You're wrong man. I think you even know thats not what the framers
intended. It's too damned easy to read what those guys had to say on
the issue and see they meant it to be an individual right, that they
really did mean there should be no laws on arms.
Gruss Gott wrote:
tBone wrote:
The
Nothing wrong with the occasional bit of mental junk food.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: New Harold and Kumar movie coming April 25th
Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay
-Original Message-
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 2:01 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Vista SP1?
Yeah, I was kind of thinking of checking with them first, since I do
have several years on my warranty and I know they can be pretty
I just remembered that you said you'd like those two old drives of mine -
the ones with the growing SMART errors?
That was right about when my grandfather died and it just drove everything
else out.
If you still want them, I still got them.
Jim Davis
*sneaks quietly into room*
*Points sternly to NO JUMPING IN MID^^^DLE OF THREAD sign*
*slinks off*
On 20/03/2008, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What?! No jumping! You might wake up Gel-ly bean. He is very sensitive to
that stuff.
You can walk, or slink in, but NO jumping!
If someone gets $100,000 worth of education and can't get anything paying
more than $20,000, they obviously didn't pay attention in class.
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:24 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Right To Bear
I just enabled Vista Dreamscapes on Vista Ultimate.
It is actually quite cool :)
It basically plays a full screen video on your desktop that somehow
takes up very little resources. Right now I have a video of a forest
waterfall. It's a novelty thing though, but I guess it can be quite
nice.
I
tBone wrote:
You're wrong man. I think you even know thats not what the framers
intended.
The problem with that argument to me is:
(1.) Who the feck cares what the framers intended? They're dead.
Sure, they were smart people, but they also expected us to take a
little responsibility and
GG wrote:
both ensures morons don't have guns and our state's rights to organize
and defend ourselves against the federal gov't.
And as for the argument that an individual needs guns to fight to the
man, well if that's the state of affairs in America then we've failed
to maintain the spirit
I have always thought that the intention of the Second Amendment was
three-fold: to establish that the states needed their own militia, that the
citizens were that militia, and that *both* the states' militia and the
individuals making up those militia had the right to keep and bear arms,
both
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just enabled Vista Dreamscapes on Vista Ultimate.
It is actually quite cool :)
Oh man... do you get the soothing sound too?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
Adam wrote:
I have always thought that the intention of the Second Amendment was
three-fold: to establish that the states needed their own militia, that the
citizens were that militia, and that *both* the states' militia and the
individuals making up those militia had the right to keep and
gg wrote:
It's a piece of genius - anything to get the power our of the federal
gov't, but I think your solution definitely meets the 80/20 rule
overall.
Plus it elevates the dialog from gun/no-gun (positional) to what we
can agree and act on (principled).
What?
:-\
NoesI have no sound.
How did you get sound?
On 21/03/2008, Casey Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just enabled Vista Dreamscapes on Vista Ultimate.
It is actually quite cool :)
Oh man... do you get the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Adam Churvis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have always thought that the intention of the Second Amendment was
three-fold: to establish that the states needed their own militia, that
the
citizens were that militia, and that *both* the states' militia and the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What?
:-\
NoesI have no sound.
How did you get sound?
I only got Vista Business, no video background for me... I was wondering if
you got sound, that would be like icing on the cake. I'd seriously thing
about an upgrade
I think I will take the plunge this weekend. I fear disaster too much
to do it during the middle of the week when I actully have to be productive!
-Cameron
Vivec wrote:
It seems stable thus far, but...I still mope that I had to give up
performance to appease the RIAA and the MPAA's silly DRM
Does anybody know of headphones with a built-in MP3 player, i.e. no wires.
I'm looking for competition to something like this
[http://reviews.cnet.com/mp3-players/tdk-mojo-1-128mb/4505-6490_7-30621560.html],
which may not be two hard, since I am not sure of TDK still produces these.
I had a
We have an amendment process.
Look not following the amendment process is what has led to the bloat we
have in government today. The government shouldn't be able to simply
legislate away our rights, or legislate on issues that aren't in their
purview. Why do we have a deficit? The federal
I'd still want to see an amendment. No laws, none. Thats what the
document says, and it's what I personally believe in.
Adam Churvis wrote:
I have always thought that the intention of the Second Amendment was
three-fold: to establish that the states needed their own militia, that the
But then we wind up with NY and California not allowing it and AZ saying
do what you want.
Wouldn't the 10th and 15th amendments prohibit that?
Or should we just do away with the constitution, and legislate as we see
fit?
Gruss Gott wrote:
Adam wrote:
I have always thought that the
tBone wrote:
nation require. You just happen to know that no amendment changing the
2nd would pass.
True dat. Which is why I like Adam's State Waiver solution. It
provides a level of regulation I think is needed without being overly
punitive to gun rights.
I'm a gun owner and I want to
If we make it ok to legislate around the 2nd, whats to stop them doing
the same for the 1st, 4th, 5th or any others?
Gruss Gott wrote:
tBone wrote:
nation require. You just happen to know that no amendment changing the
2nd would pass.
True dat. Which is why I like Adam's State Waiver
How about something like this:
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/05/24/ifreeplay-cordless-shuffle-headphones/
On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:29 AM, Ian Skinner wrote:
Does anybody know of headphones with a built-in MP3 player, i.e. no
wires.
I'm looking for competition to something like this
Again Bravo! +1
On 3/20/08, Adam Churvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I know you're joking, but this brings up a pet peeve of mine:
when
people assume that, because you have access to a gun, that people had
better
do what you say or want, and better not say anything to contradict you,
Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
How about something like this:
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/05/24/ifreeplay-cordless-shuffle-headphones/
Ok, I think I can accept a design like that. I am definitly unconcerned
about not being a paragon of fashion walking down the street. $50
bucks for the
LOL it works out pretty well without needing a swap file the computer is
noticeably more peppy. :)
On 3/21/08, Crow T. Robot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
8 gigs of RAM? hay-soos, that's crazy!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Bill Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've used Vista Ultimate
I had never seen the first movie but a couple years ago my gf at the time
made me watch it. I resisted saying it would be retarded and i wouldn't
laugh. Boy i was wrong...i laughed my ass off.
NPH wouldn't do that!
Hah good old Neil Patric Harris. I hope he comes to rescue the boys from
gitmo!
Yeah, I was kind of thinking of checking with them first, since I do
For what it's worth, Vista will run fine with 2 Gig (although over 1 Gig,
really).
That's good to know...I wasn't sure, as I've heard it both ways. But it's just
a backup machine so doesn't get a lot of stuff loaded onto it,
How about something like this:
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/05/24/ifreeplay-cordless-shuffle-headphones/
That's a pretty slick design... I hope they come with something like that for
the Zen Stone (it may actually work better for that since the Stone is a bit
smaller).
Right now I use the Stone
get enough podcasts and you'll forget you'd ever wanted to listen to
radio.
My favs:
History According to Bob
Daily Source Code
WNYC's Radio Lab
Diane Rehms
Click Clack's Car Talk
Lifehack.org
and a handful of Ruby podcasts
On Mar 21, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Ian Skinner wrote:
Zaphod
I think I need to know more about how to get in on this Vine program!
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey wrote:
Yeah, I was kind of thinking of checking with them first, since I do
For what it's worth, Vista will run fine with 2 Gig (although over
1 Gig,
really).
That's
ZB's recent post on another thread got me thinking about this. The other
day I rode home listening to the Obama speech and found that I liked that
better than listening to music. Guess that is a byproduct of getting old, I
dunno.
Anyway, what are some favorite podcasts you all listen to? A two
I think I need to know more about how to get in on this Vine program!
It's invitation only, and I don't think they are bringing any new people into
it. I'm not entirely sure how I was lucky enough to be included, as I'm just
under the top 1000 reviewers...but I've done a lot of reviews on their
Ummm, libn bizcast? LOL!
Architecture, Building design, Sustainable construction
http://www.podcastbunker.com/audio/design.php
Architecture and Design. A little too hip, but good topics
http://www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=13833
Minneapolis buildings and architecture
Escapepod.org - SciFi short stories, generally 20-30 minutes in length
though the last one was almost an hour
Has two spin-offs, pseudopod.org for horror and launching 4/1,
podcastle.org for fantasy.
Audible.com has free books via podcast as well. Also search for
Playing for Keeps, excellent
I completely forgot about this, even meant to mention the organization here
- read about it in the paper Sunday (they are having an Athiest Convention
this weekend in the Twin Cities - they say it being Easter was just a
coincidence, wink wink)
http://mnatheists.org/content/blogsection/4/38/ -
radiolab
and
this american life
keep me podhappy
holl@
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Crow T. Robot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completely forgot about this, even meant to mention the organization here
- read about it in the paper Sunday (they are having an Athiest Convention
this weekend
dawn and drew
www.dawnanddrew.com
Those 2 remind me alot of myself and my ex gf. It's funny stuff i heard
about them while i was listening to TWIT back in the beginning days of
podcasting.
On 3/21/08, Crow T. Robot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZB's recent post on another thread got me thinking
wow...that one looks out there
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bill Wheatley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dawn and drew
www.dawnanddrew.com
Those 2 remind me alot of myself and my ex gf. It's funny stuff i heard
about them while i was listening to TWIT back in the beginning days of
tBone wrote:
If we make it ok to legislate around the 2nd, whats to stop them doing
the same for the 1st, 4th, 5th or any others?
Implicit in your statement is that we would be legislating around it -
and I get that that's your opinion. The problem is that not everyone
agrees with you and
You just said you knew it's what the framers intended, so how would it
not be legislating around the amendment?
Gruss Gott wrote:
tBone wrote:
If we make it ok to legislate around the 2nd, whats to stop them doing
the same for the 1st, 4th, 5th or any others?
Implicit in your statement
Refining and expanding my solution a bit:
1) Grandfather-in all existing legal weapons which are legally owned by
citizens, and give amnesty for turning in illegal weapons before some X
date.
2) Require state-level registration of these weapons (I know, I know, but
everybody will have to make
There is no excuse for the government to be looking at this sort of stuff
unless it relates to terrorism.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/123489
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
heart attack
Robert has a concern about civil liberties.
/heart attack
Weren't you one of the people saying it was unpatriotic to reveal that
this was hapening?
On 3/21/08, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no excuse for the government to be looking at this sort of stuff
unless
I've always had a thing for VTOLs :] It *would* be cool...
Yeah, no more F4s, no more Warthogs, etc.. *sniff* Not VTOLs, but still. :]
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:36 AM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harriers are LOUD.
I thought they were pretty much taken out of service though?
If I come off as harsh, I'm sorry, these issues get me riled up. :]
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM, denstar wrote:
What does McCain have to do with state sponsored torture?
You sound like you think we're on par
I have 3 monitors and 2 video cards.
I have two 19 monitors connected to my Radeon X800 XT and my desktop
spanned across them.
I have one 17 connected to the Radeon 7200. I would like that monitor to
act independently. I kind of want it to have its own desktop where, if I
launch an
Some of the comments are a little scary:
Comment: Although I despise EVERYTHING about the so-called Patriot Act,
if it helps snag even ONE corrupt, immoral politician, it may very well be
the GREATEST piece of legislation ever passed by this semi-literate, corrupt
Congress.
- Original
Why is that scary? You want our elected officials running amok thinking
they are above the law? (as if they don't already do this).
Todd wrote:
Some of the comments are a little scary:
Comment: Although I despise EVERYTHING about the so-called Patriot Act,
if it helps snag even ONE corrupt,
Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I want the corrupt politicians to get
away with every single thing they can. =-/
Come on. Read that statement that person made again.
Let me paraphrase and interpret : I don't agree with the Patriot Act. I am
completely against it with all of my being.
Ahh, I did not quite catch what the guy was saying. I agree that is
pretty scary. Either you like something or you don't. You can't have it
both ways.
Todd wrote:
Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I want the corrupt politicians to get
away with every single thing they can. =-/
Come on.
I am more than happy to have the government monitor bank transactions for
terrorist activities, and no, I did not say anything like that. In fact, I
have said on more than one occasion that the Feds have taken a look at my
bank account because my wife has a foreign name and she receives large sums
Adam wrote:
What do you all think of these ideas? Are we getting somewhere? Could this
actually fly?
I think it's fecking awesome and EXACTLY what's needed: regulation
without undue prohibition. I think you'd get broad support; tBone's a
purist, so maybe not him, but you could sleep well
This is exactly the arguments that were brought against the Patriot
Act in the first place.
The fear was the government would use this Act for several other
things beside fighting terrorism, and that it would never give up that
control.
gMoney wrote:
Plus there's about a 50-50 chance you'll get to see an awesome crash..
Some marine friends of mine call it the V-22 Bloodspray.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
Heh. If ever there was a project that they need to stop dumping money
into, it is this one. How many years now have they been working on this?
Sheesh. Put the money to better use.
Gruss Gott wrote:
Some marine friends of mine call it the V-22 Bloodspray.
happen to get your hands on
ms server 2008, ms sql server 2008 a 200 dollar lic of cf8 ent.
what would you do?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
Since when was CF8 Ent been $200?
Seems all illegal to me, as MS Server 2008 I don't think is even released
yet:-)
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Who [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2008 10:26 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: so. if you...
happen to get your hands on
ms
we have a server running server 2008 here as a trial of some sort. have to
ask the server guys how they got it, but IIS7.0 is lookin pretty sweet.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:28 PM, CyberAngel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since when was CF8 Ent been $200?
Seems all illegal to me, as MS Server 2008
Beta's were given out on Magazine DVD's.
And if you subscribe to MS you get the applications, but it still as far as
I know is not publically purchasable.
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2008 10:32 AM
To: CF-Community
coolio...i agree tho, that CF8 license seems purdy sketchy.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:34 PM, CyberAngel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beta's were given out on Magazine DVD's.
And if you subscribe to MS you get the applications, but it still as far
as
I know is not publically purchasable.
yea, push that money to the war in iraq...THAT'S money well spent!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Bruce Sorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh. If ever there was a project that they need to stop dumping money
into, it is this one. How many years now have they been working on this?
Sheesh. Put
right...
but would you figure out how to get a dedicated ip to your house and
just host all your own names?
is it that easy? say i am with time warner.
they dont even rotate ips more then once a major power outadge.
how do i get domain names i own to point to the ip?
man..
i could do alot of
Yes. Like put the money from the Osprey to other things like acquiring
new MRAPS or hummers.
Crow T. Robot wrote:
yea, push that money to the war in iraq...THAT'S money well spent!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:59 PM, denstar wrote:
Maybe *you* should talk to some people who lived in places like that.
Maybe they can give you some pointers on what to look out for.
I spent two years working with former Soviet states on energy programs and I
often used former Russian
Yes, it's pretty much that easy. You don't even need the dedicated IP.
www.zoneedit.com
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Who [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: so. if you...
right...
but would you figure
Sounds like you have a lot of reading and real world experience to come your
way.
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Who [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2008 10:45 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: so. if you...
right...
but would you figure out how to get a dedicated ip to
yeah... so.
i think we ALL have alot of reading and real world exp to Enjoy..
i love me some exp.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:18 PM, CyberAngel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you have a lot of reading and real world experience to come your
way.
-Original Message-
From: Dr.
gg wrote:
http://federalist.uchicago.edu/conservativecaseforobama.mp3
The first question, btw, is a doosey:
If being a conservative is believing in a meritocracy then how do you
explain President Bush?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion®
This may be for law dorks but it'd be harder to find a more
conservative policy organization than the Federalist Society founded
in part by Justice Scalia at the University of Chicago:
The Federalist Society is a group of libertarians and conservatives
formed in 1982 by students at the University
yeah... so.
i think we ALL have alot of reading and real world exp to Enjoy..
i love me some exp.
Unless you have a T, don't try hosting out of your house. Even if you
have T-level speeds you're missing Quality of Service and data
transfer rate guarantees.
Unless it's your friends and
Not to mention data redundancy, daily maintenance, 24 / 7 support.
-Original Message-
From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 March 2008 12:19 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: so. if you...
yeah... so.
i think we ALL have alot of reading and real world
tBone wrote:
You just said you knew it's what the framers intended, so how would it
not be legislating around the amendment?
Here's the deal: this whole thing was brought on by the Cato Institute
and a sweeping ruling by a lower court that scared even the Bush
Administration.
Now that's
redundancy?
no one does that...
i have a broken dvd burner for back ups..
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
I got the impression that he was just going to play with it. If he is
considering hosting something serious .. yea .. no. :)
- Original Message -
From: CyberAngel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:22 PM
Subject: RE: so. if
I remember landing under sniper fire, Clinton recounted. There was
supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but
instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to
get to our base.
Uh, except for that never happened and there's of picture her hugging
a child
I just remembered that you said you'd like those two old drives of mine -
the ones with the growing SMART errors?
That was right about when my grandfather died and it just drove everything
else out.
Hhm, don't think that was me Jim. Is there another Mary Jo hanging around here?
;-)
any tips?
He's a machinist with a automation company, one of their machines needs work
at a plant in Vrutry (North Eastern). He's never been to Europe.
Apparently they've got him flying into Paris then to Vienna then he's
driving from them (about a 3 1/2 drive)... it seems like there should
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: favorite podcasts
Anyway, what are some favorite podcasts you all listen to? A two or
three
word description would be nice too, to weed out topics I
Would still require legislation, and without an amendment most of us
gun nuts wouldn't go for it.
Adam Churvis wrote:
Refining and expanding my solution a bit:
1) Grandfather-in all existing legal weapons which are legally owned by
citizens, and give amnesty for turning in illegal weapons
Fuck you, it's a war,your in it to win it, any cost, any sacrifice. the
end.
kill them all let the spaghetti monster figure it out.
Crow T. Robot wrote:
yea, push that money to the war in iraq...THAT'S money well spent!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Bruce Sorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, I agree...there is no going back. We must stay and must
win. It was just a piss-poor decision to go in the first place. Pulling
out IMO is not an option now. 500 billion $$$ to date is
just...well...sad. You don't agree?
Stirring the pot I guess. :) I know you won't agree.
TheCrow wrote:
Stirring the pot I guess. :) I know you won't agree. In the true spirit
of cf-comm, no thread is safe from the iraq war argument.
Well this is where it's my turn to ask tBone to turn in his
conservative card. A libertarian doesn't turn over the majority of
his active
It's a legal order.
More over, American blood has been spilled, we've backed down enough
over the last 40+ years.
Gruss Gott wrote:
TheCrow wrote:
Stirring the pot I guess. :) I know you won't agree. In the true spirit
of cf-comm, no thread is safe from the iraq war argument.
Well
85 matches
Mail list logo
