RE: Layer 3 configuration from CAT4000 CWI [7:34736]
The Catalyst 4000 series has the ability to perform L3 switching/routing! See the link below for details! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/28.html Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JEK Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Layer 3 configuration from CAT4000 CWI [7:34736] I believe that the 8500/6500/6000/5500/5000 are the only Cat's that will do L3 switching/routing. HTH. - jek Cisco Breaker wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I know that you can create VLAN or enable a port from CWI software inside the CAT4000. Is it possible to configure layer3 routing (if you have the module SUP3) from the CWI of the CAT4000? Because my customer doesnt want to buy CiscoWorks2000 for only one switch. Best regards, Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34970t=34736 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: back to back frame relay tunnel using 2 2500 routers? [7:34422]
What you're looking for can be found on ccPrep's website See link below http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-whitepapers/ccpapers.htm Download the HomeLab White Paperin there is an actual config to do exactly what you're asking! HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dave petit Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: back to back frame relay tunnel using 2 2500 routers? [7:34417] I am looking for a sample config using 2 2500 routers back to back e0/e0 tunneling, so that the 4 serial interfaces can be configured as one (4 port)frame relay switch. any one know where i can find it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34422t=34422 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDA ! [7:34288]
755 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDA ! [7:34288] Hi All, I am planning to give CCDA exam and wondering what's the passing score. Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34290t=34288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ping Circusnuts 2600 Series ROM upgrades [7:32113]
What's up Oz! And welcome back! To stay on topic... Did we ever figure out the latest version of bootrom for the 2600 series! Phil ...? Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ping Circusnuts 2600 Series ROM upgrades [7:32113] Hi Phil How goes it BOOT-2600= is the part # you need from Cisco Hi stefan Oz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33090t=32113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wic 1T [7:32133]
Actually the WIC-1T can be used in asynchronous mode on the 1600 and 1700 series platforms! The command you're looking for is physical-layer async In all other platforms, it operates in sychronous mode only. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] The WIC-1T is synchronous only. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_1t_wic.shtml If you want a WIC card that supports asynchronous serial then a WIC-2A/S would do. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/wic-2as.shtml You mention modem support. Is your aux port free? If so, any reason why it won't meet your needs? -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic 1T [7:32133] Hi all i have been searching on the cisco site for some information relating to WIC1T. I have just installed one into a 1720 for a modem connection now by cisco (or the information i can find ) the 1720 with this module supports both aysnc and sync's modes. now my question is do i have to do anything special to get it to work in async mode . by the way my ios is 12.0(3)T any help appreciated D'Wayne Saunders, Network Administrator Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: 0419 823 568 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... ** * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32882t=32133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN connector PIN configuration [7:32802]
Here's a link on CCO that indicates the pinouts! http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2500/2524/ boa/boapin.htm#21253 Watch the word wrap! HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sim, CT (Chee Tong) Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 7:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN connector PIN configuration [7:32802] Our Telecom only install the ISDN line on their krone block and end it with a pair of wire. Can we need to patch the pair of wire into a RJ45 connector (not RJ11 ) and connect it to the ISDN U interface port and make it work. But I am not sure about the PIN configuration of the connector. Is that middle two pins , pin 4 and pin 5 like normal phone wire. == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32806t=32802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT : Tacacs+ / Linux [7:32661]
Here's a couple of links I used to get Tacacs+ up and running on a Redhat v7.2 box. http://stiwww.epfl.ch/tacacs/u_g_F404.html Link on CCO http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/480/tacplus.shtml Also be advised that since it appears you installed using the .rpm file, it probably installed a copy of the User's Guide on your system, although that file might be an older version. On Redhat 7.2 it's in the usr/share/doc/tac_plus-F4.0.3.alpha directory! HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex Lee Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT : Tacacs+ / Linux [7:32661] A newbie question regarding Tacacs+ on Linux box for home lab. I download the Tacacs+ v.9 from http://www.gazi.ed.tr/tacacs. Installed it successfully (I believe) as per instruction from the site, since I got a output of : tac_plus-F4.0.3.alpha-9 when I issue a query : rpm -q tac_plus How can I tell if Tacacs+ is up and running even before I configure a router to test it ? Is Tacacs+ running as a service (daemon) whenever the Linux box boots up ? I cannot get answer after reading the docs from the same site. Can any group member point me to some resources concerning running Tacacs+ on Linux ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32666t=32661 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573]
Bryon, check out this recent message posted by Dennis Laganiere. Here's the link in the archives http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31324t=31305 HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Byron Mobley Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 8:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Equipment for home lab? [7:32573] From reading this forum it seems this topic has been addressed before but I can't find a list of what's required for a good / complete home lab for CCNP and then CCIE. Any help, comments, suggestions would be appreciated. And yes, like most people I'm on a budget. Thanks in andvance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32576t=32573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Back 2 back frame [7:32438]
Here's a link to a variety of frame-relay setup examples! Watch the word wrap... http://www.ieng.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/wan_c /wcdfrely.htm -Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of BH Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Back 2 back frame [7:32438] Does anyone know where I can get directions to set up 2 routers to do back to back frame-relay? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32446t=32438 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832]
12.0(20) on one router and 12.1(12) on the rest! Which 11.3 version are you running? -Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diffy De Villiers Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832] Hi Stefan, Thank you for your input, but indeed things is more confusing now!!! I am glad to see that you got the expected results. Maybe the implementation differences lies in the version of IOS. I am using IOS 11.3 (what version are you using?). Kind Regards Diffy Stefan Dozier 01/16/02 07:19PM I hope I'm not confusing the issue here. I plugged your config into my pod, with a few minor changes (interface types used). I used serials thorughout the net, where you used some ethernet interfaces, with the exception of RouterD where I used a loopback interface instead of the ethernet you used! Here's my config and RouterA's routing table. hostname RouterA ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterB via network 1 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 1 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 end ! hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterA via network 1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 1 ! interface Serial1 description connected to RouterC via network 2 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 4 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 end ! hostname RouterC ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterB via network 2 ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 4 ! interface Serial1 description connected to RouterD via network 3 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 64 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 end ! hostname RouterD ! interface Loopback0 description network 4 ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-point ip ospf cost 16 ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterC via network 3 ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 64 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 end RouterA#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default U - per-user static route, o - ODR Gateway of last resort is not set O IA 192.168.4.0/24 [110/85] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 O IA 192.168.2.0/24 [110/5] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 O IA 192.168.3.0/24 [110/69] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 As you can see, I got the results expected! I am very curious why you're getting the results you posted, but I can't reconfig my pod right now to match your exact setup without sabotaging another issue I'm trying to resolve. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diffy De Villiers Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832] Hi Andrew, Thank you for you willingness to assist. Someone in the group suggested that a routing loop may exists (i.e, the path Router A uses to get to network 3 is via B via C via D to network 3). Although this may explain the extra cost factor of 64, this is not what happens as can be seen from the following two traceroute outputs: RouterAtraceroute 192.168.3.1 Tracing the route to 192.168.3.1 1 192.168.1.1 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 192.168.2.2 8 msec 8 msec * RouterAtraceroute 192.168.3.2 Tracing the route to 192.168.3.2 1 192.168.1.1 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 192.168.2.2 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec 3 192.168.3.2 8 msec 8 msec * As you can see the optimal path is used everytime (i.e. Router A to B to C to network 3). When examining the Link-State Databases of the routers in Area 0, network 3 has a metric of 128 (and not 64 as would have been expected). Similarly network 1 has a cost of 2 (and not 1). Why is the costs of these two summary routes doubled?. Kind Regards Diffy de Villiers Andrew Larkins 01/14/02 01:53PM Hi, I am not to sure myself here. I will ask one of my colleagues here as well to see if he has any light that he can shed here. Regards Andrew -Original Message- From: Diffy De Villiers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 13:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832] Hi Everybody This is the third time that I am posting this message to this studygroup, I had no reply to the previous two
RE: CCIE #8642 [7:32411]
Congratulations and well done! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lijewski Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE #8642 [7:32411] First I would like to thank everyone here who has answered my questions, and everyone who posts here. This is an invaluable source of information. I took my lab exam on Tuesday in San Jose, it was my first attempt and I was very nervous. I didn't think that I did well enough to pass and had a very bad plane flight home waiting to look at the email. To my relief I did better than I thought and was happy to see my number waiting for me in my email. To everyone here, again I say thank you. To everyone working twoards the lab exam, your hard work will pay off. Bill L. P.S. Anyone need a new CCIE to work for them ? :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32465t=32411 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wic 1T [7:32133]
Actually the WIC-1T can be used in asynchronous mode on the 1600 and 1700 series platforms! The command you're looking for is physical-layer async In all other platforms, it operates in sychronous mode only. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] The WIC-1T is synchronous only. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_1t_wic.shtml If you want a WIC card that supports asynchronous serial then a WIC-2A/S would do. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/wic-2as.shtml You mention modem support. Is your aux port free? If so, any reason why it won't meet your needs? -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic 1T [7:32133] Hi all i have been searching on the cisco site for some information relating to WIC1T. I have just installed one into a 1720 for a modem connection now by cisco (or the information i can find ) the 1720 with this module supports both aysnc and sync's modes. now my question is do i have to do anything special to get it to work in async mode . by the way my ios is 12.0(3)T any help appreciated D'Wayne Saunders, Network Administrator Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: 0419 823 568 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... ** * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32512t=32133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832]
I hope I'm not confusing the issue here. I plugged your config into my pod, with a few minor changes (interface types used). I used serials thorughout the net, where you used some ethernet interfaces, with the exception of RouterD where I used a loopback interface instead of the ethernet you used! Here's my config and RouterA's routing table. hostname RouterA ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterB via network 1 ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 1 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 end ! hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterA via network 1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 1 ! interface Serial1 description connected to RouterC via network 2 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 4 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 end ! hostname RouterC ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterB via network 2 ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 4 ! interface Serial1 description connected to RouterD via network 3 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 64 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 end ! hostname RouterD ! interface Loopback0 description network 4 ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf network point-to-point ip ospf cost 16 ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterC via network 3 ip address 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.0 ip ospf cost 64 ! router ospf 10 network 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 2 end RouterA#sh ip route Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default U - per-user static route, o - ODR Gateway of last resort is not set O IA 192.168.4.0/24 [110/85] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 O IA 192.168.2.0/24 [110/5] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 O IA 192.168.3.0/24 [110/69] via 192.168.1.1, 00:02:50, Serial0 As you can see, I got the results expected! I am very curious why you're getting the results you posted, but I can't reconfig my pod right now to match your exact setup without sabotaging another issue I'm trying to resolve. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diffy De Villiers Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832] Hi Andrew, Thank you for you willingness to assist. Someone in the group suggested that a routing loop may exists (i.e, the path Router A uses to get to network 3 is via B via C via D to network 3). Although this may explain the extra cost factor of 64, this is not what happens as can be seen from the following two traceroute outputs: RouterAtraceroute 192.168.3.1 Tracing the route to 192.168.3.1 1 192.168.1.1 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 192.168.2.2 8 msec 8 msec * RouterAtraceroute 192.168.3.2 Tracing the route to 192.168.3.2 1 192.168.1.1 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec 2 192.168.2.2 8 msec 4 msec 4 msec 3 192.168.3.2 8 msec 8 msec * As you can see the optimal path is used everytime (i.e. Router A to B to C to network 3). When examining the Link-State Databases of the routers in Area 0, network 3 has a metric of 128 (and not 64 as would have been expected). Similarly network 1 has a cost of 2 (and not 1). Why is the costs of these two summary routes doubled?. Kind Regards Diffy de Villiers Andrew Larkins 01/14/02 01:53PM Hi, I am not to sure myself here. I will ask one of my colleagues here as well to see if he has any light that he can shed here. Regards Andrew -Original Message- From: Diffy De Villiers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 January 2002 13:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: URGENT - PLEASE HELP - OSPF summary route cost. [7:31832] Hi Everybody This is the third time that I am posting this message to this studygroup, I had no reply to the previous two postings. Hopefully someone will be able to assist me this time. I have a problem understanding how costs are calculated for OSPF summary routes. To understand my problem refer to the following example: This is the internetwork diagram (with 4 routers A,B,C D): netw 1 netw 2 netw 3netw 4 [ A ][ B ][ C ]-[ D ]-| cost 1 cost 4 cost 64 cost 16 -- Here are my router configurations: -- hostname RouterA ! interface Serial0 description connected to RouterB via network 1 ip address 192.168.1.2
RE: wic 1T [7:32133]
Actually the WIC-1T can be used in asynchronous mode on the 1600 and 1700 series platforms! The command you're looking for is physical-layer async In all other platforms, it operates in sychronous mode only. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Cotts Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wic 1T [7:32133] The WIC-1T is synchronous only. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/hw_1t_wic.shtml If you want a WIC card that supports asynchronous serial then a WIC-2A/S would do. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/107/wic-2as.shtml You mention modem support. Is your aux port free? If so, any reason why it won't meet your needs? -Original Message- From: D'Wayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic 1T [7:32133] Hi all i have been searching on the cisco site for some information relating to WIC1T. I have just installed one into a 1720 for a modem connection now by cisco (or the information i can find ) the 1720 with this module supports both aysnc and sync's modes. now my question is do i have to do anything special to get it to work in async mode . by the way my ios is 12.0(3)T any help appreciated D'Wayne Saunders, Network Administrator Ph:08 89507742 Fax:08 89521112 Mobile: 0419 823 568 www.lasseters.com.au World's First Government Licensed and Regulated Online Casino... ** * This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to Lasseters Online. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of Lasseters Online are neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32201t=32133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple posts [7:32204]
I have seen a couple of dupes today, but hadn't noticed any prior to today! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rik Guyler Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple posts [7:32204] A few days ago I started receiving duplicate emails from the Groupstudy. Now I am receiving triplicate emails. Anyone else experiencing this? --- Rik Guyler Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32212t=32204 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Half.com book purchase [7:32234]
Ditto, Chuck! I'll have to agree with your observations! 19 days total from order submission to receipt of book! Ouch But I guess I should feel fortunate since the projected shipping arrival dates could have netted me the book anywhere from 12 to 34 from my actual order submission! 34 daysamazing! But the price was rightAnd I could afford to wait! God knows I'm not lacking around here for a book to read. But still, if I want it fast, Bookpool has always worked for me! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic - Half.com book purchase [7:32234] Based on my first experience with this means of purchasing books, I have the following observations: 1) price is great 2) service / delivery sucks Don't be in a hurry when you use this subsidiary of e-bay. from the postmark to my hands was about a week, but the postmark is two weeks after I placed the order and the order was accepted. you have no choice for shipping. media mail ( media is apparently Eskimo for dog sled via the north pole ) is the only option. reading the site, I see that comments from other customers are all over the board. about equal good and bad. the bad all revolve around turnaround time. I chose half.com because they claimed to have the book in stock at the time I was ordering. Other places stated no availability. I suspect a part of the problem with the particular book I ordered is that is it is newly released, and the seller ( some small shop in New Jersey ) accepted my bid thinking they could get the book through distribution and found they had to wait for the release. for my money, bookpool is still the way to go. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32248t=32234 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2600 Series ROM upgrades [7:32113]
Phil, here's my 2620. Looks as if there's atleast one updated ROM available. ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) cisco 2620 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x102) with 59392K/6144K bytes of memory 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write) -Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Circusnuts Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2600 Series ROM upgrades [7:32113] Anyone got the skinny on this one. I have version 11.3(2)XA3 ROMs running in my 2611 and was told my 16 Meg FLASH upgrade did not take because I need to upgrade the ROMs. Is Cisco offering anything newer ??? Both my 2621 and 2611 have the same ROMs and my 2621 is 16F and 64 RAM device. Thanks In Advance !!! Phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32123t=32113 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ...to Desgin or ...to IE [7:31849]
Indeed, you have! But wait until you discover the archives! :-) Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Packet Loss Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ...to Desgin or ...to IE [7:31849] Morning All, Stumbled upon this NG and feel like I have found a gold mine. Have one more test to go (640-506, support) to complete the CCNP. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31865t=31849 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656]
John, I've been following your thread and think I found a possible answer to your question on why the neighbor statement gets ignored when entered on spoke routers! In the OSPF Desig Guide Section 1 under Adjacencies on Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) Networks the next to last statement in the paragraph gives us a clue. The neighbor command applies to routers with a potential of being DRs or BDRs (interface priority not equal to 0). So to test that theory, I changed the priority on one of my spokes to 1 from 0 and viola, it takes the neighbor statement just fine. Prior to changing the interface priority I could enter the neighbor statement under the OSPF process, but it didn't show up in the config. Spoke Router: interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay IETF logging event subif-link-status logging event dlci-status-change frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.2 100 broadcast frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 100 broadcast frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! router ospf 64 network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 neighbor 192.1.1.2 Hub Router: interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation frame-relay IETF frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.1 100 broadcast frame-relay map ip 192.1.1.3 200 broadcast frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! router ospf 64 log-adjacency-changes network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 neighbor 192.1.1.3 neighbor 192.1.1.1 priority 1 I thought you only need the neighbor statement on one side of the connection? Once a router accepts the hello, adjacencies are formed with information from the hello via unicast communication from that point forward. Sort of like if I shout over a hill, Hey Routerman are you there, this is Jim. Then you would respond back to me by name. -Original Message- From: Router Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF and The Disappearing Neighbor Statement [7:31656] I was able to reproduce your exact scenario. I had a hub with two spokes and the neighbor statements only appeared on the hub. This is very interesting and I'm not sure what the reason behind it is. I am glad that this was brought up, because I would love to get to the bottom of this situation. I'll keep you posted John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... The network statement definitely was there, but the neighbor statements would only appear on the hub router. Interestingly, I just saw a sample configuration similar to this on CCO and they only had the neighbor statement on one router, not both. I think as long as one router has a neighbor statement configured, the adjacency will form assuming all other things being equal (network type, etc.) The adjacencies formed but I had to cycle the interfaces to get things started. Even if the neighbor statement is only required on one side, I still don't understand why the router wouldn't let me add it. The adjacencies would eventually form, however, and routing occurred exactly as I expected it. I did notice a minor issue with the neighbor statements on the hub. I had three of them, and one of them inserted 'priority 1' at the end, yet the other two remained as I entered them. Router Man 1/11/02 3:08:03 PM The only time that the neighbor statement will not show up in the running-config, is if you do not have a network statement under the router ospf process. I am doubting that the neighbors formed an adjacency without the neigbor or network statements showing up under the ospf config. If the adjacency was actually formed, then it must be a bug. Another thing that I have noticed is than when trying to use the neighbor statement to set the priority, neighbor 1.1.1.1 priority 255 the priority will change to something other than what I set it too. It took me a while to figure this one out. The problem is that I have to have matching ip ospf priority 255 statements under the interfaces running ospf . John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It was hot, too hot. Our detective had been working feverishly to configure OSPF over NBMA without the use of ip ospf network statements. He knew that to do this he must explicitly add neighbor statements or adjacencies would not form. He logs into the hub router and types in his three neighbor statements. All seems well. It's still too hot, but it's a dry heat. He now logs into one of the spoke routers and types in his neighbor statement. He pauses momentarily and then checks the OSPF adjacencies. Something seems to be wrong, he thinks to himself. This ought to be working, but it isn't. Why not? He looks through the running config to look for any errors and notices the the neighbor statement that he just
RE: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559]
The 2514 has 2 ethernet interfaces! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of sam sneed Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DHCP coonection on Cisco Router [7:31559] Hello group, I wanted to use a Cisco router to connect to my ISP via DSL or Cable modem. What would be the least expensive router I could get used on e-bay that could perform this. It obviously needs 2 ethernet interfaces and I'm not sure if there is a model in the 2500 series that supports this. Thanks alot. I'd like to use this setup for studying and internet connectivity. sam sneed Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31568t=31559 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPP link negotiation problem [7:31132]
I agree! From what I've read, that's not how it's suppose to work! This link came through the list recently! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/131/ppp_callin_hostname.html I'm not sure if you've seen it or not, if you have, I apologize for not reading the entire thread! If you haven'tcheck it out! If you can't get to work as advertised, post your results, and I'll try and see what happens! -Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of bergenpeak Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPP link negotiation problem [7:31132] Thanks for the responses so far. I still don't understand the purpose of the ppp chap hostname command under the interface config. Using this command, I am now able to get a PPP link up. But I must do the following: rtr-a config: username rtr-b int serial 0 encap ppp ppp chap hostname rtr-a rtr-b config: username rtr-a int serial 0 encap ppp ppp chap hostname rtr-b That is, I must define the hostnames to be *different* on each side, and then define the corresponding global username to match the remote hostname on each side of the link. Thus, the interface ppp chap hostname command doesn't appaear to simplify the CHAP config. This seems to defeat the purpose of this command as suposedly it's used to simplify the CHAP config so that the same hostname can be used on multiple routers. Or so its stated in the ICRC book (page 373). So, I'm not really sure what benefit there is for this command, as it doesn't seem to simplify the config. But I'm sure I'm missing something... :-) Thanks for any more info/comments. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31413t=31132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Framesaver CSU Cable Question ? [7:31427]
I just picked up a Paradyne 9120 Framsaver CSU and while researching the cable I need to connect to a router I came across a possible alternate cable I wasn't aware of. The CSU came with a v.35 adapter (I was actually expecting a pigtail) but the adapter will work just fine, so I know that the CAB-V35MT MALE DTE V35 10 FT cable is the one I would normally use with the adapter. What I wasn't aware of is the CAB-530MT MALE DTE RS-530 10 FT cable which appears to allow me to connect directly to the CSU's 25 pin Port#1 or Port#2 connection and forego the v.35 adapter! Can anyone confirm my suspicions that the CAB-530MT will work for this application? The way I figure, the more pieces I can eliminate, the easier it becomes to troubleshoot if problems arise! -Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31427t=31427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Framesaver CSU Cable Question ? [7:31427]
Ole I have the pdf Technical reference document from Paradyne's website available and it indicates that the interface is a EIA-530a. From the tech reference: EIA-530A Port 1 or 2 Interface Cable The following table shows the EIA-530A circuit and pin assignments that are supported for a port connector/interface ( Port 1 or Port 2). I'm making the assumption that EIA-530 and RS-530 are one in the same...but you know what happens when one assumes :-) Anyway I'm relatively sure that the CAB-530MT cable will work, but I was hoping for solid confirmation from someone out there actually using the CAB-530MT in lieu of the CAB-V35MT/Adapter or pigtail cable, either in a lab environment or in production. BTW: RS-323 ??? Is that a RS-232 mistype! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Framesaver CSU Cable Question ? [7:31427] I am not an expert in your CSU, but you want to be absolute sure about what the 25 pin interface on it is. It could be either RS-323 or RS-530, and the two cables are not wired the same. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Stefan Dozier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Framesaver CSU Cable Question ? [7:31427] I just picked up a Paradyne 9120 Framsaver CSU and while researching the cable I need to connect to a router I came across a possible alternate cable I wasn't aware of. The CSU came with a v.35 adapter (I was actually expecting a pigtail) but the adapter will work just fine, so I know that the CAB-V35MT MALE DTE V35 10 FT cable is the one I would normally use with the adapter. What I wasn't aware of is the CAB-530MT MALE DTE RS-530 10 FT cable which appears to allow me to connect directly to the CSU's 25 pin Port#1 or Port#2 connection and forego the v.35 adapter! Can anyone confirm my suspicions that the CAB-530MT will work for this application? The way I figure, the more pieces I can eliminate, the easier it becomes to troubleshoot if problems arise! -Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31462t=31427 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PPP negotiaiton problem [7:30767]
Well, those were my symptons..exactly! A couple of months ago I was doing ddr configs using modems connected via the aux ports and everything thing worked fine at 38400. I still had the configs saved, so I know they worked! When I revisited ddr during the thanksgiving holidays, using the same configs I had working before, the connection(s) would establish, but I couldn't any data (read: icmp packets or pings)to pass at 38400. Debugs indicated that the dialer was connecting but the PPP Authentication process was having problems! Actually, the exact same debug symptons you posted! What made me think to drop the modem speed down to 9600, remains a mystery, but I did and it worked! I finished my tasks and I didn't really think about it any more. The reason: I don't have usr modems, I have some old Supras with no documentation, and with all the AT commands I punched in the modems from memory, (knowledge or forgotten knowledge from my bbs days) I felt fortunate to have them working at 9600. Besides packet speed doesn't matter hear at home anyway as long as I can get them across the link, when needed! So I moved on to other scenarios! So when your message came across, and you didn't find a solution I figured it was worth a shot to drop the line speed and see if it was the same problem I experienced. So it surprised me when you replied that it worked and it piqued my interest! The only thing I know for a fact that I changed, (besides me changing the modem settings) was between the time I had them working at 38400 and not being able to get them working at 38400 was. I upgraded IOS from 12.0 to 12.1. I noticed you're running 12.1. So today I downgraded the IOS to 12.0(20) and viola... They work fine at 38400 using 12.0. Went back to 12.1 with the same configs I just had working at 38400 and with IOS 12.1 I have to drop the aux line speed to 9600 to get them to work! A buglet...possibly! So try downgrading the IOS and see if they start to work at 38400, again! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Breaker Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPP negotiaiton problem [7:30767] Yes you are right it worked, but I can not belive. Because as I have tested before aux interfaces support up to 38400 with usr dial up modems. Now I wonder what is your experience, I am curious, would you please tell me? Best regards, Stefan Dozier wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... This may seem like a strange request, but bear with me a moment: Try changing your aux line speed from 38400 to 9600. If it works, I'll share a puzzling experience I had recently! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Breaker Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPP negotiaiton problem [7:30767] Excuse me everyone but passwords are the same. While I was pasting here I just changed the passwords of the config but they were the same before as cisco. And I am trying now, both passwords are the same but it isnt working. Best regards, Cisco Breaker wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I am configuring 2 router from their aux ports (but not back to back) with usr modems. I have configured the aux ports like they will act as back up ports. Everything is normal till it comes to ppp authentication session. I am pasting the configs and also after I tried my configs but they didnt work so I found a config from cisco and tried that one but it didn't worked too. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/async_backup_14281.html Software versions are 12.1 (10), Any help willl be appreciated. Best regards, newyork#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1368 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname newyork ! ! username albany password 0 cisco ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script backup atdt\T TIMEOUT 60 CONNECT \c ! ! voice-port 1/0 ! voice-port 1/1 ! voice-port 2/0 ! voice-port 2/1 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Async5 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 3600 dialer fast-idle 10 dialer enable-timeout 10 dialer map ip 192.168.2.1 name albany modem-script backup 250 dialer-group
RE: PPP negotiaiton problem [7:30767]
This may seem like a strange request, but bear with me a moment: Try changing your aux line speed from 38400 to 9600. If it works, I'll share a puzzling experience I had recently! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cisco Breaker Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPP negotiaiton problem [7:30767] Excuse me everyone but passwords are the same. While I was pasting here I just changed the passwords of the config but they were the same before as cisco. And I am trying now, both passwords are the same but it isnt working. Best regards, Cisco Breaker wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I am configuring 2 router from their aux ports (but not back to back) with usr modems. I have configured the aux ports like they will act as back up ports. Everything is normal till it comes to ppp authentication session. I am pasting the configs and also after I tried my configs but they didnt work so I found a config from cisco and tried that one but it didn't worked too. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/async_backup_14281.html Software versions are 12.1 (10), Any help willl be appreciated. Best regards, newyork#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1368 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname newyork ! ! username albany password 0 cisco ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero ! chat-script backup atdt\T TIMEOUT 60 CONNECT \c ! ! voice-port 1/0 ! voice-port 1/1 ! voice-port 2/0 ! voice-port 2/1 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no fair-queue ! interface Serial0.1 point-to-point ip address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Async5 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 3600 dialer fast-idle 10 dialer enable-timeout 10 dialer map ip 192.168.2.1 name albany modem-script backup 250 dialer-group 1 async mode dedicated no peer default ip address ppp authentication chap callin ! ip classless ip route 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.255 Serial0 ip route 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.255 Async5 2 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 line aux 0 exec-timeout 0 0 script dialer backup modem InOut transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 login ! no scheduler allocate end here is the config and debug for albany router albany#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1031 bytes ! version 12.1 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname albany ! username newyork password 0 cspm ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 25 ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ! ! ! voice-port 2/0 ! voice-port 2/1 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay ! interface Serial0.1 multipoint ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Async5 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer-group 1 async mode dedicated no peer default ip address ppp authentication chap ! ip classless ip route 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 Async5 2 ip route 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.255 Serial0 2 no ip http server ! dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 line aux 0 modem InOut transport input all stopbits 1 speed 38400 flowcontrol hardware line vty 0 4 login ! end 00:38:27: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Async5, changed state to up 00:38:27: As5 PPP: Treating connection as a callin 00:38:27: As5 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive Open 00:38:27: As5 LCP: State is Listen 00:38:29: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State Listen 00:38:29: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ [Listen] id 41 len 25 00:38:29: As5 LCP:ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 00:38:29: As5 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 00:38:29: As5 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0731DE4D (0x05060731DE4D) 00:38:29: As5 LCP:PFC (0x0702) 00:38:29: As5 LCP:ACFC (0x0802) 00:38:31: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State REQsent 00:38:31: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 42 len 25 00:38:31: As5 LCP:ACCM 0x000A (0x0206000A) 00:38:31: As5 LCP:AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 00:38:31: As5 LCP:MagicNumber 0x0731DE4D (0x05060731DE4D) 00:38:31: As5 LCP:PFC (0x0702) 00:38:31: As5 LCP:ACFC (0x0802) 00:38:33: As5 LCP: TIMEout: State REQsent 00:38:33: As5 LCP: O CONFREQ
RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746]
Please post replies to the list! That way you can benefit from the wide ranging knowledge and wisdom of the groupstudy collective! As to your observation: Not really sure what's going on! You could double check just to make sure that only the ports you're looking to monitor are enabled! Also I'll throw this out there and maybe someone else can comment or correct me if I'm way out in left field. I seem to remember in one the switch models (maybe the 2900XL's) where the port monitor command actually monitors all ports belonging to the same vlan as the monitor port. Not sure if the 1900's are doing something similar or not! Stefan -Original Message- From: Chong Chun Wei (Central) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:24 AM To: 'Stefan Dozier' Subject: RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] Thanks Stefan.. I have enabled the monitor-port, and set the source and destination port. And the result is I can now see some traffic traversing thru the destination port. BUT.. after some observation I found out that the traffic between the source and dest are different!! So what's go wrong? Is there anythin else I left out? I even set both the port to the same vlan.. Please help -Alvin- -Original Message- From: Stefan Dozier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] From the command-line: If your switch is an Enterprise Edition monitor-port ---enables port monitoring i.e span monitor-port port 0/27 -port you have your analyzer connected to. monitor-port monitored 0/3 port(s) you're monitoring See this link for a more detailed description of the commands: Watch the word wrap http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v9x/cli/par t1.htm#xtocid1592767 From the Management Console (Main Menu) Depress [M] Monitoring and follow the menu selections to enable monitoring, and select the the ports your analyzer is connected to and the port(s) you want to monitor. HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chong Chun Wei (Central) Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] Dear all, Is is possible to set SPAN on a catalyst 1900? If yes, how? Thankyou. Cheers, Alvin Chong IT-NCS Mobile: 016- 3304503 Fixed: 03 - 7211595 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30839t=30746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP [7:30852]
Congrats KC, and welcome! Your realized irony is so true! I know I'm feeling your pain! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of KC Krebs Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP [7:30852] Hello Group Members, I've been reading posts on GroupStudy for about a year and wanted to introduce myself. I just passed the CIT and completed my CCNP!!! I will now start the long learning process for the CCIE. I'm located in Pittsburgh, PA if anyone wants to start a study group. What I find the most ironic is that the more I learn, the more I realize I don't know know that much. Anyway, with the CCNP, I feel that I may be able to add to some discussions, but will definitely be able to learn from others. Thanks, KC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30870t=30852 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746]
A perfect example of the collective in action! Thanks Priscilla Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] At 04:41 PM 1/3/02, Stefan Dozier wrote: Please post replies to the list! That way you can benefit from the wide ranging knowledge and wisdom of the groupstudy collective! Excellent advice. He sent the same question to my private unicast address and I ignored it. ;-) But I will answer questions to the collective. I have also run into surprising results with port monitoring on a 1900. I don't always see all the traffic I expect to see. I think we discussed this before and it might be in the archives. I discovered that some Cisco switches disable the forwarding of unknown (flooded) unicast traffic and unregistered multicast traffic to the monitor port. The goal is to protect the network from problems associated with this traffic exiting an additional port. Check to see if the 1900 switch automatically added the port block unicast and port block multicast commands to the monitor port. This can make troubleshooting difficult. I don't think you can get it not to do this. The workaround is to use a higher-end switch. Priscilla As to your observation: Not really sure what's going on! You could double check just to make sure that only the ports you're looking to monitor are enabled! Also I'll throw this out there and maybe someone else can comment or correct me if I'm way out in left field. I seem to remember in one the switch models (maybe the 2900XL's) where the port monitor command actually monitors all ports belonging to the same vlan as the monitor port. Not sure if the 1900's are doing something similar or not! Stefan -Original Message- From: Chong Chun Wei (Central) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:24 AM To: 'Stefan Dozier' Subject: RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] Thanks Stefan.. I have enabled the monitor-port, and set the source and destination port. And the result is I can now see some traffic traversing thru the destination port. BUT.. after some observation I found out that the traffic between the source and dest are different!! So what's go wrong? Is there anythin else I left out? I even set both the port to the same vlan.. Please help -Alvin- -Original Message- From: Stefan Dozier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] From the command-line: If your switch is an Enterprise Edition monitor-port monitor-port port 0/27 monitor-port monitored 0/3 See this link for a more detailed description of the commands: Watch the word wrap http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v9x/cli/pa r t1.htm#xtocid1592767 From the Management Console (Main Menu) Depress [M] Monitoring and follow the menu selections to enable monitoring, and select the the ports your analyzer is connected to and the port(s) you want to monitor. HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chong Chun Wei (Central) Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] Dear all, Is is possible to set SPAN on a catalyst 1900? If yes, how? Thankyou. Cheers, Alvin Chong IT-NCS Mobile: 016- 3304503 Fixed: 03 - 7211595 Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30872t=30746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746]
From the command-line: If your switch is an Enterprise Edition monitor-port ---enables port monitoring i.e span monitor-port port 0/27 -port you have your analyzer connected to. monitor-port monitored 0/3 port(s) you're monitoring See this link for a more detailed description of the commands: Watch the word wrap http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/28201900/1928v9x/cli/par t1.htm#xtocid1592767 From the Management Console (Main Menu) Depress [M] Monitoring and follow the menu selections to enable monitoring, and select the the ports your analyzer is connected to and the port(s) you want to monitor. HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chong Chun Wei (Central) Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: setting SPAN on Cat 1900 [7:30746] Dear all, Is is possible to set SPAN on a catalyst 1900? If yes, how? Thankyou. Cheers, Alvin Chong IT-NCS Mobile: 016- 3304503 Fixed: 03 - 7211595 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30758t=30746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA tutorial in beta for Cisco 2900 configuration [7:30587]
Outstanding job Mike! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNA tutorial in beta for Cisco 2900 configuration [7:30543] I just posted the first version at a new tutorial I'm working for configuring the Cisco 2900 ethernet switch. Drop by and take a look. This is a how do I do ??? type of tutorial. All comments are welcome. Include suggestions for other details that might be useful... I plan to add over the next few weeks the following trunking etherchannel logging Anything else? http://www.packetattack.com/tutorials.html MikeS PS- yes I know that some will have great fun with this at my expense.. but what is life without some whimsey added ( Thanks Howard for reminding me of a fun word :) ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30587t=30587 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: to set the interval in ' show interface' [7:29981]
Here's the command: R5-2511(config-if)#load-interval ? Load interval delay in seconds If you're applying this in a lab environment and are just curious about how the numbers will look with different intervals, go for it. If you're actually trying to accomplish something meaningful by changing the intervals, I would definitely consider Howard's questions and comments below! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Howard C. Berkowitz Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: to set the interval in ' show interface' [7:29981] Hi , I remember someone from here saying we can set the interval from the load to a shorter time instead of the 5 minutes. #show interface ... Tks I vaguely remember that there is a setting to do this, put in after customer demands and against the recommendations of pretty much everyone in routing engineering. What problem are you trying to solve with a shorter interval? How would the results of the statistics change anything you are doing? Hypothetically, if you used the shortest possible interval, that of one instruction time, the utilization would either be 0% (the CPU is idle) or 100% (the CPU is doing something). The five-minute weighted moving average represents experience for spotting trends beyond instantaneous peaks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29985t=29981 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788]
There's atleast 15 advertised on E-bay with auction dates closing within the next weekI'll agree 2523's appear to be in short supply...but there's atleast 2 listed Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Green Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] ok tell me this guys. the 2523 and 2514 are not available in like used_hardware / online / acution sites. seems these two are pretty popular ones. why ? i have been trying to get hold of 2514 (has 2 ethernet interfaces) but have been unsuccessful yet. --- Circusnuts wrote: All you need is @ least version 10.0 IOS and Serial interfaces. This explains why the AGS and MGS (and ear muffs) are still found in a lot of CCIE labs today. All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: EA Louie To: Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: Re: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] yes it is. I have one and it works fine as a frame switch AND router with isdn, serial, and token ring. A great multi-purpose device, and usually cheaper than a 2522. - Original Message - From: Ham web To: Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:39 AM Subject: Home lab - 2523 [7:27788] hi folks, Joust wanted to know if the 2523 was a good buy to act as a frame relay/x.25 switch in a home lab Many thanks Ham __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1 _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28587t=27788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redistribution Question [7:28374]
Well since I need the redistribution practice, figured I'd plug your config into my pod and see if I could figure out what gives! First thing I noticed...and it may just be a typo or dyslexia (it's an affliction I experience often (smile))if you didn't cut and paste your configs. From your post... A is connected to B with 10.1.1.100 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to A with 10.1.1.1 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to C with 192.168.1.17 /28 - Serial 1 doesn't coincide with your posted configs hostname RouterA ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 Second...Here's my plugged in config and all devices have connectivity to all other devices as expected. Caveat: only the necessary portions of the config are listed for brevity and I changed some DTE/DCE interfaces and increased the clockrate (personal preferrence)! hostname RouterA ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue ! router ospf 100 network 10.1.1.100 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! end ! hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue clockrate 400 ! interface Serial1 ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.240 ! router ospf 100 network 192.168.1.17 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! end ! hostname RouterC ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.18 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue clockrate 400 ! interface Serial1 ip address 192.168.2.49 255.255.255.240 clockrate 400 ! router ospf 100 redistribute igrp 200 metric-type 1 subnets network 192.168.1.18 0.0.0.0 area 0 default-metric 10 ! router igrp 200 redistribute ospf 100 network 192.168.2.0 default-metric 1 100 255 1 1500 ! ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 ! end ! hostname RouterD ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.2.50 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue ! router igrp 200 network 192.168.2.0 ! end HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Lee Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redistribution Question [7:28374] I need some help on a Redistribution question: I have setup 4 routers: Router A - Router B - Router C - Router D A, B C are running OSPF, and C D are running IGRP - I'm trying to redistribute between OSPF IGRP routes: A is connected to B with 10.1.1.100 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to A with 10.1.1.1 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to C with 192.168.1.17 /28 - Serial 1 C is connected to B with 192.168.1.18 / 28 - Serial 0 C is connected to D with 192.168.2.49 / 28 - Serial 1 D is connected to C with 192.168.2.50 / 28 - Serial 0 However, I could only ping from D to A ( vice versa), but I couldn't ping from B to D, or D to B N.B: D to C (and vice versa) is fine as they are directly connected Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Hunt Lee Below are the configs for the routers: Router A version 11.0 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterA ! ! no ip domain-lookup ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 no ip address no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 ! router ospf 100 network 10.1.1.100 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! ip host RouterB 10.1.1.1 ip host RouterC 192.168.1.18 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end Router B version 11.0 service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname RouterB ! no ip domain-lookup ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! router ospf 100 network 192.168.1.17 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! ip host RouterA 10.1.1.100 ip host RouterC 192.168.1.18 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! line con 0 line aux 0 transport input all line vty 0 4 login ! end Router C version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RouterC ! ! ip subnet-zero no ip domain-lookup ip host RouterA 10.1.1.100 ip host RouterB 192.168.1.17 ip host RouterD 192.168.2.50 ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.18 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 ip address 192.168.2.49 255.255.255.240 no ip directed-broadcast clockrate 64000 ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 redistribute igrp 200 metric-type 1 subnets network 192.168.1.18 0.0.0.0 area 0 default-metric 10
RE: OT-How to find port on switch if you have MAC [7:28429]
show cam [mac-address] Here's a link for future reference http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_4/cmd_ref/ sh_a_c.htm#xtocid231346 watch the nasty' word wrap! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Oxman Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT-How to find port on switch if you have MAC [7:28429] Sorry for the off-topic post, but... If I have the MAC address of a device and I want to know which port on a Cat 5505 it's plugged into, how I can I find that out? I assume it's a command on the switch, but what is it? Thanks, --Don _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28435t=28429 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Redistribution Question [7:28374]
o - ODR P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set I10.0.0.0/8 [100/8576] via 192.168.2.49, 00:00:58, Serial0 192.168.2.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets C 192.168.2.48 is directly connected, Serial0 RouterD# And when I ping from Router A to D, it works.. but it doesn't work from B to D ( vice versa) RouterA#ping 192.168.2.50 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.50, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 84/86/88 ms RouterA# RouterB#ping 192.168.2.50 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.2.50, timeout is 2 seconds: . Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) RouterB# And here's what I got from OSPF topology table: RouterA#show ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (10.1.1.100) (Process ID 100) Router Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum Link count 10.1.1.100 10.1.1.100 8780x8004 0x4E42 192.168.1.17192.168.1.178220x800F 0xEE46 2 Summary Net Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum 192.168.1.16192.168.1.178120x8001 0xBC79 Summary ASB Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum 192.168.2.49192.168.1.178020x8001 0xB251 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum Tag 192.168.2.48192.168.1.491190 0x8002 0xA7CF 0 192.168.2.48192.168.2.498290x8001 0xA2D4 0 RouterA# RouterB#show ip ospf database OSPF Router with ID (192.168.1.17) (Process ID 100) Router Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum Link count 192.168.1.17192.168.1.178620x8015 0x41F3 2 192.168.1.49192.168.1.492020 0x8004 0x49BA 2 192.168.2.49192.168.2.498640x8002 0x38CC 2 Summary Net Link States (Area 0) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum 10.1.1.0192.168.1.178690x8005 0xD2BE Router Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum Link count 10.1.1.100 10.1.1.100 9280x8004 0x4E42 192.168.1.17192.168.1.178700x800F 0xEE46 2 Summary Net Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum 192.168.1.16192.168.1.178600x8001 0xBC79 Summary ASB Link States (Area 1) Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum 192.168.2.49192.168.1.178510x8001 0xB251 AS External Link States Link ID ADV Router AgeSeq# Checksum Tag 192.168.2.48192.168.1.491239 0x8002 0xA7CF 0 192.168.2.48192.168.2.498760x8001 0xA2D4 0 RouterB# RouterA#trace 192.168.2.50 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to RouterD (192.168.2.50) 1 10.1.1.1 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec 2 RouterC (192.168.1.18) 32 msec 28 msec 32 msec 3 RouterD (192.168.2.50) 44 msec * 40 msec RouterA# RouterB#trace 192.168.2.50 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to RouterD (192.168.2.50) 1 RouterC (192.168.1.18) 16 msec 12 msec 16 msec 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 RouterB# Stefan Dozier wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well since I need the redistribution practice, figured I'd plug your config into my pod and see if I could figure out what gives! First thing I noticed...and it may just be a typo or dyslexia (it's an affliction I experience often (smile))if you didn't cut and paste your configs. From your post... A is connected to B with 10.1.1.100 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to A with 10.1.1.1 / 24 - Serial 0 B is connected to C with 192.168.1.17 /28 - Serial 1 doesn't coincide with your posted configs hostname RouterA ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 clockrate 64000 hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.168.1.17 255.255.255.240 no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 Second...Here's my plugged in config and all devices have connectivity to all other devices as expected. Caveat: only the necessary portions of the config are listed for brevity and I changed some DTE/DCE interfaces and increased the clockrate (personal preferrence)! hostname RouterA ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.100 255.255.255.0 no fair-queue ! router ospf 100 network 10.1.1.100 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! end ! hostname RouterB ! interface Serial0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28101]
Think of the definition of spoof - deception, lying, hoaxing, etc...etc... Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496. What spooofing does is lie to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic requires the connection. Notes of interest: Line protocol is up (spoofing) is D channel information that the interface alleges to be up. Spoofing does not necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In fact, there may be no line on the interface. end quote: HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Perez Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092] PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0 BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28101t=28101 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115]
Actually a backup interface will go into standby mode! http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/britobribackup.html Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Donald Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115] If you use a interface as a backup doesn't it spoof. - Original Message - From: Stefan Dozier To: Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:29 AM Subject: RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28101] Think of the definition of spoof - deception, lying, hoaxing, etc...etc... Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496. What spooofing does is lie to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic requires the connection. Notes of interest: Line protocol is up (spoofing) is D channel information that the interface alleges to be up. Spoofing does not necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In fact, there may be no line on the interface. end quote: HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Perez Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092] PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0 BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing) Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28140t=28115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]
See comments inline... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy Hoang Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760] That means changing the escape character of the device being controlled by the termserv. What if you have several devices on the termserv. Nothing a little foresight and a couple of cut paste keystrokes or mouse clicks couldn't cure... It is better to change the escape character of the termserv itself and leave everything else as default. I won't argue that point, as I'm sure you could do it several different ways! Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27849t=27760 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
Dave If there's no cable installed in Serial4/1/3, obviously I (atleast) need to broaden my level of research on why you do can accomplish that feat on 7500 series routers but not on 2500 series routers! It's just not happening here! But heythat's not a problem, don't mind expanding my horizons and if and when I find an answer, I 'll post some feedback here. Thanks for the info Dave Priscillamy apologies! Off I goto CCO! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] Tell you what, I got it to work just fine: interface Serial4/1/3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip route-cache distributed loopback no keepalive no cdp enable C7507MIX#sh int ser 4/1/3 Serial4/1/3 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is cyBus Serial MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation HDLC, crc 16, loopback set Keepalive not set Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/0/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions RTS up, CTS up, DTR up, DCD up, DSR up Dave Stefan Dozier wrote: I don't think it will Priscilla! Even with the encap HDLC, the DCD (carrier detect) control lead must be high in order for the interface status to be in an up condition. The only way I know to accomplish that is with a cable inserted or some type of serial loopback plug, if there's such an animal. And obviously you can't have line protocol in an up state if the interface status isn't in an up state! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] At 06:52 PM 11/28/01, Tom E wrote: How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. What's the encap? I thought this would work if you used HDLC. Priscilla -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27739t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
Now that's a really good question! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] A cable-less serial interface? It's called a loopback interface. ;-) Which makes me wonder why the original poster was attempting this in the first place. Is there some functionality that he/she desires to get from a serial interface that is up/up without a cable that he/she couldn't get from a loopback interface? MADMAN 11/29/01 12:39:00 PM To be honest I have never tried such a thing but I thought it made sense that if I enabled loopback the interface should come up. I now tried reenabling keepalives and the interface is still up but it shows itself to be in the looped state: C7507MIX#sh int ser 4/1/3 Serial4/1/3 is up, line protocol is up (looped) Which makes sense as it's seeing it's own keepalive packets come back via the loop. I can't do this on a 2500 either but I can't tell you why, any Cisco hardware engineers out there?? oh well it's pretty much acedemic anyway, cableless serial interfaces are about as useful as a three legged horse. Dave Stefan Dozier wrote: Dave If there's no cable installed in Serial4/1/3, obviously I (atleast) need to broaden my level of research on why you do can accomplish that feat on 7500 series routers but not on 2500 series routers! It's just not happening here! But heythat's not a problem, don't mind expanding my horizons and if and when I find an answer, I 'll post some feedback here. Thanks for the info Dave Priscillamy apologies! Off I goto CCO! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] Tell you what, I got it to work just fine: interface Serial4/1/3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast ip route-cache distributed loopback no keepalive no cdp enable C7507MIX#sh int ser 4/1/3 Serial4/1/3 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is cyBus Serial MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255 Encapsulation HDLC, crc 16, loopback set Keepalive not set Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/0/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 3 carrier transitions RTS up, CTS up, DTR up, DCD up, DSR up Dave Stefan Dozier wrote: I don't think it will Priscilla! Even with the encap HDLC, the DCD (carrier detect) control lead must be high in order for the interface status to be in an up condition. The only way I know to accomplish that is with a cable inserted or some type of serial loopback plug, if there's such an animal. And obviously you can't have line protocol in an up state if the interface status isn't in an up state! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] At 06:52 PM 11/28/01, Tom E wrote: How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. What's the encap? I thought this would work if you used HDLC. Priscilla -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27747t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760]
Try this On line console 0 add escape 27; when you have a ping or traceroute or something you want to break out of, press the [ESCAPE] key. BTW: I found this while perusing through the archives! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hollis Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) [7:27760] Does anyone know an escape sequence other than Ctl-Shift-6(x) to use while within a Term server session. Say I need to stop an unsuccessful traceroute... but when I do Ctl-Shift-6(x) it takes me back to my Term server. Thanks. kk/USN Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27767t=27760 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latest Doc CD ??? [7:27520]
Thanks! Stefan -Original Message- Subject: RE: Latest Doc CD ??? [7:27520] same format as CCO. -junovtv Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27550t=27520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
I don't think it will Priscilla! Even with the encap HDLC, the DCD (carrier detect) control lead must be high in order for the interface status to be in an up condition. The only way I know to accomplish that is with a cable inserted or some type of serial loopback plug, if there's such an animal. And obviously you can't have line protocol in an up state if the interface status isn't in an up state! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] At 06:52 PM 11/28/01, Tom E wrote: How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. What's the encap? I thought this would work if you used HDLC. Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27619t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604]
As a correction to my last post, Ali is absolutely correct! What was I thinking. Even if the DCD (carrier detect) is up, by virtue of a cable inserted in one side, if there's no connectivity on the other end of the cable, the interface is still going to show down/down! Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ali, Abbas Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] It is correct, but according to my knowledge, it will still show down/down even the cable is attached. The only way to bring it to up/up if other side is also connected along with the encapuslation and other parameters. It is different then Ethernet where the physical port will go up as soon as the cable is detected. Abbas -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] Tom, I don't think you can!! HDLC is the default, and requires cable attached in order for the router to show up. There is no way to simulate as far as I am aware. Having said that, someone will prove me wrong no doubt. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom E Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial up/up w/o cable [7:27604] How can you get a serial interface to go up/up without a cable connected? I have tried loop and no keep. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27620t=27604 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Doc CD ??? [7:27520]
Are the latest shipping Doc CD's using the same format as the website (dropdown menus) or are they still shipping the old website format? My CD resources ran dry so I haven't seen an updated CD in quite some time, but since CCD Online is always available, it's all good! But I realize at some point I have to ween myself off the online site and get used to the Doc CD, and the sooner I get started learning how to get around the CD, the better off I'll be. Especially if it's still using the old format. Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27520t=27520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850]
C'mon. Sounds like a typical Urban Legend if ya ask me. If you're prepared for the exam, the way you answer the survey, truthfully or notwill have absoultely no bearing on the outcome of the exam. Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kaminski, Shawn G Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850] I must share your superstition. I always filled out the survey as if I was doing a career change and didn't know squat about networking even though I've got numerous certs and have hands-on experience. I've heard that the grading of an exam is somewhat based on your answers to this survey. So, I don't think that the questions would be more difficult, just possibly the grading. Whether it's true or why they would do this, I don't know. It's just an interesting bit of information I heard about and decided that it's better to be safe than sorry! Shawn -Original Message- From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850] Just did one to see and they are just as easy as always. Nothing changed yet. Off topic: Is it just me and my superstitions, or does any one else feel that the survey before each test on how many certs you have, experience you have, etc., changes the difficulty on the test based on how well you say you know the stuff, number of yearsd in, etc,.? Also, what would happen if you said no the the NDA before the test? Does it boot you off and send you home $125 poorer? Brian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... For all those people who are starting CCNP, I have some advice for you. Dont be discouraged by all the people telling you they got a 990 on every exam. That was then, and this is now. I new price of 125 (Nov 11th) for test indicates that things have changed very much. I say this because Cisco states the 125 is for the cost of changing the exams. I have just heard from friends that took it and that alot of their friends are failing. I have failed CCNP Routing as well just recently. The number of CCNPs has increased this year, by 100% since the following year, I think that trend is coming to a screaching halt. How to study, it should be common sense, which i dont have much of :) Print out the study guideline from Cisco, and know everything they mention forwards and backwards. Obviously OSPF, BGP. If you have any study guides, dont really put much stock in them there not worth 2c anymore. I suggest exam cram for a basic idea of what its about, and cisco press to look up the things that are hard to understand. And maybe sybex if you want to read the entire book :) I think some of the questions on Boson go overboard, but that might be what you need. I guess it cant hurt to know too much. Boson is now only good for learning what type of questions are on the exam, not THE actual questions on the exam anymore. Brian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26925t=26850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850]
Ditto Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850] If it helps, I can let you know that I have always answered the survey correctly, and I have not failed a Cisco test yet. Have a great day. Ole Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26928t=26850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Ciscopress errata [7:26940]
Try this link. http://www.ciscopress.com/changeling.cfm?chnglng=6sbchnglng=9 HTH Stefan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCNP Ciscopress errata [7:26940] Hi, I am trying for the CCNP and using the Ciscopress books. Has anyone using these books found any errata for them? Currently I am reading the CCNP Routing book. I have tried the Ciscopress web site to no avail. Tried also contacting Ciscopress via email, but they don't seem respond. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26947t=26940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCIE written! [7:26765]
Congrats Tim! I'm studying for the written now...but I'm in no big hurry. Got this thing about doing it right, vice doing it twice! Stefan Hello all, I'm happy to report I passed my IE written just today. Whew!! Now on to the lab.. Kind Regards, Tim Booth MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26771t=26765 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clockrate vs Bandwidth [7:26640]
Hi All, As I know that when you connect two routers with back-to-back cable and one of the routers has to set the clockrate to be the DCE end. Basically, the clockrate is limit the speed of the serial link. And the bandwidth is only for the routing. But someone told me that the bandwidth can also limit the speed of the serial link. Is it true? And under what situation? Thanks. Francis That someone was misinformed! This is straight from CCO, and I'll post the actual link, so you can see for yourself. The bandwidth command sets an informational parameter only; you cannot adjust the actual bandwidth of an interface with this command. Here's the linkwatch the word wrap! http://www.ieng.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/inter_ r/iraccess.htm#xtocid1599394 HTH Stefan# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26643t=26640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: what happen to the KLEIN INTERACTIVE SITE [7:26521]
Ozhere's your bit of luck! It was reported a few weeks ago by one of the tech news websites (the exact one escapes me at the moment) that CompTIA won a copyright infringement case against KEEN Interactive, so if that the cheat sheets site you're looking forSo sorry! Stefan# maybe they got caught cheating and shut down with a bit of luck Oz Danny Rising wrote: DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT HAPPEN TO THE CHEET-SHEETS web site. I AM trying to purchase the CCIE WRITTEN PRACTICE NOTES. IF you have any information on this or have already purchased please let me know. Thanks, Danny Rising, II Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26588t=26521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Physical-layer async command available in 2501? [7:26594]
AFAIK, the physical-layer async command is only available on the 2500 series routers that have low speed synchronous/asynchronous capable serial interfaces, i.e. 2520 - 2523. The 2501 only has high speed synchronous serial capable interfaces, and as such wouldn't need the physical-layer async command. So to answer your question...11.3 probably does support physical-layer async, if used with the appropriate hardware, i.e. 2520 - 2523. HTH Stefan# Is this command available in 2501 router? I have IOS ver 11.3 and seems to me this IOS doesn't support that. I wonder if any of the latest IOS supports this command. TIA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26599t=26594 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNA 1.0 and CCNP 2.0 [7:26606]
No Stefan# Dear firends, I have a question here, I got my CCNA 1.0 before and I completed the CCNP 2.0 today. Do I need to re-exam CCNA 2.0?? Thanks. JB Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26611t=26606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Physical-layer async command avail [7:26594]
My bad! My intention wasn't to indicate that the 2500 series were the only routers capable of using the physical-layer async command! I just referenced the 2500 series as an example because the orig post mentioned it's availability on a 2501. But after re-reading the post I can see how it could get misinterpreted. Thanks for clearing that up for those who might have been confused by my post! Stefan# Ummm.. the 1600s also will let you set the physical-layer. I work with over 200 1600s with modems hanging on the serial port with SMDS on the 56K WIC. This is the standard config plus using IP unnumbered, async default routing and ppp authentication. Version is 11.3 IOS. ::Snip:: ! interface Serial0 physical-layer async ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 encapsulation ppp no logging event subif-link-status :::snip:: MikeS Stefan Dozier wrote: AFAIK, the physical-layer async command is only available on the 2500 series routers that have low speed synchronous/asynchronous capable serial interfaces, i.e. 2520 - 2523. The 2501 only has high speed synchronous serial capable interfaces, and as such wouldn't need the physical-layer async command. So to answer your question...11.3 probably does support physical-layer async, if used with the appropriate hardware, i.e. 2520 - 2523. HTH Stefan# Is this command available in 2501 router? I have IOS ver 11.3 and seems to me this IOS doesn't support that. I wonder if any of the latest IOS supports this command. TIA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26616t=26594 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scripting to Reload a Router ??? [7:19068]
Is there any way to build a script via notepad that one could cut paste in the appropriate commands in to do a write erase and reload without user intervention? Or will the associated prompts not allow cut pasting without manually depressing the enter key? I can't seem to get pass the. Erasing the NVRAM filesystem will remove all files! Continue? [confirm] and the Proceed with reload? [confirm] prompts. Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19068t=19068 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2501 Acces Pro [7:17414]
As noted in a later msgI answered assuming the poster was referencing
the AccessPro PC ISA card equivalent of a 2501, and not the CiscoPro 2501
{white case}, which I'm realtively sure, when converted and upgraded, would
be
capable of running 12.2.
Stefan
At 08:05 PM 8/29/01 +1130, Symon Thurlow wrote:
hmmm, I have a converted Ciscopro 2503, 16/16 and I am pretty sure I
put 12.2 on it. I'll have a look tonight when I get home.
Symon
---
At 01:22 PM 8/27/01 -0400, you wrote:
Has anyone had any experience with these? I just was given two of
them for
free and want to upgrade them to new code. When I try to upgrade
them, I get
a message that says wrong software for this platform. I'm not sure
if it is
because the boot rom is too old, or if it is something else. If I
put in new
2500 boot rom and upgrade the memory, will these run the new code?
Which version of new code are you attempting to run?
If you're thinking 12.1 or 12.2 code, forget it!
I'm currently running 12.0-18 code on one nowand I haven't had
any luck going any higher than that!
And I have the latest bootroms with 16D/16F installed.
Stefan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Symon
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17765t=17414
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2501 Acces Pro [7:17414]
At 01:22 PM 8/27/01 -0400, you wrote: Has anyone had any experience with these? I just was given two of them for free and want to upgrade them to new code. When I try to upgrade them, I get a message that says wrong software for this platform. I'm not sure if it is because the boot rom is too old, or if it is something else. If I put in new 2500 boot rom and upgrade the memory, will these run the new code? Which version of new code are you attempting to run? If you're thinking 12.1 or 12.2 code, forget it! I'm currently running 12.0-18 code on one nowand I haven't had any luck going any higher than that! And I have the latest bootroms with 16D/16F installed. Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17629t=17414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2501 Acces Pro [7:17414]
At 02:47 PM 8/27/01 -0400, Jim Newton wrote: No these are actual 2501's but they are cheap versions of the real thing. They are painted white, and don't seem to have full IOS on them, but I was just wondering if they are upgradeable if I go through the work. Belay my last! I made the assumption you were talking about the Access Pro in PC ISA card form! Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=17630t=17414 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: Re: tftp server! [7:13203]
Jason, which Linux Distro are you running? I'm experincing the same problem described by Sean, and although it could be categorized as a minor inconvenience that the filename has to exist prior to uploading them to the tftp server, it's an inconvenience I would really like get make go away! Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13309t=13203 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 5505 switch puzzle [7:11335]
At 05:56 AM 7/10/01 -0400, Stephen Skinner wrote: guys , this is what i saw when i ran this test on my 5509 this is my 5509 System Bootstrap Version: 2.4(1) Hardware Version: 1.3 Model: WS-C5500 Serial #: Module Ports Model Serial # Hw Fw Fw1 Sw -- - -- - -- --- --- 1 2 WS-X5506 007586383 2.12.4(1) 2.4(1) 3.1(1) 3 1 WS-X5302 010457260 7.020.73.1(1) 11.2(12a.P1)P1 4 24WS-X5224 007583504 1.33.1(1) 3.1(1) 5 2 WS-X5101 005844319 1.21.1 1.3 2.1(7) 7 12WS-X5201 006492462 2.03.1(1) 3.1(1) 9 12WS-X5201 006492554 2.03.1(1) 3.1(1) 10 24WS-X5224 007585630 1.33.1(1) 3.1(1) changing the VTP domain does NOT change the revision number adding a vlan does .. change the rev i then RESET my system and low and behold... my rev number is 1 Was this a warm boot or cold boot ? If it was a warm boot, the documentation seems to support that in some cases, i.e switch/OS versions, warm boot or clear config all will not reset the vtp config rev number. If it was a cold boot (power down/power up) and the config rev number didn't reset, I'll at a lost, but that wouldn't the first time I've been dumbfounded by the way something actually works vice the way I believe or have learned(read) it works. That's what so great about learning the interworkings of internetworking! anyone want to give me the command to set vtp rev to 0 ...apart from deleting all the vlan`s .and i`ll do it and post the responce steve I'm not aware of a specific command that will reset the vtp config rev number, but if there is one, I'm sure someone here will correct me and educate us all! Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11722t=11335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Max RAM for a 2600 [7:11407]
I certainly hope so, since I just did the same for a 2620. Here's a line from sh ver of a 2620 in production. cisco 2620 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x102) with 59392K/6144K bytes of memory. BTW: what kind of pricing did you find for the 64megs ? Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11416t=11407 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 5505 switch puzzle [7:11335]
At 07:37 PM 7/9/01 -0400, you wrote: One thing I never really thought about until I read something the other day: If a switch was set to server mode I would have been wary of the configuration revision before connecting it to an existing network. If it was set to client mode I don't think I would have been quite as cautious. No matter whether the switch is client or server, the switch with the highest revision will override the others. You can't change the VLAN configuration, but if the revision is already higher it will override any other switches VLAN config. Agreed Another thing which seems a little strange - The CP BCMSN book suggests the following steps before inserting a new switch into an existing domain(cut down a little): 1. Issue a Clear Config All 2. Power Cycle the switch to clear the VTP NVRAM 3. Determine the mode of operation and if Server mode is to be used, verify that the revision is set to zero. Step one and two seem to be a bit of overkill. From memory, the revision was set to zero after each change of VTP mode, VTP domain, and a few other things. Whoa.I haven't read anywhere that the configuration revision number gets reset to zero when changing the switch's VTP mode, VTP Domain name, etc. In testing that theory, unfortunately I'll have to rely for now on my trusty 1924 with the latest enterprise software installed as a testbed, but with continued discussions and education afforded by the list, perserverance in the pursuit of the knowledge required to obtain the ultimate certification, and my ability to keep a job that right now affords me the opportunity reach a higher level of understanding each and everyday.one day I'll be in a environment where 55xx and 65xx are available as testbeds for scenarios just like this..[can't you just see the envy, Rich]. Anyway, I'm back from la la land now, and my test doesn't indicate that the config rev number resets when changing the vtp mode or the vtp doamin name, atleast not on the 1900 series switches, which I'm well aware are miles apart from the big boys, 55xx and 65xx series. After reading how non-volatile it was, I was quite surprised how easy it was to reset it, although this could be an image related thing. Anybody any other experiences? Rich? Step 3 seems to go against my previous comment that it doesn't matter what mode the switch is in. Why take more care for Server Mode if Client will have the same disastrous effect? Agreed, client mode is just as dangerous as server mode if the config rev number is higher and maybe even moreso for the casual implementer who could possibly surmize that in client mode the switch couldn't perform changes in the VTP domain. If we carry on like this we may actually get a topical thread to the same length as a troll thread or a thread discussing whether piracy is a good or bad thing. :-] no, say it ain't so! Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11625t=11335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 5505 switch puzzle [7:11335]
Gareth Hinton wrote: Yeah that was sort of what I was getting at. It would be nice if you could put the switches into a learning mode, where all server mode switches learn from all other server mode switches initially, but that's not the case, so one of them will decide it's got the highest VTP version and all others VLAN info will be wiped out. I can't remember what the negotiation process consists of when both versions are zero, or if I ever knew. It's not an ideal way of doing it anyway. Probably easier to cut/paste vlan info on to one switch and make sure it's got the highest version. I've got a few sites with multiple 5500's in one VTP domain and they're all set to Server mode. Never caused any problems I can think of. Off to get another book out to find out which switch wins when both are version zero. Gaz Quoting from the Cisco Press BCMSC book , chap 3 page 112 Two databases with the same configuration number will not update each other, because they assume that they both have the same information. Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11391t=11335 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cs-516 Access Server [7:7318]
Can somewhat post a working config from a CS-516 Access Server? I'm considering purchasing one vice a 2509/11 ? Stefan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=7318t=7318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Opinions on Cisco Access Pro AP-EC's [7:1045]
At 12:10 PM 4/18/01 -0400, Allen May wrote: Somehow I missed Drew's original message, so I'll comment here and hope he can benefit from the post. I've owned an AccessPro "EC model" for almost two years now and it hasn't given me a moments problem. Other than the fact that it has only one serial port, it's functionally equivalent to a 2501 router. I believe the last IOS version that's officially supported the AccessPro's is 113.11a. I've ran 11.3-11a Enterprise, and I'm currently running 120-8 Enterprise and haven't experienced any problems. I have loaded up to 120-16 Enterprise on it and although it experienced slowness when initially booting, once it booted up, everything ran fine. To clarify this, I've experienced the same slowness while booting with anything above 120-8 Enterprise on my 2501, 2503 and 2521 also. I have not successfully gotten any 12.1 images to load on my AccessPro. If you're budgetarily constrained, as I was when I initially purchased mines, it's a great buy, especially if your're the type who prefers real hardware to configure and learn on at your leisure, vice simulation software or vitual rack time. Some lines deleted for brevity RouterA#sh ver ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c)XB2, PLATFORM SPECIFIC RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-BOOT-R), Version 11.0(10c)XB2, RouterA uptime is 6 days, 23 hours, 42 minutes System restarted by reload at 22:50:36 EDT Wed Apr 11 2001 System image file is "flash:/c2500-js-l.120-8.bin" cisco AP-EC (68030) processor (revision A) with 16384K/2048K bytes of memory. 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY) As you can see, it's upgradable to the latest boot roms, and you can add up to 16 megs of DRAM and Flash. Stefan Never heard of it but I'm checking it out...pretty spiffy. However, it makes no mention of what IOS it can use..hmmm. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/accespro/fiji _hig/63325.htm - Original Message - From: "Drew Simonis" To: Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:04 PM Subject: Opinions on Cisco Access Pro AP-EC's [7:1045] I saw this device mentioned on another mailing list I read as a good item for a home lab. Basically, its a 2501 on a PC card. I wonder why I haven't seen this device mentioned in this group as a good piece to have. Are there any issues with this product that make it less suitable than a 1601, 2501, etc?? Curious... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=1174t=1045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF virtual links
At 03:59 PM 4/7/01 -0400, Fred Danson wrote: Fred I setup Lab #30 just to see if I would experience the same thing, and initially I did, until I rebooted RouterA (your R2503). Somehow rebooting allowed reachability and I was able to ping the 152.1.1.1 address (actaully I used 192.168.104.3). I also noticed the "ip ospf interface-retry 0" on several interfaces in your config, I had them in mine's also. I gotta look that one up but I suspect that it appears in the config because the opposite side of the link hasn't been initialized or configured yet! After I deleted all the "ip ospf interface-retry 0" entries off the interface configs and rebooted all three routers, I still have reachibility to 192.168.104.3 (your 152.1.1.1) and also found that network 192.168.104.0 (your 152.1.0.0) is in the routing table of RouterB (your 2523). I have all the router configs and sh commands as well as the capture of the successful ping, but I'll reserve posting them to save bandwidth until I hear if you rebooted and cleaned up the configs and your problem still exist. Stefan Hey group, I am in the middle of Lab #30 from the CCIE Lab Study Guide which involves OSPF virtual links. Here's my configs: R2503 - backbone router hostname r2503 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 192.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 ! end -- R2523- backbone router, link between R2503 R4000 hostname r2523 ! ! ip subnet-zero ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Serial0 ip address 193.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue ! interface Serial1 ip address 192.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial4 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial5 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial6 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial7 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial8 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface Serial9 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown ! router ospf 100 area 1 virtual-link 3.3.3.3 network 192.1.1.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 193.1.1.2 0.0.0.0 area 1 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 ! end - R4000, in areas 1 4, has a virtual link through R2523 hostname r4000 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0 ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 152.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no keepalive media-type 10BaseT ! interface Serial0 ip address 193.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue clockrate 64000 ! interface Serial1 no ip address shutdown ! interface TokenRing0 no ip address shutdown ! router ospf 100 network 152.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 4 network 193.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 1 area 1 virtual-link 2.2.2.2 ! ip classless ! ! ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end - the virtual link seems to be working fine. Here's a paste of show ip ospf virtual-link from r2523 r2523#show ip ospf vir Virtual Link OSPF_VL0 to router 3.3.3.3 is up Run as demand circuit DoNotAge LSA allowed. Transit area 1, via interface Serial0, Cost of using 64 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT, Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 Hello due in 00:00:01 Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed) Here's a paste of show ip ospf virtual-link from r4000 r4000#show ip ospf vir Virtual Link OSPF_VL0 to router 2.2.2.2 is up Run as demand circuit DoNotAge LSA allowed. Transit area 1, via interface Serial0, Cost of using 64 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT, Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 Hello due in 00:00:03 Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed) Here's the problem. I cannot ping r4000's ethernet interface (which is in area 4) from r2503. the network statement for 152.1.1.0/24 is in r2503's route table, but not in r2523's route table. r2503#show ip route Codes: C - connected, S -
Re: OSPF virtual links
At 03:59 PM 4/7/01 -0400, Fred Danson wrote: interface Serial0 ip address 192.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip ospf interface-retry 0 see CCO link below no ip mroute-cache no fair-queue http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/28.shtml Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compress IOS software link
At 11:55 AM 4/4/01 -0700, KP wrote: This link is dead, does someone have another link somewhere... http://www.mcseco-op.com/mzmaker.htm I just downloaded the file, so the link is good! If you continue to experience difficulties, contact me direct, I'll send you the file via email. Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CAT 5000 what does port status inactive mean?
At 11:02 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote: I just happen to have be investigating some VTP/Vlan issues using 5500's and a 2924 XL this week, so I did some reading via CCO and ran across this White Paper. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/21.html I'll post it incase it helps although you don't specifically mention you are using VTP or if you are using VTP, that you're inserting this switch into an existing VTP domain. But it does address one instance, where the ports can be in an "inactive" state. HTH Stefan *** VTP Troubleshooting and Caveats Below are some common troubleshooting situations for VTP. How a Recently-Inserted Switch Can Cause Network Problems In situation, you have a large switched domain, which is all in the same VTP domain. You want to add one switch in the network. This switch was previously used in the lab and you enter the "good" VTP domain name. You configure it as a VTP client, and you connect it to the rest of the network. Then, you bring up the ISL link to the rest of the network. In just a few seconds, the whole network is down. What could have happened? The configuration revision of the switch you insert was higher than the configuration revision of the VTP domain. Therefore, your recently-introduced switch, with almost no configured VLANs, has erased all VLANs through the VTP domain. This will happen whether the switch is a VTP client or a VTP server. A VTP client can erase VLAN information on a VTP server. boldbiggerYou will know that this has happened when many of the ports in your network go into inactive state, but continue to be assigned to a non-existing VLAN. /bigger/bold Solution: Quickly reconfigure all of the VLANs on one of the VTP servers. *** I have a catalyst switch and a number of its ports are showing up as inactive. The cisco web page does not list inactive as one of the possible values in the status field of a show port command, yet there it is Anyone know what this means? They were not connected until I assigned them to a VLAN, then they showed up as inactive Thanks Tom cat5000-3 (enable) sho port Port Name Status Vlan Level Duplex Speed Type - -- -- -- -- -- - 1/1 notconnect 1 normal half 100 100BaseTX 1/2 notconnect 1 normal half 100 100BaseTX 2/1 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/2 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/3 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/4 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/5 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/6 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/7 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/8 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/9 inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/10inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/11inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 2/12inactive 4 normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/1 inactive 331normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/2 inactive 331normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/3 inactive 331normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/4 inactive 331normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/5 inactive 332normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/6 inactive 332normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/7 inactive 332normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/8 inactive 332normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/9 inactive 333normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/10inactive 333normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/11inactive 333normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/12inactive 333normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/13inactive 334normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/14inactive 334normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/15inactive 334normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/16inactive 334normal auto auto 10/100BaseTX 3/17inactive
CCNA (640-407) Study Guide Wan Supplement
Please accept my apologies for spamming the list. Looking for fellow list member "cpasq" IRT subject document. Unfortunately I deleted your original post looking for the 640-407 Study Guide WAN Supplement, so I can't email you directly. While looking for something else I ran across the pdf copy of the supplement I have. If you still need it email me directly. Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Good book on RIF?
At 12:47 PM 2/23/01 -0500, Andrew Shappell wrote: Can anyone recommend a good book detailing RIF. I know from experience that the CCIE Written exam is laced with questions about RIF. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. - Andrew E. Shappell CCNP CCDP Don't know of any books per se, but here's a link right on the Groupstudy website that should get you started in the right direction. http://www.groupstudy.com/notes/notepages/rif2.html Also, Lou Rossi, Sr's "Token Ring Whitepaper" is a must-have. You can find it on the CCPrep.com's website http://www.ccprep.com/resources/news/archives/Token_Ring2.pdf Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Frame relay lab problem - need help
At 09:45 PM 2/21/01 -0500, you wrote: Hi group, Tried to do Lab #9 (page 183 of All-in-one CCIE Lab Study guide). I was using a 4500 as frame relay switch and two 2501. Every 'Sh' command output were basically same as the book. The only exception is 'Sh frame map' on each of the two routers (RouterA RouterB). RouterA#sh frame map Serial0 up: ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 1000x64,0x1840 broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active RouterB#sh frame map Serial0 up: ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 1010x65,0x1850 broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active I could not ping either. Apparently the inverse arp is not working. I check my config on the routers many times. What have I missed ? Can someone in the group help me with this ? Thanks. While doing Lab #13 using a 2521 and three other 2500 series router, I managed to get the same output, but at the hub router (Router A). RouterA#sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 210(0xD2,0x3420) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active Serial0 (up): ip 0.0.0.0 dlci 200(0xC8,0x3080) broadcast, CISCO, status defined, active I believe this happened to me because, I already had the FrameSwitch and the 2 spoke routers configured, up and running, and then I powered up the Hub Router and configured it. *** Explanation: Unfortunately the router I'm using as a hub router is an AccessPro card stuck in a PC, so it's a bit more difficult to get to and configure, so I saved it for last. In other words, it's just pure happenstance that the powerup sequence dictated that I powerup and configure the Hub router, last. When performing labs from the CCIE Lab Study guide, I always boot to a clean router, "erase start; reload", skip the initial setup configuration, paste my basic router configs and then paste the lab scenerio from the book. Anyway, once the hub router was powered up, I configured the S0 interface and the results posted above is what I get when I issue the "sh frame map" command. I solved the problem by rebooting the router with S0 configured and saved to NVRAM and viola, I have a properly working HUB router. RouterA#sh frame map Serial0 (up): ip 192.1.1.3 dlci 200(0xC8,0x3080), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active Serial0 (up): ip 192.1.1.4 dlci 210(0xD2,0x3420), dynamic, broadcast,, status defined, active But I'm not satisfied that reloading the router is the only way to solve the problem. I did some research, and found the "clear frame-relay-inarp" command, clear frame-relay-inarp Clear inverse ARP entries from the map table but it doesn't seem to clear the table as advertised, atleast not in the configuration and IOS version I'm currently running (120-6 IP only). I haven't gotten around to trying a different version of IOS yet. Maybe some here can shed some light on why the command doesn't work as advertised. Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Password Lost
At 11:21 PM 11/10/00 +1100, you wrote: I have lost my login password to the Cisco 2501 router, what should I do? Go here.. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/index.shtml Look under the Access Products section for 2500 series routers. HTH Stefan _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Token Ring MAU
At 07:27 PM 11/9/00 -0800, you wrote: Look on EbayI picked an Andrew's 8228 and 4 IBM TR nics for less than $40.00, including shipping! Stefan I haven't done Token Ring in years, but I'm putting my home lab together. Does anybody have any suggestions for a low-cost MAU and some NICS. I don't mind buying new, I just don't want to spend a lot on old technology. Let me know your thoughts. - Dennis _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
