Sam, the only thing I know of that I have in common with you is that
we both have daughters. I believe that yours is older than mine,
perhaps 11 or 12 if I recall correctly. Now back away from the
partisan blinders for a moment, look at the words that that Limbaugh
used toward this young woman
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:17 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
BS. He meant every word of it. If there hadn't been such a backlash,
he would still be meaning it.
I agree he still means it. If he was a left winger he's be a hero.
He's not so he has to repent for using the common word for what she
Nothing you just said makes any sense. Rethink it and try again.
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I have to say -- in this context slut is every bit as
devastating as the worst n-word-using insult. It essentially says you're a
whore if you have
between this and the state ultrasound initiatives, I am starting to wonder
if the GOP platform isn't best summarized as Girls having sex! ZOMG! I
realize that this sounds to most of us like it could be a lot of fun, so
let's emphasize: to them this is a *problem*.
In this particular instance the
I'm going to boycott Carbonite
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
I liked what one of the show's biggest sponsors said well after the
limpblob gave his Faux apology:
I know, one of those sentences was kind of long. I'll try to hit closer to
your reading level next time. But meanwhile, if you follow it with your
finger, you may find it easier to follow.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing you just said makes any sense.
Flustered are you?
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
you really did not read or listen to her testimony did you.
Professional ignorance so it would seem. No wonder you're a fan of
Limpdick.
you can answer a comment now -- instead of just making your own comment
nearby -- and it actually sends you email if someone answers you.
+1
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Sam, the only thing I know of that I have in common with you is that
we both have daughters. I believe that yours is older than mine,
perhaps 11 or 12 if I recall correctly. Now back away from the
partisan blinders for
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
between this and the state ultrasound initiatives, I am starting to wonder
if the GOP platform isn't best summarized as Girls having sex! ZOMG! I
realize that this sounds to most of us like it could be a lot of fun, so
let's
What I meant was I do not have access to someone with a 70-80 IQ to
follow along with your logic.
I'll pretend.
A black man testifies that he is black. Someone calls him the n-word.
WTF?
Someone testifies she needs $1000 a year for contraception when we
know Walmart or Target provide the pill
hey, what happened to my happy filter? Sam, I am sure that if I ran this
down I'd find out this number is some distortion of yours or Rush's so, no
thanks. I have real problems to think about so I'll leave you to ponder
where Ms Fluke's friend gets her prescriptions filled. I personally don't
Amazon:
Durex Pleasure Pack Condom Tin, 48 Count by Durex
Buy new: $15.79 ($0.33/count)
http://walmartstores.com/pressroom/news/6747.aspx
More medicines covering more categories Important prescription
medicines have been added to the $4 program covering glaucoma,
attention deficit
Did you actually hear Ms. Fluke's testimony? She never asked for
taxpayer funded contraceptives. Her testimony centered on the medical
use of birth control pills to treat ovarian cysts. She never mentioned
sex--that part was Limbaugh's fantasy. She was advocating for the
inclusion of
Sam is deliberately offensive. He forgets or more likely deliberately
ignores the fact that Ms. Fluke was testifying about the lack of
coverage for student purchased health insurance for certain medical
conditions. Better to lie to support is point in other words. He is
like someone from the
It's probably time to ignore Sam. This isn't a left or right issue, as
he seems to see everything as, but a right and wrong issue. Rush was
wrong. He got called on it. He backpedaled because he knows he screwed
up. The apology is a formality. He doesn't mean it.
Now, I have not heard
In an interview with Alter on November 30, Obama offered that
Republican opposition to the stimulus helped create the tea-baggers
and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party where it now
controls the agenda for the Republicans.
Where's your outrage?
Her insurance covers doctors
On 3/4/2012 12:08 PM, Sam wrote:
In an interview with Alter on November 30, Obama offered that
Republican opposition to the stimulus helped create the tea-baggers
and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party where it now
controls the agenda for the Republicans.
Where's your
http://studentaffairs.georgetown.edu/insurance/faqs.html
Q. Are pre-existing conditions covered?
A. Pre-existing conditions are covered if the condition or treatment
is not specifically excluded or limited per the Exclusions and
Limitations in Description of Benefits Booklet.
(Note: Although
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:23 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/4/2012 12:08 PM, Sam wrote:
In an interview with Alter on November 30, Obama offered that
Republican opposition to the stimulus helped create the tea-baggers
and empowered that whole wing of the Republican Party where it now
You know that the only responses will be from Sam. Think I'll skip
that feature :)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
you can answer a comment now -- instead of just making your own comment
nearby -- and it actually sends you email if someone answers you.
+1
On 3/4/2012 12:36 PM, Sam wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:23 PM, PTcft...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/4/2012 12:08 PM, Sam wrote:
In an interview with Alter on November 30, Obama offered that
Republican opposition to the stimulus helped create the tea-baggers
and empowered that whole wing of
Dumbass...she isn't talking about condoms...she is referring to the
pill...sheesh...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:00 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Dana
dumbass...she isn't talking about condoms...she is talking about the
pill...get a fucking clue Sam...sheesh
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:48 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
Amazon:
Durex
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
Eh. People identify themselves as tea-baggers, and don't do it out of
irony, so it can't be all that much of an insult. I don't think slut
and prostitute are on the same relatively benign level, no matter the
context.
You mean
Why would we have outrage? That is a factual statement.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 11:08 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
In an interview with Alter on November 30, Obama offered that
You do realize that tea baggers called themselves tea baggers long before
comedians did? Comedians just ran with it because they realized the other
meaning behind it before the tea baggers did.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 11:36
Fertility and prescription birth control must mean condoms. My bad.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
dumbass...she isn't talking about condoms...she is talking about the
pill...get a fucking clue Sam...sheesh
dumbass? ya think. That's like calling water wet.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Dumbass...she isn't talking about condoms...she is referring to the
pill...sheesh...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
You mean the sign held by a woman that states tea bag the liberal
dems before they tea bag you
implied she was going to dangle her scrotum in their mouths? Sounds
like she was calling the dems tea-baggers.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Triplets?
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
dumbass? ya think. That's like calling water wet.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
Dumbass...she isn't talking about condoms...she is referring to
On 3/4/2012 1:19 PM, Sam wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:53 PM, PTcft...@gmail.com wrote:
Eh. People identify themselves as tea-baggers, and don't do it out of
irony, so it can't be all that much of an insult. I don't think slut
and prostitute are on the same relatively benign level, no
1. Well said.
2. I am not sure. My best guess, if her testimony indeed uses the number,
is that this is the cost of treating endometriosis for that patient. It
does seem a bit high for oral contraceptives alone. More likely it's a
different but related number, like a couple of specialist visits
It's a kick in the face to any woman who ever tried to make a serious
statement in public is what it is. For me, a total flashback to Anita Hill
on Congress trying to explain to a bunch of fat white MALE fuckheads why it
might hard to work in an environment where your boss acts like a pig, and
For the record here is the transcript of Ms. Fluke's testimony before
Pelosi's hearing:
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf
Leader Pelosi, Members of Congress, good morning, and thank you for
calling this
hearing on womens health and allowing
It's actually more egregious than that since the first time around
they didn't include any women at all. People had to raise a big stink
about the fact that no women were even allowed to present on an issue
of fundamental importance to women and only then was a woman allowed
up to say something
ok so we're getting it from that $3000? Divided by three.
That's cost of contraception, notice. Nothing there about oral
contraceptives. So an average, across many students, some of whom may get
injections, implants or IUDs. Maybe some of the implants need to be
removed on an emergency basis.
er, might not be
3. I am seeing $5 to $30 as a co-pay when I Google cost of oral
contraceptives. I suggest that anyone who actually needs to know what it
is give a call to Walgreen's. But a $30 copay suggests a retail price in
the 70s so that $1000 be that high after all.
yeah, exactly. I thought we were past this.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
It's actually more egregious than that since the first time around
they didn't include any women at all. People had to raise a big stink
about the fact that no women were
Of course we aren't past this. Nothing more fun than patronizing
women, punching hippies and putting uppity niggers in their place.
Well, and queer bashing of course.
Judah
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, exactly. I thought we were past this.
On
no, seriously, someone is editing an article I wrote, and it's emailing me
the comments they insert. It's a nice feature, I like it, especially for
multiple-iteration editing processes like some I get involved in. Used to
be the process would then wait until I noticed the questions. And I don't
Oh, I totally misread the subject. I thought you were saying that it
is a Google News feature. You comment on part of an article and then
someone else tells you that you are an idiot and it emails you. That
would be really annoying.
Now in Google Docs, it is totally different and I can see that
too much like cf-community
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Oh, I totally misread the subject. I thought you were saying that it
is a Google News feature. You comment on part of an article and then
someone else tells you that you are an idiot and it
id10t. ;)
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
too much like cf-community
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com
wrote:
Oh, I totally misread the subject. I thought you were saying that it
is a Google News feature. You
Its obvious you did not read it. And as usual you try distraction and
prevarication as a response. Pathetic and tiresome.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Flustered are you?
.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
you
Yes he said something funny about a girl acting as a tool. It was
crude, but in every other instance it would be funny. I find it
amusing that people are so easily offended and make this out to be so
much worse than what even Obama himself says.
I think everyone is pretending it's much worse
Now you're going to pull the Anita Hill crap? Have you no honor?
Trying to ruin a mans career with lies. This proves you show outrage
only when the left tells you to.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a kick in the face to any woman who ever tried to
Are you series?
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during
law school.
Did you really not read your own post or did you just not understand it.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record here is the
No they didn't. Pelosi did by pretending it was something that it
wasn't. Then she got a fake expert witness that researched the school
to find they didn't cover contraception and signed up for the sole
purpose of fighting it. Then pretended she was an unfortunate student
that can't survive with
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
That's cost of contraception, notice. Nothing there about oral
contraceptives. So an average, across many students, some of whom may get
injections, implants or IUDs. Maybe some of the implants need to be
removed on an
Speaking of patronizing people you don't agree with...
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Judah McAuley ju...@wiredotter.com wrote:
Of course we aren't past this. Nothing more fun than patronizing
women, punching hippies and putting uppity niggers in their place.
Well, and queer bashing of
Actually I did. I get a kick out of you when you hit the wall in a discussion.
Makes me laugh every time. And it's so predictable.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
Its obvious you did not read it. And as usual you try distraction and
prevarication
On 3/4/2012 7:42 PM, Sam wrote:
Yes he said something funny about a girl acting as a tool. It was
crude, but in every other instance it would be funny.
I highly doubt that.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
On 3/4/2012 7:49 PM, Sam wrote:
Are you series?
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during
law school.
Did you really not read your own post or did you just not understand it.
Don't be a dumbass, Sam. When taken in context with the entire post, it
is
You obviously didn't read the transcript and just want to stir up shit
like Rush. So once again, I am going to label you as trolling.
You keep repeating the same stupid statements that were addressed in the
testimony. You have no clear argument. you have been all over the
place and nothing
it's the only thing approaching a valid argument on the other side of the
issue, Sam. Valid argument, meet Sam, Sam meet valid argument. Some
Catholic institutions say they should not have to pay to include
contraceptives in coverage they are funding for their students and/or
employees,
or, to phrase it in more constitutional terms, privacy vs free speech. And
freedom of religion -- they sort of overlap here if spending money is
speech these days. The right not to be compelled to spend my money in ways
prohibited by my religion, vs. the right not to be compelled to do jump
???
Of course she's talking about birth control. That's why she's
testifying. That's what contraception means.
What did I miss?
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:22 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't be a dumbass, Sam. When taken in context with the entire post, it
is easy to see she is not
Acting as a tool?
Sam you haven't just jumped the shark you've pole vaulted it. I
originally thought it was just an act. But rarely have I known someone
as hateful as you.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:21 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/4/2012 7:42 PM, Sam wrote:
Yes he said something funny
there is no reasoning with this slime who disguises himself has a human.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:22 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/4/2012 7:49 PM, Sam wrote:
Are you series?
Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000
during
law school.
Did you really
dropping pubic hairs in her face and dumping porn on her lap? And you
talk of honour? twisted very twisted. I've met member of WAR who have
more honour than you.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Now you're going to pull the Anita Hill crap? Have you no honor?
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:35 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
You obviously didn't read the transcript and just want to stir up shit
like Rush. So once again, I am going to label you as trolling.
I did read the transcript and I pointed out repeatedly why none of it
applies to the hearings. That
Terms of coverage part way down the faq
http://studentaffairs.georgetown.edu/insurance/faqs.html
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
it's the only thing approaching a valid argument on the other side of the
issue, Sam. Valid argument, meet Sam, Sam meet valid
Georgetown offers employees contraception coverage. Students using the
non-group plan offered through the school does not. It does cover
contraception for medical reasons.
Wrong argument, wrong place.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
it's the only thing
probably, but it's the only one you had. I think contraception should be
covered for reasons of equity and economics, remember. You're the one
arguing... something. That Rush Limbaugh is a good guy maybe?
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Georgetown offers
None of that was true
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
dropping pubic hairs in her face and dumping porn on her lap? And you
talk of honour? twisted very twisted. I've met member of WAR who have
more honour than you.
so it's a matter of how obnoxious that process is, I guess, if anyone wants
to make something of it. It looks like a gender-specific requirement to me,
though.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Terms of coverage part way down the faq
Sandra's argument doesn't apply and you're supporting it.
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Dana dana.tier...@gmail.com wrote:
probably, but it's the only one you had. I think contraception should be
covered for reasons of equity and economics, remember. You're the one
arguing... something.
How did you get that from this:
Q. Are pre-existing conditions covered?
A. Pre-existing conditions are covered if the condition or treatment
is not specifically excluded or limited per the Exclusions and
Limitations in Description of Benefits Booklet.
(Note: Although birth control is not
This kind of sums up what I've been thinking all along.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/04/a-quick-note-to-everyone-who-howled-at-me-for-criticizing-david-lettermans-comments-on-sarah-palin-and-her-daughters-and-who-are-now-scolding-rush-limbaugh/
.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:35 PM, PT
It can get worse than that according to Ms. Fluke's testimony. I
trolled a few other forums etc and got the impression that this is
very common with Georgetown students. Even with a specific medical
diagnosis the student health care denies oral contraceptives, even
with specific medial orders
I was being nice...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 12:23 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
dumbass? ya think. That's like calling water wet.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Eric
yeah, I think it's them and Catholic University claiming the constitutional
issue. There was another large non-academic employer also, whose name
escapes me. Anyway, so -- the really interesting questions. Would this
insurance policy cover vasectomy? Viagra? Testosterone?
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at
Not only didn't invite, but refuses to allow her to testify when requested
by Dems...
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 2:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
It's a kick in the face to any
So it's actually 3000...not 1000...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 2:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Limbaugh is voice of GOP majority?
For the record here is the transcript of Ms. Fluke's testimony before
On 3/4/2012 9:11 PM, Sam wrote:
I did read the transcript and I pointed out repeatedly why none of it
applies to the hearings. That is why it was not accepted as a valid
argument.
Then you didn't understand what you read.
You on the other hand have not addressed any of the issues I've
On 3/4/2012 9:50 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
It can get worse than that according to Ms. Fluke's testimony. I
trolled a few other forums etc and got the impression that this is
very common with Georgetown students. Even with a specific medical
diagnosis the student health care denies oral
divided by three years in law school. But that's the cost of contraception,
not oral contraceptives.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
So it's actually 3000...not 1000...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:21 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/4/2012 9:11 PM, Sam wrote:
I did read the transcript and I pointed out repeatedly why none of it
applies to the hearings. That is why it was not accepted as a valid
argument.
Then you didn't understand what you read.
I did.
See. Here we go. WTF are you talking about?
On 3/4/2012 10:36 PM, Sam wrote:
I debate quite well. Problem is when you are set in your decisions
before hand and are shown the truth.
What decision was I set in?
It seems to frustrate you.
What, being shown the truth?
Yes
you hate
80 matches
Mail list logo
