > is they any thing you need to do to support teaming? > > no errors in non teamed mode. > > Thanks > > Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49488&t=49254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
At 04:12 PM 7/23/2002 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote: > >Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this > >direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that > >turn people on? > >My impression is that it is an unholy alliance of traditional telcos >and traditional vendors to traditional telcos, coupled with >FUD/cluelessness with certain enterprises who think L2 is >automatically configurable and infinitely scalable. > >I have seen estimates from telcos that without massive retraining, >they think they can only support 10% L3, 90% L2 with their existing >provisioning and support personnel. They obviously haven't configured L2VPN recently :) IP looks pretty good comparatively from a complexity standpoint. > >Last I checked, IP did a pretty decent job of providing a > >robust means of interconnection between remote sites. To me, its LANE all > >over again, ie lets take a scalable, robust, intelligent technology and try > >and bridge with it. As far as building MANs with Spanning Tree as your > >control protocol, I might suggest that it will give you a real headache > >from a scaling and provisioning standpoint. You might want to find someone > >who worked at Yipes to give you some ideas. > > > >As far as building MPLS based bridging networks I would suggest that in > >many cases, the technology is pretty fresh at this point. The ppvpn group > >in the ietf and the vendor community (same thing?) are still considering a > >number of candidate solutions. However, at this point you should be able > >to find vendors capable of providing point to point topologies with various > >degrees of scaling properties. As well, I have heard that Riverstone may > >have a point to multipoint (ie capable of replicating one packet across a > >series of point to point LSP's) solution, but I have not researched it. In > >the future, a true VPLS solution should shake out that provides multi > >vendor compatible, 802.1d like bridging (ie mac learning with some type of > >listen/learn/forward STP like loop prevention). Again though, I tend to > >ask myself, is this really what we want to do with our nifty IP networks. > > > >I will say that I am fully behind replacing legacy frame/atm vpn networks > >with IP/MPLS networks in order to reduce the number of networks supported > >by a single provider. There are definite efficiencies to be gained here. > > > >Most access gear at this point supports some type of MPLS however. What > >type of gear are you using currently that makes it prohibitively expensive > >to upgrade at this point? > > > > > > > > > > > >At 08:12 PM 7/21/2002 +, bbfaye wrote: > >>we are handling a case of a MAN project now. > >>We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means >we > >>have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access nodes(expensive...). > >>Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the > >>aggressive > >>nodes.I think it's not so good to do this,but not so sure about the > >>disadvantage. > >>Does anyone have experience or suggestion about using vlan and l2-mpls vpn > >in > >>the man? > >>thanks a lot. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49459&t=49346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Everything working now? [7:49438]
$4,000? Kind of expensive. I built a dual P3 1.13GHz system for less than $1,800: Intel SIA2 motherboard with 2 P3 1.13GHz 1GB memory (IBM) 2x36GB Cheetah SCSI (15,000 rpm compared to 10,000 rpm) CDRW+DVD Lian-Li aluminum case Accessories The thing I like is it's very quite. Compaq servers' noise really bothers me. I bought everything from ebay and all brand new. With $4,000, I can build another system for standby. Yoshi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kelly Cobean Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Everything working now? [7:49438] Paul, I'm sure that you'll get 1000 diffent suggestions on this, but my preference is Compaq. The DL380-G2 offers everything you'll need. You can get Dual processors, SCSI-RAID, etc, and they are fully Redhat compliant. We are using several of them with Redhat 7.2, and they are awesome. They are a little more expensive, but the support, service and quality you get from Compaq are unmatched in the Intel-based server industry in my opinion. Cost is probably around 4K/server once you outfit it with drives, etc. Check CDW.com for prices and configurations. HTH, Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed herein are those of the author alone, and do not necessarily relfect those of AT&T Government Solutions, Inc., it's management, or it's affiliates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Everything working now? [7:49438] GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize. We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase said new hardware :-). With the free bandwidth from Swiftcomm and the selling of banner advertisements, we have been able to create quite a trust fund. So I need suggestions on Intel based servers that are 1u in size. The more redundancy and memory, the better. Probably SCSI. The new server needs to work under RedHat Linux. Any suggestions! Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49464&t=49438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed routing 3.0 [7:49452]
Hey all, want to thank all the people for the advice on the routing email. Tough exam it was. Passable, but you need to be on the ball. Now iv got the Switching test up next and was wondering if anyone has used Quizware as an alternative to Boson? Thanks. Richard Tufaro - MCSE - CCNA - GSEC Network Engineer - Anda Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49452&t=49452 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
I believe it costs a fortune (over $1000) for us mere customers/end users. I imagine Cisco thinks you resellers need to have it to support your customers, so they don't have to do as much of the support. I love my 12.1 printed docs, which I paid $400 plus shipping (around 43 dollars, I think) on ebay. My impression is that most people in this industry have no problem using the CD documentation and reading just about everything from a screen. I feel like some sort of relic because I strongly favor reading from paper. ""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Jason, > > Funny you should mention it. > > I just received my order of documentation, which I placed over a month > ago. > > One thing for sure, I got more documentation than I realized I ordered- > and it was all free. I did not find an indication of charge for > shipping or the docs themselves. Now I have enough documentation to > fill 5 bookshelves! > > ... and yes, part of that documentation is the 12.2 docs-- config guide, > debug docs, command guide, Voice-Video-Fax docs, and the list goes on. > > All of it is soft-cover though, so don't expect hard-cover. > > I received 1 very large box, a medium sized box, several small boxes and > bubble envelopes... 11 pieces in all. > > Some of that was Voice docs though... ICS 7750, IP Phones, Call Manager, > CiscoWorks for Voice, etc. > > I figured, if it was free, and I want to familiarize myself with that > stuff for the future, why the heck not order it! > > I believe my Reseller Status is what allowed me to order it all for free > though. > > Good Luck! > > Mark Odette II > StellarConnection Services > CCNP, MCSE, A+ Certified. > > -Original Message- > From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444] > > When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select > documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would > like > to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the > list. > Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter > quantity 1 > for all the IOS documenations. > And I'm concerned about billing too, it appears it will charge our Cisco > Reseller for the shipping and/or costs. > Do these documents cost anything or is it just the cost of shipping? > > I thought I had read a thread that mentioned this somewhere, but I > couldn't > find it using the groupstudy google search engine, and the older archive > search engine gave a glimpse not found error. I apologize if some of the > questions here have already been answered. > > Thanks everyone, > -Jason > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.cciewannabe.com - Remote Cisco Lab Access Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49465&t=49444 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]
Dear All, I am jumping into a similar mess as when I started at my current company, but this time the Macs out number the PC's. Well here is the scoop: 180 Macs 50 PC's Static Ip's No DHCP No FW Quick Mail Server and a whole bunch of other nasty things.. - They just purchases a Pix 515 - They just bought Exchange 5.5 My projects are: Set up DHCP Set up Pix Set up Private Addressing Set up Exchange Migrate them from Quick Mail etc etc I have done this before but maybe you guys can help as to how I should go about this the quickest. Thanks, Kevin _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49492&t=49492 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Startup? [7:49493]
Can someone clarify this for me? During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books states it is in this order: - Routing Table is Generated Down State Init State 2way State (bidirection communication established) - DR/BDR Election ExStart State (DR/BDR election done) Full State So the routing table is first populated for each router, then the DR and BDR are elected? Thanks Rob Cluett, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49493&t=49493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49482]
Stephane, Looks like you are using the wrong command to achieve the desired result... you use 'summary-address' to define routes you want to 'summarize' for redistribution - it has nothing to do with a default gateway address. 'default-information-orginate' is the command you want to use to push out a default gateway into ospf for what you are trying to achieve. HTH, Mark. -Original Message- From: Stephane LITKOWSKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2002 04:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF summarizing BGP redistributed routes into 0/0 [7:49461] Hi all, I tried to use the "summary-address" OSPF command to summarize learned BGP routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work. (fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) - router B Router A : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 redistribute bgp 1 subnets network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 5.0.0.0 network 6.0.0.0 network 7.0.0.0 network 8.0.0.0 network 9.0.0.0 network 10.0.0.0 ! ip classless ip route 5.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 6.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 7.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 8.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 9.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 FastEthernet0 Router B : -- router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 1.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0 On the router A, I can see that type 5 LSA is installed for 0/0 and propagated to neighbor : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 592 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 592 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 4 0x8001 0x2A22 0 But after some seconds, the external LSA is aged out and so disappears (by what ) : CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 593 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 593 0x8006 0x7C72 2 Type-5 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag 0.0.0.0 192.168.254.254 36000x8002 0x301B 1 CustomerA#sh ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count 192.168.108.4 192.168.108.4 597 0x8003 0x6121 2 192.168.254.254 192.168.254.254 596 0x8006 0x7C72 2 If I use another summary-address (like 4.0.0.0/6 or 8.0.0.0/5), it works fine (external LSAs are not aged out). Why this use doesn't work ? What happens ? Why the LSA is aged out ? The purpose of this test was to conditionnaly advertise default routes (if BGP routes disappears, default route disappears). NB : router A is 1750 router with IOS 12.1(14) Thanks for help, -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49482&t=49482 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP Server on Multiple VLANs [7:49403]
Hello Don, I think you could set up DHCP scopes on a server and use the "ip helper address" command to direct dhcp discover broadcasts from your clients. The router should place its own sub-interface address in the packet and send it to the DHCP server. The server should then pick from the corresponding scope depending on the router IP address. I know of at least one server which does that but I do not want to mention it here. Winston V. Shaw CCIE(#7991) -Original Message- From: Don Pezet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP Server on Multiple VLANs [7:49403] Hey guys, I have a Cisco 3620 connected to a 2948G-L3 which in turn provides layer three services to a cluster of 3548XLs. I have 9 operating VLANs and have been trying to work out a scenario for DHCP in my environment. Right now, we assign static IPs in all 9 vlans because we do not want to provide seperate DHCP servers for each. If we could find a way to get one server to provide DHCP to all the VLANs then we could implement it. The trick is, each VLAN is a different subnet. I had heard that if you use the 3620 as a DHCP server, create subinterfaces on a FE port using ISL and assign IP addresses appropriately, and create multiple DHCP pools, then the router would issues IPs from pools that matched the interface it drew the request from. However, when I try this it just issues IPs from the first pool until it is full and then moves to the next. Is there a way to make sure the router assigns correct IPs on the correct sub-interfaces? Is there a 3rd party DHCP server that would do this better? Let me do a sample config to show what I tried. Each network has a network printer at .200 (don't ask) and a router sub-interface at .1 except the 10.10.10.0 network which has reserved IPs through 100, but still a router interface at .1 Here's the Cisco 3620 DHCP portion of the config: ! ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.100 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.200 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.1 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.200 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan1 network 10.10.10.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 10.10.10.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan10 network 192.168.1.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.1.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan20 network 192.168.2.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.2.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan30 network 192.168.3.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.3.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan40 network 192.168.4.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.4.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan50 network 192.168.5.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.5.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan60 network 192.168.6.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.6.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan70 network 192.168.7.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.7.1 ! ip dhcp pool Vlan80 network 192.168.8.0 /24 dns-server 4.2.2.1 default-router 192.168.8.1 ! interface FastEthernet1/0 description connected to Private Network no ip address duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet1/0.1 encapsulation isl 1 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.10 encapsulation isl 10 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.20 encapsulation isl 20 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.30 encapsulation isl 30 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.40 encapsulation isl 40 ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.50 encapsulation isl 50 ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.60 encapsulation isl 60 ip address 192.168.6.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.70 encapsulation isl 70 ip address 192.168.7.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! interface FastEthernet1/0.80 encapsulation isl 80 ip address 192.168.8.1 255.255.255.0 no ip redirects ! Thanks, Don Pezet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49484&t=49403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Startup? [7:49493]
yes. ""Robert Cluett"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Can someone clarify this for me? > > During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books > states it is in this order: > > - Routing Table is Generated > Down State > Init State > 2way State (bidirection communication established) > - DR/BDR Election > ExStart State (DR/BDR election done) > Full State > > So the routing table is first populated for each router, then the DR and BDR > are elected? > > Thanks > Rob Cluett, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49494&t=49493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254]
the teaming we have does not share the mac address. it shares the ip and you can see the mac address has 1 different character then the other. -Original Message- From: E Joseph To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/23/02 5:00 PM Subject: Re: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254] I have seen a similar error when we had 2 pcs on the same switch with the same mac address. (it was a strange driver issue that caused pc's with that driver to have the same, incorrect mac address) I don't understand teaming, I would guess teaming has to come up with a "shared" mac address to work. The switch may see that address moving back and forth between teamed ports?? Maybe someone else can clarify.. Ed --- Gary Crouch wrote: > When I team our Intel NICs one of the ports on our > cat 3500xl shows > addr_flapp about once every minuet > is they any thing you need to do to support teaming? > > no errors in non teamed mode. > > Thanks > > Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49495&t=49254 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496]
Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support exam is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49496&t=49496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Startup? [7:49493]
Generating candidate routes for a routing table is an OSPF function in this context, not a router function. For that reason you need to think only about when in the OSPF state machine are DR/BDR roles detected/elected. In general, this occurs on a per segment basis when an ospf speaking router initially transmits and listens for hellos. At 01:08 AM 7/24/2002 +, Robert Cluett wrote: >Can someone clarify this for me? > >During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books >states it is in this order: > >- Routing Table is Generated > Down State > Init State > 2way State (bidirection communication established) >- DR/BDR Election > ExStart State (DR/BDR election done) > Full State > >So the routing table is first populated for each router, then the DR and BDR >are elected? > >Thanks >Rob Cluett, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49497&t=49493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49498]
Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port. ""Winston Shaw"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy. > Try setting port security commands or setting cam filter commands. If it > takes these commands you are in business. Be careful of how you use them > though. Using MAC addresses for security can cause problems like shutting > ports down when the unwanted MAC tries to cross the port threshold. > > Winston V. Shaw > CCIE(#7991) > > > -Original Message- > From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from > [7:49410] > > > I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same > VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with > one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another > port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able to access > port 6, on VLAN 60, but not each other. > > > > I did find something on CCO about Private VLANs, but I see that the 2924 is > not on the list of hardware that supports PVLAN's. Does anyone know of a > way > to accomplish this segregation within the same VLAN, short of PVLAN's? Any > help is much appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Don Claybrook Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49498&t=49498 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]
Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-) Ok, here's the order I'd do things in... First things first, get that firewall in place. You don't list what their internet connectivity is, but if they bought a PIX, it's safe to assume that they have a persistent connection, and that being true, they're really hanging it out there for someone to cut off, so to speak. Network security is always a primary concern, and the firewall won't take alot of time to set up. Not setting it up could be very costly. If they already have a light(er)-weight firewall like a Linux host running IP chains or IP tables, replacing this first will save your users down-time later because you can pre-configure your internet rulebase/access in preparation for your private addressing. Next, I'd do the DHCP and Private Addressing. These go hand in hand, and since your firewall is now in place, you can do the NAT/PAT translations as needed and not have to rethink these later. Third, get Exchange up and running. If it's going on a different system than Quick mail is running on, great! Now you can get them running in parallel, and move users accounts over one at a time or in batches. There are probably tools out there to do the mailbox format conversion. Now that your network is secure at layer3/4, you can focus on the nitty-gritty of the user data. (Oh yeah, don't forget that backup!!!) It's a 10,000 foot view, but that's how I'd do it. I'm not really a MAC guy, but I'd venture a guess that most or all of your MAC's run TCP/IP and support DHCP, so from an L3/4 standpoint, they're really no different than your PC's. When doing multiple projects like this, I tend to work along the OSI model. If the wiring is horrible, or the NIC's are all old 10Base2 nics and have transceivers to hook them to your BaseT network, take care of the layer 1 stuff first. Next, if the network is all unmanaged hubs, and your network is one gigantic broadcast domain, start installing switches to quiet down the network. Next, get VLANs/routing/security in place for Layer3/4. Next, work on the "upper layers" where all of your apps and data live and talk. Just my $0.02 worth. HTH, Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin O'Gilvie Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Dear All, I am jumping into a similar mess as when I started at my current company, but this time the Macs out number the PC's. Well here is the scoop: 180 Macs 50 PC's Static Ip's No DHCP No FW Quick Mail Server and a whole bunch of other nasty things.. - They just purchases a Pix 515 - They just bought Exchange 5.5 My projects are: Set up DHCP Set up Pix Set up Private Addressing Set up Exchange Migrate them from Quick Mail etc etc I have done this before but maybe you guys can help as to how I should go about this the quickest. Thanks, Kevin _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49499&t=49492 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF Startup? [7:49493]
Correction (I am correcting myself) Actually it goes like this: - Neighbors are Established Down State Init State 2way State (bidirection communication established) - DR/BDR Election ExStart State (DR/BDR election done) - Routing Table is Generated Loading (Sending LSU's, LSR's) Full State (All LSR's Satisfied) - SPF Algorithm Executed (Old Routing Table still in use) - New Routing Table in use Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49500&t=49493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496]
Hi, 776 regards, Alexey -Original Message- From: Charles McKnight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496] Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support exam is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49501&t=49496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49503]
Wha?!? What would that accomplish? Mike W. "Thomas Larus" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the > port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49503&t=49503 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OSPF Startup? [7:49493]
Robert, You are correct. Think of it this way, there first has to be a table to populate before OSPF can populate it, so when the startup configuration is read, the router takes the ip address statements from the interfaces, along with any static routes, and creates the initial routing table. Now there is something for OSPF to populate. Also, the config file must be read to determine which interfaces will participate in the OSPF process, so the "connected routes" must be known before the OSPF state-machine is started. HTH, Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I Network Engineer AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Cluett Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF Startup? [7:49493] Can someone clarify this for me? During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books states it is in this order: - Routing Table is Generated Down State Init State 2way State (bidirection communication established) - DR/BDR Election ExStart State (DR/BDR election done) Full State So the routing table is first populated for each router, then the DR and BDR are elected? Thanks Rob Cluett, CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49504&t=49493 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DHCP Server on Multiple VLANs [7:49403]
That's exactly what he should do "Winston Shaw" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello Don, > > I think you could set up DHCP scopes on a server and use the "ip helper > address" command to direct dhcp discover broadcasts from your clients. The > router should place its own sub-interface address in the packet and send it > to the DHCP server. The server should then pick from the corresponding scope > depending on the router IP address. I know of at least one server which does > that but I do not want to mention it here. > > Winston V. Shaw > CCIE(#7991) > > > > -Original Message- > From: Don Pezet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DHCP Server on Multiple VLANs [7:49403] > > > Hey guys, > > I have a Cisco 3620 connected to a 2948G-L3 which > in turn provides layer three services to a cluster of > 3548XLs. I have 9 operating VLANs and have been trying > to work out a scenario for DHCP in my environment. > Right now, we assign static IPs in all 9 vlans because > we do not want to provide seperate DHCP servers for > each. If we could find a way to get one server to > provide DHCP to all the VLANs then we could implement > it. The trick is, each VLAN is a different subnet. > > I had heard that if you use the 3620 as a DHCP > server, create subinterfaces on a FE port using ISL and > assign IP addresses appropriately, and create multiple > DHCP pools, then the router would issues IPs from pools > that matched the interface it drew the request from. > However, when I try this it just issues IPs from the > first pool until it is full and then moves to the next. > > Is there a way to make sure the router assigns > correct IPs on the correct sub-interfaces? Is there a > 3rd party DHCP server that would do this better? > > Let me do a sample config to show what I tried. > Each network has a network printer at .200 (don't ask) > and a router sub-interface at .1 except the 10.10.10.0 > network which has reserved IPs through 100, but still a > router interface at .1 > > Here's the Cisco 3620 DHCP portion of the config: > ! > ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.100 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.2.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.3.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.4.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.5.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.6.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.7.200 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.1 > ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.8.200 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan1 > network 10.10.10.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 10.10.10.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan10 > network 192.168.1.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.1.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan20 > network 192.168.2.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.2.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan30 > network 192.168.3.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.3.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan40 > network 192.168.4.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.4.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan50 > network 192.168.5.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.5.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan60 > network 192.168.6.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.6.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan70 > network 192.168.7.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.7.1 > ! > ip dhcp pool Vlan80 > network 192.168.8.0 /24 > dns-server 4.2.2.1 > default-router 192.168.8.1 > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0 > description connected to Private Network > no ip address > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.1 > encapsulation isl 1 > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.10 > encapsulation isl 10 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.20 > encapsulation isl 20 > ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.30 > encapsulation isl 30 > ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.40 > encapsulation isl 40 > ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.50 > encapsulation isl 50 > ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.60 > encapsulation isl 60 > ip address 192.168.6.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.70 > encapsulation isl 70 > ip address 192.168.7.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip redirects > ! > interface FastEthernet1/0.80 > encapsulation isl 80 > ip address 192.168.8.1 255.255.255
RE: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49507]
I like the idea put down earlier. Why have them on the same VLAN. From what I know (an issue you can all debate) this would need to be assessed when you design you network. The idea I use when building my switched network, is grouping together users who have the same network needs, and allocating them to the same VLAN. This keeps them away from the evil developers whilst at the same time gives me the power to enforce restrictions upon what IP's they can or cant access. What do you all think ? Would love to hear it. John -Original Message- From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 24 July 2002 12:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How to keep multiple switch ports on the same VLAN from [7:49503] Wha?!? What would that accomplish? Mike W. "Thomas Larus" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the > port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port. ** visit http://www.solution6.com visit http://www.eccountancy.com - everything for accountants. UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed by it. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49507&t=49507 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Priscilla Oppenheimer [7:49347]
hhm learn something new every day. thanks. that still gets back to how ip unnumbered "really" works, as opposed to how most of us "think" it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about using the RID as the interface address: "this memo has adopted an alternate scheme, which has been invented multiple times but which is probably originally attributable to Phil Karn. In this scheme, a router that has unnumbered point to point lines also has a special IP address, called a router-id in this memo. The router-id is one of the router's IP addresses (a router is required to have at least one IP address). This router-id is used as if it is the IP address of all unnumbered interfaces." whaddaya know - I did recall correctly :-> so it would appear that in the Cisco implementation, at least, for unnumbered interfaces, the reference interface ip also becomes the RID for purposes of unnumbered? So what does this discovery do to the proposition that one "should" use a loopback as the reference for unnumbered interfaces because loopbacks are "never down"??? interesting discussion. learned something new. Chuck > > ""richard dumoulin"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > No prob, see below. > > > > > > > > RB#sh run > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 11.2 > > no service password-encryption > > no service udp-small-servers > > no service tcp-small-servers > > ! > > hostname RB > > ! > > enable password cisco > > ! > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > interface Ethernet0 > > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > interface Serial0 > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0 > > ! > > interface Serial1 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial2 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial3 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial4 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial5 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial6 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial7 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial8 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial9 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface BRI0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > no ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0 > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password cisco > > login > > ! > > end > > > > RB#172.16.1.1 > > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > > > > User Access Verification > > > > Password: > > RA>en > > Password: > > RA#sh run > > Building configuration... > > > > Current configuration : 801 bytes > > ! > > version 12.2 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname RA > > ! > > enable password cisco > > ! > > memory-size iomem 10 > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > ip ssh time-out 120 > > ip ssh authentication-retries 3 > > ! > > call rsvp-sync > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface Ethernet0/0 > > ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.0.0 > > no keepalive > > half-duplex > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial0/1 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface Serial0/2 > > ip unnumbered Ethernet0/0 > > clockrate 200 > > ! > > interface Serial0/3 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > ip classless > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/2 > > no ip http server > > ! > > ! > > ! > > dial-peer cor custom > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > password cisco > > login > > line vty 5 15 > > login > > ! > > no scheduler allocate > > end > > > > RA# > > RB# > > [Resuming connection 1 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > > > RA# > > RA# > > RB#172.16.1.1 > > Trying 172.16.1.1 ... Open > > > > > > User Access Verification > > > > Password: > > RA>en > > Password: > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms > > RA# > > RB#term mon > > % Console already monitors > > RB# > > %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Ethernet0, changed state > to > > down > > [Resuming connection 2 to 172.16.1.1 ... ] > > > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/4/8 ms > > RA#ping 192.168.1.1 > > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > > ! > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/5/8 ms > > RA# > > RB#conf t > > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > > RB(config)#int e0 > > RB(config-if)#shut > > RB(config-if)# > > %L
Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352]
I believe you may need to configure a pvc on ATM12/0/1 > ""Edward Sohn"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Thanks for the reply, Andre... > > > > Hmmm...I was thinking the same way you did at first, but then the book's > > configuration actually has both "atm pvc" commands in each interface. > > Is that a typo, then? > > > > Even so, I cannot get connectivity between my routers. Here is my "sho > > run" for the L1010 and 2 routers: > > > > L1010: > > > > Current configuration: > > ! > > version 11.2 > > no service pad > > no service password-encryption > > no service udp-small-servers > > no service tcp-small-servers > > ! > > hostname L1010 > > ! > > ! > > ip host-routing > > no ip domain-lookup > > ! > > atm address 47.0091.8100..0050.a2c6.4001.0050.a2c6.4001.00 > > atm router pnni > > node 1 level 56 lowest > > redistribute atm-static > > ! > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/0 > > no atm auto-configuration > > atm uni version 3.1 > > atm maxvp-number 8 > > atm maxvc-number 8192 > > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > > atm maxvci-bits 10 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/1 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/2 > > no atm auto-configuration > > atm uni version 3.1 > > atm maxvp-number 8 > > atm maxvc-number 8192 > > atm maxvpi-bits 3 > > atm maxvci-bits 10 > > atm pvc 0 121 interface ATM12/0/0 0 112 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/3 > > ! > > interface ATM13/0/0 > > ip address 175.128.100.5 255.255.255.0 > > atm maxvp-number 0 > > ! > > interface Ethernet13/0/0 > > no ip address > > ! > > no ip classless > > ! > > line con 0 > > exec-timeout 0 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > login > > ! > > end > > > > ROUTER 1 > > > > Current configuration : 854 bytes > > ! > > version 12.2 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname R3620-1 > > ! > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > fax interface-type fax-mail > > mta receive maximum-recipients 0 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > > ip address 165.128.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > duplex auto > > speed auto > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > clockrate 200 > > ! > > interface ATM1/0 > > no ip address > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > ! > > interface ATM1/0.1 multipoint > > ip address 165.128.100.1 255.255.255.0 > > map-group ip-Pvc > > atm pvc 112 0 112 aal5snap > > ! > > router eigrp 100 > > network 165.128.0.0 > > auto-summary > > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > > ! > > ip classless > > ip http server > > ! > > ! > > ! > > map-list ip-Pvc > > ip 165.128.100.2 atm-vc 112 broadcast > > ! > > call rsvp-sync > > ! > > ! > > mgcp profile default > > ! > > dial-peer cor custom > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > ! > > ! > > end > > > > ROUTER 2: > > > > Current configuration : 835 bytes > > ! > > version 12.2 > > service timestamps debug uptime > > service timestamps log uptime > > no service password-encryption > > ! > > hostname r3620-2 > > ! > > ! > > ip subnet-zero > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > fax interface-type fax-mail > > mta receive maximum-recipients 0 > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > > ip address 165.128.2.2 255.255.255.0 > > duplex auto > > speed auto > > ! > > interface Serial0/0 > > no ip address > > shutdown > > ! > > interface ATM1/0 > > no ip address > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > ! > > interface ATM1/0.1 multipoint > > ip address 165.128.100.2 255.255.255.0 > > map-group ip-Pvc > > atm pvc 121 0 121 aal5snap > > ! > > router eigrp 100 > > network 165.128.0.0 > > auto-summary > > no eigrp log-neighbor-changes > > ! > > ip classless > > ip http server > > ! > > ! > > map-list ip-Pvc > > ip 165.128.100.1 atm-vc 121 broadcast > > ! > > call rsvp-sync > > ! > > ! > > mgcp profile default > > ! > > dial-peer cor custom > > ! > > ! > > ! > > ! > > line con 0 > > line aux 0 > > line vty 0 4 > > ! > > ! > > end > > > > THANKS! > > > > Eddie > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andre Riscalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 2:36 PM > > To: Edward Sohn > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Lightstream PVC config problem... [7:49352] > > > > > > > > Edward, > > > > You are simply trying to define the same PVC mapping 2 times... > > Basically you need to see the mapping of a PVC in the LS1010 similar as > > a cross-connect - You only need to configure the cross-connect in ONE of > > the physical interface. > > > > For example, let's say you want to configure a PVC from port 12/0/0 > > (0/112) to port 12/0/2 (0/121) in your ATM switch. You would have 2 ways > > of doing this: > > > > Either: > > > > interface ATM12/0/0 > > no ip address > > atm pvc 0 112 interface ATM12/0/2 0 121 > > ! > > interface ATM12/0/2 > > no ip address > > ! Heya, > > > > > > I'm kinda new at the ATM bit, and I'm having trouble configuring
Re: Looking for learning partner for CCIE lab [7:49510]
hi, guys I am in toronto and just passed written test. i am looking for some learning partner for new version lab test. james Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49510&t=49510 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496]
776 -Original Message- From: Charles McKnight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496] Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support exam is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49513&t=49496 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
