Re: [H] Windows 7 - cmd.exe is unknown publisher

2014-12-18 Thread Thane Sherrington

My fix was to run the System Update Readiness Tool.

T





Re: [H] Windows 7 - cmd.exe is unknown publisher

2014-12-17 Thread Robbie Pence
I've run into this when using Windows third party themes.

On Dec 11, 2014 10:45 AM, Eli Allen ealle...@gmail.com wrote:

 Might be a bug from patch Tuesday so guessing there will be a patch soon
 On Dec 11, 2014 8:58 AM, Thane Sherrington 
 th...@computerconnectionltd.com wrote:

 I've seen this a few times, but I've never found a simple fix for this.

 Every so often I see a computer where when I run cmd.exe in elevated mode,
 I get the message:
 Do you want the following program from an unknown publisher to make
 changes?
 Program Name: cmd.exe
 Publisher Name: Unknown

 It is a the correct cmd.exe (copied from a known good copy).

 I've fixed this in the past with a repair install, but I was wondering if
 anyone knew of a quicker method.

 I'm assuming that some sort of security check has been screwed up, but I
 haven't figured out what yet.

 T


Re: [H] Windows 7 - cmd.exe is unknown publisher

2014-12-11 Thread Eli Allen
Might be a bug from patch Tuesday so guessing there will be a patch soon
On Dec 11, 2014 8:58 AM, Thane Sherrington 
th...@computerconnectionltd.com wrote:

I've seen this a few times, but I've never found a simple fix for this.

Every so often I see a computer where when I run cmd.exe in elevated mode,
I get the message:
Do you want the following program from an unknown publisher to make
changes?
Program Name: cmd.exe
Publisher Name: Unknown

It is a the correct cmd.exe (copied from a known good copy).

I've fixed this in the past with a repair install, but I was wondering if
anyone knew of a quicker method.

I'm assuming that some sort of security check has been screwed up, but I
haven't figured out what yet.

T


Re: [H] Windows 7 Media Center licenses

2013-11-03 Thread tmservo

On 2013-11-03 18:44, Winterlight wrote:

Cable TV in my area is provided by COX, and unfortunately they encrypt
every channel except for PBS.  In the last couple of months I have had
inexplicable glitches that resulted in Media Center loosing it's
licences for TV shows that I had previously recorded. When this
happens I can't play TV in Media Center using my Silicon Dust network
Tuner, and all the encrypted TV shows that were recorded are now
inaccessible. I usually have to work through a troubleshooting process
involving the reinstall of Media Center Playready, and success with MC
always results in a loss of any existing licensing. Even when I image
the hard drive, and restore it, the licenses are still gone. This
makes the idea of building a video library with MC impossible.

This is not normally a problem, however, this has happened to be twice
this month, and once it happens any video library I have is now gone.
Is there any way to back up licenses so you can restore them in the
event MC goes bad?


There is a very simple answer to that.  Use MCEBuddy or MCTV-Converter

http://mcebuddy2x.codeplex.com/

And convert anything you want to save to MKV/MP4 BEFORE you change over 
your media center, and all your files will come along with you.   If you 
do it on the machine they were recorded on, generally it converts 
everything.


Re: [H] Windows 7 Media Center licenses

2013-11-03 Thread Winterlight
Wow, these will remove commercials AND decrypt MC recordings? I am 
downloading it now. Thanks Chris





There is a very simple answer to that.  Use MCEBuddy or MCTV-Converter

http://mcebuddy2x.codeplex.com/

And convert anything you want to save to MKV/MP4 BEFORE you change 
over your media center, and all your files will come along with 
you.   If you do it on the machine they were recorded on, generally 
it converts everything.




Re: [H] Windows 7 - explorer won't load at boot

2013-08-01 Thread Tim Lider
Are there any other problems set as the shell? If so remove them.

Also, could be a virus. I see that some people have fixed it with Spybot Search
and Destroy.

Good luck,

On August 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM Thane Sherrington
th...@computerconnectionltd.com wrote:
 I've got a Windows 7 machine which boots to a blank screen, but I can
 bring up task manager and run explorer and then the desktop
 appears.  Checking the \HKLM\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current
 VersionWinlogon, Explorer is set as the shell.  Any ideas?

 T


Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com
timli...@adv-data.com


Re: [H] Windows 7 - explorer won't load at boot

2013-08-01 Thread Tim Lider
Err.  Programs set in the shell.

On August 1, 2013 at 12:39 PM Tim Lider timli...@adv-data.com wrote:
 Are there any other problems set as the shell? If so remove them.

 Also, could be a virus. I see that some people have fixed it with Spybot
 Search
 and Destroy.

 Good luck,

 On August 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM Thane Sherrington
 th...@computerconnectionltd.com wrote:
  I've got a Windows 7 machine which boots to a blank screen, but I can
  bring up task manager and run explorer and then the desktop
  appears.  Checking the \HKLM\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current
  VersionWinlogon, Explorer is set as the shell.  Any ideas?
 
  T
 
 
 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com
 timli...@adv-data.com
Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com
timli...@adv-data.com


Re: [H] Windows 7 - explorer won't load at boot

2013-08-01 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 04:39 PM 01/08/2013, Tim Lider wrote:

Are there any other problems set as the shell? If so remove them.

Also, could be a virus. I see that some people have fixed it with 
Spybot Search

and Destroy.


Found it.  There is another key:
HKCU\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current Version\Winlogon

That had a string value shell set to cmd.exe.  Removed it and I'm back.

Thanks!

T 





Re: [H] Windows 7 - explorer won't load at boot

2013-08-01 Thread Tim Lider
Awesome!


On August 1, 2013 at 1:03 PM Thane Sherrington th...@computerconnectionltd.com
wrote:
 At 04:39 PM 01/08/2013, Tim Lider wrote:
 Are there any other problems set as the shell? If so remove them.
 
 Also, could be a virus. I see that some people have fixed it with
 Spybot Search
 and Destroy.

 Found it.  There is another key:
 HKCU\Microsoft\Windows NT\Current Version\Winlogon

 That had a string value shell set to cmd.exe.  Removed it and I'm back.

 Thanks!

 T


Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com
timli...@adv-data.com


Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-05 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 05:03 PM 3/4/2010, Christopher Fisk wrote:

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:


At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some 
stuff.  That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it 
becomes username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is 
Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch 
file.  Am I doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 
Ultimate instead of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable 
normally.  Now I'm really confused.


Has the username been changed?  Try creating a new user and testing 
that and changing the name of a user that is working properly.


The username hadn't been changed (it was the one from the Windows 
install) but when I created a new username, it worked fine.  I then 
deleted the first username and recreated it and it worked fine 
too.  Ahh, Microsoft - life would be so boring without your little tricks. :)


T 





Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-05 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 05:10 PM 3/4/2010, Eli Allen wrote:

The username comes from what is entered when you login not the actual
username


Yeah, but I'm clicking on the user to go into Windows, so I'm not 
typing anything.


T 





Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-05 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 05:14 PM 3/4/2010, JRS wrote:

When you run set from the command prompt, what does it show as the user?


It was showing Fred-PC$.  After recreating the user, it works.  Weird.

T



 --
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net


Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



- Original Message 
 From: Thane Sherrington th...@computerconnectionltd.com
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 12:42:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

 At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
  I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some 
stuff.  That works
 fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes username-PC$ - 
so if the
 username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of 
course, that
 breaks the batch file.  Am I doing something wrong or did MS 
really change this?


 Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 
Ultimate instead of
 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable normally.  Now I'm 
really confused.


 T





Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some 
stuff.  That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it 
becomes username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is 
Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch 
file.  Am I doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 Ultimate 
instead of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable normally.  Now 
I'm really confused.


T 





Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Stan Zaske
So am I confused, that you're still using batch files. Written anything 
in BASIC lately? No offense, just couldn't resist. LOL



On 3/4/2010 2:42 PM, Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.  
That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes 
username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP 
and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch file.  Am I 
doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 Ultimate 
instead of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable normally.  Now 
I'm really confused.


T






Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 04:57 PM 3/4/2010, Stan Zaske wrote:
So am I confused, that you're still using batch files. Written 
anything in BASIC lately? No offense, just couldn't resist. LOL



On 3/4/2010 2:42 PM, Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:

I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.
That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes 
username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in 
XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch file.  Am 
I doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 
Ultimate instead of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable 
normally.  Now I'm really confused.


T






Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 04:57 PM 3/4/2010, Stan Zaske wrote:
So am I confused, that you're still using batch files. Written 
anything in BASIC lately? No offense, just couldn't resist. LOL


Batch is God's language.  There are two many useful command line 
programs to dump it.


T




On 3/4/2010 2:42 PM, Thane Sherrington wrote:

At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:

I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.
That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes 
username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in 
XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch file.  Am 
I doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 
Ultimate instead of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable 
normally.  Now I'm really confused.


T






Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:


At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.  That 
works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes username-PC$ - so 
if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of 
course, that breaks the batch file.  Am I doing something wrong or did MS 
really change this?


Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 Ultimate instead 
of 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable normally.  Now I'm really 
confused.


Has the username been changed?  Try creating a new user and testing that 
and changing the name of a user that is working properly.



Christopher Fisk


Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread Eli Allen
The username comes from what is entered when you login not the actual  
username


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 4, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Thane Sherrington th...@computerconnectionltd.com 
 wrote:


I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.   
That works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes  
username-PC$ - so if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP  
and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, that breaks the batch file.  Am I  
doing something wrong or did MS really change this?


T




Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread JRS
When you run set from the command prompt, what does it show as the user?

 -- 
JRS 
stei...@pacbell.net


Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



- Original Message 
 From: Thane Sherrington th...@computerconnectionltd.com
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 12:42:50 PM
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables
 
 At 04:29 PM 3/4/2010, Thane Sherrington wrote:
  I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.  That 
  works 
 fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes username-PC$ - so if the 
 username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.  Of course, 
 that 
 breaks the batch file.  Am I doing something wrong or did MS really change 
 this?
 
 Interesting.  Just checked on another 7 machine (this one 7 Ultimate instead 
 of 
 7 Home Premium) and it shows the variable normally.  Now I'm really confused.
 
 T 



Re: [H] Windows 7 environment variables

2010-03-04 Thread maccrawj

echo %username% results in the typical XP/2K/etc... expected output here 
under 7.

On 3/4/2010 12:29 PM, Thane Sherrington wrote:

I have a little batch file that uses %username% to do some stuff.  That
works fine in Windows XP and Vista, but in 7, it becomes username-PC$ -
so if the username is Fred, %username% is Fred in XP and Fred-PC$ in 7.
Of course, that breaks the batch file. Am I doing something wrong or did
MS really change this?

T





Re: [H] Windows 7 God Mode

2010-01-14 Thread Stan Zaske
Yeah, heard about this on Twitter several days ago and did it. Takes a 
bit of getting used to because it's just one long list of everything 
that you have to scroll through.



On 1/14/2010 8:37 PM, CW wrote:

Really, just a script ready folder, but one of the neater tricks I've seen 
online for Win7.

http://windows7center.com/windows-7-feature/unleash-god-mode-on-windows-7/

   




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Tim Lider
Hello,

As for Antivirus/Firewall I use Norton Internet Security 2010. I know they
used to suck, but in 2009 they turned things around. Only bad part is you
need to pay yearly subscription.

As for Spyware Looks like NIS is doing the job as well. Watches websites and
even tells you if the site is somewhere you should not be :)

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
 Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:34 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 Firewall
 
 I have made the Win7 Pro clean install upgrade. I am running SAV
 10.2.0.298 but I still need to make a choice on a software firewall
 and maybe some anti spyware ... or is Win7 firewall good enough. I
 have a ZoneAlarm System works license for the latest version which I
 got for free last year, but ZA has become so  annoying in the last
 couple of years, and you can't just install the firewall anymore. So
 what does the collective use for Win7 firewall... Spyware?
 




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Scott Sipe
In recent years I've pretty much stopped using any 3rd party security software. 
Builtin firewall. No spyware software (I'll install programs temporarily to do 
a scan and make sure I'm clean -- last time I used Malwarebytes I think). No 
antivirus -- but then I've never really run my personal computer with antivirus 
software. Just keep the system patched, etc.

Work computers--yes to spyware/virus software, personal no.

What's the consensus, am I playing with fire? :p

Scott

On Jan 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Tim Lider wrote:

 Hello,
 
 As for Antivirus/Firewall I use Norton Internet Security 2010. I know they
 used to suck, but in 2009 they turned things around. Only bad part is you
 need to pay yearly subscription.
 
 As for Spyware Looks like NIS is doing the job as well. Watches websites and
 even tells you if the site is somewhere you should not be :)
 
 Regards,
 
 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
 Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:34 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 Firewall
 
 I have made the Win7 Pro clean install upgrade. I am running SAV
 10.2.0.298 but I still need to make a choice on a software firewall
 and maybe some anti spyware ... or is Win7 firewall good enough. I
 have a ZoneAlarm System works license for the latest version which I
 got for free last year, but ZA has become so  annoying in the last
 couple of years, and you can't just install the firewall anymore. So
 what does the collective use for Win7 firewall... Spyware?
 
 
 



Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Tim Lider
Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and works pretty
well in tests I do at work.

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com


 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Scott Sipe
 Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:58 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall
 
 In recent years I've pretty much stopped using any 3rd party security
 software. Builtin firewall. No spyware software (I'll install programs
 temporarily to do a scan and make sure I'm clean -- last time I used
 Malwarebytes I think). No antivirus -- but then I've never really run
 my personal computer with antivirus software. Just keep the system
 patched, etc.
 
 Work computers--yes to spyware/virus software, personal no.
 
 What's the consensus, am I playing with fire? :p
 
 Scott
 
 On Jan 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Tim Lider wrote:
 
  Hello,
 
  As for Antivirus/Firewall I use Norton Internet Security 2010. I know
 they
  used to suck, but in 2009 they turned things around. Only bad part is
 you
  need to pay yearly subscription.
 
  As for Spyware Looks like NIS is doing the job as well. Watches
 websites and
  even tells you if the site is somewhere you should not be :)
 
  Regards,
 
  Tim Lider
  Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
  Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
  http://www.adv-data.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
  boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
  Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:34 AM
  To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
  Subject: [H] Windows 7 Firewall
 
  I have made the Win7 Pro clean install upgrade. I am running SAV
  10.2.0.298 but I still need to make a choice on a software firewall
  and maybe some anti spyware ... or is Win7 firewall good enough. I
  have a ZoneAlarm System works license for the latest version which I
  got for free last year, but ZA has become so  annoying in the last
  couple of years, and you can't just install the firewall anymore. So
  what does the collective use for Win7 firewall... Spyware?
 
 
 
 




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Winterlight
On the computer where my data is I do use AV, Spy and Mall ware and 
some sort of software firewall to warn me about out go. But on the 
rest of my PCs I run clean .. just what the OS has, because they have 
special purpose and I don't do anything dangerous with them, in fact 
I rarely use a web browser... if something does goes wrong I just 
restore the image file. On my laptop I run a lot of stuff from a VM 
through a VPN and start over every day.


At 09:58 AM 1/5/2010, you wrote:
In recent years I've pretty much stopped using any 3rd party 
security software. Builtin firewall. No spyware software (I'll 
install programs temporarily to do a scan and make sure I'm clean -- 
last time I used Malwarebytes I think). No antivirus -- but then 
I've never really run my personal computer with antivirus software. 
Just keep the system patched, etc.


Work computers--yes to spyware/virus software, personal no.

What's the consensus, am I playing with fire? :p

Scott

On Jan 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Tim Lider wrote:

 Hello,

 As for Antivirus/Firewall I use Norton Internet Security 2010. I know they
 used to suck, but in 2009 they turned things around. Only bad part is you
 need to pay yearly subscription.

 As for Spyware Looks like NIS is doing the job as well. Watches 
websites and

 even tells you if the site is somewhere you should not be :)

 Regards,

 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
 Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:34 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

 I have made the Win7 Pro clean install upgrade. I am running SAV
 10.2.0.298 but I still need to make a choice on a software firewall
 and maybe some anti spyware ... or is Win7 firewall good enough. I
 have a ZoneAlarm System works license for the latest version which I
 got for free last year, but ZA has become so  annoying in the last
 couple of years, and you can't just install the firewall anymore. So
 what does the collective use for Win7 firewall... Spyware?







Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Joe User
Hello Scott,

Tuesday, January 5, 2010, 11:58:07 AM, you wrote:

 In recent years I've pretty much stopped using any 3rd party
 security software. Builtin firewall. No spyware software (I'll
 install programs temporarily to do a scan and make sure I'm clean --
 last time I used Malwarebytes I think). No antivirus -- but then
 I've never really run my personal computer with antivirus software.
 Just keep the system patched, etc.

 Work computers--yes to spyware/virus software, personal no.

 What's the consensus, am I playing with fire? :p

 Scott


I haven't used anti-virus, anti-spyware, or third party firewalls for
a number of years now. I don't even patch unless I am effected
directly with the issue. I do my service packs though. Been fine for
years. What's my secret? I will not use Microsoft for email or web and
I am behind a router.

I know people say 'omg you don't do what you are supposed to - run this
security suite and patch everyday or you will get viruses'. Guess
what. I'm clean and doing fine. Can everyone run like this? Maybe not
but I am sure the more savvy users here can. Have to use your heads.


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...

...now these points of data make a beautiful line...



Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Brian Weeden

I use MSE and really like it.

---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:04 AM, Tim Lider timli...@adv-data.com wrote:

Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and  
works pretty

well in tests I do at work.

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com



-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Scott Sipe
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:58 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

In recent years I've pretty much stopped using any 3rd party security
software. Builtin firewall. No spyware software (I'll install  
programs

temporarily to do a scan and make sure I'm clean -- last time I used
Malwarebytes I think). No antivirus -- but then I've never really run
my personal computer with antivirus software. Just keep the system
patched, etc.

Work computers--yes to spyware/virus software, personal no.

What's the consensus, am I playing with fire? :p

Scott

On Jan 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Tim Lider wrote:


Hello,

As for Antivirus/Firewall I use Norton Internet Security 2010. I  
know

they
used to suck, but in 2009 they turned things around. Only bad part  
is

you

need to pay yearly subscription.

As for Spyware Looks like NIS is doing the job as well. Watches

websites and

even tells you if the site is somewhere you should not be :)

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com


-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:34 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

I have made the Win7 Pro clean install upgrade. I am running SAV
10.2.0.298 but I still need to make a choice on a software firewall
and maybe some anti spyware ... or is Win7 firewall good enough. I
have a ZoneAlarm System works license for the latest version  
which I

got for free last year, but ZA has become so  annoying in the last
couple of years, and you can't just install the firewall anymore.  
So

what does the collective use for Win7 firewall... Spyware?











Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread JRS
I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw against 
Norton and McAfee, catching more
virii than either of the others.

 

 
 Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and works pretty
 well in tests I do at work.
 
 Regards,
 
 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com
 
 


Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Brian Weeden
MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and  
lightweight/unobtrusive.


---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS stei...@pacbell.net wrote:

I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw  
against Norton and McAfee, catching more

virii than either of the others.





Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and  
works pretty

well in tests I do at work.

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Anthony A. Riederer
I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising.
Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it. 

Tony
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and  
lightweight/unobtrusive.

---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS stei...@pacbell.net wrote:

 I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw  
 against Norton and McAfee, catching more
 virii than either of the others.




 Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and  
 works pretty
 well in tests I do at work.

 Regards,

 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com





Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Michael Resnick

Lightweight and Free are certainly good.
But, does anyone have any feedback on how effective MSE is compared 
to some of the other AV/AM progies?


-Mike


At 03:40 PM 1/5/2010, Anthony A. Riederer wrote:

I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising.
Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it.

Tony
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and
lightweight/unobtrusive.

---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS stei...@pacbell.net wrote:

 I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw
 against Norton and McAfee, catching more
 virii than either of the others.




 Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and
 works pretty
 well in tests I do at work.

 Regards,

 Tim Lider
 Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
 Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
 http://www.adv-data.com





__
Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will 
not have, nor do they deserve, either one. - Benjamin Franklin




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread tmservo
I've been ple*santly surprised by its ability to remove infection if installed 
on a hosed box.  That to me is always a tough test
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Michael Resnick mike...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:07:44 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

Lightweight and Free are certainly good.
But, does anyone have any feedback on how effective MSE is compared 
to some of the other AV/AM progies?

-Mike


At 03:40 PM 1/5/2010, Anthony A. Riederer wrote:
I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising.
Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it.

Tony
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and
lightweight/unobtrusive.

---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRS stei...@pacbell.net wrote:

  I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw
  against Norton and McAfee, catching more
  virii than either of the others.
 
 
 
 
  Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and
  works pretty
  well in tests I do at work.
 
  Regards,
 
  Tim Lider
  Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
  Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
  http://www.adv-data.com
 
 


__
Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security, will 
not have, nor do they deserve, either one. - Benjamin Franklin


Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Stan Zaske
Free and unobtrusive yes but the game plan is to try to take market 
share and then start charging for it. Still while it's free and works 
well I'll use it.




On 1/5/2010 2:40 PM, Anthony A. Riederer wrote:

I have to agree here. Which with a Microsoft product is surprising.
Lightweight and free. Who would have thunk it.

Tony
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 1:47 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Cc: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and
lightweight/unobtrusive.

---
Brian

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-01-05, at 11:37 AM, JRSstei...@pacbell.net  wrote:

   

I've had good luck with MSE as well, and it did well in tests I saw
against Norton and McAfee, catching more
virii than either of the others.



 

Wow!  At least get Microsoft Security Essentials.  Its free and
works pretty
well in tests I do at work.

Regards,

Tim Lider
Sr. Data Recovery Specialist
Advanced Data Solutions, LLC
http://www.adv-data.com


   


   




Re: [H] Windows 7 Firewall

2010-01-05 Thread Gary VanderMolen

I definitely 2nd that opinion. I hate all the 'false positive'
warning pop-ups you get from the third party security programs.

Gary VanderMolen, Microsoft MVP (Mail)

--
From: Brian Weeden brian.wee...@gmail.com

MSE has two big features that are important to me: free and  
lightweight/unobtrusive.





Re: [H] Windows 7 Experience Index

2009-12-17 Thread Anthony Q. Martin

Ok5.9 (Aero) and 5.7 (gaming)according to here:

http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=279threadid=120377

I can live with these scores for $75.

Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Ok...I know I'm doing a build on the cheap here, so I'm not overly 
concerned about getting top speed here,


BUT.

Processor: 7.4 (ok by me)
Memory: 7.5 (ok by me)
Graphics (areo): 3.7 (What?? - I have to stare at this all day, so 
this may not be good).
Graphcis (gaming): 5.8 (Not going to be playing games at work but I'd 
be happy with this for Aero!)

Primary HD: 5.9 (Does one need SSD to get faster, but this is ok for me)

So, I'm looking for a cheap (ie, $75 or less) vidcard to get the Areo 
graphics up about 5.8 or so.  I'm thinking of a Radeon 4670 but I 
can't find a Win7 EI score on it.


Any ideas?

BTW, on my home system I'm getting:

6.3, 5.5, 5.9, 5.9, and 5.7.  I see an I5 on a cheap mobo in my future.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Experience Index

2009-12-17 Thread Greg Sevart
The highest disk score for a magnetic drive I've seen is indeed 5.9...and
that's on 7.2k SATA, 10k SATA, or 15k SAS. My 2x Intel G2 SSD array gets a
7.9 (highest possible) though. A single Intel G2 seems to get around a 7.7,
and the OCZ Vertex gets around a 7.3.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:16 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 Experience Index

Ok...I know I'm doing a build on the cheap here, so I'm not overly 
concerned about getting top speed here,

BUT.

Processor: 7.4 (ok by me)
Memory: 7.5 (ok by me)
Graphics (areo): 3.7 (What?? - I have to stare at this all day, so 
this may not be good).
Graphcis (gaming): 5.8 (Not going to be playing games at work but I'd be 
happy with this for Aero!)
Primary HD: 5.9 (Does one need SSD to get faster, but this is ok for me)

So, I'm looking for a cheap (ie, $75 or less) vidcard to get the Areo 
graphics up about 5.8 or so.  I'm thinking of a Radeon 4670 but I can't 
find a Win7 EI score on it.

Any ideas?

BTW, on my home system I'm getting:

6.3, 5.5, 5.9, 5.9, and 5.7.  I see an I5 on a cheap mobo in my future.




Re: [H] Windows 7 install

2009-10-22 Thread Rick Glazier

My first guess would be you would need a third party
OS Bootloader Program to sort this all out.

Acronis has that as part of the Disk Director Suite, and
there is a freeware one that sounds like GAG (or something).
(Not an inpriring name for something this important... grin)

Rick Glazier

From: Tony Riederer

I am wondering if there is any problems or special things that need to be
done here. I have Vista Ultimate 64 on one of my puters. I have Windows 7
Pro from my school that I would like to install on the same machine and dual
boot them. It is not an upgrade edition. Just wondering if anyone knows if
there is a certain way to do this.


Re: [H] Windows 7 install

2009-10-22 Thread Jamie Furtner
I dual-booted the Beta and Vista with no issues for a while - just make 
sure to install to another drive or partition. 
http://lifehacker.com/5126781/how-to-dual-boot-windows-7-with-xp-or-vista


Windows includes a boot loader and will automatically add Vista and 
Windows 7 to the list and let you pick and choose. You don't need a 
third party one.


Jamie


Rick Glazier wrote:

My first guess would be you would need a third party
OS Bootloader Program to sort this all out.

Acronis has that as part of the Disk Director Suite, and
there is a freeware one that sounds like GAG (or something).
(Not an inpriring name for something this important... grin)

Rick Glazier

From: Tony Riederer
I am wondering if there is any problems or special things that need 
to be
done here. I have Vista Ultimate 64 on one of my puters. I have 
Windows 7
Pro from my school that I would like to install on the same machine 
and dual
boot them. It is not an upgrade edition. Just wondering if anyone 
knows if

there is a certain way to do this.




--
Jamie Furtner ja...@furtner.ca
I aim to misbehave
- Malcom Reynolds (Serenity movie)
It's not safe...
For them.
- River Tam (Serenity movie)



Re: [H] Windows 7 install

2009-10-22 Thread Rick Glazier

I must have been in too much a hurry when I read the original question.
I admit, my answer makes no sense.
Somehow I assumed they would be on the same partition not the same machine.

Rick Glazier


- Original Message - 
From: Jamie Furtner ja...@furtner.ca

To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 install


I dual-booted the Beta and Vista with no issues for a while - just make 
sure to install to another drive or partition. 
http://lifehacker.com/5126781/how-to-dual-boot-windows-7-with-xp-or-vista


Windows includes a boot loader and will automatically add Vista and 
Windows 7 to the list and let you pick and choose. You don't need a 
third party one.


Jamie


Rick Glazier wrote:

My first guess would be you would need a third party
OS Bootloader Program to sort this all out.

Acronis has that as part of the Disk Director Suite, and
there is a freeware one that sounds like GAG (or something).
(Not an inpriring name for something this important... grin)

Rick Glazier

From: Tony Riederer
I am wondering if there is any problems or special things that need 
to be
done here. I have Vista Ultimate 64 on one of my puters. I have 
Windows 7
Pro from my school that I would like to install on the same machine 
and dual
boot them. It is not an upgrade edition. Just wondering if anyone 
knows if

there is a certain way to do this.




--
Jamie Furtner ja...@furtner.ca
I aim to misbehave
- Malcom Reynolds (Serenity movie)
It's not safe...
For them.
- River Tam (Serenity movie)



Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-10-03 Thread maccrawj
Workgroups, WINS  NBoTCPIP are a pita. The IP works, so if you setup a DNS server 
you could connect using machine names without problems.


Steve Tomporowski wrote:
The IP address (have to remember to use \\ or it will open the browser) 
works fine, nice solid contact.  I'll have to try the trick with the 
master browser.  I've heard of that problem on several versions of Windows.


Steve

maccrawj wrote:
By IP address, DNS, or WINS? If IP works then it's likely a master 
browser election issue like the old days. Disabling the master browser 
on the XP box would solve that, so would putting up a DNS server and 
not relying on WINS.


Off the top of my head @ 4AM so YMMV!

Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a 
WinXP machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  
Lately, the last couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  
It's only important that the Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, 
visa versa doesn't matter.




Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-09-30 Thread maccrawj
By IP address, DNS, or WINS? If IP works then it's likely a master browser election 
issue like the old days. Disabling the master browser on the XP box would solve that, 
so would putting up a DNS server and not relying on WINS.


Off the top of my head @ 4AM so YMMV!

Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a WinXP 
machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  Lately, the 
last couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  It's only 
important that the Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, visa versa 
doesn't matter.


Steve


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4468 (20090929) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-09-30 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
I'm still running the Win7 RC build 1700, I think (it's on my home 
machine).  It seems that if I reboot I may or may not have internet 
connection.  Sometimes I'll have to reboot 3 times to get the internet 
connection to appear.  Once it does, I'm good to go...but...  And once I 
do have network access I can always see my laptop downstairs, which 
runs XP, but I can't see my other PC running XP which sits next to my 
Win7 PC. Argh!  I'm probably not doing sharing correctly somehow on the 
second PC.


Also, I still have problems using files on a portable HD between XP and 
Vista and Win7 computers.  The old read only BS.


Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a 
WinXP machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  
Lately, the last couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  
It's only important that the Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, visa 
versa doesn't matter.


Steve


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4468 (20090929) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-09-30 Thread Steve Tomporowski
There is only the 'homegroup' on the Win7 box.  According to the help, 
which I haven't tried to dispute yetonly a Win7 machine can join the 
homegroup.  The WinXP machine shows up every once in a while, but I 
think the main idea is to use the IP address and that should do it.


I probably made a mistake on the install when I told it that I was in a 
home environment.  I probably would have gotten options for different 
workgroups if I had chosen 'business'.  Still might be able to change it...


Steve


Robert Martin Jr. wrote:

Search for the XP computer by IP addy instead of browsing network. That usually 
works if there is a DNS issue. Workgroup the same I assume?

lopaka

--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Steve Tomporowski didym...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Steve Tomporowski didym...@gmail.com
Subject: [H]  Windows 7 Networking
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 3:46 PM

Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a WinXP 
machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  Lately, the last 
couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  It's only important that the 
Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, visa versa doesn't matter.

Steve


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4468 (20090929) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4471 (20090930) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


  




__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4471 (20090930) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-09-30 Thread Steve Tomporowski
The IP address (have to remember to use \\ or it will open the browser) 
works fine, nice solid contact.  I'll have to try the trick with the 
master browser.  I've heard of that problem on several versions of Windows.


Steve

maccrawj wrote:
By IP address, DNS, or WINS? If IP works then it's likely a master 
browser election issue like the old days. Disabling the master browser 
on the XP box would solve that, so would putting up a DNS server and 
not relying on WINS.


Off the top of my head @ 4AM so YMMV!

Steve Tomporowski wrote:
Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a 
WinXP machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  
Lately, the last couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  
It's only important that the Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, 
visa versa doesn't matter.


Steve


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4468 (20090929) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com







__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature database 4471 (20090930) __


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com






__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4471 (20090930) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




Re: [H] Windows 7 Networking

2009-09-29 Thread Robert Martin Jr.
Search for the XP computer by IP addy instead of browsing network. That usually 
works if there is a DNS issue. Workgroup the same I assume?

lopaka

--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Steve Tomporowski didym...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Steve Tomporowski didym...@gmail.com
Subject: [H]  Windows 7 Networking
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 3:46 PM

Okay, here's a good one:  How do you network a Win7 machine with a WinXP 
machine.  So far, Win 7 only sees that machine sometimes.  Lately, the last 
couple of boots, it refuses to see that machine.  It's only important that the 
Win7 machine sees the WinXP machine, visa versa doesn't matter.

Steve


__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature 
database 4468 (20090929) __

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

2009-09-02 Thread Jamie Furtner

Winterlight wrote:
I purchased two Windows 7 Pro upgrades back when they were offering 
them. I have a desktop running Vista 64 Home Premium OEM and a laptop 
I got last year that came with Vista 64 Home premium.  When MS offered 
the Advance copy of Windows 7 upgrades I grabbed two of the 100 dollar 
PRO versions, having had my fill of the Home Premium limitations.


In the last month I have been reading confusing stories about Windows 
7 upgrade DVDs which seem to imply that if you are running Vista Home 
Premium, you can only upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium using a 
upgrade DVDor if you have Vista Business you can upgrade to 
Windows 7 PRO. Is this apply to everybody or is this just for  those 
who bought a computer and are getting a free Windows 7 upgrade.
For in-place upgrades, it's supposed to be like-to-like versions 
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd772579%28WS.10%29.aspx). 
So far no information has come out around how people who can't do 
in-place upgrades will be able to do the install. The thinking so far is 
that it'll work like the Vista upgrade clean-install hack, but nobody 
really knows yet. As you're not looking at doing an in-place upgrade, I 
think we'll have to wait until we're closer to public release and the 
upgrade disks are out.


Licensing is separate, and I haven't seen anything around how that is 
supposed to work.


Also, if I install my Windows 7 PRO to a separate partition of my 
current Vista 64 OEM desktop, so I can dual boot them. Will Windows 7 
deactivate my Vista 64 after authenticating it for upgrade purposes. 
Or will it allow me to keep running Vista 64 OEM on it's original 
computer. In other words, can I keep and dual boot the Vista 64 OEM 
after installing the Windows 7 Pro upgrade DVD.
I've never seen a previous version disabled before. The RC didn't touch 
my other Vista install when I did a parallel install, but I wiped my 
drives before I installed the RTM version.


Jamie

--
Jamie Furtner ja...@furtner.ca
I aim to misbehave
- Malcom Reynolds (Serenity movie)
It's not safe...
For them.
- River Tam (Serenity movie)



Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

2009-09-02 Thread maccrawj
So Vista is not like XP upgrade where all you needed was the previous CD/DVD to 
verify it? Seems stupid if down the road to do a fresh install you'd have to start 
with the previous version 1st though I see the anti-piracy benefit.


Will the DVD's for 7 be like Vista where all versions are there and key decides what 
you can activate?


Sure hope 7 has revamped some of Vista account status BS with a single local 
superuser where even domain admins sub-admins.


Jamie Furtner wrote:

Winterlight wrote:
I purchased two Windows 7 Pro upgrades back when they were offering 
them. I have a desktop running Vista 64 Home Premium OEM and a laptop 
I got last year that came with Vista 64 Home premium.  When MS offered 
the Advance copy of Windows 7 upgrades I grabbed two of the 100 dollar 
PRO versions, having had my fill of the Home Premium limitations.


In the last month I have been reading confusing stories about Windows 
7 upgrade DVDs which seem to imply that if you are running Vista Home 
Premium, you can only upgrade to Windows 7 Home Premium using a 
upgrade DVDor if you have Vista Business you can upgrade to 
Windows 7 PRO. Is this apply to everybody or is this just for  those 
who bought a computer and are getting a free Windows 7 upgrade.
For in-place upgrades, it's supposed to be like-to-like versions 
(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd772579%28WS.10%29.aspx). 
So far no information has come out around how people who can't do 
in-place upgrades will be able to do the install. The thinking so far is 
that it'll work like the Vista upgrade clean-install hack, but nobody 
really knows yet. As you're not looking at doing an in-place upgrade, I 
think we'll have to wait until we're closer to public release and the 
upgrade disks are out.


Licensing is separate, and I haven't seen anything around how that is 
supposed to work.


Also, if I install my Windows 7 PRO to a separate partition of my 
current Vista 64 OEM desktop, so I can dual boot them. Will Windows 7 
deactivate my Vista 64 after authenticating it for upgrade purposes. 
Or will it allow me to keep running Vista 64 OEM on it's original 
computer. In other words, can I keep and dual boot the Vista 64 OEM 
after installing the Windows 7 Pro upgrade DVD.
I've never seen a previous version disabled before. The RC didn't touch 
my other Vista install when I did a parallel install, but I wiped my 
drives before I installed the RTM version.


Jamie



Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

2009-09-02 Thread Bobby Heid
I seem to remember that there is some sort of key file on the disk that
tells the installer what version to install, but all of the versions are
there.  I saw something a while back that tells how to update the file to
get a different version.  If I can find that info, I'll post back.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of maccrawj
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:33 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

So Vista is not like XP upgrade where all you needed was the previous CD/DVD
to 
verify it? Seems stupid if down the road to do a fresh install you'd have to
start 
with the previous version 1st though I see the anti-piracy benefit.

Will the DVD's for 7 be like Vista where all versions are there and key
decides what 
you can activate?

Sure hope 7 has revamped some of Vista account status BS with a single local

superuser where even domain admins sub-admins.




Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

2009-09-02 Thread swzaske

Here you go.  :-)

Convert Win7 Ultimate to Pro or Home Premium

Here's the crux of the matter: If you put a DVD containing Win7 Ultimate 
in your PC and run the installer — either by booting from the disc or 
running the setup program from inside Windows — you end up with Win7 
Ultimate. No surprises there.


However, if you first delete a tiny file named ei.cfg before making the 
installation DVD, the Win7 installer will give you the choices shown in 
Figure 1.


Windows 7 installer
Figure 1. Delete or rename ei.cfg before burning a Windows 7 
installation DVD, and a menu then allows you to select which version to 
install.


In fact, no matter which Win7 installation DVD you have — Ultimate, Pro, 
or Premium — if you delete the ei.cfg file from the disc, you'll be 
offered the same choices and can install any version of Windows 7.


At the moment, only a small number of people have received a physical 
DVD containing Windows 7 Ultimate. Instead, most current Win7 users 
downloaded an .iso file, which includes everything on the Windows 7 
Ultimate DVD: boot settings, file-structure details, etc. You burn the 
.iso file to a DVD. Then you either boot your PC from the DVD or run the 
setup program within an older version of Windows to kick the Win7 
installer into gear.


If you have a Windows 7 Ultimate .iso file, it's easy to delete ei.cfg. 
First, get a 30-day trial version of the gBurner utility, which is 
available from the program's download page at CNET's Download.com. Then 
install and run gBurner, open the Windows 7 .iso file, and delete (or 
rename) \sources\ei.cfg. Piece o' cake, although it can take 20 minutes 
to save the altered .iso file.


You can then use either gBurner or Alex Feinman's ISO Recorder program 
(available from Alex's site) to burn a version of the .iso file without 
ei.cfg to DVD.


What if you do have a physical Windows 7 installation DVD, but you don't 
have an .iso file? In that case, use either gBurner or ISO Recorder to 
rip the DVD into an .iso file. Then follow the instructions above to 
delete the ei.cfg file and burn a new DVD.


Get the right version of Windows 7 going now and you won't have to 
reinstall it — or pay an exorbitant price — later.


(My thanks to all-around good guy Seth Bareiss for his help in 
researching this topic.)


Bobby Heid wrote:

I seem to remember that there is some sort of key file on the disk that
tells the installer what version to install, but all of the versions are
there.  I saw something a while back that tells how to update the file to
get a different version.  If I can find that info, I'll post back.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of maccrawj
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:33 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] windows 7 upgrade confussion

So Vista is not like XP upgrade where all you needed was the previous CD/DVD
to 
verify it? Seems stupid if down the road to do a fresh install you'd have to
start 
with the previous version 1st though I see the anti-piracy benefit.


Will the DVD's for 7 be like Vista where all versions are there and key
decides what 
you can activate?


Sure hope 7 has revamped some of Vista account status BS with a single local

superuser where even domain admins sub-admins.



  




Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread tmservo
Bit faster for me.  Hdmi audio support is improved over rc1. Codecs integrated 
correctly for mkv without registry help. Some new addons I haven't played with. 
 

No major changes I've seen. 

--Original Message--
From: swzaske
Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 RTM
Sent: Aug 8, 2009 6:27 PM

So what's the verdict so far? Any changes or improvements from RC1?


Sent via BlackBerry 


Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread Greg Sevart
I just spent the better part of the afternoon and evening rebuilding my work
machine to the RTM bits. (I was running the RC, and I don't believe in
in-place upgrades, period). Sucks that I have to do it after hours, but it
takes a good 5 hours or so to get critical tools and such reinstalled.

It does seem faster overall. Animations seem a little more refined and a
little smoother--including Aero Peek, which I've grown to use quite a lot.
I'm still waiting on a W7 RTM RSAT package, and the RTM XPM bits. Luckily,
the W7 RC RSAT package installed and seems to work--I tested that
beforehand, because that would have been an instant restore from backup. :)

Greg


 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
 Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 6:44 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM
 
 Bit faster for me.  Hdmi audio support is improved over rc1. Codecs
 integrated correctly for mkv without registry help. Some new addons I
 haven't played with.
 
 No major changes I've seen.
 
 --Original Message--
 From: swzaske
 Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 RTM
 Sent: Aug 8, 2009 6:27 PM
 
 So what's the verdict so far? Any changes or improvements from RC1?
 
 
 Sent via BlackBerry




Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread tmservo
HyperV server manager add on is still a stupid cludge. But so far, otherwise, 
very polished. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net

Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:00:27 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM


I just spent the better part of the afternoon and evening rebuilding my work
machine to the RTM bits. (I was running the RC, and I don't believe in
in-place upgrades, period). Sucks that I have to do it after hours, but it
takes a good 5 hours or so to get critical tools and such reinstalled.

It does seem faster overall. Animations seem a little more refined and a
little smoother--including Aero Peek, which I've grown to use quite a lot.
I'm still waiting on a W7 RTM RSAT package, and the RTM XPM bits. Luckily,
the W7 RC RSAT package installed and seems to work--I tested that
beforehand, because that would have been an instant restore from backup. :)

Greg


 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
 Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 6:44 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM
 
 Bit faster for me.  Hdmi audio support is improved over rc1. Codecs
 integrated correctly for mkv without registry help. Some new addons I
 haven't played with.
 
 No major changes I've seen.
 
 --Original Message--
 From: swzaske
 Sender: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 ReplyTo: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 RTM
 Sent: Aug 8, 2009 6:27 PM
 
 So what's the verdict so far? Any changes or improvements from RC1?
 
 
 Sent via BlackBerry



Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM

2009-08-08 Thread Greg Sevart
In terms of the interface itself, or that you have to install the RSAT
package to get the client? Interface wise, it doesn't bug me too
much...though it is light on many fronts. I do hate that it is tied to RSAT,
but at least it runs without having to drop in .NET DLLs and set environment
variables, etc. that is required to run the vSphere 4.0 client.

I do despise the WMI-only Hyper-V API though

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
 Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 11:56 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM
 
 HyperV server manager add on is still a stupid cludge. But so far,
 otherwise, very polished.
 Sent via BlackBerry
 





Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Julian Zottl
Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring them.

Julian


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:

 Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...





Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread CW

Yeah, I'm getting 180k.. SUCKS.
 

 -Original Message- 
 From: Julian Zottl jzo...@radiantnetworks.net 
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com 
 Date: 08/06/09 13:14 
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN 
 
 Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring them.
 
 Julian
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
 
  Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
 
 
 



Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Bryan Seitz
It's been out for a week so I just needed to grab my MSDN key woot!

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:14:14PM -0400, Julian Zottl wrote:
 Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring them.
 
 Julian
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
 
  Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
 
 
 

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Julian Zottl
Windows 7 Ultimate (x86) - DVD (English)

Includes: Ultimate; 08-04-2009
File Name: en_windows_7_ultimate_x86_dvd_x15-65921.iso Date Posted
(UTC): 8/6/2009
9:59:54 AM SHA1: 5395DC4B38F7BDB1E005FF414DEEDFDB16DBF610 ISO/CRC: C1C20F76



Looks like it was posted today!  Might want to check to make sure you have
the newest!





Julian


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:

 It's been out for a week so I just needed to grab my MSDN key woot!

 On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:14:14PM -0400, Julian Zottl wrote:
  Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring
 them.
  
  Julian
 
 
  On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
 
   Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
  
  
  

 --

 Bryan G. Seitz



Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Bryan Seitz
File Name: en_windows_7_ultimate_x64_dvd_x15-65922.iso Date Posted (UTC): 
8/6/2009 9:59:56 AM 
SHA1: 326327CC2FF9F05379F5058C41BE6BC5E004BAA7 ISO/CRC: 1F1257CA 

-rw-r--r-- 1 seitz seitz 3224686592 Jul 26 00:44 
7600.16385.090713-1255_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso
SHA1 
(7600.16385.090713-1255_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso)
 = 326327cc2ff9f05379f5058c41be6bc5e004baa7


YUP! :)


On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:43:34PM -0400, Julian Zottl wrote:
 Windows 7 Ultimate (x86) - DVD (English)
 
 Includes: Ultimate; 08-04-2009
 File Name: en_windows_7_ultimate_x86_dvd_x15-65921.iso Date Posted
 (UTC): 8/6/2009
 9:59:54 AM SHA1: 5395DC4B38F7BDB1E005FF414DEEDFDB16DBF610 ISO/CRC: C1C20F76
 
 
 
 Looks like it was posted today!  Might want to check to make sure you have
 the newest!
 
 
 
 
 
 Julian
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Bryan Seitz se...@bsd-unix.net wrote:
 
  It's been out for a week so I just needed to grab my MSDN key woot!
 
  On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:14:14PM -0400, Julian Zottl wrote:
   Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring
  them.
   
   Julian
  
  
   On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
  
Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
   
   
   
 
  --
 
  Bryan G. Seitz
 

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Greg Sevart
They finally posted links that used Akamai instead of their own server farm,
and I was able to pull in at 3.2MB/s.

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/securedownloads/dd692862.a
spx



 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Julian Zottl
 Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:14 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN
 
 Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring
 them.
 
 Julian
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
 
  Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
 
 
 




Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread tmservo
Blarg. Ok I already got it off theirs, just took awhile
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net

Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:52:32 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN


They finally posted links that used Akamai instead of their own server farm,
and I was able to pull in at 3.2MB/s.

https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/securedownloads/dd692862.a
spx



 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Julian Zottl
 Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 1:14 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN
 
 Grabbing it now :)  ~230kB/s here..  I'm guessing people are whoring
 them.
 
 Julian
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
 
  Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...
 
 
 



Re: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

2009-08-06 Thread Neil Davidson
excellent. I checked earlier today, but I guess time difference got in the
way, only the RC was available.

I'll download this sometime over the weekend. Although, I'm not ready to put
it on any systems, waiting to upgrade my main desktop to an SSD as well.



-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: 06 August 2009 18:26
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 RTM available on TechNet and MSDN

Get it while it's hot. Not getting much speed though...




Re: [H] Windows 7 Anytime Upgrade and Family Pack Pricing Announced

2009-07-31 Thread Winterlight
The problem is that it's home premium, which is probably OK for your 
wife or kids, but not for a HWG user. I bought a OEM version of Vista 
Home Premium for my new 64 bit build thinking there was little 
difference to warrant the additional 70 bucks that Ultimate asked 
for. I was wrong. Home premium doesn't have a User configuration in 
device manager. You have to fire up an administrator account through 
command line. Google apps won't install unless you are logged in as 
THE administrator.  Home premium won't remember network passwords. I 
have been running into lots of little zingers like this in the 8 
months I have been running Vista 64 Home Premium. But if you do 
install Home Premium I would make sure you immediately create an 
administrator account and log in as that. It is not enough to be a 
user with administrative privileges.


This time I bought two prepaid Windows 7 PRO and I didn't have to 
think about it.



At 03:46 PM 7/31/2009, you wrote:

Excellent price on the family pack. Real temptation to upgrade 3 of my boxes.

http://bit.ly/s4Rg5




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-21 Thread Greg Sevart
It's official - August 6th for select Connect customers, MSDN, and TechNet.
http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2009/07/21/when-will-you-g
et-windows-7-rtm.aspx


Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:32 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out
 for download
 
 Ms sent an email out to technet people a few weeks ago and basically
 inferred that the whole reason that they were offering a non-shipment
 version and online updates was that rtm would get to us right away.
 Sent via BlackBerry
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net
 
 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:27:59
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
 
 I should have been more specific - availability on Connect for TAP
 members.
 I suspect that availability on MSDN and TechNet will be sooner than
 Microsoft has publicly stated, but you never know. They still haven't
 officially even announced RTM.
 





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-21 Thread swzaske

Another link.
http://icrontic.com/


Greg Sevart wrote:

It's official - August 6th for select Connect customers, MSDN, and TechNet.
http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2009/07/21/when-will-you-g
et-windows-7-rtm.aspx


Greg

  

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:32 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out
for download

Ms sent an email out to technet people a few weeks ago and basically
inferred that the whole reason that they were offering a non-shipment
version and online updates was that rtm would get to us right away.
Sent via BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net

Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:27:59
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download


I should have been more specific - availability on Connect for TAP
members.
I suspect that availability on MSDN and TechNet will be sooner than
Microsoft has publicly stated, but you never know. They still haven't
officially even announced RTM.







  


Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread James Boswell

Um, this is very old news dude?

On 19 Jul 2009, at 14:17, Brian Weeden wrote:


http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx

---
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread Brian Weeden
Hmm - I assumed that it was the RTM, but maybe I was wrong.  Not sure why
Microsoft would send me an email thanking me for downloading the RC and
notifying me that this was out if it wasn't an updated version (well, that
might be specious reasoning on my part).

Well then just go find it on the torrents then :)

---
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US


On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, James Boswell torazch...@gmail.comwrote:

 Um, this is very old news dude?

 On 19 Jul 2009, at 14:17, Brian Weeden wrote:

  http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx

 ---
 Brian Weeden
 Technical Advisor
 Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
 +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
 +1 (202) 683-8534 US





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread Greg Sevart
Current rumor is that build 6.1.7600.16385 (not 6.1.7600.16384) has
successfully been voted the RTM build just as of yesterday, and will be
available on Connect (and potentially MSDN and TechNet) on July 24. I'd be
wary of anything you might find available for download, since supposedly all
16385 ISO builds out there are 3rd party re-packs from the only leaked
copy--a VHD.

We'll see. :)



 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:39 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
 Hmm - I assumed that it was the RTM, but maybe I was wrong.  Not sure
 why
 Microsoft would send me an email thanking me for downloading the RC and
 notifying me that this was out if it wasn't an updated version (well,
 that
 might be specious reasoning on my part).
 
 Well then just go find it on the torrents then :)
 
 ---
 Brian Weeden
 Technical Advisor
 Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
 +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
 +1 (202) 683-8534 US
 
 
 On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, James Boswell
 torazch...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  Um, this is very old news dude?
 
  On 19 Jul 2009, at 14:17, Brian Weeden wrote:
 
   http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx
 
  ---
  Brian Weeden
  Technical Advisor
  Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
  +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
  +1 (202) 683-8534 US
 
 
 




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread Bryan Seitz
   Yeah, also not like we can't wait another week... I've been running the RC 
for awhile now and 
the RTM coming out just means I have to reinstall hehe :)


On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 01:22:39PM -0500, Greg Sevart wrote:
 Current rumor is that build 6.1.7600.16385 (not 6.1.7600.16384) has
 successfully been voted the RTM build just as of yesterday, and will be
 available on Connect (and potentially MSDN and TechNet) on July 24. I'd be
 wary of anything you might find available for download, since supposedly all
 16385 ISO builds out there are 3rd party re-packs from the only leaked
 copy--a VHD.
 
 We'll see. :)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
  boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
  Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 8:39 AM
  To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
  Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
  
  Hmm - I assumed that it was the RTM, but maybe I was wrong.  Not sure
  why
  Microsoft would send me an email thanking me for downloading the RC and
  notifying me that this was out if it wasn't an updated version (well,
  that
  might be specious reasoning on my part).
  
  Well then just go find it on the torrents then :)
  
  ---
  Brian Weeden
  Technical Advisor
  Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
  +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
  +1 (202) 683-8534 US
  
  
  On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, James Boswell
  torazch...@gmail.comwrote:
  
   Um, this is very old news dude?
  
   On 19 Jul 2009, at 14:17, Brian Weeden wrote:
  
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/download.aspx
  
   ---
   Brian Weeden
   Technical Advisor
   Secure World Foundation http://www.secureworldfoundation.org
   +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
   +1 (202) 683-8534 US
  
  
  
 

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread Gary VanderMolen

I doubt it will be on Connect. MS has told us beta testers that
there will be no mass giveaway of RTM copies to the testers.
We were also told there could be up to a 2-3 week delay before it's
available on MSDN and TechNet.

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)


--
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:22 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download


Current rumor is that build 6.1.7600.16385 (not 6.1.7600.16384) has
successfully been voted the RTM build just as of yesterday, and will be
available on Connect (and potentially MSDN and TechNet) on July 24. I'd be
wary of anything you might find available for download, since supposedly all
16385 ISO builds out there are 3rd party re-packs from the only leaked
copy--a VHD.

We'll see. :) 




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread Greg Sevart
I should have been more specific - availability on Connect for TAP members.
I suspect that availability on MSDN and TechNet will be sooner than
Microsoft has publicly stated, but you never know. They still haven't
officially even announced RTM.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Gary VanderMolen
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 10:21 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
 I doubt it will be on Connect. MS has told us beta testers that
 there will be no mass giveaway of RTM copies to the testers.
 We were also told there could be up to a 2-3 week delay before it's
 available on MSDN and TechNet.
 
 Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)
 
 
 --
 From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:22 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
  Current rumor is that build 6.1.7600.16385 (not 6.1.7600.16384) has
  successfully been voted the RTM build just as of yesterday, and will
 be
  available on Connect (and potentially MSDN and TechNet) on July 24.
 I'd be
  wary of anything you might find available for download, since
 supposedly all
  16385 ISO builds out there are 3rd party re-packs from the only
 leaked
  copy--a VHD.
 
  We'll see. :)





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download

2009-07-19 Thread tmservo
Ms sent an email out to technet people a few weeks ago and basically inferred 
that the whole reason that they were offering a non-shipment version and online 
updates was that rtm would get to us right away. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net

Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:27:59 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download


I should have been more specific - availability on Connect for TAP members.
I suspect that availability on MSDN and TechNet will be sooner than
Microsoft has publicly stated, but you never know. They still haven't
officially even announced RTM.

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Gary VanderMolen
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 10:21 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
 I doubt it will be on Connect. MS has told us beta testers that
 there will be no mass giveaway of RTM copies to the testers.
 We were also told there could be up to a 2-3 week delay before it's
 available on MSDN and TechNet.
 
 Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)
 
 
 --
 From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net
 Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 11:22 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC is out for download
 
  Current rumor is that build 6.1.7600.16385 (not 6.1.7600.16384) has
  successfully been voted the RTM build just as of yesterday, and will
 be
  available on Connect (and potentially MSDN and TechNet) on July 24.
 I'd be
  wary of anything you might find available for download, since
 supposedly all
  16385 ISO builds out there are 3rd party re-packs from the only
 leaked
  copy--a VHD.
 
  We'll see. :)




Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-27 Thread mark.dodge
I could not find it at Microcenter, have a link?

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 09:22A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

Microcenters are offering it at $39.99. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:34 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available


but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out
next year.

http://bit.ly/4fhxpM

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-27 Thread Eli Allen
In store only:
http://microcenter.com/storefronts/microsoft/windows7/preorder.html

Eli

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of mark.dodge
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 6:51 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

I could not find it at Microcenter, have a link?

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 09:22A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

Microcenters are offering it at $39.99. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:34 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available


but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out
next year.

http://bit.ly/4fhxpM

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.




Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-27 Thread mark.dodge
Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Eli Allen
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 05:57A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

In store only:
http://microcenter.com/storefronts/microsoft/windows7/preorder.html

Eli

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of mark.dodge
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 6:51 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

I could not find it at Microcenter, have a link?

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of tmse...@rlrnews.com
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 09:22A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

Microcenters are offering it at $39.99. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:34 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available


but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out
next year.

http://bit.ly/4fhxpM

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.




Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-27 Thread Veech

Is Windows 7 considered an improvement over XP Media Edition?

- Original Message - 
From: mark.dodge mark.do...@earthlink.net

To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 05:03
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available



Thank you.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Eli Allen
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 05:57A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

In store only:
http://microcenter.com/storefronts/microsoft/windows7/preorder.html

Eli

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of mark.dodge
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 6:51 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

I could not find it at Microcenter, have a link?

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of 
tmse...@rlrnews.com

Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 09:22A
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

Microcenters are offering it at $39.99.
Sent via BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:34
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available


but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out

quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out
next year.


http://bit.ly/4fhxpM


--
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.






Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-27 Thread Gary VanderMolen

Too bad. The nearest store is a 4 hour roundtrip for me, so not really
worth it.

Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)


--
From: Eli Allen ealle...@gmail.com


In store only:
http://microcenter.com/storefronts/microsoft/windows7/preorder.html 




Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread John R Steinbruner

Thanx for the heads up.:)

Just got my Win 7 upgrade package ordered for the half price special  
even though it's not Friday here yet.  :)




On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:


http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell  
out quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October  
22. It's really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until  
SR1 comes out next year.


http://bit.ly/4fhxpM



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread John R Steinbruner
Oh and BTW, I am gonna 'upgrade' the Vista side of the dual boot and  
leave the XP intact even though it is much

older than Vista..  :)



On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:34 PM, John R Steinbruner wrote:


Thanx for the heads up.:)

Just got my Win 7 upgrade package ordered for the half price special  
even though it's not Friday here yet.  :)




On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:


http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell  
out quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October  
22. It's really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until  
SR1 comes out next year.


http://bit.ly/4fhxpM



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.




--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread FORC5
but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean 
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out 
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's 
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out next 
year.

http://bit.ly/4fhxpM

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread tmservo
Microcenters are offering it at $39.99. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:34 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available


but it is a upgrade disk. how generous of them. I know the tricks to clean 
install a upgrade disk, just bugs me a little.
fp

At 04:14 AM 6/26/2009, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out 
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's 
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out next 
year.

http://bit.ly/4fhxpM

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Time is the dressmaker specializing in alterations.


Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Stan Zaske wrote:


http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell out 
quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 22. It's 
really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until SR1 comes out next 
year.


http://bit.ly/4fhxpM


Does it upgrade 64 bit Vista?  or stuck with just 32 bit?



Christopher Fisk
--
Leela: Hey, you know what might be a hoot?
Professor: No. Why would I know that?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Pre-order now available

2009-06-26 Thread Winterlight

At 07:28 AM 6/26/2009, you wrote:

On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Stan Zaske wrote:


http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1090tag=nl.e539
There's supposed to be only a limited number and if true will sell 
out quickly. Pre-order now and get the DVDRom when it ships October 
22. It's really a good deal but I'm going to stick with Vista until 
SR1 comes out next year.


http://bit.ly/4fhxpM


Does it upgrade 64 bit Vista?  or stuck with just 32 bit?


According to what I read yesterday MS decided to put ALL versions on 
one DVD this time so that an upgrade only requires a different key. 



Re: [H] Windows 7 Radeon driver woes

2009-06-14 Thread maccrawj
Total non-sequiter but try lowering your 3d resolution to 1024x768 and see if that 
helps. Was getting crazy crashes under XP w/ 9.x drivers and 3870x2 card, problems 
stopped when I stopped trying to do 1280x1024.




Stan Zaske wrote:
Is anybody running Windows 7 RC1 with a Radeon 4000 series video card? 
I'm using 9.4 currently but 3D apps and games will crash the driver 
forcing it to reset. I've tried the WHQL driver released by Microsoft 
last month and 9.5 and both are even more flaky than 9.4. I was 
wondering if anybody had a similar experience and hopefully when 9.6 
comes out next week things will improve. Anybody having any problems 
with Nvidia drivers?




Re: [H] Windows 7 Radeon driver woes

2009-06-13 Thread Greg Sevart
I had problems with the stock MS drivers, but updating to NVidia's drivers
resolved them...


 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske
 Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 5:08 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 Radeon driver woes
 
 Is anybody running Windows 7 RC1 with a Radeon 4000 series video card?
 I'm using 9.4 currently but 3D apps and games will crash the driver
 forcing it to reset. I've tried the WHQL driver released by Microsoft
 last month and 9.5 and both are even more flaky than 9.4. I was
 wondering if anybody had a similar experience and hopefully when 9.6
 comes out next week things will improve. Anybody having any problems
 with Nvidia drivers?




Re: [H] Windows 7 Radeon driver woes

2009-06-13 Thread John R Steinbruner

No issues with my older nVidia 8800 GTS on Windows 7 RC..

Don't own any Radeon stuff to test


On Jun 13, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Stan Zaske wrote:

Is anybody running Windows 7 RC1 with a Radeon 4000 series video  
card? I'm using 9.4 currently but 3D apps and games will crash the  
driver forcing it to reset. I've tried the WHQL driver released by  
Microsoft last month and 9.5 and both are even more flaky than 9.4.  
I was wondering if anybody had a similar experience and hopefully  
when 9.6 comes out next week things will improve. Anybody having any  
problems with Nvidia drivers?



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



Re: [H] Windows 7 RC Torrent == Bad

2009-05-13 Thread Joe User
Hello Brian,

Wednesday, May 13, 2009, 4:14:47 PM, you wrote:

 Be careful - that compatability mode requires a specific
 virtualization technology that isn't found in all CPUs.

I think the biggest problem will be supporting (effectively) two OS's
on the system. I can see the support headaches now...

Do not misunderstand, Win7 should kick the Vista in the ass hard.

-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...

...now these points of data make a beautiful line...



Re: [H] Windows 7 RC Torrent == Bad

2009-05-13 Thread tmservo
Bigger problem for people is still the same.  Some drivers (xp drivers) will 
not install in vista/win7.  So, for example, dentists who camera shot hardware 
can't upgrade past xp right now because no driver support.  
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Weeden bwee...@swfound.org

Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:14:47 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC Torrent == Bad


Be careful - that compatability mode requires a specific
virtualization technology that isn't found in all CPUs.

On Wednesday, May 13, 2009, Neil Davidson li...@ab10.org wrote:
 Have you tried the software with the XP compatibility mode they have
 included with W7? You have to download it as an extra, but it is effectively
 a XP Virtual Machine specifically for problem applications that didn't like
 Vista, and won't like W7.

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
 [mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske
 Sent: 13 May 2009 21:00
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: Re: [H] [Bulk] Windows 7 RC Torrent == Bad

 I started to download it that way but failed to find a clean copy. Since
 then I have downloaded the official version and installed it on my game
 box. Unfortunately, its less compatible than Vista with the software I
 use but works better and faster. I really like it because of the
 improvements to the UI and it seems much faster especially boot speed.

 Christopher Fisk wrote:
 http://www.therunningtally.com/2009/05/windows-7-rc-has-a-botnet/

 Anyone using Windows 7 they got from a Torrent?  Looks like the most
 common torrents for it had a built in botnet.


 Christopher Fisk




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread DHSinclair

Uhdaya think Ubuntu might use a different file system than ntfs?
Just a thought...
Best,
Duncan

At 15:44 05/02/2009 -0700, you wrote:

Already found a bug.  :)

Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10 on
it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..

Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,
then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have
a nice clean
40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



__ NOD32 4049 (20090501) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread John R Steinbruner
Yep, of course it does, but the XP install sees the drive and  
partitions just fine.  :)





On May 2, 2009, at 3:48 PM, DHSinclair wrote:


Uhdaya think Ubuntu might use a different file system than ntfs?
Just a thought...
Best,
Duncan

At 15:44 05/02/2009 -0700, you wrote:

Already found a bug.  :)

Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10  
on

it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..

Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,
then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have
a nice clean
40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



__ NOD32 4049 (20090501) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com






--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.




Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread tmservo
Intentional.  Addresses early complaints that it would show linux and non-ms 
partitions as unformatted and allow them to be wiped.  This is designed to 
prevent dataloss and alteration of boot records.   So that's not going to 
change.  It was changed to work just that way on purpose.  
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: John R Steinbruner stei...@pacbell.net

Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:44:41 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 RC


Already found a bug.  :)

Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10 on  
it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..

Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,  
then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have  
a nice clean
40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)



-- 
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread DHSinclair
Uh? So the bug is that W7 is not as bright at XP in file system 
recognition/partitioning?

Sorry, I remain a bit confused..
Best,
Duncan

At 15:56 05/02/2009 -0700, you wrote:

Yep, of course it does, but the XP install sees the drive and
partitions just fine.  :)




On May 2, 2009, at 3:48 PM, DHSinclair wrote:


Uhdaya think Ubuntu might use a different file system than ntfs?
Just a thought...
Best,
Duncan

At 15:44 05/02/2009 -0700, you wrote:

Already found a bug.  :)

Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10
on
it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..

Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,
then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have
a nice clean
40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



__ NOD32 4049 (20090501) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com



--
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.



__ NOD32 4049 (20090501) Information __

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread tmservo
Btw, the bigger point for oems was that this method hides recovery partitions 
to keep users from wiping them out..yes, smarter users can, but they generally 
aren't worried about that.  



Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: tmse...@rlrnews.com

Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 23:03:14 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC


Intentional.  Addresses early complaints that it would show linux and non-ms 
partitions as unformatted and allow them to be wiped.  This is designed to 
prevent dataloss and alteration of boot records.   So that's not going to 
change.  It was changed to work just that way on purpose.  
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: John R Steinbruner stei...@pacbell.net

Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:44:41 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 RC


Already found a bug.  :)

Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10 on  
it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..

Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,  
then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have  
a nice clean
40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)



-- 
JRS
stei...@pacbell.net

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.


Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread Greg Sevart
That's actually quite interesting, because I just installed W7 RC1 to a test
machine that I had just last week done a clean install of Ubuntu 9.04 on. I
was able to knock out all of the Linux partitions with ease. Could be
because I had other drives available as well as the primary?

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of John R Steinbruner
 Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 5:45 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 RC
 
 Already found a bug.  :)
 
 Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10 on
 it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..
 
 Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,
 then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have
 a nice clean
 40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)
 
 
 
 --
 JRS
 stei...@pacbell.net
 
 Facts do not cease to exist just
 because they are ignored.
 





Re: [H] Windows 7 RC....

2009-05-02 Thread tmservo
Hmmm. By default its supposed (at least what we were told) hidden and restore 
partitions by default, no matter what.  Maybe something different going on.  

Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net

Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 18:24:25 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 RC


That's actually quite interesting, because I just installed W7 RC1 to a test
machine that I had just last week done a clean install of Ubuntu 9.04 on. I
was able to knock out all of the Linux partitions with ease. Could be
because I had other drives available as well as the primary?

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
 boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of John R Steinbruner
 Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 5:45 PM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Windows 7 RC
 
 Already found a bug.  :)
 
 Went to install on my ole T42 laptop that currently has Ubuntu 8.10 on
 it, the Win 7 setup said I had no disk drive installed..  LOL..
 
 Had to fire up an XP install disk, delete and recreate the partition,
 then went back to the Windows 7 install that suddenly now says I have
 a nice clean
 40 gig drive in this ole beater laptop.  :)
 
 
 
 --
 JRS
 stei...@pacbell.net
 
 Facts do not cease to exist just
 because they are ignored.
 




Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-29 Thread Joe User
Hello Robert,

Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 12:17:48 AM, you wrote:

 It's already in the wild :)
 I was however using a legit beta before I wiped it.

 lopaka

I am looking forward to getting a copy of Windows 7.
Not sure how I will, but I am.

-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...

...now these points of data make a beautiful line...



Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-29 Thread FORC5
I'll play with that later, I imagine on booting to the disk I hit install 
instead of repair and then I would get that option.

But I agree with Robert on the apts but think in my main machine I am limited 
to XP x86 for now because of some of the older 16bit ( and maybe even 8bit) 
programs I use. 

thanks

Like 
At 07:32 PM 4/28/2009, tmse...@rlrnews.com Poked the stick with:
Oh, there is a neat trick... Forget repair install, it does an install 
migration, and it is slick.  For those that wonder, may 4 the rc goes public. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:18:33 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 ?


Been messing with Windows 7 a little for a month or so, not too bad I must say.

Wanted to see how it handled change so I plugged the drive into a different 
computer, was very impressed with the repair/restore screen it takes me too 
other then the fact it would not repair. 
I suppose if it was on the same hw the repair would have been fine. Booted to 
the cd and attempted a repair, same result.

I suppose we are not allowed to change MB's in MS's future, huh ? But this is 
a pre release.

Have not done this with Vista, I would guess the same result but I wonder if 
Vista has this boot to repair option without using the disk ( like needed with 
 XP ) This will be tested soon, server to be updated. If Vista will not repair 
or run I think XP64 or Server 2003 is in order to replace it.

strange thing though, drive was c: in other box but saw the OS ( after driver 
install, OLD hw) it saw the os on E: Have no idea why. only drive in system. 
Only thing I can think of it is a older system with two PATA channels and 
supposed it was picking up E ( would be the logical 4th drive) Old Asus a7n8x 
deluxe, still runs the 3200 barton like a top and does OK with Vista and 2 gig 
ram other then I have been plagued with BSOD's, suspect Vista does not like 
the old HW. But it did run fine for a very long time.

any one else playing with 7  ( not 7 of 9 ) :-D
fp

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
In war there is no substitute for victory.

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
In war there is no substitute for victory.



Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-29 Thread Sam Franc

Read this**\
April 27, 2009 (Computerworld) Ever since Bill Gates stepped down and
Steve Ballmer took over his role, Microsoft has been getting one thing
after another wrong. Vista continues to be a disaster both for users and
for the company's bottom line. And Microsoft's ad campaign last year,
starring Gates and Jerry Seinfeld
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9114538, 


is already a model of how /not/ to do television advertising. Somehow,
though, after years of stumbling around like a drunken college freshman
after an NCAA basketball win, Microsoft is getting its act together.

First, Microsoft has reluctantly -- oh how reluctantly -- brought back
Windows XP. Officially, Microsoft has cut XP support
http://blogs.computerworld.com/good_bye_xp_hello_windows_7.
Unofficially, hardware vendors such as Hewlett-Packard aren't going to
let XP die anytime soon. You'll still be getting new PCs with XP on them
well into 2010
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9131191, 


and I wouldn't be surprised to see fresh copies of XP appearing in 2011.

Microsoft finally got it. No one with two brain cells wants Vista.

What's more amazing to me, though, is that Microsoft finally figured out
that after Vista, no one wants a long, drawn-out rollout of a new
Windows operating system. So, instead of orchestrating its traditional
years-long series of preannouncements and announcements, Microsoft is
just focusing on getting Windows 7 -- a.k.a. Vista Lite -- out as fast
as possible, with as little official fanfare as possible.

That doesn't mean Microsoft hasn't been advertising Windows 7. But
buying time on television and space in magazines might make more people
realize just how thoroughly Microsoft has given up on Vista. Instead,
Microsoft is advertising the upcoming release by leaking betas
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9124399 


almost every week -- and will soon do the same with release-candidate
builds.

It's funny that some people actually think that anyone is pirating
Windows 7 betas. It's clear that Microsoft is deliberately leaking them
to build up buzz around the new operating system. Don't believe me? Then
why does Microsoft give away free authentication keys that will let
/any/ copy of Windows 7 work? If the company didn't want those copies of
Windows 7 out there, it wouldn't do that. This tactic is fairly subtle:
By making people work -- but not too hard -- to get copies of Windows 7,
Microsoft is leading them to believe that they're onto something
special. And since it has been a long, long time since anyone thought
there was something special about Windows, this is savvy marketing on
Microsoft's part.

(Mind you, I've been running Windows 7 for quite some time now on a
variety of test boxes, and it's not all that great. It's better than
Vista, but that's really not saying much. For my money, XP SP3 is still
the best of the Windows family.)



Finally, Microsoft has also come up with a winning set of TV ads. The
ones with the cute kids are, well, cute, and the Mac attack ads do make
the point that PCs really are cheaper than Apple's proprietary hardware.
However, if you're a thinking user, you'll realize that you get what you
pay for and that Macs really are better than low-cost PCs. And if you're
a thinking user who wants a really low-cost PC, you don't want Windows
anyway -- you want desktop Linux.

But Microsoft's ads aren't meant for savvy computer users. They're meant
for home users with XP Home and Conficker on their PCs. As long as you
don't look too closely at Microsoft's offerings, its new marketing and
ads are making Windows look good again. Who would have thought that
Microsoft could pull the wool over even dumb users' eyes again? That,
nevertheless, is what it's managing to do.

/*Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols* has been writing about technology and the
business of technology since CP/M-80 was cutting-edge and 300bit/sec.
was a fast Internet connection -- and we liked it! He can be reached at
s...@vna1.com mailto:s...@vna1.com./












Joe User wrote:

Hello Robert,

Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 12:17:48 AM, you wrote:

  

It's already in the wild :)
I was however using a legit beta before I wiped it.



  

lopaka



I am looking forward to getting a copy of Windows 7.
Not sure how I will, but I am.

  




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.6/2084 - Release Date: 04/28/09 06:15:00


  


Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-29 Thread Rick Glazier
- Original Message - 
From: Sam Franc

Read this**\
April 27, 2009 (Computerworld) 
/*Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols* has been writing about technology and the

business of technology since CP/M-80 was cutting-edge and 300bit/sec.
was a fast Internet connection -- and we liked it! He can be reached at


Sam, I skimmed over the intro and thought you wrote that...

While I use XP-Pro_SP3 the most, I'm warming up to Vista.
They had to jamb it into my hands inside Laptops, and it took
some work to get used to, but it grows on you...

Rick Glazier



Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-29 Thread Bobby Heid
I like Vista also.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Rick Glazier
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:39 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

- Original Message - 
From: Sam Franc
 Read this**\
 April 27, 2009 (Computerworld) 
 /*Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols* has been writing about technology and the
 business of technology since CP/M-80 was cutting-edge and 300bit/sec.
 was a fast Internet connection -- and we liked it! He can be reached at

Sam, I skimmed over the intro and thought you wrote that...

While I use XP-Pro_SP3 the most, I'm warming up to Vista.
They had to jamb it into my hands inside Laptops, and it took
some work to get used to, but it grows on you...

Rick Glazier





Re: [H] Windows 7 ?

2009-04-28 Thread tmservo
Oh, there is a neat trick... Forget repair install, it does an install 
migration, and it is slick.  For those that wonder, may 4 the rc goes public. 
Sent via BlackBerry 

-Original Message-
From: FORC5 fuf...@cox.net

Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:18:33 
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Windows 7 ?


Been messing with Windows 7 a little for a month or so, not too bad I must say.

Wanted to see how it handled change so I plugged the drive into a different 
computer, was very impressed with the repair/restore screen it takes me too 
other then the fact it would not repair. 
I suppose if it was on the same hw the repair would have been fine. Booted to 
the cd and attempted a repair, same result.

I suppose we are not allowed to change MB's in MS's future, huh ? But this is a 
pre release.

Have not done this with Vista, I would guess the same result but I wonder if 
Vista has this boot to repair option without using the disk ( like needed with  
XP ) This will be tested soon, server to be updated. If Vista will not repair 
or run I think XP64 or Server 2003 is in order to replace it.

strange thing though, drive was c: in other box but saw the OS ( after driver 
install, OLD hw) it saw the os on E: Have no idea why. only drive in system. 
Only thing I can think of it is a older system with two PATA channels and 
supposed it was picking up E ( would be the logical 4th drive) Old Asus a7n8x 
deluxe, still runs the 3200 barton like a top and does OK with Vista and 2 gig 
ram other then I have been plagued with BSOD's, suspect Vista does not like the 
old HW. But it did run fine for a very long time.

any one else playing with 7  ( not 7 of 9 ) :-D
fp

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
In war there is no substitute for victory.


  1   2   >