Re: Number of PCs in the same vlan

It will depend on the capability of the switch. that you are using. Regarding to the cisco recommendation 1) 500 node for 1 Ip segment 2) 300 node for 1 Ipx segmnet 3) Mixed enviroment 200 4) Netbios 200 5) Appletalk 200 "Katsagianni Natasa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news

Re: 2500 Flash ?

I've never had 8 & 4 increments work in the 2500. I've always had (2) 4 Meg sticks or (1 or 2) 8 Meg sticks. Usually the boot ROM memory count is not effect by the ROM's, it's usually a situation of disappearing interfaces or "no usable interfaces" when your IOS supersedes the ROM code. Phil -

Bridging - Ethernet to token ring

Does anyone have a sample config for this. I know that I need to specify bridge-groups and the relevant bridge protocols. A client is looking at a seriously temporary solution. He need Ethernet users and Token rings users to connect via bridging. I am trying to set it up in the lab with 2 Cisco 25

IPSec Cisco to Linux (with NAT)

Hi there, i am looking for config samples for an IPSec setup between a cisco = (1720) router and a linux box with NAT enabled on both devices.=20 any advice is welcome, gabriel _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Re: Number of PCs in the same vlan

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:00:37AM +0200, Katsagianni Natasa wrote: > Is there a limit on how many PCs you can assign on the same VLAN ? About 2 billion, although in practice 200 (Windows/Apple) to 500 (Unix) are good limits due to broadcast traffic. -- Ryan O'Connell - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - ht

Re: how to see the physical memory configuration

On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Andrew Larkins wrote: > Is there a way - via IOS - to see what the physical memory configuration is, > for example how many SIMMs are present in the 3640 DRAM banks. The reason > for this is I have an old router on a site far away that needs upgrades. I >

Re: Passed CCIE written in Second shot

If you can, check here: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/700/configrp.html Buy CCIE-Lab book & get familiar with Cisco DOC CD bgp ospf eigrp rip dlsw isdn scenarios + basic voip very important Good luck Cheers CCNA CCDP CCNP Almost CCIE :-) >From: "Almazi Rashid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "A

Routers can't ping own interface

I have a question - please if I have overlooked something just point me in the right direction, I'm not looking to be spoon fed. :) I looked through the Cisco web site and documentation that I had but I was wondering if anyone else had seen this. I have two routers in a test lab, a 2509 and a 2

Re: Really Confused

Your log shows you have two channels in use on interface BRI0 ( BRI0:1 and BRI0:2). Only one of the channels was down (BRI0:2 is the second channel on the BRI interface) when the SNMP traffic is crossing the interface. Later in the log, it shows the first channel is brought down (BRI0:1). At th

CCIE Written

Hi, I'm looking for a book for CCIE written test to understand the methodology of the written exam. Which book(s)are widely used for written ? Regards, Alec __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.y

RE: Cisco router is running very slow when SSh is implmented

I was going to suggest the use of an access class ... applied to the vty lines ... but thanks for the transport input line! < that outbound telnet from all boxes on the LAN would be blocked as well; as there 'responses' would get dropped at the router ... hence the use of access classes ...>> Reg

RE: Routers can't ping own interface

have you enable ip routing - I was playing in the lab here on something else with this command disabled.. I was able to ping the other side ip address and not my own.. router(config)# ip routing hth -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 20

RE: how to see the physical memory configuration

any idea what that command is?? -Original Message- From: Ryan O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2001 12:32 To: Andrew Larkins Cc: Cisco Mail List Subject: Re: how to see the physical memory configuration On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Andrew Larkins wrote: >

RE: CHAP authentication w/ dialer profiles

Frank, I think you forgot to put the ppp chap password cisco It will not authenticate without it Omar -Mensaje original- De: Frank B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:17 AM Para: Santarsiero, Bill; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Me @ Work; [EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Routers can't ping own interface

It wasn't enabled, but I went ahead and enabled it, no difference. I finally for up and running purposes just added a static route, now everyone can talk to everyone, but I still can't ping my own serial interfaces. thanks! Patrick Andrew Larkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/28/2001 07:

Re: Bridging - Ethernet to token ring

I configured cisco 2612 with SRT/TLB, users in ethernet domain was able to communicate with token ring domain users and vice versa. If you want to apply transaparent bridge between 2 differnent domain, from ethernet side, that should not have any problem, but users in token ring has problem to co

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

Did you try extended ping? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > It wasn't enabled, but I went ahead and enabled it, no difference. I finally for > up and running purposes just added a static route, now everyone can talk to > everyone, but I still can't

Configuring RADIUS server

Hi Everyone, I am using TACACS Server to Authenticate, Authorize and Account users on the Network Access Server (Cisco Terminal Server). It is working great. However, I would like to duplicate the same thing but I would like to use RADIUS instead of TACACS. I am running free RADIUS on a SUN box

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

Hi; Can you ping 127.0.0.1 Thanks Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I have a question - please if I have overlooked something just point me in the > right direction, I'm not looking to be spoon fed. :) I looked through the Cisco > web site

NTP Question?

Does the Denver clock have an IP address , so I can set my router to it? Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: bri flapping with demand cirquit/igrp redistribution

the whole idea for DDR is that only interesting traffic will bring up the link. Once the link is active, then by all means, the routing protocols can send hello messages. This is for the case where DDR is used for backup purposes. You will to weigh up the benfits vs costs. -Original Message

RE: Routers can't ping own interface

what encapsulation are you running on the interfaces?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2001 15:00 To: Andrew Larkins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Routers can't ping own interface It wasn't enabled, but I went ahead and enabled

Netware 4 server

I have a netware 4 server and a cisco router just be installed on the Ethernet. The router can't see the server a.encapsulation difference b.router address must be configured on the server c.server need to be the default gateway d.rebbot the router Thanks

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

No, no I can't. I didn't bother to check this yesterday. I went into each interface and enabled loopback, but I still can't ping it. Sorry to be so dumb on this, but what am I doing wrong (Ok, so it's a loaded question!)? "Vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<99sse3$u7h$[EMAIL

Loop up signal

What is the result of sending a loop up signal to the csu/dsu? Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gro

Re: Netware 4 server

Encapsulation Difference, A. KOLIY wrote: > I have a netware 4 server and a cisco router just be installed on > the Ethernet. The router can't see the server > a.encapsulation difference > b.router address must be configured on the server > c.server need to be the default gateway > d.rebbot the

Re: Cisco 4500 not booting

Here are the instructions I give to others in my department and it presumes that you're using a directly connected laptop as your tftp server. FLASH Memory Upgrade Instructions for 2600 Series Routers Before you even start, make sure the IOS you want to install on the router exists on the lapt

Re: trunking

This may seem like nit-picking, but it isn't actually a revision of 802.1Q that supports PVST, but rather, the vendor gear that supports PVST with the use of 802.1Q... Nortel Passport (Accelar) switches support this as well... -Brant Rik wrote: > Actually, most newer revisions of Dot1Q support

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

Patrick - in order for the routers to ping the opposite router's Ethernet interface, you need to run a routing protocol (or use static routes) to get that routing information in each router's table. In order for each router to ping it's own serial interface, it needs to be able to translate th

Re: More Info (OSPF and IP Classless)

When I did my original testing, both routers were in area 0. When I get home tonight I'll try putting the default-advertising router into a different area just for grins. I'll also try changing the default advertisement to a type 1 external instead of type 2. I have no idea why that would have

RE: bri flapping with demand cirquit/igrp redistribution

Here's what I did. Changed the access-list to deny and changed the wildcards from 3 to 255 since IGRP redistributes the classful version of 173.5.8.x network. See below: interface BRI0/0 ip address 173.5.8.1 255.255.255.252 ip ospf demand-circuit ... router ospf 1 redistribute igrp 100 met

RE: Netware 4 server

Can you ping the server from the router? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of KOLIY Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Netware 4 server I have a netware 4 server and a cisco router just be installed on the

Re: Please help - this is quiet urgent

Gayathri, How are you routing the traffic? Are you using DLSW or RSRB? Make sure you check your bitswap on the token interface also. Clayton Dukes - Download Free Essays, Term Papers and Cisco Training from http://www.gdd.ne

RE: W2K Client for VPN3000?

Pix OS 6.0 is in Beta now with a projected release date (FCS) of April 25th. Chris Lemagie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Henry Rollins Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 6:14 PM To: Chris Lemagie Cc: Jeff Groman; Weil, Timothy R; Group Study

Free for a good Canadian home.......

I've been doing some spring cleaning... I have about 20 Cisco documentation CD sets... They date from March 1999 to June 2000... No guarantee as to what date you'll receive I will send them to the first 20 people that reply with Canadian postal addresses... Please don't send a request unless

Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

Are there such creatures? I'd like to play around with this stuff in my home lab and don't feel like shelling out hundreds of dollars for software just to play with it once in a while. I found some older freeware TACACS software, but I'd like to play with TACACS+ and RADIUS. Any ideas? Thanks,

IT Career Academy?

Over the last week or so, somebody keeps sending me instant messages when I'm at home on AOL. He asks me all sorts of career related questions, mostly for advice regarding his educational options. He then references some company whose website is www.itcareeracademy.com and asks me to check into

Tacacs and dialup authentication

Hi Everyone. I am having trouble trying to work out why I cannot get a router to connect via ISDN to another router when tacacs is configured. I want to use the local Tacacs database and I have followed the instructions on the cisco web site http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsol

Re: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

Mr. Cheapskate, TACACS and RADIUS have always been free. Go to these sites: http://www.gazi.edu.tr/tacacs/ http://www.freeradius.org TACACS is esasy to setup and configure. RADIUS is more powerful, open-standard but a little more difficult to set up. F___ those bastards at Cisco. They prov

RE: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

I would check http://www.winfiles.com/ if you are looking for Windows versions of these products. I get most of my freeware from there. Chris Lemagie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:45 AM

RE: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

I'd like to make a comment regarding "Radius is more powerful"...In actuality TACACS+ is Much more robust and versatile then RADIUS. From encrypting the entire datagram, to using TCP, to being able to split Authentication, Authorization and Accounting services, to setting privilege exec levels, TA

Re: IT Career Academy?

Never heard of the company, or that guy (never used AOL), but I don't think it is unrealistic to start from nothing and acheive CCNP in 6 months. It's only written tests... Anybody with enough time to read all of the exam crams and study guides for these exams can pass them. Can that same pers

CCIE Study Partner

Hi Bill, I found your post to the group about couple of weeks ago in the archive. I am also in Madison, WI. I passed the CCIE written a few months ago. I have been preparing for the lab test since then. Please contact me off-line. George Zhang Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: W2K Client for VPN3000?

Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Lemagie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 3:56 PM To: Henry Rollins Cc: Jeff Groman; Weil, Timothy R; Group Study (List) (E-mail) Subject: RE: W2K Client for VPN3000? Pix OS 6.0 is in Beta now with a projected release date (

Re: IT Career Academy?

Mask Of Zorro wrote: > > only written tests... Anybody with enough time to read all of the exam crams > and study guides for these exams can pass them. > > Can that same person be of much use in a real production environment? > Probably not. But I have seen people do this - many people. In fact

vpn upgrade question

Hi Folks, I would like to know when upgrading my vpn3030 from 2.5 to 3.0, will I be able to use the old config or will I need to make a new config from scratch on the 3.0? Also, once I'm running 3.0 on my concentrator, can those people who use 2.5 vpn client still have access or they will be forc

PIX virtual telnet

Hi, I have a Cisco PIX firewall with OS version 5.3.1. I am trying to implement the virtual telnet feature for authentication, from some reason when I am trying to attach an access-list to the aaa authentication statement it gives me the following error massage "do not support hybrid configuratio

Re: 2514 Upgrade Problem!!

That's exactly what I did. Thank you. Kind regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 2514 Upgrade Problem!! >Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:18:54 -0800 (PST) >

RE: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

Rizzo, I will grant you that TACACS+ is versatile robust than RADIUS but only if you NAS of equipments are Cisco products. If you are using products from vendors other than Cisco, chances are RADIUS is the prefer choice. RADIUS and TACACS+ are both open-source so anyone can take the code and twea

IBGP neighbors

3/28/2001 12:55pm Wednesday =20 Would anyone care to elaborate on IBGP neighbors? Must they always be fully meshed or do route reflectors negate this? =20 =20 Richard L. Pickard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 560-6482 =20 _ FAQ, list arc

RE: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

There is a big difference between "powerful" and "more widely used". I'll give you that if your using a device other then Cisco, you may be best to go the RADIUS way. However, anyone who has any experience with TACACS+ and RADIUS, specifically with Cisco devices, will tell you that TACACS+ is the

suggestion on backbone connections needed!!

=20 I need your suggetion. We do point to point SDSL for backbone connections over existing copper = for=20 some remote buildings that have no fiber. We need to remotely monitor = and=20 configure these SDSL boxes. Please forward any information you have on a = equivalent to the Flow Point 2

RE: vpn upgrade question

Upgrading to 3.0 will preserve the existing configurations. After you upgrade the concentrator, it will still be able to talk to the older clients, but the 3.0 client will not work until you upgrade the concentrator. Chris Lemagie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI

Re: IBGP neighbors

They do not always need to be fully meshed if you set up route reflectors. The IBGP "speakers" will pass the information along to the other neighbors. I almost see it as a DR in OSPF. It will pass all the information of routes and neighbors along even if there is not a mesh. Sorry if this is not t

DMZ

Hi all I frequently hear the term DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) being thrown around me Can anyone please enlighten me Cheers Dennis - 21st century air travel http://www.britishairways.com _

Re: IT Career Academy?

>Mask Of Zorro wrote: > >> >> only written tests... Anybody with enough time to read all of the exam crams >> and study guides for these exams can pass them. >> >> Can that same person be of much use in a real production environment? >> Probably not. But I have seen people do this - many peopl

RE: Freeware Tacacs+ and RADIUS?

Rizzo, My mistake. sorry about that. In a Cisco-centric environment, TACACS+ is definitely THE choice. I also agree is much easier to configure than RADIUS. Sean >From: Rizzo Damian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Rizzo Damian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'Sean Young'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,

Re: IBGP neighbors

Exactly... Route Reflectors negate the need for a full iBGP mesh... "Pickard, Richard" wrote: > 3/28/2001 12:55pm Wednesday > =20 > Would anyone care to elaborate on IBGP neighbors? > Must they always be fully meshed or do route reflectors negate this? > =20 > =20 > Richard L. Pickard > [EMA

RE: Implementing SSH on Cisco IOS

What about TACACS+/cisco SecureAcs on your routers! -Original Message- From: Simmons, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 7:49 AM To: 'Glenn Johnson '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: Implementing SSH on Cisco IOS Last time I asked a few months ago they had no

Re: IT Career Academy?

Howard, you're killing me. Jim ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:p0500190db6e7ea56fb33@[63.216.127.100]... > >Mask Of Zorro wrote: > > > >> > >> only written tests... Anybody with enough time to read all of the exam crams > >> and study guides for these exams c

Re: IBGP neighbors

By having route reflectors, it would eliminate the need for having a fully meshed ibgp network. The route reflectors would update and pass on routing information to all the other clients in the network, without having to run all these connections to each other, thus allowing to scale the network.

Re: DMZ

The DMZ is an area of your network that the outside world has access to but is separated by security devices from the rest of your internal network. For example: InsideNetwork <---> Firewall <---> DMZ <-> Firewall/Router <---> Internet The DMZ would hold your file servers and w

Re: DMZ

Another rough answer: Ok, the DMZ deals with a 3 part firewall. Basically, there is a LAN that hangs off of your firewall that contains your servers like the e-comm. and mail. Then you have your internal LAN where your users are. In order for your users to get out to the net they have to go throug

Re: DMZ

Quite simply its an area between the router and say a firewall that is protecting the inner network. Alot of companies will place mail and internet servers there. They get less protection than those hosts behind the firewall but are available resources to both the internet side and the protected

Re: What is static NAT subnet mask?

I'm way behind so this may be answered already. I take it that this isn't on a PIX from the command given. On the PIX the subnet mask is defined with the global command. Hope this helps. Allen May - Original Message - From: "Shawn Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: T

Re: IT Career Academy?

And subnetting would be a 'piece of cake' for him too since he can divide any cake into any number of equal size pieces. - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 1:22 PM Subject: Re: IT Career Academy?

RE: OSPF overrides "no ip classless"

John, did you ever try distributing route for 8.0.0.0 instead of 0.0.0.0 to see whether it was true for all routes or just the clammy "normal", "default" default route :) ? - Tks        | BV    |

RE: IT Career Academy?

What about discontiguous pieces. Such as 1/2 the cake for me and 1/20th for you. 1/4 for Allen, 1/8 for Howard with the remainder being divided into 32'nds Would that still be a piece of cake too? :) -Original Message- From: Allen May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March

Re: NTP Question?

http://www.google.com and search for public ntp clock sources I did last night, and there were a few public accessible sources in Colorado, I believe including the one in Boulder. -e- - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001

Re: Can not ping outside of PIX 520 after upgrade to 5.31

Can't say I can suggest anything without more config, but what do you mean by the strange route? The route is for the directly connected subnet on your outside interface. Give us a peek at some more of config. Gareth ""Gary Crouch"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[E

default route considerations

3/28/2001 3:13pm Wednesday =20 I recently came across the following on a practice test: =20 A default route of 0.0.0.0 may be used, but what is the most important consideration? No info was given about a routing protocol. Can anyone point me in the right direction on where to go with this? =2

Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication

Looked through it for ages. I may be missing something but looks like the authentication is just failing, possibly due to not using the same password on RouterA and RouterB? On RouterA username RouterB password fred On RouterB username RouterA password fred Fingers like mine - too big to tyyppe

Re: default route considerations

One thing to watch is trhat some routing protocols do not undertand the 0/0 route, like IGRP... In cases such as these, you will need to make use of the default network command to provide default-route functionality... "Pickard, Richard" wrote: > 3/28/2001 3:13pm Wednesday > =20 > I recent

ISDN SIMULATOR-WANTED

Hello, I am looking to purchase an ISDN Simulator. Perhaps one from someone's personal lab, etc. Thanks, Dwayne _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PR

Re: Private Vlans - Is this a good idea

Amen! ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:p0500190eb6e697785d87@[63.216.127.100]... > Let me generalize my standard question of "what is the problem you > are trying to solve," with "what problem do you NOT WANT to solve." > What you are describing is a management, n

ISDN SIMULATOR

Hello, I am looking to purchase an ISDN Simulator. Perhaps one from someone's personal lab, etc. Thanks, Dwayne _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PR

RE: OSPF overrides "no ip classless"

Now that I think about it, I believe I did try 10.0.0.0/8 and it still behaved classfully, even running OSPF. I'll try it again to make sure, though. I'm only 30 and my memory is already failing me. John >>> "Bob Vance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/28/01 8:34:49 AM >>> John, did you ever try distri

HELP

We are running a Network management platform based on the NETCOOL = package.=20 We have recently started to receive SNMP from one of our routers (Cisco 7500) with a summary of "Free_Huge Buffer is very low; less than 10%".=20 If we need too, we can filter these errors out but I am unwilling to d

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

Cisco routers employ 'hearself' on the serial interfaces. A look at CCO should explain the details and help you understand the specifics for this problem. --- Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi; > > Can you ping 127.0.0.1 > > Thanks > Vincent > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ¼¶¼g©ó¶l¥ó > [EMAIL PROT

Re: PIX virtual telnet

Gil Just an idea. Do you already have the old type commands configured (aaa authentication include etc) as well as new type (aaa authentication match mylist etc). I believe, but never tried that they both work, but can't be used together. Perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree, just stabbing in th

help for bcmsn

any last minute brush-up documents for bcmsn ? - Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct an

Re: Private Vlans - Is this a good idea

FUD - Sounds gud! What is it? If the FU stands for what I think it does, what does the D stand for. Sorry for dragging the thread to one side, but I think I work somewhere that FUD cud become a major part of our vocabulary. I don't want to make up my own D if it's already in popular use :-)

No Subject

Hi everyone, I have a story that wish to share with everyone. One of my friends works for a company that uses Cisco PIX as the firewall. This afternoon, he called and told me that the company firewall is experiencing a Denial of Service (DOS) attack. The attack is so heavy that the PIX is just

Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication

Hi, Where is the TACACS configured. I would have thought you would need a reference to TACACS in your AAA statements and a refernce to the TACACS server address. aaa new-model aaa authentication login default tacacs+ local aaa authentication login console tacacs+ enable aaa authentication ppp

RE: OSPF overrides "no ip classless"

And 8.0.0.0 is in that magic "in-between" place of being a supernet but not the "normal" default route. - Tks        | BV    | Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co. Vox 770-623-

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

Robert, It may be due to packet is getting looped..dont send any traffic on serial interface ( i would suggest shut all other interface ) turn logg console on & type "debug ip packet" then ping it & see your outgoing interface. thanks rahul. - Original Message - From: "Robert Padjen

Reverse Telnet (Not the usual question)

How do I configure reverse telnet?? Just kidding... We have a very minor problem that I haven't figured out how to resolve completely. We have a 2511 and we're using two of its async lines for reverse telnet into the console ports of two routers. The problem I have is that often I get a 'conne

Cisco PIX has been brought to its knee

Hi everyone, I have a story that wish to share with everyone. One of my friends works for a company that uses Cisco PIX as the firewall. This afternoon, he called and told me that the company firewall is experiencing a Denial of Service (DOS) attack. The attack is so heavy that the PIX is just

Re: Reverse Telnet (Not the usual question)

Hey John, This was talked about a little ago here. On the lines going to the console ports, put in "no exec". There was another fix but I forget. You didn't mention how the lines were configured so hope this helps. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: Reverse Telnet (Not the usual question)

That did the trick! So, what does that tell me, that the 2511 thinks there is an incoming exec session? Interesting... Thanks a bunch, John >>> "Wang, Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/28/01 4:47:03 PM >>> You need "no exec" under the tty lines: line 1 16 no exec transport input all HTH, Rog

FUD (was Re: Private Vlans - Is this a good idea

>FUD - Sounds gud! What is it? > >If the FU stands for what I think it does, what does the D stand for. Not the obvious FU... Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Much beloved of salesdroids who can't argue the merits of an issue. > >Sorry for dragging the thread to one side, but I think I work som

How do I backup the existing PIX ios 4.2 to a tftp server?

Hello everyone, we're upgrading our PIX to 5.1.4 from 4.2 and I would like to know how copy the ios to a tftp server as a backup. I have copied the config (write net...) but can't find out how to do the ios. Thank you fartcatcher. _ FAQ, list archives, and subsc

RE: OSPF overrides "no ip classless"

>Now that I think about it, I believe I did try 10.0.0.0/8 and it still >behaved classfully, even running OSPF. I'll try it again to make sure, >though. I'm only 30 and my memory is already failing me. > >John I'll bet your memory isn't from a Cisco-approved supplier. See what happens? > >>

FUD definition (WAS: Private Vlans - Is this a good idea)

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=20165 HTH, TroyC -Original Message- From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Private Vlans - Is this a good idea FUD - Sounds gud! What is it? If the FU stand

Re: HELP

>We are running a Network management platform based on the NETCOOL = >package.=20 > >We have recently started to receive SNMP from one of our routers (Cisco >7500) with a summary of "Free_Huge Buffer is very low; less than 10%".=20 What does the TAC have to say about this? > >If we need too, we

Re: Cisco PIX has been brought to its knee

What version of the code was he running? I seem to remember reading somewhere recently a cross-vendor firewall evaluation where the PIX came out very well in the anti-DoS category. Thanks, Jay ""Sean Young"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi

Re: Routers can't ping own interface

>Cisco routers employ 'hearself' on the serial >interfaces. A look at CCO should explain the details >and help you understand the specifics for this >problem. Something very profound is lurking here. For some time, I have suspected that those responsible for 802.3 autonegotiation amd autodete

Re: help for bcmsn

http://cramsession.brainbuzz.com/cramsession/cisco/ccnp2_bcmsn/ - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:50 PM Subject: help for bcmsn > any last minute brush-up documents for bcmsn ? > > > >

RE: OSPF overrides "no ip classless"

I think you're right! All DRAM and no flashor is that the other way around? Maybe I'm all DRAM and no NVRAM, that's more like it. > >Now that I think about it, I believe I did try 10.0.0.0/8 and it still > >behaved classfully, even running OSPF. I'll try it again to make sure, > >tho

Re: IBGP neighbors

>3/28/2001 12:55pm Wednesday >=20 >Would anyone care to elaborate on IBGP neighbors? >Must they always be fully meshed or do route reflectors negate this? >=20 >=20 >Richard L. Pickard >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 560-6482 >=20 Perhaps too elaborate a response, but...

  1   2   >