Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-10-02 Thread Luca
Luca:

 MFPA:
 
  Can you alter the order of the fields exported by your Access Query so
  that the string TB! stores in the email address AB field is unique
  for each AB record, and the actual email address gets stored in a
  different AB field?
  
  Then %ABtoPPP would select the correct AB entry each time, so that you
  get the correct Username and Password for the course in the email
  body. And you would need to add a macro to substitute in the email
  address afterwards.
  
  For example, if you stored the email address in the State field, it 
  might be something like:-
  
  %To = %ToName %ABToState
  
  Disclaimer: I have not tested this.
 
 That looks brilliant and promising a trick. I'll test it as soon as I can then
 report here.

Seems not to work ): the variable %TO only adds a recipient to the To: field,
doesn't substitute the default value that's inevitably formed by the two
fields Name email, and email uniquely identifies the AB entry to pick
values from.

That seems to me at a first attempt. But I'm going to try harder later. 

-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it



Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-10-02 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Thursday 2 October 2014 at 9:59:46 PM, in
mid:4ler2atqqdqqu3m28jal7jtrbq83cbc...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:


 MFPA:
  %To = %ToName %ABToState

Luca:
 Seems not to work ): the variable %TO only adds a
 recipient to the To: field, doesn't substitute the
 default value that's inevitably formed by the two
 fields Name email, and email uniquely identifies
 the AB entry to pick values from.

 That seems to me at a first attempt. But I'm going to
 try harder later.  


OK. I missed the quote marks:- 

%To = %ToName %ABToState


And if the email address is stored in the State field without being 
surrounded by angle brackets you could add them here:-

%To = %ToName %ABToState


And the %To macro seems to append to the existing To header, rather 
than replacing it as the help file says. 

But %SETHEADER(header, text) does what it says on the tin:-

%setHeader(To, %ToName %ABToState) %-



-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net

Teamwork is essential - it allows you to blame someone else

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 



Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread Luca
MFPA:

 One simple suggestion would be just the one AB entry for each student,
 and list the username and password for all courses in the Memo field.
 An example AB entry might be:-
 
 
Name: John Doe 
Email: john@domain.com
Memo:  Course:  Course0
   Username:Username0
   Password:Password0 
   
   Course:  Course1
   Username:Username1
   Password:Password1 
   
   
 Your quick template would now be:-
 
 %TONAME
 %ABtoMemo
 
 
 So the student would receive just one email that listed the usernames 
 and passwords for all their courses.

Yes, I was hoping to avoid that solution because I can't manage it
automatically. I use Access to export a tab delimited file from the school
database and feed it into The Bat address book, and I would need to manually
merge any double entry by editing the memo field and deleting the double. 

Maybe I could build a new query to export a different type of address list,
with memo fields already filled that way, but I guess it would need a lot of
work (-:

Anyway, thanx a lot for your input.

-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread Rick
Maybe I could build a new query to export a different type of address list, 
with memo fields already filled that way, but I guess it would need a lot of 
work (-:

I am coming in late on this one but how about address book groups for the 
different courses?




Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Monday 29 September 2014 at 8:02:39 AM, in
mid:5510139025.20140929030...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:


Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
type of address list, with memo fields already filled
that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:

 I am coming in late on this one but how about address
 book groups for the different courses?

I wondered about that, but am not sure %ABtoPPP would search only in
the AB group selected for the mass mailing.

-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net

Hard work never killed anyone, but why take a risk?

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Monday 29 September 2014 at 7:48:52 AM, in
mid:9cvh2alt1ait4iq43sf9lbl13052rsp...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:


 Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
 type of address list, with memo fields already filled
 that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:

 
Can you alter the order of the fields exported by your Access Query so
that the string TB! stores in the email address AB field is unique
for each AB record, and the actual email address gets stored in a
different AB field?

Then %ABtoPPP would select the correct AB entry each time, so that you
get the correct Username and Password for the course in the email
body. And you would need to add a macro to substitute in the email
address afterwards.

For example, if you stored the email address in the State field, it 
might be something like:-

%To = %ToName %ABToState

Disclaimer: I have not tested this.


-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net

Don't learn safety rules by accident... 

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread Luca
MFPA:

 Hi
 On Monday 29 September 2014 at 8:02:39 AM, in
 mid:5510139025.20140929030...@grunwalds.com, Rick wrote:
 
 
 Maybe I could build a new query to export a different
 type of address list, with memo fields already filled
 that way, but I guess it would need a lot of work (-:
 
  I am coming in late on this one but how about address
  book groups for the different courses?
 
 I wondered about that, but am not sure %ABtoPPP would search only in
 the AB group selected for the mass mailing.

Unfortunately not. Even if I select a single message for a new message using
template action, the %ABtoPPP will select the first occurrence of PPP for the
corresponding email address, in the whole set of address books.


-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-29 Thread Luca
MFPA:

 Can you alter the order of the fields exported by your Access Query so
 that the string TB! stores in the email address AB field is unique
 for each AB record, and the actual email address gets stored in a
 different AB field?
 
 Then %ABtoPPP would select the correct AB entry each time, so that you
 get the correct Username and Password for the course in the email
 body. And you would need to add a macro to substitute in the email
 address afterwards.
 
 For example, if you stored the email address in the State field, it 
 might be something like:-
 
 %To = %ToName %ABToState
 
 Disclaimer: I have not tested this.

That looks brilliant and promising a trick. I'll test it as soon as I can then
report here.

Thanx!

-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-28 Thread Luca

Hi all,

Hope there is someone willing to help me with this macro problem.

In short: I guess I need a value for nnn in the ABnnnPPP macro to pick the
whole To: header field of the message. The to value seems to pick only the
email address, without the nick part. 

Long explanation:

I use the following quick template with the mass mailing function, to send
personal credentials to a bunch of students:

   %TONAME
   User name: %ABtoZip
   Password: %ABtoCountry

I previously inserted user name and password in the Zip and Country fields
for each student entry in my address book.

Now, problem is that the same student can have more than a single entry in the
address book, all with the same email address but different credentials, one
for each course the student is enrolled in. I identify the different entries
for different courses adding the course name in the address book name field,
this way:

   Name: John Doe - course 1 
   Email: john@domain.com
   Zip: username1
   Country: password1

   Name: John Doe - course 2 
   Email: john@domain.com
   Zip: username2
   Country: password2

Unfortunately, the to part in the macros %ABtoZip and %ABtoCountry, selects
only the email address. So, when I try new mass mailing using template, two
emails will be created correctly, one for each address book entry, but both
picking only the first of the two couples Zip and Country. This will produce
two messages, this way: 

Message 1:

   To: John Doe - course 1 john@domain.com
   Body:
   User name: username1
   Password: password1

Message 2:

   To: John Doe - course 2 john@domain.com
   Body:
   User name: username1
   Password: password1

That is evidently wrong. The %ABtoZip macro should be capable to select the
correct address book entry according to the whole To:  field of each
message, not only the email address.

Any help? Different solutions for the problem? I would be really grateful.

Tia.

This is The Bat help definition for the macro:

ABnnnPPP Inserts a field from the address book.
nnn determines the address used, PPP is the address book field to be used.
Values for nnn:
TOAddress Book entry for the TO header (current message)
FROMAddress Book entry for the FROM header (current message)
REPLYAddress Book entry for the REPLY-TO header (current message)
OTOAddress Book entry for the TO header (original message)
OFROMAddress Book entry for the FROM header  (original message)
OREPLYAddress Book entry for the REPLY-TO header  (original message)

 


-- 
Luca - e-mail: p.stevens at libero.it



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Template problem: macros to identify sender name and address

2014-09-28 Thread MFPA
Hi


On Sunday 28 September 2014 at 11:36:09 AM, in
mid:mamf2admh27lk46j97tt54nbffs58em...@4ax.com, Luca wrote:


 In short: I guess I need a value for nnn in the
 ABnnnPPP macro to pick the whole To: header field
 of the message. The to value seems to pick only the
 email address, without the nick part.

The help file entry you quoted says nnn determines the address used.
You seem to have multiple AB entries with different display names but
the *same* address.

I would not expect the display name to be part of the
information used to search the address book.



 Any help? Different solutions for the problem? I would
 be really grateful.

One simple suggestion would be just the one AB entry for each student,
and list the username and password for all courses in the Memo field.
An example AB entry might be:-


   Name: John Doe 
   Email: john@domain.com
   Memo:  Course:  Course0
  Username:Username0
  Password:Password0 
  
  Course:  Course1
  Username:Username1
  Password:Password1 
  
  
Your quick template would now be:-

%TONAME
%ABtoMemo


So the student would receive just one email that listed the usernames 
and passwords for all their courses.


-- 
Best regards

MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net

Live your life as though every day it was your last.

Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 



Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Luc
 Good afternoon list,  

 On a list i'm subscribed to, i have the lists mail address set up for a
 reply by way of a quick template. The part i'm using for it is:

 %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
 in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
 reply to field.

 Is there something wrong with the way i use the %TO=%TO=list
 address%CC= ?

 It used to work for me in previous versions of TB!
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com

Need a website?
http://www.w-orx.com
 

Powered by The Bat! version 2.12.00 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

People will pay more to be entertained than educated. - Johnny
Carson.





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Luc,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:13:38 +0200 GMT (23/08/2004, 21:13 +0700 GMT),
Luc wrote:

L  %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L  in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L  reply to field.

You are not setting the Reply-To field.

L  Is there something wrong with the way i use the %TO=%TO=list
L  address%CC= ?

No, but you might want to add %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If I understand you correctly.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Chrysler: The Mercedes-Benz of American Cars

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Luc
Good afternoon Thomas,
  
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 21:24:34 GMT+0700 (which was
16:24:34 where I live) Thomas Fernandez would write:
  
snipped a bit

TF No, but you might want to add %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 Sorry for my ignorance but is it like this in that case:

 %TO=%TO=list address%CC=

 %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 in my %Qinclude=Cds ?

 --
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com

Need a website?
http://www.w-orx.com
 
---
Powered by The Bat! version 2.12.00 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

Being idle is very hard work because everyone is against you. -
Oscar Wilde




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Luc,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:18:29 +0200 GMT (23/08/2004, 22:18 +0700 GMT),
Luc wrote:

TF No, but you might want to add %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
L  Sorry for my ignorance but is it like this in that case:

L  %TO=%TO=list address%CC=

This has nothing to do with your reply-to address.

L  %Reply=[EMAIL PROTECTED]

L  in my %Qinclude=Cds ?

Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

One should never generalize.

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Bill McQuillan

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 08:23:42, Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro.

Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually %replyto. How accurate 
this may be is another question. ;-)

-- 
Bill McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 2.11 on Windows XP 5.1 build 2600-Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:43:48 -0700 GMT (23/08/2004, 23:43 +0700 GMT),
Bill McQuillan wrote:

 Yes, that's where you can include the %reply macro.

BM Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually
BM %replyto. How accurate this may be is another question. ;-)

I thought it was %ReplyTo. But I checked the Help file before posting,
and there is said %Reply.

Help / Topics / Index / Macros / Adress Macros.

No, wait! This is under the heading ABnnnPPP. Scrolling down I see
that you are right. I should have paid more attention.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Ist der Chef da? - Dumme Frage! Wuerden wir dann hier sitzen und
Karten spielen?

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 





Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Luc
Good evening Bill,
  
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 09:43:48 GMT-0700 (which was
18:43:48 where I live) Bill McQuillan would write:
  
snipped a bit

BM Reading the help file shows me that the macro is actually %replyto. How accurate 
this
BM may be is another question. ;-)
  
 Txn guys for clearing it up :-)
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com

Need a website?
http://www.w-orx.com
 
---
Powered by The Bat! version 2.12.00 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

If you think education is expensive, TRY IGNORANCE!!! - Andy
McIntyre.




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Luc,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:13:38 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 16:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

L  %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L  in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L  reply to field.

TB inserts your address in the Reply-To header when you've told it so
in your account (or folder) properties.
When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor
a setting for it)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/7
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Chris

Roelof Otten @ 2004-Aug-23 2:11:14 PM
template problem mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

L  %TO=%TO=list address%CC= which is invoked with %Qinclude=Cds
L  in the template. Still, i'm always getting my mail address in the
L  reply to field.
 TB inserts your address in the Reply-To header when you've told it so
 in your account (or folder) properties.
 When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
 you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor
 a setting for it)
For example, this is part of my TBUDL reply template:
%TO=%-
%TO=%OFROMFNAME on the TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]%-
%REPLYTO=%FROMNAME on the TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]%-

This resets the destination address. Then is adds a new address based
on the original author. For example, this message is send to Roelof
on the TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Finally, it changes the
Reply-To address to Chris on the TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
help make sure that replies get back to the list.



-- 
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.

Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1

If you hear an onion ring, answer it.


pgppACpFs4U0y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Luc
Good evening Roelof,
  
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 20:11:14 GMT+0200 (which was
20:11:14 where I live) Roelof Otten would write:
  
snipped a bit

RO When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
RO you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor
RO a setting for it)

Ah but in this case i need a different reply to address:  the  one
the list uses, otherwise i get replies to my address instead of to the
list.

But it's strange i only have the problem with that particular list.

-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com

Need a website?
http://www.w-orx.com
 
---
Powered by The Bat! version 2.12.00 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools. - Douglas Adams




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Luc,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:21:50 +0200GMT (23-8-2004, 20:21 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

RO When you don't want to redirect your mail to a different address than
RO you're using in the From header, you don't need a Reply-To header (nor
RO a setting for it)

L Ah but in this case i need a different reply to address:  the  one
L the list uses, otherwise i get replies to my address instead of to the
L list.

Depends on the configuration of the list. (And on the philosophy of
the list owner or the programmer of the list software)
There are three types of lists
1) Those that always set the reply-to to the list
2) Those that set the reply-to to the list when there isn't a reply-to
3) Those that never set a reply-to
It's a matter of thinking how ethical it is to change messages from
other senders. Generally speaking 1) is totally Windows and 3) is
totally Unix

L But it's strange i only have the problem with that particular list.

I bet it's *nix based.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 2.13 Lucky Beta/7
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Chris,

23-Aug-2004 20:17, you wrote:

 Finally, it changes the Reply-To address to Chris on the TBUDL
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to help make sure that replies get back to
 the list.

But the listmailer overwrites any reply-to address anyway. (see F9)

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: template problem

2004-08-23 Thread Luc
Good evening Roelof,
  
It was foretold that on 23-8-2004 @ 21:59:46 GMT+0200 (which was
21:59:46 where I live) Roelof Otten would write:
  
snipped a bit

RO Depends on the configuration of the list. (And on the philosophy of
RO the list owner or the programmer of the list software)
  
 %REPLYTO=%FROMNAME on list list  address%-

 fixed it in this case :-)
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com

Need a website?
http://www.w-orx.com
 
---
Powered by The Bat! version 2.12.00 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

You'd better learn secretarial skills or else get married. Modelling
agency, rejecting Marilyn Monroe in 1944.




Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


template problem

2004-06-08 Thread Luc
 Good evening list,

 I use a QT that has (among other things)

%Qinclude=Cds where cds :
 
 %TO=%TO=list address%CC=

 and

 %Qinclude='RTPOCDL' where RTPOCDL:

 %TO=''%TO='%OFROMNAME on css-discuss %SubPatt=#1#% list address'

 and %Qinclude=IE where IE:

 %IF:%TIME='hh:mm:ss'=04:00:00:%IF:'%TIME=hh:mm:ss'='11:59:59':'Good 
morning'%-%IF:%TIME='hh:mm:ss'=12:00:00:%IF:'%TIME=hh:mm:ss'='17:59:59':'Good
 
afternoon'%-%IF:%TIME='hh:mm:ss'=18:00:00:%IF:'%TIME=hh:mm:ss'='23:59:59':'Good
 
evening'%-%IF:%TIME='hh:mm:ss'=00:00:00:%IF:'%TIME=hh:mm:ss'='03:59:59':'Hello'%-
 %TOFNAME,

Since upgrading to version 2.11 from 1.63, it doesn't reproduce the
name of the recipient, but instead outputs the first digit of the
date.

So i get:

Good evening 3,

It was foretold that on 3-6-2004 @ 08:06:21 GMT-0700 (PDT) (which was
17:06:21 where I live) Luc would write:

instead of:

Good evening Luc,

Isn't the template compliant anymore with the new version?

-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
 http://www.dzinelabs.com
 

Powered by The Bat! version 2.11 with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 Service Pack 4 and using the best browser: Opera.

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein





Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Reply template problem

2003-11-27 Thread William Sigmund
Thomas,

Yes, my mistake, thanks.

-- 

William   
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Reply template problem

2003-11-27 Thread William Sigmund
Roelof,

RO In an AB template it should be easy. You can insert his/her name
RO without any macros. ;-)

I can't get anything I enter into the Reply template in the
AddressBook to appear in the message editor when I create a reply.

-- 

William   
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply template problem

2003-11-27 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo William,

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:33:34 +GMT (27-11-03, 8:33 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

WS I can't get anything I enter into the Reply template in the
WS AddressBook to appear in the message editor when I create a reply.

The most common reason for that is having multiple entries in your
AB(s) for the same address.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Reply template problem

2003-11-27 Thread William Sigmund
Roelof,

Thanks, I've found the problem.

-- 

William   
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply template problem

2003-11-27 Thread Tony Boom

Hello William,

  A reminder of what William Sigmund typed on:
  26 November 2003 at 22:08:03 GMT +

WS Is there anything I have overlooked?

 %TOFNAME

-- 

Best regards,Tony.   
    
 Using The Bat! v2.01.50  ©2ØØ3 - AWB





Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Reply template problem

2003-11-26 Thread William Sigmund
Hi,

I can't get my reply template to insert the recipient's name into
either a folder template or an address book template.

I use this to get the first name from the address book:

%AbFROMFirstName

Is there anything I have overlooked?

-- 

William 
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply template problem

2003-11-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo William,

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:08:03 +GMT (26-11-03, 23:08 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:

WS I can't get my reply template to insert the recipient's name into
WS either a folder template or an address book template.

In an AB template it should be easy. You can insert his/her name
without any macros. ;-)

WS I use this to get the first name from the address book:
WS %AbFROMFirstName

You want to get the first name of the recipient in a reply, that means
you can get it the current To or from the old from, so the macro would
be %ABToFirstName (the current To) or %ABOFromFirstName ( the Old From)
When you're using this in an ABTemplate you're sure that you've got an
AB listing for your recipient, but when you're using this in a folder
or account template, it's possible that you haven't got a AB listing
for the original poster, so you could use:
%ABOFromFirstName=OFromFName this macro'll take the first name from
the AB and when that's not possible it takes the first name from the
old from header.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Reply template problem

2003-11-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello William,

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:08:03 + GMT (27/11/2003, 05:08 +0700 GMT),
William Sigmund wrote:

 I use this to get the first name from the address book:

 %AbFROMFirstName

This would be your own name; you are the sender in the FROM field. If
you do not have your own address in the AB, this macro will return an
empty string.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

BALDERDASH: Rapidly receding hairline

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.01.26
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM





Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: reply template problem

2002-08-13 Thread Paul Wilson

Tuesday, 8/13/02, 3:20 PM

Hi Marck,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, at 12:32:58 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:32 AM where I live) 
you wrote about: 'reply template problem'

MDP ... but do the default account templates apply across the board? Do
MDP you have anything in your address book for any of the variants that
MDP may be distracting TB?

The only constant in the address book entries is that my last name is
somewhere in it. Each entry is unique, eg: Paul Wilson, Pwilson,
pgwilson, etc. Each handle or nickname is not even a variant of those.

By the way, I had to find this message in my archive account. It never
arrived in the account that it was sent from. I think there may be a
problem with that account.

 The reply will have the proper date and name, subject info. The
 Quotes, cursor and cookie macros don't work. -snip-

MDP There's no reason why that would happen with consistent templates.

For testing I have pasted the same template in all of the address book
entries, plus the group reply, the account reply and folder reply,
(which normally is blank) Same result, only a portion of the template
works.

MDP If that were really the reply template being used then you would have
MDP no problem. I think that something else is kicking in. Check your
MDP address book. Check the various account templates.

The problem is only with that one account. A reply between any of the
other accounts works fine. This problem account is the oldest one. It
may be time to clean house :)
-- 
 Your communication is greatly appreciated,
   Paul
I have a photogenic memory.
Powered by The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: reply template problem

2002-08-13 Thread Paul Wilson

Tuesday, 8/13/02, 3:53 PM

Hi Allie,
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, at 07:23:10 [GMT -0500] (which was 5:23 AM where I live) 
you wrote about: 'reply template problem'

ACM So what templates do you use? Address book?
Yes!

ACM Are you saying that your folder templates are empty?
Yes!

ACM then create a quick template with handle name 'sigstrip'. Copy and
ACM paste in it the following:
Nice QT works great except on that one account. In my reply to Mark I
noted that a reply between any of the other accounts works fine. It
seems to be just this one account.

ACM You weren't clear either on whether or not this same template is being
ACM used when generating replies that were OK in content.

To test I pasted that template everywhere, ad book entries, group,
account, and even the folders. Still the same result, that one account
does not act properly.

I think I am going to delete that entire account and rebuild it from
scratch. It is my oldest account.

Thank you Allie

-- 
 Your communication is greatly appreciated,
   Paul
Nobody knows what you look like.  That makes some people,...nervous.
Powered by The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: reply template problem

2002-08-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Paul,

@11 August 2002, 20:01 -0700 (04:01 UK time)  Paul Wilson in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL Members:

 I have several accounts set up. Each has a unique variation of my
 name.

... but do the default account templates apply across the board? Do
you have anything in your address book for any of the variants that
may be distracting TB?

 ... snip

 The reply will have the proper date and name, subject info. The
 Quotes, cursor and cookie macros don't work. No quotes, the cursor
 is at the top of the page and where the cookie should it says
 (E:\batbu\tags.txt) which is the proper path and file.

There's no reason why that would happen with consistent templates.

 ... snip
 **reply template*
 ... snip

If that were really the reply template being used then you would have
no problem. I think that something else is kicking in. Check your
address book. Check the various account templates.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.1.90-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE9VktqOeQkq5KdzaARAj6bAJwNi6feI3jOmUcT1aKJTi5aYGTxBgCffYHy
kHeWzdl2vKlU3y6mPDaKiOw=
=KRjL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



reply template problem

2002-08-10 Thread Paul Wilson

Saturday, 8/10/02, 7:57 PM
Hi TBUDL Members,
I posted this on the beta list and got no response, so I will try
here.

I have several accounts set up. Each has a unique variation of my name.
No duplicate handles or address book entries. No Folder Templates
involved here, (I don't use them)

If I send a test message from one account to another, all works fine.
If I reply to that message, Highlighting and pressing F4 only a portion
of the template works.

The reply will have the proper date and name, subject info. The
Quotes, cursor and cookie macros don't work. No quotes, the cursor is
at the top of the page and where the cookie should it says
(E:\batbu\tags.txt) which is the proper path and file.

A reply to any other message, including one from myself at work, works
perfectly as expected.

I am not sure this is not a protection in case a person had auto reply
set up you could end up with a buzzillion replies, or if there is
something I am missing.

The template is below. Any help appreciated.

**reply template*

%DOW, %DATESHORT, %TIME
Hi
%TOFNAME,%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS
On%SUBPATT=2, at %SUBPATT=3 [GMT%SUBPATT=4] (which was %OTIME where I
live) 
you wrote about:
'%setpattregexp=(?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\])?(\s*(re|ha|rcpt|fwd|fw)(\[\d*\])?:\s*)*(.*)%RegExpBlindMatch=%OSubj%SubPatt=5'

%quotes=%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)
%CURSOR
-- 
 Your communication is greatly appreciated,
   %FROMFNAME
%COOKIE=E:\batbu\tags.txt
On the wings of The Bat! Version: %THEBATVERSION
Running on: %WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME,%WINDOWSMAJORVERSION,%WINDOWSMINORVERSION

End*
-- 
 Your communication is appreciated,
  Paul
Cross between a Vulcan and a Tribble?  Fuzzy logic.
Powered by The Bat! v1.62/Beta1 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information: 
 http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-12 Thread Gerard


ON Sunday, May 12, 2002, 4:06:37 AM, you wrote:

TM I also did a search in the address book tool for perl.org and found
TM only the one entry.

As far as I can see you will only find address book entries that match
that email address. It wil not check any templates and that must be the
cause.

It is possible to have templates for address book groups. Since you had
now 2 email address that showed the same problem you should check the
group(s) in the address book. Are they both in the same group? Then check
that groups properties |right-click| properties| and check the reply
template there and maybe in some other groups.

Also keep in mind that one template can make a call for an Quick
Template that changes address.


Hope this helps.

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 

Insert Cookie Here-- Sex on television can't hurt you unless you fall off. 


 Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@11 May 2002, 23:00:19 -0400 (04:00 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ... I sent him a message, and when it went out it had the perl list
 in the bcc field!  And today, I sent a msg to some people at my
 church (again not associated with the perl list and that msg had a
 bcc to the perl list!) -

Slight jingle jangle of distant bells here... This is reminiscent of
the address book setting to Add secondary addresses to BCC... Could
the records for your dad / someone at your church have the perl
address in it as a secondary?

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE83NfsOeQkq5KdzaARAvSpAJ4v2LzATeVtzoorf+os292jT67RTwCgw42E
VMKopkG8F95S7pXkSvJ7bQY=
=qjTE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-11 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Saturday, May 11, 2002 at 4:35:54 AM.

MDP Slight jingle jangle of distant bells here... This is reminiscent of
MDP the address book setting to Add secondary addresses to BCC... Could
MDP the records for your dad / someone at your church have the perl
MDP address in it as a secondary?

anything is possible, but...
I just checked the address records for all 4 people that were
associated with the 2 messages I had this problem with, and there was
only one email address in the E-Mail Address(es) field of each.

I also did a search in the address book tool for perl.org and found
only the one entry.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
How come wrong numbers are never busy?

--



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Friday, May 3, 2002 at 10:43:32 PM.

 They all look like this.  Are the folder templates filled in from
 the Account templates?  That is where I defined this.

MDP Okay - that makes sense and matches. I still think you have a rogue
MDP Reply template in the properties of one of your folders. Or perhaps
MDP it leaked into an address book entry?

Ok, it happened again (BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == cut from kludge)
and was almost a big problem this time (financial info included). I
was saved because the list thought the msg was too big.

Is there any easy way for me to check through everything for a string?
for instance [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

I am having no luck looking around manually (not even sure what I
would be looking for, but have been looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

TIA

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
Why isn't there mouse-flavored cat food?



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Friday, May 10, 2002, Tim Musson wrote...

 Ok, it happened again (BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == cut from kludge)
 and was almost a big problem this time (financial info included). I
 was saved because the list thought the msg was too big.

Are you using folder templates, or address book templates?

 Is there any easy way for me to check through everything for a string?
 for instance [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

Is it only your dad's address causing this problem, or is it all of
them?

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@10 May 2002, 16:03:21 -0400 (21:03 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Ok, it happened again (BCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] == cut from kludge)
 and was almost a big problem this time (financial info included). I
 was saved because the list thought the msg was too big.

 Is there any easy way for me to check through everything for a string?
 for instance [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

 I am having no luck looking around manually (not even sure what I
 would be looking for, but have been looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

How are you with GREP? Or some kind of file search tool. Look for
BCC in your ABD files and your CFG files at a raw level if you can.
Context may show you what's going on there.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE83DVBOeQkq5KdzaARAhwfAKDg+f/L2MRGTToF8bZlBefBCyxBOQCgm1ej
aLJyj6NhPHaEr6DBxijhQw8=
=5HNi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Friday, May 10, 2002 at 5:01:51 PM.

 I am having no luck looking around manually (not even sure what I
 would be looking for, but have been looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

MDP How are you with GREP? Or some kind of file search tool.

been a *nix admin (NetWare  M$ Win too) for the last 15 years or
so...  grep is very much my friend (vi too g).

MDP Look for BCC in your ABD files and your CFG files at a raw
MDP level if you can. Context may show you what's going on there.

That is what I was looking for (which files) - thanks, will check it
out.

[as I put this msg in the outbox and check the kludges...]

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
Why don't you ever see the headline Psychic Wins Lottery?



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Jonathan,

My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Personal
to write the following on Friday, May 10, 2002 at 4:10:25 PM.

JA Are you using folder templates, or address book templates?

As far as I know, neither...  I only ever did anything with the
templates in the Account Properties window.

I do however have a Quick Template called 'perl' that looks like this
 %TO=%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]%CC=
so how/what is putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a BCC field is beyond me.

JA Is it only your dad's address causing this problem, or is it all of
JA them?

Nope, this thread started because I replied to my dad and put my
brother's address in the To field also, but today I gen'd a new msg to
two people from my address book and it did the same thing.

Also, I checked each person's templates and could find nothing...

-frustrated-

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
Why don't you ever see the headline Psychic Wins Lottery?



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Fri, 10 May 2002, Tim Musson wrote:

 Hey Jonathan,

 JA Are you using folder templates, or address book templates?

 I do however have a Quick Template called 'perl' that looks like this
  %TO=%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]%CC=
 so how/what is putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a BCC field is beyond me.

This may be a really really stupid question.  But doesn't that macro clear
the TO field, set it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and clear the CC field? If so,
why would you want to use this on an account template, and not just create
an address book template just for [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or have I completely
missed the functions in this macro?  As for it dropping the address into
the BCC, I have absolutely no idea ;)

 -frustrated-

Understandable... I'd be in exactly the same state if personal information
was getting to the wrong people ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Jonathan,

My MUA believes you used (X-Mailer not set)
to write the following on Friday, May 10, 2002 at 9:54:13 PM.

 I do however have a Quick Template called 'perl' that looks like this
  %TO=%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]%CC=
 so how/what is putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a BCC field is beyond me.

JA This may be a really really stupid question.  But doesn't that macro clear
JA the TO field, set it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and clear the CC field?

Not a stupid question g
And, yes it does clear both the To: and Cc: fields, then put
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: field.

JA If so, why would you want to use this on an account template, and
JA not just create an address book template just for
JA [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

because I usually do a reply to a message (kind of like this one), not
a new message from the address book.

Here is an example cut from the kludges (with names  add's changed to
protect somebody or other... :-)
From: C O [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: E W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

...Reply-To: not set like on TBUDL...

JA Or have I completely missed the functions in this macro?

I know, it sounds odd, but it has to do with the list software and how
it is configured... For some reason (and yes, the moderators and users
are in agreement on this... - the 'why' question pops up every few
months, and I seem to recall RFC's or some such being quoted) that
comunity (and may others like it from what I understand) have the
default reply to listed as the person who sent the message to the
list! So if I want to reply to the list, I need to clear the To: field
(and frequently the Cc: filed) and address it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

JA As for it dropping the address into the BCC, I have absolutely no
JA idea ;)

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
Buffet.  A French word that means Get up  get it yourself!



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Jonathan Angliss

On Fri, 10 May 2002, Tim Musson wrote:

 Hey Jonathan,

 JA This may be a really really stupid question.  But doesn't that macro clear
 JA the TO field, set it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and clear the CC field?

 Not a stupid question g
 And, yes it does clear both the To: and Cc: fields, then put
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: field.

Gotcha... Doesn't that make more work on your part if you just wanted to
reply to say your dad?  I mean, you have to go ahead, strip out the list,
readd your dad's email etc etc.  Or does he have a special AB template?

 JA If so, why would you want to use this on an account template, and
 JA not just create an address book template just for
 JA [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

 because I usually do a reply to a message (kind of like this one), not
 a new message from the address book.

But you can set reply templates as well.  I use them on here, and on other
lists (even ones that don't have the reply-to set)

 JA Or have I completely missed the functions in this macro?

 I know, it sounds odd, but it has to do with the list software and how
 it is configured... For some reason (and yes, the moderators and users
 are in agreement on this... - the 'why' question pops up every few
 months, and I seem to recall RFC's or some such being quoted) that
 comunity (and may others like it from what I understand) have the
 default reply to listed as the person who sent the message to the
 list! So if I want to reply to the list, I need to clear the To: field
 (and frequently the Cc: filed) and address it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Actually, it doesn't sound odd at all.  I'm on about 3 mailing lists that
are setup in exactly the same way.  Purely because it gets a lot of
outside posters, it forces the mail client to reply to that outside poster
instead of the list, in case the poster isn't subbed on the list.

Can you not create an AB template (for Reply) for [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
then in that template, get it to clear everything?  I'll test it on Monday
on one of the lists I'm on, but I cannot see a reason it wouldn't work if
say you hit the REPLY-ALL button, instead of just the reply... but I could
be mistaken on how that kind of setup would work.  I'll give it a go ;)

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Tim,

My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60h) Personal
to write the following on Friday, May 10, 2002 at 9:34:02 PM.

 I am having no luck looking around manually (not even sure what I
 would be looking for, but have been looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]).

MDP How are you with GREP? Or some kind of file search tool.

MDP Look for BCC in your ABD files and your CFG files at a raw
MDP level if you can. Context may show you what's going on there.

TM That is what I was looking for (which files) - thanks, will check it
TM out.

I checked all files in my TB folder, my TB/Mail folder, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] folder.  No luck finding any BCC string
associated with a perl string...  A lot of the files are binary or at
least not ascii, so I am not sure the search was all that through.  I
used grep and TextPad to search.

Any other ideas? or am I back to searching the properties of a hundred
folders, etc.?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
How do you make Windows faster ? Throw it harder



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-10 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Jonathan,

My MUA believes you used (X-Mailer not set)
to write the following on Friday, May 10, 2002 at 10:29:49 PM.

 Not a stupid question g
 And, yes it does clear both the To: and Cc: fields, then put
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: field.

JA Gotcha... Doesn't that make more work on your part if you just wanted to
JA reply to say your dad?  I mean, you have to go ahead, strip out the list,
JA readd your dad's email etc etc.  Or does he have a special AB template?

Nope, dad is not on the perl list or even associated with it - that is
part of the problem.  I sent him a message, and when it went out it had
the perl list in the bcc field!  And today, I sent a msg to some
people at my church (again not associated with the perl list and that
msg had a bcc to the perl list!) - this one had financial info
attached.  Fortunately, the perl list has a size limitation and
rejected it!

I only use the 'perl' QT when repling to the messages on the perl
list.  I do my reply, put the string 'perl' on a blank line, then with
the cursor on the same line hit ctrl+space and it fixes the
To:/Cc: fields...

JA But you can set reply templates as well.  I use them on here, and on other
JA lists (even ones that don't have the reply-to set)

Will look into that, I seem to recall asking on TBUDL and this was the
solution that was presented.  Probably 18m - 2yrs ago.

JA Can you not create an AB template (for Reply) for [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
JA then in that template, get it to clear everything?  I'll test it on Monday
JA on one of the lists I'm on, but I cannot see a reason it wouldn't work if
JA say you hit the REPLY-ALL button, instead of just the reply... but I could
JA be mistaken on how that kind of setup would work.  I'll give it a go ;)

Will look at it next time I get on my ThinkPad, time for me to shut
down. g

Thanks

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
Junk: stuff we throw away. Stuff: junk we keep. 



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-04 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Friday, May 3, 2002 at 10:43:32 PM.

MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

MDP Hi Tim,

MDP @04 May 2002, 22:26:28 -0400 (03:26 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 They all look like this.  Are the folder templates filled in from
 the Account templates?  That is where I defined this.

MDP snip

MDP Okay - that makes sense and matches. I still think you have a
MDP rogue Reply template in the properties of one of your folders.

That was my thought, but couldn't find anything.

MDP Or perhaps it leaked into an address book entry?

Will look around there some.  I did find in my [EMAIL PROTECTED] add
book entry that I had previously filled in the templates, but they
were un checked and all grayed out.  I deleted them, so will monitor
things -- My biggest problem is it only happens once a month or so.

 %WRAPPED=%Quotes%Cursor

MDP NB: %WRAPPED=%Quotes will only wrap the first paragraph of the
MDP quotes...

I wondered about that, is there a way to reflow all the paragraphs?

Did you know you seem to be missing the space on your sig?

MDP - --
MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
MDP SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
MDP ·
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
MDP Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)

MDP iD8DBQE800rWOeQkq5KdzaARAor7AJ9/hfGcwbc/jMdrehF7WOTQ8IB/+QCgnjKh
MDP sFR/lkszax0yHJ+i/kmNS/I=
MDP =NhKm
MDP -END PGP SIGNATURE-



MDP 
MDP Current Ver: 1.60i
MDP FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
MDP Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
MDP Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
What goes around usually gets dizzy and falls over.



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-04 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@04 May 2002, 15:54:52 -0400 (20:54 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 %WRAPPED=%Quotes%Cursor

MDP NB: %WRAPPED=%Quotes will only wrap the first paragraph of the
MDP quotes...

 I wondered about that, is there a way to reflow all the paragraphs?

Yes, but using the recursive wrap macro I already sent to this list
yesterday in another thread. Let's see if I can find the message ID
for you... here - [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Did you know you seem to be missing the space on your sig?

How do you mean? The PGP re-written cut mark? That's usual - done by
PGP and unavoidable. You have to use a specific quote macro to
re-define what a cut mark is to have it work on a PGP signed
message. Blame Mr. Zimmerman.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE81Es9OeQkq5KdzaARAtXKAJ0T0bevUmKbVoZzK2H9yC2ggvXWGgCeOvyX
YImh4FMRCZLVZmlsspng9WI=
=bzVD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Tim Musson

Hey TBUDL,

  I seem to be having an odd problem with a QT I think...

  It is called perl, and consists of the following:
  %TO=%TO=[EMAIL PROTECTED]%CC=

  The Problem:

  I got a message from my father, and did a reply to all.
  Next I checked the addresses.
   dad was in the To: field and a bunch of others was in the CC:
   field.  I deleted all but one from CC, and moved him to To: and
   hit Ok (then I went back in and checked!).
Sent the message.

  Now as I am checking my Perl list folder, there is my message!
  Looking at the headers, it has [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CC: field!
  Checking my sent folder shows the same addressees.

  This is not the first time I have inadvertently sent to that list
  (and the problem is only with that list).

  Anyone have any thoughts?  Thanks!

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! eMail v1.60h
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
GUYS: No shirt, no service.  GALS: No shirt, no charge.



Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@03 May 2002, 08:59:49 -0400 (13:59 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   This is not the first time I have inadvertently sent to that list
   (and the problem is only with that list).

   Anyone have any thoughts?  Thanks!

Yes. Get rid of all and any folder templates!

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE80o1gOeQkq5KdzaARAo5zAJ0eweXglOGgJCD592d7Pr6DwyxSewCgiKcf
sPvDb0g2xOfyi6RXIuhPiUs=
=791B
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Friday, May 3, 2002 at 9:15:10 AM.

MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

MDP Hi Tim,

MDP @03 May 2002, 08:59:49 -0400 (13:59 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   This is not the first time I have inadvertently sent to that list
   (and the problem is only with that list).

   Anyone have any thoughts?  Thanks!

MDP Yes. Get rid of all and any folder templates!

Oops, I should have mentioned that my 'Perl' template is not a folder
template.

Another question... How do I tell if I have folder templates? I did a
right click | Properties on a number of my folders, and checked the
'Template' tab.  The are all the same, and look like this:

%TOFName,

  %Cursor

-- 
%FromAddr
Using The Bat! eMail v%TheBatVersion
%WindowsPlatformName %WindowsMajorVersion.%WindowsMinorVersion.%WindowsBuildNumber 
(%WindowsCsdVersion)
%Cookies=D:\http\OneLiners.txt

Because of how the %Cookies line looks I am led to believe that this
is filled in from somewhere.  I just recently got a new ThinkPad and
put the OneLiners.txt file on D, old ThinkPad had it in My Documents
on C.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
What else can you do at 3:00 am?



Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@03 May 2002, 11:50:45 -0400 (16:50 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Anyone have any thoughts?  Thanks!

MDP Yes. Get rid of all and any folder templates!

 Oops, I should have mentioned that my 'Perl' template is not a
 folder template.

Okay - but it's the kind of thing that only usually happens when
you've got a folder reply template butting in.

 Another question... How do I tell if I have folder templates? I did
 a right click | Properties on a number of my folders, and checked
 the 'Template' tab.

That's how you do it.

 The are all the same, and look like this:

 %TOFName,

   %Cursor

snip

I'll wager that's your account default template... mind you, that's
just the New message template. How about the reply one?

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE80rk7OeQkq5KdzaARArrCAJ4pkgi5eLeVKFmvp4msUGpS1szmHwCghfhh
i+l8ZKcnpbXcmDxUpKbSKEo=
=ZBal
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60h
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Tim Musson

Hey Marck,

My MUA believes you used Ritlabs SecureBat! (v1.60d/iKey1000)
to write the following on Friday, May 3, 2002 at 12:22:16 PM.

MDP I'll wager that's your account default template... mind you, that's
MDP just the New message template.

Agreed.

MDP How about the reply one?

They all look like this.  Are the folder templates filled in from the
Account templates?  That is where I defined this.

Hey %OFromFName,

My MUA believes you used %SETPATTREGEXP=(?im)^(X\-Mailer)\:\s(.*?)$%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS
X-Mailer: (X-Mailer not set)%-%SUBPATT=2
to write the following on %ODateEn at %OTimeLongEn.

%WRAPPED=%Quotes%Cursor

-- 
%FromAddr
MUA = TB! v%TheBatVersion (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
%WindowsPlatformName %WindowsMajorVersion.%WindowsMinorVersion.%WindowsBuildNumber 
(%WindowsCsdVersion)
%Cookies=D:\http\OneLiners.txt
%singlere

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MUA = TB! v1.60h (www.RitLabs.com/The_Bat)
Windows 2000 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 2)
I was the next door kid's imaginary friend.



Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Quick Template problem...?

2002-05-03 Thread Marck D Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Tim,

@04 May 2002, 22:26:28 -0400 (03:26 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 They all look like this.  Are the folder templates filled in from
 the Account templates?  That is where I defined this.

snip

Okay - that makes sense and matches. I still think you have a rogue
Reply template in the properties of one of your folders. Or perhaps
it leaked into an address book entry?

 %WRAPPED=%Quotes%Cursor

NB: %WRAPPED=%Quotes will only wrap the first paragraph of the
quotes...

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator
SB! v1.60d/iKey1000-5523848F0B1 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
·
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQE800rWOeQkq5KdzaARAor7AJ9/hfGcwbc/jMdrehF7WOTQ8IB/+QCgnjKh
sFR/lkszax0yHJ+i/kmNS/I=
=NhKm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current Ver: 1.60i
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com



Re: Template problem

2002-04-18 Thread Luc

 Good morning Luc,
  
It was foretold that on 16-4-2002 @ 17:13:08 GMT+0200 (which was
17:13:08 where I live) Luc wrote and spread these wise comments on
Template problem:
  
snipped a bit
L Weird thing is that i have several contacts set up this way and they
L  all work fine.  It's only this particular contact that keeps refusing
L  to do it.

 Problem solved. I forgot to click in the ditor so the template didn't
 came up DUH.
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.

I'm a try-sexual. I'll try anything once. - Samantha Jones (Kim
Cattrall) - Sex  the City (TV show)




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Template problem

2002-04-17 Thread Luc

 Good evening Luc,
  
It was foretold that on 16-4-2002 @ 17:13:08 GMT+0200 (which was
17:13:08 where I live) Luc wrote and spread these wise comments on
Template problem:
  
snipped a bit
L I have on one of my contacts attached a reply template with following
L  macro in it: %NOUSEPGP. Strange thing is that the macr doesn't work,
L  so each time i send a reply, the PGP menu pops up (unless i disable
L  it in the privacy menu).

 reply is to be read as forward. Sorry.
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Lucmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.

To get nowhere, follow the crowd. - Frank Baer.




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Template problem

2002-04-16 Thread Luc

 Good evening list,
   
 I have on one of my contacts attached a reply template with following
 macro in it: %NOUSEPGP. Strange thing is that the macr doesn't work,
 so each time i send a reply, the PGP menu pops up (unless i disable
 it in the privacy menu).

 Weird thing is that i have several contacts set up this way and they
 all work fine.  It's only this particular contact that keeps refusing
 to do it.

 FYI, it's a yahoo contact:bla bla -reject-numbers @yahoogroups.com
 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best browser: Opera.

Men and women mix just like vinegar and water. That is why you need
to keep mixing them. Otherwise, they will separate. - Alan Alda
(1936-) - US actor




Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




%Quotesstyle=text in AB template problem

2000-10-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello BatListers,

 I cannot get the following macro to work in an AB reply
 template.

 %QUOTESTYLE="=test"%QUOTES

 However, I can get it to work as a manual QT.

Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOfmFGJccVS5MnN+dEQJgCwCg+RL7K4P7SPKsZt57my4HB/BZl0oAoK5f
DNZC3h1UCd/NXI1S0gdsZojB
=95a3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: %Quotesstyle=text in AB template problem

2000-10-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick, Thanks for considering my problem.

  Inaposttime   stamped   10/27/00   re:
  "%Quotesstyle=text  in  AB  template  problem" you
  wrote:

Nick I'm  certainly  not  an  expert  at this, but have you
Nick tried putting the %QUOTES macro on a separate line:

Nick %QUOTESTYLE="test"
Nick %QUOTES

  As  far  as  I  know,  splitting  %Quotes off to a
  separate  line  doesn't  affect any change. What's
  a  mystery  to me is that it works in a QT but not
  in an AB reply template.

Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOfmrG5ccVS5MnN+dEQLUuQCg1QD8q/teyWw+vfHn3PFCT2hq8E8AoOYR
GuxVR4BNl6Zy3+zpA1J5LV1R
=ZRQ7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: %Quotesstyle=text in AB template problem

2000-10-27 Thread Nick Andriash

On October 27, 2000, at 9:19:31 AM, Jan Rifkinson Wrote:

JR As far as I know, splitting %Quotes off to a separate line doesn't
JR affect any change. What's a mystery to me is that it works in a QT but
JR not in an AB reply template.

I had a similar problem a while back involving an AB Template not working
properly, and after a thorough testing, the problem was identified as the
AB entry itself, strange as that may seem. You can try re-creating the AB
entry and re-enter the reply template and see if that helps. Aside from
that, I have nothing more to offer... sorry. :o(


Nick


N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.47 | PGP 7.0 | Win 98 SE ]
 Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID:  0x7BA3FDCE  
_

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: %Quotesstyle=text in AB template problem

2000-10-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Nick,

  Inaposttime   stamped   10/27/00   re:
  "%Quotesstyle=text  in  AB  template  problem" you
  wrote:

Nick I   had  a  similar  problem  [...]  the  problem  was
Nick identified as the AB entry itself, strange as that may
Nick seem.  You  can  try  re-creating  the  AB  entry  and
Nick re-enter the reply template and see if that helps.

  That did it Nick; very strange. Hmm.

  Thanks.


Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP ID: 0x4C9CDF9D
And TB! 1.47 Halloween Edition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i

iQA/AwUBOfm5y5ccVS5MnN+dEQIlhQCgtZeCklPEZm3LGNphiTpTZeasafcAoM0n
ktj/QkbmrTOGvKFLdAWw7Boc
=lTwj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: %Quotesstyle=text in AB template problem

2000-10-27 Thread Nick Andriash

On October 27, 2000, at 10:22:01 AM, Jan Rifkinson Wrote:

JR That did it Nick; very strange. Hmm.

JR   Thanks.

You're welcome... glad I could help.


Nick


N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.47 | PGP 7.0 | Win 98 SE ]
 Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID:  0x7BA3FDCE  
_

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





A shared template problem

1999-09-24 Thread Denis V. Petelin

Dear TBUDL members! (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

When I try to edit an existing quick template and press ok - it shows
a box with such text:

A shared template using the handle "lala" already exists

If "share with other accounts" is unchecked - everything is ok.

Can you confirm this?




Sincerely,
Denis V. Petelin (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Special thanks go to:
=
The Bat! version 1.35
working under Windows 95 4 0  B



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re: A shared template problem

1999-09-24 Thread Steve Lamb

Friday, September 24, 1999, 12:04:48 PM, Claude wrote:
  Zankoku na tenshi no Yoni, shonen yo Shinma ni nare..!  :P~


 Flying with The Bat! v1.36 Beta/4  under Polish Windows 98

 Is that polish... or _japanese_ ? :-D

If I had to guess based on my Anime roots, tenshi and Shinma both suggest
to me Japanese.

tenchi - from the series Tenchi Muyo.
Shinma - from the series Vampire Princess Miyu.

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--




Re[4]: A shared template problem

1999-09-24 Thread Claude

Hi, all,
On 25/09/1999, at 01:48,
MaXxX (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
as the numerous people stopped applausing, told them:

M Claude wrote:

  Zankoku na tenshi no Yoni, shonen yo Shinma ni nare..!  :P~
 Flying with The Bat! v1.36 Beta/4  under Polish Windows 98

C Is that polish... or _japanese_ ? :-D

M That's japanese :)

M I'll bow to you if you know what that tagline means :P

I think this is a little bit erotic, isn't it ? :)))




-- 
Best regards,

Claude.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Thought of the day (randomly french or english)
Une classe opprimée qui ne s'efforcerait pas d'apprendre à manier les armes, 
de posséder des armes, ne mériterait que d'être traitée en esclave 
Lénine.



-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--