My recollection is that conduits are discrete, and can be edited, added,
removed, without effecting other conduit entries. Unlike access-lists, where
there is an implied deny all at the end.
The reason is that on a PIX, or any good fire wall, everything is denied
unless explicitly permitted.
John, this one's got me to thinking a little bit. Your kinda right but kinda
wrong.
The areas are an OSPF structure, used for the building of the SPF tables.
It's not that inter area traffic has to go through a discreet area 0, but
that in OSPF in order for an area to learn about routes to
A well known trick of evil lab proctors making for fewer CCIE's in this
world :-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Config
You bad boys and girls should read and save my posts. Lots of good
information.
http://home.nc.rr.com/quiggle/ConfigReg.xls
courtesy of Adam Quiggle
the console port speed is determined by the values of two bit positions in
the config register. Convert from hex to binary. Bits 11 and 12 from
it's all over the CCIE list. Cisco is going to a one day lab. Speculation is
that they are eliminating all the B.S. and C.S. stuff. Some of us are
guessing that a candidate will walk into a router/switch pod that is
preconfigured with the basic stuff, and that to prove your CCIExpertise, you
This site has it's good and bad points. Searching by word or phrase can
indeed help locate things more easily, but it can work against you.
For example, I did a search on ARP and got 60 hits. Not one of which had
the RFC title. The index page gives RFC numbers, but again no titles.
So for the
The world is a single point of failure. :-
Seriously, something often overlooked - the ISP's themselves, their
backbones, their peering.
Not too long ago, up in the Sacramento area, some folks found out the hard
way that even though they were dual homed, both ISP's used the same backbone
Correction - www.ccbootcamp.com
Cisco's lawyers forced the change.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Raul
F. Fernandez-IGLOU
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: What is the Lab 'like'?
Congratulations on passing!
However, it is wise to distinguish between Cisco's answers and the Truth :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William E. Gragido
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you haven't done so already, get yourself a subscription to Certification
zone www.certificationzone.com
Check out the white paper by David Wolsefer on this topic.
Also, check out the networkers presentation on the Lab ( rats - I can't find
the link - check out the archives. Jenny McCloud
One place to look is Darren Spohn's Data Network Design, if you can find a
copy. I bough one used through Amazon, and at that time there were a few
more copies available. I have it on good authority that an new edition is on
it's way ;-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: ARP and TCP/IP layering [7:8335]
I'm simultaneously amused and confused by some of the debates on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: LLC Type 2 [7:8262]
VMS books were orange, as I recall!?
Or maybe you are thinking of the
: Friday, June 15, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: ARP and TCP/IP layering [7:8335]
Comments inline
Chuck Larrieu 6/15/01 1:04:26 PM
At 11:50 AM 6/13/01, John Neiberger wrote:
This topic has come up a few times in the past and I don't
Questions keep coming: what to believe and why?
Brought to mind something I found on CCO once. The topic was the maximum
network diameter of an EIGRP network. The following is a quote from CCO:
IP Enhanced IGRP provides the following features:
(snip)
Increased network width. With IP RIP, the
Earlier today someone was asking.
The following link will get you to the Cisco networkers presentation on CCIE
prep.
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/3304/3304.htm
( courtesy of Jenny McLeod )
I also recommend David Wolsefer's white paper on the subject, found at
It occurred to me that everything you want to know is on CCO. The problem as
always is how to find it. One of the required CCIE skill sets is ability to
find information on the document CD, of which there is an on-line version
at: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm
First place to check
From where to where?
BGP requires an existing route to it's neighbor peers. These routes may be
static, but may not be the quad zero default route ( 0.0.0.0 )
So you do not need to run an IGP between your router and your ISP's router,
for example.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
Oft overlooked in the preparation process - good points all, PO.
One other thing - Vlabs are timed, so there is pressure to complete the work
quickly. Preparation and planning are very important. It is never too early
to practice speedy, correct configuration of routers.
Chuck
-Original
Not that I think this particular offer is legit, but there are many of these
kinds of professional watcher kinds of newsletters out there, and they
are of similar size and not cheap. Stewart Alsop, former editor of Infoworld
Magazine, once published such a letter centered around IBM computing.
Yes there is
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/c_and_s/
for many things, one may substitute the word public for customer
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001
Not meant to be sarcastic, but how many hosts in any network, VLAN or
otherwise? Answer is it depends ;-
I have a question for you folks who use VLAN's extensively. Do you establish
membership by geography ( floors, parts of floors, buildings, etc ) or by
function ( accounting, sales,
and switching to provide better performance.. and I
think my point has been proven.
I wish I could log into CCO =(
Mike W.
Chuck Larrieu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
So layer three switches are faster, 'eh? By orders of magnitude, 'eh? This
calls f
For some reason the name Grand Junction comes up.
I don't know, but I was eavesdropping on a conversation yesterday, and I
heard someone say that Grand Junction was by far Cisco's most successful
acquisition. 2+2=Catalyst :-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Just got this on the TAC newsletter. Requires a CCO login.
The Cisco IP Telephony Readiness Assessment can be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/tac/iptelready
(available to registered users)
( not bad - e-mail function was broken when I tried it the other day )
The Cisco IP Telephony Solution
To throw in a couple of cents on this topic, my recollection is that the
CCIE written was in many ways similar to the CID exam, but with the added
emphasis on token ring and RIF's.
My own recommendation would be to use your CID materials for the desktop
stuff, download the white papers found on
On a 7200 router, the only IMA available is the 8 port variety PA-A3-8T1IMA,
if memory serves.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tcb
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Weird Scenario
RIP v1 can optionally support host routes ( /32 ) according to the RFC
(ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1058.txt ) this is an optional
implementation. Cisco has chosen to support host routes, if my own
experiments are accurate. You might want to try a couple of scenarios to
verify.
One more
Saw this one on NANOG this morning. Thought it was interesting. Obviously,
the person who posted it considered it as stating the obvious. ;-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Craig A. Haney
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:55 AM
Got to thinking about this after seeing some of the recent posts on the CCIE
list asking how to do or show various things.
What are the necessary informational commands one SHOULD know, not just for
the Lab, but for operations in general? For example ( short list )
Show protocol
Show IP
Idle curiousity - are you getting true packet by packet load sharing? Or
conversation by conversation?
i.e. is your traffic balance 50-50 ( for two lines )? Or some other figure,
because traffic for particular destinations is dent out particular links due
to the route caching?
Chuck
Once again, I offer the following. Need a CCO login to use it, but it is
very helpful in discussions like this.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
According to the IOS feature navigator, ISL VLAN routing is now available on
the 17xx platform with IOS 12.2.1 releases.
I came
and hardware devices as it does. Still
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 7:05 AM
To: Circusnuts; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: low-end router that does inter-VLAN routing [7:7256]
Once again, I offer
Which means...?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Layer3 switch vs Router [7:7406]
One differance is that a layer 3 switch does wire-speed
I'm having trouble deciding - is this a smart ass remark? That link
certainly makes it seem so. :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Munoz, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I am basing my reply upon continuous study of Howard's posts.
BGP is properly categorized as a path vector protocol. It is not limited in
terms of hop counts in the sense that RIP, RIPv2, or IGRP are limited, nor
is it concerned with bandwidth and cost, as OSPF and EIGRP.
BGP is concerned with
Amazing. three clicks and a couple of scroll downs and voila!
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html
according to this link, as of April 30 there were... well, I'll let you
discover for yourself.
As for the most recent number issued, that changes on a daily
Very good, and thanks.
But... to quote a sage, who made this point last time this topic came up,
what exactly is the difference between a router that routes 100,000 packets
per second, and a layer three switch that switches 100,000 packets per
second?
Cisco can talk about ASIC's versus
So layer three switches are faster, 'eh? By orders of magnitude, 'eh? This
calls for a bit of research on CCO.
Hhhmmm
Catalyst 8500 = 24 million PPS
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/ca8500c.htm#CJAEJHDF
Catalyst 6509 = 170 million PPS
with regards to the contents of the exam, I am reminded of the time I told
my son that when I was his age I could name all the presidents of the
IUnited States, to which he answered there were only 5 or six of them back
then :-
with regards to the value of the CCIE, whatever that may be, like it
You can't be having a cat get together without Pamela Forsythe's
involvement. :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: T-shirt
Might want to take a look at this link. courtesy of Adam Quiggle, who used
to spend a lot of time here.
http://home.nc.rr.com/quiggle/ConfigReg.xls
CCIE candidates, anyway, should be familiar with the config register values.
Manipulating them can provide one part of a router security program.
January 2000
Love my new job here in Silicon Valley.
My salary is 30% higher!
I have stock options!
The temperature outside is 65F in winter!
California is the best place on earth!!!
Sure glad I moved out here.
February
Still looking for an apartment.
Freeways everywhere
I am reading Doug Comer's excellent book Internetworking with TCP/IP vol 1.
Highly recommended, and I wish I had followed the good advice of several
other people on this list, and read the book a year ago.
I have a question on sliding windows as Comer describes it: The TCP sliding
window
HTTPS=2134278641, L= 156, A= 2821709
11 MyPCServer TCP HTTPS= 2821709, L=0, A=2134278797
Priscilla
At 02:10 PM 6/2/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
I am reading Doug Comer's excellent book Internetworking with TCP/IP vol 1.
Highly recommended, and I wish I had followed
If memory serves ( always a question in my case ) the facility was called
Pburst, ( maybe pburst.nlm? ) and was one of those things that got blamed
for a lot of problems on Novell servers. Almost the first words out of any
NetWare engineer's mouth were have you disabled packet burst?
A comment or two within:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jeroen Timmer
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Weird DHCP/VLAN solution suggestions wanted!! [7:6579]
We have a configuration
Asked because I don't know: how do you plan on making the switches
redundant? How are your servers, for example homed on the switches? Is it
real redundancy if closet switches are dual homed to core switches? Is your
internet connection, your firewall, etc dual homed as well?
Chuck
The world is
If you enable IPX routing, and have IPX network numbers on your various
router interfaces, or have IPX protocol stacks on your PC's then yes you can
ping mac addresses from a Cisco router. recall that in the world of IPX the
mac is the host portion of an IPX address.
I won't say that it's fun or
Hhh... Not so sure this is exactly right..
With full duplex, you have effectively created two directions --- there
and back.
I believe it is accurate to say that only one packet can be on the wire per
direction at one time.
I can send to you at the same time you are sending to me.
ish, you probably won't. If you do, you should examine the
reasons, and revise the design of your network accordingly.
Alan
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: elementary? [7:6359]
Hhh... Not so sure this is
since this appears to be a regular occurrence, you may want to save this
link.
best wishes
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William Harrison
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:help
Of course it helps if the #$^% list doesn't eat the url:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/pswdrec_2500.html
sorry
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [EMAIL
Knowing others will give you a succinct answer, I would also suggest you can
take a peek at RFC 1541
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1541.txt
for some details, such as the DHCP request packet format. In there you will
find a field defined as giaddr ( Relay agent IP address, used in booting
via
When you swap to frame relay, do you use map statements art the branch
offices?
BTW, I wasn't aware that the 16xx series supported ATM, can't verify this on
the IOS feature navigator found at:
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
which IOS version you running? I have a couple
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 8:59 PM
Subject:Wanna Be a CCIE? Try This One [7:6076]
Ever wonder what the CCIE candidates talk about on the CCIE list?
The following message came through today. I
Set up an OSPF virtual link across it ;-
Chuck
(A joking reference to a recent thread.)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Rashid Lohiya
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Why use GRE
There have been a couple of very good threads here the last couple of days -
the kind that make you think, make you hit the books or the rfc's or the
archives or the net. The kind that challenge you to learn a little bit more
and walk away a little bit smarter.
It continues to be a privilege to
Question came up on the CCIE group revolving around the meaning of the term
tunnel
I think I am seeing where the author of the below quote is going. I'm
wondering if one of the folks on this group might be willing to offer some
insight.
The question originated with someone calling an OSPF
Did some more research. In the context of the question, I went to the RFC to
see what the source says. It occurred to me that the behaviour of virtual
links must be defined in there somewhere.
Sure enough, in the router LSA there is something called the V bit, which
when set determines that the
on the same way you and I do. I'm sure he's made a
mistake or two in his life. There are a few pages of errata to be found for
his book. :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Peter I. Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:52 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Lots of free stuff at www.cisco.com
Check out the command references and configuration guides. Great place to
start.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
vijay tyagi
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 10:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ever wonder what the CCIE candidates talk about on the CCIE list?
The following message came through today. I thought the bright folks on this
list might be curious, and might want to venture an answer.
Begin original question:
Guys,
I wonder if there is anybody who remembers the discussion
Have you tried reloading the router with the cable attached?
Or blowing away the X.35 config, reloading with the cable attached, then
putting in the X.25
What version of IOS are you running? I have documented a couple of problems
revolving around serial port cables with 12.0.4 or so.
Chuck
Gee, is it time to repeat my observation that the firewall is no longer the
appropriate device for doing this kind of stuff.? What happens when some
user or group has a valid business reason to use instant messenger or real
audio? Now how to distinguish between the valid and non-valid uses and
and it worked
..
thanks for the help but what could be the reason for that if i know it will
be a help .
Arun Sharma
Chuck Larrieu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Have you tried reloading the router with the cable attached?
Or blowing away the X.35 config, r
This of course presumes it is in Cisco's interest to make the test
relevant.
Reminds a bit of the arguments we used to make in college and grad school.
My major is X, so why should I be required to take classes in Y? The answer
is BECAUSE! :-
Right or wrong, relevant or not, the fact is that
As someone who has devoted a bit of time and more than a couple of dollars
pursuing certification, and as someone who has failed one lab attempt, and
as someone who collects good advice from CCIE's and others, I can no longer
resist opening my big mouth on this.
The CCIE Lab exam is a test.
on
redundancy.
-EH
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ARP versus Proxy-arp [7:5664]
At the risk of becoming another Bob Vance..
I'm reading Doug Comer's
OK. I'll correct you.
Consider the situation where you have a router with multiple T1's ( not
frame relay ) and therefore multiple interfaces. The design might be such
that I see a destination to network X through more than one interface.
NetX--R_1--R_2-R_3
No matter
I believe you need a tunnel mode command in there under the tunnel interface
Int tun 0
Tun mode ipip
For example
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Eduardo D Piovesam
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to yourself.
Their is a reasonable
explanation of this behavior in the Sybex CCNP
switch 2.0 chapter on
redundancy.
-EH
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Before providing an answer, let me ask:
What do you think? Why?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Lupi, Guy
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:OSPF [7:5808]
When a router has OSPF
as
participating in the routing process anyway. Also, I could see it as a
possible security risk, you are sending hellos down links, and anyone would
be able to see that you are running a routing protocol. Did I hit the mark
or am I way off?
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto
Sure. Why not?
The configuration on the route reflector is:
Router bgp x
Neighbor a.b.c.d route-reflector-client
There is no configuration on the client
The whole idea of the RR is to eliminate the necessity for having full mesh.
So you can indeed have:
RR1
Module
installed in slot 5, the module in slot 6 becomes the active one.
v
Chuck Larrieu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Takes two to get 256
Takes slots 5 6, making your 6509 a 6507 ;-
Idle curiosity - why do you need a 256 gig back plane? Assuming a
I respectfully disagree.
The 40% number refers to ethernet utilization, not to percentage broadcasts.
In other words, as a rule of thumb, if you are running 4mbs of traffic
across your Ethernet, you are approaching saturation.
In terms of percentage of network traffic that is broadcast, there
By popular demand:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/pec/peclogin.html
requires a CCO login. I believe this is for partners only, so you may need a
CCO login tied to your employer's partnership account.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One avenue open to just about everyone for this kind of information is the
Cisco pre sales support group
1-800-553-6387 option 2, then choose your poison. Folks there are usually
pretty good about providing accurate information.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: how to enlarge Switching Backplane of 6509 [7:5487]
I looked at that link too Chuck. It seems that if I want the utilize the DFS
card I gottal run that nasty native IOS Is this true ?
Tony M.
#6172
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:59 AM
Just got this from Cisco, in case anyone is interested in Ipv6
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Systems Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject:Cisco Beyond Basic IP Newsletter V2.21
IPv6 HELPS FUTURE-PROOF INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURES
Going
that in their first foray
into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice.
John
Chuck Larrieu 5/23/01 2:24:37 PM
Just got this from Cisco, in case anyone is interested in Ipv6
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Systems Inc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
An interesting approach, if one can lay hands on it, is to be found in the
Cisco Products quick Reference Guide, which for each of the Cisco product
categories suggests appropriate situations for use, and competitor products
the Cisco product competes with directly.
Published semi-annually.
Is there something more recent than RFC 2740? Or earlier?
The RIPngv6 RFC 2080 looks like it was completed two years earlier than
OSPF.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:26 PM
category.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2001 17:41
Subject: RE: Books with product suggestions? [7:5568]
An interesting approach, if one can lay hands on it, is to be found in the
Cisco Products quick Reference Guide, which for each
At the risk of becoming another Bob Vance..
I'm reading Doug Comer's TCP/IP reference, on the assumption that it can't
hurt to really get into how TCP/IP works.
Proxy-arp versus normal arp.
A host does not know the physical address of another host so it sends out an
ARP request. If the
The easiest way would be to purchase two of the WS-C6500-SFM cards.
These must be placed into slots 5 6, and provide the 256 gig backplane
enhancement.
Bookmark the following link. it is the Cisco public tool for equipment
configuration. Does everything the partner tool does except give you
Takes two to get 256
Takes slots 5 6, making your 6509 a 6507 ;-
Idle curiosity - why do you need a 256 gig back plane? Assuming all seven of
the other slots each contain the 16 port Gig E blades, and each port was
going full duplex, that comes out to 224 gigs, according to my fingers. Oh
Clarification on the filtering - if the message text contains boson.com
the filter catches it and places the message into the moderator box. Your
friendly list moderator then reads the messages, makes the value judgement
as to whether this is a marketing message, or just a general interest
Interesting question. Right up the alley for all us designers and designer
wannabe's.
First of all, and presuming you meant fool proof plan keep in mind that
there is no such thing as fool proof. A fool can screw up anything!
Secondly, while number of users is one factor, the applications and
I thought a peer was someplace one went to fish or launch boats. My brother
does a lot of networking at the local peer.
Or maybe it's the name of a ballet? Peer Gynt?
Isn't two of something a peer? Something I never see, which is why my
friends like playing poker with me ( ok, that's really
I believe you may create a static nat to an inside address, and so long as
your access-lists permit, you can telnet to the outside address of that
static nat to an inside device. From there you can telnet back into the pix
box.
Public_sidePIX--inside_network
Public_IPprivate_ip
Use the search string isis ( no dash )
From my own limited studies:
IS-IS tends to treat level-1 areas as stub networks - therefore smaller
routing tables
IS-IS sure looks a lot chattier than OSPF. Debug ISIS adjacency reveals a
LOT of traffic generated just by the protocol keepalives
The
In your particular case, due to the existing T1 ports on the 7206, I would
guess at PPP multilink is the most cost effective way to go.
But just FYI, you can put an IMA device (either a card in a Cisco router, or
an external box such as Adtrans or a number of other vendors sell) and
multiplex
-
From: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:38 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207]
BTW, I have been told by folks who work in really big networks that none of
the routing
If you are able to configure an IP address on a Windoze machine, you should
be able to figure out how to make it a DHCP client quite easily. ;-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Armando M.
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:25 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:28 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207]
That's true, I didn't bother to try the math at all but it would
of bandwidth the updates would take (my
email is running really slow today)
andras
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How is IS-IS more scalable than OSPF? [7:5207]
I rechecked the NANOG
All right... That does it!
I am the only one on the list allowed to use this theme.
Chuck
--
I am Locutus, a CCIE Lab Proctor. Xx_Brain_dumps_xX are futile. Your life as
it has been is over ( if you hope to pass ) From this time forward, you will
study US!
If I were to guess, I would say that the telco is pitching an all frame
relay solution as a way to keep costs down, telling the customer he can
terminate everything on a single router. there is always the question about
the wisdom of terminating an internet connection on the same router that
601 - 700 of 1386 matches
Mail list logo
