On Sun, 2024-10-13 at 17:17 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 10/13/24 17:15, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> > RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9184
> >
> >
> > ID Title Result
> > ---
> > 9184 Ratification f
On Tue, 2024-09-17 at 17:46 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> All previous crystals are destroyed, and each crystal owner gains crystals
> equal to the total size of crystals they owned previously.
Shouldn't this take instability into account? Otherwise, it
disproportionately rewards
On Sun, 2024-09-15 at 16:38 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> Agora had the other 7 stones. Agora can't own spendies, though, so the
> Lost and Found Department ends up with those.
The proposal only compensated players. IIRC Agora isn't a player at the
moment (and I can't remember whe
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 08:12 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
wrote:
> But, (aside from the CoE) what is musicianship? I can't find it in
> the rulesets.
[Note: this article is a) written from memory and b) contains
discussion of events that happened prior to when I first registered at
Agora
On Sun, 2024-09-08 at 00:32 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 9/7/24 21:47, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > Create a new power 2 rule, "Megaphones":
> > {{{
> > Megaphones are fungible assets. The Assessor is the recordkeepor
> > of Megaphones. The creation, destru
On Mon, 2024-09-02 at 17:19 -0500, Kiako via agora-discussion wrote:
> - Sky Chit (6): If the flippor or the flippee (or both) is an officer
> and e has published each of eir reports since that report's most
> recent tardiness, the flippor and flippee each gain 1 stamp of the
> other's type.
"if n
On Sun, 2024-09-01 at 03:02 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 9/1/24 02:58, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> > THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
>
>
> So... is this sufficient under the new reporting standard? This isn't
> labeling the report as the "Rulekeepor's weekly report".
>
On Sun, 2024-09-01 at 01:00 +0100, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> (Note that if other stone actions happen at around the same time as
> this message – which is quite plausible close to a month boundary – it
> is possible that some of these actions will fail due to Stone Costs
> being wrong. The
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 17:23 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 5:01 PM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > If you run out of spendies, that’s a massive issue
> >
>
> Does it? If I run out, it becomes impossi
On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 11:39 -0400, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:34 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > An overt intent to declare Apathy, however, is likely to be
> > objected to by pretty much
On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 15:07 +, Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion
wrote:
> You should have specified Janet as well. If you did this, e would be
> less likely to object.
In general, if you're planning to run some sort of scam that involves
nobody noticing what you're up to, it's best to bribe a
On Tue, 2024-08-20 at 16:47 -0400, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 8/20/24 8:49 AM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>
> > > 9162~ Mischief 1.0 Shameless Bribery 2A
> > AGAINST: I am philosophically opposed to bribing people to pass
> > proposals using assets/rewards t
On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:12 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> juan wrote:
> > However, there are strict requirements on consent for registration, so a
> > report couldn't reasonably register someone without express consent. But
> > that seems sketchy.
> >
> > Of course, I could be
On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 19:29 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I recommend a proposal to more explicitly remove the fugitive delegations
> (Though they are kinda fun to keep around since they don't do anything),
> and also note it may be a patent title, as the Herald is responsible for
On Sun, 2024-08-11 at 16:36 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
[snip]
>
> * With T notice: that intent is ripe, was created at least T ago, e is a
> sponsor of it.
There's a missing "and" here.
--
ais523
On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 14:06 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Can I ask what this part is, and how it is ratified?
These are patent titles that are not Rules-defined (together with a few
that are Rules-defined, but don't fall into any neat categories). The
non-Rules-defined ones come
On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 22:25 +0100, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
business wrote:
> I pay a fee of 6 Spendies to transfer the Minty Stone to myself.
>
> I pay a fee of 6 Spendies to transfer the Radiant Stone to myself.
>
> I pay a fee of 6 Spendies to transfer the Power Stone to myself.
>
> (
On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 18:59 -0500, secretsnail wrote:
> ID: 9145
> Title: Pragmatic quarters
> Adoption Index: 2.0
> Author: Murphy
> Co-authors: Mischief
>
>
> Amend Rule 2555 (Blots) by replacing this text:
>
> At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each
> fugit
On Sun, 2024-07-07 at 14:09 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-official wrote:
> snail wrote:
>
> > Do the awards, bozos
>
> Wins in 2023, based on comparing the Herald's reports of 2023-01-02 vs
> 2024-01-27 (the latter of which mentions that there were no new patent
> titles since Nov 2023):
>
>
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 17:51 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
discussion wrote:
> Further gamification perhaps?
>
> Maybe "achievements" once we accomplish something peculiar with the
> boulder, or the possibility to earn lootboxes with silly, pointless
> prizes.
Thinking about this: some sort o
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 18:52 -0400, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
> I qualify for a White Ribbon, as I have never previously owned one
I was a little surprised by this one, so I checked: you had Orange and
Blue ribbons in 2008, but not White. (Previous rulesets count.)
--
ais523
On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 11:34 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> 5. Any anniversary, monthly anniversary, or quarterly anniversary that
> would otherwise occur on a day of the month that does not exist
> (after considering any leap day) instead occurs on the following day.
What's
On Fri, 2024-06-28 at 11:20 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I believe that deals and alliances are going to be extremely strong here.
> To me, it seems to be in practice a prerequisite to incarnating at all in
> the first place.
There is no downside (other than the rather pro
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 21:34 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
> I stand Alone.
Now I'm trying to figure out how you could afford to bribe so many
people (particularly along the lines of "are these bribes large, in
which case you might not be able to pay for them, or small, in which
cas
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 21:25 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
> I eliminate ais523 by paying a fee of 1 bang.
I have 2 Bangs for sale. Is anyone willing to make offers?
--
ais523
On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 11:50 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Query: This report lists my lateness as !!! - but Simplifior was only
> enacted in the past 24 hrs, right? Am I misinterpreting something in
> this report?
My guess is that the report is automatically generated, and the
au
On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 12:59 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/27/24 12:53, nix via agora-business wrote:
> > > I CFJ: "The CFJ above bars the player currently named 'apathy'"
> > I number this CFJ 4085. I assign it to ais523.
>
> Gratuitous: This is trivially TRUE. Names have no legal
On Sun, 2024-05-19 at 15:09 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > particular, if a contract would be given a Rest (the equivalent of a
> > Blot), every member of the contract would be given a Rest instead.
>
> > the Insulator (equivalent of today's Referee) was re
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 06:55 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> A ghostly player CAN incarnate by announcement, which means
> to flip eir Vitality to Invulnerable, provided there are only
> Invulnerable or Ghostly players.
[snip]
> When the match is reset, each player is set to Ghostly,
On Sun, 2024-05-12 at 15:32 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
> Proposal: No apathetic apathy
>
> Amend Rule 2465 (Victory by Apathy) by appending this text:
>
> A player SHALL NOT announce intent to Declare Apathy and then
> fail to Declare Apathy before that intent ce
On Thu, 2024-05-09 at 09:11 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/6/24 15:15, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> > So ais523 has basically won 3 times, paradox, stones, and radiance, pretty
> > much in a row.
> >
> > Just would like to point that out.
>
> A portion of this, at least
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:30 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Perhaps, I'm personally not too sure about it, although I haven't
> participated in Radiance yet, myself. I think it's good to have the
> different subgames have different levels of risk and gameplay style. We
> alrea
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:15 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So ais523 has basically won 3 times, paradox, stones, and radiance,
> pretty much in a row.
>
> Just would like to point that out.
The wins came together at around the same time, but the start of
planning for them was quit
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 17:47 +0100, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> My radiance is 100. This announcement causes me to win the game.
…which reminds me that the radiance reset is still broken.
I have been wondering if it would make more sense to cap the value of
the reset, i.e. if you have less
On Sun, 2024-05-05 at 21:38 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
discussion wrote:
> It's crazy to me how they've made a whole video game based on an
> Agoran subgame.
BF Joust escaped its origins as an Agoran subgame and became something
that received intermittent play for over seven years. I'm not
On Tue, 2024-04-30 at 09:52 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I object.
> Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> owner is ambiguous.
> The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> can take the asset due to the ensuing cont
On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> I was looking for (but couldn't find) one or two other cases that G. was
> involved in, along the lines of:
>
> * A player plays card X which gives em card Y, then plays card Y
> which retroactively negates eir pl
On Sun, 2024-04-21 at 15:16 +1000, Matt Smyth via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Good something to you all,
> Is there a circumstance where the Promoter is allowed to promote
> themselves
> to some role, or when (rarely) creating a new role, do we assume the
> Promoter cannot do this self-despotism?
No
On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 22:11 -0400, Quadrantal via agora-business wrote:
> I push þe boulder.
>
> --
>
> The above message shall be read, to the fullest extent possible, as if
> it was sent with the digraph "th" in place of all occurrences of the
> character thorn ("þ"), and such digraphs were c
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 09:17 -0500, Kiako via agora-discussion wrote:
> ARGUMENTS FOR [X]
>
> i. We again suppose (D) succeeds. Then one of (A) or (C) succeeds.
> ii. (B) fails, to avoid a paradox/indeterminacy.
> iii. (A) fails, because (A) implies (B), and (B) must fail.
> iv. (C) succeed
On Mon, 2024-04-08 at 11:21 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-discussion [2024-04-05 19:16]:
> > What does take complete control of Agora mean?
> >
> > Is any statement that is simply "not true" sufficient?
> >
> > Overall I find this to be unsavory.
>
> Yeah, rules b
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 19:16 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
wrote:
> What does take complete control of Agora mean?
>
> Is any statement that is simply "not true" sufficient?
If the statement is meaningless, then it is not true. To what extent it
is meaningful, it is incorrect.
(It is also
On Sat, 2024-03-16 at 16:23 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
Janet, you've just sent two blank messages in a row – has something
gone wrong with your email client?
--
ais523
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 14:29 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Or, in the alternative, based on the authority Rule 2125, Rule 2471
> prohibits sending a message with certain attributes, and that is what
> the infraction is. So, the infraction isn't contained within the message
> in any c
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 18:01 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
wrote:
> from Rule 2481 (Festival Restrictions) Power 3.1:
>
> {
> While Agora's Festivity is nonzero, the following apply:
> ...
>
> 2. Quorum for Agoran Decisions is equal to half the number of
> Festive player
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 15:38 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> If so, and if Kate indeed gained five Ribbons on 2023-08-31, and no
> one else gained as many, then:
> * Only Kate's vote counted on any proposal resolved after 230.
> * Only Kate's support counted on any tabled ac
On Sun, 2024-03-10 at 12:46 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> Aris wrote:
>
> > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be
> > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is
> > different from interpreting it in context.
>
> A
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 14:36 -0600, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/5/24 14:24, Rowan Evans via agora-business wrote:
> > After that: If I have granted myself a welcome package 52 times AND
> > not granted Murphy 2.4, then 2.4 times, I grant Murphy a welcome
> > package.
>
> This still fails
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 15:45 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2024, at 4:37 AM, Aris via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > Erm... that CFJ doesn't do what you want it to. CFJs are supposed to be
> > statements, not questions, and interpreting something out of context is
>
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 13:48 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Transliterated from the Shavian alphabet to standard English:
>
> {
> Hello Agora,
> I declare victory by apathy for Ben and Goren. To object, write "I
> object to victory by apathy"
>
> Goodbye Agora
> }
>
> This wasn't r
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 18:19 +, Goren Barak via agora-business
wrote:
> 𐑣𐑧𐑤𐑴 𐑩𐑜𐑹𐑩,
> 𐑲 𐑛𐑧𐑒𐑤𐑺 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑹𐑰 𐑚𐑲 𐑨𐑐𐑩𐑔𐑰 𐑓 ·𐑚𐑧𐑯 𐑯 ·𐑜𐑹𐑧𐑯
> 𐑑 𐑳𐑚𐑡𐑧𐑒𐑑, 𐑮𐑲𐑑 "𐑲 𐑳𐑚𐑡𐑧𐑒𐑑 𐑑 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑹𐑰 𐑚𐑲
> 𐑨𐑐𐑩𐑔𐑰"
>
> 𐑜𐑫𐑛𐑚𐑲 𐑩𐑜𐑹𐑩
I haven't even tried to translate this yet, but my immediate reaction
was that, based on contents and on the
On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 00:57 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 3/4/24 00:48, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I wield the Anti-Equatorial Stone, specifying the Recursion Stone (the
> > Power Stone is protected).
> > I wield the Recursion Stone as the Protection Stone, speci
On Sun, 2024-03-03 at 11:45 +0100, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
discussion wrote:
> > This *really* seems like an infinite free win generation machine. At the
> > *very* least there should be some cooldown between wins (I'd argue for a
> > global 30 day cooldown at minimum)
> >
>
> I'm flattered t
On Sun, 2024-02-25 at 13:41 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> 4st wrote:
>
> > The Geologist isn't real, and there are no crystals. If they do exist, it
> > would look like this:
> > Geologist Weekly:
> > Snail owns Crystal 2463 with size 2.
> > Snail owns Crystal 2659 with size 2.
On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 10:43 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> fwiw, I plan to vote AGAINST any attempt to ratify the ruleset as the
> ruleset is currently as if we had been playing "correctly" this whole time.
>
> As it currently stands, a vote FOR would be a vote to maintain the stat
On Sun, 2024-02-11 at 15:36 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> *sigh* here we go again
>
> I CFJ, barring Maloney: "Proposal 9055, as part of its effect,
> enacted a rule."
I think the more interesting question is whether it enacted a
regulation (which has a lower standard): the rule v
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 02:31 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I wield the Recursion Stone as the Power Stone, specifying the
> Recursion Stone.
This isn't a valid specification: the Recursion Stone is not a player.
I am not sure whether it fails outright, or whether it defaults to
spe
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 01:40 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> * Inserting the following paragraph after the paragraph:
>
> {
>
> The basis of a person is the set of all persons that are (recursively)
> part of em, in addition to emself. Rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding, a perso
On Sun, 2023-12-17 at 13:05 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Recommendation: As you suggested on Discord, have the Assessor
> explicitly announce the things being attested. Then submit a new
> proposal to fix the rule bug.
I'm not convinced that actually works – it seems more lik
On Sun, 2023-11-26 at 16:52 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 11/26/23 16:52, Agora amdw42 via agora-business wrote:
> > I, Ben, push the boulder
>
> This fails, as you are not a player. You need to register first, e.g. by
> sending "I register as a player" to agora-business.
This
On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 03:26 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
> > 9033* 4st, Janet, nix, snail 3.0 It's been 4 years, Agora. 4
> > YEARS.
> AGAINST. I will explain why to a-d.
So there was a minor mistake in the recent dictatorship scam attempt,
which I pointed o
On Sun, 2023-11-19 at 03:57 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 11/19/23 03:55, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Fwiw I don't mind incentivizing change nor more blots. If what it takes to
> > win becomes being a super goodie two shoes so be it
>
> The last time we incentivi
Here are some thoughts about a new economy that I've been thinking
about. These would ideally work in tandem with existing subgames /
other subgames that other players might propose / other economies that
other players might propose, rather than being a replacement.
This is just a sketch, so it do
On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 16:21 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I intend to clean rule 2480 ("Festivals") by replacing
> "grater" with "greater".
For the intent to work, you need to specify the mechanism, e.g. "I
intend without objection to clean…"
--
ais523
On Wed, 2023-11-08 at 20:22 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> if it helps, I think the following groups constitute the same person
> (not player):
Several of these (most of these?) are wrong – they are mixing up
natural persons and legal constructs.
For example, the AFO was an artifici
On Mon, 2023-11-06 at 12:43 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Hello y'all,
>
> Here are some questions for you:
>
> - Do you want your address to be obfuscated?
> - Do you want every address to be obfuscated?
> - Do you want the obfuscation to be uniform?
> - Do you think each player shou
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 15:42 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
> > 9026~ Janet, Kate 1.5 It's a bit dark in here
> endorse Herald
The office of Herald is vacant; you may want to add a default for if
there is no Herald when the proposal is resolved.
(For what it's worth
On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 17:18 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> This seems about the same as changing a rule by saying "Add the following
> sentence: Things are a currency. Things are tracked by the Thinger." Which
> would fail to do anything because "any ambiguity" is present (I thin
On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 16:37 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-business
wrote:
> I deny this CoE. The proposals were not submitted. You said "I submit the
> following 3 proposals" and proceeded to list 4 proposals, so the action was
> not clearly and unambiguously specified as required for by-announceme
On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 15:31 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 10/11/23 15:30, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
> > On 10/11/2023 2:29 PM, Kiako via agora-discussion wrote:
> > > I transfer one kiako stamp to ais523.
> > >
> > > > I grant kiako the following promise:
> > > > {{{
> > >
On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 20:01 +0100, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 27/08/2023 19:59, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
> > On 27/08/2023 19:57, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> > > Oops. This reach fails, I already got the Hot Potato Stone last week.
> >
On Sun, 2023-06-04 at 17:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM ais523 via agora-business
> wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that G. explicitly stated in eir message that e
> > consented to the Rice Plan – the subsequent withdrawal was sent in the
> > s
On Fri, 2023-06-02 at 14:18 -0300, Juan F. Meleiro via agora-business
wrote:
> I create the following proposal, entitled “Game Theory”:
>
> {
> Create a Power 1.0 rule called “The Button” with text:
This isn't really game theory, but "who has the most reliable Internet
connection / is best at bei
On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 17:00 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
> As annoying as it is, it seems perfectly legal to do, to me.
>
> I create and submit the following Proposal:
>
> Title: Go Home, You're Drunk
> AI: 3
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
> // Comment: This is a hotfix
On Sun, 2023-05-21 at 13:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 1:01 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > We've had artificial persons in the past, and they ceased to exist with
> > no real issues. That predated Promises, which
On Sat, 2023-05-20 at 23:43 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> Actually, in general persons ceasing to exist is likely to cause
> problems, and the current ruleset is careful to avoid it (R869/51's "is
> or ever was"; you remain an Agoran person after you die).
>
> I'm not sure there'
On Sun, 2023-05-21 at 10:50 -0700, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> I change my vote on 8983 to ABSENT, or PRESENT if I cannot change my
> vote to something invalid.
The wording you want is "I withdraw my vote on 8983" or "I retract my
vote on 8983" (these are synonyms).
To "change a vo
On Sun, 2023-05-21 at 19:43 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Oh, I just finished writing/posting my Judgement when I saw this. I don't
> think it's essential for the case and I'd rather not bite more than I can
> chew for my CfJ. It felt very difficult as it is.
>
> You could
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 11:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:25 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to thank ais523 for the 4pocalypse where everyone has 44 points.
> > > As such, if the 4pocalypse is real, I intend to, with Agoran Consent,
> > > gra
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 11:29 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:25 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to thank ais523 for the 4pocalypse where everyone has 44 points.
> > > As such, if the 4pocalypse is real, I intend to, with Agoran Consent,
> > > gra
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:50 AM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > I sometimes feel like half my arguing at Agora is dedicated to trying
> > to persuade people not to repeal the economy.
> &
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 09:37 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 9:26 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-
> discussion wrote:
> > With radiance and Stamps seemingly on their way out, I believe that your
> > Officer salary problem is part of a larger problem of Agora
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 00:01 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> It doesn't do anything. It has insufficient power to create blots.
Ah right, AI 1 but it needs 1.7 (rule 2555). So I agree with you, false
alarm.
Assuming that the author didn't intentionally set the AI incorrectly,
thoug
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 23:09 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:
>
[snip]
>
> Grant each player that did not vote FOR this proposal 2 blots.
Whoever decided to propose this immediately before several new players
joined (with timin
Here's an idea I had as a way to a) shake things up in a way that's
likely to lead to lots of interesting CFJs for the next few months (I
came up with it after reading the CFJ archives for cases that looked
interesting), and b) let us experiment with mechanisms for awarding
Radiance that don't need
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:57 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 5/18/23 18:54, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > --
> > H. ais523, Champion×17, M.N., D.N.Phil, Marvy Scamster
>
> Appreciate the little humble brag in the signature :p
A portion of that was the result of scams, and scams
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 18:49 -0500, blob via agora-discussion wrote:
> I, being the new player, totally agree with this. I would be more than
> willing to put some sort of marker in front of my name, as others in the
> past have done. How should I go about changing my name--or how have others
> in t
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 21:32 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
> > I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> > saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:32 PM ais523 via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > That said, I suspect the word in R2029 is currently undefined: I don't
> > think "a definition that was in place at t
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
> I informally risk being guilty of favoritism 7 days from now, by
> saying that the combination of CFJ calling and parenthetical reminder
> that it may fail is enough disclaimer to avoid no faking. I'll also
> note that Jane
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 13:48 -0500, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
> Any feedback on the below before I submit it?
The example should be introduced with "for example" not "For example"
(the capitalisation is wrong for mid-sentence). Other than that, it
makes sense.
--
ais523
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 11:16 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> hehe we can still fool old players sometimes - "intend" has a
> "specific meaning" for registration as well as for other contexts, so
> beokirby registered exactly as per the rules:
>
> > An Unregistered person CAN (
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 19:13 -0500, nix via agora-business wrote:
> On 5/17/23 19:10, Christian Arguinzoni via agora-business wrote:
> > I would like to register for the nomic game Agora. My preferred name is
> > blob. Thank you!
>
> Welcome! I grant blob a Welcome Package. This is interesting beca
On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 19:28 -0400, Katie Davenport via agora-business
wrote:
> I intend to:
>
> Enter the current tournament of Commune as a participant.
>
> Set my (Left, Middle, Right) constructors to construct (7, B, D),
> respectively.
>
> Invest in Olive.
This is a little ambiguous, becau
On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 06:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
wrote:
>
> Further it is clear from the text itself that it was intended
> that this definition be "hidden" and continue to provide definitional
> guidance (that's unique afaik when thinking of other old gamestate):
It can't provid
On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 00:55 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> Sorry, I meant practical for the purposes of applying "*Any* ambiguity in
> the specification of a rule change causes that change to be void and
> without effect."
>
> Of course, this compromise-based definition of
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 22:04 +0200, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'd really just need to prove once that one singular point in the mechanism
> is ambiguous, to any degree, to add "any ambiguity". It would help to
> define "ambiguous" as "capable of being understood in two or more p
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 16:39 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 5/8/23 05:33, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > A player CAN, by paying a fee of 5 brights, turn a specified rule
> > Radiant.
> > A radiant rule CANNOT be repealed. The player that turned a rule
> > Radian
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 04:33 -0500, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
> [I hope you like this idea! Please let me know your thoughts, especially
> about the Bright Abilities. This system could easily be added to, with
> alternate ways to gain radiance! Or if someone comes up with one really
>
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 13:55 +0100, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> my current thoughts are along the lines of "add Radiance for
> participation actions like proposing / officiating / judging / even
> voting
And to clarify: by this I mean voting *at all*, not specifically for
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
