Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz EQ/DRC

2020-01-28 Thread firedog
JohnB wrote: > Just a thought - can you please confirm that the files > > InguzDSP.exe > InguzDSP.exe.config > DSPUtil.dll > > are all in the folder: "C:\Program Files > (x86)\Squeezebox\server\Bin\MSWin32-x86-multi-thread" > > together with sox.exe (, etc) Hi JohnB- Thanks again. Just befor

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz EQ/DRC

2020-01-28 Thread firedog
Thanks again. My Sox.exe is in the same place as yours. So the question is, why is Inguz looking for it in the wrong place? And how do I "fix" that? I also followed your other advice about deleting files and restsrting LMS and the Touch. Same results as you saw above. Whenever the samplerates of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz EQ/DRC

2020-01-28 Thread firedog
JohnB wrote: > You say you have loaded the FIR files into your touch. > > Are you running LMS on your Touch, rather than on a separate PC, etc? If > so you will not be able use the Inguz plugin - the Touch just doesn't > have the processing power. No. Sorry for not being clear. I've got a prett

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz EQ/DRC

2020-01-28 Thread firedog
Thanks for your help. I made progress. I have convolution files I made in Audiolense. They supposedly are 32 bit float, and are wav files. I loaded them into my Touch, but can't get playback. Here's the log output showing the error, I'd appreciate it if one of you can tell me what this means and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz EQ/DRC

2020-01-28 Thread firedog
Just installed this. When I go to plugins>EQ>settings I get "Cannot initialize Silverlight: createSilverlightControl is not defined" I do have Silverlight installed on the LMS server. What's missing? Plus: How do I add my RC convolution filters? Thanks GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Isol

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] TAS Reviews new Sony HAP-Z1ES player

2014-04-14 Thread firedog
Channel Classics has some great sounding native DSD recordings. They do minimal processing, I think there is only a PCM conversion at a few very small edit points. Other than that, the original native DSD remains. If you like Mahler, try their Mahler 1st I linked to earlier. I believe if you use

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] TAS Reviews new Sony HAP-Z1ES player

2014-04-13 Thread firedog
I don't have any real argument for you except what I hear. I hear a small improvement with native DSD and with DSD over hi-res resamples to PCM of DSD. It is possible that this is simply my DAC being better at converting DSD, although I don't think it is only this, as I have heard it under differe

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] TAS Reviews new Sony HAP-Z1ES player

2014-04-12 Thread firedog
http://www.channelclassics.com/fischer-33112.html one example GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Windows 7 via FW> Mytek 192 DSD DAC;Odyssey Kismet (Khartago case) Stereo Amp; Devore Gibbon 9 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon M20 (occasional use); SB Touch slaved to E

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] TAS Reviews new Sony HAP-Z1ES player

2014-04-10 Thread firedog
Just came across this thread and it is amazing. A raft of comments putting down a product none of you have heard and clearly know little about, and also denigrating DSD, which apparently, at least the majority of you have never heard. Sorry, but the height of close-mindedness. A few points in res

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] A few words on "the second coming of DSD"!

2013-07-24 Thread firedog
First off, I agree that DSD doesn't have a big future. Most of the music being recorded in DSD today is classical. If you like classical you can even get quite a decent library as downloads. Otherwise, there isn't much to get. I think a lot of the excitement about DSD is coming from audiophiles w

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiolabs M-DAC

2012-08-16 Thread firedog
Stratmangler wrote: > Not strictly true - if you hang a M2Tech Hiface 2 out of the USB port > then it's quite happy sending 24/192. > The next logical step of enquiry goes along the lines of "I wonder if > the M2Tech Young DAC can handle 24/192 over USB"? > I think the answer to the question is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 192kHz considered harmful

2012-03-08 Thread firedog
l > information in the 16-bit recording compared to a good 24-bit recording > (and real life). -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, Grant Fidelity B-2

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 192kHz considered harmful

2012-03-07 Thread firedog
of the hi-res files, and not to any inherent superiority of the format. That may be. But then that alone is a good reason to buy them and listen to them. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles, Pink Floyd Engineer Alan Parsons Rips Audiophiles

2012-02-11 Thread firedog
inishing returns. Each added bit of sonic improvement gets more expensive the closer you get to perfection. Audiophiles think that's worth the money, other people think it isn't, and what they have is "good enough". -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless se

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Speaker placement question

2012-02-08 Thread firedog
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Magnepan-37-I-give See this thread with the entry by music producer Barry Diament, where he talks about floating his Maggies on roller platforms and how it improves the sound. He also has an article on his website about room setup -- firedog GIK

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Ripping Vinyl Experiences

2012-01-30 Thread firedog
rring vinyl to digital is that if you do a good job, the resulting digital tracks sound like analogue. Sort of shows that "digital sounding" recordings are due to something other than the inherent nature of digital. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless se

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Is spending more on the front end the answer?

2012-01-30 Thread firedog
t most bang from the buck is obtained by getting a good mid level DAC and putting some money into a clean, low jitter source. More money on an uber DAC might help, but isn't the best in terms of sound for the dollar. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server runni

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-26 Thread firedog
are being produced from a digital source. Even older analogue masters are often transferred to digital and then the new LP master is made from the digital transcription of the original analogue master tape. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexb

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-26 Thread firedog
e sounds like what most people think "analogue" sounds like. Like an LP. In other words, the sound many don't like about "digital" isn't inherent in a digital recording by it's nature; it comes from something else in the recording, mastering, and reproduction pro

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Jittery Touch

2012-01-25 Thread firedog
darrenyeats;686270 Wrote: > You make two statements which are different Firedog. The first one is > purely about jitter, and I disagree with that one. There are DACs that > eliminate jitter e.g. Benchmark. Yes it's a claim as you put it, but > unlike your claim Benchmark publis

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Jittery Touch

2012-01-25 Thread firedog
t counts > if the connected dac can " fix it" so that it's analog out is the same > as with a " better " source the source jitter did not matter. My Touch, before mods, measured by Steve Nugent of Empirical Audio, from SPDIF out: The P-P Jitter below 1MHz was 300p

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Jittery Touch

2012-01-24 Thread firedog
ments) Anyway, why do you care about that quote anyway? If you like how the Touch sounds, that's what counts. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, Grant

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Is there a device to make internet radio streams sound better?

2012-01-20 Thread firedog
My experience with lossy files is that they sound better with: a better DAC; a tube buffer or some type of tube amplification. The tube sound makes the lossy files sound a little more like the "real thing". -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless serv

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2012-01-07 Thread firedog
t at anyhwhere from 5'9" to 5'11", but IMO if you look at pictures of him next to other people the 5'11" can't be right. He was probably an inch or two shorter. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Duet - sound quality compared to Touch, DAC etc. ?

2012-01-07 Thread firedog
itely makes them sound less harsh and more musical. My recordings of 60s rock sound more like an LP through this. I wouldn't say the change is dramatic, but it is noticeable. It also makes the soundstage larger on my system. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless serve

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Duet - sound quality compared to Touch, DAC etc. ?

2012-01-06 Thread firedog
I tried a tube buffer in my system, and it made mp3s sound much better - more like music that hasn't been compressed. You can get a decent tube buffer for $150-$200. I think if you listen to mp3's that would be a more cost effective use of your money. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiolabs M-DAC

2011-12-18 Thread firedog
Before mods, my Touch was measured: "P-P Jitter below 1MHz was 300psec", which seems quite different than what's being talked about here. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-12-16 Thread firedog
hem. But most have iPhone type devices, so don't need it. The way for Logitech to go might be to make something like the Touch with a 7 inch screen, so it could actually be seen from 3m/10ft away, and then the included remote would be sufficient (like the SB3). -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Tr

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audio-gd experience?

2011-12-16 Thread firedog
The brand is much more well known in Oz. See the above forum, where lots of users wanting an affordable DAC are very happy with them. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Touch DAC

2011-12-15 Thread firedog
The new Peachtree Audio DAC-iT is getting very positive reviews. The Schiit Bifrost DAC is too. Both are said to outperform their price point. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiolabs M-DAC

2011-12-07 Thread firedog
Is this the same DAC as the 8200 DAC/pre, but without the pre? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, ClassDaudio SDS-470 amp; Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] $30, 000 audio power cable introduced

2011-11-30 Thread firedog
rious setups, some Windows versions my be better suited for turning off unwanted processes than others. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, ClassDaudio SDS-470

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] $30, 000 audio power cable introduced

2011-11-28 Thread firedog
on separate dedicated power supply to their listening room probably are spending a minimum of $100K, if not several times that, on their audio system. Their are lots of of fantastic speakers available for multiples of $30K. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running V

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Amarra software

2011-11-28 Thread firedog
ver, I have no doubt that EQ can help in some cases; also much more sophisticated methods are also available such as DSP RC, which can correct for both time and frequency. I've used it in the past and found it can work quite well. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] $30, 000 audio power cable introduced

2011-11-27 Thread firedog
hat work better? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, ClassDaudio SDS-470 amp; Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon M20 (occasional use); sometimes use PC with

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Amarra software

2011-11-27 Thread firedog
bles different filtering to be used which results in a different sound. Again, this has nothing to do with whether the upsampling is done perfectly or not. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Amarra software

2011-11-26 Thread firedog
of them are Apple fanboys. Gordon and Steve are certainly in it for what sounds best to them (and what makes their products sound best), and have no particular reason to push Apple products. Like a lot of things in audio, YMMV. The results may be system dependent. -- firedog GIK Acoustics

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Amarra software

2011-11-23 Thread firedog
e. I would say those features are worth some money. I agree $700 is a lot for the software. More than I would pay. There is also a simpler version for less than half the price, with a few less features, but apparently sonically the same. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanle

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-13 Thread firedog
ment. If some of you true believers had the balls, you'd set up a proper unsighted test and see if you really can tell the difference between a modded Touch and one that isn't. But you won't, because you prefer to live in a fantasy world and not deal with facts. -- firedog GIK Ac

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-13 Thread firedog
ay not send a stream to the Touch. Althogh what you are describing doesn't sound like this phenomenon. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150 as pre-amp, ClassDaudio SDS

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-07 Thread firedog
ally, the server can only decode one stream, and it will do what it thinks best for the various units you have on simultaneously. The "solution" to this problem is to decode at the individual unit and not at the server. Try this together with Klaus' other mods, you may find that in y

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-06 Thread firedog
Just listend to Steely Dan "Countdown to Ecstasy" - standard redbook (old) CD rip. Never heard it sound so good, so clear. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, MF X-150

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-05 Thread firedog
Try the Tune In plugin and look for more streams. I couldn't get BBC World Service from the main menu/search to work, but found a WMA stream of it with the Tune In plugin that works. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch s

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-04 Thread firedog
ver at the Audiocircle forum who mentioned the same thing. Do you have any idea what this might be or what parameter might need to be adjusted to counteract for this? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 3.0

2011-11-04 Thread firedog
Sorry for being dense, can someone explain to me exactly what line(s) in the code in which file can/need to be changed here? And if I used V 3.0 to enable "digital out only" is there any reason to alter this priority at all? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-11-02 Thread firedog
't donated, make a donation! -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, classDaudio SDS-470 amp; MF X-150 as pre-amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-10-19 Thread firedog
he idea that today's equipment reproduces music with "undetectable" levels of jitter simply isn't true. The question is undetectable to whom? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-10-06 Thread firedog
Klaus is doing it for free, but if you like his software why not make a small contribution? I did. There's a link on his page. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, classDaudi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-09-07 Thread firedog
I made the same mistake. You have to do a factory reset before the re-install for everything to work. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, classDaudio SDS-470 amp; MF X-150 as pre

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] How to browse my "HD" audio tracks?

2011-08-25 Thread firedog
So I can browse that way. It also means I can eliminate a given genre from random play if I wish. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, classDaudio SDS-470 amp; MF X-150 as pre-amp

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] EQ for Linux/Vortexbox?

2011-08-19 Thread firedog
;m reading conflicting stuff about whether or not there is a version that suits Vortexbox. Thanks for your help. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DAC-V3, classDaudio SDS-470 amp; MF X-150

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-07-28 Thread firedog
27;ve done this several times, same result. Any ideas? BTW, what is modification "Jive2"? Says "disabled" in my ttstat window. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-07-09 Thread firedog
you have going that is trying to make a sound effect? Have you tried disabling all plugins and seeing if that makes a difference? -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 am

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox audio quality, really that good ?

2011-07-07 Thread firedog
ices/DACs out there and see what they say. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless server running Vortexbox OS; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use PC wit

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Blind tests? I don't get it...

2011-06-17 Thread firedog
e, if you can't hear the difference between a $500 DAC and a $1500 DAC in a blind test, it's telling you not to spend that extra $1000 (unless your decision is based on looks and features, and not on sound). -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server runnin

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-05-08 Thread firedog
Run ttstat for the Toolbox and see what the reported buffer size is. That's the actual set buffer size, in spite of your "error message". -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hearing the differences

2011-04-20 Thread firedog
found in at least several responses here. You simply don't want to listen to anyone but yourself. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Su

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] very useful Foobar plugin....

2011-04-18 Thread firedog
ounterparts on the CD. And the hi-res download sounds both louder and more dynamic. So maybe I don't understand these nubmers very well. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-04-16 Thread firedog
soundcheck;625773 Wrote: > @firedog > > You run an EA Pacecar (1250$!) according to your signature, right? And > your Touch is even slaved to the Pacecar!?!? > The Pacecar is supposed to be doing quite sophisticated reclocking, > right? > The only reason for that device to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hearing the differences

2011-04-16 Thread firedog
ave. As a result, I also reject the pure objectivists who claim that "it's not possible to hear any audible difference between X and Y". They'd be more accurate if they said, "the vast majority of listeners can't discern a difference between X and Y". Unfortunately

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-04-16 Thread firedog
d modded my Touch to remove the analogue outs, so the mods don't have any "cost" for me. I think they do make a small improvement - certainly not the dramatic kind that others have been reporting. But I could be imagining it - I certainly don't have the ability to run an object

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-04-15 Thread firedog
if any - is worth the possible loss of features or convenience is something those using the mods have to decide. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-04-08 Thread firedog
ed to have decoding in FLAC at the device level. That's the default setting. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 +

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Differences between Tact 2.2 mini and 2.2XP?

2011-04-04 Thread firedog
They don't do the same thing. TACT works on frequency and time domains. As far as miniDSP - yes, it does the DRC. It is limited to max 48k files. The TACT will work with all hi-res files. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-03-30 Thread firedog
ter)like this. 5) DRC - I think the reference is to DSP (digital) Room Correction -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 +

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-03-29 Thread firedog
puts: Analog: off Digital: on USB: off Modification Kernel:enabled Klaus, any ideas? BTW, what is "Modification Jive2" Thanks ________ -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB T

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-03-27 Thread firedog
Genius satire. The guys at Hydrogen Audio would probably give you a medal if you posted there. I will say however, that wired works much better on my system, in terms of almost no blips, drop outs, rebuffering etc. Especially with hi-res. But I'm not making any claims about SQ. -- fi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] For the audiophile who has everything...

2011-03-25 Thread firedog
Anyone that can get people to buy that furry elephant leg and put it under an audio component in any environment that isn't an actual zoo, deserves every buck he makes off of the people that pay him good money for that stuff. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Differences between Tact 2.2 mini and 2.2XP?

2011-03-25 Thread firedog
priced if you have no other alternative for fixing room problems. Enjoy. Let us know how it goes. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Differences between Tact 2.2 mini and 2.2XP?

2011-03-24 Thread firedog
en buy the mini. BTW, I had a 2.2XP, put up room treatments in my room (GIK Acoustics), and decided I didn't need the TACT anymore. The treatments were much cheaper. So if WAF isn't a factor, consider room treatments. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-03-21 Thread firedog
ct" to the analogue you hear lots of things happen: Jitter, RF interference, filtering etc. -- firedog GIK Acoustics Room Treatments. Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF X-DACV3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speaker

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-03-12 Thread firedog
MF M1? Or is it just for auditioning? So the MF M1 is clearly superior to your modded X-DACv3 - good to know as it is also less expensive. Sounds like it's a good DAC for the price. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Worst sounding album in your collection

2011-03-06 Thread firedog
ke I have now just emphasizes how bad it sounds. The negative side of audiophilia - you find out how crappy some of your recordings are. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Spe

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Worst sounding album in your collection

2011-03-06 Thread firedog
ld find elsewhere. Not that I have any intention of paying > that kind of price for any CD... I usually like the DCC versions. So I occassionally check on ebay. Don't remember ever seeing one I was interested in that wasn't over $100. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server r

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Worst sounding album in your collection

2011-03-06 Thread firedog
rt of high pitched, metallic and "acid trip" sounding - by design. So the end result is sort of a high pitched drone without much dynamics. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gib

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Worst sounding album in your collection

2011-03-03 Thread firedog
were). For the remaster he supervised before his death, George noted the large number of instruments on each track, and the fact that much of it was essentially recorded live. He also noted that if he had to do it over again he probably wouldn't go in for that type of production. -- firedog

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2011-02-27 Thread firedog
q response)purposes I bet it is fine. I would think in general the individual calibration file is very important in this application -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-22 Thread firedog
of the asynch features of the USB, don't you lose that benefit as > soon as you convert back to SPDIF? MF claims that the asynch USB setup is low jitter and the conversion to SPDIF inside it adds no additional jitter. http://www.musicalfidelity.com/products/V-Series/V-LINK/v-link.asp -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-22 Thread firedog
significant to you); I'm not sure it will work with the Touch as you are intending. Hope I'm wrong. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] soundcheck's Touch Toolbox 2.0

2011-02-16 Thread firedog
finishes the check on the digital output and isn't put off by the negative reaction here. By the way, I have no horse in this race. I also support Klaus' efforts, and use his mods. I even made a small contribution to support the quite serious amount of time and effort he puts into thes

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-16 Thread firedog
flow, and not the clock of the PC (as in most USB implelmentations)you will get less jitter. General reaction seems to be that asynch USB is implemented very successfully in many devices now on the market, and for hi-end audio it is becoming the preferred implementation. -- firedog Tranquil PC

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-14 Thread firedog
"cheaper" version, does that mean the lesser dCS stack isn't "hi-end"? I don't think the label matters. What matters is: are you happy with the sound? If not, can you afford something better? Is the improvement "worth it", even if you have the cash? There ar

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Power cords

2011-02-13 Thread firedog
I use a couple of relatively inexpensive replacement cords ($50). I think they make a small improvement - reducing an edge or harshenss in the sound. My guess is that the main reason for this is that they are well shielded, unlike stock cords. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz - my brain hurts!

2011-02-11 Thread firedog
ic, etc), a decently powered SB server and a few hundred bucks can get you something at least as good as a $6000 TACT RC pre. Amazing. Of course, you may also have to invest in a DAC to equal the SQ. Definitely something for me to consider when I upgrade my server to something that will run Audiole

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-06 Thread firedog
o the Touch "as is" first, you may find it quite satisfactory on its own. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-02-04 Thread firedog
nds on your system, your ears, and the DAC. That said, in answer to your queries: I don't think the Duet sounded very good on it's own, but through the external DACs I tried it with it was very good. The Touch is better, but also improved through a good DAC. In both cases the sound im

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz - my brain hurts!

2011-01-28 Thread firedog
Phil- Can't the audiolense support help you with this? They must have run into this request previously. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Dual 506 + Ortof

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Inguz - my brain hurts!

2011-01-27 Thread firedog
Phil - Since I see that you are a TACT owner (and I used to be one)I'd be very interested in your opinion of the results of the Audiolense correction vs. TACT once you get it up and running. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Quality of digital outs from the Squeezebox

2011-01-24 Thread firedog
aren't very different from lots of other music server/streamer designs or mods - designed to produce the best sound possible from a given server/pc/streamer. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, De

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Jitter measurements..

2011-01-23 Thread firedog
pples and oranges. Unless it was done with the same methodology and with the same equipment it doesn't really tell you anything. I'd basically just ignore any published jitter measurements, unless they meet the criteria above. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeS

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-19 Thread firedog
said that there was no remix (they worked only from the stereo masters, and not individual tracks). They did do selective limiting, EQ, editing, filtering, etc on the tracks. Especially noted that they boosted bass and drums this way, and compressed overall a few db (stereo only, not mono). -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Empirical Audio Pace Car Reclocker Observations

2011-01-15 Thread firedog
ar in native format up to the limits of the Touch (24/96). If I was starting over though, I think I'd buy Steve's OffRamp4 USB converter. It gives you more versatility and even Steve now says that the SQ difference between it and the PaceCar is small. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless W

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-11 Thread firedog
y that. They specifically stated that the 16/44 is a downsample of the 24/44 master. Not to insult anyone in the other thread, but I believe them rather than amateur "testers". -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Ca

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-11 Thread firedog
k that a hi-res version would sound even better. I'm not claiming it would sound dramatically better, but yes, noticeably better. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers;

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-10 Thread firedog
-release(in progress, based on 24/192 digital transcription of original analogue) that is supposed to happen soon, we will get hi-res versions of the catalogue. Based on recent work at Abbey Road re-releasing Paul McCartney and George Harrison in hi-res, we can hope for uncompressed versions. --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?

2010-12-25 Thread firedog
There's a similar product, the Auraliti (auraliti.com), that sells for $800. Reputed to have excellent sound. (And yes, I know it is more limited in terms of connections, netowrking, etc., but it is the same basic idea - a high quality streamer, digital out, no moving computer parts inside.) --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2010-12-25 Thread firedog
s… -> Left/Right Identifier" item mentioned in the measurement instructions isn't there. Other items mentioned in the instructions also seem to be missing form the pages Note: I'm using windows XP and have Net Framework 2 installed. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server runn

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?

2010-12-24 Thread firedog
(and this is what my experience shows) is that > PWD+Bridge sounds better than the Transporter, which is a higher-end > device than the Touch. Why do you say the lens will have lower sound quality? -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empiri

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?

2010-12-04 Thread firedog
ge and connect to your DAC. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; KRK Ergo, MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Mirage MS-12 sub; Dual 506 + Ortofon 20 (occasional use); sometimes use PC with M-Audio

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DACs : unmodded Transporter vs Perfectwave DAC?

2010-12-03 Thread firedog
outs, and with networking ability. Perfect for use with a Tact. See the newsletter on PS Audio website. -- firedog Tranquil PC fanless WHS server running SqueezeServer; SB Touch slaved to Empirical Audio Pace Car; KRK Ergo, MF V DAC3, MF X-150 amp, Devore Gibbon Super 8 Speakers; Mirage MS-12 sub;

  1   2   >