Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"They were legally serving a warrant and performing their sworn duty." You really don't know anything about it do you? It's not hard to research. Plenty of places to read up on it. "So you think that if a person is holding a firearms when he's about to be arrested the law enforcement officers

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "If they were illegally selling firearms, actively resisting arrest, > shooting at law enforcement officers etc then it wouldn't matter if they > were neo-nazis, republicans, democratic party members, Rotarians or Free > Masons." > > Regardle

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

They were legally serving a warrant and performing their sworn duty. So you think that if a person is holding a firearms when he's about to be arrested the law enforcement officers should not protect themselves. I am sure that many street cops will agree with you in that case. On Mon, Nov 8, 201

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"If they were illegally selling firearms, actively resisting arrest, shooting at law enforcement officers etc then it wouldn't matter if they were neo-nazis, republicans, democratic party members, Rotarians or Free Masons." Regardless of whether the government instigated the whole episode. Right

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

>If they were doing the same thing...yup...doesn't matter what their >political persuasion was. He put his family in that situation. He broke >the law. Did his wife deserve to die, probably not, but she also chose to >stay there. I don’t know if the 14 yo was participating or not, but he also

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

>Not the point. The point is he keeps saying "the neo-nazi" deserved >it. I am saying that no one deserves to be killed like that, >regardless of their political persuasion. Would he be saying they >deserved if they weren't neo-nazis? > > >> How does that make you better than those you disagree

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

bject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! Not the point. The point is he keeps saying "the neo-nazi" deserved it. I am saying that no one deserves to be killed like that, regardless of their political persuasion. Would he be saying they deserved if they weren't neo-n

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

ic Roberts wrote: >> >> They were also in violation of the law...it wasn't just a political >> disagreement. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Maureen >> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 10:15 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Th

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

wrote: > > They were also in violation of the law...it wasn't just a political > disagreement. > > -Original Message- > From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 10:15 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: The Happy Meal

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

They were also in violation of the law...it wasn't just a political disagreement. -Original Message- From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 10:15 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! Did his wife deser

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Did his wife deserve it? His son? You think it is ok to kill people without rule of law simply because you disagree with their politics? How does that make you better than those you disagree with? On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Larry Lyons wrote: > > Very much so. The neo-nazi scumbag deserv

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Very much so. The neo-nazi scumbag deserved it. >Are you even aware of what happened at Ruby Ridge? That in fact the >FBI killed a 14 year old boy, and shot a woman through the head while >she stood in her home holding her baby in her arms? > >Did they deserve what they got? >http://en.wikipedi

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"Excuse me, he violated a whole series of weapons law, shot at the law enforcement officers coming to serve him a warrant and continues toresist arrest. The neo-nazi was no innocent and the FBI just didn't pick hi s name out of a hat.. He broke a series of laws, resisted lawful arrest and shot at

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Sam wrote: > > So then we agree. > > Why rant on about the likeliness of it happening? > > Never mind, I finally got the answer I was looking for. That anything is possible? Bravo. When you are ready to spit probabilities, look me up. =) :Den -- Even in the p

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

So then we agree. Why rant on about the likeliness of it happening? Never mind, I finally got the answer I was looking for. . On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:05 AM, denstar wrote: > >> OK I get it.. So you are saying if you ignore that law under no >> circumstance will anyone ever enforce with a gu

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:14 AM, denstar wrote: >> >> Is porn dangerous?  Violent video games?  Words like "fuck" and "shit"? >> >> To some extent, apparently, "safe" is in the mind of the beholder. >> >> I'm not saying I'm down for shit- just saying

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

A back up inspector came and the girl cried. Are you denying that? :P On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:14 PM, denstar wrote: >> >>> operating without a permit or a liqueur license? They almost arrested >>> a girl with a lemonade stand for no pe

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:14 AM, denstar wrote: > > Is porn dangerous?  Violent video games?  Words like "fuck" and "shit"? > > To some extent, apparently, "safe" is in the mind of the beholder. > > I'm not saying I'm down for shit- just saying. > > Crap examples, but still, there's precedent, no

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Maureen wrote: ... > You are way wrong on this one, Larry. I agree. Ruby Ridge wasn't teh awesome. Un-relatedly: last I checked, it wasn't illegal to approach a politician while holding a political sign-- wearing a wig or no (ignoring for a second how "smart" doi

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Are you even aware of what happened at Ruby Ridge? That in fact the FBI killed a 14 year old boy, and shot a woman through the head while she stood in her home holding her baby in her arms? Did they deserve what they got? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge You are way wrong on this one, La

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Excuse me, he violated a whole series of weapons law, shot at the law enforcement officers coming to serve him a warrant and continues to resist arrest. The neo-nazi was no innocent and the FBI just didn't pick hi s name out of a hat.. He broke a series of laws, resisted lawful arrest and shot at

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! "they should have stormed the place sooner and shot quicker. That neo-nazi gun runner deserved what he got." And the rule of law be damned! Some citizens should not have the rights that other citizens have. The government can do what it wants, whe

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"they should have stormed the place sooner and shot quicker. That neo-nazi gun runner deserved what he got." And the rule of law be damned! Some citizens should not have the rights that other citizens have. The government can do what it wants, when it wants. Right Larry? >From wiki: Both the

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

" San Francisco is one of the top tourist destinations on earth, but people who come to San Francisco aren't coming here to eat at McDonalds." Never said tourist went to SF to eat at McDonalds. "Doubtful that McDonalds will appeal the legislation as they didn't put any money into opposing it."

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

they should have stormed the place sooner and shot quicker. That neo-nazi gun runner deserved what he got. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "Government has a monopoly on violent enforcement in America. " > > Ruby Ridge. > > J > > - > > What has always made the state a hell

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Yeah...we will see how well that works out Jerry. -Original Message- From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 9:51 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! "See my earlier message about the legislatio

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

San Francisco is one of the top tourist destinations on earth, but people who come to San Francisco aren't coming here to eat at McDonalds. Doubtful that McDonalds will appeal the legislation as they didn't put any money into opposing it. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: >

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"Government has a monopoly on violent enforcement in America. " Ruby Ridge. J - What has always made the state a hell on earth has been precisely that man has tried to make it his heaven. - Friedrich Höderlin ~| Order the Ad

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"See my earlier message about the legislation out here. San Francisco doesn't care what the rest of the nation things." No doubt. However, there are repercussions that could be out of SF's hands. While SF might not care what the rest of the nation thinks, I bet SF likes money. People might st

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:14 PM, denstar wrote: > >> operating without a permit or a liqueur license? They almost arrested >> a girl with a lemonade stand for no permit. Uh, no, they didn't almost arrest a girl with a lemonade stand for no permit. At least not if you are talking about the case in

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:09 PM, denstar wrote: > Maybe to a certain extent, but that's kinda at the extreme end, neh? >>> So is banning toys neh? >> "Unsafe" toys get banned all the time, yes? > > These toys are safe, just stupid :) Is porn dang

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:09 PM, denstar wrote: >>> Maybe to a certain extent, but that's kinda at the extreme end, neh? >> So is banning toys neh? > "Unsafe" toys get banned all the time, yes? These toys are safe, just stupid :) > I don't think they have those spinny things (merry-go-rounds?)

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Sam wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:46 PM, denstar wrote: >> >> Maybe to a certain extent, but that's kinda at the extreme end, neh? > > So is banning toys neh? "Unsafe" toys get banned all the time, yes? I don't think they have those spinny things (merry-go-r

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

FAIL! . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > I think that your homework assignment is to learn how to be civil. > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Sam wrote: >> >> Your homework for the weekend is to determine which one of us is trolling ~

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

I think that your homework assignment is to learn how to be civil. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Sam wrote: > > Your homework for the weekend is to determine which one of us is trolling > > > . > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> >> As I said trolling the list instead

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

We're not talk about you and me. We're talking about what happens if someone decides to ignore this law. . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > Guess that says something about the differences between you and I, > Sam, since the reason I follow laws isn't because the Governmen

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:46 PM, denstar wrote: > > Maybe to a certain extent, but that's kinda at the extreme end, neh? So is banning toys neh? > There are places where the police don't carry guns. So? > Hell, telling my daughter "No" firmly is usually enough to get her to > halt what she's d

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Sam wrote: >> >> You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in >> before the guns come. >> If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot. Guess that says something about the differences between you and I, Sam, since the reason I foll

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Sam wrote: > > You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in > before the guns come. > If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot. Maybe to a certain extent, but that's kinda at the extreme end, neh? There are places where the poli

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

See my earlier message about the legislation out here. San Francisco doesn't care what the rest of the nation things. They will enforce the ordinance, and McDonald's, among others, will comply with it. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > What will SF do?  Taking them to co

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Your homework for the weekend is to determine which one of us is trolling . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > As I said trolling the list instead of having a constructive discussion. > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Sam wrote: >> >> You're argument is that it wont h

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

As I said trolling the list instead of having a constructive discussion. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Sam wrote: > > You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in > before the guns come. > If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot. > > Your insults are acceler

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

You're argument is that it wont happen because people will give in before the guns come. If the threat of guns wasn't there, law would be moot. Your insults are accelerating. Post-election stress? . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Exactly that is why I called it a st

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Exactly that is why I called it a stupid question. A really stupid unrealistic question that only served as a metaphorical firebomb, and further troll the list. But in reality what would happen is that if the franchisee (notice franchisee and not McDonalds) would be taken to court, and be require

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Jeff Garza wrote: > > Sam, they're not going to get it.  Government has a monopoly on violent > enforcement in America.  If you don't do what the government wants you will > eventually find yourself staring down the barrel of a gun... Listen, Jeff, please. Governm

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Bill Wheatley wrote: > > "For myself, I'd say that McDonalds is more dangerous than gay marriage > and teenagers with porn but probably less dangerous than nuclear waste > at a playground." > > This sounds absurd. McDonalds is not dangerous. By what definition of

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

nt: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:18 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! Actually, my point was, if they close your business down but you continue to sell food, the Sheriff or the Constable will come with guns and remove you from the premises. . On Fri, Nov 5,

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"Actually, my point was, if they close your business down but you continue to sell food, the Sheriff or the Constable will come with guns and remove you from the premises." One possibility. It leads to great questions in itself though. What it's a McD's owned by a minority or other "repressed"

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Actually, my point was, if they close your business down but you continue to sell food, the Sheriff or the Constable will come with guns and remove you from the premises. . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "That's a really stupid question." > > No, it's not. > > What wil

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"That's a really stupid question." No, it's not. What will SF do? Taking them to court just gives the whole nation even more exposure to SF's nanny politics. SF probably doesn't want that. It's actually completely legitimate due to the potential repercussions. J - No man's life, liberty, o

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

That's a really stupid answer. Try again. . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > That's a really stupid question. > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sam wrote: >> >> What if they don't pay the fine and don't close? >> >> . >> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Larry

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

That's a really stupid question. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sam wrote: > > What if they don't pay the fine and don't close? > > . > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: >> >> Hey they decide not to comply then they start getting fined and have >> difficulties renewing

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

A box or a stick is still the best toy, depends totally on the imagination. The HM toys are so specific and detailed there's nothing left for the imagination and they are useless after five minutes if that long. . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:45 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "Sometimes pointless toy

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

What if they don't pay the fine and don't close? . On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote: > > Hey they decide not to comply then they start getting fined and have > difficulties renewing their business license for that franchise. > > That said, the McDonalds Corporation may not

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

is if you resist? >> > They will show up with armed agents/police to do so. >> > >> > So, yes.  That is the ultimate method by which the government enforces >> > their >> > rules that modify your behavior.  McDonalds needs to hope that their >> &g

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Because definitions imply facts and we all know how fact challenged he is. Ergo you're not playing nice. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Maureen wrote: > > So how exactly is it not playing nice to post a definition? > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote: >> >> The new three stooges. >>

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Another appropriate saying goes here: You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts. Unfortunately too many people never understand the distinction. Several of whom are apparently on this list. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I  recently posted the definition

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"For myself, I'd say that McDonalds is more dangerous than gay marriage and teenagers with porn but probably less dangerous than nuclear waste at a playground." This sounds absurd. McDonalds is not dangerous. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:14

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"Sometimes pointless toys are cool too. =)" For the kids, no doubt. Sometimes its hard for adults to remember how cool a 10 cent toy can be. J - You cannot get rid of me because I am and always will be a socialist. You hate me because you still love me. - Benito Mussolini ~~~

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "The toy is usually just a throw away. We never got anything worth keeping. > I guess we don't go enough." > > Ain't that the truth. > > As much as this law sickens me, I despise Happy Meal toys.  They are > garbage.  When we do get them, the

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Sam wrote: > > Crayons in restaurants are next. > My money is on Cracker Jacks. =) :Den -- There are some who speak well and write badly. For the place and the audience warm them, and draw from their minds more than they think of without that warmth. Blaise Pas

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > And if McDonald's, the private organization, d3ecides not to comply? I don't know, honestly. I tried to look it up but couldn't find a link to the actual text of the bill, only summaries and the summaries don't include penalties if there are a

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

es that modify your behavior. McDonalds needs to hope that their > > advertising and pricing alone are good enough to get you in the door... > > > > Jeff > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] > > Sent: Thursday, N

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Of all the things I miss about living back east, I miss Chik-fil-a most. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > Chic-Filet has a much better policy.  They give away educational products. >  Books, Books on CD, and suc ~~~

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

"The toy is usually just a throw away. We never got anything worth keeping. I guess we don't go enough." Ain't that the truth. As much as this law sickens me, I despise Happy Meal toys. They are garbage. When we do get them, the toys have a very short shelf life. There is probably a landfill

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

It's the hat trick of insults. Me too. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Maureen wrote: > > So how exactly is it not playing nice to post a definition? > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote: >> >> The new three stooges. >> >>  Why not try to play nice for a change ~~

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

So how exactly is it not playing nice to post a definition? On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote: > > The new three stooges. > >  Why not try to play nice for a change ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://ww

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

The new three stooges. Why not try to play nice for a change? . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Maureen wrote: > > I  recently posted the definition of fact on another list and received > a reply telling me that a fact was also an opinion.  The reply is > below: > > "Fact is also something t

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Crayons in restaurants are next. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Ian Skinner wrote: > > > Am I missing something in all the discussion that preceded this post?  But I > didn't any mention that this say one can or can not have (or get for a child) > a happy meal.  But that the business can

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

I recently posted the definition of fact on another list and received a reply telling me that a fact was also an opinion. The reply is below: "Fact is also something that someone considers to be the truth. reality and perception. we have our "truths" and "facts" as a party and so does she. I'm

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

alds needs to hope that their >> advertising and pricing alone are good enough to get you in the door... >> >> Jeff >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] >> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:09 AM >> To: cf-commun

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

nalds needs to hope that their > advertising and pricing alone are good enough to get you in the door... > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:09 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sam wrote: > > You got me. Proof there's a middle > Proof of something. ;-) :Den -- The struggle alone pleases us, not the victory. Blaise Pascal ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Ian Skinner wrote: ... > As many others have said, not that I necessarily support the ordinance, just > that it does not ban the meal, just the advertisement. You are correct! Unless there's tranny-fat in them thar boxes (do they even still give 'em out in boxes?

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

>Law curbs McDonald's Happy Meal >toys > > >Excerpt: > >San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to pass a law that cracks >down on the popular practice of giving away free toys with unhealthy >restaurant meals for children. >

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Yeah...they banned Happy Meals. They also reelected Nancy Pelosi by 80%, voted to legalize pot by 65%, banned sitting or lying on the sidewalks, voted to raise taxes on real property, and changed the way they pay their transit workers from a fixed minimum wage to using collective bargaining. Sa

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

The there's getting kids to eat at all, getting them to east meat. If you live of fit you're a fool or you're working too hard. It can be a good thing if used to your advantage and moderately. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Vivec wrote: > > You know, typically I am totally against the State

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Name one. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > For the record, I think this is a silly law.  But I also see a lot of > hypocrisy in the arguments since there are quite a few laws that really fall > under the "nanny state" designation, but since it's something they ag

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

For the record, I think this is a silly law. But I also see a lot of hypocrisy in the arguments since there are quite a few laws that really fall under the "nanny state" designation, but since it's something they agree with, it's ok. On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Scott Stroz wrote: > For the

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

You know, typically I am totally against the State interfering in individual choice. But in this matter there are a few other factors to consider. 1) The types of Fast Foods that people are consuming is adversely affecting their health. 2) These people who's health is affected are putting a stra

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

It wasn't kids stuff though...Camel did the same thing -Original Message- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:51 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! When I still smoked, Marlboro had a catal

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

You got me. Proof there's a middle . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM, denstar wrote: > > Fnuck'n Liberals! > > neh, Sam? > > :Den > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

If she can drive she can buy a bag of cookies and call it lunch. Why would she be ordering happy meals, does she like the toys too? . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > If my daughter ate meat, after this year she could...drivers ed this year... > ~

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Old... -Original Message- From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:06 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! How old are you guys that you've forgotten exactly what you did when your pa

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

If my daughter ate meat, after this year she could...drivers ed this year... -Original Message- From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 11:38 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! The child doesn't drive up t

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:14 AM, G Money wrote: ... > I know you are aren't directing this at me, but in a word: Yes. > > Are we, or are we not, a FREE country? > > There is nothing subversive about what Micky D's is doing. They server junk > food. We KNOW they serve junk food. it is up to us wheth

RE: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

With all the parents that don't, someone has to do it. -Original Message- From: Scott Stewart [mailto:webmas...@sstwebworks.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:44 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!! "> Yes, I have. It's

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Wow, I used to get all kinds of great swag from them because I worked in restaurants and we'd rip off the code from the empty packs. Still have the beach blanket. .. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > When I still smoked, Marlboro had a catalog of stuff you could get for > '

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

How is that a flaw in my analogy? In both cases establishments are selling 'unhealthy' goods. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Maureen wrote: > > The 7-11 can't sell cigarettes to kids, nor target kids in their advertising. > > Not that I approve of the Happy Meal ordinance.  Just pointing out t

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Depends on how often. We pop into fast food joints when on long trips. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Medic wrote: > > It's all kind of a moot point anyway. If you are feeding your child > McDonald's you've already failed as a parent, so you might as well just give > them the damn toy.

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

When I still smoked, Marlboro had a catalog of stuff you could get for 'free' by collecting 'miles' (which was basically the UPC code). On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Medic wrote: > > Well 7-11 can't give away a my little pony with each pack of cigarettes > purchased. > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

If I did it because my child ordered me to than I would have to agree. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Casey Dougall wrote: > > If you pick up potato chips, french fries and chicken tenders, and a  2 > liter of soda at the grocery store, child services should step in, because > you're just a

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

I'm pretty sure McD's doesn't sell happy meals to 3 year olds. . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Maureen wrote: > > The 7-11 can't sell cigarettes to kids, nor target kids in their advertising. > > Not that I approve of the Happy Meal ordinance.  Just pointing out the > flaw in your analogy. >

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Why not? I once got a watch with a double pack of cigs . On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Medic wrote: > > Well 7-11 can't give away a my little pony with each pack of cigarettes > purchased. > > ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion A

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

bwahahahaha. On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Medic wrote: > > It's all kind of a moot point anyway. If you are feeding your child > McDonald's you've already failed as a parent, so you might as well just give > them the damn toy. > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sam wrote: > >> >> It's

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

It's all kind of a moot point anyway. If you are feeding your child McDonald's you've already failed as a parent, so you might as well just give them the damn toy. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sam wrote: > > It's genius. Saves consumer time and money, order by number, they're > going to ord

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

They could, if an adult was purchasing the cigs. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Medic wrote: > > Well 7-11 can't give away a my little pony with each pack of cigarettes > purchased. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Sam wrote: > > If your child orders you to go to McDonalds and get them a happy meal, > and you do it, you're messed up. Maybe child services needs to step > in. > If you pick up potato chips, french fries and chicken tenders, and a 2 liter of soda at the grocer

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

The 7-11 can't sell cigarettes to kids, nor target kids in their advertising. Not that I approve of the Happy Meal ordinance. Just pointing out the flaw in your analogy. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > McDonald's can't Happy Meals with a toy in them, but the 7-11 next >

Re: The Happy Meal Nazi: No Toys for You!!!!!!!

Well 7-11 can't give away a my little pony with each pack of cigarettes purchased. On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > McDonald's can't Happy Meals with a toy in them, but the 7-11 next > door can sell you a pack of cigarettes. That makes sensenot > > On Thu, Nov 4, 201

  1   2   >