Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
>
> The 3550 and 6500 use different CLI's. The 3550 is IOS-based
> and the 6500 is
> set-based. There really isn't a good alternative for the 3550
> switch. You
Whoa, hold on there a second. Although the 6500 and 3550 CAN have different
OS's, they don't necessarily HAVE
Symon Thurlow wrote:
>
> Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their
> public network a little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty
> fundamental problem solving tools IMHO
I'm not certain if it's still true or not, but if you mean on links to
customer sites, then in the past several
Since you are trying to 'copy running-config startup-config' I would assume
then that it's a 2900XL series switch, and not one of the 2900 series
switches that runs CatOS? (2901, 2902, 2926, CiscoPro 2200, etc..)
Not that I necessarily have an answer for you, but just wanting to make
certain you
I have to admit that that is one nice thing about Wellfleet/Bay/Nortel
routers. They built in pcap (Packet Capture) years ago, and it's actually
exportable/convertible to a sniffer format for analysis.
Alas, not on a cisco...
But I'm sure someone here will provide a more useful answer than the o
> I did this on a 3550-24:
>
> Switch(config)#int range f0/1 -24
> Switch(config-if-range)#no shut
> Switch(config-if-range)#
> 1w0d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> FastEthernet0/1,
> changed state to down
> 1w0d: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> FastEthernet0/
> I lost the enable secret password of my Cisco AS5300.I have the
> configuration showing.
>
> enable secret 5 $1$6YRM$nzNXQuv4h24C3AlB8N3rp.
> enable password 7 110A1016141D5A
>
One more point, since you have an 'enable secret' configured, the 'enable
password' serves no purpose.
When you type
Hmm...
I don't see where it says one year, I do see that it says 18 months, and
then within 12 months after the first attempt (if failed of course).
fgm
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55055&t=55046
--
FAQ, list a
er end is the same no matter
where you are.
Good Luck and don't forget to visit the Rainforest Cafe in Piccadilly Circus
if you get a chance.
Frank Merrill
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53872&t=53864
-
27;out' push them 'in' and you should be all set.
Good Luck!
Frank Merrill
Juan Blanco wrote:
>
> Team,
> Could any tell me what I am doing wrongI am trying to bring
> up my
> token-ring interface up? I connect the TR interface with a
> Token Ring
> 4-16 -
minutes, until we saw what it was actually
sending in the Cisco log.
It's been in operation for over a year now.
Have fun,
Frank Merrill
>
> Neither router should have the MTU set to bigger than the
> maximum as specified by the relevant standards for the data
> link in use, but
Check anthonypanda dot com for the DTE/DCE back-to-back cables.
There are other sources such as ccbootcamp dot com, and kg2 dor com.
And, never forget to check ebay. Just do a search on 'cisco back' and
you'll find a ton of them.
Good Luck!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/r
First, what is the config-register set to on that MSFC?
Is that why a reload is causing it to go to ROM monitor?
(should probably be 0x2102)
In other words, are these two seperate issues?
Is it returning to monitor any time it relaods. or just after this failure?
As far as the Nortel router causi
Well, isn't it likely that the problem is exactly what the error is telling
you? You have 32MB memory. The Max on a 1710 is 48MB. Does that image
require 48?
Actually, I can't even find the 1710 in the upgrade planner. If I select a
1720 instead, and then change the URL to indicate a 1710 inst
One other possibility (this happened to me recently as I'm buying equipment
for my lab) is that it doesn't really have 16MB of flash.
I had this happen (on a 2524 as a matter of fact!) when I received a router
that was listed as having 16MB flash and indeed reported 16MB.
The image on it when I re
> > Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE
> > power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it?
> > If not, can I get a copy?
>
> In case you missed it in the other thread:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
>
Although I posted this, the way
Sandra Carr wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE
> power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it?
> If not, can I get a copy?
In case you missed it in the other thread:
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html
Message Posted at:
http
Did you enable portfast or use the 'host' macro to set the user ports on
this switch? I have seen this, but it was in a situation where the user
machines had there IPX frame type set to auto. In that case the users
machine would boot up, try and autodetect the IPX frame type in use on the
segmen
> I got this message from my Cisco 3662 fastethernet interface , :
> %AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: FastEthernet0/1 transmit error
>
>From the System Error Messages guide:
Error Message
%AMDP2_FE-5-LATECOLL: [chars], transmit error
Explanation Late collisions have occurred on the Ethernet or Fast E
> BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (or
> atleast trying to get your hand on a copy of the PS CCIE book)
>
Unfortunately the company I'm with isn't going to pay for the PS, and so I
actually won't be attending, but I grabbed the PDF of the presentation from
last years Networke
Where is everyone who mentioned taking the Beta written a while back?
Did you all get your pass/fail from Cisco/Prometric yet?
I took it, and I realized afterward (duh!) that the test was almost entirely
on the new subject material, none of which I did any study for.
It makes sense, as why would
Seemed like a much easier exam didn't it?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47771&t=47764
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure v
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>
> I'm at the Networkers CCIE power session as I type, and I heard
> July.
>
> Steve
And I was at the beach with my kids (Myrtle Beach,SC) when you were typing
that so I'd have to take your word for it, but sounds like it makes sense to
me.
I'm sure I'll hear the same
My guess is no later than the middle of August based on previous Cisco
Beta-to-production life cycles. However, anything is possible.
The Beta test itself ended on May 6, and the results from that are just
coming in about now.
The Beta was a 'brutal' exam so to speak. The current written is rel
I did call Prometric a while back, and yes, they did indicate a passing
score, but then I asked the CCIE team to verify the validity of that
information, and they clearly said that the results had not been fully
analyzed, and that the pass/fail cut had not yet been determined. (That was
about 2 w
It's actually still a benefit to you though. When you have an issue like
that, and go through 'everything' and then finally figure it out, it sticks
with you much better than someone simply handing you the answer on a platter.
Good Luck!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.
Kelly Cobean wrote:
>
> See what happens when you try to type your configs from
> memory. You're absolutely right, Chuck, I posted an incorrect
> config. On the PTP interface the map statement is really a
> "frame-relay interface dlci 103" statement. Still, the proble
> persists.
Kelly,
I jus
Are you mixing apples and oranges here?
On one hand you mention determining if "VLANs are configured in cisco box".
But it would appear that you are looking at trying to determine if there are
VLANs existing on the Switch.
On the other hand, it would appear that you are querying the MSFC, and t
Tim Potier wrote:
>
> I understand the bit significance for the 16-bit confreg, but I
> am confused about the SEQUENCE of the boot and the issue with
> netboot. Assume confreg 0x2102, what is the correct boot
> sequence? Where does the flash overide (0x2-0xF) come into
> play i.e. does it r
> Yes I would use mlppp and ios in the same sentence, as I have
> been running it without a hitch on a 7200 for 6 months. also,
> you guys are missing his point (t-1's to the internet) what ISP
> is going to run
> OSPF or EIGRP with a customer ? please.
I don't see anything in the original post a
> >
> > Yes, they do want to do it, and will retire the 3524-PWR as
> soon as they
> can.
>
> Uh if they DO want to do it (have switches with inline
> power), then why
> would they want to retire the 3524-PWR?!?!?! ( I know there's
> the
> 4000/6000s but I doubt you'll see someone putting a
Giuseppe Citerna wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> i have the lab at october, and i dont know what is switch ,
> 5000 or 3550?!
> It's true that CCIE must knowns every things, but the game must
> be equal for all, and therefore the ccie candidate must known
> what is the equipment list.
> what about?!
> thanks
Timothy Ouellette wrote:
>
> Okay folks, starting off a late night studying and noticed
> something
> weird. Got two boxes connected like so RouterA---RouterB
>
> Router B has a bunch of segments off of it. Something weird.
> Per some
> of the material I have, the key chain names are suppo
> We are in the process of upgrading our Network infrastructure,
> which has CISCO routers and CAT5500 switches. During our
> preliminary evaluation, we are considering also 3COM XRN
> switches instead of CAT6500 or CAT4000. Has anyone experience
> with 3COM XRN switches? If so please let met kno
Michael L. Williams wrote:
>
>
> Here's a good answer for ya =) Convert the 6509s to Native
> IOS, then
> just run HSRP between the two active MSFCs done!
>
You don't have to convert to do that. I'm doing that right now between to
6509s with two Sups and two MSFC2s per box. With this
Michael L. Williams wrote:
>
> Yeah... I don't get this... I know there aren't any 2950s
> and 3550s that
> support power, but there's the 3524-PWR-XL-EN switch that does
> provide
> inline power. Can't they make up their mind as to whether
> they want to
> do it or not?!?!?!
Yes, they d
Here's
the link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18
Watch for that wrap!
Good Luck!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Frank Merrill"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:43 PM
> Subject: Cisco Lab Changes..Updat
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>
> There's nothing wrong with knowing the IOS based switches just
> on principal,
> as one probably installs more of them in a job then the
> 6500's. The only
> problem left with the new switches is no in-line power until
> next year when
> 802.3af is ratified.
>
> --
>
have to be dealt with now until after Nov 4.
Good Luck!
>
>
> ""Frank Merrill"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been
> clarified and
> updated,
> >
It would appear that the changes to the Lab have been clarified and updated,
and it looks like the removal of the indicated topics won't actually happen
until Nov 4th now:
Lab Exam Content and Equipment Changes
CCIE Candidates should note the following changes to the technical content
and equip
> Question: Does anyone know why the Americans didn't use the
> E-1? I have
> always wondered about this.
>
The T1 was originally developed by ATT in 1957 or 58. It was later adopted
by ANSI.
The CCITT (Now ITU) standardized the CEPT E1 for most of the world at (I
believe) a later date.
Clark Jason wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> Has anyone received their results from the BETA exam??? I took
> the exam months ago.no results yetjust wondering if
> anyone had gotten anything back from cisco yet
>
Well... as it only ran for three weeks total between April 15 and May 6 it's
ju
Hunt Lee wrote:
>
> 1 x Cat 5000
>
> I'm thinking whether I should get the below:-
>
> 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need
> for Token?? I
> really don't know what else I need...
>
If you are going to be doing that LAB after Oct 1, then heed the news that
Cisco has
supernet wrote:
>
> I heard Cisco gave its customers free networker tickets. Is it
> true?
>
> Thanks.
> Yoshi
Well They do if you spend an awful lot of money with them.
I mean in the multi-millions.
Due to the economy, they aren't giving away as many freebies as I would have
liked to see
Sounds as if it's getting to the 'first path received when multiple paths
are the same' part of the multiple path selection process.
IS the path from R1 the first received? If so, have the one from R3 come up
first and see if it then selects that one. If so, then that is the case. If
so, then t
I read the link referenced at the bottom of the page and it was quite
interesting.
If you missed it, here it is again:
http://www.eetimes.com/news/98/1012news/ibm.html
After reading that, I guess you'll be digging a hole to put the router in!
;-)
Good Luck!
Message Posted at:
http://www.gro
Clayton Dukes wrote:
>
> P.S. The website does require a login, but it's free (I just
> like to know
> who's playing on my server :-))
As an aside, your web site does nothing for me so to speak. I registered,
and never received an email giving me a password. If I select 'Forgot
Password' and
Unfortunately, based on the fact that everyone (including myself) that has
called has been told that they passed, and also based on the fact that they
apparently put P's into the pass/fail field when the scoring isn't automatic
(Since it's a Beta, cisco scores it manually), I'm not as excited as I
>
> BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=10.3.101.13, d=224.0.0.10)
> BRI0: Already 255 call(s) in progress on BRI0, dialing not
> allowed
>
> I have never seen this msg before. Anyone know what this means?
> Is there a loop somewhere?
I would guess that you have EIGRP running seeing as that is the multi
>
> I was wondering if anyone could tell me if this will count
> toward the
> existing CCNP track if my other exams are the current standard
> (640-50x) in
> which case I'M DONE!!!
Betas do indeed count, and if so, then you should be able to log into the
tracking syustem and see that you are in
I just wanted to mention how funny I thought the Sample Lab was.
It's not the lab itself, but the comment that the equipment requirement will
be 'light'.
It's amazing to me that you consider 7 routers to be a 'light' requirement
as many with home labs don't have more than 5 or 6 since you really
>
> Question1: May I know how to set the speed and duplex type of
> the interface
> ethernet0 of 2500 router. See below.. there is no speed and
> duplex option
> unlike IOS switch fasthernet switch.
That interface is a 10Mbs/Half-Duplex interface. You can't set it to
anything else. The speed
What next?
How about Disney World?
Sorry, the question just reminded me of those corny events where the winners
announce such ;-)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45306&t=45176
--
FAQ, list archives, and subs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> And get this! I am a CISSP and a CSS1 and CCSE. You would
> think that I
> know security right? I got a 0% on the CID security section
> twice! I
> still don't know why. How could I not know enough when I got
> over 900 on
> each of the CSS1 tests all on the
Juan Blanco wrote:
>
> Team,
> We have a 7200 with the following interface 4 Channelized
> T1/PRI port(s)
> We have two 2600 with a 1-Port ISDN with NT-1 Wan Interface
>
> Question, There is any cable which will allows us to connect
> the 2600
> routers directly to the 7200 and simulate a ISDN n
>
> OTOH, that still does not explain why 250 computers in eight
> different
> offices were all hitting the same DHCP server. The reason I
> know it to be
> true is that I had different scopes on each of the two servers.
> For example
> 192.168.4.50 through 150 on one server and 192.168.4.151
> t
Chris Camplejohn wrote:
>
> This is a very common design in a campus backbone to track the
> vlan uplink
> from the distribution layer to the core layer. In that design,
> there is
> only one port at L2 that is in the uplink vlan (i.e. it is a
> point-to-point
> L3 vlan). So, when that one port
Keith J. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> how come my debug commands turn on debugging
> but I see no output (2501)
>
>
> how do I setup so debug output shows up in telnet session ?
>
> thanksHi
>
>
If you've telneted in, use the 'terminal monitor' command.
Good Luck!
Message Posted
Comments in-line...
Phil Lorenz wrote:
>
> I'm a little confused by configs I see in production that
> appear to be
> contrary to how I think HSRP works.
>
> What is the significance of the preempt statement on Switch #2
> in this
> example below ???
In your example there isn't a preempt c
> module 2 is not supported
>
> afterward with a show mod is shows 0 ports and status unknown
> or it will not
> see the module at all.
>
> Bootrom is version 2.2 and version is 4.5
>
> I checked on Cisco and the module appears to be supported by
> the software.
It's clearly telling you above
I happened to purchase the CCIE 350-001 ExamCram from them when they were
going under as I got it for $7.00 (what the hell, eh?)
After receiving it and reading it, I was amazed at how many errors there
were. The good thing is that I spotted so many errors, meaning that I knew
the material well e
Michael Williams wrote:
>
> Correct... I took the beta, then took the current written
> and passed Still don't know about passing the beta because
> it takes them 6-8 weeks to get you the results (actually, the
> last beta I took, I saw the results on their tracking site a
> week before
Michael L. Williams wrote:
>
> (just to echo what others have said) If you're anywhere close
> to ready to
> take the written, do it now! I took the beta for the new
> written, and it's
> much different. Aside from information on routing protocols,
I assume this means you took the Beta, an
nrf wrote:
>
> vendor compatibility between some other vendor and Cisco. For
> example, does
> anybody know of another vendor that supports, say, EIGRP? Or
> CDP? Now you
I know that Netscout probes are identified as CDP neighbors.
Not sure that I remember seeing anything else identified a
You're right.
A bridge is not going to retransmit any frame that failed to reach it's
destination. That will be up to the appropriate protocol on the originating
host.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43461&t=43459
---
Indeed it was.
I took this today also, and although I think I was prepared well enough for
the 350-001, I'm not so certain about this 351-001.
I was actually surprised at the intensity and difficulty level.
I consider it money well spent though as it is just another few dollars on
the road to bein
65 matches
Mail list logo
