I would like to reduce the bandwidth of gigabit interface of 7600 OSR from
1000Mbps to 10Mbps for MPLS-VPN setup. Please sugest a solution.
Thanks for the help
regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57927t=57927
--
Man,
I guess what you need to do now is to concentrate in studying. Exam
schedule you stated is very close and it's not the suitable time at all
to hesitate. Instead you need by this time encouragement, spirit,
and faith in what you are doing.
I don't see a solid clue supporting your feeling
ftp to ftp-eng.cisco.com (anonymous login)
cd /rraszuk/specials
here they are:
-rw-r--r-- 1 23115eng 12940544 Feb 15 2002 c2500-js-l.20oct2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 23115eng 8303380 Feb 15 2002 c2500-p-l.20oct2001
-rw-r--r-- 1 23115eng 7973476 Feb 15 2002
Not sure what exactly you want to achieve, but here are two options:
- connect a gig-ethernet port of a switch to your gig-ethernet port
of the 7600 and use a 10/100 port on the switch with fixed 10MBit
speed setting
- use traffic shaping as described in the OSM config guide:
I have just started to study for Multicast, and I am wondering whether there
is any simulator / programs that can simulate Multicast traffic. Also, can
I use a Cisco router to act as Multicast Source (pumping out Multicast
traffic), or used it as a Group member??
Sorry if these are silly
ping a multicast address.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
H wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have just started to study for Multicast, and I am wondering whether
there
is any simulator / programs that can simulate Multicast traffic. Also,
can
I use a Cisco router to
www.ipcop.org
It is too easy, Linux based, has Snort built in, takes 5 minutes to
install, then manage with a web browser. Oh, and it's free.
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2002 00:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Anyone know what the average expected latency over Frame Relay is?
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2002 01:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: bandwidth vs. latency [7:57899]
Mirza, Timur wrote:
does anyone have a good
Hi guys,
Looking for some feedback as to how difficult it would be to pass the
CCIE lab if networking was not your primary role.
For instance, I am a bit of an IT generalist, networking probably takes
up 30% of my time. I don't feel confident that only working this much
with Cisco devices would
test
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the
ip igmp join-group - to join the group mcast group.
To generate the m/cast traffic - make a ping on m/cast address - not exectly
m/cast traffic - but it will triger the m/cast propagation, tree
establishment, etc
m/cast application - http://www.video.ja.net/mice/index.html
Best regards, mate.
not sure there is an absolute answer as it would depend on actual cable
distance travelled (not as the crow flies), number of hops, policies
enforced, congestion, etc. as a rule of thumb i would use estimated
distance in kilometers / (400kilometers per second * .6). it is usually in
the
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
Looking for some feedback as to how difficult it would be to pass the
CCIE lab if networking was not your primary role.
probably slightly more difficult than if networking were your primary role.
seriously.
just a question or two in line below
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Keith Woodworth wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I need to trouble shoot some apparent packet loss on a 7206VXR with a
NSE-1.
Weve had some folks downstream of us say
SNAT should be available in IOS on CCO around the first half of
December. Please be aware that SNAT will be released in two phases as
follows:
Phase 1
- SNAT for TCP/UDP protocols with NO embedded port info in the payload.
- Symmetric routing only
- inside NAT pools only
Phase 2 due out in 1Q'03
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Hi guys,
Looking for some feedback as to how difficult it would be to
pass the
CCIE lab if networking was not your primary role.
You wouldn't have a chance in heck. You could probably pass the written exam
with lots of reading and practice tests, but forget the lab.
I should have read Chuck's answer first. :-) It's true that on-the-job
training isn't necessary for CCIE. You could do it with lots of practice in
labs and simulated labs. Hours and hours and hours are required though.
P.
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Adrian,
To some extent your apprehension is justified, even natural. All of us in
the networking community, the world over are facing the same fears. I hate
to admit it, but i myself have thought about not going for the neext
Let me expand on Priscilla's thoughts. The reality is that for more
than trivial problems, you need a lot of information to model
latency. Bandwidth is easy.
At 1:24 AM + 11/23/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Mirza, Timur wrote:
does anyone have a good reference (e.g., white paper) on
By the way, I was in a hurry when I wrote my answer. I would just like to
mention that testing latency with pings, as I mentioned below, is an
over-simplification. You can get false results for many reasons, including
rate-limiting of ICMP on routers, etc.
You should test with the application
Hi group.
I have an OLDER model of the Cat 1900 switch that has the DB-9 port (not
RJ-45) for console access. I can't find any info on Cisco's site for
this model, so I don't know what it's pinout assignment should be. The
only way I can console in using the usual connection (e.g. terminal
server)
Thanks much! Couldn't anyone come up with a more pleasing acronym
than SNAT? It's even worse than SLARP.
Can you give me any source on this announcement, offline if you prefer?
At 4:04 PM + 11/23/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNAT should be available in IOS on CCO around the first half of
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
|- They have told us to config our ethernet port to half duplex so packets
|- will be retransmitted if they get lost in their ATM cloud so we have a
|- fairly high collison rate on this port. I dont know enough about ATM to
|- say if this is
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
|-Don't believe everything you hear! ;-) Couple comments inline.
I dont.
|-They can't tell if packets are getting dropped from trace route? Just
|-because your router doesn't send back the ICMP TTL doesn't mean it's
|-dropping packets. It could
Mirza, Timur wrote:
does anyone have a good reference (e.g., white paper) on the
nature of
bandwidth vs latency the distinction bet/ the two?
Timur Mirza
Principal Network Engineer
Network Planning Engineering, West Region
15505-B Sand Canyon Avenue
Irvine, California 92618
Verizon
I would argue that while the CCIE lab itself does not require a job that
consists of 100% networking (heck, some guys have passed the lab without
ever touching a production network before in their life), the main reason
for most people to try the lab - which is to get a high-level networking
job -
If you arent teaching what a CAT 5 cable is or what and network is, then you
arent teaching the CCNA course as Cisco lays it out . Maybe your fault
doesn't lay with the student but the teachers..?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57954t=57954
For starters, try Network Magazine article NMG20010416S0006
http://www.networkmagazine.com/article/NMG20010416S0006
All the best!
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I agree. If you have some janitor who's been saving up for months or years
to be able to afford your class, and he asks what a Cat 5 cable is, what do
you say? Sorry, I will not answer that question? How unprofessional.
BJ
- Original Message -
From: Alan
To:
Sent: Saturday,
Not to discourage you or anything, but if a candidate crams for months and
then immediately forgets everything after the lab, that's an indication the
he or she got by using primarily short-term memory. I personally don't think
it's possible to get through the lab unless you make extensive use of
B.J. Wilson wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I agree. If you have some janitor who's been saving up for months or
years
to be able to afford your class, and he asks what a Cat 5 cable is, what
do
you say? Sorry, I will not answer that question? How
Keith,
Don't ever listen to a sales person. Ever! What is the ratio of
collisions to frames output on that interface to the provider? Cisco
recommends limiting collisions to 1 out of every 1000 frames, although 1 out
of every 100 isn't bad. If it's worse than 1 out of every 100,
sspec.htm#xtocid115096
-Original Message-
From: cebuano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Console adapter for OLDER Catalyst 1924 [7:57947]
Hi group.
I have an OLDER model of the Cat 1900 switch that has the DB-9 port
Cebuano,
The problem might be a bootrom issue. Maybe the Voice feature set
requires a current or specific bootrom to program the DSPs for a
specific purpose. I don't know where to actually look for info except
IOS feature set release notes or bootrom installation info that might
cover this
All I just upgraded a few on my 2500's in my lab to 16 meg flash
everything went fine except on 1 of them. When I added the 2nd 8 meg
flash chip to this particular router one I call London this is the print
out I get. Why does it show 2 separate flash one read and one read
write? All the other
Router_1(config)#partition flash ?
Number of partitions in device
Router_1(config)#partition flash 1
you'll forgive me if I don't hit the enter button at this point ;-
Chuck
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Elijah Savage III wrote in message
[EMAIL
sent with some reservation. perhaps a bit too personal. maybe some are
interested in what is below.
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
Looking for some feedback as to how difficult it would be to pass the
CCIE lab if networking was not your
sent with some reservation. perhaps a bit too personal. maybe some are
interested in what is below.
You had me at hello...*sniff*... ;-)
One of my co-workers said once that the CCIE is a certification for people
who don't have spouses and kids. Maybe he was right, I don't know, but as
long as
The pinout is in the documentation for the 1900 and 2800 switches, but I'll
save you some heartache - get a null modem cable, and life will be good.
- Original Message -
From: Arnold, Jamie
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: Console adapter for OLDER Catalyst 1924
I was just wondering...
Are there any guidelines for firewalling a public network? I'm
responsible for a large network with a /16 public address and we're in
the process of firewalling things off. Should I expose the router
interfaces or just the border? If I filter router interfaces, should I
Team,
I want to be able to really practice and have hand on experience to the
fullest with IP Telephony. I would like to know what do you guys recommended
as a low price PBX that I could used on my lab in addition to two cisco7910
phones that I already have. The idea behind is to create different
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Chuck Church wrote:
|-Don't ever listen to a sales person. Ever!
I know I know! :)
What is the ratio of collisions to frames output on that interface to
the provider?
In just over an hour after a clear counters we had over 6 million
collisions on that interface.
Hi all,
I tried to test some tacacs config with VPDN. The purpose was to implement
per user interface router config. I observed that I cannot use some
commands like ip vrf forwarding or service-policy or ip rtp priority
in the interface config AVPAIR (but it seems to be supported). Log is below
It's that telephone-looking-thingy that plugs your computers, routers,
switches, etc. into each other, and it's carrying electrical current
that is considered 'low-voltage', so it won't kill you if you put your
tongue on the end of it at just the moment it's being charged with an
electrical
I asked for input on Global Knowledge, a couple weeks ago, and was asked by
those who gave it good marks, to share my experience. I got home last
night. Took the BSCI class in New York. I am exhausted by the volume of
information covered, but I'm really jazzed by the experience. The
instructor
Sounds like they still have their act together. I've never heard a bad
report...
David Vital wrote:
I asked for input on Global Knowledge, a couple weeks ago, and
was asked by those who gave it good marks, to share my
experience. I got home last night. Took the BSCI class in New
York. I
Anyone tell me possibly where I can pickup the screws, or possibly have
some extra's they are willing to sell me. I have the brackets I need I
just can't find the screws. Got a silly idea to possibly look at lowes
and sears hardware but now luck, I hate to buy the entire kits just for
the screws.
Keith Woodworth wrote:
|- Anyway to acutally tell for certain if the router is dropping packets?
|-
|-show buffers
|-show queueing
|-show queue interface etc.
Showing misses/failures on all buffers but these have the most:
Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 50, permanent 50, peak 201 @
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Marty Adkins wrote:
|-As Priscilla explained, output drops are frequently normal, just
indicating
|-a speed mismatch combined with a large enough packet burst that the output
|-queue limit was exceeded (40 packets). If drops are due to a lack of
buffers,
|-then that would
Keith Woodworth wrote:
we use ip route-cache policy on each interface that is has policy routing
enabled. I'm trying to find out how route-cache correlatets to CEF. Does
ip route-cache policy need to be turned off when CEF is enabled? How is
it it different than CEF? The two seem to be
Hal Logan wrote:
Not to discourage you or anything, but if a candidate crams for
months and
then immediately forgets everything after the lab, that's an
indication the
he or she got by using primarily short-term memory. I
personally don't think
it's possible to get through the lab unless
I want to setup my Win2K box to run 802.1q vlan, and I can not find how
to setup VLAN support in my 'network properties'. My NIC is Intel
8255x-based PCI Ethernet Adapter (10/100),
I can't find the related information on Intel.
Can anybody give an answer?
Message Posted at:
richard dumoulin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hal Logan wrote:
Not to discourage you or anything, but if a candidate crams for
months and
then immediately forgets everything after the lab, that's an
indication the
he or she got by using primarily
53 matches
Mail list logo
