At 09:18 PM 1/19/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
>So should we consider mouth / intestinal bacteria to have human rights
>because they have unique and individual genetic codes different from the
>host?
I only assign human rights to organisms classified in homo sapiens.
JDG
From: "The Fool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:18:05 -0600
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PRO
At 09:18 PM 1/19/2004 -0600 The Fool wrote:
>So should we consider mouth / intestinal bacteria to have human rights
>because they have unique and individual genetic codes different from the
>host?
I only assign human rights to organisms classified in homo sapiens.
JDG
> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> At 12:58 AM 11/1/2003 -0600 The Fool wrote:
> >Bullshit. I ask again: Why should anyone consider a parasitic lump of
> >undifferentiated cells any differently from a cancer?
>
> Because cancers are of the hosts genetic code, and because children ar
At 12:43 PM 10/30/2003 + Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> More important
> than strength and intelligence in the character of an American
> presidential candidate is humility. Whatever one thinks of
> President George W Bush, he cultivates the same sort of folksy
> image that served former p
At 12:58 AM 11/1/2003 -0600 The Fool wrote:
>Bullshit. I ask again: Why should anyone consider a parasitic lump of
>undifferentiated cells any differently from a cancer?
Because cancers are of the hosts genetic code, and because children are of
a unique and individual genetic code.
For someone w
At 01:21 AM 11/1/2003 -0600 The Anonymous Fool wrote:
>The only thing you've proven is that you don't answer questions.
Indeed.
JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Chad Cooper wrote:
>
> Forbes Rating of Worst Commutes to work:
> Greater Los Angeles
> San Fran
> Dallas/Fort Worth
> Houston
> Washington D.C.
> Denver
>
> Nerd From Hell
>
We're number one!
We're number one!
We'renumberone!
Yay!
I've known people who leave home (in San Bernardino, whe
Dan Minette wrote:
> It may also be worthwhile to know what the nature of these
> Indian Muslims
> who spoke out was. If they were people who Ritu happened to
> know, it would
> be as anecdotal as Erik suggested.
These weren't people I knew on a personal basis. These were people I saw
on the
ritu wrote:
Well, Al Qaeda has been exhorting its members to reach Iraq and attack
the US forces for months now. The borders are porous enough, so it is
only a question of how obedient the cadres are.
If the US had found a few barrels of anthrax or some signs of an active
nuclear program or anyth
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:40:57 +, Alberto Monteiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ritu wrote:
I have always found that a bit
strange as India has the second largest muslim population in the world -
only Indonesia has more muslims than India.
India probably has the second largest in the world of eve
From: Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:40:57 +
Ritu wrote:
>
> I have always found that a bit
&g
Ritu wrote:
>
> I have always found that a bit
> strange as India has the second largest muslim population in the world -
> only Indonesia has more muslims than India.
>
India probably has the second largest in the world of everything:
religious group, ethnic group, consumer of a product,
any profe
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [L3] RE: religious/political question
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0530, ri
From: "ritu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political question
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:01:42 +0530
Erik Reuter wrote:
&g
Erik Reuter wrote:
> Maybe an India-based entrepreneur should start a polling organization.
We have some - it's just that their questions are focused on
subcontinental, national and local politics and issues.
Ritu
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:51:20PM +0530, ritu wrote:
> And unlike Pakistan, Indian muslims just don't seem to be included in
> the international polls on the subject. I have always found that a bit
> strange as India has the second largest muslim population in the world
> - only Indonesia has mor
Erik Reuter wrote:
> A little. But I don't put a high value on such anecdotal evidence. A
> poll of at least 1000 of those people (randomly selected across a
> diverse range of backgrounds) asking how favorably they view OBL would
> be more convincing.
I don't think their support[or lack thereof
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:56:30AM +0530, ritu wrote:
> Not that phenomenal...hmm, how about this: 'In the aftermath of 9/11,
> a large number of Indian muslims spoke out against the atrocity. In
> fact, only a few of the 120 million Indian muslims spoke in favour of
> OBL and they were condemned/
Erik Reuter wrote:
> > I remember most of the 120 million muslims of my country
> speaking out
> > against the atrocity.
>
> You must have a phenomenal memory! I can only remember 120 people on a
> good day, let alone 120 MILLION!
*g*
Not that phenomenal...hmm, how about this: 'In the afterm
On 12 Nov 2003, at 8:22 pm, Horn, John wrote:
From: Horn, John
It seems to me that if there were a major terrorist attack
(or natural disaster or whatever) at Mecca during the haij
you could find a fair number of Bubba's in pickups who would
be dancing in the streets and shooting their shotguns i
> From: Horn, John
>
> It seems to me that if there were a major terrorist attack
> (or natural disaster or whatever) at Mecca during the haij
> you could find a fair number of Bubba's in pickups who would
> be dancing in the streets and shooting their shotguns in the
> air throughout the US.
> From: ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Second, _the support is already there_. People in
> > Muslim countries all over the world celebrated on
> > September 11th. I've seen the videotape, and so have
> > most other people.
>
> Sure the support is already there but it isn't as widespread
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:12:42AM +0530, ritu wrote:
> I remember most of the 120 million muslims of my country speaking out
> against the atrocity.
You must have a phenomenal memory! I can only remember 120 people on a
good day, let alone 120 MILLION!
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.n
John D. Giorgis wrote:
> At 09:16 AM 11/10/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
> >Yes. More importantly, if we had done it properly, external
> (to Iraq)
> >support for the terrorists would be minimized. As it is
> (and as I stated
> >before) we've created access for anti Americans throughout
--- "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I find most amazing is that all you opponents
> of the war talked about
> how hard it would be to rebuild Iraq before the war,
> and many proponents of
> the war agreed - but argued that it would be harder
> for America to leave
> Saddam Hus
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> > Because that seems to be normal group dynamics:
> > Isolate a group, treat
> > them with constant suspicion and act as if they are
> > all potential
> > terrorists and sooner, rather than later, there is a
> > ground swell of
> > support, within the same group, for the e
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political question
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:25:07 -0500
At 03:57 PM 11/11/2003 -0500 Jon Gabriel
--- "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As I said earlier, I wish more organizations would
> be so outspoken, whether
> >their members feel that way or not. They have a
> responsibility to speak out
> >against those who pervert their ideals, you know?
>
> No, I do not know, actually
At 03:57 PM 11/11/2003 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
>She may very well be right, yet I found no evidence of any official
>statement condemning violence against anyone except unborn children anywhere
>on their very comprehensive website. What's curious to me is that since
>(afaik) the NRLC is _the_
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political question
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:36:19 -0500
At 01:31 PM 11/11/2003 -0500 Jon Ga
On 11 Nov 2003 at 12:45, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> At 08:18 PM 11/9/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
> >The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in the manner we
> >did, without the support of the UN or even all of our NATO allies,
>
> I am sure that if *NATO* had authorized the attack on
At 01:31 PM 11/11/2003 -0500 Jon Gabriel wrote:
>>From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political questio
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political question
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:26:18 -0500
At 03:30 PM 11/9/2003 +0530 ritu wrot
At 08:18 PM 11/9/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in the manner we did,
>without the support of the UN or even all of our NATO allies,
I am sure that if *NATO* had authorized the attack on Iraq, everything
would be hunky-dory in Fallujah and else
At 03:30 PM 11/9/2003 +0530 ritu wrote:
>Gautam, how many religio-political groups condemn their own
>lunatics/extremists loudly, clearly and constantly? For that matter, how
>many political organisations/groups do that?
Pro-Lifers in the United States would be one example of a religio-political
g
At 09:16 AM 11/10/2003 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>Yes. More importantly, if we had done it properly, external (to Iraq)
>support for the terrorists would be minimized. As it is (and as I stated
>before) we've created access for anti Americans throughout the world to
>attack us. Do you reall
At 09:45 AM 11/9/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Episcopalians aren't launching suicide bombing campaigns.
No, they're too busy fighting amongst themselves about the gay bishop.
The Anglican Church became the first major Christian denomination to
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [L3] RE: religious/political question
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Dan Minette
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Dan Minette wrote:
> But, that's not where we are. As far as I can tell from the opinion
> polls and other reports, the opinion of the US held by the people of
> Iraq is souring. We are being seen less as liberators and more as
> foreign occupiers. While the idea that peo
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> --- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in
> > the manner we did,
> > without the support of the UN or even all of our
> > NATO allies, and with
> > little evidence that Hussain was involved
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [L3] RE: religious/political question
>
> Do you really think that anyone in Iraq c
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:14:15 -0800 (PST), Gautam Mukunda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in
the manner we did,
without the support of the UN or even all of our
NATO allies, and with
little evidence that Huss
--- Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in
> the manner we did,
> without the support of the UN or even all of our
> NATO allies, and with
> little evidence that Hussain was involved in
> terrorist attacks against the
> West (and of course
Andrew Crystall wrote:
> I'd point you to certain elements within Israel's current government.
> To some extent, they've been digging their own holes...
>
> Ah well. Let's just say my thoughs on the current Isralie situation
> do NOT make me popular.
So did you approve of what Moshe Ya'alom sa
On 9 Nov 2003 at 16:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yet. I wouldn't put it beyond a fanatic to do something unfortunate.
> > (Remember a certain chap called Rabin? I do...)
> >
>
> There was also Baruch Goldstein in 1994, I'm ashamed to say.
>
> The difference is, most Jews worldwide were agha
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
The problem is very different in Iraq, thankfully.
The Ba'athists almost certainly have no popular
support, very much unlike the IRA.
The problem is, neither do we. In invading Iraq in the manner we did,
without the support of the UN or even all of our NATO allies, and with
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have the US look at Britain's handling
> of the IRA problem and
> note what worked and what didn't, and use that to
> help the US avoid making
> mistakes that don't have to be made.
>
> Julia
What worked:
Very little
What didn't:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Andrew Crystall wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2003 at 9:11, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> > Our responsibility is to stop being enablers. Since
> > September 11th of 2001, the US and its allies have
> > taken up that responsibility. It's time for the rest
> > of the world to do the same.
> Yet. I wouldn't put it beyond a fanatic to do something unfortunate.
> (Remember a certain chap called Rabin? I do...)
>
There was also Baruch Goldstein in 1994, I'm ashamed to say.
The difference is, most Jews worldwide were aghast at both. With a few
despicable exceptions, there was hardly
>Robert Chassell posted:
> An article in Asia Times Online
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/EJ28Aa02.html
This article presents some thought-provoking
viewpoints on America's founding and upon
religion-in-government, particularly as it appears to
reflect the [Asian? Muslim? non-Western?
On 9 Nov 2003 at 8:40, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> > I don't think the Methodists are launching suicide
> > bombing campaigns, and
> > they're not fighting with each other to the point
> > that it's making i
On 9 Nov 2003 at 9:11, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Second, _the support is already there_. People in
> Muslim countries all over the world celebrated on
> September 11th. I've seen the videotape, and so have
> most other people. Opinion polls suggest that in much
> of the Islamic world, Osama Bin L
--- ritu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Because that seems to be normal group dynamics:
> Isolate a group, treat
> them with constant suspicion and act as if they are
> all potential
> terrorists and sooner, rather than later, there is a
> ground swell of
> support, within the
Dan Minette wrote:
> > Gautam, how many religio-political groups condemn their own
> > lunatics/extremists loudly, clearly and constantly? For
> that matter, how
> > many political organisations/groups do that?
>
> >From my perspective, its the norm over here. I remember the
> pope routinely
--- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> I don't think the Methodists are launching suicide
> bombing campaigns, and
> they're not fighting with each other to the point
> that it's making it into
> my paper. That might be a better example for yo
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> Episcopalians aren't launching suicide bombing campaigns.
No, they're too busy fighting amongst themselves about the gay bishop.
I don't think the Methodists are launching suicide bombing campaigns, and
they're not fighting with each other to the p
- Original Message -
From: "ritu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Killer Bs Discussion'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 4:00 AM
Subject: RE: [L3] RE: religious/political question
>
> Gautam, how many religio-politica
Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> --- ritu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, I digress. From where I sit, his view does
> > seem to be the view
> > of a vast silent majority of muslims. The worrisome
> > thing, though, is
> > that relentless pressure, suspicion, demonisation
> > and heckling to prove
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)
>
>
> O
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)
> The only times I've been
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Last time any female member of my family was on the
> > Boston subway after
> > dark, someone pointed a gun at her. So I'm a little
> > less enthusiastic
> > about after-hours use of the Boston subwa
--- ritu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I digress. From where I sit, his view does
> seem to be the view
> of a vast silent majority of muslims. The worrisome
> thing, though, is
> that relentless pressure, suspicion, demonisation
> and heckling to prove
> their humanitarian credentials could
Deborah Harrell wrote:
> While I _understand_ why Boykin* has done so, I
> strongly disagree with him; all who cast this "war on
> terror" in a religious frame invoke Crusade on the
> western (which Boykin has equated to 'fundamentalist
> Christian') front, and jihad on the Muslim. That is a
> r
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On 4 Nov 2003, at 3:04 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> > working very hard on "tact" for a number of years now -- how'm I doing?
>
> I think you may have confused "tact" with "tactile" on some occasions :)
:D Thanks for the smile this morning -
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 04:04 PM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>
> >On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> >
> > > At 10:50 AM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >[...] if a certain friend of mine
> > > >had gotten pregnant (and she
At 03:32 PM 11/3/03 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:
I wrote:
>Someone else said once in the same newsgroup "Of course, since
>JMS is an atheist, he doesn't believe in hell, anyway."
>jms' reply was "Says you. I'm FROM New Jersey"
Jim replied:
Now, why does everyone have to crack on New Jersey? Ther
At 02:17 PM 11/3/03 -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:44:04 +
On 2 Nov 2003,
Reggie Bautista wrote:
> To (probably mis-)quote an episode of Buffy the Vampire
> Slayer, did anyone
> else just go to a really scary visual place?
Sorry, no. :)
I have no idea what Jim looks like but a g-string on a string of letters
isn't scary at all. :)
Ritu
At 09:22 PM 11/3/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> And here I was thinking that subtlety isn't my strong suit.
One day, a number of years ago, my sister told me that I wasn't very good
at being subtle.
"You think I'm blunt."
"I wouldn't put it *that* way.
At 04:04 PM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 10:50 AM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
>
> >[...] if a certain friend of mine
> >had gotten pregnant (and she was doing everything she could to prevent
> >it)
>
>
>
> Why do I get the impre
D]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:44:04 +
On 2 Nov 2003, at 4:54 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:
On 1 Nov 2003, at 9:38 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
The Fool wrote:
So when andrew crystal starts building concentrati
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Jon Gabriel wrote:
> And here I was thinking that subtlety isn't my strong suit.
One day, a number of years ago, my sister told me that I wasn't very good
at being subtle.
"You think I'm blunt."
"I wouldn't put it *that* way."
"But *I* would."
After that, I figured I ou
From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 02:42:51 +
On 3 Nov 2003, at 7:17 pm, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: William
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I wrote:]
> > [He overstates his case here, as most
> > Christians consider Jesus 'given for the sake of
> >the world' and I think there is a Jewish concept of
> >'being a light unto the world' also.]
>
> There is a core Jewish concept of the people Israel
> being ca
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:
>
> On 3 Nov 2003, at 7:17 pm, Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >> From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAI
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Reggie Bautista wrote:
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > >Question:
> > >Why do people on this list so frequently show their ass?
>
> Jim replied:
> >I do it because I'm an attention whore.
> >
> >Well, that and I like the feeling of dollar bills sliding into my g-string.
>
> T
On 3 Nov 2003, at 7:17 pm, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:44:04 +
On 2 Nov 2003,
> [He overstates his case here, as most
> Christians consider Jesus 'given for the sake of the
> world' and I think there is a Jewish concept of 'being
> a light unto the world' also.]
>
There is a core Jewish concept of the people Israel being called upon by God
to be "or l'goyim" ("a light unt
> ritu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Robert J. Chassell wrote:
>
> > Is the theological-political connection right? Is
> it fair to say that
> > many people do wish to behave with the same
> qualities as their God?
> > If so, and if the qualities are as stated, does
> this predefine the
> > att
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Crystall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: religious/political question
> On 3 Nov 2003 at 18:19, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
&g
Reggie Bautista wrote:
>Robert Seeberger wrote:
>>>Why do people on this list so frequently show their ass?
>>Jim replied:
>>I do it because I'm an attention whore.
>>
>>Well, that and I like the feeling of dollar bills sliding into my
>>g-string.
>
>To (probably mis-)quote an episode of Buffy th
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>As Jim so wisely said, the arrogant, condescending attitude you're
>adopting isn't likely to win you any support.
Actually, that was Julia, but I do share the sentiment.
Jim
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most person
On 3 Nov 2003 at 18:19, Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jon Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:17 PM
> Subject: Re: religious/political question
>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Gabriel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: religious/political question
> If you seriously think we should be grateful to you both for insulting the
> inte
--- Chad Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Forbes Rating of Worst Commutes to work:
> Greater Los Angeles
> San Fran
> Dallas/Fort Worth
> Houston
> Washington D.C.
> Denver
I saw this the other day...hard to believe that we're
worse than New York or Boston, but I can vouch for
Dallas bei
--- Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> >[...] if a certain friend of mine
> >had gotten pregnant (and she was doing everything
> she could to prevent it)
>
> Why do I get the impression that "everything she
> could do" did not include celibacy?
>
> Just Wonde
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Reggie Bautista
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 01:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)
>
>> Then
I wrote:
>Someone else said once in the same newsgroup "Of course, since
>JMS is an atheist, he doesn't believe in hell, anyway."
>jms' reply was "Says you. I'm FROM New Jersey"
Jim replied:
Now, why does everyone have to crack on New Jersey? There aren't that many
areas in the world where you a
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>Question:
>Why do people on this list so frequently show their ass?
Jim replied:
I do it because I'm an attention whore.
Well, that and I like the feeling of dollar bills sliding into my g-string.
To (probably mis-)quote an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, did anyone
e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)
>
>
> > If you want to spend hours commuting to and
From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:44:04 +
On 2 Nov 2003, at 4:54 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 2
On 2 Nov 2003, at 4:54 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:
On 1 Nov 2003, at 9:38 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:
The Fool wrote:
So when andrew crystal starts building concentration camps and
death camps, for atheists, freethinkers, and rationalists
Considering tha
Julia Thompson wrote:
> :)
>
> 1) Yes, it would be nice if Saddam Hussein and Osama bin
> Laden died of
> cancer, the world would be better off.
Don't mean to be a kill-joy but the world would be better off only to
the extent of two nasty characters ceasing to exist. From all accounts,
OBL's
Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> Perhaps people on the list can help: is the following a fair
> description of the nature of the Jewish/Christian God, and how it is
> different from the nature of the Moslem God?
>
> And if so, are the fundamental political implications as described?
> Are more Moslem
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!
>
U...Donuts. Is there nothing they can't do?
- jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
> From: Erik Reuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > but the whole thing of not being *allowed* to pump your own
> gas bugged us.
>
> Me too! My first time I got yelled at for trying (there were no
signs
> telling me!)
Imagine coming from New Jersey to another state. The first time I
went driving
--- Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You pinko you. You know that mass transit is the
> second step on the road
> to communism. :-)
>
> Dan M.
Hey, the fact that I like it doesn't make it good
public policy :-) The question of whether it is or
not is open to debate. I _don't know_. T
- Original Message -
From: "Gautam Mukunda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)
> --- Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROT
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
