Re: [expert] Twiki (semi-hijack)

2003-11-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 4:42 pm, Bill Mullen wrote:

 BTW, I just added an Advanced POPfile Configuration section to
 the existing POPfile page. Let me know if it isn't as clear as it
 could be.

It certainly looks clear.  I think I should take a look at that as 
soon as I can spare the time.  It looks possibly more efficient, 
although I have no complaints about it whatsoever.

Are there any big advantages in upgrading the version?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] /etc/hosts and dns

2003-11-10 Thread Richard Urwin
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 2:18 am, Greg Meyer wrote:
 I have a laptop that connects to my office e-mail server as an IMAP client.
 Sometimes I am outside the firewall, and in this case, I can connect to the
 server using the server's fqdn.  When I am inside the firewall, I can
 connect to the server by making an entry in my /etc/hosts file for it that
 aliases it's private ip to it's netbios name (it is an Exchange 5.5
 server).  In order to connect, I simply change the servername in kmail
 depending on where I am.

 So now my question, is there any way to set up my hosts/resolv.conf/tmdns
 to look for the server in the local network first and if it cannot find it
 to look it up in the DNS so that I don't have to constantly change the
 setup in kmail?

 Since the local addressing scheme in place at my company is quite unique I
 would even be open to doing something like having a script called in
 rc.local check to see what the network ip block of the local network is and
 writing out a hosts file that would have an entry for the server if I am on
 the right network, although I have no idea how to actually implement that.

You mean something like:

cp /etc/hosts.base /etc/hosts
if (/sbin/ifconfig eth0 | grep 192.168.7/dev/null)
then cat /etc/hosts.extra  /etc/hosts
fi

(test it first, of course)
HTH

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is running 
in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is 
identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to 
identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!

These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text.  Generally 
they are viagra messages.  The one that really galls me is one that uses the 
name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the actual proper spelling. 
 
Nonetheless, this shouldn't matter...or so one would think.  

I have now run sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur twice on this message.  
It comes back saying it learned from the message.  About 10 minutes later 
that damn message is back and spamassassin let it come right through.  

What the hell?  I REALLY want to nuke the computer from which this comes.  I 
was doing so well there with nary a spam for weeks getting through, then 
something inane and seemingly simple like this gets through inspite of 
teaching spamassassin to recognize it as crap.

Since spamassassin appears to be falling down on the job, what would be a nice 
generic procmail recipe that would recognize EITHER iteration of viagra 
spelling (in the body or subject) and pass it, no pass go, to /dev/null?  I 
never ever ever want to see another damn viagra message of any kind ever 
again.  

Thank you for any aid in this endeavor.

praedor
- -- 
Our ship is in the hands of pilots who are steering directly under full sail 
for a rock.  The whole crew may see this course to violate our liberties in 
full view if they look the right way.
- --Samuel Adams, 1771
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/r+aQaKr9sJYeTxgRAovJAKCiMudQ74dH+XHBd6iS1MQFxMAE4ACgj3CV
8Rsqd9AcxFtWyG6Iu6/Ejrc=
=PDDb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] /etc/hosts and dns

2003-11-10 Thread Kwan Lowe

 I have a laptop that connects to my office e-mail server as an IMAP
 client. Sometimes I am outside the firewall, and in this case, I can
 connect to the server using the server's fqdn.  When I am inside the
 firewall, I can connect to the server by making an entry in my /etc/hosts
 file for it that aliases it's private ip to it's netbios name (it is an
 Exchange 5.5 server).  In order to connect, I simply change the servername
 in kmail depending on where I am.

 So now my question, is there any way to set up my hosts/resolv.conf/tmdns
 to look for the server in the local network first and if it cannot find
 it to look it up in the DNS so that I don't have to constantly change the
 setup in kmail?

 Since the local addressing scheme in place at my company is quite unique
 I would even be open to doing something like having a script called in
 rc.local check to see what the network ip block of the local network is
 and writing out a hosts file that would have an entry for the server if I
 am on the right network, although I have no idea how to actually implement
 that.


There are a couple ways to do this. IMHO, there's an easy way and a
correct way and it's not clear which is which :)

The quick way would be to write a script based on the IP address that you
receive. You could either parse ifconfig or do something when your dhcp
client returns. You could also put in a specific configuration for your
MAC address inside the DHCP server itself. However, these all have
inherent disadvantages.

The way I'd do it is to set up a DNS view for the internal and external
networks. Machines on the inside would receive the private non-routable
address when querying the nameserver for mail.domainname.com. External
machines would receive the public IP address.

For example in the named.conf:

view internal {
   // This should match our internal networks.
  match-clients { localnets; };
  recursion yes;
  zone domainname.com {
type master;
file pz/db.internal;
};
}

view external {
  match-clients { any; };
  recursion no;
  zone domainname.com {
  type master;
  file pz/db.domainname.com;
  };
}


-- 
The Digital Hermit  Unix and Linux Solutions
http://www.digitalhermit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:59:06 +
Richard Urwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:

  dd is probably all anyone on Linux needs, but doesn't have menus and a
  pretty face. The M$ware may be able to do conversion if the source and
  destination don't have matching CHS? I use DFSee myself, used to use
  Partition Magic, never Ghost or Drive Image.
 
 The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the destination drive
 will be identical to the source drive. If, like most people, you've bought
 a bigger disk, then that's hard luck. The partition table will show it as
 the same size as the old disk. I don't know where the actual full size of
 the disk is calculated so you might be able to add new partitions later,
 or you may not.
 
 I would always prefer to use tar (with the correct magic flags) to copy 
 drives.
 
 (Ghost does handle different size disks, but does it handle your
 filesystem? And it does cost money, or did the last I heard.)

Partition Image only copies the actual data on the drive and either does a
.gz or .bz2 file.  It can break down files into multiple sizes, for example
I burn to CD's as a stable backup.  It will allow you to restore to
different partition sizes, provided there is enough room for the data.

And is it GPL free software.  URPMI partimage or http://www.partimage.org

Tim

-- 
 _
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
 x registered Linux user # 329428
/ \ GnuPG KeyID 6B5A70DF www.keyserver.net


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Kwan Lowe

 These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text.
 Generally
 they are viagra messages.  The one that really galls me is one that uses
 the
 name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the actual proper 
 spelling.
 Nonetheless, this shouldn't matter...or so one would think.

I understand your pain.  Last week my servers received over 3,000 spam
messages, of which almost 100 made it past the spamfilters. Here's one
site that has interesting approach:

http://bleaklow.com/blog/archive/23.html

You could add the obfuscated strings to look specifically for those
misspellings.

-- 
The Digital Hermit  Unix and Linux Solutions
http://www.digitalhermit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:27:12 -0500
Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is
 running in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that
 is identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
 
 identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!
 
 These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text. 
 Generally they are viagra messages.  The one that really galls me is one
 that uses the name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the actual 
 proper
 spelling.  Nonetheless, this shouldn't matter...or so one would think.  
 
 I have now run sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur twice on this
 message.  It comes back saying it learned from the message.  About 10
 minutes later that damn message is back and spamassassin let it come right
 through.  
 
 What the hell?  I REALLY want to nuke the computer from which this comes. 
 I was doing so well there with nary a spam for weeks getting through, then
 
 something inane and seemingly simple like this gets through inspite of 
 teaching spamassassin to recognize it as crap.
 
 Since spamassassin appears to be falling down on the job, what would be a
 nice generic procmail recipe that would recognize EITHER iteration of
 viagra spelling (in the body or subject) and pass it, no pass go, to
 /dev/null?  I never ever ever want to see another damn viagra message of
 any kind ever again.  
 
 Thank you for any aid in this endeavor.
 
 praedor
 - -- 
 Our ship is in the hands of pilots who are steering directly under full
 sail for a rock.  The whole crew may see this course to violate our
 liberties in full view if they look the right way.
 - --Samuel Adams, 1771
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/r+aQaKr9sJYeTxgRAovJAKCiMudQ74dH+XHBd6iS1MQFxMAE4ACgj3CV
 8Rsqd9AcxFtWyG6Iu6/Ejrc=
 =PDDb
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 

By latest do you mean 2.55 or 2.60? 
With 2.60 you have to run sa-learn --import to update the Bayesian
database. 

Tim

-- 
 _
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
 x registered Linux user # 329428
/ \ GnuPG KeyID 6B5A70DF www.keyserver.net


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Jack Coates
try joining the spamassassin user's list and asking about tuning.

On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 11:27, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is running 
 in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is 
 identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to 
 identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!
 
 These are tricky html or other type of spam, they are plain text.  Generally 
 they are viagra messages.  The one that really galls me is one that uses the 
 name [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of the actual proper 
 spelling.  
 Nonetheless, this shouldn't matter...or so one would think.  
 
 I have now run sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur twice on this message.  
 It comes back saying it learned from the message.  About 10 minutes later 
 that damn message is back and spamassassin let it come right through.  
 
 What the hell?  I REALLY want to nuke the computer from which this comes.  I 
 was doing so well there with nary a spam for weeks getting through, then 
 something inane and seemingly simple like this gets through inspite of 
 teaching spamassassin to recognize it as crap.
 
 Since spamassassin appears to be falling down on the job, what would be a nice 
 generic procmail recipe that would recognize EITHER iteration of viagra 
 spelling (in the body or subject) and pass it, no pass go, to /dev/null?  I 
 never ever ever want to see another damn viagra message of any kind ever 
 again.  
 
 Thank you for any aid in this endeavor.
 
 praedor
 - -- 
 Our ship is in the hands of pilots who are steering directly under full sail 
 for a rock.  The whole crew may see this course to violate our liberties in 
 full view if they look the right way.
 - --Samuel Adams, 1771
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/r+aQaKr9sJYeTxgRAovJAKCiMudQ74dH+XHBd6iS1MQFxMAE4ACgj3CV
 8Rsqd9AcxFtWyG6Iu6/Ejrc=
 =PDDb
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 6:59 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
 On Monday 10 Nov 2003 6:24 am, Felix Miata wrote:
  Anne Wilson wrote:
   On Monday 10 Nov 2003 5:23 am, Michael Noble wrote:
It has been a while since I last dd a disk drive (it is best
to make them the same type and size).  Assuming that the old
disk is /dev/hda and the new disk is /dev/hdb the following
command should work:
   
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb
  
   I've heard people recommend this before, but I'm not sure why
   this is better than cp -a ?  I do remember that the last time I
   tried to copy a whole directory to a new partition I had some
   problems before I got it right, so I want to be clear before I
   start.
 
  AFAIK, cp can only copy files from a mounted partition to a
  mounted partition. dd can copy anything anywhere that there exist
  sectors to read  write. The example above should copy the MBR
  and partition tables, as well as all files on all partitions.
 
Then make the new disk /dev/hda and the system should boot. 
As I said it has been a while and may have the basic command
a little off.  But the original (noisy) drive will still be
in working order.
   
If you have it, I have also heard that the latest Norton
Ghost will also work.
  
   This is really a much better way, but I don't have the latest
   Norton Ghost.  My Drive Image is not the latest, either.  Is
   there not a linux tool that tackles it in a similar way, rather
   than just copying files?
 
  dd is probably all anyone on Linux needs, but doesn't have menus
  and a pretty face. The M$ware may be able to do conversion if the
  source and destination don't have matching CHS? I use DFSee
  myself, used to use Partition Magic, never Ghost or Drive Image.

 The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the destination
 drive will be identical to the source drive. If, like most people,
 you've bought a bigger disk, then that's hard luck. The partition
 table will show it as the same size as the old disk. I don't know
 where the actual full size of the disk is calculated so you might
 be able to add new partitions later, or you may not.

Hmm - I have actually only used around half of this drive, saving the 
rest for later :-)  I wonder if it would be sensible, then, to create 
one large partition in the remaining space, which can be deleted and 
allocated as necessary, later?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 11:23 am, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
 On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:59:06 +

 Richard Urwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic 
parchment:
   dd is probably all anyone on Linux needs, but doesn't have
   menus and a pretty face. The M$ware may be able to do
   conversion if the source and destination don't have matching
   CHS? I use DFSee myself, used to use Partition Magic, never
   Ghost or Drive Image.
 
  The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the
  destination drive will be identical to the source drive. If, like
  most people, you've bought a bigger disk, then that's hard luck.
  The partition table will show it as the same size as the old
  disk. I don't know where the actual full size of the disk is
  calculated so you might be able to add new partitions later, or
  you may not.
 
  I would always prefer to use tar (with the correct magic flags)
  to copy drives.
 
  (Ghost does handle different size disks, but does it handle your
  filesystem? And it does cost money, or did the last I heard.)

 Partition Image only copies the actual data on the drive and either
 does a .gz or .bz2 file.  It can break down files into multiple
 sizes, for example I burn to CD's as a stable backup.  

It has to be worth looking at, if only for that excellent reason.

 It will
 allow you to restore to different partition sizes, provided there
 is enough room for the data.

 And is it GPL free software.  URPMI partimage or
 http://www.partimage.org

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Schwartz Avi
On Nov 10, 2003, at 13:27, Praedor Atrebates wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is 
running
in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that is
identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!

I don't know how you set spamassasin, but in my installation all it 
does is tag the message as spam in the headers and I still had to 
create a rule (in my case using sieve) to move all this garbage to a 
spam folder.

Avi


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Frickin spam and spamassassin

2003-11-10 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Monday 10 November 2003 02:27 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 OK, this really irritates me.  I have the latest spamassassin.  It is
 running in daemon mode.  I have procmail setup to /dev/null anything that
 is identified as spam.  I have trained the Bayesian filter (supposedly) to
 identify certain messages as spam...BUT THEY KEEP GETTING THROUGH!

You are relying too much on pure filtering checks.  Spammers run their 
messages against SA in order to figure out what types of changes can make it 
past the stock filters.  

I rely much more heavily on DNSBL checks, and filter out messages from known 
spam sources, open relays, open proxies, etc.  As a result, I get much less 
spam passing by my SA filters.  As of one week from yesterday, I have ~2000 
messages, about 1600 of those are spam and only 1 was a false negative that 
managed to squeak past the filter.  Only 4 false positives and those were 
trivial matches from the mailing list where someone is sending through a 
known open relay.

Beef up your DNSBL scores and I guarantee that the number that squeak by will 
drop.
-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Sridhar G
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 9:27 am, Felix Miata wrote:

Anne Wilson wrote:

On Monday 10 Nov 2003 6:24 am, Felix Miata wrote:

Anne Wilson wrote:

On Monday 10 Nov 2003 5:23 am, Michael Noble wrote:

dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb
dd can copy anything anywhere that there exist sectors
to read  write. The example above should copy the MBR and
partition tables, as well as all files on all partitions.
That sounds good.  But how do I handle the various partitions? 
Do I partition the new drive first?  And format them?
That command copies all sectors, including partition table sectors,
like when you do 'dd if=somefloppyimage of=/dev/fd0' to create an
installation diskette. AFAIK, it's exactly what the very first
Ghost or Partition Image versions would have done.


Right.  I'm going to try Charlie's suggestion of changing the cpu fan 
first, just in case that's all it is.  If it isn't that, I'll get a 
new drive and try dd.  Thanks for the help

Anne



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Anne,

I had a similar problem with my 6 months old IBM HD. According to IBM's 
website the problem goes away after you reformat the drive. I tried it 
and it worked. If your's is an IBM try this after backing up the data.

-Sridhar




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Felix Miata
Richard Urwin wrote:
 
 The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the destination drive will
 be identical to the source drive.

No it won't. Everything from the first sector through the last sector #
on the old disk will be identical, which is not the same thing.

 If, like most people, you've bought a
 bigger disk, then that's hard luck. The partition table will show it as the
 same size as the old disk.

No, it will show identical use, which is not the same thing. The new
will have unallocated space beyond the last sector # used on the old
disk. You can make one or more new partitions out of that space without
any impact on the contents of any previous partitions.
-- 
God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.
1 Peter 5:5 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/partitioningindex.html


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 23:31, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Monday 10 Nov 2003 7:08 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
 
  partimage you do have that one. It's only a urpmi away.
 
 Fine.  Is it well documented?
 
 Anne

Yes, considering that I could use it.  And I can top the thick headed
list when needed. One thing I found useful is to have it on a floppy, as
the version I used couldn't image a mounted partition.  In fact now that
I think of it partimage is on Knoppix as well so if you have that
one. 

james
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 9:24 pm, Felix Miata wrote:
 Richard Urwin wrote:
  The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the
  destination drive will be identical to the source drive.

 No it won't. Everything from the first sector through the last
 sector # on the old disk will be identical, which is not the same
 thing.

  If, like most people, you've bought a
  bigger disk, then that's hard luck. The partition table will show
  it as the same size as the old disk.

 No, it will show identical use, which is not the same thing. The
 new will have unallocated space beyond the last sector # used on
 the old disk. You can make one or more new partitions out of that
 space without any impact on the contents of any previous
 partitions.

Which sounds just what I was doing with this disk.  Thanks

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Luca Olivetti
Norman Zhang escribió:
Hi,


I followed the steps given in README.RPM

1. mailbox_transport = lmtp:$myhostname
  (/etc/postfix/main.cf)
2. lmtp cmd=lmtpd listen=lmtp prefork=0 (/etc/cyrus.conf)
3. add lmtp_admins: cyruslmtp at the bottom of /etc/cyrus.conf
There's an error in /etc/cyrus.conf. The line should be added in 
/etc/imapd.conf, not /etc/cyrus.conf

4. useradd cyruslmtp with password testing123


I think I found the cause to the problem. I need to use saslpasswd2 for
cyruslmtp rather than useradd/passwd? 
Only if you want to use the sasldb for your password (either in addition 
or replacing any other authentication database you can use with sasl)

I'm a little confused with sasldb and
saslauthd.
Well, yes, everybody is confused with sasl authentication (and all its 
possible configurations). It's very flexible and that makes it very 
difficult to grasp. I'm not sure if the documentation for cyrus-sasl 
and/or cyrus-imapd is clear enough, but, IIRC, there should be enough 
information to get started.

I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.1.15-6mdk. I have saslauthd 2.1.15
(authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap) and
saslpasswd2 installed. Which one should I use? How do I check if saslauthd
is used by default?
check that in /etc/imapd.conf you have the line

sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd

*but* that will only be used for plaintext authentication. Other 
authentication methods (cram md5 for example) need a shared secret (i.e. 
the server need the plaintext password), and that's impossible with 
saslauthd. If you want to be sure that the server only advertises 
plaintext (so you are sure it will only use saslauthd and nothing else) 
you can either remove all sasl plugins except plain, or restrict to 
plaintext putting the following line

sasl_mech_list: PLAIN

in /etc/imapd.conf.
The former will affect all servers using sasl, the latter only 
cyrus-imap (note that any option starting with sasl_ in /etc/imapd.conf 
is actually an option for the sasl library, so you should read sasl 
documentation to see what options are available).


BTW, I don't have /etc/imapd.conf. Is that replaced by
/etc/postfix/main.cf?
No, /etc/imapd.conf is for cyrus-imapd (and a default version comes with 
the package, so I don't understand why you don't have it), while 
/etc/postfix/main.cf is postfix configuration.

Bye
--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,

 I followed the steps given in README.RPM

 1. mailbox_transport = lmtp:$myhostname
(/etc/postfix/main.cf)
 2. lmtp cmd=lmtpd listen=lmtp prefork=0 (/etc/cyrus.conf)
 3. add lmtp_admins: cyruslmtp at the bottom of /etc/cyrus.conf
 4. useradd cyruslmtp with password testing123

 I think I found the cause to the problem. I need to use saslpasswd2 for
 cyruslmtp rather than useradd/passwd? I'm a little confused with sasldb
and
 saslauthd. I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.1.15-6mdk. I have saslauthd 2.1.15
 (authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap) and
 saslpasswd2 installed. Which one should I use? How do I check if saslauthd
 is used by default? BTW, I don't have /etc/imapd.conf. Is that replaced by
 /etc/postfix/main.cf?

Sorry for all the noise. I found that 9.2 is using saslauthd by default. The
information is provided in /etc/imapd.conf.

sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
sasl_mech_list: PLAIN

I do have /etc/imapd.conf as it came with LM 9.2, but not smtpd.conf. I
guess smtpd.conf is indeed replaced by main.cf.

Regards,
Norman




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Re: Publishing text - OT

2003-11-10 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:05:26PM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Content-Description: clearsigned data
 What are you referring to here?  I have tried inline graphics either with or 
 without text flowing around the graphic.  This can be nifty, given a good 
 graphic and proper page placement, but as to automatic placement of a graphic 
 on the next page all by itself with its legend (the rules according to 
 university x)?  There is an obscure method in lyx that will automagically 
 create a graphic/figure page on the next full page immediately following its 
 first referent in the text (ie, via some special character/insert 
 command/latex command)?  

Ok, I get it now - I've never tried that special approach, so I can't
comment on it. I've only ever used inline graphics, as I never had the
need for anything else...


  [0] There IS NO WYSIWYG FOR HTML! Pity too many people pretend it exists
  - with their pages looking accordingly bad...
 
 And yet, there is no real reason that this must be the case.  A browser is a 
 browser is a browser, provided it understands proper HTML.  There is no magic 
 reason a WYSIWYG HTML editor cannot be done.

Wrong. A WYSIWYG cannot be done for HTML. What You See Is What You Get
WHERE? That's the question. With a medium like HTML, I know nothing
about the system it's displayed on and I can not make any assumptions
about it. The resulting page is supposed to work everywhere - that's
the basic idea of it. Hence, WYSIWYG is impossible, as I will never be
able to know the exact output, other than on my own setup(s). That's
what I was getting at.

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
-
Thomas Ribbrockhttp://www.ribbrock.org 
  You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Luca Olivetti
Anne Wilson escribió:
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 5:23 am, Michael Noble wrote:

It has been a while since I last dd a disk drive (it is best to
make them the same type and size).  Assuming that the old disk is
/dev/hda and the new disk is /dev/hdb the following command should
work:
dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb

I've heard people recommend this before, but I'm not sure why this is 
better than cp -a ?  I do remember that the last time I tried to copy 
a whole directory to a new partition I had some problems before I got 
it right, so I want to be clear before I start.
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Hard-Disk-Upgrade/index.html
suggests to use cp -a
I used that howto many times (either to recover from disk failure or to 
prepare a copy of the current distribution to a different partition 
before an upgrade) and I found it very useful.

Bye
--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,

I followed the steps given in README.RPM

1. mailbox_transport = lmtp:$myhostname
   (/etc/postfix/main.cf)
2. lmtp cmd=lmtpd listen=lmtp prefork=0 (/etc/cyrus.conf)
3. add lmtp_admins: cyruslmtp at the bottom of /etc/cyrus.conf

 There's an error in /etc/cyrus.conf. The line should be added in
 /etc/imapd.conf, not /etc/cyrus.conf

Thanks. I have changed that.

4. useradd cyruslmtp with password testing123

 I think I found the cause to the problem. I need to use saslpasswd2 for
 cyruslmtp rather than useradd/passwd?

 Only if you want to use the sasldb for your password (either in addition
 or replacing any other authentication database you can use with sasl)

 I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.1.15-6mdk. I have saslauthd 2.1.15
 (authentication mechanisms: getpwent kerberos5 pam rimap shadow ldap) and
 saslpasswd2 installed. Which one should I use? How do I check if
 saslauthd is used by default?

 check that in /etc/imapd.conf you have the line

 sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd

 *but* that will only be used for plaintext authentication. Other
 authentication methods (cram md5 for example) need a shared secret (i.e.
 the server need the plaintext password), and that's impossible with
 saslauthd. If you want to be sure that the server only advertises
 plaintext (so you are sure it will only use saslauthd and nothing else)
 you can either remove all sasl plugins except plain, or restrict to
 plaintext putting the following line

 sasl_mech_list: PLAIN

Thanks for the clarification. I guess I will use TLS on top of PLAIN. But
first I need to get postfix + cyrus working. I have been trying to get
postfix + cyrus working on and off for a long time now. Hopefully, after
getting it to work I can post my findings on Twiki.

 in /etc/imapd.conf.
 The former will affect all servers using sasl, the latter only
 cyrus-imap (note that any option starting with sasl_ in /etc/imapd.conf
 is actually an option for the sasl library, so you should read sasl
 documentation to see what options are available).

Thanks. I will read up on those docs. I now have so many docs all over the
net on my desk... Sorry I have been mixing you up and Luca Berra. 8)

Regards,
Norman




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Luca Olivetti
Norman Zhang escribió:

Sorry for all the noise. I found that 9.2 is using saslauthd by default. The
information is provided in /etc/imapd.conf.
sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
sasl_mech_list: PLAIN
I do have /etc/imapd.conf as it came with LM 9.2, but not smtpd.conf. I
guess smtpd.conf is indeed replaced by main.cf.
Well, no, smtpd.conf is the sasl configuration for postfix smtp auth. If 
you need smtp auth you'll need to create that file (in /usr/lib/sasl2, I 
think it's the wrong location but that's how mandrake's sasl package is 
configured). If you don't need smtp auth forget about 
/usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf

Bye
--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Luca Olivetti
Norman Zhang escribió:

Thanks for the clarification. I guess I will use TLS on top of PLAIN.
Well, that won't change anything (I mean, sasl is not involved so using 
tls won't mean changing sasl configuration). If you want to avoid 
cyrus-imapd advertising plaintext authentication over an insecure link 
(i.e. before tls has been negotiated) you can add

allowplaintext: no

in /etc/imapd.conf

Bye
--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] /etc/hosts and dns

2003-11-10 Thread Greg Meyer
On Monday 10 November 2003 02:10 pm, Richard Urwin wrote:
  Since the local addressing scheme in place at my company is quite unique
  I would even be open to doing something like having a script called in
  rc.local check to see what the network ip block of the local network is
  and writing out a hosts file that would have an entry for the server if I
  am on the right network, although I have no idea how to actually
  implement that.

 You mean something like:

 cp /etc/hosts.base /etc/hosts
 if (/sbin/ifconfig eth0 | grep 192.168.7/dev/null)
 then cat /etc/hosts.extra  /etc/hosts
 fi

 (test it first, of course)
 HTH

Thank you for that.  I would make a terrible programmer.  It seems so obvious 
now after seeing your simple script.
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-10 Thread Michael Holt
Hey all,
M$ has a somewhat new program called 'moviemaker' which you can
download for free for winxp.  I would like to know if there is
something comparible for linux.  I was asked if I could help with
some video production at my church and they want to use Adobe
Premier.  As always, I would like to introduce as much opensource
as possible.  I haven't done much video editing, and what I have
done was on Windows, several years ago.  I would like something
that could handle both jpeg compilation like moviemaker and also
something that could do video transitions with effects similar to
premier.  Being able to make photos 'shatter' into the next photo
or have like a 'page-flip' effect.  Same with the video; maybe
being able to 'twist' the video and merge into other footage.

Any suggestions?

Things I've looked at already are:

cinelerra
kino
mjpeg
filmgimp

As I've said, I don't have much video editing experience; if one
of the programs I've already mentioned does what I've asked, feel
free to point that out :)

Thanks!

-- 
Michael Holt
Snohomish, WA  (o_
[EMAIL PROTECTED](o_  (o_  //\
www.holt-tech.net(/)_ (/)_ V_/_www.mandrake.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread Richard Urwin
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 9:24 pm, Felix Miata wrote:
 Richard Urwin wrote:
  The big problem with dd is that when it's finished the destination drive
  will be identical to the source drive.

 No it won't. Everything from the first sector through the last sector #
 on the old disk will be identical, which is not the same thing.

  If, like most people, you've bought a
  bigger disk, then that's hard luck. The partition table will show it as
  the same size as the old disk.

 No, it will show identical use, which is not the same thing. The new
 will have unallocated space beyond the last sector # used on the old
 disk. You can make one or more new partitions out of that space without
 any impact on the contents of any previous partitions.

Thanks for the clarification. As I said:
 you might be able to add new partitions later, or you may not.
It seems you can. I was worried that the size of the disk was encoded in the 
partition table, in which case diskdrake et al would only show a disk the 
same size as the old one.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Norman Zhang
 information is provided in /etc/imapd.conf.

 sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
 sasl_mech_list: PLAIN

 I do have /etc/imapd.conf as it came with LM 9.2, but not smtpd.conf. I
 guess smtpd.conf is indeed replaced by main.cf.

 Well, no, smtpd.conf is the sasl configuration for postfix smtp auth. If
 you need smtp auth you'll need to create that file (in /usr/lib/sasl2, I
 think it's the wrong location but that's how mandrake's sasl package is
 configured). If you don't need smtp auth forget about
 /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf

After putting lmtp_admins: cyruslmtp into /etc/imapd.conf, now I can receive
mail. Setting smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes would mean all clients sending
mail to Postfix will be authenticated via sasl, including Exchange or other
peoples' servers too?

Regards,
Norman





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] ATI Radeon 9800Pro with 64bit AMD Opteron

2003-11-10 Thread J. Grant
Hi,

Has anyone tried ATI Radeon 9800Pro with 64bit AMD Opteron?  I saw the 
AMD64 RC1 is out now, but there was no mention.  I want to setup a 
high-powered GNU/Linux graphics workstation.

Tips appreciated

JG


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Luca Olivetti
Norman Zhang escribió:

After putting lmtp_admins: cyruslmtp into /etc/imapd.conf, now I can receive
mail. Setting smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes would mean all clients sending
mail to Postfix will be authenticated via sasl, including Exchange or other
peoples' servers too?
No, that would be smtpd_sasl_auth_enabled, and only depending on the 
setting of smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
You should google for postfix smtp auth or look at the documentation, 
howto and faqs section at postfix.org.

Bye

--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,

 mail. Setting smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes would mean all clients sending
 mail to Postfix will be authenticated via sasl, including Exchange or
other
 peoples' servers too?

Please ignore my question.

smtp_sasl_auth_enable keyword tells postfix to attempt to authenticate on
all outbound connections. I guess people sending in is not affected. Sorry
for all the noise. I will read up on the docs before posting again.

Regards,
Norman




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Twiki (semi-hijack)

2003-11-10 Thread Bill Mullen
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Anne Wilson wrote:

[referring to POPfile v0.20.1, vs. v0.19.1]

 Are there any big advantages in upgrading the version?

From what I gather from the relevant announcements, the use of BerkeleyDB 
instead of flat-file storage greatly improves the processing speed, and 
there seem to be a lot of worthwhile bugfixes as well. Some links:

Announcement of the 0.20.0 release
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=319997

Announcement of the 0.20.1 release
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=325812

Upgrading seems rather straightforward; stop POPfile, backup its directory 
in its entirety, and unzip the new release over the old.

The now-required BerkeleyDB Perl module is in contrib in RPM form, as 
perl-BerkeleyDB. Best to install that first. When POPfile next runs 
after the upgrade, it will convert the database file's format over.

I can't offer any specific experience as regards the upgrade, as I had 
never tried the app until today, and opted for the current version. :)

-- 
Bill Mullen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   MA, USA   RLU #270075   MDK 8.1  9.0
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people
very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] cyclades under devfs

2003-11-10 Thread Alexandre Jacarandá
Whatever GNU/Linux you are using, it's good to look on /var/log/messages and 
/var/log/dmesg .

This both files will give you some hints if you compiled on kernel or module to have 
access to
your card.


---
Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
Consultor de Tecnologia de Informação
Tel.: 0 ** 21 8131-2313

Alguns caminham pelo arco,
eu caminho pela reta.


-- 
__
Sign-up for your own personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Search Smarter - get the new eXact Search Bar for free!
http://www.exactsearchbar.com/


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-10 Thread et
On Monday 10 November 2003 10:37 pm, Luca Olivetti wrote:
 Anne Wilson escribió:
  On Monday 10 Nov 2003 5:23 am, Michael Noble wrote:
 It has been a while since I last dd a disk drive (it is best to
 make them the same type and size).  Assuming that the old disk is
 /dev/hda and the new disk is /dev/hdb the following command should
 work:
 
 dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb
 
  I've heard people recommend this before, but I'm not sure why this is
  better than cp -a ?  I do remember that the last time I tried to copy
  a whole directory to a new partition I had some problems before I got
  it right, so I want to be clear before I start.

 http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Hard-Disk-Upgrade/index.html
 suggests to use cp -a
 I used that howto many times (either to recover from disk failure or to
 prepare a copy of the current distribution to a different partition
 before an upgrade) and I found it very useful.

 Bye
I recently upgrade from hdb being a dvd reader and hdc a 5 gig, and hdd a 
cdwriter, to a dvd writer at hdd and a 120 gig at hdc, in MDk 9.1. I plugged 
in the drive to the case, and I started the computer, fired up MCC, went to 
diskdrake and told it the change, and that I wanted to make a 45 gig 
/var/www. it asked if I wanted what was now in my /var/www copied over (of 
course I did, and it did fine), and I now have a separate /var/www from /var.   
have you just tried to see if you can just do it with out thinking about it 
and using the gui?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Inspiron 3200 sound-Mandrake 9.0

2003-11-10 Thread Rob Blomquist
I see on the web, that the sound card for this machine is said to be the 
Crystal 4237B and it is said to work with the CS4232 module. How can I 
configure it, either manually or with drakconf? BTW, the installer did not 
detect the card, and did not load the draksound for it.

I have a home LAN, and a modem for this machine, what can I do when I am 
portable with it, so that I can use the modem instead of the LAN connection. 
Currently the LAN is up and running fine with a 3c589 PCMCIA slot NIC, and 
the modem has been pulled from the PCMCIA slot.

And what window managers  work best with this machine. I am a big fan of KDE, 
but I think that the machine may prefer something lighter, so as not to tax 
the video and processor so much.

Rob
-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Inspiron 3200 sound-Mandrake 9.0

2003-11-10 Thread Jack Coates
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 18:21, Rob Blomquist wrote:
 I see on the web, that the sound card for this machine is said to be the 
 Crystal 4237B and it is said to work with the CS4232 module. How can I 
 configure it, either manually or with drakconf? BTW, the installer did not 
 detect the card, and did not load the draksound for it.

try the old sndconfig utility, it does a good job on those older chips.

 I have a home LAN, and a modem for this machine, what can I do when I am 
 portable with it, so that I can use the modem instead of the LAN connection. 
 Currently the LAN is up and running fine with a 3c589 PCMCIA slot NIC, and 
 the modem has been pulled from the PCMCIA slot.
 

so it's a card modem instead of a built-in? What are you asking? How to
swap cards?

 And what window managers  work best with this machine. I am a big fan of KDE, 
 but I think that the machine may prefer something lighter, so as not to tax 
 the video and processor so much.
 
 Rob

Light weight window managers get pretty idiosyncratic (in fact, I even
know someone who uses ratpoison :-)

Have a look at XFce, IceWM, WindowMaker, blackbox. 

-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Re: Cyrus-imapd

2003-11-10 Thread Norman Zhang
Hi,

 Sorry for all the noise. I found that 9.2 is using saslauthd by default.
 The information is provided in /etc/imapd.conf.

 sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
 sasl_mech_list: PLAIN

 I do have /etc/imapd.conf as it came with LM 9.2, but not smtpd.conf. I
 guess smtpd.conf is indeed replaced by main.cf.

 Well, no, smtpd.conf is the sasl configuration for postfix smtp auth. If
 you need smtp auth you'll need to create that file (in /usr/lib/sasl2, I
 think it's the wrong location but that's how mandrake's sasl package is
 configured). If you don't need smtp auth forget about
 /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf

I added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf

smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_relay_domains
smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous

My users are local users. If I changed /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf to include
pwcheck_method:sasldb, that means I need to add users to
/var/lib/sasl2/sasl.db manually and also assign permission 644 to satisfy
chroot condition? This would also make it very difficult for users to change
their password? If I use local users, I could give them usermin access and
they could change password at will.

If I use the option pwcheck_method:pwcheck. I need to add /usr/sbin/pwck to
/etc/rc.d/rc.local but I get the following errors.

user adm: directory /var/adm does not exist
user news: directory /var/spool/news does not exist
user uucp: directory /var/spool/uucp does not exist
pwck: no changes

I'm lost here. Could you give some hints?

Regards,
Norman




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Re: Kmail po3-filters

2003-11-10 Thread Jarmo
On Monday 10 November 2003 18:26, Björn Lundin wrote:

 In KMail Config, network-part, your receive-account,
 did you check 'Filter messages if they are greater than x bytes'?
 That is how you enable pop-filters.
 /Björn

AH...No...Didn'n know about that at all...Have tried to read all docs,but 
obviosly somehow got pass that point...

Have to try it immediately...

OK.
Now I have tested it and that's not what I want.I have to set bytes nearly 
zero to keep that html-crab away.BUT same time I have to be online
confirming poup windows actionsNO...that's not what I want.I have Kmail 
set by interwall checking my mail and want to set filter so,that all possible
messages,that contains html,should be deleted from server without any 
confirmation.
I don't understand why it sould be bound to any bytesize?
Have to make succestion to Kmails authors to change that filter policy.

Jarmo


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] [dfox@m206-157.dsl.tsoft.com: hijack cont.]

2003-11-10 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Update of what is happening to David, forwarded to the list as per his
request.

David, I'd like to see those requests from your logs.

Blue skies...   Todd

- - Forwarded message from David E. Fox -

Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:41:57 -0800 (PST)
From: David E. Fox
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
To: todd
Subject: hijack cont.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
version=2.60

Todd:

I thought I'd mail you privately on a couple of things;

* because of various blacklists I cannot post to the lists and 
  such. I'm still listed in MAPS. I am trying to get them to
  de list me.

* After going back and forth with LX (my mail bounces to him, 
  natch) it seems clear that an open proxy was used - a 
  vulnerability in apache mod-proxy, to be specific. After
  reviewing the logs, I have seen a large number of GETs 
  in /var/log/httpd/*.log with very long 
  pathnames and/or requests to xxx.xxx.xxx:25. I think that
  is how they got in.

* In order to circumvent, I have installed portsentry (why isn't
  this included any more with Mandrake??!??!?) and got chkrootkit. 
  Chkrootkit reports everything OK, and portsentry has managed
  to block a fair number of IPs so far.

* LX told me this is on bugtraq. Apparently a vulnerability 
  exists in apache mod-proxy -- this was reported with plain
  vanilla apache (not apache2) in June of this year. Mandrake
  probably needs to ensure that users don't install apache2
  components unless and until they really need them (and I
  admit I probably installed too much). I have removed apache2,
  and installed just the bare bones functionality (2 rpms vs. 
  five or six).

Todd - if you can forward this to expert I would *really* appreciate
it. I hope my mail doesn't bounce :(
 
- 
David E. Fox  Thanks for letting me
[EMAIL PROTECTED]change magnetic patterns
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   on your hard disk.
- ---

- - End forwarded message -

- -- 
Blue skies...   Todd  Public key: http://www.mrball.net/todd.asc
scandal cannonball: you gonna wear your ferengi ears? :)
Morph scandal: everyone knows its the year of the Romulan..*slap*
scandal trust me to show up unfashionably dressed to a scifi convention
Linux kernel 2.4.22-12.tmb.1mdk   2 users,  load average: 1.21, 1.15, 1.18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://www.mrball.net/todd.asc

iD8DBQE/sG8YIBT1264ScBURAp0RAKCDfN+oRY/Ki5ZOkvF0a0I8WO+l6QCg6FTp
3rPerc1NcOAO6+7xqVjoK3g=
=ypUw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Inspiron 3200 sound-Mandrake 9.0

2003-11-10 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Monday 10 November 2003 8:10 pm, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 18:21, Rob Blomquist wrote:
  I see on the web, that the sound card for this machine is said to be the
  Crystal 4237B and it is said to work with the CS4232 module. How can I
  configure it, either manually or with drakconf? BTW, the installer did
  not detect the card, and did not load the draksound for it.

 try the old sndconfig utility, it does a good job on those older chips.
I shall check it out.

  I have a home LAN, and a modem for this machine, what can I do when I am
  portable with it, so that I can use the modem instead of the LAN
  connection. Currently the LAN is up and running fine with a 3c589 PCMCIA
  slot NIC, and the modem has been pulled from the PCMCIA slot.

 so it's a card modem instead of a built-in? What are you asking? How to
 swap cards?
Yes, both the NIC and modem are PCMCIA cards (3COM 56k Global Modem, and 
Etherlink III (3c589). And can I hot swap these cards, or what do I do to 
disconnect or reconnect them? Anything special?


 Have a look at XFce, IceWM, WindowMaker, blackbox.
Thanks for the tips

Rob

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Anyone get flash player 6 working under mandrake 9.2?

2003-11-10 Thread Rob Blomquist

  I downloaded flash player 6 from macromedia download
  site and install it on mandrake 9.2. It used to work
  on mandrake 9.0 with mozilla 1.1 but not 9.2 with
  mozilla 1.4. Anyone get this work?
 
 
  Thanks,

 Make sure it didn't put the libs in either /usr/lib/netscape/plugin or
 /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin/  Had that happen to me and had to move the
 files it created to the right place.

Yes, but I am trying to get it going with Konq in 9.2, and even though I have 
added the generic location, /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and 
/usr/lib/mozilla-1.4/plugins, and I still can't get konq to use it???

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Anyone get flash player 6 working under mandrake 9.2?

2003-11-10 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Monday 10 November 2003 4:29 am, Greg Meyer wrote:

 The best way to get flashplayer working on Mandrake is to get the Mandrake
 RPMS from Club Commercial Downloads.  Everything goes in the right place
 and it works in all browsers.

Is there a urpmi source for the Club Commercial site? I would love to add it.

Well, I d/l FlashPlayer-6.0-3mdk.i586.rpm and urpmi'd it, and I turned out to 
need libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.83mdk.i586 too. And with it, all my other plugins 
worked properly.

Rob


-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed. SOLVED!!

2003-11-10 Thread Mof
The rpm -e -nodeps suspend-scripts didn't work, so it became obvious that it 
was a kernel problem, so I thought I'd upgrade to the latest kernel, and see 
what happens, but as I was doing that I noticed something odd in lilo.conf :

append=quiet devfs=mount hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hda5 splash=silent

First off I really don't know what acpi=ht means.
What is ht ??
So I changed it to on
But wait! Look right next to that and you'll see the causer of all pain
resume=/dev/hda5
But /dev/hda5 is my bloody swap partition
After removing the resume=/dev/hda5, it works fine now!

Thanks alot guys for being so patient.
I should have sent the append line from the start!

Mof.

On Tuesday 11 November 2003 00:55, Jack Coates wrote:
 try rpm -e --nodeps suspend-scripts.

 On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 21:45, Mofeed Shahin wrote:
   reply-to still a problem.
 
  Yeah must be something I've done with kmail.
 
   On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:56, Mof wrote:
   On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 05:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:44, Mof wrote:
 It appears that acpi and apm do the same thing, which is the
  
   prefered one to use anyway ?
  
 And if acpi is the prefered, how do I load up the right modules ?

 Mof.
   
This order of commands should do it.  As root.
   
/etc/init.d/apmd stop
   
chkconfig apmd off
   
/etc/init.d/acpid start
   
chkconfig acpid on
   
edit lilo (or grup) and change
   
append=acpi=off  to
append=acpi=on
   
This should set you up so that upon a reboot you are running acpi
  
   not apm as well as get the right stuff started.  Note acpid won't
   start if apm is running (conflict avoidence.)
  
   Thanks James, but even with acpi working, it still hangs.
Even though I have deleted /etc/acpi/events/lid, it still crashes
   when I
   close the lid.
  
   did you remember to use service acpid restart after editing that file?
 
  yes, I even rebooted.
 
  Arrrgghhh, looks like I'll have to stick with 9.1 until I can work out
  what is going on here!!
 
  Mof.
 
 
 
 
 
  __
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
  Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] movies, jpegs, etc

2003-11-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:45, Michael Holt wrote:
 Hey all,
 M$ has a somewhat new program called 'moviemaker' which you can
 download for free for winxp.  I would like to know if there is
 something comparible for linux.  I was asked if I could help with
 some video production at my church and they want to use Adobe
 Premier.  As always, I would like to introduce as much opensource
 as possible.  I haven't done much video editing, and what I have
 done was on Windows, several years ago.  I would like something
 that could handle both jpeg compilation like moviemaker and also
 something that could do video transitions with effects similar to
 premier.  Being able to make photos 'shatter' into the next photo
 or have like a 'page-flip' effect.  Same with the video; maybe
 being able to 'twist' the video and merge into other footage.
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 Things I've looked at already are:
 
 cinelerra
 kino
 mjpeg
 filmgimp
 
 As I've said, I don't have much video editing experience; if one
 of the programs I've already mentioned does what I've asked, feel
 free to point that out :)
 
 Thanks!

There was/is one that was by many considered to be studio quality called
broadcast 2000 You can find the files here

http://www.tux.org/pub/packages/orphaned/broadcast2000/

in source form and If you go to rpmfind or rpm.pbone.net you might find
a src rpm as well.

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed. SOLVED!!

2003-11-10 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 22:02, Mof wrote:
 The rpm -e -nodeps suspend-scripts didn't work, so it became obvious that it 
 was a kernel problem, so I thought I'd upgrade to the latest kernel, and see 
 what happens, but as I was doing that I noticed something odd in lilo.conf :
 
 append=quiet devfs=mount hdb=ide-scsi acpi=ht resume=/dev/hda5 splash=silent
 
 First off I really don't know what acpi=ht means.
 What is ht ??
 So I changed it to on
 But wait! Look right next to that and you'll see the causer of all pain
 resume=/dev/hda5
 But /dev/hda5 is my bloody swap partition
 After removing the resume=/dev/hda5, it works fine now!

Yep,  it was using the same partition of the suspend as it was for
swap.  Whereas suspend to swap does use a swap partition to suspend, it
doesn't use one that is mounted and when you use swap it really mucks
with what swsuspend writes there.  In other words if you had a second
swap not in fstab (partitioned in size to about 20% over ram) That isn't
listed in fstab then suspend to swap should work right for you.  
It's up to you if you want to experiment with this or not but if you
have the disk you might want to use this.  

James

 
 Thanks alot guys for being so patient.
 I should have sent the append line from the start!
 
 Mof.
 
 On Tuesday 11 November 2003 00:55, Jack Coates wrote:
  try rpm -e --nodeps suspend-scripts.
 
  On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 21:45, Mofeed Shahin wrote:
reply-to still a problem.
  
   Yeah must be something I've done with kmail.
  
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:56, Mof wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 05:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:44, Mof wrote:
  It appears that acpi and apm do the same thing, which is the
   
prefered one to use anyway ?
   
  And if acpi is the prefered, how do I load up the right modules ?
 
  Mof.

 This order of commands should do it.  As root.

 /etc/init.d/apmd stop

 chkconfig apmd off

 /etc/init.d/acpid start

 chkconfig acpid on

 edit lilo (or grup) and change

 append=acpi=off  to
 append=acpi=on

 This should set you up so that upon a reboot you are running acpi
   
not apm as well as get the right stuff started.  Note acpid won't
start if apm is running (conflict avoidence.)
   
Thanks James, but even with acpi working, it still hangs.
 Even though I have deleted /etc/acpi/events/lid, it still crashes
when I
close the lid.
   
did you remember to use service acpid restart after editing that file?
  
   yes, I even rebooted.
  
   Arrrgghhh, looks like I'll have to stick with 9.1 until I can work out
   what is going on here!!
  
   Mof.
  
  
  
  
  
   __
   Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
   Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] MDK 9.2 lilo problem after install of updated kernel 2.4.22-21

2003-11-10 Thread gczerw

I did a completely fresh install of 9.2 and installed lilo with no
problem. However after rebooting, logging in and installing all of the
upgrades successfully, I then downloaded the updated kernel and did
an rpm
-ivh kernel2.4.22-21*.rpm.  The kernel installed, but gave me an error
when updating lilo.

When attempting to manually update lilo with the new information, the
following occurs:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# lilo -v
LILO version 22.5.7.2, Copyright (C) 1992-1998 Werner Almesberger
Development beyond version 21 Copyright (C) 1999-2003 John Coffman
Released 20-Aug-2003, and compiled at 16:45:54 on Sep 18 2003

Reading boot sector from /dev/sdd5
part_nowrite: read:: Input/output error

Anyone know why this is happening?  Never had this problem before
9.2!!!

George

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:44, Mof wrote:
 On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:58 am, Jack Coates wrote:
  1st: http://www.monkeynoodle.org/comp/reply-to
 
 huh ?? (page times out)

sorry, a power line snapped on our street and power's been out for
thirteen hours. That page explains why setting your reply-to on a
mailing list is really annoying, largely because it makes replies like
the one I'm about to type go directly to you instead of the list
archives. Directly to you may or may not help you, but to the list
archives means you would have found one of the other twenty times I've
typed this reply when you Googled for the problem :-)
...
 
 It appears that acpi and apm do the same thing, which is the prefered one to 
 use anyway ?
 

APM is old, stable, and the best thing if your laptop supports it. ACPI
is new, unstable, and on some laptops the only choice available. If half
your devices don't work and your laptop overheats all the time because
the fan never turns on, you have an ACPI laptop and you need to edit
/etc/lilo.conf, change acpi=off to acpi=on, and run /sbin/lilo.
...
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:54, Jack Coates wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 15:27, Stew Benedict wrote:
  On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Jack Coates wrote:
  
   On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 06:57, Jack Coates wrote:
edit /etc/acpi/events/lid and comment out action=/usr/sbin/pmsuspend

ACPI is attempting to trigger swsusp suspend-to-disk, which basically
doesn't work on modern laptops.
   ...
   
   that's actually not a fair comment, I should actually state that it
   doesn't work on Mandrake kernels; it works fine with SuSE and Debian
   according to the other mailing lists I'm on.
   
  
  Actually it does, depending on the machine of course, like all acpi 
  functionality.  I was using it for a week or so, but it's so slow, I can 
  do a normal shutdown/boot faster than a suspend resume.
  
  Machine: Compaq Presario 1215US
  
  Stew Benedict
 
 Good for you! did you do anything special or did it just work?
 
 BTW, ACPI and swsusp haven't actually got anything to do with each
 other, except that ACPI events can trigger a suspend.

In my case.  (Compaq Armada)  ACPI doesn't work but APM is flawless.  In
fact ACPI doesn't work under other OS's either.  So no loss.  It really
seems to be an LG problem.   A number of Laptops like mine don't quite
follow the spec or followed a test spec and so don't work right.  I've
two dells at work we use for mobile demo's Same model one is just a
version up from the other (xp and ixp or something like that)  One works
with acpi one with apm.  

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Bizarre postfix problem cant send mail

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
A lot of answers were written, you might want to go through the mail
archives. My strong, nay, vehement suggestion at this point is to format
that box's disk drives and start over, then ask specific questions.

Portsentry is good. It is also non-free in the OSI sense since Psionic's
purchase by Cisco, IIRC.

Shorewall is a sight easier than editing iptables directly, but the
people who can't handle it generally seem to like gshield. I've also
used Monmotha in the past and liked it, does it work with iptables?
Anyway, to grok shorewall you should read its docs. Here's some guiding
principles:

first, set up interfaces. There is at least one, which is the exterior
ethernet. localhost not required here.
second, set up zones. A zone is a network which is connected to an
interface. There are at least two zones, one for localhost and one for
the Internet. Change the Mandrake names to something you understand.
third, set up policy (deny everything between Internet and localhost).
fourth, set up rules (allow SMTP from Internet to localhost).

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 09:41, dfox wrote:
 Apparently I cannot send mail with my postfix on localhost to the network.
 
 Previously this was working fine and I don't see any changes made to my 
 postfix configuration files.
 
 But in the last few days things have not gone well here. Firstly, my 
 system was hijacked and used as an open proxy to send megabytes of spam 
 to the network. :(. My isp filtered my outgoing smtp port and that is 
 when I began to see a few errors in my /var/log/mail/errors file (unknown 
 service tcp/smtp).
 
 After finding out about this, I tried to post to the list and I don't 
 think any of my messages went out. I had to go into /var/spool/postfix 
 and start deleting a whole bunch of files in deferred - there was at one 
 time seven megabytes of messages trying to get out! And those were the 
 invalid addresses. I wonder how spammers survive -- I guess they just 
 exploit other systems to do the dirty work :(.
 
 At the moment, My box is better secured thanks to portsentry (why isn't 
 this program in mandrake I could not urpmi it, but I did find it 
 through rpmfind.org and the source rpm built and installed fine. 
 
 I tried running shorewall but got nowhere. I don't know how to edit 
 shorewall files and I don't want something that won't even let me ping my 
 gateway when installed. iptables is running because of portsentry but I 
 don't see anything that is specifically tied to port 25. And in atcp mode 
 it's supposed to ignore certain standard ports anyway.
 
 It seems like a catch 22 - if I disable the filters perhaps outbound smtp 
 will work, but if I do that, I'm back to where I was before, and people 
 will start targeting my box again. I counted 72 attempts of portscanning 
 done in less than six hours, and 10 minutes after I restarted httpd I got 
 spurious gets in my apache log files. I think this is how they got into 
 my box in the first place, since I don't do much if any web stuff, and my 
 log files are tiny - the other day they were over a megabyte.
  
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:22, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 08:28, Jack Coates wrote:
  1st: http://www.monkeynoodle.org/comp/reply-to
  
  check /var/log/acpid... I just checked mine and found something spooky,
  which is that it's still trying to execute /usr/sbin/pmsuspend and just
  failing because the file was renamed /usr/sbin/pmsuspend2 (which also
  doesn't work to suspend the laptop).
  
  grep -r shows that pmsuspend isn't being called from anything in /etc...
  
  oh for crying out loud... acpid needs to be restarted. service acpid
  restart.
  ...
 
 Jack,
 
Are you having one of those days :D
 
 James

that was the last time I touched a computer all day -- I went outside to
fix a gutter, a power line down the block snapped (no fault of mine :-),
and there goes the juice. Just came back on thirty minutes ago,
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:54, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:54, Jack Coates wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 15:27, Stew Benedict wrote:
   On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Jack Coates wrote:
   
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 06:57, Jack Coates wrote:
 edit /etc/acpi/events/lid and comment out action=/usr/sbin/pmsuspend
 
 ACPI is attempting to trigger swsusp suspend-to-disk, which basically
 doesn't work on modern laptops.
...

that's actually not a fair comment, I should actually state that it
doesn't work on Mandrake kernels; it works fine with SuSE and Debian
according to the other mailing lists I'm on.

   
   Actually it does, depending on the machine of course, like all acpi 
   functionality.  I was using it for a week or so, but it's so slow, I can 
   do a normal shutdown/boot faster than a suspend resume.
   
   Machine: Compaq Presario 1215US
   
   Stew Benedict
  
  Good for you! did you do anything special or did it just work?
  
  BTW, ACPI and swsusp haven't actually got anything to do with each
  other, except that ACPI events can trigger a suspend.
 
 In my case.  (Compaq Armada)  ACPI doesn't work but APM is flawless.  In
 fact ACPI doesn't work under other OS's either.  So no loss.  It really
 seems to be an LG problem.   A number of Laptops like mine don't quite
 follow the spec or followed a test spec and so don't work right.  I've
 two dells at work we use for mobile demo's Same model one is just a
 version up from the other (xp and ixp or something like that)  One works
 with acpi one with apm.  
 
 James
 

There's a guy on the Linux-sony list with the exact same model of laptop
as me who had swsusp and ACPI working fine almost a year ago, using
Debian. Me, I try with every new Mandrake kernel, and I'm always
disappointed. I'm about ready to put Debian on the laptop.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Draksync with subdirs

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 11:20, stefmit wrote:
...
  ftp? why not use IPX too as long as we're talking dead tech. 
 
 Perhaps because this is what those other boxes have ... i.e. this IS what I 
 have to deal with ...

Sorry, I was a bit short. I've never had a good experience with
Draksync, had it delete something the first time I tried it and I
promptly went back to doing my own scripts by hand.

 
  Anyway, 
  freshmeat for ftpmirror.
 
  The real answer is rsync.
 
 For Linux only, and for machines under my full control ... ;(
 
 Thx.

there are rsync binaries for win32, I've used them extensively. However,
Winders admins will usually run screaming when they smell Unix, in which
case I've offered the following heinous pile which they find perfectly
satisfactory: Offer a Samba mount accessed via IPsec and let them use
their resource kit's synchronization tool (read, rsync with a minty
Winders flavor). More complex, more failure-prone, they love it.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread James Sparenberg
Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
(or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Draksync with subdirs

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
oh yeah, and if ftpmirror doesn't do it for you, man ncftpput or
ncftpget (depending on direction of course). For bonus points, here's
incremental support once you've sync'ed the tree:
http://www.monkeynoodle.org/comp/tools/backups

-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
Anyone interested in this mess should have a look at this article:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33823.html

They're trying to increase revenues by preventing use of their desktop
offering in the server room. They've chosen a method that cuts off the
nose to spite the face, but I still think they'll continue to be quite
successful in the Fortune 500 space for inertial reasons. Only thing is,
when the Fortune 500 begins to seriously evaluate Linux desktops, they
won't be running RH. The question is, once they bring in Mandrake or
SuSE or Fedora for the desktops, what's going to stop them from bringing
it into the server room too?

RH is trying to build two truly separate distributions, a server and a
desktop, with different source trees, different package revisions,
different config tools... This is such an architecturally flawed move
that it clearly came from marketing, especially because doing it in an
open source environment is practically impossible. Every feature they
remove can easily be replaced, every attempt to cripple Fedora for
server use can be circumvented, and if it isn't easy to do then Fedora
will simply get dropped like a hot rock. If the community drops it, RH's
only chance to encourage it for desktop use is to play licensing and
discount games, where enforceability gets difficult and customer/vendor
relations get adversarial. Generally a bone-headed move all around --
worst case scenario is a hated albatross cousin to RH server, best case
scenario is that they've spawned their own new competitor.

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:20, James Sparenberg wrote:
 Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
 Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
 (or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
 with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
 the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
 been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
 
 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm
 
 James
 
 
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:20 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
 Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
 Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
 (or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
 with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
 the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
 been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.

 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm

 James

Nah - you're not alone. I posted a message with a link to an announcement 
about this. The subject went something like Redhat = traitors?... grin

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread Mof
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 05:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:44, Mof wrote:
  It appears that acpi and apm do the same thing, which is the prefered one
  to use anyway ?
 
  And if acpi is the prefered, how do I load up the right modules ?
 
  Mof.

 This order of commands should do it.  As root.

 /etc/init.d/apmd stop

 chkconfig apmd off

 /etc/init.d/acpid start

 chkconfig acpid on

 edit lilo (or grup) and change

 append=acpi=off  to
 append=acpi=on

 This should set you up so that upon a reboot you are running acpi not
 apm as well as get the right stuff started.  Note acpid won't start if
 apm is running (conflict avoidence.)

Thanks James, but even with acpi working, it still hangs.
 Even though I have deleted /etc/acpi/events/lid, it still crashes when I 
close the lid.
Here is a snippet from dmesg when acpid loads up:

ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
ACPI: AC Adapter [AC] (on-line)
ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports C1 C2, 2 performance states, 8 throttling 
states)
ACPI: Thermal Zone [THM] (73 C)
ACPI: Lid Switch [LID]
ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PBTN]
ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SBTN]


How is ACPI configured ?
I mean it looks like its stlll configured to do something when the lid is 
closed, even though there is nothing in /etc/acpi/events/ besides power.
The bios is set to do nothing if the lid is closed, and the AC power is 
plugged in.

I'm getting close to giving up here. :-(

Mof.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3721 days James Sparenberg wrote:


 Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  

  Uhm...for their own code, yes, they can...it won't be the GPL any
  more, but it's their own license. Depending on the changes, it may
  or may not still be Free Software and/or Open Source Software, but
  they *can* write any license they may want for *their own code*.

  On the other hand, I hadn't heard anything about this...could you
  point me to any URLs that talk about this?

  Vox

-- 
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else.   -- Donald B. Marti Jr.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Bizarre postfix problem cant send mail

2003-11-09 Thread Derek Jennings
On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 7:10 am, Jack Coates wrote:
 A lot of answers were written, you might want to go through the mail
 archives. My strong, nay, vehement suggestion at this point is to format
 that box's disk drives and start over, then ask specific questions.

 Portsentry is good. It is also non-free in the OSI sense since Psionic's
 purchase by Cisco, IIRC.

 Shorewall is a sight easier than editing iptables directly, but the
 people who can't handle it generally seem to like gshield. I've also
 used Monmotha in the past and liked it, does it work with iptables?
 Anyway, to grok shorewall you should read its docs. Here's some guiding
 principles:

 first, set up interfaces. There is at least one, which is the exterior
 ethernet. localhost not required here.
 second, set up zones. A zone is a network which is connected to an
 interface. There are at least two zones, one for localhost and one for
 the Internet. Change the Mandrake names to something you understand.
 third, set up policy (deny everything between Internet and localhost).
 fourth, set up rules (allow SMTP from Internet to localhost).

 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 09:41, dfox wrote:
SNIP
 
  I tried running shorewall but got nowhere. I don't know how to edit
  shorewall files and I don't want something that won't even let me ping my
  gateway when installed. iptables is running because of portsentry but I
  don't see anything that is specifically tied to port 25. And in atcp mode
  it's supposed to ignore certain standard ports anyway.

Shorewall by default disables Ping. If you want ping enabled then add a line 
in /etc/shorewall/rules
ACCEPT  loc fw  icmp8
(assuming the local zone is called 'loc')
then 'shorewall restart'


derek


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is not 
yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a relatively 
small subpopulation.  

I use it exclusively but then I have been playing with linux for years now.  I 
get it.  My father, wife, sisters...they don't get it.  They get boggled by 
configuration this and that, logins, etc.  They are all too used to just 
firing up and going with what is familiar.  Then, the biggy, is games.  If 
you play games then you are set to go through even more work with only a 
fractional hope that the game will work (working with wine is not straightup 
simple and obvious).  The newest games rarely work, or work only poorly.  Not 
a great way to make a favorable impression.  

Lindows is set to give linux a poor name as well, with their default 
run-as-root setup.  Sure, it makes it install and run similar to windoze but 
it also makes it just as vulnerable as windoze.  This can only make people 
think (ultimately) that linux is no more free viruses, worms, and hack 
attacks as windoze.  

I do think that for those who really just do web browsing, document editing, 
emailing, then linux is perfectly valid.  For those who game it just isn't 
there and wont be until linux gets more game titles itself or wine/winex gets 
much better and easier to work with.  

On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:58 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:20 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
  Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
  Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
  (or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
  with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
  the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
  been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
 
  http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm
 
  James

 Nah - you're not alone. I posted a message with a link to an announcement
 about this. The subject went something like Redhat = traitors?... grin

- -- 
Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component 
of spiritual devotion.
- --Krakauer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/rk4Yb1CLurEA6xURAmsnAJ9LgwGW6BvaUmOZeapdXBGE4SS/4gCcDgja
efM+7BPnCsPpFFqMr7rREWE=
=BHUM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:42 am, Jack Coates wrote:
 Anyone interested in this mess should have a look at this article:
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33823.html

 They're trying to increase revenues by preventing use of their desktop
 offering in the server room. They've chosen a method that cuts off the
 nose to spite the face, but I still think they'll continue to be quite
 successful in the Fortune 500 space for inertial reasons. Only thing is,
 when the Fortune 500 begins to seriously evaluate Linux desktops, they
 won't be running RH. The question is, once they bring in Mandrake or
 SuSE or Fedora for the desktops, what's going to stop them from bringing
 it into the server room too?

My take on this is that it is more of a branding issue.  Desktops need much 
more cutting edge, in most cases, than do servers and certainly different 
types of supported hardware.  RH appears to be attempting to fully 
differentiate its offerings, Fedora on the desktop with more cutting edge 
releases and by necessity, more buggy software, and the staid, old tried and 
true Redhat that goes into the server, has paid support and doesn't depend as 
much on the community.  

I don't necessarily think that any of this is a bad idea, at least from the 
perspective of creating an OS that is designed for a specific segment.
-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Luca Olivetti
Jack Coates wrote:

worst case scenario is a hated albatross cousin to RH server, best case
scenario is that they've spawned their own new competitor.
http://www.caosity.org

Bye

--
- Yo también quiero una Europa libre de Patentes de Software  -
- I want a Software Patents Free Europe too! And you? -
---
  EuropeSwPatentFree - http://EuropeSwPatentFree.hispalinux.es


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] Dell laptop hangs with 9.2 when lid closed.

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
reply-to still a problem.

On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:56, Mof wrote:
 On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 05:28 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
  On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 16:44, Mof wrote:
   It appears that acpi and apm do the same thing, which is the prefered one
   to use anyway ?
  
   And if acpi is the prefered, how do I load up the right modules ?
  
   Mof.
 
  This order of commands should do it.  As root.
 
  /etc/init.d/apmd stop
 
  chkconfig apmd off
 
  /etc/init.d/acpid start
 
  chkconfig acpid on
 
  edit lilo (or grup) and change
 
  append=acpi=off  to
  append=acpi=on
 
  This should set you up so that upon a reboot you are running acpi not
  apm as well as get the right stuff started.  Note acpid won't start if
  apm is running (conflict avoidence.)
 
 Thanks James, but even with acpi working, it still hangs.
  Even though I have deleted /etc/acpi/events/lid, it still crashes when I 
 close the lid.

did you remember to use service acpid restart after editing that file?

 Here is a snippet from dmesg when acpid loads up:
 
 ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
 ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
 ACPI: AC Adapter [AC] (on-line)
 ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports C1 C2, 2 performance states, 8 throttling 
 states)
 ACPI: Thermal Zone [THM] (73 C)
 ACPI: Lid Switch [LID]
 ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PBTN]
 ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SBTN]
 
 
 How is ACPI configured ?
 I mean it looks like its stlll configured to do something when the lid is 
 closed, even though there is nothing in /etc/acpi/events/ besides power.
 The bios is set to do nothing if the lid is closed, and the AC power is 
 plugged in.
 
 I'm getting close to giving up here. :-(
 
 Mof.
 
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Jack Coates
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 06:22, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:42 am, Jack Coates wrote:
  Anyone interested in this mess should have a look at this article:
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33823.html
 
  They're trying to increase revenues by preventing use of their desktop
  offering in the server room. They've chosen a method that cuts off the
  nose to spite the face, but I still think they'll continue to be quite
  successful in the Fortune 500 space for inertial reasons. Only thing is,
  when the Fortune 500 begins to seriously evaluate Linux desktops, they
  won't be running RH. The question is, once they bring in Mandrake or
  SuSE or Fedora for the desktops, what's going to stop them from bringing
  it into the server room too?
 
 My take on this is that it is more of a branding issue.  Desktops need much 
 more cutting edge, in most cases, than do servers and certainly different 
 types of supported hardware.  RH appears to be attempting to fully 
 differentiate its offerings, Fedora on the desktop with more cutting edge 
 releases and by necessity, more buggy software, and the staid, old tried and 
 true Redhat that goes into the server, has paid support and doesn't depend as 
 much on the community.  
 
 I don't necessarily think that any of this is a bad idea, at least from the 
 perspective of creating an OS that is designed for a specific segment.

That's good strategy in the proprietary world, but the open source
community around both distributions has to buy into the idea for it to
work in this case. How long before scratch-an-itch leads to Fedora
being a pretty good server platform?

Any way, it's all non-Mandrake. On another list, the question has been
bringing up all sorts of cross-distribution questions. So, how many
people here are using Mandrake as a server vs as a desktop? The general
impression seems to be that Mandrake is mainly a desktop OS, which is
only used as a server in SOHO environments.
-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I myself would not automatically say, Use linux instead!  It's just as good 
as windoze with regards to desktop use.  In many cases it IS as good, if not 
better, than doze.  No viruses, more stable, etc, but it does come at a cost 
of increased complexity for the end user.  They do need to know/understand 
more to successfully install and operate linux than they do with windoze.  
And gamers.  Forget about it.  I myself and happy to try to play games under 
winex but most of the time they do not work so if I want to play, I HAVE to 
reboot to doze.  Could you honestly say that telling everyone to add even 
more complexity to their computer use and dual install linux on their windoze 
system and then go back and forth as a matter of course?  

I use linux 100% exclusive as my desktop system (except for most games).  I am 
a militant anti-M$ guy though, so I learned linux.  This isn't the case with 
most generic users.  Then there are specialized desktop users.  I am a 
scientist in biochemistry/molecular biology.  I have taken the time to learn 
the ins and outs of linux use and am now able (thus far) to use it 
exclusively in my work.  My colleagues are a different matter.  They all use 
either windoze boxes or Macs.  They absolutely REQUIRE a reference manager 
like EndNote.  They use word or, rarely, wordperfect plus EndNote to produce 
their research papers for submission to journals.  The closest thing in linux 
to an app that can do the same sort of thing is Lyx/LaTex and pybliographic 
or sixpack.  I used Lyx + pybliograhic to write my dissertation and journal 
submissions.  I took the not inconsiderable time to learn much of the 
intricacies of Lyx.  My colleagues don't have time or patience for this.  All 
this said, I really dislike using Lyx.  It is painful and counterintuitive.  
I would LOVE to be able to do this in OpenOffice.  I would LOVE for the 
document on the screen to appear as it does when I print it out (Lyx gives no 
indication of what the output will actually look like).  The problem is that 
OpenOffice on linux is not able to deal with references/citations.  It does 
have a builtin bibliography setup but it is rudimentary and extremely 
limited.  In fairness, there is a plan to improve on the bibliography system 
to make it more powerful and configurable but it isn't due to start hitting 
the released versions until 1.2 at the earliest.  EndNote on windoze does 
support OpenOffice (as of EndNote 7.0, I think) so on WINDOZE, you can use 
OpenOffice and produce well-referenced documents with the same ease as you 
can with Word or Wordperfect with EndNote.  

In this area, linux just lacks and cannot work as a dropin replacement for 
most users.  Most users are not going to want to learn Lyx.  

I can use OpenOffice for presentations and drawing, but I cannot use it for 
writing.  For that I have to use Lyx.  I cannot play most games on linux but 
can on windoze.  Such annoyances, plus the complexity of having to administer 
linux is just beyond what most generic users really want.  It is getting 
there, and Mandrake is leading the way, but it really isn't fair to say that 
linux CAN replace windoze for most users as their primary (at home) desktop 
system.  It isn't even really viable yet in certain academic/scientific 
circles.  

praedor

On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:20 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
 Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
 Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
 (or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
 with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
 the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
 been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.

 http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm

 James

- -- 
Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component 
of spiritual devotion.
- --Krakauer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/rlhbb1CLurEA6xURArWHAJ983b8giPqcZtYF5e6G+6EUeDT2yACeP/p+
AlixjWOrFdqnGm7mR5XQeAw=
=cOQo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Missing menus in window managers

2003-11-09 Thread Trey Sizemore
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:42, Tim Sawchuck wrote:

 Edit  /etc/menu/menudrakeentry, and where it has title=, make it
 title=Style  (actually *any* word will fix it).
 
 Then re-run update-menus -v as root.
 
 This is a known combo-bug (new techie term!) caused by Fluxbox and RPM.  You
 might check that you have updated copies of both, but editing the above line
 will fix it.
 
 Believe me, I have done it a couple or triple dozen times in the last few
 weeks, running Cooker as they got this solved. ;-)
 
 Tim

*whe*

That did it.

Thanks for your help, Tim!

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
---

Thieves respect property;
they merely wish the property to become their property
that they may more perfectly respect it.
-- G.K. Chesterton, The Man Who Was Thursday


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Terry Smith
I'm not sure I'm in total agreement.

The computing community is not made up of only two types of users:
experts (many of whom use linux) and complete neophytes (who, for the
sake of argument, use Windows). There is, in fact, a wide spectrum of
folks - some of whom want an appliance, those who are interested in
making the machine work better, those who like to tinker, all the way to
the more hard-core 'hacker' (like many of us). So one size does not fit
all and there's certainly plenty of well-functioning linux desktop
systems that work well and are easy enough to deal with even for an
inexperienced user. A user may need help in figuring out
something/getting something new working but these lists (and info
resources on the web such as twiki) can fill that need.

A personal example..At home I have two machines that the family uses;
both are dual boot and can load Windows; one runs Mandrake 9.1, the
other Red Hat 9.0. My wife and children have had the choice of loading
Windows or Linux for the last year and a half. They run linux 100% of
the time. I believe my wife and older daughter truly don't
care...they're just trying to get things done and they know that I'll
keep the computers up-to-date and running. My younger daughter is a bit
more of a hacker and has grown to dislike Windowsshe spends most of
her time designing things with the gimp, reconfiguring the desktop, etc.

Bottom line...in a typical family (albeit with a hobbyist hacker in the
house) situation, they've chosen linux over windows and have no
complaints or regrets (although they all still love the old Macintosh
upstairs :-).

Terry Smith
Cape Cod USA
 
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 09:24, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is not 
 yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a relatively 
 small subpopulation.  
 
 I use it exclusively but then I have been playing with linux for years now.  I 
 get it.  My father, wife, sisters...they don't get it.  They get boggled by 
 configuration this and that, logins, etc.  They are all too used to just 
 firing up and going with what is familiar.  Then, the biggy, is games.  If 
 you play games then you are set to go through even more work with only a 
 fractional hope that the game will work (working with wine is not straightup 
 simple and obvious).  The newest games rarely work, or work only poorly.  Not 
 a great way to make a favorable impression.  
 
 Lindows is set to give linux a poor name as well, with their default 
 run-as-root setup.  Sure, it makes it install and run similar to windoze but 
 it also makes it just as vulnerable as windoze.  This can only make people 
 think (ultimately) that linux is no more free viruses, worms, and hack 
 attacks as windoze.  
 
 I do think that for those who really just do web browsing, document editing, 
 emailing, then linux is perfectly valid.  For those who game it just isn't 
 there and wont be until linux gets more game titles itself or wine/winex gets 
 much better and easier to work with.  
 
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:58 am, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
  On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:20 am, James Sparenberg wrote:
   Am I alone in noticing the insanity.  As if SCO wasn't bad enough.
   Lycoris deciding that it can rewrite the GPL.  Now the  CEO of RedHat
   (or as I've heard of late DeadRat) is advocating that Home users stick
   with Windows as Linux isn't ready for the desktop.  Maybe I should send
   the SOB a copy of 9.2 when it's ready to show him what RH could have
   been if they didn't suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
  
   http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39117575,00.htm
  
   James
 
  Nah - you're not alone. I posted a message with a link to an announcement
  about this. The subject went something like Redhat = traitors?... grin
 
 - -- 
 Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component 
 of spiritual devotion.
 - --Krakauer
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQE/rk4Yb1CLurEA6xURAmsnAJ9LgwGW6BvaUmOZeapdXBGE4SS/4gCcDgja
 efM+7BPnCsPpFFqMr7rREWE=
 =BHUM
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 __
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Terry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Anne Wilson
Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
have to assume that it is the new drive.

We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
writing to swap.

I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
that?

I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Sunday 09 November 2003 10:41 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
 Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It
 is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted
 all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I
 have to assume that it is the new drive.

Anne, first to be absolutely sure - I think I would unplug the old drive 
completely from the system. You don't have to remove it, just unplug the P/S.

Then see if you still have the noise...

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is
 not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a
 relatively small subpopulation.

Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use Mandrake 
here with very few problems. 

Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, but 
thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, right?

and the boys use it mostly for games...again, following the norm.

Most Windows users run to a local Windog guru when they have problems anyways, 
and thats what my crowd here does - run to me. So whats the diff? :-)

-- 
  
  /\  
DarkLord 
  \/  


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:54 am, Jack Coates wrote:

 That's good strategy in the proprietary world, but the open source
 community around both distributions has to buy into the idea for it to
 work in this case. 

Well, it is new but I think that once the community realizes that RH is 
continuing to support Open Source and continuing to make an investment in 
Fedora, they will come to accept the differentiation.  If you look at it as a 
way to clearly separate the desktop product from the server product, it 
begins to be seen as mostly a marketing move.

In some ways, this may also help them combat the FUD from MS.  With less 
frequent software updates and longer testing periods before new releases of 
RH, they will show a more low-key track record of security vulnerabilities 
and patches than they might if they were more cutting edge like Fedora.  For 
those of us who understand IT, we know that frequency of patches is not 
necessarily an indicator of low quality, in many cases, it can be an 
indicator of high quality as the number of testers and developers patch 
things before they even become known issues.  However, MS appears to be ready 
to use desktop numbers to recommend against certain Linux distributions, so 
this may just be a way for RH to combat that type of activity.

 How long before scratch-an-itch leads to Fedora 
 being a pretty good server platform?

It may already be a pretty good server platform.  I guess the main question 
then becomes, how many companies want to rely on a pretty good server 
platform for their enterprise production level systems that will cause them 
to actually lose money if they go down.  Red Hat has never compared well in 
the desktop market because of their reputation as having less cutting edge 
packages, less consumer hardware support, etc.  This whole thing may just be 
a case of RH wanting people to compare apples to apples.

I have always liked Mandrake more than RedHat because it does have more 
cutting edge software that I liked, at the price of some bugs that I could 
either work around or figure out how to fix myself.  However, I am not 
running an enterprise wide banking system on it either.  If I were, I might 
consider the ramifications of frequent software updates, less dedicated 
testing, and more unknown quantities in the mix.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Dan Gordon
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:41:05 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
 is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
 all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
 have to assume that it is the new drive.
 
 We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
 an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
 well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
 was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
 writing to swap.
 
 I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
 that?

Not likely, hard drives are a sealed unit and if dust did get in then it
would be a defective drive.  I have had two drives go in the last 6
months the way you describe, they just dont make them like they used to.
I would see if you could get it replaced.

 
 I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
 doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
 rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?
 

Regards,
Dan Gordon

-- 
Sun Nov  9 11:20:13 EST 2003
 11:20:13 up 12:53,  2 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00
... bleakness ... desolation ... plastic forks ...

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:02, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is
  not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a
  relatively small subpopulation.
 
 Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use Mandrake 
 here with very few problems. 
 
 Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, but 
 thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, right?
 
 and the boys use it mostly for games...again, following the norm.
 
 Most Windows users run to a local Windog guru when they have problems anyways, 
 and thats what my crowd here does - run to me. So whats the diff? :-)

I've noticed the exact same thing, DL.  In fact a young person I know
recently told me that he could install and run Mandrake without trouble,
yet couldn't seem to get winblowz to operate as easily, and deferred to
a local shop for assistance in getting his winblowz to work correctly.

LX


-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Filter That, Beach! --Lanman, MDK Newbie List



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] fetchmail not working on 9.2

2003-11-09 Thread Michael Noble
I installed 9.2 all the patches and fetchmail does not work.  I
can go back to 9.0 and fetchmail works.
Has anybody gotten fetchmail to work on 9.2, if so what is the trick?
Mike


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 10:41, Anne Wilson wrote:
 Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
 is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
 all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
 have to assume that it is the new drive.
 
 We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
 an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
 well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
 was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
 writing to swap.
 
 I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
 that?
 
 I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
 doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
 rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?
 
 Anne

Dust won't affect the drive, but heat will.  If the drive is mounted
with another drive right on top or right on the bottom, it can
disentegrate from not being able to shed heat.  One inch of airspace on
top and bottom should be about right.

Another thing is if a drive is left on 24/7, it will not (normally) last
as long as a drive that is powered down.  Which is one reason that I
power down systems that are not being used; the bearings have a finite
number of rotations on them before they fail.  Not just the bearings in
the hard disks but also all the fan/motor bearings.  However that
shouldn't be an issue with a 6 month old drive.

The probability is that you have some sort of manufacturers defect with
this drive and should start thinking about sending it in for
replacement.  If you are dead sure that this drive is the source of the
noise, I would be calling in for an RMA number.

LX
-- 
°°°
Linux Mandrake 9.1  Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk
Lets face it if winblowz wasn't full of holes
 then it would probably look like Linux
-- Aron Smith, Mandrake OT mailing list
*Catch Star Trek Enterprise, Wednesdays on UPN*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Sunday 09 November 2003 9:26 am, Dan Gordon wrote:
snip

 Not likely, hard drives are a sealed unit and if dust did get in then it
 would be a defective drive.  I have had two drives go in the last 6
 months the way you describe, they just dont make them like they used to.
 I would see if you could get it replaced.

Good advice.

  I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then
  doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use
  rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?

I probably would just to be safe. It's a pain to try to rescue data after 
spindle bearings have given up the ghost. See below.

 Regards,
 Dan Gordon

I upgraded a friend's old Compaq Presario roughly two months ago because his 
CD-ROM died, we replaced it with a Cicero 52x32x52 CD-RW that was on sale for 
CDN$35. Then a week later his original 13 GB hard drive started to make the 
death rattle whenever it got warm. Added a new 30 GB Maxtor he bought, 
mirrored the original Compaq/Windows partitions by freezing the old drive to 
shut it up, and installed Mandrake 9.1 for good measure.

His future brother-in-lust gave him a 9 month old Maxtor 20 GB that has bad 
sectors the next day. I managed to get RMA for that one, the day after I did 
the report to Maxtor his new 30 GB started doing weird things. Got RMA for 
that one too, but had to use a new 60 GB I had sitting here (no more drive 
slots available in my old clunker) to keep him going until the new 
replacement drives arrived. sigh

You think *you* have drive problems? g If it's mass produced it can be a 
lump, no matter what _it_ is. 

Including people. (-;

Regards;
Charlie
- -- 
Edmonton,AB,Canada User 244963 at http://counter.li.org
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 kernel 2.4.22-21mdk
09:43:55 up 8 days, 18:22, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.04, 0.06
The plot was designed in a light vein that somehow became varicose.
-- David Lardner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/rnJqG11CaRuZZSIRAlLbAJ9Du6WGvbSPMGDX9wYNlGTNLGvUNwCgmhNb
Pai/5iP5O9OkFYylgh/cIJE=
=yzqn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Michael Noble
Anne,

Usually when a drive starts to make noise, it is caused by the bearings.
I have had drives last for years while making noise.  But if this is
a new drive (less than a year) you will probably be able to get it
replaced.  But since you will have to deal with the manufacturer of the
drive (which will mean down time) it would probably do best to go out
and purchase another drive replace the noisy drive and then get it
replaced.  Once replaced, you will have a spare drive for future use.
For the copy, I would suggest dd rather than cp.

Mike

Anne Wilson wrote:
Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.  It 
is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have unmounted 
all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still happening, so I 
have to assume that it is the new drive.

We have had workmen in the house for over 2 weeks, and there has been 
an incredible amount of dust.  I cleaned out the inside of the box as 
well as I could after the main part of the work was complete, but it 
was only at about time that the noise started.  I think it is when 
writing to swap.

I suspect that dust has got in where I cannot follow.  How likely is 
that?

I wonder if I should be buying another drive of the same size, then 
doing an overnight cp -a to the new drive, then attempting to use 
rsync to keep them mirrored, just in case.  What do you think?

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] providing an SSL and non SSL way of accessing each domains www and cgi-bin.

2003-11-09 Thread Franki
Brian V Bonini wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 13:44, Franki wrote:

I think you are not understanding what I mean..

Right now, I have the cert bound to my secure.my-domain.com  subdomain..

I don't need the cert to work with any other domains...

I just want to create a way whereby I can give my users the ability to 
each use my secure.my-domain.com subdomain
to access their files. files via SSL..



What I was thinking was you could set up was a wild card that would work like:
https://*.my-domain.com
Then each of the sites could have a cname to utilize your cert.

https://domain1.my-domain.com
https://domain2.my-domain.com
etc

Anyway, what happens if you symlink secure.my-domain.com/theirusername to the
document root for their-domain.com?
Yeah, I understand wildcard certs.. but one would not make my job any 
easier for this task..

Funnily enough I did something similar to what you just suggested.

I have setup a secure webroot which  contains one dir for each host..
The dirs are symlinked to the users web root.. like cgi-ssl  so they 
can easily put stuff in those directories like normal.
seems to be working. but I'd have prefered a simplier answer..

no matter,  It's working, that will do for now...

rgds

Franki

--
Please sign our petition to encourage notebook manufacturers to offer 
video card upgrades just like desktops.
http://www.petitiononline.com/inspiron/petition.html

For free scripts, online webmaster tools, HTML, XHTML, Perl  PHP 
tutorials and stuff, visit:
http://htmlfixit.com, Free web developer resources.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
Franki schrieb am Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:58:46 +0800:

 Perth has dozens of small business servers (biggest company has 40 
 employees)
 All of them are mandrake,  non are 9.2 (yet) but that might change 
 sometime soon when I am happy with it.
 (servers are 7.2 mostly, but some 8.1/8.2/9.0 machines also, but the
 7.2 machines have been moved away from the internet.)
 
 All of them have been getting uptimes over 100 days (by which time
 I've had to restart them for a kernel upgrade or something)..

Just as an aside: Did you post a report to MandrakeBizCases?

http://www.mandrakebizcases.com/modules.php?name=Submit_News

They are always glad to hear such things and the numerous reports on the
site serve well as argumentation help for people trying to persuade
their boss to have a look at Mandrake Linux.

wobo

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Missing menus in window managers

2003-11-09 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 10:07:43 -0500
Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed on electronic parchment:

 On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 14:42, Tim Sawchuck wrote:
 
  Edit  /etc/menu/menudrakeentry, and where it has title=, make it
  title=Style  (actually *any* word will fix it).
  
  Then re-run update-menus -v as root.
  
  This is a known combo-bug (new techie term!) caused by Fluxbox and RPM. 
  You might check that you have updated copies of both, but editing the
  above line will fix it.
  
  Believe me, I have done it a couple or triple dozen times in the last
  few weeks, running Cooker as they got this solved. ;-)
  
  Tim
 
 *whe*
 
 That did it.
 
 Thanks for your help, Tim!

You are welcome.

That's half of why we are here.  The other half is to *get* help.  ;-)

Tim

-- 
 _
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
 x registered Linux user # 329428
/ \ GnuPG KeyID 6B5A70DF www.keyserver.net


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] xtart and a new session

2003-11-09 Thread Bill Mullen
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, bascule wrote:

 is there a way to get xtart to start a session on another screen,
 a-la 'startx -- :1'

Yes, by using Hans Updyke's modified Xtart script, myXtart:

http://www.dimensional.com/~hansup/linux/xtart/

It works just like the regular Xtart, but it will determine the next 
available display automatically, and launch your session on that.

Hans is a regular contributor to the alt.os.linux.mandrake newsgroup.

HTH!

-- 
Bill Mullen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   MA, USA   RLU #270075   MDK 8.1  9.0
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people
very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Why does my sound not work?

2003-11-09 Thread Linux
Yes, the volume is turned up in aumix, alsamixer and kmix.  

I ran the sound configuration tool.  That doesn't help.

Thanks anyway.

Adrian


On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:13:54 +
Alexis L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the words:

 
 Indeed, I have the same audio chip set, and after a few hours
 research, I eventually realized that the sound volume was set to
 zero in aumix..
 
 From: Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mandrake Expert List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [expert] Why does my sound not work?
 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:33:23 -0800
 
 number 1 thing to check is alsamixer, followed by the system mixer
 (aumix, kmix, c).
 
 On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 21:18, Linux wrote:
   My computer is silent
  
  
   The mobo is an Intel D865GBF (www.intel.com/design/motherbd/bf). 
   I am using the onboard sound.
  
   It works fine under Windows98SE.
  
   I use Enlightenment, and I can enable sounds under E, but I don't
   hear anything.  I can also see that esd is running if I run top or
   kpm.
  
   Below are various commands and their outputs.
  
   lspcidrake -v | fgrep AUDIO:
   snd-intel8x0: Intel Corp.|82801EB AC'97 Audio
   [MULTIMEDIA_AUDIO](vendor:8086 device:24d5 subv:8086 subd:e001)
  
   grep sound-slot /etc/modules.conf:
   alias sound-slot-0 snd-intel8x0
  
   /sbin/lsmod:
   Module  Size  Used byNot tainted
   sg 34636   0  (autoclean)
   parport_pc 25096   1  (autoclean)
   lp  8096   0  (autoclean)
   parport34176   1  (autoclean) [parport_pc lp]
   agpgart40896   6  (autoclean)
   snd-seq-oss31104   0  (unused)
   snd-seq-midi-event  5640   0  [snd-seq-oss]
   snd-seq42608   2  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq-midi-event]
   snd-pcm-oss43556   1
   snd-mixer-oss  14488   0  [snd-pcm-oss]
   snd-intel8x0   21988   1
   snd-ac97-codec 40160   0  [snd-intel8x0]
   snd-pcm77536   0  [snd-pcm-oss snd-intel8x0]
   snd-timer  18376   0  [snd-seq snd-pcm]
   snd-mpu401-uart 4396   0  [snd-intel8x0]
   snd-rawmidi17600   0  [snd-mpu401-uart]
   snd-seq-device  5832   0  [snd-seq-oss snd-seq
   snd-rawmidi] snd-page-alloc  7732   0  [snd-intel8x0
   snd-pcm] snd40868   0  [snd-seq-oss
   snd-seq-midi-event snd-seq snd-pcm-oss snd-mixer-oss snd-intel8x0
   snd-ac97-codec snd-pcm snd-timer snd-mpu401-uart snd-rawmidi
   snd-seq-device] soundcore
6276   0  [snd] ppp_async   9216   0  (unused)
   ppp_generic24060   0  [ppp_async]
   slhc6564   0  [ppp_generic]
   af_packet  14952   0  (autoclean)
   e100   56964   1  (autoclean)
   supermount 15296   4  (autoclean)
   ide-cd 33856   0
   cdrom  31648   0  [ide-cd]
   ide-scsi   11280   0
   ehci-hcd   18568   0  (unused)
   usb-uhci   24652   0  (unused)
   usbcore72992   1  [ehci-hcd usb-uhci]
   rtc 8060   0  (autoclean)
   reiserfs  175120   2
   sd_mod 11548   0  (unused)
   aic7xxx   120860   0  (unused)
   scsi_mod   91796   4  [sg ide-scsi sd_mod aic7xxx]
  
   /sbin/chkconfig --list sound:
   sound 0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
  
   /sbin/chkconfig --list alsa:
   alsa  0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
  
   /sbin/chkconfig --list alsa:
   vol 100, 100, P
   pcm 100, 100
   speaker 100, 100
   line 100, 100, P
   mic 100, 100, R
   cd 100, 100, P
   igain 100, 100
   line1 100, 100, P
   phin 100, 100, P
   video 100, 100, P
  
  
   /sbin/fuser -v /dev/dsp:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/dsp skippi 1841 f  wavplay
  
  
  
   Any thoughts??  Thank you very much.
   Adrian
  
   --
  
  On The Fly Photography
http://204EastSouth.com
  
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
  Version: 3.12
GAT d-@ s: a C++ UL++ L++(+++) P E- W++ !N o? K- w--- M+ PS+++
PE+++ Y+ PGP t++@ 5+++ X++ R+@ tv-- b++ DI D+ G e+ h+ r y++
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
 --
 Jack Coates
 Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 _
 MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
 
 
 


-- 
 
   On The Fly Photography
 http://204EastSouth.com
 
 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
   Version: 3.12
 GAT d-@ s: a C++ UL++ L++(+++) P E- W++ !N o? K- w--- M+ PS+++ 
 PE+++ Y+ PGP t++@ 5+++ X++ R+@ tv-- b++ DI D+ G e+ h+ r y++
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


-- 
 
   On The Fly Photography
 

Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Kwan Lowe
 I would LOVE to be able to do this in OpenOffice.  I would LOVE for the
 document on the screen to appear as it does when I print it out (Lyx gives
 no indication of what the output will actually look like).


LyX and LaTeX not WYSIWYG editors and actually make it a point in their
documentation. Except for an occasional business letter using a template,
I prefer to not have to worry about how the final page will look.

[...]

 In this area, linux just lacks and cannot work as a dropin replacement for
 most users.  Most users are not going to want to learn Lyx.

Have you tried kile? It's still not a replacement for most people, but if
you're reasonably proficient with LaTeX it can make editing easier. I've
been playing around with it recently and it's similar in idea to something
like quanta++.


-- 
The Digital Hermit  Unix and Linux Solutions
http://www.digitalhermit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 3:57 pm, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 10:41 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
  Recently I have noticed that my drive is noisy from time to time.
   It is a 6-month old drive, with an older one as slave.  I have
  unmounted all the partitions on the old drive, but it is still
  happening, so I have to assume that it is the new drive.

 Anne, first to be absolutely sure - I think I would unplug the old
 drive completely from the system. You don't have to remove it, just
 unplug the P/S.

 Then see if you still have the noise...

I'll do that in the morning.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Impending drive problem?

2003-11-09 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 09 Nov 2003 5:06 pm, Michael Noble wrote:
 Anne,

 Usually when a drive starts to make noise, it is caused by the
 bearings. I have had drives last for years while making noise.  But
 if this is a new drive (less than a year) you will probably be able
 to get it replaced.  But since you will have to deal with the
 manufacturer of the drive (which will mean down time) it would
 probably do best to go out and purchase another drive replace the
 noisy drive and then get it replaced.  Once replaced, you will have
 a spare drive for future use.

The odd thing is, it's for short periods, just a few times a day.

Thanks to all for comments/suggestions.  This is really bad timing for 
me, as I have so many commitments over the next few days, but I don't 
think I should ignore this.  I'll fit it all in as best I can.

 For the copy, I would suggest dd rather than cp.

OK - I'll RTFMP g

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 06:22, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:42 am, Jack Coates wrote:
  Anyone interested in this mess should have a look at this article:
  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/33823.html
 
  They're trying to increase revenues by preventing use of their desktop
  offering in the server room. They've chosen a method that cuts off the
  nose to spite the face, but I still think they'll continue to be quite
  successful in the Fortune 500 space for inertial reasons. Only thing is,
  when the Fortune 500 begins to seriously evaluate Linux desktops, they
  won't be running RH. The question is, once they bring in Mandrake or
  SuSE or Fedora for the desktops, what's going to stop them from bringing
  it into the server room too?
 
 My take on this is that it is more of a branding issue.  Desktops need much 
 more cutting edge, in most cases, than do servers and certainly different 
 types of supported hardware.  RH appears to be attempting to fully 
 differentiate its offerings, Fedora on the desktop with more cutting edge 
 releases and by necessity, more buggy software, and the staid, old tried and 
 true Redhat that goes into the server, has paid support and doesn't depend as 
 much on the community.  
 
 I don't necessarily think that any of this is a bad idea, at least from the 
 perspective of creating an OS that is designed for a specific segment.

Where as I don't find fault with having two versions of any distro.  I
do however find fault with dissing an entire segment of your
market/community/contributors just because it's convenient. Which is in
many ways what the CEO of Red Hat et al. are doing.  If Linux is so
lousy on the desktop how come it is that I can use Linux exclusively yet
work in a world where all around me are on various forms of other OS's. 
Basically I interpret what he said as, Thanks to your devotion over the
last 8 years we have a solid product, now fsck off and don't bother us
anymore.  Your work, time and effort we didn't pay for, has been of
tremendous value to us and we no longer think you are worth being
concerned about.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not alone in this feeling. 
So to all former RH users Welcome to Mandrake.

James
 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Sunday 09 November 2003 03:17 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:

 Basically I interpret what he said as, Thanks to your devotion over the
 last 8 years we have a solid product, now fsck off and don't bother us
 anymore.  Your work, time and effort we didn't pay for, has been of
 tremendous value to us and we no longer think you are worth being
 concerned about.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not alone in this feeling.
 So to all former RH users Welcome to Mandrake.

It is possible that they are doing exactly that.  It is also possible that RH 
is acknowledging what a lot of other people have been slowly coming to 
realize, including myself, that MS sold the public a bill of goods when they 
convinced them that with the right OS, they could administer and manage a 
computer without gaining any real knowledge about what they are doing.

Consumers won't get that message from a community effort like Fedora, but they 
have come to expect it from a commercial software company like RH.  For 
better or worse, and as so many newcomers to Linux point out, people are 
looking for a replacement for MS Windows that does everything that it 
promises to do but doesn't just promise to do it but delivers.  It is 
possible that there is some OS that will deliver on that, but I have yet to 
see it and don't believe that it will ever appear.  

In point of fact, that is precisely what MS has also been selling enterprises 
on for even server administration.  Shows why a lot of MSCE's are so woefully 
unprepared to do real troubleshooting and actually fix problems versus the 
reinstall/reboot crap that MS teaches.  And also why so many companies find 
it now so easy to outsource support to 3rd world locations at low wage rates.  
How hard is it to teach someone to say reboot and if that doesn't work then 
reinstall.

If RH plans to throw away the desktop market and only sell servers, then they 
will soon find themselves marginalized in much the same fashion that Sun is 
currently marginalized to a very niche market.  That doesn't really seem the 
way to expand and grow your business, and I wouldn't expect them to succeed 
at that either.

If, however, they manage to keep enough ties between their server offering and 
the community sponsored desktop offering to convince companies that they can 
implement Fedora on the desktop, and RH in the enterprise and still get 
seamless integration between the two, compatibility and shared knowledge 
among support staff, then they may be able to actually sell a value 
proposition that actually delivers what it promises to deliver and not the 
load of bunk that MS has up to now been selling.

I look at it this way.  You can pay a higher price and get promises, support 
and accountability which is worth it for a business by buying RH.  You can 
get the same functionality, but with more accountability placed on you to 
talk to the community and figure your problems out with Fedora.  You get the 
same software either way, but the free version is only financially free, it 
requires personal responsibility.  The pay version requires less 
responsibility and more money.  Same choices that people have always had with 
Linux.  Only now, they have slapped a different name on each just to make it 
more clear to the PHB types.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] xtart and a new session

2003-11-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 10:04, Bill Mullen wrote:
 On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, bascule wrote:
 
  is there a way to get xtart to start a session on another screen,
  a-la 'startx -- :1'
 
 Yes, by using Hans Updyke's modified Xtart script, myXtart:
 
 http://www.dimensional.com/~hansup/linux/xtart/

Or go here for a full explanation
http://www.tuxfiles.org/linuxhelp/multiple-x.html

but startx -- :1 will start a second session on f8 then startx -- :2
would start on on 9 (only if one exists on f8 btw)  The limit AFAIK is 6
X sessions (f7 - f12) mainly because of keys.  

James

 
 It works just like the regular Xtart, but it will determine the next 
 available display automatically, and launch your session on that.
 
 Hans is a regular contributor to the alt.os.linux.mandrake newsgroup.
 
 HTH!


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3721 days Praedor Atrebates wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux is not 
 yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for a relatively 
 small subpopulation.  

  I have to disagree with you...my mom's first computer was a linux
  box I gave her for xmas 4 years ago...she has no problem using it.

  My 3yo nephew has been using linux for about a year (ok, he's
  precocious, but it had to happen, seeing as he comes to visit at
  least every 3rd day and there's computers everywhere in my house)
  and has never had a problem, except that I have to make sure only
  his login has the frog icon on it, because I think that's how he
  recognizes his name on the computer.

  Hell, my sister uses linux whenever she comes visit with my nephew,
  because there's nothing but linux in this house and in my parents'
  house. 

  Can my mom, sister and nephew install and configure linux on their
  own? of course not...but they can't install and configure any other
  OS either. I install and configure linux for them, as well as do
  admin chores (updating and so on) for them remotely...just like any
  admin does for any user.

  So, my experience tells me...hell yes, linux is ready for the
  desktop of the mortal, as long as it's pre-installed, either by the
  HW company they get their computer from or by the friendly family
  geek. 

  Vox

-- 
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else.   -- Donald B. Marti Jr.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] 9.2 and Gramofile

2003-11-09 Thread Rob Blomquist
I am getting back to trying to record some tapes to mp3, and I am finding that 
Gramofile is being weird.

Basically, when I choose the output file, and start recording, I get a blank 
screen. I am not sure if I am going to get a recording, but I sure have no 
recording screen.

Has anybody else seen this problem?
-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Problems grabbing Standard Audio Input (was 9.2 and Gramofile)

2003-11-09 Thread Rob Blomquist
So I hunted around, and found that a program had crashed, leaving /dev/dsp 
occupied, so I killed it off, and tried again. Now Gramofile acts like it 
should, giving me the recording screen.

But still, I have some sort of problem with picking up the standard input with 
anything: gramofile, Audacity, Rezound. It seems like maybe a reboot is in 
order, but I would rather not, for the obvious uptime reason.

Rob
-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] xtart and a new session

2003-11-09 Thread Salane KIng
On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:22 am, bascule wrote:
 is there a way to get xtart to start a session on another screen,
 a-la 'startx -- :1'

 bascule
Edit /etc/X11/xdm/xservers
change at the bottom from this:
:0 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X -deferglyphs 16
to this:
:0 local /bin/nice -n -10 /usr/X11R6/bin/X -deferglyphs 16
:1 local reserve /usr/X11R6/bin/X :1 vt8
:2 local reserve /usr/X11R6/bin/X :2 vt9
:3 local reserve /usr/X11R6/bin/X :3 vt10
:4 local reserve /usr/X11R6/bin/X :4 vt11
:5 local reserve /usr/X11R6/bin/X :5 vt12

then restart X
after that there will be a menu option of 
Start New Session
It will open a new session to switch back alt-f7 as you can see alt-f8 to f-12 
can be new sessions 

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Praedor Atrebates
Yes, I know lyx is not WYSIWYG and that it is advertised as the ridiculous 
WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean).  In point of fact, it is the result 
of being stuck working with Latex via a GUI.  It does a lot to remove the 
need of learning an entire programing language (LaTex) just to produce 
documents.  That said, I merely lament the fact that I am forced to use Lyx, 
with all its difficulty, because there is nothing else like it in the linux 
world.  There is NOTHING like Word/Wordperfect + EndNote in linux - Lyx 
contains it all in one package but you give up WYSIWYG and the ease that 
comes with that.

I wrote my dissertation and other publications using Lyx.  It works well but 
it is a royal pain in the ass to get it to do what you want.  It truly is a 
weakness to not have any real idea about what your document will look like 
until you either actually print it, or repeatedly generate previews with each 
alteration/tweak.  

I am pleased that OpenOffice is working on this but it is still some time off.  
Until it is actually in the code, one is stuck with Lyx/Latex.  Ugh.

I am not proficient in Latex.  I don't have the time nor the interest in 
learning a programming lanquage just to publish scientific results.  I 
spend all day collecting data.  I simply cannot (nor can my colleagues) spend 
the time needed to learn the intricacies of Latex.  This is unrealistic.  
Word/Wordperfect/OpenOffice + EndNote removes the need for this on Windoze 
and the Mac.  

One day the equivalent functionality will be there for linux and future linux 
users.  

On Sunday 09 November 2003 02:42 pm, Kwan Lowe wrote:
  I would LOVE to be able to do this in OpenOffice.  I would LOVE for the
  document on the screen to appear as it does when I print it out (Lyx
  gives no indication of what the output will actually look like).

 LyX and LaTeX not WYSIWYG editors and actually make it a point in their
 documentation. Except for an occasional business letter using a template,
 I prefer to not have to worry about how the final page will look.

 [...]

  In this area, linux just lacks and cannot work as a dropin replacement
  for most users.  Most users are not going to want to learn Lyx.

 Have you tried kile? It's still not a replacement for most people, but if
 you're reasonably proficient with LaTeX it can make editing easier. I've
 been playing around with it recently and it's similar in idea to something
 like quanta++.

-- 
Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component 
of spiritual devotion.
--Krakauer

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Praedor Atrebates
Fine.  Do they all have root password available so they can do updates, 
reconfigure, build and install?  These are things that are essentially 
handfed to windoze users.  You click on an install button and app X is 
installed.  Done.  On linux this requires root.  Simple enough if you are 
used to this but it is just another layer of complexity if you are a doze 
user. 

Sure, this admin is everyone thing is one of the primary weaknesses of doze 
wrt viruses, worms, and hackers, but it is easier to work with.

My father can install a CD in his doze computer and click Install without 
problem.  There would be problems if I had to walk him through setting up a 
root password (and remember it!), then a user password (remember it!).  OK 
dad, setup your wireless connection.  On doze this is trivial.  On linux it 
is a frickin pain in the ass (I do it, after a modicum of hair pulling but 
then I know what I'm doing).  You download your tarball, untar it, read the 
readme and install files.  HOPEFULLY you will simply need to do a ./configure 
 make  make install (as root) and the driver will be ready.  Now you just 
have to either mess with ugly commands via iwpriv or ifconfig.  Depends on 
your device.  

OK, now setup spam filtering.  Hah!  Joe Blow can't handle it.  WE can because 
we have generally been doing this for some time AND we have the time and 
inclination to learn all of this.  Add in procmail (and the need to setup 
postfix or similar.  Whew!  Complexity beyond anything people mess with in 
doze).  Yes, linux is great and powerful.  I love it.  But I would never ever 
be able to get my father, mother, wife to deal with all this.  And ya know, 
you just can't always be there to deal with other people's computers all the 
time.  My father doesn't live next door, he lives next state over.  

Unless Joe/Jane Blow user has an expert somewhere, they are not equipped to 
deal with linux.  It's just that simple.  And again, how do you explain to 
them that they'll just have to give up the cool games if they go linux?  They 
LOVE the games afterall.  OK, just reboot to winders.  Well, why not just 
STAY in winders so you don't have to deal with the rebooting all the time?  

I merely think that for MOST people at home, linux is not there yet.  For 
people at work or at schools where there are admins to deal with all the 
complexity of configuring and handling software install, it is perfectly 
fine, but for most at home?  Nope.  Not yet.

On Sunday 09 November 2003 11:48 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:02, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
  On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
   Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux
   is not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for
   a relatively small subpopulation.
 
  Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use
  Mandrake here with very few problems.
 
  Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, but
  thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, right?
 
  and the boys use it mostly for games...again, following the norm.
 
  Most Windows users run to a local Windog guru when they have problems
  anyways, and thats what my crowd here does - run to me. So whats the
  diff? :-)

 I've noticed the exact same thing, DL.  In fact a young person I know
 recently told me that he could install and run Mandrake without trouble,
 yet couldn't seem to get winblowz to operate as easily, and deferred to
 a local shop for assistance in getting his winblowz to work correctly.

 LX

-- 
Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component 
of spiritual devotion.
--Krakauer

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] [OT] Publishing text (was: (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?)

2003-11-09 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:36:23PM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Content-Description: clearsigned data
[...]
 There is NOTHING like Word/Wordperfect + EndNote in linux - Lyx 
 contains it all in one package but you give up WYSIWYG and the ease that 
 comes with that.

Well, on the other hand: Word is *nowhere* near in matching the
print-out quality of LaTeX - and neither is OOo. Does Wordperfect
match it?
So far, the only WYSIWYG program able to match LaTeX for
sheer quality of print-out (that I have seen) was Framemaker, and
that's an entirely different league (pricewise, for starters...).

Also, you don't need to know much to write a good LaTeX document -
that's the beauty of it. LaTeX takes care of most things and you
concentrate on typing as opposed to doing layout. That's how I did it
with my scripture and reports - all written in LaTeX (XEmacs
rules...). Word would have forced me to put a lot more effort in
layout (still does) - and I hate it for that. Never mind about the old
change your printer - reformat your document problem...

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
-
Thomas Ribbrockhttp://www.ribbrock.org 
  You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Re: (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread T. Ribbrock
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:42:04PM -0800, Jack Coates wrote:
[...]
 RH is trying to build two truly separate distributions, a server and a
 desktop, with different source trees, different package revisions,
 different config tools...
[...]

Errr... While I don't like the direction RH is going (which is why I'm
here after having used RH for six years), I do wonder where you got that
impression. There's nothing explicitly desktop about Fedora - quite
the contrary. RH is going to base its business offerings (at least in
part) on Fedora, which makes Fedora a test bed, also for their server
offerings. Try it in Fedora, merge it into the Enterprise line later,
when it's matured - that seems to be the idea.
Even now, there's talk on redhat-list and fedora-list going on about
people wanting to use Fedora on servers. The programs are still there.
Even the Server Install option is still there.
Hence, I'd be curious to know how you came to this conclusion.

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
-
Thomas Ribbrockhttp://www.ribbrock.org 
  You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] 9.2 and Gramofile

2003-11-09 Thread Rob Blomquist
On Sunday 09 November 2003 2:04 pm, Rob Blomquist wrote:
 I am getting back to trying to record some tapes to mp3, and I am finding
 that Gramofile is being weird.

 Basically, when I choose the output file, and start recording, I get a
 blank screen. I am not sure if I am going to get a recording, but I sure
 have no recording screen.

And yes, no recording occurs.

Rob

-- 

Linux: For the people, by the people.


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread Phil G.
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:49:57 -0500, Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Fine.
I'm not disagreeing.  But I have a couple observations.

Now that Christmas ads are in full force, I noticed there is no reason for 
me to look at the software ads.  Pre-linux I was always buying something, 
getting an upgrade to something.  And that required more memory, more disk, 
more cpu.  With Linux, everything I could want I installed when I installed 
the OS, or shortly thereafter.  With windows I was always installing 
something.  Now, I don't install stuff often.

Maybe I do disagree just a little bit ;-), as in True, but. . .   When I 
have installed, for most products I could install through MCC.  That's 
easier than InstallShield.  For most others I've needed, there was a 
mandrake RPM.  My point is, a pc-illiterate user (I don't think) will need 
an application that's only available in a tarball.

I have two pc's and a firewall pc, and since getting rid of windows my TCO 
has gone down - not only because of licensing fees but also my time.  My 
kids are able to use linux without help from me (use, not administer) 
whereas with windows there were frequent corruption problems that I would 
have to resolve.  Caused, in part, by them downloading screen savers, 
demos, games, malware, spyware, etc.  This seems to be similar to Ronald's 
experience.

just my .02

Phil

 Do they all have root password available so they can do updates,
reconfigure, build and install?  These are things that are essentially 
handfed to windoze users.  You click on an install button and app X is 
installed.  Done.  On linux this requires root.  Simple enough if you are 
used to this but it is just another layer of complexity if you are a doze 
user.

Sure, this admin is everyone thing is one of the primary weaknesses of 
doze wrt viruses, worms, and hackers, but it is easier to work with.

My father can install a CD in his doze computer and click Install 
without problem.  There would be problems if I had to walk him through 
setting up a root password (and remember it!), then a user password 
(remember it!).  OK dad, setup your wireless connection.  On doze this is 
trivial.  On linux it is a frickin pain in the ass (I do it, after a 
modicum of hair pulling but then I know what I'm doing).  You download 
your tarball, untar it, read the readme and install files.  HOPEFULLY you 
will simply need to do a ./configure  make  make install (as root) 
and the driver will be ready.  Now you just have to either mess with ugly 
commands via iwpriv or ifconfig.  Depends on your device.

OK, now setup spam filtering.  Hah!  Joe Blow can't handle it.  WE can 
because we have generally been doing this for some time AND we have the 
time and inclination to learn all of this.  Add in procmail (and the need 
to setup postfix or similar.  Whew!  Complexity beyond anything people 
mess with in doze).  Yes, linux is great and powerful.  I love it.  But I 
would never ever be able to get my father, mother, wife to deal with all 
this.  And ya know, you just can't always be there to deal with other 
people's computers all the time.  My father doesn't live next door, he 
lives next state over.

Unless Joe/Jane Blow user has an expert somewhere, they are not equipped 
to deal with linux.  It's just that simple.  And again, how do you 
explain to them that they'll just have to give up the cool games if they 
go linux?  They LOVE the games afterall.  OK, just reboot to winders.  
Well, why not just STAY in winders so you don't have to deal with the 
rebooting all the time?

I merely think that for MOST people at home, linux is not there yet.  For 
people at work or at schools where there are admins to deal with all the 
complexity of configuring and handling software install, it is perfectly 
fine, but for most at home?  Nope.  Not yet.

On Sunday 09 November 2003 11:48 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:02, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
  Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that 
linux
  is not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - 
for
  a relatively small subpopulation.

 Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use
 Mandrake here with very few problems.

 Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, 
but
 thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, right?

 and the boys use it mostly for games...again, following the norm.

 Most Windows users run to a local Windog guru when they have problems
 anyways, and thats what my crowd here does - run to me. So whats the
 diff? :-)

I've noticed the exact same thing, DL.  In fact a young person I know
recently told me that he could install and run Mandrake without trouble,
yet couldn't seem to get winblowz to operate as easily, and deferred to
a local shop for assistance in getting his winblowz to work correctly.
LX



--
Using Mandrake Linux 9.1 

Re: [expert] [OT] Publishing text (was: (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?)

2003-11-09 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I don't know what this means.  I write a paragraph in OO, in Lyx, and in 
Abiword.  Same paragraph.  I then print it.  It looks identical regardless of 
what I used to generate it.  The text is whatever quality the printer can 
produce.  There is nothing magic about latex/lyx output to printer. 

Text is text is text.  Times New Roman is Times New Roman no matter what 
wordprocessor is used.  Arial is arial is arial.  A printer can only produce 
what it is designed for and no better.  In what way can Latex/Lyx somehow 
make a printer work better than any other app/tool?

There is no difference in text quality and formatting between Lyx and Kwrite 
for that matter.  

As the subject has OT in it, I wont worry about the OT nature of this but...
Writing my dissertation I had a couple very strict options with how to deal 
with figures.  I could produce all my figures and legends and add them all to 
the end of the document or I could include them within the body by either 
providing them their own individual pages immediately after the first page 
from which the figure was first referred to.   In something like Word, 
wordperfect, OO, Abiword, etc, I KNOW where page breaks are and will be.  
What you see is exactly what you get.  The first word on any page is what it 
is on the screen.  The last word on a page is the same last word seen on the 
screen.  In lyx there is no indication of where page breaks will be.  You 
don't know until you either print it or do a preview (which is the same as 
printing it, time-wise, but just stops one step prior to actually sending to 
printer).  This is HELL when you are trying to add graphics the page after 
the first reference in the text.  All you can do is do a preview, look at the 
page where the figure is referenced, see which paragraph ends the page, and 
perhaps where in a paragraph the page ends.  You then insert a special 
character (a page break) in the screen view at the APPARENT correct location 
in the text onscreen.

Silly you, you thought this would work.  It SEEMS reasonable.  It doesn't 
work.  What you get is the graphic does appear on its own page and it occurs 
after the word you wanted but you find that by entering a page break at that 
location, you altered the formatting of the paragraph.  You were using right 
justification but now the word that was at the end of the page originally is 
no longer right justified as it was.  There is room there now for another 
word, or perhaps a part of a hyphenated word.   To get the end of the page 
and paragraph to be properly right justified you either have to experiment 
with hyphenated variants of the next word in the sentence OR you have to 
start experimenting with entering protected blanks (you have to do a LOT of 
this) to finally get the final output text to be properly formatted.  

The problem exists for inline graphics too.  Say you use inline graphics in 
your text, but to do so you have to have at least 1/2 the text below the 
graphic.  You have to do preview after preview, tweaking the position of the 
graphic again and again until it is placed just right on the final output.  
There is no indication onscreen that you are doing OK.

Many words are not properly hyphenated in lyx.  All too often you have set 
your right margin to be just right.  For my dissertation it was a hard, fast 
1 inch.  No less.  No more.  I generate the document and it looks OK, but I 
goofed and didn't go over every single page with my careful eye.  It turns 
out that on several pages scattered throughout the document, lyx and latex 
screwed up and didn't hyphenate a long word...and let it blow right through 
your hard, fast 1 inch margins.  You have to manually go in after the fact 
and instruct lyx/latex how to hyphenate those words.  And DNA sequences?  In 
every case, unless you provide a cryptic latex command  in the document 
preamble, Lyx/latex will blow the sequence well past your margin.  You NEVER 
run into these problems in a normal WYSIWYG wordprocessor.  Never.  Because 
what you see on the screen is exactly what comes out of the printer.  No 
suprises.

Lyx is powerful.  If you know programming languages, and latex happens to be 
one of them, then Latex/Lyx is fine.  You will be able to add cryptic 
commands to the preamble and in the document (insert latex) without problem.  
But UGH!I use it because I HAVE to use it (thus far).  The instant an 
alternative comes along, like OO with proper bibliography handling 
capabilities, I will drop lyx and latex like a ball of plutonium.

praedor

On Sunday 09 November 2003 07:18 pm, T. Ribbrock wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:36:23PM -0500, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Content-Description: clearsigned data
 [...]

  There is NOTHING like Word/Wordperfect + EndNote in linux - Lyx
  contains it all in one package but you give up WYSIWYG and the ease that
  comes with that.

 Well, on the other hand: Word is *nowhere* 

Re: [expert] (OT)Uh..... Am I alone in noticing the insanity?

2003-11-09 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 15:49, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
 Fine.  Do they all have root password available so they can do updates, 
 reconfigure, build and install?  These are things that are essentially 
 handfed to windoze users.  You click on an install button and app X is 
 installed.  Done.  On linux this requires root.  Simple enough if you are 
 used to this but it is just another layer of complexity if you are a doze 
 user. 
 
 Sure, this admin is everyone thing is one of the primary weaknesses of doze 
 wrt viruses, worms, and hackers, but it is easier to work with.
 
 My father can install a CD in his doze computer and click Install without 
 problem.  There would be problems if I had to walk him through setting up a 
 root password (and remember it!), then a user password (remember it!).  OK 
 dad, setup your wireless connection.  On doze this is trivial. 

depends on your box.  On this one it won't work with doze.  Does with
Linux.  I've gone both ways over the last 6 months.  

  On linux it 
 is a frickin pain in the ass (I do it, after a modicum of hair pulling but 
 then I know what I'm doing).  You download your tarball, untar it, read the 
 readme and install files.  HOPEFULLY you will simply need to do a ./configure 
  make  make install (as root) and the driver will be ready.  Now you just 
 have to either mess with ugly commands via iwpriv or ifconfig.  Depends on 
 your device.  

And short of the compile in doze it's buy a card.  Find out that the
chipset and the driver on the disk don't match.  Download a new driver
find out it's incompatible with your laptop.  Drive to Fry's exchange
and start all over.  Took 3 trips to Fry's for a business partner of
mine to get a working wireless in his new Dell.  (and 4 calls to Dell)
On my laptop it flat won't work with doze.  On linux I've had 6
different cards work the same way.  Plug them in.  They work.  (mostly
ones I borrowed from friends.) 
 
 OK, now setup spam filtering.  Hah!  Joe Blow can't handle it.  WE can because 
 we have generally been doing this for some time AND we have the time and 
 inclination to learn all of this.  Add in procmail (and the need to setup 
 postfix or similar.  Whew!  Complexity beyond anything people mess with in 
 doze).  Yes, linux is great and powerful.  I love it.  But I would never ever 
 be able to get my father, mother, wife to deal with all this.  And ya know, 
 you just can't always be there to deal with other people's computers all the 
 time.  My father doesn't live next door, he lives next state over.  
 

Which is why it should be on the MTA not on the box.  

 Unless Joe/Jane Blow user has an expert somewhere, they are not equipped to 
 deal with linux.  It's just that simple.  And again, how do you explain to 
 them that they'll just have to give up the cool games if they go linux?  They 
 LOVE the games afterall.  OK, just reboot to winders.  Well, why not just 
 STAY in winders so you don't have to deal with the rebooting all the time?  
 
My Mom is on Unix (70 next may) my sister and my 3 year old... just to
give you the other side of the coin. (My wife won't try it. or rather
doesn't know she's using it. *grin*)

 I merely think that for MOST people at home, linux is not there yet.  For 
 people at work or at schools where there are admins to deal with all the 
 complexity of configuring and handling software install, it is perfectly 
 fine, but for most at home?  Nope.  Not yet.

The number one problem I've found with Linux is that the people
advocating it (And lord knows I'm as guilty as anyone) shows people way
to much.  Second advantage it's already installed.  This is an advantage
that cannot be matched with Linux.  Since rarely if ever does it come
both pre-installed and working right. (Note both conditions.)  I just
spent 3 days working with a guy setting up filters in outlook.  Thank
god I use evolution, since they are so similar.  2 days on the phone,
the third I said the heck with it drove to his house and we did it face
to face.  His XP box had been setup right.  both a user and an admin
(not running all the time as root like most boxes.)  

As for spam filtering.  Can't find one that works right in windows. 
Just flat not fine grained enough or easy enough for someone like my
wife to use/install.  Some things are admin tasks and need to remain
that way.  No matter what OS.
 
 On Sunday 09 November 2003 11:48 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
  On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 11:02, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
   On Sunday 09 November 2003 09:24 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Well, I gotta say that Redhat does have a point.  I do think that linux
is not yet ready for the everyday desktop user except for Lindows - for
a relatively small subpopulation.
  
   Hmm, I disagree. My 10 and 12 year old (not to mention my wife) use
   Mandrake here with very few problems.
  
   Sure, my wife uses it almost exclusively for e-mail and web-browsing, but
   thats what the Windoze majority does anyways, 

[expert] /etc/hosts and dns

2003-11-09 Thread Greg Meyer
I have a laptop that connects to my office e-mail server as an IMAP client.  
Sometimes I am outside the firewall, and in this case, I can connect to the 
server using the server's fqdn.  When I am inside the firewall, I can connect 
to the server by making an entry in my /etc/hosts file for it that aliases 
it's private ip to it's netbios name (it is an Exchange 5.5 server).  In 
order to connect, I simply change the servername in kmail depending on where 
I am.

So now my question, is there any way to set up my hosts/resolv.conf/tmdns to 
look for the server in the local network first and if it cannot find it to 
look it up in the DNS so that I don't have to constantly change the setup in 
kmail?

Since the local addressing scheme in place at my company is quite unique I 
would even be open to doing something like having a script called in rc.local 
check to see what the network ip block of the local network is and writing 
out a hosts file that would have an entry for the server if I am on the right 
network, although I have no idea how to actually implement that.
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >