""Kevin O'Gilvie"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I only have 32 megs on the 515r, the upgrade adds 32 m and a licence which
> makes it 515UR for 6k. I was thinking that it was pptp, but since I am
using
> local authentication, users authentic
I've seen 2926s that sell for under $2k on Ebay - the 2901 is about as ugly
a switch as you can find (yeah it does the job, but for $200 or so
differences, just ain't worth it). Also seen 5002s that go for under $2k on
Ebay. Patience is the key though.
Don't get why everyone looks for a 2520.
Believe the original poster was actually looking for multi-layer switching
(MLS)... the 2901 lacks this capability. You'll need a 2926G (note the
G!), or a Catalyst 5000 with Sup3/NFFC/NFFCII, Sup IIG, Sup IIIG... or a
6000 with Sup+PFC.
""Raj Singh"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
96rdj
You might need a newer version of the software - look for those with
CV/CiscoView. You also need the Java client on your PC as you do with the
2900/3500XL series switches for HTTP based management. If you can't find
info in the docs, look at the latest product software version release notes.
Tha
Jeff,
Take a look at the 2948G-L3 and 4908G-L3 switches - both should be lower
cost options that should easily keep up with your demands. Unless you have
a need for AppleTalk, both of these switches would be better than attempting
to go the 5000 route - more costly, less ports gained, etc.
Some
I did the buy route - but here's some fruit for thought - you can get lots
of lab time for equipment costs, but you don't get any refunds for labs,
equipment can be resold. Having your own equipment is nice, but when
there's a clock ticking (ie you're being billed) you're likely more
motivated/co
Anyone seen what Loveletter can do to a network? Had a meltdown today - a
couple of infected PCs were trying to scan network drives on Netware
servers... at some points the MSM saw 14Gbps in/out of traffic, in (even
with a maxed port channel config which we had its rated at 8Gbps in
full-duplex!
If all you want is the papers, you're better off getting ccbootcamp labs and
the Caslow book. The content of the ECP1 class is gained by attending the
class itself - I know, judging by your email, that's a LONG ways away.
Having been to it and paid for it out of my own pockets - its highly
recomm
Glad to help... see below for config examples...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I am trying to configure 5 Cisco router's with appletalk, can someone
out
> their send me a complete config list?
Sure...
hostname R1 <- change for your ho
Gee... must have been a really bad day huh? Can't say I disagree with
what's been said though - there's a pretty big pipeline of people waiting
for lab exam openings and from rumors heard of people getting throw out
halfway through day one - there's more than enough attempts made without any
hop
Brian,
You have to be persistent and work really hard with "sh line". Look at the
DTR, DCD, etc and check out the troubleshooting guide for modems/async ports
on CCO. Check out the pinouts on connectors - there are non-standard
pinouts on some of the old equipment - enough for some stuff to wor
Just checked MentorTech's website - its gone up to $3995.00!
""Frank Wells"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It is approximately $3600.00
>
>
> >From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Michael Le <[EMAIL PRO
Brian,
CCDA doesn't really relate much, but the CID test does help in preparation
for the CCIE R/S _WRITTEN_ exam.
Passing CCNP/CCDP and the CCIE written could mean you're like 33% ready for
the CCIE lab.
Regards,
Adrian
""Brian Lodwick"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The LS100 will be able to do the ATM basics such as CLIP (ATM Classical IP)
and LANE (ATM LAN Emulation).
The LS1010 will enable you to do newer features such as MPOA, CES, ATM QOS,
etc.
Current Cisco CCIE website still states actual configuration of the ATM
switch is not required for the R/S ex
John,
There might be ways to get this done other than BGP...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/iosw/ioft/ionetn/tech/emios_wp.htm
Take a look at the multi-homing with NAT. I do see some possible problems -
with DNS and how your hosts are resolved. You could have a server hosted
elsewhere
Side question - I was under the impression that CCIE retakes won't require
you to start at the beginning of the queue of new/1st time exam candidates.
Anyone knows for sure if there is a seperate queue for CCIE lab exam retakes
and the length of time in this queue (the only info on CCO says 30 da
Shouldn't the BGP session itself never have been formed - with a duplicate
Router ID error being the cause. Error code 2 (OPEN error) subcode 3 (bad
BGP identifier) would be the notification message sent.
I can't confirm this, but it would seem to be the most logical protocol
design choice. For
Umm - sorry, it should be...
"show ip bgp w.x.y.z" will indicate the next hop is (inaccessible).
Regards,
Adrian
""Adrian Chew"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8rjji6$e79$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rjji6$e79$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Best gues
Best guess given info given:-
R4 does not have an IP route to the BGP advertised NEXT-HOP address for R1.
If you do a "show ip bgp" on R4, the R1 route should show up as invalid.
""Sean Wu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8rgfm3$ce4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rgfm3$ce4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
Tom,
Not an expert by any means, but I believe here's how you explain it:-
Well known mandatory - is attributes that is ALWAYS present (eg. ORIGIN,
AS-PATH, NEXT-HOP)
Well known discretionary - is attributes that are optionally
added/configured (eg. Local Preference)
There is no bit that specif
Curious question - anyone knows if a clustered stack of 2900/3500s will
appear as a single STP bridge to other switches or each cluster switch
appears as a seperate bridge? I'm guessing each switch is treated as a
seperate bridge entity for the purposes of STP.
The cause of concern would be if o
Let's see the math...
Access port speed - 100 Mbps/FDX
Number of ports per 2924 - 24 (23 access, 1 uplink)
Uplink port speed - 100 Mbps/FDX
Oversubscription ratio - 23:1
Assuming you have well behaved clients and network has been properly
segmented (1,500 clients in a single broadcast domain DOE
Stop thinkking subnets, start thinking in CIDR terms. It should
theoretically be possible to aggregate with up to a /0 (0.0.0.0/0 -
everything!).
However, if we look at usable address space, besides /0, some of the
smallest prefixes are not practical:-
0.0.0.0/1 = 0.0.0.0 - 127.255.255.255 (inc
I would suggest it more as a supplemental book for the CCIE lab - for
examples of configs, etc. Did skim through it for BGP examples, but that
was cause I kept putting off getting the Halabi book waiting for the 2nd Ed
to be released.
What you should read are the bibles:-
Routing TCP/IP
Interne
Anyone tried getting an ATM NIC on Windows 2000 to work with an Lightstream
100 and Catalyst 5000 LANE blade? I suspect Microsoft's lack of backward
compatibility in their Windows 2000 ATM implementation is preventing this
setup from working. I'm using a Marconi Forerunner LE 155 adapter.
>From
Adding on to the question...
1) If a /24 is not acceptable, does the acceptable range start at /21 or /23
or?
Here is what I believe is doable - but you need your providers to co-operate
along:-
1) Get a /? from your provider, ensure they allow you to advertise a more
specific route for the por
Your traffic continues to use the BRI because of the IP fast-switching cache
that is enabled by default in IOS. On your BRI interfaces, do this:
int bri x/x
no ip route-cache
You can also use the "backup interface" command on the serial interfaces
instead of floating static routes as you have
Try this scenario...
Use each feed to simulate a small business site - with NAT for multiple IP
hosts behind the feed. Get another NT server up... put one per site. Get
the two sites connected via IPSEC/VPN. Do this for practice:-
1) IPSEC/VPN without tunnel interfaces
2) IPSEC/VPN with tunn
The more I learn, the more I realize how little I actually know. Those
people who've approached certification in the past using exam cram and
Transcender and other exam preparation tools to pass aren't going to learn
nearly as much as those who slog through the topics and understand the
concepts.
You must manually configure the OSPF interface cost such as:-
int s0
ip ospf cost 1000
int s1
ip ospf cost 1000
OSPF only does load-balancing on equal-cost interfaces. The other method is
to do this via configuring the interface bandwidth but this can affect
anything else that uses the inter
I'm trying to narrow down the number of books/material from the choices
available - specifically for CCIE lab preparation. Here's what I've
compiled so far:-
Cisco Certification - Caslow
Internet Routing Architectures (I'm waiting for that 2nd ed. book!!!
when???) - Halabi
Routing TCP/IP, 2nd Ed
Copy the IOS image onto a PCMCIA flash card on the Sup and boot from that or
copy that over to the MSFC bootflash...
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sw_5_4/msfc/star
tup.htm
""Amit Lilani"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8njsca$c8q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8njsca
Lorenzo,
Try this...
bridge irb
int bvi 172
ip addr 192.168.172.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper ...
ip helper ...
int bvi 173
ip addr 192.168.173.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper ...
ip helper ...
int g49
no ip addr
i
Chuck,
Here's what I found on Cisco's website with your problem with IP/Frame
Relay...
Serial interfaces using HDLC, PPP, LAPB, and Frame Relay encapsulations, as
well as SLIP and tunnel interfaces, can be unnumbered. Serial interfaces
using Frame Relay encapsulation can also be unnumbered, but
Chuck,
I can't be sure of the actual answer, but I would try the following:-
1) Don't use IP unnumbered, configure IP addresses on the Serial interfaces
2) Try frame-relay map commands (to eliminate any Inverse ARP issues)
3) You might want to troubleshoot EIGRP and see if you need the 'neigbor'
Karen,
Did some searching and found this...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/12.html
It looks like the rules are simple for switched ports to desktops:-
1) Enable portfast
2) Disable trunking (DTP)
3) Disable port-channelling (PAgP)
You might want to check out PortFast BPDU Guard - it loo
Jon,
Try the CS-508 (8-port) or CS-516 (16-port). I think there's an even older
something (ASM?) too. You should be able to get the CS-508/516 for $200-300
on Ebay... a lot cheaper than a 2509. Problem is its not flash upgradable
and the software is pretty old (think 10.x is the last availabl
Chuck,
I'd say go for the VPN/PIX... and the LocalDirector too. You might want to
check out the Cisco/ArrowPoint products, VPN 3000, 7100 series too.
Aironet shouldn't give most people much trouble... though I haven't touched
these. Have used both the Lucent's Orinoco and Jaguar's Waveaccess
nected interfaces) is set for next-hop IP address of 192.168.255.2 (the
router's loopback IP address is 192.168.255.1 with a /24 mask).
Regards,
Adrian
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Adr
I've seen this in some configurations where traffic is sent via a route-map
to an IP address that is on the same subnet as a router's loopback
interface.
Eg.
interface ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map abc
interface loopback 0
ip address 192.168.255.1 255.255
40 matches
Mail list logo
