Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Finally!

Thanks for keeping tabs on this, Steve.

Just remember folks: any publicity is good publicity, or as a British writer
put it, it's always good to see your name in the papers, other than in the
obituaries. (And cold fusion has been in the obits countless times.)

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread OrionWorks
 Finally!

 Thanks for keeping tabs on this, Steve.

 Just remember folks: any publicity is good publicity, or as a British writer
 put it, it's always good to see your name in the papers, other than in the
 obituaries. (And cold fusion has been in the obits countless times.)

 - Jed

Steve, or Jed

Any speculation as to why 60 Minutes has decided, now, to do an
article on this subject? Was there a specific tipping point, or have
they been quietly watching this field for some time now. Cumulative
effect?

I would love to know whom they have interviewed. Guess we shall soon know.

My sense is that it will probably be a positive installment. 60 M
often seems to side with the underdog.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
Here is the LENR-CANR news section announcement. Note that I included 
the link to the CBS website announcement.




CBS 60 Minutes reports on cold fusion

April 2009

The CBS newsmagazine 60 minutes will report on cold fusion on April 
19, 2009. See: 
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/08/60minutes/main13502.shtmlhttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/07/08/60minutes/main13502.shtml


COLD FUSION IS HOT AGAIN - Presented in 1989 as a revolutionary new 
source of energy, cold fusion was quickly dismissed as junk science. 
But today, the buzz among scientists is that these experiments 
produce a real physical effect that could lead to monumental 
breakthroughs in energy production. Scott Pelley reports. Denise 
Schrier Cetta is the producer.


A detailed description of the broadcast is here: 
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2009/60MinutesTurnsUptheHeat.shtmlhttp://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2009/60MinutesTurnsUptheHeat.shtml


CBS asked Prof. Robert Duncan to do an independent evaluation of the 
literature and to visit researchers and experiments. Duncan has not 
performed cold fusion experiments himself and had the impression that 
the original claims were mistaken. He now says I am convinced that 
this excess-heat effect is real.


Most experts who have conducted independent evaluations of cold 
fusion have concluded the effect is real, notably Garwin, and 
Gerisher, who wrote: In spite of my earlier conclusion, -- and that 
of the majority of scientists, -- that the phenomena reported by 
Fleischmann and Pons in 1989 depended either on measurement errors or 
were of chemical origin, there is now undoubtedly overwhelming 
indications that nuclear processes take place in the metal alloys. 
See: 
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GerischerHiscoldfusi.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GerischerHiscoldfusi.pdf


Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell

OrionWorks wrote:


Any speculation as to why 60 Minutes has decided, now, to do an
article on this subject?


They have been working on it since before ICCF14. I do not know what 
triggered their interest at this particular time but I know they have 
been in contact with many researchers such as Mike Melich over the 
years. People like Melich have done a lot for the field, cultivating 
interest in high places. The people at CBS do their homework, unlike 
many other reporters. It must have cost them a fortune to produce 
this short segment.




I would love to know whom they have interviewed. Guess we shall soon know.


Krivit's coverage mentions the person I think is most important: 
Robert Duncan. Not that I consider him the preeminent expert on 
anything like that but he is an outsider to the field which gives him 
credibility. Of course now that he says he believes it, the skeptics 
will say he is an insider who has lost all credibility.


Krivit mentioned that fellow Dwight Williams from the Discovery 
Channel broadcast:


http://science.discovery.com/videos/brink-news-evidence-of-nuclear-fusion.html

I wrote about him elsewhere (or was it here?):

This show is generally supportive, but the interviewer talks to a 
DOE physicist Dr. Dwight Williams, who claims that cold fusion was 
never replicated. Clearly he did not bother to read the peer-reviewed 
literature. Scientists get their information from the mass media as 
often as anyone. They seldom bother to look at journal papers.


- Jed



[Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell

The people at Energetics Technology put the video preview on their front page:

http://superwavefusion.com/

This is one of the few groups of researchers in cold fusion who have 
a knack for public relations. Plus they know how to do a solid 
demonstration as well as a solid experiment. The two are not quite 
the same. They did a great job impressing Prof. Duncan! I told Tanya 
congratulations.


I found something a little unexpected in the website. Click on the video here:

http://superwavefusion.com/the-process/

It is a bla, bla, bla conventional explanation of cold fusion. Then 
at 1:10 (timestamp from the end of the video) it says the deuterons 
begin to move more collectively, like a school of fish and it gets 
interesting.


I am not sure what this refers to. Perhaps the Chubb theory?

- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread OrionWorks
From Jed,

 The people at Energetics Technology put the video preview on their front
 page:

 http://superwavefusion.com/

 This is one of the few groups of researchers in cold fusion who have a knack
 for public relations. Plus they know how to do a solid demonstration as well
 as a solid experiment. The two are not quite the same. They did a great job
 impressing Prof. Duncan! I told Tanya congratulations.

 I found something a little unexpected in the website. Click on the video
 here:

 http://superwavefusion.com/the-process/

 It is a bla, bla, bla conventional explanation of cold fusion. Then at 1:10
 (timestamp from the end of the video) it says the deuterons begin to move
 more collectively, like a school of fish and it gets interesting.

 I am not sure what this refers to. Perhaps the Chubb theory?

I believe I've seen this video before, or at least a variation of it.

What does Chubb's theory entail?

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell

OrionWorks wrote:


 It is a bla, bla, bla conventional explanation of cold fusion. Then at 1:10
 (timestamp from the end of the video) it says the deuterons begin to move
 more collectively, like a school of fish and it gets interesting.

 I am not sure what this refers to. Perhaps the Chubb theory?

I believe I've seen this video before, or at least a variation of it.

What does Chubb's theory entail?


Honestly, God only knows -- that level of physics is far over my head 
-- but it sounds a bit like a school of fish to me.


It involves a bunch of deuterons with overlapping wave functions, 
which lose their identity and begin acting as one, sort of like 
people joining the Hare Krishna cult (or religion if it is tax 
deductible). The heat is dispersed over millions of deuterons instead 
of originating at a single location which is why it does not produce 
a sharp 24 MeV jolt in a single particle.


For more information, see Scott  Talbot Chubb's papers.

- Jed



[Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
If 60 Minutes has a major effect on public opinion, and helps free 
up funding for the field, that will not surprise me. But it will be 
ironic. It will demonstrate that scientists and decision makers in 
government tend to be more influenced by the mass media than by 
scientific publications.


The tide does seem to be turning. Press coverage is more friendly 
than it used to be. More facts and fewer rumors are reported. But 
funding is still dreadfully restricted and I still fear that the 
researchers will not live long enough to make significant progress.


Based on previous press reports favorable toward cold fusion, such as 
a report of the Arata experiment last year, I predict this event it 
will increase Internet chatter and traffic to LENR-CANR for a few 
weeks, and then fade away. But the effect may linger long enough to 
jog a few decision-makers to allocate a few more dollars, or perhaps 
a few million more! And that is all we need.


We require an end to the beginning, if not the beginning of the end. 
We do not need Nature and Scientific American to wave a white flag 
and admit they were wrong. I predict that the present editors and 
writers at these journals will never do that, unless commercial 
products are rolled out, which I regard as highly unlikely under the 
present circumstances. But I could be wrong about them. I never 
imaged that Robert Park would give an inch. Of course he needs to 
give a mile, which he will never do.


The other day I told Mizuno that Maddox died, and I related the 
famous quote about cold fusion will remain dead for a long time 
which is surely an enigmatic thing to say. Did he mean that he hoped 
it would revive only after he was gone? Mizuno responded: perhaps I 
should be angry at the man but honestly I pity him. Here was the most 
important and interesting discovery in his lifetime and he never even 
looked at it. What a wasted opportunity. That is how I feel about 
the whole history of cold fusion. So much talent wasted; so many 
years. So many energy problems could have been solved by now, and so 
many lives saved, if only scientists had done their job.


I do not blame the mass media for this sad history. I blame 
scientists and scientific administrators at places like the DOE and 
the APS. The ones who never looked at the experiments. They never did 
their jobs. Huizenga and the DoE review panels. Of course there is 
plenty of blame to go around. Even the cold fusion researchers share 
a small tiny fraction of the blame for this fiasco, but they are more 
sinned against than sinning.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.com wrote:

 Why now?

Could it be because the Oilies are Out of Office?   Oh!

Terry



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread OrionWorks
Jed sez:

 What does Chubb's theory entail?

 Honestly, God only knows -- that level of physics is far over
 my head -- but it sounds a bit like a school of fish to me.

 It involves a bunch of deuterons with overlapping wave functions,
 which lose their identity and begin acting as one, sort of like
 people joining the Hare Krishna cult (or religion if it is tax
 deductible). The heat is dispersed over millions of deuterons instead
 of originating at a single location which is why it does not produce
 a sharp 24 MeV jolt in a single particle.

 For more information, see Scott  Talbot Chubb's papers.

 - Jed

Ah, yes. The HK Hare Krishna hypothesis. Atoms loosing their
identity. That's as good an explanation as any I've heard! ;-)

Thanks, Jed.

Regards,
Steven would-you-like-to-make-a-donation Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks



Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 So many energy problems could have been solved by
 now, and so many lives saved, if only scientists had done their job.

But the need was not as great as it is now.  We have always said, on
this list, that $5/gal oil would make a difference.  IMO, it has.

Terry



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread Ron Wormus
Actually I think this is what Frank Znidarsic  has been trying to get at with his electromagnetic 
Bose condensate convergence of the motion constants ideas but he has a very opaque method of 
explanation.

Ron

--On Friday, April 17, 2009 3:49 PM -0400 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com 
wrote:


OrionWorks wrote:


 It is a bla, bla, bla conventional explanation of cold fusion. Then at 1:10
 (timestamp from the end of the video) it says the deuterons begin to move
 more collectively, like a school of fish and it gets interesting.

 I am not sure what this refers to. Perhaps the Chubb theory?

I believe I've seen this video before, or at least a variation of it.

What does Chubb's theory entail?


Honestly, God only knows -- that level of physics is far over my head -- but it 
sounds a bit like
a school of fish to me.

It involves a bunch of deuterons with overlapping wave functions, which lose 
their identity and
begin acting as one, sort of like people joining the Hare Krishna cult (or 
religion if it is tax
deductible). The heat is dispersed over millions of deuterons instead of 
originating at a single
location which is why it does not produce a sharp 24 MeV jolt in a single 
particle.

For more information, see Scott  Talbot Chubb's papers.

- Jed







Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell

Note that Google Trends shows a gradual decline in interest in the subject:

http://www.google.com/trends?q=cold+fusion

This does not surprise me. If I were not increasing the number of 
papers at LENR-CANR, download traffic would probably decline there.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread Jones Beene

Guys - 


 Ah, yes. The HK Hare Krishna hypothesis. Atoms loosing their
 identity. That's as good an explanation as any I've heard! ;-)


BTW - wasn't Frank Z or maybe Horace the first to suggest something akin to 
boson-like coherence, or did Chubb come in ahead of them with the quasi-BEC 
slant? Its been tossed around for a long time...

Way before that - Robert Forward suggested really cold fusion - at cryogenic 
temps.

We might as well give credit where credit is due... since 60 Minutes is getting 
hold of it - someone might actually start to give a damn.

Jones



Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell

Terry Blanton wrote:


But the need was not as great as it is now.  We have always said, on
this list, that $5/gal oil would make a difference.  IMO, it has.


In that sense it is unfortunate that the price is back to $2.

The Obama administration may be the best thing that has happened to 
energy policy in the last 40 years. We'll see. He may not follow 
through. Congress may derail him. He should tax gasoline to keep the 
price above $3 to $4 per gallon, but I doubt he has the guts or the 
support in Congress to do that.


It is possible that Obama or someone in the administration will watch 
60 Minutes and start asking questions, or even take action. It will 
not take much to help the researchers. A few million -- heck, a few 
hundred thousand -- would be manna from heaven. I wrote to the 
administration, and so did many other people, but the voice of CBS is 
probably 5 to 6 orders of magnitude louder than mine. That's the 
trouble with mass media in a high population nation. If this were 
Iceland I could probably get a message through to someone in government.


- Jed



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread thomas malloy

OrionWorks wrote:


Jed sez:
 


What does Chubb's theory entail?

It involves a bunch of deuterons with overlapping wave functions,
which lose their identity and begin acting as one, sort of like

For more information, see Scott  Talbot Chubb's papers.


 



Ah, yes. The HK Hare Krishna hypothesis. Atoms loosing their
identity. That's as good an explanation as any I've heard! ;-)
 


Sounds more like a Bose Einstein Condensate to me.


--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread mixent
In reply to  OrionWorks's message of Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:39:22 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Steve, or Jed

Any speculation as to why 60 Minutes has decided, now, to do an
article on this subject? Was there a specific tipping point, or have
they been quietly watching this field for some time now. Cumulative
effect?

I would love to know whom they have interviewed. Guess we shall soon know.

My guess, for what it's worth is that the recent announcement of evidence of
fast neutrons has rocked the boat here and there, and tipped a few people who
were doubtful over the line. The fact that this evidence is being produced in
government labs doesn't harm the cause.

[snip]
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread thomas malloy

Jed Rothwell wrote:


Terry Blanton wrote:


But the need was not as great as it is now.  We have always said, on
this list, that $5/gal oil would make a difference.  IMO, it has.



In that sense it is unfortunate that the price is back to $2.


Don't worry, $5 / gallon gas will be back.


--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread mixent
In reply to  Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:37:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
That is how I feel about 
the whole history of cold fusion. So much talent wasted; so many 
years. So many energy problems could have been solved by now, and so 
many lives saved, if only scientists had done their job.
[snip]
That's exactly how I feel when I try to communicate to people that my invention
is a hundred times better than CF. It's a quantum leap beyond current cold
fusion experiments. Sort of like comparing a modern fission reactor to Fermi's
first pile in Chicago.
...and no one will give me the time of day.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview - super cold

2009-04-17 Thread Mark Goldes
Not Robert Forward, Robert Carroll...

Mark

--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 2:34 PM

Guys - 


 Ah, yes. The HK Hare Krishna hypothesis. Atoms loosing their
 identity. That's as good an explanation as any I've heard! ;-)


BTW - wasn't Frank Z or maybe Horace the first to suggest something akin to
boson-like coherence, or did Chubb come in ahead of them with the quasi-BEC
slant? Its been tossed around for a long time...

Way before that - Robert Forward suggested really cold fusion - at
cryogenic temps.

We might as well give credit where credit is due... since 60 Minutes is getting
hold of it - someone might actually start to give a damn.

Jones



Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Steven Krivit

oh yeah, almost forgot about that.

At 01:21 PM 4/17/2009, you wrote:

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.com wrote:

 Why now?

Could it be because the Oilies are Out of Office?   Oh!

Terry




Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Jed Rothwell
thomas malloy wrote:


 Don't worry, $5 / gallon gas will be back.


What makes you think so? Do you expect the economy will recover soon, and
the price will rebound?

I think the price reached $4 before the recession.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread thomas malloy

Jed Rothwell wrote:


thomas malloy wrote:
 


Don't worry, $5 / gallon gas will be back.


What makes you think so? Do you expect the economy will recover soon, 
and the price will rebound?


The great inflation has just begun. However I think that the economy 
will rebound.




--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- 
http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---



Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

2009-04-17 Thread Harry Veeder


- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energetics Technology website features 60 Minutes preview

 
 Guys - 
 
 
  Ah, yes. The HK Hare Krishna hypothesis. Atoms loosing their
  identity. That's as good an explanation as any I've heard! ;-)

I think socio-political prejudices are everywhere, even in the language
of physics.
As I see it, under certain conditions atoms refuse to behave like rugged
individualists. However, a rugged individual physicist might equate such
cooperative
behaviour with a loss of identity, but I see it as the expression of a
shared identity.

Harry



Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

2009-04-17 Thread Harry Veeder

The decline in interest appears to have leveled off.
If the graph represented a stock price, would it be a good time to buy
in? ;-)

Harry

 
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: Friday, April 17, 2009 5:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:It will be ironic if 60 Minutes has a major effect

 Note that Google Trends shows a gradual decline in interest in the 
 subject:
 http://www.google.com/trends?q=cold+fusion
 
 This does not surprise me. If I were not increasing the number of 
 papers at LENR-CANR, download traffic would probably decline there.
 
 - Jed
 
 



Re: [Vo]:...CBS TV's 60 Minutes Turns Up the Heat

2009-04-17 Thread Steven Krivit



At 01:21 PM 4/17/2009, you wrote:

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Steven Krivit
stev...@newenergytimes.com wrote:

 Why now?

Could it be because the Oilies are Out of Office?   Oh!

Terry



Terry...why CBS? why now?

Something just fired in my neuro-net...Pure speculationI vaguely recall 
some incident with Dan Rather and Bob Park some years ago...I wonder if 
this is CBS' serving of crow


Steve 



Re: [Vo]:Red Skeletons

2009-04-17 Thread Harry Veeder
Related...

Sinkholes below Lake Huron hold strange ecosystem: researchers
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/02/25/sinkholes.html

Harry

- Original Message - 
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net 
Date: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:42 pm 
Subject: [Vo]:Red Skeletons 

 Thursday . being Free Association day.. 
 
 Free association is a technique used by trick cyclist. make that 
 psychoanalysts, and was first developed by Sigmund Freud, 
 according to 
 Wiki-the-wise. 
 
 Remember . you cannot practice psycho-anal-ysis without being 
 slightly anal 
 .. ;-) 
 
 In free association psychoanalysis, certain special patients, 
mildly 
 deranged or not. like Freddy are invited to relate whatever comes 
 into their 
 meandering minds during the session; and most notably not to 
 censor their 
 thoughts. This technique is intended to help the patient learn 
 more about 
 what he or she thinks and feels in an atmosphere of non-judgmental 
 curiosityand acceptance. 
 
 Anyway, with that in mind, here is a most interesting bloody 
 image, but with 
 a slightly unprincipled ending. 
 
 http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2009/04/ancient-frozen- 
 ecosystem-produce 
 s-blood-red-ice-flows.ars 
 Freddy thinks that the authors of this study could have overlooked 
the 
 unconventional principle known as the fractional ground state. 
 Our principles are the springs of our actions. Our actions, the 
 springs of 
 our happiness or misery. Too much care, therefore, cannot be taken 
in 
 forming our principles. - Red Skelton 
 . which unconventional bloody principle - the fractional ground 
 statecould be supplying at least some of the energy for 
 metabolism in the 
 bacteria. Most of the cellular life in the Red Falls are derived 
from 
 Proteobacteria, the closest relatives of which metabolize sulfur 
 and iron. 
 If the hydrino is real, then it is very possible that some little- 
 knownlifeform on Earth, or possibly in more extreme conditions 
 elsewhere in the 
 solar system - has evolved to exploit it - sez Jones the vortician 
 The slightly unprincipled Antarctic researchers, like all good 
 workerants, have echoed the mainstream neglect (can a lack of 
 something be 
 echoed?). Here is what they say : Unlike the sulfur-powered 
 communitiespresent at undersea vents, there's little indication of 
 a hydrogen sulfide 
 metabolism present in the ice at Blood Falls. Instead, it appears 
that 
 energy is obtained when sulfur is cycled through different 
 oxidation states 
 by reacting it with iron, producing the Fe(II) seen in the brine. 
The 
 oxidized sulfur is then used to react with carbon compounds, 
 powering the 
 metabolism. All of that is pretty low-energy-the authors suggest 
 that the 
 doubling time for a bacterium in this environment would be roughly 
300 
 days-and requires an external source of Fe(III) to power the 
 system. The 
 authors posit that the glacier itself might provide the source by 
 extractingnew iron as it scrapes across the underlying rocks. End 
 of quote. 
 Of course few scientists give the hydrino theory much credence, 
 and it is no 
 surprise that it goes unmentioned once again - yet someone, 
 perhaps a 
 special patient or special agent with special patience, deranged 
 or not, 
 needs to mention that possibility; and since Mills is unavailable 
 (onceagain), let's invite Freddy F.over to do the dishonors.. 
 FF: Consider first, that the color seen in the image above is most 
 likelyfrom hematite and other iron oxides. 
 Iron(II,III) oxide (aka magnetite) is the chemical compound with 
 formulaFe3O4. It contains both Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions and is sometimes 
 formulated as 
 FeO.Fe2O3. In some situations, it can acts like a solid 
 electrolyte, since 
 it always has these IP holes. 
 Fe3+ as it turns, out is a strong Mills' hydrino catalyst with an 
 energyhole of 54.8 eV. and in contrast to the official version of 
 events in the 
 Red Falls, in the Millsean viewpoint there is no need for an 
external 
 source of Fe(III) to power the system nor anything else. Since that 
 external source is the very weak link of their opposing 
 viewpoint (no mass 
 transport in ice?), and since the fractional ground state 
 hypothesis doesn't 
 require it - then the possibility is at least worth mentioning. 
 It would be nice if Dr Mills could stage a convincing demo, of 
 course. 
 However, there are ways to test the hypothesis without him. Such 
 as: Is 
 there anomalous UV emission, even faint - from glaciers, even 
 downshiftedinto the visible spectrum? Hmmm. 
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/30684...@n05/3221228498/ 
 Signed, Freddy F. 
 Red-said: Well, I guess you might say that Freddie the Freeloader 
 is a 
 little bit of you, and a little bit of me, a little bit of all of 
 us, you 
 know. 
 He's found out what love means. He knows the value of time. He 
 knows that 
 time is a glutton. We say we don't have time to do this or do 
 that. There's 
 plenty of time. 
 The trick is to apply