Touche' Patrick... its great when you know what your product can do.
Wonder who will take the challenge? To misquote Ten Bears...your words
have iron no paper can hold...
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 6:42 PM, Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
wrote:
Put it this way, you guys want to
450 doesn’t have anything over LTE, I see this more what deployment strategy an
operator wants to follow:
1. Macro type deployment, Lte ,high customer count per site ratio, $$$
2. Micro site deployment,450 or wifi based gear, med to low customer count
per site ratio, low $
Gino A.
It’s the best way to deploy Ubiquiti because the APs are inexpensive and the
processors can’t handle a lot of overhead or users. You make a lot of new
friends too because people with APs on their house are the first to call when
it goes down.
Rory
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On
Rory, so this is not buried in the last thread:
*We have seen exceptional results when testing Telrad’s equipment. Our
terrain is rough at best, abrupt elevation changes with thick forests
throughout our network footprint. We have tested both the Cambium PMP450
product in the past, with minimal
Put it this way, you guys want to organize a foliage-based NLOS shoot out
in 3.65? Do it. I'll provide the gear on my end. If I don't at least twice
the distance of the 450 at the same mod, I'll give you the gear. If I do,
you ALL taking up the dare put in orders. Deal?
--
Patrick Leary
Director
That's good to hear.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 21, 2015 8:59 PM, Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Jaime. I only dare because I've enough customer examples to know
I'm more than safe.
On Feb 21,
Heh... I got to troubleshoot an Optaphone last summer. Absolutely nothing
wrong with the equipment, just a n connector that wasn't sealed properly by
the operators doing their own maintenance or something and took on some
water. I recall that it had been installed circa 2002 in this particular
We installed Optophones in Santa Ana and Coleman Texas!!! Damn small world
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 3:13 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I know a guy that used to modify cordless phones back in about 1990.
Garberville California. His name was Nat. He could get 5 miles out of
The issue was the implied inclusiveness. That is the way it was sold.
Maybe it could do 70 Mbps.
Maybe it could go 70 miles.
Maybe it could support 70 PMP customers.
But it could not do all 3 at the same time.
Whatcha want Bunky; 70 Mbps, 70 miles, or 70 PMP customers? Pick one.
bp
Except for the fact that gamers will always complain, there's never been a
legitimate complaint. As the customer quote mentioned, his gamer's
performance improved compared to UBNT...even running WiMAX. That's with a
gamer who does several hundred gig a month. That's because the jitter under
WiMAX
Iirc Rory wanted a Telrad vs Cambium 450 shootout… not the 320
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Patrick Leary
patrickleary.af...@gmail.commailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
The name withheld in that one is because the user would rather not upset
their former vendor, yet. I do not think they've broken the news.
Been a long time coming. I saw things go the other way back in the old
Alvarion days.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Josh Luthman
There have been several, Josh.
Nathan Stooke liked it to much he is buying $2.3M worth of it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday,
I know a guy that used to modify cordless phones back in about 1990.
Garberville California. His name was Nat. He could get 5 miles out of those
things. At the time Jim Carlson was selling TVs and hot tubs. Jim decided to
make a higher powered (2 watts) UHF version called the OptaPhone. I
You missed this part:
*We have tested both the Cambium PMP450 product in the past, with minimal
success when dealing with NLOS due to foliage (the link would disappear
after a few hundred meters of NLOS coverage). Our testing so far with the
Telrad COMPACT1000 and their CPE7000 outdoor CPE has
yes
2015-02-21 7:36 GMT+01:00 Kurt Fankhauser li...@wavelinc.com:
$5 per radio?
Kurt Fankhauser
Wavelinc Communications
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
http://www.wavelinc.com
tel. 419-562-6405
fax. 419-617-0110
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Daniel Gerlach
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
in the 420-450 MHz band. Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
capability of 900 MHz.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/21/2015 9:59 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
Jaime,
Can you put this in a more simplified explanation
And not legal for commercial use I'm sure...
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
My take on it is that it is a semi-off-the-shelf way to do broadband
in the 420-450 MHz band. Might have twice the foliage-penetrating
capability of 900 MHz.
bp
Well if you have a HAM license for this band you can transmit data in the
420 to 450MHz band US or 430 to 450MHz Europe at very high power levels
using 5 and 10MHz channels!!!
They use an approach used by many to up or down convert a frequency from
say 2.4GHz down to 902-928MHz.. eg .(Shireen,
Would it be usable for commercial purposes?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 1:22 PM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting read
Well if you have a HAM license for this band you can transmit data in the 420
to 450MHz
Ok, with all due respect, this is BS (and I'm not talking about Base
Station either). With some of the new gear that Ubiquiti has and Mimosa is
releasing, I could get more bandwidth and lower latency to the end user at
a lower price - this is what WISPs have excelled at for many years. I'm
sure
Meant to say between his Telrad gear and his UBNT links.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
wrote:
That just me drinking the Koolaid and believing it Jason. I do though
think the latency ding Moto users have always done is a red herring. I've
never in
That just me drinking the Koolaid and believing it Jason. I do though think
the latency ding Moto users have always done is a red herring. I've never
in my entire career had an actual operator using my gear telling latency
caused them problems. The issue is really jitter, and we do better than
Here is Daniel Moore quote from when he first fired up his new gear:
We deployed two Compacts this week, different towers. Our first two
installations were completed tonight on Tower 1, here are the results---
The first- customer is aprox 6 miles from the base station. Behind a small
hill.
The more I do wireless, the more I prefer the microcell model. Telrad's
equipment certainly seems like something you would use in a macrocell-type
setup, if for no other reason than price. I've seen much more consistent
jitter when using Ubiquiti in a microcell vs macrocell application.
On Sat,
Well I found it interesting
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
As an old time Ham Operator, it would be pretty cool to operate a data
station at 420MHz using 100 watts or more! I intend to research it more.
On Feb 21, 2015 10:53 AM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I found it interesting
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime
speaking of legal. I hear the Mennonites in Cuahtemoc Chih have their own
long range cordless telephone system using 200=300MHz systems from
Senao/Engenius with 100 ft. towers. they use as two way radio as well.
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at
So the solution to the price points and the legitimate concerns of smaller
operators is not to address them directly, but rather to insult prospective
customers? I understand, a customer concerned about cost is likely not
going to be a good long term prospect when selling a higher ended product
Assuming we did have the fiber what would be an accurate number for everything
needed to hang a bts. Earlier in your comments you said about $275 per cpe?
Sent while mobile
On Feb 21, 2015, at 5:07 AM, Patrick Leary patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
wrote:
Neighborhood style micro pop would
Ryan, that should be the very worst case on the CPE and that's all in (no
caps of course), except for the cable. It even includes the mount bracket,
as shown circled here:
[image: Inline image 1]
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Ryan Ray ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming we did have the fiber
yeppers...I think our military uses something similar in 300MHz band using
Atheros based transceiver and UDC from ???. I said too much
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Philip Rankin wireless...@gmail.com
wrote:
As an old time Ham
Jaime,
Can you put this in a more simplified explanation please?
What, exactly, can we do with this?
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 21, 2015 8:44 AM, Jaime Solorza
losguyswirel...@gmail.commailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/dl435/index.html
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems
They had a microcell vs macrocell seminar at show but I was in Phoenix
Contact training off site
in 20 words or less what is difference?
Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jason McKemie
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com wrote:
The more I
Mimosa will be a contender in the big boy WISP arena when they finally release
their PtMP. I dunno that UBNT will have the advanced capabilities.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason McKemie
I'm looking forward to their entry. As far as I see it, only two companies
are out there really trying to break the mold. We are defining what it
means to do fixed LTE and they are setting the bar in traditional
unlicensed.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote:
No one is saying f'off but you. I responding to your disbelief. I'm never
going to convince everyone, nor will we ever be a fit for everyone, nor do
we want everyone. Right now we are attracting a pretty good crowd, mostly
consisting of long time Cambium users. And I mean major WISPs; lots of
Moving the AP closer to the user vs. trying to serve customers further out
from a central site. The microcell model works a lot better than macrocell
when it comes to unlicensed IMO. There are also many different levels of
micro and macro cells.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Jaime Solorza
Here are the jitter quotes I was looking fro from Daniel Moore:
There is a higher latency on the WiMAX platform. With LTE we see an
average of 20 ms added vs 40-60 ms with WiMAX. That said- the latency
jitter is much more stable than our WIFI gear. Almost no jitter on both
WiMAX and LTE. With
corporate address]
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150221/bcfa534c/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:54:04 -0700
From: Jaime Solorza losguyswirel
Show me 100w amp that will work on this? Then you need the same amp on the
customer side. These cards are old news
On Feb 21, 2015 11:04 AM, Philip Rankin wireless...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul, Absolutely not legal for any commercial purpose and can only be used
by a licensed amateur radio
[this is my
corporate address]
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150221/bcfa534c/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:54:04 -0700
From: Jaime
patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG]
patrick.le...@telrad.com patrick.le...@telrad.com [this is my
corporate address]
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150221/bcfa534c/attachment-0001
...@telrad.com [this is my
corporate address]
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://afmug.com/pipermail/af/attachments/20150221/bcfa534c/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:54:04 -0700
From
45 matches
Mail list logo
