[leaf-user] Alcatel adsl speedtouch problems.
Hi all, I am still trying to get my adsl connection going using an usb speedtouch adsl modem, but so far no luck. I followed the descriptions in the bering users guide but I am still not succesfull. If i run the ifup -v ppp0 as suggested by Jacques when he tried to help out Matthew I see the commands defined in my /etc/interfaces execute, so I see the mount, modem_run command, and then pon adsl. But after that I don't see a ppp0 device when I do an ip add. I have attached the relevant portions of daemon.log & syslog Any help would be greatly appreciated. Kim Oppalfens daemon.log Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 19760), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 2 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 14139), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 3 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 17929), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 4 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 14656), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 5 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 22150), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 6 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 4072), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 7 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 19059), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 8 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 27194), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 9 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 2304), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 10 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 3171), status = 0x8b00 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Modem hangup Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connection terminated. Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: using channel 11 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Using interface ppp0 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyp1 Sep 15 15:10:17 mgoose pppd[30758]: Script /usr/sbin/pppoa3 -m 1 -c -vpi 8 -vci 35 finished (pid 32096), status = 0x8b00
[leaf-user] Unresolved symbol: gr_is_capable
Hi all, I have been trying to compile my own bering 1.2 kernel based on a stock 2.4.20 kernel & patched with the patches from Jacques' devel folder. Compiling the kernel went fine. Problem is I don't get my 8139too or my hostap.o to load. I get an error stating unresolved symbol: gr_is_capable. I tried with my own modules & with the ones downloaded from Jacques' site same result. Anyone has any ideas on how to solve this? I assume it is grsecurity related, but don't know how to fix it. Kim Oppalfens --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] compiling a uclibc kernel
Hi all, Is there something special I should know about comiling my own kernel for bering uclibc version 1? So far I tried starting from stock 2.4.20 & apply patches from the bering environment Starting from the 2.4.20 prepatched kernel sources from the download dir. Compiled those in a gentoo 1.1 (2.4.19 kernel environment) & in a woody uml environment. Kernels seem to compile fine using the bering config (adding ipt_string & smp support). But booting using the kernels is unsuccessfull Kernel Panic attempted to kill init. Any help greatly appreciated. Tabee Kim Oppalfens --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Messages log full with these entries
Hi all, Does anyone have an idea what these messages might mean? I get them just about every 45 minuten (each time when I renew my dhcp lease). When I manually call pump to renew the lease I don't get the messages, if I let it happen automaticly there back. Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose root: shorewall restarted by pump.shorewall Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose Invalid zone (Refreshing) in record "Refreshing Shorewall... " Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose Terminated Apr 2 04:31:43 mgoose Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose root: shorewall restarted by pump.shorewall Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose Invalid zone (Refreshing) in record "Refreshing Shorewall... " Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose Terminated Apr 2 05:24:13 mgoose Apr 2 06:16:43 mgoose root: shorewall restarted by pump.shorewall Apr 2 06:16:43 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 06:16:43 mgoose [: /etc/shorewall/params: unexpected operator Apr 2 06:16:44 mgoose Invalid zone (Refreshing) in record "Refreshing Shorewall... " Apr 2 06:16:44 mgoose Terminated --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall log
Port 445 is Win2K's backup for the smb related netbios ports 135;137 & 139. If eth0 is your internet attached interface someone is probably trying to get some netbios related info from your machine & the firewall is blocking it as it should. Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training >-- Original Message -- >To: Phil Faris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Ray Olszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Shorewall log >Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 10:14:28 -0800 > > >At 09:08 AM 3/29/2003 -0800, Phil Faris wrote: >>Can anyone tell me what this Shorewall log entry means? I get about fifty > >>to sixty hits like this every day. >> >>Mar 29 16:12:57 Gateway Shorewall:net2all:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT= >>MAC=00:20:af:38:31:c5:00:10:67:00:b5:6b:08:00 SRC=64.214.177.149 >>DST=209.233.16.123 LEN=48 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=111 ID=28282 DF PROTO=TCP > >>SPT=3463 DPT=445 SEQ=3057110942 ACK=0 WINDOW=16384 SYN URGP=0 > >Interpreting log entries when given NO information about the system >involved is always guesswork. Here I assume your setup is typical (for >example, eth0 is the external interface, 209.233.16.123 is your IP address). > >The traffic is TCP (PROTO=) to port 445 (DPT=). /etc/services says 445 is > >"microsoft-ds". A quick Google search on "microsoft-ds" turns up two things > >of interest. > > 1. "microsoft-ds" is associated with a Microsoft service called > >LanMan. > > 2. BugTraq reports a DoS attack associated with use of this port. > >More analysis would require more Windows expertise than I possess, but >perhaps someone else here knows enough to say more. If not, this should be > >enough to let you use Google productively to learn more. > > > > > > > >--- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: >The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! >NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] uCLIB Bering Question
I experienced the same thing, it disappeared when I loaded the compatablitity libraries. But that would probably ruin your one floppy approach. It is perfectly possible on two flops though. If anyone can explain for the (in my belief) strange error message please do Kim Oppalfens >-- Original Message -- >From: "David Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] uCLIB Bering Question >Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:28:14 +0800 > > >Hi again. With the advent of uCLIB I thought I would return to my >original plan to create a single floppy disk Bering with SSHD instead of >wasting a CDROM drive. > >The packages I need seem to fit on a floppy no trouble but I get an odd >error when packages I didn't source from the Bering uCLIB CD. I need to >run ez-ipupdate, bpalogin (Big Pond Australia cable login script) and >udhcp. I have added them to the floppy and syslinux.cfg. They load >fine. Then when the try to run I get variations of the following error >message: > >Starting /usr/sbin/bpalogin... >/etc/rc2.d/s46bpalogin: /usr/sbin/bpalogin: not found > >The same thing occurs for ez-ipupdate, udhcpc and udhcpd but with a >different number ie not 46. The number relates to the sequence of >starting the packages. > >When I look around I find the packages are actually, the executables do >exist in the places where they are supposed to be, but if I try to run >them, I get not found, even from the directory the executable is in. Is >this a permissions problem? Root doesn't have rights to the >executables? > >On another issue, is the lshd.lrp package in Bering a replacement for >the latest version of sshd?? > >Any assistance gratefully accepted. > >Thanks heaps as always. > >David Pitts >IT Services Manager >Reid Library >University of Western Australia > >Telephone: (08) 9380 3492 Fax: (08) 9380 1012 > > > > >--- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: >The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! >NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! >http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Accessing lshd externally.
Oops, seems I forgot some info. Lshd is definitely running, I can access it internally. The connection fails with a timeout after about 10 seconds. Routing seems to work just fine, since I can access just about anything from the inside to the internet. I don't have access to the logs at this point though. Will check if anything is in there later tonight. Kim >-- Original Message -- >From: "Brad Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Kim Oppalfens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Accessing lshd externally. >Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:05:43 -0500 > > > >Kim, > >On Fri, 07 Feb 2003 10:51:17 +0100 Kim Oppalfens wrote: > >> I am testrunning the new uclibc version of bering and I am trying to >> Access my firewall externally over ssh. Unfortunately I am unsuccessful. >> >> The firewall (shorewall) is configured to allow the connection. >> /etc/hosts.allow & deny don't block anything neither so I don't know what >> Is wrong anymore. > >Have you verified lshd is running? (There used to be a bug in the >startup script.) Is there anything in the logs? (Particularly >daemon.log and messages.) How does the ssh connection fail? >Quick connection refused? Longer timeout? Can you verify that >routing is working as expected, aside from ssh? With a bit more >information we should be able to help. > >--Brad > > > >--- >This SF.NET email is sponsored by: >SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! >http://www.vasoftware.com > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb
After reading your rules at a quick glance you seem to need the folowing modules loaded. cls_u32.o Sch_htb.o Sch_sfq.o Sch_prio.o Verify that they are loaded by issuing the lsmod command. You might want to split up your tcstart and insert an echo ok echo ok1 and so on in between the rules. That way you know which rule is generating the problem. Good luck. Kim Oppalfens >-- Original Message -- >Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 10:47:18 -0300 >To: Kim Oppalfens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Pereyra) > > >Hi again Kim !!! > >These are my htb rules: > >I just replaced tc by run_tc > > >-- >tc qdisc del dev eth1 root >tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 30 > >tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 5Mbit > >tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 32Kbit >tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:10 handle 10 sfq perturb 10 >tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip sport >80 0x classid 1:10 > >tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:20 htb rate 5Mbit >tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:20 handle 20 sfq perturb 10 >tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dport >25 0x classid 1:20 > >tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:2 classid 1:30 htb rate 2Kbit ceil 16Kbit >tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:30 handle 30 sfq perturb 10 > >--- > >Thanks > >roberto > > > > >On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:29:15PM +0100, Kim Oppalfens wrote: >> You might want to post your tcstart file, we might be able to tell >> You what is going on based on that. >> >> My first guess is that you failed to load a necessary scheduling module. >> But without your actual script it is hard to guess which one. >> >> Kim >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Roberto Pereyra [mailto:leaf@;gualeguaychu.gov.ar] >> Sent: maandag 4 november 2002 20:58 >> To: Kim Oppalfens >> Cc: 'Roberto Pereyra'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >> >> >> >> >> Hi again >> >> >> I have now, this message when shorewall start: >> >> >> RTNETLINK answers= Not such file or directory >> >> Is this a important error or only a warning. >> >> >> thanks >> >> roberto >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:55:39PM +0100, Kim Oppalfens >> wrote: >> > Probably not, >> > >> > Added the list back to the conversation (use reply all when replying > >> > thanks). >> > >> > Depends on what you are trying to do. >> > But I would gamble that since you started from htb init you will >> > probably need : >> > >> > cls_fw.o or cls_u32.o >> > Sch_htb.o off course >> > Sch_sfq.o >> > Sch_prio.o >> > Sch_ingress.o >> > >> > And yes you need to add those to /etc/modules >> > >> > Kim Oppalfens >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Roberto Pereyra [mailto:leaf@;gualeguaychu.gov.ar] >> > Sent: vrijdag 1 november 2002 13:24 >> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >> > >> > >> > Thanks all again ! >> > >> > another question: >> > >> > To tc and bandwidth manager works fine >> > >> > I must copy all the modules that have: >> > >> > bering_1.0r4_modules.tgz file under the >> > >> > /2.4.18/kernel/net/sched >> > >> > in my bering /lib/modules directory ?? >> > >> > It's rigth ?? I need do it ?? These are seventeen files. >> > >> > I must too write all the modules names in the module configuration > >> > file ?? >> > >> > Excuse my poor english I spanish speaker. >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > roberto >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at >> > 12:25:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > > No problem. >> > > Is it working as expected? >> > > >> > > Kim >> > > >-- Original Message -- >> > > >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:22:31 -0300 >> > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >> > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Pereyra) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >thanks Kim >> > > > >> > > >roberto >> > > > >> > > >On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:42:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >wrote: >> > > >> insert the contents of htb.init >> > > >> in the tcstart file in the shorewall directory >> > > >> >> > > >> Kim Oppalfens >> > > >> >-- Original Message -- >> > > >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Pereyra) >> > > >> >Subject: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >> > > >> >Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:08:17 -0300 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Hi >> > > >> > >> > > >> >I have the tc complied commands with htb.init from >> > > >> > >> > > >> >http://freshmeat.net/proyects/htb.init >> > > >> > >> > > >> >for my network bandwidth manager. >> > > >> > >> > > >> >(htb.init compile) >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Where I must to insert it ?? There works with shorewall ?? >> > > >> > >> > > >> >I run the lastest bering version. >> > > >> > >> > > >> >thanks a lot >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> >
RE: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb
insert the contents of htb.init in the tcstart file in the shorewall directory Kim Oppalfens >-- Original Message -- >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Pereyra) >Subject: [leaf-user] bandwidth manager with htb >Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:08:17 -0300 > > >Hi > >I have the tc complied commands with htb.init from > >http://freshmeat.net/proyects/htb.init > >for my network bandwidth manager. > >(htb.init compile) > >Where I must to insert it ?? There works with shorewall ?? > >I run the lastest bering version. > >thanks a lot > > >roberto pereyra >? Where I must insert it ?? > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] LEAF Package Descriptions
I have an exell file that describes just about everything in that list. I used that list and ran it through freshmeat & sourceforge. The exell file was imported into the cvs descriptions. I don't know the exact link for cvs anymore though. Mike, care the fill in the blank?? Thanks Kim >-- Original Message -- >From: "Brad Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Alby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] LEAF Package Descriptions >Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:26:16 -0500 > > > >On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:01:07 -0400 Alby wrote: > >> Does anybody know of a location where I can get a description >> on all the packages available? >> >> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/packages-list.html > >Not for all of them. Dave Douthitt has a few of the descriptions >for his packages at > > http://leaf.sf.net/devel/ddouthitt/repository/ > >Most of them are named very similarly to, when not exactly as, >the upstream software packages they contain. Google and >freshmeat.net are probably good resources for finding out more >about them. When a web search fails, you can always download >the package, extract it (e.g. with "tar xzf pkgname.lrp"), and >look for packaged documentation, especially in >var/lib/lrpkg/pkgname.help . > >--Brad > > > >--- >This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future >of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community >Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. >http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Wireless bridge not working.
Morning people, (Well for me it's morning). I am trying to set up a wireless bridge on bering RC3 using a dlink 520 pci wireless nic (prism2 based)and a 3com 590. both interface are up & running. So far I have the bridge module loaded. The 2 interfaces eth1 & wlan0 added to the bridge. Both interfaces are up & in promisc mode. The bridge interface gets ip address 192.168.0.1 I can ping from the firewall to the access point (wireless) on 192.168.0.4. I can ping from the firewall to a client (cross cable) on 192.168.0.2. I cannot however ping from the client to the access point. Strange thing is that I have configured an almost identical setup for a friend of mine, and everything is working fine there. Only difference between his setup & mine is that he is using ad-hoc mode (2 wireless interfaces talking directly to each other). and I am using infrastructure mode (with an access point). Is there anything obvious I have forgotten? ip add output: 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: dummy0: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc htb qlen 100 link/ether 00:50:da:bf:fb:b5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 213.118.142.5/22 brd 213.118.143.255 scope global eth0 4: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:10:b5:41:a4:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 5: wlan0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:05:5d:5c:39:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 6: cipdb0: mtu 1428 qdisc noop qlen 100 link/ether 00:00:5e:c2:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 7: br0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether 00:05:5d:5c:39:47 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.1/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global br0 ip route output: 192.168.0.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.1 213.118.140.0/22 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 213.118.142.5 default via 213.118.140.1 dev eth0 # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00055d5c3947 yes eth1 wlan0 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Where to put iwconfig calls?
Comments inline >> Hi list, >> >> since no one seemed to know how I could get my >> dlink 520 to retain its config after boot I decided >> to go about it in another way. > >I remember seeing your original post, but can't find an copy >anywhere. Are you using the wlan-ng drivers? When using a >full install, the configuration is of wlan-ng cards are handled >via /etc/pcmcia/wlan-ng and /etc/pcmcia/wlan-ng.opts. Not sure >if that will help in your case. I am using the hostap_pci.o module, so nope this doesn't help me much. > >> I would like to make some iwconfig calls during each boot. >> mainly : >> >> iwconfig wlan0 mode managed >> iwconfig wlan0 essid default >> >> What would be the correct or best place to do this? >> /etc/interfaces doesn't seem to work since I need >> to add the wlan0 later on to a bridge. > >I am probably being dense and overlooking something obvious, but >why is it that the "up command" iface option doesn't work? Is it >some sort of timing or sequence issue? Brad, I will refrain myself from commenting on the fact that you think your being dense ;-). But this part actually solved my problem, I did try that prior to sending my first mail, but on looking up what I had done exactly to put it in my reply I noticed I made a typo in my interfaces file. iface wlan0 inet static addres ... masklen 24 up iwconfig ... Notice the one s in addres, once I fixed that everythank worked like a charm. Kim "feeling a little dense myself now" --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] Where to put iwconfig calls?
Hi list, since no one seemed to know how I could get my dlink 520 to retain its config after boot I decided to go about it in another way. I would like to make some iwconfig calls during each boot. mainly : iwconfig wlan0 mode managed iwconfig wlan0 essid default What would be the correct or best place to do this? /etc/interfaces doesn't seem to work since I need to add the wlan0 later on to a bridge. Kim Oppalfens --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] broadcast through pptp-connection (bering rc3)
One way to have broadcasting sent over wan links is to use cipe in bridging mode. I have created a package that does just this. Before anyone asks why I want this the reason is pretty simple. A lot of lan games tend to use broadcasting to find the game server, so this way I am trying to play lan games over the internet. As for a business reason to do this, I can't come up with a good example neither. Kim >-- Origineel Bericht -- >From: "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "stefan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [leaf-user] broadcast through pptp-connection (bering rc3) >Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 09:13:16 -0500 > > >> i want to send broadcast-packet through a pptp-connection. any ideas >?? > >I won't bother to ask why, but this is generally a bad idea. The only >networking software I know of that's broken enough to need to send >broadcast packets down a WAN link is Microsoft's file sharing...they >actually pitch their ability to route broadcast traffic as a feature, >not as a requirement of their broken protocols. Even with M$ >networking, however, there are ways around needing to tunnel broadcast >packets.. > >Anyway, check into L2TP (Level 2 Tunneling Protocol), which is the M$ >mechanism used to pipe broadcast traffic across routers & WAN links. >There's a linux version of this available, which you should be able to >run on your LEAF system. Sorry, but I don't recall the linux project >name offhand...a quick google search for linux and l2tp should point you >in the right direction... > >Charles Steinkuehler >http://lrp.steinkuehler.net >http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing >real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! >http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Repetitive firewall message
As far as I am concerned tcp/ip illustrated by Richard Stevens is probably one of the best tcp/ip books out there. Your other question was already addressed by Tom Kim Oppalfens >-- Origineel Bericht -- >From: "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "LEAF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] Repetitive firewall message >Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:09:43 -0700 > > >Hi folks, >I get, sometimes, dozens of this firewall message- > >Aug 19 13:43:38 clonebox kernel: Shorewall:rfc1918:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= >MAC=01:00:5e:00:00:01:00:20:40:3f:e8:43:08:00 SRC=192.168.100.1 >DST=224.0.0.1 LEN=28 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=1 ID=0 PROTO=2 > >and I'm not sure if it's something I should be concerned with or not. >Also, is there any good information ( web site, book, etc.) that >anyone's aware of that might help me understand, piece by piece, what my >firewall log messages mean? Thank you as always! > >Craig > > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old >cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! >https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Backing up .lrp with Bering CD
I think you can still set the destination by using the d in the backup menu & then use the c for custom. If you don't add an entry for fd0 in your isolinux.cfg you probably won't be able to take advantage of the overriding capabilities of the lrpkg.cfg file. Check http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bubooting.html more specifically section 9.5 for more info on lrpkg.cfg Kim Oppalfens >-- Origineel Bericht -- >From: "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "LEAF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] Backing up .lrp with Bering CD >Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:45:02 -0700 > > >Hi folks, >I notice that I don't have an option to back up packages to a floppy >disk from the main menu with my Bering CD. Do I need to modify my >isolinux.cfg file and somehow add a /dev/fd0 entry to allow for this or >is there something else I need to do? Below is my isolinux.cfg file >entries. Thank you. > >Craig > >display syslinux.dpy >timeout 0 >default linux initrd=initrd.lrp init=/linuxrc root=/dev/ram0 >boot=/dev/cdrom:iso9660 PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom:iso9660 > > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old >cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! >https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Unknown traffic on firewall
Port 1214 is used by the filesharing application Kazaa. Recently a vulnerablitiy must have come up because I have been seeing regular scans on a daily basis from different ip's for about a month now. As David already replied you are not accepting nor deny'ing them but you are rejecting them. Only difference is that you do reply with a reset packet to close off the session. Well I guess you could say it is slightly more polite then not responding at all :-). Unfortunately it is also telling that your machine is up & is doing some filtering so you could consider it slightly less secure as well. Kim Oppalfens >> What I don't understand is why the packets are not denied and who is responding >to this >> packets. > >> tcpdump: >> >> 13:24:08.722724 213.168.220.62.2605 > 80.134.34.59.1214: S 229201904:229201904(0) >win 8192 >> (DF) >> 13:24:08.722724 80.134.34.59.1214 > 213.168.220.62.2605: R 0:0(0) ack 229201905 >win 0 >> 13:24:09.752724 213.168.220.62.2605 > 80.134.34.59.1214: S 229201904:229201904(0) >win 8192 >> (DF) >> 13:24:09.752724 80.134.34.59.1214 > 213.168.220.62.2605: R 0:0(0) ack 1 >win 0 >> 13:24:10.452724 213.168.220.62.2605 > 80.134.34.59.1214: S 229201904:229201904(0) >win 8192 >> (DF) >> 13:24:10.452724 80.134.34.59.1214 > 213.168.220.62.2605: R 0:0(0) ack 1 >win 0 >> 13:24:11.352724 213.168.220.62.2605 > 80.134.34.59.1214: S 229201904:229201904(0) >win 8192 >> (DF) >> 13:24:11.352724 80.134.34.59.1214 > 213.168.220.62.2605: R 0:0(0) ack 1 >win 0 > > >Looking at your output, they are sending you some sort of packet destined >for >port 1214 on your firewall (80.134.34.59) and your firewall IS rejecting >it, >using the TCP RST flag (ReSeT). Your firewall can send a RST, or ignore >the >packet entirely; in this case, it sends a RST. > >I don't know what port 1214 is supposed to be for, but port 2605 is BGP (a >routing >protocol) - surprise surprise... > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old >cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! >https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Help with a Possible Bering Configuration Please
I have just set up an almost identical environment. Just a tad bit more difficult because it used pppoe to go out instead of eth0. Your problem with shorewall not responding is probably because something is wrong with your routing table. So to fix this you should bring up all of your interfaces and the bridge in the interfaces file. Make sure your eth1 & wlan 0 don't have an ip address. The only interface needing an ip address is the br0 (bridge interface). Don't forget to make sure that dhcpd uses br0 to distribute addresses and make the necessary adjustments to shorewall so that br0 is being masquereaded and so on. If you need more detailed help just ask. Kim Oppalfens > >I've been trying for the last few weeks to create the following small >office "killer" Bering distribution. I've solved some of the issues but >I'm still not 100% sure if what I want will actually work. > > > >I've would like to have the following setup: > > > >Eth0 as the internet port (Done) > >Eth1 as the internal port (Done) > >Wlan0 as the 802.11b port (Done) > >Running on Bering RC3 WITH shorewall acting as the firewall (Done) > >Samba Printer server to USB printer (1/2 Done - Printing to LPT) > >DHCP server for both Eth1 and Wlan0 (Only made for Eth1 so far) > >Bridging between the Eth1 and Wlan0 to allow for traffic between >interfaces behind and through shorewall (Can't seem to make work at all) > > > >My Question(s) are: > > > >Is it possible to have just one ip subnet for both the wired (Eth1) and >wireless (Wlan0) clients? > > > >If so, can anyone point me where I can learn how to do this with >bridging? > > > >I've tried to do this with the bridge.lrp and bridge.o, but when BR0 can >up ShoreWall stopped. I wish to use bridging so it can be as automated >as possible. I have gotten this to work with the use of static IP and >routing, but this is not the best solution for a DHCP environment. > > > >I am using the following LRP and .o: Any suggestions for better ones: > > > >Basic Bering RC3 distribution with the following added: > >Hostap_plx.o, wireutil.lrp, libm.lrp for the Linksys wireless card > >Tulip.o for the 3com NICs > >SMB-2b.lrp, lpd.lrp, parport.o, parport_pc.o, lp.o for the printing > >Dhcpd.lrp for Dhcp > >Ide_mode.o, ide_disk.o, ide_prob.o for hard disk support > > > >Bridge.lrp and bridge.o used when trying the bridging > > > >Any help would be greatly appreciated. Once I got this working I wanted >to post as a package with a how to.I've seen a lot of really good ideas >and solutions in the LEAF world, but for a newbie like me it is really >daunting to start into. > > > >Rob sealock > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Welcome to geek heaven. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] Newbie
Comments inline. > >My objective: build a secure router/firewall/bandwidth manager system >preferably without any moving components and a disk/fs component that >would allow me to make the device read-only thro' physical means e.g. >tabs, jumpers etc. I intend using a flash 8MB IDE module. I know and >understand iproute2, tc, ipchains, iptables etc. I was looking at a good >firewall script generator and I came across shorewall. > >I need a few pointers please. TIA for all help. ALL IDEAS on any of the >above welcome. > >1. Does LEAF always boot off floppy? Can I load it on a flash module >that plugs into the IDE and make it boot off that piece? No leaf doesn't have to boot off of a floppy, i have been running an ide based memory module for months now. Some people run from flas,hdd or cdrom. >2. Are the appropriate parts of the fs by default ro to prevent hacking? I am not sure about what you mean by apropriate parts, but most things are only editable by the owner which usually means root. >3. Is there any doc or site or URL that helps a person like me >understand how I can move from a regular distro to this smoothly. I don't know about a document explaining how to move from a regular distro to a leaf based solution, but the bering branch comes with a very good installion & user guide. Check the documentation part of the leaf branch. Kim Oppalfens > >Mohan > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] What are syslinux.cfg and/or lrpkg.cfg files ???
I am not sure about dachstein, but if you create a bering cd the file is no longer called syslinux.cfg but isolinux.cfg content is still the same though. Kim Oppalfens >-- Original Message -- >From: "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "LEAF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] What are syslinux.cfg and/or lrpkg.cfg files ??? >Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:44:28 -0700 > > >Hey Erich, >What do you mean "You can start with what's in your syslinux.cfg and >expand it"??? I've looked on my Dachstein CD, and I don't even see a >syslinux.cfg file! How do I know if I have one on my CD, how do I find >it, and how do I "look" at it? If I create this infamous lrpkg.cfg >file...should I even care about what's in the syslinux.cfg file??? >Thanks for your help. > >Craig > > > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
RE: [leaf-user] HOW TO ADD STATIC ROUTES TO BERING..
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw/ip-syntax.php This should help you figure it out. If you need more help just give a yell. Kim Oppalfens >-- Original Message -- >From: Troy Aden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Leaf-User (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [leaf-user] HOW TO ADD STATIC ROUTES TO BERING.. >Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 21:10:27 -0600 > > >I done a fair amount of digging and I can't find any documentation on haw >to >add static routes to Bering. Can anyone tell me how to do it or point me >to >the documentation. I am trying to add 4 static routes. > >Thanks in advance. > > Troy > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] traceroute through Bering firewall
>> Ms traceroute sends 3 of these packages to every hop. >> So if 1 of them is timing out it is probably a site between you and >> your traceroute target that has icmp replies filtered. >> >> Bottom line it is probably out of your hands. Someone on the road is >> blocking icmp. It doesn't kill traceroute but it means your missing one >hop. > >Um, right. It's the first hop. My Bering firewall. That's what we were >talking about... Oops sorry about that, didn't follow the entire thread. Well that means that it shouldn't be out of your hands then I suppose :-) but puts it right back in. Kan you do a normal ping to your bering firewall from the machine you are tracerouting from? Kim Oppalfens > >-- >Dan Harkless >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://harkless.org/dan/ > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] traceroute through Bering firewall
>> involves some icmp rule being added, not sure what though. But default >> bering only allows icmp type 8 in which is the echo request icmp >> packet. Just testing by allowing all icmp in should confirm my suspicion >> that it is an icmp related issue. Close it up afterwards again. > >Why, is there a specific danger to allowing ICMP packets from your internal >network to the firewall box? There are some hacks based on ICMP like the icmp redirect message. So is there a specific danger to allow this from your internal network? I don't know depends on how much you trust the people on your internal network I suppose. > >> I will try and network monitor an microsoft traceroute and come back with >> a better filtered solution. > >That'd be great... I have done a network monitor of a traceroute session and traceroute uses identical packets as ping does just with shorter TTL. Traceroute in ms is based on the fact that if the ttl becomes 0 the router that drops the packet because of this sends you a time to live exceeded in transmit back. (This message contains the routers ip address). Ms traceroute sends 3 of these packages to every hop. So if 1 of them is timing out it is probably a site between you and your traceroute target that has icmp replies filtered. Bottom line it is probably out of your hands. Someone on the road is blocking icmp. It doesn't kill traceroute but it means your missing one hop. Kim Oppalfens > >-- >Dan Harkless >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://harkless.org/dan/ > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] traceroute through Bering firewall
>> >> Microsoft traceroute uses icmp whereas unix traceroute tends to use udp > >> ports in the range above 33000. > >Huh. That's wild. I didn't know UDP was useful for such things. I'd've >thought there'd have to be like a "tracerouted" listening to some UDP >port(s) for it to work that way, whereas I thought the TCP/IP stack was >responsible for responding to certain ICMP messages, and that ICMP's whole >reason for being was things like ping and traceroute (and lower-level >equivalents). The unix traceroute is based on the fact that you will respond with a package stating that nothing is listening on that port. That is normal behaviour if you don't have a firewall DROPping the package. A reject rule might make a unix traceroute already happy (not sure though). As to making the traceroute from microsoft work, I am pretty sure it involves some icmp rule being added, not sure what though. But default bering only allows icmp type 8 in which is the echo request icmp packet. Just testing by allowing all icmp in should confirm my suspicion that it is an icmp related issue. Close it up afterwards again. I will try and network monitor an microsoft traceroute and come back with a better filtered solution. Kim Oppalfens > >> I am not sure on the exact range used but 33434-33463 probably is correct. >> >> So if the problem is reproducable by tracerouting from a win2k station > >> it is icmp related and not udp related. > >I see. That explains why Russ Price and I were seeing different behavior >than Tom Eastep. Presumably the solution, then, would be to open up some >"icmp" stuff in Shorewall, though I wouldn't hazard to guess what. > >Personally it doesn't really bother me that the first hop of traceroute >always gets "* * *", now that I know it's to be expected. (If the required >Shorewall rule to fix it were easy, however, I'd probably go ahead and do >so.) > >-- >Dan Harkless >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://harkless.org/dan/ > > >--- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board >for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! >http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > >leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user >SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] iproute2 FAQ!
Quoting Samuel Abreu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I don't know of a faq but I find this page rather helpful. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw/ip-syntax.php As you can see what you missed is the dev keyword. Should have been ip addr add 192.168.2.1 dev eth0 Kim > Whats the oficial page of iproute2 used in LEAF??? > > My doubt is how to add another IP in a interface??? > > When i try "ip addr add 192.168.2.1 eth0" returns: > Error: either "local" is duplicate, or "eth0" is a garbage. > > Thanks > > Samuel Abreu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Add module to initrd.lrp
Quoting Blaise Lab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: add it in the /boot/lib/modules directory. and declare it in the /boot/etc/modules file. backup initrd.lrp afterwards Kim > Hello, > > So how can I add usb storage module (usb-storage.o ???) to initrd.lrp ? > > Thanks... > > Blaise > > Message: 5 > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Leaf User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Bering / USB storage key > Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:27:04 +0100 > > If you really wanted to use a usb key, you could boot from a floppy > (syslinux, copy syslinux.cfg, vmlinuz, initrd.lrp) and have the rest of > the > packages on the key. You would need to put the usb storage module (if > indeed > this is the right module) in initrd.lrp and also have a usb port > available > on your router Mobo (Mine's an old Intel socket 7 (not super) and has a > USB > riser) > > This would speed up booting a little (how often to you need to reboot?, > mine's been running for at least 2 months without trouble) and also > allow > you to run those big packages like ssh and squid. > > TTFN > > Antony Briggs > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering: to Preserve Root Password, backup which package.lrp ?
Quoting AdvertisingDept <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I think it is the etc package. Someone please correct me if I am wrong on this one. Kim > Using Bering_1.0rc3 image. > > After I assign a password to root > # passwd > > Which package.lrp do I backup to make root password survive reboots? > > I expected it to be in root.lrp. It was not backed up with root.lrp. > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Ramdisk
Aanhalen Godfried Duodu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: edit /var/lib/lrpkg/root.linuxrc edit systsize to whatever you want. Kim Oppalfens > I have been gettingwarning indications on the web interface for > Bering-rc3 . I want to increase the ramdisk to clear the indication. How > do I increase the ramdisk? Is it in the syslinux.cfg file? > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: bering wireless bridge (some success)
Aanhalen Mark A Nordstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Do the components of the bridge still have their ip addresses assigned?? Output of ip add & ip route might be helpfull to solve this. Kim Oppalfens > With some info from Jim TerWee I've managed to get some > of this working. Currently, I can get to the bridging > laptap from anywhere on the my network, and from the > laptop with the wireless card. However, I can't seem to > get from the network to the laptop. > > I've poked around on the bridge laptop, but since this is > fairly new to me, I'm not to sure what to look for. The > only oddity I could find is from 'brctl showmacs br0' > which lists all the mac addresses on the network (and the > 2 in the bridge laptop), but not the one on the other > laptop. > > -- > Mark > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing > > real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! > http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in! http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
[leaf-user] cipe bridging over the internet SUCCES
Hi all, I am not quite finished yet and still need to do some testing. But I am way to excited to wait. Things that are working as we speak. Is pinging internal interfaces on both sides of the cipe tunnel. And accessing file shares through the cipe tunnel. Current setup Box 1: Internal ip 192.168.0.1 (mask 24) External ip x.x.172.2 eth1. Bridged interface (192.168.0.1). Bridge parts eth1 & cipdb0. (both without ip). Box 2: Internal ip 192.168.0.10 External ip x.x.182.186 ppp0 (pppoe interface). Bridged interface 192.168.0.10 (mask 24) Bridge parts eth1, cipdb0 & wlan0. Gonna try some lan gaming over the internet this weekend. Btw using bering RC3 on box2 RC2 on box 1 both modified to use glibc2.2 (cdrom based) Kim - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Newbie questions (I know, I know)
Aanhalen Harold Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Comments inline. > I'm new to the whole LEAF / LRP arena, but an old programmer. Started > my > first ISP with a single Linux/486DX4-100 box a while ago, sold it, and > now > have a dozen machines running at my home/office. I have a few questions. > I > read what documentation I could find, but most of the sites appear to > be > down/moved (c0wz, etc). welcome, most of the docs are centralized on http://leaf.sourceforge.net or http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (c0wz is mirrored there). > 1) Which version should I be playing with? Security is my main > concern.. I personally prefer Bering since (unless I am mistaken) is the only one using kernel 2.4 and iptables which makes the firewall statefull vs stateless 2.2 kernels. > > 2) The Ethernet cards came with a fa31x.o file, but it generates lots > of > errors when included in the module area. Tulip.o seems to generate less > errors, but still a few. Which module should I be using? List archives (http://leaf.sourceforge.net) mailing listst. Seem to imply that the natsemi module can be used. Make sure you load pci-scan first since natsemi depends on it. If you are going to use Bering (again leaf.sourceforge.net releases) The modules can be found at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/drivers/net/ > > 3) Where do I get ipcfg, route, and the other required tools to > troubleshoot > this whole process? I don't believe LINUX is seeing any of the cards. > dmesg > lists the tulip module banner as the last line in the startup process. The 2.4 kernels don't use ipcfg they use the ip command ip link show & ip add show. More info here http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ericw/ip-syntax.php > > 4)Will I have to create yet another machine just to compile kernels if > I > want to use the IDE drives, and the network cards? Nope for nic's see answer to question 2 for the IDE drives see the bering release's user documentation. the installation guide might come in handy too. > > Thanks for the boost. Once the basics are running, the firewall, etc > should > be a straight forward port from the existing linux box. (ipchains) Unfortunately that probably won't be the case. 2.4 kernels use iptables. Luckily enough bering comes with shorewall which makes configuring rules a breeze. for help on that see http://www.shorewall.net > > If ya wanna flame me, please do it off-line at [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > not > on the list...Suggestions can be sent to the same address. I don't think anybody got ever flamed on this list for asking questions. You might want to use the leaf site now you know about it to do some searching, but we will still be here to answer any questions. Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training > > Harold Miller > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by NW.NET's MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Stuff, things, and much much more. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Anybody know what happened to:
Aanhalen "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Just gambling here but couldn't a packet coming from the inside with an echo request or (probably any data destined for 0.0.0.0) provoke this kind off response? A capture of network traffic should help you out if that is the case. Kim Oppalfens > > PS: These are some strange logs you're seeing. :) I believe > they're getting logged because of the "0.0.0.0" return > IP address that the packets say they are from. That IP > address was historically used for broadcasts, but is now > much more likely a sign of trouble. A lot of firewall > rulesets block traffic from that IP address straight away. > > PPS: The message that it's sending in this log is an ICMP > error message "Destination Unreachable". My hunch is > that your LEAF box is on a cable-modem environment, > and someone in your neighborhood is experiment with a > rather sloppy and noisy DOS attack. You may want to > send this logfile to your ISP's "abuse" email. > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 02:27:08 -0700 > > From: Michael McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Leaf Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [leaf-user] Anybody know what happened to: > > > > http://www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl > > > > Its not there anymore > > > > Jul 7 03:04:00 mikerouter kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 > PROTO=1 > > 0.0.0.0:3 80.135.217.223:3 L=56 S=0x00 I=42918 F=0x T=150 (#17) > > > > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Stuff, things, and much much more. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] tc
Aanhalen hari-nuryadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thx for your kindness, yeah u r right i haven't load the > module yet :) > Thx for Jnilo too, i really appreciate your answer. No problem. > > Btw, can u show me the example how to share 64 kbps > bandwidth with 2 client (64 kbps 1:2) with tc command using > cbq? > What i have do succesfully is limit 64 kbps bw on one > client based on tbf policy. I don't really understand your question here. Do you have a 64 kb connection coming from the internet which you want to divide to 2 clients? Or is upload traffic that you want to shape? If it is downstream what should happen with the bandwidth when it is not being used by one of the clients? Kim Oppalfens > > Thx again for the help. > > hari-huhui > > On Wed, 03 Jul 2002 18:33:47 +0200 (CEST) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Aanhalen hari-nuryadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I don't think you have to recompile anything. > > I am acutually quite sure since I have been using tc > > with bering rc2. > > You are probably just missing some modules. > > > > Check > > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/net/sched/ > > > > You need cls_fw; sch_cbq or tbf although htb is easier; > > and maybe some other > > stuff depending on what you want > > to do. > > > > Load these modules in /etc/modules after they are copied > > to /lib/modules > > try again. > > > > If you need more help just ask > > > > Kim Oppalfens > > > > > Hmm > > > I'm not so sure which part of Bering which include tc > > in > > > default, but mine used bering-1.0.rc-3 and have tc on > > it. > > > Maybe i have already add tc.lrp on it, i have checked > > it on > > > syslinux.cfg and on my harddisk...yes..there is tc on > > it. > > > > > > I have try googling and i found a mailing list that > > analyze > > > i have to recompile my kernel to support RTNETLINK, if > > it's > > > the answer, so the next question is how to recompile > > kernel > > > on Bering to support RTNETLINK. I've found another > > > documentation to on Bandwidth Management on leaf, but > > it is > > > based on old Leaf version like dacstein, materhorn, > > oxygen, > > > etc, did anyone have write documentation on bandwidth > > > management on Bering? > > > > > > I really appreciate if someone could show me the > > location > > > of the documentation. > > > > > > Thanks for the help. > > > > > > hari-huhui > > > > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 20:14:08 -0700 > > > "Steve Sobka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hari, > > > > > > > > I don't think bering 1.0-rc3 loads the tc package at > > > > boot. Did you add it > > > > to the end of your syslinux.cfg file? > > > > > > > > mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt > > > > less /mnt/syslinux.cfg | grep tc > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "hari-nuryadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:15 PM > > > > Subject: [leaf-user] tc > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello again averyone, > > > > > It is nice for me being here because this mailing > > list > > > > are > > > > > different than other. It's so helpful. > > > > > Btw, i have a problem again, it's about tc on my > > > > bering. I > > > > > have read the documentation about badwidth > > management > > > > and > > > > > other technical documentation about tc with a good > > > > example > > > > > there, but when i try to implemented it on my > > bering, > > > > these > > > > > are what happen: > > > > > > > > > > 1. With cbq: > > > > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root cbq > > bandwidth > > > > > 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 > > > > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > > > > 2. With tbf: > > > > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 64Kbit buffer > > > > 5Kb/8 > > > > > limit 10Kb > > > > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > > > > > > > > > My bering always give those kind of messages. I'm > > tryng > > > > to > > > > > make my client behind my bering, which attach to > > device > > > > > eth0 on my bering, to get 64 Kbps rate. I do the > > > > default > > > > > instalation of bering-1.0.rc-3, which is already > > > > include tc > > > > > on it. > > > > > Is there any idea what should i do now? > > > > > Thx for the help. > > > > > hari-huhui > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Kemudahan Hosting > > > > PlasaCom --- > > > > > Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan > > keringanan > > > > 50% biaya > > > > registrasi > > > > > mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. > > > > > Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > > No, I will not fix your computer. > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > >
Re: [leaf-user] eth1 not found - nic problems
Aanhalen The Tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: did you try loading mii.o before the 8139 module? what is the output of the ip add command?? Kim > Thanks Kim: > > I am currently running smoothwall with a Intel etherexpress16 and smz > ez100 > and the loaded modules are eexpress and rtl8139, I took out the > Intel > pro100 (pci, which I would like to use) and put back in the Intel > etherexress16 (isa) because I did not want to go without a firewall > for > too long. I did not get a chance to ping yet with the current setup, > but at > the time I had the other setup (with the Intel pro100), I tried ping and > did > not get a response from either nic. Strangely the smz nic works with > the > rtl8139 in smoothwall but the smc website supplies a tulip (tulip.H > whatever > that means). > > Are there any other Linux commands I can run besides ping? > > Does the leaf project have modules for supplying compiling tools? > > Tiger > > > To: The Tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [leaf-user] eth1 not found > > Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 08:14:24 +0200 (CEST) > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Aanhalen The Tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If I am not mistaken, the 8139 module depends on the mii.o module to > be > loaded > > in advance. > > > > But You might want to try to find out which card is non functional. > > One way to accomplish this is to find out which ip address you > already > have. > > (for eth0) > > > > Try pinging that ip and check the back of your box for the led that > is > blinking > > on ping rhythm :-). > > > > Then check your box to see which card that is. > > That will probably give us some more info to troubleshoot your > problem > then we > > have now. > > > > Btw which cards are in there at this point (since you mention 3 > different > cards) > > > > Kim Oppalfens > > Azlan Training > > Leaf-project member > > > > > > > > > I am trying to create a bering floppy setup for my firewall and I > am > > > having > > > trouble I think with the nics being recognized. I am using a smz > ez100 > > > nic > > > and I tried using the tulip driver module and I also tried the 8139 > > > module > > > because it works in my smoothwall, I also had installed a intel > pro100+ > > > and > > > took out a intel etherexpress16 because I wanted full duplex, I did > not > > > find > > > a module for the intel pro100, intel supplies uncompiled code for > one > > > called > > > e100.c but I am not set up to compile. I could not figure out which > nic > > > was > > > not being recognized but I did get a message line saying "eth1 does > not > > > exist" I could not figure out which nic was eth0 and 1 and what > > > address > > > they had, I tried ifup and ifdown but I am not very familiar with > most > > > linux > > > commands. I tried a few different modules but could not get it > > > working. > > > smoothwall also did not recognise the intel pro100+ but smoothwall > is > > > using > > > ipchains and I wanted the capabilies found in bering (iptables > etc.). > > > > > > does anyone have any ideas for me to figure out what nics are > working > > > and > > > what are not? > > > > > > thanks, > > > Tiger > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > No, I will not fix your computer. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] tc
Aanhalen hari-nuryadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I don't think you have to recompile anything. I am acutually quite sure since I have been using tc with bering rc2. You are probably just missing some modules. Check http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/modules/net/sched/ You need cls_fw; sch_cbq or tbf although htb is easier; and maybe some other stuff depending on what you want to do. Load these modules in /etc/modules after they are copied to /lib/modules try again. If you need more help just ask Kim Oppalfens > Hmm > I'm not so sure which part of Bering which include tc in > default, but mine used bering-1.0.rc-3 and have tc on it. > Maybe i have already add tc.lrp on it, i have checked it on > syslinux.cfg and on my harddisk...yes..there is tc on it. > > I have try googling and i found a mailing list that analyze > i have to recompile my kernel to support RTNETLINK, if it's > the answer, so the next question is how to recompile kernel > on Bering to support RTNETLINK. I've found another > documentation to on Bandwidth Management on leaf, but it is > based on old Leaf version like dacstein, materhorn, oxygen, > etc, did anyone have write documentation on bandwidth > management on Bering? > > I really appreciate if someone could show me the location > of the documentation. > > Thanks for the help. > > hari-huhui > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 20:14:08 -0700 > "Steve Sobka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hari, > > > > I don't think bering 1.0-rc3 loads the tc package at > > boot. Did you add it > > to the end of your syslinux.cfg file? > > > > mount -t msdos /dev/fd0u1680 /mnt > > less /mnt/syslinux.cfg | grep tc > > > > Steve > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "hari-nuryadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:15 PM > > Subject: [leaf-user] tc > > > > > > > Hello again averyone, > > > It is nice for me being here because this mailing list > > are > > > different than other. It's so helpful. > > > Btw, i have a problem again, it's about tc on my > > bering. I > > > have read the documentation about badwidth management > > and > > > other technical documentation about tc with a good > > example > > > there, but when i try to implemented it on my bering, > > these > > > are what happen: > > > > > > 1. With cbq: > > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle 1: root cbq bandwidth > > > 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 > > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > > 2. With tbf: > > > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 64Kbit buffer > > 5Kb/8 > > > limit 10Kb > > > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > > > > > My bering always give those kind of messages. I'm tryng > > to > > > make my client behind my bering, which attach to device > > > eth0 on my bering, to get 64 Kbps rate. I do the > > default > > > instalation of bering-1.0.rc-3, which is already > > include tc > > > on it. > > > Is there any idea what should i do now? > > > Thx for the help. > > > hari-huhui > > > > > > > > > - Kemudahan Hosting > > PlasaCom --- > > > Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan > > 50% biaya > > registrasi > > > mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. > > > Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran > > > > > > -- > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > No, I will not fix your computer. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > > > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > > SR FAQ: > > > http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > No, I will not fix your computer. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > SR FAQ: > > > http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom > --- > Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan 50% biaya > registrasi > mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. > Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > No, I will not fix your computer. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/
Re: [leaf-user] wondering how.....
Aanhalen hari-nuryadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Maximum size of ramdisk is arguably 8 MB less than the total amount of ram you have, I thought leaf needed about 8 MB of actual memory. Things like this are all in the mailing list archives. ( A search on the user mailing list on "size root ramdisk" gave me 91 hits) Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training > It is working now :) > Thank you very much. > I try to fill the syst_size=20M and it can give me 20 M on > /. Btw, what is the maximum size of Ramdisk i can get when > i run bering on P166 RAM 16 M? And where do u read the > documentation like this, it can help me and other that > don't know this stuff i guest :) > > hari-huhui > > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:40:30 -0700 > "Scott Ritchie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bering just uses the hard disk as a booting source. The > > actual OS is run in > > Ramdisk, meaning you share part of your system's memory > > as a "virtual disk". > > > > The 6MB refers to the size of your ramdisk. In > > syslinux.cfg after > > "initrd=initrd.lrp" add "syst_size=10M". 10M being > > 10MBytes is just what I > > have set (system has 64MB of ram). > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > Hi again everyone, > > > I'm wondering what is the function of partitioning > > harddisk > > > to become small 20 M msdos based, when my bering still > > read > > > the 6 M of /dev/root? > > > > > > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% > > > Mounted on > > > /dev/root 6144 606084 99% > > / > > > > > > I can't add packets anymore :(, once i backed up init.d > > > with that condition, it killed my dnscachex because out > > of > > > memory. > > > I try to add more memory but /dev/root still read 6 M > > only. > > > I read the LRP-harddisk-HOWTO, but the packet itself is > > > based on materhorn and eiger. Is it compatible with > > Bering? > > > Or is there anyway to raise my / space so i can add > > more > > > and more packages to my bering. > > > > > > Thx for the answer. > > > > > > hari-huhui > > > - Kemudahan Hosting > > PlasaCom --- > > > Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan > > 50% biaya > > registrasi > > > mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. > > > Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran > > > > > > -- > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > > > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > > SR FAQ: > > > http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > > > - Kemudahan Hosting PlasaCom > --- > Hosting menjadi lebih mudah dan murah dengan keringanan 50% biaya > registrasi > mail hosting dan webhosting selama bulan Juni 2002. > Klik http://idc.plasa.com untuk pendaftaran > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] eth1 not found
Aanhalen The Tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If I am not mistaken, the 8139 module depends on the mii.o module to be loaded in advance. But You might want to try to find out which card is non functional. One way to accomplish this is to find out which ip address you already have. (for eth0) Try pinging that ip and check the back of your box for the led that is blinking on ping rhythm :-). Then check your box to see which card that is. That will probably give us some more info to troubleshoot your problem then we have now. Btw which cards are in there at this point (since you mention 3 different cards) Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training Leaf-project member > I am trying to create a bering floppy setup for my firewall and I am > having > trouble I think with the nics being recognized. I am using a smz ez100 > nic > and I tried using the tulip driver module and I also tried the 8139 > module > because it works in my smoothwall, I also had installed a intel pro100+ > and > took out a intel etherexpress16 because I wanted full duplex, I did not > find > a module for the intel pro100, intel supplies uncompiled code for one > called > e100.c but I am not set up to compile. I could not figure out which nic > was > not being recognized but I did get a message line saying "eth1 does not > exist" I could not figure out which nic was eth0 and 1 and what > address > they had, I tried ifup and ifdown but I am not very familiar with most > linux > commands. I tried a few different modules but could not get it > working. > smoothwall also did not recognise the intel pro100+ but smoothwall is > using > ipchains and I wanted the capabilies found in bering (iptables etc.). > > does anyone have any ideas for me to figure out what nics are working > and > what are not? > > thanks, > Tiger > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Error on Booting CD
Aanhalen Abjin M H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: First lets check to see if /dev/cdrom exists. Try booting with the old cdrom and without the floppy disk. login and do a ls -la /dev/cdrom If that link doesn't exist you found your problem. And probably should manually create the link yourself. edit /var/lib/lrpkg/root.dev.mk and and the ln -sf /dev/hdX /dev/cdrom Where X equals A if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a master B if the cdrom is attached to the primary ide-controller and is a slave C if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a master D if the cdrom is attached to the secondary ide-controller and is a slave Backup initrd Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training > Hi, > > I just created a "Dachstein-CD" using the iso image from > http://lrp.steinkuehler.net (dachstein-cd-v1.0.2.iso) and when I boot > my > system I got to the login prompt and it worked fine. Then I created two > files in a floppy as mentioned in the documentation lrpkg.cfg and > pkgpath.cfg. In lrpkg.cfg I have > LRP=etc,ramlog,local,modules,dhcpd,dnscache,weblet > and in pkgpath.cfg I have > PKGPATH=/dev/cdrom > But now when I boot from the cdrom with the floppy inserted the boot > process stops with this message > . > . > . > LINUXRC: Installing > LRP=etc: (nf!) > ramlog: (nf!) > local: (nf!) > modules: (nf!) > dhcpd: (nf!) > dnscache: (nf!) > weblet: (nf!) > LINUXRC: Finished > autodetecting RAID arrays > autorun > autorun DONE. > Freeing unused kernel memory: 52k freed > INIT: version 2.78 booting > INIT: No inittab file found > > Enter runlevel: > > Could someone please help me out here, I would really appreciate it. > How > do I get to the login prompt? I want to run a firewall/vpn gateway. > > Thank you > > Abjin > > > > --- > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] RE: booting from CDROM
Aanhalen "Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It is hard to tell since you don't provide enough information. But I will try a little gamble here. If you followed the guide that was mentioned in the previous guide and you entered /dev/cdrom in boot & pkgpath variable (in syslinux.cfg) this is probably your problem. You can easily check this by booting from cdrom and do ls /dev/cdrom if there is no file found you will have to specify something else in syslinux.cfg probably /dev/hda or /dev/hdb or /dev/hdc or /dev/hdd Check your boot sequence to see how your cdrom is detected Kim Oppalfens Azlan Training > You should address these questions to the list. > > Anyway, have you read the doc? > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bucdrom.html > > Please explain in more detail what is not working. > > Cheers > > -Original Message- > From: Mohd Nazri Bin Ab Hamid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: > > > hi.. one Q, > > i got bering floppy that is worked for eth0 and ppp0, now i want to > create a > bootable bering CDROM. > > while booting from CDROM i got and error: kernel panic: Attempted to > kill > init! why? > > Thanks in advance. > > > ___ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We > supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Question about Dynamic DNS
Aanhalen Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Comments inline > I have not done this but why not just dig or nslookup for the FQDN > before > launching ez-ipupdate and then decide if it is needed? > > something like > > if (my_new_ip != nslookup(myhost.dyndns.org)) > ez_ipupdate(my_new_ip); That is kinda defeating the purpose of ez-ipupdate, that is just what it does, checking if your ip has changed, not by using dig but by using a cache file. The nslookup approach would indeed help against overupdating. But it would be problematic because dyndns deletes your account if it is not updated for 30 days. Kim Oppalfens > > that should cover most circumstances unless you are rebooting often, > getting a new address all the time and TTL's are longer than your reboot > > interval. > > HTH > > Erich > > > THINK > Püntenstrasse 39 > 8143 Stallikon > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 > > > ___ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We > supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Re: lrp fax package
Aanhalen Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Heinz Bruederlin wrote: > > > Hello Jack, > > > > is there any LRP Package to receive Faxes on a ISDN-Card or Fax-Modem Yes there is, check http://leaf-project.org/devel/ddouthitt/packages/efax.lrp Have fun. Kim > ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Heinz > > > > > > > > > > I don't know. Your best bet is the leaf-user list; I've cc'd them. > > -- > Jack Coates > Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... > > > ___ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We > supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] Bering bootable cd (Help)
Comments inline > Try to remove or uncomment the modules. Ok I' ll try that and see what happens. > > > Btw the new kernel was necessary to boot from flashmodule from apacer > which > > is an idedrive. > > > > At the end of /boot/etc/modules isofs.o is trying to load. I said > trying, > > because it is failing stating > > insmod: init_modules isofs.o device or resource busy > Did you use your own created modules, or did you download the > modules ( in that case you could have a problem due to the fact > that the modules on the bering site, are from a patched kernel. I used downloaded versions, but I used the same patches for the kernel so I don't think that is the problem, especially in combination with the next comment. (read on) > > Afterwards I get the tempfs & linuxrc & > > Installing packages : (all my packages are the (nf!) or not found & I > get a > > kernel panic stating that I tried to kill init. > It seems that your cdrom is not recognized that reason the > packages are not found. > > If I use all the same .lrp files & kernel on the flash module > everything > > runs fine except for the above mentioned ide-probe & isofs problem. > > Which isn't a real concern when booting from the module. > I expect that you included the flash rom ide support in the kernel > itself. After you boot from the ide-rom, can you mount the cdrom > or at least try to "insmod" the modules from boot/lib one by one > and try to mount the cdrom then. > Perhaps a conflict betweeen the ide driver for the cdrom and the > disk ( Master slave conflict ? ) > Hope I have given you a few hints where you might look for a > solution. After I boot all modules are loaded (according to lsmod) except for isofs.o. If i try to insmod isofs.o I get the same problem, but a mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt works like a charm. So I think I can conclude that there is nothing wrong with the modules, can't I? I am affraid this also rules out master/slave problems. Correction this definitely rules out master/slave since flashrom is on ide channel 0 & cdrom on ide channel 1. I didn't include ideflash support in the kernel by the way, the apacer module uses the ide specifiaction and does not need anything special to work. Kim - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [leaf-user] OT: Stupid shell question
Aanhalen Peter Nosko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Although I am not a real expert on the matter I think it has always been this way. I seem to remember something that the calculate access the entire path is being checked, and if you don't have access somewhere along the way that access is blocked. Kim > pn] I'm trying to CD to a directory that has 755 permissions, and as > "world" > I'm denied permission. I see that the dir two levels above has 770. > Changing it to 775 fixes it. Has it always been this way (...having a > brain > fart)? > > --- > Peter Nosko > > > > > leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
Re: [Leaf-user] Bering: How do I get my dns & dhcp servers to work together?
Aanhalen Mark Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I think tinydns will be sufficient, dnscache definitely will not cut it because it is what the name implies, a caching-only dns server, so there is no way to add extra entries or records to dnscache. This should be possible with tinydns and I don't think tinydns is dependent on dnscache could be mistaken here though. Kim > I'm running a Bering firewall, and I want all my local computers added > to my > dns server. This is so I don't have to try to figure out what address > a > computer got before I can access it. How can I get my dhcp server to > update > my dns server? Should I be running tinydns, dnscache, or both? > Thanks! > > -Mark Ivey- > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Compiling modules for Bering
Aanhalen Dave Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I am by no means an expert on the matter but since noone responded I'll share my views. I have compiled my own "bering kernel" so I should be able to tell you a thing or two. When I compiled my own kernel I had some problems so I asked the list if it could be glibc based, I was told (I believe by jacques that kernel & modules do not depend on the libc library so that this couldn't be the problem). I 'll save you the rest of my problems but this should answer your question. For the module to compile it is probably as simple as compiling it to a stock kernel. Although your original kernel probably has to be compiled with the option or hook (or whatever it is called to accept your module). Bottom line you will probably have to change your kernel too if you want to use your own compiled module. Consequence is that your kernel will have to be patched for lrp. Check Jacques Nilo's developper page on Http://leaf.sourceforge.net for the patches. Jacques or anyone else, If I am goofing please correct thanks. Kim > Hi all, > > I have a Bewan ADSL PCI card arriving in the next few days, and in > preparation, I want to get its driver compiled for Bering (I'm pretty > sure > it doesn't already exist in the modules list). > > Is someone happy to do that, or could someone point me in the right > direction for compiling it - is it as simple as just compiling it in a > 2.4.18 tree, or are there glib type issues etc that I have to watch out > for. > > Many thanks > Dave > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??
Aanhalen Przemyslaw Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I don't think bering has builtin support for ide so booting might be a problem. Unless /boot/lib/modules can help. But if I am not mistaken that won't allow you to put lrp packages on that disk since those modules are loaded after unpacking the lrp packages. Could be just mumbling here though. Jacques any insight here? Could we use modules to boot from HDD? Kim > That seems to be the simplest since all data (modules/packages and boot > > files) are then in the same media. Reading > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/doc/howto/LRPHardDiskHOWTO.txt should > help. > But anyway, the idea of the Bering and other distributons is to use low > > cost pc with small size systems. > Maybe I'm wrong :) > > > Rissone Ruggero wrote: > > I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD. > > > > Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard > Disk > > ?? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Ruggero > > > > ___ > > Leaf-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > > > > > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Bering on HD ??
Aanhalen Rissone Ruggero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: In short : Compile kernel with ide support (if we are talking about an ide disk) Scsi support for a scsi disk ofcourse. Use syslinux to copy boot loader to hdd. Copy .lrp files to disk. Adapt syslinux.cfg to boot from hdd probably /dev/hda1 change package location in syslinux.cfg to /dev/hda1. Cross fingers Pray reboot :-) Kim > I've read that it's possible to install Bering on CD. > > Could someone tell me the procedure for installing Bering on Hard Disk > ?? > > Thanks in advance > > Ruggero > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] Syslogd delay
Aanhalen Rissone Ruggero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I had the same issue, probably has something to do with name resolution. Check you /etc/hosts & /etc/resolv.conf for incorrect settings. Kim > Hi. > I'm a newbie in LRP world and I have a question on Bering distro. > During the boot, syslogd waits for more than 3 minutes prior to > continue > the boot sequence. > I've disabled all the logging functions without any changes in the > delay > time. > Is it possible to use another (maybe better) syslogger in my Bering > system ?? > > Thanks in advance for the answers. > > Best Regards > > Ruggero Rissone > Italy > > > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] snort logging to mysql database (repost forgot subject)
Hi all, Sorry about the repost (forgot about the subject line) Just installed the snort IDS package and it seems to be working. (Seems to be because I don't know anything about writing the preprocessors or filter rules yet). What I would like to do next is log to a mysql Database. And I was wondering if anyone already made a mysql.lrp. I know this is going to take quite some diskspace, but I am hoping That my 64 MB ramdisk will cope. Thanks in advance Kim - This mail sent through Tiscali Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] glibc & pppoe...
Aanhalen Nicolas Riendeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The 9.x versions of Bind don't really like compiling on a glibc as > old as > > > that used for LEAF, or I would have done this already... > > > > > > Charles Steinkuehler > > > http://lrp.steinkuehler.net > > > http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) > > > > > > Same problem with 3.x series of the Roaring Penguin PPPoE client > > I had it running (3.3) on ES2B before a very unfortunate hd crash > (too much current variation thank to our power utility company...). > > There was a "trick" however... I had replaced the glibc 2.0 libraries > with glibc 2.1.3... I haven't yet "updated/migrated" my current > Dachstein > installation to glibc 2.1.3 because I'm still experiencing some > problems > (see my message concerning gzip/gunzip) with it but once this get's > resolved > I'll switch back to 2.1.3... Would any of the people who already tried (and preferably succeeded) upgraded to glibc 2.1.3 give a little bit more explanation at how it is done? I am running a dual floppy eigerstein for the moment and would like a shot. Is it just a matter of replacing some binaries and maybe some symbolic links? If so which binaries and which links would that be? Or is there more to it than that? Does the kernel version or something in kernel configuration has something to do with it? I already noticed there is a dachstein cd iso with glibc 2.1.3 support, if it is just a matter of replacing binaries could I just copy those from this iso image? Thanks in Advance Kim Oppalfens > > I'm running it off a write-protected SCSI hd but this would also be > possible > for DCD (Dachstein CD). The main problem I can see with migrating a > Dachstein or > any other distribution to glibc 2.1.3 (or newer) would be that it would > no > longer be able to make it fit on a diskette and that this would > introduce > minimum glibc version requirements for lrp packages... > > Have a nice day! > > Nick > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] Ipupdate with Proxy support
Hi all, My new ISP requires all trafic to pass its proxy server. I was happily using ez-ipupdate to update my dyndns account, but that doesn't seem to work through the proxy. So my question is does anybody know either how to configure ez-ipupdate for proxies, or has anonther updater available that supports the dyndns service as an lrp package. Or if you know about another program that doesnot require python or perl I could try and make that into an lrp myself. (I dont want to have add a perl or python package to my floppy) Kim Oppalfens - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] OPENSSHD
Aanhalen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you are behind a cable modem, you might have the same problem I did. That problem being that your isp is blocking port 22. Just put your ssh daemon on a port above 1024 and things should be fixed. That is if this was the issue off course. Kim Oppalfens > I'm back! I added a line in Hosts.allow to allow ALL > for sshd: > > sshd: all: > > Still can't get in today. Can anybody else see sshd on > my box? 12.243.228.133 Let me know. I searched the > archives, but up till now everyone was using sshd-1, and > it appears that it is different than opensshd. Any > thoughts? I can get in using ssh on my internal > network, but not on my external network. Dachstein CD > 1.0.1, openssh, opensshd > > Thanks, > > Sean > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] packages in the oxygen directory
Hi all and especially to David, I have downloaded some of the packages from the oxygen packages list and tried them on my eigerstein beta2 but they all seem to segfault. I am talking especially about ethereal and winscan, is this a library problem or a kernel version issue? And is it fixable without switching over to an oxygen distribution? Because I got quite accustomed to my eigerstein config? Thanks in advance. Kim "If the definition of a trainstation is the place where a train stops, then what exactly would a workstation be?" - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
[Leaf-user] searching the mailing lists
Hi all, is there some secret trick about searching the leaf mailing lists that I am not aware off?? My searching on vpn didn't yield any results, and I think it is rather unlikely that there has not been any talk about vpn's on the leaf- list. If I brows the list I even found some mails in the last few days. What am I doing wrong? Oh yes I am logged at the leaf site so that's not it. Kim - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] connect to PPTP server through EigerStein lrp (newbie)
Aanhalen Mark Risher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If I am not mistaken (and I am not often :-)) Charles has a readily available VPNMasq enabled kernel and matching modules at his site. Check http://lrp.steinkuehler.net and search for the Kernels & modules part. TopLeft there is a link. There you should find everything you need to get VPN working. Kim happy VPN'ing. > Hi: > > Forgive my ignorance, but I've read so many > semi-related pages by now that I'm dizzy with > confusion: > > I am attempting to connect from my Windows box, > through my EigerStein LRP laptop, to my company's PPTP > VPN. The LRP is working fine out-of-the-box for > regular traffic -- I am connecting to Yahoo! now -- > but when I attempt to run the VPN client software, I > never get authenticated. > > There are two ways I could go, according to my > interpretation of the results of my Google searches: > 1) I could run the pptp-linux client on the LRP box, > or 2) I could build a new kernel for the LRP box with > IP_MASQ_PPTP configured, and use the windows client. > > Question #1: Is the above correct? Are these my only > options? Can I simply use the stock kernel and load a > new module? > Question #2: Since #1 seems the more straightforward, > I would prefer it. I can get the linux pptp client > running, but what else do I need to do? Must I open > ports? Change the NATing? Something else? Please > help if you can. > Question #3: If someone has already built an > out-of-the-box module/kernel pair which supports PPTP > masquerading, could you please point me to it? I would > rather exhaust all these options before building a new > kernel of my own, but I can't find any already-done > versions... > > Thank you very much for any help you can provide. > > -Mark > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Re: [Leaf-user] modules.conf
Aanhalen Jeff Newmiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Kim Oppalfens wrote: > > > Hi listmembers, > > > > > > I am looking for the file that would replace the modules.conf file of > > > a normal complete linux distribution in Eigerstein beta 2 > > Omitted to save disk space. > Dang, according to the poptop setup faq I need to put 4 alias lines in it. alias ppp-compress-18 ppp_mppe alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate Is there another place I can put this in? Would /etc/modules accept these aliasses? > To specify which modules get loaded, do it IN THE RIGHT ORDER in > /etc/modules. /etc/modules.conf allows you to do it out of order and > have > the software compensate for your forgetfulness. That is an excessive > luxury in a floppy-sized system. > > --- > Jeff NewmillerThe . . Go > Live... > DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live > Go... > Work:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. > Playing > Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#. #.O#. with > /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. > rocks...2k > --- > > > ___ > Leaf-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > > - This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be) ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
