Re: BGP !

I would be really surprised if the 160* series supports the current 128 soon to be 256 megs required for a full routing table. Brian Whalen On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Muhammed Khalilullah wrote: > Hi All, > I just wanna know if 1600 routers support BGP. If yes, > then which IOS version and wh

Re: BGP !

Yes if you got enterprise image. As for memory issue, I think 24M 1600 can do as 16M 25xx also running smooth in our company. regards Fanglo "Muhammed Khalilullah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > I just wanna know if 1600 routers supp

Re: BGP !

>From: Brian Reply-To: Brian To: Muhammed Khalilullah CC: Subject: Re: BGP ! >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:53:15 -0800 (PST) > >I would be really surprised if the 160* series supports the current 128 >soon to be 256 megs required for a full routing table. Did i misread the q

Re: BGP !

a small office connectivity solution. Bri - Original Message - From: "Robert Nelson-Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 7:40 AM Subject: Re: BGP ! > >From: Bri

Re: BGP !

>From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Robert Nelson-Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: BGP ! >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:49:07 -0800 > >You didn

Re: BGP !

>I would be really surprised if the 160* series supports the current 128 >soon to be 256 megs required for a full routing table. > > Brian Whalen There are two issues here. One is which, if any, versions of IOS for the 1600 platform support BGP. Second, if the goal is to learn BGP, there

RE: BGP !

Muhammed, A 1600 will support BGP4 in the IP PLUS feature set. I have the IOS version, IOS name and most of them have the memory needs inside the parenthesis. Here they are, good luck. Duncan 12.1(7) c1600-sy-l.12.1-7 (4/12) c1600-sy-mz.12.1-7 (N. A./4) 12.1(6) c1600-sy-l.12.1-6

Re: BGP

Setup an IBGP session between them. Andy On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Var1abl3 Var1abl3 wrote: > I have two core routers. One of them has two connection to the internet and > the other one has one. How can I setup BGP so that I can utilize all three > of the links? Thanks > > Router A -is

RE: BGP

Try this: BGP: - Overview - case studies - Using for Interdomain Routing - Technical Tips

RE: BGP

Title: RE: BGP Have you heard of the CiscoPress book by Sam Halabi called Internet Routing Architectures, he is the BGP Guru. -Original Message- From: Andre Fecteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Hello

Re: BGP

Halabi's book is a good reference. I would also pay a lot of attention to the following *RFC 1771 BGP v4 *RFC 1997 BGP Communities *RFC 2796 BGP Route Reflection *RFC 1965 BGP AS Confederations *RFC 1998 BGP Communities for Multihoming I would also read Cisco's si

Re: BGP

Halabi's book is a good reference. I would also pay a lot of attention to the following *RFC 1771 BGP v4 *RFC 1997 BGP Communities *RFC 2796 BGP Route Reflection *RFC 1965 BGP AS Confederations *RFC 1998 BGP Communities for Multihoming I would also read Cisco's si

RE: BGP

I bought it myself yesterday. Quite a book! I wonder if there is the equivalent for Frame Relay and OSPF. Pierre-Alex -Original Message- From: Andre Fecteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:55 AM To: Pierre-Alex Subject: Re: BGP I of course haven&#

RE: BGP

; I bought it myself yesterday. Quite a book! > I wonder if there is the equivalent for Frame Relay and OSPF. > > Pierre-Alex > > -Original Message- > From: Andre Fecteau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:55 AM > To: Pierre-Alex > Subj

RE: BGP

OSPF Network Design Solutions by Tom Thomas -Original Message- From: Pierre-Alex To: Andre Fecteau; Cisco Sent: 12/11/00 11:05 PM Subject: RE: BGP I bought it myself yesterday. Quite a book! I wonder if there is the equivalent for Frame Relay and OSPF. Pierre-Alex -Original

Re: BGP

Remember if Someone e-mails you direct, it will not have the footers. Paul - Original Message - From: "ElephantChild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stacy Vacca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, Aug

Re: BGP

What is the minimum required for pass in the New CCNA 2.0 ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: BGP

using route reflectors and confederation i guess but you need to be mroe specific about the question. Regards Atif -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RamanG Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 5:34 AM To: cisco GroupStudy Subject: BGP Can som

RE: BGP !!!

Title: BGP !!! Hi,     First of all BGP is NOT distance vector protocol nor link state, it is a path vector protocol. Second it is not a routing protocol, routing tables and bgp tables are two different thing.   I hope it clears some things.     Gil     CCNA/CCDA  -Original Message--

Re: BGP !!!

Hi, BGP is used to create inter domain free loop routing between AS. It uses Path Vector as its metric. It carries the number of the AS as it traverse the network to avoid loops. Hope this helps you. -Subbi. Raees Ahmed Shaikh wrote: > > > I was always hearing about the great BG

RE: BGP

Both, or neither. BGP is commonly referred to as a "Path Vector" protocol. See RFC1771 "A Border Gateway Protocol": http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1771.html See http://www.itprc.com/routing.htm for several links to BGP tutorials. Irwin -Original Message- From: cisco cabanaboy [mailto:[EM

RE: BGP

No. -Original Message- From: cisco cabanaboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Is BGP DV, or LS? = ciscocabanaboy, CCNP-Voice, CCDP, MCSE, CNX, A+, N+, I-net+, BOFH... __

Re: BGP

>Is BGP DV, or LS? Not really either. It's Path Vector, more like a source routing method. It derives from DV, but has significant differences. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: BGP

nice question. I would say BGP is way too complicated to be a DV protocol. clipped from: http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/117.htm -Distance-Vector Routing Protocols This type of routing protocol requires that each router simply inform its neighbors of its routing table. The way BGP informs it

RE: BGP

This is a very interesting and complex question in my opinion. As I understand it the classification of whether a routing protocol utilizes a distance-vector or link-state algorithm depends on how that routing protocol announces it's routes to the network. With a distance-vector algorithim eac

RE: BGP

>This is a very interesting and complex question in my opinion. As I >understand it the classification of whether a routing protocol utilizes a >distance-vector or link-state algorithm depends on how that routing protocol >announces it's routes to the network. > >With a distance-vector algorithim

RE: BGP

Neither BGP is a Path Vectoring Protocol. Distance Vector and Link State are terms for Interior Gateway Protocols. Gerwin -Original Message- From: cisco cabanaboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 7:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Is BGP DV, or LS?

Re: BGP ?

Yes you can!!! I am going to assume that each AS is a different ISP??? So the only thing keeping you from doing this would be ISP guidelines, some ISP's might not want you to advertise like this. You will have to disable automatic route summarization no auto-summary Pros and Cons All

Re: BGP ?

Chris Allen wrote: > > Yes you can!!! I am going to assume that each AS is a different ISP??? So > the only thing keeping you from doing this would be ISP guidelines, some > ISP's might not want you to advertise like this. > > You will have to disable automatic route summarization > no aut

Re: BGP ?

Hi, You can use a Policy Route Map and using the community attribute. This will, overcome the transminssion of ISP to another ISP via your network.. Rob Chris Allen wrote: > > Yes you can!!! I am going to assume that each AS is a different ISP??? So > the only thing keeping you from doing th

RE: BGP ?

what we do here. -Original Message- From: Oleh Hrynchuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 10:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP ? Chris Allen wrote: > > Yes you can!!! I am going to assume that each AS is a different ISP??? So > the only thing keeping you

Re: bgp questions

I would choose D , correct me if I am wrong --- David Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have this question on my cisco prep exam > fill-in-the-blank. Please = > help. > > A BGP router reports all activate routes based from > BGP __. This is = > the default policy action for BGP routers. >

Re: bgp questions

>I would choose D , correct me if I am wrong >--- David Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have this question on my cisco prep exam >> fill-in-the-blank. Please = >> help. >> >> A BGP router reports all activate routes based from >> BGP __. This is = >> the default policy action for

RE: bgp questions

I sent this to the originator only... -Original Message- From: Andrew Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:52 PM To: David Tran Subject: RE: bgp questions I would say the answer is C. BGP will not send routes learned from internal peers to other internal

Re: bgp questions

Yuck, really bad question. No frame of reference, no nothin. What is a activate route anyway? Active route? I think the key to answering this question is the question: when would BGP not report an active route? When BGP and the IGP are not in sync, then an active route would not be reported.

RE: bgp questions

They really need to start wording these questions better!! -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bgp questions >I would choose D , correct me if I am wrong >--- Davi

Re: bgp questions

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only situation that bgp cares about IGP's synchronization is when bgp is explicitly configured to announce networks (i.e network x.x.x.x mask x.x.x.x) and it would have to check the igp to see if there is a valid route to that network. This can be overridden by '

RE: bgp questions

-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ahmed Aden > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:36 AM > To: Rodgers Moore > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: bgp questions > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the o

RE: bgp questions

l Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ahmed Aden Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:36 AM To: Rodgers Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bgp questions Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only situation that bgp cares about IGP's synchroniza

RE: bgp questions

dents fully understand synchronization. Brian Dennis CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ahmed Aden Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 9:54 AM To: Brian Dennis Cc: Rodgers Moore; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

RE: bgp questions

te. > > Disabling synchonization won't affect the > originator of the route. > > > > Brian Dennis > > CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) > > CCSI #98640 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be

RE: bgp questions

gt; > >> > Brian Dennis >> > CCIE #2210 (R&S)(ISP/Dial) >> > CCSI #98640 >> > >> > -Original Message- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> > Ahmed Aden >> >

RE: BGP book

Internet Routing Architectures Second Edition by Sam Hallabi ISBN 157870233X -Original Message- From: Laurel Redd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 12:39 PM To: Kenneth Lorenzo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP book There is one I would not recommend: BGPv4

RE: BGP book

D] Subject: Re: BGP book There is one I would not recommend: BGPv4 this is a slim paperback book (has green spine I think) can't remember the author. HORRIBLE book. I am sure it had some good info in it but reading through it made NO sense to me at all. Talked in circles most of the time

Re: BGP book

Does anyone have both editions, and can tell me what the major differences are? Thanks, BJ - Original Message - From: Dusty Harper To: Laurel Redd ; Kenneth Lorenzo ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 4:19 PM Subject: RE: BGP book Internet Routing Architectures

Re: BGP book

Is this it: BGP4 Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet by John W. Stewart. Paperback (January 15, 1999) On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Laurel Redd wrote: > There is one I would not recommend: > BGPv4 > this is a slim paperback book (has green spine I think) can't remember the > author. HORRIB

RE: BGP book

Just hear say. New edition has more information. Smaller type so that book stays the same size. Seems useful to have the new edition. > -Original Message- > From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:55 PM > To: cisco > Subjec

Re: BGP book

That book would be BGP4: Interdomain Routing in the Internet. And, if you are new to BGP I would highly recommend it. It's the first book I read on BGP and I found that the author adequately explained the material in a very short amount of time. Reading that book prepared me to read Halabi's bo

RE: BGP book

> > From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 3:55 PM > > To: cisco > > Subject: Re: BGP book > > > > > > Does anyone have both editions, and can tell me what the > > major differences > &

Re: BGP book

ohn W Stewart III >Very Hard to understand and read even if you know what you're doing with it. > >Morgan > >- Original Message - >From: "Jim Dixon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Laurel Redd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "Kenn

Re: BGP book

What are the differences between 1st and 2nd edition. Duck - Original Message - From: Gardner, Donald/COR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1:35 PM Subject: RE: BGP book > "Internet Routing Architectures, The definitive B

Re: BGP book

w the differences. Duck - Original Message - From: Bradley J. Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1:54 PM Subject: Re: BGP book > Does anyone have both editions, and can tell me what the major differences >

Re: BGP Command

On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Steven Dangerfield wrote: > All, > > I have recently been on a BGP course. I am slightly unsure about the effects > of the command below, > > clear ip bgp * > > Looking at the command ref on CCO, it suggests that it causes the Router to > drop all of its neighbor BGP sessions

Re: BGP Command

Hello Steve, Both statements are correct; clear ip bgp * resets all BGP sessions in the router simultaneously. Thanks/Brgds Faruq MCSE, CCNA, (CCNP to be :)) Steven Dangerfield wrote: > All, > > I have recently been on a BGP course. I am slightly unsure about the effects > of the command be

Re: BGP book

There is one I would not recommend: BGPv4 this is a slim paperback book (has green spine I think) can't remember the author. HORRIBLE book. I am sure it had some good info in it but reading through it made NO sense to me at all. Talked in circles most of the time and was really dry. Morgan ---

Re: BGP book

el Redd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Kenneth Lorenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:42 PM Subject: Re: BGP book > Sam Halabi for BGP Internet Routing Architectures (Second Edition is now out) > THIS is the BGP Bible. > > Laurel Redd wrot

RE: BGP Loadbalancing !

I would say yes. All he needs is a policy which could say for example... if you try to go to microsoft go through 1 ISP and any other site through the other ISP. In all - BGP can do whatever you want it to do - whatever the companies policy is. No flames please. Robert McCallum CCNP CCDP CCIE W

Re: BGP Loadbalancing !

"Schimek, Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, >my company is an internet-provider in austria. > >the following situation. >one of our customers has his own network ( with own AS Number ) - currently >he is connected to another ISP. but plans to connect to our network soon.. >the problem in here is :

RE: BGP Loadbalancing !

Getting traffic off the net in a somewhat balanced fashion is the easy part. Finding a way to have equal amounts of it traverse multiple AS's and end up at two differing entry points into the AS is the stuff of GODS :) Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 12/4/2000 at 4:07 PM

Re: BGP mesh

Hi Muhammad, I am afraid I cannot find any attached Cisco documentation. But I will try and answer your question. IBGP speakers need to be full meshed to prevent routing loops that could occur from a "distance vector routing protocol" like behaviour. By having a full mesh, an IBGP peer gets firs

RE: BGP implementations

I am no BGP master, but from what I understand is that there are a few "rules of thumb" so to speak. The first being that it is not deemed acceptable to peer anything smaller than a /20. There is an RFC written about this, I beleive, RFC#2008. The reason being that it is highly desirable to kee

Re: BGP Weight

If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to reset the BGP connection, then any existing routes that were in the BGP table before adding the weight parameter to the neighbor command, would be left at the default of 0 for routes learned from the neighbor. Reset the BGP connection (**AFTER HOURS ON THE

RE: BGP Weight

Or just the route you want to flush. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Sucevic Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:46 PM To: John Neiberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP Weight If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to

Re: BGP Weight

This is the first time BGP has ever run on this router, and I had the weight parameter configured before I allowed any routes in. After changing my route map to allow partial routes, I did a soft incoming reset. Might that have something to do with it somehow? Before the reset, there were no BG

RE: BGP question

Title: RE: BGP question Hi, From my own research/study on BGP i recall that: Local Preference - preference given to a BGP route to compare it with other routes TO THE SAME destination.         Since this is LOCAL to the AS, it does NOT get passed to EBGP neighbors. You use this

Re: BGP Question

At 09:14 AM 9/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: > From Reading the RFC, it seems the the Multi-Exit-Discriminator and the > Local-Preference fields do the same thing. Additionally, it appears that > they are not redistributed outside of their Home A/s. > >Questions: >1. What's the difference between th

Re: BGP Question

t;Howard C. Berkowitz" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP Question Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:13:28 -0400 At 09:14 AM 9/14/2000 -0500, you wrote: >From Reading the RFC, it seems the the Multi-Exit-Discriminator and the >Local-Preference fields do the same thing. Additionally, it appea

Re: BGP Dampening!

Kent, Just an idea What if you put in a static route to null with an administrative distance of 200? I'm assuming the route will be learned via IGP, so when the route goes away via IGP, it's still there statically, so eBGP will continue to advertise it. Rodgers Moore "Kent" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: BGP Dampening!

Wouldn't you be able to use 'no-sync' with BGP so it won't check it's IGP tables, and then advertise the route manually? "Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > Is there a way by using BGP dampeing that we can make > bgp advertise a

Re: BGP Dampening!

Rodgers, Yes, that was one of my thoughts. I just felt that maybe the dampeing can help me in this case without static route, looks like no, so the dampeing is only for the flap routes, and I do not see any definition on how long a route can go down and come back to be consider flapping instead

Re: BGP problem

I have solved the problem now. Regards, Raymond Mak Raymond Mak wrote: > Hi, > > I have local and global connection to Internet. > When I trace from local site to internal network, it passes through > local connection, and when I trace from global site to internal network, > it can pass through

RE: BGP problem

How did you manage to solve it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Raymond Mak Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP problem I have solved the problem now. Regards, Raymond Mak Raymond Mak wrote

Re: BGP Challenge

At 3:35 PM -0800 10/29/2000, whitaker wrote: >ok, so I'm trying to implement some BGP routing for the first time. >I've read through the advanced IP network design, Internet Routing >Architectures, the RFCs, and a couple other books on BGP. But as we >all know, none of this compares to good ex

Re: BGP Challenge

eference 100 ip as-path access-list 30 ^$ neighbor <6509B ip address> route-map sprint-preference out (And add the similiar statements to the 6509B) - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October

Re: BGP Challenge

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, whitaker wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! I'm not familiar with RSPL (obviously); I'll read > up on it. > > As far as the soft reconfiguration goes, I assume I'll need to add the line > 'neighbor soft-reconfiguration inbound' command to enable soft > reconfiguration. What

Re: BGP Challenge

On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, whitaker wrote: > ok, so I'm trying to implement some BGP routing for the first time. > I've read through the advanced IP network design, Internet Routing > Architectures, the RFCs, and a couple other books on BGP. But as we > all know, none of this compares to good experi

Re: BGP Challenge

- From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 11:44 AM Subject: Re: BGP Challenge >On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, whitaker wrote: > >> ok, so I'm trying to implement some BGP routi

Re: BGP Challenge

ancing, since you are transmitting way only to > UUNET. > Is that true? > > Rgds, > raf > > -Original Message- > From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: whitaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Monday, O

Re: BGP Challenge

-Original Message- From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: rafdian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:00 PM Subject: Re: BGP Challenge >On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, rafdian wrote: > >> Very interesting...

RE: BGP question

Tony Li, the author of RFC 1771, can tell you a lot.. ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1771.txt So can Bassam Halabi, author of Internet Routing Architectures Here is a good link on CCO http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/fund/ith2nd/it2435.htm John Stewart, author of BGP4, Interdomain Rout

Re: bgp problem

You can't advertise routes out of the same interface your recieve them from. "azhar mumtaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost">news:20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost... > A BGP speaker must never advertise an address of a peer to that peer as a > NEXT_HO

RE: BGP book

Title: RE: BGP book Bassam Halabi's Internet Routing Architectures (Cisco Press, ISBN 157870233X) is the definitive guide. -Original Message- From: Kenneth Lorenzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP book

RE: BGP book

Halabi - Internetworking Routing Architectures -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kenneth Lorenzo Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP book can anyone recommend a book that has extensive coverage of B

Re: BGP book

you cant go wrong with halabi's book, rfc's, and a small little pocket book I keep in my bag by john w stewart.. Kenneth Lorenzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<8v6s7j$8rh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >can anyone recommend a book that has extensive coverage of BGP? Thanks! >Kenneth > >

Re: BGP book

Thanks! "Kenneth Lorenzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8v6s7j$8rh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8v6s7j$8rh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > can anyone recommend a book that has extensive coverage of BGP? Thanks! > > Kenneth > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription in

Re: bgp filtering

You have to think about this from the perspective of the bgp update itself. The update is going "out" to the neighbor and thus out makes sense in this context. Should you want to filter updates from the neighbor, in would be the case. The interesting/confusing thing is that you do outbound fi

Re: bgp filtering

that the distribute list should say IN in this case. > >- Original Message - >From: Peter Van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 5:35 AM >Subject: Re: bgp filtering > > >> You have to think about this f

Re: bgp filtering

i agrre with you.it should say in ... Alec Smiths wrote: > Router A > > neighbor 2.2.2.2 distribute-list 1 out > access-list 1 deny 160.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > In this case router A wants to deny updates for > network 160.0.0.0 propagated from router b (2.2.2.2) > to router a . But why does i

RE: BGP question

The route will be advertized out the bgp router , other routers will recieve the route and update it in its routing table. When a packets is destined to that network the router will forward the packet to the bgp router which was originally avertizing the route. When the originating router get the

Re: BGP minimum

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I trying to add redundency to my network at work (I work for a very small > local ISP) and I'd like to run BGP on this router so that if line A dies to > upstream provider A, line B will take over to upstream provider B. > > What is the least requ

Re: BGP minimum

This is a good question, and I'd like to pose a question myself to people who read my response. As far as I am concerned, my answers here are at the minimum real-world level for Internet routing operations. I draw a distinction between Internet routing operations and "BGP". ACRC was complete

Re: BGP minimum

>On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I trying to add redundency to my network at work (I work for a very small > > local ISP) and I'd like to run BGP on this router so that if line A dies to > > upstream provider A, line B will take over to upstream provider B. > > > > What is

Re: BGP minimum

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > >On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I trying to add redundency to my network at work (I work for a very small > > > local ISP) and I'd like to run BGP on this router so that if line A dies to > > > upstream provider A, line

Re: BGP minimum

Yes, a book on operational Internet routing issues would be great. For example, what is SWIP? What is a route registry? In fact, could you answer those questions here?? ;-) Priscilla At 10:44 AM 7/25/00, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >This is a good question, and I'd like to pose a question myse

Re: BGP minimum

Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > > > > >There is none. You can be single homed and run BGP (But why do that?). > > > > Depends on what you mean by multihomed. It can be quite reasonable > > to run BGP when you are connected to multiple POPs of a single > > provider, and want to optim

Re: BGP minimum

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > Yes, a book on operational Internet routing issues would be great. For > example, what is SWIP? What is a route registry? In fact, could you answer > those questions here?? ;-) I may be wrong, but I believe Sam Hallabi's books touch on RR's.

Re: BGP minimum

Actually, I think it was Pikachu that said it to Meowth and Team Rocket when they attacked Ash. There is alot of ancient history, literature, and mythology in modern cartoons if you are familar with both. For example, I have always thought that Garfield was a modern rendition of Henry the 8th...

Re: BGP minimum

""Howard C. Berkowitz"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:v04220895b5a354b03237@[63.216.127.98]... > This is a good question, and I'd like to pose a question myself to > people who read my response. As far as I am concerned, my answers > here are at the minimum real-world level for Intern

Re: BGP minimum

>Yes, a book on operational Internet routing issues would be great. >For example, what is SWIP? What is a route registry? In fact, could >you answer those questions here?? ;-) > >Priscilla Starting points on both: SWIP SWIP is the Shared Whois Project, which is the means of tracking who

Re: BGP Tutorial

What kind of tutorial is that? I am studying BGP4 these days. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi guys/Gals > I have tutroial for BGP anyone wants it send me an email. > > Regards, > amir > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >