Re: Chnage Management email notification issue

2008-05-22 Thread T. Dee
We had a similar issue, that being when you create a Change and you add Task(s), however, at the last minute you decided NOT to save the Change record ALL the Task(s) associcated with the Change are set to Status = Closed / Status Reason = Canceled. This results in Orphan Records. According to

Re: Question: Overview Console

2008-05-15 Thread T. Dee
to restart the Plug-in server. Audrey H. Franklin Senior Systems Analyst ITS-ECOMS New York University Tel: 212.998.1146 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:54 am Subject: Re: Question: Overview Console

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-05-14 Thread T. Dee
it and ensure that the Z field is getting set as the filter indicates. Other than that, I don't have any more rabbits up my sleeve - sorry. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May

Question: Overview Console

2008-05-14 Thread T. Dee
Currently when I make changes to the Overview Console I STOP and RESTART Remedy Services. Is there another way of restting the Overview Console without stopping and restarting Remedy Services? Thanks! Ty ___

Re: Question: Overview Console

2008-05-14 Thread T. Dee
Technology Systems Division University of North Carolina Wilmington (910) 962-7177 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:42 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question

Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-05-13 Thread T. Dee
I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one of the out of the box Notifications, so I added the field to: SYS:Form Field Selection The field shows up in the pull down menu in SYS:Notification Messages - however, when the notification goes out it is just showing as #Change Type#. Any

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-05-13 Thread T. Dee
, LisaD -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: SYS:Notification Messages I wanted to add another field (Change Type) to one

Question: ITSM 7 - Workinfo

2008-05-12 Thread T. Dee
I'm curious how others have dealt with ITSM 7 and the Workinfo on Incident and Change. When the ticket is Assigned to a group only the people that are Members or Associate Members can update the ticket. What is other people want to update the Workinfo with comments, etc. - how do you deal with

Re: Question: ITSM 7 - Workinfo

2008-05-12 Thread T. Dee
if they don't see the impact of opening modifications up to everyone. Long - but hopefully useful. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:10 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject

Question: ITSM 7 - Group

2008-05-09 Thread T. Dee
I have created my own Form and created a group in Group. I gave the Group a name and a unique ID as well as making it Change. However, when I go into the admin form and select the field I want to set the permissions on the group is not showing up in the list of groups. What am I missing?

Re: Question: ITSM 7 - Group

2008-05-09 Thread T. Dee
Thanks Roger, but I do have the Group Type set to Change. On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Roger Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** On the Group form the Group Type field needs to be set to Change -Original Message- From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Fri

Re: OT: Canadian Tax Obligation for US Resident Working in Canada

2008-05-02 Thread T. Dee
The other thing to be aware of as well - keeping property, bank accounts, Health Card, etc. shows the government that you have the intent of returning to Canada and as a result any income you earn outside of Canada is taxable - even in countries that may not charge you tax. On Thu, May 1, 2008

Question: SLM Data

2008-04-21 Thread T. Dee
I am trying to create a report to see if all my SLAs are correct. I see that SLM:ServiceTarget_Category contains most of what I want, however, it does not contain the qualification of the SLA. Does anyone know where this information is stored? THANKS!!

DEFECT - SW00293048 - ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Incident Template

2008-04-16 Thread T. Dee
When you create an Incident Template and you set the Impact and Urgency it automatically sets the Priority and Weight - works fine. However, if you change your mind later and select (clear) from the Impact and Urgency pull down it does NOT clear the Priority and Weight. The defect number is:

Re: Question: Auditing - ITSM 7 (patch 6)

2008-04-15 Thread T. Dee
Has anyone done a Crystal Reporting on one of the Auditing Forms? Thanks. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are

Re: Question: Auditing - ITSM 7 (patch 6)

2008-04-14 Thread T. Dee
What is more confusing is I just created a new Change and I modified the Scheduled Start Date and saved the record. I then opened CHG:ChangeRequest_AuditLogSystem. I searched in original request ID for my Change that I just created a no records found. On 4/14/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED

OT: RFE - Procedure Change

2008-04-11 Thread T. Dee
Just an FYI. I opened an issue with Remedy and was told it was not a defect. I requested an RFE be opened. I was told that Remedy has changed their procedures / policies that if you want an RFE you must fill out the RFE Form. Thought you might be interested.

OT: ITSM 7 - Task - Status Reason (Spelt Wrong)

2008-04-10 Thread T. Dee
Not sure if anyone has seen this or reported it to Remedy, but the Status Reason in Task Canceled is spelt wrong - should be Cancelled. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:

Re: ITSM 7 - Task - Status Reason (Spelt Wrong)

2008-04-10 Thread T. Dee
. can.celed also can.celled, can.cel.ing also can.cel.ling, can.cels also can.cels Scott Parrish IT Prophets, LLC (770) 653-5203 www.itprophets.com -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, April

Re: ITSM 7 - Task - Status Reason (Spelt Wrong)

2008-04-10 Thread T. Dee
Certified, CMMI(R) Level 3 Rated Company -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:16 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM 7 - Task - Status Reason (Spelt Wrong) Good point

Re: Incident Console customization

2008-04-09 Thread T. Dee
If you double click on the field in the table that you added - what are the permissions - should be general access and public. Ty On 4/8/08, Pease, Franci E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** My users have requested Next Target Date field be added to the Support view of Incident Management

Re: Escalation will not run?

2008-04-09 Thread T. Dee
I have seen this before - we had this happen that escalations would just stop running - I had to restart the server and it fixed the issue. On 4/9/08, Sokol, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** I have an escalation that is normally disabled. I enable it whenever I need it to run. It is very

Re: Escalation will not run?

2008-04-09 Thread T. Dee
(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 12:07 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Escalation will not run? I have seen this before - we had this happen that escalations would just stop running - I had to restart the server and it fixed

Question: Production Testing - ITSM 7 (patch 6)

2008-04-07 Thread T. Dee
I am going to be migrating the code / data from our development server to our production server. The users will test the production server to ensure everything is OK before go live date. I know that I will need to reset the Help Desk, Change and Task ticket numbers back to zero. However, I was

Re: Error when saving ar.cfg: No Permission

2008-04-04 Thread T. Dee
Did you check the attributes of the file to see if it is read only - attrib ar.cfg On 4/3/08, Gary Opela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to change submitter mode to locked on a new remedy install. I keep getting an error stating I do not have write permission to ar.cfg. I went to the

Question: Allow Request Creation

2008-04-04 Thread T. Dee
I have looked in both the Change Management User's Guide and Configuration Guide (both 7.0) and there is nothing that talks about the option on the left hand side of Change called Create Request Creation. Does anyone know what this is? THANKS! Happy Friday :-)

Re: Question: Allow Request Creation

2008-04-04 Thread T. Dee
Console. -- Tony Worthington Sr. Technical Analyst Kohl's Department Stores [EMAIL PROTECTED] 262-703-5911 *T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED]* Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 04/04/2008 02:12 PM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages - Adding NEW Field to pull down menu

2008-04-02 Thread T. Dee
University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:33 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question

Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-04-01 Thread T. Dee
I created a NEW SYS:Notification Messages for when the Status goes into Pending for Incident and it works great! However, I noticed it is slow going out. When I create a NEW Incident I get the notification within seconds, but my Pending Notification takes a few minutes. My email configuration

Re: Help with Change Management

2008-03-31 Thread T. Dee
Is this with current Changes or NEW Changes? Ty On 3/31/08, Katherine Hoffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi all, I have a problem with my change requests. One of our managers left and his name was deleted from the system. I am not sure if this had anything to do with the issue but it

Re: Approvals

2008-03-31 Thread T. Dee
Do you have entries in both Approver Mappings and Approval Process Configuration? Ty On 3/31/08, Don Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** We are on ITSM 7 patch 6 in a windows environment. If we create a change and save it in Request For Authorization they Approval Engine can not find the

Re: Approvals

2008-03-31 Thread T. Dee
I don't believe you can skip states as this will affec the approval process. Ty On 3/31/08, Don Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Yes. I made sure the configuration process was correct and then added the mappings. The approvers are members of the support group and have the correct

Re: Help with Change Management

2008-03-31 Thread T. Dee
Have you checked the Approval Process Configuration and Approval Mappings. Ty On 3/31/08, Katherine Hoffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** This is with all the NEW changes. On 3/31/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this with current Changes or NEW Changes? Ty On 3/31/08

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages - Missing ?

2008-03-28 Thread T. Dee
and to learn, to laugh and make others laugh. This is my purpose. Any day I don't do this was not worth the time it took to get through it. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, March

Re: Adding SLA Due Date field to Overview Console

2008-03-28 Thread T. Dee
You also have to enter each field into SHR:ARDBCFields and you must stop and start remedy services after you have done this. Field ID: 955750016 Form GUID:MAINHELPDESK Vendor Field ID: 95575 GUID: Submitter: The field ID is the ID of your field

Re: OT: Defect - Send To, Mail Recipient

2008-03-27 Thread T. Dee
regards Michiel Beijen __ MANSOLUTIONS Energieweg 60-62 3771 NA Barneveld The Netherlands Tel. +31-(0)612968592 Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet http://bsm.mansolutions.nl On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:36 PM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Question: SYS:Notification Messages - Missing ?

2008-03-27 Thread T. Dee
I have two Notifications - the Notification Message Tags are: CHG-APR-GroupApprovalOLAResolutionEscalation CHG-APR-IndividualApprovalOLAResolutionEscalation I have exported ALL Filters and I am unable to reference any Filter to these two Notifications. Do these even exist? Thanks!

Re: First Contact Resolution (FCR) ITIL ITSM 7

2008-03-27 Thread T. Dee
We created our own FCR and I have a field set if the call is resolved within 1 hour and resolved by the individual who opened the ticket. On 3/27/08, Kevin Pulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hello all, I'm trying to find information on FCR (First Contact Resolution) specifically for the

Re: First Contact Resolution (FCR) ITIL ITSM 7

2008-03-27 Thread T. Dee
: ** Hi Kevin, Same here as Tyrone, resolved in 1 hour and resolved by the person who opened the ticket. Same setup for FCR at the last two companies I worked for as well, for whatever that's worth. Jase On 3/27/08, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We created our own FCR and I have

Question: Pending Change - Tasks ?

2008-03-26 Thread T. Dee
I'm curious what others are doing with their Change / Task application. When I place a Change into Pending my Change is Pending. However, all the Tasks remain in their current State. So all the users that have Tasks assigned to them DO NOT know that the Change is Pending. Does anyone else have

OT: Defect - Send To, Mail Recipient

2008-03-26 Thread T. Dee
Just an FYI to those of you who use the User Tool and use ITSM 7.0. If you try and use the Send To, Mail Recipient feature you will see that the subject line of the email refers to a different Change, Incident, Problem, etc. number then the record you are on (which ever one you are using).

Re: Question: REJECT incoming emails

2008-03-25 Thread T. Dee
Barneveld The Netherlands Tel. +31-(0)612968592 Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet http://bsm.mansolutions.nl On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 2:39 PM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't remember if there is a way to tell Remedy to reject incoming emails from users when they reply to a message

Re: Filter : Notify Action

2008-03-24 Thread T. Dee
If they don't appear in the email this is a permissions issue. Ty On 3/24/08, Anuj DUA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, We have observed that when we change the value of User Name field in notify action of a filter then, some of the selected fields does not appear in the mail. For

Question: REJECT incoming emails

2008-03-24 Thread T. Dee
I can't remember if there is a way to tell Remedy to reject incoming emails from users when they reply to a message that Remedy sent to them. We don't have Incoming emails setup - only Outgoing. If I remember correctly if a user replies to a message from Remedy it stops all other messages from

OT: Change Database Entry Mode - Optional to Display Only

2008-03-24 Thread T. Dee
Are there any utilities that would allow me to change a database field from Optional to Display Only? ARS 7.0.01 (patch 002) Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:

Re: Change Database Entry Mode - Optional to Display Only

2008-03-24 Thread T. Dee
the original form, save, then Paste the field into the original form, change the field type to display-only and save. Stephen Remedy Skilled Professional -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Monday, March

OT: Documentation - Workflow, etc.

2008-03-20 Thread T. Dee
I was wondering for those of you who do customizations, modifications, etc., how do you document your changes / workflow, etc. Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:

Re: Limit a single record from being searched

2008-03-20 Thread T. Dee
You can do row level access. Have an active link set the row level field of the group id that you want only those individuals to have. On 3/20/08, Moore, Christopher Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hey everyone- I got an odd request today: to create a record (a CI) which can only be

Re: Documentation - Workflow, etc.

2008-03-20 Thread T. Dee
of the workflow name, and deactivate the old workflow. That way we can easily roll back any changes. Chris -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 8:20 AM To: arslist

Re: Documentation - Workflow, etc.

2008-03-20 Thread T. Dee
forms and workflow objects are created and modified. Then you could run reports off of that form. Took me a couple days to build mine. Add to that design docs, etc. as others have mentioned. Rick On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 7:33 AM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was kind of thinking

RESOLVED: Approval by Mistake - Change ITSM 7.0

2008-03-20 Thread T. Dee
write capability to do the approval. You can of course create customization to remve the approver. -Original Message- From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 3:57 pm Subject: Question: Approval by Mistake - Change ITSM 7.0 One of my users asked me

Question: Task - Status Bypassed - ITSM 7

2008-03-19 Thread T. Dee
Can someone explain the Bypassed Status in Task? I have looked in the BMC Remedy IT Service Management Task Management Administrator's Guide and can't find anything on this. Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-03-19 Thread T. Dee
THANK YOU! On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Pierson, Shawn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you do a search on the ARSList archives, there was a good description of how to do this. I don't have the person's name that posted it to be able to give them credit (sorry), but here is the text I

Question: No Approval Required - Change - ITSM 7

2008-03-19 Thread T. Dee
I have setup a Approval Process Configuration for a change type that does not require an approval and this works great. However, if I turn on auto assignment for Change then this does not work. Has anyone seen and/or dealt with this? Thanks!

Question: Approval by Mistake - Change ITSM 7.0

2008-03-19 Thread T. Dee
One of my users asked me a question - What happens if I add an Approver John Smith and I accidently select the wrong person, can I remove this Approver. This is a good question - is this possible? Thanks!!! ___

Re: Question: Approval by Mistake - Change ITSM 7.0

2008-03-19 Thread T. Dee
:33 PM, Roger Justice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** No, you can provide specific people with over write capability to do the approval. You can of course create customization to remve the approver. -Original Message- From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, 19

Re: OT: Defects - ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Task - Requested For / Requested By

2008-03-18 Thread T. Dee
Update according to 1, 2, and 4 are working as DESIGNED. BMC said if you made a mistake CANCEL the Change and recreate it. Item 3 is fixed in patch 7. Ty On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:16 AM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an FYI - I found some defects with Change / Task and wanted

Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-03-18 Thread T. Dee
I tried to insert another field into the email message body of Notification Message Tag - CHG-APR-ApprovalNTForIndividual - however the pull down is empty. Has anyone come across this? Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access

Re: Question: SYS:Notification Messages

2008-03-18 Thread T. Dee
Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject

Question: Incident Pending Notification

2008-03-17 Thread T. Dee
In the previous version of Help Desk the user would get a notification when the ticket went into Pending. I have noticed this is no longer the case. I was looking at SYS:Notification Messages, but I don't see any notification event for notifying the customer on their status change. Has anyone

Re: Question: Incident Pending Notification

2008-03-17 Thread T. Dee
* +HPD:INC:NTCustPending_854_SetTag Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. Call Tracking Administration Manager University of North Texas Computing IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/ -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Monday, March 17

OT: Defects - ITSM 7 - Task - Requested For / Requested By

2008-03-14 Thread T. Dee
Remedy has confirmed that these are defects and they have been logged as defect SW00290295. I found some defects with Change / Task. 1. When I create a Change by selecting a Template that includes a Task(s), then I enter the Requested By and Requested For and save the Change record you will see

Re: Question: Overview Console - Assignee

2008-03-13 Thread T. Dee
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Question: Overview Console - Assignee Thank you - I have added fields before. The problem is the Assignee field is not the same on Task, Change and Incident. But I see

Re: Audit Log for Deleted Tickets

2008-03-13 Thread T. Dee
return any data, so I am thinking that this change ticket doesn't exist in the system any more. Lou -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:44 PM To: arslist

Re: Audit Log for Deleted Tickets

2008-03-13 Thread T. Dee
Try it - if you still get stuck email me back. Ty On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:24 AM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I am talking about Task - it is due to the fact that someone is blanking out the Assignee, but Remedy is not blanking out the hidden Assigned To field. Do a report

Question: Character Field - Expand Box

2008-03-13 Thread T. Dee
I know this is an odd question and I am sure the answer is no, but when you have a character field and you click on the expand box at the end of the character field it pops up a small window allowing you to type / edit and/or see your text. Is there a way to make the box bigger by default?

Re: Question: Character Field - Expand Box

2008-03-13 Thread T. Dee
apply to all text windows that are opened. HTH Marc T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent by: Action

Re: OT: CTM:People Phone number format..

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
The format for Canada is correct. On 3/12/08, Joe D'Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** This may well be off topic and I apologize for posting this to the list but I thought it may perhaps be the quickest way to get the most current information of what I want to know considering we have a

Re: Adding fields to the Incident Process Flow Wizard

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
PROTECTED] Web Address: www.digitalfoundation.org (SDVOB) A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:12 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject

Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:06 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People Could I be the licenses or permissions they belong to? Try removing their groups

Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
file... -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:06 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People Could I be the licenses or permissions

Re: Audit Log for Deleted Tickets

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
I had this happen to - it is due to the fact that someone is blanking out the Assignee, but Remedy is not blanking out the hidden Assigned To field. Do a report with the Assignee and Assigned To and you will see the problem. Hope this helps. Ty On 3/12/08, Louis Cobuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Removing Pending status as a choice

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
Do not delete the Pending Statuses - mark them offline in SYS:Status Reason Menu Items. Simply add new ones to the SYS:Status Reason Menu Items. As well don't forget to get them to the hidden field Status Reason. As well remember about the Process Flow you have to modify the records in

Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
try to Delete them. -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:06 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People What is their Profile

Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 10:24 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People Mary - what is the profile status? Did you manually change the Support Staff field? Ty On 3/12/08, Mary Dollus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Removing Pending status as a choice

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
an attribute of the field, not a menu. The only way I can think of to do that are the 2 I listed, but I'm open to other options! Chris -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11

Re: Removing Pending status as a choice

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:05 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Removing Pending status as a choice Do not delete the Pending Statuses - mark them offline in SYS:Status Reason Menu Items. Simply add

Re: Audit Log for Deleted Tickets

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
Lou - did it work? On 3/12/08, Louis Cobuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Ty I'll give that a go. Lou -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:44 AM To: arslist

Re: Question: Overview Console - Assignee

2008-03-12 Thread T. Dee
) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 10:10 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Overview Console - Assignee Thank you - I have added fields before. The problem is the Assignee field is not the same on Task, Change and Incident. But I see

Question: Overview Console - Assignee

2008-03-11 Thread T. Dee
I have added a couple of new fields to the Overview Console with no problems. However, the users want to see Assignee on the Overview Console. The problem is the Database ID for Change, Help Desk and Task is not the same. Has anyone added Assignee to their Overview Console? Thanks!

Re: Can't delete a user from CTM:People

2008-03-11 Thread T. Dee
Could I be the licenses or permissions they belong to? Try removing their groups / permissions and try again. On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Mary Dollus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hi All, I'm trying to delete some users out of the CTM:People form however I keep getting the error

Re: Question: Overview Console - Assignee

2008-03-11 Thread T. Dee
Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:19 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: Overview Console - Assignee I have added a couple of new fields to the Overview Console with no problems

Re: Adding fields to the Incident Process Flow Wizard

2008-03-11 Thread T. Dee
Are you talking about adding fields to the Dialog windows that pop-up when using the Process Flow Wizard? On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Abdul Baytops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Hello Listers Has anyone added fields to the Incident flow Process Flow Wizard (Investigation Diagnosis

Question: ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Migration

2008-03-10 Thread T. Dee
I'm curious as to how others are migrating their foundation data / setup data for ITSM 7 from their Development Server to their Production Server. Thanks! ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org

Re: Question: ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Migration

2008-03-10 Thread T. Dee
: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:04 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Question: ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Migration I'm curious as to how others are migrating their foundation data / setup data

OT: Defects - ITSM 7 (patch 6) - Task - Requested For / Requested By

2008-03-10 Thread T. Dee
Just an FYI - I found some defects with Change / Task and wanted to let you know. I am logging this with Remedy and when I get the defect number I will provide you with it. 1. When I create a Change by selecting a Template that includes a Task(s), then I enter the Requested By and Requested For

Question: ITSM 7 - Task Template - Category

2008-03-10 Thread T. Dee
Can someone tell me what the purpose of the Category in Task Template. I have three choices Change Management System, Incident System and Task Management System. When I go to the Tasks tab in Change and relate a task, I get the Select Template dialog window I get the Type pull down with Standard

Re: Change Templates ITSM7

2008-03-07 Thread T. Dee
Don - on the Change Template there is the field Notes, which will populate Notes on the Change Form - will this be sufficient for their request? Ty On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Don Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Has anyone attempted to or been requested to add Work Info information

Re: Change Templates ITSM7

2008-03-07 Thread T. Dee
What about adding the attachment to the task - you can add attachment to Tasks. Then when the Task is added to the Change they will see the attachment. Does that help? Ty On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Don Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** No that would not work. They don't want to use

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-06 Thread T. Dee
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:14 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) Are you talking about the Approval Process Configuration? I tried to create a new record, but got a SQL error. On 3/5/08, Roger

OT: Defect - Task - SW00279798 - ITSM 7 (patch 6)

2008-03-06 Thread T. Dee
Just an FYI - there is a defect in ITSM 7 - Task. If the Task is Assigned to someone (Bob Smith) and you blank out the person's name (Bob Smith) in the Assignee field and hit save it does not blank out the Assigned To field and this is the field that the Overview Console uses to list the Tasks

Question: ITSM 7 - Change / Tasks - Sequencing

2008-03-06 Thread T. Dee
I apologize if this question is basic, but is it possible to have Tasks that are not part of the sequence - i.e. 1, 2, 3. Or do you just make it the same sequence number. Thanks. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist

Re: Question: ITSM 7 - Change / Tasks - Sequencing

2008-03-06 Thread T. Dee
That is correct, but there are some Tasks they want to create without any sequence dependencies. So for example setting up the phone they don't want it to be dependant on any other tasks. Is this possible? THANKS! On 3/6/08, Kevin Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you can make

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
will need to set up aan approval process that will allow this to occur with a qualification such as Timing = no impact. -Original Message- From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 5:08 pm Subject: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) I am

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
to use that allows the Change to go from RFC to Scheduled on self approval. -Original Message- From: T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 7:51 am Subject: Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6) I have the Approvals for certain Change

Re: Question: Change Statuses - ITSM 7.0 (patch 6)

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
Lammey ESPN MIT Technical Services Applications Management 860-766-4761 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Dee Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:14 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Question: Change

Question: Task 7.x (patch 6) - Defect or By Design

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
If you go into Task and enter just the Task number (e.g. 172) and search it pulls up the record. However, if you enter in the Change number in the Request ID field on Task and search it will not work. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or

Re: Question: Task 7.x (patch 6) - Defect or By Design

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
I'm putting it in the field called Request ID - 5th field from the top on the far right side. This is where the Change Number is. On 3/5/08, Howard Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Dee, What field are you putting in the change number? A screen shot might help. Hbr On Wed, Mar 5

Re: Question: Task 7.x (patch 6) - Defect or By Design

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
7.0.03 - Patch 006 On 3/5/08, Howard Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ** Dee, What patch level are you at? That should work. hbr On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:51 AM, T. Dee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm putting it in the field called Request ID - 5th field from the top on the far right

Question: Overview Console - ITSM 7 - Patch 6

2008-03-05 Thread T. Dee
Has anyone experienced issues with the Overview Console? When I go into the Overview Console I see Tasks that are NOT Assigned to me, as well I don't belong to any of the Groups of the Tasks that are showing. Odd behaviour.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >