As of this morning, I have been able to verify the following resources for
Cisco 3550 study and practice. By Monday, not only will these switches be in
the CCIE Lab, but test takers will be responsible for all L2 and L3
functionality, including things like VLAN tunneling, BGP, and a wealth of
Catalin wrote in message
news:200211021650.QAA21112;groupstudy.com...
Here is my problem:
1) I have two subnets: 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 and 10.5.0.0 255.255.0.0
2) 10.5.0.0 should not access any resource on 10.1.0.0
3) 10.5.0.0 should have internet access
4) the internet access router is
Stephane Litkowski wrote in message
news:200211021923.TAA29421;groupstudy.com...
As I said, on my 2500, there's no command clns routing in show run
But after verification, clns routing is enabled (but command does not
appear).
2514-MPLS#sh protocols
Global values:
Internet Protocol
For those United States residents, Tuesday is election day. No politics
here. No flames here. You have a right and a privilege that is rare in
today's world. Please take the appropriate amount of time to get to your
polling place and exercise the right that many have fought and died for.
Your vote
Greg Macaulay wrote in message
news:200211012046.UAA07098;groupstudy.com...
Stop the presses --
I solved the problem
(1) I needed to have connectivity between the router and my LAN. So I
connected the E0 interface to the Cable-Modem Router (10/100).
(2) Then I configured the E0
Jennifer Mellone wrote in message
news:200210310718.HAA06644;groupstudy.com...
Cute!
So I'm thinking that tomorrow (Halloween) I'll put on a subnet mask.
It will be 255.255.0.0, and the two 0's will have little holes in the
middle
for my eyes ;-)
too bad they no longer allow whacky subnet
well, I was going to do a quick and dirty lab for you, but entering the
neighbor command has been wreaking havoc on one of my routers.
in general, what I seem to have proven is that even with the neighbor
statement configured under the RIP process, RIP announcements will not go
out an interface
found this while stumbling around:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/cuso/epso/sqfr/safev_wp.pdf
enjoy
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56618t=56618
--
FAQ, list archives, and
what port is your hyperterminal set up to use? surely not your ethernet
port, since one uses hyperterminal for serial communications.
if you can ping from DOS to the router, then the ethernet segment is OK
but your hyperterminal provides you only with a session to the router or
switch.
Greg -
Eric R wrote in message
news:200211010406.EAA30793;groupstudy.com...
for those of you planning to take the new test coming soon...
Resolved IOS Caveats in Release 12.1(11)EA1a
These IOS caveats were resolved in Release 12.1(11)EA1a:
Mark W. Odette II wrote in message
news:200211010440.EAA07078;groupstudy.com...
I think the version of IOS in the LAB is 12.1(5T). Chuck could confirm
this, as well as I believe it is on the CCO site.
CL: actually, I don't know, as I haven't been in the lab in a while ( but
will be soon ).
DAve Diaz wrote in message
news:200210301521.PAA21871;groupstudy.com...
you get a regrade and the same detail, takes ages apparently, unless your
really close you are giving cisco free money
CL: probably takes forever because the proctor would have to rebuild your
pod from the saved
in any octet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
if the rightmost bit is 0 ( zero ) the number is even
if the rightmost bit is 1 ( one ) the number is odd
= even
0010 = even
0100 = even
etc
0001 = odd
= odd
etc
you should be able to figure out a one line access-list using this
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:200210302236.WAA17724;groupstudy.com...
Jason Owens wrote:
I have a LAN segment in which I wish to move the routing from a
7206 to a new 6509. On the 7206, The interface I want to move
has the one main segment (172.16.x.y/24) and around 15
ran into another one today. customer specified APC ( angle polished
connector ) for his fiber links.
I did some searching on the net, and I believe I understand a bit of the
physics involved. 8 degree reflection of the lightwave. used in cable tv
deployments. ( I may be misunderstanding )
I
Some folks believe that writing is a solitary profession. The writer sits in
his/her little office, banging out the thoughts, coming up with the
manuscript, and sending it off to the publisher, who does everything else,
including sending royalty checks in huge amounts.
I recently discovered that
;groupstudy.com...
This reminds me. Chuck and Leigh Anne, when are you going to submit
your pictures to the website so I can see who's at the other end of
these emails?? :-) Same goes for Peter! (and anyone else I'm
forgetting who visits here regularly.)
John
The Long and Winding Road
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message
news:200210291940.TAA15991;groupstudy.com...
Priscilla,
This doesn't explain why it says at the beginning of the survey (not sure
if
this is true for all exams), Your answers to this survey will help in the
grading of this exam (not sure if these are the
saw this one come through today. Personally, I agree with the premise.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3953254;5700831;g?http://207.27.3.33/2/
watch the wrap
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56500t=56500
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
news:200210280429.EAA24675;groupstudy.com...
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
[snipped]
area 0 range 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area not working on ABR
either
CL: well, area 0 range is an illegal command. you may be able
to enter it,
but it does
in message
news:200210290538.FAA14601;groupstudy.com...
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
news:200210280429.EAA24675;groupstudy.com...
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
[snipped]
area 0 range 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area not working on
ABR
either
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
news:200210252303.XAA06341;groupstudy.com...
Tim Medley wrote:
Oh did they mean to redesign the website? I thought some script
kiddies defaced it and Cisco hadn't had time to fix it.
Nope, marketing kiddies! ;-)
Priscilla
Oh. Script
ccie ccielab wrote in message
news:200210231402.OAA29232;groupstudy.com...
I configure point-to-multipoint on serial int and the /32 mask show up
CL: yes - that's the way it is supposed to work. see rfc 2328 for details.
R1
int s0
ip add 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip ospf net
there who can't or won't do proper design
Dave
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
MADMAN wrote in message
news:200210241322.NAA16403;groupstudy.com...
Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
VLANs in the same box.
CL: you can also bridge between unlike
Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan
and the server configuration. I was one of the warm bodies corralled to do
installation of the desk sets.
Some idle thoughts.
( Mr. RFC 1149 Compliant is free to laugh loudly at me and make denigrating
comments :- )
1)
one more thing - I have proof positive that in line power can work just
fine over Cat 3
Chuck
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:200210251844.SAA20015;groupstudy.com...
Someone a lot smarter than I did the intelligent work - i.e. the call plan
and the server configuration. I
think route-maps
the access-list part should be easy to figure out.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
J B wrote in message
news:200210251954.TAA07601;groupstudy.com...
Can some one help me with this one?
or point me into the right direction!
Rip routes:
100.0.0.0/24
100.1.0.0/24
MADMAN wrote in message
news:200210241322.NAA16403;groupstudy.com...
Sure you can bridge between like VLANs and route between differant
VLANs in the same box.
CL: you can also bridge between unlike vlans and unlike subnets - don't
forget fallback bridging!
Dave
Jesse Loggins wrote:
straight-forward,
not until you get under the hood do you really see or observe the real
issues involved. Thanks for keeping us all sane :-)
Nigel
- Original Message -
From: The Long and Winding Road
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: Update: OSPF Route
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote in message
news:200210210329.DAA32381;groupstudy.com...
Sorry for the misunderstanding, guys. I got to thinking more about this
and
I guess I wasn't thinking of the MSFC, just the 6500 switch itself. I work
with 6000's with MSFC's and it should have slapped me in the
this is the second consecutive morning where I have seen the entire week of
November 11 with lots of empty Lab seats.
Plus a few on Nov 19th.
The next open dates after that are in May 2003
Interesting.
Get 'em while they're hot!
--
Message Posted at:
OR - who / what is over rated?
I revisited a couple of CCIE Lab preparation books last night. I sat down
with high hopes, after a frustrating afternoon at the rack. I was looking
for some enlightenment.
The first book I hit was one of the so called CCIE Professional
Development books. The
]
Comments inline...
--- The Long and Winding Road
wrote:
Larry Letterman wrote in message
news:200210170505.FAA27055;groupstudy.com...
Pris,
In our 6509's we used to make the native vlan and
the data vlan
the same and it was something other than 1...if a
blade fails
better off buying a cheap hub.
someone better versed in the electronics than I will explain this.
Essentially, the splitter does not provide the right circuitry back to the
switch.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
Sim, CT (Chee Tong) wrote in message
[EMAIL
based on this and the off line moderators' thread, I have to ask, Howard -
who put the nickel in you? Cuz whoever it is, no more nickels for them. :-
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
the price for this list is reading Howard's jokes
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote in message
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa versa
a) getting smaller subnets to match a longer boundary
( subnets with longer prefixes )
b) dealing with larger subnets
an addition to the mix
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
in no particular order of importance, and for no particular reason.
1) redistributing classful protocols into classless protocols and visa
versa
a) getting smaller
John Brandis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi All,
Got this problem. Have a site at the moment, site a running the 172.17.x.x
networks. Management has just informed me that we have just acquired an
empty building down the road, site b. The idea is that we
Shahid Muhammad Shafi wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
the babies are in San jose as well ;-)
CL: did you hear sobbing and the sounds of heads banging against the
desktops while you were there? ;-
Cisco Nuts wrote:Sorry Greg,
On a sidenote, they have
This one deserves a homily. I can sleep tonight after solving this one.
The age old question - how to get a /23 to propagate into classful /24
domain via redistribution.
I've been toying with this a while tonight.
The problem - an in use interface - token ring or ethernet - has a /23
Larry Letterman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Pris,
In our 6509's we used to make the native vlan and the data vlan
the same and it was something other than 1...if a blade fails and
we put in a new one , it defaults to vlan 1 for all ports. If the
blade has
andwidth
over their
networks, but the 2.5G network development, and the
standardization of the
network with 1 common signal.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
The Long and Winding Road
wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven A. Ridder wrote in m
no no no - read CCO and what it says.
during the period Sept 1 through Nov 4 the equipment will be swapped. It
won't happen in every rack in every location on the same day.
There are some places where the 3550 is already in place. RTP, for example,
so folks have said - here on this list and
snipping a little for clarity and brevity. response below
--
Jenny McLeod wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
snip
I am getting confused at this point, should it be possible to
have IP,
IPX and QoS all at the same time?
CL: sure, they can all be
ifferent post that all packets were apparently being
identified as IP packets with no ToS bit set.
JMcL
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a
means of testing
QoS config
Passed the DQoS exam today.
60 questions, 60 minutes, can't review questions, for those of you who can't
live without this kind of information.
Let me say that after my recent hellish experience with the CIPT exam, I
found it a pleasure to take a test in which all of the questions were based
on
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP
telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little
as
8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS score as
ompliant.
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Steven A. Ridder wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP
telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwid
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Following my own advice, I regularly check CCO to see what's up with the
CCIE Lab.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45
a couple of comments below. may get longish as I just put together a QD
lab, and the outputs may bog this down.
bergenpeak wrote in message
news:200210121501.PAA05804;groupstudy.com...
Hi JFD,
Thanks for the response, but it doesn't answer the question. Is there
something
about
Daniel Cevallos wrote in message
news:200210121728.RAA31195;groupstudy.com...
I will on vacation starting October 5 and will be returning to the office
on
October 15, 2002.
CL: I can hardly wait!
Thanks,
Danny
Message Posted at:
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of testing
QoS configurations.
I have done any number of tests this morning. all of the following have been
applied inbound on an interface:
access-list 171 deny ip any any
work. I'm following along in the DQoS class book.
The Long and Winding Road
10/12/02 01:42PM
the continuing saga of QoS configuration and testing
As near as I can tell, ping testing is utterly useless as a means of
testing
QoS configurations.
I have done any number of tests
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
news:200210122330.XAA04802;groupstudy.com...
In line (like a firewall)...
snip
CL: Let he who has never brought a network down by accident ( or
otherwise )
cast the first stone. Did I ever tell you the one about the newly
minted
Novell admin who decided to
this looks like a job for NBAR, if not Surf Control
Arnold, Jamie wrote in message
news:200210122343.XAA07638;groupstudy.com...
It will try one of the standard, higher ports that are listed, if it can't
get through it begins to look elsewhere...like 80.
MS made it smart..to some
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The number after network.node is the IPX socket number, not an SPX socket
snip for clarity
Were those numbers you told us made up to hide the details for security
reasons? Can you tell us the actual numbers?
Nathan Chessin wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
1) Since when is VoIP a bandwidth-hungry app
CL: it sure will be when teenage boys and teenage girls start using the
medium! :-
Nate
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
DQoS test on Monday. Let's see if I pass of rail!
some thoughts below
--
Adam Broad wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I have a 1720 router connected to a 3640 router by leased line (256K
link). I wish to route IP, IPX and have VoIP (QoS) from site to site.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Nathan Chessin wrote:
1) Since when is VoIP a bandwidth-hungry app
Good point. VoIP isn't usually a bandwidth hog, although I guess it could
be
with tons of users all using their phones at once.
I had a
I downloaded the most recent B*S*N test engine and sample tests. I'm just
wondering
On my laptop, the software locks up every time. No keyboard or mouse
response. Will sit forever. I finally had to uninstall it for fear of losing
too many other important things.
On my desktop - it doesn't
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Nathan Chessin wrote:
1) Since when is VoIP a bandwidth-hungry app
Good point. VoIP isn't usually a bandwidth hog, although I guess it could
be
with tons of users all using their phones at once.
I had a
in case anyone is interested, my answer below
--
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a
moment, until I remembered something.
Today's puzzle - why was I scrat
I'm doing something very similar on a customer network recently installed.
Double NAT'ing works just fine provided you have the appropriate paths to
and from the other end.
In my case I have Clinic-Umbrella_Org_Router-PIX-internet
Clinics have a hodgepodge of addresses. I NAT from
neil K. wrote in message
news:200210112334.XAA14349;groupstudy.com...
Hi Group,
Can someone please explain to me the difference between cir and mincir.Any
help is highly appreciated.
whoa - deja vu, dude! just had a thread like this one yesterday. there
were some good explainations,
here are a couple of internet sources I use:
time.nist.gov
ns.arc.nasa.gov
tick.usno.navy.mil
I haven't looked in a while, but these days you can probably do a google
search and get a zillion reliable time servers.
if your client requires the IP address, you can ping each of the names, and
get
the 3550 documentation instructs you to use the change vtp domain name
technique, which works fine.
I haven't tried the other ways, because they are too radical.
--
www.chuckslongroad.info
like my web site?
take the survey!
Paul Ruiz wrote in message
you're asking two different questions.
in answer to question number 2 -
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html
Colin Weaver wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi All,
I'm looking for opinions on what you would do (buy) if you
Ole, it's been a long time for me as well, but isn't that last set of
numbers - the four after the : ( colon ) the SPX socket number? That is the
thing that appears to be changing.
Not that I would know what the change signifies. what's running on that
workstation?
--
!
Ole D Jensen wrote
John Hutchison wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm curious. We offer DSL and CIR as far as I've ever dealt with it is the
minimum throughput the telco will guarantee. Are they mistating? For
example, our 768x128 dsl has a cir of 10k.
CL: you would think that the
Black Jack wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
As long as we're dreaming...how about adding a big whiteboard with Caslow
or
Pavlichenko stationed in front? :-)
CL: as long as we're headed towards left field, let's get that remote viewer
guy who's always on Art
Following my own advice, I regularly check CCO to see what's up with the
CCIE Lab.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html#45
Looks what's new!
-
Equipment List
2500 series routers
2600 series routers
3600 series routers
3900 series Token
Clark, John wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What difference does it make when I say default-metric 1 100 255 1
1550 instead of the above.
answer: EIGRP uses a composite metric so you would be changing the
bandwidth
(1) and MTU (1550) for routes from
John Neiberger wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I just realized that I kind of looked like a dork by responding like I
did. I discovered that if you read this email on the web you can see
the entire thing. In my mail box it was truncated dramatically.
CL: I
Aziz Islam wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Group,
Is there a way of finding out if a 8-port or 16-port Gigabit Ethernet
module
on a Catalyst 6509 Switch has GBIC's installed by consoling into the box.
A
quick answer can be to just look at the Catalyst 6509
in line ( like the skates )
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Our parent company had the idea of letting a TelCo do the same for us.
The TelCo was/is contracted to set up a gateway between the old
network and the new network. Lucky for us we're
Router Man wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I've always known it to work the other way around. If you change the
hello
interval - the dead interval will
become 4 times the hello interval.
CL: this was one of the old standbt trick questions in various study
assuming you have the proper image on the 3550. this should give you the
idea
interface vlan 10
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface vlan 20
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
interface fa 0/10
switchport access vlan 10
interface fa 0/20
switchport access vlan 20
router eigrp
well, this has been discussed here many times but
the first CCIE was #1025 I don't recall the name now, but a month or so
back we got the name here on the list
the second CCIE was / is Terry Slattery, #1026
you can always check out the guy's bona fides on CCO -
Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in puzzlement for a
moment, until I remembered something.
Today's puzzle - why was I scratching my head in puzzlement, and what was it
I remembered?
High levels - you don't get to play. Let the newbies try their hands.
During the maintenance
--
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Friday Follies On Wednesday - what's the
problem? [7:55218]
Saw this one today. It caused me to scratch my head in
puzzlement for a
moment, until I remembered s
Al Walter wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Do you think he could have meant the 111th CCIE?
CL: hhhmm... a thought.
CL: it wasn't too many years ago that a lot of CCIE's that I met weren't
really big on strutting their numbers. My former boss at March
Again, not claiming to know a lot of ATM, but certainly understanding telcos
who don't configure their part correctly..
does your carrier use ILMI at all? if so, you could set up ILMI and then do
a debug to see what the telco is sending you.
I'm trying to recall if there is a downside to
401 - 482 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
