First, there's only a handful of Cisco Routers that do PPPoE with certain
versions of IOS, but the one that sticks out in my mind at the moment is the
1750 with it's WIC-1ENET
... and yes, you have a point, as that specific scenario would yield two
Ethernet interfaces
... But I think (can't rememb
Thank you to everybody who responded to my earlier email.
I realize that a picture says more than a thousand words,
therfore I am supplementing my earlier questions with the
following scenario:
--
Here are my router configurations:
-
I've been reading and posting for a week or so now and figured I'd
introduce myself.
I'm preparing for the CCIE R/S Lab. At this point I'm trying to list
out which areas I need to study. I passed the written with a few days
prep in early December. I've got a CCNA and CCNP. Most of my
certific
Well actually I meant the PPP interface would be separate from the
native IP/ethernet interface. This is leaving an area which I actually
have real world experience with but a quick search on CCO brought up a
good config example.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/soho77pppoe_client.html
Thoug
Here is a much better reference. Actual PPPoE instead PPPoEoA. Don't
know when/if it'll be available on the lower end platforms.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fwan_c/wcfppp.htm#xtocid1245615
Darrell Newcomb wrote:
>
> Well actually I meant the PPP int
Dear Friends,
I am getting problem to configuring Frame Relay b/w MAX-3000 (Lucent
Access server) and 2500 series router using v.35 cable. but i m unable
to configure it.
Is any one have did it before ( Frame Relay b/w MAX-3000 or MAX-6000 to
any cisco router)
Kindest Regards
Muhammad Zahid
Hi everybody.
The scenario is the following:
I have two Cisco 7500 an several 2600 connected to one of them by E1s, the
ISDNs of the 2600 are connected to the opposite 7500 and are configured as
backup lines. The 7500s are connected between them by ATMs an EIGRP is the
routing protocol. As you can
Good point. For a PRI you must also specify the switch type that you will be
communicating with at the CO.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mark Odette II
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is an ISD
As far as I can see, John is not using NAT, but a single Ethernet interface
connected to a switch or a hub, serving two networks. It seems to be working
since he can ping from one network to the other, but the problem with the
DSL gateway is that it has a default gateway set to the provider, and t
Welcome and good luck!
The k1d
""Darrell Newcomb"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've been reading and posting for a week or so now and figured I'd
> introduce myself.
>
> I'm preparing for the CCIE R/S Lab. At this point I'm trying to list
> out which areas
I guess the obvious question that you didn't address is why are you trying
to summarize the 10 network on different routers... or at all for that
matter?
The k1d
""David j"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi everybody.
> The scenario is the following:
> I hav
Thanks for the reply. Marc. I found the answer in chap11 on Jeff's book.
Originally I thought IGRP cannot take any subnetted route like
172.16.1.0/24, it will only take route with classful boundary , in this case
172.16.0.0/16. From Chap11, it says if the IGRP interface is configured with
/24, t
Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit and wisdom when
providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so desperately seek.
While you're at it, can you provide us with a list of the RFC's you have
written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. Anything to improve my
own understand
I know what you mean Chuck, it's hard to explain a misconfigured
network. Not implying the Ole misconfigured the router per se but when
auto stuff doesn't work that is the end result. I have been involved
numerous times in problems that were auto related but most often things
"work" but performa
I just want to check with you guys running BGP in production, what versions
are you using right now ?
Thanks...
Jason
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30534&t=30534
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: h
I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-))
"Jason" wrote in message news:...
> I just want to check with you guys running BGP in production, what
versions
> are you using right now ?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Jason
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30535&t=30535
-
You say you can't reach the DNS server in another part of the
network. I'm assuming the DNS server is 10.x.x.x also. If so is no ip
classless the culprit. Not quite sure based on the info why your messin
with ADs either except to put a higher cost on the backup, ISDN, links.
good luck
Dav
It's been more than once when I've encountered autonegotiation/autosense
issues between a Cisco router and Cisco switch. I've even seen problems
when both interfaces were 10/100 and both hard-coded to 100/full and the
link wouldn't come up. This may a chink in the Cisco armor as I rarely
encount
>I know what you mean Chuck, it's hard to explain a misconfigured
>network. Not implying the Ole misconfigured the router per se but when
>auto stuff doesn't work that is the end result. I have been involved
>numerous times in problems that were auto related but most often things
>"work" but per
Upgraded a couple of 7204s running full BGP to 12.2.6 and works great.
Dave
Jason wrote:
>
> I just want to check with you guys running BGP in production, what versions
> are you using right now ?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Jason
--
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications
Did you start early on the Champagne Howard???
:-)
Happy New Year...
Ole
~~~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~
http://www.RouterChief.com
I think a major motivation of a lot of "silent lurkers" (like myself) and
those who actively participate on this list is to benefit from the comments
of such great industry stalwarts such as Howard Berkowitz, Priscilla
Oppenheimer, Pamela Forsyth, etc, etc,. They always enrich their comments
with
> I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-))
Wow, had me scared there for a while :P
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30542&t=30535
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
I just posted the first version at a new tutorial I'm working for
configuring the Cisco 2900 ethernet switch. Drop by and take a look. This is
a "how do I do ??? type of tutorial. All comments are welcome. Include
suggestions for other details that might be useful... I plan to add over the
next fe
More likely EIGRP !! :-P
Jason
""Kane, Christopher A."" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Somebody spending too much quality time with BGP lately?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:02
wandering mind today, but for some reason it has occured to me to mention
the following:
authentication: a core topic
BGP authentication is the easiest - a single simple command based around the
neighbor statement
RIP comes out second. uses the key chain, but is done per interface and is a
thre
Is anyone aware of the possibility of the Cisco Catalyst 2924G switch ever
supporting a 1000-T GBIC (twisted pair gigabit ethernet) in its two 1000-X
slots? I have a C2924G, but it only supports 1000-SX, 1000-LX/LH, 1000-ZX
(all fiber). I'm just wondering if anyone has heard of support for the
100
Totally depends on the platform/feature set you require. I expect most try
and stay in the S train, though MPLS pushes you to the ST train. Usually
folks talk to their cisco SE team and get a feel for which IOS is likely to
be the most stable. Definately most are in the 12 range now though I
Anyone know why machines on a switch are arping itself such that it can't
communicate with anything else except itself.
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.group
Who is it trying to talk to? What is supposed to be happening? And what is
it that is happening exactly?
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know why machines on a switch are arping itself such that it can't
> communicate with anything else exc
is this something we should be talking about in public? ;->
Chuck
""Tom Richs"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone know why machines on a switch are arping itself such that it can't
> communicate with anything else except itself.
>
>
> __
Now that's funny!
Heather
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Larrieu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 2:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Active CCIE? [7:30341]
>
> when you are trying to study for the recertification test, but you
> have too
Although I did not buy the kit as a "kit". I used every book seperately
and can say they are excellent resources. In fact I would not miss the
chance to have them as a resource. Good Luck!
Rob wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Anyone have any experience with the Cisco CCNP Training Kit? Any in
Is it slow at work today or what?
I was browsing CCO and ran across something called "long reach ethernet"
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/long_ethernet/
lots more.
Interesting product and market. Interesting, because on the
I just did a serach and people on amazon hate it. I wouldn't waste your
money.
""Rob"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi folks,
>
> Anyone have any experience with the Cisco CCNP Training Kit? Any info
> or comments will be very welcome and appreciated.
>
I'm dying here at work as well. Too boring even to study today.
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Is it slow at work today or what?
>
> I was browsing CCO and ran across something called "long reach ethernet"
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts
Thanx for the articles..interesting...
and yeahwork is slow today =)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco LRE ( Long Reach Ethernet ) [7:30553]
Is it slow at wo
Auto-negotiation is infamous for not working as advertised! ;-) It's not
just Cisco equipment.
There is definitely a problem when introducing older 10BaseT equipment into
the equation, which it sounds like Ole did. Perhaps one of the more
hardware, physical-layer type engineers remembers more
Is there any standardization for autonegotiation like 802.x or something. I
have never heard of anything like it, and maybe that's half the problem?
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Auto-negotiation is infamous for not working as adverti
Just curious, but when using the LinkSys 10/100 switches, what did they
auto-negotiate to? Which speed and which duplex mode?
Did the hub that you installed even understand auto-negotiation? Perhaps it
was too old to understand auto-negotiation which was introduced to the IEEE
802.3 specs rela
What'sUpGold. Couldn't live without it.
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 11:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: simple ip monitor [7:30433]
Cisco will be comming out with DHRP which will do just that.
""2387""
Nice! And it's very nice of you to make it available for free. ;-)
Will you cover VLAN configuration?
Thanks
Priscilla
At 12:14 PM 12/31/01, you wrote:
>I just posted the first version at a new tutorial I'm working for
>configuring the Cisco 2900 ethernet switch. Drop by and take a look. This
Yes, it's in IEEE 802.3. It's in Clause 28 of the IEEE 802.3 2000 Edition.
It might have been in earlier versions too.
Priscilla
At 02:31 PM 12/31/01, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>Is there any standardization for autonegotiation like 802.x or something. I
>have never heard of anything like it, and
Very interesting technology. Maybe I should start my own consulting company
to install these devices in hotels and make my million :-)
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Cisco LRE (
To cisck0k1d, I'm trying to summarize the ip 10.x.x.x in order to reduce the
routing table in the routers of branch offices, because I also have some
2500 with little memory.
To MADMAN: yes, of course, the DNS server has an ip 10.10.10.40, I have the
ip classless in all the routers, the problem is
for whatever reason, my mind has been ensnared with thoughts of the Cat 3920
token ring switch and various implications.
I want to run a couple of concepts through the list, just to check that my
understanding is correct.
So, because of the nature of token ring, one has to do some jiggering to do
if you're in the San Francisco area, I can think of quite a few hotels where
this would make sense. Places like the Fairmont or the Mark Hopkins aren't
going to disrupt their guests and their revenue stream for rewiring. Of
course there would be the problem of prying the dollars out of their
manag
Were going to test it out, definately has a good size niche market
potential.
Dave
Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>
> Is it slow at work today or what?
>
> I was browsing CCO and ran across something called "long reach ethernet"
>
> http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html
>
> http://www.cisco.
Thanks.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes, it's in IEEE 802.3. It's in Clause 28 of the IEEE 802.3 2000 Edition.
> It might have been in earlier versions too.
>
> Priscilla
>
> At 02:31 PM 12/31/01, Steven A. Ridder wrote:
> >Is there
You hit the nail on the head!!!
Dave
"Steven A. Ridder" wrote:
>
> Is there any standardization for autonegotiation like 802.x or something.
I
> have never heard of anything like it, and maybe that's half the problem?
>
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int
Comments below...
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Chuck Larrieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> One of the things I am getting around to in this post is DLSw
Someone at Cisco was just telling me about a guy who came in from Korea to
take the CCIE lab and during lunch, he called TAC on one of the problems.
The TAC tech recognized the problem as a lab problem from his CCIE test,
called down to the lab instructors to see if that person was taking the lab,
Here is what I would do in a hub and spoke, especially when ocncerned
about routing table size when in reality more than one route is a
waste. Enable EIGRP on all routers and at the head site "leak"
default. Remote routers have the routes they need, they are either
locally connected or going dow
I'm a bit confused on the the following IRB commands:
In Caslow (p612), it gives the following IRB config example:
(Config)# bridge irb
(Config)# interface bvi 1
(Config)# bridge 1 bridge ipx
But I thought the whole purpose of BVI is to route packets from the Bridge
group to the BVI itself, and
I think you are close but here are my thoughts off the top of my
noodle, the source ring would be the TRCRF as you say. I think the
bridge number just needs to be the same on both routers and is not
associated with the BRF. lastly the target ring is the number you
choose via the source-ring brid
I sure love slow days like today. I've discovered a whole new section on the
company intranet - a group that does performance and acceptability testing
for vendor equipment which we sell.
So I'm looking over the firewall report - Cisco 515 versus several other
things.
I have never seen or heard
Yes if you don't add the route statement it won't work, (route).
Dave
Hunt Lee wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused on the the following IRB commands:
>
> In Caslow (p612), it gives the following IRB config example:
>
> (Config)# bridge irb
> (Config)# interface bvi 1
> (Config)# bridge 1 bridge ip
sure. But really, the whole point of IRB is to make is POSSIBLE to bridge
and route the same prtotocls over the same interfaces. This doesn't mean
that you WANT to or HAVE to.
Shame on me for not having my Caslow handy, but perhaps the scenario
requires IPX bridging only?
Come to think of it, br
He is one smart TAC and should get a year-end bonus. Perhaps our group
members can send recommendation to Cisco's management for his diligence.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Someone at Cisco was just telling me about a guy who came in from
I've got a PIX 1 at home that I'll be installing soon. Do
you think that ought to work for a single-user household? ;-)
John
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On Mon, 31 De
Hi group
I am new to VoIP. I have configured two voice gateways in my lab adn
they are working fine. It's a very simple scenario and the calls are
originated from one and terminated on the other one.
Currently, everyone who dials the phone number of the voice ports can
dial a number and the gate
I must confess that my CCIE Lab preparation with regards to DLSw was
probably a lot like most peoples - I got a good SLSw book a few days before
my date and spent 10-12 hours learning "enough to be dangerous" I can't
comment on the suitability of this approach, and even if I could, the fact
is tha
Aw come on, I was about to talk about the merits of EGP and BGP3. Who needs
classless addressing anyway?
""Wojtek Zlobicki"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-))
>
> Wow, had me scared there for a while :P
Message
The Checkpoint/Nokia 330 runs IPSO as the OS on hardened freeBSD. These will
actually run routing protocols too, i.e.., RIP, OSPF, IGRP, etc Nice GUI
too...They do dominate their market segment.
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:5
Comments below...
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Chuck Larrieu ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> that said, if there were no token ring switch in the picture,
Outstanding job Mike!
Stefan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCNA tutorial in beta for Cisco 2900 configuration [7:30543]
I just posted the first version at a new tutorial I'm
That was a nice tutorial. Thank you very much. Good job!
Randy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30588&t=30562
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
In the BRS book it says there are only 5 minumum commands to get ISDN up and
running and that is
2 global
isdn switch-type basic-5ess
and
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
and
3 interface
dialer-group 1
dialer string 2001
ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
I am having a hard time getting 2 route
I don't know too much about the Nokia boxes, but have
done quite a bit of work on Pix's. I witnessed the
515 fail at between 20-30 mbs (a documented bug). I
found that to be very lame. Also, did quite a bit of
testing with cisco on the PIX 535. If anyone cares to
see when that thing fails
Can you post configs from both routers plus the output of "show
isdn stat" and show dialer from both?
Also, have you tried debugging isdn q921 and q931? How about
debugging the dialer?
John
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, an
Thanks MADMAN, I'll think about your suggestion but.the next year :->
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30592&t=30528
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
This is router 1
r1#sh run int bri 0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 124 bytes
!
interface BRI0
ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.0
dialer string 2002
dialer-group 1
isdn switch-type basic-5ess
end
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
r1#sh dialer
BRI0 - dialer type = ISDN
Dia
It appears that the router is dialing but the calls are
failing. Can we see the output of "show isdn stat" as well
as "debug isdn events" and/or "debug isdn q921" and "debug isdn
q931" ?
John
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, a
BORING..
""nrf"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Aw come on, I was about to talk about the merits of EGP and BGP3. Who
needs
> classless addressing anyway?
>
>
> ""Wojtek Zlobicki"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I mean
Can you guys give me some insight into what this might be telling me?
r2#sh isdn stat
Global ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess
ISDN BRI0 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-5ess
Layer 1 Status:
DEACTIVATED
Layer 2 Status:
Layer 2 NOT Activated
Layer 3
Here is a little wit and wisdom. There isn't enough
RFCs or books in the world to help you pass the CCIE
lab. We will be waiting for your third "I failed the
CCIE lab AGAIN" e-mail.
BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to
consider minding your own business.
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote:
>
PacBell has assigned you a single IP address (.238). They have an
access-list that allows only packets sourced from that address to leak into
the internet (or for that matter even arrive at ur dsl gateway
interface"
Access-list looks like:
ip access-list 1 extended no-leak
permit ip x.x.x.238
> Someone at Cisco was just telling me about a guy who came in from Korea to
> take the CCIE lab and during lunch, he called TAC on one of the problems.
> The TAC tech recognized the problem as a lab problem from his CCIE test,
> called down to the lab instructors to see if that person was taking
Howard,
Most ISPs today just use "service compression" to
compress the configuration when the configuration is
to big too fit into NVRAM. I would not expect you to
know that seeing as you do not really work on routers.
Being a network engineer in the real world is
different than writing about it
Hi everyone,
Happy new year to you all.
Could you send me URLs of sites that help teach you how to manage
portals and the building blocks of portals and the issues involved.
Thanks
Omer Ehsan Dar
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30601&t=30601
---
Yeah chuck:
We have been looking into this for some time, Cisco has you thinking it's
new but it aint. You use existing phone jacks and wiring and a little box
figures it all out. One freq for data one for voice on the same wire. There
is a standard called home-phone/rf (or some such thing I forge
Hey Folks,
Am l alone in this? My year old subscription to Certificationzone.com ends
on Dec 31 2001 EST. It is just 2:37pm EST Dec 31st and l have already been
deleted from their database and l can't access the site. This is the error
message am getting.
OOPS!
"The Zone ID or Password you suppli
Hi Folks,
Just got back from a PartyJust wanted to wish you all a HAPPY NEW
YEAR!
Now back to my CCNP
Tehlet
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30602&t=30602
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription i
At 11:41 PM -0500 12/31/01, Cisco Cisco wrote:
>Howard,
>Most ISPs today just use "service compression" to
>compress the configuration when the configuration is
>to big too fit into NVRAM. I would not expect you to
>know that seeing as you do not really work on routers.
Dear Troll,
Apparently, y
Hm.
At least two meta-issues in play here.
1. It remains to be seen whether or not someone can assimilate all extant
written materials and possess the fleetness of thought required to fill in
any functional gaps that might result from the difficulty of conveying
knowledge/competence/expertis
You have access to a phone during the test? I guess a cell call during a
bathroom break could occur.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, EA Louie wrote:
> > Someone at Cisco was just telling me about a guy who came in from Korea
to
> > take the CCIE l
I had started the slides for the VLANs.. they are in progress.. I was also
thinking of a few slides of spanning tree for getting stats and blocked
ports.. anything else I should include?
MikeS
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30607&t=30562
---
87 matches
Mail list logo
