I have a customer who needs to have several ports on a 2924XL-EN in the same
VLAN. The customer does not want these ports to be able to communicate with
one another, but would like all of them to be able to go to/through another
port. E.g., ports 1 to 5 would be on VLAN 50, they'd all be able
you thought about access lists on your router that will be doing the routing
? Some one else may be able to offer a better solution than this, I hope so
at least. I would also like to know if there is a better way.
John
-Original Message-
From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So your saying that you configured the serial interface with ip
unnumbered, sourcing the ethernet interface of the repective routers.
If you shut down the ethernet you can still access the remote router
over the serial??
This is something new or have I been out of the unnumbered game too
Hi,
I have configure AUX port for routing and need to
configure asyn port s0/0. Need the configuration for
both to work simultaneously. AUX port configuration is
as.
interface Async65
ip address 10.190.6.1 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
encapsulation ppp
keepalive 30
async mode
It's just one stream (the other users). You don't talk, send out your
stream over the wan, have it come back to you.
neil K. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steve,
It makes sense to consider two RTP flows as a conversation consists of
full-duplex
At 08:04 PM 7/21/2002 +, Chuck wrote:
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 5:25 PM + 7/21/02, richard dumoulin wrote:
Well, I interpret it that you can ping the serial, no ?
I would assume that. It makes no sense for an ISP to
That 24Kbps would make sense as G.729 should compress the voice to 8Kbps for
a unidirectional voice signal, so 16Kbps for bi-directional 24Kbps
should be plenty for overhead and a bi-directional voice stream. However,
if you want you could use G.729b (or G.729ab if you happen to be using
which is the software on the cisco that does4nt come up?
CCna,CCNP CQS.
Antero Vasconcelos
COMPTA - Parceria e Tecnologia
Engenharia de Redes
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel. (+351) 222070940
Fax (+351) 222070935
www www.compta.pt
-Original Message-
From: Sujal G. Ajmera
Tom,
Thanks for the input about taking the lab.
Where did you find 12.1 IOS Docs?.
I looked at Cisco Press and other book stores on line, they only have 12.0.
Is 12.1 being used in the lab?.
Thanks
Reza
Thomas Larus wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
(I recently failed my first
12.5 on a 3660
-Original Message-
From: Antero Vasconcelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Sujal G. Ajmera; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Motorola router with Cisco router [7:49228]
which is the software on the cisco that does4nt come up?
CCna,CCNP
Chuck wrote:
never mind - I've done a bit of testing, and it appears that
the IP number
that is incrementing is a count of distinct events. I.e. if I
do a test
ping, let it sit a while, and do another test ping, I see the
number
increment.
I gotta get out more.
LOL, Chuck. Good to
Edward,
I had the same exact issue from the same exact book, I am working with a
LS1010 ASP in a 5500 switch (pretty much the same as your setup). The
previous post was correct in saying that you only have to enter the PVC on
one of the interfaces, do a show atm vc (I think that's right) and
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are
A couple of suggestions:
1) Verify that your ATM interfaces are up and up which i assume you
already did.
2) Since your LS1010 ATM interfaces are setup with UNI version 3.1, change
your ATM uni version on your routers to be 3.1. (The default is 3.0).
Please provide the IOS version you are
hhm learn something new every day. thanks.
that still gets back to how ip unnumbered really works, as opposed to how
most of us think it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about using the RID
as the interface address:
this memo has adopted an alternate scheme, which has been
Hey Andre,
Thanks for your help thus far...Yes, all the
interfaces say up/up. I have changed the router
versions to 3.1 as you suggested. I still have no ip
connectivity. Any other suggestions?
The routers/l1010 both have very up-to-date software,
as shown below from my sho ver.
Thanks,
Chuck wrote:
hhm learn something new every day. thanks.
that still gets back to how ip unnumbered really works, as
opposed to how
most of us think it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about
using the RID
as the interface address:
this memo has adopted an alternate
The only problem I see with Access lists on the router is the ports
having to be in the same VLAN. This will allow them to see each other
without going through the router. If the ports do not need to see each
other why the need to be in the same VLAN, you could try put the ports
in separate VLANS
Hi all,
anyone knows what I must emphasize on for CID 3.0. Is
SNA included ? AppleTalk ?
any form of inputs will be greatly appreciated
thanks
suaveguru
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
Hi all,
I tried to use the summary-address OSPF command to summarize learned BGP
routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work.
(fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) -
router B
Router A :
--
router ospf 1
I have had bus errors on my Cisco 4000 router.
I ran a memory diagnostic on memory addresses 0x0004
to 0x067F which should have covered tests for DRAM lower location,
boot EPROM, Flash EPROM, and DRAM upper location as well as Onboard
ressources and system IO
(
Hi,
Today I passed the BSCI exam towards my CCIP certifictaion.I scored 930 and
the passing score was 700 and the number of questions are 57.The exam
contains all the routing protocol (more stress on IS-IS).
The pattern of the exam is different from other exams,The exam has some
design
are u trying to run ima? if you have questions about the card, plug a
loopback plug in and the port should go green. if u don't think the 3660 is
recognizing the card, try reseating the card after rebooting the box.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49433t=48858
I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the
aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes.
If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out
your aggregation, you may want to use some lower end routers/switches, kind
Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
turn people on? Last I checked, IP did a pretty decent job of providing a
robust means of interconnection between remote sites. To me, its LANE all
Nothing like real-world scenarios on test that are nothing like the
real-world.. :)
Tim
CCIE 9015
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BSCI exam [7:49432]
Try using VPI 1 instead of 0. I know 0 is a valid option but I have
seen it not work and we don't use it for other reasons that I don't know
the history of. Also the framing and scrambling parameters are needed
if I recall.
Here is a config I know works cause I was using it in the lab:
GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the
list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the
archive search engine and may enable it later once things stabalize.
We need to obtain new hardware and we actually have the money to purchase
said new
I am configuring 2620 3DES feature set. On the other side of IPSec is Avaya
VPNet.
I am debugging this and seems as the transform set is configured right.
VPNet is configured as follows:
Encryption: 3DES
Hash: SHA
Diffie-H Group1
Anyone know what tranform set setting I should be using?
Thanks
Hi all,
How can I configure a delay with dialer Profiles ??
Let's say I have a the following scenario with three routers (FR with OSPF).
In case of the failure of the connection between router_3 and router_1 ,
either router_2 or router_3 can bring up an ISDN line.
First it should come up the
Sorry for the confusing diagram ;)
router_1 connects to router_2 via FrameRelay
router_1 connects to router_3 via FrameRelay
All routers have ISDN connections
need something like the backup delay xx yy command but for dialer interfaces
?!?
cheers,
monti
Message Posted at:
When logged in to CCO, I can go to the Product Upgrade tool, select
documentation, and see a large list of available documentation. I would like
to order the documentation set for 12.2, but I do not see it on the list.
Is there a way to order the complete set? or should I just enter quantity 1
If you follow this group via the Newsfeed (nntp://news.groupstudy.com) you
may have missed a few messages from this morning. You can see what you
missed by going to the website:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/list.php?f=7
Sorry for the inconvenience!
Paul Borghese
Message Posted at:
Dude- Your Getting' a Dell! :-)
Seriously, I think you could pick up a Dell Refurb 1U system with
extended warranty at a steal... and they work great!
2U would be the way to go though, that way you can get RAID 5
Hot-Swap-ability, and have plenty of cooling space for the SCSI Drives.
BTW- What
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Kent Yu wrote:
I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the
aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes.
If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out
your aggregation, you may want to
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote:
Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
turn people on?
My impression is that it is an unholy alliance of traditional telcos
and traditional
I'm curious what would happen if you took the no keepalive statement off
of the ethernet interface you are using. By having this in place, you are
effectively spoofing the up condition on the interface by telling it that
up is ok, even if you aren't sending or receiving keepalives. I would
Jason,
I am not sure but I think it depends on the type contract you have.
I have the same issue. I know there are people on this list that have
ordered 12.2 but when I look for it on the list I don't see it, I only see
12.1.
Reza
Barbee Jason wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Is there a tool out there for retrieval serial numbers from cisco switches?
Anyone?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49449t=49449
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
to allow a workstation access so as to be able to use
and configure via the PDM, we give the command
http server enable
http 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside
what is the purpose for the command
pdm location 165.12.55.12 255.255.255.255 inside
do we need both the commands to allow the
Did anyone else get the vigilar.com spam? I am trying to determine if
they are culling addresses from this list. If they are we will make it
public they are spammers and arrange a boycott against their company.
Please contact me direct and do not reply to the entire list.
Thanks!
Paul,
I'm sure that you'll get 1000 diffent suggestions on this, but my
preference is Compaq. The DL380-G2 offers everything you'll need. You can
get Dual processors, SCSI-RAID, etc, and they are fully Redhat compliant.
We are using several of them with Redhat 7.2, and they are awesome.
Product Number Product Description
DOC-SRIOS12.2=Cisco IOS Release 12.2 Documentation Set
-Eric
- Original Message -
From: Reza
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Jason,
I am not sure but I think it depends on the
I just went back onto CCO, and this is what I found. You just might
have overlooked what you were looking for. The following is an excerpt
from the order site:
DOC-SRIOS11.3= Cisco IOS Release 11.3 Documentation Suite
DOC-SRIOS12.0= Cisco IOS Release 12.0 Documentation Suite
I believe the answer is yes.
The HTTP command specifies what node is allowed to hit the HTTP Server,
while the PDM command defines the host allowed to log into the PDM App.
I'm sure someone will rightly correct me if I'm wrong. :)
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: John Green
I'd agree with the 2u and Dell recommendations. Much more flexible and
better redundancy in the 2u systems. If the box will sit in a
populated area be wary of the new Dell 2650, it's an extremely loud
system.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Jason,
Funny you should mention it.
I just received my order of documentation, which I placed over a month
ago.
One thing for sure, I got more documentation than I realized I ordered-
and it was all free. I did not find an indication of charge for
shipping or the docs themselves. Now I have
I think Cricket will do this via rmon or SNMP?
-Original Message-
From: Kwame [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serial Number Retrieval Tool [7:49449]
Is there a tool out there for retrieval serial numbers from cisco
I've received a couple emails from them. Same email sent to two of my
addresses; only one is on this list
I hate spam!!
I hate spam!!
I hate spam!!
Cheers,
mike j.
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc.
161 North Clark St.
9th Flr
did you try the ip helper address command on each of the vlans to point
to a DHCP server?
Don Pezet wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hey guys,
I have a Cisco 3620 connected to a 2948G-L3 which
in turn provides layer three services to a cluster of
3548XLs.
Hi all,
I tried to use the summary-address OSPF command to summarize learned BGP
routes to a default summary route (0/0) and it seems that it doesn't work.
(fake BGP routes) - router A 1.0.0.0/32 (OSPF) -
router B
Router A :
--
router ospf 1
I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet
interface on a 7513
service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF
enabled
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49466t=49466
--
FAQ,
turn on dcef or cef.
GEORGE wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I get this message when I try to apply a policy to my fast Ethernet
interface on a 7513
service-policy is supported only on VIP interfaces with DCEF
enabled
Message Posted at:
Wow. Maybe my eyes were strained last night, but that option was not there.
I logged in today and it was there. =DOC-SRIOS-12.2. Placed my order, and
when I called Cisco Customer Support to verify they said the balance due is
$0.00.
Thanks for your help!
-Jason
Message Posted at:
Yea, but most co-location facilities charge on a per u basis. While we
are currently being hosted for free at Swiftcomm, you never know when we
will need to pay again.
Therefore, I am trying to keep the footprint down to 1u.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then please report it to any and every spam list you can think of. Please
the more of us that take action, the better.
Here is some e-mails to help along the way. Their corporate network is
being hosted by earthling (or at minimum their website). Try complaining
to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Some more informations :
LSA for 0.0.0.0 (using summary-address) :
CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1)
Type-5 AS External Link States
LS age: 5
Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
LS Type: AS External Link
Thinking of buying routersim.com's switch simulator to help me w/ BCMSN:
http://www.routersim.com/product_switchsim.asp
Does anybody have a review? Or recommend a similar product?
Thanks everybody, -Sean.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49472t=49472
Anyone using a Maxserver series terminal server in their rack? I got a 24
port one for free and would love to use it in my lab. However, this thing
has proven a major PITA to configure! If anyone out there has configured
one of thse I would really appreciate some tips or examples.
Thanks in
Stephane,
You're missing the default-information originate command. 0/0 can not
be propagated into OSFP without it. Static, conditional, dynamic,
redistributed, it doesn't matter. You need that statement to allow the 0/0
route into OSPF. (No doubt why it's showing up in the database but
Hello Mr. Litkowski,
Based upon what is represented as your goal and diagram, I would suggest you
use a default-information originate route-map statement under the ospf
process on router A. The route map should clearly identify the bgp routes of
interest.
Winston V. Shaw
CCIE(#7991)
I was under the impression that the PDM command is just a pain in the arse
cosmetic addition for use only within PDM.
I'm fairly certain it's nothing to do with access to PDM itself. I'll try
deleting them next time I get chance and see what effect it has on PDM, and
if PDM automatically puts
Is another router sending out the same summary?
At 07:26 PM 7/23/2002 +, Stephane LITKOWSKI wrote:
Some more informations :
LSA for 0.0.0.0 (using summary-address) :
CustomerA#sh ip ospf database external
OSPF Router with ID (192.168.254.254) (Process ID 1)
I have an atm switch similar to the LS100 in almost every way except the
color of the case. It was NEC before it became the LS100 and I will sell it
to you for a very reasonable price. The swith does work and I have pictures
of it side by side with the LS100 to show the simalarities. The best
Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy.
Try setting port security commands or setting cam filter commands. If it
takes these commands you are in business. Be careful of how you use them
though. Using MAC addresses for security can cause problems like shutting
ports down when the
Virtually any Cisco contract will entitle you to free documentation. If
it shows up with an orderable quantity in the product upgrade tool, then
you can get it for free.
Thanks,
Shawn
Mark W. Odette II wrote:
Jason,
Funny you should mention it.
I just received my order of
PDM location commands have no functionality. Think of them as PDM build
a map of networks/hosts around it based on the static, nat, global and
route statements you have configured on your PIX. You can remove those
commands if you wish, but next time you'll use PDM, they'll be back in
your config.
Got it!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Steven A. Ridder
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: nbar message [7:49466]
turn on dcef or cef.
GEORGE wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
Cheers Guys... docs on da way!!!
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Heisey
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Docs Hardcopy? [7:49444]
Virtually any Cisco contract will entitle you to free documentation. If
it shows up with an orderable quantity in the
This command I looked it up at Cisco web site and it says it's a
maintenance operation protocol
But what does it do exactly?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49487t=49487
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I agree with the other post... if you don't want 1 and 5 to access each
other, then what's the point of having them in the same VLAN?
Mike W.
Winston Shaw wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy.
Try setting port
New version, v1.1.3, with numerous bug fixes :(, is posted on
http://www.geocities.com/milicsasa/Tools/
Now with Windows2000 support !
Regards,
Sasa,
CCIE 8635
Wright, Jeremy wrote:
does anyone know of a similar tool for windows. we dont have redhat on a
laptop which would be a huge
Thanks for the clarification!
I figured I'd learn the truth to what I thought when I read up on the
PDM documentation, or the PIX doc for the CSS1.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Lidiya White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 4:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just curious, whats the newsgroup running on now?
Paul Borghese wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
GroupStudy is definitely causing me to age prematurely! Ok, I think the
list, newsfeed, and website are back in operation. I did disable the
archive search
I have seen a similar error when we had 2 pcs on the
same switch with the same mac address. (it was a
strange driver issue that caused pc's with that driver
to have the same, incorrect mac address) I don't
understand teaming, I would guess teaming has to come
up with a shared mac address to
At 04:12 PM 7/23/2002 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote:
Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
turn people on?
My impression is that it is an
$4,000? Kind of expensive. I built a dual P3 1.13GHz system for less
than $1,800:
Intel SIA2 motherboard with 2 P3 1.13GHz
1GB memory (IBM)
2x36GB Cheetah SCSI (15,000 rpm compared to 10,000 rpm)
CDRW+DVD
Lian-Li aluminum case
Accessories
The thing I like is it's very quite. Compaq servers'
Hey all, want to thank all the people for the advice on the routing email.
Tough exam it was. Passable, but you need to be on the ball. Now iv got the
Switching test up next and was wondering if anyone has used Quizware as an
alternative to Boson? Thanks.
Richard Tufaro - MCSE - CCNA - GSEC
I believe it costs a fortune (over $1000) for us mere customers/end users.
I imagine Cisco thinks you resellers need to have it to support your
customers, so they don't have to do as much of the support. I love my 12.1
printed docs, which I paid $400 plus shipping (around 43 dollars, I think)
on
Dear All,
I am jumping into a similar mess as when I started at my current company,
but this time the Macs out number the PC's. Well here is the scoop:
180 Macs
50 PC's
Static Ip's
No DHCP
No FW
Quick Mail Server
and a whole bunch of other nasty things..
- They just purchases a Pix 515
- They
Can someone clarify this for me?
During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books
states it is in this order:
- Routing Table is Generated
Down State
Init State
2way State (bidirection communication established)
- DR/BDR Election
ExStart State (DR/BDR election
Stephane,
Looks like you are using the wrong command to achieve the desired
result... you use 'summary-address' to define routes you want to
'summarize' for redistribution - it has nothing to do with a default
gateway address. 'default-information-orginate' is the command you want
to use to
Hello Don,
I think you could set up DHCP scopes on a server and use the ip helper
address command to direct dhcp discover broadcasts from your clients. The
router should place its own sub-interface address in the packet and send it
to the DHCP server. The server should then pick from the
yes.
Robert Cluett wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can someone clarify this for me?
During OSPF Start up when is the DR/BDR election done? The BSCN books
states it is in this order:
- Routing Table is Generated
Down State
Init State
2way State
the teaming we have does not share the mac address. it shares the ip and
you can see the mac address has 1 different character then the other.
-Original Message-
From: E Joseph
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/23/02 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: Teaming network cards causes flapping [7:49254]
I
Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support
exam is?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49496t=49496
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Generating candidate routes for a routing table is an OSPF function in this
context, not a router function. For that reason you need to think only
about when in the OSPF state machine are DR/BDR roles detected/elected. In
general, this occurs on a per segment basis when an ospf speaking
Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the
port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port.
Winston Shaw wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not sure, because I do not have a 2924XL-EN handy.
Try setting port security
Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-)
Ok, here's the order I'd do things in...
First things first, get that firewall in place. You don't list what their
internet connectivity is, but if they bought a PIX, it's safe to assume that
they have a persistent connection, and that being true,
Correction (I am correcting myself)
Actually it goes like this:
- Neighbors are Established
Down State
Init State
2way State (bidirection communication established)
- DR/BDR Election
ExStart State (DR/BDR election done)
- Routing Table is Generated
Loading (Sending
Hi,
776
regards,
Alexey
-Original Message-
From: Charles McKnight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496]
Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support
exam is?
Wha?!? What would that accomplish?
Mike W.
Thomas Larus wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Keep the two ports apart by keeping them in separate VLANs, and turn the
port that they both need to be able to access into a trunk port.
Message Posted at:
Robert,
You are correct. Think of it this way, there first has to be a table
to populate before OSPF can populate it, so when the startup configuration
is read, the router takes the ip address statements from the interfaces,
along with any static routes, and creates the initial routing
That's exactly what he should do
Winston Shaw wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello Don,
I think you could set up DHCP scopes on a server and use the ip helper
address command to direct dhcp discover broadcasts from your clients. The
router should
I like the idea put down earlier. Why have them on the same VLAN. From what
I know (an issue you can all debate) this would need to be assessed when you
design you network. The idea I use when building my switched network, is
grouping together users who have the same network needs, and allocating
hhm learn something new every day. thanks.
that still gets back to how ip unnumbered really works, as opposed to how
most of us think it works. RFC 1812 specifically talks about using the
RID
as the interface address:
this memo has adopted an alternate scheme, which has been
I believe you may need to configure a pvc on ATM12/0/1
Edward Sohn wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thanks for the reply, Andre...
Hmmm...I was thinking the same way you did at first, but then the book's
configuration actually has both atm pvc commands in
hi, guys
I am in toronto and just passed written test. i am looking for some learning
partner for new version lab test.
james
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49510t=49510
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
776
-Original Message-
From: Charles McKnight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 8:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passing score for 640-606 exam [7:49496]
Does anyone know what the passing score for Cisco 640-606 Support
exam is?
Thanks
Message
99 matches
Mail list logo
