Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
I am Locutus, a Cisco exam proctor. Brain dumps are futile. Your life, as it has been, is over. From this time forward YOU will study US! ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially for > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > Please reply fast > > Thanx in advance, > > Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55160&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-books [7:55001]
If it just goes with books this would be durable but you forgot to say how painful it is if you ever thought of having your own CCIE lab. Buying routers is some sort of unaffordable luxury, one becaeause of the range of salaries that when converted into its equivalent amount in dollars looks peanuts, the other is which makes it even worse is that we pay much more than the original price of the equipment to cover shipment and taxes imposed on any exported equipment. This makes the only feasable possibility to have a real lab over there if your company can afford one - for company's use - or just rely on your real experience through work. Ug.. life is just so unfair. I was laughing my headoff reading that e-mail of the guy who left USA to England and trying to same some money for his power chords. Thought wanna have some real fun and know the real meaning of spending money you should drop a visit to Egypt. Anyway, no matter what it takes I will nail this CCIE beast down Regards, Yasser >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >Over here in South Africa, Cisco books are sold at a minimum of a R1000.00 >although some of them reach R1600.00 each That is a lot of money for us. For >example, our exchange rate is R10.52 to $1.00 so even if the book RRP is >$50.00, we will pay R900.00 for it. Then we still have to pay shipping which >sometimes is nearly equivalent to price of the book itself. Reading most of >the Cisco Press books, I've realised how much of the same stuff is sometimes >regurgitated amongst them. >Now I have a huge cisco press library, that was bought from a CCIE, and I >still buy books (the real kind), but I don't see the sense in buying some >cisco press book for the high price of R1000.00 when I know I will only read >them once. For those books, I would prefer to have them in PDF format, at a >reasonable price. I understand the piracy thing, it's just to easy to email >a pdf of the book. But for me to pay $50.00 for a virtual copy of the book >does not make sense. In that case, I'll would rather pay for the shipping >and get the real thing ... After all a bookshelf full of cisco press books >in their trademark green looks very sexy, and initimidates the sh!t out of >everyone else, when you tell them you've read them all! (obviously, it's >even better if you remember it all!) > >The other thing also affect us, is the shipping, after paying a huge amount >for a book, custom's get's hold of it, charges us more, and hopefully, then >our postal system delivers the book (if they don't steal it). I bought >Doyle' TCP Vol2, and the first one got missing, after which amazon had to >send another copy ... Life is sometimes just not fair for those of us not in >the U.S.A ! > >BTW, Adobe has a lot of sexy 'rights management technologies'. If you create >e-books, you can lock it to a specific user. The e-book will be unreadable >anywhere else. Although this has already probably been cracked! :-( > >Just my take on it. >Manish > >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 08 October 2002 04:57 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: E-books [7:55001] > > >I haven't looked into how Cisco Press is doing their online books. I think >you have to subscribe or something. > >The publishers are interested in technical feedback on what works for >people. They know they need to address the need for electronic access at a >reasonable price. Most of them are kind of fumbling around trying to figure >this out. If there's legitimate reasons for liking PDF, I think that's good >feedback. > >I doubt they'll use PDF, though, because it's too easy to share. The >publishers will definitely need to make money on the electronic products and >they will want to minimize easy access to the products by people who want to >get something for nothing, or, worse, people who want to sell the >publisher's property without the publisher's consent. > >Hey, I'm beginning to sound like a lawyer. Seriously, there's lots of room >for innovation here with results that please the customer and make business >sense for the publisher. Now I sound like a marketer. >From an author's point >of view, I want people to see all that content I worked so hard on. The >money is nice but so small, it's secondary. > >___ > >Priscilla Oppenheimer >www.troubleshootingnetworks.com >www.priscilla.com > >Ken Chipps wrote: > > > > I like pdf format myself. I often print out a few pages or a chapter > > to study from. Then I can highlight different parts for different > > areas of > > study. This avoids messing up the original book. I have done > > this may times > > with the Lanmmle books, all of which I paid for myself. In > > fact, I am doing > > this right now as I leave for class. I need to brush up on VLAN > > configuration. While the students are doing a lab on their own, > > I will be > > reviewing VLAN information so I can create a new lab for VLANs > > in a CAN. I > > wish all books came h
Re: Migration Plan (6509) [7:55064]
in line ( like the skates ) ""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Our parent "company" had the idea of letting a TelCo do the same for us. > The TelCo was/is contracted to set up a "gateway" between the old > network and the new network. Lucky for us we're smarter than they are > (at least we think we are...) and are having things our way. :-) > > It's difficult to try keeping a "hands-off" approach to letting a > vendor install a major piece of equipment in the core of MY network. > Maybe you know how it is... watching an engineer (CCNP with some > experience) who is supposed to know what he's doing but brings down the > network instead. Add a CCIE with a few years experience to the mix, > three more tries with two of them resulting in network outages. CL: Let he who has never brought a network down by accident ( or otherwise ) cast the first stone. Did I ever tell you the one about the newly minted Novell admin who decided to have some fun one afternoon unloading and loading NLM's? > > The suggested configuration for our first 6500 (a 6513 with dual > Sup2/MSFC2/PFC2) was to run in HSRP between the two MSFCs. (For those > who don't know, an MSFC - Multiservice Switch Feature Card or something > like that, is a routing module on the switch supervisor). We are > running IP, IPX and AppleTalk. What they didn't tell us was we had to > keep the configurations sync'ed between the two MSFCs otherwise there > would be problems. Config Sync doesn't support AppleTalk. Guess > what... we had problems. We're now running SRM. CL: serves you right for running AppleTalk. > > I guess I should get to the point here. My experience says "forklift" > upgrades are bad. Way too much room for things to go bad. Considering > the problems introducing a single new core box, I'd take it slow. make > sure everything runs as planned while you upgrade. Make sure > Spamming-Tree (did I say that??) is working properly, VTP is > communicating and the hardware has burned in. That brings up another > thing: after the first few weeks, one of the lights on the switch fabric > module stopped showing green (looked burned out). While tempted to say > it's just a light, you have no idea what the root problem causing the > light not to function is. We had the vendor replace the card. CL: advice certainly worth considering > > It seems our vendor keeps shooting itself in the foot. Their engineers > keep doing things that prevents them from earning any respect from us. > On a positive note, I know one engineer with that company who I do > respect. Too bad they keep him in design. :-) CL: seriously, having spent wonderful quality ( but far too little ) time with the likes of Marty Adkins and Val Pavlichenko, not to mention a young guy at work I'm beginning to think is in this class, I suspect that there are very few top level network engineers in the world, and a lot of wannabe's. CL: Not everyone can be a brain surgeon. Most of us are just GP's. Of the CCIE's I have met, many are in this latter category as well. Let alone us CCNP / CCDP types. ;-> We all just do the best we can, and live in fear that something we touch is going to break and we won't know how to fix it. > > Ken > > >>> "Chuck's Long Road" 10/07/02 > 09:45PM >>> > interesting. > > The following may or may not be feasible, depending upon space in > closets, > and cost of implementation. It is something my employer is supposed to > be > doing for the various "branch offices" of a major customer we have > during a > major network forklift upgrade. It has tended not to happen this way > for a > lot of reasons, political and practical. > > 1) Place all new switches into the various closets. Connect them up > > 2) set up a gateway ( single link ) between the new core switch(s) and > the > old core switch(s) > > 3) test connectivity by taking a laptop with as many user applications > as > practical, and go from closet to closet testing connectivity to the > various > servers, services, etc. > > 4) assuming point three results in connectivity everywhere, do a closet > by > closet migration of users from the old switches to the new switches. > > 5) migrate all devices ( servers, internet, etc ) onto the new core > switches. > > 6) assuming all remains well, unplug the old stuff and if Cisco is > not > offering you a generous trade in, sell it on one of the auction sites. > > Like I said, sometimes time, space, and cost does not permit this. > > Chuck > > -- > > www.chuckslongroad.info > like my web site? > take the survey! > > > > ""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message > [snip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55162&t=55064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cables [7:55096]
Must use a T-1 Crossover not a ethernet crossover. The pinout is at the following site: http://www.nelnet.org/network/cables/t1.html -ALE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cables [7:55096] Would this work for a T1 WIC to T1 WIC "virtual circuit"? Or could you use a standard x-over? -Original Message- From: Ellis, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cables [7:55096] also look at: http://www.gcom.com/home/support/t1crossover.html ALE -Original Message- From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cables [7:55096] In my mind a rollover is a mirror image, i.e. 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, etc... whereas a crossover crosses over specific wires for a specific purpose, T1 crossover is not the same as a 56K xover is not the same as an ethernet crossover etc... Dave maine dude wrote: > > Hi, > > Can someone please tell me if there is any difference between a cross-over > cable and a roll-over cable? > > Thanks, > > - > Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55164&t=55096 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
Go and find it in your own country ! ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially for > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > Please reply fast > > Thanx in advance, > > Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55165&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
The best brain dump that I know of is at www.cisco.com. It's done wonders for my test prep! -- Johnny Routin ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially for > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > Please reply fast > > Thanx in advance, > > Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55163&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good ole American bigotry posted all over the global Internet to win world favor. Keep it up!!! ""Erwin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Go and find it in your own country ! > > ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially > for > > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > > > Please reply fast > > > > Thanx in advance, > > > > Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55167&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF dead-interval to hello-interval relation? [7:54969]
I've always known it to work the other way around. If you change the hello interval - the dead interval will become 4 times the hello interval. ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello, > > Couple of questions on OSPF hello and dead interval...(that's driving me > NUTS) :-) > > 1. Why does OSPF NOT change the hello-interval when you first configure the > dead-interval. Ex. I changed the dead-interval to 60 but the hello-interval > still showed up as 10. > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os dead-interval 60 > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > I was assuming that the hello interval would get bumped to 15 but looks like > that's not how it works!! > > -- > > 2. So I changed the hello interval next to 20 thinking that it would bump > the dead interval to 80. But lo! behold! It does NOT change it to 80. Why is > this?? > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os hello-interval 20 > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 20, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > -- > > 3. Next, I set the hello interval back to it's default of 10 but still the > dead interval does not get set back to 40. Why?? > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os hello-interval 10 > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > -- > > 4. So, I changed the dead interval back to 40 manually. > > Next, I changed the hello interval to 20 and this time, OSPF set the dead > interval to 80. > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip ospf hello-interval 20 > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 20, Dead 80, Wait 80, Retransmit 10 > > 5. Ok, Finally I set the hello interval to 10 and this time OSPF worked at > the way is should work. > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip ospf hello-interval 10 > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 10 > > > Anybody have any real good explanations for this or is it just a BUG? OR is > this the way Cisco OSPF works!! > > Running ver. > R1-RTD#sh ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.1(2), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > > Thank you. > > Sincerely. > > > > > _ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55169&t=54969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF dead-interval to hello-interval relation? [7:54969]
""Router Man"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've always known it to work the other way around. If you change the hello > interval - the dead interval will > become 4 times the hello interval. CL: this was one of the old standbt trick questions in various study materials. How to change hello without changing hello, or the flip side, how to change dead without changing dead. CL tested this and on 12.1.5T10 changing hello no longer changes dead, and changing dead no longer changes hello. Resetting the OSPF process does not result in changes to either parameter. CL: Another new feature, making life easier. > > ""Cisco Nuts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hello, > > > > Couple of questions on OSPF hello and dead interval...(that's driving me > > NUTS) :-) > > > > 1. Why does OSPF NOT change the hello-interval when you first configure > the > > dead-interval. Ex. I changed the dead-interval to 60 but the > hello-interval > > still showed up as 10. > > > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os dead-interval 60 > > > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > > > I was assuming that the hello interval would get bumped to 15 but looks > like > > that's not how it works!! > > > > -- > > > > 2. So I changed the hello interval next to 20 thinking that it would bump > > the dead interval to 80. But lo! behold! It does NOT change it to 80. Why > is > > this?? > > > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os hello-interval 20 > > > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 20, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > > > -- > > > > 3. Next, I set the hello interval back to it's default of 10 but still the > > dead interval does not get set back to 40. Why?? > > > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip os hello-interval 10 > > > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 60, Wait 60, Retransmit 10 > > > > -- > > > > 4. So, I changed the dead interval back to 40 manually. > > > > Next, I changed the hello interval to 20 and this time, OSPF set the dead > > interval to 80. > > > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip ospf hello-interval 20 > > > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 20, Dead 80, Wait 80, Retransmit 10 > > > > 5. Ok, Finally I set the hello interval to 10 and this time OSPF worked at > > the way is should work. > > > > R1-RTD(config-subif)#ip ospf hello-interval 10 > > > > R1-RTD#sh ip os int s0/0.2 > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 10 > > > > > > Anybody have any real good explanations for this or is it just a BUG? OR > is > > this the way Cisco OSPF works!! > > > > Running ver. > > R1-RTD#sh ver > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > > IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-D-M), Version 12.1(2), RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > > > > Thank you. > > > > Sincerely. > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55170&t=54969 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
Well, it's not really "racism," it's xenophobia. But yeah, the original poster was speaking the International Language of Laziness. ;-) BJ On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:45:32 GMT Robert Edmonds wrote: > Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good > ole American bigotry posted > all over the global Internet to win world > favor. Keep it up!!! > > ""Erwin"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Go and find it in your own country ! > > > > ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Could someone please tell me where to avail > latest CCNP dumps especially > > for > > > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > > > > > Please reply fast > > > > > > Thanx in advance, > > > > > > Raj > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55171&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vlans [7:55172]
Hi, we have our network setup with 6509s in the floor risers as access switches, connected by fibre to a pair of 6509s in the data centre which route between the vlans. Why if I do a tracert from my pc to a PC on a different vlan, do I not see a hope indicating the routing between the vlans? Any idea's...? Thanks- - Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55172&t=55172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Study for CIT [7:55173]
I am study for the CIT:
Possible problem and recommended solution: Switch cannot communicate with
another device
Another problem could be with the actual configuration of the interface.
Make sure the interface you are connecting to (sc0 or me1) is UP (use the
show interface command to check). Make sure the IP address, subnet mask, and
VLAN membership of the switch interface (sc0 or me1) is correct (use the
show interface command). To prevent conflicts, make sure the me1 and sc0
interfaces are configured with IP addresses and subnet masks in different
subnets (use the show interface command to ! check), or disable one of the
interfaces using the set interface {sc0 | me1} disable command.
Question:
make sure the me1 and sc0 interfaces are configured with IP addresses and
subnet masks in different subnets to prevent conflict. What kind of
conflict could have occurred?
Thanks for the help.
Tony
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55173&t=55173
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: protocol monitoring software [7:55110]
So everyone seems to recommend Netflow. I don't know much about it but I'll only ask these basic questions and research the rest: My switches are 3548XL and 2948g-L3 switches. Is netflow supported on these by default or do I have to buy some feature package? Could I just enable it on these models? 2948>sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) L3 Switch/Router Software (CAT2948G-IN-M), Version 12.0(7)WX5(15a) RELEASE SOFTWARE Cisco3500-3>sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5)XU, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) thanks a bunch. ""Greg Reaume"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sam, > > OVER HERE! LOOK HERE! PICK ME! > > :) Seriously though, take a look at NetFlow. Nice flow based accounting > exported at flow conclusion by the router to a 'collector'. It records, on > a per-flow basis, src AS, src IP, src port, dst AS, dst IP, dst port, pkts > in flow, B in flow, start time, stop time, etc, etc, etc. I'm sure you get > the idea; this is pretty powerful stuff! > > You can have your collector aggregate all the flow exports over a given time > period, or you can have your router do it before it sends the info to the > collector. Cisco sells their own commercial products to collect and analyze > and they also partner with 3rd party commercial vendors to provide you with > collectors and analyzers. The best stuff though, IMHO, are the tools from > the open source community. Cisco acknowledges these tools and even lists > where you can get them on their website, however, they are obviously not > supported. > > Start here: > > http://www.cisco.com/go/netflow > > http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/FlowScan/ > > http://www.splintered.net/sw/flow-tools/ > > http://www.columbia.edu/acis/networks/advanced/CUFlow/ > > > There are good examples of implementations here: > > http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu/ > > http://www.canet3.net/stats/map.html > > > And of course, although they have no relation to NetFlow, no disscussion of > network monitoring tools is complete without Tobi's Tools: > > http://www.smokeping.org > > http://www.mrtg.org > > http://www.rrdtool.org > > > HTH, > > Greg Reaume > > > ""Cliff Stewart"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sam, > > Have you taken a look at NBAR? Take a look at the > Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Configuration Guide > it should work for you. > > -Cliff > > -Original Message- > From: "sam sneed" > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue Oct 08 10:19:08 PDT 2002 > Subject: protocol monitoring software [7:55110] > > >Hello, > > > > I am looking for software that will monitor what kind of traffic is going > >through my network and report it.I am only concerned with what is going > >through my firewall so I will place the monitoring station on a hub with > the > >firewall or use SPAN port. Here are requirements: > > > >Doesn't use netflow to collect data, want to use libpcap to capture data. > >Want breakdown of what type of traffice by bytes and %'s ie. HTTP, FTP, > SMTP > >etc. > >Do not want to use NTOP, too much of a pain in the ass to get it to work > >longer than 20 minutes without a seg fault. > >Would like the output in graphical form preferbably embeded in a web page. > > > >If anyone has come across this please let me know. I'm contemplating > writing > >my own software but would rather not. > > > >Thanks. > ___ > GO.com Mail > Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55174&t=55110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
At 1:45 PM + 10/9/02, Robert Edmonds wrote: >Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good ole American bigotry posted >all over the global Internet to win world favor. Keep it up!! Erwin's email is in Singapore. Nevertheless, this is an example of how bigotry can derail technical discussions. > >""Erwin"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Go and find it in your own country ! >> >> ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially >> for >> > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? >> > >> > Please reply fast >> > >> > Thanx in advance, >> > > > > Raj > -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Member of Groupstudy moderation team Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 books: Building Service Provider Networks (Wiley 2002), WAN Survival Guide (Wiley 2000), Building Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise Neworks (McMillan 1999), Building Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching (McMillan 1998). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55177&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
To paraphrase an old Saturday Night Live routine: "Robertyou ignorant slut" Did you happen to notice Erwin's email address? Erwin SG = Singapore. Erwin's comments *were* pretty stupid. Almost as stupid as yours. Take your US bashing somewhere else. Quoting Robert Edmonds : > Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good ole > American bigotry posted > all over the global Internet to win world favor. Keep > it up!!! > > ""Erwin"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Go and find it in your own country ! > > > > ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest > CCNP dumps especially > > for > > > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > > > > > Please reply fast > > > > > > Thanx in advance, > > > > > > Raj > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55176&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
At 12:00 PM + 10/9/02, Erwin wrote: >Go and find it in your own country ! > >""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially >for >> BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? >> >> Please reply fast >> >> Thanx in advance, >> > > Raj I'm going to respond to this as a moderator. The particular messages did not show up in the moderator queue, so this is the first chance I've had to seen this. Raj, this list is very anti-dump. First, it's not practical to memorize everything needed for the advanced exams. Second, the majority of people here believe in working to understand, not memorizing. Erwin, any national references, other than perhaps to clarify language differences, often are inflammatory, and thus not appropriate to the list. -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 books: Building Service Provider Networks (Wiley 2002), WAN Survival Guide (Wiley 2000), Building Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise Neworks (McMillan 1999), Building Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching (McMillan 1998). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55168&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP brain dump!!!!!! [7:55166]
I can't help but jump into this discussion. Prior to joining the neworking field, I've zero experience and I wouldn't get where I am today if I didn't have the CCNP cert (back in Jan. 2000). As a biology major fresh out of college, I don't think any managers would be interested in a guy with no working experience and no certs. However, through the braindumps, I was able to get the CCNP cert in 2 weeks. Granted that I didn't have networking experience but I can pick up things very quickly. Furthermore, the one advantage I had going for me (at that time) is that I know how to build a franken pix firewall. Arm with this knowledge, I actually put this on my resume and look for jobs. I got several network security job offers including Nokia with a very nice salary (90k in Jan. 2000). I am making a lot more today. The point I am trying to make here is that CCNP braindumps is not such a bad thing if you know how to use it to your advantage. It will further enhance your career and financial rewards. my $0.02c - Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos, & more faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55166&t=55166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
At 12:00 PM + 10/9/02, Erwin wrote: >Go and find it in your own country ! > >""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially >for >> BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? >> >> Please reply fast >> >> Thanx in advance, >> > > Raj I'm going to respond to this as a moderator. The particular messages did not show up in the moderator queue, so this is the first chance I've had to seen this. Raj, this list is very anti-dump. First, it's not practical to memorize everything needed for the advanced exams. Second, the majority of people here believe in working to understand, not memorizing. Erwin, any national references, other than perhaps to clarify language differences, often are inflammatory, and thus not appropriate to the list. -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 books: Building Service Provider Networks (Wiley 2002), WAN Survival Guide (Wiley 2000), Building Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise Neworks (McMillan 1999), Building Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching (McMillan 1998). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55168&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP QoS with FR/ATM? [7:55175]
I am trying to understand how ip qos works with FR and ATM. I read that both FR and ATM do per vc queueing, is this true? If I configure CBWFQ udner one fr or atm pvc, does the router have two sets of queues? one set for different classes of ip packets, after the ip packet got dequeued from the ip layer, they will be queued again under that pvc? is it same for fr and atm? since the atm/fr vcs have cbr, vbr or cir, so they must have queues per pvc for cells or frames, ip qos such as CBWFQ has queues for different classes of ip packets, how do they work together? I can not find anything from cco, all of the qos docs either explain ip qos or atm/fr qos. thanks for any help. JJ __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55175&t=55175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
Sorry, wrong choice of words perhaps. What I mean is to use the policing features of ATM. I believe using CAR will take up more processor power as compared to using the ATM policing. ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What do you mean inherent? You still need to define the shaping > charateristics when using vbr-nrt, default is line rate and the public > ATM network will police. > > Dave > > Schwantz wrote: > > > > Why don't you use ATM's inherent policing attributes like vbr-nrt ? > > > > Schwantz > > > > ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. > > > > > > do you have CEF turned on? > > > > > > how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic on > > > your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you > > sure > > > you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what > are > > > you doing to test? > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""sisco"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit > > > > command,but it doesn't work! > > > > > > > > interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point > > > > description DS3 > > > > bandwidth 45000 > > > > ip address 255.255.255.252 > > > > ip access-group 153 in > > > > ip access-group 111 out > > > > no ip unreachables > > > > no ip proxy-arp > > > > rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit > > > exceed-action > > > > drop > > > > pvc 19/555 > > > > encapsulation aal5snap > > > > > > > > thnks! > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Sr. Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55178&t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
I completely agree with Mark. Erwin do not refer your comments towards a country. Raju is my country men and I will not tolerate any one on the list bashing the country for his dump request. Tx / RamG ""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially for > BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > > Please reply fast > > Thanx in advance, > > Raj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55180&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
I apologize for my outburst. I did not mean to insinuate that ONLY Americans can be racist. In all fairness I will acknowledge that people from any country can be equally racist, intolerant and ignorant. ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 12:00 PM + 10/9/02, Erwin wrote: > >Go and find it in your own country ! > > > >""Vinod Raju"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >> Could someone please tell me where to avail latest CCNP dumps especially > >for > >> BSCI (routing) and BSCSN (switching)? > >> > >> Please reply fast > >> > >> Thanx in advance, > >> > > > Raj > > I'm going to respond to this as a moderator. The particular messages > did not show up in the moderator queue, so this is the first chance > I've had to seen this. > > Raj, this list is very anti-dump. First, it's not practical to > memorize everything needed for the advanced exams. Second, the > majority of people here believe in working to understand, not > memorizing. > > Erwin, any national references, other than perhaps to clarify > language differences, often are inflammatory, and thus not > appropriate to the list. > > -- > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > directly to me*** > > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 > books: Building Service Provider Networks (Wiley 2002), WAN > Survival Guide (Wiley 2000), Building Routing and Switching > Architectures for Enterprise Neworks (McMillan 1999), Building > Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching (McMillan 1998). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55179&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: good alt. to a catalyst 3550 [7:55132]
The Cat 3550 is currently a new product so used items are hard to find. However, if you are not too far along in your CCIE preparation, you have some time. The fact that this question was not posted to the CCIELAB mailing list suggests that you may not be in a huge hurry yet. Many of the important lessons that you need to learn can be learned with a relatively cheap lab of Cisco 2500-series routers. No voice, no switch (except perhaps some really cheap switch), no ATM. Many of the hardest lessons to learn involve matters such as routing protocols and redistribution among routing protocols, as well as countless router IOS features -- which can be learned in a cheap lab. After 6 mos to 1 year, you may find that 3550s are available used from CCIEs who went before you. Yes, this means that for many months you may need to use lab scenarios that do not take advantage of the cutting edge features of the 3550s, or you will need to adapt scenarios to your topology. This is not optimal, but a lot of us have had to do this with other technologies (taking the ATM link out of a scenario, not doing the voice part, doing token ring with MAUs instead of the formerly-expensive TR switch). Best wishes, Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't know of any alternative for the 3550. While you can purchase a less > expensive switch to practice your IOS-based commands (such as a 2912XL, > 2924XL, or 3524XL, for example), you will be losing a lot of features that > will most likely show up on the CCIE Lab exam, such as advanced Quality of > Service (QoS) and Layer 3 functionality. > You're best off biting the bullet and purchasing a 3550 or renting 3550 rack > time. > Shawn K. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vic Dmon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:19 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: good alt. to a catalyst 3550 [7:55132] > > > > Hi, does anyone know what would be a good (and cheap) alternate for a 3550 > > switch. Please let me know. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55181&t=55132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-books [7:55001]
Hello, Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] can fulfill your requirement. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55184&t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNA,CCNP & CCNP EBOOK & Other Stuff for sale [7:55182]
Hello everybody, I have the Sybex CCNA Virtual Lab e-trainer,CCNA Ebook,CCNP,CCIE,CCDA,cisco press EBook,& Cisco Etrainer PPTs,lots more.It retails but I am very flexible and willing to trade if you need any of those items. Good luck to everyone.Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sandip Banerjee CCNP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55182&t=55182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3550 Vlan [7:55183]
I have a 3550 that connects to 5 Cisco 2900 XL L2, and 1 port that connects to a HP procurve Switch. Does any have an example in how to set routing between vlans. For example users on 193.268.1.1 need access to 192.168.2.x and vice versa. Any help will be appreciated. = 3550 port fa0/2HP procurve|-Users 192.168.2.x = \ TRUNK \ \ 192.168.1.x \ 2900 XL \ \xover 2900 XL2 \ \xover 2900 XL 3 \ \xover 2900 XL 4 \ \xover 2900 XL 5 \ \xover Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55183&t=55183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-books [7:55001]
Hello, Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] can fullfil your requirement. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55185&t=55001 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550 Vlan [7:55183]
assuming you have the proper image on the 3550. this should give you the idea interface vlan 10 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 interface vlan 20 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 interface fa 0/10 switchport access vlan 10 interface fa 0/20 switchport access vlan 20 router eigrp 123 network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 no auto-summary -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! ""J B"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a 3550 that connects to 5 Cisco 2900 XL L2, and 1 port that connects > to a HP procurve Switch. > Does any have an example in how to set routing between vlans. > > For example users on 193.268.1.1 need access to 192.168.2.x and vice versa. > > > Any help will be appreciated. > > = > > > 3550 > port fa0/2HP > procurve|-Users 192.168.2.x > = > \ TRUNK > \ > \ 192.168.1.x > \ > 2900 XL > \ > \xover > 2900 XL2 > \ > \xover > 2900 XL 3 > \ > \xover > 2900 XL 4 > \ > \xover > 2900 XL 5 > \ > \xover Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55186&t=55183 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vlans [7:55172]
My guess is because the forwarding is done in hardware, the PFC. You will also notice that if you do a large file transfer for example and do a sh int vlan x you will not see the input/output counters register any traffic. Dave maine dude wrote: > > Hi, > > we have our network setup with 6509s in the floor risers > > as access switches, connected by fibre to a pair of 6509s in the data > > centre which route between the vlans. > > Why if I do a tracert from my pc to a PC on a different vlan, do I not see > > a hope indicating the routing between the vlans? > > Any idea's...? > > Thanks- > > > > - > Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55187&t=55172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#640-603 RTING - Being Retired [7:55188]
I just noticed on CCO that on October 25th, exam 640-603 will be retired. Certification reqs. for CCNP and CCDP already reflect this and list only BSCI as an exam for CCNP/CCDP. People out-there preparing for 640-603 should either hurry up, or recheck the requirements for BSCI... Marko. Tvlvupsstur ~essi er fra Margmiplun hf., Supurlandsbraut 4, Reykjavmk. Fyrirvara og leipbeiningar til viptakenda tvlvupssts fra Margmiplun hf. er ap finna a vefsmpunni http://www.mi.is/fyrirvari Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55188&t=55188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7507 rate-limit [7:54987]
Not to be nitpicky but policing and shaping are two differant things. Shaping tries to buffer and queue traffic above a commited rate, smoothes it out. Policing drops packets above the commited rate,no buffering, enforcing said rate. Dave Schwantz wrote: > > Sorry, wrong choice of words perhaps. What I mean is to use the policing > features of ATM. I believe using CAR will take up more processor power as > compared to using the ATM policing. > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > What do you mean inherent? You still need to define the shaping > > charateristics when using vbr-nrt, default is line rate and the public > > ATM network will police. > > > > Dave > > > > Schwantz wrote: > > > > > > Why don't you use ATM's inherent policing attributes like vbr-nrt ? > > > > > > Schwantz > > > > > > ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > what you have provided in your configuration appears to be correct. > > > > > > > > do you have CEF turned on? > > > > > > > > how do you know it's not working? do you have a lot of non ip traffic > on > > > > your network? ( rate limiting does not effect non ip traffic ) are you > > > sure > > > > you are pushing ip traffic through at a rate greater than 38 meg? what > > are > > > > you doing to test? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""sisco"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > i was trying to limit my 45Meg bandwidth to 38Meg using a rate-limit > > > > > command,but it doesn't work! > > > > > > > > > > interface ATM4/1/0.1 point-to-point > > > > > description DS3 > > > > > bandwidth 45000 > > > > > ip address 255.255.255.252 > > > > > ip access-group 153 in > > > > > ip access-group 111 out > > > > > no ip unreachables > > > > > no ip proxy-arp > > > > > rate-limit input 3800 84000 84000 conform-action transmit > > > > exceed-action > > > > > drop > > > > > pvc 19/555 > > > > > encapsulation aal5snap > > > > > > > > > > thnks! > > -- > > David Madland > > CCIE# 2016 > > Sr. Network Engineer > > Qwest Communications > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > > Churchill -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55189&t=54987 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enable Secret of AS5300 [7:55086]
Frank Merrill wrote: >>I lost the enable secret password of my Cisco AS5300.I have the >>configuration showing. >> >>enable secret 5 $1$6YRM$nzNXQuv4h24C3AlB8N3rp. >>enable password 7 110A1016141D5A >> > > One more point, since you have an 'enable secret' configured, the 'enable > password' serves no purpose. > When you type 'enable' to go to exec mode, it will only work with the > 'enable secret' at the password prompt. > If a secret is configured, the enable password is never utilized. > > You can safely remove the 'enable password'. > apart from that, i always thought the enable secret can not be cracked/reverted etc? just those marked with 7 (e.g. enable secret, vty password etc) can. or have i missed something? cya -bis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55195&t=55086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vlans [7:55172]
you will only see one hop since the router connects both switches... Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of maine dude Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vlans [7:55172] Hi, we have our network setup with 6509s in the floor risers as access switches, connected by fibre to a pair of 6509s in the data centre which route between the vlans. Why if I do a tracert from my pc to a PC on a different vlan, do I not see a hope indicating the routing between the vlans? Any idea's...? Thanks- - Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55196&t=55172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
Its true that Vinod has asked for something thats illegal. But that doesnt mean that you can talk against ones motherland. So please avoid such indecent comments. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55197&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP brain dump!!!!!! [7:55166]
Mike, I'm top posting because At 2:49 PM + 10/9/02, mike greenberg wrote: >I can't help but jump into this discussion. Prior to joining the neworking >field, I've >zero experience and I wouldn't get where I am today if I didn't have the >CCNP cert(back in Jan. 2000). As a biology major fresh out of >college, I don't think any managers would be interested in a guy >with no working experience and no certs. > >However, through the braindumps, I was able to get the CCNP cert in 2 >weeks. > >Granted that I didn't have networking experience but I can pick up things >very quickly. Furthermore, the one advantage I had going for me (at >that time) is that I know how to build a franken pix firewall. Arm >with this knowledge, I actually put this on my resume and look for >jobs. I got several network security job offers >including Nokia with a very nice salary (90k in Jan. 2000). I am making a >lot more today. > >The point I am trying to make here is that CCNP braindumps is not such a bad >thing if you know how to use it to your advantage. It will further enhance >your career and financial rewards. > Mike, I hear you, that braindumps helped you. I think I can speak for the moderator team and many of the people on the list that we feel braindumps tend to cheapen the certifications. They are not welcome on this list. If you want to start a braindump site or list, no one is stopping you. Now -- did I ever get a job when I didn't have direct work experience with a technology? Of course I did. These were mostly in programming, and you'd better believe I didn't cram from then nonexistent braindumps -- I read several books on the programming language, wrote a few programs, and, if possible, tested them. In my more research-oriented jobs, no one assumes that I know everything about a topic. Part of my responsibility is inventing solutions. Obviously, that doesn't apply at entry level. Any list has its own customs; any list or medium is fundamentally subject to the "owner of the press." Freedom of the press doesn't mean you can force the press owner to print anything you want. -- "What Problem are you trying to solve?" ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not directly to me*** Member of Groupstudy moderation team Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 books: Building Service Provider Networks (Wiley 2002), WAN Survival Guide (Wiley 2000), Building Routing and Switching Architectures for Enterprise Neworks (McMillan 1999), Building Addressing Architectures for Routing and Switching (McMillan 1998). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55198&t=55166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP dumps????????????? [7:55156]
Actually, it's not xenophobia. That would mean he was afraid of them. The technical term isn't racist, either, because he' got a problem with his nationality not race. Therefore, it would be nationalism. heheh...Just trying to have a little fun. :) Mr. Raju, you actually would be wasting your time, anyway. Brain dumps will give you some answers, yes, but the simple fact is, unless you understand the SCIENCE of it, you're NOT going to pass. Cisco exams are EXTREMELY good at verifying this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55199&t=55156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General PIX question DES/3DES [7:55200]
Do any of the PIX firewalls come with 3DES or is it an upgrade option on all the models Particularly the PIX-525-UR-BUN. Thanx, mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55200&t=55200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE numbers [7:55201]
Greetings all, I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I don't know? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55201&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
well, this has been discussed here many times but the first CCIE was #1025 I don't recall the name now, but a month or so back we got the name here on the list the second CCIE was / is Terry Slattery, #1026 you can always check out the guy's bona fides on CCO - http://tools.cisco.com/CCIE/Schedule_Lab/CCIEOnline?verify requires a CCO login - if he's a CCIE he has a CCO login of his own, if you don't have one. I think. -- www.chuckslongroad.info like my web site? take the survey! wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings all, > > I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure > the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I > don't know? > > Thanks...Nabil > > "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55202&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
You're correct, he's lying. >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 10/9/02 11:41:25 AM >>> Greetings all, I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I don't know? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55203&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrade pix 501 to 3des [7:55204]
Anyone have any recommendations on whom to go to for this? Good Price Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55204&t=55204 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
Stuart Briggs is the first CCIE, # 1025. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55205&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [nsp] Bonding of Multiple ISDN B-Channels [7:55206]
>Hi. Could anyone tell me what router / interface to use and what I would need >to configure in order to bond up to 4 ISDN B-channels based on bandwidth >needs? Looked into this some time ago, though have not yet deployed these configuration... 2 ISDN lines(4 B channels, 256k) Cisco 1720 with WIC-1B-U(x2) 4 ISDN lines(8 B channels, 512k) Cisco 3620 with NM-1E and NM-4B-U >Sample configuration? Sorry, not deployed, just some info gleaned from these lists some time ago. Dave Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55206&t=55206 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: #640-603 RTING - Being Retired [7:55188]
Those who are just finding out are already late. The last date to sign up for 603 was September 13 (fact that I discovered 3 weeks ago when I went to take the exam). But IS-IS is not bad at all - I just passed the BSCI test yesteday. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55207&t=55188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: protocol monitoring software [7:55110]
Sam, Since NetFlow is an L3 technology, it won't be supported on the 3500XL. You don't need it here anyway. You enable NetFlow at any L3 device which a workstation may use as its gateway to the rest of the network/Internet, and at your ASBR(s). As for the 2948G-L3, I'm not sure if its supported under CatOS; I coudn't tell you for sure one way or another without looking into it further. I do know that in IOS, NetFlow requires that you have an IP+ feature-set. Greg Reaume ""sam sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... So everyone seems to recommend Netflow. I don't know much about it but I'll only ask these basic questions and research the rest: My switches are 3548XL and 2948g-L3 switches. Is netflow supported on these by default or do I have to buy some feature package? Could I just enable it on these models? 2948>sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) L3 Switch/Router Software (CAT2948G-IN-M), Version 12.0(7)WX5(15a) RELEASE SOFTWARE Cisco3500-3>sh ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) C3500XL Software (C3500XL-C3H2S-M), Version 12.0(5)XU, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) thanks a bunch. ""Greg Reaume"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sam, > > OVER HERE! LOOK HERE! PICK ME! > > :) Seriously though, take a look at NetFlow. Nice flow based accounting > exported at flow conclusion by the router to a 'collector'. It records, on > a per-flow basis, src AS, src IP, src port, dst AS, dst IP, dst port, pkts > in flow, B in flow, start time, stop time, etc, etc, etc. I'm sure you get > the idea; this is pretty powerful stuff! > > You can have your collector aggregate all the flow exports over a given time > period, or you can have your router do it before it sends the info to the > collector. Cisco sells their own commercial products to collect and analyze > and they also partner with 3rd party commercial vendors to provide you with > collectors and analyzers. The best stuff though, IMHO, are the tools from > the open source community. Cisco acknowledges these tools and even lists > where you can get them on their website, however, they are obviously not > supported. > > Start here: > > http://www.cisco.com/go/netflow > > http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~plonka/FlowScan/ > > http://www.splintered.net/sw/flow-tools/ > > http://www.columbia.edu/acis/networks/advanced/CUFlow/ > > > There are good examples of implementations here: > > http://wwwstats.net.wisc.edu/ > > http://www.canet3.net/stats/map.html > > > And of course, although they have no relation to NetFlow, no disscussion of > network monitoring tools is complete without Tobi's Tools: > > http://www.smokeping.org > > http://www.mrtg.org > > http://www.rrdtool.org > > > HTH, > > Greg Reaume > > > ""Cliff Stewart"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sam, > > Have you taken a look at NBAR? Take a look at the > Cisco IOS Quality of Service Solutions Configuration Guide > it should work for you. > > -Cliff > > -Original Message- > From: "sam sneed" > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Tue Oct 08 10:19:08 PDT 2002 > Subject: protocol monitoring software [7:55110] > > >Hello, > > > > I am looking for software that will monitor what kind of traffic is going > >through my network and report it.I am only concerned with what is going > >through my firewall so I will place the monitoring station on a hub with > the > >firewall or use SPAN port. Here are requirements: > > > >Doesn't use netflow to collect data, want to use libpcap to capture data. > >Want breakdown of what type of traffice by bytes and %'s ie. HTTP, FTP, > SMTP > >etc. > >Do not want to use NTOP, too much of a pain in the ass to get it to work > >longer than 20 minutes without a seg fault. > >Would like the output in graphical form preferbably embeded in a web page. > > > >If anyone has come across this please let me know. I'm contemplating > writing > >my own software but would rather not. > > > >Thanks. > ___ > GO.com Mail > Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55208&t=55110 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
LOLROFL -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE numbers [7:55201] Greetings all, I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I don't know? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55210&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
The first CCIE number given was 1025. Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE numbers [7:55201] Greetings all, I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I don't know? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55211&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
this brings up the age old question who certified the first CCIE :) -Original Message- From: Silju Pillai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201] Stuart Briggs is the first CCIE, # 1025. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55212&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
It actually started with #1025. Terry Slattery is the second outside of Cisco at 1026. ALE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE numbers [7:55201] Greetings all, I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I don't know? Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55213&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vlans [7:55172]
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: > > Hi, > > we have our network setup with 6509s in the floor risers > > as access switches, connected by fibre to a pair of 6509s in > the data > > centre which route between the vlans. > > Why if I do a tracert from my pc to a PC on a different vlan, > do I not see > > a hop indicating the routing between the vlans? > > Any idea's...? There are so many possible reasons, it's hard to list them all. A generic comment is that Trace Route isn't very relible. Routers (and so-called "switching routers") may not send back the ICMP TTL Expired for numerous reasons, including: ICMP is rate-limited ICMP is disabled for security reasons ICMP is disabled for performance reasons ICMP is disabled for traffic that arrives and leaves on the same interface bugs (not with Cisco?! ;-) Another possibility is that the traffic really isn't flowing through the router. What addressing are you using? What default gateway is configured on the PCs? Is the router doing Proxy ARP? Are the PCs assuming Proxy ARP is in use? How are the devices physically connected? Are you sure VLANs are really delineating broadcast domains? I have run into situations where a PC ARPs for a device not in its subnet, due to having no default gateway configured or the default gateway set to itself. Due to a VLAN misconfiguration or some other reason for the PCs hearing each others broadcasts (like they are in the same hub or whatever), the other PC responds rather than the default gateway and subsequent traffic flows directly, without the router getting involved. Since you can't trust Trace Route, you would have to put a protocol analyzer on the networks to determine if this is happening. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com > > Thanks- > > > > > > > - > Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55214&t=55172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
most likely lawyers as you have to have the test process & evaluation process checked out before you can go to market with the program. protection against liabilities and such I expect. Juniper had to do similar things to bring the JNCIE program to market. At 06:42 PM 10/9/2002 +, Clark, John wrote: >this brings up the age old question who certified the first CCIE :) > >-Original Message- >From: Silju Pillai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:05 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: CCIE numbers [7:55201] > > >Stuart Briggs is the first CCIE, # 1025. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55215&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55217]
I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office on October 15, 2002. Thanks, Danny Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55217&t=55217 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]
Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a moment, until I remembered something. Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it I remembered? High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try their hands. "During the maintenance window, a Company engineer loaded an incorrect routing table into a Cisco router. This mis-configuration was propagated across the network resulting in major link failures. As a result, links become overloaded and for all practical purposes were shut down. It appears that Cisco's involvement was limited to TAC support to help resolve the outage. A router mis-configuration during X Company's maintenance window caused the outage. Cisco Hardware and IOS software problems are not a factor." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55218&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]
I guess you suddenly remembered that this company must be the one which has filed bankruptcy and has let all their BGP gurus to greener pastures. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a > moment, until I remembered something. > > Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it > I remembered? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55221&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPPoE software for 3640 [7:55220]
What is a good stable code to run PPPoE on the 3640? Kerpal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55220&t=55220 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55222]
Good to hear. Where are you vactioning? - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cevallos" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55217] > I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office on > October 15, 2002. > > > > Thanks, > Danny Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 9/30/2002 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55222&t=55222 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mincir/Cir [7:55223]
Hi Group, Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any help is highly appreciated. Regards, neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55223&t=55223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mincir/Cir [7:55223]
cir=the average rate you want to transmit at in periods of non-congestion. mincir=the minimum amount the telco will commit to transmit during the periods of congestion. usually mincir=cir/2 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55224&t=55223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55225]
Lol!! -Original Message- From: Michael Linehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 October 2002 21:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55222] Good to hear. Where are you vactioning? - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cevallos" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Cisco Certification Digest V2 #2286 (Out of the Office) [7:55217] > I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the > office on > October 15, 2002. > > > > Thanks, > Danny Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.393 / Virus Database: 223 - Release Date: 9/30/2002 # Scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by the Webvein Mail Gateway # Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55225&t=55225 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]
Someone changed the MTU size and now Outlook won't work! -Original Message- From: The Long and Winding Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218] Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a moment, until I remembered something. Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it I remembered? High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try their hands. "During the maintenance window, a Company engineer loaded an incorrect routing table into a Cisco router. This mis-configuration was propagated across the network resulting in major link failures. As a result, links become overloaded and for all practical purposes were shut down. It appears that Cisco's involvement was limited to TAC support to help resolve the outage. A router mis-configuration during X Company's maintenance window caused the outage. Cisco Hardware and IOS software problems are not a factor." [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55226&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the probl [7:55218]
Harold Monroe wrote: > > Someone changed the MTU size and now Outlook won't work! Hee hee. Very funny. ;-) Priscilla > > -Original Message- > From: The Long and Winding Road > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the > problem? [7:55218] > > Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in > puzzlement for a > moment, until I remembered something. > > Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, > and what was it > I remembered? > > High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try > their hands. > > > "During the maintenance window, a Company engineer > loaded an incorrect > routing table into a Cisco router. This mis-configuration > was propagated > across the network resulting in major link failures. > As a result, > links become overloaded and for all practical purposes were > shut down. It > appears that Cisco's involvement was limited to TAC support > to help resolve > the outage. A router mis-configuration during X > Company's maintenance > window caused the outage. Cisco Hardware and IOS software > problems are not > a > factor." > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55228&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Study for CIT [7:55173]
The me1 interface is an out-of-band management interface on the 4000, as you
may know. Unlike the in-band sc0, which is an internal logical interface
that particpates in ordinary switching functions, including CDP and spanning
tree, the me1 interface is a physical Ethernet interface that is used for
configuration and problem resolution.
Normally, the me1 interface is configured to be in a different subnet than
the sc0 interface, allowing both interfaces to remain up. However, both
interfaces may be configured in the same subnet or with the same IP address,
but the sc0 interface will shut down. Interface me1 always takes precedence
in this instance. For example, if you already have the sc0 interface
configured with an IP address of 172.16.84.17 255.255.255.0, and you try to
configure the me1 interface in the same subnet (172.16.84.18 255.255.255.0),
you will see the following messages:
Switch-A> (enable) set interface me1 172.16.84.18 255.255.255.0 172.16.80.255
This command places me1 and sc0 into the same ip subnet.
The sc0 interface will be automatically configured down if necessary to
resolve the conflict.
Do you want to continue (y/n) [n]?y
That's the issue they were probably trying to address with that confusing
comment about "conflicts."
___
Priscilla Oppenheimer
www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
Tony Chen wrote:
>
> I am study for the CIT:
>
>
> Possible problem and recommended solution: Switch cannot
> communicate with another device
>
> Another problem could be with the actual configuration of the
> interface. Make sure the interface you are connecting to (sc0
> or me1) is UP (use the show interface command to check). Make
> sure the IP address, subnet mask, and VLAN membership of the
> switch interface (sc0 or me1) is correct (use the show
> interface command). To prevent conflicts, make sure the me1 and
> sc0 interfaces are configured with IP addresses and subnet
> masks in different subnets (use the show interface command to !
> check), or disable one of the interfaces using the set
> interface {sc0 | me1} disable command.
>
> Question:
>
> make sure the me1 and sc0 interfaces are configured with IP
> addresses and subnet masks in different subnets to prevent
> conflict. What kind of conflict could have occurred?
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Tony
>
>
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55227&t=55173
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]
I want to know why company 's engineer was working on company X's equipment. I think that is the problem. :) Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Harold Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218] Someone changed the MTU size and now Outlook won't work! -Original Message- From: The Long and Winding Road [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218] Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a moment, until I remembered something. Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it I remembered? High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try their hands. "During the maintenance window, a Company engineer loaded an incorrect routing table into a Cisco router. This mis-configuration was propagated across the network resulting in major link failures. As a result, links become overloaded and for all practical purposes were shut down. It appears that Cisco's involvement was limited to TAC support to help resolve the outage. A router mis-configuration during X Company's maintenance window caused the outage. Cisco Hardware and IOS software problems are not a factor." [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55229&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218]
""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I want to know why company 's engineer was working on company X's > equipment. I think that is the problem. CL: Because the network in question was "X-rated"? ;-> > > :) > > > Thanks > > Larry > > > -Original Message- > From: Harold Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the problem? [7:55218] > > > Someone changed the MTU size and now Outlook won't work! > > -Original Message- > From: The Long and Winding Road > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the > problem? [7:55218] > > Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in > puzzlement for a > moment, until I remembered something. > > Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, > and what was it > I remembered? > > High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try > their hands. > > > "During the maintenance window, a Company engineer > loaded an incorrect > routing table into a Cisco router. This mis-configuration > was propagated > across the network resulting in major link failures. > As a result, > links become overloaded and for all practical purposes were > shut down. It > appears that Cisco's involvement was limited to TAC support > to help resolve > the outage. A router mis-configuration during X > Company's maintenance > window caused the outage. Cisco Hardware and IOS software > problems are not > a > factor." > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55230&t=55218 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter-tel VoIP Solution [7:55231]
Anyone familiar or are using an Inter-tel VoIP solution? Thanks, Steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55231&t=55231 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to let everyone know I was back! [7:55232]
Not that most of you know me, but mebbe! Cheers, I know Dan Herleighe is watching..sorry about the horrendous spelling of your name. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55232&t=55232 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1602 WIC-1DSU-T1 keeps getting QUICC_Serial:Reset [7:55234]
Hi all I have a 1602R with a WIC-1DSU-T1 card installed. I am trying to bring up the line, but the interface is down/down. The ISP swears that I have the correct linecode, frame type, and other settings. A debug serial interface shows: QUICC_Serial1: Reset from x45623q21 It keeps trying to restart and keeps getting reset with the above debug code. I have checked the cables. The lights on the WIC are CD illuminated and ALARM illuminated. I searched the archives and found someone had the same problem back in april with the a 1603 and the same debug trace, but no one replied. Please help! I have no where else to turn as I have no maintenance on this router. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55234&t=55234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1602 WIC-1DSU-T1 keeps getting QUICC_Serial:Reset [7:55234]
Every time I have had the orange alarm light on one of my WIC cards, AND I was sure that all the cabling and everything on my end was OK, I found that it was the carrier. I would have them do a thorough diagnostics and see if they can latch on to your CSU, etc. ""Wilson, Christian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all > > I have a 1602R with a WIC-1DSU-T1 card installed. I am trying to bring up > the line, but the interface is down/down. The ISP swears that I have the > correct linecode, frame type, and other settings. A debug serial interface > shows: > > QUICC_Serial1: Reset from x45623q21 > > It keeps trying to restart and keeps getting reset with the above debug > code. I have checked the cables. The lights on the WIC are CD illuminated > and ALARM illuminated. I searched the archives and found someone had the > same problem back in april with the a 1603 and the same debug trace, but no > one replied. Please help! I have no where else to turn as I have no > maintenance on this router. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55235&t=55234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: good alt. to a catalyst 3550 [7:55132]
On Mar 1, 9:48am, "Thomas Larus" wrote: } } scenario, not doing the voice part, doing token ring with MAUs instead of } the formerly-expensive TR switch). Formerly, is certainly the right word. Now that token ring is off the lab, token ring equipment is dirt cheap. A Cat 3900 just went for $200 US on that auction site. }-- End of excerpt from "Thomas Larus" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55236&t=55132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
Do you think he could have meant the 111th CCIE? wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings all, > > I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure > the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I > don't know? > > Thanks...Nabil > > "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55237&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATM Problem [7:55238]
Greetings, I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM Circuit. Currently, our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We submitted an order to add another site into the cloud. The telco provided the vpi's but only two sites communicate. Site C | | | Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site B | | | NEW Site Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW Site" was added but (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate with Site A. Teloc has checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. Which brings up another strange item--All the VPI's were the same: New site Originating Destination 90 90 100 100 80 80 I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both ends,,Does this sound correct? OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" and site a exchange info. Site A interface ATM5/0/0 ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 ip pim sparse-mode ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 ip ospf network non-broadcast map-group TEST atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap no atm ilmi-keepalive map-list TEST ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast NEW Site interface ATM3/0 ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 ip ospf network non-broadcast map-group TEST atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap no atm ilmi-keepalive map-list TEST ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast Site C interface ATM1/0/0 ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F ip ospf network non-broadcast map-group TEST atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap no atm ilmi-keepalive map-list TEST ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 ip 192.58.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast Any help is greatly appreciated! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55238&t=55238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Hi, The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for site B yet configured. Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so under OSPF you will neighbor statements. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > Circuit. Currently, > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > submitted an order to add > another site into the cloud. The telco provided the > vpi's but only two > sites communicate. > > > Site C > | > | > | > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site B > | > | > | > NEW Site > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > Site" was added but > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate with > Site A. Teloc has > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > Which brings up another > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > New site > Originating Destination > 9090 > 100 100 > 8080 > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > ends,,Does this sound > correct? > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > and site a exchange > info. > > Site A > interface ATM5/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > ip pim sparse-mode > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > NEW Site > interface ATM3/0 > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > Site C > interface ATM1/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > ip 192.58.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > Any help is greatly appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] = "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55239&t=55238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: General PIX question DES/3DES [7:55200]
Upgrade. You can get DES free but 3DES is upgrade. --- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Do any of the PIX firewalls come with 3DES or is it > an upgrade option on all > the models Particularly the PIX-525-UR-BUN. > > Thanx, > mkj [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55240&t=55200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: General PIX question DES/3DES [7:55200]
I know I've seen a Pix 501 that comes with 3DES on ebay priced around $100 more than the straight DES ones, if that helps a bit. Tom Larus wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Do any of the PIX firewalls come with 3DES or is it an upgrade option on all > the models Particularly the PIX-525-UR-BUN. > > Thanx, > mkj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55233&t=55200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Eric, Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my part entering the information in the posting. The map-list in the router does have the correct IP address. I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on the "NEW SITE" router/map list without any success. I apologize, I should have stated that in my previous posting. I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF process, but no success. THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" but eventually shows as being down. Also, I receive a message on the "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. Thank You for your assistance.. -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] Hi, The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for site B yet configured. Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so under OSPF you will neighbor statements. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > Circuit. Currently, > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > submitted an order to add > another site into the cloud. The telco provided the > vpi's but only two > sites communicate. > > > Site C > | > | > | > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site B > | > | > | > NEW Site > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > Site" was added but > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate with > Site A. Teloc has > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > Which brings up another > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > New site > Originating Destination > 9090 > 100 100 > 8080 > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > ends,,Does this sound > correct? > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > and site a exchange > info. > > Site A > interface ATM5/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > ip pim sparse-mode > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > NEW Site > interface ATM3/0 > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > Site C > interface ATM1/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > Any help is greatly appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] = "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55241&t=55238 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Bill, No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches this goes through and they have a mis-match in their PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Eric, > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > part entering the > information in the posting. The map-list in the > router does have the > correct IP address. > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > the "NEW SITE" > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > should have stated > that in my previous posting. > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > process, but no success. > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > receive a message on the > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Hi, > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > site B yet configured. > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > Circuit. Currently, > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > submitted an order to add > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > the > > vpi's but only two > > sites communicate. > > > > > > Site C > > | > > | > > | > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > B > > | > > | > > | > > NEW Site > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > Site" was added but > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > with > > Site A. Teloc has > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > Which brings up another > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > New site > > Originating Destination > > 90 90 > > 100 100 > > 80 80 > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > ends,,Does this sound > > correct? > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > and site a exchange > > info. > > > > Site A > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > ip pim sparse-mode > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > > > > > NEW Site > > interface ATM3/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > > > > > > Site C > > interface ATM1/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > = > "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security > deserve neither > freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.
RE: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Eric, I appreciate your help. SITE A--PINGS ALL SITES SITE C-- PINGS ALL but "new site" NEW SITE--PINGS SITE A ONLY -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:30 PM To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] Bill, No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches this goes through and they have a mis-match in their PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Eric, > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > part entering the > information in the posting. The map-list in the > router does have the > correct IP address. > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > the "NEW SITE" > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > should have stated > that in my previous posting. > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > process, but no success. > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > receive a message on the > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Hi, > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > site B yet configured. > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > Circuit. Currently, > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > submitted an order to add > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > the > > vpi's but only two > > sites communicate. > > > > > > Site C > > | > > | > > | > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > B > > | > > | > > | > > NEW Site > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > Site" was added but > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > with > > Site A. Teloc has > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > Which brings up another > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > New site > > Originating Destination > > 90 90 > > 100 100 > > 80 80 > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > ends,,Does this sound > > correct? > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > and site a exchange > > info. > > > > Site A > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > ip pim sparse-mode > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > > > > > NEW Site > > interface ATM3/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > > > > > > Site C > > interface ATM1/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > = > "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security > deserve neither > freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin > >
Re: CCIE numbers [7:55201]
""Al Walter"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Do you think he could have meant the 111th CCIE? CL: hhhmm... a thought. CL: it wasn't too many years ago that a lot of CCIE's that I met weren't really big on strutting their numbers. My former boss at March First wasn't much for talking about it. The number wasn't on her e-mail signature or her stationery. I believe there are a couple of folks on this list who know or who have interviewed with another former March First CCIE, initials TV, an Australian who had a pretty good gig at Big Bank, and who never strutted his number either. CL: of course, three years ago, there were only about 1/4 as many CCIE's as there are today > > > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Greetings all, > > > > I've a gentleman claiming to be he's CCIE number 111. I know for sure > > the numbers started at 1126 (1125 LAB). Do you guys know anything I > > don't know? > > > > Thanks...Nabil > > > > "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55244&t=55201 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Again, not claiming to know a lot of ATM, but certainly understanding telcos who don't configure their part correctly.. does your carrier use ILMI at all? if so, you could set up ILMI and then do a debug to see what the telco is sending you. I'm trying to recall if there is a downside to doing a debug atm events of debug atm packet. seems to me I've locked up routers issuing one or the other of those. debug atm packet will show you activity links to pvc's - which in turn can tell you if anything other than keepalives are happening. as with frame relay dlci's, atm vpi / vci numbers are locally significant. I've done a number of RLAN's now ( DSL to ATM ) and the telco I work for has a convention such that anything from the DSLAM to the customer prem is pvc 0/35 and from the host ATM side the PVC represents a particular DSLAM and a particular port on that DSLAM. 2/27 would be DSLAM 2, port 27, etc. just about every problem I've encountered on an RLAN is the result of misconfiguration at the DSL / ATM handoff. best wishes ""Bill Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Eric, > > I appreciate your help. > > SITE A--PINGS ALL SITES > SITE C-- PINGS ALL but "new site" > NEW SITE--PINGS SITE A ONLY > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:30 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Bill, > > No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites > a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet > session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to > do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. > > > If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify > the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly > in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be > fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches > this goes through and they have a mis-match in their > PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Eric, > > > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > > part entering the > > information in the posting. The map-list in the > > router does have the > > correct IP address. > > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > > the "NEW SITE" > > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > > should have stated > > that in my previous posting. > > > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > > process, but no success. > > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > > receive a message on the > > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > > > Hi, > > > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > > site B yet configured. > > > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > > > HTH, Erick > > > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > > Circuit. Currently, > > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > > submitted an order to add > > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > > the > > > vpi's but only two > > > sites communicate. > > > > > > > > > Site C > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > > B > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > NEW Site > > > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > > Site" was added but > > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > > with > > > Site A. Teloc has > > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > > Which brings up another > > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > > > New site > > > Originating Destination > > > 90 90 > > > 100 100 > > > 80 80 > > > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > > ends,,Does this sound > > > correct? > > > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > > and site a exchange > > > info. > > > > > > Site A > > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > > ip pim sparse-mode > > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > > map-group TEST > > > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > > > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > > > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > > > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc
Re: General PIX question DES/3DES [7:55200]
3DES is subject to country implementation. So need to request to Cisco for implementation of the 3DES. CMIAW Best Regards, HATO >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: General PIX question DES/3DES [7:55200] >Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:35:10 GMT > >Do any of the PIX firewalls come with 3DES or is it an upgrade option on >all >the models Particularly the PIX-525-UR-BUN. > >Thanx, >mkj _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55246&t=55200 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM Problem [7:55238]
If these are indeed PVP's being supplied, then you should be able to check PNNI to make sure everyone sees each other. You PNNI masking may be off, double check everyone has the same PNNI level mask applied to the NSAP Nodes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Smith Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] Eric, I appreciate your help. SITE A--PINGS ALL SITES SITE C-- PINGS ALL but "new site" NEW SITE--PINGS SITE A ONLY -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:30 PM To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] Bill, No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches this goes through and they have a mis-match in their PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Eric, > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > part entering the > information in the posting. The map-list in the > router does have the > correct IP address. > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > the "NEW SITE" > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > should have stated > that in my previous posting. > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > process, but no success. > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > receive a message on the > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Hi, > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > site B yet configured. > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > Circuit. Currently, > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > submitted an order to add > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > the > > vpi's but only two > > sites communicate. > > > > > > Site C > > | > > | > > | > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > B > > | > > | > > | > > NEW Site > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > Site" was added but > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > with > > Site A. Teloc has > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > Which brings up another > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > New site > > Originating Destination > > 90 90 > > 100 100 > > 80 80 > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both ends,,Does this > > sound correct? > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > and site a exchange > > info. > > > > Site A > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > ip pim sparse-mode > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > > > > > NEW Site > > interface ATM3/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > > > > > > Site C > > interface ATM1/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 1
RE: ATM Problem [7:55238]
router is a Cisco 827. For other brand CPE routers, the pvc is different. Randall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of The Long and Winding Road Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 09:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] Again, not claiming to know a lot of ATM, but certainly understanding telcos who don't configure their part correctly.. does your carrier use ILMI at all? if so, you could set up ILMI and then do a debug to see what the telco is sending you. I'm trying to recall if there is a downside to doing a debug atm events of debug atm packet. seems to me I've locked up routers issuing one or the other of those. debug atm packet will show you activity links to pvc's - which in turn can tell you if anything other than keepalives are happening. as with frame relay dlci's, atm vpi / vci numbers are locally significant. I've done a number of RLAN's now ( DSL to ATM ) and the telco I work for has a convention such that anything from the DSLAM to the customer prem is pvc 0/35 and from the host ATM side the PVC represents a particular DSLAM and a particular port on that DSLAM. 2/27 would be DSLAM 2, port 27, etc. just about every problem I've encountered on an RLAN is the result of misconfiguration at the DSL / ATM handoff. best wishes ""Bill Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Eric, > > I appreciate your help. > > SITE A--PINGS ALL SITES > SITE C-- PINGS ALL but "new site" > NEW SITE--PINGS SITE A ONLY > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:30 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Bill, > > No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites > a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet > session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to > do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. > > > If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify > the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly > in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be > fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches > this goes through and they have a mis-match in their > PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Eric, > > > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > > part entering the > > information in the posting. The map-list in the > > router does have the > > correct IP address. > > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > > the "NEW SITE" > > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > > should have stated > > that in my previous posting. > > > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > > process, but no success. > > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > > receive a message on the > > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > > > Hi, > > > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > > site B yet configured. > > > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > > > HTH, Erick > > > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > > Circuit. Currently, > > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > > submitted an order to add > > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > > the > > > vpi's but only two > > > sites communicate. > > > > > > > > > Site C > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > > B > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > NEW Site > > > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > > Site" was added but > > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > > with > > > Site A. Teloc has > > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > > Which brings up another > > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > > > New site > > > Originating Destination > > > 90 90 > > > 100 100 > > > 80 80 > > > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > > ends,,Does this sound > > > correct? > > > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > > and site a exchange > > > info. > > > > > > Site A > > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > > ip pim sparse-mode > > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > >
Looking for a job : Consultant/Architect [7:55249]
Respected Sir/Madam, I am a Network Consultant/Architect with 3.5 years experience in the IT industry. I am currently working for one of the Top 5 comapnies of Fortune 500. I am working as a Consultant doing both pre-sales & post-sales and design/architect network (LAN/WAN/RAS/VPN/etc). I also do level-2 troubleshooting for our support engineers. I impliment VPN solutions, Cisco routers, Cisco Switches, Network Audit using H/W Analyzers and troubleshoot based on reports and give consulting, Wireless implimentation (Lucent and Intel), etc. Job can be anywhere. Currently I am in located in Bangalore, India. I am more than willing to relocate from India. Please let me know by e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if anyone is interest in my CV. Thanking you. Regards, Cisco Maniac Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55249&t=55249 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM and Frame Relay interworking [7:53414]
Yes indeed, you simply configure the frame and ATM as you normally would, and the provider will provide which vpi/vci maps to which DLCI. I think the traffic between the carrier's ATM cloud & frame relay cloud (& vice versa) translates via FRATM. Randall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM and Frame Relay interworking [7:53414] Yes the service provider provides the magic, you simply configure the frame and ATM as you normally would, the provider will provide which vpi/vci maps to which DLCI. FRF8 provides a mechanism for relaying link status from frame to ATM and vis-versa but it not not always implemented by all vendors:( Dave Ben W wrote: > > We have a number of these ATM/Frame PVCs also. From what our vendor told > us, the packets are migrated from ATM to Frame, or vise versa, on the > vendors network. We have seen some latency that the vendor tells us is an > effect of the packets hopping from ATM to Frame or Frame to ATM. Otherwise > it works great. -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55250&t=53414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: ATM Problem [7:55238]
Regarding RLAN (DSL to ATM), I think pvc "0/35" tells the DSLAM that the CPE router is a Cisco 827. For other brand CPE routers, the pvc is different. Randall -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of The Long and Winding Road Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 09:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] Again, not claiming to know a lot of ATM, but certainly understanding telcos who don't configure their part correctly.. does your carrier use ILMI at all? if so, you could set up ILMI and then do a debug to see what the telco is sending you. I'm trying to recall if there is a downside to doing a debug atm events of debug atm packet. seems to me I've locked up routers issuing one or the other of those. debug atm packet will show you activity links to pvc's - which in turn can tell you if anything other than keepalives are happening. as with frame relay dlci's, atm vpi / vci numbers are locally significant. I've done a number of RLAN's now ( DSL to ATM ) and the telco I work for has a convention such that anything from the DSLAM to the customer prem is pvc 0/35 and from the host ATM side the PVC represents a particular DSLAM and a particular port on that DSLAM. 2/27 would be DSLAM 2, port 27, etc. just about every problem I've encountered on an RLAN is the result of misconfiguration at the DSL / ATM handoff. best wishes ""Bill Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Eric, > > I appreciate your help. > > SITE A--PINGS ALL SITES > SITE C-- PINGS ALL but "new site" > NEW SITE--PINGS SITE A ONLY > > -Original Message- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:30 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Bill, > > No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites > a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet > session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to > do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct. > > > If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify > the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly > in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be > fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches > this goes through and they have a mis-match in their > PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Eric, > > > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > > part entering the > > information in the posting. The map-list in the > > router does have the > > correct IP address. > > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > > the "NEW SITE" > > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > > should have stated > > that in my previous posting. > > > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > > process, but no success. > > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > > receive a message on the > > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > > > Hi, > > > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > > site B yet configured. > > > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > > > HTH, Erick > > > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > > Circuit. Currently, > > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > > submitted an order to add > > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > > the > > > vpi's but only two > > > sites communicate. > > > > > > > > > Site C > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > Site A--- ATM CLOUD Site > > B > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > NEW Site > > > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > > Site" was added but > > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > > with > > > Site A. Teloc has > > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > > Which brings up another > > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > > > New site > > > Originating Destination > > > 90 90 > > > 100 100 > > > 80 80 > > > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > > ends,,Does this sound > > > correct? > > > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > > and site a exchange > > > info. > > > > > > Site A > > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > > ip pim sparse-mode > > > ip ospf au
