Re: Qmailadmin
Which version of qmailadmin are you using? I am planning to install 0.39 as evrybody now is complaining about bugs in 0.42 Regards Sumith - Original Message - From: Rick Updegrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 5:24 AM Subject: Re: Qmailadmin > > Hello everybody!!! > > > > I am using qmail1.03 on a rh7.0. > > I would like to use qmailadmin 0.39. <-- > > check the site for updates regulary > > > but I can't log in, I need 'postmaster' but I don't know who is he. > > He is the default which you get when you do a ./home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain > somedomain.com > > so .. the password you gave it there is the postmaster's password. Does > this look familiar? It is in the INSTALL document for the latest (at the > time I wrote this) version. > > 6. Add a virtual domain > > For this example, we will add a domain "test.com" > > # cd /home-dir-of-vpopmail/bin > > # ./vadddomain test.com > or > # ./vadddomain test.com password-for-postmaster <-- YO CHECK ME OUT > > vadddomain will modify the following qmail files > (default locations used) > /var/qmail/control/locals > /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts > /var/qmail/control/morercpthosts (if rcpthosts > than 50 lines) > /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains > /var/qmail/users/assign > /var/qmail/users/cdb > > It will also create a domains directory > ~vpopmail/domains/test.com > ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/postmaster/Maildir ... > ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/vpasswd > ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/vpasswd.cdb > > If you do not specify a password on the command line, it > will prompt for a password for the postmaster. > > Then it will send a kill -HUP signal to qmail-send telling it > to re-read the control files. > > Note: setting up DNS MX records for the virtual domain is not > covered in this INSTALL file. > > > however I use omail and it run very wel. > > I use qmailadmin and I think the name fits, and it runs very well now that > all of those annoying images are gone : ) I do wish the mailing list > manager would get fixed sometime soon however. I am going to have to take a > programming class one of these days. > > > Thanks fo your support. > > > >
concurrency patches
HI I have applied Russ Nelsons Big TO DO Patch and Big concurency patch Is this enough for qmail to handle a large number of simultaneous deliveries or I need to specify it in qmail-control Please explain me as I have just started with Qmail. also i see that Dave Smith of Xoom.com has updated the Big-to-do patch... Is the updated one recommended or the original is good enough. Regards Sumith
Re: qmailconfig
> Hi, > Where is the tcpserver config ? > Can you help me tou configure this ? > Thanks Look at the documentation for tcpserver, which is part of the ucspi-tcp package. http://cr.yp.to has a link to the ucspi-tcp documentation. - Sam
RE: assign file lost
THX, I do recover it. I means that: I build a server support abt 100 virtual domains, with vpopmail of course. last morning, i add another two virtual domains, and somewhat is wrong, unfortunately lost that CDB file, but all users' DIR is there and virtual domain also stand there. rebuild the ASCII file $PATHqmail/users/assign and run $qmailbin/qmail-newu thx Live With qmail thx Mark Delany also >Lost? You mean someone deleted them or the disk got trashed, right? yes, i means that rebuild the CDB file >The usual thing is to get it off of your backup. Does this not work >for you? net yet, but will be done from today's on >If you're asking for a magic way to get a file back that has been >deleted/trashed and which you have no backup, then you're out of >luck. This is not a qmail problem though, this is a system management >problem. yep, i am that unfortunately guys Best Regards Michael Moore
conf-spawn
Suppose my concurrencylocal and concurrencyremote will never be greater than, say, 50. Is there then any penalty in setting conf-spawn to 100? More to the point, is there any reason not to set conf-spawn to the largest value possible, other than portability? paul
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
Greg White wrote: SNIP > > > Please read up on IPv4 classes. Classes are not determined by the size > of > the network address. 192.x.x.x is a class B address. SNIP Apologies to the OP and to the list for being both pedantic and incorrect. s/Class B/Class C/ Note to self -- never post before morning coffee. GW
Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ?
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:56:54PM +, Mark Delany wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 05:46:51PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote: > > David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > > > > Um, most reporting measured results from optimizing high-traffic > > > qmail-based mail servers have found that disk activity on the queue > > > disk is the first limit they hit. > > > > > > How about, if the first delivery fails, pass it off to a server with > > some disks. Why not pre-process with qmail-remote before queueing? > > qmail-remote is way too late as most of the I/O load is putting the > mail in the queue, not getting it off. Besides, the symptom isn't > delivery failure, it's slowness. Actually. I was little hasty on the first point. I now see what you're getting at. One question is, how far do you let qmail-remote go before deciding it will work. It it's past the MAIL FROM/RCPT TO part, then why not complete the delivery rather than incur the double load and double latency? If you mean to try and completely do the remote delivery prior to placing it in the queue, then this is the passthru idea that people have suggest previously. It potentially has merit with an amount of added complexity. One problem is that a busy system, such as a mailing list system may be at full concurrencyremote for extended periods of time, in which case, new submissions should not attempt qmail-remote delivery so you're back to square one. Another problem is that the mail has to be stored somewhere while qmail-remote attempts delivery. Well, unless you want the submitting client to wait - that may create a lot of confusing latency for, eg, people sitting on a PC using Eudora. If the mail is stored somewhere, you're starting to get back to a disk queue. But it's not necessarily a silly idea. I believe that sendmail tries to do something like this in certain circumstances. A monolithic design has an advantage in this regard. Doing this is a nice compartmentalized way with the current qmail wouldn't be a lot of fun. Regards.
Re: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 04:12:03PM -0600, Virginia Chism wrote: > > > "Life with qmail" > > I have seen this mentioned severa, times lately. Where can I find this > document? Apart from the fact that the url is mentioned on qmail.org, it is http://www.lifewithqmail.org -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ?
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 05:46:51PM -0600, David L. Nicol wrote: > David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > > Um, most reporting measured results from optimizing high-traffic > > qmail-based mail servers have found that disk activity on the queue > > disk is the first limit they hit. > > > How about, if the first delivery fails, pass it off to a server with > some disks. Why not pre-process with qmail-remote before queueing? qmail-remote is way too late as most of the I/O load is putting the mail in the queue, not getting it off. Besides, the symptom isn't delivery failure, it's slowness. Regards.
Re: Qmailadmin
> Hello everybody!!! > > I am using qmail1.03 on a rh7.0. > I would like to use qmailadmin 0.39. <-- check the site for updates regulary > but I can't log in, I need 'postmaster' but I don't know who is he. He is the default which you get when you do a ./home/vpopmail/bin/vadddomain somedomain.com so .. the password you gave it there is the postmaster's password. Does this look familiar? It is in the INSTALL document for the latest (at the time I wrote this) version. 6. Add a virtual domain For this example, we will add a domain "test.com" # cd /home-dir-of-vpopmail/bin # ./vadddomain test.com or # ./vadddomain test.com password-for-postmaster <-- YO CHECK ME OUT vadddomain will modify the following qmail files (default locations used) /var/qmail/control/locals /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts /var/qmail/control/morercpthosts (if rcpthosts > than 50 lines) /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains /var/qmail/users/assign /var/qmail/users/cdb It will also create a domains directory ~vpopmail/domains/test.com ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/postmaster/Maildir ... ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/vpasswd ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/vpasswd.cdb If you do not specify a password on the command line, it will prompt for a password for the postmaster. Then it will send a kill -HUP signal to qmail-send telling it to re-read the control files. Note: setting up DNS MX records for the virtual domain is not covered in this INSTALL file. > however I use omail and it run very wel. I use qmailadmin and I think the name fits, and it runs very well now that all of those annoying images are gone : ) I do wish the mailing list manager would get fixed sometime soon however. I am going to have to take a programming class one of these days. > Thanks fo your support. >
Re: Using a RAMDISK for /var/qmail/queue thoughts ?
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > Um, most reporting measured results from optimizing high-traffic > qmail-based mail servers have found that disk activity on the queue > disk is the first limit they hit. How about, if the first delivery fails, pass it off to a server with some disks. Why not pre-process with qmail-remote before queueing? -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Five seconds of light is a lot of data.
qmailconfig
Hi,
Where is the tcpserver config ?
Can you help me tou configure this ?
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qqrbl
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:52:06 -0800
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Russ,
Find attached a quick script I hacked up to use with Bruce Guenter's
QMAILQUEUE patch. I have it installed on my system as
/var/qmail/libexec/qqrbl and run it via
':allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/libexec/qqrbl"' in my tcpserver config
file.
Uses the Mail::RBL module (note that Mail::RBL thinks it requires a
really recent version of Perl, but if you change the 'our $VERSION'
variable to 'use vars qw($VERSION)' and get rid of the 'use
warnings.pm', it runs just fine under 5.005_03.
Real simple script, basically, it groks the IP's out of every
Received: line and runs them through all three RBL's at mail-abuse.org
(easy enough to edit the script to change that) and adds an 'X-RBL:'
header for every match, making filtering down the line easier.
I considered just using a simple bourne shell script with Bruce's
qmail-qfilter and rblcheck, but this seems more elegant. :)
Please post on qmail.org as you see fit.
Thanks.
j.
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=qqrbl
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# Id : qqrbl
# Author : Jay Soffian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Purpose: Runs IP's found in message Received: lines through rblcheck
# and notes any positive hits by adding X-RBL: headers.
# History: Dec 27, 2000 - Initial.
use strict;
use Mail::RBL;
sub qqrbl {
my $qmail_queue = "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue";
my %rbls;
foreach my $rbl (@_) {
$rbls{$rbl} = new Mail::RBL($rbl);
}
# We get our message contents on fd0 from qmail-smtpd or ofmipd.
open(SMTPEIN, "<&=0") or fail(54, "dup(fd0) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
# Create a pipe so we can wedge ourselves between qmail-smtpd/ofmipd and
# qmail-queue. We pass fd1 (the message envelope) straight through since
# we don't care about it for purposes of rblchecks.
pipe (QQEIN, QQEOUT) or fail(51, "pipe() failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
my $qq_pid = fork;
fail(51, "fork() failed (#4.3.0) - $!") unless defined $qq_pid;
if ($qq_pid == 0) { # child (exec qmail-queue)
# unset QMAILQUEUE so that we don't get executed again by accident,
# causing an infinite loop.
delete $ENV{QMAILQUEUE};
close QQEOUT; # don't need this half of the pipe
# wedge between stdin and the pipe
open (STDIN, "<&QQEIN") or fail(54, "dup(pipe) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
exec $qmail_queue or fail(51, "exec($qmail_queue) failed
(#4.3.0) - $!");
} else { # parent
$SIG{'PIPE'} = 'IGNORE';
close QQEIN;# don't need this half of the pipe.
my %ips;
while() {
if (1 .. /^$/) {
map {$ips{$_} = 1} /(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/g if
/^Received:/;
if (/^$/) {
foreach my $rbl (sort keys %rbls) {
foreach my $ip (keys %ips) {
print QQEOUT "X-RBL: $ip is listed by $rbl\n" if
$rbls{$rbl}->check($ip);
}
}
}
}
print QQEOUT $_; # pass message along to qmail-queue
}
# close everything properly
close SMTPEIN or fail(54,"close(smtp in) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
close QQEOUT or fail(53,"close(qq out) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
# make sure qmail-queue exits okay
waitpid ($qq_pid,0);
my ($status) = ($? >> 8);
fail($status, "qmail-queue failed ($status). (#4.3.0)") unless $status
== 0;
}
}
qqrbl(qw(relays.mail-abuse.org
dialups.mail-abuse.org
blackholes.mail-abuse.org
)
);
exit 0;
sub fail {
my ($exitval, $msg) = @_;
warn $msg,"\n";
exit($exitval);
}
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
qmail config
Hi,
Where is the tcpserver config ?
Can you help me tou configure this ?
Thanks
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qqrbl
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:52:06 -0800
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Russ,
Find attached a quick script I hacked up to use with Bruce Guenter's
QMAILQUEUE patch. I have it installed on my system as
/var/qmail/libexec/qqrbl and run it via
':allow,QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/libexec/qqrbl"' in my tcpserver config
file.
Uses the Mail::RBL module (note that Mail::RBL thinks it requires a
really recent version of Perl, but if you change the 'our $VERSION'
variable to 'use vars qw($VERSION)' and get rid of the 'use
warnings.pm', it runs just fine under 5.005_03.
Real simple script, basically, it groks the IP's out of every
Received: line and runs them through all three RBL's at mail-abuse.org
(easy enough to edit the script to change that) and adds an 'X-RBL:'
header for every match, making filtering down the line easier.
I considered just using a simple bourne shell script with Bruce's
qmail-qfilter and rblcheck, but this seems more elegant. :)
Please post on qmail.org as you see fit.
Thanks.
j.
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=qqrbl
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# Id : qqrbl
# Author : Jay Soffian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Purpose: Runs IP's found in message Received: lines through rblcheck
# and notes any positive hits by adding X-RBL: headers.
# History: Dec 27, 2000 - Initial.
use strict;
use Mail::RBL;
sub qqrbl {
my $qmail_queue = "/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue";
my %rbls;
foreach my $rbl (@_) {
$rbls{$rbl} = new Mail::RBL($rbl);
}
# We get our message contents on fd0 from qmail-smtpd or ofmipd.
open(SMTPEIN, "<&=0") or fail(54, "dup(fd0) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
# Create a pipe so we can wedge ourselves between qmail-smtpd/ofmipd and
# qmail-queue. We pass fd1 (the message envelope) straight through since
# we don't care about it for purposes of rblchecks.
pipe (QQEIN, QQEOUT) or fail(51, "pipe() failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
my $qq_pid = fork;
fail(51, "fork() failed (#4.3.0) - $!") unless defined $qq_pid;
if ($qq_pid == 0) { # child (exec qmail-queue)
# unset QMAILQUEUE so that we don't get executed again by accident,
# causing an infinite loop.
delete $ENV{QMAILQUEUE};
close QQEOUT; # don't need this half of the pipe
# wedge between stdin and the pipe
open (STDIN, "<&QQEIN") or fail(54, "dup(pipe) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
exec $qmail_queue or fail(51, "exec($qmail_queue) failed
(#4.3.0) - $!");
} else { # parent
$SIG{'PIPE'} = 'IGNORE';
close QQEIN;# don't need this half of the pipe.
my %ips;
while() {
if (1 .. /^$/) {
map {$ips{$_} = 1} /(\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3})/g if
/^Received:/;
if (/^$/) {
foreach my $rbl (sort keys %rbls) {
foreach my $ip (keys %ips) {
print QQEOUT "X-RBL: $ip is listed by $rbl\n" if
$rbls{$rbl}->check($ip);
}
}
}
}
print QQEOUT $_; # pass message along to qmail-queue
}
# close everything properly
close SMTPEIN or fail(54,"close(smtp in) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
close QQEOUT or fail(53,"close(qq out) failed (#4.3.0) - $!");
# make sure qmail-queue exits okay
waitpid ($qq_pid,0);
my ($status) = ($? >> 8);
fail($status, "qmail-queue failed ($status). (#4.3.0)") unless $status
== 0;
}
}
qqrbl(qw(relays.mail-abuse.org
dialups.mail-abuse.org
blackholes.mail-abuse.org
)
);
exit 0;
sub fail {
my ($exitval, $msg) = @_;
warn $msg,"\n";
exit($exitval);
}
Next_Part(Wed_Dec_27_16:52:06_2000_747)
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A
UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751
USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
Re: stupid question of the year award!
At 03:16 PM 1/26/2001, you wrote: >Sorry for being such a dunce. I have been there many times and just didn't >pay attention to the title. Please ignore and don't flame . . .(hiding) heh too late... there are some on this list who are simply laying in wait for an opportunity to flame at any sign of weakness or silly questions... a bit like jackals in that respect, aren't we, Mr. Socha? ;o) smartass on a Friday Jer
Re: stupid question of the year award!
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Virginia Chism wrote: > > "Life with qmail" > > I have seen this mentioned several, times lately. Where can I find this > document? http://www.lifewithqmail.org And, oh, while I am here, I would like to inform everyone that, to unsubscribe from the list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've mentioned this before, and I will mention this again. - Sam
Re: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
* Virginia Chism <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010126 17:16]: > > "Life with qmail" > > I have seen this mentioned severa, times lately. Where can I find > this document? Webmaster, huh? http://www.google.com/search?q=%22life+with+qmail%22
RE: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ HIH, Laurence -- Laurence Brockman Unix Administrator Videon Cablesystems Alberta Inc 10450-178 St. Edmonton, AB T5S 1S2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (780) 486-6527 -Original Message- From: Virginia Chism [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 3:12 PM To: QMail Mailing List Subject: RE: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp > "Life with qmail" I have seen this mentioned severa, times lately. Where can I find this document?
stupid question of the year award!
Sorry for being such a dunce. I have been there many times and just didn't pay attention to the title. Please ignore and don't flame . . .(hiding) > "Life with qmail" I have seen this mentioned several, times lately. Where can I find this document?
RE: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
> "Life with qmail" I have seen this mentioned severa, times lately. Where can I find this document?
Re: local delivery problem
Charles Cazabon wrote: > Which part didn't you understand? You're injecting mail with bare linefeeds. > That's a no-no. Don't do it. > > > i'm using, fetchmail to retrieve my mail. > > Then fetchmail is broken. Use something else. I wouldn't say fetchmail is broken. The bare LFs weren't inserted by fetchmail, they're being passed on unchanged from the original source. Alternatively, fetchmail provides an option, forcecr, that will make sure every line ends with a CRLF. http://cr.yp.to/docs/smtplf.html covers this. > I wrote getmail because of > issues like this. You can find it from the link below, and best of all, > it doesn't even do delivery by SMTP re-injection. I like that feature. At any rate, fetchmail also offers delivery straight to an MDA. ---Kris Kelley
Re: local delivery problem
Jorge Bras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > delivery 13: deferral: > message_transmission_failed_(451_See_http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.)/ > > i have already read it (http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html). Which part didn't you understand? You're injecting mail with bare linefeeds. That's a no-no. Don't do it. > i'm using, fetchmail to retrieve my mail. Then fetchmail is broken. Use something else. I wrote getmail because of issues like this. You can find it from the link below, and best of all, it doesn't even do delivery by SMTP re-injection. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: local delivery problem
Jorge Bras wrote: > i'm getting this msg at my mail log: > > delivery 13: deferral: > message_transmission_failed_(451_See_http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html. )/ > > i have already read it (http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html). Did you read or skim? :) That page says what to do when you see this problem with fetchmail: make sure you are using the forcecr option when fetching. ---Kris Kelley
local delivery problem
Hi there, i'm getting this msg at my mail log: delivery 13: deferral: message_transmission_failed_(451_See_http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.)/ i have already read it (http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html). i'm using, fetchmail to retrieve my mail. could any one help me please. ./bras -- Jorge Bras Support Engineer kpnQwest Portugal GPG Fingerprint: 9DE5 F4E7 FB38 01CB 9F54 E7EC C6FA 3A8C 2E0E 54EB
Re: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
Fish Flowers wrote: > Hmm -- but smtp is assigned a port number (25) in /etc/services... > > When and where is tcpserver called? I'll try passing it an explicit port > argument... That depends. If you followed the "Life with qmail" way of doing things, tcpserver is called from /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run. At any rate, qmail should be fired up during the machine's boot sequence, so the call to tcpserver, or at least the script it's hiding in, should be somewhere in your start-up scripts. ---Kris Kelley
Re: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Kris Kelley wrote: > Looks like you're calling tcpserver with a port argument of "smtp". You > have two options: either use a port argument of "25" instead (a number > instead of a name), or define a port number for smtp in /etc/services or > similar file. Hmm -- but smtp is assigned a port number (25) in /etc/services... When and where is tcpserver called? I'll try passing it an explicit port argument... Fish.
Re: tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
Fish Flowers wrote: > @40003a71e0a43872189c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port > number for smtp > > OK, fair enough... how do I open the port? Or point tcpserver to > it? Ack! Lack of unix training coming back to bite me in the butt! Looks like you're calling tcpserver with a port argument of "smtp". You have two options: either use a port argument of "25" instead (a number instead of a name), or define a port number for smtp in /etc/services or similar file. ---Kris Kelley
tcpserver unable to figure out port number for smtp
OK, I lied, qmail is logging -- I just wasn't clueful enough to figure out where. But now I have! (Thanks James and Charles.) But it didn't help. /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current shows the following: @40003a71e0a43872189c tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for smtp ... repeat ad nauseam OK, fair enough... how do I open the port? Or point tcpserver to it? Ack! Lack of unix training coming back to bite me in the butt! Fish.
Re: can't connect to smtp
Have you checked your tcpserver logs to see what it thinks is going on? If there is no record of your attempt to connect, it means it is not listening on port 25. Otherwise it may tell you why you are being refused. Just in case--did you re/compile the rules file? You could also use tcprulescheck to test the rules file. -K "Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger." > From: Curtis Collicutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:54:52 -0800 (PST) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: can't connect to smtp > > Hi, > > I'm trying to diagnose the reason why I can't connect > to port 25 on the localhost. I've tried with #telnet > localhost 25 and #mconnect and I get: > > tcpclient: unable to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 25: > connection refused > > with both. > > I've just installed qmail following the howto found at > http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html. > > $ ps ax | grep qmail > 22825 ?? S 8:39.46 supervise qmail-smtpd > 25256 p0 R+ 0:00.00 grep qmail (sh) > 20531 C0- S 10:04.16 supervise qmail-send > > Shows that qmail-smtpd is running, but I can't > connect. > > tcpserver rules are: > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > :allow > > So I should be able to connect, as far as I know. > > Anything else I can look at? I'm so stumped. > > Thanks for any help. > Curtis. > > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. > http://auctions.yahoo.com/ >
Re: qmail license
Clemens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My Problem is this: DJB says as the first words in his statement >about Software user's rights: > >In the United States, once you own a copy of a program.. >2 Problems: >a) I am not within the United States Good question... I suppose your rights would be determined by your countries copyright law. >and the *much *bigger problem is: >b) When Do I own a copy of a program? IANAL, but you own a copy of a program when you possess a legally obtained copy. You don't have to hold the copyright to the original to own a copy. >There are lots of examples where by just having the source of a pice of >software you do not own this software by any means. No, but you own the copy. >You can even receive >the software legally but you are just not allowed to use them e.g. for >commercial purpose. Only when the copyright holder distributes the software under a license that restricts its use. qmail is not distributed with a license. >So: Where is said that I own qmail as soon as I download it? You don't "own qmail", you own a copy of it. -Dave
Re: assign file lost
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:02:48AM +0800, maxen wrote: > I had my /var/qmail/users/assign file lost. > but i want to recover this file and the relatived cdb file by my-self > what can i do? Lost? You mean someone deleted them or the disk got trashed, right? The usual thing is to get it off of your backup. Does this not work for you? If you're asking for a magic way to get a file back that has been deleted/trashed and which you have no backup, then you're out of luck. This is not a qmail problem though, this is a system management problem. Regards.
assign file lost
I had my /var/qmail/users/assign file lost. but i want to recover this file and the relatived cdb file by my-self what can i do?
Re: Re: Qmail and GFS
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:52:01AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous > metadata (as I said above), or have your program sync the directory of a file > after syncing the file. Bruce Guenter's SRPM of qmail includes a patch > which does the directory sync, so you don't have to mount the filesystem > with synchronous metadata for safety. That's actually not a patch. It's a small object file that replaces the libc open, link, rename, and unlink routines. The replacement routines call the syscall as usual, but after making the call do a fsync on the directory leading up to the given filename. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ PGP signature
Re: failure notice (qmail and ezmlm)
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:08:49AM -0700, Ben wrote: > I am having difficulty in getting my mailing lists to work. I believe that > the lists addressed are not even being evaluated by ezmlm, but are being > reject by qmail due to a configuration mistake on my part. > > The msg at the end of this email is a forward of the failure notice from > qmail. > > Also, I am including my configs and other info below: > > "aquinas.pp.asu.edu" is the host's real name, and "hdshc.asu.edu" is an alias > for this host. > > All mailing lists are in the form "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (virtual > domain) -- but seems to get reformatted to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", > which is annoying but workable; Remove the CNAME record and make it an A or an MX record. That's what's causing the rewriting of the host name. > BEGIN FILES: > users/assign--- > +hdshc.asu.edu-:hdshc.asu.edu:1002:83:/home/vpopmail/domains/hdshc.asu.edu:-:: > >+aquinas.pp.asu.edu-:aquinas.pp.asu.edu:1002:83:/home/vpopmail/domains/aquinas.pp.asu.edu:-:: > . > > control/defaultdomain- > pp.asu.edu > > -control/defaulthost-- > hdshc.asu.edu > > control/locals-- > localhost.asu.edu > aquinas.pp.asu.edu > > -control/me- > aquinas.pp.asu.edu > > > --control/plusdomain- > asu.edu > > > ---control/rcpthosts- > localhost.asu.edu > aquinas.pp.asu.edu > hdshc.asu.edu > > control/virtualdomains--- > aquinas.pp.asu.edu:hdshc.asu.edu > > END FILES > > > I know the problem is probably simple, but I can't see it. It has deffinately > prompted me to want to learn more about email systems and qmail more > specifically. You have aquinas.pp.asu.edu in both locals and virtualdomains. Having a domain in both files is always a mistake. To fix your problem, get rid of the CNAME, and add hdshc.asu.edu to virtualdomains and remove it from locals. Chris
Re: failure notice (qmail and ezmlm)
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:08:49AM -0700, Ben wrote: > All mailing lists are in the form "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (virtual > domain) -- but seems to get reformatted to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", This is because of hdshc.asu.edu. IN CNAME aquinas.pp.asu.edu. hdshc.asu.edu will be rewritten to aquinas.pp.asu.edu by mailservers as a CNAME says kinda "this host does not exist and is really called aquinas.pp.asu.edu". > control/locals-- > localhost.asu.edu > aquinas.pp.asu.edu > control/virtualdomains--- > aquinas.pp.asu.edu:hdshc.asu.edu A host may not be in locals and virtualdomains at the same time (i.e. it may, but locals takes precedence to virtualdomains). Another problem might be that if the ezmlm mailinglist is configured to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] it will not accept beeing called [EMAIL PROTECTED] The easiest way to fix your problem is probably to change hdshc.asu.edu. IN CNAME aquinas.pp.asu.edu. to hdshc.asu.edu. IN A 129.219.125.101 \Maex -- SpaceNet AG| Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen| Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
Re: Things I have noted
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 10:13:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem with "there is a delay in delivering the message"-type mails > is that the average user never takes the time to read those messages, and > thinks that they mean that the mail has bounced. No, the problem is that while they may be helpful if sent by a server under your control (where you can delete the message if you like) they are a nightmare if sent by remote systems where you have no chance to control them. As I said before, if you will get one every hour for a whole week (and then the message was bounced with a undelivery notice) you will surely start to hate this "feature". \Maex -- SpaceNet AG| Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen| Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
Failure notice & Headers
Hi, How i can personalise the failure notice and add X-Complaint-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in headers ? I have a server with a name ndsoftware.net when i make a lookup on ip. How force qmail to use mail.ndsoftware.net ? And how apply this in headers ? Thanks Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED] France: Tel +33 671887502 - Fax N/A UK: Tel +44 8453348750 - Fax +44 8453348751 USA: Tel N/A - Fax N/A
Re: qmail license
Am 26.01.2001 um 08:39:04 schrieb Charles Cazabon: Hi Charles, > > this might seem like a stupid question but I really *did* bother quite a > > while with the subject before asking here. > > Except that this has been discussed to death many times in the past on the > list. perhaps it might be an idea to lose some words about this in the qmail-FAQ or on the website to avoid people (as mine ;-) asking the same question over and over again. > Look through the qmail list archives; you'll find everything you > need there. I did exactly this and I looked at the archive again for a long time back. My Problem is this: DJB says as the first words in his statement about Software user's rights: In the United States, once you own a copy of a program.. 2 Problems: a) I am not within the United States and the *much *bigger problem is: b) When Do I own a copy of a program? If I burn a CD of M$ Windows I own the CD but this still does not grant the right to me to use the program on it. The part I need is: Where is said, that if I download qmail from DJB's website, I *DO OWN* the copy of qmail? There are lots of examples where by just having the source of a pice of software you do not own this software by any means. You can even receive the software legally but you are just not allowed to use them e.g. for commercial purpose. So: Where is said that I own qmail as soon as I download it? This would be necessary to apply DJBs statement to any existing situation. thanks in advance /ch
Problem with sending: access denied
Trying to send to a mailing list on our server, I get this error: Jan 26 11:12:33 chub qmail: 980532753.765862 delivery 33222: deferral: Unable_to_open_.qmail/LISTNAME/qmail-default:_access_denied._(#4.3.0)/ .qmail/LISTNAME/q-mail-default is a pointer to /home/accountname/listname/manager and this file and directory both have RX permission for user, group, and world. What else could be going on? Thanks... Emily Witcher Crytech Inc. 406-655-0501 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Things I have noted
On 26 Jan 2001, James R Grinter wrote: > On the subject of notifications, it's becoming more of a problem > because of "similar" domains - you should have typed > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and instead type "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". The > latter doesn't even accept mail deliveries, so it hangs around in the > queue for too long. I have had emails that took literally a month to get delivered. It was nice that Qmail kept the message in the queue that long, since the message would have not been delivered to him if I was using a MTA that gives up after five days. The problem with "there is a delay in delivering the message"-type mails is that the average user never takes the time to read those messages, and thinks that they mean that the mail has bounced. - Sam
failure notice (qmail and ezmlm)
Hello all, I am having difficulty in getting my mailing lists to work. I believe that the lists addressed are not even being evaluated by ezmlm, but are being reject by qmail due to a configuration mistake on my part. The msg at the end of this email is a forward of the failure notice from qmail. Also, I am including my configs and other info below: "aquinas.pp.asu.edu" is the host's real name, and "hdshc.asu.edu" is an alias for this host. All mailing lists are in the form "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (virtual domain) -- but seems to get reformatted to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which is annoying but workable; This system used to work until I screwed something up in the config files :( I would greatly appreciate any help on this. I have been fighting this for a day now and need to get the lists back up. BEGIN FILES: users/assign--- +hdshc.asu.edu-:hdshc.asu.edu:1002:83:/home/vpopmail/domains/hdshc.asu.edu:-:: +aquinas.pp.asu.edu-:aquinas.pp.asu.edu:1002:83:/home/vpopmail/domains/aquinas.pp.asu.edu:-:: . control/defaultdomain- pp.asu.edu -control/defaulthost-- hdshc.asu.edu control/locals-- localhost.asu.edu aquinas.pp.asu.edu -control/me- aquinas.pp.asu.edu --control/plusdomain- asu.edu ---control/rcpthosts- localhost.asu.edu aquinas.pp.asu.edu hdshc.asu.edu control/virtualdomains--- aquinas.pp.asu.edu:hdshc.asu.edu END FILES I know the problem is probably simple, but I can't see it. It has deffinately prompted me to want to learn more about email systems and qmail more specifically. Again, any assistance on this would be greatly appreciated. -- Ben Trussell Hugh Downs School of Human Communication [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can write a small letter to Grandma in the filename. -- Forbes Burkowski, CS, University of Washington -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:49:41 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at aquinas.pp.asu.edu. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (qmail 424 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2001 17:49:41 - Received: from post2.inre.asu.edu (129.219.110.73) by aquinas.pp.asu.edu with SMTP; 26 Jan 2001 17:49:41 - Received: from conversion.post2.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #47347) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from general2.asu.edu (general2.asu.edu [129.219.10.242]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #47347) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:52 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by general2.asu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00141for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:48 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:38:48 -0700 (MST) From: Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII -- Ben Trussell Hugh Downs School of Human Communication [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dishonor will not trouble me, once I am dead. -- Euripides
mail routing?
Hi; Is it possible to route incoming mails to different machines for example if a user name start with a to c abc.foo.org will handle it or if a user name start with d to g defg.foo.org will handle that.. I think it must be possible.And all machines must be aware of that configuration to handle right email.Of course there is another problem grows how will end user know which machine is right machine to send mail and RECEIVE(via pop3) any comments? __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Re: Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail
if anyone is still interested in that rewritten and scaled down qmail-scanner, I have got it up and running, and can send it to anyone who is is interested. ---Original Message--- From: Alex Kramarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 06:35:04 PM To: Qmail list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail Yes, it's as simple as that (only you have to put it in two places - the read loop of the message and the envelope header). Right now I am in process of rewriting the qmail-scanner script to do only, and only that, without ANYTHING related to virus scanning. ---Original Message--- From: Michel Boucey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 06:26:19 PM To: Alex Kramarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail and does it work ?is it just something like s/\@foo.org/\@foo.fr/ at the right place to door is it very much more complicated ? __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
Ok I got it working. I read another Howto and it said to load the tcp.smtp with /usr/local/sbin/qmail cdb now the other one that I was using was tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp Which for some reason wasn't working. In any event now everything works just like I want it to. I just have to learn about IPV4 some more. Anyone have some good references since I'm not understanding a whole lot about it. Miles
Re: amavirus
Dale Herring wrote: > > Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.520058 info msg 489162: bytes 727 > from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 6559 uid 101 > Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.567272 starting delivery 3: msg > 489162 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.567352 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 > Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail-local[6569]: execution started That's a message from scanmails, so I assume the following stuff is cause by your anti-virus scanner which is called from scanmails. Which anti virus product do you use? > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: Note: /etc/conf.modules is more recent than > /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdksmp/modules.dep > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-0064 > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: Note: /etc/conf.modules is more recent than > /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdksmp/modules.dep > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-0064 > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail qmail-local[6635]: terminating Here terminats scanmails > Jan 26 06:36:25 mail qmail: 980512585.364156 delivery 3: success: > fgrep:_conflicting_matchers_specified/procmail:_Unrecognised_options:_"-"/Us > age:_procmail_[-vptoY]_[-f_fromwhom]_[parameter=value_|_rcfile]_.../___Or:_p > rocmail_[-toY]_[-f_fromwhom]_[-a_argument]_-d_recipient_.../___Or:_procmail_ > [-ptY]_[-f_fromwhom]_-m_[parameter=value]_..._rcfile_[arg]_.../Processing_co > ntinued/procmail:_Couldn't_read_"/home/dale/dale"/bin/qmail-local:_/var/log/ > qmail-local/logfile:_Permission_denied/ Why is procmail called here? Which ./configure did you use for AMaViS 0.2.1 ? best regards, Rainer Link -- Rainer Link | Student of Computer Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] | University of Applied Sciences, Furtwangen, Germany rainer.w3.to | http://www.computer-networking.de/
Re: Wildcards in badmailfrom?
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:40:12 CST, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Someone posted a patch to do this some time ago. You could search the > qmail list archives for it, or look at qmail.org for a pointer. I think > it was called 'badrcptpatterns' or something similar. Yes, thanks to another poster I found the wildmat program/patch that will add this into it. I seached for ``wildcard'' instead of ``regex'' on qmail.org which is why I didn't see it the first time... Andy
Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or127.0.0.1)
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote: > If AOL or hotmail would decide to change their MX records to your mailserver > this will for sure also cause you problems. Actually, Qmail works fine as an incoming MX for Hotmail.com. mail.hotmail.com, one of Hotmail's incoming mx machines, runs Qmail. [1] While not quite on the same scale as hotmail/AOL, egroups.com is not exactly a low-traffice mail server. egroups has a single incoming mail exchanger, which runs Qmail. This is one of the reasons I like Qmail--it can scale up to just about any level of mail traffic out there. - Sam [1] Qmail's fingerprint is that it accepts the MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the SMTP session being shortened to MAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RE: Install went fine, but won't work
> > Miles Scruggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > 65.193.90.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > > > I own most of this class C. How can I specify a range ie > > 65.193.90.129-200? > > If your subnet doesn't split on an octet boundary, list all the IPs > individually. It all gets compiled into an efficient CDB anyway. > You only have to do this once; a four-line shellscript would make it > quick work. Ok all understood, but that doesn't solve the main problem. I'm trying to relay from one of the host that are under that relay umbrella and it won't let me. For some reason it looks like the variable isn't being set. btw what is a good class address scheme that I can use for internal use and won't route on the internet. I think 10.* is one are there any others. Miles
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
Miles Scruggs wrote: SNIP > > > > > 192.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > Isn't 192.* a non routable Class A that will not route on the net? ( I use > it internally) > > > > > This allows anything in the 192.* net to relay through your host. > > I'm sure > > you do not mean that. > > SNIP Please read up on IPv4 classes. Classes are not determined by the size of the network address. 192.x.x.x is a class B address. 63.x.x.x (that you mentioned in a part I snipped) is a class A address. They may hand these out in /24 sizes, but the class remains the same. Also, non-routable is a misnomer. Nothing prevents misconfigured routers from routing the true private networks (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16) to anywhere in the world, and many routers do. Now that that's over, no, 192.0.0.0/8 is _not_ a private network. To prove this to yourself, traceroute f.root-servers.net, or just do a 'dig' (or dnsqr ) on it: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: a.root-servers.net. 5w6d16h IN A198.41.0.4 f.root-servers.net. 5w6d16h IN A192.5.5.241 j.root-servers.net. 5w6d16h IN A198.41.0.10 k.root-servers.net. 5w6d16h IN A193.0.14.129 HTH, GW
RE: SMTP Time woes
> Received: from lance.sapcanada.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] > [205.240.222.67]) > by mail.travel-net.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02916 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:09:59 -0500 -0500 the timezone. > Received: (qmail 5414 invoked by uid 1031); 26 Jan 2001 16:15:52 - The time was normalized to - timezone. which means plus five hours. J.
Re: Wildcards in badmailfrom?
Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a really annoying spammer on my hands and just wonder if it is > possible to use wildcards in badmailfrom? Someone posted a patch to do this some time ago. You could search the qmail list archives for it, or look at qmail.org for a pointer. I think it was called 'badrcptpatterns' or something similar. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: qmail-inject not working?
Fish Flowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And yet when I try and use qmail-inject to test the delivery, nothing > happens -- no error messages, no syslogs, no mail. Very strange. qmail _always_ logs. You're just looking in the wrong logfiles. Look again, based on your setup. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
Miles Scruggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 65.193.90.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > I own most of this class C. How can I specify a range ie > 65.193.90.129-200? If your subnet doesn't split on an octet boundary, list all the IPs individually. It all gets compiled into an efficient CDB anyway. You only have to do this once; a four-line shellscript would make it quick work. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
RE: RE: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly
If I knew how to write perl I probably wouldn't be askingthanks for the tip anyway -Original Message-From: Alex Kramarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 2:22 PMTo: Qmail listSubject: Fw: RE: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly Brian Longwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >>Is there a filter that I can use to scan incoming & outgoing message headers>>and reject messages based on pre-defined criteria (text string)? >You've assumed that I haven't already been there...I have...I've already looked at qmail-scanner and I'm >afraid that the overhead will be too much on my system. I don't want a full-fledged virus-guard, is there >something more lightweight that can do regex filtering on the subject line? You don't have to use the scanning features of qmail-scanner; you can disable the scanner features just by commenting out some calls to the scanning functions. hell, you can write you own 20-30 lines of perl script based on qmail-scanner, all you have to do is to read the message from pipe 1 and the envelope from pipe 2, rewrite them and reinject into qmail-queue, all of the code is there ... __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: qmail - how bundle mails?
Thomas König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > how does i reach, so that qmail will send mail to different users > in the same domain as bundle? > e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with one connection, so that only one mail must be send over the net > with the information to the smtp server, that this mail is for more > user. You don't. qmail was designed not to do this. You could do major surgery on the source, or use another MTA. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail
Yes, it's as simple as that (only you have to put it in two places - the read loop of the message and the envelope header). Right now I am in process of rewriting the qmail-scanner script to do only, and only that, without ANYTHING related to virus scanning. ---Original Message--- From: Michel Boucey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 26, 2001 06:26:19 PM To: Alex Kramarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail and does it work ?is it just something like s/\@foo.org/\@foo.fr/ at the right place to door is it very much more complicated ? __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Wildcards in badmailfrom?
Hey all, I have a really annoying spammer on my hands and just wonder if it is possible to use wildcards in badmailfrom? Originally I added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to badmailfrom and that blocked it for about a month. Then he got halfway smart and changed his sender address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for which I added @tpts6.seed.net.tw to badmailfrom. This however, only worked for a few minutes as he is apparently starting to create random names for mail hosts. Here is a list that I have collected so far @tpts4.seed.net.tw @mx.seed.net.tw @ara.seed.net.tw @tpts6.seed.net.tw @sky.seed.net.tw @iris.seed.net.tw @giga.net.tw @party.seed.net.tw @ksmail.seed.net.tw @saturn.seed.net.tw @tpts7.seed.net.tw Now, my question is, would it be possible to block as in @*.seed.net.tw Thanks. I guess I could always try it to see what it does but I would rather know before hand---the man page doesn't mention anything about wildcards. Andy
qmail-inject not working?
Well, now I have supervise, svscan, and apparently qmail up and running: bash-2.03# ps -ef |grep qmail qmailq 8711 8704 1 10:11:47 pts/20:00 qmail-clean qmaill 8710 8703 1 10:11:47 pts/20:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/lo g/qmail/smtpd qmailr 8708 8704 1 10:11:47 pts/20:00 qmail-rspawn qmails 8704 8700 2 10:11:46 pts/20:00 qmail-send root 8715 8125 0 10:11:50 pts/20:00 grep qmail root 8702 8699 1 10:11:46 pts/20:00 supervise qmail-smtpd qmaill 8705 8704 0 0:00 root 8700 8699 0 10:11:46 pts/20:00 supervise qmail-send qmaill 8707 8701 1 10:11:47 pts/20:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/lo g/qmail root 8706 8704 1 10:11:47 pts/20:00 qmail-lspawn |preline procmail bash-2.03# And yet when I try and use qmail-inject to test the delivery, nothing happens -- no error messages, no syslogs, no mail. Very strange. Furrfu. Any ideas? Thanks -- Fish.
Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail
and does it work ? is it just something like s/\@foo.org/\@foo.fr/ at the right place to do or is it very much more complicated ? Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Système > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 < On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Alex Kramarov wrote: > Michel Boucey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > >I have installed an intranet qmail server on, say, foo.org ; and I want, > >for all the mail which is send to an Internet domain, for all the outgoing > >mail from the foo.org intranet domain, to rewrite the sender address from > >the intranet domain foo.org to the Internet domain foo.fr . Is it possible > >with the new qmail-inject from mess822 to rewrite the sender's domain name > >for the outgoing intranet mail to a valid Internet domain name ? > > I have asked this question here two weeks ago and no one answered, so I ended up >modifying qmail-scanner to rewrite the messages.
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
> From: "Miles Scruggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:07:46 -0600 > > > > > > Sorry if this is a repeat to the list but I just subscribed > > > > > The install went just find but I have a problem > > > > > 1.) I can't seem to to set the enviroment variable to allow me to have > > > certain hosts relay. Below is the contents of my tcp.smtp > > > > > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > > 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > > > This allows anything in the 192.168.1.* subnet to relay through > > your host. > > > > > 192.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > Isn't 192.* a non routable Class A that will not route on the net? ( I use > it internally) Not true at all. 192 is where class C addresses start. Once upon a time, they were all in 192. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500 My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft, but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft. PGP signature
SMTP Time woes
To anyone, Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lance.sapcanada.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [205.240.222.67]) by mail.travel-net.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02916 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 11:09:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 5414 invoked by uid 1031); 26 Jan 2001 16:15:52 - ### This message was sent at 11:32am , any ideas Date: 26 Jan 2001 16:15:52 - ### Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Corey Jarvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test I have checked all the time configurations and they are all set. Any ideas
RE: Install went fine, but won't work
> > Sorry if this is a repeat to the list but I just subscribed > > > The install went just find but I have a problem > > > 1.) I can't seem to to set the enviroment variable to allow me to have > > certain hosts relay. Below is the contents of my tcp.smtp > > > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > > This allows anything in the 192.168.1.* subnet to relay through > your host. > > > 192.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Isn't 192.* a non routable Class A that will not route on the net? ( I use it internally) > > This allows anything in the 192.* net to relay through your host. > I'm sure > you do not mean that. > > > 65.193.90.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" I own most of this class C. How can I specify a range ie 65.193.90.129-200? > > And I have a feeling yo do not mean this, either (all hosts in > 65.193.90.*? > Do you trust them all to relay through you?) > > > :allow > > > > Then I ran the > > > tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp > > > > And here is my tcpserver startup line which is in > > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtp/run > > > > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x > > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 1003 -g 102 0 smtp rblsmtpd > > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 > > You're only using rbl.maps.vix.com for rblsmtpd (since you don't > supply any > options). Where can I find out more about these options? > > You do not need to restart tcpserver to activate changes to > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb. K thanks > However, you're not telling us what the problem is; from which IP you're > connecting to the smtpd, or what the error message was, or what the logs > say. When I try to relay mail to a remote host I get the error message "sorry that domain isn't in my list of allowed hosts in the rcpthosts file" This is when I try to relay from 192.168.1.147 > Can you connect to port 25 on that machine? Can you send mail to a user > local to that machine (via smtp)? I have have the host in rcpthosts it will even relay it remotely Miles
Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1)
"D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Patrick Bihan-Faou writes: > > If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a > > bug... > > In fact, it's not a bug; it's a portability problem. If you were using > OpenBSD, you'd see outgoing connections to 0.0.0.0 rejected with EINVAL. Although the proposed fix, adding 0.0.0.0 to ipme, doesn't pose any kind of compatibility problem. -ScottG.
Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1)
Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:32:47PM -0500, Scott Gifford wrote: > > Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If AOL or hotmail would decide to change their MX records to your mailserver > > > this will for sure also cause you problems. > > > > No it won't. qmail will give an error that the MX records points back > > to itself, and bounce the message. > > I don't think that any mailserver out there will be able to handle > the load if AOL or Hotmail will change the MX record to point at that > system (without prior notice). > This would be a DOS just like the 0.0.0.0 is. Oh, I see. Yes, that's correct. There are all kinds of DOS attacks against any public Internet service. The ones to worry about are the ones that let a single user with a slow Internet connection deny service to a large number of people. The ones that require being singled out for destruction by large ISPs, there's nothing that can really be done about. -ScottG.
qmail - how bundle mails?
Hi, how does i reach, so that qmail will send mail to different users in the same domain as bundle? e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] with one connection, so that only one mail must be send over the net with the information to the smtp server, that this mail is for more user. the background is: I've a mailing list server, and we pay for traffic. On the server ist installed qmail, vpopmail and ezmlm. any ideas? tom
Re: Re: Qmail and GFS
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 04:44:55PM +0200, Alex Kramarov wrote: [snip] > Is this really true, about EXT2 being unreliable as well ? Yes. Greetz, Peter.
Re: qmailadmin
Sure.. Read the INSTALL file that came with Qmailadmin -Sumith - Original Message - From: info To: qmail Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:42 AM Subject: qmailadmin Hello!!! is there a way to set max number of account for each different domain name? Thanks
Re: Re: Qmail and GFS
Alex Kramarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site > >which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with synchronous > >metadata. > The patch info says : > Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux > because it assumes that link() is a synchronous operation. This is not the > case with EXT2 and ReiserFS. So you have to apply this patch to avoid losing > messages due system crashes > Is this really true, about EXT2 being unreliable as well ? Not necessarily. ext2 doesn't sync the metadata of a file when the file is synced; instead, it is synced when the directory it is in is synced. So for safety, you either have to mount the filesystem with synchonous metadata (as I said above), or have your program sync the directory of a file after syncing the file. Bruce Guenter's SRPM of qmail includes a patch which does the directory sync, so you don't have to mount the filesystem with synchronous metadata for safety. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Re: Qmail and GFS
---Original Message--- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site>which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with synchronous>metadata. The patch info says : Qmail was designed for BSD-like filesystems. And it is unreliable under Linux because it assumes that link() is a synchronous operation. This is not the case with EXT2 and ReiserFS. So you have to apply this patch to avoid losing messages due system crashes Is this really true, about EXT2 being unreliable as well ? __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: qmail license
Clemens Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this might seem like a stupid question but I really *did* bother quite a > while with the subject before asking here. Except that this has been discussed to death many times in the past on the list. Look through the qmail list archives; you'll find everything you need there. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: The joy of Qmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The other big gotcha is that qmail binaries have the uids of the qmail users > hard coded in them. Bruce Guenter has a very useful patch to qmail which makes it take its various UIDs and GIDs from the ownership of a set of files in /var/qmail/owners -- so if you want to reassign UIDs by searching through the filesystem and piping the results to chmod scripts, qmail will continue to work just fine, providing of course that you stop qmail before doing this, and re-start it after. The patch is included in his SRPM. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: Qmail and GFS
James R Grinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ie. semantics that local Unix filesystems are supposed to conform to > (but which Reiserfs apparently doesn't). I believe there's a small patch to qmail somewhere on the ReiserFS site which makes qmail as safe on that filesystem as on ext2 with synchronous metadata. A page with various tips: http://www.jedi.claranet.fr/qmail-tuning.html The actual qmail patch for ReiserFS: http://www.jedi.claranet.fr/qmail-link-sync.patch Russell, I don't think this is on qmail.org. Care to add it? Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
Re: bcc sucks
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:27:12AM -0600, Matthew Patterson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Alex Pennace wrote: > >Sure it is. The recipient address for that local delivery is stored in > >the environment variable RECIPIENT. Additionally if instructions for > >the delivery are in a .qmail-...-default file the part of the address > >covered by the -default wildcard is in the environment variable > >DEFAULT. See man qmail-command. > > Sounds like just what I needed. The man page doesn't specify it the enviornment > variables are set locally to the program or are globally set, I assume local to > the program, but I want to make absolutely sure They are set up in the environment prior to the execution of any program lines.
Re: qmail+virtualdomain
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:05:18PM +0100, Massimiliano Santarelli wrote: > Well , now i put "avatar.yi.org:alias-avatar" into virtualdomains file, > and made a: touch ~alias/.qmail-avatar-pluto > Into my locals file i've: cikosub.yi.org > but if i send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > it seems there's no difference between the two domains for the same user. Did you kill -HUP pidof(qmail-send) \Maex -- SpaceNet AG| Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0 Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen| Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen asleep yet.
Re: smtproutes
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:31:49AM -0500, Steve Woolley wrote: > I am planning to use smtproutes to route email from a qmail server > to an internal Microsoft Exchange 5.5 server. > If the Exchange server goes down for a period of time, will the > qmail server cache (for lack of a better word) the routed emails > locally until the Exchange server comes back up? or will the > qmail server bounce the email back (after a given amount of time)? It will keep retrying for upto a week (with growing intervals). After that week, it will bounce the mail. Read up on queuelifetime in man qmail-send to see how to increase that period even more. Greetz, Peter.
Re: Qmail and GFS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'd like to get a bit of advice on this one. I know that NFS > is a big no-no when using qmail due to the way it handles the > queue. I also know that qmail may have trouble with certain > journaling filesystems (for example, reiserfs) because qmail > assumes that link() and unlink() are syncronous operations > (according to the reiserfs FAQ). I knew I'd seen the requirements explicitly mentioned somewhere. Then I had occasion to build qmail from scratch the other day and found it: % cat conf-qmail /var/qmail This is the qmail home directory. It must be a local directory, not shared among machines. This is where qmail queues all mail messages. The queue (except for bounce message contents) is crashproof, if the filesystem guarantees that single-byte writes are atomic and that directory operations are synchronous. These guarantees are provided by fixed-block filesystems such as UFS and by journaling filesystems. Under Linux, make sure that all mail-handling filesystems are mounted with synchronous metadata. ie. semantics that local Unix filesystems are supposed to conform to (but which Reiserfs apparently doesn't). Does GFS? That's the question.. James.
smtproutes
I am planning to use smtproutes to route email from a qmail server to an internal Microsoft Exchange 5.5 server. If the Exchange server goes down for a period of time, will the qmail server cache (for lack of a better word) the routed emails locally until the Exchange server comes back up? or will the qmail server bounce the email back (after a given amount of time)? Steve Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hint for MDaemon users
MDaemon has an option very similar to fetchmail's 'qvirtual' option
(for stripping prefixes off Delivered-To lines). It's in the
'DomainPOP Mail Collection' config box, tab 'Processing'. Bottom box
named 'Address Processing'. Tick first box ('Strip Text From Left')
and enter text to be stripped in the textbox.
Some of your customers may be interested in this. I now hacked my
forward-wrapper to fix up DTLINE without the prefix, because some of
our customers have severely broken mailers.
Greetz, Peter.
amavirus
Got a basic out of the box qmail install. Invoked via rc.local using tcpserver. I compiled the amavis and installed. did my links as directed qmail-local > /usr/sbin/scanmails yadda yadda yadda Before I put the links in place qmail works great. Using Maildir As soon as I put the links in place I get this crap. Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.520058 info msg 489162: bytes 727 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 6559 uid 101 Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.567272 starting delivery 3: msg 489162 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail: 980512584.567352 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 Jan 26 06:36:24 mail qmail-local[6569]: execution started Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: Note: /etc/conf.modules is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdksmp/modules.dep Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-0064 Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: Note: /etc/conf.modules is more recent than /lib/modules/2.2.15-4mdksmp/modules.dep Jan 26 06:36:25 mail modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-0064 Jan 26 06:36:25 mail qmail-local[6635]: terminating Jan 26 06:36:25 mail qmail: 980512585.364156 delivery 3: success: fgrep:_conflicting_matchers_specified/procmail:_Unrecognised_options:_"-"/Us age:_procmail_[-vptoY]_[-f_fromwhom]_[parameter=value_|_rcfile]_.../___Or:_p rocmail_[-toY]_[-f_fromwhom]_[-a_argument]_-d_recipient_.../___Or:_procmail_ [-ptY]_[-f_fromwhom]_-m_[parameter=value]_..._rcfile_[arg]_.../Processing_co ntinued/procmail:_Couldn't_read_"/home/dale/dale"/bin/qmail-local:_/var/log/ qmail-local/logfile:_Permission_denied/ Okay I can handle the modules 2.2.15-4mdksmp and the etc/conf.modules. not a problem there what is binfmt-0064 and what program installs it? and why am I getting the rest of this message. Mail dont get delivered btw.. just kind of sits in limbo someplace.
Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1)
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:18:11PM -, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > Patrick Bihan-Faou writes: > > If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a > > bug... > > In fact, it's not a bug; it's a portability problem. If you were using > OpenBSD, you'd see outgoing connections to 0.0.0.0 rejected with EINVAL. Even BSD/OS, under which qmail including 1.03 was developed, 0.0.0.0 is the localhost. It is so on every other OS. You are describing something that OpenBSD does different from the rest of the world. Greetz, Peter.
qmail license
Hi, this might seem like a stupid question but I really *did* bother quite a while with the subject before asking here. Someone else asked me what exactly the qmail license ist about. So I was looking for "the license". I searched LWQ and google but everything I found is a statement about limitaions for qmail-distributors and DJB's opinion about licenses. Well, This does no have something to do with the qmail license, does it? Is there a statement anywhere on the aouthors website that grants the right to use qmail for any purpose as long as you just do not redistribute it? Is there a statement that qmail can be used free of charge? I did not fint a hint in "Running qmail" either (but there I might have overseen it). thanks for any explanation /ch
Re: ORBS
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella wrote: > How to fix it, please ? does support your server open relay throu smtp? Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Fw: RE: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly
Brian Longwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >>Is there a filter that I can use to scan incoming & outgoing message headers>>and reject messages based on pre-defined criteria (text string)? >You've assumed that I haven't already been there...I have...I've already looked at qmail-scanner and I'm >afraid that the overhead will be too much on my system. I don't want a full-fledged virus-guard, is there >something more lightweight that can do regex filtering on the subject line? You don't have to use the scanning features of qmail-scanner; you can disable the scanner features just by commenting out some calls to the scanning functions. hell, you can write you own 20-30 lines of perl script based on qmail-scanner, all you have to do is to read the message from pipe 1 and the envelope from pipe 2, rewrite them and reinject into qmail-queue, all of the code is there ... __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: qmail+virtualdomain
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, you wrote: > Your virtualdomain is not called 'virtualdomain' so stop lying about > that. > > Show us the contents of your configfiles, especially locals and > virtualdomains, please. > > Greetz, Peter. Well , now i put "avatar.yi.org:alias-avatar" into virtualdomains file, and made a: touch ~alias/.qmail-avatar-pluto Into my locals file i've: cikosub.yi.org but if i send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] it seems there's no difference between the two domains for the same user. thanks Massimiliano
Re: qmail+virtualdomain
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Massimiliano Santarelli wrote: > modifying the locals/rcpthost files , > and in virtualdomain file (newvirtualdomain:newuser). ^ > How can i solve this problem and split different users with different > virtualdomain?? Maybe in just using the right filenames... you missed the last s each. virtualdomains and rctphosts are right. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg http://www.bsws.de | Germany
Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or127.0.0.1)
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Pavel Kankovsky wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Dan Peterson wrote: > > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c > > Revision 1.20; dated Feb 28 1998. > > Hmm...hmm...right. Ok, I missed it. It did not occur to me 0.0.0.0 is a > broadcast address in Canada. :) > > Anyway, qmail 1.00 was released on February 20, 1997. Was there any > handling for 0.0.0.0 in qmail 1.00? Now that's lame. That statement would only have relevance if 1.00 was a current release and it's not even close. Drop it already. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstorehttp://www.cloudninegifts.com ==
qmail Digest 26 Jan 2001 11:00:00 -0000 Issue 1256
qmail Digest 26 Jan 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1256 Topics (messages 55911 through 56057): Re: Why so few qmail-remote processes 55911 by: Jacques WERNERT 55926 by: Markus Stumpf 55935 by: Jacques WERNERT 55942 by: Markus Stumpf Things I have noted 55912 by: Rod... Whitworth 55930 by: Markus Stumpf 56012 by: Rod... Whitworth 56044 by: James R Grinter bcc sucks 55913 by: Matthew Patterson 55915 by: Alex Pennace 55917 by: OK 2 NET - André Paulsberg 55922 by: Alex Pennace 55929 by: Matthew Patterson 56002 by: Brian Reichert Re: unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] 55914 by: Noah Sematimba qmailadmin 55916 by: info qmail-pop3d broken LAST command 55918 by: Eng. Ramy M. Hassan 55923 by: Michael Maier 55948 by: Charles Cazabon can't receive mails via telnet on port 25 55919 by: Thomas König 55920 by: Thomas König 55921 by: Thomas König 55925 by: Alex Pennace 55927 by: Thomas König Is it safe to recompile and install qmail after patching. 55924 by: Eng. Ramy M. Hassan 55931 by: Markus Stumpf 55934 by: Matthew Patterson 55938 by: Peter van Dijk Re: A lot of Temporary_error_on_maildir_delivery 55928 by: Markus Stumpf 55933 by: Kaj-Michael Lang 55946 by: Charles Cazabon Re: rblsmtpd 55932 by: Chris Johnson 55998 by: Martin Randall 56017 by: Peter van Dijk 56018 by: Ian Lance Taylor Re: Cron run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily 55936 by: root 55939 by: Matthew Patterson 55940 by: Chris Johnson 55941 by: Henning Brauer 55943 by: Greg Owen Strange messages in log 55937 by: Marcus Korte 55944 by: pape.innominate.com 55945 by: Brett Randall How to set routing in qmail? 55947 by: Michail A.Baikov 55949 by: Peter van Dijk No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient 55950 by: john roberts 55951 by: Markus Stumpf 55953 by: Charles Cazabon 55955 by: john roberts 55957 by: Alex Kramarov 55958 by: Markus Stumpf 55959 by: Markus Stumpf 55976 by: Jon Sharp Re: No transport provider was available for delivery to this rec 55952 by: Frank Tegtmeyer 55960 by: Frank Tegtmeyer Re: qmail-pop3d and fetchmail 55954 by: Kris Kelley 55956 by: Peter van Dijk 55963 by: Markus Stumpf 55972 by: Peter van Dijk qmail compile error 55961 by: Fish Flowers 55967 by: Peter van Dijk quotas 55962 by: fred 55966 by: fred qmail+virtualdomain 55964 by: Massimiliano Santarelli 55970 by: Frank Tegtmeyer 55973 by: Markus Stumpf 55977 by: Peter van Dijk 55995 by: Massimiliano Santarelli 56016 by: Peter van Dijk 56021 by: Frank Tegtmeyer ORBS 55965 by: Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella 55971 by: Chris Johnson 55975 by: Markus Stumpf 55978 by: Peter van Dijk 55989 by: Peter van Dijk relay controls 55968 by: Dan Egli 55979 by: Chris Johnson 55980 by: Dan Egli 55981 by: Peter van Dijk 55985 by: Chris Johnson 55986 by: Markus Stumpf 55997 by: Charles Cazabon 56003 by: Mark Delany 56004 by: Peter van Dijk 56005 by: Markus Stumpf 56006 by: Charles Cazabon 56008 by: paul.anastrophe.com Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1) 55969 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 55982 by: Markus Stumpf 55983 by: Greg Owen 55984 by: Dave Sill 55987 by: paul.anastrophe.com 55988 by: Peter van Dijk 55992 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 55999 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 56001 by: Markus Stumpf 56013 by: paul.anastrophe.com 56014 by: Mark Delany 56015 by: Greg Owen 56019 by: Charles Cazabon 56023 by: Scott Gifford 56025 by: D. J. Bernstein 56026 by: Virginia Chism 56028 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 56032 by: Scott Gifford 56033 by: Patrick Bihan-Faou 56034 by: Markus Stumpf 56036 by: Pavel Kankovsky 56037 by: Dan Peterson 56038 by: Pavel Kankovsky how to stop smtp there's no sendmail 55974 by: rocael.usa.net 55991 by: Peter van Dijk 55993 by: Markus Stumpf 55996 by: pape.innominate.com 56000 by: Charles Cazabon Re: in qmail 55990 by: Jeff Krintila 56009 by: Matthew Patterson 56010 by: Tim Hunter 56011 by: Peter van Dijk 56020 by: Charles Cazabon 56022 by: Frank Tegtmeyer Sqwebmail Documentation 55994 by: Alex Le Fevre SMTP Time issues 56007 by: Corey Jarvis 56024
RE: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly
You've assumed that I haven't already been there...I have...I've already looked at qmail-scanner and I'm afraid that the overhead will be too much on my system. I don't want a full-fledged virus-guard, is there something more lightweight that can do regex filtering on the subject line? -Original Message-From: Alex Kramarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 1:32 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly Brian Longwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >Is there a filter that I can use to scan incoming & outgoing message headers>and reject messages based on pre-defined criteria (text string)? Use qmail-scanner, and next time you should visit qmail.org before asking these questions ! __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: rewriting outgoing remote mail
Michel Boucey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >I have installed an intranet qmail server on, say, foo.org ; and I want,>for all the mail which is send to an Internet domain, for all the outgoing>mail from the foo.org intranet domain, to rewrite the sender address from>the intranet domain foo.org to the Internet domain foo.fr . Is it possible>with the new qmail-inject from mess822 to rewrite the sender's domain name>for the outgoing intranet mail to a valid Internet domain name ? I have asked this question here two weeks ago and no one answered, so I ended up modifying qmail-scanner to rewrite the messages. __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Re: is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly
Brian Longwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >Is there a filter that I can use to scan incoming & outgoing message headers>and reject messages based on pre-defined criteria (text string)? Use qmail-scanner, and next time you should visit qmail.org before asking these questions ! __IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
is there a filter to scan message header and reject accordingly
Is there a filter that I can use to scan incoming & outgoing message headers and reject messages based on pre-defined criteria (text string)? I want to deal with the W32/Hybris virus Thanks, Brian
rewriting outgoing remote mail
Hi ! I have installed an intranet qmail server on, say, foo.org ; and I want, for all the mail which is send to an Internet domain, for all the outgoing mail from the foo.org intranet domain, to rewrite the sender address from the intranet domain foo.org to the Internet domain foo.fr . Is it possible with the new qmail-inject from mess822 to rewrite the sender's domain name for the outgoing intranet mail to a valid Internet domain name ? Thanks for help ... Cordialement, Michel Boucey Administrateur Système > Société Norm@net +33 2 31 27 13 45 <
Re: tcpserver can't find smtp port, formerly "can't connect to smtp"
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:16:53AM -0800, Curtis Collicutt wrote: > Hi, > > When booting, this message gets sent to the console: > > tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > > Here is the command I use to start qmail-smtpd with > tcpserver: > > # start qmtpd with tcpserver > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u > 2850 -g 32750 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd & > Your are missing one argument to tcpserver, the host, use /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 2850 -g 32750 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd & ^^^ Regards, Gerrit. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] innominate AG the linux architects tel: +49.30.308806-0 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
tcpserver can't find smtp port, formerly "can't connect to smtp"
Hi, When booting, this message gets sent to the console: tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure out port number for /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd Anyone know how to fix this? Or how to better diagnose the problem? Here is the command I use to start qmail-smtpd with tcpserver: # start qmtpd with tcpserver /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 2850 -g 32750 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd & and the tcp.smtp rules look like: 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" Thanks for any help. Curtis. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: Problem with qmail and SMTP port w/ Debian Linux.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:26:39PM -0800, John Bowen wrote: > > Hi, > > Having a problem, here's my story: I did a clean install of Debian Potato > Linux on a P100 machine, I did NOT install exim [selected option 5/do not > configure mail] when doing the install. I followed the Life With Qmail > document to the letter, installing qmail 1.03, the daemontools, and > ucspi-tcp. I also installed the POP3 module that came with qmail. The 4 > qmail- processes are running and locally everything seems to work okay > [verified with a ps and a qmail-inject to myself from an echo on the command > line]. > > Now, I can send mail from my machine to other local accounts and external > domains just fine. I can check POP3 remotely just fine. However my big > problem is that I'm not receiving outside mail sent to my domain. I > verified DNS is setup correctly and goes to the correct IP address. The > bounce message I'm getting is: > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Deferred: Connection refused by > > mail.birthmachine.com. > The tcpserver running qmail-smtpd has not been started, check with svstat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd if You exactly follow lwq. You may consider using the not debian compliant var-qmail package I provide: http://innominate.org/~pape/Debian/qmail.html Regards, Gerrit. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] innominate AG the linux architects tel: +49.30.308806-0 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com
Re: supervise fatal errors
Just go into the affected Directories and delete those lock Files manually. Because UFS Solaris is a bit laggy in I/O this Problem occurs when you stop and start your qmail Programs too fast! -- Michael Maier / http://www.shell-provider.net Fish Flowers wrote: > I've gotten qmail to compile, and my init scripts set up, but when I run > "qmail start", I get the following: > > Starting qmail: svscan > . > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-send/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock: temporary > failure > supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure > > The supervise fatal errors repeat every couple of seconds. > > This is a SunOS 5.7 box, running qmail-1.03. Any thoughts? > > Fish.
Re: Install went fine, but won't work
Miles Scruggs writes: > Sorry if this is a repeat to the list but I just subscribed > The install went just find but I have a problem > 1.) I can't seem to to set the enviroment variable to allow me to have > certain hosts relay. Below is the contents of my tcp.smtp > > 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > 192.168.1.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" This allows anything in the 192.168.1.* subnet to relay through your host. > 192.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" This allows anything in the 192.* net to relay through your host. I'm sure you do not mean that. > 65.193.90.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" And I have a feeling yo do not mean this, either (all hosts in 65.193.90.*? Do you trust them all to relay through you?) > :allow > > Then I ran the > tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp > > And here is my tcpserver startup line which is in > /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtp/run > > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x > /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 1003 -g 102 0 smtp rblsmtpd > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 You're only using rbl.maps.vix.com for rblsmtpd (since you don't supply any options). > I have restarted smtpd just to make sure the changes took, I don't know if > this is nessary or if they are on the fly. You do not need to restart tcpserver to activate changes to /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb. However, you're not telling us what the problem is; from which IP you're connecting to the smtpd, or what the error message was, or what the logs say. Can you connect to port 25 on that machine? Can you send mail to a user local to that machine (via smtp)? Vince.
