Re: Tacacs help required [7:71818]

2003-07-04 Thread Devrim Yener KUCUK
It seems we are getting the LCP I 00:27:39: BR0:1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 3 len 4 not very clear, in fact why is the remote sending LCP O TERM could you collect? (from remote) deb ppp neg deb ppp authen deb aaa author deb isdn q931 deb tacacs regards devvv - Original Message - Fr

RE: TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764]

2003-06-17 Thread Nikolay Abromov
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70784&t=70764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764]

2003-06-16 Thread Moffett, Ryan
how about tac_plus from Cisco, also found on several other places around the 'net? It's free, and open source. -Original Message- From: Vance Krier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TACACS - Cheap or Free [7:70764] Hey Group,

RE: TACACS password encryption [7:60886]

2003-01-12 Thread Mike Sweeney
I just ran a trace showing a telnet session from a desktop to the terminal server which uses TACACS to provide authentication. The telnet session where I typed in the password is plain text.. this is in response to the terminal server prompt. The actual username/password between the terminal serve

Re: TACACS+ & AS5300 [7:58977]

2002-12-11 Thread Andrew Dorsett
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mamoon Dawood wrote: > I'm configuring TACACS+ with AS5300, but I can not understand the > meaning of TACACS+ or RADIUS Key, is it the enable secret password on > the AS5300? No, radius uses a key that you enter to provide for the encrypt/decrpt of the auth/acct packets. You

Re: Tacacs Server for Switches [7:57074]

2002-11-09 Thread Oliver Hensel
There is a much improved version of the Cisco TACACS daemon on http://www.gazi.edu.tr/tacacs/ which is what everyone I know of is running... YMMV Oliver mike greenberg sagte: > If you are good with unix/linux, download the freeware source code from > cisco website and use it. It's free. I use f

Re: Tacacs Server for Switches [7:57074]

2002-11-07 Thread mike greenberg
If you are good with unix/linux, download the freeware source code from cisco website and use it. It's free. I use freeRadius running on linux which works great. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:Any sugestion for free Tacacs server ? Thanks Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos fr

RE: TACACS/RADIUS on CISCO Router [7:53621]

2002-09-22 Thread Nathan Nakao
entication would be more secure than using the router for authentication. Just my 2 cents. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dain Deutschman Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 9:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TACACS/RADIUS on CISCO

Re: TACACS/RADIUS on CISCO Router [7:53621]

2002-09-22 Thread Dain Deutschman
just using a local username database ""exchange"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey, > > is there a possibility to set up a router acting > as a radius or tacacs server with local authentication > without external server ? > > Please let me know > > best regards

RE: TACACS+ [7:53721]

2002-09-20 Thread Blair, Philip S
riday, September 20, 2002 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TACACS+ [7:53721] Now I know why EDS stock is taking a beating When you use TACACS+, you basically offload the authentication, authorization and accounting to the TACACS+ server (running on your Linux box). If you don't want

RE: TACACS+ [7:53721]

2002-09-20 Thread mike greenberg
Now I know why EDS stock is taking a beating When you use TACACS+, you basically offload the authentication, authorization and accounting to the TACACS+ server (running on your Linux box). If you don't want people to connect to your routers via telnet, set the vty line on your routers to acce

RE: TACACS+ [7:53721]

2002-09-20 Thread Blair, Philip S
Your passwords are encrypted with SSH between the client and router, between the router and tacacs server your tacacs key is used. I use tac_plus with clients that use a combination of SSH and telnet. Some routers require SSH some basic telnet is allowed. I have no special configurations within

Re: TACACS/RADIUS on CISCO Router [7:53621]

2002-09-19 Thread Robert Edmonds
I'm not an expert on this, but it seems to me that if you don't have a local database or an external server, you don't have any user names to authenticate against. I think you'll need something else. ""exchange"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey, > > is there a

Re: TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Rick
You mind sharing your public key so I can encrypt the super secret search engine. :) ""Roberts, Larry"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Normally you would have a TACACS/RADIUS server ( Cisco's ACS comes to mind ) > and a TACACS/RADUS client ( Router/WAP also come

RE: TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Roberts, Larry
Normally you would have a TACACS/RADIUS server ( Cisco's ACS comes to mind ) and a TACACS/RADUS client ( Router/WAP also come to mind) In order for those two devices to communicate you must specify a password that is "shared" between them. This is used to assure that the Devices in question are wh

RE: TACACS - Radius password authentication [7:47897]

2002-07-01 Thread Dan Penn
Not that we mind helping you, but there is a great wealth of knowledge with a good search engine at cisco.com. They are types of servers that can run AAA applications. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan Hansen Sent: Monday, July

RE: Tacacs Question [7:45390]

2002-05-29 Thread Keyur Shah
Try global config command, ip tacacs source-interface -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) CISSP,ccsa,css1,scsa,scna,mct,mcse,cni,mcne Hello Computers "Say Hello to Your Future!" http://www.hellocomputers.com Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556 -Original Message- From: Ric

Re: Tacacs Question [7:45390]

2002-05-29 Thread Steve Boer
If I'm not mistaken, this would be a "ip tacacs source-interface fast3/0". My only $0.02 would be, wouldn't a loopback interface be more appropriate since A) It doesn't go down and B) would be a lot easier for either ACL'ing or firewalling since you'd have a separate subnet allocated for lo0's? Fe

RE: TACACS+ [7:41103]

2002-04-10 Thread Pierre-Alex Guanel
I have read the documentation for ACS v2.6 I went to IOS commands (under group) in the IOS Commands sections I am getting error message whenever I enter something in the "command" and "argument" window. (for example: configure terminal gives me the error "exec terminal:incorrect format" Any id

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-28 Thread Kent Hundley
calling the PIX a NAS might confuse some people. -Kent -Original Message- From: John Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TACACS+ [7:39297] is the Cisco Secure ACS server a TACAS+ server ? ie the

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-28 Thread John Green
is the Cisco Secure ACS server a TACAS+ server ? ie the pix is acting as a tacas+ client to the ACS server ? is that correct ? if yes, then the protocol for user authentication and later access-control between the pix and ACS server called as TACAS+ protocol ? is this correct ? lastly if pix is

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
ceived in 1.64 secs (1.2e+02 Kbytes/sec) > ftp> bye > > -Kent > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Steven A. Ridder > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: TACACS+ [7:3

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Kent Hundley
0.4.alpha.tar.Z (193771 bytes). 226 Transfer complete. 193771 bytes received in 1.64 secs (1.2e+02 Kbytes/sec) ftp> bye -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven A. Ridder Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Mike Sweeney
Come by my site.. I have a few different flavors of TACACS+ for downloading along with docs and white papers. I have a link to the TACACS stuff in the news columm. MikeS www.packetattack.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39305&t=39297

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Patrick Ramsey
Then take that same server and turn it into your dhcp/dns server and start the creep into the enterprise :) >>> "Kent Hundley" 03/23/02 12:53PM >>> IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server from Cisco, install it on Linux and play around with it. You'll lear

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I think cisco stopped the DL of the free tacacs server a while ago. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Kent Hundley"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server > from Cisc

RE: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Kent Hundley
IMO, the best way to study TACACS+ is to download the free TACACS+ server from Cisco, install it on Linux and play around with it. You'll learn much more about how TACACS+ works by implementing it and trying different things than any WP (it helps a lot if you have a router to work with as well).

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Random characters to block url filter:apfho hfopiqwhj987489-123749 hd7634y 9y98yu*&^&^%*(%^*&^*(& 89yx9823749-8127c4 8977899^*%&^T&*(^&^%&^%*(&^*&(^*(&%^&^$C %^TYBVR%%R http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:Taca cs_plus -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: ht

Re: TACACS+ [7:39297]

2002-03-23 Thread Steven A. Ridder
cs_plus -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have read the white paper on this. Does anyone know of a good study > source on this topic other than the white paper itself? > > Thanks Message Posted at:

Re: tacacs+ ports [7:38814]

2002-03-19 Thread bob smith
port 49 both TACACS & TACACS + ""NetEng"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know what ports tacacs+ uses? I'm looking for what ports > Authentication uses, which ports Authorization uses, and what port > Accounting uses. If there are any additional ports

RE: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-16 Thread Ray Smith
You know what if you get you kicks scolding people before helping them, then I rather you not help at all. Keep the Sarcasm to your self! >From: Sean Knox >To: 'Ray Smith' , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: TACACS+ Server [7:38324] >Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:40:11

RE: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-15 Thread Sean Knox
For the uninitiated, QA = Quality Assurance and SQA is Software Quality Assurance. :) -Sean -Original Message- From: Sean Knox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TACACS+ Server [7:38324] Padding here, padding there

RE: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-15 Thread Sean Knox
link... "SQA SUX" or just a coincidence? I work in QA, so maybe I'm just seeing things.. :) - Sean -Original Message- From: Ray Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324] Solaris budd

Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-15 Thread Patrick Ramsey
a copmputer? I think most of the list has put together a machine or two. >>> "Ray Smith" 03/15/02 02:25PM >>> Solaris buddy. Do you know how to build one? >From: Brian >To: Ray Smith >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324] >

Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-15 Thread Ray Smith
Solaris buddy. Do you know how to build one? >From: Brian >To: Ray Smith >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324] >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:52:17 -0800 (PST) > >I suspect that depends slightly on the od u want to use? >BSD, Linux, and Solaris wil

Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-14 Thread Patrick Bass
I'm betting slowaris, since it's a sparc-5 ""Brian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I suspect that depends slightly on the od u want to use? > BSD, Linux, and Solaris will all run on that, which r u planning to use? > > Bri > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Ray Smith wrot

Re: TACACS+ Server [7:38324]

2002-03-14 Thread Brian
I suspect that depends slightly on the od u want to use? BSD, Linux, and Solaris will all run on that, which r u planning to use? Bri On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Ray Smith wrote: > Does anyone know how to build/setup a TACACS+ Server on a Sparc-5? > > Ray > > >

RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Andy Hoang
Try TeraTerm. Very versatile. The break key is Alt+B. http://download.cnet.com/downloads/1,10150,0-10001-103-0-1-7,00.html?tag=src h&qt=tera+term&cn=&ca=10001 After you break into rommon, change the config-reg to 0x2142 (confreg 0x2142) >confreg 0x2142 >reset - System will reload and bypass s

RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Michael Williams
I got myself into a similar situation, with a 3600 also =) What I found however, was that when I would console in, it would ask for user/pass, and upon waiting 30 seconds or so, it prompted me with "password:" and entering the enable password I got in. But, a common thing that happens when confi

RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
rk try this one cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html#how-to HTH Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] Webpage for common terminal pro

Re: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Tshon
I believe that your problem isn't that you aren't doing the correct sequence, but I think that if you are trying to send the break from win nt/2000 it doesn't work unless you know how to set it. You do need a machine that sends the break key. Farooq Ali wrote: >Hi All: > >I would appreci

Re: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Steven A. Ridder
]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] > > > Try several different break sequences such as CNTL-F6-BREAK. I think there > is a website out there somewhere that lists different possible break

RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
Webpage for common terminal programs and break sequence numbers Scott -Original Message- From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] Try several different break

RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread s vermill
Try several different break sequences such as CNTL-F6-BREAK. I think there is a website out there somewhere that lists different possible break sequences for various platforms. I think CNTL-F6-BREAK works with Hyperterminal as bundled with W2K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form

Re: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]

2002-02-12 Thread Timo Graser
You can't sent a break with Hyperteminal(Windows) download the terminalpprgram from Cisco for Example, you will be able to sent a break then Farooq Ali schrieb: Hi All: I would appreciate if some one can help me in the right direction: scenario: Trying to install Tacacs on a Win2k ser

RE: TACACS+ Auth redundancy? [7:35043]

2002-02-11 Thread Georg Pauwen
Hi, You can use multiple 'radius-server host' or 'tacacs-server host' commands to specify multiple hosts. The software searches for hosts in the order you specify them. Example: radius-server host RADIUS1 radius-server host RADIUS2 If RADIUS1 is down, RADIUS2 will be contacted. The same for T

RE: TACACS+ Auth redundancy? [7:35043]

2002-02-10 Thread Michael Williams
Sure. AFAIK, you can simply specify more than one TACACS server in your config and it should attempt to contact each server in the order you enter them. Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35064&t=35043 -- FAQ

RE: Tacacs+ software [7:32699]

2002-01-21 Thread Mike Sweeney
I have a few different ones available for downloading along with some docs and white papers www.packetattack.com/downloads.html MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32730&t=32699 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscr

Re: Tacacs+ software [7:32700]

2002-01-21 Thread Richard Tufaro
Found one. This one was submitted, but I couldn't get to it. Before. http://www.gazi.edu.tr/tacacs/index.php >>> Richard Tufaro 01/21 11:25 AM >>> Where would one, go about getting the freeware UNIX version of Tacacs+? Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/480/tacplus.shtml, points me to a plac

RE: TACACS+ [7:30963]

2002-01-07 Thread Dimitris Vassilopoulos
Hello Edward, In case you use Cisco equipment, there is the line configuration command "absolute-timeout" . 3640_DialUp#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. 3640_DialUp(config)#line 97 126 3640_DialUp(config-line)#absolute-timeout ? Absolute timeout interval i

Re: tacacs+ and pix [7:27141]

2001-11-22 Thread Patrick W. Bass
there is only privileged and unprivileged mode. no levels. ""ipguru1"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I tried looking this up but all I find is how to setup tacacs+ on the > pix. I would like to have priv. levels on the pix? Is this possible? > > thanks > bk

RE: TACACS Config [7:26811]

2001-11-20 Thread Mike Sweeney
The "default" is the name of the group you are using.. so you would have in the router config the following line ! aaa authentication login DEFAULT(group name) tacacs+ enable(allows you to use enable password if the tacacs fails) ! MikeS Ken Diliberto wrote: > > Thanks, Mike. > > Any time I us

RE: TACACS Config [7:26811]

2001-11-20 Thread Ken Diliberto
Thanks, Mike. Any time I use the "default" keyword, the daemon refuses to load giving an "expected string" error. It's good practice, though. I've almost locked myself out of the switch. As long as I'm too lazy to cycle the power, I'll hack at it until I get it right. :-) Thanks. Ken >>> "

RE: TACACS Config [7:26811]

2001-11-20 Thread Mike Sweeney
The info is out there.. do a google search on TACACS CONFIGURATION. I have pasted a simple script here for you to start with. Feel free to drop by my web site for other info and downloads for TACACS+. www.packetattack.com MikeS - ios config -- hostname Router ! aaa new-model aaa authent

Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-27 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
t call them for support. You'll be researching how to do a lot of good old fashion console work without the boss finding out. - Original Message - From: "Ramesh K" To: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:14 AM Subject: Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > Hi stephen, > > You can

Re: Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-27 Thread Ramesh K
> > >steve > > >>From: "khramov" >>Reply-To: "khramov" >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] >>Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:12 -0400 >> >>As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should >be used for &g

Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-24 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
No that is not it Steve, my therapist says if I'm good all week I can have a relapse or two on friday. P>) - Original Message - From: "Stephen Skinner" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:00 AM Subject: Re: Tacacs [7:17110] > Hello, > > i don`t mean to

Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-24 Thread Stephen Skinner
) for some assistance in this subject matter. unfortunatly i don`t have an answer to your question but also require info on tacacs+so please don`t be afraid to pass on what you may learn Kindest Regards steve >From: "khramov" >Reply-To: "khramov" >To: [E

Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-24 Thread Sean Young
If you are familiar with Unix, contact me off-line and I will assist you with installing and configuring TACACS on Unix platform. I can also help you with configuring routers and switches as well. >From: "khramov" >Reply-To: "khramov" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sub

Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-24 Thread khramov
As far as I know this is Cisco newsgroup and it should be used for technical discussions not for personal insults. If you think that you are smarter than me or have better work habits that is fine, I am not going to argue with that. Otherwise I would be asking questions. Donald B Johnson jr wr

Re: Tacacs [7:17110]

2001-08-24 Thread Donald B Johnson jr
After someone gives you an answer, are you going to have time to research if it is a good solution for you or are you going to just implement it. It sure must warm the cockles of your supervisors heart if he could see you now. actually the only two things that would make me to busy that I couldn't

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14539]

2001-08-01 Thread data com
uot;data com" >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written >[7:14428] >Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 13:03:42 -0500 > >At 03:16 PM 8/1/01 +, data com wrote: >>Carroll, >> >>I got CCNP and CCDP but I am pretty new to

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-08-01 Thread George Yiannibas
""Jonathan V Hays"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Great! Unfortunately my Linux box has an Intel AL440LX motherboard and I > can't find any > place in the BIOS to disable the keyboard (or "halt on error, except > keyboard" which is > another popular BIOS option).

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14525]

2001-08-01 Thread Carroll Kong
At 03:16 PM 8/1/01 +, data com wrote: >Carroll, > >I got CCNP and CCDP but I am pretty new to UNIX system. >I want to lean UNIX with a focus on networking part for the following reasons. >-integrate UNIX system to the internetwork >-use UNIX for device management using scripts > >Now, what fla

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14503]

2001-08-01 Thread data com
Carroll, I got CCNP and CCDP but I am pretty new to UNIX system. I want to lean UNIX with a focus on networking part for the following reasons. -integrate UNIX system to the internetwork -use UNIX for device management using scripts Now, what flavour of UNIX do you recommend to learn as a start

RE: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-07-31 Thread Sean Young
ne. On a side note, how did Jason know how to do this? Man, he is good. >From: "Baker, Jason" >To: Sean Young , [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417] >Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 10:29:18 +1000 > >nothing to do wi

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14428]

2001-07-31 Thread Carroll Kong
At 07:20 PM 7/31/01 -0400, Jonathan Hays wrote: >No keyboard? It depends. > >While it's true that native UNIX workstations (Sun, HP, etc.) will run >"headless", most >Intel x86 boxes I have encountered require you to plug in a keyboard or the >machine >won't boot, regardless of the OS installed. O

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-07-31 Thread Jonathan V Hays
>Reply-To: "Jonathan Hays" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and > Passed CCIE [7:14417] >Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:51:31 -0400 > >Not > always possible. > >"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > > Disable i

RE: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-07-31 Thread Baker, Jason
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2001 10:38 am > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE > [7:14417] > > I run RedHat 7.1 with kernel 2.4.7 on a Dell Optiplex 700 MHz with no > keyboard and mouse.

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-07-31 Thread Sean Young
ays" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417] >Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:51:31 -0400 > >Not always possible. > >"Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > > > Disable it in the bios. > > > > -Origina

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE [7:14417]

2001-07-31 Thread Jonathan Hays
Not always possible. "Roberts, Timothy" wrote: > Disable it in the bios. > > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Hays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Us

RE: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14415]

2001-07-31 Thread Roberts, Timothy
Disable it in the bios. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Hays [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14413] No keyboard? It depends. While it's true that n

Re: OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14413]

2001-07-31 Thread Jonathan Hays
commands. > > Another beauty of a *nix box; you only need two cables for it, power and > network. Forget screen, keyboard, mouse... > > Symon > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Carroll Kong > Sent: 31 Jul

OT, was RE: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written [7:14407]

2001-07-31 Thread Symon Thurlow
power and network. Forget screen, keyboard, mouse... Symon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Carroll Kong Sent: 31 July 2001 00:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written today [7:14288] At 06:40

Re: Tacacs+ for home Use? and Passed CCIE written today [7:14288]

2001-07-30 Thread Carroll Kong
At 06:40 PM 7/30/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette) wrote: >Hello all. I just passed my CCIE today (very happy). I was not as >difficult as I expected (possibly over studied for it, if that's >possible). Anyways, I am about to embark on the long journey to >complete the CCIE by taki

Re: TACACS+ and AAA [7:10211]

2001-06-30 Thread Kenneth
Cisco's site search for "configuring AAA" ""anthony moore"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone got any good reference or know where to get documentation on > configuring TACACS+, AAA, and Cisco ACS server Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/

Re: TACACS+ and AAA [7:10210]

2001-06-27 Thread Tony Medeiros
Went to http:\\ cisco.google.com/cisco Did a search on "AAA configuration" First hit was: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/aaaisg/c262ap1.htm The best thing to ever happen to CCO was the google search. It has saved my bacon on many occasions. CCO has almost anything

Re: Tacacs [7:2602]

2001-05-01 Thread Kevin Wigle
down that the call will be accepted at the secondary gateway. Sorta like - if this destination is avail, use it - else use this one. Is this clear??? hope so Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > > From: "Henry D." > > To: > > Sent: Monday, 30 April, 20

Re: Tacacs [7:2602]

2001-04-30 Thread Henry D.
I'm not an expert in TACACS but I know you can have more than 1 server specified in the routers. I mainly used it just for authentication, in which case there was no problem whatsoever with this setup. If first specified server is not reachable, the other is being used. I don't think there would b

Re: Tacacs Server Example [7:1788]

2001-04-24 Thread Sean Young
Rico, I need to know how familiar you are with Unix platform. I run my tacacs server on a linux platform. The setup and configuration is quite simple. Before I go on, I need to know the following the information: 1) How familiar are you with Unix? by that, I mean you don't have to be familiar

RE: Tacacs Server Example [7:1788]

2001-04-24 Thread Keyur Lavingia
try the list at www.unix.com. Its good too. Sincerely, KEYUR LAVINGIA Network Engineer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Washington Rico Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 5:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tacacs Server Example [7:1788]

RE: Tacacs and dialup authentication

2001-03-29 Thread Radford Dion
-- > From: Tony van Ree [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday 28 March 2001 23:56 > To: Radford Dion; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication > > Hi, > > Where is the TACACS configured. > > I would have thought you would

RE: Tacacs and dialup authentication

2001-03-29 Thread Radford Dion
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication > > Looked through it for ages. I may be missing something but looks like the > authentication is just failing, possibly due to not using the same > password > on RouterA and RouterB? > > On RouterA &g

Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication

2001-03-28 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, Where is the TACACS configured. I would have thought you would need a reference to TACACS in your AAA statements and a refernce to the TACACS server address. aaa new-model aaa authentication login default tacacs+ local aaa authentication login console tacacs+ enable aaa authentication ppp

Re: Tacacs and dialup authentication

2001-03-28 Thread Gareth Hinton
Looked through it for ages. I may be missing something but looks like the authentication is just failing, possibly due to not using the same password on RouterA and RouterB? On RouterA username RouterB password fred On RouterB username RouterA password fred Fingers like mine - too big to tyyppe

Re: Tacacs+ Trouble

2001-03-07 Thread kent . hundley
J, First, you need to know what configuration file is being used. If you don't know, use "ps -ef | grep tac". (it might be ps -aux, I always get my solaris and linux mixed up) Once you know what the config file is, you need to understand the syntax. If the tacacs version your using is the

Re: Tacacs+ Trouble

2001-03-05 Thread joshandlaura
The question was: How is a properly built TACACS+ box put together, preferably w/Red Hat 7.0? I would just like some tips. Sorry, I probalbly should have put it in a more question-like form. J. Way "Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Tacacs+ Trouble

2001-03-04 Thread Andy
I imagine just asking the question would get better results. andy On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, joshandlaura wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have a question regarding TACACS+. I have a server up and running > already but I've been having trouble administering the box (adding/deleting > users, c

Re: TACACS+ Server for Solaris WHERE?????

2001-03-01 Thread Randy Feliz
- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; McCallum, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:57 AM Subject: Re: TACACS+ Server for Solaris WHERE? > Rob

Re: TACACS+ Server for Solaris WHERE?????

2001-03-01 Thread kent . hundley
Robert, Funny you should ask, I just downloaded and installed a copy of the free cisco tacacs server a few days ago. You can pick it up at ftp-eng.cisco.com/pub/tacacs. Be aware that this is an unsupported product with no warranties, although it does come with a decent user guide. You canno

RE: TACACS+ Server for Solaris WHERE?????

2001-03-01 Thread roger . gore
I'd try http://www.sun.com or http://www.cnet.com or http://www.computershopper.com Isn't the Internet a wonderful place?! -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 06:29 To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-

Re: Tacacs and Security question

2001-01-30 Thread Muhammad Zahid
Dear Greg, Please check it out http://cisco.com/warp/public/707/index.shtml Kindest Regards Muhammad Zahid Greg wrote: > I am studying for the Written exam and I have heard that there are quite a > few security questions that involve Tacacs and radius and when I went to > Cisco's web site an

Re: Tacacs and Security question

2001-01-30 Thread John Hardman
Hi Here is an excellent link that has the comparison of TACACS+ and RADIUS, which would be a good thing to know. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/aaaisg/c262c1.htm HTH -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE+I ""Greg"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 955t43$hhf$[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-30 Thread dwhitley
ction. -Original Message- From: Study Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 3:27 AM To: Piatnitchi Cristian; 'Kevin Wigle'; cisco Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs+/Radius Hi all I am also looking for same. There was one free copy ditributed by Microsoft on

RE: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-30 Thread Study Cisco
Hi all I am also looking for same. There was one free copy ditributed by Microsoft on technet CDs. If some one knows in which month they have distributed the same. Regards. __ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a

RE: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-29 Thread Piatnitchi Cristian
Hi Kevin CHeck the cisco ftp site I found there the free TACACS+ server a few weeks ago. If the memory helps me there is a free version for Solaris. You have to compile it. Use Copernic to find the exact address. Search free TACACS Crisitan -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailt

Re: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-29 Thread John Nemeth
On Jun 21, 5:24am, "Kevin Wigle" wrote: } } Our lab tech is really an anti-NT type of guy. He doesn't want any } production servers using NT. My type of guy... } And he also would prefer Radius over Tacacs+. Does anyone have a source of } freeware Radius for unix? His preferred platform

Re: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-29 Thread Kevin Wigle
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Tacacs+/Radius > Kevin, > > Ascend (Now Lucent) use to have the sources for the generic Livingston > Radius server on their web site under the support area. You might also > try a search on RADIUS or Livi

Re: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-29 Thread peter whittle
Kevin, Ascend (Now Lucent) use to have the sources for the generic Livingston Radius server on their web site under the support area. You might also try a search on RADIUS or Livingston on your favourite search engine. You will need to compile them using gnu C. When I last played with them ( a

Re: Tacacs+/Radius

2001-01-29 Thread Kevin Wigle
ld compile. He also says that it could have been more than a few years ago.. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Kevin Welch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mon

  1   2   >