RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
--Raised Hand-- -- Original Message -- From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:20:56 -0400 >Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your web page >that shows up when I log in to my account. > >What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service >providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a >service provider, please raise your hand. > >Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined before >you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading the list is >extremely curious as to what the revenue share program really is, and when it >does come out, unless you hear exclamations of "What a Bargain" coming off >this list there won't be many of us joining that program. > >Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or reasons to >upgrade to 4.3? > > > > Original Message >> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> Gary, >> >> 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in >> violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. >> >> 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and >> additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection >> Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology >> in email outbreak detection. >> >> 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will >> provide the details to this when it is ready. >> >> David B >> www.declude.com >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary >> Steiner >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use >> Commtouch? >> >> Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are >> the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does >> not? >> >> And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled >> out somewhere. >> >> >> >> Original Message >> > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM >> > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> > >> > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we >> > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June >> > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. >> > >> > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no >> > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. >> > >> > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to >> > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) >> > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this >> > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an >> > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by >> > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be >> > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. >> > >> > David B >> > www.declude.com >> > >> > >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> > John T >> > (Lists) >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM >> > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> > >> > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: >> > >> > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise >> > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User >> > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, >> > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed >> > Program into another applic
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
But from an accounting perspective, no revenue is directly generated by them. Thus, no revenue to share from a cost center. So how much revenue do you attach to your electric bill? There are a million subjective ways to attach revenue to cost, and every business will have different nuances in the way they do it. That's what makes this proposed revenue-sharing model completely impractical. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 1:00 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 A book on accounting is not necessary. I am very familiar with cost centers. It is a fact that removing cost centers can cost a business revenue. So if a small ISP removes spam filtering from their offerings then their customers that want a one stop shop will go elsewhere. It is a balancing act. What cost centers help you retain customers? Which ones will get you new business? Electricity is also a cost center but without it you would not have any revenue generating services to offer! Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:37 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Kevin, > > It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on > business accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating > centers. > Sometimes it may be a judgement call as to where one item goes, as in > spam filtering, but it is the business's call as to how they structure > their pricing model, what is considered revenue-generating, and what is > considered a cost. External parties have no business deciding what > should be considered revenue-generating for any given business. > > Also, I think everyone is missing the point Matt has made several times > of how do you decide how much revenue should be attributed to > spam/virus filtering. How do you attach a value to it's contribution > to keeping customers or obtaining new customers? Or a relative value > of the service against other services like base email hosting, web > hosting, traffic reports, control panels, database hosting, media > hosting, tech support, maintenance, etc. Again, it's a judgement call. > And since most businesses have different mixes of costs, pricing > models, etc. it would take looking at each business individually to > come up with some sort of revenue-sharing model. One size would most > definitely not fit all. > > In short, while this idea may be "creative", it's not the least bit > practical. Revenue-sharing should be a misnomer, and pricing should be > by server, domain, or account/alias. For a pricing model to be > successful, subjectivity needs to be removed so that the factors > determining it can be easily quantified. > > Darin. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is > still a > consumable that indirectly makes restaurants money by keeping its > customers > happy. When it is there no one notices, when it is not customers > definitely > know and are put off. > > My comments are not about the revenue sharing but that email is a lost > leader for an ISP. Lost leaders simply make business money by keeping > the > customers happy purchasing other higher margin products. Otherwise > there > would be no reason to sell a service for less than it costs to > maintain. > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Glenn \ WCNet > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement > regarding > > ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of > > Declude. > > MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the > > version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to > > participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. > > Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that > > part. > > > > The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage > fee > > or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's > > daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. > > > > > > - Original Mes
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
A book on accounting is not necessary. I am very familiar with cost centers. It is a fact that removing cost centers can cost a business revenue. So if a small ISP removes spam filtering from their offerings then their customers that want a one stop shop will go elsewhere. It is a balancing act. What cost centers help you retain customers? Which ones will get you new business? Electricity is also a cost center but without it you would not have any revenue generating services to offer! Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darin Cox > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 6:37 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Kevin, > > It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on > business accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating > centers. > Sometimes it may be a judgement call as to where one item goes, as in > spam filtering, but it is the business's call as to how they structure > their pricing model, what is considered revenue-generating, and what is > considered a cost. External parties have no business deciding what > should be considered revenue-generating for any given business. > > Also, I think everyone is missing the point Matt has made several times > of how do you decide how much revenue should be attributed to > spam/virus filtering. How do you attach a value to it's contribution > to keeping customers or obtaining new customers? Or a relative value > of the service against other services like base email hosting, web > hosting, traffic reports, control panels, database hosting, media > hosting, tech support, maintenance, etc. Again, it's a judgement call. > And since most businesses have different mixes of costs, pricing > models, etc. it would take looking at each business individually to > come up with some sort of revenue-sharing model. One size would most > definitely not fit all. > > In short, while this idea may be "creative", it's not the least bit > practical. Revenue-sharing should be a misnomer, and pricing should be > by server, domain, or account/alias. For a pricing model to be > successful, subjectivity needs to be removed so that the factors > determining it can be easily quantified. > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is > still a > consumable that indirectly makes restaurants money by keeping its > customers > happy. When it is there no one notices, when it is not customers > definitely > know and are put off. > > My comments are not about the revenue sharing but that email is a lost > leader for an ISP. Lost leaders simply make business money by keeping > the > customers happy purchasing other higher margin products. Otherwise > there > would be no reason to sell a service for less than it costs to > maintain. > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Glenn \ WCNet > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement > regarding > > ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of > > Declude. > > MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the > > version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to > > participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. > > Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that > > part. > > > > The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage > fee > > or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's > > daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it > and > > it > > costs you money to provide then what is the business case for > providing > > the > > service? > > > > Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital > > investments/expenditures. Not spend money fo
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message This has been a great thread to follow and I just want to add my two cents worth. At the moment the whole issue of spam filtering is quite complex. Declude's configuration requires constant tweaking it seams. That translates into labour. If Declude can somehow manage to reduce the amount of labour and skill involved that would be of great value It would not necessarily earn us more money, but it can earn us more time. Personally I would like to have Declude running and then just forget about it. Well maybe I would continue reading this list because it can be entertaining and educational. Regarding revenue sharing. I do charge for anti-spam and anti-virus services. I don't compete with the mayor service providers that offer it for free. As with others on this list I offer personalized quality service to my clients. I attract clients that understand and desire that. I have never advertised. It does work. While I recognize that there is value to anything that frees up my time, I do have to keep an eye on net income also I spend money on tools and consume my time. Any revenue sharing program with a third party will be compared against what I do now. If it's clear and fits in comparison to what I do now, then it will be attractive to me. If it also saves time that will make some difference Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 519-741-1222 ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Well then if your profit is negative and they wish to share in it, then they owe you money right?? : ) Marc -- Original Message -- From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:39:52 -0400 >MessageWhile customers are referred to us for our spam/virus filtering >capabilities, we do operate it as a cost center, as the labor and other >expenses involved are slightly higher than the additional revenue generated >from them. > >Darin. > > >- Original Message - >From: Glenn \ WCNet >To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:32 PM >Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > >You're saying that email and spam/virus scanning is a service aspect that >specifically draws customers to an ISP. I'm saying it doesn't, that's all. >I've not once heard a customer state that email service was the deciding >factor in choosing us, and there's no evidence it entices them to stay. > > >- Original Message ----- >From: Kevin Bilbee >To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:01 PM >Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > >Then stop offering mail if it such a burden to the business. Explain to your >customer that they can > > > >can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply >abandon it and create another. > > > >Let us know how many customers stay with your service. Of course you will not >be able to quantify the lost new business! > > > > > >Kevin Bilbee > > > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:55 AM >To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > >Hahahahaha! E-mail hardly keeps or draws customers. Anybody who wants >e-mail can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, >simply abandon it and create another. Domain hosting, maybe a little. >However, I have domain customers who have never used their included mail >service. > > > > > >- Original Message - > >From: Kevin Bilbee > >To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM > >Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > >So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would >be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need >to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need >to land new business? > > > > > >Kevin Bilbee > > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL >PROTECTED]) >Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AM >To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > >Kevin, > > > >Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue >(hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting >provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone >competes with. > > > >Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a >hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus >scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus >scanning. > > > >Darrell > >---------------- >Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. > IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG >Integration, and Log Parsers. > > - Original Message - > > From: Kevin Bilbee > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost > leader/not a revenue builder. > > > > If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus > protection? > > > > > > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > >--- >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Revenue sharing is a sales ploy and for all practical purposes doesn't really exist in the accounting world. For instance, if we pay a royalty or a commission on a sale, that payment goes into expenses on the P&L statement. I guess you could say that all expenses share revenue, assuming there are less expenses than revenue so some revenue falls to the bottom line as profit. Logically, it follows that if there are more expenses than revenue, then there's just too much darn revenue sharing going on :-) As Matt and others have pointed out, e-mail, spam and virus systems are loss leaders for most ISP's and, as such, they don't generate a line item entry in revenue. Therefore, the revenue share ploy is inconceivable and impracticable. The Declude folks would have known this on the front end if they were in-touch with the many ISP customers among us or, at least, would have the fore thought to ask -- there is no doubt we would have told them. :-) Incidentally, I don't call it negative or lame, when one of our customers tell us what's broken or what won't work - I call that an opportunity. Thanks, Thursday, July 20, 2006, 8:36:47 AM, Darin Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DC> Kevin, DC> It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on business DC> accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating centers. DC> Sometimes it may be a judgement call as to where one item goes, as in spam DC> filtering, but it is the business's call as to how they structure their DC> pricing model, what is considered revenue-generating, and what is considered DC> a cost. External parties have no business deciding what should be DC> considered revenue-generating for any given business. DC> Also, I think everyone is missing the point Matt has made several times of DC> how do you decide how much revenue should be attributed to spam/virus DC> filtering. How do you attach a value to it's contribution to keeping DC> customers or obtaining new customers? Or a relative value of the service DC> against other services like base email hosting, web hosting, traffic DC> reports, control panels, database hosting, media hosting, tech support, DC> maintenance, etc. Again, it's a judgement call. And since most businesses DC> have different mixes of costs, pricing models, etc. it would take looking at DC> each business individually to come up with some sort of revenue-sharing DC> model. One size would most definitely not fit all. DC> In short, while this idea may be "creative", it's not the least bit DC> practical. Revenue-sharing should be a misnomer, and pricing should be by DC> server, domain, or account/alias. For a pricing model to be successful, DC> subjectivity needs to be removed so that the factors determining it can be DC> easily quantified. DC> Darin. DC> - Original Message - DC> From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DC> To: DC> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM DC> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DC> No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is still a DC> consumable that indirectly makes restaurants money by keeping its customers DC> happy. When it is there no one notices, when it is not customers definitely DC> know and are put off. DC> My comments are not about the revenue sharing but that email is a lost DC> leader for an ISP. Lost leaders simply make business money by keeping the DC> customers happy purchasing other higher margin products. Otherwise there DC> would be no reason to sell a service for less than it costs to maintain. DC> Kevin Bilbee >> -Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Glenn \ WCNet >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding >> ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of >> Declude. >> MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the >> version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to >> participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. >> Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that >> part. >> >> The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee >> or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's >> daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM >> Subject: RE: [Declude.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message While customers are referred to us for our spam/virus filtering capabilities, we do operate it as a cost center, as the labor and other expenses involved are slightly higher than the additional revenue generated from them. Darin. - Original Message - From: Glenn \ WCNet To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 You're saying that email and spam/virus scanning is a service aspect that specifically draws customers to an ISP. I'm saying it doesn't, that's all. I've not once heard a customer state that email service was the deciding factor in choosing us, and there's no evidence it entices them to stay. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then stop offering mail if it such a burden to the business. Explain to your customer that they can can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Let us know how many customers stay with your service. Of course you will not be able to quantify the lost new business! Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNetSent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:55 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Hahahahaha! E-mail hardly keeps or draws customers. Anybody who wants e-mail can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Domain hosting, maybe a little. However, I have domain customers who have never used their included mail service. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need to land new business? Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Kevin, It would probably help for you to take a course or read a book on business accounting. There are cost centers, and revenue-generating centers. Sometimes it may be a judgement call as to where one item goes, as in spam filtering, but it is the business's call as to how they structure their pricing model, what is considered revenue-generating, and what is considered a cost. External parties have no business deciding what should be considered revenue-generating for any given business. Also, I think everyone is missing the point Matt has made several times of how do you decide how much revenue should be attributed to spam/virus filtering. How do you attach a value to it's contribution to keeping customers or obtaining new customers? Or a relative value of the service against other services like base email hosting, web hosting, traffic reports, control panels, database hosting, media hosting, tech support, maintenance, etc. Again, it's a judgement call. And since most businesses have different mixes of costs, pricing models, etc. it would take looking at each business individually to come up with some sort of revenue-sharing model. One size would most definitely not fit all. In short, while this idea may be "creative", it's not the least bit practical. Revenue-sharing should be a misnomer, and pricing should be by server, domain, or account/alias. For a pricing model to be successful, subjectivity needs to be removed so that the factors determining it can be easily quantified. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:54 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is still a consumable that indirectly makes restaurants money by keeping its customers happy. When it is there no one notices, when it is not customers definitely know and are put off. My comments are not about the revenue sharing but that email is a lost leader for an ISP. Lost leaders simply make business money by keeping the customers happy purchasing other higher margin products. Otherwise there would be no reason to sell a service for less than it costs to maintain. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Glenn \ WCNet > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding > ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of > Declude. > MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the > version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to > participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. > Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that > part. > > The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee > or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's > daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and > it > costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing > the > service? > > Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital > investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make > money. > > An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matt Robertson > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > > revenue would be lost. > > > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > > > Not in this universe. > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > > mysecretbase.com > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailin
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Hi We're not a service provider (but I love and value the fact that all of you are!) Rob > >What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service providers." If there is anyone >subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
I believe the explanation that everyone is looking for with this "revenue sharing" piece is there is a difference between revenue boosting, and revenue saving. With all the competition from the major players in our market today, we constantly have to integrate new services at no additional price increase to our customers - whether it be extra Spam filtering services, larger bandwidth allocations on web sites, more email accounts in standard hosting packages, etc. This results in added expenditures with no additional revenue. Each time we have to do this, we have to weigh the factors - what is the cost per user to implement? Will it allow us to keep the customer for another year? We do not get new customers because we have a remarkable Spam filter system that no one else has - all ISP's in my market provide Spam filtering. We get new customers because we get to know them by first names and provide 24/7 customer service that is hard to find elsewhere. Sincerely, Randy Armbrecht Global Web Solutions, Inc. 804-346-5300 x112 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112 http://globalweb.net Richmond's Internet Source since 1996! WEB HOSTING including EMAIL beginning at $29/month! DSL Starting at $34.95/month! Non-Profits - receive a 25% discount on most services! "Global Web Solutions" is a registered trademark of Global Web Solutions, Inc., Glen Allen, VA -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:33 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make money. An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Robertson > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > revenue would be lost. > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > Not in this universe. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > mysecretbase.com > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message You're saying that email and spam/virus scanning is a service aspect that specifically draws customers to an ISP. I'm saying it doesn't, that's all. I've not once heard a customer state that email service was the deciding factor in choosing us, and there's no evidence it entices them to stay. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then stop offering mail if it such a burden to the business. Explain to your customer that they can can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Let us know how many customers stay with your service. Of course you will not be able to quantify the lost new business! Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNetSent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:55 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Hahahahaha! E-mail hardly keeps or draws customers. Anybody who wants e-mail can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Domain hosting, maybe a little. However, I have domain customers who have never used their included mail service. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need to land new business? Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Details are good. Why not provide them at the time of the roll out and avoid a lot of noise and upset posts? It would be good if you did this kind of thing routinely with new Declude releases, too. It would be pretty amazing what little things would keep the natives from becoming so restless. Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 11:33:03 AM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> Darrell, DB> 1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to DB> CommTouch for analysis? DB> RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns DB> (from the header), and Structural Pattern (mathematical sample of the body DB> and attachments. These patterns don't contain anything to violate privacy DB> concerns. They don't use things like recipient information, and the DB> structural patterns are a random sampling of the bytes of the message (not DB> looking for the content or meaning of the words). These patterns make up DB> what is called a digital signature, that is one way hashed using md5 and DB> sent to CT detection centers where the hash is compared to CT DB hashes. A DB> reply is sent back with the result classification. This process takes about DB> 150ms. DB> 2. What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? DB> The CT Engine communicates to CT centers over port 80. A proprietary DB> protocol is used for this communication, it is not standard HTTP. As long DB> as the box can access the internet (with or without a proxy), CT can access DB> our centers. There is also a built-in failover mechanism. DB> 3. Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we DB> call when using Sniffer a rule panic? DB> There is a procedure that Declude or users can report FP's to CommTouch. I DB> am having a KB article written on how to do this. DB> 4. Is there a trial? DB> Unfortunately not as every time CT is activated we pay a fee. DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> -Original Message- DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell DB> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) DB> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? DB> David, DB> Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to DB> CommTouch for analysis? DB> What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? DB> How does one handle false positives? through Declude or directly to DB> CommTouch? DB> Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call DB> when using sniffer a rule panic? DB> Is there a trial? DB> Darrell DB> David Barker writes: >> Darrell, >> >> It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet >> traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as >> soon as emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The >> Commtouch in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and >> receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant >> protection from new outbreaks. >> >> David B >> www.declude.com >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Darrell >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? >> >> Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this DB> works. >> Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? >> >> Darrell >> -- >> -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude >> And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI >> integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM >> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? >> >> >> -David, >> >> Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch >> or something similiar? >> As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, >> but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. >> >> Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" >> pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. >> Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. >&g
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Why the secretive one-on-one scenario? You have an active customer base on this list which is interested. What's negative is not fostering the communications with the the active customer base and, moreover, explicitly attempting to derail an open and transparent discussion on this list. The reason why many folks are saying it is a bad decision, is because Declude rolled out a product without defining many of the details. Well, you couldn't have confirmed my prior post very much better. Whenever a firm ignores their customer base, or worse, goes to war with them (even when they are as right as rain), they will lose. It is just a big matter of attitude and a small matter of time. Thanks, Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 8:40:17 AM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> Don, DB> "in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively DB> refrain from discussing a subject" DB> Let me reiterate just for those who may have missed my earlier post. DB> Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, DB> function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would like DB> to speak to someone about the Service Provider Program please call or email: DB> Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> I have communicated our intention to the lists and what seems to have DB> happened is that the majority of the posts have been negative. I am DB> surprised that only a handful of people have taken up our offer to discuss DB> this with us but rather post to the boards how this is such a bad decision DB> on our part without knowing the facts. If as Service Providers you are DB> losing money, clearly something needs to change. It is hard for me to accept DB> that the reason Service Providers are not making money is because of DB> Declude. DB> We have not finalized our program yet and are looking for some constructive DB> feedback from our Service Providers in order to make this a successful DB> program, that will benefit both Declude and you. DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> DB> -Original Message- DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don DB> Brown DB> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:15 PM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB> A friend of mine was one of the original founders of Bridge Data. They were DB> the first folks to take the Wall Street Ticker and resell it using DEC PDP DB> 1170, 1134, 1144, etc., to ADP, Traders, Brokerages and others. DB> Bridge owned SAVVIS and some other related entities and they were a publicly DB> traded company. During that time, not many years ago, I saw a long article DB> in a St. Louis business journal, where the CEO quoted similar numbers which DB> were also projected by some 3rd Party consultancy Group. He added his own DB> forecast about increases in head count and revenue. He was a well educated DB> and bright individual and he wasn't a pup, when it came to running a DB> company. He had tenure and a track record. DB> Less than a year after the date of the article, Bridge filed for Bankruptcy. DB> You'll note I didn't say "bankruptcy protection." In contrast, no amount of DB> protection could saved the enterprise. DB> There is a moral to this story. DB> Whenever a company doesn't listen to the customer, or in this case tells its DB> most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a DB> subject, which the company itself made most topical, then I can point to the DB> foregoing and many other examples of what to expect in the future. DB> Personally, I am disappointed in where I see Declude now and where I see it DB> going. The lack of good flowing communications to/from the customer base DB> about new releases, bug fixes, etc. and, particularly, the lack of a DB> properly orchestrated roll-out of this new product enhancement/add-on, says DB> that the organization is disjointed, disorganized and that major changes are DB> not well thought out and prepared for in advance, nor well managed as brush DB> fire on the back side. DB> The people expressing concerns, asking questions and wanting an audience are DB> your active customers. Keep telling them to go away and they will. DB> How many times is Declude going to kick itself in the chins with steel toed DB> combat boots before someone there gets it? DB> Thanks, DB> Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 4:19:51 PM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DB> wrote: DB>> Just as a side note. I have provided the contact information if you DB>> have any further questions about the upcoming program, please be DB>> reminded that the board is designed for comments on p
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
our legacy customers. How quickly we forget how much it is for an IMail renewal these days ? To summarize, lets stop the bitching and start working together as a community again. I am totally aware of everything that is posted on the list and I have a long list of action items, one day at time is my approach. I am reaching out to those on the list who want to do this, and work with Declude to create a better product, service and happy customers because at the end of the day that's what it is all about. For us to be successful you need to be successful, that is our goal. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway product? Are people like me not your target for the gateway product? It's also what one isn't getting for the product that exists now. I don't wish to see new functionality added at an expense when the lack of product enhancements it is clearly one of the biggest gripes that people have. Declude has become progressively more buggy over time and done so without adding many advantages. I am now in a position where the new licensing enforcement mechanism prohibits me from upgrading to a version that fixes bugs even if it was offered because the licensing enforcement mechanism is not sound and a huge liability to me. I've been bitching about licensing enforcement since Declude was purchased and it started phoning home. Then last Christmas Eve, you guys messed up and the poorly designed license enforcement mechanism caused many systems to stop processing E-mail for several days while it was claimed that you had no purposeful capabilities to disable software in this way. Then the software was patched and it was promised that Declude would not actively disable software in this way. Then a few months later you did just that. This is completely unacceptable and it must be changed in order for me to continue using the product. Now as far as CommTouch is concerned, I did address this very fairly earlier in this thread: "With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not available to people like me under reasonable terms." There is no doubt that CommTouch has potential, just like any other new test, to make my system easier to operate or slightly more accurate, and for many these differences could be even larger. It is not however in any way quantifiable to revenue generation. It is only a cost. If Declude wants to have any success in courting for-profit spam and virus blocking services, you will base your licensing on user counts and functionality, and bear in mind that being successful in this business is not a matter of using Declude, but instead being good at one does, so the service providers should have the benefit of increased margins when volume exceeds that of most. For service providers that offer these things as an expected and highly commoditized service, you should understand that they will not by any means jump at the opportunity to pay any more than they already are. As some have pointed out, there was a mass exodus from IMail to SmarterMail based on just two things...increased costs and no attention to adding expected functionality, instead IMail pretended that they were a groupware company and that everyone would love them even more for it. Declude needs to stop copying the Ipswitch of then, and start copying the Ipswitch of now under Kevin Gillis' direction as they try to pick up the pieces of past mistakes. Matt David Barker wrote: CT is a feature of the new Declude Gateway product. It was by my request that we made CT available to Declude Security Suite users as an option and price that is beyond reasonable. As you have clearly pointed out in your post that CT is of no real value to you ("CommTouch has zero possibility of generating revenue for businesses like my own") then you ask me why it is not available to people like you under reasonable terms. Am I missing something ? It comes down to this, it was my descions to include CT for those who could make use of it and we negotiated a deal where we could include our Service Providers under a different program. What we are doing is giving you our customers options, which I do not see as being the wrong way to do things. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMA
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message Then stop offering mail if it such a burden to the business. Explain to your customer that they can can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Let us know how many customers stay with your service. Of course you will not be able to quantify the lost new business! Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Hahahahaha! E-mail hardly keeps or draws customers. Anybody who wants e-mail can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Domain hosting, maybe a little. However, I have domain customers who have never used their included mail service. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need to land new business? Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
No they do not impose a revenue sharing model, but toilet paper is still a consumable that indirectly makes restaurants money by keeping its customers happy. When it is there no one notices, when it is not customers definitely know and are put off. My comments are not about the revenue sharing but that email is a lost leader for an ISP. Lost leaders simply make business money by keeping the customers happy purchasing other higher margin products. Otherwise there would be no reason to sell a service for less than it costs to maintain. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Glenn \ WCNet > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:01 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding > ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of > Declude. > MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the > version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to > participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. > Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that > part. > > The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee > or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's > daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and > it > costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing > the > service? > > Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital > investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make > money. > > An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? > > > Kevin Bilbee > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matt Robertson > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > > revenue would be lost. > > > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > > > Not in this universe. > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > > mysecretbase.com > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Andy, not sure what you mean, are you beating around the Bush ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:41 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage >> fee or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's << Otherwise, Chili's would revise their menus. Enough of that sh*t, as a certain world leader would say. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 05:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of Declude. MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that part. The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make money. An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Robertson > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > revenue would be lost. > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > Not in this universe. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > mysecretbase.com > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
>> The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's << Otherwise, Chili's would revise their menus. Enough of that sh*t, as a certain world leader would say. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 05:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of Declude. MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that part. The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make money. An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Robertson > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > revenue would be lost. > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > Not in this universe. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > mysecretbase.com > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? In 2006, for any small operator, nothing insofar as the service itself is concerned. You only do it to provide a complete solution for customers, and you do it at a loss. If I could cut out email I could cut out 50% of the server resources I have in place (and which I just finished tripling). The increasingly difficult model for the small ISP dictated my shift into an emphasis on contract programming and away from design and hosting. So when a company that caters to the small business -- who as a body are pretty much all in the same boat -- and seeks to increase their costs in a market where consumer perception is that they're already an expensive choice (I am cutting fees to existing customers to keep them... not raising them)... well thats going to be a mighty tough sell to anyone who is in the trenches and understands fully what they are up against. I came into this thread a little late and if my read on the posts from Declude is any indication, some of this is sinking in. I'll make a decision after I see what the revenue sharing program looks like. As an aside to Declude to explain where I am coming from: I was a Declude user for a couple of years and left it for an open source solution, which I am still reasonably happy with, but -- since I am already going to the trouble of rebuilding all of my mail services on new servers right now -- am willing to reconsider if I can get a qualitative advantage for a justifiable cost. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
I think one thing that happened here is that the announcement regarding ComTouch didn't make it *clear* that it is an *optional* part of Declude. MY initial impression was that *any* Service Provider who uses the version of Declude that incomes ComTouch would be required to participate in the licensing of it, by whatever scheme fit the bill. Now that I understand it's optional, fine, I don't have to use that part. The toilet paper manufacturer does not impose a per-customer usage fee or take a direct percentage of the restaurant's daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly/yearly sales. - Original Message - From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make money. An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Robertson > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > revenue would be lost. > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > Not in this universe. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > mysecretbase.com > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Then I just do not get it. If revenue would not be lost without it and it costs you money to provide then what is the business case for providing the service? Last I checked business, are in business to make money on capital investments/expenditures. Not spend money for things that do not make money. An analogy: Does a restaurant make revenue from toilet paper? Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matt Robertson > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it > > revenue would be lost. > > Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue > of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I > can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the > server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a > part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. > > Not in this universe. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Janitor, MSB Web Systems > mysecretbase.com > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
They were at $264 for combo JunkMail/Virus, which works out to $132/product. Later they were broken out at $132 apiece. Then the price was raised. Then the price was evidently lowered back to what it was (I haven't looked to verify this last, just taking David B's word on it). Darin. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:16 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > Oh and prices were increased from $132 to $295 before they were dropped back > to $132 for legacy customers, so there was no price cut except in the sense > of department stores raising prices to have a sale. FYI, from the time that Service Agreements first came out through December, 2004 the Service Agreements were never less expensive than $295. So when they were lowered to $132, it was definitely a real price cut. -Scott --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
On 7/19/06, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. Hardly. Carry that argument out to prove how wrong it is. By virtue of the fact that they allow me to be in business in the first place I can expect a knock on the door from Microsoft since they make the server o/s... and Dell since they make the servers. So just being a part of the show lets the pig belly up to the trough. Not in this universe. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
To help clarify this. Service Providers are businesses like ISP's, Hosting Providers, Clean & Forward services who provide spam protection and/or virus protection to their customers by charging them a fee for the service that they offer. Whereas a Non Service Provider would be a business that provides email to it's own employees. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Robertson Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:41 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 On 7/14/06, Scott Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another hand raised. End User (business) here. Apparantly I missed the > Exchange memo. Put yourr hand down :-) According to the definition you are a service provider. Quoted with emphasis added: "definition: a business which provides their customers with delivery of their Email communications AND/OR USERS with access to their own Email I'm curious about CommTouch and coming back to Declude but the implications of what I am seeing are indeed disturbing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
On 7/14/06, Scott Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another hand raised. End User (business) here. Apparantly I missed the Exchange memo. Put yourr hand down :-) According to the definition you are a service provider. Quoted with emphasis added: "definition: a business which provides their customers with delivery of their Email communications AND/OR USERS with access to their own Email I'm curious about CommTouch and coming back to Declude but the implications of what I am seeing are indeed disturbing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Janitor, MSB Web Systems mysecretbase.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
> Oh and prices were increased from $132 to $295 before they were dropped back > to $132 for legacy customers, so there was no price cut except in the sense > of department stores raising prices to have a sale. FYI, from the time that Service Agreements first came out through December, 2004 the Service Agreements were never less expensive than $295. So when they were lowered to $132, it was definitely a real price cut. -Scott --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message Hahahahaha! E-mail hardly keeps or draws customers. Anybody who wants e-mail can go to Hotmail or Yahoo. When the addy gets horked by spammers, simply abandon it and create another. Domain hosting, maybe a little. However, I have domain customers who have never used their included mail service. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 11:12 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need to land new business? Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Also check out the free Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/), which we have also been using successfully for a few years. Not to mention the old Pyzor service (http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/), which is still available and functioning (Razor spun off from this project) and we also use. And finally, see iXhash (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/iXhash), which we also just started using about a month ago. I guess what I am getting at here is that there are lots of "free" choices/options/solutions available out there without having to resort to pricey and convoluted options like CommTouch. Had Declude queried its customer base before getting in bed with CommTouch, they might have come up with some better/cheaper/more acceptable solutions... Bill - Original Message - From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:19 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Sound like Cloudmark (http://www.cloudmark.com/) and their free Razor service (http://razor.sourceforge.net/), which I have already been using successfully for a few years now. Bill - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:33 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Darrell, 1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns (from the header), and Structural Pattern (mathematical sample of the body and attachments. These patterns don't contain anything to violate privacy concerns. They don't use things like recipient information, and the structural patterns are a random sampling of the bytes of the message (not looking for the content or meaning of the words). These patterns make up what is called a digital signature, that is one way hashed using md5 and sent to CT detection centers where the hash is compared to CT DB hashes. A reply is sent back with the result classification. This process takes about 150ms. 2. What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? The CT Engine communicates to CT centers over port 80. A proprietary protocol is used for this communication, it is not standard HTTP. As long as the box can access the internet (with or without a proxy), CT can access our centers. There is also a built-in failover mechanism. 3. Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using Sniffer a rule panic? There is a procedure that Declude or users can report FP's to CommTouch. I am having a KB article written on how to do this. 4. Is there a trial? Unfortunately not as every time CT is activated we pay a fee. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? David, Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? How does one handle false positives? through Declude or directly to CommTouch? Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using sniffer a rule panic? Is there a trial? Darrell David Barker writes: Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell -- -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Hi David, In regards to the concern raised by many, and you're response that you need time to turn everything around... The problem many of us are having is that all we have seen so far, even in the recent announcements, is demand for more money with none of the increased functionality we've been asking for for two years now. It would have settled much better with most of us if announcements had been made of new functionality so we feel better about the money we've already spent with you and gotten no benefit from, rather than a communication about increased costs with no discernable added functionality (for the many of us who already have Message Sniffer). I'm sure you would have gotten a much better reception if you had started with relaying increased functionality that many have been asking for for a couple of years, and how customers with existing service agreements would be extended due to the previous lack of added features and support. In short, lead with an offer to make existing customers feel better, not a demand for more money from those who are already frustrated. The latter tactic just serves to drive customers away, and is the same tactic Ipswitch used unsuccessfully. Oh and prices were increased from $132 to $295 before they were dropped back to $132 for legacy customers, so there was no price cut except in the sense of department stores raising prices to have a sale. We all know IT costs are among the first cuts in any business, so market share and increased product/service lines are a much better way to increase revenue than increasing prices for the same product/service. The latter is usually a sign of a struggling business that is trying to keep from going under. I don't mean to beat the pulpy mess that used to be a horse, been trying to stay silent through all of this to let you come through on your own, but the above perspective seems to have been missed. Bottom line is consider your customer's concerns before you make announcements, address them in the announcement, and you'll be more successful. All the best, Darin. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:23 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, 1. With regards to no new functionality, we have been over this I agreed and made a commitment to address this. I think to say that Declude has become more buggy over time is not entirely true as I have posted before, much of the problems were not seen under the single application declude.exe, many of these things became more obvious with the decludeproc service. Again this is not a new point of contention but we cannot keep going over and over it again and again, I am asking that you give me some time to turn this around. 2. As far as the licensing mechanism is concerned we talked about this less than a week ago, and again I committed to coming up with a solution. I do understand the problem. I will tackle each issue one at a time everything cannot be all done at once. 3. "It is not however in any way quantifiable to revenue generation." I disagree for many of the same reasons that Goran suggested. 4. To compare Declude to IMail is not a good comparison especially when the cost of our Service Agreements have been what they are and not increased, if fact we lowered the cost of our Service Agreements. They used to be $295 per product and we changed that to $132 for our legacy customers. How quickly we forget how much it is for an IMail renewal these days ? To summarize, lets stop the bitching and start working together as a community again. I am totally aware of everything that is posted on the list and I have a long list of action items, one day at time is my approach. I am reaching out to those on the list who want to do this, and work with Declude to create a better product, service and happy customers because at the end of the day that's what it is all about. For us to be successful you need to be successful, that is our goal. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway product? Are people like me not your target for the gateway product? It's also what one isn't getting for the product that exists now. I don't wish to see new functionality added at an expense when the lack of product enhancements it is clearly one of the biggest gripes that people have. Declude has become progressively more buggy over time and done so without adding many advantages. I am now in a position where the new licensing enforcement mechanism prohibits me from upgrading to a version that fixes bugs even if it was offered because the licensing en
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
CT is only run once and deals with spam as a weighted test or a Virus as a Virus scanner on the AV side, it runs before the AV in the virus.cfg all other scanners will also run if EXITSCANONVIRUSDETECT OFF David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:41 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Is this how the AV part of the program works and will it run when the other AV scanners run or is it only run once and then identified as either spam or a virus? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as they emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch Engine in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not > permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to > customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been > established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > &
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Matt, 1. With regards to no new functionality, we have been over this I agreed and made a commitment to address this. I think to say that Declude has become more buggy over time is not entirely true as I have posted before, much of the problems were not seen under the single application declude.exe, many of these things became more obvious with the decludeproc service. Again this is not a new point of contention but we cannot keep going over and over it again and again, I am asking that you give me some time to turn this around. 2. As far as the licensing mechanism is concerned we talked about this less than a week ago, and again I committed to coming up with a solution. I do understand the problem. I will tackle each issue one at a time everything cannot be all done at once. 3. "It is not however in any way quantifiable to revenue generation." I disagree for many of the same reasons that Goran suggested. 4. To compare Declude to IMail is not a good comparison especially when the cost of our Service Agreements have been what they are and not increased, if fact we lowered the cost of our Service Agreements. They used to be $295 per product and we changed that to $132 for our legacy customers. How quickly we forget how much it is for an IMail renewal these days ? To summarize, lets stop the bitching and start working together as a community again. I am totally aware of everything that is posted on the list and I have a long list of action items, one day at time is my approach. I am reaching out to those on the list who want to do this, and work with Declude to create a better product, service and happy customers because at the end of the day that's what it is all about. For us to be successful you need to be successful, that is our goal. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway product? Are people like me not your target for the gateway product? It's also what one isn't getting for the product that exists now. I don't wish to see new functionality added at an expense when the lack of product enhancements it is clearly one of the biggest gripes that people have. Declude has become progressively more buggy over time and done so without adding many advantages. I am now in a position where the new licensing enforcement mechanism prohibits me from upgrading to a version that fixes bugs even if it was offered because the licensing enforcement mechanism is not sound and a huge liability to me. I've been bitching about licensing enforcement since Declude was purchased and it started phoning home. Then last Christmas Eve, you guys messed up and the poorly designed license enforcement mechanism caused many systems to stop processing E-mail for several days while it was claimed that you had no purposeful capabilities to disable software in this way. Then the software was patched and it was promised that Declude would not actively disable software in this way. Then a few months later you did just that. This is completely unacceptable and it must be changed in order for me to continue using the product. Now as far as CommTouch is concerned, I did address this very fairly earlier in this thread: "With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not available to people like me under reasonable terms." There is no doubt that CommTouch has potential, just like any other new test, to make my system easier to operate or slightly more accurate, and for many these differences could be even larger. It is not however in any way quantifiable to revenue generation. It is only a cost. If Declude wants to have any success in courting for-profit spam and virus blocking services, you will base your licensing on user counts and functionality, and bear in mind that being successful in this business is not a matter of using Declude, but instead being good at one does, so the service providers should have the benefit of increased margins when volume exceeds that of most. For service providers that offer these things as an expected and highly commoditized service, you should understand that they will not by any means jump at the opportunity to pay any more than they already are. As some have pointed out, there was a mass exodus from IMail to SmarterMail based on just two things...increased costs and no attention to adding expected functionality, instead IMail pretended that they were a groupware company and that everyone would love th
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Sound like Cloudmark (http://www.cloudmark.com/) and their free Razor service (http://razor.sourceforge.net/), which I have already been using successfully for a few years now. Bill - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:33 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Darrell, 1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns (from the header), and Structural Pattern (mathematical sample of the body and attachments. These patterns don't contain anything to violate privacy concerns. They don't use things like recipient information, and the structural patterns are a random sampling of the bytes of the message (not looking for the content or meaning of the words). These patterns make up what is called a digital signature, that is one way hashed using md5 and sent to CT detection centers where the hash is compared to CT DB hashes. A reply is sent back with the result classification. This process takes about 150ms. 2. What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? The CT Engine communicates to CT centers over port 80. A proprietary protocol is used for this communication, it is not standard HTTP. As long as the box can access the internet (with or without a proxy), CT can access our centers. There is also a built-in failover mechanism. 3. Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using Sniffer a rule panic? There is a procedure that Declude or users can report FP's to CommTouch. I am having a KB article written on how to do this. 4. Is there a trial? Unfortunately not as every time CT is activated we pay a fee. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? David, Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? How does one handle false positives? through Declude or directly to CommTouch? Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using sniffer a rule panic? Is there a trial? Darrell David Barker writes: Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell -- -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, th
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David, It's the revenue share. Is that not a requirement of the gateway product? Are people like me not your target for the gateway product? It's also what one isn't getting for the product that exists now. I don't wish to see new functionality added at an expense when the lack of product enhancements it is clearly one of the biggest gripes that people have. Declude has become progressively more buggy over time and done so without adding many advantages. I am now in a position where the new licensing enforcement mechanism prohibits me from upgrading to a version that fixes bugs even if it was offered because the licensing enforcement mechanism is not sound and a huge liability to me. I've been bitching about licensing enforcement since Declude was purchased and it started phoning home. Then last Christmas Eve, you guys messed up and the poorly designed license enforcement mechanism caused many systems to stop processing E-mail for several days while it was claimed that you had no purposeful capabilities to disable software in this way. Then the software was patched and it was promised that Declude would not actively disable software in this way. Then a few months later you did just that. This is completely unacceptable and it must be changed in order for me to continue using the product. Now as far as CommTouch is concerned, I did address this very fairly earlier in this thread: "With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not available to people like me under reasonable terms." There is no doubt that CommTouch has potential, just like any other new test, to make my system easier to operate or slightly more accurate, and for many these differences could be even larger. It is not however in any way quantifiable to revenue generation. It is only a cost. If Declude wants to have any success in courting for-profit spam and virus blocking services, you will base your licensing on user counts and functionality, and bear in mind that being successful in this business is not a matter of using Declude, but instead being good at one does, so the service providers should have the benefit of increased margins when volume exceeds that of most. For service providers that offer these things as an expected and highly commoditized service, you should understand that they will not by any means jump at the opportunity to pay any more than they already are. As some have pointed out, there was a mass exodus from IMail to SmarterMail based on just two things...increased costs and no attention to adding expected functionality, instead IMail pretended that they were a groupware company and that everyone would love them even more for it. Declude needs to stop copying the Ipswitch of then, and start copying the Ipswitch of now under Kevin Gillis' direction as they try to pick up the pieces of past mistakes. Matt David Barker wrote: CT is a feature of the new Declude Gateway product. It was by my request that we made CT available to Declude Security Suite users as an option and price that is beyond reasonable. As you have clearly pointed out in your post that CT is of no real value to you ("CommTouch has zero possibility of generating revenue for businesses like my own") then you ask me why it is not available to people like you under reasonable terms. Am I missing something ? It comes down to this, it was my descions to include CT for those who could make use of it and we negotiated a deal where we could include our Service Providers under a different program. What we are doing is giving you our customers options, which I do not see as being the wrong way to do things. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider which was ancillary to a business that I used to operate which required me to offer hosting. I added E-mail because I was sick of dealing with my customer's ISP's for their E-mail problems (lost passwords, poorly performing services, bad technical support, etc.). Then after several years of doing E-mail I ran into a problem where my customers were frequently getting infected by viruses and their virus infections were preventing them from exploiting the benefits of their Web presence...so I purchased Declude. Spam wasn't much of an issue then. Then a year later spam started becoming more of an issue and I started tweaking my Declude configs to try to block more, and I started running into the issues of false positives, plus althoug
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Darrell, 1. Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? RPD extracts 2 types of patterns from the message, Distribution Patterns (from the header), and Structural Pattern (mathematical sample of the body and attachments. These patterns don't contain anything to violate privacy concerns. They don't use things like recipient information, and the structural patterns are a random sampling of the bytes of the message (not looking for the content or meaning of the words). These patterns make up what is called a digital signature, that is one way hashed using md5 and sent to CT detection centers where the hash is compared to CT DB hashes. A reply is sent back with the result classification. This process takes about 150ms. 2. What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? The CT Engine communicates to CT centers over port 80. A proprietary protocol is used for this communication, it is not standard HTTP. As long as the box can access the internet (with or without a proxy), CT can access our centers. There is also a built-in failover mechanism. 3. Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using Sniffer a rule panic? There is a procedure that Declude or users can report FP's to CommTouch. I am having a KB article written on how to do this. 4. Is there a trial? Unfortunately not as every time CT is activated we pay a fee. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:26 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? David, Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? How does one handle false positives? through Declude or directly to CommTouch? Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using sniffer a rule panic? Is there a trial? Darrell David Barker writes: > Darrell, > > It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet > traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as > soon as emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The > Commtouch in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and > receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant > protection from new outbreaks. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Darrell > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? > > Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. > Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? > > Darrell > -- > -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude > And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI > integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. > > - Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? > > > -David, > > Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch > or something similiar? > As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, > but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. > > Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" > pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. > Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. > > And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. > > - Original Message - > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > >> There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers >> we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 >> June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. >> >> Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no >> restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. >> >> However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to >> enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) >> to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue sha
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
CT is a feature of the new Declude Gateway product. It was by my request that we made CT available to Declude Security Suite users as an option and price that is beyond reasonable. As you have clearly pointed out in your post that CT is of no real value to you ("CommTouch has zero possibility of generating revenue for businesses like my own") then you ask me why it is not available to people like you under reasonable terms. Am I missing something ? It comes down to this, it was my descions to include CT for those who could make use of it and we negotiated a deal where we could include our Service Providers under a different program. What we are doing is giving you our customers options, which I do not see as being the wrong way to do things. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider which was ancillary to a business that I used to operate which required me to offer hosting. I added E-mail because I was sick of dealing with my customer's ISP's for their E-mail problems (lost passwords, poorly performing services, bad technical support, etc.). Then after several years of doing E-mail I ran into a problem where my customers were frequently getting infected by viruses and their virus infections were preventing them from exploiting the benefits of their Web presence...so I purchased Declude. Spam wasn't much of an issue then. Then a year later spam started becoming more of an issue and I started tweaking my Declude configs to try to block more, and I started running into the issues of false positives, plus although I was blocking more, the increase in volume was causing more to leak so my customers were complaining more and more. I bared down and eventually became an expert, and I decided then that instead of this being a cost to me (no one paid me for E-mail, just Web hosting and other services), I decided to turn it into a business. My largest source of revenue from this business just so happens to be from another Declude user who operates a Web hosting company. He was in the same place as I was, but he didn't have the patience or understanding to fix all of his issues, and I showed him how we could both profit from upselling the service and I fixed his false positive issues and made his server more manageable to boot. He still uses Declude and it is still free for his customers (who generally don't even know it is there), but many customers do want more and are willing to pay. Without offering this alternative, he would lose not just the revenue from MailPure that he shares, but also some of the customers that were unsatisfied with his standard Declude protection. I have four hosting providers that I work with now that resell my service, and two of those are current Declude customers. One tells me that he picks up customers because other customers tell their friends to come to his service because they have MailPure. Many of these guys are technically capable of doing better on their own, but they got into the business to host and or design Web sites and not to deal with spam and viruses just like me, and it is not easy to turn a profit from an expensive ancillary service offering without making a major change in focus (or skipping all of that and partnering with someone like me). CommTouch has zero possibility of generating revenue for businesses like my own even though I profit from offering the service unlike most service providers. This is why a revenue share with Declude is out of the question. The suggestions are that CommTouch will make experts out of novices in this game and allow some to become spam blocking businesses by simply adding better detection, but spam blocking businesses don't come packaged for people to plug-n-play. For most, spam and virus blocking will remain a cost center. Approaching this market with a revenue share licensing for a software add-on is overwhelming evidence of not understanding the market. With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not available to people like me under reasonable terms. Matt Paul Navarre wrote: >*** >Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost >leader/not a revenue builder. > >If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering >spam/virus protection? >*** > >Is this a serious question? > >If you don't offer spam and virus filtering, you won't have any customers. >In most markets the local competition
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message So then indirectly it does generate revenue. Because without it revenue would be lost. The ISP users need to ask is what level of these services do I need to offer to keep current customers happy and what level of service do I need to land new business? Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
I am one of the Declude users that is not a service provider but use it only to protect our relatively small network. I've been very happy with Declude's recent moves and have upgraded to the 4.x suite. I'll be researching this new offering and if the price/performance pans out I'll buy a license. What I don't get about all the complaints is, this is an option. You don't have to add it unless you want it. Moving to the suite was the same. When Imail tried to force us to upgrade to their suite they lost my business. I don't see the same thing happening here. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:40 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Don, "in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a subject" Let me reiterate just for those who may have missed my earlier post. Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the Service Provider Program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have communicated our intention to the lists and what seems to have happened is that the majority of the posts have been negative. I am surprised that only a handful of people have taken up our offer to discuss this with us but rather post to the boards how this is such a bad decision on our part without knowing the facts. If as Service Providers you are losing money, clearly something needs to change. It is hard for me to accept that the reason Service Providers are not making money is because of Declude. We have not finalized our program yet and are looking for some constructive feedback from our Service Providers in order to make this a successful program, that will benefit both Declude and you. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 A friend of mine was one of the original founders of Bridge Data. They were the first folks to take the Wall Street Ticker and resell it using DEC PDP 1170, 1134, 1144, etc., to ADP, Traders, Brokerages and others. Bridge owned SAVVIS and some other related entities and they were a publicly traded company. During that time, not many years ago, I saw a long article in a St. Louis business journal, where the CEO quoted similar numbers which were also projected by some 3rd Party consultancy Group. He added his own forecast about increases in head count and revenue. He was a well educated and bright individual and he wasn't a pup, when it came to running a company. He had tenure and a track record. Less than a year after the date of the article, Bridge filed for Bankruptcy. You'll note I didn't say "bankruptcy protection." In contrast, no amount of protection could saved the enterprise. There is a moral to this story. Whenever a company doesn't listen to the customer, or in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a subject, which the company itself made most topical, then I can point to the foregoing and many other examples of what to expect in the future. Personally, I am disappointed in where I see Declude now and where I see it going. The lack of good flowing communications to/from the customer base about new releases, bug fixes, etc. and, particularly, the lack of a properly orchestrated roll-out of this new product enhancement/add-on, says that the organization is disjointed, disorganized and that major changes are not well thought out and prepared for in advance, nor well managed as brush fire on the back side. The people expressing concerns, asking questions and wanting an audience are your active customers. Keep telling them to go away and they will. How many times is Declude going to kick itself in the chins with steel toed combat boots before someone there gets it? Thanks, Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 4:19:51 PM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> Just as a side note. I have provided the contact information if you DB> have any further questions about the upcoming program, please be DB> reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, DB> function, features of our software, not Declude's strategy of DB> marketing & sales programs. DB> Thanks DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> -Original Message- DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DB> David Barker DB> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Sub
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David Barker wrote: I did not say that Postini offered a poor service it was a comment from Matt. Actually, that was a private comment from and old conversation with me, and I think the point was missed. Postini is the McDonalds of the spam blocking business. It's edible, it even tastes somewhat good, but it's not a porterhouse steak. A few years ago Postini linked to a PDF to a PC World article where they shared the Editor's choice with Brightmail (if I recall properly). Their tested spam blocking rate was 80% for Postini and 85% for Brightmail. Postini shared honors because of their better customer control panel. It was beyond me how they could be boasting about such deplorable results. At that time, I was at 99.5% spam block rates (and getting better), and my customers didn't have a control panel because they shouldn't need one. My customers have me block their spam and viruses because I am the expert and I do a good job, not because of the control that I might give them. Postini doesn't compete in terms of accuracy, they compete by way of brand recognition and having many resellers. People don't use what they don't know, and you can clearly be tops in the business without having the best results. This same model goes for other services such as hosting and Internet access. The only way to operate successfully in the face of the shirts is to focus on results, relationships, and value added service. Anyone can jump on board the Postini model and start reselling hamburgers...I will continue serving steaks. Matt --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
ahh like Razor? -Nick David Barker wrote: Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as they emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch Engine in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able to use Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to me? Gary
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Gary Steiner wrote: If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Standing with both hands raised. We are a local government entity. AKA "Cheap" We can't even afford to put a staff member on scraping the bottom of the barrel. ;) As a side note, I am finding these types of conversations interesting. I'd vote "no" for a separate list for Service Providers to converse on this issue. Anything that affects pricing and Declude's future business model interests me. As an outside observer, I can understand the outrage at the profit sharing issue but I believe in the long run, the dollars will make the displeasure known. The majority will not agree to that structure and not use this "add-in." Thus Declude/Commtouch will not make money on it. I agree that Declude should focus on making the product better (fixing) and making it's money that way rather than spending time & resources forming some kind of business partnership with a new (to Declude users) company. I like the Firefox strategy. Make a good program, allow people to add things to it, find out what add-in most people like, integrate that into the next version. I use Imail as a negative example. They made they system a "suite" of stuff to justify a huge pricing increase. We hat to quickly upgrade at the due to security concerns but never used anything in the suite beyond the Imail server. People are moving over to SmarterMail. fProt and Declude appear to be moving in that direction too. :( Most of us probably chose Imail, Declude, fProt over their larger competitors because they were stripped down "get 'er done" applications. What does it do and how well does it do it. -- John Olden - Systems Administrator Champaign Park District --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
> A service provider program would be an interesting topic for discussion. > And probably this list is fine as all the active people appear to be I agree. > And fear that it will involve more expense as opposed to more revenues. > If > it genuinely involved more revenue then I am all for sharing it. Indeed. >From where I sit I see zero inclination on the part of my customers to spend more on "commodity" services relating to e-mail. It would need to be a revolutionary enhancement to service *and* this additional benefit would need to be immediately understood by my clients to have any chance of increasing revenues. I am *far* more interested in reducing costs (open source for example) than trying to ask my clients for more money. Having said that, I always try to keep an open mind and I will be very interested to hear more regardless of whether I participate. Paul Navarre --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Is this how the AV part of the program works and will it run when the other AV scanners run or is it only run once and then identified as either spam or a virus? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:11 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as they emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch Engine in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had > to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) > understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions > for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable > our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take > advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being > forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you > increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will > include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer > the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement > has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and > now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Gary Steiner >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? >> I see that its downloadable in my account, but it wo
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
David, Are components of the message hashed and some type of hash is sent to CommTouch for analysis? What ports/protocol does it communicate with CommTouch back on? How does one handle false positives? through Declude or directly to CommTouch? Is there a mechanism that if false positive is detected to do a what we call when using sniffer a rule panic? Is there a trial? Darrell David Barker writes: Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
A service provider program would be an interesting topic for discussion. And probably this list is fine as all the active people appear to be interested. Personally I am curious about ideas regarding this that everyone has. And fear that it will involve more expense as opposed to more revenues. If it genuinely involved more revenue then I am all for sharing it. It is just that I have yet to see an honest program out there. That does not mean that Declude cannot do it however. So I am curious Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 519-741-1222 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:06 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Robert, > > I did not say that Postini offered a poor service it was a > comment from Matt. My point was that the market is huge and > Declude with our existing customer base can be successful > with a very very small % of this market. The difference is > how we go about obtaining our share, this is part of the idea > behind the Service Provider Program. > > What I would like to see is some postive ideas as a community > on how this can best be done. > > Perhaps, I should set up a separate list for this discussion ? > > David B > www.declude.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert E. Spivack > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:08 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Correction David B, Postini offers a great product, it's > Declude with the product that is questionable. > > We switched most of our services over to Postini and have > been glad to avoid the bugs, crashes, and huge price hikes of > Declude. In comparison, as our Postini volume grows, our > costs are actually going down. > > Managed services is growing, but managed spam blocking and av > is actually stagnent. Postini and others (choose your > favorite leader) already have most the market. Just ask most > end-users --- it no longer is a question of "do you have av > or spam blocking protection" - most everyone does. It's a > tougher issue of how well does it work - "good enough" is > unfortunately the answer from many people and "not good > enough but I won't pay a dime more for something better" is > the answer from the rest. > > As evidenced by Postini, Microsoft, and other activity, the > CAGR growth is coming from enhanced services such as > archiving (SOX compliance), encryption, collaboration, and > other newer value-added email services. > > As mentioned by others, av scanning and spam blocking is commoditized. > > Sure, that doesn't mean there will not continue to be > incremental technology improvements and some smaller vendors > will eek out some growth continuing to offer slightly better > technical solutions, but in the overall market, the chance > for a big win by new players in av/spam blocking services is past. > > "game over" guys - time to come up with some new tricks > besides trying to squeeze your best advocates for more money. > > F-Prot, Declude, & who next will be hurting and trying > to survive by raising prices? In a commodity market with > many suppliers, that's not a winning strategy. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:09 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Matt, > > Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this > industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While > the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out > that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are > projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is > plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with > Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services > and help market and promote those services. This is the idea > behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're > being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the > small guys compete against the big guys. > > If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone > about the program please call or email: > > Arik [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Kristina [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > > From: [EMAIL
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Standing by... Darrell David Barker writes: Darrell, I am getting there :) David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would > David, I have asked as well as submitted a inquiry to support and others have asked "Is their a CommTouch trial" "How does it work" etc and none of those posts have been repsonded to. Can you please take a moment and answer a question that is within the scope of this "forumn". Darrell --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Darrell, It is not a DNS test. Commtouch analyzes large volumes of Internet traffic in real time. New spam and Malware outbreaks are identified as soon as they emerge, and recorded in the Commtouch Detection Center. The Commtouch Engine in Declude queries the Commtouch Detection Center and receives a message classification in real-time. The result is instant protection from new outbreaks. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:32 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had > to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) > understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions > for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable > our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take > advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being > forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you > increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will > include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer > the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement > has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and > now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Gary Steiner >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? >> I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to >> know > what I'm >> getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. >> >> The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are >> especially > confusing. >> >> https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 >> >> Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Darrell, I am getting there :) David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, > function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would > > David, I have asked as well as submitted a inquiry to support and others have asked "Is their a CommTouch trial" "How does it work" etc and none of those posts have been repsonded to. Can you please take a moment and answer a question that is within the scope of this "forumn". Darrell --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Robert, I did not say that Postini offered a poor service it was a comment from Matt. My point was that the market is huge and Declude with our existing customer base can be successful with a very very small % of this market. The difference is how we go about obtaining our share, this is part of the idea behind the Service Provider Program. What I would like to see is some postive ideas as a community on how this can best be done. Perhaps, I should set up a separate list for this discussion ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. Spivack Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:08 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Correction David B, Postini offers a great product, it's Declude with the product that is questionable. We switched most of our services over to Postini and have been glad to avoid the bugs, crashes, and huge price hikes of Declude. In comparison, as our Postini volume grows, our costs are actually going down. Managed services is growing, but managed spam blocking and av is actually stagnent. Postini and others (choose your favorite leader) already have most the market. Just ask most end-users --- it no longer is a question of "do you have av or spam blocking protection" - most everyone does. It's a tougher issue of how well does it work - "good enough" is unfortunately the answer from many people and "not good enough but I won't pay a dime more for something better" is the answer from the rest. As evidenced by Postini, Microsoft, and other activity, the CAGR growth is coming from enhanced services such as archiving (SOX compliance), encryption, collaboration, and other newer value-added email services. As mentioned by others, av scanning and spam blocking is commoditized. Sure, that doesn't mean there will not continue to be incremental technology improvements and some smaller vendors will eek out some growth continuing to offer slightly better technical solutions, but in the overall market, the chance for a big win by new players in av/spam blocking services is past. "game over" guys - time to come up with some new tricks besides trying to squeeze your best advocates for more money. F-Prot, Declude, & who next will be hurting and trying to survive by raising prices? In a commodity market with many suppliers, that's not a winning strategy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would > David, I have asked as well as submitted a inquiry to support and others have asked "Is their a CommTouch trial" "How does it work" etc and none of those posts have been repsonded to. Can you please take a moment and answer a question that is within the scope of this "forumn". Darrell --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Glenn, Many of the bugs that are in 1.81 have been fixed with further releases, the reason you do not see the bugs is that they are not obvious under the single application, ie. Declude.exe when it crashes it just drops the message back in the spool whereas with the service these messages are moved to the \review folder. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Zajicek Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Exactly. I'm still running Declude Version 1.81. *Every* time I've almost gone for an update/upgrade, there comes a surge of "issues" reported on this list. I simply DO NOT have time to deal with trying to figure out which reported bugs may or may not affect me, watching for / SEARCHING for the fixes. There's also the issue of sheer confusion on what Version IS the latest one with the FEWEST bugs, what ARE those bugs, and how an upgrade will impact (read: break) my working configuration with Imail 7.15 (I can't upgrade Imail because that's one of the items for which I no longer can afford support/maintenance). -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:23:01 -0500 > > >What irks me more is not having things fixed in the existing Declude, >such as the broken image spam problem. I'd like to see Declude fix >their base product before spending time enhancing it. I'm not griping >-- just making an observation. > > > > > > > >--- >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type >"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at >http://www.mail-archive.com. > > Sent via the WebMail system at wcnet.net --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
It's not a big issue, it is something that occurred on very rare occasions. It is really minor. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Thanks David Is the global variable correction important enough to upgrade from 4.2.20? Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 519-741-1222 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Gary, > > 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being initialized > more than once has been corrected. > > You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join our > Service Provide Program you can choose not too participate. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:21 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your > web page that shows up when I log in to my account. > > What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to > service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing > list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. > > Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined > before you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading > the list is extremely curious as to what the revenue share program > really is, and when it does come out, unless you hear exclamations of > "What a Bargain" > coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program. > > Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or > reasons to upgrade to 4.3? > > > > Original Message > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > Gary, > > > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to > Declude will be > > in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection > > and additional spam identifying technology such as > Recurrent Pattern > > Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a > > leading technology in email outbreak detection. > > > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and > > will provide the details to this when it is ready. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy > customer use > > Commtouch? > > > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an > add-on, what > > are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude > > alone does not? > > > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was > > spelled out somewhere. > > > > > > > > Original Message > > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service > Providers > > > we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service > Providers After 1 > > > June > > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in > component. > > > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before > 1 June 06) > > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share > program, thi
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Don, "in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a subject" Let me reiterate just for those who may have missed my earlier post. Be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the Service Provider Program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have communicated our intention to the lists and what seems to have happened is that the majority of the posts have been negative. I am surprised that only a handful of people have taken up our offer to discuss this with us but rather post to the boards how this is such a bad decision on our part without knowing the facts. If as Service Providers you are losing money, clearly something needs to change. It is hard for me to accept that the reason Service Providers are not making money is because of Declude. We have not finalized our program yet and are looking for some constructive feedback from our Service Providers in order to make this a successful program, that will benefit both Declude and you. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Brown Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 A friend of mine was one of the original founders of Bridge Data. They were the first folks to take the Wall Street Ticker and resell it using DEC PDP 1170, 1134, 1144, etc., to ADP, Traders, Brokerages and others. Bridge owned SAVVIS and some other related entities and they were a publicly traded company. During that time, not many years ago, I saw a long article in a St. Louis business journal, where the CEO quoted similar numbers which were also projected by some 3rd Party consultancy Group. He added his own forecast about increases in head count and revenue. He was a well educated and bright individual and he wasn't a pup, when it came to running a company. He had tenure and a track record. Less than a year after the date of the article, Bridge filed for Bankruptcy. You'll note I didn't say "bankruptcy protection." In contrast, no amount of protection could saved the enterprise. There is a moral to this story. Whenever a company doesn't listen to the customer, or in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a subject, which the company itself made most topical, then I can point to the foregoing and many other examples of what to expect in the future. Personally, I am disappointed in where I see Declude now and where I see it going. The lack of good flowing communications to/from the customer base about new releases, bug fixes, etc. and, particularly, the lack of a properly orchestrated roll-out of this new product enhancement/add-on, says that the organization is disjointed, disorganized and that major changes are not well thought out and prepared for in advance, nor well managed as brush fire on the back side. The people expressing concerns, asking questions and wanting an audience are your active customers. Keep telling them to go away and they will. How many times is Declude going to kick itself in the chins with steel toed combat boots before someone there gets it? Thanks, Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 4:19:51 PM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> Just as a side note. I have provided the contact information if you DB> have any further questions about the upcoming program, please be DB> reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, DB> function, features of our software, not Declude's strategy of marketing & sales programs. DB> Thanks DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> -Original Message- DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DB> David Barker DB> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB> Matt, DB> Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, DB> CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may DB> seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like DB> Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in DB> revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if DB> Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer DB> premium services and help market and promote those services. This is DB> the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're DB> being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. DB> If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about D
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Thanks David Is the global variable correction important enough to upgrade from 4.2.20? Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet & Computer Services 519-741-1222 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Gary, > > 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being > initialized more than once has been corrected. > > You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join > our Service Provide Program you can choose not too participate. > > David B > www.declude.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:21 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part > of your web page that shows up when I log in to my account. > > What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions > apply to service providers." If there is anyone subscribed > to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please > raise your hand. > > Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing > defined before you introduce the product? I'm sure that > everyone here reading the list is extremely curious as to > what the revenue share program really is, and when it does > come out, unless you hear exclamations of "What a Bargain" > coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program. > > Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features > or reasons to upgrade to 4.3? > > > > Original Message > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > Gary, > > > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to > Declude will be > > in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection > > and additional spam identifying technology such as > Recurrent Pattern > > Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a > > leading technology in email outbreak detection. > > > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and > > will provide the details to this when it is ready. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy > customer use > > Commtouch? > > > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an > add-on, what > > are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude > > alone does not? > > > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was > > spelled out somewhere. > > > > > > > > Original Message > > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service > Providers > > > we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service > Providers After 1 > > > June > > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in > component. > > > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before > 1 June 06) > > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share > program, this > > > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > > > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your > business, > > > by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which > > > would be independent of Imail/SmarterMai
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Gary, 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being initialized more than once has been corrected. You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join our Service Provide Program you can choose not too participate. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:21 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your web page that shows up when I log in to my account. What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined before you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading the list is extremely curious as to what the revenue share program really is, and when it does come out, unless you hear exclamations of "What a Bargain" coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program. Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or reasons to upgrade to 4.3? Original Message > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Gary, > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be > in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection > and additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern > Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a > leading technology in email outbreak detection. > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and > will provide the details to this when it is ready. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use > Commtouch? > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what > are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude > alone does not? > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was > spelled out somewhere. > > > > -------- Original Message > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers > > we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 > > June > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, > > by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which > > would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > John T > > (Lists) > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > > As of June 1, 2
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
If we could get away with it, we wouldn't offer any e-mail service. There is more tech support overhead and other costs with e-mail than everything else combined. Unfortunately, not offering e-mail and Spam/Virus protection is not an option, from a competitive stand-point. Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 10:22:00 PM, Kevin Bilbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: KB> KB> KB> Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a KB> lost leader/not a revenue builder. KB> KB> KB> KB> If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? KB> KB> KB> KB> KB> KB> KB> KB> Kevin Bilbee KB> KB> --- KB> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To KB> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and KB> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found KB> at http://www.mail-archive.com. Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inetconcepts.net (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message Kevin, Mainly because in order to get other types of business that may bring revenue (hosting, etc) this type of service is expected. Look at any ISP/hosting provider that is offering $5.00 a month hosting plans this is what everyone competes with. Could you imagine yourself (consumer or small business) signing up with a hosting provider and them not handling your email or even better not virus scanning it? Even with yahoo/gmail you get free spam filtering and virus scanning. Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
Also, to piggy back on this - we would like to know exactly how this works. Is something downloaded to your system is it DNS based etc? Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ? -David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had > to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) > understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions > for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable > our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take > advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being > forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you > increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will > include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer > the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement > has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and > now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Gary Steiner >> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 >> >> I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? >> I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to >> know > what I'm >> getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. >> >> The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are >> especially > confusing. >> >> https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 >> >> Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my >> reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able >> to > use >> Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it >> to > me? >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> >> --- >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type >> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at >> http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, >
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Hi Gary, What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Hand !!! We are a school. Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo netherlands t +31 74 255 06 10 / f +31 74 255 06 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Correction David B, Postini offers a great product, it's Declude with the product that is questionable. We switched most of our services over to Postini and have been glad to avoid the bugs, crashes, and huge price hikes of Declude. In comparison, as our Postini volume grows, our costs are actually going down. Managed services is growing, but managed spam blocking and av is actually stagnent. Postini and others (choose your favorite leader) already have most the market. Just ask most end-users --- it no longer is a question of "do you have av or spam blocking protection" - most everyone does. It's a tougher issue of how well does it work - "good enough" is unfortunately the answer from many people and "not good enough but I won't pay a dime more for something better" is the answer from the rest. As evidenced by Postini, Microsoft, and other activity, the CAGR growth is coming from enhanced services such as archiving (SOX compliance), encryption, collaboration, and other newer value-added email services. As mentioned by others, av scanning and spam blocking is commoditized. Sure, that doesn't mean there will not continue to be incremental technology improvements and some smaller vendors will eek out some growth continuing to offer slightly better technical solutions, but in the overall market, the chance for a big win by new players in av/spam blocking services is past. "game over" guys - time to come up with some new tricks besides trying to squeeze your best advocates for more money. F-Prot, Declude, & who next will be hurting and trying to survive by raising prices? In a commodity market with many suppliers, that's not a winning strategy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
1) as we know everyone can scan for viruses and for spam locally on their pc 2) so we tell them that when they do it on the server they save bandwidth and cost plus they don't have to waste time on setting it up locally and maintain it 3) so we charge a (small) per user fee per month for virus & spam protection 4) we move all spam to a special "spam" pop account so the customer sees how much gets filtered plus he has a change to review spam mail 4) we offer a 14 day trial for the service - after this everyone subscribes to it... The small fee should at least cover the cost of av/spam software involved, so when prices go up we look for other products that can do the same thing, or if we are satisfied with how it works (with spam) we don't renew the service agreement and stay at the current version But generally hosting business was more fun 5-6 years ago... Andrew Dave Beckstrom schrieb: Email only makes money for spammers. Declude and the other mail tools are an expense not a revenue generator. Adding CommTouch just adds to overhead without generating any revenue. I'm glad its an option and doesn't affect the rest of Declude. Declude is already at the upper limit of what we're willing to spend on a tool. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:51 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology in email outbreak detection. 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will provide the details to this when it is ready. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use Commtouch? Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does not? And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled out somewhere. Original Message From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Exactly. I'm still running Declude Version 1.81. *Every* time I've almost gone for an update/upgrade, there comes a surge of "issues" reported on this list. I simply DO NOT have time to deal with trying to figure out which reported bugs may or may not affect me, watching for / SEARCHING for the fixes. There's also the issue of sheer confusion on what Version IS the latest one with the FEWEST bugs, what ARE those bugs, and how an upgrade will impact (read: break) my working configuration with Imail 7.15 (I can't upgrade Imail because that's one of the items for which I no longer can afford support/maintenance). -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Beckstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:23:01 -0500 > > >What irks me more is not having things fixed in the existing Declude, such >as the broken image spam problem. I'd like to see Declude fix their base >product before spending time enhancing it. I'm not griping -- just making >an observation. > > > > > > > >--- >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > Sent via the WebMail system at wcnet.net --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
> > With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, > CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that > can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and > lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and > not available to people like me under reasonable terms. > > Matt > What irks me more is not having things fixed in the existing Declude, such as the broken image spam problem. I'd like to see Declude fix their base product before spending time enhancing it. I'm not griping -- just making an observation. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
I agree with this. I was also once a hosting provider which was ancillary to a business that I used to operate which required me to offer hosting. I added E-mail because I was sick of dealing with my customer's ISP's for their E-mail problems (lost passwords, poorly performing services, bad technical support, etc.). Then after several years of doing E-mail I ran into a problem where my customers were frequently getting infected by viruses and their virus infections were preventing them from exploiting the benefits of their Web presence...so I purchased Declude. Spam wasn't much of an issue then. Then a year later spam started becoming more of an issue and I started tweaking my Declude configs to try to block more, and I started running into the issues of false positives, plus although I was blocking more, the increase in volume was causing more to leak so my customers were complaining more and more. I bared down and eventually became an expert, and I decided then that instead of this being a cost to me (no one paid me for E-mail, just Web hosting and other services), I decided to turn it into a business. My largest source of revenue from this business just so happens to be from another Declude user who operates a Web hosting company. He was in the same place as I was, but he didn't have the patience or understanding to fix all of his issues, and I showed him how we could both profit from upselling the service and I fixed his false positive issues and made his server more manageable to boot. He still uses Declude and it is still free for his customers (who generally don't even know it is there), but many customers do want more and are willing to pay. Without offering this alternative, he would lose not just the revenue from MailPure that he shares, but also some of the customers that were unsatisfied with his standard Declude protection. I have four hosting providers that I work with now that resell my service, and two of those are current Declude customers. One tells me that he picks up customers because other customers tell their friends to come to his service because they have MailPure. Many of these guys are technically capable of doing better on their own, but they got into the business to host and or design Web sites and not to deal with spam and viruses just like me, and it is not easy to turn a profit from an expensive ancillary service offering without making a major change in focus (or skipping all of that and partnering with someone like me). CommTouch has zero possibility of generating revenue for businesses like my own even though I profit from offering the service unlike most service providers. This is why a revenue share with Declude is out of the question. The suggestions are that CommTouch will make experts out of novices in this game and allow some to become spam blocking businesses by simply adding better detection, but spam blocking businesses don't come packaged for people to plug-n-play. For most, spam and virus blocking will remain a cost center. Approaching this market with a revenue share licensing for a software add-on is overwhelming evidence of not understanding the market. With that said, as an add-on in the same regard as things like Sniffer, CommTouch might be a good solution (if it performs well) for those that can pay the $195/year, however it still irks me that after two years and lots of promises, these things are being added at an extra expense and not available to people like me under reasonable terms. Matt Paul Navarre wrote: *** Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? *** Is this a serious question? If you don't offer spam and virus filtering, you won't have any customers. In most markets the local competition offers it for free. The national competition certainly does (yahoo, google, earthlink etc). Many of us are fighting against low-priced inferior competition. The problem is that the average customer doesn't know that they are inferior. They *do* know how much they charge, and if they offer spam/virus protection and you don't it doesn't matter how poor the other guy's service is. They will leave. Sure, they will find out later how much the other guys suck, but how much time/effort/money will it cost to get them back? Chances are they'll try the next cut rate place instead of coming back to us anyway. Paul Navarre --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://w
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
1. Honestly, I don't know. 1b. The mail server would literally be overwhelmed and crash without it. 1c. Perhaps that's not a bad idea. That'd be one less target for the spammers to hit. 2. A significant number of our users don't use our mail. Many of those that don't aren't even aware they HAVE mail service, they use Yahoo or Hotmail or whatever. That's the only e-mail service they know. 2b. Those that do use the mail, a significant number of them aren't aware we have spam/virus protection. 2c. Many of those who use the mail, and either are or are not aware of the spam protection, are completely oblivious to how much spam there really is. They may get a handful of spams during a storm and call fussing about it. If they only knew ... 2d. Those who are aware of the protection, certainly wouldn't pay extra for it. They bitch already about the monthly rate, which is significantly higher than the $9.95 competition. Internet access nowadays is a commodity, not something for which one seeks out a quality service ... -- Original Message -- From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:22:00 -0700 >Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost >leader/not a revenue builder. > >If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus >protection? > > > >Kevin Bilbee > > >--- >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found >at http://www.mail-archive.com. > Sent via the WebMail system at wcnet.net --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
*** Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? *** Is this a serious question? If you don't offer spam and virus filtering, you won't have any customers. In most markets the local competition offers it for free. The national competition certainly does (yahoo, google, earthlink etc). Many of us are fighting against low-priced inferior competition. The problem is that the average customer doesn't know that they are inferior. They *do* know how much they charge, and if they offer spam/virus protection and you don't it doesn't matter how poor the other guy's service is. They will leave. Sure, they will find out later how much the other guys suck, but how much time/effort/money will it cost to get them back? Chances are they'll try the next cut rate place instead of coming back to us anyway. Paul Navarre --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Email only makes money for spammers. Declude and the other mail tools are an expense not a revenue generator. Adding CommTouch just adds to overhead without generating any revenue. I'm glad its an option and doesn't affect the rest of Declude. Declude is already at the upper limit of what we're willing to spend on a tool. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David > Barker > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:51 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Gary, > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in > violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and > additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection > Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology > in email outbreak detection. > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will > provide the details to this when it is ready. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use > Commtouch? > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are > the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does > not? > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled > out somewhere. > > > > ---- Original Message ---- > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by > > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be > > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > John T > > (Lists) > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > > As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not > > permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to > > customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established > with Declude. > > > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > > and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > > > John T > > eServices For You > > > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > Gary Steiner > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today > > > a
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message What exactly is protestion. let me see I think it shuld be protection!! Yea that is it, protection. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin BilbeeSent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:22 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Title: Message Question to thoes that are saying that spam/virus protestion is a lost leader/not a revenue builder. If it does not generate revenue then why don't you stop offering spam/virus protection? Kevin Bilbee ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
If E-mail with spam and virus protection is offered to our customers as a loss leader for an unrelated business, does this mean that CommTouch would pay us to use their product? (Negative revenue). - Original Message - What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 - Commtouch trial ?
-David, Just curious is there a free one-month test drive option for CommTouch or something similiar? As one of those pesky non-ISP's the $195 a year is pretty reasonable, but I'd really like to test drive it before I buy it. Not to be offensive, but I have no belief of the "100% no false positive" pitch and the "99.99+% spam catch rate" pitch. Trust me I get many a phone call hyping those terms. And I'll have to make that jump to Declude 4.x too. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:42 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able to use Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to me? Gary --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Another hand raised. End User (business) here. Apparantly I missed the Exchange memo. - Original Message - From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:20 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your web page that shows up when I log in to my account. What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined before you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading the list is extremely curious as to what the revenue share program really is, and when it does come out, unless you hear exclamations of "What a Bargain" coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program. Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or reasons to upgrade to 4.3? Original Message From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Gary, 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology in email outbreak detection. 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will provide the details to this when it is ready. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use Commtouch? Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does not? And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled out somewhere. Original Message > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not > permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to > customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
A friend of mine was one of the original founders of Bridge Data. They were the first folks to take the Wall Street Ticker and resell it using DEC PDP 1170, 1134, 1144, etc., to ADP, Traders, Brokerages and others. Bridge owned SAVVIS and some other related entities and they were a publicly traded company. During that time, not many years ago, I saw a long article in a St. Louis business journal, where the CEO quoted similar numbers which were also projected by some 3rd Party consultancy Group. He added his own forecast about increases in head count and revenue. He was a well educated and bright individual and he wasn't a pup, when it came to running a company. He had tenure and a track record. Less than a year after the date of the article, Bridge filed for Bankruptcy. You'll note I didn't say "bankruptcy protection." In contrast, no amount of protection could saved the enterprise. There is a moral to this story. Whenever a company doesn't listen to the customer, or in this case tells its most active customers that they should effectively refrain from discussing a subject, which the company itself made most topical, then I can point to the foregoing and many other examples of what to expect in the future. Personally, I am disappointed in where I see Declude now and where I see it going. The lack of good flowing communications to/from the customer base about new releases, bug fixes, etc. and, particularly, the lack of a properly orchestrated roll-out of this new product enhancement/add-on, says that the organization is disjointed, disorganized and that major changes are not well thought out and prepared for in advance, nor well managed as brush fire on the back side. The people expressing concerns, asking questions and wanting an audience are your active customers. Keep telling them to go away and they will. How many times is Declude going to kick itself in the chins with steel toed combat boots before someone there gets it? Thanks, Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 4:19:51 PM, David Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DB> Just as a side note. I have provided the contact information if you have any DB> further questions about the upcoming program, please be reminded that the DB> board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our DB> software, not Declude's strategy of marketing & sales programs. DB> Thanks DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> -Original Message- DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David DB> Barker DB> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB> Matt, DB> Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR DB> forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem DB> commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a DB> poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there DB> is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers DB> to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those DB> services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't DB> think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the DB> small guys compete against the big guys. DB> If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the DB> program please call or email: DB> Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> David B DB> www.declude.com DB> DB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt DB> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM DB> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 DB> David, DB> What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any DB> revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude DB> customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a DB> gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed DB> that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined DB> with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized DB> much of what we are doing. DB> I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of DB> reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with DB> those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing DB> what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and DB> tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. DB> Matt DB> David Barker wrote: DB> There are restrictions on CommTouch being
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
My hand is raised. Kevin Bilbee Standard Abrasives > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:21 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your > web page that shows up when I log in to my account. > > What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to > service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list > who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. > > Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined > before you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading > the list is extremely curious as to what the revenue share program > really is, and when it does come out, unless you hear exclamations of > "What a Bargain" coming off this list there won't be many of us joining > that program. > > Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or > reasons to upgrade to 4.3? > > > > Original Message > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > Gary, > > > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be > > in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection > > and additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern > > Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a > > leading technology in email outbreak detection. > > > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and > > will provide the details to this when it is ready. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use > > Commtouch? > > > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, > what > > are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude > > alone does not? > > > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was > > spelled out somewhere. > > > > > > > > Original Message > > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers > > > we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 > > > June > > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in > component. > > > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June > 06) > > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > > > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > > > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, > > > by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which > > > would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include > CommTouch. > > > > > > David B > > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > John T > > > (Lists) > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license > agreement: > > > > > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > > > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > > > License Agreeme
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part of your web page that shows up when I log in to my account. What I find particularly amusing is the line "Restrictions apply to service providers." If there is anyone subscribed to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please raise your hand. Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing defined before you introduce the product? I'm sure that everyone here reading the list is extremely curious as to what the revenue share program really is, and when it does come out, unless you hear exclamations of "What a Bargain" coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program. Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features or reasons to upgrade to 4.3? Original Message > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > Gary, > > 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in > violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. > > 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and > additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection > Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology > in email outbreak detection. > > 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will > provide the details to this when it is ready. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use > Commtouch? > > Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are > the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does > not? > > And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled > out somewhere. > > > > -------- Original Message > > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by > > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be > > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > John T > > (Lists) > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > > As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not > > permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to > > customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established > with Declude. > > > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > > and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > > > John T > > e
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David, There are only a handful of us that offer spam and virus blocking as an itemized service, the others that are service providers offer these things as expected services, and do so at great cost and labor. Most service providers generate no direct revenue from spam and virus blocking. For the few of us that do, none of us are projecting $100 million in revenues from the services, or even 1 million, much less that much in terms of profits. Declude doesn't generate my income. It is just one of many tools that I use. Adding CommTouch would not generate even $1 more in extra revenue for me either, so except for the possibility of saving my labor, there is no financial benefit to me adding it on. I would trial it if I thought that it could provide some benefit to what I already have (which is tough), but I would never share revenue with anyone that doesn't themselves help me generate revenue. Please note that I am trying to be nice here. This would really piss me off if I thought that it has any chance for success as a model going forward and it affected me, but it doesn't. The only thing it serves to do is reinforce the continuation of strange and unfortunate choices that have been made. There are plenty of software companies offering similar products that have much more normal licensing and pricing arrangements, and they clearly work. I would suggest that Declude innovate the product instead of innovating the licensing and pricing. Declude is not big enough of a company to defeat the lingua franca of the industries it operates within. Matt David Barker wrote: Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distrib
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Glenn, We do understand - which is exactly why we recognize that you cannot continue on the current path you are on today :) and as a Declude community we need to get creative. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:32 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 To give you guys over at Declude an idea of what is going on out here in the real world of small ISPs, there may be some small bit of revenue (meaning funds from paying customers) coming in here, but the operating costs have outweighed that for the last couple years. The owner has sunk over $100,000 of his personal funds into the business to keep it afloat. I've already eliminated software and hardware maintenance contracts on several things. Two employees have been eliminated and one cut to part-time (two days per week), on a staff that originally was an impressive grand total of six people. I have not had pay raise in four years. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina [EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
To give you guys over at Declude an idea of what is going on out here in the real world of small ISPs, there may be some small bit of revenue (meaning funds from paying customers) coming in here, but the operating costs have outweighed that for the last couple years. The owner has sunk over $100,000 of his personal funds into the business to keep it afloat. I've already eliminated software and hardware maintenance contracts on several things. Two employees have been eliminated and one cut to part-time (two days per week), on a staff that originally was an impressive grand total of six people. I have not had pay raise in four years. - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina [EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declu
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Just as a side note. I have provided the contact information if you have any further questions about the upcoming program, please be reminded that the board is designed for comments on performance, function, features of our software, not Declude's strategy of marketing & sales programs. Thanks David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Matt, Managed services is the fastest growing segment of this industry, CAGR forecasted at 25% per year through 2009. While the industry may seem commoditized, you have pointed out that businesses like Postini offer a poor product but are projecting $100,000,000 in revenues. So I'd say there is plenty of revenue to cannibalize if Declude works with Service Providers to empower them to offer premium services and help market and promote those services. This is the idea behind our Service Provider Program. I don't think we're being greedy, but rather trying to get creative and help the small guys compete against the big guys. If you have any questions or would like to speak to someone about the program please call or email: Arik[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kristina[EMAIL PROTECTED] David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:07 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it,
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
John, These are all very important questions which we will answer with the revenue share program. Please understand we are not forcing any existing customers to change, but rather are offering an alternative, this is why CommTouch is an add-on so that we do not place you in a position that will effect your current business model negatively. You will still have the choice of taking us up on our offer or not. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:40 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 David, lets say for the sake of discussion I wanted to use/purchase/license the Declude Gateway product with CommTouch as a "legacy" customer. Who and how is the revenue projected or actual derived from use of the CommTouch software/feature? Is Declude going to pay some one to audit my accounting? Do I have to pay some one to audit my accounting? Who or how is revenue going to be defined? If you ask my clients, it will depend. If their wife/husband/friend/associate at another company is getting lots and spam and he/she is not, they will say the service is valuable. But in the next second, if that important e-mail telling them about a change to the proposition they have been working on for 2 months is delayed, they will say the service is worthless. Are we going to have to keep a diary of when the service is valuable and when it is worthless to determine the percentage of revenue? And exactly how is that percentage going to be determined? Without spam filtering, our service is meaningless, yet it is by far not the only cost associated with our service. Or I am going to have to purchase some kind of software that will create a report showing by percentage how much spam was caught by the CommTouch software/feature compared to other tests? But what about spam that gets caught by a lot of different tests? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:42 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > enable our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and > will include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > transfer the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License > Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for > such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program > into another application and then distribute such to third parties > unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of > June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to > use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a > separate revenue share agreement has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > and now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today > > about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Gary, 1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to Declude will be in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service. 2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection and additional spam identifying technology such as Recurrent Pattern Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a leading technology in email outbreak detection. 3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and will provide the details to this when it is ready. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use Commtouch? Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does not? And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled out somewhere. Original Message > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we > had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June > 06) understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no > restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to > enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) > to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this > program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an > opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by > providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be > independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User > License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, > Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed > Program into another application and then distribute such to third > parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). > As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not > permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to > customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today > > about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to > > know > what I'm > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > > especially > confusing. > > > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my > > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be > > able to > use > > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it > > to > me? > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David, lets say for the sake of discussion I wanted to use/purchase/license the Declude Gateway product with CommTouch as a "legacy" customer. Who and how is the revenue projected or actual derived from use of the CommTouch software/feature? Is Declude going to pay some one to audit my accounting? Do I have to pay some one to audit my accounting? Who or how is revenue going to be defined? If you ask my clients, it will depend. If their wife/husband/friend/associate at another company is getting lots and spam and he/she is not, they will say the service is valuable. But in the next second, if that important e-mail telling them about a change to the proposition they have been working on for 2 months is delayed, they will say the service is worthless. Are we going to have to keep a diary of when the service is valuable and when it is worthless to determine the percentage of revenue? And exactly how is that percentage going to be determined? Without spam filtering, our service is meaningless, yet it is by far not the only cost associated with our service. Or I am going to have to purchase some kind of software that will create a report showing by percentage how much spam was caught by the CommTouch software/feature compared to other tests? But what about spam that gets caught by a lot of different tests? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David > Barker > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:42 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had > to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) > understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions > for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will > include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to > > know > what I'm > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > > especially > confusing. > > > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my > > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able > > to > use > > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it > > to > me? > > > > Gary > > > > > > > >
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Andy, Yes I agree with you. Since I have a perpetual license I have the right to use the last version that I acquire under a current service agreement FOREVER. Just like I can still continue to use Word 95 if I had purchased it and it would run on the hardware/os etc etc I was using "OWN" and "RIGHT TO USE FOREVER" interchangeably Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy > Schmidt > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:44 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > Goran, > > Actually, you do NOT own the software. The software vendor does (unless > they > wrote it "for hire"). > > With a paid-up, perpetual license you own the RIGHT to use the software > version you purchased without time restriction and without making > additional > payments - but that's all. > > An annual (or whatever term) licensee, will have to pay for each term. > > In either case, you will need to acquire a service agreement to obtain > more > current versions that what you originally pre-paid for. > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran > Jovanovic > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 03:24 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > John, > > That applies to the Version 4 product for the people who are renting it on > an annual basis. Check out section 2 on that page > > 2. Copyright and ownership > > Once you have acquired the Product, You own only the Media on which the > Software is recorded. You do not own the Software itself. The Software is > the exclusive property of Declude, Inc. The Software and the Documentation > are proprietary products of Declude, Inc. and are protected by copyright > and > other intellectual property rights. Declude, Inc. reserves the right to > maintain records of your installation. This may include the electronic > notification of your installation from your mail server, appliance or > gateway server to Declude, Inc. > > Us who have a perpetual license do not fall in this category. We own the > software and not just the media. So there must be another version of this > document for us perpetual users as this one dows not apply to us. > > Goran Jovanovic > Omega Network Solutions > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > John T > > (Lists) > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license > agreement: > > > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise > transfer > > the > > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License > Agreement > > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such > purposes > > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's > and > > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to > clean > > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share > agreement > > has > > been established with Declude. > > > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software > and > > now > > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > > > John T > > eServices For You > > > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gary > > > Steiner > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today > about > > Declude 4.3? > > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to > know > > what I'm > > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > > especially > > co
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. Excellent! Thanks for the reply - -Nick --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy customer use Commtouch? Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an add-on, what are the benefits of having Commtouch? What does it do that Declude alone does not? And of course it would be nice if this "revenue share program" was spelled out somewhere. Original Message > From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had > to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) > understand the licensing restrictions. > > Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions > for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. > > However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our > legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage > of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced > onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase > revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the > Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will > include CommTouch. > > David B > www.declude.com > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Gary Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to > > know > what I'm > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > > especially > confusing. > > > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my > > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able > > to > use > > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it > > to > me? > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, > just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe > Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David, What makes the good folk at Declude and CommTouch believe that there is any revenue to share? For the majority of service providers that are Declude customers, spam blocking is a 100% cost center, and for the few that offer a gateway service, none of us are getting rich, in fact the astounding greed that software companies have presented us with in the last 5 years combined with competitive pressures of cheap or even free services has commoditized much of what we are doing. I have absolutely no revenue to share with Declude or CommTouch outside of reasonable software licensing fees. The only revenue that I share is with those that generate business for my company. If I get rich off of doing what I am doing, it will be primarily the result of my blood, sweat and tears, otherwise there would be 10,000 others just like me. Matt David Barker wrote: There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able to use Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to me? Gary --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Goran, Actually, you do NOT own the software. The software vendor does (unless they wrote it "for hire"). With a paid-up, perpetual license you own the RIGHT to use the software version you purchased without time restriction and without making additional payments - but that's all. An annual (or whatever term) licensee, will have to pay for each term. In either case, you will need to acquire a service agreement to obtain more current versions that what you originally pre-paid for. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 03:24 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 John, That applies to the Version 4 product for the people who are renting it on an annual basis. Check out section 2 on that page 2. Copyright and ownership Once you have acquired the Product, You own only the Media on which the Software is recorded. You do not own the Software itself. The Software is the exclusive property of Declude, Inc. The Software and the Documentation are proprietary products of Declude, Inc. and are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. Declude, Inc. reserves the right to maintain records of your installation. This may include the electronic notification of your installation from your mail server, appliance or gateway server to Declude, Inc. Us who have a perpetual license do not fall in this category. We own the software and not just the media. So there must be another version of this document for us perpetual users as this one dows not apply to us. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer > the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement > has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and > now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > > Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know > what I'm > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > especially > confusing. > > > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my > > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able > to > use > > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to > me? > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service Providers we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service Providers After 1 June 06) understand the licensing restrictions. Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in component. However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 1 June 06) to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share program, this program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your business, by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will include CommTouch. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gary Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to > know what I'm > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > especially confusing. > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able > to use > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it > to me? > > Gary > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
David - at Declude - Would you kindly comment on this? Also on what is Declude 4.3? -Nick John T (Lists) wrote: I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able to use Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to me? Gary --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
John, That applies to the Version 4 product for the people who are renting it on an annual basis. Check out section 2 on that page 2. Copyright and ownership Once you have acquired the Product, You own only the Media on which the Software is recorded. You do not own the Software itself. The Software is the exclusive property of Declude, Inc. The Software and the Documentation are proprietary products of Declude, Inc. and are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. Declude, Inc. reserves the right to maintain records of your installation. This may include the electronic notification of your installation from your mail server, appliance or gateway server to Declude, Inc. Us who have a perpetual license do not fall in this category. We own the software and not just the media. So there must be another version of this document for us perpetual users as this one dows not apply to us. Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T > (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: > > 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer > the > Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement > unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes > (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another > application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first > acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and > other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean > and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement > has > been established with Declude. > > http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 > > Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and > now > have to pay them some of your meager profits? > > John T > eServices For You > > "Seek, and ye shall find!" > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > > Steiner > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? > > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know > what I'm > > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are > especially > confusing. > > > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my > > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able > to > use > > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to > me? > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
Well the definition says: "As a service provider (definition: a business which provides their customers with delivery of their Email communications and/or users with access to their own Email)" We are all businesses of one sort or another - Check We all provide our customers (internal or external) with delivery of email - Check So I agree can any one of us use this product? Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 2:24 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about > Declude 4.3? I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be > nice to know what I'm getting before I install it, especially the new > Commtouch stuff. > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially > confusing. > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? > Based on my reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever > be able to use Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please > explain it to me? > > Gary > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the license agreement: 3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this End-User License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License from Declude, Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed the Licensed Program into another application and then distribute such to third parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from Declude, Inc.). As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers are not permitted to use Declude software to clean and forward mail to customers unless a separate revenue share agreement has been established with Declude. http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=121 Is Declude trying to put us out of business? We pay for the software and now have to pay them some of your meager profits? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary > Steiner > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 11:24 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3 > > I guess someone is going to make an official announcement today about Declude 4.3? > I see that its downloadable in my account, but it would be nice to know what I'm > getting before I install it, especially the new Commtouch stuff. > > The "Restrictions" listed next to the Add Commtouch section are especially confusing. > > https://www.declude.com/articles.asp?ID=205 > > Who would use Declude and not fit the definitions of the restrictions? Based on my > reading of the Restrictions, nobody who uses Declude will ever be able to use > Commtouch. If I am misreading this, would someone please explain it to me? > > Gary > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.